Tanulási eredmények alapú stratégiai tervezés az iskola szervezetében
Knowledge only real when shared
1. Knowledge only real when shared
László Horváth
(horvath.laszlo@ppk.elte.hu)
ELTEfeszt – 01/02/2014
2. “THE ILLITERATE OF THE 21ST CENTURY WILL
NOT BE THOSE WHO CANNOT READ AND
WRITE, BUT THOSE WHO CANNOT LEARN,
UNLEARN, AND RELEARN. ”
Alvin Toffler
3. Participation in education and training (2011)
35.0
(% of the population aged 25-64)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Bulgaria
Romania
Croatia
Greece
Hungary
Turkey
FYR of Macedonia
Slovakia
Poland
Latvia
France
Italy
Lithuania
Malta
Ireland
Belgium
Cyprus
Germany
EU-27
Spain
Portugal
Czech Republic
Estonia
Austria
Luxembourg
United Kingdom (2)
Slovenia
Netherlands
Norway
Finland
Sweden
Iceland
Switzerland
Denmark
Eurostat (2012)
5. Landscape of workplace learning
of the learning is delivered via formal training
processes.
of learning is developed through relationships,
networks and feedback.
of learning is by using challenging assignments and
on-the-job experiences.
10%
20%
70%
Lombardo & Eichinger (2000)
7. Recognition of non-formal and informal learning
Formal learning: Learning that occurs in an organised and structured
environment and is explicitly designated as learning. Formal learning is
intentional from the learner’s point of view.
Nonformal learning: Learning which is embedded in planned activities not
always explicitly designated as learning but which contain an important
learning element. Non-formal learning is intentional from the learner’s point of
view.
Informal learning: Learning resulting from daily activities related to work,
family or leisure. It is not organised or structured in terms of objectives, time
or learning support. Informal learning is mostly unintentional from the
learner’s perspective.
Validation of learning outcomes: The confirmation by a competent body
that learning outcomesacquired by an individual in a formal, non-formal or
informal setting have been assessed against predefined criteria and are
compliant with the requirements of a validation standard. Validation typically
leads to certification.
CEDEFOP (2009)
8.
9. Knowledge-based information society
INFORMATION SOCIETY
• Information and
knowledge became
important capitals (Bell,
1973)
Revolution of ICT
(networking)
Economic crisis
Rise of social and cultural
movements (Castells,
1996)
KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY
• Optimal use, allocation and
development of skills
(OECD, 2011)
• Ensuring the
competitiveness of
knowledge (Zhang & Liao,
2010)
• Flexible work -> demands
adaptibility (Delors, 1999)
How can individuals and organizations function
effectively in this changed environment?
10. Interpreting learning and change
Individual learning Learning
Org. development
Change management
Team learning Change
Org. learning
(Pol, Hlousková, Lazarová & Novotny, 2011)
11. Definition
Knowledge management
Knowledge management is the capturing, codification,
structuring, categorization, making available and sharing of
knowledge for the better use and protection of intellectual
capital in an integrated, synergic way. (Henczi, 2011)
In the practice
The skill for creating, sharing and application of
organizational knowledge and theory and practice of it’s
development. (Obermayer-Kovács, 2007)
12. (Sveiby, 1997)
IT-way
- Information
management
- ICT background
knowledge
- Software and
hardware
IT vs. HR
Human-way
- Human Relations
- Psychological-business
background
knowledge
- Development of
individual skills
18. References
1. Bell, D. (1974): The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society. A venture in social forecasting. Heinemann,
London.
2. Castells, M. (1996): The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
3. CEDEFOP (2009): European Guidelines for validation non-formal and informal learning.
4. Delors, J. (1999): Oktatás – rejtett kincs. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest, 219 o.
5. Eurostat (2012): Lifelong learning statistics. URL: http://bit.ly/1keC5Gc (Latest download: 30/01/2014)
6. Henczi Lajos (2011): Tudásmaraton. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.
7. Kianto, A. és Andreeva, T. (2011): Does KM really matter? Linking KM practices, competitiveness and
economic performance. International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics (IFKAD) 2011. június 15-17,
Tampere, Finnország.
8. Komenczi, Bertalan (2011): Electronic learning environment. Eszterházy Károly Főiskola. URL:
http://bit.ly/1guw5eg (Latest download: 30/01/2014)
9. Lombardo, M. M. & Eichinger, R. W. (2000): Career architet development planner. Lominger Ltd. Minneapolis,
911 p.
10. Nonaka, I. (1991): The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69. November-December,
96-104. o. URL: http://bit.ly/Hf8UVx (Utolsó letöltés: 2013. 10. 23.)
11. Obermayer-Kovács Nóra (2007): Tudatos tudásmenedzselés a tudásgazdaságban. A tudásmenedzsment
sajátosságainak vizsgálata a magyar szervezeteknél. Doktori Értekezés, Veszprém.
12. OECD Skills Strategy. Towards an OECD Skills Strategy. 44 o. URL: http://www.oecd.org/edu/47769000.pdf
(Utolsó letöltés: 2012. 12. 20.)
13. Pol, M., Hlousková, L., Lazarová, B., Novotny, P. és Sedlácek, M. (2010): On definition characteristics of
organizational learning in schools. In: Baráth, T. és Szabó, M. (szerk.): Does Leadership Matter? Implications
for Leadership Development and the School as a Learning Organization, Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Szeged,
147-157. o.
14. Sveiby, K. E. (1997): The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-based Assets.
Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
15. Thurow, L. C. (1996): The future of capitalism. How today’s economic forces shape tomorrow’s world.
Penguin Books.
16. Zhang, J. X. és Liao, H. Z. (2010): Upgrading knowledge competitiveness is the new mission of higher
education. US-China Education Review, 7. 10. sz. 78-86. o.