chemical composition of cementious materials in ternary diagram

1. 1
CEMENTIOUS MATERIAL COMPOSITION
TERNARY DIAGRAM 1: CaO-SiO2-Al2O3
1. FLYASH
ACTUAL VALUES (%) SUM RATIO NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 Al2O3 CaO SiO2 Al2O3
6.95 58.92 22.06 87.93 1.137268 7.904015 67.00785 25.08814
7.98 54.6 21.79 84.37 1.185255 9.458338 64.71495 25.82672
8.1 52.83 22.76 83.69 1.194886 9.678576 63.12582 27.1956
3.03 60.77 21.26 85.06 1.175641 3.562191 71.44369 24.99412
4.83 55.52 22.91 83.26 1.201057 5.801105 66.68268 27.51621
7.52 50.02 24.96 82.5 1.212121 9.115152 60.6303 30.25455
2. CEMENT
ACTUAL VALUES (%) SUM RATIO NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 Al2O3 CaO SiO2 Al2O3
64.75 19.14 4 87.89 1.137786 73.67163 21.77722 4.551143
62.57 20.42 4.948 87.938 1.137165 71.1524 23.22091 5.626692
62.8 20.5 6 89.3 1.119821 70.32475 22.95633 6.718925
59.8 22.4 2.7 84.9 1.177856 70.43581 26.38398 3.180212
60.92 20.83 5.29 87.04 1.148897 69.99081 23.93153 6.077665
64.52 21.31 4.9 90.73 1.102171 71.11209 23.48727 5.400639
3. SILICAFUME
ACTUAL VALUES (%) SUM RATIO NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 Al2O3 CaO SiO2 Al2O3
0.2 97 0.2 97.4 1.026694 0.205339 99.58932 0.205339
0.014 95.2 0.913 96.127 1.04029 0.014564 99.03565 0.949785
0.03 97.57 0.06 97.66 1.023961 0.030719 99.90784 0.061438
1.85 93.9 0.02 95.77 1.044168 1.931711 98.04741 0.020883
0.78 96.43 0.01 97.22 1.028595 0.802304 99.18741 0.010286
0.2 98.7 0.3 99.2 1.008065 0.201613 99.49597 0.302419

2. 2
4. GGBS
ACTUAL VALUES (%) SUM RATIO NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 Al2O3 CaO SiO2 Al2O3
44.87 32.79 12.76 90.42 1.10595 49.62398 36.2641 14.11192
42.8 34.1 13.5 90.4 1.106195 47.34513 37.72124 14.93363
32.8 34.2 16.5 83.5 1.197605 39.28144 40.95808 19.76048
38.05 36.17 13.36 87.58 1.141813 43.44599 41.29938 15.25462
39.43 31.19 13.41 84.03 1.190051 46.92372 37.1177 15.95859
36.01 36.87 14.23 87.11 1.147974 41.33854 42.32579 16.33567
TERNARY DIAGRAM

3. 3
TERNARY DIAGRAM 2: CaO-SiO2-MgO
1. FLYASH
ACTUAL VALUES (%) NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 MgO SUM RATIO CaO SiO2 MgO
6.95 58.92 1.13 67 1.492537 10.37313 87.9403 1.686567
7.98 54.6 5.46 68.04 1.469724 11.7284 80.24691 8.024691
8.1 52.83 7.06 67.99 1.470805 11.91352 77.7026 10.38388
3.03 60.77 4.47 68.27 1.464772 4.43826 89.01421 6.547532
4.83 55.52 5.75 66.1 1.512859 7.30711 83.99395 8.698941
7.52 50.02 1.47 59.01 1.694628 12.7436 84.76529 2.491103
2. CEMENT
ACTUAL VALUES (%) SUM RATIO NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 MgO CaO SiO2 MgO
64.75 19.14 1.89 85.78 1.165773 75.4838 22.31289 2.203311
62.57 20.42 1.916 84.906 1.177773 73.69326 24.05013 2.256613
62.8 20.5 2.9 86.2 1.160093 72.85383 23.7819 3.364269
59.8 22.4 2.6 84.8 1.179245 70.51887 26.41509 3.066038
60.92 20.83 3.94 85.69 1.166997 71.09348 24.30855 4.597969
64.52 21.31 1.42 87.25 1.146132 73.94842 24.42407 1.627507
3. SILICA FUME
ACTUAL VALUES (%) SUM RATIO NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 MgO CaO SiO2 MgO
0.2 97 0.5 97.7 1.023541 0.204708 99.28352 0.511771
0.014 95.2 0.382 95.596 1.046069 0.014645 99.58576 0.399598
0.03 97.57 0.05 97.65 1.024066 0.030722 99.91807 0.051203
1.85 93.9 0.17 95.92 1.042535 1.928691 97.89408 0.177231
0.78 96.43 0.7 97.91 1.021346 0.79665 98.48841 0.714942
0.2 98.7 0 98.9 1.011122 0.202224 99.79778 0

4. 4
4. GGBS
ACTUAL VALUES (%) SUM RATIO NORMALISED VALUES (%)
CaO SiO2 MgO CaO SiO2 MgO
44.87 32.79 3.8 81.46 1.227596 55.08225 40.25288 4.664866
42.8 34.1 4.5 81.4 1.228501 52.57985 41.89189 5.528256
32.8 34.2 10.4 77.4 1.29199 42.37726 44.18605 13.43669
38.05 36.17 7.12 81.34 1.229407 46.77895 44.46767 8.753381
39.43 31.19 9.32 79.94 1.250938 49.32449 39.01676 11.65874
36.01 36.87 5.05 77.93 1.283203 46.20814 47.31169 6.480175
TERNARY DIAGRAM

5. 5
REFERENCES:
1. Moslih Amer Salih, Nima Farzadnia, Abang Abdullah Abang Ali, Development of high
strength alkali activated binder using palm oil fuel ash and GGBS at ambient
temperature, Construction and Building Materials 93 (2015) 289–300, ELSEVIER,
ScienceDirect.com, Website [on-line], Available:
www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat, 9 June 2015.
2. Dong-Yi Lei , Li-Ping Guo , Wei Sun , Jiaping Liu , Xin Shu , Xin-Li Guo, A new
dispersing method on silica fume and its influence on the performance of cement-
based materials, Construction and Building Materials 115 (2016) 716–726,
ELSEVIER, ScienceDirect.com, Website [on-line], Available:
www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat, 28 April 2016.
3. Deng-Deng Zheng, Tao Ji, Can-Qiang Wang, Effect of the combination of fly ash and
silica fume on water resistance of Magnesium–Potassium Phosphate Cement,
Construction and Building Materials 106 (2016) 415–421, ELSEVIER,
ScienceDirect.com, Website [on-line], Available:
www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat, 24 December 2015.
4. Wolfram Müllauer, Robin E. Beddoe, Detlef Heinz, Leaching behaviour of major and
trace elements from concrete effect of fly ash and GGBS, Cement & Concrete
Composites 58 (2015) 129–139, ELSEVIER, ScienceDirect.com, Website [on-line],
Available: www.elsevier.com/locate/cemconcomp, 11 February 2015.
5. J.E. Rossen, B. Lothenbach, K.L. Scrivener, Composition of C–S–H in pastes with
increasing levels of silica fume addition, Cement and Concrete Research 75 (2015) 14–
22, ELSEVIER, ScienceDirect.com, Website [on-line], Available:
http://ees.elsevier.com/CEMCON/default.asp, 15 May 2015
6. Heba A. Mohamed, Effect of fly ash and silica fume on compressive strength of self-
compacting concrete under different curing conditions, Ain Shams Engineering
Journal (2011) 2, 79–86, Ain Shams University, Website [on-line], Available:
www.elsevier.com/locate/asej; www.sciencedirect.com, 2 July 2011.
7. Na Zhang , Hongxu Li , Dandan Peng, Xiaoming Liu , Properties evaluation of silica-
alumina based concrete: Durabilityand environmental friendly performance,
Construction and Building Materials 115 (2016) 105–113, sciencedirect.com, Website
[on-line], Available: www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat, 13 April 2016.
8. Tan Mahua and D M Roy, An investigation of the effects of organic solvents on the
rheological properties and hydration of cement paste, cement and concrete research vol.
17, pp.983-994, The Pennsylvania State University, USA, 1987.