Rembrandt Van Rijn, Jacques Louis David, And Francisco Goya

Rembrandt Van Rijn, Jacques Louis David, And Francisco Goya
Critique of Rembrandt van Rijn, Jacques Louis David, and Francisco Goya
Rembrandt van Rijn was a great Dutch painter and printmaker who worked during the 1600s.
During his life the Netherlands was in a period of great achievement, particularly for artists.
Because of this Rembrandt was able to amass a great amount of fame and fortune in his early life as
his art was in demand. Unfortunately, later in his life personal tragedy threw him into poverty. In
1656 he was forced to declare bankruptcy and his collection of artwork was auctioned off.
(Rembrandt van Rijn: Biography and Chronology , n.d.)
Rembrandt painted in the Baroque style of art. He's especially famous for his self–portraits, of
which he created more than ninety. (Rembrandt Painting, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Greek and Roman religion was especially popular, though Goya leaned away from it and only
produced one Roman work of art, "Saturn Devouring his Son". He was more interested in Christian
the religion, which can be found in a multitude of his paintings and etchings. Rembrandt also
focused highly on dramatic scenes from the Christian faith. David was the most heavily inspired by
Roman mythology, and used the stories to make political statements about the world around him. By
Goya's time secular paintings were more common, and moving towards today it's increasingly rare
to see artists portraying religious scenes and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Death Of Marat By Jacques-Louis David
The Death of Marat by Jacques–Louis David is a well–known painting constructed during the
French Revolution. The main character of the painting was called Jean–Paul Marat. Marat was a
lawyer during this time period. In his time alive he was able to defend many French people that
weren't able to defend themselves even if he suffered while doing it. Initially, Marat was killed by
Charlotte Corday. Corday was a young royalist who believed that she was destined to liberate
France. One of the main reasons that Corday killed Marat was because of the anti royalist politics
that he represented also known as lower class people. As a lawyer Marat was able to help his
patients and attending his terrible skin disease at the same time. Furthermore, what Marat did for the
French people was extraordinary. He would defend the French people who couldn't defend
themselves. This was very hard to find during this age because most of the people believed in what
the King would say and do. When Marat was assassinated the people felt like they could no longer
have someone that would fight for them ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
David captures the political circumstances in France through the depiction of this historical event by
showing that the pen will always be mightier than the sword. No matter how bad the community is
getting beaten up with the sword, the words that are left behind are what will make the difference in
history even bigger for future generations. In other words David was telling the people that it was
now time to fight back. To conclude, David's The Death of Marat has a lot of symbolism in it. It
shows how if it wouldn't have been for Marat the peasants of France would have nobody to defend
them, how Marat would put his clients first before himself, and how the pen will always be mightier
that a

The Social Hierarchy Of Julius Caesar
In every sense of life, there is a hierarchy. Every single being is constantly being compared to one
another until either or comes out on top. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there is no
denying the clear social hierarchy presented in the Roman Empire. Undoubtedly, the dictator of
Rome, Julius Caesar, sits at the very top of the social hierarchy at this time. Similarly to Caesar,
Jean–Paul Marat, a politician during the French Revolution of 1789, is also considered on the more
elite half of the social hierarchy during that time. The social status' of these two men didn't make
them any less susceptible to very real problems, including physical disabilities, murder and
incontrol of what happens after death. No matter what a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On the other hand, Marat was stabbed only once by a woman named Charlotte Corday. In The Death
Of Marat, a single puncture can be seen on his chest, with a scarce amount of blood running down
his torso, not nearly enough to be bathed in like Caesar was (David). Both of these men died at the
hands of another human by the act of getting stabbed.
After the murder of Caesar and Marat, the two would come to be portrayed in a certain manner.
Because of their status, these portrayals had long lasting effects when compared to the death of
someone lower in the social hierarchy. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus allows Marc Antony
to speak on Caesar's behalf in front of the citizens of Rome. Marc Antony says "He was my friend,
faithful and just to me [...]When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept" (Shakespeare. III. ii. 85,
91). The word choice, such as "faithful" and "wept", portray Caesar as kind and vulnerable. Antony
also adds "Here is the will, and under Caesar's seal./ To every Roman citizen he gives, /To every
several man, seventy–five drachmas." (Shakespeare III. ii. 240–243). After these statements made
by Antony, the people of Rome see Caesar as a once worthy human being who cared about them.
Marc Antony paints Caesar in a way that influences the Romans to mourn, instead of celebrate, his
death. This change of opinion causes the Romans to hate the

How Did Robespierre Influence The French Revolution
Robespierre was hinting at a society based on virtue defining the political positon of a person set in
a similar society of terror, an early communist–like society. But the Convention greatly disagreed
with him and agreed that he had begun to go insane with power, similarly to how Napoleon
Bonaparte would for the following years militaristically. Consumed by the Revolution, Robespierre
is then executed. Starting the war, Robespierre held a firm belief of sovereignty and equality, to
form a republic, and was against the death penalty, viewing it as an excessive punishment. But, as
the war progresses his ideology begins to change, favoring the use of the guillotine and leading a
society of terror. Marat was an extreme radical of the French Revolution. The difference to the
others was the fact that he was not part of any political group, but instead a powerful and influential
advocator through the press. Through his writing, he called for war against the monarchy, death to
any traitors, and declared anyone that did not support the National Assembly was not a true French
citizen and labeled a counterrevolutionary. In voicing these things, the public became more
motivated to fight for the cause and Marat became a saint among the people, and ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
His stance in finding success through the death of more and more people was also held up by the
ends justifying the means, if it meant bringing happiness to the people. His journalism would lead to
people taking action and also resulting in the September Massacres in September 1792, where
citizens stormed into prisons and killed the criminals held there, as well as royal guards, and other
suspected citizens called out in his journalism. Even after his assassination, he was treated as a

Jean-Paul Marat Argumentative Essay
Earlier in the week Jean–Paul Marat was found dead in his bath tube stabbed straight in the chest.
He was found there in the afternoon by a friend who was coming to meet him for lunch. This is
when the question arose of who killed the infinite Jean–Paul Marat. After questioning people about
what they had seen it was found that Charlotte Corday was the one to kill him she was captured
right after guards figured out where she was. Today at high noon she is to be executed. I know for
sure that me and the rest of the world shall be there to watch her pay for what she has done.
Earlier in the day, before writing this article, I went to Miss.Corday and asked her if she felt that she
was sorry for what she had done. She responded by saying, "I

How Does Marat Use Art As Propaganda
On July 13, 1793, a young Royalist by the name of Charlotte Corday managed to gain entry into
French revolutionary leader Jean–Paul Marat's apartment. As the well–known writer had agreed to
receive her, she proceeded to stab and kill him when he was most vulnerable, in his bathtub. This
was where he was accustomed to sitting hour after hour treating the disfiguring skin disease from
which he suffered. The disease is thought of to be dermatitis herpetiformis, a rare ailment where the
sufferer lives with chronic, very itchy skin rashes made up of bumps and blisters. A traumatic
political assassination was carried out by a woman and only added fuel to the revolutionary fire. The
Death of Marat has been forever captured by Jacques–Louis David as a famous work of art which
now resides within the Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium. Further examining this piece
shows how the work of art was used as propaganda during its time period. Looking at the piece it's
clear that Marat is dying. His eyelids droop as his head weighs down heavily on his ... Show more
David fills his canvas with numerous details borrowed from Marat's world, including the knife
which was used to kill him and Charlotte's petition. Having these items be the only ones in the room
with any connection towards the assassin almost completely erases her from the picture. Rather than
place the attention on her, he shines a light on Marat, allowing him to show a gentler side to the
man. The only piece of furniture in the room beside the bathtub itself is the writer's makeshift
writing–table which at the bottom had something very interesting on it written in french. On the
bottom of the painting, it says year two. ("L'an Deux" translating directly to"Year Two"). We are not
in 1793 but instead we are in year two of the revolution. Replacing the old world with the new
revolutionary

Jacques-Louis David's Influence On The Enlightenment
In 19th century France, the Neoclassical art style arose, influenced by the classical artistic style of
Greco–Roman society. Around this time, France encountered many political, social and economic
changes brought up mostly by the lower class French citizens. Jacques–Louis David was a highly
influential Neoclassical artist during this time. Commissioned by both Nobles and lower class
citizens of France, he created artworks such as the Oath of the Horatii (image 1), the Death of Marat
(image 2), and Napoleon Crossing the Alps (image 3). David's art represented the ideas of thinkers
of that time rather than just the ideals of that time. The purpose of David's art was to gain the
support of French citizens through artistic propaganda in order ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Due to the time period in which David created art, some ideals of the enlightenment may have been
depicted, this, however, wasn't the main motive of David's art. "The enlightenment was a radically
new synthesis of ideas about humanity, reason, nature, and God that had arisen during classical
Greek and Roman times and during the Renaissance (Stokstad 898)." In Napoleon Crossing the
Alps, the central figure of the painting is Napoleon. He was a war general who gained popularity
through conquest before making himself emperor in 1804. In the painting, he is the largest and
clearest figure depicted. This painting goes against the ideas of the enlightenment such as separation
of powers, where power is split across three branches equally so that no one person would hold too
much power, which was a widely held ideal during the time (Spielvogel 28). This painting does,
however, serve as propaganda to depict Napoleon as a strong leader because he is appearing to stay
still and calm on a moving horse in order to show that even through chaos he will remain a good
leader for his people. Napoleon Crossing the Alps conveys that the purpose of David's art wasn't to
depict the ideals of the enlightenment, but to influence the audience and to be used as

Who Is Charlotte Corday Responsible For The French Revolution
Charlotte Corday was not against Revolution in general, but she was against the violent element
represented by Jacobins. Charlotte is believed to be a big sympathizer of the Girondist fraction that
sent Louis XVI to the guillotine earlier of that year. The power of the Girondists was overthrown in
June 2, 1793 when 80,000 citizens surrounded convention and demanded their arrest. Marat was an
instrumental person that influenced the downfall of the Girondists and was a big proposer of a
radical elimination of this party and their supporter. Marat once said that it is necessary to executed
hundreds of thousands of people for good of the republic. His publishing was full of hatred that
initiated an outburst of a mob violence. The violence spreads out from Paris to the provinces. After
the overthrowing the Girondists, they were proscribed, hunted down, and arrested. Charlotte Corday
who seen the growing violence, came to conclusion that only one person is responsible for the
chaos, and with his elimination, the peace will return. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through the times till the French Revolution, women were considered unpolitical, often uneducated,
and generally good for kitchen, bed, and childbirth. It was unheard that young woman, like
Charlotte, would take a political stance, and assassinate an influential person. Corday's action turned
the attention of the revolutionary government against the growing demands of women liberation,
and their rights were suppressed. Many women were sent under the guillotine for political
participation that was not in line with the republican ideology. Also it showed that the government
needs to pay attention to women as a political threat to their rule and the Revolutionary Tribunal
equally arrested and sent condemned women to their deaths under

Essay on Art History
In the early 1700s, the monarchies failures at finance, national debt, involvement in multiple wars
with little care given to veterans and rising unemployment inflamed the people. When coupled with
the monarchies lifestyles of lavish spending on countless mistresses, flouting morals, excessive
parties at court, and political favors, the popularity of royalty was quickly disintegrating. The
irresponsibility of the aristocracy was no longer ignored, and a movement was beginning. This set
the stage for political change.
Writers such as Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) and John Locke (1632–1704) of England experienced
these changes and began exploring the ideals of republicanism and liberalism through their writing.
Thus, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It did not take long for the ideas to spread through Germany, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Spain,
Portugal, and the American Colonies. The American Revolution began in 1775, and Thomas Paine
wrote Common Sense in January of 1776. Voltaire who had written thousands of letters, books, and
pamphlets finished his "Dictionnaire Philosophique in 1764, and the French Revolution began in
1789.
As these social, political, and moral views changed, so too did the style the arts used to
communicate life. It was during this Age of Enlightenment that the Neoclassical era in art history
began by reflecting these changing views using a style much less ornate and gilded than the Baroque
and Rococo styles that had previously dominated artistic endeavors. Strict adherence to simple
classical style with an aim to technical perfection was favored and borrowed heavily from Greek
and Roman pieces discovered earlier in the 1700s. Art was approached with the same logic and
reason of the age and with much less emotion and drama than Baroque or Rococo.
The subject matter was often dark and serious, morally and ethically upright, or heroic. Where the
aristocracy had valued drama, emotion, and grandeur, the people now valued self–denial and self–
sacrifice over self–indulgence. The colors were often dark or solemn and made use of chiaroscuro,

Death Of Marat
The Death of Marat, was a painting done by Jacques–Louis David in 1748 – 1825, depicting the
assassination of Marat, a leader of the French Revolution. It was commissioned by the French
Convention to glorify Marat and to serve as a propaganda that upholds the momentum of the
revolution. By doing so, David aimed to raise people's sympathies towards Marat by portraying him
as the savior of the revolution, "friend of the People", and the victim. He idealized Marat and chose
to bias towards Marat on this assassination event. He blended fact and fiction into the painting
which drove people to see Marat's death as a tragedy and Corday, the murder, as the wicked and
immortal. In this analysis, I will write about the symbol and falsehood he had added ... Show more
In the painting, Marat was shown with undecorated and dirty cloths around him while in reality he
actually lived in a highly ornamented house and had servants following him around. By doing so,
helped make him look humble and foster his "friend of the people" image. On Marat hand, there was
a letter saying "13th July 1793. Marie Anne Charlotte Corday to the citizen Marat. The terrible
misfortune that I have entitles me to ask for your kindness." Along with a list of the names and
location of several Girondins. It was written by Corday, the murderer, to gain entrance into his
house. As stated in history, Corday at first was not determine to assassinate Marat, her decision to
kill him was depended upon Marat's response to the letter. Marat's response was "Good, in a few
days I will have them all guillotined" which was totally opposite to her expectation, therefore she
stabbed him. During the revolution, Marat guillotined whoever seemed to be opposing him, he was
seen as merciless and brutal leader with great power. However, in the painting, David twisted the
truth, he drew a little note on the table saying "You will arrange this assignment for this mother of
five children, whose husband died in defense of the homeland". By this, showed Marat kindness and
his concern about the need of his people which again promoted his friend of the People

"The Death of Marat", a Comparison.
The two pieces of art I have chosen are "The Death of Marat "by Jacques Louis David, painted in
1793 and Vik Muniz' modern recreation of the same painting from his series of works "Pictures of
Garbage" 2008. "The Death of Marat" by David
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/his/CoreArt/art/neocl_dav_marat.html Vik Muniz' "Marat"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703440004575548581385394008.html The most
obvious comparison between these two works is the subject matter as one is a recreation of the
other, though a recreation for a completely different reason to that which the original painting was
created, and where one is a masterful oil painting from the eighteenth century the other is a powerful
piece of photographic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Upon gaining entry to his apartments under false pretences she stabbed him to death whilst he was
in his bath tub. Following his death Marat was commissioned to paint the scene in honour of his
friend and fellow revolutionary. Although Marat was disfigured from illness and believed to be
quick to take offence and also to violence, David paints him as a young healthy man and "the face is
marked by suffering but at the same time is also gentle and suffused by a growing peacefulness".
Through his clever use of imagery such as the knife, the writing desk, the petition from Corday
"David discreetly bears witness to his admiration and indignation, in perfect harmony with the
drawing, the blending of outrage and compassion David felt at the sight of his victim" Although
often described as an opportunist because of the ways David made use of the political unrest with
his paintings showing constant parallels with the successive regimes of the period. With works from
"The Oath of The Horatii", to later works such as "Bonaparte Crossing the St. Bernard Pass", David
in a way can be described as a social artist because many of his paintings documented and expressed
the political and emotional feeling of the times. This brings me onto Vik Muniz' portrayal of David's
"Marat". Vik Muniz is a contemporary artist and photographer. He often recreates well known
works of art and images from popular culture. By using unconventional materials to make huge

The Tennis Court Oath And The Death Of Marat
The French Revolution was a chaotic time of blood, death, and fear. Though there were many
negative outcomes and events of the Revolution, it big change to sweep across France. The
Revolution began in the middle of 1789 with the swearing of the Tennis Court Oath, in which
members of the third estate, as well as some from the first and second estates, swore that they would
not go anywhere until they had written a constitution for France. Then, the Revolution really took
off, and continued on for years. Many people influenced the Revolution, such as Marat and
Robespierre. The death of Marat was another event that had a large influence on the Revolution, as
though he had caused lots of deaths, he was stilled viewed as a hero by most. Looking at the two
paintings "The Tennis Court Oath," and "The Death of Marat," "The Tennis Court Oath" depicts a
more significant and relevant event, as this was the event to really cause the French Revolution to
take off.
"The Tennis Court Oath" is a painting that depicts the swearing of an oath by members mainly from
the third estate, but also some from the first and second that had sided with the third. Just days
before, the estates had been called by the king to a meeting of the Estates General, where the
representatives from each estate gathered at the palace Versailles to discuss important matters
proposed by the king. The Estates General had not met in over 150 years, but the king needed their
approval for him to raise taxes to

Analysis Of The Chains Of Slavery By Jean-Paul Marat
"Man has the right to deal with his oppressors by devouring their palpitating hearts." Although
harsh, Jean–Paul Marat's words resonate strongly with the ideals he pushed for in revolutionary
France. With his newspaper and political positions, Marat pushed for a complete eradication of the
noble class in current power, advanced the Convention beliefs, and pressed for liberal changes
throughout the Parisian government. According to Ide, In Marat's newsletter L'Ami du peuple,
meaning friend of the people, he intensely criticized the upper class and nobles throughout France.
Even before his newsletter's first issues, Marat was outspoken against the injustices done by English
aristocrats. In his first public work, entitled The Chains of Slavery, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This common shared belief among Convention members led to an eventual poster, created by Marat,
stating, "Five or six hundred heads lopped off would have assured you repose and happiness". It was
a few years later that the Convention classified King Louis XVI as an enemy of France and put him
to death. King Louis's death, the pressures the National Convention created to eradicate nobility, and
even Marat's tragic death would help to instigate the Reign of Terror (Vidalenc 2014, pg. 1). Besides
the desire of the Convention to purge the government of wealthy nobles, Marat also pushed for the
elimination of the Girondins in the Convention the article Jean Paul Marat states. The fighting
between the Girondins and the Montagnards ended immediately after the Girondins's expulsion
from the Convention, leading to more power in the hands of Marat and his fellow Montagnards. The
Convention was eventually disbanded, though not before helping to amend French politics and
social issues (Jean Paul Marat 2015, pg.

Essay on Jaques Louis David
1. Introduction
Set on a stage of revolution and Enlightenment, the Neo–Classical period presents a broad and
interesting topic. Jacques Louis David was the first political painter, and a true revolutionary, but
one cannot disengage his art work from the social and political systems of the period. Therefore, this
essay will present an overview of the social context and systems of Pre Revolution France,
Neoclassicism and how David's work was influenced by it and how his work influenced it. Also
important to note are the art work that influenced Neoclassicism.
2. Social and Artistic Climate in the 18th Century
2.1. Neoclassicism
Neoclassicism refers to the style of painting, sculpture, decorative arts and architecture used from ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Mettais: 152–156)
The second noted influence on the New Classical period was the excavations of Herculaneum and
Pompeii and the paintings, sculptures and jewellery that were brought forth from these sites. These
mines of wealth motivated an interest in Greco–Roman art, which is the mark of Neoclassicism.
Within the recovered works, people saw a physical perfection and moral health which was a
dominant theme of the Enlightenment. New perceptions of society based in the Athesian
commonwealth and the Roman republic was beginning to form, and later these themes became
symbols of freedom and democracy (the basis of Romanticism). The artistic assumption of the time
was the idea that, one must raise beauty over morality and that beauty lies in shape and contour, not
in colour, which only assisted beauty. This principle simplified the Neo–Classical forms.
(Praz: 70, 71)
2.2. The Academy
The first academy was started by Leonardo da Vinci in 1498. It was designed as a gathering of
people to discuss art and science. This evolved to the instruction of these subjects by means of an
apprenticeship system; masters teaching students.
Later, the Academy adopted a policy of exclusion to non members, offering only students the

opportunities to be given commissions, exhibitions and prestige. Also, artists could only gain
recognition for their art by the guilds if they had studied at the Academy.
During the seventeenth century, the French

Similarities Between The French Revolution And Haitian...
Heroes or Tyrants?
The privilege of freedom is a crucial part of our happiness that many people seem to take for
granted. Usually, to receive this right, it involves some acts of violence. The French and Haitian
revolutions were triggered by a desire for freedom that the people had. In Haiti, the slaves had
absolutely no liberty and were forced to work for the plantation owners under intense conditions in
order to maintain Haiti's success. Similar to Haiti, the third estate residents in France had little to no
freedom working extremely hard under an absolute monarchy with a king who held interests only in
himself and his glorious palace. Both groups of citizens were tired of this inequality and decided to
fiercely riot in exchange for freedom. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Marat published The Friend of the People, which was a well–known newspaper article in an effort
to support the third estate, written by him that violently criticized the people who were opposed to
the concept of the revolution. He initially had good intentions overall, simply by promoting equal
beliefs onto the citizens. Soon enough, Marat began to think that killing people who loathed the
ideas of the revolution, was going to positively impact France. Just like Robespierre, he contributed
to the Reign of Terror by purging anyone who had contradicted his ideas. He thought the more
deaths that were being committed, led to solving the most problems. In doing so, this reveals that
Marat let the political power get to him, somehow guiding him into thinking that murdering people
was justified, only if the victims who were being executed didn't share the same opinion as him. Not
only did Marat execute residents of whom opposed his ideas, but he also killed conservative
revolutionary leaders, which were the people who didn't fully support his method in which he sent
people with opposing views to the guillotine. This action essentially exposes how Marat would kill
anything and everything that came in his way. He continued to support these massive purges,
including the September Massacres, all in which at the same time, still attacking people in the press
who disagreed

Jean-Paul Marat
Death Portraits of Jean–Paul Marat The French Revolution one of the most important significant
events in European history, which lead to the end of European monarchy. The French Revolution
effected the way Europeans used to think giving of the sense of hope and liberty from monarch's or
nobles. Thanks to the theories of radical journalists and politicians whom started to publish their
thoughts about the French monarchy government, and the leaders of the corrupted government
people started to speak more freely about the aristocrat class. One Jean–Paul Marat had been one of
those journalists who would speak and write his thoughts about the French monarchy he played a
very important role in the making of the French Revolution. However, the amount trouble one gets
to speak freely two hundred years ago differs from the modern–day freedom of speech one gets; and
Marat's radicalism against the French monarchy head resulted in his death. As a result, Marta's death
grams the attention of two artists that try to capture the moment of Marat's death by drawing a
portrait of his death. The first artist to draw a portrait of Marat's death was a French artist Jacques–
Louis David in 1793 who named the painting The Death of Marat. Another artist that painted a
painting capturing Marat's death had been a Norwegian painter called Edvard Munch the painting
was painted more than one hundred years after Jacques painting, and it was also called The Death of
Marat. The similarities and

Neo Classicism In The French Revolution
The French Revolution (1789–1799) was flanked by two artistic styles, Rococo and Neo–classicism.
The French Revolution brought numerous changes and influences to the world of art. Amongst the
avant–garde movements in the late eighteenth century, Neoclassicism and Rococo styling
flourished. The influence of the Revolution did not stop with visual arts, but also shaped the world
of literature. Jacques–Henri Bernardin de Saint–Pierre's 1788 short novel Paul et Virginie (Paul and
Virginia) is a romantic tragedy that is regarded as one of the most historically significant pieces of
18th century French literature.
The basic reasons behind the French Revolution were poverty and famine, which provoked the
rising of the impoverished society that included peasants, laborers and merchants against both the
aristocracy and clergy. Frustration with the monarchy and the Church turned violent and hundreds of
priests were killed by mobs throughout the revolution, as happened in the September Massacres of
Paris in 1792. Eventually, the French government replaced the quasi–state religion of Christianity
with anti–clerical Secularism. With religion marginalized, it's no surprise that they looked towards
an alternative source of morals and values from antiquity. That hostility to religion explains why on
the path to the revolution, Neoclassical artists portrayed themes of civic duty and allegiance to the
state rather than to church (or family). Paintings showed virtues glorified by the Romans

Compare And ContrastThe Tragedy Of Julius Caesar And...
The Stepping Stone of Murder
Rarely in history has murder been viewed as righteous, but in the cases of Julius Caesar and Jean–
Paul Marat, it was praised rather than shunned. When diving into the stories of these two murders
there are noticeable comparisons between Marc Antony in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar and
Jacques–Louis David, artist of The Death of Marat. Both presented their fallen friend in a better
light and manipulated the masses to serve their side, using murder as a stepping stone to greater
things.
Upon their friend's murder, Marc Antony and Jacques–Louis David attempted to present their friend
in an appealing way that would improve their legacy, yet Marc Antony did so verbally and Jacques–
Louis David through artistry. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, after Brutus spoke plainly to the
citizens of Rome, Antony slyly addressed them by choosing to remember Caesar as a great leader
through a memorial that was based on a twisted truth. One tactic Antony used was to remind the
crowd that "[Antony] thrice presented [Caesar] a kingly crown,/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was
this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he was ambitious" (Shakespeare III.ii.96–99). Through his words,
Antony convinced the public of all that Caesar had done for them, while simultaneously
undermining the conspirator's argument against Caesar's ambition. By disparaging the conspirators'
motives for murder and recognizing Caesar as a great man who only wanted to serve his people,
Antony presented him in an

Compare And Contrast Essay Good Vs Evil
Good vs. Evil There are numerous things that citizens of this world are afraid of. A huge example is
public speaking. Getting up in front of many peers, friends, advisors, and role models can
intimidate, frighten, or discourage us in many different ways. The fear that others will judge or think
less of us is scary and can be a gigantic blow to our pride. Often times, feelings of anxiety join the
scene, making the situation as terrible as it can possibly be. Many of these feelings that have been
mentioned contribute to the reason why humans like to stay in their comfort zones and do the things
that they have always done, for fear that people may judge them, or they might fail. Another
common fear that people have is dying. For many religiously active people, this topic is the least of
their worries, but for others, they can't help but worry about what will become of them once they
leave this earth. Will they be remembered for how amazing and confident they were? Will people
feel a rush of relief and happiness because they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During funerals, relatives and close friends of the person who has perished usually speak about or
discuss the things that they accomplished in their lives. They focus on the highs in their life and the
great moments that took place during their peaks. For example, if a teenager died in an unexpected
car accident, their mom would undoubtedly talk about how awesome a child they were, how blessed
they were as a parent, and how much they're going to miss them in the future. The sins that we have
committed in our lives are "forgotten" and people tend to focus on the bright sides of our lives. Part
of the reason for this is empathy, and the fact that, as humans, we have all sinned at some point in
our lives or another. Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that the deaths of modern people are
remembered in a cheerful or optimistic

How Did Marat Contribute To The French Revolution
Jean–Paul Marat was an important figure in the French revolution because of his tactful writing
style, his callings for more violence, and the legacy he left in the French revolution.
To start, Jean–Paul Marat was an important figure in the French Revolution because of his tactful
writing style. The title of his Newspaper that was published during the duration of the French
revolution was Ami du peuple, which translates to Friend of the People. Titling his paper in this
manner offered Marat many benefits. In chosing the world friend, Marat makes a connection with
the common French citizen by implying that he is invested and interested in the well being of all
French citizens not only the wealthy members of society . The word friend was also used in a way to
subtly expose the common enemy of the French people. To call oneself a friend implies that other
members of French society are the enemy of the common people. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In his death, Marat was shown as a martyr for a just cause after he was assassinated by a French
woman named Charlotte Corday. The painting the Death of Marat by Jacques–Louis David glorifies
his death making him seem like a figure of purity that was killed Jean–Paul Marat became
historically significant as he is shown in the eyes of the French people as if Marat almost possessed
divine qualities. The painting also displays Marat's dead body in a similar fashion to the crucifixion
of Christ. In the eulogy, given by Marquis de Sade, he compared Marat to Jesus by saying, " Like
Jesus, Marat loved ardently the people, and only them. Like Jesus, Marat hated kings, nobles,
priests, rogues and, like Jesus, he never stopped fighting against these plagues of the people"
Likening the death of a journalist and revolutionist to the death of a religious figure, insured the
people of France that he had died for a good

Oath Of The Horatii Analysis
The painting 'Oath of the Horatii' of 1785 confirms David's new style. In the end of 1782, the
tragedy Horace of the playwright Corneille is represented and the last act of the play makes a strong
impression upon David. Indeed, the first sketch of the painting depicts the scene in which the aged
Horace speaks to the crowd in defence of his accused son, victor over the Curiatii. This sketch,
however, does not satisfied David due to its lack of communication, so, inspired by the classical
history of the period, he decides to depict a more communicative and powerful scene: the oath of the
Horatii. He starts to paint it in Paris but, believing that only in Rome he could paint a Roman
picture, symbol of patriotism, he moves to the Eternal City ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Firstly, through the nudity, the painter can proceed with a detailed analysis of gestures and anatomy
of the body, and secondly, with the naked body, he can bypass questions about the contemporary
dress, which are repudiated by the classical tradition because of the lack of nobility (Baecque de,
1997 p.187). Here, David is very influenced by Barnave, whose harmonious body is seen as a
perfect aesthetic symbol which reflects the neoclassicism corporeal ideal. Thus, in painting the
bodies of the people of The Tennis Court Oath, David focus his attention on three important parts of
the body: face, hand, and torso, through which he can emphasise not only the importance of the
subject of the drawing, the oath, but also the feelings and the soul of the protagonists of the oath
itself (Op. Cit. p, 188). Therefore, the ideal beauty of the new classicism is represented by these
three corporal parts which are connected each other by shaping a triangle. But, "how can the
movement of the soul show themselves externally by the harmonious action of the muscles?". As de
Baecque explains, in the body everything begins from the torso which is the place of the heart, rises
toward the face which is the seat of the mind, whose eyes play an important role since through them
one can recognise the feelings and emotions of the other, to turn out in the muscles, especially the
arms and hands, which are symbols of

The Death Of Marat
Sydney Hamer English 1030 Stukes Project 1 January 27, 2015 One of the most breathtaking and
fascinating ways someone can author something for me is a piece of art. Whether it is a sculpture,
architecture or a painting it can be very moving. Many details go into a piece of art that can make
one feel someway that one may not feel from reading a book or listening to a song. Throughout
history artists of all types have used their talents to persuade or inform people. The painting The
Death of Marat by Jacques Louis David was created in 1793 (Park). Jacques Louis David used his
skills as an artist to author the scene of the death of Jean–Paul Marat, which had the power to inspire
people to make a change in the country of France for the better, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
On the Boston College art history website they describe how David also uses some of the techniques
of light and dark similar to the Entombment of Christ by Caravaggio. The light is softer as it hits
Marat's face and the light is harsher as it hits the weapon to accentuate the tragedy of the murder.
David also keeps some of Marat's body in shadow that allows for the viewer to feel compassion and
outrage at different parts of the painting (Neo–Classicism). David using the medium of painting was
very important in his message reaching a lot of people. In the 18th century there was no radio or
television so there was limited ways to get information to a large amount of people. Nowadays one
could tweet something and it can literally reach the world. David had the twitter of the 18th century,
art. David using paint was the appropriate way in that time period to successfully complete his goal
of persuading and informing people of the horrible murder and his

Compare And Contrast The Death Of Marat And Michelangelo's...
In these two exquisite works of art or shall we call them the grand master pieces of their era's. Both
Jacques–Louis David's The Death of Marat and Michelangelo's Pieta flawlessly reflects the
untimely deaths of two significant figures that we know of today. The two figures comprised of
Jesus Christ in Michelangelo's Pieta and Jean–Paul Marat in Jacques–Louis David's The Death of
Marat. In the two pieces we see that the pair of artists portray the figures in a divine and yet virtuous
way. One work of art almost mimicking the other, yet there is still some differences between the
characteristics of each piece still making it its own individual self. In the following paragraphs we
will be diving deeper into the similarities and differences ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Not only did David want to do this but his artistic viewpoints wanted him to reflect the use of
propaganda to others through art in the Neoclassical era. In other words, he wanted to depict
through the painting how politics during the French Revolution were taken sternly and had serious
repercussions in a sort of misleading way. In the same way, if you did not fit into the rest of society
and you stood out you were labeled as a target. As we see Marat was murdered by Corday who was
seen as his political enemy. In the meantime, through the style of David's painting we see the use of
iconography or "the study or description of images and symbols" . Here in this painting of The
Death of Marat we see the main image (i.e. Marat) being used as more than just the centerpiece of
the work rather, the symbol of the work which means there is more to this work than just The Death
of Marat. Strangely enough, we can see the use of iconography when comparing The Death of
Marat to an almost political Christ of his people. Meaning that Marat was killed for his religious
beliefs/political beliefs and died for his people as that of Christ did with his religious beliefs.
Incidentally, we can say that "David's clear sympathies for Marat and his transformation of the
politician into a timeless martyr" or someone who sacrifices their life for not believing in Marat's
case the political beliefs of the others in

Odette's 'Irregul Revers'
ARTFUL PRETENDERS is an intriguing script about art forgery. The core plot about a widow
forging her late husband's paintings is a plot with strong merit. The goal is clear and the stakes
becomes high. There are some nice setups and payoffs. There are solid themes about betrayal, fraud,
and trust. There are definite strengths to the storytelling, especially the protagonist Odette, but the
script would benefit from building upon those strengths. The first act sets up the world of art and the
ordinary world of Odette and her husband Dorian. A good job is done in painting a portrait of
Dorian's character as an artist. He's a free spirit, does drugs, and appears temperamental. However,
the first concern about the opening is that apparently ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Felix's motivation for this is unclear or what he thinks he will get out of this. It might have worked
if he discovered the truth and blackmailed Odette, but he never does this. At the end, he implies he
knows what she did, but again, the purpose of this has no payoff. He also makes a connection with
Jamesey, but what this means isn't well understood. The police scenes in the car when they get the
call and later find the bodies can be cut. The police dialogue isn't compelling. They need to be more
serious. Maybe just show them get a call to the area, then cut to the apartment with Harald and the
gun, and then the police arrive and shoot him. The other element that does not feel compelling is the
idea of Odette talking like Alexis using the term "dearie." It doesn't feel natural and feels a bit
forced and contrived. It doesn't sound like Odette. Alexis' death also holds no real tension given the
way it is executed. It would have been more effective for her to be alone and then killed, with
Odette finding her body. In addition, the narrative descriptions mention Odette's eyelashes too many

Jacques-Louis David Research Paper
Jacques–Louis David was born on August 30, 1748, in Paris, France. By the time he was 9, his
father was killed in a duel, giving his widow mother no option but to leave him with his two uncles.
As the years went on, David began to show interest in painting. His uncles sent him to François
Boucher, a main painter of the time and family companion. Boucher was a Rococo painter, yet the
Rococo time was offering route to a more traditional style, so Boucher chose to send David to his
companion Joseph–Marie Vien, a painter more tuned in to the neoclassical response to Rococo.
By age 18, the skilled youthful artist was enrolled at the Académie Royale (Royal Academy of
Painting and Sculpture). After a few disappointments in rivalries and discovering ... Show more
After all, this was a period in time where suicides were happening left and right so they were very
common. I think it's quite ironic that in the picture the bath tub is made up as if it were a bed. It
gives off the vibe that Marat wanted to be comfortable before he died. I think that this is a very
successful piece because it shows a brief image of the neoclassical period. It has been constructed
beautifully to show how common suicides were. I feel like the picture is a tad tragic simply because
of the facial expression David painted on Marat's face. As far as I am concerned, David did an
amazing job trying to communicate this with us. If I were to change or add anything I would've
added more red to the tub. The bloody tub would've added more emphasis to his death. Overall
though, this was a good

French Revolution Essay
The French Revolution was a time for expansion in human freedom. It was a way for the French to
re–invent their government to give some sort of equality for their people. There were many
successes the French Revolution made, such as creating public schools for children and making it
mandatory for them to attend. The French Revolution had the intentions to create a better
government and lifestyle for their people, such as Jacobins who believed in the poor having their
turn to rule. Though, others opposed the ideas of the revolution. Those people did not go unpunished
by their beliefs. This was known as the Reign of Terror, which was not completely necessary for
their society.
The French Revolution was held in order to stop ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Part I: All children will attend school, boys between the ages of 5 and 12, girls between the ages of
5 and 11. (Draft of Law on Public Education, by Citizen Robespierre)" This showed how the
government was serious in making sure all people in France had some education. This was a great
success because every person could at least read and write. Lastly, women were finally given the
freedom of equality. Woman had always been oppressed by men because of physical capability, they
were not as physically strong as men. But, they were finally able to pass a law of equality in a
written declaration. "Article 1: Woman is born free and lives equal to man in her rights. Social
distinctions can be based only on the common utility. (Declaration of the Rights of Women, by
Olympe de Gouge)" This clearly shows that the French Revolution aided women in the right of
equality with men. These successes clearly show how the French Revolution helped to expand
human freedom.
The people who supported the Revolution were known as Jacobins. They were people who believed
that the poor should have the turn to rule, they represented the lower class people. This group was
made up of anyone who believed in their ideas, even women. Two men who were part of the
Jacobins were Georges Danton and Jean–Paul Marat. They highly believed in the poor being in
control. Danton once stated "The Rich used to rule Paris. Now we cry: "Make way for the

Jean-Louis David and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Essay
Jean–Louis David + Jean–Jacques Rousseau
Question : In what ways and to what extent is an understanding of historical context important in
approaching the works of (a) David and (b) Rousseau?
"The Lictors Returning to Brutus the Bodies of his Sons", is a painting by the French artist Jean–
Louis David in 1789. Having led the fight which overthrew the monarchy and established the
Roman Republic. Brutus tragically saw his sons participate in a plot to restore the monarchy. As a
judge, he was called upon to render the verdict, and without hesitation condemned his two sons to
death.
The full title of this work is "Brutus Returning Home after having Sentenced his Sons for Plotting a
Tarquinian Restoration and Conspiring against Roman ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was not an uncommon reaction towards David's art at the time. However, the painting was
restored to a place of honor by Baudelaire, who wrote :
"This painting is David's masterpiece and one of the great curiosities of modern art because, by a
strange feat, it has nothing trivial or vile. What is most surprising in this very unusual visual poem is
that it was painted very quickly. When one thinks of the beauty of the lines, this quickness is
bewildering. This is food for the strong, the triumph of spiritualism."
David's artwork did not just involve the use of "pretty" colours. Many of his paintings beared
powerfull meanings, historically and politically. Culturally they had a huge impact on social activity
during the French Revolution. The story of Brutus was popular with educated sections of the French
public during the eighteenth century. Voltaire's play "Brutus", was performed on stage from 1730. In
November 1790, the first two performances of a revival of "Brutus" at the National Theater in Paris
took place. At the second performance of the revival, a stage tableau of David's painting was acted
out at the moment when the death of Brutus' son was announced.
Like his later "Death of Marat", David's "Brutus" can be seen as a representation of a kind of
political heroism in which the best interests of society are put before those of the individual. His
painting also appeared at a time when a general dissatisfaction

Quotes About Bob Dylan
"Bob Dylan (Robert Allen Zimmerman, May 24, 1941) is an American singer, songwriter, musician,
painter, and writer. He has been influential in popular music and culture for more than five decades.
Dylan's lyrics join a range of political, social, philosophical, and literary influences". The quote
above in meaning is that just by having democracy and giving the people the rights doesn't solve
any issues. People still do bad things while having democracy and they blame it on the government.
There were many people who supported the killing of the people in France because they had thought
that it could solve problems that were going on at that time and some who disagreed because
violence doesn't solve anything at all and that they took it too ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Cordy's plan worked but it also failed because that did not stop the violence in the French
revolution. Corday also blamed Marat for the civil war she thought would happen in France. She
believed that Marat was bad for the future of France and that his death would stop the violence in
France. She also believed that Louis XVI should not have been executed
However, Maximilien would disagree with this quote because he believed that only democracy
would fix the government and the country. Maximilien Robespierre is one of the best–known
leaders of the French Revolution. He was born in Arras, France and he went to school to become a
lawyer and got his degree at law school. He also, got elected to the Estates General to help make
laws for France and fought against the French Monarchy, the death penalty, slavery, for democratic
reforms and the people to have more power. He helped gain a reputation for defending the poor
society. he was elected president of the powerful Jacobin political faction. At first, he was against
the killing of the people because he thought it wasn't right but as the Revolution grew more and
more, he started to believe that it was out of hand to the point where nothing could be solved.
Robespierre states in his speech "Virtue and Terror" that 'If the strength of popular government in
peacetime is virtue, the strength of popular government in revolution is both virtue and terror; terror
without virtue is disastrous, virtue without terror is

The Death Of Robespierre, Leader Of The Jacobins Essay
Marat was sitting in his bathtub, he received a visitor by the name of Charlotte Corday, who had
been refused admittance earlier in the day. She claimed to have vital information on escaped
Girondins and proceeded to list off the names of the missing Girondins. After he had finished
writing out the list, Corday claimed that he told her, "It will not be long before they are guillotined",
a statement she later changed at her trial to, "I will shortly have them all guillotined in Paris". With
that statement, Corday retrieved a knife she had brought and plunged it into his chest. Marat cried
out in agony saying "Aidez–moi, ma chère amie!" ("Help me, my dear friend!") and died. After
Marat 's death, Maximilien Robespierre, leader of The Jacobins, was appointed as the head of The
Committee of Public Safety on July 27, 1793. Although Robespierre was a bourgeoisie, he
identified with the plight of the sans–culottes and would become their voice as the revolution
progressed. It was because of this representation that he would become a prominent figure at the
most radical point in the revolution. He defended the principle that the "rights of man" should
extend to all men – including the poor, and the slaves in the colonies. Beginning in the spring of
1792 and forward, France was in an upheaval. The country was involved in foreign wars, civil war
and revolt. While revolutionaries were planning a new government without the king, counter–
revolutionaries were plotting the

Bedroom Observation Essay
The painting depicts the murder of Jean–Paul Marat that occurred while he was in his bathtub.
When I initially looked at this painting, I noticed the dying body and the letter in his hand. At first
when I looked at this painting, I thought the letter in Marat's hand was a suicide note. It just seemed
odd to me that he was holding a letter in his hand if it had not been a suicide. However, the letter in
Marat's hand was sent from his murderer Charlotte Corday–in fact you can see her name written on
the paper if you look closely enough, but she is not painted in this piece which I also found
interesting.
I've actually seen this painting before in one of the classrooms in the Academic Center at University
of Baltimore. Ironically enough, it is one of the classrooms that a lot of forensic science classes take
place and it is also a lab: one of my teachers has even pointed out the painting and discussed it. My
teacher told the class that most people assume it is a suicide but that is only because they are
unaware of the story and context of this painting. I think it is interesting that not only does this ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Specifically I think David tried to show how Marat was a martyr "for the cause" and make him into
some type of hero. David did not include Marat's skin condition in this painting, and I think that was
one of his ways to honor and idealize Marat. Additionally, David did not include Charlotte Corday
in this painting, almost as if he wanted to ensure that all focus would be on Marat and to not
memorialize her. It certainly would have made a more dramatic painting if David had painted
Corday stabbing Marat. Or if he had painted Marat reading the letter with Corday coming, knife in
hand, and ready to kill him. However, because he chose to paint Marat dying, and it makes me
believe he wanted to make Marat into a

The Death Of Marat
Despite the different centuries and artistic modes, these gentlemen played a large role in societies
political and religious triumphs and downfalls. Two works of Art in different centuries, and different
Artistic styles, yet they are alike. How can this be? The Death in each piece? The Dark and light
contrast of the oil on canvas? It's said Jacques–Louis David mirrored Caravaggio, the brush
techniques show truth in that. Each painting represented a turning point, the Catholic Church
rebelling against normality, and the French revolution uprising, these Artist were riding in the front
seat!
Neoclassical Jacques–Louis David's The Death of Marat, was created on the Age of Revolution, it
mirrored the social elite, and intellects, along with the political changes on the scene. The
revolutionary movements in France and America, based on classical ideals such as democracy in
other countries, made neoclassical art appealing (Annenberg (n.d.). Those ideas were a major factor
of the overthrow of the French monarchy in 1789. In the domain of the Revolution, this piece stands
today as a moving certification to what can be refined when an Artist's political emotions are clear
in his work. A political Martyr ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the painting David with the head of Goliath, the light shows David to look like a boy from the
street, whose sword shows blood on it to indicate, like Caravaggio once, he knows what it is to have
just killed a man (David, Goliath). Another drop of blood on goliath's temple points out that he has
been felled by a stone. The cloudy shadows from the figures demonstrate on the human body, the
touch of carnage (David, Goliath). Caravaggio frequently was his own subject matter when he
needed a model. Caravaggio's workmanship was always passionate, engaging society to get closer
to the contemporary views, relating to normal individuals

Art Analysis: The Death Of Marat
The photo I chose was "The Death of Marat." This picture has significant meaning and a powerful
back story. It speaks two different voices for each side of the fence during the France revolution. For
some individuals this picture was a symbol of power because Marat was looked up as a rebel and a
leader, but to the others this picture represented victory and a new start because Marat had been
killed and it saved hundreds of thousands of civilians from being beheaded. As the movie wasteland
show cased the image as a rebellion leader who was killed trying to lead his people from unfair
treatment. This gives the actual image a sense that Marat wasn't a terrorist but a hero who died
fighting for his people. This artwork was created in 1793 and still has so much meaning and it's an
example on how, although people live in the same country or even city; there's always going to be
conflict do to different perspectives and views ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first meaning is showing Marat off as the death of a leader and almost upon as a savior of the
whole community. To some the picture is persuading almost as the paintings of Christ as far as the
symbolic meaning of the dead man. The difference the between Two paintings is that on the other
hand, some people look at this painting as a sign of victory because it's the death of a terrorist and a
monster. The symbolic meaning of Marat creates different meanings for two different minded
groups of people in the same community. Which is an example that this pictures not only shows but
speaks that you have to know the back story to all paintings before making your full judgement off
what something actually

The Use Of Media And Media During The French Revolution
Media and propaganda have helped establish free societies, overthrow governments, and incite wars
throughout history. Revolutionaries utilized each to inspire and unite the populace during the French
Revolution. Persuasive newspapers and pamphlets featured opinion pieces that convinced
commoners of the drastic economic, social, and political changes needed to improve their quality of
life, role in society and potential for social advancement. Revolutionaries used art in museums and
mass–distributed prints as propaganda to rally the masses with nationalistic themes of heroism,
martyrdom and the power of the people. Music and festivals also contributed by infusing the masses
with passion to unite against the monarchy and fight for the revolution. The use of media and
propaganda in the French Revolution systematically distributed revolutionary ideas to the people
and drastically altered the course of the movement.
The French Revolution officially began in 1789, but the monarchy made a series of disastrous
earlier decisions which created the perfect conditions for the movement to thrive and engulf the
country in chaos. King Louis XVI dedicated funds to assist the American colonists in their fight for
independence against the British. While the French succeeded in their goal, the war left France with
a depleted treasury. Peasants became dissatisfied with the government after a series of droughts and
poor harvests. Tensions were further inflamed by the high taxes the monarchy

Robespierre And The Sans Culottes Declared Essay
The month of September would be remembered as one of the bloodiest months in French history, in
particular, September 5, 1793. On this day, Robespierre and the Sans Culottes declared "terror is the
order of the day." These words would begin a period of violence where the "enemies of the
Revolution" were executed en masse. Between 1793 and 1794, thousands of French citizens were
imprisoned and hundreds were killed by a group called the Committee of Public Safety. They
claimed they were acting in the best interest of the people, but were, in fact, acting in the interest of
wiping out their political adversaries. The head of this "committee" was political leader Maximilien
Robespierre. He was referred to as "the incorruptible" by his peers because of his unwavering
commitment to the Revolution. By the end of this period however, he would fall victim to his own
committee. This would be the end of The Terror. The Terror cannot be isolated as a great event of
the French Revolution without first examining the events that lead to it. The flight of King Louis
XVI and his family, the eventual execution of the king and Marie Antoinette, the purge of the
Girodins as a political group, and the assassination of radical journalist, Jean–Paul Marat, are a few
of the significant events that lead to terror being called the order of the day. Although there are
many other significant events throughout the French Revolution, the aforementioned occurrences
are key in what led to the

Similarities Between Julius Caesar And The French Revolution
Ancient Rome and the French Revolution were, although both a long time ago, very different
political atmospheres. As captured by William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,
Julius Caesar was becoming a dictator with only the beloved Marcus Brutus to save the people.
While, flash forward a few thousand years, in the French Revolution, anyone with a high social
standing was murdered as shown by Jacques–Louis David's painting, The Death of Marat. The two
historical events seem wildly different– except for the killers. Charlotte Corday and Marcus Brutus
are comparable via their public image, murder weapon, and motive. The essential part to any murder
is a motive, which both Corday and Brutus had. Both eliminated their victims for selfless reasons.
The only reason Corday killed was because Marat was seen as a threat to the success of the French
Revolution for the good of the people Corday murdered him. Corday executed because that was
what she thought was the right thing to do with was similar to Brutus. Brutus was a man for the
people and would have done anything for them. Caesar was his friend, however, he still killed him
because he believed it was in the best interest of the Roman people. "Not that I loved Caesar less,
but that I...loved Rome more" (Shakespeare III.ii.21–22). This line shows Brutus' motivation was
for the people which is similar to Corday. Despite this similarity, the murders were still very
different. Brutus had the ability to consult with several people on the repercussions of the murder
whereas Corday acted completely alone. This meant that Brutus was well aware and was able to
consult with several people to make sure that the murder was valid while Corday did not have that.
Both factors affected the affairs as a whole once again showing how similar but, different Corday
and Brutus are. Another significant similarity between Brutus and Corday was their chosen murder
weapon. As portrayed in the painting with the knife laying on the floor it is inferred that that was
what Corday used to kill Marat (David). David also painted a stab wound on the body of Marat to
show where exactly the fatal injury was inflicted (David). Both images give an impression of how
the murder took

The Death Of Marat By Jacques Louis David
An outstanding figure in neoclassical art, Jacques–Louis David released his painting titled The
Death of Marat in 1793 after the murder of Jean–Paul Marat. The revolutionary painting shows
Marat's deceased body soaking in a bloody bath, with a quell in hand. Many thoughtfully placed
details are included in the piece that add to the implication that one should focus on the sacrifices,
and involvement Marat made during the French Revolution. With the use of symbolism, David
coax's the audience into viewing Marat as the political martyr of the revolution. One of the more
palpable contributions to the glorification of Marat is the position in which his body is painted.
Marat was involved in many beheadings of the revolution and would have voted in favor of many
more. His most successful occupations included being a journalist and politician involved with the
radical Jacobins. He would frequently post his political views in his own self–published newspaper.
As he worked his way up the political ladder many began to fear and despise him. In the end, his
success would be his downfall. This was a man with obvious influence over others, who would use
those willing to follow. Feeling fear for her home, young noble Charlotte Corday decided to take
matters into her own hands, and quickly moved into action. She deceived Marat with a false list of
anti–revolutionaries, who in return, promised to have each beheaded the next day. Seizing the
opportunity, she plunged a knife deep into

Jean Paul Marat: Target and Martyr of Liberty Essay
Jean Paul Marat: Target and Martyr of Liberty
The French Revolution produced countless influential politicians throughout its tumultuous course.
As a political figure in the French Revolution, Jean Paul Marat began as a nonentity and became a
martyr to the revolutionary patriots of France. His influence is often misconstrued, and sometimes
overlooked. Although he was not a political leader like Robespierre, his influence was substantial in
that he motivated many people through his writings and powerful personality. Through his
involvement with the Cordeliers' Club and his journal Ami du peuple, started September 1789,
Marat was able to express the indignation of the bourgeois class through his hopes for social
revolution. His ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jean Paul Marat's early personal life had an effect on his later political career. Born in Boudry,
Neuchatel on 24 May 1743 to a family of mixed race, Jean Paul Marat had a passionate and
tenacious temperament that would serve him throughout his professional life. Marat always fought
for his principles, and this exceptional determination was apparent even from his childhood.
Although he was bold and passionate, he exuded coolness and confidence when under fire– a trait
that helped him in his political career when he was being denounced in front of the entire National
Convention. An educated man fascinated in the natural world, Marat's first career was as a scientist
and physician. His education opened him up to radical thoughts and ideas, as he held great
admiration for Enlightenment philosophers such as Rousseau. His dedication to the scientific
profession lasted until the French Revolution, when he was accidentally thrust into politics. The
political climate was changing, and the people were growing impatient with the declining economy
and oppressive monarchical rule of Louis XVI. The nature of Marat's liberal thoughts and political
leanings introduced him to politics as a writer who would later become a politician of national
importance. Jean Paul Marat's political beliefs were radicalized during the French Revolution, but
he was not a republican from the very start. Marat's political ideals were similar to other
revolutionaries because

The Radical Period of The French Revolution Essay
The Radical Period of The French Revolution
By the end of 1971, Europe was preparing to witness the end of a seemingly triumphant revolution
in France. The country was restructuring its government in a forceful and bloodless manner, while
the tyrant King
Louis the XVI agreed to the demands of the masses (albeit without much choice). However, due to
the fanatical aspirations of men such as Danton,
Marat and Robespierre,it would be only a matter of months before the moderate stage of social and
political reform was transformed into a radical phase of barbaric and violent force. In their quest for
freedom, equality and fraternity, the leaders of the Jacobins inadvertently turned the revolution into
an oligarchic dictatorship ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moderate forces preferred to concentrate on the foreign affairs of "new" France, but the radicals
insisted on domestic stability first. Led by the popular
Danton and the merciless Marat, the Paris Commune discarded the old constitution and called for a
National Convention to begin work on a new, revised version.
The National Convention, divided by the moderate Girondins and the radical Jacobins, was the
place where the future of the country was to be eventually determined. It was the premise of the
Jacobins that they should eradicate the "enemy within" and secure the destiny of the revolution
through the destruction of counter–revolutionary forces. They believed that by weeding out those
who opposed the revolution, they could achieve their goals quickly and efficiently. The Girondins
were not so quick to agree with the Jacobins, and so political deadlock begin to form in the
Convention. It was not until after the September massacres, when 1200 prisoners were executed
without trials, that Robespierre and his followers were able to justify their premise. They
condemned the actions of the unruly mobs that caused the deaths of innocent Frenchmen and
demanded that the Monarchy be abolished in order to eliminate as many of the royalists and
monarchists that still remained. It was Marat with his want 100,000 heads to fall" speeches that
convinced the masses that those who were not in favour of the revolution had to be dealt with
immediately

Rembrandt Van Rijn, Jacques Louis David, And Francisco Goya

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Samantha Jones

More from Samantha Jones (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Rembrandt Van Rijn, Jacques Louis David, And Francisco Goya