2. SIDDIQUI et al.: NOVEL ULTRAWIDEBAND PRINTED ANTENNA WITH A DUAL COMPLEMENTARY CHARACTERISTIC 975
Fig. 1. Schematic of a printed circular monopole fed by SRR coupled and shunt
strip shorted CPW (Configuration A): (a) Top view with SRR on bottom met-
allization (b) Side view with SRR separated by from the CPW fed Monopole
(c) Schematic of a CPW transmission line shorted with shunt strips of width
(d) Schematic of a unit cell square SRR.
II. ANTENNA TOPOLOGIES AND DESIGN RATIONALE
Three prototype antennas namely Configuration A, Configu-
ration B and Configuration C, having CPW feed with different
combinations of SRR and CRR loading with and without
metallic shunt strip have been designed and fabricated. Con-
figuration A as shown in Fig. 1(a) comprises a printed circular
monopole antenna of radius, , fed by a shunt strip shorted
CPW and coupled with a pair of SRRs. The CPW feed consists
of ground planes having width and , length and a
signal line of width, and length with symmetric gaps,
, between the ground planes and signal line. The antenna is
printed on a substrate having thickness and dielectric constant
as shown in Fig. 1(b). Fig. 1(c) shows the alignment of the
thin metallic shunt strips of width , shorting the signal line
with the ground planes. Two square shaped split ring resonators
having dimensions ‘ ’ which is half the external side-length
of the SRR, conductor thickness ‘ ’, separation between rings
‘ ’ and split gaps ‘ ’ and ‘ ’ as shown in Fig. 1(d), are
printed on the bottom or back side of the substrate. The center
of the shunt strips is positioned at a distance from
bottom edge of the substrate. For optimal excitation, the SRRs’
axes should be aligned with the centre of the CPW slots and
the shunt strips. A fabricated prototype of Configuration A is
shown in Fig. 2. Configuration B is similar to Configuration
A, but without the shunt strips as was used in [6], where as,
Configuration C is similar to Configuration B loaded with a
pair of closed ring resonators (CRRs) in place of SRRs. The
structural dimensions of the CRRs are similar to SRRs with
shorted split gaps ( ).
The propagating electric field vector in the CPW is polar-
ized along the plane of the SRRs and the magnetic field vector
is along the SRRs’ axes. The fundamental mode of the propa-
gating signal excites the SRRs at a frequency determined by the
Fig. 2. Fabricated prototype of a printed circular monopole fed by SRR coupled
and shunt strip shorted CPW (Configuration A) (a) Top view (b) Bottom view.
SRRs’ dimensions and the constitutive parameters of the host
substrate [9], [6]. The diamagnetic behavior of the SRRs in Con-
figuration B yields a frequency notch in the UWB antenna as
was discussed in [6]. Interestingly, when a metallic shunt strip is
placed on the CPW transmission line strategically aligned with
the SRRs axes, thereby effectively shunting the signal line with
the ground planes, as in Configuration A, the frequency notched
UWB response of the antenna is transformed into a narrow-
band response. Hence, the proposed Configuration A exhibits
a complementary phenomenon vis a vis to the frequency notch
response of the antenna in Configuration B. The position of the
shunt strips should be coincident with the SRRs’ axes and their
combination forms a bandpass filter and yields a sharp narrow
band response corresponding to the resonance frequency of the
SRR. If the SRRs are replaced with CRRs as in Configuration C,
that is with shorted split gaps ( ), the antenna re-
stores its UWB characteristic as has been verified in this work.
The closing of the rings effectively destroys the magnetic reso-
nance of the SRRs and restores transmission for the entire UWB
spectrum [10].
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The three prototypes were fabricated on Taconic sub-
strates having , and thickness
mm. The circular monopole having radius
mm and the CPW feed design having ground plane
length mm, width mm and feed gap
mm were common for all three prototypes. For Config-
uration A, a pair of SRRs having dimensions mm,
mm, mm and split gaps mm,
were printed on the other side of the substrate with their
axes coinciding with the slot lines in the CPW as shown in
Figs. 1 and 2.
The shunt strips having width mm, at
mm, are used to short the signal line of the CPW with
the ground planes. Configuration B was fabricated by removing
the shunt strips ( ) from Configuration A. Configura-
tion C was similar to Configuration B but with shortened split
gaps ( ) of the SRRs. The prototypes were designed
and simulated using a commercial EM Simulator [11] and val-
idated with the measured impedance and radiation characteris-
tics. Fig. 3 shows the comparison between the measured reflec-
tion coefficients of antenna Configuration A and antenna Con-
Authorized licensed use limited to: Birla Institute of Technology & Science. Downloaded on April 28,2020 at 08:09:37 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
3. 976 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 14, 2015
Fig. 3. Measured of the CPW fed Circular Monopole loaded with SRRs
only (Configuration B) and with SRRs and shunt strips (Configuration A). Pa-
rameters for Configuration A: mm, mm, mm,
mm, mm, mm, mm, mm;
SRR parameters: mm, mm, mm,
mm Shunt strip width mm, mm; Parameters for
Configuration B: same as Configuration A, with Parameters for Con-
figuration B: as in Fig. 2 with .
figuration B. For Configuration B, with the CPW fed monopole
antenna coupled only with a pair of SRRs, the response
yields a notch centered at 6.55 GHz which corresponds to the
resonance frequency of the SRR. On the other hand for Con-
figuration A, the introduction of shunt strips yields a pass band
response and a sharp narrowband characteristic is obtained at
6.59 GHz in the measured . The theoretical value of the res-
onance frequency as per the proposed formulation in [6] was
computed at 6.52 GHz. The figure validates the complemen-
tary behavior of antenna Configuration A and Configuration B,
where the notch and the narrowband response corresponds to
almost the same frequencies. Fig. 4 shows the simulated reflec-
tion coefficients of the CPW fed Circular monopole loaded with
SRRs and shunt strips (Configuration A) for variable SRR pa-
rameters. The shift in the narrowband frequency is achieved by
changing the SRR dimensions and without scaling the printed
monopole dimensions. SRRs having different values with
different ring separation, ‘ ’ and split gaps
values were simulated to achieve a wide tuning from 4.8 GHz
to 8.4 GHz. The four encircled plots show the variation in the
reflection coefficient with varying split gap dimension ‘ ’ (
mm, mm and mm) for a fixed set of ,
and . The variation of the narrow band operating frequency
due to the gap variation can be exploited by introducing a phys-
ical device like varactor to achieve practical reconfigurability.
The SRR variables provide significant flexibility only limited
by the width of the signal line to shift the narrowband reso-
nances over 50% of the UWB spectrum. The plot also vali-
dates the simulated result with the measured result for Config-
uration A. Fig. 5 shows the measured and simulated reflection
coefficients of the printed monopole antenna Configuration ,
where the CPW is coupled with CRRs which are basically SRRs
with shorted split gaps ( ). Shorting of the split gaps
effectively converts the split ring resonators into closed ring res-
onators thus nullifying its effect on the transmission line and
therefore restoring the ultra wideband response of the antenna
operating from 2.8 GHz to 11 GHz as seen from the figure. The
plot is also compared with the measured data obtained using a
conventional CPW fed printed circular monopole.
Fig. 4. Simulated of the CPW fed Circular Monopole loaded with SRRs
and shunt strips (Configuration A) for variable SRR parameters and compared
with measured prototype of Configuration A. Parameters as in Fig. 3 with SRR
strip width, mm and shunt strip width, mm.
Fig. 5. Measured and simulated of the CPW fed Circular Monopole loaded
with closed ring resonators (shorted split gaps, ) and without shunt
strips(Configuration C)compared with CPW fed monopole only without SSRs
and shunt wires. Parameters as in Fig. 3.
The measured radiation patterns for the fabricated prototype
of antenna Configuration A is shown in Fig. 6. The plot shows
the co- and cross- polarized beam patterns for the narrowband
SRRs and shunt strip coupled CPW fed planar monopole (Con-
figuration A) in the E ( ) and H( ) planes at 6.59 GHz.
The radiation patterns show good monopole type radiation for
the E-planes with good cross polar discrimination of at least
dB in and good omni directional pattern in the
H( ) plane. The maximum calibrated gain in the E( )
plane as a function of frequency for Configurations A and C are
depicted in Fig. 7. A gain of 3.1 dBi at 6.59 GHz was obtained
for the narrowband antenna (Configuration A) and the gain in
the other frequency range is suppressed to less than zero. This
again is complementary to the gain pattern for the frequency
notched antenna (Configuration B) where the calibrated gain is
well above 1 dBi except at the notch frequency where it drops
to dBi as shown in Fig. 7.
The complementary nature of the antenna configurations A
and B can be explained with more physical insight by observing
the magnitude of the Poynting vector along one of the slots of
feeding-CPW line of the antenna over the entire UWB band as
a function of the distance from the feed position as illustrated in
Fig. 8. As shown in Fig. 8(a), the diamagnetic behavior of the
SRRs at its resonance frequency prohibits propagation at that
frequency whereas the rest of the spectrum is transmitted along
Authorized licensed use limited to: Birla Institute of Technology & Science. Downloaded on April 28,2020 at 08:09:37 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
4. SIDDIQUI et al.: NOVEL ULTRAWIDEBAND PRINTED ANTENNA WITH A DUAL COMPLEMENTARY CHARACTERISTIC 977
Fig. 6. Measured co-polarized and cross polarized radiation patterns for (a)
plane (E-plane), and (b) plane (H-plane) of the narrowband antenna
(Configuration A) resonating at 6.59 GHz. Parameters as in Fig. 3.
Fig. 7. Measured maximum realized calibrated gain characteristic in the (
) plane as a function of frequency of the CPW fed Circular Monopole loaded
with SRRs and shunt strips (Configuration A) and CPW fed Circular Monopole
loaded with SRRs only (Configuration B). Parameters as in Fig. 3.
the slot, giving rise to a notched UWB response. However, with
the positioning of the shunt wire, which acts as an electrical wall
on the transmission line, the filtered energy over a narrow band
is propagated along the line and coupled to the antenna ensuring
a narrow band operation of the antenna. The rest of the energy
is reflected back to the input port as depicted in Fig. 8(b), with
the dashed line indicating the central position of the shunt
wire at a distance mm from the input port.
IV. CONCLUSION
A novel idea to yield three different and complementary oper-
ating states using a simple CPW fed printed monopole antenna
is proposed. It has been demonstrated that a frequency notched
UWB antenna using a pair of SRRs can be transformed into a
narrowband antenna by shorting the signal line with the ground
planes using shunt strips. Simple bond wires or thin conducting
tapes can be used to transform the antenna response. It has also
been demonstrated that closing the gaps in the SRR rings, re-
store the UWB response of the antenna. The concept could be
exploited by embedding proper high-speed solid state or RF
MEMS based switches to achieve reconfigurability in cognitive
radio and MIMO applications.
Fig. 8. Simulated contour plots of the magnitude of the Poynting vectors of the
propagating electromagnetic energy though the longitudinal dimension of one
of the slots as a function of frequency. (a) Antenna Configuration B. Parameters
as in Fig. 3 with . (b) Antenna Configuration A. Parameters as in Fig. 3.
(Plots are in uniform scale).
REFERENCES
[1] P. S. Hall, P. Gardner, and A. Faraone, “Antenna requirements for soft-
ware defined and cognitive radios,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 100, no. 7, pp.
2262–2270, Jul. 2012.
[2] F. Ghanem, P. S. Hall, and J. R. Kelly, “Two port frequency reconfig-
urable antenna for cognitive radio,” Electron. Lett., vol. 45, no. 11, pp.
534–536, May 2009.
[3] E. Ebrahimi, J. R. Kelly, and P. S. Hall, “Integrated wide-narrowband
antenna for multi-standard radio,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.,
vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 2628–2635, Jul. 2011.
[4] Y. Tawk and C. G. Christodoulou, “A new reconfigurable antenna de-
sign for cognitive radio,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagat. Lett., vol.
8, pp. 1378–1381, 2009.
[5] J. Liang, L. Guo, C. C. Chiau, X. Chen, and C. G. Parini, “Study of
CPW-fed circular disc monopole antenna for ultra wideband applica-
tions,” in IEE Proc. Microw. Antennas Propagat., Dec. 2005, vol. 152,
no. 6, pp. 520–526.
[6] J. Y. Siddiqui, C. Saha, and Y. M. M. Antar, “Compact SRR loaded
UWB circular monopole antenna with frequency notch characteris-
tics,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 4015–4020,
Aug. 2014.
[7] A. K. Horestani, M. Duran-Sindreu, J. Naqui, C. Fumeaux, and
F. Martin, “Coplanar waveguides loaded with S-shaped split ring
resonators: Modeling and application to compact microwave filters,”
IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagat. Lett., vol. 13, pp. 1349–1352,
2014.
[8] J. K. A. Everard and K. K. M. Cheng, “High performance direct cou-
pled bandpass filters on coplanar waveguide,” IEEE Trans. Microw.
Theory Tech., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1568–1573, Sep. 1993.
[9] F. Aznar, J. Bonache, and F. Martin, “Improved circuit model for left-
handed lines loaded with split ring resonators,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol.
92, pp. 43512(1)–43512(3), 2008.
[10] K. Aydin and E. Ozbay, “Identifying magnetic response of split-ring
resonators at microwave frequencies,” Opto-Electron. Rev., vol. 14, no.
3, pp. 193–199, 2006.
[11] High Frequency Simulation Software,. Anysys, vol. 15.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Birla Institute of Technology & Science. Downloaded on April 28,2020 at 08:09:37 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.