Why Aras?
One Company's Journey
     Realization
          To
   Implementation
  (as an Open User)
   Aras Comm nit E ent
   A as Community Event
         May 2010
The Road from Chaos
    • 1 Company – 3+ R&D Divisions
      – Acoustical
      – Electronic
      – Mechanical
      – Systems
        • Electronic
        • Firmware
        • Software
        • Mechanical
    • Operated Independently
       p           p       y
The Road from Chaos
    • Each using a paper-based systems
      governed by ISO 9001 to track and manage
      projects

    • There was little communication among the
      design facilities

    • Management had no visibility into
      production,
      production individually or cross-functionally

    • Time to Market projections were
      occasionally missed
A New Day Dawns
    • Strategic initiative to unify and automate
      processes across all R&D divisions
      – Standards applied to all
      – Gain visibility into the projects
      – Optimize overall capacity
         • Shifting projects among the groups
             – when workloads were uneven

             – when one group required the specialization provided
               by the other

      – Maintain ISO 9001 integrity
Where to Begin?
    • Criteria
      – Central Administration
      – Web Based
         • Project Management
              j        g
         • Content Management
         • Form Management
         • Reporting
      – Functionality
         • Microsoft SQL Server Back End
         • Ease of Use
         • Si lif Key Strokes
           Simplify K St k
Where to Go?
    • In-House Design
      – Too complex to build with the resources at hand
               p


    • Prepackaged Applications
      – Project Management
         •   Arena Solutions
         •   MS Project
             MS-Project
         •   vProject
         •   Pro.file
         •   xColla
      – Enterprise Management
         • NetSuite
         • Epico
           Epicor
         • Plex
The Sun Starts to Rise
     3+ years later…
Second Chance?
    • Call from Jennifer McCullough
      – Aras solution functionality overview
      – Abilit t change & modify the Aras solutions
        Ability to h           dif th A       l ti
      – Ease of use and simplicity of screens

    • Registered to view the Demo
More than Meets the Eye
    • Program/Product Management
      – PMI Project Management
               j        g
      – Resource Management
    • Product Engineering
      – Bill of Materials
      – Change Management
      – Document Management
    • Q lit Pl
      Quality Planning
                   i
      – Compliance
      – FMEA Risk Management
More than Meets the Eye
    • Gain Control of Processes
      – Data Entry
      – Review
      – Approval


    • Stop Changes to the Item
      – Lock the Item from change while in
        review or approval
      – Control who could change the data
More than Meets the Eye     Created our own
                              “Voice of the
                               Customer”
    Create & Modify Items
More than Meets the Eye   Made our own
                           Workflows
More than Meets the Eye
    Product Lifecycle Management
Seeing Clearly Now
    • Criteria
      – Central Administration
      – Web Based
         • Project Management
              j        g
         • Content Management
         • Form Management
         • Reporting
      – Functionality
         • Microsoft SQL Server Back End
         • Ease of Use
         • Si lif Key Strokes
           Simplify K St k
And Away We Go
    • Engineering Implementation
      – New Idea
      – Rapid Product Development
        • Voice of the Customer
           – Sets forth pre-approval for the use of man hours
             on a product
           – Gathers Necessary Information
               » Marketing
               » Engineering
               » Fi
                 Finance
        • Quotes, Profitability and Design
           – Finalizes t e information for final app o a
                a es the o at o o             a approval
           – Authorizes the creation of the project
And Away We Go
    • Quality Systems Implementation
      – ISO Binder
      – ISO Document Approval
        • Monitor Changes in Control Documents
                       g
        • Sign off Approvals
      – Issues
        • Internal, Customer and Supplier
      – CA/PA
        • Root cause Analysis
        • Corrective Action
        • Preventative Action
Time to Add on
    • ITIL Service Desk
       – To help with Customer Service
       – Track Incidents
    • Skills Management
       – Track Continuing Education
       – Set Course Training
    • Meetings
       – Visibility of Notes and Agendas
       – Assignments
       – Supporting Documents
Time to Modify
    Upload functionality to Image Browser
Time to Modify
    Use of Signatures on Documents
Time to Modify
                           Able to View All Sides

    Extended Part Viewer
Time to Modify              Put in Picture Reference
                                    for Parts

    Part Visual Reference
Time to Modify
    Different Look




                      … and made our own
                     Outlook-style Navigation
Surprise!
    • Ease of Configuring & Programming
       – No central programmer
            • User from Internal Departments / Business
              Users are taught to create Own Items
            • Maximizes Resources
       – Easy to use GUI
            • Microsoft look and feel
            • Takes most of the guess work away
            • Logical process
       – Quick Implementation
04 Ace 2010 Mi Tek Aras Plm Open User Deployment

04 Ace 2010 Mi Tek Aras Plm Open User Deployment

  • 1.
    Why Aras? One Company'sJourney Realization To Implementation (as an Open User) Aras Comm nit E ent A as Community Event May 2010
  • 2.
    The Road fromChaos • 1 Company – 3+ R&D Divisions – Acoustical – Electronic – Mechanical – Systems • Electronic • Firmware • Software • Mechanical • Operated Independently p p y
  • 3.
    The Road fromChaos • Each using a paper-based systems governed by ISO 9001 to track and manage projects • There was little communication among the design facilities • Management had no visibility into production, production individually or cross-functionally • Time to Market projections were occasionally missed
  • 4.
    A New DayDawns • Strategic initiative to unify and automate processes across all R&D divisions – Standards applied to all – Gain visibility into the projects – Optimize overall capacity • Shifting projects among the groups – when workloads were uneven – when one group required the specialization provided by the other – Maintain ISO 9001 integrity
  • 5.
    Where to Begin? • Criteria – Central Administration – Web Based • Project Management j g • Content Management • Form Management • Reporting – Functionality • Microsoft SQL Server Back End • Ease of Use • Si lif Key Strokes Simplify K St k
  • 6.
    Where to Go? • In-House Design – Too complex to build with the resources at hand p • Prepackaged Applications – Project Management • Arena Solutions • MS Project MS-Project • vProject • Pro.file • xColla – Enterprise Management • NetSuite • Epico Epicor • Plex
  • 7.
    The Sun Startsto Rise 3+ years later…
  • 8.
    Second Chance? • Call from Jennifer McCullough – Aras solution functionality overview – Abilit t change & modify the Aras solutions Ability to h dif th A l ti – Ease of use and simplicity of screens • Registered to view the Demo
  • 9.
    More than Meetsthe Eye • Program/Product Management – PMI Project Management j g – Resource Management • Product Engineering – Bill of Materials – Change Management – Document Management • Q lit Pl Quality Planning i – Compliance – FMEA Risk Management
  • 10.
    More than Meetsthe Eye • Gain Control of Processes – Data Entry – Review – Approval • Stop Changes to the Item – Lock the Item from change while in review or approval – Control who could change the data
  • 11.
    More than Meetsthe Eye Created our own “Voice of the Customer” Create & Modify Items
  • 12.
    More than Meetsthe Eye Made our own Workflows
  • 13.
    More than Meetsthe Eye Product Lifecycle Management
  • 14.
    Seeing Clearly Now • Criteria – Central Administration – Web Based • Project Management j g • Content Management • Form Management • Reporting – Functionality • Microsoft SQL Server Back End • Ease of Use • Si lif Key Strokes Simplify K St k
  • 15.
    And Away WeGo • Engineering Implementation – New Idea – Rapid Product Development • Voice of the Customer – Sets forth pre-approval for the use of man hours on a product – Gathers Necessary Information » Marketing » Engineering » Fi Finance • Quotes, Profitability and Design – Finalizes t e information for final app o a a es the o at o o a approval – Authorizes the creation of the project
  • 16.
    And Away WeGo • Quality Systems Implementation – ISO Binder – ISO Document Approval • Monitor Changes in Control Documents g • Sign off Approvals – Issues • Internal, Customer and Supplier – CA/PA • Root cause Analysis • Corrective Action • Preventative Action
  • 17.
    Time to Addon • ITIL Service Desk – To help with Customer Service – Track Incidents • Skills Management – Track Continuing Education – Set Course Training • Meetings – Visibility of Notes and Agendas – Assignments – Supporting Documents
  • 18.
    Time to Modify Upload functionality to Image Browser
  • 19.
    Time to Modify Use of Signatures on Documents
  • 20.
    Time to Modify Able to View All Sides Extended Part Viewer
  • 21.
    Time to Modify Put in Picture Reference for Parts Part Visual Reference
  • 22.
    Time to Modify Different Look … and made our own Outlook-style Navigation
  • 23.
    Surprise! • Ease of Configuring & Programming – No central programmer • User from Internal Departments / Business Users are taught to create Own Items • Maximizes Resources – Easy to use GUI • Microsoft look and feel • Takes most of the guess work away • Logical process – Quick Implementation