Definitions Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Definitions Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction
1. Using two references and in your words, defines Weapons of Mass Destruction?
Weapons of mass destruction might be described as "weapon with the capacity to inflict death and destruction on such a massive scale and so
indiscriminately that its very presence in the hands of a hostile power can be considered a grievous threat"(WMDC, 2006). Most weapons of mass
destruction are nuclear, biological, or chemical. The term is a relatively new one, as it first appeared in December 1937 in an address by Archbishop
Of Canterbury. Weapons of mass destruction may also include fierce fighting machines such as tanks and atomic missiles. These arms can cause
massive damage to physical structures such as buildings, roads, and bridges (Graham & Talent, 2008). However, the meaning of the term was quite
different from the way it is used in the contemporary international law. "Weapons of mass destruction" appear in the document signed by Harry Truman
in 1945. After that, the term "weapons of mass destruction" was included in the titular resolution passed by the General Assembly of theUnited Nations
(WMDC, 2006). The essential characteristics of these arms are their ability to cause large–scale destruction. There is no single definition of the term
"large–scale destruction". However, it could be assumed that massive destruction is the one that causes injuries or death for a large number of people
and the one that destroys vast territories, causing damage to ecology and making it
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Weapons Of Mass Destruction
On the FBI website, Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) are defined as being "devices or weapons that are designed or intended to cause death
or serious injury, and are a serious enough threat to require specialized focus to combat" (Weapons of mass, n.d.). They are considered to be a
decisive weapons that are the ultimate and most destructive. Brian Bennett (2007), in his book entitled, Understand, Assessing and Responding to
Terrorism, asserts the future looks like it could possibly be filled with more chemical and biological weapons, as well a nuclear/radiological arsenal
(p. 138). A combination of agencies and partners in counterterrorism division work together to focus on preparedness for these potential threats. In
addition, they work on prevention and response via a focus organization to be able to impede the advancements of the enemy, especially in the area of
chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
138). Anthrax laced letters were delivered to media and senators, resulting in five deaths (p. 138). This has stopped or interrupted terrorist plots
including the West Coast Airliner Plot in 2002, where hijacked airplanes were to be used to attack targets on the west coast (p. 139). There was also
the Jose Padilla plot, where Padilla intended to use dirty bombs to blow up apartment buildings (p. 139). IN 2003, the U.S. along with other nations
"disrupted a plot to attack a tourist site outside the United States" (p. 140). There have been more, but the effect of any would have been

Wmd Cause Mass Destruction
In this world there is an extreme multitude of weapons that cause mass destruction. These weapons range from biological attacks such as anthrax,
nuclear weapons such as those with radioactive warheads, and especially those with inter–continental ability, or even chemical weapons such as nerve
or respiratory agents that can stop one's nervous system, or their respiratory system as well as shut down other vital body functions. With so many
types of WMDs in the world there must be a way to contain them. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has addressed this by attempting to
control who can get these kind of weapons. The chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBRN) must be contained for the safety of
the public. This... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1945 the United States of America dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan on in Nagasaki and the other in Hiroshima. Both of these locations are
still affecting people in those areas, although not far as much as when the bombs went off. The radiation is very bad for us humans "A large, rapid
dose of radiation causes cell death, and effects are apparent within hours, days, or weeks"(Reed). People suffer many health issues from high doses of
radiation which can all result in

The Power Of Terrorism: Weapons Of Mass Destruction
After the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001, and the increasing threat of an oncoming attack using a weapons of mass destruction (WMD)
device placed a lot of fear in the public of NATO allied countries. Much of the world realized terrorism had advanced in their abilities and willingness to
cause great harm and panic, and it was a matter of time before terrorism turned to more advanced weapons, and possibly soon WMD devices will be
used in an attack on an allied nation. After this realization, NATO received much political pressure from its allied countries to establish a plan to
combat terrorism, with special focus in combatting weapons of mass destruction.
During the Prague Summit in 2002, NATO agreed to a transformation of the NATO

The Weapons Of Mass Destruction
During past decades Americans have become more familiar with terms such as weapons of mass destruction. This term in particular set off an
atmosphere of fear as well as devastation in a person's mind. Such instruments are often referred to chemical bombs, radiation, or anthrax. These are
weapons can cause mass casualties. This paper will attempt to explain the types of weapons of mass destruction that are often deployed in the world
today. Further it will expand on the protocol implemented by the United States government in order to combat the use of these weapons of mass
destruction. Furthermore, this work will explore current practices to detour the future use as well as production of such massive arms by other nations.
Finally, it will define what could occur if the world collective does not adapt a national agreement when dealing with such devices.
U.S. Capacity for Combatting Weapons of Mass Destruction
The world as we know it today can be a cruel place to live in. There is a lot of evil lurking around every corner and if one is not careful, evil will strike
them down. Terrorism is a problem not only in the United States, but all around the world. While terrorism does not have one specified meaning it has
come to simpler terms as a person or a group of people who has one intended purpose and that is to change the way the government operates through
violence and death.
There are many types of weapons that can cause mass destruction. Chemical, biological, or even

Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Introduction
The United States government has a responsibility to assess and prepare for the weapons of mass destruction threat posed by terrorists. Weapons of
Mass Destruction (WMD) is a term that individuals often use to generalize groups of distinct weapons into one main category when discussing acts
of terrorism (Mauroni, 2010). A more precise way of describing WMD terrorism is by addressing the weapon by the appropriate classification, in
order to understand the significance of the type of weapon.. Throughout this paper, these weapons will be classified by chemical, biological,
radiological and nuclear (CBRN). These weapon types have different protocols, which makes it imperative that each weapon is adequately understood
in terms of probability and the potential impact (Mauroni, 2010). Generally, all weapons are low probability but they each have different impacts on
society and the likelihood of each weapon being deployed by terrorists vary. According to Meulenbelt and Nieuwenhuizen (2015), "Chemical weapons
seem to be relatively easily obtainable, biological ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Attempts at nuclear terrorism are probable but there will be many obstacles for success. One main factor that hinder use of nuclear weapons is the
acquisition of fissionable material. The raw material that is widely used for production of nuclear devices is uranium and plutonium (Meulenbelt and
Nieuwenhuizen, 2015). These materials are not easily obtainable and successful weaponization is highly unlikely. Terrorists are able to obtain these
materials from facilities but these buildings are heavily secured. Using uranium and plutonium to create a nuclear weapon requires technological
sophistication and it is cost–effective. These characteristics support the evaluation that, nuclear attacks are unlikely to occur but the impact would be
terrifying (Meulenbelt and Nieuwenhuizen,

Advertical Analysis : Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of death in the United States. Smoking causes more deaths each year than the most common causes such as car
accidents, alcohol use, illegal drug use, etc. combined according to the Centers for Disease Control Prevention. (CDC). The "weapons of mass
destruction" advertisement uses this appealing phrase to grab the audience's attention that smoking is deadly. This billboard advertisement posted in
New Albany, Indiana is meant to capture attention from citizens and tourist who pass by that billboard whether it is by walking or driving. This
advertisement conveys a strong message by using Aristotle's three artistic proofs (pathos, logos, and ethos) to convince the audience that smoking leads
to death.
Advertisers purposely intend to use phrases with different meanings relating to things that are priority for most. Therefore, pathos is used in this
advertisement because it influences an audience by appealing to their emotions by stating that cigarettes are "the weapons of mass destruction". The
phrase "weapons of mass destruction" in this advertisement makes the audience think about weapons in war. War is a heavily touched topic that most
are interested and up to date with. Moreover, "mass destruction" can make the audience visualize natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes,
floods, etc. One example of mass destruction that many are unaware of is pollution. Pollution causes many problems to our environment, but humans
still do not

Prescriptive Effects Of Ideology And The Weapons Of Mass...
A leader cannot call something a "genocide" and then walk off the public stage without doing anything to help because terminology does not just have
descriptive qualities but prescriptive qualities as well. The term Weapons of Mass destruction is limited to a select few innately powerful weapons,
whose deployment is controlled by a single or small group of people and that when deployed can kill a monumental number of humans. This definition
is very precise for a reason, these weapons must be dealt with differently because responsibility for mass casualty when using a WMD lies with the
leaders instead of the masses. Leaders are solely responsible for the decision to take a large number of human lives. The term Weapons of Mass
destruction should not be expanded to include ideologies and more primitive weapons, for unlike those already apart of the definition, ideologies and
primitive weapons are only so destructive when chosen to be used by the masses. By expanding the term one is expanding an expectation that WMDs
should be evaluated on the macro level. This is harmful to it would conflate the importance of smaller–scale choices, thereby misrepresenting history
and hindering the world's ability to learn from such mistakes. Ideology is the excuse and primitive weapons the tool by which the masses create
destruction– they are not weapons of mass destruction themselves– but part of systems that create similar effects. Since distinction is vital to effectively
understanding and

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Research Paper
Should we have entered Iraq even though we were not absolutely positive that they were in possession of weapons of mass destruction? We had two
choices to choose from at the time: 1) we could take our chances, not go into Iraq, and put Americans' and many other people's lives at risk or 2) we
could go into Iraq, find the weapons of mass destruction, and confiscate them.
A year after the 9/11 attacks, Bush informed the U.N. that inspections showed "stockpiles of VX, mustard and other chemical agents" were likely
hidden in Iraq and that the regime was "rebuilding and expanding" chemical weapons production facilities. As the president, it is his sworn duty to put
the American people as his top priority, which means protecting both them and their... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The report led to Operation Guardian, when an American soldier from a technical escort unit, wearing a protective suit and mask and carrying a
detector, reopened the shipping container. The operation's planners had expected 150 to 200 shells. The disposal technicians found nearly 400. The
United States had invaded Iraq to reduce the risk of the weapons of mass destruction that it presumed Mr. Hussein still possessed. And after years of
encountering and handling Iraq's old chemical arms, it had retroactively informed the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in 2009
that it had recovered more than 4,500 chemical weapons. Thus, proving that President Bush was correct in that there were weapons of mass destruction
in Iraq and that he may have saved many people's lives by going into Iraq rather than taking his chances.
The war continued on until 2011, when Barack Obama, two years into his presidency, announced that all U.S. troops have been taken out of Iraq.
Two years after this, the war was resurrected and he began sending more troops back to Iraq. As of April 2016, there were 5,000 troops in Iraq and
the numbers are still growing due to the U.S's preparation in taking Mosul back from

The Pursuit Of Weapon Of Mass Destruction
Terrorism poses a serious threat to the security of every nation; a worldwide problem that doesn't recognize borders, nationality, or religion. These
Non State Actors (NSA's), entities engaging in international operations without the authority of an established nation are always looking for a better
way to further their agenda. One of these ways is through the pursuit of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). Most isotopes that can be utilized to
create an operational device are easily tracked due to their radioactive signature, and the technology is rare making it difficult to acquire a feasible
nuclear program. The next best thing is to instill fear and panic, is chemical and Biological weapons. The only way to deter these actions is to actively
monitor precursor, sources, and the organizations and groups which have expressed interest in creating a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) program.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The best way to prevent such an attack is through the proliferation of precursor chemical, biological, equipment and technology. This can be
accomplished in many different ways to include active monitoring of facilities housing high risk materials, utilizing real–time security systems
networks. Online, Users can be tracked looking for technical procedures on the internet through the use of CYBINT (Cyber Intelligence) protocols.
Organizations that are known to be looking to acquire, purchase, or manufacture Chemical or Biological Warfare (CBW) weapons based on
information gathered from the intelligence community through the use of OSINT (Open Source), HUMINT(Human), SIGINT(Signal), and
FININT(Financial)

Terrorist Attacks: Weapons Of Mass Destruction
After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 the United States became very focused on preventing future attacks and preparing first responders
for any future attacks. Al Qaeda was not able to use one of the known weapons of mass destruction (WMD) so they created their own with air
planes, fuel, and dedicated followers. Technically, they combined hazards by using a flammable chemical to create a bomb. Terrorist groups in
today's world have become creative in their attacks which makes it more difficult to prepare for and respond to attacks. It also increases risk for first
responders. When a first responder arrives on the scene of a terrorist attack they may not know if a chemical, biological, or radiological agent was used.
If they do not have personal protective equipment to deal with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Weapons of mass destruction include chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (CBRNE) materials. Terrorist may decide to use them
independently or combine hazards to create a larger attack. While terrorist attacks are usually targeted at humans, CBRN materials can also affect
animals and the environment (containment soil and water). A chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear "attack against people could be used to
cause illness, death, fear, societal disruption, and economic damage. An attack on agricultural plants and animals would primarily cause economic
damage, loss of confidence in the food supply," and possibly deaths for animals and humans (Forest & Howard, 2013, p. 113). If the soil and water are
not properly decontaminated, it can also cause many long term health related issues in humans and

The War Of Mass Destruction
In a war of mass destruction and huge weaponry, development of the next big offensive device was on the minds of all the leaders involved. Many of
these weapons were designed in secret laboratories under the top scientists and physicists in the world. High emphasis and funding put into these
designs, the developments flourished. Some of these weapons were unbelievable successes, making their way to the battlefield and meeting all the
expectations set by their imaginative creators. Others, however, did not make it any further than the testing unit. Numerous previously unheard of ideas
were presented, several being far ahead of their time. This was the cause for some of the weapons failures. Although, these were launching pads for
some... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During its final testing, however, the Panjandrum nearly killed a filmer of the event, roaring towards him and shooting rockets in every direction.
Due to safety reasons, the project was discontinued after that final test. Barnes Wallis, also British, designed what was called an Earthquake Bomb.
This was a bomb that fell from high above the earth, penetrated the ground, exploded, and caused an earthquake. It was used towards the end of the
war, on massively reinforced installations, underground caverns, buried tunnels, and bridges. Some of Wallis' bombs based on the Earthquake Bomb
were used to disable the German V2 factory, bury V3 guns, sink Tirpitz, the battleship, and other previously undamageable targets. Another British
bomb designed by Barnes Wallis was the Bouncing Bomb. The concept was a bomb that bounced across water to avoid torpedo nets. It was designed
to allow speed and time of detonation to be pre–determined. In May of 1943, a Bouncing Bomb was used to explode German dams underwater,
having a similar effect to Wallis' other design, the earthquake bomb. Also in the family of bombs developed by Great Britain, was the E61 Anthrax
Bomb. This was a biological bomblet, sub–munition for the E133 cluster bomb. Within in was thirty–five milliliters of anthrax spores, or other
pathogen,on 30.600 sharp flechettes. The anthrax bombs were relatively lightweight and portable, because even just a scratch would prove lethal.

18 U. C. 2332 The Five Types Of Weapon
Title 18 U.S.C. 2332a, WMD refers to any material, weapon, or devices that are intended to cause, or is capable of causing death or serious bodily
injury to a significant number of people through release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals or precursors, a disease organism,
or radiation or radioactivity, including (but not limited to) biological devices, chemical devices, improvised nuclear devices, radiological dispersion
devices, and radiological exposure devices. (WMD, 2016).
The 1995 Sarin subway attack in Tokyo and the Anthrax letters scare along with multiple attempts by terrorists both at home and abroad have
illustrated the fact that terrorists are not objected to using chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Of the five types of WMD's that I have chosen to highlight for this assignment, three fall under Biological warfare, while the other two fall under
chemical warfare.
Biological weapons can be broken into three groups;
1)BACTERIAL
This is a contagious bacterial disease that is transmitted through the air(respiratory) or by person–to–person contact, and is often accompanied by fever
and delirium, headache, weakness, and cough. If not treated early enough, the recipient may go into septic shock and die. Antibiotics are effective in
the treatment of this type of disease.
Examples: Plague, Anthrax or Q fever; (HLS 101 – Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). [APA], n.d.).
2)VIRUSES
This is a submicroscopic infectious agent that is unable to grow or reproduce outside a host cell. It is non–cellular but consisting of a core of DNA or
RNA surrounded by a protein coat.
Example's: Small Pox, Hepatitis, the Avian Influenza; (HLS 101– Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). [APA],

Weapons Of Mass Destruction In Iraq
However, in the months following this Resolution, evidence to suggest Iraq's non–compliance concerning the removal or destruction of Weapons of
Mass Destruction could not be verified through the United Nations. Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei were still investigating when the United States
declared war, however, prior to the declaration, they reported no evidence of non–compliance. Colin Powell's plea to the UN to sanction the use of
armed force was not obliged, in response to this in March 2003, the United States claimed diplomacy had failed, thus the only rational course of action
was toppling Saddam's regime. The United States had attempted to acquire a UN–sanctioned invasion but failed to do so. This begs the question; why
did the United States use an argument that cited UNSCRs, yet themselves, fail to comply with United Nations demands? ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The answer to this is, of course, change the argument. Prior to the invasion, the United States declared the war an act of pre–emption, based on shaky
evidence that they were unwilling to corroborate. The United States claimed that Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction, and also colluded with
terrorist organizations. Considering this, the United States felt that it was imperative that they topple the regime in order to safeguard the country from
an attack by either Saddam or by terrorists backed by

Examples Of Mass Destruction In Bowling For Columbine
In the movie, Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore asks the manager at a missel factory if there is any difference between the weapons of mass
destruction that they build at the factory and the weapons used for mass destruction like in Columbine. The manager says there is no correlation
between the two, but are they really that different? Both weapons of mass destruction are the same in definition, message, and effect/damage. There is
no difference between manufactured weapon of destruction and a school shooting. What technically makes something a weapon of mass destruction?
The definition of a weapon of mass destruction is "A weapon of mass destruction is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological or other weapon that
can kill and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That it is ok to use violence on others because it protects us? That we can just kill others because we don't agree with them? There is no difference
between missels built for mass destruction and those used in shootings. They are the exact same in definiton, message, and effect/destruction. If we
want to eliminate the amount of shootings we hear in the news, we need to get the govenment to stop spreading the message that it is ok to kill others
for "protection" by bringing fear into the people we don't agree with. The government is the biggest terrorist of all and no one is doing anything to
stop it. So, is there really a difference between the government's weapon of mass destruction and the one from Columbine? No, there

Nuclear Arms are Weapons of Mass Destruction
Nuclear arms can easily be classified as weapons of mass destruction, as they destroy all ecosystems that come in contact with it in a matter of
seconds, this fairly new and evolving breed of warfare is continuously becoming a bigger threat to society due to the fact that; the government can turn
to nuclear power if opposing countries do not comply with their needs. The Cold War was essentially defined bynuclear weapons and the nuclear arm
race between United States and the Soviet Union. A high degree of anxiety existed between the two superpowers and millions of citizens around the
world were put to risk by nuclear arm race. The use of these nuclear weapons were exceedingly destructive and the consequences were so enormous
that the protection of human rights were questioned. However the use of these weapons were merely to prevent their use by others. In other words
nuclear weapons were devices of deterrence not warfighting. There was a mutual nuclear weapon ownership with both states possessing nuclear
weapons, therefore the odds of war dropped quickly. Both superpowers quickly came to the realization that nuclear war between the two countries
could lead to a devastation effect on the world which concluded the cold war. "From 1968 the only universal treaty that stops the spread of nuclear
weapons is the Non– Proliferation Treaty (NPT) with about 130 members. China is a nuclear weapon state but not a party to the treaty. Also missing
are India, Pakistan, Brazil, Argentina

The Zombie Apocalypse : Mass Destruction, And Apocalypse
The Zombie Apocalypse I experienced was significant in human history as it is comparable to that of the Columbian Exchange and Rabies
Apocalypses in that they include both mass panic and contagion. However, the Zombie Apocalypse is distinct as it was mass destruction and
extinction on a global scale and unlike the aforementioned apocalypses the zombie apocalypse did not cease overtime but evolved instead. To
understand the concept of the Zombie Apocalypse, one must define apocalypse. According to Youde a Zombie Apocalypse is comparable to a
natural disaster with the added bonus of flesh eating corpses. On top of that an apocalypse can be viewed as a collapse of government, social order,
and an end to life as we know it. For the purpose of all apocalypses, humanity is going to be defined according to Bill Gates where humanity is having
the ability to pass information and knowledge down generations. The zombie apocalypse has similarities to that of the Columbian Exchange and Rabies
apocalypses. The Zombie Apocalypse is similar to the Columbian Exchange in the loss in population. The population of the Native Americans went
from 20 million to 1.6 million in a century which can be attributed to lack of immunity to European diseases and warfare. Much like the Columbian
Exchange the Zombie Apocalypse resulted in a population drop, with only an estimated 500 humans left near towards the end of the apocalypse and
none left at the end. Another important note on the Columbian

Wmds: Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs for short, are nuclear, biological or chemical weapons "that is designed or intended to cause [widespread]
death or serious bodily injury" (Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction). Many countries use them as a deterrent of war, and as a potential form of
retaliation. However, the construction, possession, and usage of WMDs could possibly be the most self–destructive thing humanity has ever done
because they lead to nothing but death and destruction, as evidenced by the U.S. bombing or Japan in WW2, the Iraqi chemical warfare against the
Kurds, and and the Soviet Union's massive biological warfare program. The primary issue with WMDs is, of course, the widespread death and
suffering they cause. Usage causes not only results in immediate devastation, but leaves an dangerous or even uninhabitable area for up to decades,
via radioactive fallout or lingering chemicals. This can directly or indirectly lead the environmental damage, and often does. The construction,
especially of nuclear weapons, is very expensive, and diverts countries' resources away from areas they could be put to better use. Finally, just the
possession of WMDs can allow a country to challenge a much stronger one, and aid in terrorism. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The very first usage was as early as the year 1346, in which the Tartars attacked Kaffa, contracted a plague, and "used catapults to throw the
plague–infested bodies of their dead over the city walls" (Rebehn). The most recent uses include Tokyo in 1995 by a religious sect and letters
containing anthrax spores in 2001. Steps are being taken by world leaders to curb the usage of WMDs; for example, "the United States ... helped lead
the global campaign to abolish [WMDs]. By 1975, most of the world's nations had signed the convention" (Miller

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay
In the text weapons of mass destruction refers to materials, weapons, or devices that are intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a
significant number of people (page 711, para. 3,4). In 1939, Albert Einstein's Letter to President Roosevelt mentioned that the work of scientists E.
Fermi and L. Szilard led him to expect that 'uranium' may be turned into a source of energy in the immediate future (Page 1, para. 1). Einstein knew
how powerful uranium was and how a very large amount of it could set up a nuclear chain reaction. He knew that if in case this did happen he wanted
the president to be well prepared for the outcome. Einstein argued that weapons of mass destruction required a lot of attention and if they are going to
be initiated then the following steps should be followed: a person who is confident and trustworthy should keep the government updated with further
development and put forward recommendations for government action, particularly the secure supply of uranium (Page 2, para. 6). Secondly, this
person should also speed up work by making sure funds are provided and also that they have the necessary equipment needed for completion (page 2,
para. 7)
In the Draft of Press Release Announcing the Use of the Atomic Bomb in 1945, Stimson argued that he believed dropping the bomb would force japan
to surrender on terms acceptable to the United States. He quotes "It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction that the ultimatum of July 26
was

Scientists and Weapons of Mass Destruction
A weapon is a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage. Although, who's the creator of a weapon that can inflict physical
damage? The answer is patriotic scientists. These scientists believe they are creating a weapon that is protecting their country and themselves. Starting
with simple weapons, people have developed with more advanced methods to kill one another in a war or anywhere. This helps us understand that a
scientist shouldn't have an obligation to create a weapon because it causes mass destruction, sometimes turns into a failure, and affects the environment.
When we talk about weapons of mass destruction, we think of nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on earth. An
example for a nuclear weapon is an atomic bomb called "little boy" and "fatman," which were a gun–type weapon and the implosion–type. These were
the first atomic bombs dropped by United States on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Many scientists and engineers in the "Manhattan Project" developed these
bombs. About 140,000 deaths were reported from the Hiroshima bombing. These innocent people were killed within seconds from these atomic bomb
created from obligated scientists. Scientists and engineers have created something so powerful that can't be undone. For example, when a country has
nuclear weapons and wants to engage in a nuclear war, it won't because of the destruction that it has to face to gain victory. Though, in the 21st

Nuclear Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Karla Ximena Leyte
Though Paper #3
Weapons of mass destruction and their ability to challenge security and create large–scale obliteration have become the most significant threat in
international politics, causing vast concern of the consequences that may arise if they were to emerge in the hands of dangerous non–state actors.
Chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons not only possess the ability to end the life of many but also pose negative effects on the environment
and global economy. While their ability to wipe out a mass of civilians causes terror throughout the world, the major concern in regards to WMD
is the possibility of their landing in the hands of treacherous terrorist groups. This fear expanded in 2001 after the terrorist use of anthrax in the
United Sate's postal services (Reed). Although all nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons acquire the ability to terrorize a civilization, nuclear
weapons pose the deadliest threat. Chemical weapons seize the ability to wipe out thousands of lives with effective "gas" attacks while biological
threats influence the spread of deadly diseases. What makes these two forms of WMD less severe than nuclear weapons is that protective clothing
and gear can be worn to avert lethal gas and it is difficult for a pandemic disease to become large scale in today's era (Macfarlane). The United States
should focus its concern on nuclear weapons and the fatal threat they pose not only on human life but also on infrastructure. Arming an

Weapons of Mass Destruction
Weapons of Mass Destruction Weapons of Mass Destruction (1) Introduction (2) The Term * 1 Early uses of term * 1.1 Evolution of its use * 2
Definitions of the term * 2.1 United States * 2.1.1 Strategic * 2.1.2 Military * 2.1.3 Criminal (civilian) * 3 Common hazard symbols * 3.1 Radioactive
weaponry/hazard symbol * 3.2 Biological weaponry/hazard symbol (3) Treaties * 1 General * 2 Delivery systems * 3 Biological weapons * 4
Chemical weapons * 5 Nuclear weapons * 5.1 Non–proliferation * 5.1.1 By region * 5.2 Weapons limitation * 5.3 Cooperation (4) Nuclear (or)
Atomic (4.1) Nuclear warfare * 1 Types of nuclear warfare... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
states with stockpiles * 3.2.1 Israel * 3.2.2 North Korea * 4 Manner and form * 5 Disposal * 6 Lethality * 7 Exposure during Operation Iraqi Freedom
and Operation New Dawn[76] * 8 Unitary versus binary weapons (6) Biological (6.1) Biological Warfare * 1 Overview * 2 History * 3 Modern BW
operations * 3.1 Offensive * 3.1.1 Anti–personnel * 3.1.2 Anti–agriculture * 3.1.3 Entomological warfare * 3.2 Defensive * 3.2.1 Research and
development into medical counter–measures * 3.2.2 Role of public health and disease surveillance * 3.2.3 Common epidemiological clues that may
signal biological attack * 3.2.4 Identification of bioweapons * 3.3 Genetic Warfare * 4 List of BW institutions, programs, projects and sites by country
* 4.1 United States * 4.2 United Kingdom * 4.3 Soviet Union and Russia * 4.4 Japan * 4.5 Iraq * 4.6 South Africa * 4.7 Canada * 5 List of people
associated with BW * 6 In popular culture (6.2) Biological Agent * 1 Classifications * 1.1 Operational * 1.2 Legal * 1.3 Regulatory * 2 List of
biological and toxin agents of military importance * 2.1 Bacterial bio–agents * 2.2 Chlamydial bio–agents * 2.3 Rickettsial bio–agents * 2.4 Viral
bio–agents * 2.5 Mycotic bio–agents * 2.6 Biological toxins * 2.7 Biological

The Importance Of Tsunamis : Mass Destruction And Disasters
In 2004 a devastating Tsunami transpired in the Indian Ocean, known as the Sumatra that killed over 270,000 people in a matter of hours, ranking itself
the sixth–deadliest natural disaster in history by an estimated death toll. No tsunami sensors existed in the ocean to alert the people living in these
coastal areas of the catastrophic Seismic Sea Wave that would arrive, consequently changing the outcome of their lives forever. Earthquakes trigger
tsunamis and can wipe out entire ecosystems depending on their magnitude. With Tsunamis causing more mass destruction and deaths throughout this
past vicennial than years prior, scientists should enlarge precautionary protocols by increasing the number of tsunami sensors in coastal areas.
Subheading 1
Tsunami research has increased dramatically within the last decade as a result of the recent tragedies caused by tsunamis around the world, with over
200,000 more deaths in this decade than last (Witze 151). Professor at the school of marine science and technology, Changsheng Chen, partnered with
Robert Beardsley, fellow oceanographer to research the different components of a tsunami (Kostel 34). With the information collected from this study,
such as the current, temperature, and salinity, Chen and Beardsley were able to recreate and study every aspect of the tsunami wave. This enables
scientists to research the different ways to track when a tsunami forms. For instance, with the studies conducted, scientists now believe that if a
potential tsunami forms near the Indonesian Archipelago, that it will reach the shoreline in an average of 30 minutes (Madin 53). With this
information, scientists will be able to update alert systems and spread word of an incoming tsunami in less time, making it easier for citizens to
evacuate.
There have been dangerous tsunamis in the past decade that have caused serious injuries because of the lack of tsunami alert systems in their area. For
instance, around an hour after an earthquake hit in Japan, there was a tsunami wave that hit the Sendai port measuring 55 inches in height, causing
around 160,000 people to flee the area with a death toll of around 50 people reported (Rich 1). A tsunami of this magnitude is capable of causing

The War Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction
In excess of 600 billion dollars has been spent on the war in Iraq since it began in 2003, plus over four thousand U.S. troops have died because of
this war, and despite a struggling economy the US government is keeping our troops in Iraq with no end in sight. The war in Iraq is a current
military operation that began, without a declaration of war, on March 20, 2003 and is still taking place today in 2009(Thompson). Americans have
been shielded from this war and have forgotten why we went to war in the first place. Thus clarification is needed by the American public on why the
invasion on Iraq was baseless, how the mismanagement is affecting our soldiers and what the overall end result could be. Prior to the war, the
governments of the United States and the United Kingdom declared Iraq was suspected to possession weapons of mass destruction and this posed an
imminent danger to our security and our allies. The American public was led to believe that Saddam Hussein had significant stockpiles of weapons of
mass destruction and was equipped to use them. Following the terror of September 11th by al–Qaeda, the American public was apprehensive of another
vicious attack, and President Bush used this fear to justify his "revenge" on Saddam Hussein. These weapons were one of the key reasons the public
believed why we were going to war in Iraq; however, in six years no such weapons have been located. Furthermore, the following quote from NBC
news, shows the CIA's final

Can Weapons Of Mass Destruction Be Justified?
Can Weapons of Mass Destruction be justified? Weapons of mass destruction are 'weapons that can devastate large areas and kill huge numbers of
people'. There are 3 types of WMD's; Nuclear Weapons, Biological Weapons and Chemical Weapons. In the world there are only 8 counties that
own nuclear weapons and these include USA, Russia, UK, China, France, India and Pakistan and unofficially Israel. In this essay I will be
looking at whether or not Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD's) can be justified, we can link this to the just war theory. I will also be looking at
the 1945 Atomic bomb attack on Hiroshima and whether or not it can be justified. WMD's can be justified WMD's can be justified as they can
stop a greater evil therefore meeting part of the criteria for a Just War. If they are stopping a greater evil then they can be seen as justifiable as
destruction can possibly be reconciled quicker than a greater evil that could carry on for years. The possession of WMD's themselves can be useful,
the MAD theory (mutually assured destruction), if one country owns WMD's then it's unlikely another country is going to attack them, in the long run
the possession of WMD's could eradicate war, as there is a mutuality. Democratic countries can justify their WMD's as they make their countries the
'police' of WMD's and therefore shows their authority and power. Democratic countries that possess the nuclear weapons can make the world safer,
again because of the MAD theory. Countries

Mass Destruction Research Paper
While weapons of mass destruction may not pose as much of a threat as they did in the early 2000s, they are still in use to this day, with the added
possibility of more being created in the future. Should we continue to neglect and ignore the imminent threat of WMDs, the world could cease to
exist as we know it. As someone who has participated in Model UN the past two years, I have been required to do extensive research on weapons
of mass destruction and their effects. As a result, I have learned quite a bit about WMDs and how their coverage in the media has drastically
decreased since the early 2000s, yet their threat is still present. The height of media coverage on WMDs came in the early 2000s due to the Iraq
Disarmament Crisis. WMDs drew in massive media attention due to... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While nuclear weapons are universally known as a weapon of mass destruction, they are not the only type. Other types of weapons of mass
destruction include, radiological, chemical, and biological. While nuclear weapons may be the most known, biological and chemical weapons
are more commonly used. To this day, chemical and biological weapons continue to be used in the Syrian Civil War. Specifically, Chlorine and
mustard gas have been used on all sides of the civil war, and in most cases, despite the possible harm to civilians. The official website of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation defines WMDs as any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas weapon that is designed with the intent to cause death or
serious bodily injury. While some may claim that weapons of mass destruction do not pose as much of a threat today as they did in the early 2000s, I
disagree. While it may be true that weapons of mass destruction do not receive the amount of media coverage they used to, that does not decrease the
threat they pose at all. The threat of nuclear and chemical and biological and radiothermal warfare is still alive and

Analyzing The Menace Of Mass Destruction
Analyzing "The Menace of Mass Destruction" Although many people carry on with their daily life half indifferent and half frightened, their
tomorrow's fate solely lies in their thoughts, actions and decisions at the current time. "The Menace of Mass Destruction" is a speech that was
previously given by Albert Einstein to the General Assembly and the Security arm of theUnited Nations during the second yearly dinner of the Foreign
Press Association. Ideally, the speech is among the most influential speeches ever given because it addresses critical issues that threaten human peace,
outlines the reasons for the mishaps, and provides adequate solutions to their problems. The speech is the most effective since it focuses on the real
issues affecting today's generations that in turn determines the future generations' peace and stability. In addition, it gives guidelines into how different
nations can live peacefully without posing threats to the future generations. Furthermore, Einstein's speech was effective since he grabbed the attention
of his audience through the use of various literary and rhetorical devices. He applies logos to pass on valuable information to his audience. For instance,
he notes that fear and anxiety result into hatred and aggressiveness. He also asserts that fear and distrust usually fasten conflicts among nations. In
addition, progressive growth in technology has been the cause of the ever increasing instances of hostility, (Atomic

Biological Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay
Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction
One of the three serious weapons used for mass destruction is biological. Historically, biological weapons are the oldest form of WMD and have
been in use since the Medieval Ages. During medieval times corpses were placed on catapults and launched into an enemy 's water or food supply to
poison is and cause deadly infections. As far as being used the United States, in 1763 when British officers planned to distribute blankets with
smallpox (eku, 2017). In this era the use of biological weapons was new and thought this particular strategy was necessary to win out wars between
countries. These horrific attempts were continued during war as generals made it a priority to kill off their enemies and instill ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Smallpox is another highly contagious viral disease that shows signs of high fever, severe weakness, and an eruption of pimples that blister,
produce pus, and form pockmarks on the body. The most common three ways biological weapons work are: One is contact with the skin, two is
gastrointestinal, and three is pulmonary (eku, 2011). Biological weapons are very serious and any country, state, or city being threatened by this
needs to take it very seriously. Not only is this type of weapon hazardous but it is actually pretty easy to create and get a hold of. Terrorist groups
are drawn to easy ways to create panic and chaos, threatening to release this type of weapon will definitely cause that. A biological attack can not
only cause sickness and death in one particular area, but can also spread from one country to another due to how easily it can be spread.
Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction
Chemical weapons are manmade poisons that are made to kill, injure, and incapacitate others. They are dangerous because they are silent and are often
invisible to the naked eye. They typically attack different parts of the body like skin, lungs, and can make you confused of what is going around you.
Types of chemical weapons include blister agents, blood agents, choking hazard agents, nerve agents, tear gas, vomiting agents and psychiatric
compounds. . These agents can be sarin, arsines, cyanide,

The Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Research Question: Are there recent developments in weapons of mass destruction planning? Weapons of mass destruction, or WMD, provides a
fundamental problem for governments and other organizations such as hospitals and schools. If WMDs manage to fall into the hands of terrorists,
perhaps during a civil war, the potential for devastation and casualties is high. Therefore planning efforts to avoid WMD scenarios remain at the top
of priority lists. This literature review will highlight the meaning of weapons of mass destruction, what some organizations or governments have
currently implemented for such a scenario, as well as other planning efforts in order to reduce the likelihood of an attack by terrorists with WMDs.
To begin, what are weapons of mass destruction? "Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is, on the face of it, a straightforward designation. The term
is generally accepted to mean munitions whose destructive attributes come from fission or fusion reactions, biological agents, or chemical
weapons"(Grove 2014). WMD's have been on the minds of Americans since the tragic events of September 11, 2001, and before that during the Cold
War. There has been considerable discussion over whether the description is one of gauge– that is, enormously destructive weapons – or is intended to
signify the characteristic or mysterious nature of its means of obliteration. in the article Grove highlights such discussions to help readers understand
what meaning lies for most people

Weapons Of Mass Destruction: A Case Study
The problem I would like to address is how can we shared values and new security strategies to reduce ethnic conflicts, terrorism, and the use of
weapons of mass destruction. I would align two solutions. One solution for the problem of sharing one set of values. Another solution for the new
security strategies. The two solutions I would align to reduce ethnic conflict, terrorism, and the use of weapons of mass destruction is identify functions
parts of the value system within in the security system and create a systemic process system with kanban for check and balance. It is important to
create prosocial behavior with stable and predictable patterns from the pre existing social arrangements using one language to identify them due to
social forces. The social forces impact how we think and behave, how we see people, and how people see us (Durkin & Carrothers, 2015).
Identifying the norms and values within the system allows creates a structure were true understanding of reasoning and logic are made clear for
communicating the meaning of norms and values that shape prosocial behavior. The norms and values are a functions part to the whole system. The
society is the whole system. Norms and values are a functioning part. A framework driven by common sense to communicate the function part (norms
and values) is idea for promoting facts and evidence that would motivate prosocial behavior and encourage balance at check points. A communication
network would be the base to a systemic process system with kanban for check and balances. The kanban points for check and balance would be areas
for adjustments or maintenance from formulated objective or scope calculation. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The five functions of effective management (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Durkin, K. F., & Carrothers, R. M. (2015). Sociology: Beyond common sense [Electronic version]. Retrieved from

Weapons of Mass Destruction and Risk Galore
Weapons of mass destruction, as classified by the FBI, are any destructive devices, chemical or biological agents used with the intention of causing
death or injury on a large scale. These weapons have been used in history, but most are banned to due to the extent of destruction caused. The atom
bomb, probably the most well–known of these weapons were used sparingly but caused massive damage in the few areas affected. Chemical
weapons, agents that can be traced in Syria today, have the potential to spread quickly while causing death and severe injury to those affected. Like
chemical weapons, biological weapons which have been used since the early 1900's, possess the trait of quick contamination and severe damage to
those affected. In... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1995, terrorists released chemical gas on a Tokyo subway; this resulted in several deaths and disabilities towards those who survived (OPCW). The
United States used chemicals in the Vietnam War; the spreading of these chemicals led to several health problems among US war veterans today,
limbless children in Vietnam, and 650,000 Vietnamese suffering from chronic conditions (McMillan). As chemical weapons are banned, Barack
Obama had reacted, as Syria used chemical weapons on its own people, to say that the use of chemical weapons is banned and those who fail to
comply have crossed the red line (Cagle Cartoons). Due to the fact that chemical weapons are internationally banned, it is obvious that they possess a
threat to security and mankind, especially as they can cause widespread damage as a result of their toxicity. The use of chemical weapons lead to a
large number of harmful effects toward the human body. Nerve agents lead to the malfunction of the nervous system, nausea, convulsions and spasms.
Other agents, like the blistering, choking, or blood agents result large blisters, 3rd degree burns, damage to the lungs, respiratory failure and death
(Shea). As a result, these harmful effects have led to the banning of chemical weapons as they possess abundant threats to humankind. To summarize,
chemical weapons, weaponry that is internationally banned, have the potential to cause horrific injuries and death among humans

Mass Destruction
When it comes to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), whether by a terrorist group, an individual, or an unfriendly nation, presents a potentially
severe threat to the United States. Weapons of mass destruction consist of several things that are employed with the intention of causing death or
severe physical injuries to a considerable number of people by means of release of toxic chemicals, radioactive material or any type of other threat.
The biggest concern is that a WMD may possibly be seized by the terrorists or perhaps the terrorists can develop their own WMD. Chemical threat
agents are the aerosols, poisonous vapors, liquids or solids that effect people toxically. These chemicals mostly occur naturally in the environment and
are also synthetically produced. Chemical releases are although unintentional, as may be in the case of an industrial accident,... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In case of an explosive attack the staff is now well trained to help the victims effectively. In case of any of the three threats and especially a chemical
breakout the number of causalities would be quite significant so the organization plans to manage it efficiently. By having training programs available
to anyone . The basic plan offers a plan of the emergency management coordination system set up in the Atlanta area. It is consists of description of the
threats and hazards the state might face, the resources the organization foresees needed to support the local government and the structure in which
these resources maneuver within. The phases are outlined within the basic plan regarding the emergency management process, situation, the purpose,
concept of operations, assumptions, organization, obligation of responsibilities by means of emergency support functions (ESFs), logistics,
administration, activities and planning in deterrence, preparedness, reaction, recovery and

Intelligence And Weapons Of Mass Destruction Programs
Introduction and Purpose Statement
Intelligence has proved to be essential to military actions since antiquity, particularly concerning invasions from a nation's military. Invading Iraq due to
the determination of the continued Weapon of Mass Destruction programs in 2003 resulted, in part from intelligence received by human intelligence
sources. The specific cause that led to the initial determination to invade was the belief that Iraq maintained a Weapon of Mass Destruction program at
the same time also suggesting that Saddam had links to Terror groups. Additionally, the Iraqi Weapon of Mass Destruction Programs during the 1998
inspection from the United Nations led to the assessment of the weapon systems in Iraqi.
Consequently, the Iraq war had resulted in thousands dead along including an unstable nation. Inquiries post–invasion revealed critical flaws within the
intelligence collected. Much of the information provided to the Central Intelligence Agency along with the National Security Council from human
intelligence proved to be incorrect. Furthermore, the incorrect information had compounded the issue with a limited network of assets in Iraq to verify
the intelligence received. One of the most important intelligence failures of the 21st Century is seen in the invasion of Iraq. How can the review of
intelligence collections conducted on pre–war Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction programs better determine the faults in intelligence received from
human intelligence sources,

Regulatory Efforts Or Weapons Of Mass Destruction?
Weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs, are, according to the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (WMDC), "the most inhumane of all
weapons and are rightly called weapons of mass destruction and weapons of terror" (WMDC 2006 p 229). Primary regulatory efforts geared toward
controlling the attainment, maintenance, and use of weapons of mass destruction is extremely important and is regulated by international law. Treaties
and agreements are initiated and enforced through entities like the United Nations and other governmental and non–governmental agencies as attempts
to keep WMDs out of the hands of certain groups and individuals while enforcing responsible measures of those who currently possess them.
Treaties, specifically, have been used

Mass Destruction
The purpose of this article is to address the need for further training for First Responders. This article discussed Police, Fire Department, Public
Officials responses to emergency incidents and protocols needed by each agency. It will also look into what lapses there is in training and what can
be done to improve and be better prepared in case the situation arises again. As George Santayana stated, "those who cannot remember the past are
condemned to repeat it." (2016) The journal started off like very few do, with a fictional story. A story of two policemen and how their day was going
but took a dramatic change for the worse. This scene was different from normal days, not any day but the 4th of July. Two highly trained policemen,
...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The claim for better policies, procedures, protocols and plans is of valid concern. These need to be in place for not only for government agencies that
might have to respond to such a heinous event in the future but the need to take into account state and local agencies. Without proper procedures in
place, implemented and practiced the confusion of 9–11 will happen again. First responders cannot be expected to deal with the emergency at hand.
They need to be there to access the situation and cordon off the area. As stated by Henry and King "emergency responders, including supervisors,
experts, and managers who respond later are made more fully aware of policies, procedures, and protocols, they can begin the task of saving lives much

Wmd (Weapons Of Mass Destruction)
WMD(Weapons of Mass Destruction)
"A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us."(Margaret Thatcher). Although this quote sounds ridiculous, it
is absolutely right. Arguments have been made by President Obama that "nuclear weapons are the greatest threat to U.S. security." However, history
proves that weapons of mass destruction whether– biological, nuclear, chemical or radioactive, are a necessary evil to sustain global stability, deter
attacks from rogue nations and encourage diplomacy.
Weapons of Mass Destruction sustain global peace by keeping the most powerful nations honest. Currently the United States, Russia, China, UK, North
Korea, India, Pakistan, Israel and France all possess WMD. Of these nations the U.S. is the most prepared to deploy its weapons, while Russia
reportedly has the most WMD's. These nations are the most ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
North Korean Leader Kim Jong II, and Iran's Leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad both threaten to attack the United States and its allies, conduct tests, and
oppress their own people. However, when feeling threatened each leader has ultimately come to the bargaining table to discuss sanctions. Why?
Because these rogue leaders know that attacking a world power in possession of WMD's would be suicide. And they want to live.
Weapons of Mass Destruction encourage world leaders to talk rather than attack. There are two deadly implications of using WMD's. First, the innocent
victims are killed in the other country. Second, more innocent victims are killed when the country responds with their own WMD's. Diplomacy is the
profession, activity, or skill of managing international relations. In this case it's an action, the action of threating the use of such weapons calms down
both sides in conflict. This is a win–win. Each side gets to talk tough and save face and maintain their status in their

Banning Weapons Of Mass Destructions
Jacob Brown Dr. Wells 4–30–15 English 101 Banning Weapons of Mass Destructions Won't Work August 6, 1945, the United States launched an attack
on Hiroshima that had never been seen before. No military in the world knew how to defend themselves from such an attack and no civilian felt safe
from the oncoming onslaught (Oppenheimer). An atomic bomb was dropped on that day from a United States Air Force B–29 bomber over the city of
Hiroshima. The radiation falling on the city and the leveling of the city's buildings from the blast left up to thousands of people homeless. This was
just the beginning of the use of weapons of mass destruction and on that day, the true destruction from these weapons began. A few days later the
United States were at it again, August 9, 1945, the second atom bomb had been dropped on Nagasaki causing the same amount of devastation. People
were left with no homes or anywhere to go because of the destruction caused by the blast. Weapons of mass destruction, also referred to as WMDs,
can be composed of either chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear agents designed to wipe out mass amounts of people and destroy objects in
their pathway. Weapons of mass destruction pose a threat to global society because of all the technological advancement that countries now have. The
countries that possess nuclear weapons include the USA, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea, and Possibly
south Africa. Iran which is

The Proliferation Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction
To what extent do WMDs and their proliferation present a threat to global security and what are possible solutions? Proliferation of Weapons of Mass
Destruction and Threats to Global Security The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is one of the foremost threats challenging global security
today. The United States should take an offensive strategy and re–emphasize its nuclear program due to the current affairs around the globe and the
growing threat of the use of weapons of mass destruction against our citizens, allies and vital interests. The existing arms control agreements, such as
the 1968 Non–Proliferation Treaty and the prohibition of biological weapons of 1972, have not been able to address the issues of weapons of mass...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Movement of illegal imports and the exchange of money can be completed with virtually no restrictions depending on the place and time due to relaxed
import and export laws, lack of enforcement controls, and electronic system networks. Furthermore, many governments seem to be unwilling or unable
to implement control over the development, storage, or use of these weapons. More problematic are the shifting ideologies and international
relationships that have occurred over the decades following the cold war. Today there is little doubt terrorist groups or states would use weapons of
mass destruction to further their interests if they were available. The 9/11 Commission Report documented that Usama bin Laden in an interview with
ABC television had called for Muslims to kill Americans without regard to their status claiming all Americans were "targets." He had also attempted to
purchase weapons–grade enriched uranium for over $1.5 million dollars in an effort to make an atomic bomb. Although the material later turned out not
to be uranium, it clearly indicated the terrorist's intent to discharge nuclear weapons without regard to the subsequent fallout of loss of lives,
environmental or economic impacts worldwide.[footnoteRef:2] According to Frederick Mattis, in Banning Weapons of Mass Destruction, nuclear
weapons are still considered to be the ultimate weapon of mass

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Research Paper
Ever since the tragic events that took place on 9/11, the looming fear of terrorist organization opting to use a Weapon of Mass Destruction has
manifested itself into the biggest concern for our nation's Homeland Security. To prevent such destructive weaponry from ever falling into the
possession of a hostile extremist group, the United States government must continue to be active and remain persistent in their counterterrorism efforts.
Several major terrorist organizations throughout the middle–east, are vigorously attempting to obtain and even develop these weapons so they can be
used against their enemies. Even the very thought of a terrorist group, such as ISIS, successfully obtaining or developing a Weapon of Mass
Destruction alone, is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The incredible amount of danger associated with the use of any Weapon of Mass Destruction is the reason for why it's become the biggest concern
towards the safety and security of the United States and its citizens. The term "Weapon of Mass Destruction" is used to identify and categorize an
assortment of extremely devastating weaponry, as each of the weapons placed into this category have two unique traits: "their potential for large–scale
destruction and the indiscriminate nature of their effects, notably against civilians" (Reed, n.d.). Since the despicable attacks made against the United
States on 9/11, no other major attacks involving a Weapon of Mass Destruction being used by a terrorist organization to target the United States have
been documented. This is primarily due to the governments focus on increasing the level of Homeland Security and arrangements made with other
foreign nations to effectively monitor and control the manufacturing of these weapons. By effectively applying theses new strategic measures, it has
made it very problematic for terrorist's organizations to even be able to obtain the materials required to develop a Weapon of Mass

Definitions Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Lyons

More from Jennifer Lyons (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Definitions Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction