1. SAFETY MATTERS
WH&S IN THE WORKPLACE
Alana Heffernan
Patrick Turner
18 June 2015
Safety Matters – WH&S In The
Workplace
1
2. OUR HISTORY
Founded in 1919
Maurice Blackburn – distinguished lawyer and Labor member of
Parliament
Dedicated to worker’s rights
defense of underprivileged groups
determined to make a genuine difference for people who
need help
Fight hard for best possible outcome
2Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
3. OUR SERVICES
Employment & Industrial Law
WorkCover
Road Accident Injuries
Medical Negligence
Asbestos Diseases
Superannuation & Disability Insurance
Public Liability
Faulty Products
Comcare
Will Disputes
3Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
5. OUTLINE OF TODAY’S PRESENTATION
Employer and employee obligations under the WHS Act (Qld)
Offences
Work Groups
Role and powers of HSRs and Health & Safety Committees
PINs
Discriminatory, coercive and misleading conduct
Negotiating WHS clauses in enterprise agreements
OHS from a Public Liability perspective
5Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
6. 1. EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE
OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE
WHS Act (Qld)
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 6
7. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
National Model Act
─ adopted by all states except Victoria and Western Australia.
Queensland Legislation
– Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld)
– Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (Qld)
Institutions overseeing WHS across Australia
─ Comcare
─ State regulators (such as Workplace Health and Safety Queensland)
─ Fair Work Commission
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 7
8. WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT 2011
Legislation concerned with removing risk and prevention
• Not concerned with injuries and compensation
Concept of ‘Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking’ (PCBU)
(s20)
Most employers – companies, unincorporated associations, councils etc
Managers, designers, manufacturers, importers, suppliers, installers
(ss22-26)
Officers, workers ,other persons at a workplace have separate duties
(ss27-29)
Duties of a PCBU are linked to the carrying out of work
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 8
9. PCBU – PRIMARY DUTY OF CARE
So far as is reasonably practicable…
Ensure health and safety of workers while at work
Ensure others are not put at risk from work carried out (s19(1)-(2))
Ensure:
– provision and maintenance of a work environment without risks to health and
safety, safe plant and structures, safe system of work;
– safe use, handling, storage of plant, structures and substances;
– provision of adequate facilities for welfare of workers; information, training,
instruction or supervision necessary to protect all persons; and,
– monitor health of workers and conditions at workplace
In certain circumstances, must maintain accommodation premises
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 9
10. PCBU – OTHER DUTIES
PCBUs who manage or control workplaces, fixtures, fittings or plant, designers,
manufacturers, importers, suppliers, installers all owe further duties beyond the
primary duty (ss 20-26
Duties under WHS Regulation – all PCBUs and industry-specific
All PCBUs owe duties to:
– notify of ‘notifiable incident’ (death, serious injury/illness or a dangerous incident)
and preserve incident sites (ss37-38)
– consult with workers (s 47)
All duty-holders owe a duty to:
– consult with all duty holders (s46)
Officers of a PCBU must exercise due diligence to ensure PCBU complies with duties
and obligations under WHS Act (s27)
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 10
11. REASONABLE PRACTICABILITY
‘Reasonably practicable’ (s18)
– Likelihood of the hazard or risk occurring;
– Degree of harm that might result from the hazard or risk;
– What person knows, or ought reasonably to know about the hazard or
the risk and ways of eliminating or reducing it;
– Availability and suitability of ways to eliminate or reduce risk;
– Cost of eliminating or reducing the risk.
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 11
12. WORKERS’ DUTIES
Take reasonable care for your own health and safety (s28(a))
Take reasonable care of the health and safety of persons who may be
affected by your acts or omissions at a workplace (s28(b))
Comply with reasonable instruction given by a PCBU to allow
compliance with the WHS Act (s28(c))
Co-operate with any reasonable policy or procedure of PCBU relating
to health or safety at the workplace that has been notified (s28(d))
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 12
14. OFFENCES – BREACH OF DUTY
3 Categories of criminal offences for breach of health and safety duties:
– Reckless conduct—category 1 (s31)
– Failure to comply with health and safety duty—category 2 (s32)
– Failure to comply with health and safety duty—category 3 (s33)
Exceptions– volunteers and unincorporated associations
DPP can initiate proceedings for Category 1 offences
WHSQ and all inspectors can initiate proceedings for all offences
A person can request WHSQ bring a prosecution for a Category 1 or 2
offence within 6-12 months of alleged contravention
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 14
15. PENALTIES
Serious Penalties:
Courts can also make:
– adverse publicity orders (s236)
– restoration orders (s237)
– work health and safety project
orders (s238)
– court ordered work health and
safety undertakings (s239)
– injunctions (s240)
– training orders (s241)
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 15
Corporation Individual as PCBU or officer Individual as worker or other
Category 1 $3 million $600K, 5Y jail or both $300K, 5Y jail or both
Category 2 $1.5 million $300K $150K
Category 3 $500K $100K $50K
16. OTHER OFFENCES
WHS Act provides for many other offences, which have distinct penalties:
Incident notification (ss38-39)
Authorisations (ss41-45)
Consultation (ss46-47)
Establishment of Work Groups (ss52-57)
HSRs (ss61,70-74, 97,99)
Health & Safety Committees (ss75,79)
Discriminatory, coercive or misleading conduct (ss104-108)
WHS entry permit holders (ss118-151)
WHSQ and inspectors (ss155-190)
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 16
18. EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATION
WHS based on cooperation and consultation between all those at work
Employee representation is important and is recognised as one of the
Objects of the WHS Act:
“…providing for fair and effective workplace representation,
consultation, cooperation and issue resolution in relation to work health
and safety”
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 18
19. WORK GROUPS
What are they?
– Negotiated and agreed groups of workers
– Share similar workplace health and safety interests and conditions
Can be made up of workers:
– in one or more workplaces operated by a single employer; or
– of multiple employers at one or more workplaces
There can be more than one Work Group in a workplace
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 19
20. ESTABLISHING A WORK GROUP
Employees can ask their employer for a Work Group to be established
(s 50)
Purpose of the negotiations is to determine (s 52(3))
─ number and composition of work groups to be represented by HSRs
─ number of HSRs and deputy HSRs to be elected
─ workplace(s) to which the work groups will apply
─ the businesses or undertakings to which the work groups will apply
In addition, note: Matters to be taken into account in negotiations (s 17
WHS Regulation)
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 20
21. MATTERS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT
(S17 – WHS REGULATION)
• (a) the number of workers;
• (b) their views;
• (c) nature of each type of work carried out;
• (d) number and grouping of workers who
carry out the same/similar types of work;
• (e) areas/places where each type of work
is carried out;
• (f) extent to which any worker must move
from place to place while at work;
• (g) diversity of workers and their work;
• (h) nature of any hazards at the
workplace(s);
• (i) nature of risks at the workplace(s);
• (j) nature of engagement of each worker;
• (k) pattern of work carried out by workers,
i.e. full-time, part-time, casual or short-
term;
• (l) times at which work is carried out;
• (m) arrangements at the workplace(s)
relating to overtime or shift work.
Inspector can determine the particulars failing
agreement (s 54 –WHS Act)
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 21
22. 4.ROLE AND POWERS OF
HSRS AND HEALTH & SAFETY
COMMITTEES
22Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
23. POWERS OF HSRS
Purpose of HSRs powers are to (s 68(1)):
– Represent the Work Group in relation to WHS
– Monitor measures taken by PCBUs in compliance with WHS Act and
regulations
– Investigate complaints from members of the Work Group
– Inquire into anything which appears to be a risk to the health and safety
of the Work Group
WHS Act gives powers to HSRs but does not impose compulsory duties in
their capacity as HSRs (s 68(4))
23Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
24. POWERS OF HSRS
HSR has the power to do any of the following (s68(2)):
– Inspect any part of a workplace in which a member of the Work Group
works:
• after giving reasonable notice; or
• without notice immediately in the event of an incident or immediate
risk to health or safety
– Accompany an inspector during a workplace inspection of the workplace
or part of the workplace of their Work Group
– Request the establishment of Health and Safety Committee
– Represent one or more members of the Work Group at interviews on
health or safety matters between that person and an inspector or PCBU
– Seek the assistance of any person whenever necessary (subject to
restrictions on entry)
24Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
25. WORKPLACE INSPECTIONS
Inspections can take various forms, including:
– regular inspections of the workplace or particular activities of processes;
– specific inspections arising from complaints or concerns by members of
the Work Group;
– inspections before and following substantial change to the workplace,
e.g. to plant or work processes; and
– Inspections after an incident or injury
The nature and extent of the inspections needed may depend on
circumstances including the frequency of injuries in that area or if likelihood
of injuries
25Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
26. AMWU V VISY (NO 3) [2013] FCA 525
Delegate and HSR Mr Zwart was suspended and given a warning after
tagging out a forklift because he could not hear the reversing warning
beeper
AMWU brought a general protections claim claiming that the suspension
and warning was because Mr Zwart exercised workplace rights
One of the workplace rights relied on was the right under s 58 of OHS Act to
inspect “any part of a workplace at which a member of the designated
workgroup works”
Visy argued that there was no power to inspect the forklift only the
workplace “at which” not “on which”, “in which” or “with which” they work
26Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
27. AMWU V VISY (NO 3) [2013] FCA 525
Justice Murphy rejected Visy’s argument stating that it had “no merit”
Not consistent with the objects of the OHS Act
Would lead to absurd results
“For example, acceptance of the respondents’ construction would
mean that a health and safety representative could inspect the floor on
which an employee stood but not a piece of dangerous plant standing
on the floor and used in the work. “ Murphy J at [137]
“Workplace” includes movable plant and equipment at the workplace.
27Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
28. POWERS OF HSRS
If after consulting with an employer a health and safety issue is not resolved
a HSR may:
– Issue a PIN (s 90(2))
– Can no longer direct that work cease
An HSR may also deal with a health and safety issue by:
– Seeking the assistance of another person (for example an appropriately
qualified union official);
– Following an issue resolution procedure; or
– Seeking the assistance of an inspector if the issue is not resolved
through the resolution procedure
HSRs are entitled to accompany inspectors during inspections (s 58(1))
28Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
29. NEWMAN GOVERNMENT -
REDUCED POWERS OF HSR
Removal of s85 – HSR can no longer direct member of Work Group to
cease work
HSR’s assistant must provide at least 24 hours notice (but less than 14
days) to PCBUs and persons with management or control of the workplace
during usual hours
PCBU may refuse entry to assistant on ‘reasonable grounds’ where
notice/information not given
Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015 -
currently in committee but will likely be passed
These powers likely to be restored
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 29
30. HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEES
Purpose and benefits
─ Facilitate regular meetings between parties for the planning and
development of policies and procedures
─ Vehicle for the exchange of ideas
─ Bring together employees’ knowledge and experience of jobs and tasks
and the employers’ perspective of the workplace and business
requirements
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 30
31. ESTABLISHMENT AND COMPOSITION
Timeline for establishment (s75(1))
─ PCBU has two months from the time on the request of a HSR or 5 or
more workers
─ May also do so at their own initiative
Constitution of HSC (s76)
─ Workers not nominated by PCBU must make up at least half the
membership
Relevant HSRs automatically included
─ Must be consultation on the remaining membership (s 49)
─ Employer representatives should be persons involved at senior
management levels able to make decisions about health and safety
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 31
32. FUNCTIONS OF HSC
Facilitate cooperation between employers and employees in instigating,
developing and carrying out measures designed to ensure the health and
safety of workers at work
Assist in developing health and safety standards, rules and procedures to
be followed out or complied with at the workplace
Other functions as determined and agreed by the HSC and the PCBU
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 32
33. OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION
HSCs must meet at least every three months (s 78(a))
─ at any other reasonable time if at least half of the members request it
HSCs can determine their own procedures for the organisation and
conducting of its meetings (s 72(5))
There are no additional duties imposed by the WHS Act on workers who are
members of HSCs
PCBUs must allow committee members time as reasonably necessary to
attend meetings, carry out functions and pay them.
Also must allow access to information re. hazards, health and safety of
workers to HSC but require consent for information that identifies a worker
or could lead to identification of worker – this is to change.
Should not be used for the resolution of health and safety disputes
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 33
35. PROVISIONAL IMPROVEMENT
NOTICES (PINS)
A PIN is a written direction requiring a person to remedy a breach or likely
breach of the WHS Act or Regulations.
It is not compulsory to use a specific form to issue a PIN, however, there are
general requirements for form and content (ss 91 and 92).
Prior to issuing a PIN HSR must consult with person about remedying
breach or likely breach of the matters or activities causing the breach of
likely breach (s 90(3)).
35Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
36. PROVISIONAL IMPROVEMENT
NOTICES (PINS)
HSR cannot issue a PIN if:
– The HSR has not:
• Completed the training required by the Regulations; or
• Completed training under corresponding WHS laws (i.e. in another
State that also has uniform WHS laws) (s 90(4).
– An inspector has already issued, or decided not to issue, a PIN (s
90(5)).
36Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
37. WHEN CAN A PIN BE ISSUED?
After consultation a PIN can be issued if:
– The HSR believed on reasonable grounds that a person is contravening
a provision of the WHS Act or the regulations; or
– Has contravened a provision in circumstances that make it likely that the
contravention will continue or be repeated.
Examples of contraventions that may continue to be repeated include:
– Excessive noise levels in the workplace;
– Ongoing exposure to dangerous chemicals;
– Unguarded machines; or
– Lack of consultation with employees or HSRs about safety matters.
37Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
38. CONSULTATION
Workplace Health and Safety Queensland will consider that consultation
has occurred prior to the issue of a PIN if the HSR has:
• verbally or in writing provided information to the person about the
contravention and ways to remedy the contravention or likely
contravention or the things or operations causing the contravention
or likely contravention
• allowed the person an opportunity to express their views and to
contribute within a reasonable time to remedy the alleged
contravention or resolve the matters or activities causing the alleged
contravention
• taken into account the view of the person before issuing the PIN
• advised the person of the outcome of consultation in a timely
manner.
38Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
39. WHO CAN A PIN BE ISSUED TO?
A PIN can be issued to any person.
NB: any conduct engaged in on behalf of a body corporate by an employee,
agent or officer of the body corporate acting within the actual or apparent
scope of his or her employment, or within his or her actual or apparent
authority, is conduct also engaged in by the body corporate.” (s 244)
There is no express limit about the conduct complained of being at the
workplace, i.e., PINs could be issued to persons such as the designer of a
plant, buildings or structures.
However, HSR’s powers are limited to matters relating to the workers in the
work group (see s 68). Therefore, would not be able to raise matters about
general public safety.
39Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
40. INFORMATION ON A PIN
A provisional improvement notice must:
– be in writing (s 91);
– state the representative's belief on which the issue of the notice is
based and the grounds for that belief (s 92(a)); and
– specify the provision of this Act or the regulations that the representative
considers has been or is likely to be contravened (s 92(b));
– briefly state how the provision is being contravened (s 92(c)); and
– specify a day before which the person is required to remedy the
contravention or likely contravention (must be at least 8 days after
issuing of PIN) (s 92(d)).
PIN can also give directions about fixing the problems, but not required to
do so (s 93).
Separate PINs should be completed for each contravention otherwise PIN
may be open to challenge
40Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
41. INFORMATION ON A PIN
In Chysostomou v VWA [2014] VCAT 176 the applicant had lodged a PIN in
relation to Train Operating Standards that allow the operation of trains:
– “with failed or inoperative train headlights during the hours of daylight
and darkness for a period of up to 22 hours thus decreasing the visibility
of trains approaching unprotected pedestrian crossings, level crossings,
platforms or person(s) conducting works on or near the rail line” and
– “with cracked or smashed Driver windscreens for a period of up to 22
hours on the Driver’s side or for an indefinite period of time if the
windscreen is smashed or cracked on the off side of the windscreen”
Senior Member Davis ordered the applicant to provide more particulars
about why it is alleged that the system of work complained of is unsafe and
the reasons it is unsafe.
41Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
42. AMENDMENTS TO PIN
HSRs may make minor amendments to a PIN after it has been issued (s
94).
The changes must be restricted to “minor” changes:
(a) for clarification; or
(b) to correct errors or references; or
(c) to reflect changes of address or other circumstances.
A PIN can also be cancelled by the HSR, by giving written notice to the
recipient (s 96).
42Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
43. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER A PIN IS
ISSUED?
A person who has been issued with a PIN must, as soon as practicable,
display a copy of the notice in a prominent place at or near the workplace,
or part of the workplace, at which work is being carried out that is affected
by the notice (s 97). NB – this is a civil remedy provision
A person issued with a PIN must comply with it within the specified time
frame or dispute the PIN by calling an inspector (s 99).
It is an offence not to comply with a PIN in the time specified in
circumstances where an inspector has not been called.
If disputing a PIN, recipient must seek a review from the regulator within 7
days (s 100).
43Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
44. INSPECTORS AND PINS
If called the inspector may perform any functions or exercise powers under
the WHS Act that they consider reasonably necessary in the circumstances.
Inspector must enquire into the circumstances relating to the issuing of the
PIN with the HSR who issued it and why the PIN has been disputed (s 101).
The inspector will then do one of the following:
– Affirm the PIN
– Affirm the PIN with modifications
– Cancel the PIN (s 102).
After making their decision the inspector will issue a written notice to the
HSR setting our the basis for the inspector’s decision (s 102).
44Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
45. MISTAKES IN PINS
A PIN will be invalid if it does not contain the matters in s 91 and 92.
A PIN is not invalid merely because of:
– A formal defect or irregularity; or
– A failure to us the correct name of the person as long as the notice
sufficiently identifies the person (s 98).
If a defect or irregularity, when viewed objectively, could mislead the person
receiving the PIN then the PIN will be invalid. For example if:
– the PIN is illegible or capable of multiple meanings
– if the date for compliance is not clear; or
– if the wrong section of the Act or regulations are named and therefore is
misleading about the corrective action required.
45Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
46. DIRECTIONS FOR WORK TO CEASE
A worker may cease, or refuse to carry out, work if the worker has a
reasonable concern that to carry out the work would expose the worker to a
serious risk to the worker’s health or safety, emanating from an immediate
or imminent exposure to a hazard (s 84).
No longer an express right for HSRs to direct the cessation of work in
Queensland.
Employer may direct employees to suitable alternative work (s 87).
46Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
47. REVIEWING DECISIONS –
INTERNAL REVIEW
Section 223 and schedule 2A sets out the decisions that are reviewable
under the WHS Act.
Reviewable decisions include a decision under s 102 to affirm (with or
without modifications) or cancel a provisional improvement notice.
Applications for IR must be made with 14 days and made in the form
approved by the regulator (s 224).
If an IR application is made the authority must make a decision to affirm or
vary the reviewable decision or set aside the reviewable decision and
substitute it with another decision within 14 days of receipt of the application
(s 226).
NB: the 14 days ceases to run if the IR requires further information (s 226).
47Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
48. REVIEWING DECISIONS – QCAT
A person can apply to QCAT for review of a reviewable decision or a
Internal Review decision made by the regulator.
Some decisions are reviewable in the QIRC, however, decisions with
respect to PINs are only reviewable by QCAT (see schedule 2A of WHS
Act).
Applications to QCAT are dealt with under the QCAT Act. No time limit for
application in WHS Act, so 28 days applies.
QCAT then holds a de novo hearing where it may affirm, vary or set aside
the decision under review based on the evidence before it (s 20 of QCAT
Act).
48Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
50. DISCRIMINATORY CONDUCT
It is an offence under the WHS Act to engage in “discriminatory” conduct (s
104).
The discriminatory must be the dominant reason for the conduct (s 105).
Unlike other provisions of the WHS Act, a person alleging a contravention of
this provision can initiate civil proceedings in the Magistrates Court.
50Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
51. WHAT IS DISCRIMINATION? – S 105
Similar, though broader, than adverse action.
A person engages in “discriminatory conduct” if the person:
– dismisses a worker; or
– terminates a contract for services with a worker; or
– puts a worker to his or her detriment in the engagement of the worker;
or
– alters the position of a worker to the worker’s detriment; or
– refuses or fails to offer to engage a prospective worker; or
– treats a prospective worker less favourably than another prospective
worker would be treated in offering terms of engagement; or
– the person terminates a commercial arrangement with another person;
or
– the person refuses or fails to enter into a commercial arrangement with
another person.
51Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
52. PROHIBITED REASON – S 106
Also broad, but only relates to health and safety matters.
A person engaging in any of the following is a prohibited reason:
– is, has been or proposes to be a health and safety representative or a
member of a health and safety committee; or
– undertakes, has undertaken or proposes to undertake another role
under this Act; or
– exercises a power or performs a function or has exercised a power or
performed a function or proposes to exercise a power or perform a
function as a health and safety representative or as a member of a
health and safety committee; or
– exercises, has exercised or proposes to exercise a power under this Act
or exercises, has exercised or proposes to exercise a power under this
Act in a particular way; or
– performs, has performed or proposes to perform a function under this
Act or performs, has performed or
52Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
53. WHAT IS A PROHIBITED REASON?...
– proposes to perform a function under this Act in a particular way; or
– refrains from, has refrained from or proposes to refrain from exercising a
power or performing a function under this Act or refrains from, has
refrained from or proposes to refrain from exercising a power or
performing a function under this Act in a particular way; or
– assists or has assisted or proposes to assist, or gives or has given or
proposes to give any information to any person exercising a power or
performing a function under this Act; or
– raises or has raised or proposes to raise an issue or concern about
work health and safety with—
• the person conducting a business or undertaking; or
• an inspector; or
• a WHS entry permit holder; or
• a health and safety representative; or
• a member of a health and safety committee; or
53Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
54. WHAT IS A PROHIBITED REASON?...
• another worker; or
• any other person who has a duty under this Act in relation to the
matter; or
• any other person exercising a power or performing a function under
this Act; or
– is involved in, has been involved in or proposes to be involved in
resolving a work health and safety issue under this Act; or
– is taking action, has taken action or proposes to take action to seek
compliance by any person with any duty
– or obligation under this Act.
NB: maximum penalty is 1000 penalty units. Can also seek compensatory
and general damages.
54Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
55. COERCION, ETC – S108
Similar to coercion provisions in the FW Act, however, with the addition of
“inducement”.
A person must not organise or take, or threaten to organise or take, any
action against another person with intent to coerce or induce the other
person, or a third person—
– to exercise or not to exercise a power, or to propose to exercise or not
to exercise a power, under this Act; or
– to perform or not to perform a function, or to propose to perform or not
to perform a function, under this Act; or
– to exercise or not to exercise a power or perform a function, or to
propose to exercise or not to exercise a power or perform a function, in
a particular way; or
– to refrain from seeking, or continuing to undertake, a role under this Act.
Can also initiate civil proceedings to address the conduct.
55Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
56. MISREPRESENTATIONS – S109
A person must not knowingly or recklessly make a false or misleading
representation to another person about that other person’s—
– rights or obligations under this Act; or
– ability to initiate, or participate in, a process or proceedings under this
Act; or
– ability to make a complaint or inquiry to a person or body empowered
under this Act to seek compliance with this Act.
NB: person must have been expected to rely on representation.
No access to civil proceedings.
56Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
57. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
A person who engages in discriminatory or coercive conduct can be the
subject of criminal proceedings (s 110).
If a person is convicted of engaging in discriminatory or coercive conduct,
can be ordered to (s 111):
– pay compensation; and/or
– Reinstate the worker; or
– Employ the worker.
NB: “a legal burden of proof”. This requires the defendant to establish the
exception or defence on the balance of probabilities. Once this is done, the
prosecution must refute the exception or defence beyond reasonable doubt.
57Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
58. CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
Can initiate proceedings for discrimination or coercion/inducement in the
Magistrates Court (s 112(2)).
Must be affected by the alleged conduct, or be authorised to represent the
affected person (i.e. a Union) (s 113).
Can seek:
– Injunctive relief;
– For discriminatory conduct – compensation;
– For discriminatory conduct – reinstatement or re-employment;
– For either action – any other order the Court considers appropriate.
Above not to be considered as restrictive on Court’s powers (s 112(5)).
Time limit for proceedings is 1 year (s 113).
58Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
59. CIVIL PROCEEDINGS…
Reverse onus of proof – prohibited reason presumed to be the substantial
reason for the conduct unless the defendant proves otherwise (s 113).
It is a defence to a proceeding if the defendant proves that—
– the conduct was reasonable in the circumstances; and
– a substantial reason for the conduct was to comply with the
requirements of this Act or a corresponding WHS law.
NB: “a legal burden of proof”. This requires the defendant to establish the
exception or defence on the balance of probabilities. Once this is done, the
prosecution must refute the exception or defence beyond reasonable doubt.
Cannot seek compensation in civil proceedings if also receiving
compensation in criminal proceedings (s 114).
59Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
60. CIVIL PROCEEDINGS…
Prohibited from multiple actions ( s 115).
Would not be able to initiate proceedings under WHS Act if also initiated
proceedings under Fair Work, Industrial Relations or Anti-Discrimination
legislation for the same matter.
Cannot recover compensation if recovered compensation under any other
Commonwealth or State law with respect to the same matter (may be an
issue with workers’ compensation)
Cannot commence or continue proceedings if failed in a proceeding under
another Act, in relation to the same matter (except workers’ compensation
claims).
Magistrates Court is a costs jurisdiction.
60Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
62. WHY PUT WHS CLAUSES IN
EAs?
Difficulties with obtaining enforcement of WHS Act
Employees/Unions cannot sue for breach of WHS Act (except
discrimination and coercion)
Broad remedies available for contraventions of EAs under the FW
Act
No compensation available in FWC bullying jurisdiction.
62Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
63. POTENTIAL PITFALLS
As with any EA clause the exact wording is important.
Any clause should be clear in imposing obligations on the
employer as opposed to a series of “hortatory” or “aspirational”
statements. See Reeves v MaxiTRANS Australia Pty Ltd [2009]
FCA 970; (2009) 188 IR 297
If the clause is ambiguous or confusing it may not be enforceable.
See National Tertiary Education Union v La Trobe University
[2014] FCA 1330
63Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
64. WHS CLAUSES IN AGREEMENTS
64
2.2 OUR RESPONSIBILITIES TO YOU
2.2.1 To abide by the requirements of our policies and procedures as
varied from time to time.
2.2.2 To abide by the requirements of relevant legislation and laws that
apply to the employment relationship including:
(a) industrial relations;
(b) Anti-discrimination;
(c) Superannuation;
(d) Long service leave
(e) Occupational health and safety;
(f) Workers’ compensation;
(g) Repatriation and return Soldiers;
(h) Taxation; and
(g) Privacy.
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace
65. PUBLIC LIABILITY CLAIMS
What about?
– A subcontractor or independent contractor
– An employee working for a host employer
– An employee working on a large site managed by a principal
What duties are owed if, any?
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 65
66. RELEVANT LEGISLATION
Civil Liability Act (Qld) 2003
Personal Injuries Proceedings Act (Qld) 2002
General common law duties
Obligations and duties under the contract of service
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 66
67. IS THERE A DUTY OF CARE OWED?
Host employer arrangement – yes generally.
An employment-like relationship could give rise to a similar high duty of care
to that of employer-employee relationship: Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling –
control test
Principal – independent contractor – depends on the facts of the case – a
duty does not automatically arise
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 67
68. CASE STUDY
TNT Australia Pty Ltd v Christie [2003] NSWCA 47
Facts: P employed by employment agency, Manpower. P worked at
brewery operated by TNT. P injured when a forklift malfunctioned and
moved backwards over his foot.
Held: TNT and the P were in a position analogous to that of employer and
employee, giving rise to a non-delegable duty of care upon TNT. In finding
Manpower also liable, that an employer who operates a labour hire
business does not abdicate its non-delegable duty simply because its
employees are sent to work for a client.
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 68
69. DUTY OF CARE: EXTENT
The duty of care does not require that the host company/principal contractor
to
– provide training to sub-contractors in the safe methods of performing the
subcontractor's specialised work
A principal contractor can engage a competent and independent contractor
to perform the work and rely on their skill
A principal contractors and are unlikely to possess detailed knowledge of
safe work methods across the spectrum of trades involved in construction
work
If a principal contractor fails to engage a competent contractor they too may
be negligent for the failure of the contractor to perform some type of work
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 69
70. CASE STUDY
In April 2003, a labour-hire employee working for Roche Mining Pty Limited
fell approximately 2.5m while climbing into a Caterpillar 785B dump truck.
He suffered serious injuries to his pelvis, lower back and hips.
The worker claimed damages for his injuries against Roche, which was in
charge of the running of the Coal Mine he was working on and owned the
plant and equipment used at the mine.
He alleged that Roche failed to provide him with a safe system of work,
requiring that the Cat be parked in a way that increased the risk of its
operator falling, and failed to provide a safe means of accessing the cabin
of the truck.
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 70
71. CASE STUDY (CONT.)
Roche argued the worker was a ‘highly qualified' and ‘experienced driver' of
specialised equipment and did not require any instruction, supervision,
training or control.
Roche also contended that the worker had contributed to the fall, by failing
to maintain ‘three points of contact' while ascending the ladder.
Held that the relationship between Roche and the worker, while not being
employer and employee, was ‘significantly closer' than that between a
principal and independent contractor and they were liable
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 71
72. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Civil Liability Act
– S 9(1) – A person does not breach a duty to take precautions against a
risk of harm unless:
• Risk was foreseeable (knew or ought to have known of risk)
• Risk was not insignificant and
• A reasonable person in the circumstances would have taken the
precautions
– S 9(2) – in deciding whether reasonable person would have taken the
risk court will look at:
• Probability harm would occur if care not taken – s 9(2)(a);
• Likely seriousness of the harm – s 9(2)(b);
• Burden of taking precautions – s 9(2)(c); and
• Social utility of activity creating risk of harm – s 9(2)(d).
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 72
73. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
– Section 10
• The fact that a risk if harm could have been avoided by doing
something in a different way does not of itself give rise to/affect
liability for the way the thing was done and
• The subsequent taking of action that would have avoided a risk if
done earlier does not give rise to/affect liability in relation to the risk
and does not of itself constitute an admission of liability
The risk of harm is one made in prospect and not retrospect. Hindsight has
no part to play
Safety Matters – WH&S In The Workplace 73
74. QUESTIONS?
Alison Barrett, Principal
Ph: 07 3016 0333
Email: abarrett@mauriceblackburn.com.au
Safety Matters – WH&S In The
Workplace
74
Employer and employee obligations under the WHS Act (Qld)
Offences
Work Groups
Role and powers of HSRs and Health & Safety Committees
National Model Act
The National Model Act was the outcome of a national review into model occupational health and safety laws in Australia and a desire to harmonise these standards across state jurisdictions.
Directed at work health and safety generally, rather than workplaces, work processes or types of workers
It moves away from the employment relationship
There are graduated enforcement / alternative sanctions
Victoria not adopting the model act
In April 2012, Ballieu government announced it would not adopt the Model Act based on the cost of business in Victoria being too high, impacting on the productivity of small business
While the Victorian Labor party was in opposition, its Shadow WorkCover and Industrial Relations Ministers, stated that if Labor was successful at the November 2014 election they would not be adopting the harmonised WHS laws while a Federal Coalition is in power because they “don't trust the Federal Government to [uphold] legislation that's going to maintain the safety standards [currently in] Victoria”.
The Victorian WorkSafe site states that:
The Victorian Government has confirmed that Victoria will not adopt the national model workplace health and safety laws in their current form. The Government supports the principle of national harmonisation and continues to work towards best practice legislation.
Western Australia
On 23 October 2014, the Minister for Commerce, the Hon Michael Mischin MLC, tabled in Parliament the Work Health and Safety Bill 2014 (WHS Bill) and announced the opening of a public comment period for the draft legislation.
This public comment period has now closed.
The state government is reviewing the comments and considering whether to adopt proceed with the draft legislation
Queensland
In Queensland, the Newman Government passed the harmonised Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld) and Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (Qld).
One year later, they began a process of ‘consultation’ with small business in relation to the State’s WHS laws which culminated in the passage of the Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2014.
introducing new notice of entry requirements (and penalties for contravention) for Health and Safety Representatives (HSR), their assistants and WHS entry permit holders. These persons must give at least 24 hours notice to the person conducting the business or undertaking and the person managing the workplace
removing powers of HSRs to direct workers to cease work
removing the requirement for a person conducting the business or undertaking to provide an up-to-date list of HSRs and Deputies to Work, Health and Safety (the Regulator)
removing consultation requirements for introducing, amending or revoking codes of practice; and
establishing transitional provisions ensuring that existing orders to cease work continue to apply and that WHS entry permit holders who entered workplaces prior to commencement without notice, are not subject to the new penalties.
As will be discussed later – a proposed Bill, currently in committee, will reverse most of the Newman changes.
Which law applies?
It is important to note that criminal liability attaches to where the risk or injury occurred.
For example, if a contract says that Queensland law applies, but the incident occurs in Victoria, Victoria’s OH&S laws will apply and not the Model Act.
Institutions
Regulators
Nine across Australia
Queensland: Workplace Health and Safety Queensland - Responsible for administering the WHS Act
It also provides a range of contradictory roles:
Policing / investigative function
Provision of advice
Oversight role
Researching function
Provision of training
Fair Work Commission
Makes awards and certifies agreements (which contain provisions relating to health and safety) and has a bullying jurisdiction
WHS Act
The Model Act introduced the concept of a person conducting a business or undertaking.
This is a broad concept designed to capture all types of modern working arrangements
The WHS Act places the primary duty of care and various other duties and obligations on a ‘person conducting a business or undertaking’ (PCBU).
The meaning of the term is set out at s5 of the WHS Act but will include:
Persons conducting a business or undertaking alone or with others i.e. companies, unincorporated association, partners in a partnership, government departments, councils, the self-employed etc but excludes workers and officers
The following PCBUs have further duties beyond the primary duty of care:
PCBUs who manage or control workplaces, fixtures fittings or plant (s 20)
Designers, manufacturers (22 and 23)
Importers (s24)
Suppliers (s25)
Installers of products or plant used at work (s 26)
Officers, workers and other persons at a workplace have separate duties (ss27, 28, 29).
There are certain organisations and individuals who are exempted by statute from owing a duty i.e. a volunteer association does not conduct a business or undertaking.
Duties of a PCBU are linked to the carrying out of work at a workplace by workers.
“The definition of a ‘workplace’ is a place where work is carried out for a business or undertaking and includes any place where a worker goes, or is likely to be, while at work.
The definition of a ‘worker’ is a person who carries out work in any capacity for a person conducting a business or undertaking”
http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/model-whs-laws/guidance/volunteers/pages/whs-duties-organisations
Employers’ duty
This is an absolute duty which is qualified by “reasonable practicability”
Refers to the concept of “working environment” which is broader than the concept of “workplace”
There is no need for an injury, a risk of injury is sufficient
Duty to consult
S 35(1) sets out the circumstances under which an employer is required to consult, these are:
Identifying or assessing hazards or risks
Making decisions about the measures to be taken to control the risks
Making decisions about the adequacy of facilities
Making decisions about procedures
Determining the membership of any health and safety committee
Proposing changes that may affect the health and safety of employees
S 36(1) sets out how employees are to be consulted
Sharing information
Giving employees an opportunity to express their views
Taking into account the views
If the employees and employer have agreed to procedures for undertaking consultations, consultation must be in accordance with these
WHS Regulation
PCBUs also owe a number of duties under the WHS Regulation including to provide first aid facilities
Dangerous incident:
The regulator must also be immediately notified of any dangerous incident that exposes a person to a serious health or safety risk from immediate or imminent exposure to:
the uncontrolled escape, spillage or leakage of a substance
an uncontrolled implosion, explosion or fire an uncontrolled escape of gas, steam or a pressurised substance
an electric shock
the fall or release from height of any plant, substance or thing the collapse, overturning, failure or malfunction of, or damage to, plant that is required to be licensed or registered the collapse or partial collapse of a structure, including an excavation or of any shoring supporting an excavation
the inrush of water, mud or gas into an underground excavation or tunnel
the interruption of the main system of ventilation to an underground excavation or tunnel, or
other incidents as stated in the WHS Regulations.
Consult with workers
“PCBUs must so far as reasonably practicable consult with workers who carry out work for the business or undertaking who are, or are likely to be, directly affected by a matter relating to health and safety. This includes giving workers a reasonable opportunity to express their views or raise issues about work health and safety at the workplace.”
“If there is an agreed consultation procedure then the consultation must be in accordance with those procedures. If an HSR represents workers the consultation must involve the HSR”
“A PCBU must consult with workers and take their views into account when:
identifying hazards and assessing risks arising from work proposing changes that may affect the health and safety of workers, and
whenever specifically required to do so under particular regulations
and when considering making decisions about:
ways to eliminate or minimise risks
the adequacy of facilities for workers’ welfare at work
procedures for consulting with workers
procedures for resolving health and safety issues
procedures for monitoring the health of workers or workplace conditions, and
how to provide health and safety information and training to workers. “
Due diligence
Due diligence includes taking reasonable steps to:
acquire and keep up to date knowledge on work health and safety matters
understand the nature and operations of the work and associated hazards and risks
ensure the PCBU has, and uses, appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise risks to work health and safety
ensure the PCBU has appropriate processes to receive and consider information about work-related incidents, hazards and risks, and to respond in a timely manner
ensure the PCBU has, and implements, processes for complying with their duties and obligations (for example reports notifiable incidents, consults with workers, complies with notices, provides appropriate training and instruction and ensures HSRs receive training entitlements), and
verify the provision and use of the relevant resources and processes.
Reasonably practicable
This qualification indicates that the employer is not required to take every possible step that could be taken – just those that are reasonably practicable for the employer to achieve the identified end of providing and maintaining a safe work environment
Regard is had to 5 considerations which are balanced in the context of the circumstances and facts.
Essentially “There are two elements to what is ‘reasonably practicable’. A duty-holder must first consider what can be done - that is, what is possible in the circumstances for ensuring health and safety. They must then consider whether it is reasonable, in the circumstances to do all that is possible.”
“To identify what would be reasonably practicable to do, all of the relevant matters must be taken into account and a balance achieved that will provide the highest level of protection that is both possible and reasonable in the circumstances. No single matter determines what is (or was at a particular time) reasonably practicable to be done to ensure health and safety”
Objective test – a person is judged by the standard of behaviour expected of a reasonable person in the duty-holder’s position who is required to comply with the same duty
Section 28 sets out the employees’ duties
Duties only apply when the employee is “at work”
Reasonable care
There is no qualification of “reasonable practicability”
However, s 28(a) provides that an employee must take “reasonable care”
This is analogous to the common law duty
As per the Explanatory Memorandum to the Model Act “The duty…is necessarily proportionate to the control a worker is able to exercise over his or her work activities and work environment. “
Duties of other persons at the workplace (section 29)
Similar duties apply to other persons at a workplace. Any person at a workplace, including customers and visitors, must take reasonable care of their own health and safety and that of others who may be affected by their actions or omissions. They must also comply, so far as they are reasonably able, with any reasonable instruction that is given by the PCBU to comply with WHS laws.
Offences:
Category 1 – a duty holder, without reasonable excuse, engages in conduct that recklessly exposes a person to a risk of death or serious injury or illness.
Category 2 – a duty holder fails to comply with a health and safety duty that exposes a person to risk of death or serious injury or illness.
Category 3 – a duty holder fails to comply with a health and safety duty.
34 Exceptions
(1) A volunteer does not commit an offence under this division for a failure to comply with a health and safety duty, except a duty under section 28 or 29.
(2) An unincorporated association does not commit an offence under this Act, and is not liable for a civil penalty under this Act, for a failure to comply with a duty or obligation imposed on the unincorporated association under this Act.
(3) However—
an officer of an unincorporated association (other than a volunteer) may be liable for a failure to comply with a duty under section 27; and(b) a member of an unincorporated association may be liable for failure to comply with a duty under section 28 or 29.
Process re. non-prosecution of complaint
“If the regulator decides not to prosecute the complainant may make a written request that the regulator refer the matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions. The matter must be referred within one month of the request being made. The Director of Public Prosecutions must consider the matter and advise in writing the regulator within one month of whether a prosecution should be brought. The regulator must provide the complainant and alleged offender with a copy of the advice or a summary of the advice. If the work health and safety regulator declines to follow any advice to prosecute it must provide written reasons for its decision.”
The WHS Act provides that courts can also make alternative orders.
Adverse publicity orders – order to notify/publicise,, the offence, its consequences, the penalty imposed and any other related matter
Restoration orders - to remedy any matter caused by the commission of the offence that appears to the court to be within the offender’s power to remedy
WHS project orders - undertake a stated project for the general improvement of work health and safety within the period stated in the order.
Undertakings - may (with or without recording a conviction) adjourn the proceeding for a period of up to 2 years and make an order for the release of the offender on the offender giving an undertaking with stated conditions
Training orders - requiring the offender to undertake or arrange for 1 or more workers to undertake a stated course of training
Employee representation provides a means for involving workers and giving them a voice in health and safety matters
‘A work group is set up for the purposes of electing—and being represented by—one or more HSRs”
Work Groups can stand alongside other workplace structures (joint consultative committees, workplace advisory committees, enterprise consultative committees)
DWGs in multiple employer situations
Multiple employer WGs may be suitable for situations where:
There are many employers on a single site (eg: construction sites, public events);
There are many employers on multiple adjacent sites (eg: shopping centre); and
There are many employers on may diverse sites (eg: clothing and textile industry where there are many employers in multiple small workplaces)
Independent contractors
Independent contractors cant be part of establishing WGs or electing HSRs in a workplace in which they are working as a contractor or subcontractor
Employees can request their employer facilitate elections for health and safety representatives to represent those who carry out work for the business or undertaking (s50).
If a request is made under s50, the employer must facilitate must facilitate the determination of a work group(s51).
Negotiation of particulars
Particulars have to be determined by negotiation and agreement.
employees may be represented by any person authorised by the employee in those negotiations (i.e. a union rep) (s 52(5))
Employer must do everything reasonable to ensure that negotiations start within 14 days after the request (s 43(3). It is an offence to contravene this provision
Purpose of the negotiations is to determine (s 52(3))
number and composition of work groups to be represented by HSRs
number of HSRs and deputy HSRs to be elected
workplace(s) to which the work groups will apply
the businesses or undertakings to which the work groups will apply
Under s16 of the WHS Regulation:
Negotiations for and determination of work groups and variations of work groups must be directed at ensuring that the workers are grouped in a way that—
most effectively and conveniently enables the interests of the workers, in relation to work health and safety, to be represented; and
has regard to the need for a health and safety representative for the work group to be readily accessible to each worker in the work group.
s 17 Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011(Qld))
Matters to be taken into account
S 17 of the Regulation lists the following matters to be taken into account in negotiations (or in determining unresolved particulars):
Must take into account all relevant matters including:
(a)the number of workers;
(b) the views of workers in relation to the determination and variation of work groups;
(c) the nature of each type of work carried out by the workers;
(d) the number and grouping of workers who carry out the same or similar types of work;
(e) the areas or places where each type of work is carried out;
(f) the extent to which any worker must move from place to place while at work;
(g) the diversity of workers and their work;
(h) the nature of any hazards at the workplace or workplaces;
(i) the nature of any risks to health and safety at the workplace or workplaces;
(j) the nature of the engagement of each worker, for example as an employee or as a contractor;
(k) the pattern of work carried out by workers, for example whether the work is full-time, part-time, casual or short-term;
(l) the times at which work is carried out;
(m) any arrangements at the workplace or workplaces relating to overtime or shift work.
Important things to note about the matters
The matters indicate a flexibility in the Work Group concept
When the matters are applied to negotiations, they could enable:
The workplace to be divided into separate geographical areas (eg: admin, factory floor)
Employees who perform specialised functions could constitute one workgroup (eg: admin, maintenance, production)
There could be a separate Work Group for each shift
Where agreement reached
Workers must be advised of the outcome of negotiations by the employer as soon as practicable (in any form i.e. letter, email otherwise). penalty for individuals and body corporate for not doing so)
Variations to the agreement can be negotiated.
Where agreement not reached
Where agreement is not reached in a negotiation ‘within a reasonable time’ or where an employer has not taken all reasonable steps to commence negotiations and these have not commenced within 14 days of a request by workers, either party may ask Work Health and Safety Queensland to arrange for an inspector to determine the particulars that are unresolved. i.e. number and composition of work groups.
‘Reasonable time’ = depends on the circumstances in the workplace
Work Health and Safety considers this to be a period of 2 weeks from the time negotiations begin
Act does not specify what procedure the Inspector should follow – likely inspector would consult with the parties.
Though Inspector’s decision is binding on the parties it can be appealed to the Internal Review Unit of Work Health Safety Queensland.
HSRs are elected by members of Work Group according to the procedure set by the Work Group, subject to the minimum conditions for a procedure set out in the Regulation. Serve three year terms.
WHS Act gives powers to HSRs but does not impose compulsory duties in their capacity as HSRs . Of course, this would not displace any duty they owed as a worker.
HSRs may choose to conduct inspections independently or jointly with the employer or their representative. The HSR is entitled during any inspection to discuss health and safety issues with the workers in the WG. Where joint inspections are arranged, it may be appropriate for the employer’s safety officer or relevant senior manager to be available during and after the inspection to discuss health and safety issues that have been raised in the inspection.
Useful decision – examining the identical Victorian provision.
The OHS Act plainly contemplates the inspection of workplaces for the purposes of improving occupational health and safety. In my view it would be inconsistent with the goals of the Act if the meaning of “workplace” was so limited that it allowed inspection only of the workplace itself and not those things necessary for the work found within it. For example, acceptance of the respondents’ construction would mean that a health and safety representative could inspect the floor on which an employee stood but not a piece of dangerous plant standing on the floor and used in the work.
Further, there is nothing textually in ss 5(1) or 58 which indicates that the word “workplace” should be construed as meaning only the location or the building in which work takes place, but not the plant and equipment in it. The definition in s 5(1) refers to a workplace “whether or not in a building or structure”. On the respondents’ construction it is only the building or structure that can be inspected. This strongly points away from the respondents’ construction.
Another indication that the inspection power is intended to be broad is that it allows a health and safety inspector to inspect “any part of a workplace”. It would be a strange result indeed if, in the circumstances contemplated by s 58 of an incident involving an immediate risk to employee safety that the health and safety representative was to be restricted to an inspection of the building itself, and could not inspect moveable plant and equipment.
Removal of s85 – HSR can no longer direct member of Work Group to cease work.
Requirement that HSR’s assistant provide at least 24 hours notice (but less than 14 days) to PCBUs and persons with management or control of the workplace during their usual hours.
Regulation requires that notice must be written, provide details of HSR and assistant and provide a statement of reasons why the HSR considers it necessary for assistant to enter workplace.
For WHS entry permit holders – notice must include name of Union and declaration permit not revoked or suspended.
Under the Model Act a PCBU may refuse entry to assistant on ‘reasonable grounds’. However, Neman amended this to include where notice has not been given or the information required by the Regulation has not been given.
However, if access refused – may ask inspector to assist in resolving.
Work Health and Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2015 - currently in committee but will likely be passed.
Relevantly:
“allow WHS entry permit holders to enter a workplace immediately if they suspect a contravention has occurred and provide notice of entry as soon as is reasonably practicable afterwards, removing the requirement to provide at least 24 hours’ notice of entry;
reinstate the power for a trained HSR to direct a worker in their work group to cease work if they have a reasonable concern that to carry out the work would expose the worker to a serious risk to their health and safety, emanating from an immediate or imminent exposure to a hazard. This will restore consistency with the model WHS laws;
allow HSRs to request the assistance of any person, removing the requirement for at least 24 hours’ notice if the assistant requires access the workplace;
remove the penalty for failing to provide notice of entry to inquire into a suspected contravention of the WHS Act, consult and advise workers and make copies of documents relevant to a suspected contravention. This penalty does not exist in the model WHS laws;
decrease the maximum penalty for contravening WHS entry permit conditions from 200 penalty units to 100 penalty units, to restore consistency with the model WHS laws;
Establishment
Penalties apply under the Act if this obligation is contravened
Composition
“Unless they do not wish to participate, HSRs are automatically a member of the relevant HSC. If there is more than one HSR at the workplace, the HSRs may agree among themselves as to who will be on the HSC. They may agree to have more than one HSR join the HSC.”
Consultation
Refer back to consultation obligations under s 47, 48 and 49
Where the employees are represented by a HSR, the consultation must involve the HSR
Employer representatives
Should be drawn from senior managers, line managers, supervisors, safety officers, technical experts and personnel officers
This ensures that the representation has the relevant knowledge and expertise regarding company policy, production needs and technical matters concerning the premises, processes, plant, machinery and equipment and systems of work
These functions are outlined in s 77 of the WHS Act
Specific functions are likely to include:
Formulating agreed procedures
Studying incident statistics and trends to report to management with recommendations for corrective action
Examining health and safety audits
Considering reports and information provided by inspectors
Developing systems to ensure health and safety issues are considered during the section of new plant and processes
Assistance in the development of safe working procedures and safe systems of work
Selection of consultants
Dispute resolution
Not an appropriate function for HSCs
Small workplaces
Unlikely to have an HSC
Employers in these workplaces still have a duty to consult under s 35
This could involve employers involving employees in developing policies and procedures and reviewing their effectiveness
There is no statutory definition of consultation, however, the federal health and safety body, Safety Australia, provides this information.
This is under the Victorian legislation, however, it is similarly constructed and the same principles would apply here.
affirm the PIN if the inspector believes that the OHS Act or
regulations have been breached or if there are circumstances that
make it likely that the breach will continue or be repeated;
• affirm the PIN with modifications if it is necessary to correct
defects and/or include more appropriate details or information; or
• cancel the PIN if the inspector believes that the recipient is not
breaching or has not breached the OHS Act or regulations or if the
PIN has been issued to the wrong duty holder.
A PIN will be invalid if it does not contain the three matters in ss 91 and 92, being the HSRs belief and reason for belief, the provision being breached and the date by which it must be fixed.
Examples of a defect or irregularity that could mislead the person
receiving the PIN and that could cause a substantial injustice might be
where:
• the PIN states the wrong section of the Act or particular regulation
(e.g. section 21(2)(a) SAFE PLANT rather than section 21(2)(e)) TRAINING and the person
receiving the PIN would be led into giving the plant extra maintenance
rather than putting in place training and instruction for employees;
• the writing on the PIN is illegible or capable of multiple meanings; or
• the day (e.g. ‘Wednesday 22 July 2005’) by which the person must
fix the breach does not accord with the date on the PIN (22 July 2005
is actually a Friday) leading to confusion as to whether the person
receiving the notice must comply with one date or the other.
(2) The decision may be—
(a) to confirm or vary the reviewable decision; or
(b) to set aside the reviewable decision and substitute
another decision that the internal reviewer considers
appropriate.
(3) If the internal reviewer seeks further information from the
applicant, the 14-day period ceases to run until the applicant
provides the information to the internal reviewer.
(4) The applicant must provide the further information within the
time (being not less than 7 days) stated by the internal
reviewer in the request for information.
(5) If the applicant does not provide the further information
within the required time, the decision is taken to have been
confirmed by the internal reviewer at the end of that time.
(6) If the reviewable decision is not varied or set aside within the
14-day period, the decision is taken to have been confirmed
by the internal reviewer.
Examples of decisions that can be reviewed by the QIRC include, decisions relating to health and safety committee under section 76(6), decision in relation
to training health and safety representative under section 72 (which Patrick talked about earlier), decisions following failure to commence negotiations under section 54.
NB with QCAT – no automatic right to representative. Further, if proposed representative is not legally qualified, further hurdles to representation.
QCAT Act:
43 Representation
(1) The main purpose of this section is to have parties represent
themselves unless the interests of justice require otherwise.
(2) In a proceeding, a party—
(a) may appear without representation; or
(b) may be represented by someone else if—
(i) the party is a child or a person with impaired
capacity; or
(ii) the proceeding relates to taking disciplinary action,
or reviewing a decision about taking disciplinary
action, against a person; or
(iii) an enabling Act that is an Act, or the rules, states
the person may be represented; or
(iv) the party has been given leave by the tribunal to be
represented.
(3) In deciding whether to give a party leave to be represented in a
proceeding, the tribunal may consider the following as
circumstances supporting the giving of the leave—
(a) the party is a State agency;
(b) the proceeding is likely to involve complex questions of
fact or law;
(c) another party to the proceeding is represented in the
proceeding;
(d) all of the parties have agreed to the party being
represented in the proceeding.
(4) A party can not be represented in a proceeding by a person—
(a) who, under rules made under section 224(3), is
disqualified from being a representative of a party to a
proceeding; or
(b) who is not an Australian legal practitioner or
government legal officer, unless the tribunal is satisfied
the person is an appropriate person to represent the
party.
(5) A person who is not an Australian legal practitioner or
government legal officer and who is seeking to represent a
party in a proceeding must give the tribunal a certificate of
authority from the party for the representation if—
(a) the party is a corporation; or
(b) the tribunal has asked for the certificate.
This is a relatively new provision. Previously, workers were unable to sue in the Mags Court for breaches of WHS Act.
NB: threatening to engage in the action is the same as engaging in it for the purpose of the act.
NB: threatening to engage in the action is the same as engaging in it for the purpose of the act.
There is also accessorial liability, similar to section 550 of the FW Act.
There is also accessorial liability, similar to section 550 of the FW Act.
There is also accessorial liability, similar to section 550 of the FW Act.
There is also accessorial liability, similar to section 550 of the FW Act.