The Iron Wall

The Iron Wall
The Iron Wall is a documentary film released in 2006. It is all about the establishment of the West
Bank Israeli settlements. According to the film, these settlements are a strategy to occupy the
territory permanently. The construction of the controversial Israeli West Bank barrier is among the
issues covered. The Palestinians for Peace and Democracy and the Palestinian Agricultural Relief
Committees jointly produced the film. The Al–Jazeera Television Production Festival made the film
an "Official Selection." The film follows the timeline through which the establishment of the
settlements took place. It examines the effects of the settlements on the peace process. Featured in
the film are interviews with noted political analysts and peace activists from Palestine and Israel,
including Hind Khoury, Akiva Eldar, and Jeff Halper. The subtitles of the film are in Hebrew, Arabic
and English.
The film points to the West Bank settlement–colonies that Israel propagated as the main challenge to
peace. The film argues that colonization takes place through these settlements without regard to
Palestinians' desires. This process has gone on through decades before Israel was established. The
daily growth of the settlements is an indication that the policy is active. The film claims that ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even in the light of oppression, they still fight back, tackle soldiers with arguments, and prevent the
destruction of their olive trees using nonviolent means. Truly, indigenous people are inclined to
resist alien settlers provided the hope of treading the dangerous path of foreign settlement is alive. It
shocks just how the settlers do not care about living in other people's land. In fact, the settlers do not
even know that they live on Palestinian land. All they do is occupy the luxury houses, consuming
water and swimming in the pools despite the scarcity of the natural resource. The houses are cheaper
due to government
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Conflict Between Israel and Palestine Essay examples
The conflict between Israel and Palestine has tight roots in history, stretching thousands of years
back to when the Israelites first forged their way into the land, then known as Canaan. It came to its
peak in 1948, the year Israel declared its independence (Beinin). Ever since then, the volatile area of
Palestine has become a battle ground for war, terrorism, and politics. The two nations have
attempted to make agreements, but so far, none of them have succeeded in creating long–lasting
peace. Since it is unlikely that neither Israel nor Palestine would completely give up their land to the
other nation, a compromise needs to be forged between the two. The conflict between Israel and
Palestine cannot stop unless Israel lifts the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These restrictions have not completely closed off trade into Gaza, however. With heavy border
control on the surface, traders have turned to smuggling goods through subterranean tunnels that
burrow into Egypt. It is estimated that around 15,000 jobs are found in the tunnels, smuggling
anything from weapons and cement, to food and cigarettes. These jobs are very much high–risk,
however, with cave–ins increasingly common. (Myre) If Israel dropped their blockade and opened
up more trading opportunities for the people of Gaza, there would be a significant decrease in
accidents in these smuggling tunnels, and their economy would be better off. Above all else, it
would express to the Palestinians of Gaza that Israel was prepared to trust them. The second step in
ending this violent conflict in the Middle East is for Israel to lift their occupation and settlement on
the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. If Palestinians and Israelis had settled for the terms outlined in
the original United Nations partition plan in 1947, history might have taken a very different path.
This plan would have split the land into two different states, an Arab state, and an Israeli state.
Jerusalem and Bethlehem, for their religious significance to many cultures, would have become
international regions. (Beinin) Due to the likelihood of further Jewish immigration, this

The Israeli Palestinian Conflict : Israel Palestine...
Some studies on the Israel–Palestinian conflict postulate that the nature of the conflict has always
been about land, meaning the partition of the holy land (e.g., Newman, 2002; Klieman, 2000;
Alpher, 1995). But a tectonic shift occurred with the swift Israeli victory in the 6 day war of 1967,
when Israel occupied the territories. Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories bar Gaza strip (
territorially miniscule) has morphed into a sort of colonialism as Israel has buil a number of
settlements on the territories it found in control of after 1967, which practically amounts to an
annexation of the land. Therefore, the current Israeli–Palestinian conflict is essentially a conflict
over Israeli colonization, the only remaining settler colonialism in the world. Early Israeli political
thinkers were aware of the need to have overwhelming military superiority over the Arabs, the need
for an Iron wall of Jewish Bayonets to drive the Palestinians into despair. The idea was to create a
situation that in any subsequent negotiations, Israel would be able to negotiate from the position of
strength.
The conflict can only end if Israeli decolonization happens in Palestinian territories and a Palestinian
state, which many Israelis support comes into being in its place in the territories occupied in 1967. If
the Palestinian state takes the form of numerous non–contiguous enclaves surrounded by Israel, the
likelihood of the conflict is high. Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon

Though the agreement and acknowledgement from both sides...
Though the agreement and acknowledgement from both sides was a great accomplishment, the fault
in the Oslo Accords was lack of action and enforcement, leading way into accusations from both
sides. While it is important for both sides to be careful, a peace talk strong enough to mend the
schism between Israel and Palestine should be clear in its wording, and the agreements should be
enforced. Both sides' unresolved conflicts over land, refugees, education, and terrorism prevent any
progress from being made. An attempt to establish peace without resolution of these problems will
result in failure, proven in past negotiation efforts. The core sources of the Israeli–Palestinian
conflict should be the focus of the peace talks. It is integral ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Palestinians, in peace talks, have proposed balanced land swaps as well ("Middle East peace").
If both sides negotiate with open minds, compromise can be made. Because of lack of enforcement,
peace agreements that should have worked have failed. Both sides still struggle over matters that,
according to negotiations of the past, should not exist.
However, this is not the end to the struggle between the two states. Though some controversies, such
as land, are fairly straightforward, others are not. Apprehensions about security and refugees are
main concerns of Israel. Allowing refugees could result in a possible change of demographic to a
Palestinian majority. As a people that have been persecuted throughout history, the Jewish have an
extremely legitimate reason to have safety and security a top priority. They desire a homeland free
of jeopardy. Palestinian organizations in the past (and present, involving rejectionist groups such as
the Hamas) have wanted the destruction of Israel as a state ("Negotiations). Israel accuses Palestine
of not taking action against these terrorist groups, and fears that in the future, a Palestinian state
could be overtaken by one. Palestine believes that a two state solution is actually necessary for
security. Though both sides have many concerns, to make decisions and statements based on
general, wide assumptions is also incredibly dangerous for both sides, and prevents progress. All

The Israeli Palestinian Conflict Of Palestine Essay
115,000 is the total estimated number of civilians, armed forces, and others involved killed since the
start of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in the late 19th century. Throughout the past several decades
the Israeli Zionists and Palestinian natives have fought over a section of land in the Middle East for
recognition as an independent or bi–national country. This has led to a war in which a peaceful
solution, and not just managing the problem but attempting to end the problem is paramount. The
history of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict begins around 1880 whenever the original Zionist
movement, creation of a homeland for Jews in Palestine, was first formed and thousands of Jews
migrated to the then Ottoman Empire occupied Palestine. At the end of World War I, in 1918, the
British controlled the Palestine area and encouraged Jewish migration to the newly British mandated
Palestine. Throughout the following years, up to 1939, violent riots or revolts, depending on who
was describing them, would break out killing many. After World War II ended, and the United
Nations was formed, in 1947 the U.N. gathered the General Assembly to attempt to solve the
problems in Palestine creating two separate states, one for Jews and another for Arabs. War breaks
out as the nearby Arab states reject the plan. When the war ended 700,000 Palestinians fled, Jordan
controlled the West Bank and east Jerusalem, and Egypt controlled the Gaza Strip (Shikhmanter).
In the following two decades small

Oslo Accords
Twenty–three years later, the agreement signing that took place on the front lawn of the White
House that had plans to change the ways between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization
(PLO) is now looked at as one of the worst actions that was a part of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
This agreement is known as the Oslo Accords or "Peace Process". Just like several other peace acts
in the world, the United States played a significant but limited role in making the Oslo Peace
Accords happen. Although the agreement had high potential to work, the amount of lying, accusing,
trust issues, corruption, and terror for the citizens of losing their homes caused this series of
agreements to fail. Between 1993 and 1998, the series of agreements ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Israel repeatedly refused to withdraw its troops at a rate and to the extent contemplated under the
agreements, and continued its settlement of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Palestinians, meanwhile,
violated restrictions on the number of persons under arms. Israel also charged that the Palestinian
Authority failed to take adequate steps to halt attacks on Israeli civilians by armed Palestinian
groups, or to stem 'incitement' to violence against Israel." Neither side could agree on anything
because there was no trust between the two them. The Office of The Historian declares that "At the
prime minister's insistence, Clinton convened a summit at Camp David in July 2000, where he,
Barak, and Arafat attempted to reach a final agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
Accounts differ as to why Camp David failed, but it is clear that despite additional concessions by
Barak, the Israelis and Palestinians remained strongly at odds over borders, Jerusalem, and whether
Israel would recognize Palestinian refugees' "right of return." The summit ended without a
settlement; Clinton would blame Arafat for its failure." By December of 2000, the riots had already
been in action since September and the violence between the Israelis and Palestinians was brutal
(Office of the Historian). Bill Clinton, President of the United States had been pushing for the peace
between Israel and Palestine and was a

Foreign Aid For Economic And Humanitarian Development...
Post the Oslo Accords in 1993, multiple countries supported aid for economic and humanitarian
development in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Foreign aid was also used to support the
initiation of a peace process between the Palestinians and Israelis. There was a hope of an
improvement in the economic standing in the region from both the international community and
majority of the Palestinian population. However, it is arguable that the economy of the occupied
Gaza Strip and West Bank has in fact plummeted to an even worse condition than before the Oslo
Accords. Although there have been positive short–term outcomes from the Accords, there have been
far more long–term and complex consequences. Donor countries, most importantly the United
States, were not able to effectively allocate aid in order to reduce the inefficiency of the Palestinian
economy. The inability of the United States to provide stable economic and humanitarian
development within Palestine is the result of three main issues: Israeli military occupation and
blockades, the unintentional implementation of a dependency for aid in occupied Palestine, and
political patronage.
Focusing on the United States as a major donor, U.S. bilateral economic and humanitarian assistance
to Palestine will be unsuccessful with continuing support towards Israeli military occupation and
blockades in the occupied West Bank. Palestine has been allocated approximately $5 billion in U.S.
bilateral economic assistance post the Oslo

Year Land Size West Bank Share Essay
Year Land Size West Bank Share (%)
1967 527 9.3
1973 700 12.4
1984 1800 31.9
1993 2500 44.3
1995 2557 45.3
1998 2729 48.4
2000 2760 48.9
Source: The 1967, 1973 and 1984 data–points are from Benvenisti and Khayat (1988). The 1993
datapoint is from Maariv, Jan 22, 1993 and B'Tselem (1997). The 1995, 1998, and 2000 data points
are based on Ha'aretz, Jul 20, 2000 and Isaac and Ghanyem (2001). The shares data are computed
based on the West Bank land area of 5640 km2 (World Fact–Book, 2001).
Israeli governments have supported settlers in various ways, including providing them land, cheap
mortgages, tax reductions, grants, subsidies and employment and deplying IDF to guard settlements.
In per capita terms, the government has invested more in the settlements than in Israel propers. In
the 1990s for example, 5.3 m of road per person were paved in Israel proper. compared with 17.2 m
in the territories.
One of the core demands of the Palestinian negotiators at Oslo and at Camp David ( in the late
1990s) was that Jewish settlements be evacuated. An evacuation seemed manageable. Prime
minister Rabin and believed that settlements had no security value. Prime Minister Barak and Peres
also wanted to evacuate settlements. But during the Oslo process, the Labor government.
tried to show they were pro–settler. The reason was the fear of an Israeli civil was according to
Reuveny.
In 1988, the Palestinians gave up 78% of the historic Palestine in return for the de facto recognition

The Pros And Cons Of Israel's Occupation Of Gaza And West...
Little did Israel know that the Six Day War would turn into a fifty year occupation of Gaza and the
West Bank? During this occupation the Israeli Government placed settlement and settlers in the
disputed territory for the purpose of keeping a buffer between Israel and the Palestinians as well as
using the settlements and settlers as a means to keeping Gaza and the West Bank. During 2005 the
Israeli government began removing settlers and turning the land back over to the Palestinian's with
the thought that holding on to it had become too big of a problem and it had become to taxing to the
Israeli government (Monitor, 2015).
With the peace process stalled Israel would best serve its National interests by leaving the settlers
and settlements in Gaza and the West Bank. Without a Palestinian peace deal the financial cost and
man hours and loss of strategic lands would leave them more vulnerable to Palestinian attack.
By staying they can keep the status quo and to a degree keep the Palestinian's in ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Without a Palestinian peace deal the financial cost and man hours and loss of strategic lands would
leave them more vulnerable to Palestinian attack. The Israeli's began moving out of settlements in
Gaza and West Bank but abruptly reversed course in 2000 after violence broke out again. Many road
blocks have arisen which have made it more difficult for the Israeli's to believe that the two parties
will ever come to a peace agreement. 60% percent of Israeli's believe that Israel should relinquish
the West Bank and Gaza. Even though that number is high many Israeli's believe that Israel would
be relinquishing land that were promised to their people in the Bible. With all things considered
Israel could best serve its interest by remaining in the disputed lands until an expectable peace plan
is completed. There are no guarantees for peace without it (Monitor,

International Relations : State Profile And Bilateral...
Samantha Tsu
POSC 230 – International Relations
December 11, 2014 For the extra credit assignment that will be applied to the final, the topic I chose
to write about was opinion number four which is: State Profile and Bilateral Relations. Expanding
from the second project presentation, the "state" I chose to give my presentation on was Palestine.
Palestine is located in the Middle East in the country of Asia and their territory is considered to be
only the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The capital of Palestine is Jerusalem, and the type of people
who predominately reside in occupied Palestinian land are those of the Arab descent. According to
research, there are approximately 11,000,000 people all over the world, who consider themselves to
be Palestinian, which is constituted as 49% of all the people in the world. But, only 16.5% of
Palestinians live in Palestinian occupied land. Research also shows that majority of the Palestinians
are Muslims, but they are citizens of Israel and many of the Palestinians are widely known to be
Christians or Jewish as well. The official language of Palestine is ancient language of Arabic, which
in my opinion is a cool language because you don't read that language from left to right like many
other languages, with Arabic, you read it from right to left. Although, all countries rely on other
countries for economic support through trade, Palestinian territory is especially dependent on trades
with other countries. Most of Palestine's revenue

Fatah And Hamas Conflict
The violence pointed back to when Palestinians protested against the Israelis from occupying the
West Bank and Gaza by violence and civil unrest, which brought on a series of action called Intifada
(uprising) in the middle east. The Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin shook hands with the Palestinian at
the White House after signing the Oslo Agreement. This agreement failed to hold and strength and
the region became unsettled, which caused conflict with the Palestinian leaders. Hamas gains their
popular support through well–funded social actions, which grew out of the Muslim Brotherhood.
"Hamas sponsored the building of schools and hospitals, and ran other charitable and religious
organizations" (Economist). Both Fatah and Hamas were opposed to the PLO leadership in
Palestine. That Fatah and Hamas were reconciliation agreement to signal the end of divisive fighting
between the two group for the control of Palestine. Those agreements failed to hold up between to
two political parties. Fatah was not happy with the Palestinian choosing Hamas to protect the
citizens. "The Fatah–Hamas conflict exploded in 2006, when Hamas won more seats than Fatah did
in the legislative election and earned the right to form a new government" (Preface). Fatah was
considered to be an enemy of Israel as well as a terrorist ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Hamas uses its military wing to kill Israeli citizens. They were accused of fighting the Israelis
because they are Jews. Hamas reported that these accusations were false and completely wrong. The
group was called terrorist nor for the plans or action that stood for, but that they employed
indiscriminate violence. Since Hamas did not agree with Israeli taken over the Palestinian, they are
considered terrorists from destroying Israel. As stated by Stanley Cohen, "Hamas is a nationalist
resistance forced to resort to violence because it has so little power compared with Israel"
(Davidson,

Israeli Settlements And The New U.S. Administration. The
Israeli Settlements and the New U.S. Administration The focus of this essay will be the construction
of new Israeli settlements in the West Bank region and whether or not Israelis think the Trump
Administration supports these new settlements. This is an important topic because Israeli settlement
building has been a major issue preventing Israelis and Palestinians from coming to a peace
agreement. Also in Assignment 1, I referred to this issue as a possible limitation to my prospective
trip to Jerusalem so I would like to further research the issue here. I will be using three main sources
for this essay: Al Jazeera, a regional news organization in the Middle East, Haaretz, an Israeli
breaking news site, and the Jerusalem Post, an Israeli ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the article, they ask the same question I posed above: "Does Trump support the building of
settlements or is he opposed (JPost Editorial)?" The article focuses on his first meeting with Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump told him that he would like Israel to "hold back on
settlements for a little bit...I would like to see a deal made (Trump, JPost Editorial)." This statement
would make people assume that he is initially against further settlement building in the West Bank.
Trump also said he is in favor of a solution that involves both Palestine and Israel, which the article
says was common for previous presidents to say. The article also claims that Trump's pick to be the
ambassador to Israel is in favor of building settlements, which I will talk about with another article
below. The writers of this article are confused due to this fact, and say that Trump might not even
have a clear opinion of settlement building yet. The writers want Netanyahu to "proceed cautiously"
in dealing with Trump as they are not sure of his true intentions. The article closes by calling for
more communication between the countries (JPost). As mentioned in the previous paragraph,
President Trump's pick to be the U.S. ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, is considered a
supporter of new settlement building. An article written by Jonathan Cook and published on Al
Jazeera on May 14, 2017 takes a closer look at Friedman. Its

1967 Six Day War
Assess the consequences of the 1967 (Six Day) War for Arab–Israeli relations
On the 23rd May 1967, the Israelis declared war on the Arabs due to the blocking of the straits to
Israeli shipping. The 1967 Six Day War had a major impact on Arab–Israeli relations. This is due to
Israel gaining control over the occupied territories, large increases of Jewish settlement in the
occupied territories, the increase of Israeli military in the Middle East.
The Israeli occupation of Arab territories had a large impact on Arab–Israeli relations. Through the
dominancy of the Israeli army during the Six Day War, they were able to capture the Sinai
Peninsula, the Gaza Strip from Egypt, East Jerusalem, the West Bank from Jordon and the Golan
Heights from ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Historian Avner Cohen writes, "In the end Israel launched a pre–emptive aerial attack in which most
of the Egyptian air force was destroyed, virtually deciding the Six Day War. Through Israel's
dominance they were regarded as the 'strongest military power in the Middle East'. Also, the Arabs
had become severely weakened as a result of the Six Day War, as they had lost a high amount of
casualties and the relations between Syria, Jordon and Egypt declined as evident through Syria not
accepting UN Resolution 242 while Egypt and Jordon did. Through Israel's superiority, their
relations with Egypt had improved as highlighted through Egypt recognising Israel as a state in
1979. Nevertheless, Israel's dominancy also stresses its improvement in its relations with Jordan
signing a peace treaty in 1994, and Iran signing a peace treaty in 1979. Even though, certain
relations improved the Arabs would turn to terrorism and the Israeli army would be seen as the
aggressor. By Israel dominating the Six Day War and establishing itself as the 'strongest military
power in the Middle East, its relations with other Arab countries had dramatically improved.
In conclusion, the 1967 Six Day War had a major impact on Arab–Israeli relations. Due to Israel
gaining control over the occupied territories and increasing its settlement, the Arab–Israeli relations
had declined as the Arabs were livid that Israel would not

The Bank Of The West Essay
Organization information
The name of the organization which I work for is called Bank of the West and is a subsidiary bank
of BNP Paribas. This financial institution can be found all over the west coast of the United States.
In the state of New Mexico there are about 20 branches and 15 of them are located in the city of
Albuquerque. The organization itself has about 10,000 employees; however, the branch that I work
at has a total of 13 employees. The structure of the bank has always been hierarchical, yet now days
it has become more noticeable with the new changes that the company went through. The
organization culture encourages creativity, rewards employees for serving customers in the best way
possible, and welcome and respect diversity. The goals of Bank of the West is to sever and most
important to educate customers about financial responsibilities.
Role(s) in the organization
Is been about three months that the titles of all employees changed. The titles that the employees
have are; branch manager, assistant branch manager, relationship banker, universal banker, senior
service officer, service banker III, and service banker I.
Let's start with the obligations of the branch manager, assistant branch manager, and relationship
banker. The most important duties that they are in charge of are; bringing new business to the
branch, maintaining existent customers, and making sure the correct documentation is on hand when
opening new accounts.
The senior service officer,

The Palestinian Domain Of The West Bank
The unemployment rate is 46 percent and 38 percent and of the populace is beneath the poverty line.
In particularly helpless zones in the West Bank, kids experience provocation and brutality from
officers and the pilgrims. On account of devastations, they likewise experience the ill effects of
absence of satisfactory instruction offices. Large portions of them additionally regularly bear long
commutes to their schools because of the construction of settler bypass roads.
Home annihilations and removals by Israeli powers proceed. Israeli checkpoints, detours, and the
division divider hinder and limit development inside the Palestinian domain.
Since 1967, when Israel vanquished these regions, Palestinians have been living under Israeli ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Knowing that their child is most likely being beaten up by soldiers on the way to the station,
stripped and humiliated in prison, quite likely physically abused in multiple additional ways, and
destined to be held – perhaps in isolation – for days, week, or months and all before a trial has even
taken place. Parents are without the ability to protect their children. Quite often, in fact, they cannot
even go and see them. When the military trial under which their son is to be sentenced – often to
years and sometimes even decades in prison. All they can do is hire a lawyer whose efforts will
reduce the ultimate sentence by a few months.
Only every once in a long while can even the most talented legal counselor accomplish more than
bear the cost of the tyke a cordial face in court and be an outside witness to the unfairness of the
procedures. Then the vicinity of such an attorney gives Israel spread to its "legal framework."
Perhaps most noteworthy and once in a while saw by individuals in the outside world, is the way
that Palestinians live, fundamentally, in a jail in which Israel holds the keys. They can 't leave Gaza
or the West Bank unless Israeli watchmen permit them to. In the event that they have been permitted
out, they can 't come back to their homes and families unless Israeli gatekeepers license it. Much of
the time, in both cases, Israel declines such permission.
The territory now known as the West Bank formed the heart of ancient

Israel 's Impact On The West Bank
Israel has made travel between major Palestinian population centers (Jenin, Nablus, Ramallah,
Bethlehem, and Hebron) in the West Bank easier over the last several years. Several major
checkpoints in the West Bank that restricted direct movement between and into these cities have
been removed or modified. However, in general this opening is less the result of an overall easing in
movement restrictions than the result of the institutionalization of movement controls into a formal
and permanent regime of restrictions that has replaced roadblocks with gates that can be opened and
closed at the whim of the military and that has reconfiguring how Palestinians travel.
According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
While Palestinian movement is severely restricted, a separate system of roads that are closed to
Palestinians or that bypass Palestinian communities has been set up for Settlers to ensure their
unrestricted movement in the West Bank and between the West Bank and Israel.[iii] According to
the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem,
"there were 67 kilometers of roads in the West Bank that Israel classified for the sole, or practically
sole, use of Israelis, first and foremost of settlers. Israel also prohibits Palestinians from even
crossing some of these roads with vehicles, thereby restricting their access to nearby roads that they
are ostensibly not prohibited from using. In these cases, Palestinians travelers have to get out of their
vehicle, cross the road on foot, and find an alternative mode of transportation on the other side."[iv]
OCHA has also reported that in 2013 at least 55 West Bank communities which are home to more
than 180,000 people remain completely isolated as a result of roadblocks, barriers, checkpoints and
other movement restrictions. All of the main roads into and out of these communities remain
blocked and residents wishing to leave these communities must use alternative routes that are two to
five times longer than the blocked direct routes. Many

The Prospect Of A Two State Nation Solution For Israel...
The Israel–Palestine conflict is one of the most long–term, pressing, and largely confounding social,
political, and national quandaries of our age. Since we have been moving with surprising velocity
into the vast horizons of globalization, the conflict has built up tremendous momentum and has
called into question the adequacy of our current attempts at coming to a peaceful resolution that can
simultaneously and successfully address both sides of the struggle. The purpose of this paper has
been to understand the prospect of a two–state nation solution for Israel and Palestine. The
discussion arises a retrospective view of the context behind the present analysis. We begin with a
discourse that informs the reader of the historical narrative between the Jewish inhabitants of Israel
and the Palestinians who also seek to live in the lands which comprise Israel. At the forefront of the
discussion are some key issues such as trends in Israeli settlement expansion over time, the manner
in which these settlements create political challenges towards the prospect of a two–state solution,
and the fragmentation of power within Palestinian political parties which inhibit the opportunity for
proper negotiations amongst the two parties. Finally, we delve into a discussion on nationalism, it's
importance in the discussion of a two–state solution, and the challenges posed when trying to
formulate US Foreign Policy towards the matter.
(Part A) R.B.G.
The scope of Israeli settlement activity

Israel has a Failed State Index Score Due to the West Bank...
Israel
According to the US–based Failed States Index (FSI), Israel ranks number 67 and is in greater
danger of becoming a failed state than the likes of Congo, Cuba and Jordan. Despite Israel's
booming economy, high life expectancy and low unemployment, part of the explanation for its low
FSI ranking is the West Bank. According to the Fund for Peace's methodology, Israel/West Bank is
considered one entity when determining its Failed States Index score. The issues Israel/ West Bank
scored highest on the FIS were; external intervention (8), factionalized elites (8), human rights (8),
group grievance (9.3), and refugees (8). Other sources of Israel's instability stems from the Israeli–
Palestinian conflict, inequality, internal breakdown and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In response to attacks Israel began building the anti–terrorism fence to stop West Bank terrorists
from killing Israeli citizens. Whatever analysis is put on the history, there can be no disputing that
the Palestinian Territories (Gaza and the West Bank) have been occupied by Israel since the Six Day
War and that this occupation has had profound implications for the development of the two occupied
territories. The opposing sides have been in an almost continuous state of armed conflict. The longer
the Israeli–Palestinian conflict continue, the weaker Israel as a modern state will become.
Regional Implications from Israel's Instability
The West Bank continues to remain an occupied territory with Israel being the occupying power.
Israel's policies in the West Bank have displaced a million Palestinians, forcing them into refugee
status which in turn has led to a refugee influx in neighboring country, Jordan. Palestinian existence
in the West Bank is being increasingly confined to ghettos cut off from farmland, schools, medical
care and from other Palestinians. Some would argue that Israel's aggressive policies against
Palestinians provoke terror attacks on Israeli citizens. The resort to terrorist acts by Palestinians,
especially suicide bombings in crowded public places, has caused them to lose much of the
international sympathy their cause would otherwise benefit from. Similarly, the cruelties of Israelis
to the Palestinians, especially in the ongoing siege of Gaza,

The Conflict Between Palestine And Israel
Throughout this essay you will learn about the conflict between Palestine and Israel. Many factor
took place to cause the conflict between Palestine and Israel, such as, the history, where the conflict
stands today, why both side have a good argument against one another, and why the attempts at
peace have fallen short. The Israel–Palestine conflict has lasted for a longer time than anyone would
have expected. The conflict elaborated into a gigantic battle when it could have been an easy solve.
Overall, the ongoing conflict should have never gone this far and damaged this many people's lives
throughout Palestine and Israel. Many are confused as to why the conflict began in the first. The
conflict has been happening for years now with Israel and Palestine fighting over the region of
Gaza. The conflict began with a debate over Palestine and Israel disagreeing over which country
gets control over what part of the land. The primary approach was to give Palestine the control of
the state of Gaza and the West Bank, and leaving the rest of the land to Israel. This plan they came
up with was called the "two–state solution" which was supposed to help reduce less conflict. Israel
and Palestine could have replaced the "two–state solution" with the "one–state solution" means the
would have created a huge Israel or a huge Palestine in that land, which would have caused bigger
controversy among the countries. Through the whole conflict many civilians have been injured and
killed in the

The Conflict Between Israel And Palestine Essay
The conflict between Israel and Palestine has raged on since Israel 's founding in the 1940s, the
solution to this problem is not always straight forward or clear. It seems like everyone has formed
their opinions and are stuck in their ways. The United Nations has even seem to accept the conflict
as a certainty and for a large part does not wish to address it (Baker). However just because this
problem is complex doesn 't mean there is no hope for a solution. This conflict is generally seen as a
war over where the border between these two states should lay, and due to the increase of extremism
on both sides, whether both states should even exist or one state should prevail alone. However there
is more complexities to the conflict then finding a mutual place for the border be drawn. There is the
conflict over who will control the Holy City, Jerusalem. In addition there are concerns on both sides
over security and the internal economy of each state. Finally is the problem that even if an
agreement to form the two states were met and agreed upon, would these two vastly different and
deeply opinionated states even be able to peaceful co–exist in the future. With all the history and
politics considered, for me the answer becomes clear; Palestine has the right to be a state and that
state should in large part reflect their position they have presented to the international community.
The outbreak of this conflict would begin in 1948, however you can start the modern history of

The Arab Israeli Conflict Essay
According to an apocryphal story, Pope John Paul once said that he believes there are two possible
solutions to the Arab–Israeli conflict, the realistic and the miraculous. The realistic being divine
intervention, and the miraculous being a voluntary agreement by both parties. On September 13th,
1993, it looked like the miraculous had happened when the Oslo Accords were signed by Israeli
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafat
on the White House South Lawn. However, the objectives of the historic accords were never fully
implemented and the Palestinians remain a stateless nation. Further steps toward Israeli–Arab peace,
including the Cairo Agreement, Oslo II and the Camp David Summit, have fallen short of the goals
of both parties.
When he became president in 1993, Bill Clinton and his advisors did not initially make Israeli–
Palestinian peace a priority. The administration looked first to other Middle Eastern affairs,
believing that an Israeli–Syrian agreement was more likely, and that the policy of "dual
containment" in Iran and Iraq was more pressing. They thought that once they made a breakthrough
between Israel and Syria the Lebanese would be close behind, and that this would put pressure on
the Iran and Iraq, the biggest opponents of any sort of Israeli–Arab peace deal (US Office of the
Historian). The Americans were made aware of the secret negotiations that had begun in Oslo in
December 1992 between the

The West Bank
Mas–ha
Mas–ha is a small village, probably the size of the Consumes River College campus; however, the
meaning to me is greater than the whole state of California. Mas–ha is special to me because it is my
hometown. Mas–ha is located within the disputed side of the West Bank in Palestine. Its population
is about one thousand two hundred people. In the whole village there are two major families. The
size of Mas–ha is approximately two square miles. This village is very prized to me, because of its
distinctions such as the religion, the location, the culture and family. My hometown village Mas–ha
only has one religion, Islam. The people of Mas–ha wake up before sunrise to the voice of the
Sheikh, who is the man who calls us for prayer. Due to the small size of the village, everyone hears
the call to prayer; the Sheikh doesn't even need to use the microphone. To call the villagers to
prayer, the Sheikh stands in the high tower of the mosque and recites the Athan, which is the formal
call for prayer in Arabic. When everyone lines up for prayer, if some one is missing, it is noticed
quickly. Once everyone is accounted for, the people line up in a straight line side by side and begin
the prayer. After prayer is finished, everyone returns home for a simple breakfast before the
workday begins. The men head out to their fieldwork, the kids go to school, and the mothers do the
housework. During the workday there are two more prayers that they attend, Duhr and Asr, and one
more

Holocaust And The Holocaust
Holocaust, by definition, refers to a systematic and organized persecution targeting a specific group
of individuals in a society. The conceptualization and justification of holocaust takes a political path,
in most cases, and augmented by economic or social ideologies; with the targeted group or
population perceived of not living up to the standards to achieving the ideologies. In other words,
the coordination and implementation of holocaust, be it state–sponsored or by external governments'
foreign policies, seeks to destroy or realign the essential foundations of life, torture, maim, and
deliberate infliction of direct physical and psychological destruction. This follows violation of
human rights and freedoms; cases of genocide, displacements, establishment of police–states and
discriminatory regimes that further ruin the well–being of the people in the long run (Petersohn
1047). Palestine has had significant disintegration of political and social institutions, cultures,
religion, and experienced forced blights that deteriorated personal liberties, dignity and health. In
Palestine's case, the disintegration has over time taken a political perspective and fueled by war,
armed conflict and political violence; aimed at destroying ethnic and racial groups.
To understand the extent of human rights violation in Palestine, it is prudent to understand the
strategies employed, and further delve in to the specific violations. Historically, Israel's occupation
of Gaza strip and West

Crossing Borders
Crossing Borders
The beat–up Arab minivan slowed tentatively under the scrutinizing gaze of the Israeli soldier on
duty. The routine was simple. About halfway between Damascus Gate in East Jerusalem and
Ramallah, the West Bank commercial center, the driver, blaring Arabic music on his radio,
maneuvered around the dusty slabs of concrete that composed the Beit Haninah Checkpoint. He
waited for a once–over by the Hebrew–speaking 18–year–old and permission to continue.
Checkpoints–usually just small tin huts with a prominent white and blue Israeli flag–have become
an integral and accepted part of Palestinian existence under Israeli occupation. But for me, a silent
passenger in the minivan, each time we entered the no man's land ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This summer I traversed these border crossings and military checkpoints several times a week,
traveling from the comfortable West Jerusalem neighborhood where I was staying, to various
locations in the West Bank. Now that I am home, I cannot help but return again and again to this
millisecond of uncertainty. I realize now that border crossings and checkpoints have permeated my
intellectual and personal lives here at school as I continue crossing over symbolic borders in both
my extra–curricular and academic endeavors.
For example, I have crossed over from the back of the classroom to the front, and have been both
rewarded and challenged by my teaching experiences. Since my freshman year of high school, I
have taught Hebrew language and Judaic studies at a local religious school, where I have tried to
impart my love for my heritage to middle–school–age students. Additionally, I have not only
volunteered but also invested personally in problematic middle school classrooms. Whether role–
playing methods of de–escalating a fight, or dividing the class into China and the U.S. in order to
simulate global politics, each class has given me a fresh outlook on education as well as a renewed
excitement for my own studies.

As a student, the opportunity to share my passion for learning has been personally fulfilling; the

Essay on Israel-Palestine: Two-State vs One-State Solution
What Does The Future Hold for Israel–Palestine?
The Israeli–Palestinian conflict has proven to be one of the most complex and "intractable" conflicts
of modern history – or as some may even add – of all time. And after many decades of failed
attempts at peacemaking in this region, there still seems to be no conceivable end to the conflict.
During those same decades, most of the parties involved as well as the international community
have embraced the idea of a two–state solution, but the question we pose today asks whether this
solution is still a viable option considering the present context, and if not, is it finally time to
consider a one–state solution? This essay will argue that although a two–state solution remains the
more ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, the involvement and conflict–resolution approaches of the international community
during the South–African ordeal differed greatly from those of today, since Israel has a more
complex relationship with the United–States than South–Africa ever did and an international boycott
of Israel would ultimately fail as it would be interpreted as a repetition of the Holocaust, which
began with the simple slogan "Don't buy from the Jews" and which no one in their right mind
desires today! (5)
So, is a two–state solution a more viable option? One might think that a two–state option is a very
remote possibility seeing the constant hostility from the Palestinian side, the crisis and disconnect
between Hamas and the official Palestinian Authority, the fragmentation of the West Bank territory
into districts due to growing Israeli settlements, and an almost inexistent peace process between the
two nations in light of a unilateral Israeli approach to conflict resolution. However, it is also vital to
underline that the lack of evidence of a one–state option being the optimal solution to the problem
makes the route towards a two–state solution more compelling in comparison. In fact, by opting for
a one–state solution and

The Conflict Of The Palestinian Negotiations
The word 'colonization' and 'encroachment of lands' reach a new level when we talk about the
Occupied Palestinian territory. In 1948, with the establishment of the state of Israel more than three
quarters of the Palestinian population were forcibly dispossessed and expelled to become refugees in
neighboring Arab states to make way for the 'newcomers'(Giacaman et al., 2009).
Since then the lives of British Mandate Palestinians kept on becoming worse with ongoing conflicts
and failed attempts of resolutions. The outcomes of the Israeli–Palestinian negotiations to peace
have not yet been determined. But what has been seen is that since the eruption of violence in
September 2000, Palestinians have suffered from a lack of access to basic services, particularly
much needed medical services and violations of the health–related rights, which have also increased
considerably with time (Stefanini & Ziv, 2004).
From that time, multiple roadblocks have been established in the West Bank and in the Gaza,
preventing people in these areas from accessing medical care. Physical barriers have been
established around villages, medical personnel have been denied free passage, ambulances were
torched with fire, hospitals have been surrounded by tanks and searched and have been left without
medical supplies, residents have been imprisoned in their homes without basic food items or access
to medicines (Stefanini & Ziv, 2004).
This assignment will outline the major health problems in the Occupied

The History Behind The Conflict
The History Behind the Conflict
A conflict that started when the Romans invaded and conquered Judea, the homeland of the Jews,
and claimed it to be Palestine. Later on, Palestine was conquered by the Arabs. For more than a
thousand years, the Arabs have inhabited in Palestine.
With much resentment for those who stole their home of ancient times, there was the creation of the
Zionist Movement. The plan was to bring back Jews to Israel, but with the situations, they were to
overlook the large population of the Arabs located there.
In 1917, Palestine was endowed to Britain. Palestine was acknowledged as a League of Nations
mandate to construct a national home for the Jews. Resentment was now towards the Jewish
population for stealing land that the Arabs claimed as theirs. Riots were commonly repeated, and
following was a revolt. Fabricating the rivalry between the Jews and the Arabs in Palestine.
In 1947, the United Nations rationed the land into states between the Arabs and the Jews. This was
not accepted by the Arabs, so a war was declared. With the Jews being victorious, they extended
their state. The Arab states still refused to recognize Israel or make an attempt to make peace.
With the Jews and the Arabs disagreeing with one another, many wars broke out, terror raids
executed, and the Israeli reprisals.
Who is Involved in the Conflict?
Many have been pulled in to participate in theirs contra distinction. With the countries picking their
sides to have a difficult time

The Peace Process : West Bank And Gaza Strip
Since the 6 Day War of 1967, Israel has occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the Palestinian
economy has become extremely dependent on the richer economy of Israel. Many thought that the
signing of the Oslo accords in 1993 would relieve the constraints on the growth of Palestinians
would be removed since peace would give them the opportunity to implement their own economic
priorities. However, because of the second Intifada, the retraction of the peace process brought West
Bank and Gaza Strip to a worse condition than it already was in. Today, the Palestinian economy is
still directly tied to Israel's economy. With the failure of Oslo accords, the divided Palestinian
territories separated between Israeli and Palestinian authorities led way to the development of an
Israeli system of permits and passes for Palestinians to travel within the occupied territories. This
was the start of many policies against Palestine. The Palestinian economy is now isolated from
world markets, and also from the restriction of moving goods and people between the West Bank,
Gaza Strip, as well as cutting off transit between Palestinian population centers within the
Palestinian territories. This policy of closure is said to have been established as a security measure to
prevent or reduce the chances of a Palestinian attack on Israeli citizens or security. My sense of the
Closure Policy is not only did this policy restrict movements of people and good, the external
closure (limiting Palestinian

The Conflict Between Israelis And Palestinians
Erin Shin
Combs
English 1–2 Acc., P. 1
18 April 2016
The Conflict Between Israelis and Palestinians
On July 14, 2014, Mohammed Suliman, a Muslim living in Gaza City, tweeted, "Amir, 12, and
Mohammed. 10, want to buy yogurt. Things are calm, they tell their mom. They leave the house. A
blast is heard. They 're dead" (Hosford). Tragic though it is, this is not a rare phenomenon in this
region. In fact, 2,314 Palestinians were killed and 17,125 injured just in 2014 alone as a result of
Israel's activities in the Gaza Strip, West Bank, and East Jerusalem, according to the annual report
by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). Because of the unfair
treatment of Palestinians, the situation in Israel/Palestine is a human rights conflict.
To further understand this conflict, one must first know how it began. In 1948, the country of Israel
was formally created. Technically speaking, this would be the origin of this conflict, but some
scholars think it began earlier. They believe it was a result of the Jewish exiles in ancient times when
the land was conquered by the Romans. The land was then taken over by Arabs, who are still found
there today.
Jews had several reasons for immigrating to Palestine. Firstly, in the late 19th century, Jews created
a movement to migrate back to the Holy Land, ignoring the fact that the area was already occupied
by Palestinians. As a result, conflicts over who had rights to the land arose. Great Britain was in
control of

Israel Water Conflict
The long and winding road to peace between Israel and Palestine is fraught with complications that
impede the establishment of stable coexistence in the troubled region. For as long as the Israeli–
Palestinian conflict has been ongoing, it has largely been recognized as a dispute over land, borders,
and sovereignty. Within the core conflict of land rights lies the equally important and inseparable
issue of water rights. Inequality between Israeli citizens and Palestinians in the occupied territories
permeates into all aspects of daily life from land ownership to travel restrictions to resource access,
including water. A humanitarian crisis has arisen out of Israel's policy of allocating the lion's share
of the available water to Israeli citizens ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The majority of freshwater sources come from groundwater and other natural water reservoirs that
are concentrated in the northern half of the country; these bodies of water include the Jordan River
and its tributaries, the Sea of Galilee (also known as Lake Tiberias), the Coastal Aquifer, and the
Mountain Aquifer (3). Politics withheld, the roots of the water problem boil down to basic
economics: limited resources and ever–growing demand. Sharing primary sources of groundwater
and surface freshwater between Israelis and Palestinians has been especially complicated given the
region's dry physical climate as well as the volatile political climate. The prevailing environmental
conditions are limitations imposed by nature, but the problem has been compounded by the growing
population and demand and exacerbated by unequal resource governance and the present reality of
military occupation

Disputed Territory of Israel and Palestine
The territory of Israel and Palestine has been disputed since 1947, and the conflict in this region
continues to this day. It has become an international conflict as it has spread outside the boundaries
of those nations involved, associating other countries such as Syria, Jordan and Egypt with the
contentions. Other countries have also become involved, with the aim of generating peace and
stability throughout the region, but as of yet, the unrest remains. The recent conflict originally arose
after world war two as a result of the UN (United Nations) allowing the division of the Palestine
region into Jewish and Arab sectors because of the migration of many Jews into the region, in 1930
alone 230,000 Jews moved into this location to avoid the negative attitudes and actions that were
brought about as a result of the Hitler Regime. The Palestinians believe that Israel belongs to them,
and that the UN's decision is wrong, whereas the Jews believe that parts of the land belong to them
because of the religiously important history related to the location, a movement known as Zionism
also encouraged Jews to move to Palestine as they saw it as the natural location to create a Jewish
state. One location that was proven in court to religiously belong to the Jews is the Sheik Jarrah
neighbourhood, where Jews are now being allowed to settle, with the other parts of the population
being forcefully evicted from their homes.
One location that is populated by Palestinians is that of the

The West Bank
1. Amiry proves that the stereotypes of the Israeli and Palestinian people are misguided. Salim,
Suad's husband, treats her very well. The same goes for many other Palestinian husbands. Suad is an
educated architect. Despite that stereotype that Israeli and Palestinian's hate each other, the book
proves that not to be the case. Suad takes an Israeli man to the hospital due to a heart attack proving
that compassion, at times, can override territories. She chooses an Israeli vet for her dog, Nura.
1.1 Suad chose the Israeli vet because she felt that Dr. Hisham was sexist for taking so long to give
Nura her vaccines due to her being a female dog. She was able to get better medicine for Nura. This
is a big deal because Nura enjoys more ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
3.3 The soap factory was historic. Suad felt like their heritage was slowly being erased. The soap
factory did not have all of the strict rules in place that the other business's did.
3.4 Suad was a rebel of sorts. Her personality rubbed the soldiers the wrong way. So in a sense, they
tore it up because they could. She would stare at the soldiers and they did not like that.
4. Suad dealt with the occupation with finding humor in the absurdity of it all. Like when she gave
the the soldier the excuse the Nura could not driver herself to Jerusalem and needed Suad to drive
her. She found humor with Salim and his cousin getting arrested not for breaking rules but for the
mere fact that she would not stop staring at a soldier. Humor was how she survived.
4.1 Rami felt like he could seek revenge on his classmates if he became a collaborator. Collaborators
felt like they would get easier access to Israel but were looked upon as traitors by the Palestinians.
5.1The thing that surprised me the most about Budrus were the women. They seemed more fearless
than the men on some occasions. I had to laugh when the women would say to the one female Israeli
soldier, "Yasina, come join us." I was also surprised at how peaceful the Palestinian people tried to
protest.
5.2 Both sides want peace. By watching the movie it seemed as so many olive trees were being
destroyed

The First Two Uprisings Of The West Bank, Gaza And East...
The term intifada properly translates as shaking off and in this literal sense the first two uprisings in
1987–1993 and 2000–2003 failed to achieve the goal of Palestinian autonomy or eventual
independence. The First Intifada took place on the 8th of December 1987. This protest was against
Israeli's occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem. At the crowded checkpoint
Israeli truck swerved and killed four The Palestinians. Palestinians in revenge swept across the Gaza
Strip, spread to the World Bank and set into motion a blaze of nationalist resistance to occupation.
Intifada began unpredictably spontaneous actions such as stone–throwing were happening, but later
on Intifada became more organized. Students, women, workers, agriculture started to grow food in
gardens and at home to replace Israeli goods. Clinics were providing emergency help to people who
were in need. Palestinians always have seen themselves as occupied, that what made them
economically depend on Israel. Palestinian's work, wages were half of what Israeli workers would
get paid, their taxes were high and another thing was that they didn't have any kind of job security,
because Israeli security denied them any rights within Israel. In this case, position of Palestine is
understandable, they are like any other people wanted to be free from being heavily dependent on
the Israeli's rules and resist the force that has been used against them.
Another thing that made Palestine angry was that

The Conflict Of The West Bank And Gaza Strip
One State, Two States Few, if any, modern conflicts are as complex as the Arab–Israeli conflict.
Specifically, the political situation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip has led to bloodshed, political
high wire acts, and cycles of hope and disappointment for decades. Consensus has generally leaned
towards advocated a two–state solution for the conflict, in which the Israel remains a Jewish state,
and the Palestinian Arabs establish their own country carved from currently Israeli–occupied
territories. This solution has become more infeasible, not more attainable, efforts to find a lasting
peace have occurred. The main alternative, a one–state solution, in which one nation takes full
control of the Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While UN Security Council Resolution 242 called for Israel to remove itself from these areas and
return to its pre–1967 War borders (Farsakh 2005), Israel continued its presence in the region. In the
years that have followed, numerous solutions have been proposed to solve the crisis and to bring a
lasting peace and sense of stability to the area. The solution most supported up to now has been the
two–state solution. In this solution, parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (likely the full area in
the latter) would become part of an independent, self–governing Palestinian state, while the rest of
the area would become Israeli territory. With this, Palestinians would have a nation–state and could
chart their own political and cultural course. Most nations and international organizations have lent
their support to this idea, including the US, the UN, and Israel and Palestinian Authority (Sanger
2016), forming the basis for most peace talks aiming to resolve the conflict. The question that now
remains is why has this solution not yet been achieved? The disagreement on the borders of each
state remains one of the primary roadblocks to achieving the two–state solution. There exists no
consensus on which land would belong to Israel and which to an independent Palestinian state. One
complicating issue in

Essay on Israeli Settlements
On the 17th of April 2012, Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas, sent a letter to Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicating the only way the Palestinian Authority would agree
to move forward with peace talks is if Israel would agree to freeze the building of settlements in the
West Bank1. Israeli settlements in the West Bank have become the largest obstacle in negotiating a
two–state solution and it appears the continued expansion of Israeli settlements may render a two–
state solution impossible. Inside the Israeli government following the 1967 war there was a debate
about how to deal with the newly occupied territories of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula,
and Golan Heights. The debate revolved around two ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With Israel's border needs in mind, Allon proposed a multifaceted solution for Israel's occupation of
the West Bank. He suggested Israel would incorporate the Jordan Valley, the Judean desert along the
west coast of the Dead Sea, the area surrounding the Jerusalem metropolitan area, and a small tract
of land south west of the Palestinian city of Hebron6. This configuration of newly incorporated land
was designed to "provide Israel with the minimal defensible borders that are indispensable without
impairing, to any meaningful extent, the basic interests of the other side, including those of the
Palestinian community"7. It is important to note that Allon envisioned that the non–incorporated
"Palestinian" parts of the West Bank would remain free of Israeli settlers and would eventually be
handed back to the Kingdom of Jordan in order to form a future Jordanian–Palestinian state. The
second important part of Allon's plan is the use of a "selective settlement policy" within the
incorporated areas of the West Bank as part of Israel's defense strategy8. The selective settlement
policy allowed for Israelis to settle in the West Bank, but only in areas lacking large Palestinian
cities and villages. Unfortunately, the Allon Plan failed to account for the religious fundamentalism
that would motivate much of the settlement building in the West Bank.
Founded in 1974, the Gush Emunim movement strongly advocated the return of Jews to the

The Pros And Cons Of The Camp Israel
The threat of radical Islam and the deadlock in the Washington conferences forced the Rabin govt.
to change the Israeli rejection to negotiate with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Subsequently, secret negotiations talks initiated between the Israel and the PLO, which were held in
Oslo, Norway. On 13 September 1993, in Washington both the Israel and the PLO singed the
Declaration of principles. In the declaration both states mutually recognized each other. It stated that
during the 5 year period Israel would withdraw its military from the Jericho and the Gaza Strip, also
with its additional withdrawals from unspecified areas of the west bank. The declaration also stated
the other key issues like territories to be surrendered by Israel, the status of Jerusalem, water rights,
nature of Palestinian entity to be created, the refugee problem and the future of Israeli settlers were
kept aside for the final status talks.
In 1994 Palestinian Authority (PA) was formed by the PLO, which had the "self–governing" powers
in the areas, which were being redeveloped by the Israeli forces. In January of 1996, Palestine held
election for the presidency of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Palestinians and most of the Muslim world did not accept this stance. Arafat left the Camp
David among his constituents, as he did not bend to the American and Israel pressure. When Barak
returned home he faced political crisis in his own government, also the departure of coalition
partners as they felt that Barak had offered too much to the Palestinians. The Israelis came to realize
that they would not achieve peace if they kept insisting on imposing the terms on the Palestinians;
majority of the population began to believe that if this were the case, they would have to learn to
live with the conflict

Should The Military Occupation Of Israel
Apart from the growth of infrastructure, the military occupation needs to end so that the Palestinian
people can move freely through Palestine because the current restrictions through the occupation
destroy Palestine's ability to self–govern. We need to end the military occupation; it has gone on
long enough. After the Oslo Accords, the West Bank is now comprised of small detached Palestinian
areas within a continuous Israeli–controlled region (Le More 984). For eventual stability, Israel must
relinquish its control of the West Bank and Gaza. The occupation creates the conditions for
Palestinian hatred of Israel, especially when Israel bans travel between Palestinian villages in the
West Bank through the presence of military personnel and checkpoints (Hadid & Sengupta). Israelis
need to let Palestine be a state, and if they support its development, the Palestinians will hate Israel
less. Palestinians need to be able to go throughout the West Bank, or else there will never be self–
determination. To grant further autonomy, Israel should allow for more transportation between Gaza
and the West Bank. A road between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip would drastically improve the
free movement of the Palestinian people (Hazboun). If there is more freedom of movement,
Palestine would get more opportunity to develop, and Israel would dampen the anti–Israeli
sentiments amongst the Palestinians. The freedom of movement can only occur if the occupation
ends; Israeli withdrawal is best

Jerusalem And The West Bank
Research In Jerusalem and the West Bank, there are many holy sites that are considered to be sacred
to the Christian faith, Jewish faith as well as the Islamic faith. Those sites include: The Dome of the
Rock, Al–Aqsa Mosque, The Western (Wailing) Wall, and many others. The land of Jerusalem and
the West Bank is also thought to be sacred in their own rights due to the history of who has occupied
these areas in the past. Each one of these sites is seen as very sacred in the international world.
Recent acts of violence have plagued this area. These acts have led to deaths on all sides. There
needs to be a protection of access to these sites for all people that see it as sacred: The Muslims, The
Christians, and also The Jewish population. This site is in a lot of danger because of its location, of
the ambiguity about who is in control of which part. There 's a lot of violence going on in the West
Bank. There are thousands of Palestinians in the streets now that there have seen so many acts of
violence. The recent reporting's feature single independent attacks from young Palestinian men. In
the past, there have been more collective acts of violence, but now a day there are single
independent person 's. Due to these actions of violence, the citizens have continued to riot. This has
probed police interaction with the protesting rioters and again more violence. A Political solution
that many experts believe is needed in order to correctly combat this issue there have been many

Analysing the Israel-Palestine Conflict in International...
Analysing the Israel–Palestine Conflict in International Relations Perspective
Introduction to International Relations
Analysing the Israel–Palestine Conflict in International Relations Perspective
Background
Since the early 20th Century, Israelis and Palestinians have been fighting over the land between the
Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. With the assumption that Palestine is a state to facilitate
discussion, this report sketches out the most significant elements of the conflict on the three levels
defined by Kenneth Waltz, and applies the Realist theory of international relations (IR) to the "Two–
State" solution.
Levels of analysis
1. First Level
The first level focuses on individuals ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, divergent values among parties could result in unstable governments. Such instability has
been particularly highlighted by frequent national elections and coalition reconstruction in Israel.
The PA resembles a classic authoritarian regime under the reign of Mahmoud Abbas even though it
is supposed to be democratic. The PA government remains relatively stable under this structure.
However, militant groups like Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad could be a credible external threat
to the established governance of the PA. Since 2003, conflicts between the two major factions, the
traditional dominant party, Fatah, and its subsequent electoral rival, Hamas, have fractured the
Palestinian side. "After the Hamas took power in the Gaza Strip in June 2007, the territory
controlled by the PA was split between Fatah in the West Bank, and Hamas in the Gaza Strip."[1]
The estrangement between the parties has led to "the fall of bipartisan governance of the PA"[2].
3. Third Level
The third level is the international level which can be broken down into sub–groups such as relevant
third–party states, transnational actors, international organizations, and the relations between states.

The Quartet on the Middle East represented by a special envoy formed by the United States, Russia,
and the United Nations is an international contingent mediating the official negotiations. The

The Iron Wall

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Robin Anderson

More from Robin Anderson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Iron Wall