Plant propagation: Sexual and Asexual propapagation.pptx
The Quality Assurance of Micro-credentials: A Global Scoping Review of Current Practice
1. The Quality Assurance of Micro-credentials:
A Global Scoping Review of Current Practices
Professor Mark Brown
Dublin City University
05h October 2023
Professor Josep M. Duart
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
2. Survey of 510 US employers
https://upcea.edu/employers-are-all-in-on-microcredentials-survey-shows-inside-higher-ed/
The Quality Assurance of Micro-credentials
11. 1
In 25+ countries, we found no national framework, standards or guidelines for micro-credentials. In many
cases, however, there is evidence of a plan or commitment in the future to integrating quality assurance standards
for micro-credentials within existing requirements.
No specific quality assurance standards for micro-credentials
1. External QA of micro-credentials
12. 1
In 25+ countries, we found no national framework, standards or guidelines for micro-credentials. In many
cases, however, there is evidence of a plan or commitment in the future to integrating quality assurance standards
for micro-credentials within existing requirements.
2
In Australia, Canada (x3), United Kingdom, Estonia, Spain (x2) and The Netherlands we found
common standards already apply for micro-credentials, and tangible evidence of a decision to extend the
application of existing standards for their quality assurance.
No specific quality assurance standards for micro-credentials
Common standards and quality assurance processes apply for micro-credentials
1. External QA of micro-credentials
16. 1. External QA of micro-credentials
Germany
Spain
Estonia
17. 1
In 25+ countries, we found no national framework, standards or guidelines for micro-credentials. In many
cases, however, there is evidence of a plan or commitment in the future to integrating quality assurance standards
for micro-credentials within existing requirements.
2
In Australia, Canada (x3), United Kingdom, Estonia, Spain (x2) and The Netherlands we found
common standards already apply for micro-credentials, and tangible evidence of a decision to extend the
application of existing standards for their quality assurance.
3
In New Zealand, Malaysia and Ireland we identified a framework or specific standards or guidelines for
micro-credentials to address particular issues related to their quality assurance.
No specific quality assurance standards for micro-credentials
Common standards and quality assurance processes apply for micro-credentials
Specific guidelines and quality assurance processes developed for micro-credentials
1. External QA of micro-credentials
18. • Management, Staffing and
Administration
• Teaching, Learning and
Assessment
• Participant support
• Facilities
• Premises and facilities in the
case of face-to-face delivery
Standards and Indicators
https://www.the-bac.org/micro-credentials-pilot-scheme/
1. External QA of micro-credentials
25. • No course quality rating
• Limited careers guidance
• No learner support information
• Limited details on QA processes
• No employability outcomes data
2. Institutional QA of micro-credentials
A lost opportunity…
27. 2. Institutional QA of micro-credentials
Doesn’t give students
good advice
https://www.iteca.edu.au/ITECA/Content/News/2023/he-q2/mc.marketplace.shutdown.call.aspx
28. Plan and Adjust
• Institutional leadership
• Organisational structures
• Business models and resource
allocation
• Policies, regulations &
pathways, including for online
delivery outside of country
• IT Systems and platforms
- Flexible enrolment
- LMS/VLE
- Digital badging/certificate
Implement Monitor
• Internal approval processes
• Appropriate workload models
• Professional learning and
support for MC development
• Peer review of learning design
• Appropriate assessment and
learner feedback strategies
• Study disclosure and learner
readiness for success
• Availability of learning
support and library resources
Quality Assurance Processes
and Supports
Strategy, Quality Culture and
Infrastructure
Feedback and Performance
Reporting
• Learning analytics data on
student engagement
• Retention, progression and
completion data
• Student experience data
• Employer satisfaction data
• Meets professional
accreditation requirements
• Graduate employment data
• Cyclic institutional review of
micro-credential offerings
2. Institutional QA of micro-credentials
29. Specific QA issues for online [MCs]
Organisational context
• Business continuity
• Access to IT infrastructure
• Learners outside of country
Programme context
• Online teaching experience
• Training and professional development
• Synchronous vs asynchronous delivery
Learner context
• Learner readiness
• Access to online resources
• Equivalency of learning support
2. Institutional QA of micro-credentials
Inclusive of
M
icro-credentials
35. EUROPEAN STANDARDS AND
GUIDELINES
GUIDES AND BENCHMARKING TOOLS
FOR ENHANCING QUALITY
COUNTRY SPECIFIC QUALITY
FRAMEWORKS AND GUIDELINES
Final remarks
New QA considerations? Enabling or Constraining? Quality Conversations!
36. Thank you
Professor Mark Brown
Director, National Institute for Digital Learning
Dublin City University
Ireland
mark.brown@dcu.ie
LinkedIn: https://ie.linkedin.com/in/mark-brown-dcu
No Twitter Account by Choice
Professor Josep M. Duart
Psychology and Education Sciences Department
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Spain
jduart@uoc.edu
Contact details…