The document discusses various modifications that have been made to the original Herren activator appliance. It describes appliances that have one rigid acrylic mass but with reduced bulk, as well as appliances consisting of two parts joined by wire bows to reinforce muscle impulses. Some modifications discussed include the Eschler modification from 1952, Herren's activator from 1953, the LSU activator, elastic open activator, bow activator, Harvold Woodside activator, Karwetzky appliance, propulsor, cutout activator, and magnetic activator device. The document provides details on the design and intended use of several of these modified activator appliances.
2. CONTENTSCONTENTS
IntroductionIntroduction
Modifications used in correction of Class IIModifications used in correction of Class II
division1division1
Modifications used in correction of Class IIModifications used in correction of Class II
division 2division 2
Modifications used in correction of Class IIIModifications used in correction of Class III
Eschler’s Modification (1952)Eschler’s Modification (1952)
Herren's activator (1953)Herren's activator (1953)
Herren's shaye activator – LSU activator (1953)Herren's shaye activator – LSU activator (1953)
Elastic open activator of Klammt (1955)Elastic open activator of Klammt (1955)
The bow activator of Schwarz (1956)The bow activator of Schwarz (1956)
Harvold Woodside Activator (1963)Harvold Woodside Activator (1963)
The Karwetzky appliance (1964)The Karwetzky appliance (1964)www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
3. The propulsor(1968)The propulsor(1968)
Wunderer’s modification (1971)Wunderer’s modification (1971)
Reduced activator of Cybernator of SchmuthReduced activator of Cybernator of Schmuth
(1973)(1973)
The cutout (or) palate free activator (1968)The cutout (or) palate free activator (1968)
Magnetic activator device (1993)Magnetic activator device (1993)
Stockli & TeuscherStockli & Teuscher
Stockfish’s KinetorStockfish’s Kinetor
ReferencesReferences
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
5. In a clinical study undertaken by Ahlegren,In a clinical study undertaken by Ahlegren,
50 consecutive cases50 consecutive cases
25 boys and 25 girls25 boys and 25 girls
The mean age of the group was 9 years,The mean age of the group was 9 years,
ranging from 7 years to 14 years.ranging from 7 years to 14 years.
Treatment time varied from 1 year to 8Treatment time varied from 1 year to 8
years, with a mean of 3 years, 2 months.years, with a mean of 3 years, 2 months.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
6. Two DevelopmentsTwo Developments
Increased interocclusal distance
Improved retention
Increased efficiency
Bulk Incorporation
Of
appurtenances
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
7. Modifications can be broadly categorized intoModifications can be broadly categorized into
2 types2 types
1. Appliances with ONE RIGID ACRYLIC1. Appliances with ONE RIGID ACRYLIC
MASS for maxillary and mandible arches butMASS for maxillary and mandible arches but
with reduced volume or bulk.with reduced volume or bulk.
2. Appliance consisting of2. Appliance consisting of 2 parts2 parts joined byjoined by
wire bows. Muscle impulse are reinforced bywire bows. Muscle impulse are reinforced by
wire elements in the design.wire elements in the design.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
9. Rigid applianceRigid appliance
No muscle shorteningNo muscle shortening
Isometric contractionIsometric contraction
Myotatic reflexMyotatic reflex
Musculoskeletal adaptation by a new mandibularMusculoskeletal adaptation by a new mandibular
closing patternclosing pattern
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
25. HERREN’S DENTOFACIALHERREN’S DENTOFACIAL
ORTHOPEDICS (1953)ORTHOPEDICS (1953)
By Paul Herren, a young graduate of theBy Paul Herren, a young graduate of the
University of Zurich Dental SchoolUniversity of Zurich Dental School
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
26. Selmer- Olsen, Herren, HarvoldSelmer- Olsen, Herren, Harvold
and Woodsideand Woodside
Rigid appliance (PRP)Rigid appliance (PRP)
No muscle shorteningNo muscle shortening
Isometric contractionIsometric contraction
Myotatic reflexMyotatic reflex
Musculoskeletal adaptationMusculoskeletal adaptation
by a new mandibularby a new mandibular
closing patternclosing pattern
Dislocation of mandibleDislocation of mandible
anteriorly or openinganteriorly or opening
beyond the postural restbeyond the postural rest
positionposition
Stretching of soft tissues orStretching of soft tissues or
viscoelastic properties ofviscoelastic properties of
tissuestissues
Muscle tensionMuscle tension
Build up of potential energyBuild up of potential energy
K .E P.E
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
30. MODUS OPERANDI OF THEMODUS OPERANDI OF THE
HERREN ACTIVATORHERREN ACTIVATOR
> 8 mm
Study by Graf – 100 g of force every mm of mandibular forward shift.www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
35. Cross section through the molarCross section through the molar
region Of the 0ral cavityregion Of the 0ral cavity
Guide the mandibular
Arch in its path to
Proper position
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
36. RetentionRetention
15 months after the achievement of dental15 months after the achievement of dental
arch relationship.arch relationship.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
37. H- activatorH- activator
Low vertical openingLow vertical opening
More horizontal registrationMore horizontal registration
Low construction bite with markedly forwardLow construction bite with markedly forward
mandibular positioning.mandibular positioning.
General rule for construction bite:General rule for construction bite:
SagittalSagittal
VerticalVertical
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
38. IndicationsIndications
Class II div 1 malocclusion with sufficientClass II div 1 malocclusion with sufficient
overjet.overjet.
Class II caused by mandibular overclosureClass II caused by mandibular overclosure
that results in functional retrusion.that results in functional retrusion.
Class II div 1 with posterior positioning ofClass II div 1 with posterior positioning of
the mandible , caused by growththe mandible , caused by growth
deficiency but future horizontal growthdeficiency but future horizontal growth
expected.expected.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
39. L.S.U Activator (1953)L.S.U Activator (1953)
Louisiana State University modificationLouisiana State University modification
By R. ShayeBy R. Shaye
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
40. HARVOLD WOODSIDEHARVOLD WOODSIDE
ACTIVATOR (1963)ACTIVATOR (1963)
Viscoelastic properties of muscle & theViscoelastic properties of muscle & the
stretching of soft tissues are decisive factorsstretching of soft tissues are decisive factors
for activator action.for activator action.
Thus the forces responsible for moving theThus the forces responsible for moving the
teeth in activator therapy are not due toteeth in activator therapy are not due to
muscle function per se but to the stretchingmuscle function per se but to the stretching
of soft tissues.of soft tissues.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
41. SleepSleep
Mandible drops openMandible drops open
Appliance may fall out IneffectiveAppliance may fall out Ineffective
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
42. Maximal mandibular protrusion minusMaximal mandibular protrusion minus
3mm3mm
Vertical bite 8-10mm > than inter-occlusalVertical bite 8-10mm > than inter-occlusal
space i.e. average of 12-15mmspace i.e. average of 12-15mm
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
43. Dislocation of mandible anteriorly or openingDislocation of mandible anteriorly or opening
beyond the postural rest positionbeyond the postural rest position
Stretching of soft tissues or viscoelastic propertiesStretching of soft tissues or viscoelastic properties
of tissuesof tissues
Muscle tensionMuscle tension
Build up of potential energyBuild up of potential energy
Without motor activationWithout motor activationwww.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
44. More these muscles are stretched, theMore these muscles are stretched, the
greater is force delivered to the activatorgreater is force delivered to the activator
Force = swallowingForce = swallowing
bitingbiting
myotatic reflexmyotatic reflex
viscoelastic propertiesviscoelastic properties
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
46. IndicationsIndications
CLASS II DIV 1 CASES WITHCLASS II DIV 1 CASES WITH
VERTICAL GROWTH PATTERN.VERTICAL GROWTH PATTERN.
This case can not be improvedThis case can not be improved
significantly sagitally by anteriorsignificantly sagitally by anterior
positioning of mandible.positioning of mandible.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
47. The Bow ActivatorThe Bow Activator
By A. M. Schwarz (1956)By A. M. Schwarz (1956)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
48. Reduced Activator or Cybernator ofReduced Activator or Cybernator of
Schmuth (1973)Schmuth (1973)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
49. The Karwetzky ModificationThe Karwetzky Modification
(1964,1970,1974)(1964,1970,1974)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
50. Type IType I Anterior upper short leg
Posterior lower Long leg
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
51. Type IIType II Posterior upper short leg
Anterior lower Long leg
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
54. The Propulsor (1968)The Propulsor (1968)
Conceived by Muhlemann and refined byConceived by Muhlemann and refined by
HotzHotz
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
57. Eliminates any functional retrusion tendenciesEliminates any functional retrusion tendencies
Offsets any functional dominance of posteriorOffsets any functional dominance of posterior
temporalis fibers which is so often seen in classictemporalis fibers which is so often seen in classic
Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.
The acrylic between the occlusal surfaces of theThe acrylic between the occlusal surfaces of the
first molars serves to stabilize the appliance whenfirst molars serves to stabilize the appliance when
therapy is initiated.therapy is initiated.
As treatment progresses, however, this acrylic isAs treatment progresses, however, this acrylic is
removed progressively to allow for unhinderedremoved progressively to allow for unhindered
eruption of the molars and resultant reduction oferuption of the molars and resultant reduction of
the deep overbite, if it exists.the deep overbite, if it exists.www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
59. CUT- OUT OR PALATE-FREECUT- OUT OR PALATE-FREE
ACTIVATORACTIVATOR
By Metzelder (1968)By Metzelder (1968)
Acrylic covers only palatal or
lingual aspects of the buccal
teeth and a small part of the
adjoining gingiva
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
60. Appliance for the treatment of classAppliance for the treatment of class
II div 2 malocclusionII div 2 malocclusion
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
61. Appliance for open bite treatmentAppliance for open bite treatment
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
62. The construction used for theThe construction used for the
treatment of Class III problemstreatment of Class III problems
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
63. Elastic Open ActivatorElastic Open Activator
By G. Klammt of Gorlitz, East GermanyBy G. Klammt of Gorlitz, East Germany
(1955)(1955)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
64. Standard type of EOA activator withStandard type of EOA activator with
flat acrylic partsflat acrylic parts
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
65. Standard type of EOA activator withStandard type of EOA activator with
contiguous acrylic partscontiguous acrylic parts
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
67. Treatment of Class II div 2Treatment of Class II div 2
malocclusionmalocclusion
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
68. Treatment of Class III malocclusionsTreatment of Class III malocclusions
and anterior cross biteand anterior cross bite
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
69. Magnetic activator device (MAD)Magnetic activator device (MAD)
Darendeliler and Joho (1993)Darendeliler and Joho (1993)
A magnetically active, two-piece (upper and lower),A magnetically active, two-piece (upper and lower),
functional orthopedic appliance has beenfunctional orthopedic appliance has been
developed, magnetic activator device (MAD) fordeveloped, magnetic activator device (MAD) for
the correction of Class II malocclusions.the correction of Class II malocclusions.
The magnetic forces are used to give freedom ofThe magnetic forces are used to give freedom of
mandibular movement and to allow for continuousmandibular movement and to allow for continuous
functioning of the orofacial muscles when thefunctioning of the orofacial muscles when the
appliance is worn.appliance is worn.
Samarium cobalt (SmCo17) magnets areSamarium cobalt (SmCo17) magnets are
incorporated on the buccal aspects of the upperincorporated on the buccal aspects of the upper
and lower appliances.and lower appliances.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
71. Magnetic forces ranging from 150 to 600Magnetic forces ranging from 150 to 600
gm per side have been used on patients,gm per side have been used on patients,
and it seems that the skeletal versusand it seems that the skeletal versus
dental response depends on the intensitydental response depends on the intensity
of the magnetic force usedof the magnetic force used
A force of 300 gm, when the magnets areA force of 300 gm, when the magnets are
in contact, on each side has been found toin contact, on each side has been found to
be an appropriate value in patients age 7be an appropriate value in patients age 7
to 12 years.to 12 years.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
72. The use of this less bulky design rather thanThe use of this less bulky design rather than
a traditional orthopedic appliance, along witha traditional orthopedic appliance, along with
the freedom of function it permits, hasthe freedom of function it permits, has
enabled patients to wear the applianceenabled patients to wear the appliance
nearly 24 hours in most cases.nearly 24 hours in most cases.
The aim is to retain the positive factors ofThe aim is to retain the positive factors of
traditional functional treatment and add to ittraditional functional treatment and add to it
freedom of mandibular function in everyfreedom of mandibular function in every
possible muscle activity, allowing full-timepossible muscle activity, allowing full-time
wear, except for meals and oral hygiene.wear, except for meals and oral hygiene.www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
73. Each appliance has two retention clasps that hookEach appliance has two retention clasps that hook
over buttons bonded on the buccal surface of all fourover buttons bonded on the buccal surface of all four
first permanent molars. The acrylic part of eachfirst permanent molars. The acrylic part of each
appliance covers the occlusal surface of the lateralappliance covers the occlusal surface of the lateral
segments.segments.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
77. Activator Headgear therapyActivator Headgear therapy
Pfeiffer and Grobety (1982) have describedPfeiffer and Grobety (1982) have described
combination activator — cervical headgearcombination activator — cervical headgear
therapy.therapy.
They preferred to use cervical headgear, whereThey preferred to use cervical headgear, where
necessary, for two reasons: (1) to extrudenecessary, for two reasons: (1) to extrude
maxillary molars, and (2) to apply orthopedicmaxillary molars, and (2) to apply orthopedic
traction to the maxilla and an activator to inducetraction to the maxilla and an activator to induce
orthopedic mandibular changes, restrainorthopedic mandibular changes, restrain
maxillary growth, and cause selective eruption ofmaxillary growth, and cause selective eruption of
teeth.teeth.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
78. IndicationsIndications
Treatment with combined headgear -Treatment with combined headgear -
activator appliances is indicated foractivator appliances is indicated for
adolescent patients with malocclusions ofadolescent patients with malocclusions of
the Class II, Division 1 type.the Class II, Division 1 type.
Maxillary prognathism, mandibularMaxillary prognathism, mandibular
retrognathismretrognathism
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
79. A cervical headgear with a long outer bow is used.A cervical headgear with a long outer bow is used.
The inner bow is inserted into buccal tubes attachedThe inner bow is inserted into buccal tubes attached
to the maxillary first molars and the outer bow isto the maxillary first molars and the outer bow is
adjusted to about 5° below the inner bow.adjusted to about 5° below the inner bow.
This produces a predominantly distal force throughThis produces a predominantly distal force through
the center of resistance of the molar teeth.the center of resistance of the molar teeth.
During treatment, once a Class I molar occlusionDuring treatment, once a Class I molar occlusion
has been established, the outer bow is raised abovehas been established, the outer bow is raised above
the inner bow if uprighting of the molars is indicated.the inner bow if uprighting of the molars is indicated.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
80. The neck strap produces a force ofThe neck strap produces a force of
approximately 400 grams, measuredapproximately 400 grams, measured
unilaterally.unilaterally.
Patients are instructed to wear thePatients are instructed to wear the
appliances simultaneously for 14appliances simultaneously for 14
continuous hours a day. Patients are seencontinuous hours a day. Patients are seen
about once every 6 weeks, at which timeabout once every 6 weeks, at which time
the necessary adjustments are madethe necessary adjustments are made
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
83. • Vertical anterior torquing springs to reduce lingual
tipping of maxillary incisors.
• Headgear will restrict the horizontal growth of the
maxilla
• The acrylic prohibits posterior maxillary eruption
and allow mandibular eruption
The Stockli-type Activator
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
85. Stockfish ApproachStockfish Approach
Extraoral force to maxillary first molarExtraoral force to maxillary first molar
bands in conjunction with his kinetor.bands in conjunction with his kinetor.
Hickham and Shaye combinationHickham and Shaye combination
Activator + EO force approach for correctionActivator + EO force approach for correction
of sagittal problemsof sagittal problems
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
86. TWO PARTS
UPPER AND
LOWER JOINED
BY WIRE BOWS
MUSCLE
IMPULSES
REINFORCED BY
WIRE ELEMENTS
FLEXIBILITY:
MANDIBULAR
MOVEMENTS IN
ALL DIRECTIONS
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
87. ConclusionConclusion
Modifications according to the malocclusion.Modifications according to the malocclusion.
Patient compliance is one of the mostPatient compliance is one of the most
important factors.important factors.
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
88. ReferencesReferences
1.1. T.M.Graber, Thomas Rakosi, A.G.Petrovic;T.M.Graber, Thomas Rakosi, A.G.Petrovic;
Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances:Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances:
2nd Edition, Mosby Co. 1997; Page no 161-1942nd Edition, Mosby Co. 1997; Page no 161-194
2.2. T.M.Graber,Bedrich Neumann; removableT.M.Graber,Bedrich Neumann; removable
orthodontic appliances : 2nd edition W.B.Saundersorthodontic appliances : 2nd edition W.B.Saunders
Co. ; Page no 198- 310Co. ; Page no 198- 310
3.3. Darendeliler and Joho MAD II AJO-DO VolumeDarendeliler and Joho MAD II AJO-DO Volume
1993 Mar (223 - 239)1993 Mar (223 - 239)
4.4. Levin Activator headgear therapy AJO-DO VolumeLevin Activator headgear therapy AJO-DO Volume
1985 Feb (91 - 109)1985 Feb (91 - 109)
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com
89. 5. Interviews Dr. Robert Shaye on Functional5. Interviews Dr. Robert Shaye on Functional
Appliances 1983 MayAppliances 1983 May 330 - 342 JCO.330 - 342 JCO.
6. DR. WILLIAM GROSSMAN, DR. JAMES P.6. DR. WILLIAM GROSSMAN, DR. JAMES P.
MOSS Removable Appliance Therapy 1968MOSS Removable Appliance Therapy 1968
JCO Jan 28 - 36JCO Jan 28 - 36
www.indiandentalacademy.comwww.indiandentalacademy.com