U.S. -Led Interventions During World War II

U.s. -led Interventions During World War II
Since World War II, America has often been considered and called upon to serve as the world's
policeman. But is it a role we have performed effectively – and perhaps more importantly, is it one
that we should continue to play? With opinion polls showing the American people's overwhelming
reluctance to serve a military role in foreign countries, it is time to consider whether the title of
"world's policeman" is one we should keep. Studying American interventions in the world since
WWII offer some lessons and insights into both America's desire – and ability – to police the world,
and leads to the unavoidable conclusion that we are the only nation capable of preventing the all–too
common atrocities, genocides and acts of aggression that destabilize continents and create untold
human suffering. Of the dozens of times America has chosen to get involved in foreign countries in
the last 60 years, several stand out as obvious successes, including U.S.–led interventions in Korea,
Kosovo and Lebanon. In addition, there are several well–known examples of seeming failure, as
well as numerous outright refusals to become involved in the affairs of another nation. Each of these
– successes, failures and refusals to act – help to answer the important question of what role
America should assume in coming decades. Kosovo, a region in Yugoslavia, was one example of
America's success in policing atrocities, acts of aggression and humanitarian crisis created by
foreign governments. In 1997,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Global War On Terror And U.s. Operations
Sweeny 1
Christopher Sweeny
Mrs. Gallos
English 3
20 April 2015
A Global War:
The Global War on Terror and U.S. Operations to Eliminate Terrorism
Approximately 2,823 people were killed in the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 9,
2001. Since then there have been 20,022 terrorist attacks in the united states alone, according to
www.wnd.com. There are many dangerous terrorist organizations out There. Most of them are based
in the middle east. "there's another organization using the same exact tactics–wreaking destruction
in Iraq and tearing at the country's social fabric in the process. This time, it's a Shia militia with
close ties to the Iraqi government, the Iraqi army and Iran." stated in an article on ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
They first caught the world 's attention when they raided a boarding school in a town on the edge of
nigeria's border called Chibok. During the raid, approximately 300 nigerian school girls were taken
hostage by Boko Haram, and were threatened with forced marriage and forced conversion. This is
one of the few acts of violence that Boko Haram have committed against society. Since May 2011,
6,742 people have been killed by Boko Haram during these attacks. Boko Haram has been known
for their history of suicide bombing, raiding, and shooting schools and dormitories. "...Boko Haram
has been menacing Nigeria's northern communities for years. " according to nationalintrest.org. The
last terrorist group is Kataib Hezbollah. Kataib Hezbollah was founded in 2006 or 2007 and is
known for ambushing U.S. troops during their patrols of iraqi neighborhoods and setting Improvised
Explosive Devices, or IED's, in the roads that U.S. Humvees patrolled. "The killing of U.S. soldiers
and the frequent rocket attacks that KH would launch directly into Baghdad's Green Zone landed the
group on the U.S. foreign terrorist organization list in 2009." according to nationalinterest.org. Nouri
al–Maliki, former Iraqi prime minister, depended mostly on informal Shia militias like Kataib
Hezbollah for reinforcing an army that is having a hard time repelling ISIL's power. But terrorism
can be anywhere at anytime. the Inter Services Intelligence of Pakistan supported islamic

U.s. War On Terrorism Essay
The United States vision of and for the world changed dramatically, and perhaps permanently, on
September 11, 2001. The aftermath frightened and impacted the nation's reputation, and in order to
measure the nature and extent of our policies, it is important to understand our efforts after this
national attack on US soil. Many interesting documents released earlier that year provides a detailed
perspective of America's economic policies and actions towards the War on Terror. The U.S. came
out with a massive debt that has impacted the nation in several ways, but this leads to a basic
question with a complex answer: How did the U.S. War on Terrorism impact the American Debt
Crisis? After researching further into the 9/11 attacks, clearly most of the money put into the war
was wasted or misspent. Even though it was crucial going after the terrorists, especially since they
had taken many lives and were capable to repeating their attack caused fear throughout the nation. It
is important to signal out that the U.S. was attacked from a terrorist organization that had their focus
on the U.S. for a long time. The impact that this served after 9/11 plays a clear role in defining the
results of how these economic policies were taken into action. After looking over this tragic event in
the U.S. history, there should have been a very high consideration towards how the money was
going to be used in an effort to defeat terrorism before this event occurred. The top priority for the
U.S. has

U.s. Citizens During The Civil War
In order to look into the lives of the U.S. citizens during the Civil War I decided to look into the first
week from April 12, 1861 to April 18, 1861 of the New York Times. I looked into this week of
articles to see how the New York Times covered the outbreak of the war and the people's response to
it. Some of the main war events covered were: call for Union to relinquish command of Fort Sumter
and first shots of the war, reaction to the surrender of Fort Sumter, Lincoln's Proclamation to add
seventy–five thousand volunteers to the war efforts, possible attacks on Fort Pickens, and the
Confederate reaction to Lincoln's Proclamation. During this week, the north was obviously nervous
and scared yet felt they would win as well as confused as to why the war was happening at all. The
April 12 paper included information on the confederates asking Major Anderson to surrender Fort
Sumter and strategies for the defense of the fort. In the Times article "The Forts in Charleston
Harbor" there is a sense that the union forces have positioned themselves well and the confederates
have waited too long allowing the opportunity for reinforcements to arrive if needed at Fort Sumter.
This feeling can be seen in the final sentence where it reads: "But be the motive what it may, there is
little doubt that they have lost the golden opportunity, and that the Stars and Stripes will continue to
wave over the old fort, unless puerile negotiations should allow the Confederate force to prepare

Essay on The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy
Assignment 1 – The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy
SHAMIKA WARD
EMMANUEL OBUAH
POL 300: Contemp Intl Problems
May 31, 2013
The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy
The Reagan Doctrine was the foreign policy in the United States, enacted by President Ronald
Reagan. The doctrine was design to eradicate the communist governments in Africa, Asia, and Latin
America that were authorized and corroborated by the Soviet Union. This assignment will review by
what method the United States delivered open and private backing to guerrilla and resistance
movements during the Regan years. Additionally, explain the political doctrine detailed events that
occurred in Afghanistan when the Soviet Union invaded. As a final point, this assignment will
define ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Internally, Democrats in Congress advised that the Regan Doctrine would ultimately lead to a
nuclear war in return; they attempted to hamper and break the enactment of the doctrine
(Conservapedia, 2012). Historian Barbara Tuchman differed with Regan confrontation doctrine and
desired the United States to follow the stuff goose strategy. This decision was to offer the Soviet
Union with consumer goods and all the grain they needed. Nonetheless, in spite of Regan's lack of
foreign policy qualifications his detection to stop the "Evil Empire" would not deter him.
Nevertheless, several people thought he was a precarious warmonger (Souza, 1997).
Explicate the Regan Doctrine and Specific Actions and Events
With the war in Afghanistan into a year, most of the international community believed that the
Soviet Union was invincible and to stop them would lead into a nuclear war.
In an article written in the Third World Quarterly, by Andrew Hartman titled, The Red Template: US
Policy in Soviet–Occupied Afghanistan. "The broad framework of US foreign policy in the era of
the Cold War, as well as other eras, the U.S. must adhere to the bottom line. This means, protecting a
constructive investment environment for private business benefits" (Hartman, 2002). In 1981,
former Pakistani Dictator and General Mohammed Zia al–Haq, understood US Policy bottom line.
In a meeting with William Casey, the Director of the Central

U.s. Vietnam War On American Culture, Politics, And...
Regarded as one of the most controversial and polarizing military conflicts in U.S. history, the
Vietnam War has left a deep and lasting impact on American culture, politics, and foreign policy.
From 1964 to the present day, the Vietnam War redefined the scope of U.S. influence both at home
and abroad, and caused a fundamental shift in American society that dramatically changed the way
in which Americans viewed their government and the role of the United States as a world power. For
an entire generation of Americans, who watched as the horrors of the war in Vietnam unfold before
the spotlight of the national media, the Vietnam War directly challenged the superiority of the
American way and the infallibility of U.S military dominance. In truth, the U.S government, U.S.
military, and the American people as a whole struggled to accept the lessons of America's greatest
military failure and the sobering reality of the war's consequences. To this day, the legacy of this so–
called "American War" continues to resonate throughout the fabric of American society as a
cautionary tale of U.S foreign intervention and blind acceptance of open–ended conflict.
For the United States government, the failure of U.S intervention in Vietnam provided lessons about
where and under what circumstances the United States should intervene in foreign conflicts.
Throughout the mid–twentieth century, U.S. foreign policy was characterized by the idea of
"containment". Coined by George Kennan in 1946,

U.s. Failed During The Vietnam War
This investigation seeks how the U.S. failed in the Vietnam War. The main body of this investigation
outlines why the U.S. lost the winnable war, the causes for the U.S. defeat, and the differences
between Vietcong and the Americans, which is one of the main reason why the U.S. failed in the
Vietnam War. Two main sources used in this essay are When We Lost the Winnable War by Bruce
Walker and The Vietnam War 1964–75 – The causes for the US defeat by Jyri Hintikka. Both of
these sources of information gives details and causes on how the United States lost the war.
Section 2: Investigation On November 1 of 1955 was the start of one of the largest colonial war, the
Vietnam War. The war lasted from November 1, 1955 to the April of 1975, approximately 19 years
and 5 months. The war was a fight between South Vietnam, anti–communist, and North Vietnam,
the communist. The South Vietnamese were supported by the United States and other anti–
communist nations. While North Vietnamese were backed up by the Soviet Union and its
communist allies. After the war, there a big controversy on why the U.S. lost a winnable war and
why they backed out. Why exactly did the U.S. lose the Vietnam War? Vietnam War a war that
America could easily have won, and should have. There are many reasons why the Americans lost to
Vietcong, but it did not make it impossible to win. The American hi–tech tactics constantly killed
the wrong people and dispirited their own troops. With that fact most of the

U.s. Government During The Cold War
Tensions during the Cold War sparked many changes in American legislation, altering the way many
lived their lives. One of the most obvious areas of change is in education, with the fear of Soviet
dominance causing transformations across the nation. The severe adjustment of government
education changed the way students learned, the information taught in the classroom, and the overall
view of education in the eyes of the public in a positive way.
Government Changes:
Summary:
Changes instigated by the U.S. government during the Cold War had a profound effect on the
educational landscape, as they altered how people viewed education, who had access to education,
what they were taught, how they were taught, etc. Although many changes were done on the local
and state level, the most considerable effects are seen after changes were made on the national scale,
in legislations such as the National Defense Education Act of 1958, and in government bodies such
as the Department of Education.
G.I. Bills(1944 & 1984):
The original G.I. Bill was signed into law in 1944, under the name Serviceman 's Readjustment Act.
After WWI, millions of veterans returned home, only to face massive unemployment and a
recession. After WWII, twice as many veterans would return to similar issues if nothing was done.
With the chance of another recession looming, legislators created the Serviceman 's Readjustment
Act. The act, which became known as the G.I. Bill, provided $500(about $6,757 today) to veterans

U.s. Entered War On The United States
9–11–01, September 11, 2001, a typical day for the United States and citizens of New York City,
which soon changed and will be forever remembered as the beginning of a new America. October 7,
2001, when the U.S. entered war in the Middle East in response to the attacks that happened on
September 11th. The attacks on the U.S. were not only the start to the longest war in American
history, but also the start of many changes for our country. Some effects on the states include
political changes and new improvements. Ideas to improve our safety included involved security
improvements, new laws and agencies. Although the political effects after 9/11 were the majority of
our concerns, the economic aftermath and recovery were huge. The U.S. going ... Show more
With a great nation comes great political power and responsibility played in the upkeep of our states.
After the events of 9/11 America's political side was forever altered. Clearly upset with the Middle
East and whom the U.S. believed was responsible foreign affairs had to be looked at. Our
government had put a stop to all communication, trade, travel, and influence from some countries
overseas. Our President and congress were immediately forced to stop all meetings with foreign
leaders due to the security regulations of our Department of Defense. Not only was our government
no longer involved with the majority of other countries our citizens also could not travel to these
places nor buy from them and all who were believed to be involved in secret affiliation would be
brought to court. Policy with other countries prior to the events was different when looking at the
topic of involvement of the U.S. and others. Before 9/11, the Bush administration had focused its
foreign policy attention on China and Russia; on determining whether a Middle East peace
settlement was in the cards; on building a ballistic missile defense system; and on contemplating
how to deal with rogue states such as Iran, Iraq, Libya, and North Korea. At many meetings of the
National Security Council, officials debated the pros and cons of a new sanctions regime against
Saddam Hussein 's dictatorial government in Baghdad; they also discussed what would be done if
U.S. planes enforcing the no–fly

U.s. Involvement During The Korean War
U.S. involvement in Korea The reason I am writing my research paper on the Korean War is because
I am interested in Korean history also the Korean War had many significances to American history
because it was the first physical war to take place during the Cold War. It was also the first war the
United Nations entered with many countries coming to add the First Republic of Korea. This war
was not about winning but rather it was for stopping the spread of communism. The United States
government feared communism because it threatened the American Ideal of freedom, liberty and
economics while communism was a government that oppressed its people and controlled their
economy. America theorized that the spread of communism would be similar to the domino effect
when one country falls to communism the neighboring country would fall too. The United States
was worried all of Korea would fall to communism and the only was to defeat communism was to
hold South Korea and keep its republic government intact. Another significance it holds would be
how would the countries who signed the NATO react if the United States allowed Korea to be
conquered. The Korean war shows the United States as the world's police because the U.S. helped
South Korea when the North invaded and having the United Nation help. The Korean War officially
began in 1950 but there were various events that were involved creating government tensions on
both sides of the Korean peninsula. The start of the

U.s. Soldiers During The Vietnam War
U.S. Soldiers in the Vietnam War To this day, many Vietnam veterans suffer and feel forgotten,
unappreciated, and even discriminated against. Combat experiences or physical disabilities have
ruined some of their lives. For more, returning to normal life had not been easy. "Imagine if you had
just graduated out of high school and were sent to a guerrilla warfare far away from your home.
During the war, you were exposed to a lot of stress, confusion, anxiety, pain, and hatred. Then you
were sent back home with no readjustment to the lifestyle in the states, no deprogramming of what
you learned from the military, and no "welcome home" parades. You are portrayed to the public as a
crazed psychopathic killer with no morals or control over your aggression. You find that there 's
nobody you can talk to or who can understand what you 've been through, not even your family. As
you re–emerge into civilization, you struggle to establish a personal identity or a place in society
because you lack the proper education and job skills. In addition, there are no supportive groups to
help you find your way, which makes you feel even more isolated, unappreciated, and exploited for
serving your country" (Thompson 279). This situation is like what many Vietnam veterans had felt
upon returning home from war. Upon their return to the states, veterans displayed severe psychiatric
symptoms. The symptoms varied from difficulty sleeping to vivid flashbacks, and are now
recognized as Post

The Cold War Tension Effect On The U.s. And The World
Ison Leong Leong 1 Amy Hawkins ULI Lv6 Advanced Writing 26 July 2015 The Cold War
Tension's Effect on the U.S. and the World After the end of World War II, some people may have felt
safe. However, even before Nazi Germany put its guns down in Germany in 1945, the political
giant, and U.S. president, Franklin D. Roosevelt died by illness. The new president, Harry
S.Truman, had to face an unstabilized situation and some new challenges. At first, he had to make
sure the war criminals were punished during the Nuremberg trials. He helped create the World Bank
and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and financed the remaking of Japan under General
Douglas MacArthur. In 1947, Truman developed the Marshall Plan, which offered more than $10
billion for the reconstruction and reindustrialization of Germany (SparkNotes Editors). The Marshall
Plan was so successful that manufacturing plants in Western Europe were producing the product
equal to prewar numbers within a couple of years. The U.S and the Soviet Union worked together
during the World War II, because they had the same interest. Unfortunately, Joseph Stalin, Soviet
premier, did not agree with what Truman did above. He wanted Nazi Germany to pay for what they
had done in the Second World War, and he destroyed the factories in Germany in order to make sure
the German

U.s. Relations And End The Cold War
President Obama 's efforts to normalize U.S.–Cuba relations and end the Cold War in our
hemisphere have captured scores of headlines worldwide––and for good reason. It was an
ineffective policy that was even losing power as a partisan tactic. But the success in Cuba begs the
question of why the U.S. government still refuses to end World War II on the island of Guam, a U.S.
territory for over a century.
The little known story of Guam 's experience before and after World War II illuminates what is
wrong with American policy toward the U.S. territories. This is a policy that bluntly states that
unincorporated territories like Guam legally "belong to, but are not part" of the United States and its
citizens cannot vote for the president ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Subsequently, from 1899 to 1941, the president of the United States appointed Navy officers to
serve as governors and oversea the construction of naval facilities.
Although clearly undemocratic, the Navy justified military government by asserting that while the
native people of Guam, the Chamorros, were "becoming more like Dad (Uncle Sam) every day,"
they were not mature enough to become American citizens and were therefore safest under U.S.
martial rule. In the words of former Navy secretary Claude A. Swanson: "these simple people have
not yet reached a state of development commensurate with the personal independence, obligations
and responsibilities of United States citizenship." To become citizens, concluded Swanson, "would
be most harmful to the native people."
Ironically, when the time came to defend Guam from imminent Japanese attack, the U.S. evacuated
the wives and children of their (white) military dependents but left Chamorro families to fend off for
themselves. Not lost on Chamorros, Guam––the only occupied U.S. territory in the Pacific––was the
first island to be invaded by the Japanese and the last to be liberated by the United States. If the
American forces had arrived only a few days later, the Japanese claim that "they would find only
flies," may have come to pass. By the time that the U.S. military landed on July 21, 1944, the
Imperial Army had killed nearly 10% of Guam 's population via

In The ‘Business Of War,’ Roy Is Stating That The U.S.
In the 'Business of War,' Roy is stating that the U.S. government and other's like it are purely
economic in thought, and the root causes for the very terrorism that resulted in 9/11. She points out
that similar and worse grief to 9/11 happens on a large–scale, with violations of human rights and
wars happening as a result of the American and British forces in Iraq, who were actually an ally to
Saddam Hussein until he decided to act of his own accord. She is directly stating here that America
actually helped acts of terror in relation to Hussein because they were power–hungry, using the
logical fallacy of an appealing to emotions by invoking anger in the audience at these actions
(Handel). The hypocrisy of America and the motivation for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
If she had added more supporting evidence and counterarguments, I believe that it would have been
a stronger speech. Roy created multiple beautifully thought–out, well–written aphorisms, but the
evidence for her arguments once she started talking about morals and the free market became like a
mild slippery slope logical fallacy; almost taking on the tone of a conspiracy theory (Handel). She
completely blames the government, making it mildly confusing, because for most of the speech she
was speaking about the importance of acknowledging different points of view – in this case, only
using it in a way so that it was different views of the public. The point of her speech was to open
people's eyes to the horror's happening outside of America and the corruption of those with power. I
will admit freely that the first time I read through the speech I was completely ensnared by the flow
of the piece, the beautiful language, vivid depictions, and skilled use of rhetorical devices. The more
times I read, however, the more I questioned her argument – isn't the reason most people are elected
into positions of power is because they want to help people, and then in order to stay there they have
to serve the people? There are a few, especially heads of state, who are harsh, but I think she was a
little hypocritical herself because she only spoke about

The U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War
Sukvasa (Bew) Kornniti
Ms. April Slagle
World History and Geography 2
7 March 2014
How did the US involvement in the Vietnam War Impacted the US Socially, Economically, and
Globally? The Vietnam War was one of the most outrageous and long–drawn out wars in history.
The other name for the Vietnam War was called Cold–Era proxy War. The war had been battled in
order to stop the spread of invasion from communism in the southern parts of Vietnam. The
American played the role of a supporter to the southern part of Vietnam, trying to prevent
communist from approaching the southern part of Vietnam. The Americans was influenced by the
French government to help with the war. France did not support communism due to their loss to the
communist ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Again, the United States have learned a lesson from the Vietnamese feared rebellions happening in
the United States among themselves again. To prevent that from happening, America actions and
understanding were based on the media and information being delivered appropriately by the
government of the country. The Vietnam War did not only have caused unrest among the United
States civilians, but the war resulted in the depreciation of America's economy. Due to the war's
demands in supplies, there were enormous amounts of negative imbalances in the industrial sector.
Industries that manufacture goods such as agricultural products, capital goods, and consumer goods
have been prevented from manufacturing the product to meet the population's needs.
(http://www.historycentral.com/) The Factories were unable to manufacture goods and ship it to
their people. This is because the factories that were trying to manufacture the consumer's goods had
to shift their responsibility towards catering and producing goods to met the demands of the military
instead. Additionally, the unnecessary military spending, and the diversion of funds oversea resulted
in the depreciation of the United States dollars. There were no equivalent funds or offers coming
into the country, so the United States withdrawn themselves from improving their countries areas to
military households and

Impact of the Gulf War, September 11th, and the War in...
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. It was
completed on September, 1787, with its adoption by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, and was later ratified by special conventions in each of the original thirteen states. It
created a more unified and defined government in place of what was then a group of free and
independent states operating under the Articles of Confederation. During its history there have been
a numerous number of events which have occurred which have seriously tested this Constitution
After conflicts in South Korea, the two World Wars and Vietname the next conflict to have tested the
Constitution was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With George Bush Snr defeating Sadaam Hussein and ordering him and his trrops withdrawal from
Kuwait this was deemed to be going against the Constitution. This is because America and George
Bush were imposing themselves on a foreign country and determined how they were to conduct
themselves. There was no justification for their involvement. Having previously defeat the Soviet
Union there was no oppostion to America and they were seen as the only 'Super Power'. With the
concept of Seperation of Power being upheld in America, Internationally, this was not the case as
there was no form of checks and balances, there was no one to question America so they done what
they percieved to be correct. They were imposing their own from of government on foreign land,
this goes against the Constitution and the 6 defining principles which make up the Constitution.
The next challenge on the Constitution was the attack on the World Trade Centres on September
11th 2001. The September 11, 2001 attacks were a series of suicide attacks against the United States
conducted on Tuesday, September 11, 2001. According to the official 9/11 Commission Report,
nineteen men affiliated with Osama bin Laden and Al–Qaeda, a loose network of Sunni Islamist
terrorists, simultaneously hijacked four U.S. domestic commercial airliners. Two were crashed into
the World Trade Center in Manhattan, New York City – one

U.s. Decision For Enter World War II
The U.S. decision to enter World War II was not one which was hastily made. World War I had been
simmering for some time, over two years in fact, prior to the U.S. entrance into this bloody affair.
Endless debate had occurred at all levels of our government, and even among the general
population, to the appropriate role of the U.S. in this war. As one factor after another combined to
make U.S. involvement more of a probability, one factor in particular would prove to be the final
straw which would topple the decision making process from one of restraint to one of action. This
factor was, of course, the Japanese bombing at Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor was attacked on the
morning of December 7, 1941 and would prove to be Japan's greatest mistake, a mistake for which
the consequences would extend throughout the war and well into Japan's post–war future. More
immediately, however, it would serve to drop the restraint which the U.S. had maintained as the war
had raged on in Europe for over two years. The U.S. would have entered WWII even if the Japanese
did not attack Pearl Harbor. The axis powers, Germany and Italy, were gaining to much power in
Europe and then Japan decided that they were going to join with the axis powers, this was not
settling well with the U.S. World War II spanned a six year period between September 1, 1939 (the
date of Germany's invasion of Poland) and September 2, 1945 (the date of the Japanese surrender)
("Pearl Harbor Raid, 7 December 1941–Overview and

War Between The Eu And The U.s. Essay
Hello! Thank you for your question about a war between the EU and the U.S. The short version is
that given much of Europe 's cutbacks on military spending, the much lower number of ships, air
craft and troops, and the lack of a unified military, it is likely that if the US and the EU went to war
right now the US would win. Below you will find a delve of my findings.
METHODOLOGY
In order to find the answer to this question, I first found documents put out by the United States
Department of Defense, the European Department of Defense and NATO to get exact number on
troops, weaponry and nuclear missiles for each side. Then, I researched relative capabilities of each
side as they have been reported in the news and by partisan committees to get an unbiased view of
how effectively each side uses what they have in combat situations. Finally, I compiled information
on how public opinion and government policies can affect fighting to determine if either side had
weaknesses unrelated to defense spending. Below you will find the data I collected along with notes
about how each country might deploy the technology and troops available to them most effectively.
Since you stated in your question Today, I wrote this with the assumption that the UK would be
included in the EU despite their recent vote to leave it which has not yet gone into effect.
GROUND TROOPS
Here are the numbers as of 2016 for the US military personnel:
Army: 475,000
Army Reserve: 198,000
Navy: 327,300
Navy

The U.S./Cuban Showdown and the Cold War
The 13 days in where the Soviet Union confronted the USA by placing nuclear missles in the island
Cuba which is just 90 miles off American mainland is regarded as the closest the two countries came
to war in the Cold War period. The short term signifcances were huge, as the world came close to a
third world war, but in the long term it actually helped USA and the Soviet Union build a stronger
relationship. It led to the Moscow–Washington hotline. However, during the 13 days it proved to
many leaders and citizens around the world how fragile a relationship the two countries had, and
showed a glimpse into the future that no one wanted to experience. However, what was most
significant about the event in the short term was that the outcome seemed to give the USA the upper
hand in the cold war. The result of the crises was that the Soviet Union retreated and took all their
offensive weapons in Cuba away, whilst the American missiles in Turkey were allowed to stay
where they were. Although the Cold War continued for another three decades after, the event led to
the decline of Khrushchev, which proves how significant a defeat it was for the Soviets. Opposition
had mounted against Khrushchev during and after the crisis and for all his dramatics, bringing the
world to the brink of nuclear war for example, he had not delivered any meaningful victories.
In the early days of September 1962, American U–2 spy planes detected that the Soviet Union were
building surface–to–air launch

U.s. Foreign Policy During The Cold War
Introduction
"I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting
attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures." This declaration, made by
former President Harry S. Truman on March 12, 1947, is part of the Truman Doctrine, and was the
basis for U.S. involvement in Western Europe throughout the Cold War. Although the North Atlantic
Treaty, and the resulting North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), was established during the
Cold War "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down," NATO has persisted
since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990. This essay will seek to examine the U.S. decision to
create and participate in NATO. It will begin by providing a history of NATO and the U.S. decision
to participate in NATO before considering how this decision is both an instance of continuity and
change in U.S. foreign policy since former President George Washington's Farewell Address. The
essay will conclude by considering the legacy of this decision and its impact on U.S. foreign policy.
While this essay will consider the period of time leading up to the formation of NATO and will
briefly touch on the present day, greatest consideration will be paid to the time period immediately
preceding and following the formation of NATO in 1949.
Formation of NATO
Following the end of World War II, the United States became increasingly concerned with the
perceived threat of Soviet aggression in

U.s. Foreign Policy During The Cold War Essay
The overview of The U.S. Foreign Policy
The objective of 'the U.S. foreign policy' course is to develop personal ability for applying IR
theories to the U.S. foreign policy. Then, students will be able to understand the direction as well as
the grounds of the U.S. foreign policy. To achieve this objective, I will discuss major the theoretical
issues through the brief history of the U.S. foreign policy until the Cold War. After that, I will
examine the challenges which the U.S. confronts.
One of the theoretical issues in the U.S. foreign policy is the concept of isolationism and
internationalism(or interventionism). To comprehend this concept, we need to figure out the history
of the U.S. foreign policy briefly to find consistency in the flow of the policies. The Monroe
Doctrine, which is famous for the declaration against European Imperialism (Monroe, 1823), was
actually not the first argument of isolationism. As a matter of fact, isolationism began from George
Washington's Farewell Address. (Washington, 1796) Meanwhile, President Woodrow Wilson tried to
change the America's isolationism and to realize his liberalism via his Fourteen Points and the
League of the Nations. (Wilson, 1918) However, his effort failed with the opposition of the
parliament and the interest of World War I's victorious countries.
In 1940s, the U.S. participated and took a significant role in the World War II, and could not hold
isolationism due to the threat of communism and Soviet in Europe.

The Vietnam War Cost the U.S. More than Money Essay
U.S.A Involvement in Vietnam War Direct U.S. military involvement in The Vietnam War, the
nation's longest, cost fifty–eight thousand American lives. Only the Civil War and the two world
wars were deadlier for Americans. During the decade of Vietnam start in 1964, the U.S Treasury
spent over $140 billion on the war, enough money to fund urban regeneration projects in every
major American city. In spite of these enormous costs and their accompanying public and private
disturbance for the American people, the United States failed, for the first time in its history, to
attain its stated war aims. The goal was to preserve a separate, independent, non–communist
government in South Vietnam, but after April 1975, the communist Democratic ... Show more
On August 4, 1964 the Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred in which American Naval Vessels in South
Vietnamese waters were fired upon by North Vietnam. On August 5, 1964 President Johnson
requested a decree expressing the determination of the United Sates in supporting freedom and in
protecting peace in Southeast Asia. On August 7, 1964, in reply to the presidential request, Congress
authorized President Johnson to take all necessary measures to repel any attack and to prevent
aggression against the U. S. in Southeast Asia (United States). The selective bombing of North
Vietnam began immediately in reply to this resolution. In March of the following year U. S. troops
began to arrive The political involvement in Vietnam was about much more than just promised aid
to a weak country in order to put off the spread of communism. It was about money. After all, wars
require equipment, guns, tools and machinery. Most of which was produced in the United States. It
was about proving America's commitment to stop socialism, or rather to confine communism in its
present boundaries. But most of all it was about politics. The presidential political involvement in
Vietnam had little to do with Vietnam at all. It was about China for Eisenhower, about Russia for
Kennedy, about Washington D.C. for Johnson and about himself for Nixon (Post). The last two of
which were the major players in America's involvement in

The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy: The Ronald Reagan...
The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy: The Ronald Reagan Doctrine
By: Jennefer Paddock
Professor Altman: POL300
March 4, 2012
The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy: The Ronald Reagan Doctrine
President Ronald Reagan's Doctrine was supposed to sponsor anti–communist guerillas who were
trying to overthrow pro–Soviet regimes (Roskin 58). President Reagan supported anti–communist
groups, and Reagan argued that the American economy was on the move again, while the Soviet
Union had become stagnant. President Reagan had morally opposed nuclear weapons since 1945,
and he quietly worked to make the world safer from the threat of nuclear war. Under Reagan's
administration, the Reagan Doctrine was implemented by the United States to oppose global
influence of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Support for freedom fighters is self–defense" (Carpenter 1986). As part of his effort to gain
Congressional support for the Nicaraguan contras, President Reagan labeled the contras "the moral
equivalent of our founding fathers," which was controversial because the contras had shown a
disregard for human rights. There also were allegations that some members of the contra leadership
were involved in cocaine trafficking. President Reagan and other conservative advocates of the
Reagan Doctrine advocates also argued that the doctrine served U.S. foreign policy and strategic
objectives and was a moral imperative against the former Soviet Union, which Reagan, his advisers,
and supporters labeled an "evil empire" (Weinberger 2004). Describe the effects of the diplomatic
efforts for the United States and other countries. The Reagan Doctrine had an impact in Chile and
Nicaragua. One of the first places that President Reagan turned his attention to was Chile, a country
that imposed military and economic restrictions upon. By 1984, Reagan's administration formulated
a new policy toward Chile and made the restoration of democracy Chile's main objective, as a way
to prevent Chile from having to come under Soviet influence. The Reagan administration viewed the
installation of democracy in Chile as necessary to ensure that Chile was not affiliated with
communism. In addition, President Reagan took the communist threat in

U.s. Involvement During The Korean War
US Involvement In the Korean War President Truman's desire to stop communism in the Korean
Peninsula resulted in the decision to join the Korean War. The catalyst for the United States'
involvement in the Korean War is mostly due to the fear of the spread of communism, which was
caused by North Korea's encroachment and intimidation of South Korea, as well as the desire to
silence the Soviet Union. Other factors attributed to US involvement such as the Truman Doctrine,
the Domino Theory, and McCarthyism. The United States has a profound fear of communism and
honestly I think most, if not all, countries do as well. "Communism" according to Wikipedia, "is a
social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of
the communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the common ownership of
the means of production and the absence of social classes, money, and the state." In plain terms, it is
a form of government in which no one owns anything, it all belongs to the state and everyone is
equal no one is above anyone else.
Now to some people that must give a euphoric feeling to have everyone equal. Well, the one deadly
factor that leads to disasters, anarchy, and deaths is us. The humans. Humans cannot live with
everyone being equal. We still have the biological need to make things ours and communism
disables the luxury of having private property and owning things in Kaminsky 2 general.
Communism itself isn't a

U.s. Vietnam And The Vietnam War Essay
Throughout almost the entirety of the American war against the North Vietnam and Viet Cong in the
mid– to late–1960s and '70s, several high–ranking U.S. officials–including Democratic President
Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas and his Republican successor Richard Nixon of California–have
repeatedly made their claims about the mission to "save" the "independent" nation of South Vietnam
against the "hostile and aggressive" North Vietnamese communist invaders, despite all evidence to
the contrary where we proved that the United States was the aggressive invader and the foreign
policy at the time ultimately caused Americans at home to feel a sense of disillusionment; our belief
in American exceptionalism ideology, our societal culture and national identity, all of these were a
result of the realities about the war in Vietnam and damaged our reputation around the world as a
force for good and championing democracy during the Cold War era while not wanting to be
portrayed as a "paper tiger" . The following essay will analyze and contrast between the official U.S.
claims about the war in Vietnam and the realities it ensued following the aftermath. How did
American leaders publicly explain and justify U.S. military intervention in Vietnam? Officially the
U.S. role in the military intervention in Vietnam occurred after France's defeat to the Viet Minh in
the French–Indochina War to reclaim their lost territory to the Japanese Empire during World War II.
Since Ho Chi Minh's repeated

U.s. Involvement During The Persian Gulf War
.Mohammadamin Montazer
Mr. Kanna
U.S. History, period 1
29 May 2015
U.S. Involvement in 1st Persian Gulf War
"One of the good things about the way the Gulf War ended in 1991 is, you 'd see the Vietnam
veterans marching with the Gulf War veterans" (George H. W. Bush). President Bush stated that the
Persian Gulf War was not fully supported by the soldiers who fought in the war. Gulf War veterans
marched like Vietnam veterans because they also viewed the war as unjustified. Persian Gulf War
veterans would say, "American soldiers lost their lives' for oil." The first Persian Gulf War started
from August 2, 1990 and ended on February 28, 1991. This war began by the invasion of Kuwait by
Iraq. During this invasion some of the oil fields of Kuwait were set on fire and some of the oil
spilled to the Persian Gulf. The Persian Gulf was the oil supplier for western countries. So anything
happened to the Persian Gulf, the western countries will naturally react. The factors that led to The
United States' involvement in the first Persian Gulf War included Saddam Hussein's invasion of
Kuwait, his control over a sizable share of the world's oil reserves and his power over the economies
of the world. Many Americans believe that the first Persian Gulf War was not necessary for the
United States.
On August 2, 1990, Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, attacked Kuwait as a result of overproduction of
oil in Kuwait, which had cost Iraq an estimated $14 billion a year when oil process of obtaining the

U.s. Army And The Civil War
Army personnel were deeply involved throughout the process of reconstruction. Beyond their
tremendous effort to strengthen the Freedman's Bureau, the military oversaw voter registration and
elections, established schools, prohibited alcohol, tried to settle property disputes, contracted labor
systems and most importantly, maintained law and order. The violence that erupted in the South
during the years of reconstruction was dreadful. With military occupation, white violence against
blacks did not disappear but it did subside. Blair mentions, that "no matter how small the number of
occupying soldiers, ex–Confederates and white supremacists invariably backed down whenever
confronted by the army." According to Blair, "Military force on a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With a post–Civil War military made up of only about, 25,000 men, "committing 10,000 to 20,000
troops to long term occupation of the South was unthinkable for practical, economic and political–
ideological reasons." For the short time the Military remained in the South, they achieved significant
success in establishing policies of Reconstruction. The Civil War and Reconstruction brought a
variety of significant changes to the United States and its citizens. Once under servitude and
suffering abuse, Reconstruction brought African Americans new freedoms, rights and opportunities.
It was the first time in American history that the Government took full responsibility in defending
and protecting its citizen's basic human rights. Once politically powerless, Reconstruction policies
opened new doors for African Americans throughout the United States. During the years of
Reconstruction, African Americans in the United States searched for the true meaning of freedom
while leaving their first legacies of success on the world. Historian, Steven Hahn describes the
legacies left behind by African Americans during this confusing period. According to Hahn, "at one
time and place or another, a black man occupied virtually every office available at the local level."
After the ratification of the Civil War Amendments, African Americans in the South moved into
politics decently fast. They

The U.S.- Mexican War Essay
The United States has always has been an oppressor of its neighboring countries, making any and all
populations that stand in the way of what it wants an enemy. The U.S.–Mexican War was a violent
and shattering event for Mexican citizens that lasted from 1846–1848. It drastically altered the
course of Mexican and American history for years to come. Once the debilitating battle ended, the
United States emerged a world power having acquired more than 500,000 square miles of valuable
territory and Mexico spent years recovering from the loss of land and Mexican citizens. Ultimately,
it was the "insatiable ambition of the United States, favored by [Mexican] weakness" that was the
principle cause of the U.S.–Mexican War. This can be broken down ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
as its citizens were still in the midst of the Mexican Revolution. However, soon after the Mexican
Republic was formed, it was realized that the U.S. expansion into Mexico could become a real
danger. Mexico had just attained its freedom from Spain in the 1820s and as such, did not want to
fall into another malevolent trap with the U.S., leaving its citizens unsure of how to proceed without
starting a war. Though the nation of Mexico remained tentative of its international relations,
American citizens and groups of American citizens "contribute[d] materially to aid the cause of
Texas." This was partly because not all migration was unsolicited before the annexation of Texas
and as such, some Americans felt entitled to occupy Mexico. After Mexico declared its
independence from Spain it needed more settlers to populate the areas of its nation with few citizens
living in its regions. Thus, in order to ease tensions between the countries, a proposal was created
that involved U.S. citizens living in Texas to become citizens of Mexico and pledge allegiance to the
Mexican nation. "The settlers, it [was] asserted, were to be exclusively Catholics," and obey the
laws of their new nation. However, what was decided on paper and what the settlers actually did
were inconsistent with each other. The settlers were unhappy with the rules of their new
management, felt no loyalty to the Mexican government, and refused to follow the laws or convert
to

Pol 300 Assignment 1: the Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy
POL 300 Assignment 1: The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy Click Link Below To Buy:
http://hwcampus.com/shop/pol–300–assignment–1–the–cold–war–and–u–s–diplomacy/ Assignment
1: The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy Due Week 5 and worth 135 points Select a president from the
table, "Presidents and Their 'Doctrines,'" in Roskin, Chapter 4. Then write a 3–5 page paper on the
doctrine that president used according to Roskin. Your research must include at least four (4)
credible sources, apart from your textbook. Your paper must address the following: Summarize a
situation that required U.S. diplomatic efforts during the president's time in office. Explicate the
diplomatic doctrine the president followed, with reference to specific actions or ... Show more
and other countries. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely described the effects of these
diplomatic efforts for the U.S. and other countries. Insufficiently described the effects of these
diplomatic efforts for the U.S. and other countries. Partially described the effects of these diplomatic
efforts for the U.S. and other countries. Satisfactorily described the effects of these diplomatic
efforts for the U.S. and other countries. Thoroughly described the effects of these diplomatic efforts
for the U.S. and other countries. 4. Assess, in conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of the
particular doctrine that was followed. Weight:

The U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War Was Justified Essay
The U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War Was Justified
The Vietnam conflict has been known for being the most unpopular war in the history of the United
States. The war of 1812, the Mexican war and the Korean conflict of the early 1950's were also
opposed by large groups of the American people, but none of them generated the emotional anxiety
and utter hatred that spawned Vietnam. The Vietnam war caused people to ask the question of
sending our young people to die in places where they were particular wanted and for people who did
not seem especial grateful.
Vietnam has a very rich and cultural diverse background dating all the way back to 1066 when
William the Conqueror invaded and paved the way for English colonization. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
All Ho Chi Minh was trying to gain from all this was aid and recognition from the United States, but
Truman was afraid to give due to the fact he thought of ho as another puppet of the USSR.
Ho Chi Minh was soon known by many people from Indochina as their main spokesman. They were
amazed by a person who was not afraid to laugh at the French, yet stood up for the people of
Indochina. Many people thought that Ho Chi Minh was no more then a legend. When Sun Yat–sen,
leader of China's nationalist army, died in 1925, Chiang Kai–shek of Moscow was put in charge
with military strategist Mikhail Borodin. Chiang chose Ho to be Borodin's advisor and interpreter.
Ho took this position, but began to secretly plan Indochina's first communist organization, set in
Canton(Dudley 45). Most of Ho's followers were young Annamese rebels who were sick of being in
the Vietnamese Nationalist party and their leader, Pham Boi Chau. The group set up Chau by hurling
a bomb at the governor of Indochina's car. Chau disappeared after this. Ho was soon accused of
taking a bribe from the French, in exchange for revealing Chau's whereabouts. Chau was said to be
executed, but really died naturally while in jail. Pointing this out got Ho out of trouble for a while.
Once Ho's Communist party got going, he set up a training camp for guerrilla techniques. It was
called the Whampoa Military Academy. At the academy, the followers were trained

U.s. Military Intervention During The War Of The United...
If it is accepted then, that Washington should have taken stronger action earlier in the conflict, the
question becomes whether there are any practical, more decisive approaches that could have been
employed earlier in the war to greater success. This essay examines three alternative measures that
could have been adopted by the US at the outset of the conflict, in light of existing commitments,
foreign policy and attitudes. The most controversial option is direct military intervention. Current
American–led airstrikes have exclusively focused on ISIS, however, the current Russian
intervention can provide clues as to whether earlier American air strikes against Assad would have
impacted the conflict. Russia intervened on the basis of creating "new realities" upon which to build
a political settlement, but the true effect of these measures is to essentially keep the Assad regime
from collapsing (ACRPS, 2015). This intervention has helped "turn the tides" of the conflict for the
regime (Heistein, 2016). There are questions as to whether, at the outset of the conflict, The
Administration could have realistically engaged in airstrikes. Even those who advocated a more
"muscular" policy early in the war such as Hilary Clinton, Leon Panetta and David Patraeus, were
not proposing any where near the kind of military involvement that would have been large enough
to re–shape the conflict or even provide enough leverage to negotiate a settlement (Miller, 2016).
However, it can be

The Cold War, Soviet Russia And The U.s.
During the cold war, Soviet Russia and the U.S. disagreed on many matters, but found a common
ground in appreciating technology and its instrumental value to the progress of society. Each nation
glorified their contrasting examples of the ideal lifestyle, however their shared faith in technology
was fulfilled in different forms. The Soviet Union had clearly attained their upper hand in the Space
Race, achieving the launch of Sputnik, the first artificial satellite and Vostok 1 which brought the
first human to outer space. The US government were also acutely aware of the vulnerability of their
military forces as the Soviet Union were developing advanced nuclear weaponry with potential for
mass destruction. Conscious of their technological inferiority in comparison, the U.S. sought after
ways to demonstrate a technological competence and restore faith in an insecure nation. The family
home was praised as the symbol of American prosperity but remodeled to convince a nation that
they were just as knowledgeable and proficient in technology as the Soviet Union. These
modifications had a radical influence in what was considered as 'necessary' technologies to the ideal
American home but also materialized a direct confrontation with fears of a nuclear attack on
American soil. In this sense, military technology did not have a direct or literal influence on the
American home during the Cold War, rather that the consciousness that such technology existed had
a profound influence on

Containment as U.S. Policy During Cold War Era
Containment as U.S. policy during Cold War Era
From after World War II and up until 1991 the foreign policy of the United States was based on Cold
War ideology and the policy of containment; to prevent nations from leaning towards Soviet Union–
based communism, as first laid out by George Kennan and later used as one of the key principles in
the Truman Doctrine (LeCain). As this essay will argue, because of this policy the United States
made a commitment to fight communism everywhere in the world and got them involved in
conflicts more because of self interest, self protection and determination to beat communism than
the cause itself. The fear of communism first emerged after the Soviet Revolution in 1917 during the
First Red Scare in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though President Truman had developed the policy of containment and gone to war in Korea
to fight against communism, Senator McCarthy continued to attack the President calling him "a son
of a bitch" (LeCain) and referred to Truman's and Roosevelt's Democratic administrations as
"twenty years of treason" (Maier 815). Americans grew impatient due to the Korean conflict and
McCarthy fueled the already angry and frustrated American voters and in 1952 Dwight D.
Eisenhower was elected president. President Eisenhower hinted that if the North Koreans did not
come to the peace table, the United States might use atomic weapons (LeCain). Offering the same
terms as President Truman did, Eisenhower was able to make the Chinese and North Koreans sign a
peace treaty on July 27th 1953 (Maier 815). With Eisenhower as president Senator McCarthy's days
were numbered (Fried 132), the massive defense budget would be reduced, but it did not have an
effect on American Cold War policy (Brands 43). Eisenhower was a moderate Republican (LeCain)
and he did not attempt to cut the New Deal programs, but wanted to reduce the budget. Six weeks
after Eisenhower enters office, Stalin dies. This offered a possibility in reductions in defense
expenditures, thus reducing the budget (Brands 41). The change of leadership in both Washington
and Moscow made Winston Churchill advocate a summit

The Tactics Used by the U.S and the N.L.F in the Vietnam...
The Tactics Used by the U.S and the N.L.F in the Vietnam War
During the Vietnam War, the United States took a completely different approach than the National
Liberation Front (NLF) when it came to tactics. America was more modern in their attacks, using
their air force and heavily armed ground troops. Whereas the NLF only had guerrilla fighters, who
stayed on the ground and attacked quickly.
The first tactic involved the US air force strategically bombing North Vietnamese targets. This
included bombing army bases, bridges, railways and factories, even though North Vietnam didn't
have many factories to bomb. US panes were flying 164 flying missions a day on average in early
1966. Bombs often ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They did this by dropping chemical bombs that defoliated the vast amount of trees. This chemical
became known as "Agent Orange". This now meant that American helicopters were able to spot the
enemy more easily.
Although "Agent Orange" worked, it did effect the Vietnamese people. One effect of this chemical
was that it caused cancer amongst those who used it or were affected it. It also had an effect on
pregnant woman who ended up giving birth to seriously deformed children or stillborns. The war
also had many psychological effects. The North Vietnamese used this as propaganda against the
Americans, suggesting that they had done it deliberately to harm innocent people. But aside from
this, the Americans were still struggling to have a clear view of the enemy. Because of this, they
introduced another chemical bomb – Napalm. Napalm is a thick liquid, which usually contains
petrol and is used in firebombs and flame–throwers. It cleared the undergrowth, which gave the US
more chance of being able to spot the Vietcong from the air.
Although, there was one major problem. Napalm also sticks to human skin, and gradually burns
away the flesh. The Americans simply dropped it on forest, possibly forgetting that innocent peoples
lives were at risk. Unsurprisingly, people were hurt– killed. In December 1966, the North
Vietnamese finally permitted an American journalist to visit

The U.s. War Of Independence
The U.S. War of Independence ensued from the increasing conflict between the British North
American colonies and England. However, this conflict cannot be traced back to a single cause,
rather, to multiple issues and protests towards the tyranny of the mother country. Even though the
numerous Acts enforced by the British government undoubtedly generated dissatisfaction amongst
the colonists, it was the government's rejection of cooperation or compromise that persuaded many
colonists of the inevitability of war and independence.
The oppressive reasons for the colonists' repeated cry of, "No taxation without representation!"
became some of the primary influences on the spirit of the American Revolution. Between the years
of 1651–1774, the colonists experienced unjust taxation and orders from the British Parliament, as
they endured the Navigation Acts, Molasses Act, Sugar Act, Currency Act, Stamp Act, Declaratory
Act, Quartering Act, Townshend Duties, Tea Act, Coercive Acts, and then finally, the Quebec Act.
The main issue with these acts that infuriated the colonists, was that they were not being represented
in British government. The colonists saw Britain's actions as threats and argued that they, as British
colonists and citizens, were to possess all the rights belonging to Englishmen , which included
having representatives in government. If England was truly their mother country, then her acts and
levies, many of which infringed upon the natural rights of the colonists ,

U.s Propaganda On Vietnam War
U.S propaganda in Vietnam War
In the need of human resources, the U.S government in the 3rd quarter of the 20th century has
started mobilizing young men into navy and military troops. This mobilization was preceded with
heavy amount of propaganda that used big variety of different motives to recruit as many people as
possible and to stop the deserters that tried to flee to the country. The motives used in propaganda
ranged from hateful to nationalistic. When thinking of power, most people think of United States
whether it be financial power or military power. But when looking into how United States got this
power and maintains it, you have to look at the ins and outs of its ploys. One thing that plays a key
role in this militaristic power is the use of propaganda.
The use of propaganda has helped United States out in many ways and has become a tactic to win
wars. For example, during World War 2 the United States used posters and newspapers to get the
public riled up about the war. This eventually helped the country out and helped them win the war.
The use of media propaganda can help out in many ways such as encouraging soldiers to fight,
implant a strong dislike for the nemesis, or just get support from back home. These little things have
helped United States win wars in the past when done correctly. But when the technique of
propaganda is used wrong, it can be the key factor of losing a war and that is exactly what happened
in the Vietnam War.
As the government slowly

U.s. Intervention Abroad During The Vietnam War
From Vietnam to Iran: U.S. Intervention Abroad
From Vietnam to Iraq, the United States has intervened in dozens of countries, claiming each
instance as a fight for democracy and liberation. While that claim is embraced by some Americans,
others reject it. Since the 1900s, a growing number of Americans have questioned U.S. international
motives and oppose U.S. intervention abroad. These Americans believe that intervention results in
pointless bloodshed without liberation. Movies can act as a medium to represent the full spectrum of
American attitudes towards U.S. intervention abroad. Full Metal Jacket (1979) follows the journey
of a Marine recruit during the Vietnam War, and Argo (2012) recounts the CIA rescue of six
American hostages ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
involvement. Through Joker's interactions with other U.S. soldiers, the film explores multiple
opinions on the Vietnam War, focusing mostly on the critics of U.S. intervention. The Vietnam scene
opens up with an interaction between Private Joker and Private Rafterman: "You know what really
pisses me off...we're supposed to helping them, and they shit all over us every chance they get. I just
can't feature that." Rafterman's remarks reflect the belief that the U.S. is really helping the
Vietnamese; he is naive soldier who doesn't understand the source of Vietnam hostility towards U.S.
soldiers. The idea of America–helping–Vietnam is reiterated by a Colonel in the city of Hue: "We
are here to help the Vietnamese because inside every gook there is an American trying to get out".
The Colonel portrays the U.S. intervention as a mission to liberate the Vietnamese. America is
associated with freedom, and thus the image of an American climbing out of a Vietnamese
represents the Vietnamese people discovering freedom. Therefore, Colonel believes the U.S. has a
mission to help.
While the messages of Rafterman and the Colonel support the war, the majority of characters in the
film criticize the war as an unjustified bloodshed. About halfway into the movie, Private Joker and
the squadron circle around the corpse of two dead comrades. Rafteran once again praises the U.S.
sacrifice in the fight for democracy, but Private Animal Mother

U.s History : American Civil War
Omer Bhatti U.S History I Professor Ojserkis U.S History I: Final Paper In early April 1861, the
attack on Fort Sumter marked the beginning of the American Civil War. However, the belligerence
of both sides of the war began long before the first shot. There is a great deal of possible causes of
the Civil War, and in much disagreement with popular belief the war was not solely fought about the
existence of slavery. Unfortunately, there is no simple reason why the war began because there were
many sectional differences between the states of the North and of the South. In many ways the Civil
War can be described as a war between two different countries instead of a war between two
sections of a country. Slavery was perhaps the most noticeable ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even though, the causes of the Civil War were various these articles each introduced a cause that
they believed contributed greatly to catalyzing the Civil War. The most obvious difference in
lifestyles between these two countries was that the South was a slave proponent and the North was a
non–slave proponent. In his article, The Way We Weren't, David Von Drehle, he states the
importance of slavery in context of the Civil War, "The once obvious truth of the Civil War does not
imply that every soldier had slavery on his mind as he marched and fought. Many Southerners
fought and died in gray never having owned a slave and never intending to own one. Thousands
died in blue with no intention to set one free. But it was slavery that had broken one nation in two
and fated its people to fight over whether it would be put back together again." (Von Dehle, 1). This
statement makes clear that slavery was a major factor in instigating the Civil War. The article also
mentioned that slavery's influence on the belligerence of both regions is also distinct with the
violence in Kansas, which was later properly labeled "Bleeding Kansas." This battle displayed the
fight over the acceptance of slavery since, it involved Missouri residents, called Border Ruffians," to
journey to Kansas to forcibly persuade the people of Kansas to become a slave state. This
highlighted the dissension over slavery since it was so important to the

U.S. Entry into World War I
Woodrow Wilson delivered his now–famous War Message to Congress on April 4, 1917. Four days
later, Congress declared war and the United States became a formal partner in the war to end all
wars. As the Wilson administration was to discover, however, declaring war and making war were
two very different propositions. The former required only an abstract statement of ideals and
justifications and a two–thirds Congressional majority; the latter required the massive mobilization
of virtually every sector of American society – military, industrial, and economic, as well as public
opinion. The Wilson administration sought to accomplish this daunting task in two concomitant and
interdependent fashions. First, it undertook an unprecedented ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
America's spirit of volunteerism was in many ways the product of a carefully constructed
government propaganda machine that underlay each of its wartime measures. The centerpiece of the
government's propaganda campaign was the Committee on Public Information (CPI), a federal
agency established just one week after Wilson's declaration of war. The CPI's objective was to
convince the American public of the "absolute justice of America's cause [and] the absolute
selflessness of America's aims" (Woodrow Wilson, as quoted in Zeiger, 79). To be sure, the converse
of this was also true; the objective was not only to glamorize U.S. efforts, but to demonize the
enemy, as a slew of racialized, highly derogatory anti–German propaganda made clear. To this end,
the CPI made full use of the burgeoning fields of professional advertising and public relations,
creating and distributing posters, pamphlets, billboards and slogans for agencies like the Fuel
Administration, the USRA, and the Selective Service System and programs like the Liberty Loan
drive. Hoover made perhaps the most extensive use of CPI propaganda for his Food Administration.
Posters with catchy slogans like "Wheatless days in America make sleepless nights in Germany,"
and "If U fast U beat U boats," drove home the government's message: every American was a
soldier in this war and only by doing one's part could the United States fend off German aggression
and make the world safe for democracy. Other CPI

U.S. -Led Interventions During World War II

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Melissa Luster

More from Melissa Luster (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

U.S. -Led Interventions During World War II