European Imperialism Africa Dbq

European Imperialism Africa Dbq
Africa was imperialized in the 1880s. Before imperialism, African countries socially had thousands
of different tribes, nations, cultures and languages. Africa was also economically active before
imperialism by having complex trade. Europeans imperialized Africa to spread Christianity,
abolition of slavery, their beliefs in cultural and racial superiority and to open new markets.
Europeans also wanted Africa's natural resources like their ivory, gold, rubber, diamonds, fruit
minerals, palm oil and others. Europeans imperialized Africa by cooperating with local leaders,
taking advantage of African conflicts and because they had more weapons than Africa. The effects
of European imperialism on Africa were socially negative and economically negative. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was written in Rhodesia in the 1890s for the people interested in learning about life under
European rule. This was a primary source because the author was the leader of his people during this
time and so he got to experience the ways the British took away the power of his people first hand.
This document shows that the effects of imperialism were negative for Africa because the British
took away their land and animals. Another example of how the effects of imperialism were
economically negative is on document #4. document #4 was written by Elinor Burns who was a
British writer and Marxist (fought for the rights of workers). He wrote this in West Africa, 1927 for
the people interested in British imperialism in West Africa and said that food supplies that were
grown in colonies made a lot of money (cash crops). He also said that everything that the Africans
produced had to be given to the British for them to sell. This documents shows how the effects of
imperialism were negative because the Africans had to grow cash crops for the British to sell and
they didn't have
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

European Imperialism Dbq
"Imperialism is a policy in which a strong nation seeks to dominate other countries politically,
economically, and socially" (Chapter 11 sec.1). Europeans looked to Africa as a source of raw
materials, which could be used for Industrial products.The Europeans used technology to their
advantage. They had better artillery, a long range of communication, a cure for the malaria disease,
and transportation. The Europeans used all of their resources to help them imperialize Africa.
However, there were other driving forces such as competition, economy, cultural diversity, and
technology. The Europeans plan was to use their new technology to fight against Africa. The
europeans philosophy was that technology was the most effective driving force towards
imperializing Africa. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The reason europeans wanted these raw materials in the 1st place, was so they could make a profit
and benefit from it; and they felt Africa was the place. The Europeans used some of this technology
to get an advantage over Africa, because they knew Africa didn't have new guns and cures like the
Europeans did. In addition, "The Industrial Revolution led to many discoveries and inventions that
helped Europeans take over Africa(Document C)". Europeans had many inventions that made them
one step farther than Africa. Europeans had the repeating rifle, which is a faster loading gun that was
able to fire multiple shots more accurately. Another important invention that Europeans had that
Africa didn't was quinine. When European explorers and Historians traveled inside the interior of
Africa, some would catch Malaria, according to Document C. The Europeans knew that they were
going to come across diseases in Africa, so they prepared themselves with a cure called

European Imperialism In Britain
Over the course of history, societies of greater technological advancements have dominated and
often manipulated societies that lack their technological advancements. European countries and
especially England have caused a great deal of damage to cultures and societies around the world
through their manipulation of these entities.
Britain throughout history has multiple examples of imperialism and in all cases of imperialism the
native people lose some of their identity due to the colonization of Britain. Through manipulation
Britain has been able to reach a significant position as a world power. Britain was able to excel due
to the manipulation of the natives or of societies with lesser technological advancements.
Britain and its cases of

European Imperialism In Africa
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and
then colonized those countries in order to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling
countries to use the weaker countries for their resources such as oil, water, and land. Colonizing
other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There
are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries
"scrambled" for Africa, it seemed as though Africans had no say in anything that was happening to
their country. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and
power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Before European domination, the people of Africa were divided into hundreds of ethnic and
linguistic groups. Most followed traditional beliefs, while others converted to Islam or Christianity.
Europeans divided Africa and ignored the tribal, ethnic, and cultural boundaries of the African
people. This has led to tribal conflicts in many African nations that continue to this day. In South
Africa, for example, natives suffered from apartheid. Apartheid is segregation of political and
economic discrimination against non–europeans in South Africa. Cultural groups were also split
apart during imperialism. European leaders picked favorite culture groups, resulting in rivalries.The
East African states lost their independence and were subjected to european rule and administration
and many African chiefs and kings either were killed or sent to exile. The Africans were seen as an
inferior group and were forced to labor for European plantations. With the increase in Europeans
moving to East Africa, natives lost their land and were put into reserved camps. New boundaries
were drawn and defined in East Africa without respect of the tribes which led to disunity of
Africans. The colonies doing the mother country's hard work did not civilize the smaller colonies.
They were put to work as cheap labor. They had no freedom, had to do what the mother country said
since it has so much towering power over them, they were exploited and were taken advantage

"In imperialism nothing fails like success. If the conqueror oppresses his subjects, they will become
fanatical patriots, and sooner or later have their revenge; if he treats them well, and governs them for
their good, they will multiply faster than their rulers, till they claim their independence," William
Ralph Inge. It was not a good beginning for European imperialism in Africa. Between the 1500s and
1800s, european slavers and traders did not travel far from the african coast. The west coast of
Africa was known as "the white man's grave." Throughout the 300 years in Africa it was said to be
about buying slaves from the chief and managing to escape the waters of west Africa with your crew
and cargo still alive, instead of imperialism. Important ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The map explains, that there was notable rivalry in europe for African colonies with only two
exceptions, Liberia, and Ethiopia. Every square mile of Africa's region was taken (Doc A). This
holds importance because the two countries that did stay independent, expanded as well. A majority
rule of dictators wanted more land; facts. These next sources present the evidence that their national
identities were focused on being economic and industrial powers. Not to mention, in the passage it
states that Fabri believed that Germany needs to "strive after" colonies (Doc B). This matters
because Germany needed to compete with the Anglo–Saxons or the British to maintain its new
position of "industrial greatness." Meanwhile, Ruskin says the colonists' first aim of England
"should be to advance the power of England by land and sea ," (Doc

Examples Of European Imperialism
Gandhi once said, "Violent nationalism, otherwise known as imperialism, is a curse." What is
imperialism? It is defined as "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through
diplomacy or military force." An example of this is European Imperialism, which lasted from 1870
to 1915. European powers imperialized smaller countries/nations like Africa to gain resources,
power and most importantly, to spread their ideas. Through European Imperialism, imperialization
was mainly justified and caused by social relations that still manage to influence the world today by
disrupting traditions and social structures. These social beliefs highly impacted European
imperialism to give warrant on their actions.
European Imperialism was justified due to Europe's belief that they were the superior rac and had
the right to rule over inferior races. In Jules Ferry's speech on imperialism he says, "I repeat ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This leads to cultures being erased and shows how the modern world is still stirred to this day. From
Jules Ferry's speech he quotes, "...she must also be great country, exercising all of her rightful
influence throughout the world and carry everywhere that she can using her language, her customs,
her flag, her arms, and her genius." This speech proves why Europe is imperializing, to spread their
power and views of France socially, economically and politically. To add on, "Sub–Saharan Africa,
by 1900, was beginning to experience the more systematic loss of traditional values, particularly in
some areas where Christian missionaries he made advances." Imperialized countries lost their
beliefs and tradition due to Europe's views spreading, causing Europe to keep spreading power by
becoming imperialists. Hence, this allowed imperialism to be a good concept for Europeans but
negatively influencing other countries that were being taken

European Imperialism DBQ
Between the years 1881 and 1914, African territory was being invaded by Europeans during the
New Imperialism period. Before Europe's invasion, Africa consisted of various tribes and had no
central government due to this during the mid nineteenth century. Europe attempted to colonize
Africa using harsh military force and resulted in the European Scramble for Africa. The European
Scramble for Africa caused African leaders to have different reactions such as some wanting to have
no conflicts, but peace, surrendering to the Europeans due to fear, and also attempting to fight back
against the Europeans. One of the different ways Africans reacted was their way of resistance
against the Europeans. Various political leaders would rather have themselves ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to Europe's need of expansion they used military force to get their way through Africa, but
some societies wanted to rebel against them. Although some of these African societies rebelled
against Europe, they were defeated due to the advancements the Europeans had. In document 9,
Mojimba described how white men are more brutal and inhumane and also how white people got
their advantage over them because of their advanced guns and privileges. Also in document 4, it
explains how they were treated from the Europeans and the mass number of deaths that came from
rebelling against

New Imperialism in Africa was caused by many factors, and had a great impact on the histories of
both Europe and Africa, because of Europe's gain of land, money, and power, and Africa's loss of
culture and way of life. Although I see and understand motives by the Europeans, I do not agree that
they were justified for their actions in Africa. New Imperialism was a period of colonial expansion
into closer regions, such as Africa, by the strong European nations in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries. In 1869, the French finished the Suez Canal in Egypt, which connects the Mediterranean
Sea to the Red Sea, which ultimately leads to the Indian Sea. This shortcut to India was wanted by
all of Europe, and this worried Britain about their colony ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Almost every action done by Europeans was with the motive of gaining more wealth and becoming
more powerful, and this includes imperialism. In the eyes of the Europeans, by civilizing the
natives, the markets created far outweighed the losses of life and also culture to the natives. In my
eyes, it was not at all justified. The loss of thousands of years of culture is not worth the expansion,
money, or power. It was only a facade that all Europeans agreed with the imperialistic empire, as
seen in "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell. The narrator, a European police officer in Burma
saw that "imperialism was an evil thing" and "was all for the Burmese and all against their
oppressors, the British." The story shows the expectation placed on the Europeans to uphold this
superiority, as seen with the narrator shooting the elephant "solely to avoid looking a fool" in front
of the natives. I think that the people agreeing with imperialism were the minority in population, but
they were the majority in power, which is why the majority of the world started as European
colonies. All in all, I do not believe the Europeans were justified for their actions in Africa, and this
part of history directly influenced the

European Imperialism In Congo
At the age of Imperialism taking over or colonizing lands was a habit for strong empires or nations
and example of these colonized nations is Congo which mast of the European countries had their
eyes on it. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through
colonization, use of military force (Dicionary). It started in the 1870s when many of the European
countries started to colonize lands far from Europe mainly in Africa. There were very strong
Empires or imperial governments at this period of time like the British, German, and the Belgium
governments. Every Empire had its reasons and hustifications for colonizing and taking over any
lands, but the common reason is the natural resources or economy. Not only economy ... Show more
The British government in London had not been completely advised by Frere about the expected
attack on Zululand and at first was not overwhelmingly in the state of war. However, the entry of the
news of the defeat at Isandlwana in London on February 11–one of the significant shocks to British
eminence in the nineteenth century excited the British government into a full–scale battle to hide
any hint of failure confront. An army force led by Col. Evelyn Wood suffered an internal defeat at
Hlobane on March 28. However on March 29, the decisive victory over the Zulu at the Battle of
Kambula (Khambula). On the 2nd of April, a British Colum under Chelmsford's command exacted a
heavy defeat on the Zulu at Gingindlovu, where in excess of 1,000 Zulu were killed. Chelmsford's
troops at that point moved towards Cetshwayo's royal villages at Ulundi, where on July 4, 1879,
they exacted a final defeat on Cetshwayo's surviving warriors. Cetshwayo himself was caught in
August, and the Zulu nation was at the mercy of the British government, which had not yet thought
about how to join Zululand into its Southern Africa property. (Britannica,

Throughout history around the world, imperialism took a big role. Imperialism had positive and
negative effects. The Age of Imperialism took place between 1800–1914. During this time, Europe
played a big role and was a major world leader. Many European countries had set up their colonies
in many parts of the world such as Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Because of the European
imperialism, they grew in power, making them a big part of the world's power. They are also gaining
natural resources and land. However, although Europe is gaining all the positive effects of this
imperialism, the other countries––Asia, Africa, and Latin America––had an entirely different effect.
Instead of gaining power like the Europeans, these countries and their people are being mistreated.
They had all their land, culture, freedom, respect taken away from them. In addition to these
negative effects, there was also racism involved. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, the negative effects overthrew the positive effects. In document 5, an African woman,
Baba, describes how the she had lost her income from the slaves fleeing. The woman also
mentioned how the reduction in taxes was because they had to pay to the local chiefs and officials.
In Document 6, the Ndebele people were not happy when the British overran them. They therefore,
revolted to surprise their oppressors. However, because their oppressors were advanced in their
weapons, the Ndebele people were defeated and the Ndebele king committed suicide. Ndansi
Kumalo recounted what had happened. He retold how they surrendered to the white people and how
the white people were cruel and assaulted many of their people. So they wanted to fight back and be
killed instead of bearing to see it continue to

20th Century European Imperialism
Imperialism is a policy of extending a countries power on influence through democracy or military
force. During the 19th through 20th century the world was going through what is now known as the
New Imperialism. During this time Europe was conquering Africa. Europe went through a lot of
changes that affected their belief about themselves. The changes that happened during this time led
to the resurgence of economic nationalism and national imperialism. Europeans occupied the top
end of the continuum. The Europeans thought that Africans were inferior. Slave abolitionists
contributed to the idea of Africans being and inferior by arguing that Africans had to be protected
from the slavers and that they couldn't take care of themselves. Also scientist believed that the
Africans were and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The scientist thought the Africans were stuck in the barbarism stage. The barbarism stage is
accompanied by the beginning of settled agriculture. The Europeans thought the way that Africans
worked made them fat and lazy. The Europeans thought this because Africans worked very slowly.
They didn't understand why the Africans worked the way they did. Europeans argued that by
colonizing Africa they were also exporting civilization to a continent which they regarded as
evolutionary backwards and undeveloped. The departing powers left behind few Africans equipped
to lead their newly independent nation. On the eve of the Scramble of Africa only ten percent of the
continent was under control of Western nations. One of the last regions of the world that was largely
untouched by informal imperialism and civilization was Sub Saharan Africa. Europe saw this region
as a great resource to get Great Britain out of the Long depression that lasted from 1873–1876.
Toward the end of the scramble for Africa Europe really didn't gain that much in investment as they
thought they

Effects of European Imperialism in Africa Amidst the thriving chaos of the Industrial Revolution
and subsequent to the politically volatile French Revolution, Europe in the 1800s was an ever–
changing realm of new systems, machines, methods of transportation, ideas, and leaders. Those
leaders faced a plethora of challenges both internally and externally, as both their subjects and other
countries were angry with them for various reasons. One of the problems these rulers faced was the
matter of imperial power on other continents. So, the more relevant European leaders met at the
Berlin Conference to decide what each country was allowed to colonize. In doing so, the rulers they
legalized the Scramble for Africa, therefore allowing colonization ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The vibrant ways of life of man Africans was turned into weeks of excruciating labor, the elaborate
societal and structures in place were disrupted, mental development was crushed, and Congolese
were massacred (Morel). In the words of journalist Edward Morel, "to kill the soul in a people–this
is a crime which transcends physical murder" (Morel). Morel wrote about the atrocities he witnessed
to raise awareness, as many people were ignorant to them. Some Europeans were actively ignoring
the truth, whereas others were ignorant solely because they were being left in the dark as to what
was truly going on. Regardless, the ignorance surrounding Belgian Congo allowed the atrocities
committed there to continuously occur. Another way in which ignorance enabled the crimes
committed under imperial rule in Africa is the soldiers did not truly comprehend the deplorable
conditions to which they were subjecting the Africans. The Congolese people were forced to endure
starvation, disease, exposure to the elements and to vicious animals, and death. According to one
refugee who survived the barbarity of working in the rubber–producing regions of Belgian Congo,
"the white men and soldiers said: 'Go! You are only beasts yourselves'" (refugee interview).
Evidently, the soldiers actively ignored the Congolese people. Not only were the soldiers ignorant to
how

In a time period beginning in the 19th century, the British Empire imperialized all over the world.
there are many examples of Great Britain imperializing other nations during this time, but China,
Africa, and India should be looked at with a microscope. Imperialism is one of the big reasons why
these nations have grown and prospered through the years. It introduced medicine, education,
advanced transportation and communications, and religion. The introduction of religion is both good
and bad, some say it was forced upon the citizens but others say differently. With these incredible
positive effects came some negatives. The stealing of land, cheap labor, taxing, and slavery is never
good. Imperialists were clearly wrong in some parts, but the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
European imperialists built on the information provided by adventurers and missionaries. For
example, a Scottish missionary named David Livingstone, went to Africa in the 1840s and spent
three decades exploring the interior of Africa. This exploration sparked interest in Africa and others
followed, including the imperialists. (Imperialism in Africa). The Berlin Conference of 1884
allowed Europeans to draw lines on maps and carve Africa into colonies. The result was a
transformation Africa, with essentially all parts of the continent colonized in about fifteen years. The
Europeans continued to interfere with African land and culture. Thus, leading to independent revolts
and eventually lead to the Boer War. This was a conflict between The British and the Dutch farmers.
Black South Africans decided to help the Dutch who were fighting back against their enemies. The
British captured many of these men and put them in concentration camps where many of them died.
The establishment of colonies were actually a positive for Africa. It made for a new way of life
socially, politically and economically. So even with the horrible and unjust concentration camps,
Great Britain was able to give back to the people they conquered in

Beginning in 1881 and subsiding in 1914, Africa underwent an invasion of European power known
as Imperialism. While african territory was being occupied, divided, and colonized by larger
countries, the driving force behind European Imperialism in Africa became rather transparent. The
sizable countries sought after power and resourceful profit in which they looked to the smaller
African colonies to provide. Two of the biggest winners in the race to seize these colonies were
Britain and France, they desired a gain in technological advancements, exported African resources,
and economic growth. Technology and the development of such gave a prominent advantage to all
countries planning to occupy land in Africa. The invention of the repeating

Between the years 1870s and 1900, Africa faced imperialist aggression, diplomatic pressures,
military invasions, and the conquest and colonization by the Europeans. African societies
desperately tried to put up various forms of resistance against the attempt to colonize their countries
and impose foreign domination. Much to their effort, by the early twentieth century, much of Africa,
except Ethiopia and Liberia, had been colonized by European powers. The three three main factors
that motivated the European imperialist push into Africa where, economic, political, and social. This
all developed in the nineteenth century following the fall of the profitability of the slave trade, its
abolition and suppression, as well as the expansion of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While these were used as needed by African forces, the dominant type used depended on the
political, social, and military organizations of the societies concerned. In general, small–scale
societies, the decentralized societies (erroneously known as "stateless" societies), used guerrilla
warfare because of their size and the absence of standing or professional armies. Instead of
professional soldiers, small groups of organized fighters with a mastery of the terrain mounted
resistance by using the classical guerrilla tactic of hit–and–run raids against stationary enemy forces.
This was the approach used by the Igbo of southeastern Nigeria against the British. Even though the
British imperialists swept through Igboland in three years, between 1900 and 1902, and despite the
small scale of the societies, the Igbo put up protracted resistance. The resistance was diffuse and
piecemeal, and therefore it was difficult to conquer them completely and declare absolute victory.
Long after the British formally colonized Igboland, they had not fully mastered the

The Impact Of European Imperialism
Between the period of 1870 and 1914, European powers was at an all–time high. The European
powers shifted from being land–based empires to sea–based empires. Land–based empires were
typically short–lived, unstable and had limited power. While the new transition of sea–based
empires according to class notes, shaped the modern world's network of long–distance trade.
European powers switching to sea–based empires caused major growth, such as global trade and the
"New Imperialism". Coming from this new entry was the Industrial Revolution, which according to
John Hobson's, "Imperialism caused mass production, development of communication and
transportation, economic surplus and global trade". This was the start of major imperial growth
between European Powers. European powers started to realize that they had the power to expand
their empire globally and take over undeveloped markets. In the 19th century before the war,
nationalism and imperialism was extremely important to European Powers. European Powers
realized they had the power to go from imperialism to direct colonialism, where they could gain
control over other territories.
Prior to the war European Powers were rising, and becoming more powerful. "While some
Europeans such as futurist, welcomed the idea of war, others plotted how their imperial nations
could best succeed in a war to come (Mangin,1910,52)". European powers started to believe that
having another war would benefit them. In the 19th century this was the

European Imperialism Dbq Essay
For the 300 years between 1500 and 1800,European nations traded for slaves,gold, and ivory along
the west coast of africa, but they did not go deeply into the continent. In the 1880s Africa was under
full assault as European nations competed with one another for control of the continent. The driving
force behind European imperialism is power and they gain it by getting control and resources of
Africa and they justify it all by saying it was their duty as more civilised nations to make other
nations as civilized as theirs.
The first thing that European countries needed was control over Africa and many countries tried to
do so and this led to competition between almost all nations. This can be seen in document A
because it shows a map of the many locations other countries have taken as theirs. Control was a big
factor in all of this but it is only one of the many factors that comes in when a country wants power.
The next thing that the European countries needed was resourses for the mother country can get
more wealthy and better in supply. This can be seen in document D, and E because document D
shows the exports from Africa and how the mother country is using the resources to further the
country's power by advancing in technology, and document E shows the many imports and ... Show
Document B shows a very good example of nation pride which also contributed to european
imperialism for example John Ruskin, lecture at Oxford University, february 8, 1870, and Friedrich
Fabri,Does Germany need colonies? 1879 both inspire nationalism. Document F shows a poem that
tells US to take part in imperialism this is an example of national pride for the US to colonize. These
two documents show one of the many things that was the drive of European

Social Reasons For European Imperialism
Imperialism by European countries took place in the late 19th century and the early 20th century.
Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military
force. European nations went after nations in Asia and Africa because of the benefits for the
European nation that took over them. For how many benefits there were for the imperial power,
there were many drawbacks to the country being taken over. Traditional way of life was disrupted,
racism, and economic exploitation was not appealing result for the colonies that were taken over.
The social reasons for imperialism varied from nationalism to the spread of a certain religion. The
political reasons for imperialism varied from access for an army and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The industrialized nations of Europe competed with each other for natural resources and raw
materials such as copper, rubber, petroleum, and cotton. The European nations could no longer
provide enough raw materials for themselves, as the industrial revolution was growing, so the
nations had to find another way to get these natural resources and raw material. The nations of
Europe turned to imperialism as a result for the need for raw materials and natural resources.
Imperialism was the perfect way to gain the materials needed to keep the industrial revolution at a
high. Another benefit to imperialism, for the imperial power, was the new markets to sell the output
of factories. This surely boosted the economy of the European nation with the international markets,
because investment opportunities in newly developing areas had a greater potential for large profits
than if invested in the more stable domestic economies. Industrialists believed that access to
markets, natural resources, and investment opportunities would be more profitable if they did not
have to compete with other nations, so there was a race to see which country could gain the most
and most strategic land. One example of a strategic area of land is Great Britain's control of
Singapore and the Malay Peninsula. Having control of these two nations meant that Britain was able
to protect its trade routes between India and China. The Imperial

The Europeans all scrambled to colonize Africa for t's raw materials and land. THey had justified it
as the White Man's burden. They believed that is was their responsibility as a more developed race
to help Africa catch up in technology, government, economics etc. Rhodes even said, "–and that the
more of the world we inhabit, the better it is for the human race." (Doc, 1) With this mindset,
Europeans colonized Africa and started to export raw materials such as rubber, diamonds, gold,
palm oil etc. White man's burden led to Imperialism because they thought taking over other
countries was the only to help them move forward. In doing so, they also spread their power and
influence throughout the world. The White man's burden was also accompanied

The Role Of European Imperialism In Africa
Ever heard the saying big bank take little bank ? That's basically what imperialism is. Imperialism is
a policy which a strong nation take complete control over other countries . This is exactly what the
Europeans did in several different parts of Africa . Not only did the Europeans divided and
colonized Africa but they took everything away ,from their culture to their independence. Why take
all this away ? It's simple , the Europeans nations was competing against each other and they
thought they were superior. They noticed Africa had many raw materials and resources they could
use and benefit from. The driving force for imperialism in Africa was economics , competition , and
politics. In order for the European nation to be advance

European nations traded for slaves, gold, and ivory along the west coast of Africa for the 300 years
between 1500 and 1800. The European nations wanted to express their superiority because they felt
that their countries were the best. According to Wikipedia, "Imperialism is taking a country's pride,
their culture, or capturing their land." That is exactly what the European nations did to Africa. The
reasons behind European imperialism in Africa are nationalism, cultural reasons, and economic
reasons. Nationalism comes into place because Europeans were very competitive when it came to
power and wanted the world to notice how great they were. The English intellectual, author, and
speaker, John Ruskin Who was a well regarded English intellectual,

Examples Of European Imperialism
The British European have shown many examples of Imperialism. Imperialism is ruling countries by
the power of military force. The British use imperialism for three reasons. Those three reasons are
natural resources, new markets, and the belief of European superiority.
The first reason imperialized natural resources is to have an expansion of gold, diamonds, tin and
copper. To get these natural resources they had to fight over South African land. When the Dutch
found these resources first the British found out. The British wanted the resources too so they began
to fight over them. The Africans did not like this, so of course they fought of their home land. The
Africans, Dutch and British fought over South Africa. This fight was the 1st modern ... Show more
The first negative reason the imperialism is bad is lost control of land and independence. When the
British took over they forced the Africans to follow their laws, pay their taxes, learn their language,
and practice their religion. The Africans lost all control of their way of living forced to live the way
the british do. The second negative thing is thousands of people died in battle. The British army's
technology was far more advanced than the Africans, also their skill. So when the Africans went into
battle, not knowing the skill of the british army, many of Africans lives were lost in battle. The third
and final reason that imperialism was negative is the breakdown of traditional cultures. The British
are racist believing they are more superior than other cultures, they believed that they had the right
to take over other countries and cultures then forcing them to believe in their religions, learn their
languages, and live their way of life. The British way of life was much more different than the
Africans traditional way of living. When the British came the Africans lost control of land and
independence, thousand died in battle fighting the British, and the Breakdown of traditional

European Imperialism Influence
Influence of European Imperialism Known as the "New Imperialism," this aggressive expansion was
the turning point of an old era. European powers such as Britain, Russia, and France began to grab
parts of Africa and Asia. It brought about sudden changes to the ancient empires and kingdoms of
the Eastern Hemisphere. Most of these changes gave blessing to a new age of modernization.
However, some people might of recognized imperialism as immoral, tool for the rich, and
undemocratic rule for others. Despite these facts, European imperialism established new reforms
and advancements for foreign countries, while providing a chance for European expansion for its
growing populations. The belief of racial superiority at the time influenced the many new reforms
imposed on foreign countries. Rudyard Kipling, an English writer, portrayed his reasons in the poem
"The White Man's Burden". In it he described the Eastern people as , "'...new–caught, sullen peoples
/ Half devil and half child'" ("White Man's Burden" 1–8). While as racist this quote may seem, the
new reforms help change the perilous ways of the Indian culture. This condemned the act of pudra,
which is the isolation of a woman in a separate room, and banned sati, a Hindu custom in which the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, improvements in sanitation and medicine resulted in a higher population and life
expectancy; people would be able to survive from sickness. Also, with a new education system,
farming methods improved and there was less local warfare in India and African countries. Because
of this, there would be a higher population and problems would arise such as, competition for land
and famine. Although the problems of population are caused by new advancements, this forced the
people to look for new ways and ideas focus on. Instead of worrying about sickness, one could now
go into other majors and adapt to the changing

Benefits Of European Imperialism
Imperialism is the takeover of a country in order to control the government's resources, economy,
and culture. In Europe, political rivalries resulted in competition for resources that led to
Imperialism in Africa during the 19th century. European nations were mainly looking for wealth and
power to be the best. Despite the fact that the colonized people now had better education among
other things, the Europeans benefited more from Imperialism because they would do anything
necessary in order to gain the upper hand against their competition and increase their power as a
country. The Europeans profited from the many raw materials deposited in Africa which allowed
them to produce more goods to improve their wealth and allow them to trade more with others. They
also colonized parts of Africa and spread their power as well as population. While doing this, they
disregarded the people that already lived there and treated them poorly.
Materials from distant areas were stripped from their land and profited off of in the age of
Imperialism, bringing changes both good and bad throughout much of the Eastern hemisphere.
Britain decided that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
European countries had rivalries and competitions creating tense conditions that resulted in
Imperialism. They were greedy for wealth and took ports and deposits of valuable materials all for
themselves. Finally, the Europeans had a stronger power and presence which intimidated the
colonized people making them lesser. This essay matters today because If the colonized people were
to benefit more from Imperialism, there would most definitely be a lot more imperializing
happening today. African societies would be more advanced and sophisticated as well as a larger
trade market and variety in production. Though this never happened and the benefits of imperialism
went to the

During the 1870's Europeans started colonizing countries in Africa.Europrans did this because they
needed all of Africa's valuable resources.Africa was a big target because they were not very
modernized in technology so it was easier for the Europeans to sieze control. The Europeans
controlled Africa in two ways direct and indirect rule. Direct rule is when the country in charge rules
strictly over the country and they try to civilize the people they are ruling. Indirect ruling is when
the country in charge is ruling from far away and they usually rule through a native leader.
Imperialism negatively affected the lives of the Africans in the 19th and 20th century because the
education the Europeans provided for the Africans was of poor quality, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Some may argue that Europeans giving education to Africans was a positive effect, but some
Africans would disagree with that specifically A. Adu Boahen. Boahen was a politician and historian
from Ghana and his views of Imperialism differ of those from the Europeans. Boahen said the
effects of colonial education were unsuccessful because "Its inadequacy, large numbers of Africans
remained illiterate". Although Europeans thought they were doing a good deed by giving
uneducated Africans education it was not a good thing because many of the Africans didn't learn as
much as they should have. Education was also a negative effect because it changed Africans views
on their own culture. Boahen talks about Africans who did get a useful education and how they were
people who "Worshipped European culture, equating it with civilization" (Document 2). Those
educated Africans started to believe civilization was a good thing and they began to dislike their
own culture. Imperialism changed the beliefs of some Africans and that made the African nation
much weaker because of their lack of support for each other. Most Africans were blind sided and
thought if they had good education they would be considered good like the Europeans, but that was
far from the

European Imperialism Dbq Essay
During the 19th century in 1880, King Leopold of Belgium began the process of European
imperialism in Africa. Leopold had acquired 900,000 square miles of Africa, he called this Congo
Free State. He began to take out ivory and rubber in order to make money. All while Leopold was
exporting those goods, other European leaders held a conference to divide up Africa in a practicable
and tranquil manner. What was the main driving force behind the European imperialism in Africa?
Imperialism had several driving forces behind it including national competition, technological
advances, and cultural superiority. However, the most important cause of imperialism was
economics.
One of the driving forces behind European imperialism was national competition. There were seven
different European countries within Africa with colonies (Doc A). All these countries wanted to be
equal to their neighbors or stay above them. None of them wanted to be surpassed by them in wealth
or distinction. England had the idea that they needed to take others colonies. Germany had the idea
that in order to " prove and maintain its newly won position" they needed to take others colonies
(Doc B). The national competition helped drive imperialism because of the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Europeans had many technological advancements. Although the development of the steam engine
was their most powerful force for imperialism. The "steam engines powered ships and railroads"
creating a more efficient way of trading resources (Doc C). All European industries benefited from
the African resources. The industries benefited the most from was "French West Africa" because
they exported everything from oils to cotton (Doc D). The industries were able to make "cosmetics,
drugs, food products, and fabrics" from the exported resources (Doc D). Technological
advancements helped drive imperialism because Africa had an abundance of natural resources that
Europe

The Rise Of European Imperialism
"The sun never sets on the British Empire," is an ancient saying, referring to the immense territory
Britain has conquered throughout its years of Imperialism.. Often times, many countries that
colonize other nations usually have a purpose of doing so, such as the want for money, resources,
humanitarian aid, greed, and or power. However, Britain wasn't the only country responsible for
Imperialization. Other countries such as France, America, and Japan also played their parts in
Imperialism. The driving force of European Imperialism was power over a people in colonized
nations. The reasons for these include the beliefs that Caucasoid Europeans were the superior beings
and the European continent being the most superior civilization on the face of the planet.
Thesis: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Pierre Paul Leroy–Beaulieu, De la Colonisation Chez les Peuples Modernes, Pierre Paul Leroy–
Beaulieu states that the Western Civilization has been the most progressive and successful
civilization compared to others from highest to lowest, such as China and Japan, India (pre–British
conquest), Java and the indochinese peninsula , and finally, the rest of the world whom he refers to
as barbaric savages, leaving Africa. With the west's success in science, arts, and civilization, he
found it unjust to leave the rest of the world in barbaric conditions and living under ignorance. With
this in mind, the narrator would find it easier to trade and profit off of these people in their
homeland once they have succeeded in educating them and teaching them the importance of justice,
division of labor, and the uses of capital. He claims, '"It opens an area not only to the merchandise of
the mother country but to its capital and its savings, to its engineers, to its overseers, to its
emigrants."' The tone of the narrator's statement comes off as greedy when his sole purpose is to
educate a people to gain access to their

Racism, industrial capitalism and nationalism all relate to western civilization's competition of
superiority, and this was ultimately what fueled imperialism in Africa. European nations were driven
by the unknown world and exploration was a major part of life in the mid 1800s to early 1900s.
Exploration led to colonization causing even more competition through Europe, due to colonization
directly relating to power. Christianity also played a role in exploration. Exploration happened even
more due to the desire of spreading this religion around the world.
France, Britain and Germany were the main Imperialist powers in Africa during the late 19th
century, and in 1885 they signed the Berlin Act. This formalized the process of partition of Africa. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This can be linked back to nationalism, which is the belief that the interests of a specific nation are
of primary importance. European nations believed strongly in the idea of Social Darwinism which
was created by Charles Darwin who wrote about it in his book, The Descent of Man (1871), which.
Darwin stated, "Those species that were able to adapt were selected for survival, and those that
failed simply perished." In other words, Darwinism was the belief of survival of the fittest, and due
to much less advanced technology and weapons, these Africans were very vulnerable to the
Europeans who did not care for them, but only cared about profit for their country. This is summed
up in Karl Pearson's The Standpoint of Science where he wrote, "You get superior and inferior races
living on the same soil, and that coexistence is demoralizing for both. They naturally sink into the
position of master and servant." Pearson is saying it is natural that the inferior race being the
Africans, became the European's servants. Philp D. Curtin adds to Pearson's idea in The Black
Experience of Colonialism and Imperialism by writing, "It seemed natural to give the lowest rank to
people whose skin color was most different than their own." The working conditions for the
Africans were horrendous, and they were most often p3ayed an insufficient amount to make a
difference in their lives. They were also often guarded by the white farmers who carried rifles to
strike the workers with fear. This unfair labor was the backbone for making profit in Africa. Without
all the added labor, there would have been very little productivity in the

Reason For European Imperialism
Imperialism, a policy in which one country seeks authority over another country by economic and
political domination. The Europeans at this time in history, were looking for resources and
something to help them show their national pride; the best way to do that was to imperialize
different countries. Africa, which was not industrialized, was seen as not capable to lead themselves
into modernization. The europeans as well as many other countries began to seek land in the
divided, war–filled country. The reasons for europeans seeking imperialism is because of the strive
for natural resources, the need to show national pride, and thoughts upon racism.
In imperialism, natural resources where a large driving cause to the spread of authority all ... Show
An empire such as Britain requires an imperial race (Primrose). People from all over saw how
different people and cultures came from all over the world which create hate and a variety of
disapproval for others. African people were seen as hated, uncivilized people only because, they had
so many different cultures and different ways of living. If Africa was to be industrialized before
other countries came it would have been seen as a land that is respected because the people who live
in it are capable of industrialization. But because the land was not industrialized before imperialism
racism became a strong attacking point upon the uncivilized. France went with a fully developed
race into territories marked by barbarism and people who cannot develop their own land (Merlin).
France in this description sees themselves as superior to the Africans because, they do not have
fighting within their country and they are industrialized. Without their ability to come together as a
country and grow an economy France would be another Africa. Racism drove France to come to
Africa and show their superiority over them. Racism was a large reason for imperialism.
Africa was a resource rich, divided, different country. Every country that took a part in Africa's
imperialism saw this matter and took advantage. If Africa had time to figure out how to develop an
economy, unify with each other, and industrialize itself; imperialism from other countries would

The race for expansion was the particular driving force for the scramble of South East Asia and
Africa. The motivation or theme when imperializing a country would be for its size, quantity
raw/natural materials, and the native people basically Social Darwinism. These two countries both
contained the abundance and natural materials needed by the colonizers. The view on how the same
country affected each country was completely two different outcomes and results.
During the late nineteenth century, the major European powers scrambled to colonize Africa. Before
the 1880, the Europeans controlled little of the African continent. Using indirect and direct rule,
European nations exploited Africa, and their governance stimulated African nationalism. The
positive effects of imperialism were the cultural benefits that could be profited. Cultural Imperialism
in Africa was responsible ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The initial goal of European countries was to maximize the economic potential of their colonies.
Colonial rule in Africa was quite the same as Southeast Asia, most European governments ruled
their new territories in Africa with the least effort and expense possible, the Europeans rule on
Africa was indirect. Indirect rule meant that relying on existing political elites and institutions, the
British had especially followed this approach and in some areas the British simply asked a local
ruler to accept their authority and to put their flag over every official building. Indirect rule led to
some negative consequences, the British were basically fraud because their administrators made all
the major decisions. The colonial powers endeavored to minimize the costs of their empires. The
negative effects of colonization and colonial rule were briefly depicted in Kipling's poem named
"The White Man's Burden" (Documents 7). The poem itself stated

For centuries, European nations had been trading slaves, gold, ivory, and more with the west coast
of Africa. Throughout the early 1800s, Europeans barely knew anything about the rest of the country
of Africa. This quickly changed as Europe grew a sudden interest in exploring the rest of the country
and taking advantage of their many valuable resources. Many wonder what motivated Europeans to
Imperialize Africa, or extend their country's power throughout Africa. The driving forces behind
European Imperialism in Africa were the strive for ultimate power in Africa between competing
countries, the need for money and technological advancements in European civilizations, and the
constant attempt for Europeans to spread their cultures throughout ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
. . (Document F) By reading this poem, the reader can understand the viewpoint of many Europeans,
and how they viewed themselves as being significantly "more intellectual" than the Africans.
Although Europe may have encountered a series of obstacles along the way, European countries
collectively imperialized the entire country of Africa for many reasons. European countries seized
land by utilizing technological advancements to their advantage, to gain power and rise above
competing other European countries, and to spread their own culture and religion throughout Africa.
European countries did technically compete with each other to conquer African land, but altogether
each country eventually came together to take over the entire country. All of these reasons share one
common factor: they only benefit the Europeans. From the way Europeans treated Africans and
forcefully took over their country, it is clear that Europeans would destroy any other countries
without hesitation to gain as much power as

Consequences Of European Imperialism
The Consequences of European Imperialism
Imperialism was in its prime from the 1800s all the way up to 1920. France, Netherlands and Great
Britain were some of the first that had participated in the colonization of Africa and parts of Asia.
The goal in mind was to dominate with nationalism and social darwinism as their main ideologies.
The biggest results of imperialism was the enormous growth in the European economy,
industrialization of the European and African continent and a growth in nationalism of those who
were colonized.
One of the most noticeable effects of imperialism in the 19th and early 20th century was the huge
growth in Europe's economy. Resources like cotton, rubber, ivory copper and diamonds are all
examples of resources

What is imperialism? Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through
diplomacy or military force. Beginning in the 1800s European explorers began to push their way
into the interiors of western and central Africa. In 1807 the British outlawed the trans–Atlantic and
in 1833 slavery itself bringing a new wave of imperialism. What were the driving force behind
European Imperialism in Africa? Imperialism has several driving forces behind it including
competition and the natural resources in those areas. However, the most important cause of
imperialism was the moral responsibility Europe, in their eyes, had to give the African natives. One
of the driving forces behind European imperialism was the competition behind all of the countries.
In Document A there is a map of Africa from 1884–85, it shows that out of all of the countries in
Africa only 2 were independent. During the time of exploration all countries were fighting for land
to get more money, whoever had the most land was a better and more powerful than everyone else.
Also, the more land they had, the more natural resources they had. Even wars would start over
territory due to the competition. Many people could infer that the countries thought 'the bigger the
better' for their home country. That is why competition was one of the driving forces of imperialism
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In document D, it shows how Europe took resources from Africa, sent them back to the mother
country, and made goods out of the resources. For example, they took cotton from Africa to make
fabric in Europe. Also, in document E it shows how only a quarter of the products made from the
resources come back to Africa for the people. This just shows how Europe took the resources to
make a profit and not giving it back to the people who were working for them. Natural resources
helped drive imperialism because Europe was using the natives land for their

Europe played a big part in Africa during the late 1800s and early 1900s. When Europe discovered
Africa, they took the people as slaves, but when slavery was banned it became a scramble for land.
Soon after the countries were competing against each other for the land of Africa because it
contained many natural resources that they could sell. However, some countries had different
intentions, some wanted to help people in Africa by feeding them or building schools. The main
driving forces behind European imperialism in Africa, are, helping the natives, nationalism, and
natural resources. One of the main driving factors of European imperialism in Africa is that
Europeans wanted to help Africans in need. Part of Africa needed food, water, shelter, and education
so some European countries went to travel to Africa so they could help these people. According to
Rudyard Kipling's poem, "Take up the white man's burden, The savage wars of peace–, Fill full the
mouths of Famine, And bid the sickness cease." (Doc F) In the poem Kipling talks about how the
Europeans needed to go to Africa and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Europe found out about Africa they started to compete with one another to be on top.
According to the Africa Map, After slavery ended Europe went into a mad scramble for African
land. With Brittan and France taking the most land. (Doc A) Once slavery was abolished Europe
went to Africa to gain land and power. Some explored Africa to expand their empire while others did
it to fight for first place. For example, according to Fredich Fabri's speech, "Should the new German
Reich wish to prove and maintain its newly won position of power it will have to acknowledge its
colonial task anew" (Doc B) Germany and England were both competing against one another to stay
a powerful and influential country. All in all, the European countries were in a scramble to colonize
Africa for the power the land would

Reasons For European Imperialism
The European nations were in a competition to be the most sophisticated and technologically
advanced country Britain was leading and with exponential growth Britain needed a major source of
raw product and people to fuel the flames of the industrial revolution. With this need Britain used
africa to supply their demand. Europe had many reasons that kept them from colonizing Africa such
as Malaria and the need of justification to slaughter many people that would be necessary for the
colonization of africa. The driving force behind the European nation spreading imperialism
consisted of 3 main things those things where economics, political competition, and the culture's
attitude toward the situation Europe at the time was looking for a source of income and resources so
the looked no farther than their neighboring continent Africa. According to Document E "Great
britain and south Saharan africa Imports and Exports, 1854 and 1900" during 1854 Britain was
importing almost double of what they were exporting from Africa but during 1900 Britain was
exporting almost double of their imports. The imperialistic changes allowed for Britain to change
their colony Africa from a dependent source of material and trade to a dependent source of ... Show
A country could claim it was the most powerful and boost all it wanted but if a rival country thought
they were dominant they could easily go to war or settle it depending on the amount of land held by
the two countries to avoid

European Imperialism Outline
I. Introduction
A. Hook
1. While Europeans prospered with their imperialism millions suffered as a result.
B. Attacher
1. This torment can be shown with Europe oppression and violence. Even today people suffer
because of the nations of Europe' actions.
C. Thesis
1. All in all, imperialism by Europeans was horrible time for the people that were conquered by
them.
II. Body Paragraph 1 Oppression
A. Topic Sentence
1. When a nation that take control of another nation they often oppress by the governments who
took them over.
B. Evidence
1. For instance, in India, Brittan mad it harder to get government positions.
C. Explanation
1. This is done by making everyone aping of a civilian job be required to take a test. It would be
very easy for Britain to discriminate agents Indians.
D. Evidence
1. Another act of oppression is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Transition/Thesis Tie–In
1. While Europe preached for a better way of life for the natives this wasn't the case because of the
strict laws they brought to suppress them.
III. Body Paragraph 2 War
A. Topic Sentence
1. In Europe's quest to get rich they would sometimes harm innocent people to do so.
B. Evidence
1. This is reminded in the pillaging in Africa.
C. Explanation
1. Europeans wanted to get as many recourses as they could for the least amount of effort. This,
unfortunately, lead to them pillaging villages for wat they want and burning every thin they want.
With European guns against to a reactively isolated community the natives didn't have much of a
chance against these cruel campaigns.
D. Evidence
1. Another feature is there resistance against protest.

E. Explanation
1. In India, Britain was very aggressive against protesters even though they were mostly peaceful.
India had a right to be upset at being run by a nation thousands of miles away and should be allowed
to express this without being harmed.
F. Transition/Thesis Tie–In
1. These acts show how far people might go to enrich themselves.
IV. Body Paragraph 3 Aftermath
A. Topic

Certain colonies suffered due to colonization, others have recovered well such as the United States,
Canada, and Australia. Former colonies in Asia, South America, and Africa suffered so much more
under colonization than the three mentioned before due to the interests of different European
countries. Most importantly many European countries were driven by colonization or imperialism
through those processes they were attracted to economic, political and or social power.
Imperialism is defined as a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy
or military force (Dictionary.com, 2015) .Imperialists believed in order to remain a strong country
you had to have a steady supply of natural resources for the industrial economy ... Show more
The continents of Africa, South America, and Asia have an abundance of natural resources which
attracted Europeans centuries ago. "The Scramble for Africa" began from 1880 to 1900 where rapid
European powers began having interests in their resources; due to the end of the Atlantic–Slave
Trade, unemployment, poverty, homelessness and social displacement in Europe (Boddy–Evans,
2015). Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Spain all claimed countries for
themselves. They created declarations of exclusive claims to areas of trade, imposition of tariffs,
control of waterways and commercial routes in different parts of Africa. The scramble for Africa
became so intense that German chancellor Otto von Bismarck held the Berlin Conference to avoid
inter–imperialist conflict and war between the countries. As a result, the conference divided the
continent without any African participation. Europeans had no regards to the various ethnicities,
culture, and tribes within the continent (Iweriebor, 2011). The French, German, Portuguese, and the
Dutch used direct rulings to centralize their territories without any attempt to preserve African
institutions (Colonialism and Africa's Integration into the Global Economy, n.d.).Africans signed
treaties with the European diplomats thinking that they represented commercial friendships while
the Europeans believed that the Africans signed over their sovereignties to European powers. This
misunderstanding initiated many years of conflict between them. Africa was rich in minerals such as
copper, iron, uranium, manganese, gas, gold and oil. These raw minerals were often manufactured
and brought wealth back to Europe. Much of the same events happened throughout South America
and Asia. Imperialists essentially wanted the land to

European Imperialism
It is said that the colonization of Africa by European settlers was significant in terms of politics,
economic advances or economic failures, as well as the advancement of power and destruction of
pre–colonial African Cultures. The two largest European powers striving to colonize Africa are
France and Britain. There are three reasons for Europe's interest in colonizing Africa. The first
reason is the fact that Africa was an unknown and mysterious continent that has yet to be explored
by European settlers or any settler for fact. Because of this Europe wanted to gather scientific data
of the unknown African continent. The expeditions of explorers like Samuel Baker, Joseph
Thompson, Richard Burton, John Speke, and some others in the nineteenth ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
These three reasons of Europe's interest in Africa are all interrelated. For example, there was a
system dedicated to the fact of determining if a particular area would benefit Europe if they decided
to colonize based on the scientific data received. I believe Europeans were very avid about
imperializing colonies and empires in Africa. This statement is proved by reasons relating in
political, cultural, and economic. In a political stance, there was competition among other European
states "for sovereignty in the international system of the eighteenth century" (Khapoya, 1994, 103).
The pride that came with Great Britain claiming and controlling a country in Africa that was "more
than forty times it's own size" (Khapoya, 1994, 104). In the exact words of Vincent B. Khapoya
enlightened my statement and belief that politics was a huge factor in imperializing Africa by the
European's, "the possession of huge colonies provided manpower that held out the promise of
imperial powers by getting richer and growing stronger by being able to wage successful military
campaigns anywhere in the world" (Khapoya, 1994,

The Three Droplets of European Imperialism
A Document Based Essay
During the late 1800's the initial ideas of colonizing susceptible territories in Africa and
monopolizing an area under one European colony is the main influence on European Imperialism.
European countries were motivated by the abundance of new market and good, the growing
competition between European countries to imperialize African countries, and the idea of social
darwinism. The main European countries involved in the colonization of Africa were Great Britain,
France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, and Spain. While each of the countries had their own individual
motivations that contributed to their roles in European Imperialism, they were all competing against
each other which ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the case of European Imperialism, before mentioned motivations of conquering new markets and
being competitive between countries suggest the ideas of Social Darwinism. Some of the
contributors to Social Darwinism are race, social status, dominance, capital, and land ownership.
Cecil Rhodes, a British business man and contributor to the mining industry, said, "It is our duty to
seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory" (Doc 3). The word duty suggests that the British
felt that because they were capable of conquering territory, they should. Rudyard Kipling's beliefs of
Social Darwinism ties directly into that of Cecil Rhodes's. He says, "Take up the White Man's
burden – Send forth the best ye breed" (Doc 4). In this case, the white man are Anglo–saxon's from
Europe same as Rhode's belief that the Anglo–Saxon race is the best, most human, and most
honorable (Doc 3). The idea that the Anglo–Saxon race is the best was a justification for European
countries to civilize Africa because they believed they could conduct a more productive government
in these

European Imperialism Africa Dbq

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Nicole Savoie

More from Nicole Savoie (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

European Imperialism Africa Dbq