Differences Of State Constitution Vs. United States...

Differences Of State Constitution Vs. United States...
In my humble opinion, State Constitutions should differ from the United States Constitution, as it
gives a deeper sense of independence and corresponds to the needs of that particular state. The
Declaration of Independence is a prime example of independence, as though I concur that each state
is to be shadowed by the United States Constitution. You cannot anticipate what benefits a society
within a state that borders the ocean will be beneficial to a state surrounded by mountains, as
common sense allows us to determine the economic and geological demands will differ to a degree
as well as people's beliefs. Some people are vegetarians and others are avid hunters, and the scope is
really too broad to categorize this volume of diversity under one constitution. From religion to what
makes an economy function, one constitution cannot "blanket" an entire nation and everything run
like clockwork. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule was adopted, but as a law enforcement officer, it is hard to
digest when a suspect is cleared of a crime and the evidence proved differently. Mapp v. Ohio made
all evidence inadmissible in state court when a violation of the Constitution has occurred, based on
the Justices interpretation (Hall, 2015). The evidence that surrounds why law enforcement was
present and engaged the way they did seems irrelevant, so the differences between State
Constitution and the United States Constitution is somewhat like a double edge sword. The United
States Constitution overruled the State Constitution, as it should, but the outcome has to be
respected by everyone that lives in the United States of America, regardless of the like and dislikes
of the final
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Main Functions Of A State 's Constitution
The constitution is a written document by which the state is run or operated. It is extremely
significant as it sets the foundation and provides the fundamental instructions on how the local
government and the people ought to function. The four functions of a state's constitution is to state
where the power of political institutions originate from, assign powers, construct a system where
checks and balance is put in place within the government, and sets the limits of political power. To
sum it up, it "spells out the [state's] basic political principles and goals, institutional arrangements,
modes of selecting public officials, and rights and duties of private citizens."( Murphy)
The Texas constitution echoes certain ideas from the US ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
art.II, sec.1) The functions and responsibilities of each department is further addressed and
explained. In order to prevent any chance of tyrannical actions against the people of the state by
political institutions it states that "no person, or collection of persons, being of one of these
departments, shall exercise any power properly attached to either of the others, except in the
instances herein expressly permitted."(Texas Const. art.II)
Although these principles are shown in the constitution, some are more reflected than others. The
principle least reflected is federalism which in the case of a state's constitution, the federal
constitution should take priority over the state's. In the US Constitution, such idea is known as the
Supremacy clause. The Texas constitution does not heavily divulge in this principle. It only states in
article 1 section 1 that Texas, as a free and independent state, is "subject only to the Constitution of
the United States." This could be interpreted as that the federal constitution precedes Texas's
constitution in the case where the state law or legislature is not in accordance to that of the federal.
A bill that has been signed by Texas has been a focus of controversies. The abortion bill demands a
list of health regulations that abortion clinics are required to adhere to. The demands are that
abortion would be prohibited 20 weeks after fertilization, and also

The Constitution Of The United States
Abaft every country in the world is a set of rules and regulations that is the substratum for that
country. A Constitution can be defined as a document that is the substratum of the country's
principles. Elements in the Constitution may contain sundry information. Which can include: how
many terms a leader may serve, what rights the citizens have, how the judicial system works, etc.
The United States in no different from those countries. Every constitution is different, no country
has the exact constitution as another. The U.S Constitution is a four–page document detailing how
to country is governed. Not only that, but the Constitution states what rights citizens gain at birth.
Although the Constitution has been used to make important changes throughout U.S history, many
people are still oblivious to the document, and through analyzing the Constitution citizens can see
the changes the document has made on society.
Study
The U.S Constitution is a very important document for the United States. Not only does the U.S
Constitution give rudimental guidelines of our country, but also guarantees rudimental rights for
citizens of the United States. Nicknamed "The Supreme Law of the Land" the Constitution can be
described as the backbone of our country. However, most people of our country do not know most
of the information contained in the Constitution or sometimes what the Constitution is. According to
a survey conducted by ABC news, seventy percent of Americans could not name what

The Constitution Of The United States Essay
The Constitution of the United States, specifically the Bill of Rights, guarantees and protects the
rights of individual citizens. In addition to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to
keep and bear arms, individuals have the freedom to assemble and the freedom to petition. More
importantly, is the protection from unreasonable search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishment,
self–incrimination, and the deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
(United States Constitution, n.d.). Are these rights, however, afforded to those individuals who
choose to disobey the laws of the land? Incarcerated individuals do have rights and privileges. In
fact, when an individual is taken into custody, possible legal issues can arise, governmental liability
surfaces, and attention must be given to the rights and privileges of the imprisoned individual. With
that being said, it is important to note that while imprisonment of criminals has been a fundamental
aspect of our country's justice system, the methods and practices associated with it have changed
over time. Several issues take place when the government takes custody of an individual based on
due process rights. To begin, when an individual is taken into custody, each person must be read his
or her Miranda rights based on the 1966 Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona (Chronology,
n.d.). Protecting those being arrested from self–incrimination is the purpose of reading the Miranda

The Constitution And Its Effects On The United States
The constitution was the secound type of government on the Untited States.It 's a document that
explains, how the government should act; what it can do and can 't do. The constitution is divided
into seven articles. Article one establishes the legislative branch. It talks about "the necessary and
proper clause" which means that congress has the power to pass any law that is necessary. It
explains expressed powers and implied powers. Expressed powers are the power to tax, to raise an
army and a navy, power to coin and to regulate inter state commerce. Power to impeach and remove
the President, Supreme Court justices and federal judges for treason, bribery and other high crimes
and misdemeanors, Senate confirmation of treaties, Senate ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records and
proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof." Privileges and Immunities Clause "The citizens
of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States."
Article five talks about the process of amending an amendment. Article six talks about the
supremacy clause. States that in any case where there is a conflict between state law and national
law, the Constitution or federal treaties, the latter shall take precedence over the former. Article
seven talks about the approval by conventions of nine of the states was required to ratify the
Constitution. The bill of rights are the first ten amendments of the constitution. The bill of rights
was made to try to protect everyones rights and freedom. amendment one allows to freely exercise
any religion. to express themselves by allowing us the freedom of speech and to peacefully
assemble. The secound amendement guarantees the right to bear arms. The Third Amendment
makes it illegal and unconstitutional to allow soldiers to temporarily reside in private homes during
peace time without the permission of the owner. The only time it is legally allowed to have soldiers
live in private homes without the permission of the owner is during wartime. The Fourth protects
citizens from unreasonable seizures and searches. The Fifth Amendment protects against double
jeopardy,

The Constitution And The United States
Throughout the Texas Government course, varies topics of Texas has been searched. There are fifty
states in United States. Each state has constitutions, laws and government. There are some
similarities and differences between the states. Although Texas is one of the biggest states in the
United States, the question is Texas is the strongest state. There will be three areas that will be
discussed, the constitution, the style of government and the immigration laws of both states. The
first topic is the constitution, in order to understand the each state, a focus on the beginning should
be addressed.
Constitution
The fundamental and entrenched rules that govern an organization 's conduct, nation–state and
establish its concept, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A lengthy document is most likely easy to be misunderstood by many people. Although Maryland 's
constitution is also lengthy, it is not as long as that of Texas though it is still longer than the average
state. For both the Texas and Maryland 's constitutions they are unorganized, and some sections are
difficult to understand. According to Maryland Government, the Constitution of Maryland has been
amended over 200 times and the most recent was in 2010. (Maryland Government).
Judicial Election remains the strength of the Texas Constitution. In Texas, judges are elected. In
Texas, the justice system is the people's will. In many states and nations, the judges are appointed.
This is done through the governor's office which leads to a similar thinking where a person can or
cannot get a fair trial. Governors in Maryland appoint the judges.
In conclusion due to low voter turnout both the Texas and Maryland constitutions are difficult to
amend. Constitutional amendments are displayed to the public to vote on as according to law. The
biennial session the part–time legislature is allowed is 140 days. (Sandoval). It is very difficult to
hear every amendment to the constitution considering the size of Texas. If the constitution is hard to
understand, long and difficult to amend, how will this affect the style of government?
Style of Government
In Texas, the home–rule city and the general–law city are the two types of

The United States Constitution And The Rights Of The...
The United States Constitution is a document that embodies the fundamental laws and principles by
which the United States is governed, sets limits on what the government can and cannot do, as well
as defines the natural rights, liberties, and freedoms of American citizens. It is arguably, the most
important document ever crafted in American history and the one document that affects every single
citizen within the United States every single day. It is thanks to this document that the United States
citizens can enjoy the freedoms that they hold today, which are outlined in the bill of rights, as well
as ensuring the citizens a fair form of government through a system of checks and balances, which
guarantees that the government cannot bare qualities of tyranny, corruption, and ineptitude. For
example, natural rights such as the freedom of speech, which is the first amendment in the bill of
rights of the constitution, ensures that the citizens of a government have a voice in government
policy and procedures by allowing them to participate in political discussion, to voice their opinions
through debate, and to express their content or discontent with a government official or policy, as
well as laying the foundation for all other freedoms and rights. The Constitution also prevents the
government from becoming too powerful or tyrannical through the separation of powers, as well as
places limitations on the powers of the government through provisions such as the Establishment

The Constitution was signed over 200 years ago and it still stands as the single most important
document in the history of the United States because it laid the groundwork for at the rights and
liberties that we enjoy today. This document created a government comprised of three equal parts;
the Executive, the Legislative and the Judicial branch. This ensured that no one branch had more
power than the others; a system of checks and balances with each having a specific role which
collectively formed the laws we follow today, while at the same time setting limits for the
government itself.
Prior to the Constitution being signed, the United States was a country comprised of thirteen
colonies that were free to create their own laws under The Articles of Confederation but could not
enforce those laws. That left people yearning for a more organized and accountable form of
government. Just as in those times, people today want to know that they are guaranteed certain
inevitable rights that will not be taken away.
The United States of America was founded on the principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness. Although happiness is not guaranteed, we do have the freedom to live our lives freely
and to go after what we feel is happiness as it relates to our lives. When our founding fathers met,
they put together a paper that physically brought life to a new government. They all had varying
thoughts and ideas of how this new government would operate. This created much

The Constitution And The United States
The Constitution was written with one principal issue in mind: factions. This central point of tension
within any government has remained a founding principle in the United States, and a strong national
government is the answer to this issue. By creating a representative and balanced national core the
country is given the best chances to avoid tyranny. While these ideals have worked well in the
United States, the Constitution has fallen short of its original goals. Control of the US is now placed
in a two party system, and too often in corporate control, both factions inadequately checked by the
current system. A document rooted in 200 year old ideology has seen its time come and go, and
today the nation needs a new base, founded on the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Madison postulates that a larger national government will more effectively prevent tyranny for two
reasons. He states first that "representatives must be raised to a certain number, in order to guard
against the cabals of a few". With only a limited number of representatives, the ability for a faction
to take control is greater. Increased diversity with in the deciding body is necessary to protect
against these dangers. He also states that a larger pool of voters can prevent unethical swaying of
elections, and therefore prevent tyranny. Another view presented in The Federalist Papers was the
necessity of a cumbersome government. An expedient government is one in which laws can be
changed quickly, and one in which justice is easily avoided. An example can be taken from the
Committee of Public Safety during the French revolution. Here, expediency was great and tyranny
the result. The constitution addresses the controlling of faction specifically. The system's aim is to
create a cumbersome, checked government that will prevent a faction control. The principle method
employed to achieve this end is to divide powers, and to create a system of checks and balances to
insure that each power achieves their designated role within the whole of the government. The
powers outlined being the legislative, the executive, and the judicial; each piece checking the others.
Take, for example, the legislative

United States Constitution
Novus Ordoro Seclorum is Latin for "a new order for the ages." Why did Americans select the
constitutional order they did in 1787–1789, and why did they reject a more democratic and
confederal form not more than a decade old? "Having initially hesitated in attending the
Convention, once decided, Washington pushed the delegates to adopt 'no temporizing expedient' but
instead to 'probe the defects [of the Articles] to the bottom, and provide radical cures,'" from
Matthew Spalding, Ph.D. At the beginning of the Philadelphia debates in 1787, Edmond Randolph
set aside the Articles of Confederation and the Congress of Confederation, and instead created the
skeleton of a new constitution which included a Supreme National Government with ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The delegates wisely choose the chance of good. Considered at the Philadelphia Convention was a
Confederate government, the system from Articles of Confederation. One of many problems under a
confederacy is a weak federal government. From Generation Joshua, "It must be understood that the
Articles of Confederation were really just an agreement between friends, a gentlemen's agreement...
The Confederation Congress was a shadow, while the true power rested with the individual states."
Instead of the federal government being able to do their job, the states ran the country. The
government was inhibited by its inability to govern. The states were being governed, not the people,
so the government was not doing its job, to govern the people, instead, it was governing the states. .
James Madison says, "One characteristic, was that in a federal Government, the power was
exercised not on the people individually; but on the people collectively, on the States." However, the
biggest problem is that it simply did not work. Edmond Randolph, a delegate to the Philadelphia
Convention from Virginia, says "I lament the crisis that revising the federal system has brought
about, but I believe that it is necessary to prevent the fulfillment of the prophecies of an imminent
American downfall

The United States Constitution
The Constitution The Constitution is the foundation of the United States Government. Each branch
of the government relies upon this document to dictate how power is distributed in this democracy
and the people rely on the Constitution to protect them from the Federal government's power.
Before the Constitution the colonies were divided under the governance of the Articles of
Confederation. This first government was adequate through the Revolutionary War but afterwards
the people needed union and a strong central government. The need for a government spurred men
into action and the Constitutional Convention was called to develop this much needed strong central
government. These men were known as the Framers of the constitution. Unfortunately not all was
good at the convention. There was much debate about the way the legislative branch between the
Virginia plan and the New jersey Plan and the debate was resolved with the Connecticut
compromise. There were many more debates over things great and small but one of the most
important was the debate between the Federalists and anti–Federalists about the ratification of the
constitution and including a Bill of Rights which guarantees the people's rights and protections
therein. The combination of these many factors created the Constitution as it is known today, a
strong central "trunk to the United State's "tree" that will grow new branches over time and let
others fall to fit the needs of the people resting under its protective

In this world we live in the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States is very important.
Without the Amendments Constitution to protect us, the citizens our rights, this world would be very
hard to live in. I am glad that the Constitution is around and available, thanks to our Founding
Fathers, we have a rulebook for almost everything we can think of. To me, the most important part
of the Constitution is the Amendments, as it should be there to protect us the citizens. My focus on
this essay is our Second Amendment, to find out the real meaning of it and our rights. I am here to
dissect the real meaning of the second Amendment "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the
security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". What
does the statement really mean? How are we protected by the Second Amendment? Was the Second
Amendment made for us in mind or for the government's own protection? That's what this research
paper is all about, I'm here to find out everything and anything I can. According to the Keeping the
Republic textbook, the founders did not pass the Amendment for the concerns of our freedom. On
Page 140 of the textbook, it shows a breakdown of what they exactly had in mind. It shows that the
government created the Bill of Rights political documents more of fear that a powerful national
government will coercive power of the state for it's own end. So yes, we have our Amendments, but
there is always

The Constitution Of The State Of Texas
The Constitution of the State of Texas is the document representing the structure and function of the
Texas government. The current Constitution took effect on February 15, 1876 and is the sixth
Constitution in the history of Texas. When first constructed, the Texas Constitution was a poorly
organized document that did not explain clearly the responsibility for government actions. Since its
conception (through June 2011), there have been 646 proposed amendments and 476 adopted
amendments added to this document. The Texas Constitution is also highly restrictive; it only grants
enumerated powers to the State of Texas and does not allow for implied powers. The constant
change to this Constitution has added to its poor organized condition that is extremely difficult to
understand, even by the courts. The amendment process for the Texas Constitution is basic in that,
there is only one way to propose and ratify an amendment. A two–thirds majority vote of both the
Houses is required to propose an amendment and ratification is executed through a statewide public
vote. Once an amendment 's proposed, the legislature sets a date for the election of the proposed
amendment. . Before the election takes place, it is mandated that at least three months out from the
vote all counties in Texas must publish the proposed amendment once a week for four weeks in a
newspaper. Once it is time to vote, general elections are used (whenever possible) throughout the
state to avoid the expense of

The Constitution of the United States
The Constitution of the United States took many years of controversy to establish. The final
Constitution set up a government based on the system of checks and balances. This Constitution
consists of three branches, the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial. Powers given to each
branch help keep any individual branch from taking over.
The first Constitution was called the Articles of Confederation. It was drafted by the Continental
Congress in 1776 and approved in 1777 as the American Revolution was in motion. This was not
too long after the Declaration of Independence was ratified in 1776, and the Articles of
Confederation became ratified 5 years later in 1781, a little before the Battle of Yorktown, which
effectively ended the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An event in 1787 finally brought these problems to a head. It was Shays' Rebellion, a rebellion led
by a former captain in the Continental army, Daniel Shays of Massachusetts. After risking his life to
fight for his country, Shays had come home to his farm, only to find himself in court for
nonpayment of debts. Seeing that he was not alone in this injustice, he gathered together a group,
made up of mostly farmers and attempted to take over a federal arsenal. Their goal was to Reform
the state government. The rebellion lasted nearly a year, and the federal government did not have the
power to stop it. Finally the state militia managed to catch the rebels off guard and the rebellion
ended. Shay and many of his followers managed to escape, and eventually they were pardoned. This
rebellion made it clear that the federal government had no power, and the Constitutional Convention
was arranged.
The Constitutional Convention had a total of 55 delegates from every state but Rhode Island.
George Washington, originally not planning to go, became unanimously elected the Convention's
president. At first their plan was to refine the Articles of Confederation, but after about a week of
debate, they decided to simply write a whole new constitution. The convention lasted four months,
during which the doors of the Pennsylvania state house remained closed to all but the delegates.
Many heated debates occurred in that state

In 1787 the Constitution of the United States was written and ratified to better that time period.
Many people believe that the Constitution was an excellent tool in previous years but, it is no longer
relevant to today's society. Others disagree, they think that the United States Constitution is still
applicable to today's American citizens. The Constitution is significant to American life, it protects
each individual's rights, limits the federal government's power, and amendments can be added to
accommodate new practices, if necessary. While this document was created two hundred twenty –
eight years ago, it is what allows everyone to live their lives freely. On May 25, 1787 delegates from
each of the thirteen states attended a meeting. This assembly was known as the Constitutional
Convention, and it was located in the State House of Pennsylvania. The long a rigorous task of
developing a stronger government began. Edmund S. Morgan states, "After meeting on ninety–
seven days from May 25 to September 17, 1787, the convention submitted a new plan of
government to the states for their approval or rejection," (Morgan, on creating the U.S.
Constitution). Morgan claims, "It had been an arduous and contentious process, sustained through
debate and compromiseand the realization that failure to revise or replace the moribund Articles of
Confederation could doom the new nation..." (Morgan, Commentary of Delegates & Observers).
Even George Washington had concerns that the new plan

The United States And Uk Constitution
"The "Separation of powers" refers to the idea that the major institutions of state should be
functionally independent and that no individual should have powers that span these offices. The
principal institutions are usually taken to be the executive, the legislature and the judiciary."
Therefore, the organs of state as described by Montesquieu should operate separately order to
successfully implement law and order to the UK.
Comparing both the US and UK constitution, there are some very obvious differences. For example,
the US has a written constitution whereas the UK has constitutional provisions scattered across
various statutes . The UK constitution has a lack of separation compared to the US however, this
operates under a presidential power but it is still appreciated that the UK present some separation
between the three bodies that operate the country.
So what are the major institutions and what do they aim to achieve? The legislature is Parliament,
the supreme law making body and democratic leaders of the UK. The legislature reign sovereign
over the UK as they are not bound by successors nor predecessors and have full control with regards
to the creation of statute and the repeal of statutes in existence. The executive is most commonly
known as the Government, thus formulating Government policies and executing them alike. The
judiciary are the enforcers of the law which is made by the legislature and also to adapt and interpret
laws is order to avoid absurdity

The Uk 's Constitution And The United States
Unlike many other Nations with a codified constitution, the UK has no single constitutional
document– this means, she has no single constitutional document but whose main sources are, Acts
of Parliament, Judicial decisions and Constitutional conventions. This essay looks at the features of
the UK's constitution, what a written constitution entails and whether or not it would be desirable
for UK to embrace codification being the only European state with an unwritten constitution. There
has never been a 'constitutional moment' at which the fundamental rules required clarification and
laying down in a single document; instead, there has been an unusual continuity in the governing
institutions; It has relatively been peaceful, hence, no need for a written constitution . However, this
cannot be said of the codified constitutions, which tend to come about after there has been a severe
rupture in the political system of the country concerned. For example, revolution, civil war, the
ending of dominance by another country . In recent years, the UK's constitution has become partly
written; shifting from a more political to a more legal form of constitutionalism (this can be seen in
the power conferred on the courts to review government decisions on human rights ground.
Moreover, the British constitution has shown itself over centuries to be extraordinarily dynamic and
flexible, with the capacity to evolve in the light of changes in circumstances and in society. There
are many who

The Pros And Cons Of The United States Constitution
The United States Constitution was signed in 1787, in hopes of creating a new legal system that
would ensure basic human rights for all citizens. Often, the constitution evokes political discussion
on whether or not there should be a constitutional convention. The article named "Re – examining
the Constitution by Kenneth Jost (2012), provides the reader with an interesting analysis of the pros
and cons of a constitutional convention ("Con – Con"). Citizens who oppose the Con – Con argue
that changing the Constitution wouldn't transition well because of the current political climate, and
explain that it has worked fine over the years. On the other hand, citizens who are in favor of the
Con – Con, state that the constitution is outdated, and suggest that reviewing it may be beneficial to
better suit the citizen's needs. A close comparison of both arguments reveals that people who support
the constitutional convention have stronger reasons regarding the document and are more rational
about the issues associated with it. According to Jost (2012), the nation has contradicting views on
political issues which divide where we think the appropriate role of the government lies (p. 743).
American politics is complex and reflects a partisan system, making it challenging for governmental
officials to decide on whether or not to re–examine the constitution. Another crucial point when
analyzing this issue, is a person's positionality in the American society determines their view on the

The Constitution of the United States of America was presented in 1787, pertaining to a newly
formed government and how the former colonists of England projected to run a new country. The
Constitution was drafted in Philadelphia by the brilliant and later 4th President of the United States,
James Madison. This document was presented to ameliorate the Articles of Confederation, written in
1777, that contained a weak central government and no chief executive or court system. Another
intention of the Constitution was to frame, or establish, a government with no tyranny, the absolute
control of one person or a specific group of people. As problems usually arise, solutions can also be
forged to solve these issues. The work of Madison and many others helped extinguish the dilemma
of tyranny, but specifically "how did the Constitution of the United States guard against, or protect
the country from, tyranny?" Explicitly, the Constitution of the United States protects the people
against tyranny by federalism, the separation of government powers, checks and balances, as well as
the the big states versus the small states. One way that the Constitution guards against tyranny is by
the compound government, referred to as federalism. A federalism government is one government
consisting of two components– a central government, or a nation as a whole, and individual state
governments. The United States still holds this principle, with the central government, based in
Washington D.C., and

The United States Constitution And The Constitution Essay
The United States Constitution, this very detailed group of words was written in 1787, but it did not
take effect until after it was ratified in 1789, when it replaced the Articles of Confederation. It
remains the basic law of the United States then and till the present day of 2016. The first state to
ratify the Constitution was Delaware; the last of the original thirteen to ratify was Rhode Island and
since only nine were required, this was two years after it went into effect. When the U.S.
Constitution was presented to the states, many people chose to be either Federalists or Anti–
Federalists. Virginia and many other states were against the Constitution because there was no bill
of rights included in it and being that some didn't quite understand the reasoning behind a
constitution. James Madison was known as the "Father of the Constitution", and he and Alexander
Hamilton were two Federalists who supported the Constitution and explicated it in the Federalist
papers in 1788. On the other side George Mason, an Anti–Federalist, opposed the Constitution.
George believed the constitution did not establish a wise and just Government. Declaration of
Independence On June 7, 1776, a so called resolution was introduced in the Second Continental
Congress declaring the union with Great Britain to be dissolved, proposing the formation of foreign
alliances, and suggesting the drafting of a plan of confederation to be submitted to the respective
states. This in lack of better words

As a new, democratic country, the United States of America had many obstacles that they had to
overcome. One of these obstacles was coming up with a framework for the new government to
follow and abide to. The first written attempt was the Articles of Confederation, which failed
because of some weaknesses that it possessed. Of these weaknesses included a weak central
government, over powerful state governments, and no national court system, so instead of uniting
the country, it just loosely kept them together. In order to write, or modify this into a better
framework, the Continental Congress called for a convention of delegates to meet in May of 1787 in
Philadelphia. After much arguing between the delegates (federalists and antifederalists), the
Constitution of the United States was passed under the condition that the Bill of Rights would be
adopted. The Bill of Rights, at the time, consisted of 10 amendments; of these 10 comes one of the
most controversial ones, the Second Amendment, which is the right for individuals to bear arms.
This amendment was, and will continue to be one of the most controversial issues from the time of
the ratification of the Constitution of the United States up to the 21st century. As a nation, there is
still a battle between people who want to put restrictions on this amendment and people who believe
that it should be left alone. The book, A Well Regulated Militia by Saul Cornell, goes on to describe
the controversies of the Second Amendment, as

The United States Constitution And The Constitution Of Russia
Upon consideration, one would imagine that the United States of America's constitution and the
constitution of Russia would not be very similar. Due to the fact that the two nations are around
5,000 miles apart or even the fact that the Unites States Constitution was ratified on September 17,
1787, and Russia's Constitution was ratified on December 12, 1993, a 206 year difference. Despite
these facts, if one were to dig deeper into the Russian's constitution, the many resemblances within
the United States constitution begin to surface. However, due to the fact that the Constitutions were
written 206 years apart, the political problems and traditions that the two nations were facing during
development of these constitutions were extremely ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both constitutions established a federal government that is governed and ran by three independent
branches of government; the executive, the legislative and the judicial. Both nations also share the
check and balance systems ensuring that the branches do not overpower one another. The legislative
branch of the Russian nation is composed of a bicameral federal assembly, consisting of a upper and
lower house of government that is formed by the State Duma and the Federation council. This is
similar to our two house bicameral legislature consisting of the Senate and House of
Representatives. In both countries, the upper house consists of two representatives that come from
each state or region and the lower house consists of representatives that are elected by popular
ballot.
The head of the state, the presidents of both nations, holds the power of the executive branch. The
executive branch is granted the powers to grant pardons, appoint Ambassadors, as well as ministers,
and can also appoint officers. The president's power goes further into detail in Article 2, section 2
and 3. As well as with Russia's Article 83 – 93 in their constitution. Russia's executive branch's goal
is to protect the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, as well as its integrity and

The United States Constitution and Its Various Amendments
"The United States Constitution is a healthy document which still serves our nation exceptionally
well and does not need drastic change or revision." Since June twenty first of 1788, when the United
States Constitution was ratified in Washington D.C. it has been considered The Law of the Land.
Ever since that date, we have followed those rules as the Federal law and overall "ruling" of our
lives. For almost two hundred twenty four years, this has been what our country has been following
to this day. The United States Constitution is made up of seven articles, and twenty seven
Amendments.
These seven articles are written help protect the country and to run it as evenly and as fairly as
possible. It is stated in the preamble to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some may say that adding seventeen amendments is a "drastic change." However, these
amendments were added as problems arose. In fact, the 18th amendment, which established the
prohibition of alcohol, was repealed (overturned) by the twenty–first amendment about fifteen years
later. Conflicts are always going on not only in the world, but in the United States. hundred's of
problems are solved each day by using the United States constitution. There are twenty–seven
amendments to the constitution, ten of them being added just 3 years after signing, this means that
after the Bill of Rights were established, only 17 changes were made. Therefore, theoretically
speaking, there has been about 17 problems with the United States Constitution that has forced it to
be changed. There is an article about Facebook allowing people to view other's personal
information. This right is protected by the U.S. constitution through the 4th Amendment. "The right
of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable
searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly

INTRODUCTION
The Constitution of the United States was signed on the 17th of September in 1787. The delegates
who signed the document were the delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. The
Convention was presided over by George Washington. It was the Constitution of the United States
that established the national government and certain basic fundamental laws apart from
guaranteeing some basic rights to the citizens of the United States. The first Constitution of the
United States was the Articles of Confederation which had to be ratified in 1781 because the nation
was nothing more than a loose confederation of some states each of whom operated like as if they
were independent countries. The government at the Center comprised of one legislature, the
Congress of the Confederation and there was no judicial branch or no President to look after the
matters. (The US Constitution, 2016)
DEMOCRATIC OR UNDEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTION
Dahl (2003) says that the Constitution of the United States is both democratic and undemocratic in
different ways. It is democratic in the sense that the Constitution is democratic as it allows for its
people the right to expression and it is present in the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a list of
amendments. The other democratic aspect of the Constitution is that it can be changed or amended
through a democratic process as it is the elected representatives of the people who amend it. The
Constitution cannot be said to be truly

Articles Of Confederation And The United States Constitution.
Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution Cheryl Powers Chamberlain College of
Nursing HIST 405 January, 2017 Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution
Introduction: The strengths and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation vs. the new
Constitution of 1787 Created by Continental Congress, the Articles of Confederation were the first
promising attempts of aligning the 13 colonies of the United States. By 1781 the Articles were
finalized and became one of the three fouding documents of the United States. However, some
believed the Articles did not offer an appropriate central government. After all, it had no executive
branch and no judicial branch. Even the international treaties could ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Authority was pretty much decentralized and their union, lax. The Constitution, however, created a
bicameral system and allowed each representative to cast a vote. Each state was comprised of two
Senators and a number of House representatives depending on their census population. The
Constitution also created an Executive Branch of government and strove for a more centralized
authority in politics. When the Articles were replaced by the Constitution in 1789, it laid out a more
extensive system of government. It created a system of checks and balances for the three branches
of government so that one did not have more power than the other. It created a Bill of Rights – the
first 10 Amendments of the Constitution that defined our civil liberties. However, the Constitution
did not address several very important issues, the first being that of slavery. Yes, it was amended
several times, with the new additions being subject to repeal, like the 18th Amendment which
prohibited the sale of alcohol and started the prohibition. Regardless, it now carries 27 Amendments
and 7 Articles. The drafting of the Constitution and the Great Compromise When it was time to
replace royal authority with popular sovereignty, each state had to ask themselves questions that
would eventually mold it's own government. The governor lost power while the assemblies became
more important. Pennsylvania established the most radical constitution. It eradicated

In our society today, we have many rights that are guaranteed to us by the Constitution. In the
setting of the book 1984 written by George Orwell most if not all of an individual's rights have been
taken away by the government. Without the rights that we are guaranteed by the Constitution, the
people cannot have individual freedom or any freedom at all. The lack of freedom also makes a
functional democracy impossible. In the Constitution of the United States there are twenty–seven
amendments that guarantee the people certain rights that the government cannot legally take away
or violate. The first of those amendments, which is possibly the most important out of all the
amendments states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right
of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances"
(Constitution). This makes sure that the people and the press has the right of speech. As shown by
Orwell, without the right of free speech almost all of a person's basic freedom. The people are
restricted to say what the government wants them to say and if the say otherwise there are serious
consequences. This takes the ability of a person to act on their own away and helps ensure that the
government will stay in control. The first amendment also applies to the press. If the press isn't free
to report the truth and they

A constitution is defined as the system of fundamental principles according to which a nation, state,
or those of such nature are governed. The Constitution of the United States of America is the
supreme law over our nation as a set of rules in which our country is run. In addition to following
the rules of the national constitution Texas also has its own constitution as wall as every other
state's; Texas's is among the longest. Similarly to the United States Constitution, the structure and
function of the government is described throughout, although in this case it is specifically addressed
to the state of Texas. Originally this document was initially adopted in 1876, currently the document
consist of a preamble seventeen articles and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is an extreme importance on protecting the liberties of American citizens and their various
individualized lives. By delegating power and authority, this prevents a concentration in power; the
U.S and Texas Constitutions are similar for the separation of powers, along with checks and
balances as well as both containing the bill of rights. Each has their own concept of federalism
inscribed in each document, the largest importance and difference is the U.S Constitutions
supremacy clause and the necessary and improper clause for a lot of issues can be classified into
these categories. The creation of even the ideology of a constitution is amazing, "it came mainly
from the predecessors of classical economic thought, what little the Framers' generation derived
from Adam Smith was not the central principles about markets and government that we today
associate with classical thought" (Hovenkamp 9). The ideas of a constitution and its principles can
be looked at in reading through and understanding what the governments purpose if so we can
understand how there functions will show and relate to us. The Texas constitution does the best at
avoiding any political power against the interest of the people defined in the bill of right the
individual rights are always addressed well and each individual is equal and heard. The restriction of
powers for the government

The United States Constitution was adopted September 17, 1787. The purpose around its
construction was to add more detailed rights, laws and regulations in the United States than the
Articles of Confederation gave when it was established on November 15, 1777. The ratification of
the Bill Of Rights added to the constitution December 5, 1791 created a clear understanding of the
rights garneted to the American people. The founders created laws and restrictions that limited the
governmental power and created a system democracy within those laws and in return fortified the
foundation of what would become greatest country in the world. The signing of the executive order
#9066 became one of the most violated constitutional failures in United States history. The same
country that started a revaluation and constructed the Declaration of Independence for the reason to
be free from Great Britain's miss use of power violated the very foundation the U.S. was built
around. After Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, the fear of a second attack on the West Coast caused
President Franklin D. Roosevelt to sign Executive order #9066 on February 19, 1942 only two
months after the attack. In their article "the Japanese American incarceration: The Journey To
Redress," Authors Yoshino William and John Tateishi write, "Executive Order 9066 gave broad
authority to the military to secure the borders of the U.S. and to create military zones from which
individuals, citizens, and aliens alike, could be

"The United States Constitution has proved itself the most marvelously elastic compilation of rules
of government ever written."–Franklin D. Roosevelt. In order to make "the most marvelously elastic
compilation of rules of government ever written"(Roosevelt) it took multiple modifications, and
approximately 116 days to complete. The reason for the creation of the Constitution was to not let
any government or any person become too powerful. The other purpose of the constitution was to
resolve disputes between the federal government and the state government. In the first versions of
the Constitution, there were many examples of what the government was allowed to do, but there
were not any examples of what the government was not allowed to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Could some parts of a student 's first amendment be restricted at school? There have been many
cases on this topic, and the courts have struggled to decide what factors of freedom of speech are
protected at schools. Freedom of speech allows citizens to say what they want to, when they want
to. It also allows citizens to express themselves however they would like to. For example, someone
could be wearing a shirt that says "Get the governor out of office! I will do whatever it takes, will
you?" Although this might be considered "protected under the terms of freedom of speech," there
still could be consequences with the law. In this situation, some people might take it as a threat to
the governor. Therefore, citizens have to be careful with what they say, otherwise things could get
out of hand. Freedom of speech is so important to citizens because it allows them to disagree, stand
up for themselves, and express their opinions. Citizens of the United States do not have any
restrictions on their first amendment, however certain portions of a student 's first amendment:
freedom of speech may be restricted at schools. In one case Morse v. Frederick, Joseph Frederick
held up a banner (at a school supervised event) that said "Bong Hits For Jesus"(Frederick) the word
"Bong" was a slang reference to marijuana smoking. When the principal, Deborah Morse, saw the
banner she immediately took it away and suspended Joseph

The Problem With The United States ' Constitution
Allana Diego
Mrs. Morris
CLN4U
9 January 2015
The Problem with the United States' Constitution
According to the United Nations, human rights are defined as "rights inherent to all human beings,
whatever their nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion,
language, or any other status. Humans all equally entitled to human rights without discrimination.
These rights are all interrelated, interdependent and indivisible."
The fight to protect human rights has been ongoing since the creation of law. The question of what
constitutes as a human right has been raised time and time again to redefine laws in order to
accommodate groups who have had their rights violated. From women's rights to the rights of
coloured people in America, social movements have been an integral part of creating change for the
betterment of society. Today, the world faces yet another movement: the campaign for gay rights
and the legalization of same–sex marriage.
The gay rights movement in Canada began in 1967 with the arrest of Everett George Klippert on the
grounds of his homosexual conduct. He was the last person in Canada to be arrested for his sexual
orientation, as his case sparked protests and demands for reform. Ten years later, the
decriminalization of homosexuality in Canada ensued as a direct result of this case.
In the United States, the gay rights movement began much earlier. Dating back to 1924 the Society
for Human Rights in Chicago, the earliest

The constitution, the governing document of the United States, virtually perfect in its creation and
given life through the thoughts, worries, and dreams of a few great and very intelligent men, it can
be said to be the living law of the land, one that has grown and matured with society and the world
of today. This document has performed amazingly in its ability to represent the people of its time
and to allow room for interpretation of law in combination with society to allow it to continue to
represent the people of the future. Created out of the desperation to preserve a struggling country,
this document has been mirrored by others in order to create or recreate governments in many parts
of the world. Still, despite of this, it seems that many in power within the United States at this time
appear to struggle with the proper interpretation of this living law of the land, and instead
manipulate government to achieve personnel agendas or personnel benefit in some fashion, while
turning a near blind eye to any influence of constitutionality. So, in response to this, I feel that three
amendments should be added to this great document, one out of the spirit of redundancy to illustrate
the obvious, and the other two out of necessity to address issues of integrity and stability within
government and society. These amendments reflect the issues of term limits to those within
Congress, a religious freedom protection clause, and an American Integrity clause; the effects and

Chapter 1 The United States Constitution is a lot more than a bunch of words we don't really
understand, I mean let's be real...what do half of these words even mean? Impeachment...judicial
review...popular sovereignty...okay Thomas Jefferson, stop messing with our minds! Well, how
about I let you know what they mean. Impeachment is when someone gets accused or charged from
doing something bad. Judicial review is when the court gets to decide when a law is
unconstitutional, which means that it does not follow the Constitution. Popular sovereignty is telling
us that the power and authority comes from the people! I bet you're getting bored with all of these
weird words, but they are very important to help us understand the Constitution. Did you know that
powers weren't given to only one group of people? The federal government has certain powers and
so do the states! There are three types of powers, pretty cool right? The three types of powers are
delegated powers which come from the government, reserved powers which come from the state
and concurrent powers which come from both. You know how there are those awesome people who
fight for our country? Well those people are maintained by the federal government. They also
regulate trade with other places to help us get the things that we need. But our favorite part of
all...money. The federal government issues us the money and without them, we wouldn't be able to
buy all of the cool things we have today! The people who give set up our

The United States Constitution was ratified in the summer of 1788 and is the governing document of
the United States of America. Owing to its brevity and clarity of thought, it has stood the test of
time, whereas founding laws of other nations have come and gone, lost to the thoughts of the many
for whom they were originally conceived of to sustain. Of the prescient statutes that comprise this
most venerable of documents is Article 1, Section Four, which laid a foundation for the election of
federal representatives. It states in part: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for
Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the
Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While codification of this statute in 1875 for the U.S. House of Representatives and in 1914 for the
U.S. Senate has accomplish much in the way of streamlining the elections process throughout the
United States, the nation is still saddled with a patchwork of 50 state laws which make it, almost by
constitutional decree, impossible for citizens of the United States to equally exercise their civic
voting rights. While the U.S. Code mandates a date for federal elections, the Constitution
simultaneously grants each state broad power in how it conducts federal elections. The outcomes on
Election Day are the result of disparate voting experiences and, some argue that to protect the
integrity of the electoral system, changes need to be implemented. Others argue that voter turnout is
a problem, with the United States historically ranking embarrassingly low internationally in voter
turnout, but that these results are due to lack of voter interest in the political system as a whole
rather than lack of opportunity to cast a ballot. Is there a problem, and if we agree there is, what is at
its root? Furthermore, what could be done politically to address any such problem?
Those U.S. citizens that seek to participate in the election process are in some precincts faced with
an inadequate number of poll workers and voting

The Constitution of the United States has governed this country for over 200 years. The Bill of
Rights, also known has the first Ten Amendments of the Constitution, has protected the unalienable
rights of citizens in the United State. Selective incorporation was used in order to nationalize the
Bill of Rights and protect the immunities, rights, and privileges of all United States citizens within
the states. The success of Selective Incorporation, along with the 14th Amendment, ensured that
states could not put in place any laws that took away the constitutional rights of American citizens
that are preserved in the Bill of Rights. Although the 14th Amendment was not taken seriously for
almost a century, the Selective Incorporation process ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Fourteenth Amendment prevented the states from limiting the rights granted to citizens in the
Constitution and did not allow the states to enforce their own law. This amendment was nationalized
through a process of Selective Incorporation. The purpose of Selective Incorporation was to, not
only nationalize the Bill of Rights, but to also protect the immunities, rights, and privileges of all
United States citizens. The first eight amendments were 'selected' and 'incorporated' into the
Fourteenth Amendment, and through the Fourteenth Amendment, these amendments were
nationalized. Through several court cases and rulings, the Bill of Rights were brought into the
national spotlight and became protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, which was ratified into the
Constitution in 1868. The confusion of whether or not the Bill of Rights applied to solely the
National Government began with the Supreme Court ruling in 1833, Barron v. Baltimore, saying
that the Bill of Rights only applied on a national level when dealing with governments and did not
apply to the states. The ruling of this Supreme Court case was used in order to urge the adoption of
the Fourteenth Amendment. In the concluding ruling, it was "declared that its 'privileges and
immunities' clause included 'the personal rights guaranteed and secured by the first eight
amendments to

Abstract Enclosed in the Constitution of the United States is a Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights lists
rights that each citizen has. The Fourth Amendment details one of those rights that US citizens have
against unlawful search and seizure. The world is vastly different than the time that the Founding
Fathers wrote the Constitution of the United States. Search and seizure grew to other areas as the
United States advanced. Acquiring digital evidence is a function of computer forensics and
computer forensic experts have to follow law in obtaining digital evidence in order for the evidence
to be admissible in court. This paper details the history of the Fourth amendment, its application in
the acquiring of digital evidence, and the exceptions provided. This paper also explains how privacy
plays a critical role in the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. History of the Fourth
Amendment Privacy is something everyone covets. As an American, privacy is a right protected by
the Bill of Rights in the Constitution of the United States of America. The Fourth Amendment
states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized." (Congress.gov, 2014) The architects of the
Constitution wanted to ensure

The Uk Constitution And The United States
Often the UK constitution is asserted to be the most unique in the world, as its sources are a piece of
historical significance as they come from great British heritage. From the case of Jackson and others
v Her Majesty's Attorney General, Lord Steyn stated that 'We do not in the UK have an uncontrolled
constitution'. In general terms a person may judge the UK constitution to be uncontrolled due to it
being unwritten, as it is derived from a wide range of sources. Which vary from common law to
international treaties. However on the other side of the spectre, a written constitution is one like the
USA's, embodied into a single document. Putting aside the fact that the UK constitution is from a
variety of different sources, it must be verified that it has worked successfully to this date from 1689
when 'the supremacy of parliament over the crown' was introduced, following the glorious
revolution. It can also be said that, why would the UK constitution be classed as uncontrolled, if it
has worked for hundreds of years and it is still going strong.
A constitution is generally there for one purpose, it 'sets out the framework and principal functions
of the organs of government' and by setting out these functions the UK has been growing and
adapting. We in other words have an evolutionary constitution. If it ever came to a time where a
written constitution was enacted, it would indeed disrupt the infrastructure of the UK as they are
inflexible. Clear inflexibility is shown by

The Constitution And Freedom Of The United States
The Constitution and Freedom The process of debating the guiding document of the new nation,
provided the opportunity for 55 delegates to reflect on a national argument. The key issue of strong
central government verses strong states provided the dividing line between Federalists and Anti–
Federalists and would be seen as the underlying theme for many of the debates. Writing as Brutus,
Robert Yates stated it succinctly, "The most important question that was ever posed to your decision,
or to the decision of any people under heaven, is before you..." (1787). The Anti–Federalists were
concerned with maintaining freedom. The states had just fought a battle to remove themselves from
the tyranny of English control. To give up significant amounts of power to a centralized entity
would undermine what they had accomplished in winning their freedom. The states were
individually named in the Declaration of Independence and the Treaty of Paris recognized them as
"free sovereign and independent states. Several steps were taken to ensure the new federal
government would not become simply a replacement for Britain as the ruler of the states.
Representation The first step towards ensuring their freedom was to establish how the states would
be represented in the new Federal government. Some form of elected or chosen representation was
needed to ensure that the states would have a direct hand in determining the laws of the new
country. The original plan proposed by Virginia

Kimberly McCauley A00250630 Optional Essay Assignment Our Constitution in the Making While
composing the Constitution of the United States; our forefathers had many agreements, and
disagreements on the ways that are government would operate. They held a very important meeting
to ratify a failing constitution; that consisted of many debates, and compromises. The heated
discussions were so great on certain issues that some problems were left out altogether to delay an
internal southern conflict that would affect our young nation in the years to come. The constitution
that was written first was the Articles of Confederation. In this constitution, most of the power was
given to the states; with a malfunctioning structure that did ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This meeting was called the Constitutional Convention that took place in the summer months of
1787. Only twelve states out of the thirteen participated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
Rhode Island was not present, perhaps due to the fact that it was afraid of a centralized government.
The mention of many literary works took place in the constitutional debate during the convention
that called for the creation of a prevalent engagement of private ownership that had principles,
standards, and functioned correctly. One view that everyone brought into the conversation was one
of nationalism, a nation filled with people that loved their country; with a sense of patriotism, and
unity. Our forefathers had areas of agreement that extended into four broad directions. Of course, a
republic was necessary in the restricting of our government ruled by the people. A contract had to be
adopted by the people in order for us to live in a structured society. The government needed to be
centralized, which carried an authority above the states, and in order to keep a dictatorship from
forming the government needed to split up into different entities that carried out different jobs. All
of these agreements had to be established in order for our government to be successful. Just as there
were agreements; the disagreements far outweighed the agreements when it comes to equality, and
representation. Who was the government going

The words spoken by man have the power to shape and ratify everything in its path. We as a nation
must procure a stance that will enforce and implement the necessary laws by any means possible.
This can only be obtained if all parties are on one accord with an understanding that the rights of the
people and their protection are our governments' concern. The strong structure of a government can
only promote strong commercial growth and prosperity. For the Americans, forming a new nation
with its own values and beliefs was a very daunting task. It was supremely difficult when the
members of the nation were holding on to the beliefs of the old ruling country. In 1787 the
Constitution of the United States of America was created. Though it may appear to be not difficult
to clarify the development of the US constitution, the procedure through which its shaping was
fulfilled is a long way from simple to clarify. Prior to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation
governed the states, yet immediately nullified in light of the fact that they were excessively
powerless. "The ratification of the national constitution was the founders' political response to
excessive democracy" unleashed by the American Revolution. Several framers of the United States
Constitution benefited from their knowledge of the states' experience and tried to create a better
constitutional system, where the US constitution and state constitution complements each other
(Shivakumar, 146). The proposed

Differences Of State Constitution Vs. United States...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Kerry Lewis

More from Kerry Lewis (18)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Differences Of State Constitution Vs. United States...