5. Oh no! I love History. He was such an
interesting fellow, though many
people didn’t truly understand what
he was all about. People were always
mistaking him for his brother who
they call Past but History, he was so
much more than past. He was all
about connecting big ideas and when
you spent time with History you felt
like you were a better person because
of what you learned from him.
6. You want to hear what other people say
about him? He had many critics. And
some often refer to him as boring but
his true friends, those who knew him
well say he is very interesting,
enjoyable and helpful.
7. History knew he was not perfect. Just like any
hero, he had his flaws, which is that, he did not
learn from his mistakes and often repeated
them. However, he acknowledged this flaw and
encouraged his friends to learn from both his
successes and his failures. Doctors could not
determine History’s cause of death but his
friends’ suspect he died of a broken heart
because he felt unappreciated. In lieu of flowers,
History’s family is asking you to honor him by
learning or remembering the skills and lessons
from his life.
8. Oh Jerry, I think I am going to
cry.That was beautiful!
One thing is for sure.There
would never be another quite
like History.
10. Meaning of History
Sources of History
General Kinds of Historical Sources
Historical Criticism
Colonial Historiography
Philippine Historiography AfterWorldWar II
Characteristics of Contemporary Philippine
Historiography
11. “In order to know the destiny of
the people, it is necessary to open
the book of its past.”
- Jose Rizal (The Philippines A
Century Hence)
12. study of past events presented in chronological
order and with explanation
13.
14. Historians - Individuals who write about history
Historiography - the practice of historical writing
19. Primary Sources
“Are original documents and contemporary
accounts of an event written by either someone
who experienced the event or someone who
witnessed the event”
27. Examples of Secondary Sources:
Textbooks
Commentaries
Journals
Editorials in newspaper
28. External Criticism
- is the practice of the ff:
a.Verifying the authenticity of evidence by
examining its physical characteristics.
b. Consistency with the historical characteristic of
the time when it was produced.
c. Materials used creating the evidence.
29. Internal Criticism
- examination of truthfulness of the evidence.
a. Content of the evidence.
b. Author’s context, background and sources.
c.To whom it was produced.
d. Agenda behind its creation.
30. Historians attempt to understand the past
Historians attempt to understand the past based
on evidence
Historical evidence that comes directly from
society is called primary source.
Historians interpret the primary source to
decide what they actually tell us about the past
31. Interpretation:The process of deciding on
the meaning of a historical source
Based on these interpretations, historians
attempt to create a narrative (a story)about
what happened in the past
Historical narratives and interpretations are
known as secondary sources.
33. 1. What are the benefits of using primary sources?
2. Why do you think most history textbooks are secondary
sources?
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of accessing
online primary sources?
4. What are the challenges of understanding our country’s past
mindful of the problems that characterize the writing of our
national history?
Bring it on!
Editor's Notes
Rizal’s annotation of Morga
They suppose to understand not driven by their purpose
They only look evidence that will support their purpose
Most reliable are primary sources
Correct interpretation but with correlation to other primary sources
What is the purpose of Cory Aquino for stopping Bataan powerplant??
Cory wanted to erase the evilness of Marcos
Or cory only worsen the lives of people??
As historians, you have skills to determine primary sources… all primary sources must be included in the history… but corroborated with secondary sources… ask what is the difference of corroboration and collaboration??