2. Division Profile
1 • No. of Elementary Schools
2 • No. of Secondary Schools
3 • TOTAL
4 •No. of Districts
894
239
1,133
55
3. Division Profile
1 • No. of Districts
2 • No. of Teachers
3 • No. of Municipalities
4 •Congressional Districts
15,306
55
44
7
4. DMEA SCOPE
Total No. of LARDO per Grade Level
Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant
(ELEMENTARY)
Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant
(SECONDARY)
Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadrant
(KINDERGARTEN)
Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadrant
(GRADE 1-3 (READING, FILIPINO, MTB)
CONCERNS/ISSUES/GAPS/PROBLEMS (CIGPs)
6. Percentage of LARDO per Grade Level
Series1
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.31
0.71
0.47
0.52 0.55
0.49
0.37
0.26
0.16
0.23
0.17
0.00 0.00
Percentage of LARDOs per Grade Level
7. Percentage of LARDO by Congressional
District - ELEMENTARY
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
FIRST
DISTRICT
SECOND
DISTRICT
THIRD
DISTRICT
FOURTH
DISTRICT
FIFTH
DISTRICT
SIXTH
DISTRICT
SEVENTH
DISTRICT
OVERALL
0.75
1.12
1.32
0.62
0.56 0.57
0.1
0.81
8. Percentage of LARDO by Congressional
District - SECONDARY
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
FIRST
DISTRICT
SECOND
DISTRICT
THIRD
DISTRICT
FOURTH
DISTRICT
FIFTH
DISTRICT
SIXTH
DISTRICT
SEVENTH
DISTRICT
OVERALL
1.8
2.22
1.1 1.14
0.58
1.95 2
1.57
9. Total Number of Schools with LARDO in
each Quadrant (ELEMENTARY)
with 0 LARDOs with 1-5 LARDOs
with 6-10 LARDOs
with 11 and above
LARDOs
599 143
89 63
ELEMENTARY-
894
1
• With O LARDOs
2
• With 1-5 LARDOs
3
• With 6-10 LARDOs
4
• With 11 & above
LARDOs
10. Total Number of Schools with LARDO in
each Quadrant (SECONDARY)
with 0 LARDOs with 1-5 LARDOs
with 6-10 LARDOs
with 11 and above
LARDOs
177 24
17 21
SECONDARY-
239
1
• With O LARDOs
2
• With 1-5 LARDOs
3
• With 6-10 LARDOs
4
• With 11 & above
LARDOs
11. Total Number of Teacher RESPONDENTS
Who conducted a meeting with Parents of LARDO
NONE with SOME
with MANY with ALL
2,140
(36.59%)
1,660
(28.39%)
666
(11.39%)
1,383
(26.65%)
12. Was conducting a meeting with parents effective?
YES NO
% 83.45 16.55
Peer Guidance Home Visits
13.76 % 34.19 % 52.05 %
13. Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each
Quadrant
KINDERGARTEN
Enrolment Beginning Developing Consistent
32,581 8,145 12,707 11,729
21. Policies in K to 12
None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10
more
If NO what?
Home Visits More
meetings
Performance
contract
others
3159 733 212 155
Was Intervention conducted YES NO
7441 592
23. Policies in K to 12
None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10
more
Failures 4563 2752 1129 365 918
Student you’ve
meet
3836 3027 1136 393 715
Parents you’ve
meet
3080 3324 1150 418 635
Was the meeting effective? YES NO
7515 619
24. Policies in K to 12
None 1-3 4-6 7-9 10
more
If NO what?
Home Visits More
meetings
Performance
contract
others
3159 733 212 155
Was Intervention conducted YES NO
7441 592
25. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to
be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger person New/
recurring
LEARNERS LARDO’s Institutional PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring Mapping/
Data Mining,
identification
of schools/
teachers/
Learners
with CIGP
Home
visitation
ICT Integration
Remedial reading
Designated
DSS
Rewards
System
Capacitate
SH/Teachers
on :Varied
instructional
delivery,
conduct of
remediation
Failures Institutional PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring
Reading Mastery technical EPS, PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring
TEACHERS Instructional
Competence
technical SDS, ASDS,
PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring Conduct
orientation,
Induction,
Training and LAC
sessions
Intensify
Capacity
Building and
LAC Session
activitieds
Time on task technical PSDS, SH,
Teachers
recurring Intensify Time-on-
Task Policy
Constant
Monitoring
21st skills
Integration
technical PSDS, SH,
Teachers
new Conduct Training
Needs Analysis on
ICT Skills
Conduct
Capacity
Building
Training on
identified
26. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/
to be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger person New/
recurring
Sch. HEADS/
Managers
Time on Task Technical/
institution
al
SH, PSDS, recurring Observance of
the required
number of
observations
to be
conducted
monthly
Constant
technical
assistance
given to
School Heads
on
Instructional
supervision,
Resource
generation
and
mobilization,
SIP
preparation,
review and
revalidation,
Regular
Division
Executive
Conference in
3 batches
Report
Management
Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Capacity
building/
Training on
Report
Management,
Monitoring
and
evaluation,
Instructional
supervision
M and E Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring
Instructional
Supervision
Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring
Managerial
competence
Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring
27. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/
to be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger
person
New/
recurring
IM/Learning
Materials
Adequacy/
availability
Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring *In-house
production of
Grade 5 and
Grade 11
Learners’
materials and
Teachers’
guides
*hiring of
personnel
assigned to
manned in the
production of
the materials
*utilization of
the LRMDS
portal and
Division
website
*Intensify
production of
Learners’
materials and
Teachers’
guides for all
grade levels
*Maximize
the use of
LRMDS portal
and Division
website for
uploading and
downloading
of learners’
materials
*School-to-
School
Partnership(
318 recipient
schools)
Maximizing use Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
28. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action
taken/ to be
taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger
person
New/
recurring
Learning
Facilities
Classroom Needs Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring *Coordinate
with the
Physical
Facility In-
charge
*Tap
possible
partners
from Private
institutions
(eg. RAFI,
Basa
Pilipinas,
VECO, Rotary
Club,
AFLATOUN
Project-
Lamac
Coop.)
*Chinese
Chamber of
Commerce
• Intensify
Public-
Private
partnerships
• Allocation of
school
buildings
using SEF
Fund (35M)
• Allocation of
other
facilities
using LGU
SEF Fund
• Intensify
Adopt-a-
School
Program
• Giving of
Plaque of
Appreciation
to Donors
and partners
Blackboard Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Physical
Facilities
CR adequacy Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Water Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
Electricity Institutional SH,
PSDS,EPS
recurring
29. CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance
Areas of
Concern
Implementation
CIGP
TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/
to be taken
Proposed
Resolution
structure Trigger
person
New/
recurring
Financial
Management
Resource
mobilization
Institutional,
technical
SH, PSDS,
Disbursing
Officer,
Acountant,
Bookkeeper,
Property
Custodian,
BAC
recurring
Training of
newly-hired
bookkeepers,
In-house
Training (COA)
PHILGEPS,
Developed
Scheme on
liquidation,
Assigned
bookkeepers
to check
liquidation
reports
*Intensify
capacity
building of
bookkeepers,
accountant,
budget officer
Resource
Generation
Liquidation of
Funds
Late SARO Institutional,
technical
