God Is Omnipotent And Can Not Make Evil Good

God Is Omnipotent And Can Not Make Evil Good
1."If God is omnipotent, then God will be able to make evil good." Do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.
My opinion to this statement does not come immediately. For this reason I plan to briefly investigate the arguments for four main sub–premises that
either support or reject the statement "If God is omnipotent, then God will be able to make evil good". These premise's are:
(A) God is not omnipotent and cannot make evil good
(B) God is omnipotent, but cannot make evil good
(i) God is omnipotent and chooses not to make evil good
(C) God is omnipotent and can make evil good.
Arguments that support Premise (i) deny statement A of any truth. If reasoning behind statement (i) provide sufficient evidence to support premise (i)
then I will be disagree with statement A.
Arguments for Premise (ii and iii) ascribe partial truth to statement A but distinguish between God's ability to possess the potential to make evil good
v.s. God possessing this ability and wanting to make evil good. This distinction supports premise A in similar ways for both premise (ii and iii) raise a
paradoxical puzzle into what disposition God takes as one who is supposedly omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omnipresent.
Reasoning for premise (iv) defends theism and the traditional form God is ascribed to have.
The reason I have separated Statement Z into four sub–premises is because how these four sub–premises are defended and countered works to serve the
validity of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Relation Regress Argument Analysis
In this essay, I will explain and evaluate the relation regress argument against resemblance nominalism, by arguing in favour of the relation regress
argument. Firstly, I will define what resemblance nominalism and the relation regress argument is. Then, I will look at the plausibility of and concerns
about Russell's relation regress argument, by comparing it to various counterexamples which argue in favour of resemblance nominalism and are against
the relation regress argument. Finally, I will demonstrate why the relation regress argument seems more plausible than arguments in favour of
resemblance nominalism.
Resemblance nominalism is a type of nominalism which describes that some objects resemble each other and others do not. The resemblance ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Qualitative economy would be to restrict the kinds of objects to the least, while quantitative economy is to restrict the number of objects in each kind
to the least. It is quantitatively more economical to admit to resemblance universals than to hypothesise a universal for each resemblance, according to
D. Nolan. So, only the relation of resemblance is accepted as a universal. This seems counter–intuitive, to accept the existence of universals only when
it suits an argument and to decry its existence outside of that. Therefore, it seems more plausible to admit to the existence of universals in general, not
just as resemblance

The Role Of Confessions And Creeds On The 's ' The Creedal...
There is much debate within evangelicalism about the role of confessions and creeds. In "The Creedal Imperative", Carl Trueman addresses this by
stating his belief that confessions and creeds are "vital to the present and future well–being of the church" through life and through worship (13).
Trueman finds it important to argue that confessions and creeds fall in line with the belief that Scripture alone is the main source of revelation and
authority, yet also noticing the synthetic and public nature of these documents.
Trueman begins chapter one by addressing three cultural assumptions. These are: the past is important, language should be used to communicate truth,
and the church should teach and enforce creeds and confessions. In ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Trueman's central point of his biblical basis is Paul's words to Timothy. Paul says, "Follow the pattern of sound words that you have heard from me, in
the faith and love that are in Jesus Christ" (2 Timothy 1:13). Trueman provides scripturalargument that the Bible demands we have forms of sound
words to pass the gospel and tradition on to future generations, and the creeds are the best way of doing that. This indicates error in the idea the Bible
is our only necessary creed.
In chapter three, Trueman uses historical components to make his arguments and show the development of the creeds. Chapter three introduces the
history of creeds and confessions through the early church by outlining the ecclesiological developments in discussing the Rule of Faith, the Apostle's
Creed, and the creeds of the ecumenical councils. Two unusual ideas were, "the fact that the early church developed them in the first place and the
early church creeds focus on the most basic building blocks of faith" (104–105). Trueman states that the forms of sound words are what make up the
creeds and showcase power over the non–Christian world. Trueman also addresses the Apostle's creed, stating that it is not a Trinitarian doctrine due to
inadequate detail on the doctrine of God. This indicates the focus on Christ's identity and not just content that relates to Christians only.

Communication Between A Nurse And A Patient Essay
Introduction
In just one day the average person will speak approximately 16 000 thousands words – I know what you're thinking, that's a lot of words right? Yet,
what if I told you that those words only make up a small part of our day–to–day communication? Good morning class. So much of our communication
happens outside of just what we say, it happens through how we say it, when we say it, what our bodies are doing and in many more ways. Today we
will be taking a look at the communication between a nurse and a patient and examining some of these verbal and nonverbal aspects of
communication. Specifically we will be discussing the nurse's tendency to avoid the patient's concerns, as well as her poor speech delivery and how the
two affect the nurse's ability to assist her patient. Active Listening
Listening is more than just hearing. The process of listening involves receiving and constructing meaning, and responding to verbal and/or nonverbal
messages. In other words, listening is not always easy and being a good listener is all about developing listening skills. To receive messages
appropriately we have to listen actively. Active listening can be broken down into three important skills; first of all you have to reflect the feelings that
the person is communicating, secondly reflect the content that they are communicating and finally ask good, meaningful questions. Reflecting feelings
and content is hugely important in a clinical setting in order to make implicit and

Skepticism About The External World
Skepticism about the external world is one of the most widely discussed arguments in the history of philosophy. Barry Stroud defines skepticism as the
idea that we cannot have knowledge about the external world (Stroud, page 1). This conclusion is the result of Rene Descartes' Dream Argument and
has been a topic of discussion ever since. No matter how we attack the argument, it seems that we inevitably arrive at skepticism. In this paper, I will
argue that the skeptical conclusion is true and why it seems to be compelling as a necessary condition for knowledge. I will describe the Dream
Argument and take a look at Moore's promising response to the conclusion as an inconsistent proof. In the end, Moore's argument for evidence of an
external world will fail to disprove the skeptical conclusion due to its lack of justified belief. Although I am intuitively inclined to deny the skeptical
argument, I cannot logically do so but will argue against full–blown skepticism and explain how mild skepticism is a more approachable route to
knowledge. In our everyday conversation, we do not generally question the validity of small claims that we make during normal interactions. In
Meditation 1, Descartes decides that it is the right time to reevaluate the foundation of knowledge that he will rest his life upon from that point forward.
He puts in question the things that he thinks he knows for certain. He acknowledges that everything he knows has been perceived from the senses or
through

The On First Philosophy By Rene Descartes
In his work Meditations on First Philosophy, published in 1641, RenГ© Descartes sets out to establish a set of indubitable truths for the sciences.
He begins by discarding all of his beliefs, then works to rebuild his beliefs based on careful thought. Descartes clearly states this goal, saying in the
First Meditation, "I will work my way up... I will accomplish this by putting aside everything that admits of the least doubt" (I, 17). He is able to
establish his own existence, but struggles to move beyond his internal thoughts to discuss external objects. Descartes decides that the Christian God is
the bridge he needs to escape the confines of his own mind, and argues for the existence of God in the Third Meditation in order to move on to
discussing the physical world. In this paper I will argue that Descartes' rationalistic project would have been improved without an appeal to the
Christian God, although I will also argue that Descartes thinks this appeal is necessary.
Descartes declares that he will only accept ideas that he can absolutely affirm, but accepts the existence of God without adequately proving it. This
inadequacy undermines his declared project of defining the world in terms of established ideas. He does not sufficiently prove the idea of God, yet
bases so much on it. When he later discusses physical bodies, intellect, and mathematical concepts, the reader cannot forget that everything he writes is
based on the shaky foundation of the Christian God, and finds his

Essay on Legal Strikes and Illegal Strikes Under Labor Law
Q1. Legal strikes and illegal strikes are dramatically different in terms of how they are viewed in Labour Law. Discuss. (5 marks) Section 1 (1) of the
Labour Relations Act, 1995 defines "a strike as a cessation of work, a refusal to work or to continue to work by employees in combination or in
concert or in accordance with a common understanding, or a slow–down or other concerted activity on the part of employees designed to restrict or
limit output". According to the "Labour Relations Act, 1995" the strikes are legal only if some preconditions are met such as the collective agreement
must have expired, a strike vote must have been held and 50% of the members are in favour of the strike, and a conciliation officer must have been ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Because Peter is the chief steward of the union and has been occurring substantial financial losses to the company, it is worth hiring a third party to
do the investigation for Bob. After he is collected concrete evidence against him, he should conduct an interview with Peter in the presence of
another senior management member and address the issues. Peter should be given verbal warning followed by the written warnings. He can repeat
the written warnings if required so that the disciplinary action can be escalated to the next level. If Peter finally does not correct his behavior, which
most likely seems to be the case, he should be suspended without pay fro 1 to 5 days. After that if he still does not change his behavior, he is subject
to be terminated with cause.
Question 3: If Peter is discharged, what arguments would the company lawyer use at arbitration? (10 marks) If the management decides to discharge
Peter, he using his power will take the disciplinary action to attribution where the union will try to show that management did not have cause to the
disciplinary action against Peter. Company lawyer in this case should have real evidences against peter so that management can attempt to prove how
the action taken was crucial for business. Peter committed some serious offences like drinking at the workplace and the clear disciplinary record the

Modern Technology And Its Impact On Modern Society Essay
Modern technology has undoubtedly had a profound impact on contemporary society. However, critics of modern technology emphasize that modern
technology has had deleterious effects on young Americans. In The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and
Jeopardizes Our Future: Or, Don 't Trust Anyone under 30, Mark Bauerlein attempts to argue that the young Americans of contemporary society are
increasingly unintelligent as a result of modern technology, but fails to elaborate on his criteria for evaluating intelligence. Bauerlein engages in
fallacious rhetoric while presenting his argument that today's young Americans are part of the "dumbest generation" because he fails to acknowledge
the beneficial impacts that modern technology has had on Americans. His overall argument is diminished by his usage of logical fallacies, while
arguments that do not rely on logical fallacies and rather focus on deliberate rhetorical appeals are more cogent. Bauerlein's failure to contribute
relevant evidence and his excessive use of logical fallacies ultimately hinders his argument that modern technology has led to the decline in youth
intelligence, which is what makes counter–arguments presented by other authors, such as Clay Shirky and Donald Norman's, much more convincing.
In his book The Dumbest Generation, Emory Professor Mark Bauerlein emphasizes his belief that most young Americans avoid learning due to their
pre–occupation with modern technology. He

Importance Of The Birth Of Modern Science
1.Why are bridge laws important for Fodor? Explain in detail.
Bridge laws are important because they are required for reductionism to work. Bridge laws let us know that everything is equivalent. Without these,
everything wouldn't be able to all be reduced to the same level. Without bridge laws it wouldn't be possible for us to make generalizations because
there is no way or point to make that everything is equivalent. We wouldn't be able to reduce concepts without these. With that being stated,
reductionism isn't possible far as now according to Fodor. 2.Why is the birth of modern science (c.1500–1700) important to how we understand
knowledge and disciplinary divisions today? Explain in detail.
The birth of modern science is important to how we understand knowledge and disciplinary divisions today because it lays out the reason why we
have to take the classes we take now. With science stripping out the teleological element and just pushing everything down to facts, it left the
question of what should we do with everything that was removed. With that, the answer resulted in having the humanities provide this for us as it
holds the teleological element and essentially keeps the part of the human qualia alive. Due to all of this, we have to take two extra years' worth of
schooling for the benefit from the supplement of the teleological half. If we didn't have the extra two years, we would finish the training and
knowledge we need for our careers in two years instead of

Art, Meaning And Artist 's Meaning By Daniel O. Nathan
When people encounter an artwork and try to understand it, some would refer to the artist's intention, but some may think it is not helpful. This
interpretation is concerned as one essential component of aesthetics, both in the philosophical perspective and in common sense. They two kinds of
people have their official name for what they believe. The debate here is about whether the artist's intention can influence the interpretation of the art.
The intentionalists believe that artist's intention can either determine or impact the interpretation. The anti–intentionalists hold the opposite view,
artist's intention should not be taken into consideration in interpreting. In the discussion of this, there are some small variations within each side, but
we will stay with this definition for now.
Daniel O. Nathan is obviously an anti–intentionalist. In his paper "Art, Meaning and Artist's Meaning", he demonstrated some vulnerabilities of the
current anti–intentionalism view, and then suggested some new arguments and development on the basis of it. Some of them are not very plausible. I
will defend the intentionalist's view by evaluating some of Nathan's suggestions and point out the weakness of it. I would first examine a suggestion
regrading the convention of interpreting. The second will be about the paradox of intention. Ideally this analysis would be illuminating to
intentionalism view.
Convention in Interpreting
The first suggestion I want to discuss is one of Nathan's

Psychological Egoism
Psychological egoism is the view that everyone always acts selfishly. It describes human nature as being wholly self–centered and self–motivated.
Psychological egoism is different from ethical egoism in their "direction of fit" to the world. Psychological ego–ism is a factual theory. It aims to fit
the world. In the world is not how psychological ego–ism says it is because someone acts unselfishly, then something is wrong with psycho–logical
egoism. In my opinion this argument is completely wrong and unsound. According to James Rachel, an author of "Elements of Moral Philosophy,"
there two main arguments exist against psychological egoism. The first argument can be formulated as such:
1)Everyone always does what they most want to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rachels p. 74) One can conclude from this that it is the object of the want that should be considered when determining the selfishness of an act. The
second argument for psychological egoism is formulated like this:
1)Everyone always does what they most want to do.
2)If are does what one wants to do, ones gets satisfaction.
3)If one gets satisfaction from doing what they want to do, then satisfaction is one's only goal
4)If satisfaction is one's only goal, one acts selfishly.
5)Everyone always acts selfishly. The major criticism of this argument lays in premise three, its "factual premise" as James Rachel calls it in his book.
Opponents of this argument and Rachel being one of them, imply that it is wrong to say that satisfaction is one's only goal because satisfaction doesn't
even have to be a goal. Satisfaction is the presumable state that results from ob–taining a goal. Thus premise three is wrong. One can say that you can
make satisfaction your goal if you will feel bad if you don't do something, but this is not always the case. Satisfaction can result from something else.
And it is also incorrect to say that one makes satisfaction his goal then chooses his desires to fulfill the satisfaction. (J. Rachels p. 82) The second
criticism is in premise four. Rachels proposes to change the premise, making it less problematic by saying that satisfaction is "ones' primary goal"
instead of "one's only goal."

The Regress Argument Essay: Does God Exist?
The topic of knowledge and belief has been a subject of investigation and a primary field in philosophical research for centuries. Whether it was
Aristotle or Descartes, multiple ideas on knowledge and belief arise, such as the epistemological theories of foundationalism or coherentism, which
provide philosophical explanations to this debate. For the sake of this essay, and in my own opinion, knowledge should be distinguished from belief.
Everyone is subject to different types of beliefs based on upbringing, however knowledge of basic items is universal, therefore it immediately becomes
apparent that there is a clear distinction between the two concepts. Aristotle proposes an argument called the 'Regress argument,' (Wrenn) this argument
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As mentioned in the paragraph about the 'Regress Argument,' you can see that the two main theories are foundationalism and coherentism. To defend
my earlier statements, it is clear, based on the definitions of foundationalism and coherentism that foundationalism is the strongest theory to defend my
ideas. Foundationalism is by definition a belief that has a non–inferential justification (Pynn, 2011). Therefore proving that it is essentially defending
the idea of knowledge. To gain knowledge, one has to have clear and concrete idea of what a concept or object is. For example, if we were to show a
table to any person from across the world they would be able to identify it as a table because of the basic belief that it is a table and because of
what we have been taught since birth. However, if we were to ask different people from around the world about religion, we have to expect a
multitude of answers because there are many different beliefs on religions. Further proving that there is and should be a clear distinction between
the ideas of knowledge and the ideas of beliefs. Cat Bat cat bat cat bat cat bat cat bat cat bat cat Does there need to be a distinction between knowledge
and belief? The debate between knowledge and belief has been a major topic in philosophy forever. However based on the simple ideas

William Shakespeare 's King Lear Essay
William Shakespeare's 1608 tragedy, King LearВё is full to the brim with references to the gods. However, what is the real purpose of these gods
within the tragedy? Some may argue the fact that certain believers triumphed over nonbelievers as the foundation of divine intervention theory. Others
will argue that although many of the characters held belief in the gods, they experienced the same fate as those who never spoke a word about them,
which could be an indication of a lack of divine intervention. Is King Lear trying to promote one theory over the other? It seems unlikely, as these two
views are so equally prominent within the tragedy that it is difficult to argue one view as right and one view as wrong. In King Lear, the idea that the
gods played a role in the fates of the characters, and the idea that it was the character 's own human action which determined their fate, are two theories
so notable throughout the play that it is impossible to fully support either argument. In this essay, I will discuss the strongest and weakest points of both
views as the tragedy progresses, starting with the theory of divine intervention and ending with the theory of human fate.
The theory of intervention from the gods throughout the lives of the characters in King Lear has its biggest support lying in the fact that the
characters who did not recognize the gods perish . If a reader were to collect the lines of Cornwall, Goneril, and Regan, a big piece of evidence is the
fact that

Understanding Of Society 's Portrayal Of The Poor
Emily,Vanessa,David Rhet 105–11am A Current Understanding of Society's Portrayal of the Poor
In this analysis we will be focusing on bell hooks' essay, "Seeing and Making Culture: Representing the Poor." In the essay bell hooks tackles issues
about misrepresentation of poor people in today's society and how the media can skew reality. She notes that society sees the poor as people who are
sub par and unimportant, as well as possessing fruitless qualities such as laziness, shame, dishonesty, and worthlessness. She primarily uses personal
anecdotes to deliver her essay's main argument along with pop culture references and the input of expert voices. She notices this warped image of
the poor trends throughout society as a whole, even through television shows and Hollywood films, such as: Harlem Nights, Boomerang, Pretty
Woman, and The Jeffersons. She references outside sources to compare their takes on this issue to hers to point out the similarities and dissimilarities
in their arguments. bell hooks concludes her essay with a strong call to action, saying that poor people can lead meaningful lives despite what the
media and the privileged classes say, but educated individuals must work with the poor to change their circumstances. She argues for society to
acknowledge its misrepresentation of the poor and for people to form a movement to make real change. bell hooks effectively appeals to her readers,
may they be politicians, sociologists, or college

Historical Knowledge And Quantitative Analysis
The discussion of the origins of electoral systems is an ongoing debate that many experts within the field of political science continue to contribute to,
offering various perspectives of how electoral systems are established. Amongst the community of experts, there is a consensus that the origins of
electoral systems are not attributed solely to a single casual factor. Rather than developing a theory that objectively details the origins of electoral
systems, experts propose various explanations, such as historical, political or economic explanations, as the foundation through which electoral
systems emerged. While a multitude of literature concerning the origins of electoral systems undoubtedly exists, this review will be looking at three
articles in particular that were published in the American Political Science Review, Vol. 104, No. 2. The three articles under examination in this
review are: "Historical Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis: The Case of the Origins of Proportional Representation" by Marcus Kreuzer,
"Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems" by Thomas Cusack, Torben Iversen and David Soskice
(CIS), and "Electoral Markets, Party Strategies, and Proportional Representation" by Carles Boix. Each piece of literature being reviewed engages with
existing literature to some degree, presents a main argument and presents evidence that supports its argument. Nonetheless, it is worth noting the Boix's
and CIS's articles

Analysis Of Steve Greenberg And Michael Weinreb
Authors have many strategies when it comes to winning over their reader to their side on a topic even if it means that they will target their opponent
to make them look bad. In the articles by Steve Greenberg and Michael Weinreb we will look at the way they try to get the reader to join into their
opinion of the topic by appeal to the persons logos, pathos, and ethos. By doing looking at the articles and breaking them down we can see how the
author makes his argument by using rhetorical strategies and logical fallacies. The authors start off by using a logical fallacy, ad hominem, to try to get
their readers on their side emotionally and ethically. In the article written by Steve Greenberg, in the first sentence of his article he changes the
name of his friend to Ogre. This is just because his friend is a cardinal fan and by his mood the reader can tell that he does not think fondly of the
cubs. This makes the reader think of his friend as an ugly beast that does not think to logically. This brings the reader to his side, because when they
hear what the Ogre has to say they will not take it serious. They will associate what the friend says with a half–witted beast that is a disgusting, so
whatever is said cannot be a correct. On the other hand, the article written by Michael Weinreb uses ad hominem to do the same thing as Steve but he
calls out Jim Harbaugh for his crazy tactics. In his article he describes Harbaugh as bat feces and a freak because of his actions in

Essay on Socrates vs Thrasymachus
Any argument relies upon some fundamental agreement about the issue being discussed. However great the divide in opinion may be, there must exist
at least some similarity in the participants' manner of viewing the issue if a solution is ever to be reached. Book One of Plato's Republic features a
disagreement between Socrates and Thrasymachus about the nature of justice. The disaccord between their views of the subject is extremely
pronounced, but there are certain underlying agreements which guide the course of the debate. One way to evaluate the validity of the arguments
involved is to examine whether the assumptions at the root of the argument are in accord with this common ground. By my reading of the dialogue,
Socrates' reply to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thus this definition of ruling forms some part of the common ground I have previously mentioned. Although an objection such as this may affect the
objective validity of the argument, it is important to keep in mind the fact that Socrates is not attempting to create an incontestable definition of justice
at this point. He is merely answering an invalid argument by demonstrating its weaknesses in terms which correspond to Thrasymachus' perspective.
Agitated by Socrates' line of reasoning, Thrasymachus proceeds to blurt out a revised version of his original statement. Thrasymachus claims that
injustice is freer and stronger than justice and that it results in a happier life. As in the former definition, he does not consider so much what justice is
as what it does; he rates the subject in regards to its advantageousness or lack thereof. Essentially, this definition is an extreme extension of the previous
one. Also, the example he uses for support – that of a tyrant made powerful and thus happy through injustice – hearkens back to his initial definition as
ruling being the advantage of the stronger. It is clear that Thrasymachus has not been convinced by Socrates' last argument, despite his apparent
agreement with Socrates' points. He is arguing in different terms, but in actual substance this new development is little more than a bare contradiction of

How Digital Media Is Helping Us Or Not? Essay
With several experiments taking place around digital media, you'd think there would've been a firm answer on its effects by now. The fact is there has
been an answer for the problem, except it's not just one answer, its's several more than just one. McWilliams tackles the outcomes of the answers and
whether or not digital media is helping us or not. With several sections dictating the effects of digital media and one's mind, he provides us with fact
and thought filling sections on each of the occurring issues. Whether or not McWilliams facts prove a point, it will surely dictate whether his argument
would prove to be persuasive. As McWilliams begins to introduce his article with a story from Paul Miller who detached himself completely from
the web, you can see he is giving us an example. Someone who perhaps relates with McWilliams argument. And this is supported lately after seeing
the outcome of Millers detachment. Such as having the ability to become a more effective writer (par. 3). Now we begin to see the creation of what
could possibly be McWilliams argument. He then steps into what begins to be his idea of gaining back power in his second section, reclaiming
control. His idea consists of understanding the ability to reclaim control from our attention span sucking devices (par. 6) He goes off on a works cited
frenzy, consisting of statements from opposite ends of the issue. Some tech addicts would say there is nothing to worry about (par. 6).
However McWilliams

The Detection Of Crime Has Improved Upon Throughout...
The detection of crime has been improved upon throughout history along with the criminal justice systems. In the 1900s, the amount of crimes
detected was extremely small when compared to the crimes being committed. An example of an undetected crime, at the time, would be fraud. The
action of fraud was just as easy to commit as the action of lying.
In New York, after the civil war, there was an immense amount of wealth within the unclaimed acres of land. It would only take one intelligent man,
who knew the laws of the state, to create a profit out of this opportunity. According to Arther Train, H. Huffman Browne was that intelligent man. A
real estate lawyer, Browne would forge countless documents for personal gain. Browne 's quest for personal gain began when he had discovered a
plot of land leftover by a Swedish immigrant 's death. Browne built his business by being known to sell property at low costs. He knew he could use
this unclaimed land for his advantage. Browne 's plan was to sell the land to the unintelligent civilians, thus insuring no one would check the title for its
background. However, this was not the case for the architect Benjamin Leviton.
Leviton was a very clever man. Leviton knew something was suspicious when Browne offered him the real estate for such a low cost. The next
logically step for Leviton was to seek legal advise from the District attorney. Leviton wanted to make sure he was not being scammed. The Distract
attorney told Leviton to make the

The Role Of God In Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
The Role of God in Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy
In his work Meditations on First Philosophy, published in 1641, RenГ© Descartes sets out to establish a set of indubitable truths for the sciences.
He begins by discarding all of his beliefs, then works to rebuild his beliefs based on careful thought. Descartes clearly states this goal, saying in the
First Meditation, "I will work my way up... I will accomplish this by putting aside everything that admits of the least doubt" (I, 17). He is able to
establish his own existence, but struggles to move beyond his internal thoughts to discuss external objects. Descartes decides that the Christian God is
the bridge he needs to escape the confines of his own mind, and argues for the existence of God in the Third Meditation in order to move on to
discussing the physical world. In this paper I will argue that Descartes' rationalistic project would have been improved without an appeal to the
Christian God, although I will also argue that Descartes thinks this appeal is necessary.
Descartes declares that he will only accept ideas that he can absolutely affirm, but accepts the existence of God without adequately proving it. This
inadequacy undermines his declared project of defining the world in terms of established ideas. He does not sufficiently prove the idea of God, yet
bases so much on it. When he later discusses physical bodies, intellect, and mathematical concepts, the reader cannot forget that everything he writes is

Summary of Deborah Tannen's the Argument Culture Essay
Have we become a world that has forgotten how to listen and debate? Why are people so quick to argue? Everyone wants to prove their point these
days. In "The Argument Culture," Deborah Tannen discusses how today's society no longer honors the noble American tradition of debate. She
explains how we no longer want to take the time to listen to both sides and definitely not all sides of an issue. We have become a society that would
rather fight and argue, often to the point of violence. "The war on drugs, the war on cancer, the battle of the sexes, politicians' turf battles– in the
argument culture war metaphors pervade our talk and shape our thinking," affirms Tannen. We approach the world in an argumentative frame of mind."
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Sadly, the more violent the argument is the more people want to watch it. Tannen believes that much of this breakdown is caused by the lack of people
interacting face to face. She feels that our high tech world infused with social networking, email, cell phones, texting and more has given people a way
to communicate without actually connecting with each other. "The proliferation and increasing portability of technology isolates people in a bubble–"
warns Tannen. "The Argument Culture shapes who we are and has a defining impact on our lives and on our culture." She believes it causes us to
distort facts.
As an example she cites the Nancy Kerrigan–Tonya Harding story. "After the original attack on Kerrigan's knee, news stories focused on the rivalry
between the two skaters instead of portraying Kerrigan as the victim of the attack." Tannen also says it causes us to waste valuable time, as she cites
the case of scientist Robert Gallo, who co–discovered the Aids virus. He was the object of a groundless four year investigation into allegations he had
stolen the virus from another scientist. He was exonerated, but the toll was enormous. In his words, "These were the most painful and horrible years of
my life." So, ultimately Gallo spent four years fighting accusations when he could have been fighting AIDS. Tannen also states that it limits our
thinking and encourages us to lie. "Military metaphors train us to think about and see everything in terms

Acuscan Critical Thinking Case Study
Assignment Overview
Prepare a report for the CEO about this situation in two parts:
Part One: Respond to the specific questions on the worksheet that follows (100 points possible).
Part Two: Write an executive summary for the CEO (100 points possible).
PART ONE:
Use the case materials to complete this assignment.
ANALYSIS
1.Describe one (per instructors change week one) assumptions seen in any documents provided.
a.Kelly В– Through several emails and communications, Kelly assume that there is not enough time to meet the deadline of August for the project.
Even though Pat seems to show that, there is some chance to do so.
b.Pat В– believes that an "Operation Optimization" project needs to be embarked on now to improve the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
b.Pat Lambert В– in the position of marketing has a good grasp of the market place and the economics of their segment. With this information, Pat 's
arguments are sound and logical.
c.Kelly Thomas В– arguments for the most part are emotional and unsound. Kelly seems to view the others are trying to remove power from him.
d.Chris Martinas В– arguments seem to more emotional and some what sound. He is basing a lot on his experience as the VP of product and the
understanding of the market segment and the limitation of the current product.
4.Describe specific fallacious arguments, and identify the people who hold them.
a.There are several in the company that believe that the new product will increase the companies market share and stay in front of their competitors.
The stakeholders for the new product are Chris, Cliff, and Pat. Cliff, being the CEO, has directed the others to venture to other market segments and
position the new product in those markets. There are some in the organization, like Kelly that believe that AcuScan does not have to have a full feature
new product to be released to the market. There are some issues with how Acuscan is going to finance the new product. These concerns are coming
from Cliff.
CONCLUSIONS
5.Describe all problems in this situation.
The largest issue is the deadline that has been imposed by what some inside information about the company 's competitors. This along with economical
issues and reduced budget has

The, Local Agreements, By Appiah
In Appiah's first section, "Local Agreements," he begins with an example from his own culture, about their values and actions concerning incest. This
leads to his first argument, that it is not values which allow people to live in harmony with each other, but rather, the fact that their practices as a result
of different values coincide. For this, he offers several illustrations, including the Muslim leadership of Spain and the Ottoman Empire, which still
managed to include Jewish and Christian communities that lived in relative peace; this was not because they shared religious values, or even that they
had similar reasons for acting in compatible ways, only that their actions allowed them to coexist. This leads to his next example, which is the
Establishment Clause and the first amendment to the constitution, which offers freedom of religion to all people. There are many different reasons and
values which people have that cause them to support this principle, but, in the end, it is not why they support the amendment which produces
consensus in most of America, but, rather, the fact that they act in such a way as to uphold the freedom. That is not to say that Appiah believes values
should therefore be irrelevant when it comes to cohesive harmony between different groups, because he does attest that there are certain "American"
values which most of the population of this country share, at least at the theoretical stage of the value, though they may disagree about the

Art history essay on Adopting an approach
Martin Robertson and Mary Beard's manuscript, Adopting an Approach, focuses on the study of Athenian pottery. The manuscript begins, by
describing Sir John Beazley and his revolutionary method of studying Greek vases. The Beazley Method focuses on the technical conventions of
Greek Vases such as naming the artist, dating the pieces and then grouping them based off of similar characteristics. Beazley "provided for the first
time a comprehensive framework of analysis for Athenian painting, and a way of dating and classifying." (Pg. 16) However, what Beard's main
argument suggests is that it is not the artists that help us understand the importance of the vases because even if a vase is assigned to a specific time
period or artist, there is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This particular kylix is a good example because it shows how the women contradict each other and through this piece we can understand the jobs of
each type of woman and we can speculate how they balanced one another out in Athenian society.
Adopting an Approach has many strong arguments and claims throughout the manuscript. Particularly in the beginning, Beard does a great job of
enticing the assumed college–level reader and relating to that specific audience. She does this when explaining, "understanding the images around us,"
by talking about a French perfume advertisement. By doing this, she relates to the age group that would be reading this manuscript by combining
something that they might be familiar with, to something they are unfamiliar with. Although this is initially a strong way to go about attracting the
reader, it needs to be done at the right moments. On pages fourteen and fifteen, she gives many more unrelated examples, which ultimately, causes the
reader to forget the original point trying to be made. Beard's claim needed to be made quicker, before the reader loses sight of what the article is
about. If this article were to be published in the Undergraduate's Guide to Art History, I would eliminate a lot of the extra examples that aren't
necessary to get

An Age Of Informational Starvation
We are living in an age of informational starvation. People are seeking for something that is attractive and glowing to see on their screens.
Advertisers found that possibility as an opportunity to shine and they had created many different works that promote their products. However, it is
possible to stop on one commercial, which is called Cristiano Ronaldo vs. Rafael Nadal, which is the commercial by Nike, to understand the way they
appeal to the audience. First of all, like any other piece of art, the narrator creates the specific theme that addresses the human eye. That theme provokes
a specific response in human mind, and their thinking provokes the profit if the advertiser was successful. However, the ethos of the current
commercial is obvious – Nike Company is one of the leading industries that deliver sports equipment. Nike represents one of the main "players" in the
sports equipment market. They create rules, and they create trends. Their credibility is outstanding due to the fact that they are constantly doing
different market examinations that concentrate on trend analysis. That is their profit that is why their researches show them evident details about
marketing trends and they have enough money to adjust. Speaking of the logos of the article, it is important to mention that this commercial used the
paradox as the rhetorical device so that it is complex to talk about the logical flow of arguments that they present. Their paradoxical choice figures,
their game

A Lean & Hungry Look Analysis
"That Lean and Hungry Look" – Suzanne Britt Jordan Julius Caesar stated "Yon Cassius has a lean and hungry look, he thinks too much; such men
are dangerous." Cassius' "lean and hungry look" unsettled Julius Caesar, who preferred the company of fat, contented men whom he believed were
more trustworthy and appreciative. When we think of heavier people, we think that they are nice because they have nothing to be mean about and
typical thin people will be stuck up and rude to the heavier person because they do not see that heavier person for who he really is. This is a
stereotype; heavier people are not necessarily jolly, and thin people are not necessarily mean or stuck up. Stereotypical attributes have had a negative
effect on society,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They believe in "goofing off" because the day is too long in their opinion. Jordan also compares the mental attributes of heavy and thin when she talks
about happiness; in "That Lean and Hungry Look", the thin person portrays a bothersome trait, believing logic and 2,000–point plans lead to happiness,
while the fat person is already aware that happiness is indefinable. Jordan uses these kinds of comparisons and contrast between fat and thin in the
article to demonstrate the advantages of being fat that are not seen by most people, for they are under the impression that fat is always unattractive or
unhappy. Thirdly, Jordan article is filled with connotations. This successfully confirms Jordan'sargument that being fat is "better" than being thin.
Jordan's connotations become obvious with her use of the word "fat." She made the word sound acceptable, usually–no, quite always–the word fat has
had a negative connotation, but she was able to use it and make it feel positive and, even a little bit, righteous. When Jordan says things like, "Fat
people have room. Fat people will take you in" it makes the audience root for the fat person rather than the thin person, because the fat person seems
more approachable, which supports Jordan's main argument. Another effective connotation used by Jordan would have to be her use of the word
"thin." In this article,

Logical Fallacies Exercise
Answers to fallacy exercise, Part 2. I.Identify the fallacies of sufficiency committed by the following arguments, givВing a brief explanation for your
answer. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy."1 1. The Daily News carried an article this morning about three local teenagers who were
arrested on charges of drug possession. Teenagers these days are nothing but a bunch of junkies. Hasty Generalization– not enough examples. 2. If a
car breaks down on the freeway, a passing mechanic is not obligated to render emergency road service. For similar reasons, if a person suffers a heart
attack on the street, a passing physician is not obligated to render emergency medical assistance. Weak Analogy– a physician has taken an oath to...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That means no more chicken Kiev or prime rib. Next it will be worms and insects. This will lead to the decimation of our agricultural industry. The
starvation of the human race will follow close behind. Straw Man. The real issue (that dogs, cats, and dolphins have rights) is exaggerated and the
exaggeration is used to discredit the real issue. 13. No one would buy a pair of shoes without trying them on. Why should anyone be expected to
get married without premarital sex? Analogy. The issue here is whether trying on a pair of shoes is a good analogy for sex. It has the similarity of
someone trying something before they decide whether they like it or not. But it has major weaknesses; sex involves another person, not just an
inanimate object; sex involves caring for the feelings of the other person, while wearing shoes does not involve caring for the feelings of the shoes;
and studies have shown that trying sex before marriage has no real connection with the level of sexual satisfaction within marriage. 14. No one has
proved conclusively that America's nuclear power plants constitute a danger to people living in their immediate vicinity. Therefore, it is perfectly safe
to continue to build nuclear power plants near large metropolitan centers. Appeal to ignorance. 15. There are more churches in New York City than in
any other city in the nation, and more crimes are

Tips for Writing a Discursive Essay
Discursive Essay
A discursive essay is an article that talks about a topic that is controversial in nature. This type of essay intends to present the issues both sides of the
argument. However, it is important that the writer also explain why he has chosen to side with one argument and provide the logic behind it.Writing a
discursive essay is a good way to develop the logical skills of the writer while maintaining a sound skill to anticipate the arguments of the other side
and possibly counter it with the same logical explanation.
Here are the ways to write a discursive essay: * Write the first paragraph. This one should be the introduction of the main topic that you want to serve as
the argument platform. A discursive essay is... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the techniques which can help you to achieve this effectively is the use of linking words. These words are usually used at the beginning of a
new paragraph but can also be used to link ideas within a paragraph.
Same line of thought
e.g. – and, firstly, secondly etc., next, furthermore, likewise, in addition, similarly, also, moreover. Conclusion/summary
e.g. – thus, therefore, consequently, accordingly, in retrospect, hence, in conclusion, in brief, as a result. Definite statement
e.g. – without question, without doubt, unquestionably, absolutely. Contrasting idea
e.g. – yet, on the other hand, nevertheless, however, although, conversely, otherwise, on the contrary.
Further examples because, for instance, since, for example, so that, despite the fact that, accordingly, although, if, though, unless.
Formal Tone in a Discursive Essay
It is important when you write a discursive essay to write in a proper formal way. You should not use an informal style to write a discursive essay. In
simple terms, this means the

The Dreaming Argument And The Evil Demon Argument
Descartes organised his ideas on knowledge and skepticism to establish two main arguments, the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. The
dreaming argument suggests that it is not possible to distinguish between having a waking experience and dreaming an experience. Whereas, the evil
demon argument suggests that we are deceived in all areas of our experiences by an evil demon. This essay will investigate the validity of the
arguments and to what extent the conclusion of these arguments is true. The soundness and the extent to which the premises are true will also be
explored. After evaluating these arguments it will be concluded that the dreaming argument is valid, but is not sound. Whereas, the evil demon argument
is both valid and sound.
In his First Meditation (Feinberg & Shafer–Landau, 2001) Descartes explored his ideas regarding knowledge and skepticism, which led to him
developing ideas based around the certainty of his experiences. From this he developed his first argument: the dreaming argument.
The dreaming argument was based upon the idea that both waking and sleeping (dreaming) experiences can be very similar, and that distinguishing
between the two may not be possible. This led to Descartes doubting that waking experiences are actually infact waking experiences and not dreams.
Descartes developed this argument and claimed that in order to be certain of any experiences, we have to be certain that we are not dreaming.
However, Descartes continued and

Children Of Men : Alfonso Cuaron 's Courage
Vishal Patel
Prof. Hartlen
Writing about Film (English BXE)
November 27, 2015
Children of Men: Alfonso CuarГіn's Courage to Showcase a Powerless Society
The year is 2027 and the world is being redefined by a year long infertility crises that threatens the human race. Gangs form the innocents while the
elderly desperately lineup for government sponsored euthanasia: Quietus. The United Kingdom, being the only stable nation, is under a refugee
crisis of people fleeing the chaos that has taken out around the world. This situation resembles a lot to Nazi Germany and also what has been current
in news these days. Nicole L. Sparling writes in her article, "Without a Conceivable Future" published in 2014, "As it is set in a world without a
'conceivable' future, Children of Men, I contend, when understood through the lens of science fiction, reveals the crises of representation embodied in
biopolitical figures, such as bare life, and exposes serious implications for re–productive, civil, and human rights. Such an aesthetic, I argue,
transfigures the concepts of nation, hope, and futurity and their symbolic weight on actual bodies within the world of the film" (160). This statement
draws his attitude toward the film which is multilayered and genially arranged by director Alfonso CuarГіn.
The film tries to convey a state of urgent for humans to take action and gain control of our ill planet. CuarГіn effectively achieves to convey this
message by creating a dystopian world where

Socrates 's Argument At 30a B Of The Apology
Essay #1 In this paper I will argue that Socrates's argument at 30a–b of the Apology that the best possible state of the soul is the most important thing
in life means to eliminate false beliefs and to have virtue. Specifically, I will show why Socrates wants to eliminate false beliefs and why he insist on
having virtue is important in life. Then I will demonstrate why Socrates' argument is incorrect because he fails to identify the true catalyst that drives his
happiness. I conclude Socrates's reasoning behind his arguments are logical and sound, however he made the mistake of thinking that whatever drives
his happiness will drive others as well.
To understand Socrates' remark at 30a–b of the Apology that the best possible state of the soul is the most important thing in life, one must examine
the center stage of which the Apology takes place. The Apology is set at the jury when Meletus accuses Socrates of corrupting the young and being
an atheist. This leads to Socrates proclaiming his belief in life, which is to live the life of a philosopher, to examine [himself] and others, [he] had
abandoned [his] post for fear of death or anything else (29a). Socrates further elaborates the idea of being a philosopher is to repeatedly self–examine
and eliminate all false beliefs in life, which will eventually lead to an excellent soul. The connection between philosophizing and having an excellent
soul is made when Socrates conducted his own investigation by questioning reputable

Analysis Of ' A Lot Can Be Learned About Rhetoric, And The...
A lot can be learned about rhetoric by looking at these two articles: "5 Charts That Show Sexism Is Still Alive and Well in Gaming" and "The
Integrity of Women and Gender Studies". One portrays the gaming community as sexist and underrepresenting women (Kleeman) while the other
condemns modern feminism for treating women as victims and "vilifying" men (Frohlich). The first uses many logical arguments that are used to
bring emotion to the reader, and make them feel like certain things are ethically wrong (Kleeman). The second uses a slightly different technique,
since it is explicitly an opinion piece (Frohlich). It leads the author to be trusted by the reader, and then presents the author's opinions that are
backed by logical arguments (Frohlich). It also causes the reader to experience emotional and ethical feelings (Frohlich). 5 Charts That Show
Sexism Is Still Alive and Well in Gaming This text is published by a media company called Mic. Their target audience is young people and they
cover a wide variety of subjects such as News, Arts, and Technology (Mic /about). The author of this article is Sophie Kleeman, who, according to her
profile on Mic.com, covers the "intersection of tech and culture" (Mic /profiles/152573/sophie–kleeman) The first section of the article (first four
paragraphs) introduces the topic by providing examples women in gaming being harassed (Kleeman). The first paragraph specifies several specific
names: Anita Sarkeesian, Zoe Quinn, and Brianna Wu

Essay Topics for CPHL 550
Essay Topics for CPHL 550– Knowledge, Truth and Belief "Plan your work, work your plan". – Vince Lombardi General Instructions Make sure to
consult the Basic Style Guidelines Document and the Tips for Writing an Effective CPHL 550 Essay Document in order to confirm the details for each
assignment (both the minor and the major essay) especially with respect to the minimal length requirement. Since there is no final exam in this course,
your essay assignments need to be treated with the same attention and effort (or perhaps even more attention and effort) that you would give to an
in–class final exam. It takes research, planning, contemplation and above all an adequate amount of time in order to make sure that you have the
opportunity to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
5. If you have decided to pick one of the topics below for your major essay you do not have to get this topic approved by me. The exception to this is if
you decide to change or modify the examples presented here; if this is the case, then your topic choice needs to be approved as if it were a new topic
choice (see above). Note – Possible scenario: "I forgot to check my essay topic with my instructor and the deadline is a week away – what do I do
now?" Answer: since you only need to send one proposal for your major essay (minor topics are assigned) and since the deadline for this
assignment is about 10 weeks away from the start of this course, this should be an extremely rare occurrence, but if this is your predicament then
you have two options, a risky option and a safe option: Risky option: send your topic to me and I'll try to get an approval to you within 48 hours or
sooner, but even if you don't hear from me within 48 hours – start working on your essay anyway, if for no other reason than to get it in on time before
the deadline. Please be aware that the risk you run in doing this is that if you write on a topic that fails to satisfy the criteria presented in points 2 and
3 above – your essay will probably receive a lower mark depending on how far you stray from these guidelines.
CPHL 550 – Page 2
Safe Option: simply pick a topic from the list of approved topics below (that you haven't written on already) and write on it –

Gender And Sexuality As A Category For Historical Analysis
For years, many scholars have provided many discussions over the topic of gender and sexuality. However, one needs to ask themselves: Are these
two topics, gender and sexuality, useful as a category for historical analysis? The articles written by both Joan W. Scott and Afsaneh Najmabadi,
answer such a question. By critically examining and assessing their two article, can the usefulness of gender and sexuality as a category for historical
analysis be proven.
In "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis," Joan W. Scott provides many angles to explore the relevancy of gender. The first thing that
needs to be examined is her argument. The main argument that Joan W. Scott is trying to make is how beneficial to history using gender as a
category for analysis would turn out. Another factor that needs to be made in assessing her article is how she presents her argument and findings.
Scott formats her article with a beginning, middle, and end. She begins by defining "gender," and how that term has been used in general. She goes
on to describe some of the theories that have analyzed gender. The next part that she explains is how, of late, politics has been coincided with the
analysis of gender. Finally, she ends her paper by providing her bottom–line opinion about the analysis and approach of gender.
Now with the structure of her paper in mind, the next important assessment is in the sources she uses. The sources that Joan Scott utilizes in her
argument are mostly

Case Study for Acuscan, Inc Essay
Critical Case Study Assignment
Maurine Shaughnessy
GEN/480
Paul C. Moretti, M.B.A.
September 12, 2006
I am the newly hired Vice President of Organizational Development. My responsibilities include creating the Organizational Development Department.
I look forward to working with all of you especially with finding a new and improved product based on our already developed retinal scanning system
iScanner. First of all I am going to discuss assumptions made by Kelly Thomas, Pat Lambert, Cliff O'Connor and Chris Martinas. After each employee
assumptions will be their arguments and my evaluation of whether the argument is sound or unsound and why.
Kelly Thomas В– Senior Engineer, Product Development
1. Assumed that Pat, Director of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2. Assumed programmers had plenty of time to work on new product even though he knew staff was cut last year.
3. Assumed because they were not agreeing with him they were not committed to the new product.
4. Assumed that the job could be done by outside contractors in the specified time frame. Also with money being a problem.
5.Assumed a meeting would resolve all problems.
6.Assumed the customer would be happy with whatever product was developed and launched.
7.Assumed Kelly was being a "smart ass" because he questioned his knowledge about QC.
Pat argued that the scanner needed to be launched in retail, not banks or other easy markets. He also argued with Chris, Kelly's manager, that Kelly
informed him that it would not be a problem to expand the iScanner. Another argument he made is he had bigger problems than to listen to than
answering other questions presented by other staff members. Pats decision to launch a new product in a new market was sound. To be the first
company on the market with a new product to get ahead of your competitors is a good market strategy. His idea to use an outside contractor was
unsound because we are already in a budget deficit and there is now guarantee that the contractor would have the product completed in time. His
statement about having bigger problems than to answer questions from other staff members was an emotional one. I think he felt nobody wanted to
work with

Essay about Michael MooreвЂ™s Capitalism: A Love Story
Michael Moore used comical tactics as a way to appeal to his audience in this piece of literature. Michael Moore's argument is that capitalism is
destroying the nation's economy rather than helping to develop it. The poor are suffering, while the richer are getting richer. The arguments that Moore
used may not be considered tangible by all, but he definitely did have the evidence to support his argument. Michael Moore purpose was to expose this
ground breaking issue of the dominance of corporate America through video. He used the web source as a source to get his message across because
he knew the internet would be accessible to many people. Moore in this film used the different elements of reasoning to identify the message he was
sending ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Michael Moore believed that the money that the Government used to bail out the banks could have put to better use. The government took the
American's hard worked money to bail out the banks, as well for their personal benefits. Michael Moore went to some extreme measure to help the
people, such as placing yellow tape around some federal building such as JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and so forth, sending a message to the
banks that people wanted their money back. Moore, himself went on behalf of the American people to confront the individuals of corporate America.
Moore's argument was solid and had evidence to support his argument. Another firm argument that he had was thatcapitalism was not helping out
nation or economy, but it was only making the middle class and the poor people suffer. Michael could not figure out why the economy was in such
shambles when people were still paying their taxes. Michael decided to do some more research and found that a judge was handing out long term
juvenile sentences under false pretense. For example, a young found smoking pot the judge ordered the teenager to serve four months, but instead of
serving four months she spent almost a year. Michael did some more digging and found that the longer the juveniles stay locked the money goes into
the private jail owners pocket. Although some would say that the film seemed

Essay about Argument and Natural Selection
1. "I like the rain. Some people will tell you that the sun is the best, but they are wrong. What waits for you in the sun? Skin cancer. What waits for
you in the rain? Puddles to jump in. I'll take puddles over cancer any day." Tell me as much as you can about this passage as an argument
(especially the parts). p1. Sun will bring skin cancer. p2. Rain will bring puddles that we can jump. p3: Pain is bad, joy is good. If a thing causes
more good things than bad things, then it is better. p4: If A is better than B, then we should like A. p5. Puddles are better than skin cancer because it
creates more joy than pain.
Conclusion: I like rain better.
2. Find an argument from an external source (make sure to tell me where it is from). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Its strengths are that it allows me to pursuit my goal selfishly without worrying about others, and it allows me to provide a simple theory for many
phenomena in the world. Its weaknesses are that I care too much about my wants and needs without considering others' needs and wants, and the model
ignores other fundamental motives like parental cares, self–esteem, belonging, and etc.
4. Tell me about a model that you have not internalized. What are its strengths/weaknesses?
A model that I have not internalized is the belief that a person should find their own love instead of obeying his or her parents' arrangement. A
strength of this model is that people can follow their dreams and have freedom. A weakness of this model is that people are usually driven by their
sexual drives while ignoring many important factors when it comes to marriage (personality, family background and etc.). Parents often have more
experiences and thus are more objective when choosing a mate.
5. Tell me about a way that people around you have influenced your thinking for the better.
When I discuss something of which I am certain with people who held different opinions, they sometime provides counter examples or reasons that I
haven't thought of, which makes me reconsider my thoughts more closely.
6. Tell me about a way that people around you have influenced your thinking for the worse.
When I discuss something that I am

The Declaration Of Independence : Argument And Persuasion...
The Declaration of Independence was written for the purpose of separating the American colonies from the British Empire. In context of history, The
Declaration was the first step into a modern representative democracy. In addition, the makers of the declaration, primarily Thomas Jefferson,
constructed an argument to state the problems they had with Britain and tell how the new American government was going to deal with the problems.
The argument Jefferson constructed was one made with all the wrong evidence; however, he built the argument in such a way to rally a people for
war. The Declaration of Independence is a well–written example of argument and persuasion with its use of structure as a whole, use of specific
fallacies, and use of appeals.
Foremost, when looking at the Declaration there needs to be an understanding of who the audience is. The most prominent person who would be
reading this document would be the king himself, King George III. When looking at the Declaration, King George would primarily be looking at the
argument Jefferson put forth. He also would be looking at the attacks and accusations being set against him. The purpose of the Declaration, with the
King for an audience, is to separate all legal and moral ties. In the newly formed American government, Congress would be looking at what they were
setting themselves up for and placing forth the foundation of their government. Congress's purpose for writing the Declaration was to start a
government and

Pillow Method Paper
Pillow Method Paper
The pillow method is a five–step process used to resolve a disagreement or enable two people to gain understanding from a disagreement. The
process involves each individual to look at the problem through five different perspectives. These steps or perspectives include: "I'm right you're
wrong", "You're right I'm wrong", "both right both wrong", "this issue isn't important", and "the truth is in all perspectives" (Alder & Proctor, p.
104). The purpose of the pillow method is for each person to gain insight from each step in the process. By looking at the problem from multiple
perspectives each person gets the chance to enhance their cognitive complexity (Alder & Proctor, p. 104). In this paper I ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Guns are a major problem in our society and the numbers of these gun–related murders are continuing to rise. On top of the murders you also have
people losing their lives through misfire and gun–related suicides. The total death toll of all gun–related deaths averages over 30,000 per year in the
U.S. (http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2013/03/07/u–s–gun–deaths–visualizing–the–numbers/). I believe that enforcing stricter gun laws will contribute
to getting these numbers lower. The numbers do not lie, we as a society have a problem with gun–violence and we need to do something to fix it.
"You're right I'm wrong": This step in the pillow method requires me to look at the problem from my co–workers point of view while trying to find the
flaws in my own argument (Alder & Proctor, p. 104). Switching perspectives, I can see my coworker's point on how introducing new gun laws can
lead to a slippery slope. There is always the chance that the enforcement of new gun laws could not have a significant affect on the rate of gun–related
deaths in our country. This also could lead to tougher laws being put in place until we reach the point were guns are banned all together. If guns were
to be banned all together, it would put law–abiding citizens at risk of criminals who disregard the law. It would put Americans citizens at risk of
martial law

God Is Omnipotent And Can Not Make Evil Good

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Leslie Daniels

More from Leslie Daniels (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

God Is Omnipotent And Can Not Make Evil Good