Implementation of the principles of corporate social responsibility to the environment, as required in the Act No. 40 of 2007, the impact on economic development on the environment, the people who are around the activities of the company, still can not be measured in financial success because people are exposed to activities corporate social responsibility is still not lifted or increased economic life. The failure is caused partly because the focus of activities in the corporate social responsibility is still temporary and fulfillment of needs justification of Law No. 40 of 2007 that the company had engaged in the requirements, to build a business that brings benefits to the company and its employees.

1. PROGRAM MODULE (SYLLABUS)
THEME : CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN)
TOPIC : CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ON
AGRICULTURE SECTOR
DURASI : 3 DAYS FOR WORKSHOP AND 12 MONTHS FOR PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION
BACKGROUND
Implementasi atas tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan terhadap lingkungan, sebagaimana dipersyaratkan
di dalam Undang-undang Nomor 40 tahun 2007, yang berdampak terhadap pembangunan ekonomi
pada lingkungan, masyarakat yang berada di sekitar aktifitas perusahaan, masih belum bisa dilakukan
pengukuran keberhasilannya secara financial karena masyarakat yang terkena aktifitas tanggung jawab
sosial perusahaan tersebut masih belum bisa terangkat atau meningkat kehidupan perekonomiannya.
Kegagalan tersebut disebabkan antara lain karena focus kegiatan di dalam corporate social responsibility
masih bersifat temporer dan pemenuhan atas kebutuhan justifikasi terhadap Undang-undang Nomor 40
tahun 2007 bahwa perusahaan telah melakukan kegiatan yang menjadi persyaratan, untuk membangun
bisnis yang membawa keuntungan bagi perusahaan dan karyawannya.
OVERVIEW
Di dalam program workshop yang berdurasi selama 3 (tiga) hari, akan dilakukan transformasi
pengetahuan, ketrampilan dan pengalaman untuk merencanakan, membangun dan
mengimplementasikan program tanggung jawab social, sehingga rencana kegiatan corporate social
responsibility dapat dilaksanakan dan memberikan hasil nyata berupa pertumbuhan eknonomi bagi
masyarakat yang berada di lingkungan kegiatan perusahaan.
Setelah program workshop berakhir, maka dilanjutkan dengan program pendampingan dan pengajaran
dilingkungan masyarakat melalui penyuluhan, perencanaan kegiatan dan implementasi, serta
menjalankan siklus kehidupan bisnis yang akan berdampak pada pertumbuhan perekonomian bagi
masyarakat.
UNDERSTANDING
Program corporate social responsibility for economic community development on agriculture sector,
adalah kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan secara terencana dan terstruktur serta terpadu antara
rencana kegiatan yang diselenggarakan oleh perusahaan dengan keadaan pertanian yang dilakukan oleh
masyarakat yang berada di lingkungan kegiatan perusahaan.
Di dalam program ini, konsultan akan memberikan panduan kepada perusahaan untuk mempergunakan
sarana dan prasarana saat mengimplementasikan kegiatan corporate social responsibility pada
masyarakat sehingga dapat mengembangkan perekonomian dan meningkatkan taraf hidup masyarakat.

2. I. WORKSHOP
A. OUTLINE WORKSHOP
1. Pengertian Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) berdasarkan UU No. 40 tahun 2007
2. Konsep kerjasama antara perusahaan dengan lingkungan
3. Konsep CSR pada Business Critism/Social Response Cycle
4. CSR pada historical perspective
5. Komponen CSR pada Community
6. Struktur CSR
7. CSR sebagai versus argument
8. CSR sebagai argument
9. Tanggung jawab bisnis di dalam era masa depan yang berdampak pada community
B. WORKSHOP METHODE
1. Memberikan tutor dan diskusi sebagai sarana transformasi pengetahuan atas pengertian
CSR sebagaimana dinyatakan di dalam Undang-undang, sehingga peserta memiliki
pemahaman yang mendalam tentang program CSR yang harus memberikan dampak
terhadap pertumbuhan perekonomian masyarakat
2. Memberikan studi kasus sebagai sarana transformasi pengetahuan dan ketrampilan, dalam
merencanakan kegiatan CSR yang dapat memberikan manfaat secara financial kepada
masyarakat, dan menyelesaikan permasalahan yang dihadapi.
3. Memberikan penugasan sebagai sarana latihan melalui proses imitasi, sehingga peserta
mendapatkan pengalaman dalam merencanakan, membangun dan mengimplementasikan
program CSR di dalam komunitas yang bisa memberikan manfaat secara financial.
4. Memberikan transformasi pengetahuan, ketrampilan dan pengalaman dalam mengukur
pertumbuhan financial sebagai akibat implementasi CSR, sehingga dapat menciptakan
hubungan yang harmonis antara perusahaan dan masyarakat.
II. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM CSR
A. OUTLINE PROGRAM IMPELEMENTATION FOR 12 MONTHS
1. Merencanakan, membangun dan mengimplementasikan program CSR
2. R & D and Environment Analysis untuk sector pertanian
3. Define and Detail SWOT
4. Strategy merubah Weakness menjadi Strenght dan Treats menjadi Opportunity
5. Elemen yang menjadi hambatan dan berpengaruh
6. Teknologi pertanian di era globalisasi
7. Penggunaan dan pemanfaatan teknologi pertanian pada iklim tropis pada udara yang
terpolusi
8. Penggunaan teknologi pertanian secara bertahap
9. Perluasan penggunaan teknologi pertanian dan pemberdayaan masyarakat

3. B. METHODE IMPLEMENTATION
1. Pengenalan program pada komunitas
2. Pemberdayaan kelompok komunitas
3. Membangun kegiatan Riset
4. Penyebaran informasi dan diskusi masalah yang dihadapi
5. Alternatif solusi pada masalah
6. Implementasi solusi
7. Pengembangan implementasi atas solusi yang dihadapi
8. Sales Marketing dan Jalur distribusi
REFERENCE
1. Freeman, Edward; Moutchnik, Alexander (2013): Stakeholder management and CSR: questions and
answers. In:UmweltWirtschaftsForum, Springer Verlag, Bd. 21.
2. Carroll, A. and Buchholtz, A. (2003) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management.
Thomson. Ohio
3. Carroll, A. (1998) The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review, September,
vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 1-7
4. Clarkson, M. (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social
performance. Academy of Management Review. Vol.20, pp.92 -117.
5. Davis, K. and Blomstrom, R. (1975) Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility, McGraw -
Hill, New York.
6. Fombrun, C. (2000) The value to be found in corporate reputation The public's view of a company
not only acts as a reservoir of goodwill, but also boosts the bottom line. Financial Times December 4
2000
7. Griffin, J. and Mahon, J. (1997) The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial
Performance Debate: Twenty five years of incompatible research. Business and Society. Vol. 36. pp.5
-31
8. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. and Tomas, G.(1999) Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and
Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Volume 27, No. 4, pages 455-469.
9. Maignan, I., and Ferrell, O. (2001) Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument - Concepts,
evidence and research directions. European Journal of Marketing. Vol.35 No.3/4 pp.457-484
10. Matten, D, Crane, A. and Chapple, W. (2003) Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate
citizenship. Journal Business Ethics Vol. 45, Issue1 pp109
11. Menon, A. and Menon, A. (1997) Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: the emergence of corporate
environmentalism as marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 61, pp.51 - 67
12. Millennium Poll on Corporate Responsibility ‘Environics International Ltd’ in cooperation with The
Prince of Wales Trust September 1999.
13. Waddell, S. (2000) New institutions for the practice of corporate citizenship; Historical Intersectoral,
and Developmental Perspectives'. Business and Society Review, Vol. 105, pp.323 - 345.
14. Wartick, S. and Cochran, P. (1985) The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model.
Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, pp.767.
15. WBCSD (2001). The Business Case for Sustainable Development. World Business Council for
Sustainable Development. ISBN 2-94-024019-1.
16. WBCSD (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility: Making good business sense. World Business Council
for Sustainable Development. ISBN 2-94-024007-8.
17. WBCSD (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Meeting changing expectation. World Business
Council for Sustainable Development. ISBN 2-94-024007-8.

4. 18. Safety and health in agriculture. International Labour Organization. 1999. pp. 77–. ISBN 978-92-2-
111517-5. Retrieved 13 September 2010.
19. Chantrell, Glynnis, ed. (2002). The Oxford Dictionary of Word Histories. Oxford University Press.
p. 14. ISBN 0-19-863121-9.
20. Ulrich G. Mueller, Nicole M. Gerardo, Duur K. Aanen, Diana L. Six, and Ted R. Schultz (December
2005). "The Evolution of Agriculture in Insects". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and
Systematics 36: 563–595.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152626.
21. "Definition of Agriculture". State of Maine. Retrieved6 May 2013.
22. Committee on Forestry Research, National Research Council (1990). Forestry Research: A Mandate
for Change. National Academies Press. pp. 15–16. ISBN 0-309-04248-8.
23. Budowski, Gerardo (1982). "Applicability of agro-forestry systems". In MacDonald, L.H. Agro-forestry
in the African Humid Tropics. United Nations University. ISBN 92-808-0364-6.
24. Jared Diamond (2012). The World Until Yesterday. Viking. p. 353. ISBN 978-0-670-02481-0.
25. Douglas John McConnell (2003). The Forest Farms of Kandy: And Other Gardens of Complete Design.
p. 1.ISBN 978-0-7546-0958-2.
26. Douglas John McConnell (1992). The forest-garden farms of Kandy, Sri Lanka. p. 1. ISBN 978-92-5-
102898-8.
27. "The Development of Agriculture". National Geographic. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
28. DK Jordan (24 November 2012). "Living the Revolution".The Neolithic. University of California – San
Diego. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
29. Hancock, James F. (2012). Plant evolution and the origin of crop species (3rd ed.). CABI.
p. 119. ISBN 1-84593-801-1.
30. UN Industrial Development Organization,International Fertilizer Development Center (1998). The
Fertilizer Manual (3rd ed.). Springer. p. 46. ISBN 0-7923-5032-4.
31. S. Johannessen and C. A. Hastorf (eds.), ed. (1994). Corn and Culture in the Prehistoric New World.
Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-8375-7.
32. DK Jordan (24 November 2012). "Beyond Wheat". The Neolithic. University of California – San Diego.
Retrieved22 April 2013.
33. Vergano, Dan (19 January 2011). "Grapes domesticated 8,000 years ago". USA Today. Retrieved 4
May 2013.
34. DK Jordan (24 November 2012). "The "Agricultural Revolution"". The Neolithic. University of
California – San Diego. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
35. Adams, Kristina. "Horses in History: A Bibliography". USDA National Agricultural Library.
Retrieved 24 May 2013.
36. Heiser, Carl B., Jr. (1992). "On Possible Sources of the Tobacco of Prehistoric Eastern North
America". Current Anthropology 33: 54–56. doi:10.1086/204032.
37. Richerson, Peter J. (2001). "Chapter 5: Pastoral Societies". Principles of Human Ecology. pp. 79–80.
38. Michael Moïssey Postan, H. J. Habakkuk, Miller, Edward, ed. (1987). Cambridge Economic History of
Europe: Vol. 2: Trade and Industry in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press. p. 28. ISBN 0-521-
08709-0.
39. Brian M. Fagan (2004). The Seventy Great Inventions of the Ancient World. Thames &
Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05130-5.
40. Janick, Jules (2008). "Roman Agricultural History". Purdue University. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
41. Janick, Jules. "History of Agricultural and Horticultural Technology in Asia" (PDF). Purdue University.
pp. 3–4. Retrieved 23 May 2013.
42. Lesley Adkins, Roy A. Adkins (1998). Handbook to Life in Ancient Rome. Oxford University Press.
pp. 194–196.ISBN 0-19-512332-8.
43. Mascarelli, Amanda (5 November 2010). "Mayans converted wetlands to
farmland". Nature.doi:10.1038/news.2010.587.

5. 44. Morgan, John (6 November 2013). "Invisible Artifacts: Uncovering Secrets of Ancient Maya
Agriculture with Modern Soil Science". Soil Horizons 53 (6): 3. doi:10.2136/sh2012-53-6-lf.
45. Jourdan, Pablo. "Medieval Horticulture/Agriculture". Ohio State University. Retrieved 24 April 2013.
46. Janick, Jules (2008). "Islamic Influences on Western Agriculture". Purdue University. Retrieved 23
May 2013.
47. Stromberg, Joseph (February 2013). "Classical gas".Smithsonian 43 (10): 18. Retrieved 27
August 2013.
48. Backer, Patricia. "Part 1 – Medieval European history". History of Technology. San Jose State
University. Retrieved 24 April 2013.
49. Glick, Thomas F. (2005). Medieval Science, Technology And Medicine: An Encyclopedia. Volume 11 of
The Routledge Encyclopedias of the Middle Ages Series. Psychology Press. p. 270. ISBN 0-415-96930-
1.
50. Newman, Paul B. (2001). Daily Life in the Middle Ages. McFarland. pp. 88–89. ISBN 0-7864-5052-5.
51. Campbell, Bruce M. S.; M. Overton (1993). "A New Perspective on Medieval and Early Modern
Agriculture: Six Centuries of Norfolk Farming, c.1250-c.1850". Past and Present 141: 38–
105. doi:10.1093/past/141.1.38.
52. Campbell, Bruce M.S. (2000). English Seigniorial Agriculture, 1250–1450. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. ISBN 0-521-30412-1.
53. Stone, David (2005). Decision-Making in Medieval Agriculture. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. ISBN 0-19-924776-5.
54. John Langdon (2010). Robert E. Bjork, ed. The Oxford Dictionary of the Middle Ages. Oxford,
England: Oxford University Press. pp. 20–23. ISBN 978-0-19-866262-4.
55. Mann, Michael E. (2002). "Medieval Climactic Optimum". In Munn, Ted. Encyclopedia of Global
Environmental Change 1. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 514–516.
56. Crosby, Alfred. "The Columbian Exchange". The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History.
Retrieved 11 May2013.
57. Chapman, Jeff. "The Impact of the Potato". History Magazine (2).
58. Mann, Charles C. (November 2011). "How the Potato Changed History". Smithsonian.
59. Thomas, Richard M. (June 2005). "Zooarchaeology, improvement and the British agricultural
revolution".International Journal of Historical Archaeology 9 (2): 71–88.doi:10.1007/s10761-005-
8140-9.
CONSULTANT PROFILE
SETIONO WINARDI, SH.MBA
http://pt.linkedin.com/pub/setiono-winardi/22/7a/7a5
http://www.slideshare.net/setionow
http://uid.academia.edu/SetionoWinardi
Email : winardi67@gmail.com
P. +62-813-1542-1509