Call Us🔝⇛+91-97111🔝47426 Call In girls Munirka (DELHI)
Ethical decision making
1.
2. Today’s rapid changing environment poses ethical
challenges for executives
Executives have to ensure that a decision taken today
should not back fire in the future
People divide the world into “us” and “them” that leads to
discrimination.
3. Discussing the various theories used by executive to
make crucial decisions. Namely
Theories about the World,
Theories about Other People
Theories about Ourselves
What is the scope of the topic?
How aspects of the
above theory may be
incorrect
Identify areas where
errors may rise
Suggesting remedies
on how executives can
improve their ethical
decision making
5. Ignoring Low Probability events: Considering what is
important and ignoring the rest
Limiting the search of Stake Holders: Companies
must consider harmful effects as well
People are not important : Ignoring the possibility that
people will find out
Discounting the future: Considering short term gains
only
Undervaluing Collective Outcomes: Engineering
failure with corporate negligence
Theories
of world
Theories
of other
people
Theories
of self
6. Denying Uncertainty: People think the world is not
uncertain, and come up with their own theories
◦ Experience may not always be a good teacher
◦ “I should have known” means predictability
Eg: Cigarette and its hazards, standard proof is needed
Risk Trade-Offs:
◦ What are the factors that the company is ready to let go and take
risk?
◦ What level of risk is acceptable?
Risk Framing:
Theories of
world
Theories of
other people
Theories of
self
Plan Total 3 plants, 6000 employees
Plan A Save 1 of 3 plants, save 2000 jobs
Plan B One third probability of saving all 3 plants and all 6000 jobs
Plan C Loss of 2 of 3 plants and 4000 jobs
Plan D Two thirds probability of losing all 3 plants & 6000 employees
7. Focus on People
Different Events
Sins of Omission
Theories
of world
Theories
of other
people
Theories
of self
8. Focus on People
Our theories about the world consider people as the
“causal agents” for things gone wrong rather than the
external environmental factors.
Different Events
Changes in the organization often lead to unethical
conduct.
Sins of Omission
Failure to take an action by an ethical person against an
unethical conduct by the other person or group.
Theories
of world
Theories
of other
people
Theories
of self
9. Theories
of world
Theories
of other
people
Theories
of self
Increasing social diversity
of the business world
Makes executives prone to
incorrect theories about
certain social groups
Culminates into ethically
incorrect decisions
10. Characteristics of one’s own nation, group or
culture appears to be normal
Characteristics of others appear foreign, strange
and curious
Our values and beliefs become the standard
against which to judge rest of the world
11. An individual with an ethnocentric view:
Identifies strongly with in-group ethnicity,
culture, etc.
Views economic, political, social events from
the point of their in-group
Defines their culture elements as ‘correct’ &
‘natural’
Xenophobia: a fear or hatred of persons of a
different race, ethnic or national origin
Defines other culture’s elements as ‘incorrect’
& ‘unnatural’
12. Stereotypes
Generalizations about a group of people whereby
we attribute a defined set of characteristics to this
group: either positive or negative
Why do stereotypes occur?
Stereotypes arise as a way of explaining or
justifying differences between groups
Lack of exposure to other groups, cultures, beliefs
etc.
Theories
of world
Theories
of other
people
Theories
of self
14. Illusion of Superiority: People often think of themselves of being
better than others.
Illusion of Favorability
Illusion of Control
Illusion of Optimism
Self-Serving fairness Biases: An executive may often see himself
as putting in a lot of effort and may believe that he deserves much more
than what he is already getting but often in such cases other colleagues
may do not share the same view. The same executive when judging others
would only see the results got by others and not the effort put in by them.
Overconfidence: This trait is mostly seen in successful executives
where their experience may force them to believe they know more then
enough and this may lead to reluctancy to learn knew things.
Theories
of world
Theories
of other
people
Theories
of self
15. Quality
Breadth
Honesty
Inaccuracy in understanding theories of the world, of other people
and ourselves is the root cause of poor decision making skills.
We can outline three broad criteria that must be looked at for
improving ethical decision making as follows
Editor's Notes
For eg. If a rail gets derailed, we usually blame the line man, the driver and the station master. We however don’t concentrate on making the shunting and signaling systems better.
For eg: When Sears introduced commission based sales system at its automotive repairs shop, there was an increase in consumer complaints usually accusing the shop of performing unnecessary expensive work.
For eg: If a manager fails to disclose the knowledge of his colleague’s incompetence, he is the one who is responsible for harm to the organization.
When McDnalds entered India in 1996, they were not aware of the fact that Indian population was averse to beef and pork in food items. This lead to inadequate sales. Soon they realized this and removed the beef and pork products from their outlets
Till quiet recently Indians had the stereotype that the electronics devices especially mobile phones which were manufacture in China were of inferior quality, despites iphones also being manufactured in China. However companies like Xiaomi, oneplus with their differentiated offerings have established such trustworthiness that they have been able to capture a huge share of the Indian market and establish brand image and trust