Julius Caesar Conflicts

Julius Caesar Conflicts
Mia Gorman Bell 5 Mrs. Thomas 5 December, 2017 The Fall of The Roman Republic(52–50 B.C.)
In the years 52–50 B.C. there were multiple conflicts in the Roman Empire. Caesar was in Alesia
attempting to conquer Gaul, which affected Julius Caesar, Gaul, and Rome. In Rome, there was
conflict because Publius Claudius, who had been stirring trouble in the streets of Rome, was killed
in 52 B.C. during the elections. His death caused great chaos and resulted in a period with no
leadership. Later Pompey began to rule because the citizens demanded organization, even though he
was not trusted by the Senate. The elections of 51 went smoothly, and everything seemed to be
going well until March of 50 when conflict between Pompey and Caesar led to a civil ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Metellus Scipio thought that Caesar's power in Gaul should be coming to an end. At this point
Caesar's rule there depended on his relationship with Pompey, who was still powerful in Rome. C.
Scribonius Curio surprised them with his suggestion that both Pompey and Caesar give up their
positions. Cicero saw all this conflict and predicted the doom of the empire. Eventually, even though
Caesar was liked, Pompey had his partner recalled and was put into full power. If Caesar wanted to
become consul, Pompey required that he give up his army, which Caesar did not feel safe doing.
This brought on the crucial point in history, when Caesar illegally brought his army into Italy, after
crossing the Rubicon. There was no going back after that, and the 19 year long civil war began,
marking the end of the Roman
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

How Did Julius Caesar Impact Society
Power is a trait that many great leaders have. The rulers of the Roman empire were no exception.
One of the most influential and controversial rulers of Rome was Julius Caesar. He expanded the
Roman Empire by conquering Gaul and is known for never losing a war. Julius Caesar aided the
development of the Roman Empire and its people.
In 58 B.C.E, Julius Caesar began the long process of conquering Gaul, which is modern day France
and Belgium. The time when Rome was fighting to obtain Gaul was called The Gallic Wars and
lasted until 50 B.C.E. The famous book by Julius Caesar Commentarii de Bello Gallico recounted
Caesar's first hand experience in the war through battles and triumphs. Caesar sent in his legions to
defeat tribes in Gaul with an aggressive approach. The Battle of Alesia was the turning point in the
conquering of Gaul in Rome's favor. Caesar used a siege tactic hoping to starve his enemies; he
carried out his plan by fortifying their city. The siege ended when the Gaul leader surrendered.
Caesar used his legions and his intelligence to conquer Gaul up to the border of the River Rhine,
expanding the ever growing Roman Empire. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the ways he did this was by starting major building projects like the construction of the
Forum Julium which was used to provide more space for law courts. Projects like these produced
more jobs which the plebeian class desperately needed. During his time as a consul Caesar also
passed a law to redistribute the land to the plebeians and another act that made it so if you had a
farm ⅓ of your workers must be Roman citizens. Caesar helped to reduce the employment issue
among the plebeian

The Celts And The Celtic World
Knowledge of the Celts and the Celtic world has been acquired and accumulated through a variety
of mediums such as archaeological evidence, geographical markings and most importantly, the
testimonies left by Greek and Roman writers. Without these writings, developing an image of the
nature of the Celts would be extremely difficult. Comparing two authors, Roman emperor, Julius
Caesar to Greek writer, Athenaeus, it may reveal some of the prejudices and biased views held
against the Celts, but more importantly by contrasting the views of these particular authors, it also
offers a well–rounded account of the history and culture of these Celtic–speaking people.
Athenaeus was a Greek writer, who wrote around the time of 200AD. He is the author of
Deipnosophistae, a piece of literature all about eating and dining traditions. Athenaeus is writing
during a time known as The Poseidonian Tradition; Poseidonios inspired a lot of Greek writers to
write and keep record of the Celts and their culture. Athenaeus quotes Poseidonios in his
Deipnosophistae as he has first hand experience of the Celts, having travelled around studying the
Celts. Poseidonios' work only survives through the work of later authors, such as Athenaeus.
Athenaeus speaks of how Poseidonios observed the Celts during a feast, taking note of their
customs, Athenaeus' discourse is written in such a way that the impression left is that the Greeks
may have considered themselves more evolved than the Celts they were

The Conquest Of Gaul Sparknotes
Allison McNeese
Origins of the Western Tradition
04/24/2016
Amy McGlynn
Book Review: Julius Caesar's "The Conquest of Gaul"
[underline or italicize titles of books]
Between the years 58 B.C.E and 50 B.C.E., Gaius Julius Caesar conquered almost the whole of
France as well as Belgium, Switzerland and parts of Germany; he also found time to invade Britain
twice. Julius Caesar was a Roman statesman and general who played a critical role in the demise of
the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. He amassed great power through clever
political alliances and military victories. Caesar recorded his conquests in great detail which
provides valuable historical text to refer to; however it must be kept in mind that it is a clear piece of
propaganda. As the saying goes, the winner gets to write history. Nonetheless, Caesar's writings are
a unique firsthand source on his conquests in Gaul and the various Gallic tribes he came up against.
Central themes evident in his memoir are war, devotion and persuasion. Caesar was clear to outline
in his commentaries how each of his campaigns was in the best interest of the republic. He depicted
himself as a loyal servant to the Roman people and therefore portrayed his actions and decisions in
the most favorable way possible. Those who would have read his work at the time would have felt
inspired and consequently considered him a hero. Caesar's books were intended to aid future
historians in telling his story accurately and [in a way

The Emporer Caesar Essay
The Emporer Caesar
The Emperor Julius Caesar is perhaps most famous as the first Roman Emperor to convert to
Christianity. His rise from a humble birth as a peasant boy to Emperor is a tale of bravery, adversity
and ultimately triumph through faith.
Julius Caesar was born as Groyxo Gaul in 54BC into an immigrant family in the back streets of
Rome. Neither parent was rich. The German historian Guildo Horn noted: "Seine Mutter war ein
Hamster und sein Vater, der von den Holunderbeeren gerochen wurde." They were as flotsam and
jetsam on the beach. His early years would probably have been spent scavenging on the streets,
though this is not certain. Later historians, like Plato re–wrote the histories once he became Emperor
as ignoble ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shark!" and pointed out of the tent. While Asterix was distracted he swapped the treaties. Asterix
didn't notice till two months later that he had accidentally signed the 'surrender' rather than the
'victory' document. He only realised when a day–trip, which he was told was to see a flock of
interesting pigeons, turned out to be a trick. He was in fact thrown to the Christians in the Coliseum.
Aristotle says he died with a smile on his face, appreciating the practical joke. Julius Caesar was so
successful with this trick he played it again and again. The whole of France was captured without a
single drop of blood being spilt. To celebrate he changed France's name to Gaul, after himself. But
then he was worried people might think him egotistical, and so this was when he changed his own
name to Caesar, because he had 'Seized' Gaul.
Emboldened by his successes in France which he moved on to Britannia. By now his shark trick was
famous and he had to bring along a larger tent to accommodate the audiences that would gather to
see it happen. Sadly they were disappointed in Britain.
Unfortunately for Caesar the British didn't know what a shark was, so instead of staring out of the
tent, they just stared at his finger. Caesar tried a few times to solve the problem by bringing along a
dictionary with him to explain, but the British couldn't read Latin. In one last attempt in 23BC
Caesar brought along a dictionary in English to negotiate with the

Similarities Between Paris And Gauls
Both Paris which is the capital city of France and Barcelona which is the capital and the most
famous town of Catalonia have similarities with their rebellious history and their historic revolution.
The similarities are reflected on the grounds of the cause for rebellion and the phases they
underwent during the revolution period . The associated similarities for resistance in both cities were
economic problems and the cultural differences of the population in the towns. Both financial issues
and cultural differences influenced the residents to need for the insurgency. On the side of the
revolution, it encompassed a social and political change in both cities1. The essay focuses on the
historical rebellion similarities between Paris and Barcelona.
From the general view of the history of Paris, the city is believed to be over 2000 years of age.
During the period between 250 and 200 BC, the tribe Gauls of Parisii settled in the town. The
general population of Gauls was financially unstable and had different cultural practices. During the
early Middle Ages of 52BC Julius Caesar conquered Paris and made it the regional existence of
Romans. The emergence of the Romans and the preexistence of the Gauls widened the disputes
cultural Gaps . The general population of both the Romans and the Gauls was vibrant and defiant
which made them a free cooperative under the authority of Etienne Marcel who was their chief
leader. The raging of the Bastille in 1789 was the first of a progression

Analysis Of Julius Caesar 's ' The Gallic War '
Critique Essay In this critique of Julius Caesar's book, The Gallic War, I will be discussing the
purpose and accuracy (or in this case, inaccuracy) over his adventures and military campaign against
the Gallic tribes. There is a constant debate between historians: The Myth of Certainty. History is all
about interpretation and finding truth out of subjectivity. History can often be lost in time as the
firsthand accounts will eventually fade out. Even if firsthand accounts remains intact, it is not
completely objective. Every person has their own agenda and is biased in one shape or form, no
matter how much they try not to be; Julius Caesar is not an exception. I will start this critique by
stating the author's main purpose for writing his book. Secondly I will attempt to decipher the
accuracy and inconsistency of Julius Caesar's account. Finally, I will express my opinion over his
commentaries over the Gallic War. There were many reasons to why Julius Caesar wrote his book
over the Gallic War. One of these reasons was to help inspire the people of Rome. Rome had just
been sacked by the Gaul, creating tension between the Roman people and the Celtic tribes. The
growing resentment towards the Gallic people spread like wildfire as political turmoil rise. Although
the Romans were very tenacious and persevering, this did not stop the morale blow that many
Romans felt.
Another reason for the commentaries was to justify Caesar's invasion. The number one goal for any
war is to

Why Is Julius Caesar Successful
"I came, I saw, I conquered." A quote by Julius Caesar that he lived his life by. One major thing
Julius Caesar is known for is his great success in the battle of Gaul. The battle of Gaul was a huge
impact in Julius Caesar's rise as a leader of the Roman Empire. In the beginning, he set out with
strategic plans to overtake Gaul and its many tribes in order to prove to Rome the kind of powerful
man he greatly wanted to achieve. Unfortunately, with too much power comes jealousy. Most battles
start because one country wants to take of another country for their resources, population, or even
architect. However, the battle of Gaul started in a different way. A way that had made it become so
popular. Julius Caesar had been a ruler of Rome for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 57 BC, Caesar and his men set out to conquer Gaul. He took around 40,000 soldiers with him
(Strauss). They traveled by foot for nearly three days. Most men carried 50 pounds or more of
supplies on their backs. The soldiers settled alongside the river Sameria. In the first year of the war,
the Romans had everything going their way. Then the second year came, and more tribes of Gaul
realized that Caesar was not a friend but an enemy. The Belgians were the first to confront Caesar's
army (Strauss). Caesar was ready for them and defeated the Belgians. Different tribes of Gaul joined
forces to defeat the Romans. Caesar's army prepared to fight against the Nervian–led forces near the
River Selle. The Nervians were ready to attack as the Romans reached their camp. With Caesar's
first legions, or group of soldiers, defeated, the Nervians thought the Roman army would withdraw
(Strauss). The Romans however did not withdraw and battles continues between the two armies. The
Nervians outsmarted and did a surprise attack. The Roman army was much larger than they
expected. The Nervians made a mistake,which led to the Romans ability to regroup and attack back.
According the Caesar's Commentaries, the key to winning the battle of Gaul was three things: the
skill of his army, the generals of his army, and most important the greatness of himself. Other battles
followed like the

Amphitheatre Of The Three Gauls Research Paper
Amphitheatre of the Three Gauls
The Amphitheatre of the Three Gauls is a famous sanctuary which was dedicated to the cult of
Augustus and Rome. It was celebrated by many Gallic tribes who had gathered at Lugdunum, the
Roman name of the region of Lyon in ancient times. There are many things to do in France as a
tourist which must include seeing all the designated historical monuments such as the Amphitheatre
of the Three Gauls. The amphitheatre was built at the foot of a hill which was then placed at a point
where the two rives of the Rhone and Saone met. A recent find in 1957 allowed the origins of this
place to be confirmed as the part of the sanctuary of Rome and Augustus. The recent find dates the
building to around 19 AD. The Amphitheatre

Essay about Druids and Druidism: A Study of Their Real...
When interpreting history it is almost akin to separating the wheat from the chaff in farming. Close
attention has to be paid to every historical detail that is given. In many cases when studying a
historical description the reader can find a particular bias that the author has written with. The
writings of Julius Caesar and Pliny are not exempt from being written with a bias when they
describe the druids. Both authors are considered to be valid sources on historical events which make
the assertions and observations that they noted more reliable than other authors. Upon a cursory
observation of the text it seems that Caesar tended to find fewer faults in the druids customs
compared to Pliny. This paper will argue and prove that although ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Caesar makes no comment on this difference but instead keeps relaying the facts. Another part that
ties into the religious description that Caesar gives is the druid's rights to enact punishment. For
instance, "if a private person or the public does not yield to their decision they are prohibited from
sacrifices" these people are regarded "as godless and wicked and they are cut off from all." (Caesar,
21) This shows that the druids were very powerful not only when it came to religious matters but
also matters that dealt with the public. They had the power to ostracize entire clans from the rest of
the Celts for any type of religious misconduct by a particular clan. The position of druid was
coveted by the Celt people, so much so that many men were sent by "parents and relatives" to try to
become one.(Caesar, 21) This was not an easy task though. "They are said to commit to memory a
great number of verses... and remain some twenty years in training." (Caesar, 21) Part of the reason
for the extensive training that went on is that the druids refused to commit "things to writing."
(Caesar, 21) One can only imagine the great mental capacity that each one of these individuals had
to have. The huge amounts of information that had to be memorized did two things for the druids.
One it deterred anyone who did not really have the

Role Of Julius Caesar In The Gaul
Julius Caesar's role in the Gaul had a large impact in many aspects of his career such as the military,
wealth and influence on Rome and political power. Julius Caesar was a Roman politician who
turned the Roman republic into the powerful Roman Empire. Caesar overthrew the Roman republic
and founded the rule of the emperors. In this period Caesar used the problems to his advantage and
created his own supreme political and military power, gaining the trust of Rome and building his
army. Caesar is well known throughout the whole world as one of the most powerful and successful
leaders that has ever lived. In his young years, his father had a major impact on him, as he had
political success, and the family has a history in politics, which had helped Caesar in starting out in
politics. Julius Caesar's first important political success had occurred in 63b.c.e when Caesar was
appointed the role of Chief Religious office in Rome; this had set him up for future political roles.
Caesar was very strategically and had many tactics to how he would rule; he always wanted more
glory and political and military opportunities and would overcome all challenges he faced. In
59B.C.E Caesar won an election to become consul, the senate then assigned him to lands that gave
Caesar no opportunities for military exaltation, as he did not want Caesar to succeed. Caesar realised
he would need more allies to overcome his opponents in the senate. He then formed the alliance that
was known as the 'First Triumvirate' with the Roman General Pompey who brought wealth and
military success. During Caesar's rule he gained a lot of military success due to how he led his army
Military during Caesar's rule was a high contribution of his success. Military success was important
to Julius Caesar as it gave him wealth to succeed in Roman politics. It was important was important
for Caesar because it gives him enormous power in the military; this means his army would be big
and strong and would be able to protect Caesar. Success in a war gave Caesar more glory and
brought more wealth to him, and made Caesar rise more to fame. In Rome political success brought
opportunities for military command, as Julius Caesar already had much political power, his

Julius Caesar And The Gallic War Summary
One of the first wars Julius Caesar encountered was the Gallic War. The city of Gaul was rising just
like Rome. However, one day German troops took back their land forcing one Gaul tribe to retreat
back their main city. To do this they would have to cross some Roman territory. Gaul thought that
this wouldn't be a problem as they thought of Romans as understanding people. Julius Caesar soon
learned about the Gaul tribe's plans and took an army to the area in which the Gaul tribe would be
crossing. Gaul sent two of their leaders and discuss their problem. The Gaul leaders then left to find
out what date they wanted to cross. In that time Julius Caesar wanted to show how much force the
Roman army had. He ordered his troops to build a wall across the point in which Gaul wanted to
cross. The leaders soon came back and were astonished by the Roman army's creation. When Julius
Caesar and Gaul leaders met this time Julius Caesar said that he wouldn't allow them to cross. Gaul
was not about to give up so easily, from then on they began to check for weak spots in the Roman's
defenses. The Gaul tribe finally gave up as they knew that there were not any weak spots. Gaul
decided that they would take a more dangerous route. They would travel through a narrow valley
even though enemy could attack from above. Julius Caesar learned of Gauls new plans and was
fearful. He thought that if Gaul went back to its main city it would hold a grudge against Rome and
come to destroy them. So Julius

Julius Caesar Essay
English II
November 30, 2011.
Julius Caesar´s Essay Julius Caesar is mostly known for his great leadership in Rome´s Empire, he
accomplished everything he purposed and he did whatever it took to make it happen. He had all it
took to be such a leader; women were in love with him, men wanted to be part of his army and
children wanted to be like him when they grow up. For Caesar all it took was courage and
selfishness to get to where he was. A leader is a person who knows the way; goes the way and shows
the way but no one will ever be a leader without courage. Courage was part of Caesar´s being, he
knew that if he showed this part of him in the moments that seemed lost and accomplished them,
people would follow him and they would ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His craving for power was the secret ingredient for the cake he was baking. "After weeks of fighting
Vercingetorix, facing starvation, is forced to surrender" (Campbell) Weeks and weeks had to pass for
someone to surrender and even though Caesar´s men were suffering the same hunger as their
enemies Julius didn´t even think about surrender. He just wanted to prove he was stronger than
Vercingetorix was and not only some of his army died because of starvation or simply because their
bodies gave up he also left women and children die because he didn´t let them in his shelter for
protection. But even though he left all those people dying he was still an exceptional leader. Having
these two characters made Caesar a standout in a large crowd. He had all the courage he needed to
fight in a lot of battles and a hidden part of him, filled with selfishness, made him want more the
power he always wanted in whatever matters he could get there. He was well aware of everything he
was doing, he planned every step of his way and to make them happen all he needed was lots of
courage and lots selfishness.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Caesar, The Early years vol. 1, ed. Horace. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2005. Print

Military Activities In Julius Caesar Research Paper
Julius Caesar military activities were significant in Gaul, Germany and Britain, which as a result
contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. The combined result of Rome's wars of expansion
and competition among its leading men placed immense strain on the republic system. Julius Caesar,
an ambitious man, craved the need for power, which he saw Gaul as an opportunity to conquer as
Gaul lacked political unity and discipline. With the help of his devoted army and his genius with
military tactics, Caesar was able to conquer Gaul with its advantages in favor for himself, gaining
popularity as well as exploring new foreign grounds where no Roman has been before. However
with great power Caesar was faced with new enemies and the challengers of Roman senate, which
contributed to the fall of the Roman republic. Caesar was in search for power and wealth and when
Gaul became available to him, Caesar seized the opportunity to conquer Gaul. In 58 BC Caesar took
command of Cisalpine Gaul and Transalpine Gaul. This command ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In 55BC, Caesar crossed the English Channel to Britain to punish those British tribes, which had
supported his Gallic enemies. His crossing to Britain was only an exploit and had no permanent
results, but created great curiosity in Rome. Marcus Cicero wrote ' I look forward to receiving
Britannic letters from you' to a young friend who was expecting to go on the voyage. Caesar
spectacular excursion into unexplored territory, capturing the imagination of the Roman public, who
"magnified it to a remarkable degree" according to Cassius Dio. There was excitement amongst the
Roman republic to hear the latest news of the campaigns, particularly the crossing to Britain.
Gilliver suggest that Caesar felt confident enough to risk gambling his political future and was ready
to resort to civil war to obtain the domination he felt was due to

What Four Qualities Should Be Chosen For This War?
I think that I have given quite enough words, to explain why this war is inevitable given its kind,
perilous given its scope: there remains, it seems, that one must speak about the general who must be
chosen for this war, and who must be put in charge of such great matters.
If only, true Romans, you had such a great abundance of strong and virtuous men, that this choice
would be difficult for you, over who you think is to be put in charge of such great matters and such a
great war! But as it is, indeed, Gnaeus Pompeius alone is the one who has surpassed in excellence
not only the glory of these men, who are now living, but also the recorded achievement of past
generations, which thing is it that can make anyone's mind doubtful in this matter?
I, for my part, think that in the perfect general these four qualities should be present: knowledge of
military matters, overall excellence, authority, good fortune. In that case, who has ever been, or ever
should be, more knowledgable than this man?
He who departed from school and from the lessons of boyhood to his fathers army, an into the
discipline of warfare, during a major war against the fiercest enemies; he who at the end of boyhood
was a soldier in the army of a perfect general, who at the onset of adolescence was himself a general
of a perfect army; he who has clashed with the enemy more often than anyone else has argued with
their rival, who has waged more wars than the rest have read of, held more offices than others

The Battle Of The Roman Empire By Caesar 's Commentarii De...
In the unrelenting expansion of the Roman Empire, Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico accounts
the engagements of the Gallic Wars, alongside his personal intrigue of Gallic people. Yet, this work
makes use of and conveys anthropological reports of a people approaching subjugation by Rome,
the Gauls. Furthermore, Asad's "Introduction; Barlow's "Noble Gauls and their other in Caesar 's
Propaganda"; G. Boys–Stones' "The Recovery of Primitive Wisdom in Early Stoicism;
Feuchtwang's "The Colonial Formation of British Social Anthropology"; and C. Kraus, "Bellum
Gallcium," attests to the pedagogical function of such work. Therefore, I contend the Bellum
Gallicum, presents as a didactic text―in regards to Caesar, who propels the Stoic theory of cultural
maturation, informed by the pseudo–scientific principles of earlier philosophers, namely, Posidonius
and Seneca the Younger. In addition, Caesar exploits the primal nature of Roman subjects to further
both his and Rome 's agenda. Thereby, formulating a handbook, intended to instruct future
administrators in conquering, governing, and accordingly, in empire building.
1) JC 's characterization of the Gallic "character" and their knowledge of the things of culture, e.g.
battle tactics, writing, trade
Caesar, during his office as proconsul of Gaul, authored the Bellum Gallicum, in avoidance of his
aristocratic enemies and their persecution; in effort to gain the support of the plebeians, this work
was relayed directly to the Roman

Short Essay: All Quiet On The Western Front
All is chaos. Horses run everywhere except where their riders are leading. Baggage animals are
being toppled. Some men flee and others fight. The disorder appears to be in no one's favor. The
road is defined by sheer cliffs on both sides which man, animal, and barbarian were falling into.
Hannibal, seated atop my comrade Surus, commanded his army to stay back. Once the column was
broken however, Surus, with Hannibal on his back, ran into the fray with me at his side and
scattered the enemy, as was the plan.
We have been trudging through these mountains for fifteen days now. We lost more men during this
march, than we have left, and only a few of my 36 comrades that we started with remain. The men
say this will be the last day of this horrendous march, which was made longer by the men's ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then, to destroy the enemy, a detachment lead by Mago Barca comes up behind the enemy with
about a thousand more infantry and a thousand more cavalry, which crushes many of the enemy
between our main infantry and our detachment. This causes many of the enemy to flee for the river.
As the disorganized men idle near or in the river, our great general on my comrades back, leads
some of his men to massacre theses enemies by the river. Forever after I will remember the site of
the river running red from the blood, and the bodies floating down

Similarities And Differences Between King Henry And Julius...
4. Comparing Caesar to King Henry V
4.1 Aristocratic family backgrounds
King Henry V and Caesar share common historical grounds. As the third king in the Lancaster
family line, King Henry was descendent of the old, aristocratic Angevin dynasty which reigned in
England from 1154 to 1485, beginning with King Henry II of Plantagenet. The family dynasty
began in the region of Anjou and the dynasty's expansion into Europe was considered its golden age
(Vauchez, A et al. 2000:65). Similarly, Caesar too came from an old, aristocratic family that had
patrician roots. In his infamous speech made at his Aunt Julia's funeral, Caesar illustrated how the
Julia gens claimed ancestry from Aeneas, son of Aphrodite saying "...while the Julians...descend
from the goddess Venus herself..." Caesars adds that his family "...therefore hold the sanctity of
kings who rule among men and of gods whole rule over kings..." (Freeman 2008:52). By both
having an aristocratic family background, there exists a commonality between the two prominent
historical figures.
4.2 Military conquests ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As Julius Caesar advanced Roman influence and territory into the West through his conquests of
Gaul, Spain, Africa and parts of Asia, Henry V expanded the British empire into France. Henry's
invasion of France began with the attack on the French harbour of Harfleur. The Battle of Agincourt
was the definitive battle that resulted in the Treaty of Troyes being signed on the 21st of May 1420,
the effect being that Henry became the heir to the French throne, further solidified to solidified with
his marriage to Catherine of Valois, amalgamating the French and British empires ("Agincourt
600"). France proved a valuable resource to the British empire as Caesar's conquered territories were
for

Dying Gaul In Ancient Greek Art
Ancient Greece is famous for its cultural advances, particularly the art. Hellenistic is the last phase
of Ancient Greek art, and is essential for the evolution of western art. The Dying Gaul is a typical
example of Hellenistic sculptures, dated 230–220 BCE. We are unsure of who made it, but Epigonos
– the court sculptor of Attalid Dynasty – was believed to be the one. The Dying Gaul was made to
celebrate King Attalos I of Pergamon in his victory over Gauls (Galatians). The Gauls were brutal
soldiers that fought in the nude. They were so fierce that they believed in nature defense and refused
to wear armors and clothes during a battle. The bushy hair, the mustache and the torc (necklace) are
barbarian characteristics; they are symbols of their

The 390 Bce Battle At The Allia River
The 390 BCE battle at the Allia River was fought between the city state of Rome and Gauls from
northern Italy. When the Gauls laid siege to the Etruscan city of Clusium, the Romans intervened on
behalf of the latter. The Gauls withdrew but returned to advance on Rome itself. Close to Rome, at
the Allia River, the Roman army met the Gauls in battle but suffered a crushing defeat. PROLOGUE
Between 1000–500 BCE, the gradual expansion of Celtic tribes from central Europe transformed
most of Western Europe into a Celtic world. Enticed by the riches of the Mediterranean lands, tribes
of Celts wandered into the north Italian plain where they became known as Gauls or Gallic tribes.
After 400 BCE the Gauls began to take the lands they desired by force, conquering the mosaic of
cultures that lived in the Po River valley. Gallic Warriors Gallic Warriors In 391, Brennus, chief of
the Senones, led a Gallic army south into Etruria, where he besieged the town of Clusium. Clusium
was part of the Etruscan civilization which flourished to the north of the powerful city–state of
Rome. The Etruscans were politically divided, however, and with no help forthcoming from the
other Etruscan cities, Clusium appealed to Rome for help. Rome then sent the Fabii, the sons of the
influential patrician Fabius Ambustus, as envoys to Clusium. The Fabii asked the Gauls, what gave
them the right to invade Etruscan lands. The Gauls answered "that they carried their right in their
weapons" (Livy, The History

Julius Caesar As A Source Criticism
In this essay I will be describing, discussing and evaluating my chosen source. I will be using the
references that I have chosen, in order to present a clear and concise source criticism, coming to a
well rounded conclusion at the end.
The source is taken from the book 'Commentarii de Bello Gallico', which was written and edited by
Aulus Hiritus and Julius Caesar and was published around 58 – 49 BC, sometime after Julius
Caesars death. It is a secondary source which describes Julius Caesar's first–hand account of the
nine–year period that he spent fighting the Celtic and Germanic people in Gaul. The book was
written in order to inform the Roman people of the Gallic Wars from a source that they trusted,
however it is biased meaning that Caesar may have had particular motives for writing it thus
meaning that the content may also be influenced by Caesars motives. Caesars chronology of
'Commentarii de Bello Gallico' allows for him to react to the shifts in Rome's political climate
(Timothy, R. Kimbrough, 2014, p. 3), which means that the source I have chosen to critique was
written to suit Caesars immediate needs (G. Woolf, 2011, p.54), suggesting that the portrayal of joy
that Caesar has been bestowed with could be exaggerated in order to fit the political climate in
Rome, allowing him to maintain his position within the Senate and with the Roman population. The
book contains information on the Gallic Wars and its purpose is to persuade the Roman people that
Caesars appointment in Gaul and his actions during the Wars occurred in order to benefit the Roman
state and the Roman people, regardless of the legality with which they were brought about (Timothy.
R. Kimbrough, 2014, p.8).
However, the source also suggests that Caesar was popular and was a worthy figure head for the
Roman Empire because he was prepared to face the unknown (H. Schadee, 2008, p.170), presenting
the his readers that he was then welcomed by the towns and their people connotes that he was
expressing his influence and power outside of Rome. The meaning of this source is that Caesar is
attempting to exert his reputation and power over the Senate by recounting his actions during the
Wars as for the benefit of the Roman empire, to the

How Did The Romans Introduce Their Culture
1A To conquer "is to defeat someone or something, usually with force, like army troops that conquer
enemy territory" (Vocabulary.com). This is exactly what happened to the Gaul by the Romans. The
Romans conquered their region, influenced the Gaul and imported their culture. They even built
mirroring cities in the Roman Gaul to further emulate the Roman culture. Once the Romans had
conquered the Gaul they initially tried to take away their religion from them. Augustus (27 BCE to
14CE) "forbade the druidic religion for Roman citizens" (Tarpenning). Many of the Gaul had to
become Roman citizens so ultimately this law forced them into revoking their previous religion.
Tiberius (CE 14–27) "issued a decree against the druids and related diviners and healers"
(Tarpenning). Emperor Tiberius put up a ban against the religion and of any practisers of the
religion. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Latin language took over the Gaul language of before. Latin was the language taught to many in
writing but a mixture of the Gaul language and Latin was taught as a way of oral communication
especially among the elite. Over a period of time the mixture of Gaul and Latin combination of
language died out for a more formal Latin tongue. Although the emperors tried to outlaw the Gaul's
religion what had happened was a hybrid of religions is what formed. "There were strong efforts to
assimilate earlier beliefs within the accepted framework" (Tarpenning). Even though the Romans
had tried to forbid the druidic religion, the Gaullist elite wouldn't be able to just get of their beliefs
so they tried to assimilate within the accepted framework from the Romans. Romans imported their
wealth into the new conquered region. Their wealth went into building better infrastructure, building
better roads having a military presence and the overall safety of internal and external

Druids Essay
DRUIDS
Who were the Druids?
The stereotypical image of a Druid is one of a thoughtful philosopher and magician, schooled in the
lore of the traditions, and in charge of the education of the chieftains as well as those who sought to
obtain knowledge considered obscure by the rest of society. They were knowers of truth, able to
manipulate that truth as well as inform others of it. Druids not only influenced society religiously,
they also influenced it socially i.e. they took on the parts of teachers, judges, magicians, craftsmen,
advisors, priests, and masters of ceremonies, and in doing so, were greatly respected in society.
The Role of Druids
Teachers
Caesar remarked that Druidism originated in Britain and that students would travel ... Show more
Mistletoe is, however, very rarely found, and when found, it is gathered with great ceremony and
especially on the sixth day of the moon... They prepare a ritual sacrifice and feast under the tree, and
lead up two white bulls whose horns are bound for the first time on this occasion. A priest attired in
a white vestment ascends the tree and with a golden pruning hook cuts the mistletoe which is caught
in a white cloth. Then next they sacrifice the bulls praying that the gods will make their gifts
propitious to those to whom they have given it. They believe that if given in drink the mistletoe will
give fecundity to any barren animal, and that it is predominant against all poisons."
Pliny the Elder was a Roman scholar and as a result, may have been prejudiced against Celts,
however not to the extent of Julius Caesar. Because this extract was from Natural History, a writing
which was produced after extensive study, this source is probably quite reliable as the aim was to
provide accurate information to the readers. Pliny also lived from AD23–AD79, a time in which the
Celts also existed, increasing the reliability of this source.
Skilled Craftsmen
Druids had knowledge of bronze, iron, and other metals, which was passed on to the Celtic people.
Celtic coins often featured pictures of horses, boars and ears of wheat. Many other Celtic artefacts
found in graves or bogs also feature natural motifs of animals, people, nature and Gods. Techniques
such as

Battle Of Alesia Research Paper
Alesia was ancient town located on top of mont auxois. Originally the capital of the Mandubii, one
of the Gallic tribes. But that all changed on September 52 BC when Caesar conquered Alesia. today
Alesia is known as Alise–Sainte–Reine in Burgundy, France where they have the Vercingetorix
memorial.
The Battle Of Alesia
Vercingetorix and his men took refuge in Alesia and a few days later they would send out letters to
help his allies. Caesar decided to starve Vercingetorix and them surrender since he knew that the
food supply wouldn't last long because of the population of Alesia and the 80,000. Caesar ordered
his men to construct a 12 feet high and 11 miles long wall around the town to enclose it. Caesar
knew that an offensive attack on Alesia wouldn't work well since his army was about 50,00 while
Vercingetorix had 80,000 infantry and 12,000 cavalries. If Vercingetorix wanted his men to get past
the Roman wall, first they would come an upon ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And don't forget the belt of scattered camouflaged pits with sharpened poles lay between all the
trenches and if anyone did get past all that they'd find themselves facing a 12 feet wall with
projecting stakes. In late September, the expected relief army of Gauls arrived, commanded by
Commius of the Atrebates and Vercassivellaunos of the Averni. When they arrived they saw another
wall around the wall that was enclosing Alesia. On 2 October, Vercassivellaunos attacked the weak
spot (which was a steep hill that the Romans could not build through) in the Roman outer wall, with
Vercingetorix attacking the inner wall. Caesar realized the attack would be difficult to beat off and

Julius Caesar War Essay
The war of Gaul was between the Romans and the Gallic Tribes. Gaul is Latin and is located in
Western Europe which is now known as France, Northern Italy, most of Switzerland and Belgium;
Gaul back then Gaul wasn't a unified country. The war has lasted from fifty – eight B.C to fifty B.C.
There was two main conflict between the Romans and the Celts. Gauls territory was North of Italy,
they were Celtic people living in Western Europe. Julius Caesar was the most important general for
the Roman Empire while Vercingetorix was the important general for the Gallic tribes.The two
generals were fighting over land, glory, trade in the form of rivers and past conflict.
Roman tribes tried to conquer Gaul, the Romans had Julius Caesar and sixty – thousand ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For protection he used helmets and shields, they had chariots and six thousand horses, but most of
the army traveled by foot. Vercingetorix used the same weapons, protection, and traveling
equipment. Both of the generals attacked each other out of surprise harder and more brutal than the
last attack. One of Caesar's plan was to close in the Gallic Tribes which would limit their food and
water source even when they would ration it, he gave them thirty days for Vercingetorix to feed his
army until it's all gone. Vercingetorix made a plan to interrupt the Romans, but Caesar ordered more
precise traps and to build up more walls for

Analysis Of Heyl Aphrodite
Katie Brevik, ARTH 100: Art Appreciation, Essay 2, January 15, 2016
"Male vs. Female" Not only does the ideal body image vary culture to culture, but, also, by gender.
The idealized statues, Heyl Aphrodite, by an unknown artist, from the late Hellenistic period, and
Capitoline Gaul, by an unidentified artist, from 100 AD to 199 AD, differ in the sense of gender. The
statues, Heyl Aphrodite and Capitoline Gaul, both contain human–like features, but only one shows
the ideal woman figure. By observing Heyl Aphrodite, viewers notice her soft, curvaceous figure.
Her body is proportional creating balance and harmony. Fabric hugs the goddess's body, draping
over her right breast, while exposing the left, conveying a sense of sexuality. Her lack of eye contact
expresses weakness, while her body posture, with the aid of the fabric, shows movement. Merker
compares the artwork in her book, when she writes, "The raised right shoulder gives a sense of
movement; although there is no torsion, one feels there ought to be and is reminded of the unstable,
twisting movement of the Heyl Aphrodite in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unlike Heyl Aphrodite, when viewers look at the Capitoline Gaul, they notice his proportional body.
The Gaul is strong, physically fit, and firm to identify his masculinity. In comparison, Aphrodite is
average and soft, not to represent her lack of exercise, but to display how an ideal woman would
appear in that time. The body of the Gaul is completely nude, not to convey a sense of sexuality, like
Aphrodite, but to demonstrate power. He lays on his fallen shield with his sword close to his right
hand, as if fallen during a battle. Though he has come to defeat, DePauw University writes, "The
sculpture calls upon the viewer to witness the death of a noble warrior, and in doing so provokes us
to empathize with the Gaul."2 Even with this representation of defeat, the Gaul's stare remains

The Battle Of Alesia On The Roman Republic
My essay is about the Battle of Alesia that took place in 52 BC, by the Roman dictator Julius Caesar.
Rome went to war with the Gallic tribes from 58 BC to 50 BC, these wars ended with the win in
Alesia in 52 BC. The Romans had a lot of victories and that made the Roman Republic expand over
all of Gaul. This battle win in Alesia made Julius Caesar head ruler of the Roman Republic.
The background of the battle started in 54–53 BC when the Carnutes killed the pro–Roman ruler
Tasgetius. After that incident Caesar sent some troops to Gaul to get rid of any possible threats.
After sending his troops there they were attacked and after getting ambushed they were then
defeated. Caesar lost a quarter of his troops, he tried to get help from Rome ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
To create a good defense, Caesar had his men make a set of fortifications around Alesia. It was
about 18 kilometers round. It did not take long to build these walls they were set up by two four and
a half meter wide ditches and they were four and a half meters deep. There was one ditch close to
the wall and they filled it with water and set up traps. By the ditches the Romans had watch towers
filled with ammunition. Vercingetorix 's cavalry often attacked the construction sites trying to
prevent full enclosure. The Roman troops fought back and kept them away. Because it was taking
long, some of the Gallic troops managed to escape from areas that were not finished. Caesar was not
happy with just the one wall and wanted more protection so he had the men build another one. He
had it pointing outward in order to surround his army. The second wall was the same as the first and
it was able to include four troops of men. These walls were put in place to help protect the Roman
troops from the Gallic troops, who were strong and determined to win the Romans.
At the time, living in Alesia was very bad. With about 80,000 soldiers and the civilian population
there were too many people that were inside the country for the tiny amount of food that they had.
The Gauls decided to get rid of the children and the women from the city to save the remaining food
for the warriors. The Gauls were hoping that Caesar would allow the women and children an
opening to let them go. Caesar did

The Downfall Of Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar was and still is considered to be one of the greatest military generals in history. His
combination of leadership skills, military genius, and speaking ability propelled him to the forefront
of Roman society. Born on June 12/13 100 B.C., Caesar was born into an ancient aristocratic family.
Around the age of 16 after his father had died, Caesar had joined the military. It was apparent from
this time onward that Caesar was especially gifted in the arts of strategy and warfare. By the age of
30 Caesar had begun making political strides in his perpetual quest for glory and prominence.
During this time he would work closely with his friend and future mortal enemy, Pompey. In the
next ten years, Caesar would become governor of Spain and ascend to the position of consul. His
partnership with Marcus Licinius Crassus further increased Caesar's rise to power, as Crassus
himself was a powerful politician and general, who was arguably the wealthiest man in all of Rome.
Along with Pompey, the three men formed what came to be known as the First Triumvirate.
Although Caesar was aligned with Pompey, he never ceased to find ways outmaneuver him,
qualities that would eventually precipitate Rome's civil war. Continuing his military conquests,
Caesar would become the governor of Gaul, which is now modern day Belgium and France. After
ascending to this position, he'd engage in a near decade–long conquest of Gaul known as the Gallic
War. Probably his most successful battle and

Leadership and Julius Caesar
As Warren Bennis, Founding Chairman of The Leadership Institute at the University of Southern
California, once said, "Leadership is the capacity to translate vision into reality." This can be
interpreted to mean that one can be classified as a leader if he or she can put a plan into action. A
leader is often like a visionary, and forward thinkers are needed in society. A visionary has a vivid
imagination who makes dreams come true. They provide a backbone in society, helping to plan what
is to come in the future that would be most beneficial. Without a leader that has the qualities of a
visionary, no civilization has a bright future. Julius Caesar, Roman general–turned–ruler, was a
historical visionary who fit Warren Bennis' description of a leader. Possibly one of the most well–
known Roman figures, Caesar extensively pushed Rome to one of its best eras, despite Caesar
himself having a bit of a dark side. Even though Caesar seized power in the Roman Empire and
named himself "Dictator For Life," Julius Caesar was a great leader. He helped to expand the empire
into France, as well as glorifying Rome through architectural projects and reforms. Overall, ?
Julius Caesar's exceptional leadership skills begin with his victories in the Gallic Wars. The Gallic
Wars were battles in Gaul with Caesar and his men fighting various rebelling Gallic tribes. These
Gallic rebellions were caused by a population boom within the tribes of Gaul, causing them to leak
into Roman territory (Gallic

Learning About Celts Through Roman Authors Essay
Learning About Celts Through Roman Authors
The Celts left very little written documentation behind them. What is known about the Celts has
been discovered through archaeology and through the writings of Roman authors such as Caesar,
Strabo and Tacitus. Caesar wrote about the Celts in his Gallic Wars as he documented his arrivals in
Britain in 55 and 55 BC. Strabo was a Roman geographer, and included his knowledge of the
geography of Britain in his texts, and Tacitus in his "Agricola", his histories and his annals also
wrote of his knowledge of the Celts. These three authors, amongst others, gave us written evidence
of the agricultural lifestyle of the Celts, their trading, commerce and economy, ... Show more
Caesar's geography, considering the time of writing, was fairly accurate as far as measurements were
concerned. It seemed to be a popular Roman belief that the western side of Britain faced Spain, as
both Caesar and Tacitus wrote of this, although it is not true. Caesar questioned the natives as to the
size of the island and also had Volusenus make a general reconnaissance of the area, which could
account for his apparent accuracy of measurements and other geographical points that he made. He
was fairly accurate, although vague, about Ireland, saying that it was the same distance from Gaul as
Britain and about half its size. His knowledge of the whereabouts of the Isle of Man was also
accurate.
Tacitus is very self–assured of his knowledge of Britain's geography, assuring the reader that "where
my predecessors relied on style to adorn their guesses, I shall offer assured fact." He stated that
Britain was the largest island known to the Romans, and followed the general idea that Britain faced
Spain to the west, Gaul to the south and Germany to the east. His knowledge of northern Britain was
inaccurate and based on supposition, perhaps showing that very few Romans (if indeed any) had yet
ventured into Caledonia (although Tacitus did say that a Roman fleet had circumnavigated the
island). Tacitus

Julius Caesar Celtic Tribe Essay
The way the Romans interacted with the Celtic tribes to begin with was as a mediator between the
tribes and also as a protector. Later they were "peacekeepers" and finally they were rulers who
conquered them but let them govern themselves and only interfered when the was talk of rebellion.
During Caesar's Conquest of Gaul, the Romans interacted with Celtic tribes as mediators,
"peacekeepers", protectors, and rulers of the tribes. Although the Romans conquered Celtic tribes,
they allowed the tribes to govern themselves and only interfered when there was talk of rebellion.
The Romans would also act as a third party if there was a disagreement in a tribe and try to solve the
issue diplomatically. The Romans usually tried to stop rebellions ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
One example would be that his army might be losing the fight when he is not around but when he
would show up everyone would notice and fight 10 times harder than they were and somehow
against all odds win the battle that they were sure to lose. Just his presence inspired confidence,
bravery, inspiration and a sense of duty therefore making his army that much stronger. He would
come up with ingenious plans and would select certain individuals that had proven themselves
reliable under pressure and place them in command positions among his army to bolster the
confidence the other soldiers had or needed and when that did not work he would personally go onto
the battlefield and go to where his army was weakest and fight among his soldiers and then move on
to other weak spots making his army fight that much harder. His presence was even a factor in how
his enemy would fight. Most of the time when the other army found out Caesar was present they
would want to fight all the harder but logic in the army ruled and made them with less skill and as if
they didn't want to be in that fight because going against Caesar was hopeless. One time the enemy
even surrendered once they were aware of Caesar's

The Siege Of Alesia, By Julius Caesar Essay
The Siege of Alesia, also known by the name Battle of Alesia, led by Julius Caesar of the Roman
Republic against Vercingetorix of the Gallic tribes, was a very influential battle apart of the Gallic
Wars that took place in what is known today as Alise–Sainte–Reine in France. These wars started
with the Conquest of Gaul in 52 B.C.E. by Julius Caesar, who began all of the fighting because of
the threat that he had perceived from the Gallic threat to Italy, specifically Rome. He was appointed
as the governor to the Cisalpine and Transalpine Gauls with absolute authority. Over time he slowly
conquered the Gallic tribes known as the Helvetii, Belgae, and Nervii, which brought in a lot of
money because of a larger amount to tax. With this success and huge gain in money also came
enemies like Marcus Porcius Cato who began campaigns to overthrow Caesar. Caesar had run into
trouble in his attempt to invade Britain, trouble being the Gauls led by Ambiorix, destroying Roman
resources, about one–fourth of the Roman army, and a fairly large amount of the food supply,
causing the Romans to go into a defense mode. Because of this change into a defensive stance the
Gallic tribes noticed that they could regain independence from Rome with war, declaring
Vercingetorix, a prince from the Arverni tribe from modern–day France, as one of the army
commanders for the Gallic tribes who united to defeat Caesar. Vercingetorix beat Caesar at the
Batlle of Gergovia with his guerilla warfare strategies,

The Origins Of France: The New Stone Age
Catherine McManus 10/9/14 Senior Religion
The origin of France dates back to the first evidence of ancestors of humans 2 million year ago.
Theses beings were called homo erectus, meaning "to put up" or "set up right". Cavemen, known as
Neanderthals, showed up in about 100,000 BC. Humans as we know them today, however, were not
evident in prehistoric France, known as Gaul, until about 40,000 years ago. This archaic time in
Gaul is separated into three different time periods by historians: The Old Stone Age, the New Stone
Age, and the Age of Metal. The Old Stone Age was from the earliest times or existence to about
6000 BC. During this time animals, and primitive humans got food from plants. During the New
Stone Age, lasting from about 6000 to 1800 BC, people began the use of polish stone tools. There
was a transition from hunting and gathering to farming. Thus instead of roaming around for food,
humans began to settle across Gaul for residence. The Age of Metal started in approximately 1800
BC and ended in 700 BC. During this time period, metalworking began and became a prominent
part of Gaulish life. (B2, W1) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Celtic Gaul took up much of western Europe. "Celts" was a term used to describe several races,
languages, and tribes. It was used by Greeks and Romans y referring to the people inhabiting Gaul.
Celts were the most well–known race in Europe because of the large evidence they left of their
existence, and because of their dominance throughout Europe. This race, as early as the 10th
Century BC crossed the English channel to invade Britain. Because Celts were so well known,
Romans began look to where they were settled. In 390 BC, Celts caused Roman to defend
themselves after they took over and burnt their enemy's capital city of Rome.

Obelix Gauls
Asterix and Obelix Make a Comeback in New Avatar!
Good news for the Asterix and Obelix fans! The two iconic Gauls have made a gala comeback after
a pause following their last appearance in the book, "Escapade in Scotland". In the new series, the
pair of boisterous, indomitable Gauls is seen fighting to defend their homeland against their Roman
foes, in the newly published book, "Asterix and the Missing Scroll", which has hit the stands on
22nd October.
In the newly published book, the duo is seen taking on the Roman army let by mighty Julius Caesar
along with a reporter – a character that was portrayed in the line of the real–life WikiLeaks creator
and editor in Chief, who helped them to counter the propaganda war that was launched by the

Gaul: The Battle Of Bibracte
What is now modern day France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Germany, and Italy was once
known as one place by the name of Gaul. Gaul was made up of land from all over. Its land limits in
the north and the west were the Atlantic Ocean, the east's were the Rhine River and the Alps, and the
south's limits were the Po Valley, the Mediterranean Sea and the Pyrenees. This area was known as
Transalpine Gaul. The name "Gaul" dates back to the 8th century and corresponds to a military and
cultural area that was founded on a familiar religion as well as independent states. In 1st and 2nd
century AD, Gaul made most of its money by exporting wine, food, and pottery. This was not the
case in 3rd century AD, when Gaul was suffered from multiple ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Roman army and six legions were led into Gaul in 58 BC. The Gallic people had asked for
Julius Caesar's help in defending their land because the Suebi threatened to invade them. Caesar
strategically placed his men in a way where they were likely to defeat their enemy. Ariovistus,
leader of the Suebi, had escaped back over the Rhine river and never crossed it again. Caesar then
proceeded to secure his German border. This battle either wounded or killed approximately 6,000
Roman men and 35,000 Suebi men. The Battle of Sabis River was fought in 57 BC. Julius Caesar
attacked the land of the Belgic tribes, which was led by Galba. Bibrax, a Gallic city, was attacked by
Belgae while Caesar was off setting up camp. Belgae then decided to attack Caesar at his camp site,
the Aisne River. The two enemies fought and many Belgic tribes surrendered. The Nervii were the
strongest warriors until they were attacked and surrendered to two Roman legions. Orders were sent
out for tribes to stay within the areas of their land. Within the tribes, there was a total of
approximately 60,000

Personal Narrative: The Statue Of The Dying Gaul
Not but a moment ago I possessed the power to deal death at will. But at present I find myself limp
on the battle field unable to gain standing, let alone continue the fight. Over a lifetime I have honed
hard body and hard mind. An entire life in or preparing for battle. And in battle I was proficient and
deadly but my body has served its purpose and I can now taste the final moments of this life. It
tastes of dirt and blood. I shall rest where I have laid so many foe. I entered this world covered in
the blood of another and I find solace in leaving the same. I chose this statue based on the fact it was
commissioned by the victor and yet it shows a great deal of respect to the fallen army. The statue of
the Dying Gaul, shows a man in his

How Did Caesar's Military Activities Affect The Roman...
Julius Caesar's military activities in Gaul, Germany and Britain impacted the Roman Republic
greatly. Caesar was a man of ambition as Mommsen wrote that "Caesar's aim was the highest which
a man is allowed to propose himself" and through his expansion of Rome he was not quiet in
involving himself in the story. By providing for himself and boosting his legacy throughout the
campaigns he also gave great benefits to Rome. The two military activities notably Gaul and
Germany brought in luscious wealth for the Roman Republic. This success was enough to gain solid
control over the new provinces. Although this solid control only lasted for a limited time and
showed who was capable of leading. It was the Britain campaign that sought a different impact ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Off the back of successful expeditions in Gaul and Germany Rome was hopeful for more. Cicero
notes, "There was a quick realisation in Rome that campaigns in Britain were not going to yield the
eagerly anticipated profits." From this there is a shift in the impact for the Roman Republic. The
physical benefits may have not been present but there were still profits of sorts. Plutarch, believed
that "the Romans had not gained much in terms of wealth from the expeditions ". Caesar had been
the first to explore and again through his writings he let Rome know about it to keep hopes high.
These benefits for Rome included the expansion and connection to a new area of Britain and they
certainly recognised Caesar after this. Goldsworthy affirms this "the expeditions to Britain brought
Caesar huge and highly favourable public attention." The Britain campaign was a different impact
for Rome; lacking of gold, it defined a new political power and his rise in popularity. Follow this
Goldsworthy refer to "An annual report was sent to the Senate and this was widely circulated."
Caesar's name was a growing impact for the Roman's, more so than the physical benefits received
from the former military

Interaction Between The Roman And Celtic Civilizations
Interaction between the Roman and Celtic civilizations
Between 750 BC and 12 BC the Celts were the most powerful people in Northern central Europe.
The Celts consisted of a number of tribes that all spoke a similar common language as well as
sharing common elements of culture and art but were not a cohesive group like the Romans or
Egyptians. The Celts were widely spread through Europe from the British Isles to Galatia more
commonly known today as Austria, Switzerland, southern France and Spain, these areas consisted of
multiple different political organisations ruled by various leaders. North west Europe was inhabited
by three main Celtic groups; The Gauls who lived in ancient France, Britons who lived in Great
Britain and Gaels who lived in Ireland. The Celts were first mentioned in Greek written sources
around 500 BC when they were referred to as Keltoi. Other sources such as those of the Romans
also mention the Celtic groups for example texts from Alexander the Great. When the Romans
invaded and Conquered Europe most of Celtic culture, history and technology was destroyed, the
only elements surviving were those such as their language.
Much if not all of the interaction between the Romans and Celts was based on conflict, battles and
wars between the two groups occurred frequently, generally as a result of one group wanting the
others resources, land and slaves, as well as riches such as, iron, lead, zinc, copper, silver and gold.
Conflict first began between the

Julius Caesar Conflicts

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sandra Ahn

More from Sandra Ahn (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Julius Caesar Conflicts