Gloucester High School Case Study

Gloucester High School Case Study
A 16–year–old transgender boy by the name of G.G from Gloucester High School filed suit against
Gloucester County School board for discrimination in accordance with the Equal Protection Clause
and under Title IX. G.G and his mother approached school staff at the start of her sophomore year
with the news that she was now identifying as a male. The school was extremely supportive and
accommodated the family in every way possible. G's name was changed into male form and the
teachers were very understanding. G was even allowed to use the bathroom in the nurse's office for
privacy. After a few months G felt the stigma that came with not sharing the restroom with other
males. The school took into consideration the concerns and allowed G to utilize
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Sight and Blindness in King Lear
Sight and Blindness in King Lear
In King Lear, the recurring images of sight and blindness associated with the characters of Lear and
Gloucester illustrate the theme of self–knowledge and consciousness that exist in the play.
These classic tropes are inverted in King Lear, producing a situation in which those with healthy
eyes are ignorant of what is going on around them, and those without vision appear to "see" the
clearest. While Lear's "blindness" is one which is metaphorical, the blindness of Gloucester, who
carries the parallel plot of the play, is literal. Nevertheless, both characters suffer from an inability to
see the true nature of their children, an ability only gained once the two patriarchs have plummeted
to the utter depths ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Such injustice is encountered by Gloucester in the subplot. O villain, villain! His very opinion in the
letter! Abhorred villain! Unnatural, detested, brutish villain! Worse than brutish! Go, sirrah, seek
him. I'll apprehend him. Abominable villain! Where is he? (Act 1 Scene 2 Pg. 37 lines 75–78)
Gloucester fooled by his bastard son Edmund, attacks Edgar and leaves Edmund to his evil plans.
Shakesperean plays such as King Lear, illustrate the theme of good vs evil.
Gloucester's death in the subplot is a parallel to that of King Lear's in the main plot. Though
Gloucester does not have the tragic catastrophic death of King Lear. King Lear's anguish led him to
insanity while Gloucester is led to despair and attempts suicide. Before Gloucester's attempt at
suicide, he realizes that he has wronged Edgar and condemns his blindness of Edmund's...
William Shakespeare's King Lear is a dramatic play that displays many relationships between
different characters. King Lear, himself, and Gloucester can be seen as two parallel characters with
the same mentality, while at the same time be looked upon with differences. These two characters
seem to be walking down the same path unknowingly, but in the end, Gloucester becomes truly
blind to the world, and King Lear begins to take in reality as it is. The relationships between King
Lear and Gloucester will be the central topic of this paper.
Gloucester's character

Comparison Of King Lear And Gloucester Essay
Shakespeare uses subplots to dramatize the action of the play and give spark on the contrast for the
themes in King Lear. Sub plots usually improve the effect of dramatic irony and suspense. The latter,
which is used in King Lear, gives us the understanding of the emotions of the characters in the play.
This follows the parallelism between Gloucester and King Lear.
In King Lear, the subplot of Gloucester corresponds to the major plot of King Lear. Both fathers
have their own loyal legitimate child and their evil and disloyal child. They are both honourable
men, who have children that return to them in their time of need. Gloucester and Lear are both
tormented, and their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gloucester's death in the subplot is a parallel to that of King Lear's in the main plot. Though
Gloucester does not have the tragic catastrophic death of King Lear. King Lear's anguish led him to
insanity while Gloucester is led to despair and attempts suicide. Before Gloucester's attempt at
suicide, he realizes that he has wronged Edgar and condemns his blindness of Edmund's plans.
My father, poorly led? World, world, O world! But that thy strange mutations make us hate thee,
Life would not yield to age. (Act 4 Scene 1 Pg. 207 lines 10–12) This parallels Lear's death as he
also condemns his daughter Cordelia. I have seen the day, with my good biting falchion I would
have made 'em skip. I am old now, And these same crosses spoil me. Who are you? Mine eyes are
not o' the best, I'll tell you straight. (Act 5 Scene 3 pg. 317 lines 276–279) Both deaths run on the
same train tracks, as King Lear and Gloucester die as better and wiser men than they showed
themselves at first.
Throughout the play, Shakespeare uses the contrast through other characters such as Cordelia and
Edgar, who hides in the beginning and then later reveal themselves to conquer and defeat evil
forces. Subplots do make the play better all around and make the audience want to know more and
enjoy it. Lear and Gloucester even are totally different people but live in a parallel world, they are

King Lear And Cloucester Similarities
In the play "King Lear" written by Shakespeare is rifle with symbols and motifs, some of which are,
madness, betrayal, chaos, and the storm. Shakespeare effectively utilizes symbols and motifs to
create a deeper understanding of the text and develops the story. The most noteworthy use of
symbolism in the play is blindness between King Lear and Gloucester. This play predominantly
revolves around blindness, displaying how Lear's and Gloucester's fetal flaws drive them to meet
their end. They are two different characters and each plays a distinct role in the play, however, they
share many similarities and differenced in their blindness. One major similarity between Lear and
Gloucester is their complacency view of themselves. Lear and Gloucester

Mark Of The Beast : Physical Deformity In Richard III
Ch'nell Amos
Dr. Casper
English 3043.01
October 25, 2017
Mark of the Beast: Physical Deformity in Richard III
The dynamic between sin and physiognomy sparks much of the tension found within William
Shakespeare's Richard III, as moral depravity and physical deformity become the catalyst for the
violence and discord that rules Richard III. The Renaissance era, specifically neo–Platonism, viewed
the physical body as a reflection of the soul. Shakespeare's Richard III– an interpretation based off a
biography by Sir Thomas More, one that is disputed by Susan E. Lee's "Richard III', Shakespeare,
and History"– focuses on Richard's worldly rise to power at the exchange of virtue as he offers up
each kill as a sacrifice towards his rise. The idea is that the Duke of Gloucester has the mark of the
beast–– physical deformity–– and therefore was born sinful and is predisposed to evil deeds. Ian
Frederick Moulton, author of "'A Monster Great Deformed': The Unruly Masculinity of Richard III"
argues that it is more than Richard's physical ailment that pushes him toward evil endeavor and
Katherine Schaap Williams, author of "Enabling Richard: The Rhetoric of Disability in Richard III,"
asserts that no one is without a disability and therefore the audience is like Richard. This paper will
examine the relationship between Richard's deformities and historical facts, will explain how his
physical deformity and health affected his behavior, and point out that people are as villainous as the
Duke of Gloucester. Although Richard's physical deformities are meant to represent his moral short–
comings, it would seem the contorted figure of the villain represents the warping of historical facts
by Sir Thomas More. As it turns out, according to Susan E. Leas, Richard was not an evil villain and
Henry VII was not a "pure and holy deliverer" (Leas 1216). Leas asserts that after the victory of the
Tudors, Sir Thomas More wrote the biography, and he wrote a biased version of events that
Shakespeare found interesting enough to portray on stage. The problem with Shakespeare rendering
More's version of events on stage is that audiences both past and present see Shakespeare's play as
fact instead of fiction. Susan Leas supports this belief

King Lear -- Sympathetic Characters
King Lear –– Sympathetic Characters A sympathetic character, is a character that the writer expects
the reader (in this case watcher) to identify with and care about. In Shakespeare's play King Lear,
the characters Gloucester and King Lear both start out not being liked by the reader because they
come off as mean and cold. By the end of the play, the reader does sympathize for both of these
characters because of how they have been betrayed by their children. Both King Lear and
Gloucester turn out to be prime examples of a sympathetic character by the end of the play. King
Lear first appears in the play while he is splitting up his kingdom between his three daughters, he
ends up not giving any of his kingdom to Cordelia because ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the play King Lear, the two characters Gloucester and King Lear, both run on very parallel paths.
the turning point in the play where the reader starts to feel sorry for them is as soon as things start to
go bad for them. Early in the play, Lear makes bad decisions on which daughters to give his land
and power to, while Gloucester is making Edmund feel bad for being a bastard. Their decisions
blow up in their faces and the reader starts to feel bad for them. King Lear is driven to madness and
Gloucester has his eyes gouged out and want to kill himself. The impressions on both of these
characters change throughout the course of the play in the same way. Gloucester and King Lear's
fate run parallel because they both misjudge which of their children to trust, and they both suffer
from their mistakes. They are both sympathetic characters because by the end of the play you feel
sorry for them and what they have to go through, even though they initially made mistakes. These
characters show that even if a character starts out seeming mean, impulsive and angry, the reader
can still come away feeling bad for them because of what happens from their decisions. King Lear
and The Earl of Gloucester in Shakespeare's play King Lear are perfect examples of sympathetic
characters. uscero his daughters, and they just betrayed him, and didn't give him any respect as a
king, or even as a father. to give

King Lear Blindness
Literary Analysis: King Lear The Blinding
In the play, King Lear, vision and blindness are repeated allegories that relate to the characters, Lear
and Gloucester. This exemplifies the theme of self–knowledge and consciousness that occurs in the
play. These classic allegorical is inverted in King Lear, producing a situation in which those with
well working eyes cannot see what is happening around them, and those without sight are able to
"see" clearly. What do I mean? Well, Lear is completely "blind" to the character of his children,
while Gloucester blindness is literal. Blindness is echoed through Gloucester and Lear to explain
Lear's metaphorical blindness with Gloucester's literal loss of vision.
Lear is a powerful man who does not see how genuine his youngest daughter, Cordelia's love is, but
believes the deceitfulness of her sisters, Goneril and Regan. Kent, one of Lear's most loyal servants,
sees the two–facedness of Cordelia's sisters and tries to make him look pass the show that Goneril
and Regan put on and see them for who they truly are, and Lear refuses. Lear commands to Kent get
"Out of my sight!" The play echoes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lear can "see" through a sympathetic lens, after having exchanged the pride for shame, revealing to
us that mental blindness can be more damaging than physical blindness. While Gloucester, who
willingly admits that "[he] stumbled when [he] saw," is only able to "see," though sightless, after he
has suffered (4.1.20). Only through the physical pain of losing his sight was Gloucester able to see
the truth of his sons. Unquestionably, the plots of Lear and Gloucester run similar courses. However,
Shakespeare employs Gloucester's plot to clarify Lear's plot. Through the physical blinding of
Gloucester, Shakespeare provides an equivalent, which contextualizes King Lear's theme of
consciousness and allows Lear's own metaphorical blindness to be fully

The Use of Letters in King Lear Essay
The Use of Letters in King Lear
William Shakespeare used letters as a dramatic device to reveal the
characters' loyalty and betrayal in his play King Lear. The purpose of the
letter is to develop the plot and reveal the characters' attributes. Three
letters help to develop the plot and reveal the characters of Edmund, Gloucester,
Goneril and Albany.
The first letter that appeared on the stage is Edmund's false letter.
The letter talked about Edgar's plan to kill to his father, Gloucester. Edmund
made up this letter to plan against his brother Edgar. Edmund lied to
Gloucester about the letter. This ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Edmund decided to tell Cornwall
about Gloucester 's action. Edmund told Cornwall that his father was traitor
who wanted to help France. Edmund did this to receive more power and get the
credit from Duke of Cornwall. The action of Edmund displayed that he would do
anything to get higher rank. He even betrayed his father who is horribly
punished. Edmund becomes the Earl of Gloucester. Edmund had no loyalty to his

father. In Act III, the letter was in Albany's hand. Albany chose to fight the
French army and that showed his loyalty to England.
The last letter on the stage talked about the plan of murder Albany. It
was written by Goneril to Edmund. Goneril didn't love her husband and planned
to kill him. Goneril wanted Edmund to be her husband. The letter proved that
Goneril was going to betray her husband, Albany. This also means she would
betray their marriage.
In King Lear, letters developed the story and displayed the characters'
loyalty or betrayal. Edmund's false letter showed the betrayal between

My Story : My Tale
My life was one consisting of quite the amount of tragedies, however, as I tell my tale, I am careful
in reminiscing of the delightful times that occurred throughout, despite all the burdensome moments
I have endured. My story begins in the early twentieth century, when my parents birthed a healthy
girl, a prepossessing little creature. I am delighted to say I had a merry childhood, as my wealthy
parents raised me to be nothing short of whimsical, up until I reached my teenage years. My
Christian name is Margaret, and unlike my parents, I was never a peremptory woman; I was more of
a genteel and gay citizen. My parents brought me up well–educated in America with a good deal of
love, protection, and wealth, and they fancied nothing more ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Regrettably, I do remember the first thing uttered from my lips as I crossed the threshold into the
unimpressive, but efficient, home of my relatives. However, my mind was understandably
elsewhere. Growing up in the Depression was terribly difficult on me: an orphaned teen, adjusting
from the upper class to the lower class due to my parents recent passing, all in the depression.
'Where is your servant?' I inquired. The funeral was approximately a week ago, and my old servant,
Harris, had just recently departed to return to his hometown after toting the last of my belongings
into the compact front living space of my new home. (He and I had quite the bond throughout my
younger days.) Everything visible was clean and prepared for my arrival, and although there was not
much to be seen, it was quite the commodious view. At the bottom of the steps, awaited my small
and younger cousin Alice, who I noticed was wearing a raggy, castoff dress, not tailored to her tiny
frame. She returned my question with disgustful countenance, and after waiting patiently for a reply,
in which I received none, she flounced to the kitchen. I can't imagine now, after revisioning that
moment of my adolescence, how Alice was able to forbear any form of attack against me, verbally
or physically. Eventually, Uncle Arthur showed me to my room after I had waited, struggling

Selfish Blindness In King Lear
Selfish Blindness
Blindness can be defined in two ways. Literal blindness is not being able to physically see the world
around. Metaphorical blindness can be used to represent people who act and react as if they were
blind, as if decisions made do not affect anyone around. In King Lear, blindness is shown both
ways. The characters of Lear and Gloucester struggle because both have been blinded by
selfishness. Lear and Gloucester's blindness push them to make bad decisions and trust the wrong
people, both only gained vision when becoming powerless.
Lear and Gloucester's blindness lead them to making horrible decisions. "Here I disclaim all my
paternal care/ Propinquity and property of blood, / and as a stranger to my heart and me/ Hold thee
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Come, let's away to prison: We two alone will sing like birds I' th' cage: When thou dost ask me
blessing, I'll kneel down and ask of thee forgiveness" (5.3.8–11). Only when Lear lost his power and
was thrown in jail did he realize his blindness. He stopped being selfish, all he wanted was
Cordelia's forgiveness. "Prove our commodities. Oh dear son Edgar, the food of they abused Father's
wrath! Might I but live to see thee in my touch. I'd say I had eyes again!" (4.1.21–24). Gloucester
lost everything, including his eyesight however through this he realized his blindness. He like Lear
only wants his son Edgar's forgiveness. Gloucester even ranks his sons forgiveness over regaining
his own vision. "I see it feelingly" ( ). This quote can be looked at in two ways. For Gloucester, he
has to see feelingly because he lost his eyesight and has to see the world through touch. However
this can also be metaphorical, to see through feeling. Lear and Gloucester were blind because they
didn't see the people their actions affected, all that mattered was themselves. They had vision but it
was blinded by selfishness. Only once they saw through feeling, gained vision through empathy did
they truly have

Trust In King Lear
Kent: I cannot conceive you.
Gloucester: Sir, this young fellow's mother could, whereupon she grew round–wombed and had
indeed, sir, a son for her cradle ere she had a husband for her bed. Do you smell a fault? (I.I.8–16)
In the play, Edmund has never gotten much attention from his father because he was a mistake, and
he has been viewed as a lesser by society because he was not born into a legitimate family. This part
of the Gloucester plot goes along with the idea that people are blinded by societal roles, as Edmund
is shunned since he is not a part of the "legitimate" society. Edmund gets tired of being viewed as
less of a person than Edgar, and creates a plan to trick Gloucester into believing Edgar is trying to
kill him. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(I.II.15–22)
Edmund's plan ends up working, and Gloucester turns on Edgar. The fact that Gloucester easily
believes his son is going to attempt to kill him is a sign of his incredible ignorance, as Edgar is a
good man who would never betray his father. Gloucester's ignorance of the situation eventually
ruins both his and Edgar's life, and that exhibits the prevalent theme of King Lear that blindness to
the truth can destroy lives.
As the story progresses, the theme of blind trust continues. Edgar lives in disguise to escape his
father's wrath, and the lives of all the characters continuously worsen due to King Lear and
Gloucester's ignorance. Lear gets kicked out of his kingdom and lives as a homeless man and Edgar
disguises himself as "Poor Tom" pretends to be insane so his father cannot find him. Eventually,
Gloucester, along with the help of Lear's faithful servant, Kent, transports Lear to Dover so that he is
safe from Regan and Goneril. When word of Gloucester's actions gets to Regan and Goneril, they
decide to punish him by pulling out both of his eyes. After both of his eyes are gouged out,
Gloucester calls out for help from his son, Edmund. Regan then tells Gloucester that Edmund is the
one who betrayed him, and he learns that Edmund framed Edgar so that he would be killed and
Edmund could be the favorite child. Gloucester is very confused when he hears of Edmund's
trickery, and is astonished that he didn't see the true nature of his

Aristotelian Conventions Of A Tragic Hero
Aristotelian conventions are what make up a tragedy and a tragic hero. A tragic hero is an imperfect
character who due to their flaws and misjudgment, leads to their own downfall and eventually dies.
The conventions of reversal and recognition serve an essential purpose to creating this tragic hero,
as represented in William Shakespeare's King Lear. The convention of reversal is the fall of the
tragic hero and refers to the sudden change in their position and circumstance. In other words, the
tragic hero falls down the social ladder from a noble status to a lower, more base status. They end on
the opposite end of the spectrum to where they initially start. The convention of recognition is what
a tragic hero must go through before they die; ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both Lear and Gloucester start out blind to who they are. Lear begins as a prideful King, his
arrogance causes him to believe he is superior. His pride is portrayed when he holds a contest among
his daughters asking them to compliment and praise him, to receive their inheritance. He is ignorant,
therefore chooses his insincere daughters, Goneril and Regan over his sincere daughter, Cordelia.
He demonstrates recognition when he stays at Goneril's castle and she demands him to reduce his
knights against his will, he realizes that she is a "detested kite, [she] liest" (1.4.274). This also leads
him to recognize "how ugly didst [he] in Cordelia show" (1.4.279), regretting his decision. Due to
this Lear leaves to stay with Regan, where she treats him the same as Goneril. This causes him to
recognize who he is as he refers to himself as "a poor old man" (2.4.313). Additionally, it reveals the
vile nature of Goneril and Regan as he calls them "unnatural hags" (2.4.319). Finally, Lear
completes his cycle of recognition when he not only starts to view himself as an old man but also
sees himself as a father. This is portrayed when he reunites with Cordelia and comforts her saying
that together they will "pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh / At gilded butterflies" (5.3.13–
14), his description gives

Comparison Of King Lear And King Lear
In the play King Lear Shakespeare puts emphasis on the ignorance of both King Lear and
Gloucester by revealing their personalities in similar ways. This allows the reader to better
understand the characters as well as give a point of reflection for both characters. Throughout the
play, Shakespeare develops King Lear and Gloucester into parallel characters by creating
similarities in their relationship with their children, their blindness, in both a literal and figurative
sense and their doomed fate.
Within the first act of the play, it is shown that both Gloucester and King Lear are ignorant to their
children's true character. First, when King Lear is determining the division of his kingdom, he only
hears the surface of what Reagan and Goneril are saying. Although they claim to love him "beyond
what can be valued," (1.1.57) it is becomes obvious that these are just words, rather than truths. In a
similar fashion, Gloucester is quick to believe the words of Edmund. Edmund claims to have found
a letter from his brother Edgar plotting to kill their father. Just as King Lear was manipulated by his
daughters, Gloucester falls for Edmund's trap. Gloucester banishes Edgar on the spot and now it
under Edmund's thumb. While Gloucester turns against his eldest son, King Lear turn against his
youngest daughter Cordelia. She is banished as well, similarly to Edgar, for being honest with her
father. She tells him that she only loves him "according to [her] bond," (1.1.93) Both characters

Blindness In King Lear Essay
The Shakespearean tragedy, King Lear, is a significant play that explores the concept of blindness
whilst communicating the importance of the theme for the characters King Lear and Earl of
Gloucester. Blindness is in literary terms is defined as the inability of the eye to see, however in
Shakespeare's play blindness is perceived to be a mental flaw that people possess and is the catalyst
for false decisions that eventually place the two characters into emotions of despair and regret. In
the play, Lear's self–delusion and his inability to determine between right or wrong and genuine or
fake, leads him to a remorseful state.The prominent theme of blindness is explored throughout the
play and in Act 1 Scene 1, responders are able to sight the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Gloucester's two sons; the legitimate and righteous Edgar and the illegitimate, disguised "devil",
Edmund, both whom Gloucester loves equally however due to his 'bastard' son, he is blinded and
misunderstands Edgar. This act of blindness can be sighted in Act 1, Scene 2 as Gloucester is
blinded by Edmond who had given him a letter that he wrote himself, but presents in Edgar's
perspective. Gloucester is speaking to his son Edmund in anger and shock as he did not expect
another side to Edgar. Without further investigating the situation, Gloucester immediately believes
what Edmund tells him and concludes that Edgar is a "villain". Gloucester's failure to seek both
sides of this story before placing all his trust into Edmund's letter demonstrates how Gloucester
blinds himself from the truth through ignorance. Gloucester's misconception of the truth due to his
lack of consideration causes him to misconceive the true nature of both his sons. Through the use of
repetition whilst cursing Edgar, it is evident that Gloucester has concluded that his legitimate son,
Edgar, is the "villain", without any further investigation. He states, "O villain, villain! His very
opinion in the letter! Abhorred villain! Unnatural, detested, brutish villain! Worse than brutish! Go,
sirrah, seek him. I'll appre– hend him. Abominable villain! Where is he?"The repetitive use of
"villain", whilst Gloucester curses Edgar and makes it clear that he has fallen into Edmond's
deception. This also suggests Gloucester's gullibility, which is his inability and mental flaw that
Edmond deviously takes advantage of in seek of power. The concept of blindness is explored in this
scene between Gloucester and Edmund, making it evident that placing trust in people can result in
much suffering, which Shakespeare has

Essay about SUMMERTIME AND SPRING RAIN
SUMMERTIME AND SPRING RAIN
Upon first sight, it appears that John Sloan's Spring Rain and Edward Hopper's Summertime only
common characteristic is that they are both oil paintings on canvas. Spring Rain, from the school of
Impressionistic art, was painted in 1912. Summertime, which possesses a simplified, schematic
style, was created over thirty years later, in 1943. Therefore, there are extreme differences in the two
artists' technique and style. However, despite these differences, the two painters' works embody the
same theme: They are both scenes of urban realism characterized by isolation and loneliness. John
Sloan's painting depicts a dismal view of municipal life. The painting's gloominess is achieved most
effectively ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Pale yellow can be detected in the window shades, in the floor on the staircase and in the woman's
hat. In order to contrast the yellow, Hopper uses a very light, whitish blue in the curtains and in the
woman's dress. The fact that the woman's dress is white, with a hint of blue, suggests that the
woman is almost, but not quite pure.
Another compositional style that creates despondency in the paintings is Sloan and Hopper's line
usage. Hopper uses strong verticals, horizontals, and diagonals. These lines form simple, large
geometric forms. This preciseness gives the architecture a sense of depth and perspective. There is
also a stark play of light and shadow in the architecture of the building. All of these elements make
the building's architecture extremely realistic.
In contrast, John Sloan heavily uses curvy, S–shaped lines in Spring Rain, for example, in the trees
and in the shape of the woman's body. The path of the top lines on the park benches gives the
painting perspective, drawing the viewer's eye to the background. The background of the painting
uses the technique of pointillism, the specific arrangement of paint splotches. This technique also
helps to give the painting texture in the tree branches and leaves.
Even though both painters use different line styles, both styles trigger similar emotional effects in
the viewer. For example, Sloan's contoured lines give the painting a sense

What Are The Foils Of Power In King Lear
In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, the Earl of Gloucester and King Lear both
experienced a shift in their power and influence. Since Lear began the play with higher power he
appeared to have experienced more loss. These two characters are foils of one another making their
journey of power similar, a major theme in this play is loyalty, and new generations, both characters
struggle with power relate to how the family interacted.
The play began with Lear dividing his kingdom between his three daughters. This was the height of
his power and influence over others because the kingdom was his to give away. Lear states, "Know
that we have divided//In three our kingdom: and 'tis our fast intent Conferring them on younger
strengths, while we//Unburthen'd crawl toward death" (1.1.40–43), in this quote he is
acknowledging that he will no longer be in power. Gloucester also holds influence at the beginning
of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This leaves Lear without change, although he is gaining internal knowledge he is unable to fully use
it because of his inability to make conscious sound decisions. Once Lear is able to think clearly
again he realizes once again the mistakes he has made, this realization allows him to improve the
knowledge he has leading to a slight increase in power. However just as he acts on his knew found
knowledge he and Cordelia die in capture, leaving him again with no power. While this is occurring
Gloucester is hitting another low point in his amount of power. After seeing Lear's state he attempts
to commit suicide, after he thinks he is dying he states, "Away, and let me die" (4.6.60). This action
shows that he no longer has power because he has given up. The actions of those around Gloucester
allow him to finally know the amount of disloyalty of those surrounding him when learning the truth
about his sons, and their untrue attitudes towards him, gaining insight about

Gloucester and Lear's Realizations of the Importances in Life
Gloucester and Lear's Realizations of the Importance's in Life In William Shakespeare's King Lear,
Gloucester and Lear both experience similar situations in which their children cause them to suffer
greatly: The former suffers from blindness and the latter slips from reality into a state of madness. It
is not until Act 4, scene 6 that they come to the realization of the importances in life; such as true
love for and from a child. Gloucester is convinced by his illegitimate son Edmund that his legitimate
son Edgar cannot be trusted, resulting in the banishment of Edgar. King Lear believes the false
protestations of love his two elder daughters, Goneril and Regan sell to him; meanwhile, his
youngest daughter Cordelia is the only daughter ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This scene shows Gloucester that his fate is in the hands of the Gods and they will take his life only
when it is his time to die and that he must continue his life journey to find out more about himself.
During this discovery, Gloucester's loyal son is with him, in disguise. Edgar acts as his guide but he
does not reveal himself to his father in this scene because it would interfere with Gloucester's
recovery.
Act 4, scene 6 displays Gloucester's sorrow for misjudging his children and the remorse he feels
towards Edgar. This scene leads into Edgar revealing himself to his father. After Edgar's confession,
Gloucester immediately dies from joy and grief. Even though death is the end result for Gloucester,
he is able to make peace with his son before he dies. It is tragic that Gloucester did not come to the
realization that his son was with him for a long while and that Edgar did not reveal himself sooner,
but it is better late than never to be reunited with loving children. Now that Gloucester has seen his
forgiving son again, which is very important to Gloucester, the Gods find it an appropriate time to
take his life: Gloucester has accomplished what he needed to. Similar to Gloucester, Act 4, scene 6
leads into Lear making a significant discovery of his life: he is not perfect. In this scene, Lear
experiences madness but is

Tragedy Through Misreading in William Shakespeare's King...
Tragedy Through Misreading in William Shakespeare's King Lear
Shakespeare's tragedy, King Lear, portrays many important misconceptions which result in a long
sequence of tragic events. The foundation of the story revolves around two characters, King Lear
and Gloucester, and concentrates on their common flaw, the inability to read truth in other
characters. For example, the king condemns his own daughter after he clearly misreads the truth
behind her "dower,"(1.1.107) or honesty. Later, Gloucester passes judgment on his son Edgar based
on a letter in which he "shall not need spectacles"(1.2.35) to read. While these two characters
continue to misread people's words, advisors around them repeatedly give hints to their ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gloucester's tragic flaw is his inability to perceive honesty and truth with his eyes.
Though Lear possesses this same negative characteristic, he consciously makes the decision to
condemn Cordelia because she will not provide him with the immediate gratification he anticipates.
Lear misreads the only daughter who truly honors him because he is on a power trip. Lear wants to
hear Cordelia speak about his greatness and her limitless love for him. When Cordelia responds
"shall I never marry like my sisters,/To love my father all"(1.1.102–103) the king willfully interprets
this statement as an insult and becomes outraged.
After Lear condemns Cordelia, he banishes Kent, his most trustworthy supporter, because of his
boldness to defend Cordelia. Basically the king is eliminating anyone who is not acknowledging his
authority and power. At this point in the play, Lear portrays the classic Shakespearian theme that
some power corrupts but absolute power corrupts ultimately. Like Gloucester, Lear's tragic flaw is
his inability to read truth but his actions are spawned from different emotions.
Shakespeare creates the notion that these tragic characters will listen to someone else and correct
their reading errors. Of course, the tragic characters remain tragic because they lack insight to their
companions' words as they dwell on their dilemmas. The fool represents a strong irony in King Lear

The Heart Of Evil In Shakespeare's King Lear
Shakespeare's "King Lear"
In The Tragedy of King Lear, Shakespeare depicts a knot of characters, each of whom is intent on
achieving his or her aims by any means necessary. The main protagonist King Lear is "at the heart
of evil in the play," as David Beauregard asserts (204). Lear irresponsibly divides his kingdom,
gives it away to emerging chaos, and behaves as a tyrant throughout the play. In Lear, Shakespeare
creates a complex character, which deserves the misfortunes that he brings upon himself. However,
Edmond, the illegitimate son of the Earl of Gloucester, is an outright villain. His misdeeds are the
cunningly planned crimes, unlike Lear's impertinent mistreatment of the people. Beauregard further
defines the injustice described in King Lear as "the result of human evil" (217). This play's tragedy
is not in Lear's pitiful position, but in the malign state of mind of people who manipulate others, as
Lear and Edmond. In the first scene of the play, Gloucester introduces Edmond to the Earl of Kent
as his favorite son (1.1.15–16). Still, Edmond is not content with his father's love and recognition.
Meredith Skura describes Edmond as this play's villain "who maims and murders, defies religion
and family bonds" (127). Edmond openly claims that he wants his legitimate brother's property and
status (1.2.15–18). This villain constructs a plot to slander his brother Edgar in front of his father to
gain Edgar' lands and status.
I.
EDMOND
"... I have heard him oft maintain it

Pod Cell Observation Report
On 08/14/2015 I was assigned as the Tower 13 Floor officer at the Lower Buckeye Jail (address
located above) at approximately 1537 hours inmate Downd, Michael MCSO booking number
T197703 came out to one core and claimed he was assaulted in Tower 13 A Pod cell 4. I reviewed
video in the level one supervisor's officer at about 1540 hours. I observed on camera 1308 T13 A
pod PTZ multiple inmates standing in front of and around cell 4. At 1516 hours I observed Inmate
Ludwig, Austin (S5) MCSO booking number T188789 enter the cell first as (S4) Inmate Dahl
Ujacob MCSO booking number T191055 and (S6) Inmate Buchan, Devon MCSO booking number
T183777 standing as lookouts in front of the cell door. Then (S1) Inmate Kuemmerele, Dennis
MCSO booking number

King Lear Character Analysis
King Lear starts with Gloucester introducing his son, Edmund, to Kent. Then the King of Britain
wants to step down. The King has 3 daughters. Cordelia the good daughter and Goneril, and Regan
the bad ones. King Lear wants each of his daughters to tell how much she loves him. While Lear is
trying to decide who to give his power to he gets mad at Cordelia and banishes her out the country
also while disclaiming that she is his daughter. The power is divided among the two daughters. Lear
then says he only wants to keep his title as king, 100 knights, and his crown and he will spend the
remainder of his days living with his daughters. Kent objects, but Lear banishes him, too. The King
of France is visiting and he chooses Cordelia to be his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lear calls Goneril all types of names and leaves with his followers to go to Regan's house. Goneril
writes a letter to her sister warning her that Lear is coming. This makes her and her husband
Cornwall leave the house to visit Gloucester. Albany is furious when he finds out Lear left in anger.
Meanwhile Edmund is telling Edgar to run away because his father is coming. He calls for help and
before Gloucester gets there he cuts himself to make it look like Edgar tried to kill him. Later Regan
and the Duke of Cornwall get there, he tells Gloucester he'll use his resources to help arrest Edgar.
Kent and Oswald end up fighting, Oswald was sent by Goneril to warn them to avoid Lear.
Cornwall ends up getting very angry and puts Kent in the stocks. This is big because Kent was
Lear's messenger and no one would do that to the messenger of a King. When Lear looks for Regan
and Cornwall he finds Kent in the stocks and he is very furious. It also makes him more mad that
both Regan and Cornwall won't see him. When Lear finally does see Regan he complains about
Goneril but Regan is on Goneril's side. Then Goneril show up and both his daughters say they won't
let him keep not one servant. Lear ends up leaving the palace crying and is so furious to the point he
starts losing his mind. His daughters closed the door on Lear even though there is a big storm
coming. Lear winds up outside with just his fool and he has no

King Lear Act 3 Scene 4 Of Traglear '
So, before our scene can take place, we discover that Goneril and Regan are seeking the death of
Lear in act 3 scene 4, after inheriting all his power. Gloucester, being a faithful friend of Lear,
decides to tell him about Goneril's and Regan's plans, despite the possible consequences that could
occur. However, to the other characters, it is seen that Gloucester has just committed an act of
treason. Edmund uses this information to his advantage, and tells Cornwall about Gloucester's
intentions. This ultimately leads into Gloucester getting his eyes gouged out.
As a consequence of all these events, Gloucester is banished from his land, and left to fend for
himself. An Old Man, whom Gloucester's family has rented land to for generations, decides to ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The two then encounter Poor Tom in the streets, and Gloucester expresses his desire to be led to
Dover, where he plans to jump off a cliff. Poor Tom takes on the responsibility of leading
Gloucester, as the Old Man obeys Gloucester's wishes to meet them halfway to Dover with clothes
for Tom.
One important quotation found in this scene was when Gloucester was telling the Old Man to leave
him alone. Although Gloucester is now blind, he feels as though he could have never have seen
things more clearly as he does now, compared to when he had his eyesight. He states,"I have no
way, and therefore want no eyes; / I stumbled when I saw. Full oft 'tis seen/ Our means secure us,
and our mere defects / Prove our commodities" (IV.i.18–21). Once again, the significance of eye
imagery is mentioned. Just like how Lear was blind to

Examples Of Blindness In King Lear
Approximately 39 million people today are estimated to be blind. By "blind", scientists usually
imply physical blindness, or the loss of vision. However, in Shakespeare's King Lear, blindness can
have a much different meaning. Blindness in King Lear refers to the inability to see what is right and
to differ from good and evil. Blindness can be the inability to see the scheming actions of others
around him. Although no characters were physically blind in King Lear, except Gloucester, there
were many characters that were figuratively blind. Shakespeare shows that physical sight is not tied
to insight and mental sight through King Lear's blind actions, Gloucester's original mental blindness,
Gloucester's physical blindness, and by comparing Gloucester ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Although he is king of Britain, King Lear has dwindling sanity and blindness. Though he is not
literally blind, Lear is figuratively blind due to his lack of insight and better judgment. This is
displayed when King Lear asks his daughters "Which of you shall we say doth love us the most"
(1.1.56). Goneril and Regan compose alluring statements of their love of King Lear. However,
Cordelia says nothing, hoping that King Lear will see her true love over her sister's fabrications.
Unfortunately, King Lear only trusts the face value of what he sees, and is blind to Cordelia's true
love. When King Lear banishes Cordelia, Kent advises Lear to "see better, Lear..."(1.1.180),
referring to his inability to see Cordelia's love and his inability to foresee the terrible consequences
that could arise. Kent was advising Lear to open his eyes and see Cordelia's unspoken love, but Lear
could only see the superficial proclamations of Goneril's and Regan's love. Here, Shakespeare shows
that physical sight is not tied to moral sight. Although King Lear could see, he was not able to
perceive Cordelia's true love over Goneril's and Regan's fabrications of love. However, King Lear is
not the only one that is blind in the

Blindness Of King Lear By William Shakespeare
Mona Rupani
ENG4U
March–9– 2015
How is the theme of blindness explored in King Lear?
The play King Lear, written by William Shakespeare, the theme of blindness is clearly illustrated in
the characters of King Lear and Gloucester. Both characters are blind to the truth because of their
unwariness and poor judgment of character. These two characters refused to see the truth about the
ones that are loyal to them. This type of blindness in this play is mental. Mental blindness can also
be described refusing to see the truth because of one's personality. The characters blindness was the
reason of bad decisions that led to disasters. The nature causes and effects of blindness can be seen
with King Lear and Gloucester, as these characters correspond to each other. At the very start of the
play, though Lear has physical ability to see, but he is blind in the sense that he lacks understanding.
Lear cannot identify people for truly what they are, as he only sees what is on the surface. The moral
blindness abuses his relationship with his most beloved daughter Cordelia, and the loyal friend Kent.
The first mistake he made that was affected by his blindness was the giving away of his land to his
daughter. He states, "Which of you shall we sat doth love us most? That we our largest bounty may
extend". This quote shows that he wants to gives his land that loves him most. His two daughters,
Goneril and Regan to state their love to him for their share of his kingdom, and

King Lear Quotes
The Earl of Gloucester, a father with one good and one evil son, parallels to King Lear and his
daughters. Gloucester is depicted as a foolish old man, unable to see through Edmund's lies. By
mistaking Edmund's motives, Gloucester is blind to the events occurring around him, even before
Cornwall blinds him. It is obvious he is not intuitive or quick enough to understand the plotting
going on around him. He constantly blames events on the stars, and thus, he absolves himself of any
responsibility for his own actions. Later, Gloucester is willing to sacrifice his own life for the King
Lear. This heroic behavior sets Gloucester apart from his youngest son, Edmund, who is merely an
opportunist. Like Lear, Gloucester feels despair and questions a god, and like Lear, Gloucester finds
his humanity in the midst of his tragedy. The blinded old man who asks that clothing be brought, so
that Bedlam Tom might be covered, is a very different man from the Gloucester of Act I, who in the
play's opening scene, bragged about Edmund's conception. Gloucester is filled with compassion for
Poor Tom. This compassion for his fellow man indicates that Gloucester regrets the behavior of his
past, as he seeks to make amends by sharing with those he never noticed before the recent events.
Gloucester has a problem realizing which one of his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is because he dismisses his loyal son Edgar and allows himself to be manipulated by his
illegitimate son Edmund; he is gullible and superstitious. Deceived by Edmund, he casts off his
loyal, legitimate son Edgar. His loyalty to the persecuted king leads to the loss of his eyes, but his
inner sight is made whole by his blinding. In the end he is able to die happily reconciled to

Centrality King Lear
Gloucester's Centrality in King Lear Though entitled King Lear, the play does not revolve around
the king himself but rather centralizes around the tensions among characters. From filial to romantic,
the play contains relationships layered with tension, either confronted or ignored. At the root of
many tensions lies Gloucester. His role in the play may appear secondary initially, but because of his
relationships with his sons and King Lear–as well as simply his presence–Gloucester acts as the
crux in the tensions of the play. His actions or lack thereof shape the course of the play, establishing
Gloucester's centrality within the context of King Lear. The play draws many parallels between Lear
and Gloucester. At the start of the play, they both love their children and possess sanity. Lear and
Gloucester both subscribe to faith in their other children's facade of love, rather than the true
devotion Edgar and Cordelia have for their fathers. As the play continues, both Lear and Gloucester
lose their minds. Gloucester loses his eyes after he did not see Edmund's malfeasance, and Lear
loses his daughters' love after he did not understand Cordelia's attempt to tell him the truth. As the
play draws to a close, Gloucester dies ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When blind, Gloucester fails to recognize both Kent and Edgar under their disguises, allowing the
audience to also believe the new identities of Kent and Edgar. Gloucester's life comes to an end at
the very climax of the play's action, as he predicted in his speech of nature's bad omens. Edgar
reveals that Gloucester has died because "his flawed heart ...[was] too weak for the conflict to
support" (V.iii.199–20) when Edgar revealed himself and his loyalty, providing more emotional
gravitas for the moment of Edgar and Edmund's final confrontation. Gloucester's character
exacerbates tension, whether present or

William Shakespeare 's Lord Of The Flies
Henry enters the court with his different rulers. Suffolk has come back from France with Margaret,
whom he shows to the lord as his new wife. He additionally brings a peace giveaway from France,
which Gloucester peruses. He flounders when he goes to an entry about the French keeping the
regions of Anjou and Maine consequently for Margaret. Gloucester is disturbed with this loss of
area, once hard–won by Henry V and by alternate rulers in late French wars. He estimates the up
and coming loss of France and takes off. Beaufort talks against Gloucester, recommending to
Buckingham and Somerset that they plot to remove him. Salisbury and Warwick chat with York
about attempting to choke the impact of Suffolk and Beaufort, two eager and prideful nobles. York,
took off alone, talks about his confidence in his case to the throne and his disappointment that Henry
energetically permits handles that are legitimately his own to be come back to the French. Yet he can
't make his cases yet; he wants to favour Warwick and Salisbury. Gloucester identifies with his wife,
the Duchess. He had a fantasy that his staff of office was broken, yet she envisioned that she was
going to be delegated ruler. He encourages her not to discuss her unbalanced desire, since she is now
the second lady in the kingdom, behind Margaret. Hume enters, and the Duchess and Hume examine
her passion to contract a witch and seer to call upon spirits to get some information about the fate of
Henry 's rule. Solicitors go

Essay On Gloucester's View Of Human Nature
Gloucester's belief of human nature is that fathers will always be respected and honored by their
children. This view blinds him to seeing that human nature is susceptible to being twisted and
corrupted even by his own child. Gloucester is a very loyal servant of King Lear and he expects that
same loyalty from his sons. Edmund, with no love for his father, sees this flaw of naive trust of
loyalty and finds the perfect opportunity to betray Gloucester in his blindness. Gloucester was
blinded to the fact that Edmund would ever dare to betray him. When Edmund fooled Gloucester
into believing that Edgar had betrayed him he said "Abhorred villain, unnatural....to his father that
so tenderly and entirely loves him" (2.75–97). Gloucester has a hard ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Gloucester was blinded by his own view of nature. Gloucester had the firm belief that his view of
nature was correct and was the only right view. He had never encountered any other view of human
nature that contradicted his own, and so he always assumed that his view of human nature was
steadfast and would always remain constant. Gloucester would have never assumed that human
nature was susceptible to being manipulated, because this would go against his view of nature.
Gloucester states that Edgar acts "unnaturally" because he goes against Gloucester's view of nature
and he later states "and of my land, loyal and natural boy, I'll work the means to make thee capable"
(6.83–85). Gloucester sees Edmund as "natural", because Edmund's view of nature aligns with his
own. Edmund is able to manipulate Gloucester because Gloucester believes that if his view of nature
aligns with Edmund, that view will always remain. Though Gloucester is able to see that Edgar is
unnatural that does not mean that he is able to see that nature can be corrupted and evilly
manipulated. Gloucester simply saw Edgar as unnatural, as a rare flaw, not as manipulator of nature
as Edmund

Gloucester Monologue
(Narrator is driving and notices Gloucester being led by an old man) Narrator: This doesn't look the
usual hitchhiker. (Narrator pulls over, out of curiosity) Narrator: Hey! Do you guys' nee–O'MY
GOD! Are you guys okay? What happened? Gloucester: How now? Who's there? Old Man: It is a
passerby my' lord. He has taken notice of your injury. Gloucester: O' kind stranger, please do not
pay any more attention to me. I am no longer worth anyone's time. Narrator: What? That's nonsense,
you're bleeding from eyes, you need help immediately! Gloucester: Right you are sir, help is what I
need but I don't think you will be willing to help me with what I desire. Narrator: Not true sir, I
myself had experienced, waiting on a road hoping for someone to pass by and not ignore me as if I
was not there. I cannot simply turn back as if I have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then I will burden you with myself. You may leave my side old friend I'm in much debt to you. Old
Man: Don't think about it anymore my good lord, it has been nothing more but a pleasure to be
serving for this long. Farewell my lord. Gloucester: Farewell my friend. Narrator: So where are you
heading? Gloucester: Know'st thou the way to Dover? Narrator: No I do not sorry. (Thinks to his
self) He sometimes talks weird? Gloucester: Hmm, seems like we will need to improvise. Do you
know any nearby areas with views that can be looked upon by a cliff? Narrator: I do know one that
is along the way, but what value does a cliff with a view have to a man with no eyes? Gloucester: As
a matter of fact, the value of a cliff grew for me tens fold when I lost my sight. Narrator: Is that so?
Well it would be in great interest for me to hear your story but unfortunately we have reached the
spot. Gloucester: Well, thank you for your time and service. Here a token of my appreciation but as
you leave may you do a favor once more. Please lead me to the very tip of the cliff. Narrator: Off
course. (Takes Gloucester to

Theme Of Blindness In King Lear
In William Shakespeare's King Lear, the theme of blindness and insight worsens characters' ability
to judge right from wrong causing misjudgment, leading to sorrow, chaos, and tragedy. This
recurring theme of blindness and misjudgment shows Lear and Gloucester as the blind. They
demonstrate that literal sight does not assure clear judgment of a situation. As a monarch, Lear
recognizes the difference between good and bad, but his impairment of sight rendered him unable to
do that. "... By all the operation of the orbs From whom we do exist and cease to be; here I disclaim
all my paternal care, Propinquity, and property of blood, And as a stranger to my heart and me Hold
thee, from this, forever. The barbarous Scythian, Or he that makes his generation messes To gorge
his appetite, shall to my bosom Be as well neighbour'd, pitied, and relieved, As thou my sometime
daughter." soon after Kent says "See better, Lear; and let me still remain the true blank of thine eye."
Kent tries to open Lear's eyes to his mistake of banishing Cordelia and soon after speaking with
Lear, Kent himself. " ... And on the sixth to turn thy hated back Upon our kingdom: if on the tenth
day following, Thy banish'd trunk be found in our dominions, The moment is thy death. Away! By
Jupiter, This shall not be revoked" remarked Lear. Cordelia does love him the most and because he
could not see that, his lack of insight causes him to only see the loveless daughter, not the truth and
love behind it. From the

William Shakespeare 's Henry The Fourth : Part 1
Close Reading Essay Shakespeare's Henry The Fourth: Part 1 is a powerful play that forces the
reader to gain a deeper understanding about particular characters. One character who has a complex
personality is Prince Henry The Fifth, also known as Hal or Harry. When reading Henry The Fourth:
Part 1, it is difficult to determine if Hal's intentions are pure or devious. He frequently takes part in
acts that are considered unfit for a prince. For example, Hal associates himself with robbers and he
does not take his duty as Prince of Wals seriously. Although, readers may agree that Hal is young in
age, therefore he does not understand the intensity of the situation. Others may believe that Hal is an
unworthy candidate for king because he has little or no control over the people he calls friends.
However, the issue of whether Hal is pure or devious is still up for question. In Act 1:2, Hal reveals
to the audience a soliloquy that offers valuable information that can help understand his character.
The scene is where Hal is first introduced to the audience. In this one section of the play, the reader
can see Hal's interaction with the robbers, his true motive, and his inner feelings towards his father,
Falstaff, and Hotspur. Scene 1:2 is a part of the subplot which has an important message about
robbery that links to the main plot. Hal spends a lot of the play in both, which is why his character is
difficult to depict. During his encounters with the robbers, he is convinced that

Personal Narrative: My Trip To The Gloucester Army Home
Chapter One September 20th, 2016 was the day I was dreading the most out of the whole year. That
was the day when my boyfriend of almost two years would be leaving to begin his training as a
United States Army Military Policeman. We had to wake up at six in the morning to begin our
journey to the Gloucester Army Reserve office where his recruiter would take him to the Richmond
International Airport to begin his trip to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. Saying goodbye to
somebody who has been by my side nonstop for the past two years was one of the hardest things I
have ever done. Little did I know, the next five months would be nothing but a few phone calls and
occasional letters by mail. As the months go by, all I could ever think about was the moment I would
be able to bring my soldier home for good. My boyfriend, Ben, and I only got to talk on Sundays ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There was plenty of room for all of us, may even a few more. Since the trip was for my boyfriend,
my parents made me be the one to ask about my grandfather's Suburban. After I was done cleaning
my car out and washing it, I decided it was a good time to ask if we could borrow his truck. I went
into the RV, which is where they are living while they work on building their house, and said "Hey
Pop Pop, I understand if you say no, but I'm gonna ask anyways." He raised his eyebrows and said,
"Oh lord, God only knows what in the world you could possibly want." I replied back with, "Is it
okay if we borrow your Suburban for our Missouri trip? Plans changed with Ben's mom and brother
so now she needs to ride with us." When I saw his reaction to my question, I was almost positive
that he was going to say no about us using his truck. "Let me think about it," he said. "Come back
tomorrow morning and I will let you know if y'all can use it or not." I nodded my head then headed
back to my

How Does King Lear Commit Suicide
In William Shakespeare's tragic play, King Lear, the Earl of Gloucester believes he is about to
commit suicide by jumping off a cliff. Using dramatic irony, Gloucester's son Edgar, who is
disguised as a beggar, leads his father to the "edge of the cliff" to jump off, but he actually leads
Gloucester to safety. Gloucester, convinced he survived the fall, believes the gods have kept him
alive for a reason; he still has a purpose to complete. Shakespeare uses this incident as a casement to
his belief that everybody is destined by the fate of the stars; everyone has a predetermined purpose
to fulfill. Gloucester realizes he made a mistake in trusting Edmund, and after the incident on the
cliff, Gloucester believes the gods spared him because

Gloucester City Youth: Football Game Analysis
I am taking on several different service projects, but the one I will discuss in the reflection is being a
ref for the Gloucester City Youth Soccer League. Back in sophomore year at one soccer practice,
Mike Dougherty, Mrs. Doc's son, came to talk to both Varsity and JV about being volunteer referees
for the League. I decided to volunteer because my sister was still playing for GCYSL and I had
played soccer for them since I was five up until I was too old (13 years old). Never before did I ref,
so obviously I was slightly nervous on how well I would do, but all those worries were quickly gone
once I realized it was adorable watching the seven to nine year olds play their little hearts out.
Now, one obstacle that was challenging was making sure I was assertive and was not a push over
with calls. It ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, every week Coach Doc texts all the kids who help ref to ask who can make it to what
games to ref, and every time I say I can be there for both his response is always something along the
lines of, "Awesome! Thank you so much," or, "You're the best!" Also, when I arrive at the fields and
he ask me to do a bigger favor than usual I always make sure I say yes because I could tell when he
really appreciates my help– also another reason why I keep God in mind. On the contrary, if I was in
charge the number one action I would re–enforce would most certainly be to make sure the kids
know the rules of soccer by the time they advance to the regulated field at ten years old. As the
weeks go by, I become frustrated that I cannot stop the play and tell the kids what they did wrong or
give any kind of coaching because majority of them have no idea why I made a call. For every
reason of topic I just discussed, this service has taught me that it is time to move on– my childhood
of grammar and high school memories are all I have now and it is time to start the next chapter of
college and beginning a

Essay about Richard as an Anti-hero
Richard as an Anti–hero:
To what extent does Richard embody this archetype?
In William Shakespeare's play, Richard III, Richard is portrayed as physically deformed and
psychologically affected. It is believed that his inner soul is a reflection of his physical deformities.
Richard is considered as the protagonist of this play, however this is highly contradictive. A
protagonist is the hero of the story who exhibits characteristics of courage and perseverance, and is
admired for their brave deeds as well as their noble qualities. Richard however, contradicts the
character portrayal of a hero and demonstrates himself as the exact opposite: an anti–hero. The play
opens up with Richard's, (Duke of Gloucester) soliloquy: "I am determined to ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Richard says to Lady Anne: "Your beauty was the cause of the effect:
Your beauty, that did haunt me in my sleep
To undertake the death of all the world,
So I might live one hour in your sweet bosom" (1.2.126–129)
Richard takes a huge risk, handing Anne a knife and demanding she take away his life for he had
murdered both her father and husband. He insists to her it is only fair that she take his life in
response. Lady Anne rejects, falling for Richard's trap for she accepts his proposal of love. Richard
succeeds in manipulation. In the scene, Richard plays the role of a lover who will provide Anne with
the emotional support she would need; especially after suffering two loses. By persuading and
manipulating Lady Anne, Richard was able to get what he was really after; the power and a truce
with the house of Lancaster. This method of persuasion and manipulation are the basic fundamentals
that Richard uses on those he sees as useful in accomplishing his devilish deeds.
Family, loyalty, trust and marriage are some of the values and traditions that Richard ignores.
"Richard acts like a caring brother (to Clarence), devoted lover, the innocent who is unjustly
accused, a pious man of God and the simple fellow who is too modest to become King" (Cambridge
235). "I will deliver for you or else lie for you" (1, 1,115.) are the exact words that Richard
expresses to Clarence when Clarence was being sent to the tower. As soon as Clarence is out of
sight, Richard's

King Lear Character Analysis
In Act III scene 7 of Shakespeare's King Lear, Gloucester returns to his castle after secretly guiding
Lear to safety. Gloucester hoped to avoid any confrontation by Cornwall and Regan, but his son
Edmund, betrayed him and revealed the information. When Gloucester finds Regan and Cornwall,
they accuse him of being a traitor. They are both enraged that he has disobeyed their orders by
helping Lear who was just kicked out during a terrible storm. After some interrogation by Regan,
Gloucester justifies his actions and explains he sided with Lear because he disapproves of Regan
and Goneril's cruelty towards Lear.
Because I would not see thy cruel nails
Pluck out his poor old eyes, nor thy fierce sister
In his anointed flesh rash boarish ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gloucester, now aware of Regan's evil nature, wants to protect Lear from her. He is certain that
Regan would not hesitate to "pluck out" Lear's eyes given the chance. Gloucester implies it would
be more severe for Lear's eyes to be "plucked out" than his own beard. Eyes are much more vital
and it would also be significantly more painful to have them gouged out than to have one's beard
"plucked out." Most importantly, Gloucester specifically describes Lear's eyes as "poor old eyes."
Illustrating Lear's eyes as "poor old eyes" signifies how Gloucester sympathizes with him. It is clear
he is very saddened to see his friend treated so horribly. Gloucester also acknowledges Lear is
getting older and with old age, one's health such as eyesight can worsen or become "poor."
However, Gloucester understands Lear's age is all the more reason why he should be respected,
unlike Regan and Goneril.
After Gloucester finishes criticizing Regan, it is clear that his hostility towards Regan also applies to
her sister, Goneril. Gloucester's comments on Goneril are even harsher than Regan's. For example,
in the speech, Gloucester doesn't even refer to her as Goneril, but instead as "thy fierce sister."
Gloucester thinks so poorly of Goneril that he does not believe she deserves enough respect to be
addressed by her own name. When Gloucester calls Goneril "fierce," it describes her cruel nature.
He views her as a savage human because only a person so vicious would abuse

Shakespeare often used metaphors as a way to develop the fate of his characters. His play, King
Lear, is no exception. To Shakespeare, blindness isn't just the physical inability to see. Rather it is
also a mental flaw one possesses. Gloucester is a prime example of this metaphorical blindness.
Both, King Lear and Gloucester, share a parallel blindness towards their children. Gloucester's
metaphorical blindness deprived him of the ability to see his two sons, Edmund and Edgar, for who
they really are. Edmund had convinced his father that Edgar was plotting to kill him by forging a
letter. Gloucester was visionless to the fact that Edmund may just be after his earldom. He believed
Edmund and wanted Edgar disowned and dead. His inability ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During Edmund's scheme of manipulating everyone to believe Edgar wanted to kill their father,
Edgar runs away. Fearing for his life, he takes on the homeless persona as "Poor Tom". Meanwhile,
Gloucester has his eyes gouged out as Edmund continues to scheme with King Lear's evil daughters.
While on a physically blind trip to Dover, Poor Tom saves Gloucester from committing suicide.
Once they get to Dover, tragedy ensues and only then does Gloucester realize Edgar was the son
who loved and cared for him all along. It is not until he becomes physically blind, that Gloucester
gains knowledge of who his sons really are. The same can be said for Shakespeare's main character,
King Lear. Shakespeare's play, King Lear, parallels Gloucester blindness with King Lear. Both men
are blinded within their relationships with their children. The two men reject the child (Edgar and
Cordelia) that truly loves them in favor for the wicked child. Each cannot see that Edmund
(Gloucester' son), Goneril and Regan (Lear's daughters) are after their father's power and prestige.
Gloucester and Lear find themselves driven out of their positions by their unloving children, all
while Edgar and Cordelia stand by their father's

Base on the explanation from the dictionary, blindness means unable to see, lacking the sense of
sight. Here it can be understood as the physical disability. In William Shakespeare's King Lear, it
can be understood as two different elaborations on this word "blindness". One hand is the physically
disabled, just as Gloucester's story in the play, he was defected and lose his eyesight, on the other
hand, the "blindness" can be understood as mind blindness. It is obvious that in the play Blindness
leads to tragedy. Sight, however, means the limited scope that Lear and Gloucester can see.
At the beginning of this play, just as every parent would do, Lear wants to know what's his position
in his three daughters' heart, although, from his daughters' ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In this part, Lear was totally fell into the isolated situation, as Meredith analysed: Lear's childish
self–centeredness smothers Cordelia; her youthful declaration of independence tears him apart and
drives him mad. (Skura 122) It is also pity and terror for watching fathers and children attack and
abandon each other. Though Lear may already know that Cordelia is one of the only people that
treats him sincerely in this world, he was still hard to admit his mistake. David in his article
explained the situation: what he cannot bring himself to say directly are the words "I have done you
wrong" (Bromwich 8) And then in the cave, with the long conversation with the Fool, Lear finally
understand that actually Cordelia is the only person that gives him the complete love, but Coneril
and Regans, their oral words cannot represent their heart, they were trying to fool Lear and betray
Lear. With the realise on who actually is the person that treats him the best, the person is who he
deported, his third daughter, Cordelia. Then he gets mad. At this point, Lear's madness actually
means that he's not blind in mind anymore, he recognised the reality and accepted the reality, the
truth drives him mad and he's regret for reporting Cordelia away though it is too late. So as to
Gloucester, after his physical disability, he was in an isolation situation. When Edgar disguised
himself as a mad person, he meets Gloucester and guided his blind father. In that plot, Gloucester
says: 'Tis this times' plague, when madmen lead the blind. (Shakespeare xx) This sentence reveals
Gloucester's disappointment to his own

A Visual Pilgrimage The Gloucester Cathedral-Cloister :...
A Visual Pilgrimage the Gloucester Cathedral–Cloister: South and West Alleys
The breathtaking platinum print Gloucester Cathedral–Cloister: South and West Alleys, 15.2 x 11.2
cm, was a pictorialist architectural photo executed by the British photographer Frederick H. Evans
in 1900. The photo features the diminishing perspective of a stone corridor in the British Gothic
cathedral. Sunlight streams through the lavishly decorated stained glass windows. The narrow
corridor leads the viewer on a visual pilgrimage experience. The elaborate floral patterned canopies,
window frames, and wall of niches symbolizes the materialized world of the senses. While the
arched doorway represents the spiritual transition spot, cleansing the viewer's soul. The doorway
opens on a seemingly endless recession of corridor. An abundantly lit aisle next to the doorway on
the right also guides the viewer to another sacred spiritual experience. In this paper, I argue that this
photo is a remarkable fusion of physical and emotional realism. It not only possesses indexical
quality but also arouses emotional resonance within the architecture space by recording architectural
details, constructing linear perspective, creating an immersive viewing point, capturing a specific
time in a day, and manipulating a rhythmic shade–light relationship. Closely examining the
composition of the object, the renders of the utterly correct perspective and the immersive viewing
point endow the audience's viewing experience

Gloucester High School Case Study

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Megan Espinoza

More from Megan Espinoza (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Gloucester High School Case Study