War Tactics And Technologies In WWI

War Tactics In The First World War
The Technologies and War Tactics in the First World War The First World War encompassed more
than four years of battles in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas, costing nearly two hundred
billion US dollars in total. More than thirty belligerents mobilised sixty–five million troops across
the globe. Among them, twenty million were wounded and nine million were killed. Additionally,
there was a civilian casualty of nine million as well. A primary factor in the war's high casualty and
fatality rate was the advanced technologies and war tactics employed by the militaries. As products
of the industrial and chemical advancements during the century proceeding the war, some were
developed to directly aid combat, such as the machine gun, while others ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When poison gasses were introduced to the First World War, aptly named the chemists' war, they
immediately resulted in heavy casualty rates. Militaries soon developed protective protocols,
dropping chemical warfare's potency mostly among the troops, contributing to the war's high
civilian fatality rate. As early as the fifth century BCE, there have been recorded uses of chemical
warfare in Greece, China and India. The toxic gasses employed were mainly carbon monoxide,
produced from burning wood. Soldiers exposed to carbon monoxide were described to have flu–like
symptoms, and they could not combat with strength. Other chemicals were eventually discovered
and employed in war throughout the modern era, such as sulphur dioxide and calcium oxide, which
achieved similar results by blinding and choking enemies. The chemical revolution in late 18th
century brought forth means to study these chemicals, previously discovered without understanding
their chemical composition. In the succeeding century, the industrial revolution then introduced
methods to widely refine and produce chemical compounds. With growing international tensions
leading to the First World War, countries have already begun the production of chemical weapons in
preparation, despite previous prohibitions at the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. In
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The First World War, Canada
2. By the end of the First World War, Canada was employing German translators with Telegraph
operators to intercept and decipher German wireless traffic. Despite their success, this capability
was not maintained. In 1939, with the German invasion of Poland, the Canadian Army quickly stood
up a number of Special Wireless Units, to act at the tactical and strategic levels. The static Wireless
stations were positioned throughout Canada and the smaller mobile "B" units operated in close
proximity to the frontlines throughout Western Europe and Italy.
In early 1944, there was a call from the Allies in the Pacific, namely India and Australia, for Canada
to assist with monitoring Imperial Japanese wireless traffic. This resulted in the formation of
1CSWG in Aug 1944, outside of Victoria, B.C. The secretive nature of the unit, and its participation
in the Pacific war remained a secret until 1976, when members of the unit were finally awarded the
Pacific Star for their service. Destruction of many of the official records related to the unit have
resulted in much of its history being lost. As a result, many Canadians, even in the CAF, are
unaware of 1 CSWG's contributions to the war effort.
DISCUSSION
3. Unit Organization. 1CSWG was comprised of 336 Officers and men, as of its disbandment in
1946. Head Quarters (HQ) section was comprised of the CO, CSM and orderly room staff. Quarter
Master Section, Technical Maintenance (TM) section, Motor Transport (MT) section, provided CSS
to the

Essay The First World War
The First World War
c) The Following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was
finally broken:
new technology like the tank
the American entry into the war
the blockading of German ports
the German offensive in March 1918
Explain how far you agree with this statement.
All of the reasons suggested above do play a part in why the stalemate on the Western Front was
finally broken. Although, each reason stated is not equally important and there are other reasons as
to why the stalemate did break and these must be considered also.
The first suggested reason to be considered was the use of new technology, yet, however advance
the technology was, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Attack by sea was also encouraged, U–boats were made to destroy import boats, unfortunately most
of these boats turned out to be highly armed attack ships in disguise read to destroy the U–boats.
Ships that did manage to siege successfully were in effect unsuccessful because of the rationing and
recycling efforts made by the British and their allies. So overall, the new technology helped but
none of the new weaponry was war winning and most definitely not as important as the other factors
to the ending of the stalemate.
The United States entry to the war in April 1917 was due to the Zimmerman telegram intercepted by
the British intelligence and this telegram was from Germany to Mexico encouraging Mexico to
reclaim states taken from them by America.
The United States entry into the war brought millions of fresh, new, eager men and plentiful
supplies. These supplies were all helpful and most of the supplies (as America was and still is a
highly technologically advanced country) were of the new technology mentioned earlier. This

abundance of new weaponry gave Britain and the allies an edge over the Germans and their allies.
The allied troops also found a new inspiration to fight because of the United States entry and so an
intense morale boost swept through the troops. America also had immense amounts of money (being
the richest country in the world), which they lent to the

The Allied Powers of the First World War
I. Introduction
During the First World War (1914– 1918) The United Kingdom was one of the Allied Powers,
fighting against the Central Powers (the German Empire, the Austro–Hungarian Empire, the
Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Bulgaria).
In 1914, British Army did not have the power to fight a major war on the continent, and throughout
the course of military actions had to multiply in size fourteen times (Chandler/ Beckett 211). Nature
of the conflict that forced reorganization of the British Army, including raising one of the largest all–
volunteer militaries in history, creation of the Royal Air Force, and use of conscription, as well as
facing modern and far more brutal weapons resulted in tremendous changes in the British warfare.
British commanders, experienced in fighting small colonial wars, had to quickly adapt to a very
different set of circumstances.
The end of War marked a decline in the respect of authority. Economical effects of massive
casualties, during carnages like the Battle of the Somme (1916), became felt and evidences of
Generals' incompetence were brought to light (for example in 1927 publication of Lions Led by
Donkeys: Showing how victory in the Great War was achieved by those who made the fewest
mistakes by British Captain P.A. Thompson). The criticism intensified after the end of the Second
World War, when massive sacrifices of the previous war were put in perspective. Publication of
book like the Donkeys (1961) by Alan Clark or release of

Origins of the First World War
The First World War was an international conflict which erupted in July 1914 involving various
nations across the world. Many historians and those who have studied the Great War tend to give
varied opinions as to what initially sparked the outbreak. However, although these opinions between
researchers differ, they do all tend to revolve around the hostility between the great powers of
Europe, the violent assassination of the Austro–Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and the
controversial pieces of German foreign policy known as Weltpolitik and Mitteleuropa, which
according to political theorist Hans Debruck (1899), would not only transform Germany into a
nation of great economic and military power, but also into a nation that has been ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This theory appeared to be very inspirational for Germany as they were unfortunately surrounded by
other dominant powers. With Social Darwinism in mind, the new German king Wilhelm II sparked
serious concern amongst the European powers by establishing two pieces of foreign policy known
as Weltpolitik and Mitteleuropa. Weltpolitik, according to Debruck (1899), was a piece of legislation
that was established to help the Germans pursue colonial and naval power in the grand manner
through either peace or war. The other policy, Mitteleuropa, also caused huge political unrest
amongst the great powers as it was viewed as a plan for Europe to be completely dominated by
German empires. So from the establishment of these two pieces of legislation, it quickly became
unequivocal that Germany was becoming a nation of potential threat. Additionally, the Germans
were also accused by the British media of trying to cause a civil war in Ireland by providing both
loyalist and nationalist groups with weapons; another example of Germanys uprising power and
aggression (Padfield, 2005). So with Germany becoming a particularly aggressive nation, causing
the other nations such as Britain to become somewhat solicitous, how were the other great powers
such as Russia and Austria developing? Throughout the expansion of Germany, Russia and Austria
were

Essay On The First World War
The First World War was the first war that used mechanized weaponry. It is shown to be a
revolutionary advancement from the old war style that featured hand–to–hand combat and only
minimal use of comparably incompetent mechanic weapons. The improvement of these war
technologies was so huge and their powers were overlooked. These new inventions had also brought
unexpected horror to the soldiers serving in the war. The estimated deaths in both military and
citizens were 16.5 million ("Casualties | WW1 Facts", 2016). Therefore, the First World War is a
war, much more horrific compared to previous wars, because a mass number of people were killed
due to inventions of modern weapons like machine guns and poison gas which were used in an
industrial scale. Before the First World War, one of the more popular firearm used in previous wars
were the Vickers gun. This water cooled gun needs to be operated by 6 men so it needs a lot of
manpower and is time consuming ("Light Weapons", 2016). Because of the machine gun, which
could fire 400–600 small–caliber rounds per minute, was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Many of the soldiers fighting for their countries in the First World War were young teenagers who
volunteered to serve not knowing what was in prepare for them. The experience they went through
was an experience a man should not have experienced. The war had left many soldiers scarred
physically and mentally. Most of them suffered from serious cases of traumatic disorders like shell
shock (2016). These traumas experienced through each senses from sight to hearing to touch and
even smell can linger forever in their lives and minds. Many people also lost family and friends who
were soldiers that fought for the war and are dear to them because of this horrific war. This war
happened because of the greed of the countries and formation of secret allies. The war and tragic
history could be avoided. The loss of so many lives would not happen

The First World War (WWI)
World War I, a time of struggle for power, a time where most men who joined would most likely die.
World War I started with an act of terrorism, produced multiple technological advancements used
today, and ended with the downfall of many powerful empires. Before World War I, Europe was in a
state of peace for nearly a century (History.com). The Congress of Vienna included the British
Empire, German Empire, France, the Ottoman Empire, Russian Empire, and the Austria–Hungary
Empire (History.com). The peace mostly relied on the peace between the Russian Empire and
Austria–Hungary (History.com). The Balkan States was a region that was having troubles keeping
peace (History.com). The Ottomans were having a hard time with the Turks who were revolting ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In total, the end of the war resulted in four fallen empires, Germany, Austria–Hungary, Russia, and
the Ottoman (History.com). Two empires that suffered the most were the Ottoman and Russian
Empires. The Ottomans had a victory at Gallipoli, but later defeats and an Arab revolt devastated the
Ottoman land and economy forcing them to form an armistice with the Allies (History.com).
Another empire greatly damaged during and from World War I was the Russian Empire. The
Russian Empire was huge, stretched over both Europe and Asia, they had a lot of people (Stock).
Before World War I, the Russians were entering a period of industrialization (Stock). When the
Russian Empire decided to fight with the Allies, they had most trade lines cut off and they were left
with no trade (Stock). More people were moving to cities to get jobs in factories and the cities
became very unsanitary (Stock). Eventually the people started protesting against Tsar Nicholas II
[1868–1918] (Stock). After a while there was the Russian Revolution and Vladimir Lenin [1870–
1924] and the Bolshevik party took control of Russia (Stock). Because the Bolshevik party was not
fully established throughout the entirety of Russia, they had a civil war and Vladimir Lenin signed
an armistice with the Central Powers (Stock). After a while the red army of the Bolsheviks wiped
out the opposing forces of the Russian Civil War and Lenin renamed the Russian Empire to the

The Great War: The Causes Of The First World War
NICOLLA EDDY WOPARA 137932 PSIR 205 GROUPS 2 THE CAUSES OF THE FIRST
WORLD WAR The First World War or the Great War is one notable war in the history of wars. The
war lasted 4 years from 1914 –1918. This war was fought basically by the Great Powers of that
century and even though all the states were not involved it is still a great point in world history. The
notable countries that participated in that war were: Britain, France, Russia, and Italy and later
joined by the United States. They were called the Allied Powers (Entente) and their opposition side
was: Germany, the Austria–Hungary Empire and the Ottoman Empire, these ones were called The
Central Powers. This war had been predicted to happen sooner or later because of the ongoing
situations ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A military alliance is essentially an agreement between two or more countries for mutual defense
and security. The alliances are based on the notion that an attack on one member of the alliance will
incite a joint response from the other members of the alliance. In this way, alliances played a role in
the First World War because when Austria–Hungary declared war on the Serbs the Russians came to
their aid by attacking Austria–Hungary which left Germany as an ally of Austria–Hungary no choice
but to come to its defense. Germany's military response against the Russians was met in a similar
manner by response from Britain and France which marked the beginning of the war. As the conflict
dragged on the other allies were incited to participate in the war to support each

The Causes of the First World War
This question has formed part of the historiography of the causes of the First World War, a historical
debate that has endured ever since the conflict ended. It periodically resurfaces with new theories
being advanced such as the Fischer thesis, usually on account of the release of previously unseen
documents or because of a shift in the political climate. It has emerged to the fore once again
because this year is the centennial of the war's outbreak and there are plans to commemorate it
nationally across the UK. In order to fully understand how Britain's decision to go to war against
Germany is best explained one must engage into the debate revolving around the question of the
extent to which Britain and other countries were responsible for causing war. This helps explain the
intention Britain had for war which is vital in understanding their decision making process to cause
war in the first place. Some schools of thought have come to the conclusion that it was everybody or
nobody– the continent "slithered over the brink into the boiling cauldron of war without any trace of
apprehension or dismay."1 That analysis will be considered in this essay as will the widespread
thesis that it was Germany's aggression which not only created the preconditions for war, but also
triggered Britain into war with the political imbalance of power being created from the growing
naval and colonial expansion of Germany. Other factors that help explain why Britain went to war
against Germany

The Franco-Prussian War: The First World War
Before World War 1 the last war fought was the Franco–Prussian war which concluded in 1871.
During that war mainly cavalry was used and the battles were for the most part brief. European
nations went into WW1 with the notion that it will be just like the Franco– Prussian war and battles
would be just as short;, they had forgotten the toils of war. The First World War proved dramatically
different, it saw 20th century military technology on 19th century tactics. Soon it became a war of
attrition, a race to see which side would cave for the most part, to end the stalemate on the western
front. This war of attrition influenced a dramatic change whether innovative or inventive in military
technology during the period of 1915–1918. The war saw improvements ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The military technology developed were to make the war end quicker and break the stalemates yet
they simply caused more deaths. Chemical gasses did nothing but kill as infantrymen could not even
make a move after an attack due to fear of being killed by the lingering gas. This total war did not
just drive everyone into the cause, but also treated civilians as fighters with the bombing and killing
through pilotless drones and other aircrafts. Never had there been such a war, where techniques
would hurt the user almost as much as it hurt the enemy. Tanks would poison their drivers would
monoxide gas or break down in front of enemy lines. The technology created kept being furthered
even more when they proved ineffective and each time they would be more deadlier, one could not
go back to times of peace. It seems that as far as the tactics being used stayed 19th century type, no
technological advancement could break the wall. But when countries started changing their tactics,
like when Germans started using stormtroopers, there was actually a break in the defense

The First World War ( Wwi )
The First World War (WWI) was fought from 1914 to 1918 and the Second World War (or WWII)
was fought from 1939 to 1945. They were the largest military conflicts in human history. Both wars
involved military alliances between different groups of countries.
World War I was centered on Europe. The world warring nations were divided into two groups
namely 'The Central Powers' and 'The Allied Powers'. The central powers group consisted of
Germany, Austria–Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria. The Allied powers group consisted of France,
Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and (from 1917) the U.S.
World War II, the opposing alliances are now referred to as 'The Axis' and 'The Allies'. The Axis
group consisted of Germany, Italy, and Japan. The Allies group consisted of France, Britain, the
U.S., the Soviet Union, and China. World War II was especially heinous because of the genocide of
Jewish people perpetrated by the Nazis.
The causes of World War I were six. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria on
28 June 1914, the heir to the throne of Austria–Hungary was the trigger for the war. He was killed
by Serbian nationalists. Austria–Hungary invaded Serbia. At same time Germany invaded Belgium,
Luxembourg and France. Russia attacked Germany. Several alliances formed over the past decades
were invoked, so within weeks the major powers were at war; as all had colonies, the conflict soon
spread around the world.
The Versailles Treaty signed at the end of World War I not only lay

Events Leading For The First World War
Term Paper #2: Events Leading to the First World War There were five foremost supremacies in the
First World War. Those five supremacies were Great Britain, France, the German Empire, the
Austro–Hungarian Empire, and Russia. This paper will be discussing the escalation of imperialism,
nationalism, and militarism in the German Empire throughout the fifty years leading up to the First
World War and describing how each of these said characteristics led to the German Empire going to
war with and against the other said supremacies.
To start out, imperialism is the arrangement when an influential nation controls and exploits a
colony or colonies. The most communal circumstance for imperialism is when the imperialist nation
inaugurates control over the newfound terrain through intimidation and force. After the colony or
colonies are subjugated, the territory is then claimed as a colony of the imperialist nation. The
imperialist nation is frequently denoted to as the 'mother country' of the colony or colonies it has
taken over. The imperialist nation 'gives birth' to a new colony, hence the name 'mother country' of
the colony. The colonial governments are functioned by the imperial nation or a subservient puppet
regime. The manifestation of a military power is often positioned in the colony or colonies to
regulate the native inhabitants–who justifiably do not appreciate being taken over–, to deal with any
insurrections that transpire, and to dissuade imperial competitors. The

The First World War
The first world war was one of the most brutal and remorseless events in history; 'the global conflict
that defined a century'. Over nine million soldiers and a large amount of innocent civilians lost their
lives. Empires crumbled, revolution engulfed Russia and America rose to become a dominant world
power. Huge armies deployed new weapons of devastating effect from rifles and pistols to torpedoes
and flame throwers. These weapons were used not only in the trenches but by tanks too. This was an
advantage to those who were able to access such machinery as they could easily launch bullets and
missiles at nearby enemy bases. The downfall of the tank was the fact it was unable to cross the
trenches. Tanks were not the only pieces of equipment that could access this machinery but U boats
and planes too. The British carried 'bolt action rifles' in which fired 15 rounds per minute at a
minimum range of 1,400 metres away. This allowed the British to take out foes at a far greater
range. By using machinery in which rules out the need for getting up close to the enemy was a great
advantage during world war one. Soldiers ran from trench to trench attacking with all that they had.
This resulted in a massacre as the soldiers running toward the trenches were shot down. Machinery
such as machine guns and heavy artillery were the weapons used in the trenches. In modern day
society, machine guns are the main weapons used by soldiers. This wasn't the case around the 1914s.
They took four

The First World War Essay
The First World War was commonly known for its lack of movement for soldiers on all sides. World
War I took place on the Western Front from the autumn of 1914 to the spring of 1918. During the
First Battle of the Marne, German advances were pushed back by the Allied forces. To stop
themselves from loosing land they "dug in" and made protective trenches. The Allied forces were
unable to break through the German line as a result did the same and made trenches of their own.
Death was an event that many soldiers had met on the front lines daily. Due to attacks launched by
air raids with large shell bursts numerous men were buried in the process of defending themselves.
An often occurrence for many soldiers is being hit with a precisely aimed ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It took about 12 weeks away from the trench to recover. Lice were not identified for Trench Fever
until 1918. To prevent sickness many men opt to have their heads shaved to avoid nit and lice.
Another medical condition that bothered life was Trench Foot. It was a fungi infection in the feet
area caused by cold, wet and unsanitary trench conditions. Amputation was necessary when the
infection get too out of hand. Trench Foot was common at the beginning of the war; it improved and
faded in 1915 as conditions became better. The Daily life of a typical solider in a battalion was like a
cycle each day. Men began their morning by waking to orders by their officers and sergeants. They
had to climb up on a fire step to guard it from an enemy raid. Both sides actually new they were
coming for each other, but they prepared themselves for attacks that were carried out anyways. In
the early hours machine gun fires were heard from both sides along with shelling and small arms
aimed at the fronts. It helped ensured safety at dawn. Next some areas would have rum being
distributed to the men. They would soon attend to clean their rifle equipment that later officers had
inspections for. Now breakfast is serve and eaten, as forces from both sides would have an unofficial
truce. These truces would last long as it seemed as the quietest times during life in the front lines.
Inspections take place right when breakfast ends, as a company or

The Causes Of The First World War
The causes of the First World War were similar and differed from the causes of the Second World
War politically, economically, and socially. Both of these significant, historical events were
substantially affected by the interaction of dominating societies during this time period. During the
First World War, these leading societies were the European authorities of Britain, Germany, and
Austria, with slight assistance from the U.S. However, the United States allocated their full
engagement during the Second World War. Eventually, with years to come, the United States would
become one of the primary superpowers. Although these two wars were notably different from
political, social, and economic views, both of these event shared numerous similarities.
One of the main causes of both World Wars was the concept of imperialism. During World War I,
the Germans, the French, and the British were in competition to create the world 's best, most
significant and substantial empire. With the thought of imperialistic ways, the German would ally
with the Austrians, and the British would ally with the French. In World War II, Adolf Hitler was in
hopes of making expansions to the Third Reich. He decided to expand this society in hopes that he
could incorporate "all German speaking– peoples." Imperialism relates to both of the historically
significant events. It recurred within the German, Britain, and France. Due to this, the size of the
militaries increased within these three societies.

The First World War I
The Second World War will always be remembered as the "Good War," the one that had to be fought
to stop both Adolph Hitler's intent to spread Nazism and his then–unknown plans for the
"purification" of the human race. However, some do not know what went into that war. For instance,
many do not know the real injustices Germany faced at the hands of the Allies at the Treaty of
Versailles; others may not have given much thought to how both sides prepared, or did not prepare,
for the next potential war while attempting to prevent repeating the mistakes of the first; and many
may not know just what kinds of odds the soldiers faced during OPERATION Overlord. Several
events laid the groundwork for the Second World War. From Germany's side, the issues can be
traced all the way back to the Treaty of Versailles, signed on June 28th, 1919. The main treaty
architects were American President Woodrow Wilson, French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau,
and United Kingdom Prime Minister Lloyd George. The Congress did not allow the United States to
participate in the treaty, and did not allow the U.S. to become part of League of Nations, so France
and England leadership were able to dictate harsh and unfair surrender terms on the German people,
making them accept full responsibilities for the war, removing territory such as the Rhine Land, and
demanding reparations to the tune of $8,000,000,000. The French Government wished to bring
Germans' military and economy to its knees.

The First World War (WWI)
World War I The following paper gives insights on various issues; Firstly, why the First World War
started, its effects and lastly how and why America got involved in the First World War Causes of
the First World War The First World War started in 1914 and ended in 1918. The causes of World
War I were militarism, alliances between European countries, imperialism, nationalism and the
assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand (Keegan, 2014). Primarily, it may be cited, that its cause
was a struggle between the Central Powers (Austria–Hungary, Germany and Italy) and the Allied
Powers (France, Great Britain and Russia) over the expansion of Serbia into the Balkans. Nature of
the First World War The war was fought on the Eastern, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was done through National Selective Service that set up the Random Lottery Program that
registered men within 21–30 years to the military. Secondly, the War Industries Board overlooked
the production of raw materials and the Food Administration agency coordinated the conservation of
food. Also, the Railroad Administration rationed oil and coal use while the Committee on Public
Information fueled propaganda that worked in support of the American troops (Tindall, 2016).
Finally, the National Labor Board thwarted any strikes that would interfere with the war. Events
after U.S Entry into the War Firstly, the entry of the Americans demoralized the Central Powers
since they provided resources regarding manpower, food and ammunition to the British, French and
Allied Forces. They also aided the allied forces defeat the Germans at the Second Battle of Mame.
The Ludendorff Offensive was thus thwarted (Tindall, 2016). Finally, their entry also snatched
victory from the Germans and led them to sign the armistice, making them concede defeat in
November 1918. Woodrow's Fourteen

Germany's War Aims In The First World War
In the area of knowledge of history, certain crucial questions are inevitable, as to what constitutes
knowledge: How do we know our past? Who records them, and what are we recording? The last
question is the most important one as it is in the hands of the historian to ascertain what should go
down in history and how it should be recorded. Therefore, he/she has the power to create a
perspective for the people who will subscribe to this historical knowledge. This bring us to the next
important question – How far does opinion impact on the historians methodology, and the extent to
which the 'context' of the historian leads to new historical interpretations? To understand this better,
let us take an example. Context: One of the greatest historical ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In 1961 German historian Fritz Fischer published a controversial book, Germany's War Aims in the
First World War. Fischer argued that the German's had plans for war right from the start and that the
assassination of the Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand was just an excuse for war. He believed that
Germany encouraged Austrian war plans. The counter argument to Fischer's view was presented by
another German historian, Gerhard Ritter in his book, Staatskunst und Krieghandwerk: das Problem
des 'Militarism' in Deutschland. Ritter believed that Germany was mainly motivated by the desire to
keep Austria as a great power and to prevent Russian domination in the Balkans. Ritter stated in his
book that Germany had no long term war plan and they were dragged into war by Austria.
Furthermore, he believed that Germany miscalculated that Britain would not enter the war. Ritter
strongly believed that military plans were necessary for Germany with Russia posing as a threat.
This shows how two historians with same context use different methodologies in attempting to find
'historical truth.' Which leads to the question: To what extent is history discovered or invented?
Objectivity is taken away when a historian has to select or identify different themes, causes and
effects. The choice of language in which these selections are presented also impacts attempts to
maintain objectivity when presenting historical

Discussing The First World War
When discussing the First World War, there are a myriad of topics, theories and debates that can be
brought up, especially when its regarding to its breakout and and what lead to it. There are multiple
direct and indirect causes that all are interconnected with one another, making it very difficult to just
discuss about one topic without it overlapping with another completely different topic. One of the
most unquestionable causes that lead to the outbreak of the war was the alliance system that was
active in the early twentieth century and that was however set into motion well before in the mid
nineteenth century. The alliance system can be viewed as major causes from two main different
perspectives; it can be considered as a immediate cause or as a indirect background cause. However,
the existence of the alliances is crucial to the bringing about of the first world war from both
perspectives The existence of the multiple alliances and treaties is considered as a major immediate
and direct cause to the bringing about of the First World War because it turned a conflict between
two countries that could've been easily contained into a full scale world war that involved multiple
countries. To fully understand how and why this series of chain events were set into motion, one
must know and comprehend all the past alliances, treaties and accords that were created in the past
and that in time would bring to the two major European alliances, the Triple Entente and the Triple

The First World War I
Nadia Jahnecke
Mrs. Schartner
U.S. History 2 AP/IB
19 October 2015
Unit 3 Notebook Essay
The First World War fought from 1914 to 1918 was one of the largest and most brutal catastrophes
fought in the 20th century. With nearly the entire European continent fighting a barbaric and
everlasting war, the U.S. had eventually to get involved in order to reinitiate stability to Europe.
Ultimately, the U.S. taking involvement in World War I had a profound political, economic, and
social impact on the country. It increased government powers and solidified the nation's leadership
role in foreign politics. The U.S. emerged as the world 's greatest industrial power with increasing
financial opportunities for minorities. At the same time anti–immigrant and anti– communist
sentiments arose among many American citizens. And finally the war contributed to the massive
migration of African Americans from the Southern to Northern states looking for employment and
freedom and, first time allowed women to participate in jobs that were traditionally reserved for
men.
Initially, U.S. politicians and citizens had differing opinions of whether or not they should take
action in the war. Although many in society and congress disapproved war, Wilson eventually
managed to get the approval and set forth the first drafting law, the Selective Service Act. Indeed,
there were still many anti–war protests reoccurring and therefore, the government set up the nation 's
first propaganda agency, the Committee on

The Flamethrower: The First World War
The flamethrower was created in 1911 by the germans. There were previous flamethrowers in the
past used by the chinese but wasn't as advanced as the more modern flamethrowers." Unlike
grenades, flamethrowers could "neutralize" (i.e. burn alive) enemy soldiers in these confined spaces
without inflicting structural damage." These flamethrowers were used to clear out large spaces in the
trenches and chain deaths. The fires would spread quickly and incapacitate and kill the enemy. This
would cause confusion in the ranks and disrupt the organization of troops. The effectiveness of this
technology or weapon was shown and more frequently used in the war. The uses of the
flamethrower were simple. To shoot the fire out and to set fire to an object

The And Collective Memory Of The First World War
Contemporary Canadian reimagining of the First World war is from the book Catching the torch by
a Brock University teacher Neta Gordon. She wrote this book in 2014. She tries to explain to the
reader the conflict between history and collective memory of the First World War. With many other
essays, she focuses on the role of the Canadian army in the First World war. As we know, the
Canadian army entered the war in early 1915 to offer help to the Britain soldiers fighting against the
Germans. The Canadian army was basically forced to join because they were a member of the
British Empire.
On the one hand, Gordon quotes from Jonathan Vance's Death So Noble: Memory, meaning and the
First world war: "the dominant or collective memory of a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Most of the work that Gordon studied and with the publication date from this book, we can also say
that collective memory is not a whole. Most of the soldiers are dead at this time and she had to rely
on works that were published years later after the First War. Gordon quoted Winter in the first few
chapters of her book, he stated: "This sense of the socially constructed nature of "collective
memory" is vital to historical study, since it precludes talking about memory as if it exists
independently of the people who share it" (2). From what I understand from the few pages that we
had to read and with my research done with the whole book, the collective memory is based on the
present memory, but since the soldiers they rely on are no longer in a group or in the same place, it
is mostly a memory from one person.
Another thing she said that made me realize how true her statement was with the novel that we
studied during this term. She stated that: many of the narratives this volume examines rehabilitate
the figure of the father and/or conception of productive masculinity; many follow in the tradition of
early–twentieth–century home front novels by women to consider the value of female work, in
wartime and beyond [...] and most conclude with a look to the future (which is now the present) and
a sense of promise that is decidedly free from irony. (21–22)
In Sunrise for peter, we have an example of the father figure where Peter takes care of Telfer
because

The Causes Of The First World War
Option A: What in your view were the causes of the First World War? How have historians' views
on the war changed over time? Historical events are crucial in human thoughts since they
understand themselves better in the present through analyzing their past occurrences. Historical
events help us to know the causes of certain past events, therefore, making the cause to entail long–
term ideology events and actions. Nevertheless, the causes of certain events may differ depending
on the scale of history and the way historians approach the events Mackie, (1965). The research
paper will further explore the causes of the First World War, the causes of cold war and
decolonization. Through this, will answer the question on causes, why and what ... Show more
On July 28, Austria–Hungary declared war on Serbia since he wanted to take over Herzegovina and
Bosnia. Later Germany declared war on Russia when they started mobilizing due to its alliance with
Serbia. Within a week from when the war was declared, Germany, Austria–Hungary, Russia,
Belgium Serbia and Great Britain had pledged to support Austria–Hungary. b) Imperialism
According to the research, desire for greater empires and competition constituted to the occurrence
of the First World War. Simply, imperialism entails to the increase of power and wealth in a country
which may result in war. In our case, there are some contention parts which had been pointed out
such as parts of Asia and Africa since they held a lot of raw materials. The imperial nation pursues
to establish control over another smaller nation by the use of coercion which usually starts from
entry and annexation and from their political pressure which will lead to war and finally a military
conquest. For example, this phenomenon was widely talked about and seen in Hong Kong before
1997 when the former British colony was about to be handed back to China. Because of
imperialism, there was increased tension and fear within the area since they feared to be attacked by
another nation. c) Militarism Militarism is a nation's act of placing an immense necessity and
significance of the military power. To many European nations before the First

The Origins Of The First World War
The Origins of the First World War The Road To War Is Paved With Good Alliances Did a failure in
alliance cause World War 1? Who's who? Great Britain had a very large empire mostly in Africa and
Asia. Britain was choosing to keep out of all matters in Europe that didn 't concern them, this policy
was called Splendid Isolation and for some time, it was very splendid for Britain, they were once the
top for industrial and maritime industrial. Because of Splendid Isolation, it was very hard for
anybody to know where Britain stood on matters (Splendid Isolation. History BlogSpot). They
needed to protect their overseas empire, so the British had a very large navy. The French had a well–
trained army, however France was behind Britain and German in economic wealth, it made less steel
and coal than the other two countries. France and Germany had already had conflicts in the past
when France lost Alsace and Lorraine to Germany back in the Franco–Prussian War of 1871 and
they wanted it back, however they were just no match for Germany. For now, France had to wait
Russia was the biggest, but poorest country in Europe that Tsar Nicholas ruled, however he had a
very odd way of leading his country, violently stopping unpopular opinions and allowing people he
liked to have a say in Russia's policy making. Russia had a big army but they were behind on new
technology. The rest of Russia's people were simple farmers, with over 80% of the population doing
some kind of land related job.

Who Is To Blame For The First World War
Imagine yourself marching down the street, everyone in the city is gathered around you, people
cheering and screaming for you. You proudly march along your friends, to prove and show your
country is the best and a world power. Even though you didn't know why you were going, the
government gust shipped, you off for nothing but training to protect their pride for their countries.
This was WWI it started in 1914 and ended 1918; it was called "The Great War" and "the war to end
all wars". This war didn't have a good or bad side; all you know is that war was a solution to
everything. But this was the most dangerous war, they have seen before, with 22 million people
died. So how is to blame for the start of the war? Well some would say it was Germans ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By 1914 Germany was producing more coal, iron, steel and cars than Great Britain. Great Britain
saw Germany as a major rival and its growing wealth and power as a potential threat to its wealth
and power. As a result, the rivalry of Germany and Britain heightened. On the other hand, some
people believed this was the most important cause of the war. In my opinion WWI was an
unnecessary global conflict in which 22 million people needlessly lost their lives. The First World
War witnessed a huge amount of casualties. Tactics during the early stages of the war led to the
massacre of hundreds of thousands of soldiers and a huge loss in moral. The assassin and the
alliances contributed to this, by all of the major powers stepping all in because they ally needed help
(this was the most important and most major cause of the First World War happening). I also believe
that the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand was only a minor cause and put together
with all the others caused the First World War Of all the thing that happens you can now say and
prove the start of the war wasn't Germany's fault. Even if you look closer to the countries that
caused the war were Serbs, Russia, Great Britain and France. If Germany was to blame for this war
then Italy would be in the same position, they were an opposite side. Before the start of the war
every country had prayed and they were going to do anything to prove it.

First World War Vs Progressive War
In your opinion, Can the First World War be regarded as a particularly Progressive conflict, or did it
derail the Progressive Movement–or are both of these statements true?
While it is a true that the United States entered the war toward the end of the Progressive era, I do
not believe WWI can be regarded as a Progressive conflict. While in general, the United States saw
not need to enter the war and wanted to stay neutral. In addition, a lot of Progressives saw no reason
to enter the war. They thought that getting involved in the war would violate the "spirit of the
progressive reform" movement (Divine, Breen & Williams 2013, p. 569). Progressives thought that
greed was the source of the war. They felt that manufacturers of ammunition,

The Catalyst for the First World War
The origins of the First World War are diverse, complicated and widely debated among historians,
especially concerning the liability of Germany. Between 1871 and 1914, there are several elements
that have contributed to destabilize the balance of European powers. Imperialism adopted by
European countries, especially in Africa, the rise of Germany, which build up the development of
alliances between States and the expansion of nationalist movements are the main elements. 1)
Germany, a new European power The rise of Germany is one of the major elements that increased
tensions between European states. Indeed, the Prussian victory over France in 1871, allowed the
unification of Germany and the founding of a new power in Europe. The fact that Germany wanted
to act as a military and economic power developed fear of other European countries, and thus
influenced Diplomatic Relations. Between 1890 and 1914, the German population rose from 49 to
66 million inhabitants. In addition, Germany exported more steel than France, Russia and Britain
combined and was the second largest coal producer in Europe, behind Britain. The strength of
German industry allowed to increase the military capabilities of the country which had, in addition,
a well–trained and equipped army. Germany had, just before the outbreak of war, the second world
fleet, behind Britain. The foreign policy of Germany was conducted by Otto von Bismarck, the first
Chancellor of Germany from 1871 to 1890. Its policy

Siam in the First World War
At the outbreak of the war in August of 1914, which merely 4 years after ascending to the Throne in
1910, the King Vajiravudh monitoring and was well informed about development of the war in
Europe. Prior to Siam joined the war the king Vajiravudh observed that Siam was geographically so
remote from the war and he was rightly in thinking that it was wise for Siam to maintain strict and
impartial neutrality. The reason behind this decision was due to the fact that there were danger signs
of the threats to Siamese independence especially during the early years of the reign. As can be see
from the last decade of nineteenth century Siam was the only independent country in the South East
Asia that was surrounded by British and French colonies from east to west. The incident at 'Pak
Nam', in 1893, in which French brought the gun boats from their colonies in Indo–China to the 'Mae
Nam' and trained the guns on the King's Palace in Bangkok, were still fresh in the mine of people in
Siam. As a result of this conflicted Siam had to cede to France the right bank of Mae Khong River
which included Loung Pra Bang followed by the whole of Cambodia which included Phra Vuhear
temple in 1907 after signed Entente Cordiale agreement of 1907. As well as these Siam also ceded
Kedah, Kelanton, Trangkanu and Perlis to Britain in 1909. Until about 1910s Germany became a
new competitor on colonial affairs, and show increased influence in Siam. According to Directory of
Bangkok and Siam published in

The During The First World War
Reaction to the war:
During the First World War, Australia supported Great Britain which meant that Australia was also
at war. The conflict had an impact on Australia as a young nation, the following information are just
some of the issues that Australia dealt with. The outbreak of war was met with huge enthusiastic
support for Britain and for Australia to support by being part of the war. Support came in the form of
political parties, churches, the newspapers and community leaders who felt that it was a moral and
necessary commitment to enter the war. There was a rush to the recruiting offices, initially only the
healthiest and fittest men were enlisted.
Australia was a very young nation in 1914, it had only recently formed to become a ... Show more
Another example was that Companies promised the employees who volunteered for service would
have their positions held with leave granted with full pay. Events ended with both cast and audience
uniting in the anthems of Rule, Britannia and Advance Australia Fair reflecting strong nationalist
and patriot emotions. However, evidence has been uncovered to suggest that this was not the correct
image as there are hints to imply that not all Australians felt this way, for example even though
many men tried to enlist, there were many that did not which led to incidences of white feathers
being sent to the men that did not rush to enlist and also of women rejecting and abusing these men.
Effect on the economy:
When the Great War of World War 1 erupted in 1914, it had a devastating effects of on the
Australian economy and to this day, this war remains the most disastrous event Australia as an
nation in its infancy has ever suffered by lives lost and impact on the economy of the country, in fact
it remains the worst year for our economy since federation. Australia 's economy wasn 't very
diverse and relied heavily on imports and with a limited number of customers for its agricultural and
mineral exports. At the announcement of war, Germany was the biggest buyer of many of Australia
's exports such as metal, wool and wheat and this had a direct effect on Australia

Weapons of the First World War
Research Overview of WW1 Weapons During World War I many new kinds of weapons and
technology were invented and improved. Some of these weapons included tanks, chemical and
biochemical weapons, grenades, and machine guns. Chemical Warfare was used for the first time on
a large scale in World War I. There are two main types of chemical warfare, one affects the surface
of the body they come in contact with and the other affects the nervous system. Almost all chemical
warfare weapons needed to be inhaled to cause severe damage or death. Chemicals that caused
neurological damage acted by blocking the transmission of nerve messages throughout the body,
these types of chemicals included tabun, soman, sarin, and VX ("Chemical and Biological ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Chemicals that attack the nervous system are very powerful and can cause death within minutes of
inhalation. Nerve agents work by blocking the transmission of nerve messages within the body
("Chemical and Biological Warfare"). "A single drop of nerve agent can shut down the entire body's
nervous system in a few minutes" ("Chemical and Biological Warfare"). Tanks were first used in
combat in September of 1916 by the British ("The WW1 Tank"). When tanks were first created they
were basically an armored car with a track instead of tires for easier off road use. The first
prototypes of tanks were very flawed and would take a lot of improvements to become what they are
today. They were not well adapted to moving over uneven muddy battle fields so the tanks were
easily bogged down by mud and sometimes got completely stuck. Tanks were not only effective by
their protective properties but also had a scare factor towards the beginning of the war since they
were new and the German army had not experienced them in battle before. View slits were one of
the main problems with the first tanks. For one they were too small to be able to effectively see
anything out of them while the tank was moving. And the slits were targets for enemy gunshot.
The name tank came from the British, they shipped the parts for tanks in crates marked "tanks" to
try and disguise what was

Introduction Of The First World War
Introduction to the First World War
In the context of the First World War, we need to consider the question: 'Are we as a nation so
transfixed by the Gallipoli campaign that we have failed to look at what was happening elsewhere
during the First World War?
There is a strong case to be made that Gallipoli has over the past hundred years, overshadowed the
real stage on which the war was fought – the Western Front. This does a great injustice to the many
thousands of Australians who fought and died there. It is time to set the record straight – not to
diminish Gallipoli – but to raise the Western Front campaign to the same degree of significance in
the Australian psyche and its historic records.
Many Australians today would point to the 1915 Gallipoli campaign as the single most defining
moment in Australia 's history.
Before 1915 at the outbreak of the First World War Australia was widely considered as just a colony
of the British Empire. The heroism, courage and 'mateship' portrayed by the ANZACS at Gallipoli
has since become a symbol of nationhood of Australia. From this time other countries respected
Australian soldiers as a 'force to be reckoned with'/ Politicians have frequently referred to what it
means to be Australian was 'written in blood' at ANZAC Cove. Every year special remembrance
services are held at ANZAC Cove to remember the soldiers who gave their lives there.
The War on the Western Front.
In France and Belgium on the Western

The First World War (OPSEC)
Prior to the VII Corps ground offensive, the 1st Calvary Division "conducted aggressive feints,
demonstrations, and artillery raids in the direction of the Iraqi defense nearest the Wadi Al–Batin. "
In addition, simulated convoys, logistic sites, reconnaissance, command posts, and training
operations all showed a buildup of corps forces and reinforced the deception that the main attack
would be launched directly north into Western Kuwait.
The whole MILDEC program was a success. Saddam stayed focused to the east and to the coast. At
least 8 divisions stayed oriented on the Kuwaiti coast and 4 divisions were positioned to block Wadi
Al–Batin, all their attention fixed in the wrong direction. All of the efforts to develop a success
MILDEC would have been for not if Saddam had gain critical information or indications of US
positions, capabilities or, most important, intent. Operations Security, or OPSEC, had to be
incorporated in order to deny the adversary this information.
Operations Security (OPSEC)
By discovering the enemy's disposition and remaining invisible ourselves, we can keep our forces
concentrated, while the enemy must be divided.
– Sun Tzu ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The purpose of OPSEC is to reduce the vulnerability of US forces from adversary exploitation of
critical information or indicators. The process is a systematic method used to identify, control, and
protect critical information and subsequently analyze friendly actions associated with military
operations. This includes analyzing the enemy collection means, or sensors, which can observe
friendly activities and forward on to senior leadership. Most times this information is not overt like
finding top secret plans but rather "it is little indicators, puzzle pieces, that when combined with
other indicators, loudly shout 'Here I am!' to the enemy.

The First World War ( Wwi )
Along history there have been persuasive speakers who through their voices have changed the
world. They have mastered the art of persuasion and became leaders in order to inspire people to
follow them and believe in them, to fight for their country because of patriotism and honor, and they
unite masses for the best for the humanity and others for the worse. The First World War (WWI) left
leaders that implementing strategic messages dedicated to the people made a paradigm shift by that
time causing a revolutionary change and "a tragic and unnecessary conflict," as Keegan describes
the Great War. Leaders in WWI such as David Lloyd George, the Liberal chancellor of British,
Thomas Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, and later Adoft Hitler during WWII,
are remembered for their persuasive approaches.
By definition, a persuasive speech is "a message strategically designed to induce change in the
audience in some way consistent with the speaker's purpose" (Pearson 330). Mrs. Price explains
how Aristotle defined three kinds of persuasion furnished: "The first kind, ethos, depends on the
personal character of the speaker; the second, pathos, on appealing to the emotions, values, and
beliefs of the audience, and third, logos, on the proof or logic." Many leaders have mastered the
three types before mentioned and demonstrated that it is an invaluable tool that can change the
world.
World War I began on 28 July 1914 with Austria–Hungary 's declaration of war with

Canada's Role In The First World War
During the wars, Canada made a name for itself due to its contribution to both world war one and
world war two. In the events of Canada's last hundred days, the battle of the Atlantic as well as The
Normandy campaign, Canada played a crucial role in all of them. Canada ultimately helped the
allied forces in their success. Near the end of world war 1, it was known as Canada's last hundred
days because of the involvement the Canadians had in France. The Battle of Amiens was just the
first string in many victories that helped win the first world war. In July 1918, Allied forces held a
better position on Europe's western front. With united states, troops pouring in for reinforcement
commanders of the allied forces decided to switch from defence to offence and push out the German
army.
The attacking force made up of the Canadian Corps, the British Fourth Army, the French First Army,
the Australian Corps and others; tricked the Germans by appearing to weaken their front line so that
German officers expected no assault. Known as the " black day" in Germany, the Canadians pushed
the Germans back 12 km.
The Battle of Cambrai in northern France took place from September 27 to October 11, 1918, during
the First World War. The battle was the Canadian Corps' most impressive tactical victories of the
war, particularly because of the Canadians' ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The allies launched multiple attacks against German strong points throughout northern France. They
launched an attack on enemy forces holding the city of Cambrai, an important railway for German
supplies. On the morning of September 27 the Canadian Corps, with British forces on its flanks,
assaulted a dry portion of the canal. By nightfall, after a day of stiff fighting, the canal had been
crossed and

Causes of the First World War
World War I Essay
When a nation's hunger for power and control become too great, the nation may be pushed to do
things that may have harsh consequences. This was the case in the early 1900's when the world
engaged in its first major global military conflict. There were a number of causes of the First World
War; due to the Treaty of Versailles, Germany accepted full responsibility for the war. Although the
Germans had a large contribution in starting the war, they should not be fully held accountable for
starting the war. The world was a place where only the strongest nations could thrive and expand.
The major powers of Europe were all doing whatever it took to gain power, wealth, and control
different areas of land; this caused ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
France had plans of its own; they wanted to quickly overtake Germany's industrial heartland, Ruhr
Valley. France felt that if they could get into Ruhr Valley they could lower the Germany's chance to
start a modern war. The Russians planned on preparing their army for a war against the armies of
both Austria–Hungary and Germany. The pressure that each one of these plans put on the other
nations led to a war where speed was a major determining factor in the victor of the war. Once each
army began mobilization, turning back was no longer an option and the war became more inevitable
than ever. A new innovation that brought the ongoing naval battle between the major powers was the
introduction of the dreadnought. The threat of the new more powerful battleship started a race to see
who could produce the most dreadnoughts and control the sea. The pride of each nation became a
contributing factor in the war; all the major powers felt they could reign supreme and that is exactly
what they all tried to do.
One of the dominant influencing factors of the war, according to the president of the United States at
the time (Woodrow Wilson) and many others, was militarism. Military personnel had too much
power in nations such as Germany, Russia, and Austria–Hungary. Surely this could not be blamed
solely on Germany as a nation, this type of military based mindset could not be blamed on any
single nation in particular, and it was just the way things were run in

World War 1 : The Causes Of The First World War
World War 1 was a global conflict that lasted 4 years, and included the most powerful nations in the
world. The war started in July of 1914, and ended four years later. At the end of the war, 70 million
militants were involved, where a large percentage of them were Europeans. Millions of militants and
civilians died during the war. The deaths were partly contributed to by technological and industrial
advancements in some of the nations that were involved. The First World War is unarguably one of
the deadliest conflicts in human civilizations. Unresolved conflicts among contributing nations
resulted in another deadly conflict two decades later, the Second World War. The reasons that caused
the eruption of the conflict that later became the First World War have been recorded by numerous
historians. The war started after a young man from Serbia assassinated a man who was the heir to
the throne of Austria–Hungary. The man was Franz Ferdinand, and he was killed together with his
wife as they moved through the streets of Sarajevo. The Serbian killer, Gavrilo Princip, is believed
to have had ties with an undercover military group, the Black Hand. The assassination took place on
June 28, 1914. The deaths of Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophia, were partly contributed to by the
failure of the security team that protected the highly regarded couple. There were rumors before the
assassination of an Austrian plan to remove the Archduke and invade his country. On the material
day, the Archduke had travelled to Sarajevo to inspect the imperial militaries that were based in
Bosnia and Herzegovina . The assassination provoked conflict between the two nations, Serbia and
Austria–Hungary. However, the declaration of war by Austria–Hungary was put off until they were
assured that Germany would assist them in the war in case of Russia joined forces with Serbia.
Russia had two powerful allies; France and Britain. Major European players divided themselves into
two major groups as they formed alliances around the two warring parties. Austria–Hungary blamed
Serbia for the attack and declared war on Serbia the same day that the Archduke was assassinated .
The report from Germany that they would support Austria–Hungary came on

The First World War : The Great War
The First World War sometimes referred to as the European War was more commonly referred to as
the Great War. So much in the world was changed by this war, so it simply by most known as the
Great War. "It is because no other war until then had had such an impact on the world. It was the
first war to affect all of the major nations of Europe and the world. It took many lives and changed
the lives of millions more." (Rivera, 2014) Some countries do not refer to the war as great because
they lost so much and for them there was nothing great about the war. The war was groundbreaking
as nothing like it had happened before. Different countries were uniting, fighting, and making new
rules as they went along. Everything during the war was on a large scale including death, weapons,
people, and affects. Before World War I, airplanes had been used for exploring and transportation.
During this war they were being used for dropping bombs and delivering chemical weapons such as
mustard gas. The war affected future generations of people as over 40,000,000 casualties and over
20 million civilians died. By losing sons or husbands, families would be forced to move and learn a
new way of life as the money makers were not around anymore. For those soldiers that watched
their friends die right next to them, they would never be the same. So those that used to work in
businesses with loud noises or banging machines, might be affected with flashbacks to the war as
well. Man had

S Second World War the Continuation of the First World War?
"Continuation" is when something begins again where it stopped. The First World War broke out at
1914. The Second World War broke out at 1939. The discontent of some countries with the Paris
Peace Conference was a continuation of the First World War that paved the way to the Second World
War. First, there was the discontent of Germany. Germany was a defeated country in the First World
War. She was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles. She had to pay huge indemnity and give up
territories. She was forbidden to station troops in a certain area in its own boundary. Germany
wanted to take revenge and to restore the national glory. Second, there was the discontent of Italy.
She joined the Allied Powers in the First World War because they ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
US imposed high tariffs on foreign goods. Free trade stopped. The Great depression spread across
the world. It lead to the rise of totalitarianism. Italy was unhappy with the Paris Peace Settlement. It
also faced serious economic problems after the Second World War. Yet the democratic government
was unable to solve these problems. This created an opportunity for Mussolini to seize power in
1922. Once in power, Mussolini turned Italy into a totalitarian state. Germany faced serious
problems after signing the Treaty of Versailles in WW1. US once lent money to Germany, but
stopped doing so after the Great Depression had begun. Britain and France kept demanding
Germany to pay its indemnity. As a result, Germany economy collapsed. It also faced serious
economic problems after the Second World War. Yet the republican government was unable to solve
these problems. This created an opportunity for Hitler to seize power. Once in power, Hitler turned
Italy into a totalitarian state. When the Japanese economy was badly hit by the Great Depression, the
militarists became more and more popular in the country. They followed an expansionist policy
towards China and the Pacific region. In November 1937, Germany, Italy and Japan formed the
Berlin–Rome–Tokyo Axis. The formation of the military alliance encouraged the Axis Powers to
expand further, thus bringing the world closer to war. To conclude, the discontent of

First World War Dbq
The First World War was commonly called the "war to end all wars," although it clearly was not.
Just twenty years after the end of the First World War, as French Marshal Foch had predicted, the
world descended into a second war that was even more widespread and deadly. Directly or
indirectly, the First World War yielded some 40 million casualties from more than 20 countries. In
contrast, the 50 to 80 million deaths induced by the Second World War were mostly civilian. Russia
lost around 25 million people alone. Due to these events the 20th century can certainly be
considered one of the most vicious and bloodthirsty in European and human history. The First World
War was caused by decades of suspicion and resentment, a complex web of international

War Tactics And Technologies In WWI

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Katherine Alexander

More from Katherine Alexander (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

War Tactics And Technologies In WWI