Essay On Liberal Democracy

Essay on Liberal Democracy
Liberal Democracy Liberal democracy, with a capitalist economy, is the only form of social
organization that will work in this world. Socialism and Communism appear to be sound in theory,
but would never come close to achieving what capitalism does. Liberal democracy and capitalism
allow for a beneficial competition where communism does not. This competition, in the liberal
tradition, on both political and economical levels, allows for the best balance of security and
freedom to the people under the government. However, this liberal tradition does not take care of
every problem, but it does a better job than any alternative. Competition is a necessity in this world.
A more competitive market allows for a more functional ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
All of the market is voluntary, no coercion. Milton Friedman explains, "Political freedom means the
absence of coercion of a man by his fellow man." There would be people trading with other people
only when they themselves benefit from the situation. This way people have the choice on how
much to trade, or to even trade at all. Everyone can benefit from a competitive market. Friedman
explains, "By removing the organization of economic activity from the control of political authority,
the market eliminates this source of coercive power. It enables economic strength to be a check to
political power rather than a reinforcement." Without this sense of being forced into situations,
people are a lot happier. When people are voluntarily participating in the free market, then the
government makes money consequently. The competitive free market takes some responsibilities
from the government, so the government can run better. A more competitive free market allows for
the government to function more smoothly. Political competition is needed in order to achieve a
balance between liberty and security. Free elections are the best way to elect the most worthy
individual and to keep up competition in politics. Having senators run for elections and compete for
the people's vote, rather then a select few deciding who is elected ensures liberty for the people. One
of the most important rights an American has today is the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Liberal Democracy In Canada
When evaluating the liberal democracy or constitutional monarchy in Canada it is imperative to
identify that the Canadian governing system cannot unambiguously be either correct or incorrect.
Hence, Canada's democratic system functions well enough; nonetheless it would further benefit
from adopting a Nordic democratic–socialist model as well as adopting a proportional representation
electoral system. A Nordic democratic system would benefit the citizens by providing them with
universal health care, closely similar wages, free and inexpensive education, public pension plans,
and virtually free trade. Second, if Canada is to adopt a proportional representation system the
citizens will be better represented. Despite these flaws in the liberal ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is an often overlooked freedom because one may forget that this freedom is not a freedom that
every individual has. Specifically in many third or second world countries, people are eradicated
because of their opinions or request for freedom and reform. Something as simple as civil
disobedience has severe consequences in these countries. On the other hand, in Canada there are
little to no consequences for civil disobedience or requesting the government to change their
decision. Furthermore, in a sense the government allows pressure groups to be formed, and non–
government–organizations to help other's lives. Additionally, courts in Canada are open to those
who wish to challenge the laws. Finally, the media is not censored for those who wish to promote
their beliefs. In many totalitarian countries, people are unknowingly snatched of the right to think on
their own, and demand reform. As a result, though the Canadian liberal democracy may have flaws,
the rights and freedoms that are often overlooked affect the everyday lives of the citizens and the
government

Mexico: A Liberal Democracy
The definition of liberal democracy is a representative democracy that operates under the principles
of liberty and equality. In Mexico, there is still debate over whether or not they are considered a
liberal democracy. Though Mexico is making changes to become more liberal, I don't believe they
are considered to be a liberal democracy quite yet. Many changes have been occurring in Mexico
that are leading them toward becoming a liberal democracy. One example of this is from the article,
"From Darkness, Dawn." In this article it described the events of the Mayan calendar and how they
at first were seen as the end of the world for Mexico, but are now seen as a chance of rebirth for
Mexico. These positive outcomes that Mexico is experiencing

The 1953 U.S. Intervention in Iran Essay
The 1953 U.S. Intervention in Iran
Once upon a time, in a mountainous land between Baghdad and the Sea of Caviar there lived a
nobleman. This nobleman, after a lifetime of carping at the way the kingdom was run, became Chief
Minister of the realm. Within a few months he had the whole world hanging on his words, his deeds,
his jokes, his tears, and his tantrums. His personal behavior, which included wearing pajamas for
numerous public appearances; speeches to the Majles (Parliament) from his bed, which was brought
into its chambers. Frequent spells of public weeping, helped focus world attention upon him during
his premiership. Yet, his people loved all that he did, and cheered him to the echo whenever he
appeared in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By 1951 Mohammad Mossadegh had established himself firmly in the political scene in the
mountainous country of Iran. Mossadegh ran for the office of Prime Minister with just one
campaign promise: to free Iran from the British imperial yoke (Gavin, 1999, p.64). He had also built
his political strength, based largely on his call to nationalize the concession and installations in Iran
of the British–owned Anglo–Iranian Oil Company (Risen, 2000, p.10). Mossadegh embodied the
fierce nationalistic pride felt by so many Iranians, this brought Mohammad Mossadegh an easy
victory (Gregory,1951,p.31). On May Day 1951, after three days of raging Pro–Mossadegh rioting,
Mossadegh announced that the Majlis had passed the Nationalization Act, despite strong opposition
by many members of the Majlis (Gavin,1999, 65). By this time Mossadegh's power had grown so
great that the Shah (monarchy) was virtually forced to appoint him Premier. Even after being
appointed to the Premiership, popularity continued to skyrocket for Mossadegh. Mossadegh's
popularity, growing power, and intransigence on the oil issue were creating friction between the
prime minister and the Shah. These small victories wet Mossadegh's appetite for more power. As a
result in the summer of 1952, Mossadegh demanded the Shah appoint him Minister of war

Compare And Contrast The End Of History And Fukuyama
The end of the Cold War was not just a politically significant event but also an important intellectual
milestone, where academics, researchers and intellectuals examined the consequences that its end
would concur. Fukuyama's The End of History and Huntington's Clash of Civilizations are two of
such explorations but contrast each other significantly. Fukuyama predicts a future of peace, or
minimal conflict, amidst the spread of Western liberal democracy, a system of government he
believes has been actualized as perfect in Hegel's realm of consciousness whereas Huntington
argues that conflict will stem from civilizational differences, owing to the rise in civilization–
consciousness. I will start my essay by briefly summarizing the main arguments of each article, after
which I will attempt to critique each one before drawing comparisons between the two.
Francis Fukuyama, in his article, "The End of History?" talks about the rise and fall of major
ideologies ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They can essentially both be viewed as imperialists in the disguise of academia. In trying to argue
that fascism and communism were imperialist forces that the West defeated, Fukuyama forgot to
consider that the capitalism itself is one of those forces, guided by capital gain, and exploitation. In
that sense, when he argues about the appreciation of American culture in other countries, it becomes
a new–imperialism of culture where there is a new global proletariat of weaker countries who can't
afford to have protectionist economies to safeguard their values because then the West wont help
them. Nonetheless, neither Huntington nor Fukuyama tells us what we need to know in order to
synthesize their perspectives, or to ultimately decide between

The Media And Liberal Democracy
The Media and Liberal Democracy Name: Areez Somani Professor: Dr. David Hoogenboom
Student Number: 250644546 Due Date: July 19, 2015 Our society is based upon a set of key main
ingredients that have led us to today's era of information technology. This vast array of technological
advancements concerning the internet, television, mobile devices and even newspapers all share one
unique characteristic, they are controlled and manipulated by the media (Diamond, 2010, pg 5).
When referring to the media, this work refers to the channels that distribute news and its content.
This includes any forms of technology as long as there is an interface between message and the
general public. The media tends to project information in any way they see fit, mainly when
concerning political, racial and biased topics that are very sensitive in nature (Ungerleider, 1991. pg
24). In essence, the media is one of the most powerful entities that exist because of the controlling
dynamics of information (Chan, 1994, pg 54). They can curve political agendas, promote racial class
subcultures, and create public opinion with regards to any social issues. Depending on the audience,
the way information is presented, or 'skewed', can create a dynamic lasting effect. History shows
that media has played a crucial role in the formation of certain prejudices we so often encounter
every day in our lives. In Canada and the United States, we are fortunate to live in an ideal

The Pros And Cons Of Liberal Democracy
Since the dawn of human civilization, individuals have been constantly immersed in conflict with
each other. Whether these conflicts stemmed from socio–economic inequalities, political disputes,
property rights, religious disagreements, or any other contentious matter, the creation of human
governments has necessarily been to handle, organize, and resolve conflicts between people within
communities in the least destructive manner possible. Governments act as a formal instrument
through which individuals in a society can agree upon shared rules, solve problems, and engage in
cooperative behavior, and it helps avoid the severe repercussions resulting from revolutionary social
upheaval. The purpose of government – as spelled out in the Preamble of the Constitution – is to
"establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general
welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." While countless forms of
government have sprung up over the centuries, only one has been resilient enough and has had the
pervasive influence necessary to stand the test of time: democracy. While there are many different
types of democracies, this paper will focus on liberal democracy specifically. A liberal democracy is
a form of representative democracy that operates under the paradigm of classical liberalism.
According to the Center for Research on Globalization, liberal democracy is defined as:
"a system of governance conditioned

Mexico As A Liberal Democracy
Mexico, a country full of culture and beauty. However, many have been questioning what kind of
government does Mexico really have. There has been debate over the years if Mexico can be
considered as a Liberal Democracy. One can believe that Mexico can be considered liberal
democracy because their people are not forbidden or restrained from doing many things. Their
government treats them like the government treats people from the United States, they are free to do
what they want as long they follow the law their government has for them. The article "From
Darkness, Dawn" demonstrates how Mexico is no longer the way it used to be in terms as in
economy, population growth, poverty, and drug war. The author of the article "From Darkness,
Dawn" Tom Wainwright states, "Mexico outpaced Brazilin their economy, Net emigration is down
to zero, fertility rate will soon be lower, Yes there is poverty, but alleviated by services such as
universal free health care, and the failure of rich countries' anti–drugs policies means that organized
crime will not go away. But Mexico's murder rate is now falling, albeit slowly, for the first time in
five years". Wainwright ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The author of "New Leader" Randal C. Archibold states, "He has promised to bring competition and
more government oversight to the telecommunications market". This matters because the president
is trying to bring the media and show the rest of the world that he is going to make Mexico a better
country, change it liberal. Archibold also states, "President Enrique Peña Nieto has tapped in a series
of attention–getting moves that he promises will "transform Mexico" and accelerate growth in an
economy that has expanded too slowly to lift the country out of the developing world." President
Enrique Peña Nieto has came from a long way to make Mexico a better place for his people. He is
determined to change his

Canada A Liberal Democracy
Canada is one of the top liberal democracies in the world. A strong liberal democracy allows for the
people to have a voice and be able to start and guide change in the state. An important way for the
people to practice their involvement in change is by challenging the executive or the legislature
when they feel their personal rights have been infringed upon. A common way for that to be
practiced is by raising awareness when an individual feels their rights have been infringed by the
passing of a certain bill or law. One of the primitive values of a liberal democracy is an independent
judiciary. The main goal of implementing an independent judiciary is to ensure that all individual
rights are protected from infringement. The presence of the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Judges posses the power to clarify the law, to appraise evidence that is presented to them and
conduct how hearings in their courtrooms will play out. Judges are appointed and given the role of
"decision makers" in regards to administering justice. The immediate role of the judiciary is strictly
dedicated to the law and protecting citizens rights. A judge will depict and apply the law how they
see fit for each unique and individual case presented to them. An independent judiciary is an
example of separation of powers in a democracy, a judge does not have to be hesitant during the
decision making process if their decision is found to be unpopular. The Supreme Court functions
separately from other justice systems and government branches. Judges in Canada hold the ability to
be able to strike down legislation if they deem it to be unconstitutional. The judiciary in Canada has
the power to override even the most popular decisions made by the federal government if it finds
that they are opposed to the charter or are found unconstitutional. The court deals with three
different kinds of disputes; conflicts between individuals, conflicts between the government and
individuals, as well as conflicts involving the various levels of

Democracy And Liberal Democracy
Democracy is a political system in which the power belongs to the people by which majority rules.
The source indicates that freedom of choice is an essential component to a liberal democracy as it
gives the power to the people by having multiple political ideologies to choose from and elect as
their government. When there is competition between multiple parties, each party has a critical
opposition that can hold each party accountable and restrict their power within government. This
gives the power to the people because it allows people to choose from multiple political ideologies.
Without competition, a party can form an oligarchy; by which one group rules over a country.
Without a critical opposition, no one can criticize the party's ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During post war Germany, Adolf Hitler had full control over the country's political and economic
systems. During this time, in 1933, the Enabling Act was introduced essentially giving all the power
to Adolf Hitler to enact any laws without consulting the people. This act was the first step of abusing
civil liberties in a democracy and essentially forming a oligarchy. Furthermore, in the Soviet Union,
the Communist party led by Joseph Stalin controlled the government and all its actions. The
Communist ideology revolves around collectivist beliefs in which the collective supersedes the
individual It also promotes a central government led by a single leader. In the USSR, Stalin ran the
government to his accord and that resulted in civil liberty abuses. Stalin held false elections that did
not provide a choice to the citizens. Furthermore, he had got rid of anyone who questioned him
further restricting the freedom of accountability.
Competition between parties allows different ideologies to hold each other accountable during times
of crisis or prosperity. This is evident in the United States parliament. In the United States
parliament, the ideas of Montesquieu are implanted. Montesquieu suggested that government be
separated into three different branches, that way one individual or party cannot take full power or
control over the government. In the United States there are three branches, the legislative,

Political Theories And Ideology Of Liberal Democracy Essay
Many challenges put a stress on Modern Democracy because of the political theories and ideology
our government holds, the current politicians taking office, inequalities throughout social classes
and economies, and the opinions of "We the People". Nearly every country claims to be some form
of a democracy, but not all these self–proclaimed democracies allow for free politics, good
government, and rule of law (Crick, 2002). Liberal democracy has begun to win over its royalist,
fascist, and collectivist rivals over the course of the last few centuries, and the freedom to vote has
been steadily expanded to those who were without it. But the liberal democracies of the world do
have problems. Democracy is only as good as its citizens, and the quality of those citizens demands
certain constant factors (7 Concerns, 2012).
Gerrymandering is the process in which political boundaries are redraw or changed in order to
benefit one political party over another one; if one party has power of the state legislature, then they
can change political boundaries to maximize their chances of winning congressional districts to win
an election. By doing this, unfair and skewed results are produced because redrawn lines can be
made to help one party win over the other, since constituents for the losing party will be divided
between districts (Tormsen, 2015). This will also allow the winning party to win more electoral
votes and seats (Tormsen, 2015). This practice is uniquely American and can be

Are the Values of Liberalism Universal Essay
This is an immensely complex questions which deserves much more time and space than can be
devoted in this essay. However I will endeavor to apply the theories of a number of authors to the
problem and arrive at a reasonable conclusion based upon my analysis of them.
Throughout the course of the essay I will make reference to a number of authors, writing on subjects
of Ethics, Philosophy and Feminism, with the intention of attempting to divine the validity to the
claim of liberalism's universality. To start of with there will be an examination of the theory of
liberalism itself, with particular focus upon the notion of individuality and its conception of rights in
accordance with it. Using the work of George Beiswanger and Bhikhu Parekh I ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is but one theory among a seas of others. Its enforcement is a point of much debate among
contemporary scholars and policy makers. This is however how the current generation of liberals
seem to view their mission. Not least the Neo–liberals of the United States. Effectively typified by
George W. Bush. Throughout the course of this essay I hope to challenge these viewpoints and
perhaps see them change when faced with the arguments against them.
To begin, lets looks at the conception of individualism in liberalism. A central part of the theory of
liberalism is the acceptance of the theory of individualism. This is not however present in a number
of varying culture and represent a unique quality that is possessed by liberalism. In the debate
among liberals a large part of the discussions on individuals if the definition of rights. Often there is
a comparison between the 'right' and the 'good'. There are different conceptions of the meaning of
the words 'right' and 'good'. While adhering to the principle of individuality it is possible for each
persons notion of the 'good' to be different. Individuals can thus be affected adversely by what
another individual considers to be good. "An individual can be wronged quite adequately in the
name of "right" and to the applause of "moral" men." (George Beiswanger, p. 114, 1950) So using
this adversity, how is it possible for liberal governments to ensure that the good has been maximised

Liberal And Liberalism : The Components Of Democracy
Democracy is an ideal that many thinkers have attempted to define. While many agree that
democracy has become the exemplar form of government, there remain many viewpoints regarding
the various components of democracy. Two of these essential components have steadfastly been
liberty and equality. Equality is understood as the equal possession of natural rights to life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness. Liberty refers to the freedom that individuals have, that is, absent of
the influence of coercion. This freedom is only limited in that an individual may do as he or she
chooses so long as these actions do not directly harm other individuals. This review shall analyze the
role of liberty and equality as they pertain to liberal and conservative ideologies.
Liberalism is a political philosophy based on the ideals of liberty and equality that grew out of
reactionary means against religious conformity and ascribed status in medieval Europe. Given its
expansive history, it should be noted that there are multiple forms of liberalism. Classical liberalism
emphasizes the role of liberty (sometimes at the expense of social justice), while social liberalism
stresses the importance of social equality (sometimes at the expense of favoring state control).
Thomas Hobbes, a preliberal thinker, stated that "nature has made man so equal..." and that "the
right of nature...is the liberty each man has, to use his own power, as he will himself, for the
preservation of his own nature..."1

Perpetual Peace Theory Essay
Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs (1983) essay by M.Doyle, the main modern liberal
thinker. on democratic peace theory, bring back to life Kant's "Perpetual peace" (1795) theory by
analysing the lack of wars btween liberal democratic states.
Nowadays, the democratic peace theory is one of the most accepted theses among the international
relations community. It is considered as one of the most stable and unbreakable « law » of the field.
This theory explain that democracies do not fight each other, not because the people living in it are
intrinsically pacific, but because between democracies war is the last resort since it has become such
an irrational way to deal with issues.
In his essay, Doyle is trying to analyse this pacific situation by explaining the correlation between
the extern behavior of a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Consequently, the theory depends on different forms of freedoms which enhance people's rights:
negative and positive freedoms, and the guarantee of democratic participation concept.
Negative freedoms are the freedoms which are protecting the citizens from arbitrary authority –
freedom of conscience, free press and speech, equality under the law, and the right to hold and
exchange fearlessly property. Those rights are essential because they avoid the anarchical « state of
nature » and enable citizens to live in an organized society where their rights are protected.
They are different from positive freedoms whose purpose is to help and ensure a decent life to every
citizens with – social and economic equality and equal education, health care, and employment.
These rights enable a welfare system where citizen's condition of living is a central matter in

U.s. Relations Between The International System Essay
It is no doubt that China is becoming both a military and economic power in the international
system. This emergence in power however poses a threat to the United States; the current world
hegemon. To assess China's rise as an economic power, it is important to analyze state relationships
in the international system. The IR theories of Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism are crucial
in predicting the future of Sino–U.S. relations, as each theory holds a distinct position on state
relations in the international system. Thee presence of anarchy in the international system; the lack
of central authority in the international system must be acknowledged when analyzing state affairs.
Realist theory argues that states act in response to anarchy and presume the international system to
be one of self–help. States are self–interested actors that look to maximize power and ensure
security. This security dilemma in current US–Sino relations about nuclear arms. In an attempt to
compete with the US, China is "'increasing its existing ability to deliver nuclear warheads to the
United States and to overwhelm missile defense systems.'" China is exhibiting relative gains, as it
measures its own nuclear arsenal relative to the one of the US. Because the US is seen as threat to
China militarily, China's response has been to develop their defense industry. By increasing their
industry sector, China is attempting to balance power its power in the international system by
countering the power

Media's Role in Liberal Democracies
The basic elements in a liberal democracy are regular elections, a parliament exercising control over
government within law and individuals freedoms such as free debate, freedom of association and the
right to protest (Carter & Stokes, 2002).
Regular elections should include competitiveness among parties to keep elections fair and voters
should be aware of their interests. Additionally, as Carter and Stokes (2002) state that there should
be "a parliament that can exercise control over the government and all this happens within a frame
work of the rule of law" (p.10).
A liberal democracy should include extensive freedoms of speech, press (all media properties),
association, movement, thought and belief, assembly and protest, and language ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Press should be careful to present complete and just information in order to maintain the public
trust. One example is from New York Times (3 May 2003) that journalist Jayson Blair had made up
interviews and stories, he was fired at the moment in an attempt to protect the integrity of the paper
(Street, 2011, p.53).
The love of propaganda of our days negatively affect news presentation in a way it manipulates and
derives new information or selects information in favor of some particular groups.
Investigating government power or political activity is another contribution that news can make to
democracies. In other words this function can be described as maintaining politicians' honesty. This
provides the public to be aware of their politicians' activities so people can make sound choices and
rational decisions. In countries with non–liberal regimes, journalism cannot fulfill its investigative
duties, serving to their political masters. Hutton (2008) claims that in China, journalists and editors
receive "daily instructions on what may or may not be reported" (p.134).
Journalists' duty to serve the public includes investigating and gathering information by means of
having connections and resources who mostly disguise themselves for the sake of remaining hidden.
The excuse for keeping secret is either some activity is swept under the carpet or have some
externalities result into affecting many. The journalists' ability to investigate has

Democracy And The Liberal Democracy
Democracy varies in every country depending on the type of government or regime they have. There
is the liberal democracy, which is all about giving people their rights and liberties; everything is
done through fair voting and electing. The people are aware of everything that happens in their
government. Illiberal democracies are basically the same as liberal, but the people in power are
more secretive of their activities, and there is less civil liberty. It is essentially a partial democracy.
Now Authoritarian regimes designate any political system that concentrates power in the hands of
one leader or a small elite. There are no free elections and very little regard for the law. Political
institutions, social structures, and the democratic rule of law all affect liberal, illiberal, and
authoritarian regimes democratic quality differently. First, liberal democracies are more open with
the people. The philosophical traditions of a liberal democratic republic are democracies, liberalism,
and republicanism. Democracies try to be equal with all, it stresses public rights, it reaches for what
the majority wants, and it is very protective against authoritarianism. In liberalism, natural rights
can't be violated, private rights are very important, no one is above the law, and the government has
no rights. In republicanism the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. The chief
executive is chosen through lections, and every citizen has their right to vote. Political

What Extent Do Liberals Support Democracy
To what extent do liberals support democracy (45 marks)
Democracy is the ultimate political form of ideological liberalism. It refers to the ideal form of state,
and is common to both classical and modern liberals.
In the 19th century, liberals often saw democracy as threatening or dangerous. Political theorists
such as Plato and Aristotle viewed democracy as being a system of rule at the expense of wisdom
and property. The principle that the will of the majority should prevail over the minority may have
negative effects. In Northern Ireland, a very divided religious country, if the 51% get their way, the
other 49% will be in outrage. Democracy thus comes down to the rule of the 51%, as French
politician Alexis De Tocqueville ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefor although citizens may vote for a leader, they will then make decisions based on a small
number of peoples view for the majority of the people. The minority ruling the majority.
However a reason why liberals support democracy is that it shows each individual is equal– one
vote per person, gives everyone equal influence on how countries governed. Since voting is done
individually, it constraints the collective pressures of groups within society.
To conclude, liberals are now staunch advocates of democracy as it provides personal development,
consent and all individuals are equal. Modern liberals embrace democracy, but only in the specific
liberal form. They reject other forms of democracy, which may be less pluralist or more
participatory, as downright

Fascism In Russia
After World War One, many people yearned to return to normalcy; however, those desires were
rendered by the carnage and destruction caused by the war. In the twentieth century, fascism was a
response to many complicated social challenges and to the spread of Western liberal democracy. For
the growing fascist movements, the period after the First World War was seen as a time to bring
change to the nature of society, state, and international policies and laws. The rise of fascism in
Europe started in the early 1900's due to cultural pessimism, the tragic consequences caused by the
war, and the incapability of liberal democratic regimes to cope with the war's consequences. After
the Second World War, people can argue that fascism has long disappeared ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The current global economic and political climate has promoted the question of whether fascism is
on the rise again. Vladimir Putin is one of the few current world leaders who has shown fascist
tendencies. Putin's Russia has many elements that are reminiscent of the early 1900's fascism. There
are many similarities between Putin's Russia and the fundamental principles of classical fascism.
Putin asserts Russian power by putting pressure on weak neighboring states, and slams the West's
criticism of his policies and actions. By annexing Crimea and supporting pro–Russian separatists in
eastern Ukraine in 2014, Russia was able to justify "its military–patriotic mobilization of society"
and the transformation of Russia into a "besieged fortress" (Motyl, 2016, pg. 29). The annexation of
Crimea made Russian citizens feel a wave of vicarious optimism. Putin's 'bully' attitude and
aggression are supposed to manifest Russian ethnic and cultural revitalization after decades of
decline. Similar to Mussolini, Putin is building his regime on the promises of greatness, the display
of military force, and the campaign to make Russia great again. Putin's actions and policies provide
the Russian citizens with a sense of national pride, which has been lacking since the post–Soviet era.
He continues to pursue strategies and policies that restore Russian pride while consolidating power
and influence in Russia. Putin lacks of interest in engaging with Western politics has also
contributed to the rise of his popularity at

Weaknesses Of Liberal Democracy
Although our nation's government relies on the fundamentals of liberal democracy, it still has many
flaws. Articles written by Francis Fukuyama share a clear message suggesting that America's
political institutions are decaying and its flaws will not be fixed unless we have good leadership
within the government that yields good policies. It is still not too late to make reformations in the
system. Today, US citizens share a distrust for the inner workings of our government, and through
the years, there are many things that must change. Although our government is able to withstand
failures right now, it may cause an expansion of problems that will cost us indefinitely. The
existence of interest groups has caused an exponential increase in the elite control of the system,
thus creating people's lack of trust for the government.
The existence of interest groups and the government's abilities have grown substantially; however,
the accountability of the government has declined. The United States' government relies on the
fundamental checks and balances of the "three branches of government–the executive, the judiciary,
and the legislature–corresponding to...the state, the rule of law, and democracy" (The Sources of
Political Dysfunction). Nevertheless, the government has been exercising more power, allowing the
judicial branch to become an "alternate instrument for the expansion of government" (The Sources
of Political Dysfunction). As a result, interest groups have found

Intrinsic Human Dignity and Equality in Relation to...
Liberal democracy is prevalent in the West. This political arrangement guarantees the rights of a
people in relation to their government. Many Westerners, unfortunately, cannot give a philosophical
explanation and/or justification for it. Ultimately, an examination of liberal democracy will
demonstrate that it rests on notions of human dignity, equality and happiness, which are not recent
developments in philosophy, but have their origins in classical and scholastic thought. It is in said
examination that one can reasonably conclude that liberal democracy while not the best system of
government is certainly better than the alternatives. Democracy is not a contemporary phenomenon.
It did not originate here in North America. Rather, its ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
MacIntyre wrote:
A practice involves standards of excellence and obedience to rules as well as the achievement of
goods. To enter into a practice is to accept the authority of those standards and the inadequacy of my
own performance as judged by them. It is to subject my own attitudes, choices, preferences and
tastes to the standards which currently and partially define the practice (190)
It would be arbitrary and subjective for individuals to judge their own craft, may it be the arts or
sciences, without referring to authoritative tradition or body to gauge the quality of their work. Thus,
institutions are needed because "practices [require] a certain kind of relationship between those who
participate in it" (191). This relationship is not only with contemporary practitioners, but with past
practitioners "whose achievements extended the reach of the peace to its present point" (194). Thus,
the dissemination of knowledge, the observance of religion and the practice of medicine require
schools, churches and hospitals if future generations hope to benefit from the previously mentioned
goods. Democratic practices, in short, are ensured by democratic institutions. Popular rule does not
occur by simple fiat, but through institutional frameworks. Robert A. Dahl in his text, On
Democracy, proposed a hypothetical situation to demonstrate the aforementioned point,

The Argument Of Clash Of Civilians By Samuel Huntington
In the argument "Clash of Civilians" written by Samuel Huntington, he states that Western conflicts
arose between nation states and ideologies. During the cold war the First, Second, and Third Worlds
were divided by their status. Post Cold War it no longer mattered. International policies shift from
Western being the main focus to focusing on the West and non–Western civilizations. The
differences in civilization when it comes to their culture, customs, religion, ethnicity, have been
there for centuries and after the Cold War the politics among states is much less fundamental.
Civilization is far more fundamental today and throughout time, civilization identity will continue to
be a major component.
Huntington also does not see westernization as a desirable surge that engulfs world politics. Conflict
is very natural and history proves that argument. The author takes away focus from states as a
foundation of war in the future and more on conflict between major culture regions. He states that
peoples cultural and religious identities will be the primary bases of conflict post cold war. The
world is becoming a smaller place with modernization and technology; thus, relations between
people of different civilizations deepen consciousness and awareness. Post cold war, the role of the
Western society enhances the growth of civilization. Unlike Fukuyamas argument, Huntington states
that cultural characteristics and differences are more complex to solve than political and economical

Francis Fukuyama 's The End Of History
Life of Ideology, Life of Conflict: Francis Fukuyama and Samuel Huntington
In Francis Fukuyama 's "The End of History?" published in 1989, he posits that with the end of the
Cold War, humanity is reaching a point where Western liberal democracy and economic structure is
the highest form of ideological development. Other ideologies (communism, fascism, etc.) are
vestigial forms of thinking destined to fail and disappear in an inevitable progression towards a
liberal system (Fukuyama 1989). In "The Clash of Civilizations?" published in 1993, Samuel
Huntington writes that the world is divided into civilizations, based on culture (not ideology or
economic factors), and that the conflicts of the future (and some in the present) will be based on
divisions along those lines. These include, according to Huntington, "Western, Confucian, Japanese,
Islamic, Hindu, Slavic–Orthodox, Latin American and possibly African..." (Huntington 1993, 25).
While these theories are seemingly compatible at first glance – Fukuyama 's Western liberalism can
be the victor in Huntington 's war of civilizations – there is a major difference, and some important
reasons for this difference, which we can find in the authors ' pasts.
I believe that the major difference is Fukuyama 's faith in a victory for Western liberalism. While
Huntington is satisfied with showing that other civilizations/cultures will clash with the West 's,
Fukuyama is confident that the West is already on its way to victory. We can

The Rise of a Liberal Democracy
In the article Fareed wrote he defines democracy as simply a government with free and fair
elections. It is in essence rule of the majority, so if the majority is filled with ill intent then that is the
direction of the government. Basically an unfiltered voice for the masses; and it is not suitable by
itself. Liberal Democracy is described as what people think of today when they here of Democracy;
it is a government with a system of values/rights built in to protect the people from themselves. It
has basic rights like freedom of speech, press, religion, etc. written out so the Government cannot
infringe upon them. Liberal Democracy also has Free and fair multi–party elections held so the
people have a voice. It is not necessarily used ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The beginning of the Civil Rights movement started in 1948 when president Truman signed
Executive order number 9981 which stated that the armed forces had to treat all races, colors
religion and national origin the same. Ensuring that finally African Americans would finally be
treated equal while risking their lives for their country. Then in 1954 Brown v. Board of Education
went to the Supreme Court, and the court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, allowing for
desegregation of the United States. The ruling annulled the previous Plessy v. Ferguson, which
stated separate but equal facilities; the courts said when separate it is almost certainly not equal. On
December 1st 1945 Rosa Parks Refused to move to the back of the bus to let a white person sit, she
was arrested and her arrest inspired the Montgomery bus boycott. The African American society
refused to ride the buses, and the president of the Montgomery Improvement Association led the
boycott, his name was Martin Luther King Jr. While the bus boycott would last for a year until the
buses were desegregated, King would preach the method of civil disobedience and non–violent
protests, just like Gandhi used in India to gain freedoms for his people. In 1957 the Governor of
Arkansas had to send in the National Guard to integrate a white high school in Little Rock Arkansas.
This showed how much resistance African Americans had to

The Cold War Between America And The Soviet Union Between...
In studying International Relations, I have realized that, the nature of International politics can be
likened to anarchy. This is because in International relations there seems to be no supreme or
overriding authority which establishes and maintains rules or laws in international affairs. All States
appear to behave in their own interests.
A typical case of study is the Cold War. From my understanding, the Cold War describes the
relationship between America and the Soviet Union between 1945 and 1980. During this period,
neither sides ever fought each other directly, but indirectly they influenced other countries through
their ideologies (i.e. America's democracy and Russia's communism) to war. For example, America
supplied weapons to South Vietnam (anti–communist) to war with North Vietnam (pro–communist),
who were also supported and supplied weapons by China/Russia. Also with Afghanistan, Americans
helped them after the Soviet Union invaded in 1979 by supplying them with weapons to war,
without physically involving themselves. This portrays that, in the absence of a supreme power to
regulate law in International relations, the system will not be able to provide any public good, in this
case, PEACE among states. However, to some extent they do. To achieve this peace, both realists
and liberals have outlined various factors that facilitate this provision among States. For liberals,
peace among states can be achieved through economic cooperation, democratic peace

Mexico Considered As A Liberal Democracy
Mexico Considered As A Liberal Democracy Mexico's government is very corrupted as we know it
from the media. Based on logical facts, Mexico's government doesn't have the right and sufficient
system to protect an individual's right. The economy also plays a huge role into individual's voting
since there is problems financially that the head of state, Enrique Peña has been trying to solve. As
well as the situation with the drug cartels which have impacted Mexico's financial and military
power to slowly decrease these problems have led to question Mexico's democratization.In my
opinion, I feel that Mexico is not a liberal democracy with its corruption and unreformed
government leading Mexicans to lose trust in their own society (government). Is Mexico a liberal
democracy throughout the years? ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Their explanation was straight and clear on how Mexican voters "had little to nothing for a voice to
speak on who was 'running the show'. This brings up a question on how in the recent election can
support if Mexico is a liberal democracy. Seeing how Enrique Peña brings interest in his "people" to
vote for resources that can better the environment does not show a strong convincement. We know
from the media that the President's wife wasted $100 million dollars for a house through an offshore
centre this is Mexico's debt just pulling

There Are Many Theoretical Perspectives Used When Examining
There are many theoretical perspectives used when examining the international political system. In
this paper I will explain two of the most important: liberalism and realism. Though they are both
strong theories, liberalism is best when it comes to explaining international politics. Liberalism
better examines all of the influence that impact the decisions made within the international system
and better represents the emotions and personal agendas of the state. Liberalism can be considered a
combination of constructivism and realism.It takes democracy into account and examines the
dynamics through all 3 levels of analysis. The downfall of liberalism is it feels like a westernized
approach to international politics, so it might hurt a less ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This developed into a hegemonic system where the United States was unipolar therefore had the
most power. This allows the United States to have lots of global influence and control over state
security. It is ideal for a realist because they focus on power and security and a unipolar system
maximizes both of those traits. This mindset develops into an expansionist ideology, because the
more territory that the state has influence in, then the more power and security they hold.
When it comes to a realist's perspective on the Iraq war, most would say that the attack was justified.
Many offensive realists would say that Iraq posed a security threat to the United States therefore it
was necessary to take action. On a state level analysis a realist would think that Iraq was getting
progressively more aggressive, but was not consistently destructive toward the United States, on an
international level a realist would see the building of arms as a security threat. Today some
defensive realists might disagree with offensive and say that by intervening in Iraq it divided the
United States attention, and has hurt it over the years in influence, because it has used up money and
resources. This would be the difference between and offensive and a defensive realist. Either way,
any realist can agree that it was the United States unitary choice alone to go into Iraq and

Communism And The End Of History
Humankind is constantly striving to reach a point in history where war ceases and every person on
earth unites under a single cause. Articles like The Dell Theory, The End of History, and The Return
of Geopolitics all offer a unique viewpoint on what will prevent war in the future, what the ideal
political system is, and how to reach it. First, The End of History argues that when all countries
unite together in practicing liberal democracy, humankind will have reached the end point of
ideological evolution. In addition, The Dell Theory is about a man who orders a Dell laptop and
proceeds to track the process of its creation to a myriad of countries. He uses this experiment to try
to prove that all countries are tied in some way by trade and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After the Cold War liberalism was supposed to be the main form of government ending geopolitics.
However, the end of the war did not mean the end of other forms of government causing geopolitics
to still be an issue today. Although geopolitics is an issue Thomas Friedman is trying to solve by the
use of the Dell Theory and the Golden Arch Theory of Conflict Prevention. Another theory that is
trying to ending violence and wars is the theory of the end of history. The theory of the End of
History is when every country has a liberal democracy government causing the world to never go to
war. In order for the End of History to come Mr. Friedman's theories have to continue to work and if
they do not work then war will continue to happen over land. The Dell Theory is going to continue
to work while the End of History has not come and geopolitics is still an issue in many countries all
over the

Fukyama V huntington Essay
Francis Fukuyama and Samuel Huntington are two of the most controversial and influential modern
political theorists of our times. Fukuyama's book, The End of History and the Last Man, and
Huntington's book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, pose two very
conflicting theories on international relations. In this paper I will summarize and compare/contrast
the two theories. Both theories, written since the fall of communism and updated since the first gulf
war, have been widely read, taught, praised and criticized
The End of History and the Last Man is a book in which Francis Fukuyama argues the controversial
thesis that the end of history, a time when class distinctions no longer exist, believing them to be the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To understand Fukuyama's theory one must look beyond the specific words. Fukuyama is not
claiming that history has or will end and that occurrences of history will cease to exist. He is saying
that democracy is such a perfect and Idealistic form of rule that no major change in political
philosophy can happen in the future. Historical occurrences will still exist, but they will be within
the realm of the current political philosophical thought. Fukuyama goes even further to prove his
point by showing that the new philosophies on government created since the oncoming of
democracy, (Communism, Socialism, etc.) have ultimately failed and democracy has prevailed in its
place.
In the Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Samuel Huntington argues that the
primary political actors in the 21st century will be civilizations and that the primary conflicts will be
conflicts between these civilizations rather then between nation states.
Huntington Writes:
"It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily
ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source
of conflict will be cultural. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but
the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different
civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between

By Using the Structural Functionalist Approach, Discuss...
Rule by the people is what a democracy is made of, this might be achieved by having the party in
power elected into office into office by the majority, the term democracy and the practice itself is
diverse in each country but it has similar features which characterize all forms. This essay explains
the impact or contributions of political parties in a Liberal Democracy using the Structural
functionalist Approach. It will also converse the important roles that these political parties play in
every political structure, specifically in Zambia. To start with, it will explain what the terms Liberal,
Liberal Democracy and Political Parties are; it will also explain the Structural functionalist
Approach. Thereafter, the works and critiques of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Political parties being vital elements in the political, arena influence the government of the day in so
many ways. A political party is a structure in a political system or in this case in a liberal Democracy
which plays a number of roles in ensuring democratic development. According to Nassau (1979:
211) he defines a Political party as "a group of persons united in opinions or actions, more or less
permanently organised, which attempt to bring about the election of its candidates to public office
and by means to control or influence the actions and policy of government". Many scholars have
coined different definitions of political parties but most of them mainly emphasize the participation
in elections and the interest to gain public offices and mandates and all have a long term goal of
putting into effect its Political, Social and Economic philosophy.
The Structural functionalist Approach is an approach that studies, analyses and views structures and
systems in any social setting with regards to the role or functions they play in the development of
any society. A political party being a structure in a political system has a vital role or function it
plays in society. Political scientists Gabriel Almond and Bingham Powell (1966) introduced a
Structural Functionalist approach to comparing political systems. They argued that in order to
understand a political system, it was necessary to

By Using the Structural Functionalist Approach, Discuss...
Rule by the people is what a democracy is made of, this might be achieved by having the party in
power elected into office into office by the majority, the term democracy and the practice itself is
diverse in each country but it has similar features which characterize all forms. This essay explains
the impact or contributions of political parties in a Liberal Democracy using the Structural
functionalist Approach. It will also converse the important roles that these political parties play in
every political structure, specifically in Zambia. To start with, it will explain what the terms Liberal,
Liberal Democracy and Political Parties are; it will also explain the Structural functionalist
Approach. Thereafter, the works and critiques of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2013) another example of Political parties airing the expectations and demands is when opposition
political party President Elias Chipimo urged the Patriotic Front to fulfill their campaign promises
and advised them to develop an industrial policy that will address unemployment levels in the
country. (The Post July 13, 2012). In a liberal democracy, Political parties are to assume the roles of
recruiting political personnel and nurture future generations of politicians: They choose people to
stand on their ticket as candidates for elections and these candidates are faired against other
candidates from all political parties example MMD, PF, UNIP or UPND. It therefore, distinguishes
itself from unions, non–governmental organizations and other initiatives that do not want to carry
any political responsibilities. Some political parties form partnerships with other foreign political
parties in a view to share ideas, internship for their members and mutual co–operations. In April
2013 the National Restoration Party (NAREP) formed a partnership with the Liberal Party of
Denmark in a view to focus on mutual cooperation and democratic dispensation for a year. (The
Post, May 3, 2013)
It is the duty of the judiciary to interpret

American Liberal Democracy
From a political perspective or more specifically the Democratic side of the American Liberal
Democracy, we can also find examples showing that the USA did not show favourable behaviour
towards its practice of Liberalism. A law can be created, passed or vetoed by three different arms of
the government: the president, the House of Representatives and the Senate.
At first sight it seems like this organisation of power is in correlation with Democracy. Nevertheless
because different political parties rules those three arms of government, this coalition has blocked
the resolution of certain conflict or issues regardless of the people's opinion.
Barack Obama has been trying to introduce a health care system that would allow everyone to have
access ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The finance industry is primarily a service industry and therefore is there to serve people. The power
taken and given to this industry does not represent a democracy. In 1982, even though it goes
against the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933 (passed after the Great Depression in order to control banks
and prohibit commercial banks from using depositor's savings to invest in speculative instruments),
the Reagan administration enabled the deregulation of the American financial market. 'By the end of
the decade, hundreds of savings and loan companies had failed, this crisis cost tax payers $124
billion and cost many people their life's savings' (Inside Job). Nevertheless, deregulation stayed in
place and saw the 2001 internet bubble and the 2008 financial crisis which resulted in 'a global
recession which cost the world tens of trillions of dollars, rendered 30 million people unemployed
and doubled the national debt of the United States'.
'Each crisis has caused more and more damage while the [financial] industry has made more and
more money'. (Inside

The Upcoming Development of Liberal Democracies in Mexico...
Democracy: A political system in which citizens enjoy a number of basic civil and political rights,
and in which their most important political leaders are elected in free and fair elections and
accountable under a rule of law (26). In the studies we have undertaken, comparing and exploring
various countries and systems politically, economically, and psychologically throughout the quarter,
this outcry of democracy has prevailed as a main theme. Successful countries such as the United
States and Great Britain are based upon such democratic ideals. It is no wonder that countries have
striven more recently toward this goal of democratization. Both the Russian and Mexican
revolutions prove that democracy is an attainable goal in the next ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Socialism offered an 'ideal' and classless society in which the state controlled everything, yet the
people utilized the practice of controlling politics. He formed a highly centralized government,
which was furthered to totalitarian goals by his successor, Joseph Stalin. Stalin focused on military
and industrial gains which, by his death in 1953, had "crippled the Soviet state" because his
successors could not make any reforms without undermining the CPSU–the Communist Party of the
Soviet Union (367). A heavy reliance on secret police and a militarized economy was already in
place when Mikhail Gorbachev came on the scene. He was elected General Secretary of the CPSU
in 1985 when the USSR was in middle of continually diminishing economic productivity; it became
stagnant. With his powers as secretary, he saw room for reform to change the USSR drastically. He
planned to do this through instituting glastnost, or openness, in society, which he believed would
ameliorate levels of corruption. Corruption was a detriment to democratization, which he believed
would heal the economy. He brought back the first contested elections in many years. With
democratic procedures in place, Gorbachev lost his power to Yeltsin. Notwithstanding the amended
constitution, Yeltsin took liberty to control parliament to "cope with the country's economic
problems" (369). Yeltsin's successor was chosen as Vladimir Putin who has severely radicalized the

Should liberal states promote their values abroad? Is...
Since the post–World War 1 period, Liberalism has been actively advanced by Western (or 'first–
world') states as a desirable system of political theory. According to Dunne (in Baylis & Smith 2001,
pp. 163), the basis for its appeal stems from the fact that Liberalism is viewed as inherently
'optimistic', making it a natural counter–theory to the Realist theories advanced by practitioners of
realpolitik in the past (feudalism, dictatorships etc.). What makes Liberalism 'optimistic' in a sense is
that, as an ideology, it is fundamentally anchored around the liberty of the individual, and
furthermore, strives for global peace. Considering the rampant destruction and bloodshed
experienced by many of the states involved in both the World Wars, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Autocracies, it is purported, produces an atmosphere of complacency and breeds corruption due to
the absence of political competition. Furthermore, the ideals of democracy, such as individual
freedoms and rights, are arguably universal ideals, therefore states (and in this case the US) have a
moral duty to promote democracy. Fukuyama and McFaul make strong arguments for the
importance of democracy promotion, but it is not without its flaws. The world is fragmented by
ethnic, linguistic and religious differences, and as such, the notion that there exists 'moral universals'
is viewed as dangerous (Dunne 2001, pp. 179). Gray (1995, pp. 146) aptly articulated that "the
universalizing mission of liberal values such as democracy, capitalism and secularism undermine the
traditions and practices of non–Western cultures." And that may illustrate the rejection of Liberalism
thus far. Democracy, when promoted by Western states, is inextricably tied in with other Western
ideals such as capitalism and secularism. These ideals often do not mesh well with prevailing
cultural practices, resulting in dissent and potential military conflict, results contrary to Liberalism's
ultimate goal. This leads to the second rationale: national security. In 1983, Michael Doyle compiled
a list of international wars between 1816 and 1980, as well as a list of liberal states, and concluded
that "constitutionally secure liberal states

Liberal Democracies Vs. Liberal Democracy Essay
Liberal democracies, are defined as the system in which governmental body operate under the
principle of individual rights and work to protect them regardless of religion, sect, ethnicity etc.
Liberal democracies are thought to be secular in nature and generally do not account for religions or
ethnicities rather they promote a certain nationalistic perspective throughout the state. Laws are
made through majority vote in the parliament and are meant to be logical in nature rather than
derived from sources like religion, culture, traditions etc. However, in some parts of the world such
as Middle East, people value their sectarian or ethnic identities more than nationalistic values. So a
debate emerges around the openness of democratic system to religion. Although Ethnocracy offers
short term solution for some countries like Syria, yet the system should be based on liberal
democracy that work on the principle of "State nation" that protects core values of democracy and
account for religions as well.
Ethnocracy is a system that only allows political parties based on ethnic, religion or sectarian
identities to participate in the elections and individual choices are ignored. This system is applicable
in some countries like Lebanon where after widespread conflict between different groups, it has
been authorized that three parties based on Christians, Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims can only
participate in elections and people have to tie with any of these groups. There are quotas

Nations With A System Of Liberal Democracy
Nations with a system of liberal democracy have a hope to achieve a structure of government that
benefits all citizens equally (Callan, p. 1, 2004). However, countries that claim to be liberal
representative democracies (such as the United States, New Zealand, and the Britain) have failed to
be representative of all the citizens. Due to historical occurrences, traditional gender roles, and lack
of activism from the elite (white men in positions of power), women have been denied their natural
human rights and, as a result, their full potential to become active in the political sphere. As
mentioned by Anne Phillips in Engendering Democracy, "[s]ex remains a significant...indicator of
where and how much we are politically involved..." (99). This ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By assuming "men" and "citizens" can be used interchangeably, we are excluding women from
documents that directly talk about equality and freedom in liberal democracies. This shows how
separation of men and women rank is ingrained in our society. This is not limited to the United
States. Many leading liberal democracies, such as the United Kingdom, have documentation that
uses the word "men" when referring to the nation's citizens (Bill of Rights, 1689). Today, there lies a
separation of the capabilities of men and women in the minds of some. This is based on a false
understanding of gender roles, where women must 'live up to' their role of a procreating mother. As
Anne Phillips explains in Engendering Democracy society has programmed young minds to think it
is the women's duty to "...[collect] the children and [make] the tea..." and this truly is "a vital
political concern" (Phillips, 97). The issue lies in status quo, which the elite continue to apply in
nations worldwide. By training young minds to believe they have a specific role to live up to, we are
resisting citizen's natural growth and are instead demanding citizens to follow what has always been
done. Women are told to complete household and family duties while men are told to go into the
workforce and bring in an income and support his family. This system of patriarchy allows men to
become

The Pros And Cons Of Globalization
According to the traditionalist, there is a "nationalistic backlash in politics" given that only some
societies get to partake of the benefits of interdependence (Roeder). As multinational corporations
enter the economies of underdeveloped countries, many begin to feel threatened because they can't
compete against these corporations. Globalization is making the rich get richer at the expense of the
poor, as they attain access to cheaper labor and raw materials. People are losing their jobs and
business internationally and domestically. It comes as no surprise that globalization is resulting in
violent response as people try to stop globalization from tearing their own lives and societies. Many
countries are prone to pointing fingers at the United States for all the social and political unrest in
their local communities given that the new actors are under the Western influence, resulting in
further unrest (Roeder). "Today millions in the developing world support anti–market and sectarian
values reflected in support for enthnofacism, sectarian murder, and fundamentalist religions–
anything that offers psychic comfort in the face of volatile social anarchy" (Mousseau 27). Terrorist
will most likely use the people's resentment to globalization and foster it to attain higher power that
can justify their motivations through terror. It will be Washington's job to tackle its biggest challenge
of protecting its global position in the present and future international system. If

Liberal Democracy And The Constitutional System
Liberal democracy is a form of government that operates under a constitutional system and is ruled
by the electorate. The government is representative of the people and regular elections are held. It
calls for the freedoms that are stated in America's first amendment–freedom of press, speech,
religion, and assembly. This political ideology has been apart of history. Patriots, such as our
founding fathers and Patrick Henry, were willing to risk their lives in order to achieve freedom from
an oppressive monarchial government. They risked everything in order to have a shot at individual
freedoms and basic human rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The most
important claims of liberal democracy are a representative government, a limited government, the
separation of powers, and property rights. These claims will be assessed from a biblical perspective
(and further expounded upon). A representative government is a key aspect of liberal democracy.
Since the power to elect a leader to a political office rests with the people, those in office have an
obligation to honor those voices accurately. An active and responsive government body can be very
productive. Not only will it create a strong nation, but citizens have the potential to be highly
satisfied with their work. Anarchy is less likely to occur. The Bible discusses the process of starting
a representative government in Deuteronomy 1.
In Deuteronomy 1:13–17 (NRSV) it says, " 'Choose for each of your

Is Canada A Liberal Democracy
What is a liberal democracy?
Liberal democracy, otherwise known as a 'Representative democracy', is a political ideology and
form of government; most commonly found in western countries. The ideal outcome of a liberal
democracy is seen as a completely democratic and equal society. A liberal democracy is
characterized by some key features that attempt to ensure a free and fair country for all those who
reside there, said characteristics include; separation of powers, free, fair and competitive elections,
checks & balances, protection of human rights, civil rights, etc. and a rule of law.
A Liberal democracy may take different constitutional forms, for example; Australia is a
constitutional monarchy, an offset of a liberal democracy and it shares this form of government with
the subject of this essay; Canada!
Protection of Human Rights
Canada is often regarded as a leading country regarding progressiveness and social justice,
especially now with their current Prime Minister– Justin Trudeau. However, there are still many
areas of inequality, primarily in the treatment of Indigenous people, specifically Indigenous women.
Some topics of discussion relevant to Canada today are;
− Indigenous rights
− Abortion
− Gender Equality
THE MISTREATMENT OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
An estimated ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, women in the workforce continue to earn up to 30% less than men (Average earnings for
women in all job tenures (as percentage of men's earnings) were 68.4% in 2014, suggesting a gap of
over 30%.), continue to be underrepresented in politics (In 2015, women made up 28% of municipal
councilors and only 18% of mayors.) and Canada's child care & paid leave for parents still lags far
behind much of the developed

Essay On Liberal Democracy

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Katie Gulley

More from Katie Gulley (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Liberal Democracy