This document provides an overview of the social and economic impacts of British rule in India over approximately 200 years. It discusses how the British initially came to trade in India but gradually established political control. While some improvements were made to infrastructure like railroads, education, and administrative systems, these were primarily motivated by British economic and political interests rather than the welfare of Indians. The document also examines effects on land revenue systems, culture, social practices, education, and the rise of Indian nationalism.

1. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 3 Issue 5, August 2019 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD26563 | Volume – 3 | Issue – 5 | July - August 2019 Page 1059
A Study Social and Economical Impact of British Rule in India
Prof. B. G. Math
Associate Professor, Department of History, C.M.M. Arts,
Science and Commerce College, Sindagi, Karnataka, India
How To Cite This Paper: Prof. B. G. Math
"A Study Social and Economical Impact of
British Rulein India"
Published in
International
Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research
and Development
(ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-3 |
Issue-5, August 2019, pp.1059-1062,
https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd26563
Copyright © 2019 By Author(S) And
International Journal Of Trend In
Scientific Research And Development
Journal. This Is An Open Access Article
Distributed Under
The Terms Of The
Creative Commons
Attribution License (Cc By 4.0)
(Http://Creativecommons.Org/Licenses/
By/4.0)
Abstract
The British principle in India for around 200 years deserted it some
changeless engraving in the financial, political and social existence of Indians.
Whatever improvements political, regulatory monetary, social or scholarly
India saw during two centuries of British principle here were not arranged by
the pioneer rulers out of any altruistic mission for the welfare of Indians
however were just results of the supreme rulers' bigger point of keeping their
hold over India and for advancing the political, financial or material interests
of their own nation. Jawaharlal Nehru has appropriately remarked that
"Changes came to India in light of the effect of the west yet these came nearly
regardless of the British in India. Theyprevailingwithregardstohinderingthe
pace of those changes." He further said thattheclearestactualityisthesterility
of British standard in India and whirling of Indian life by it.
Keywords: politics, History
Introduction
Directly from the earliest starting point of their association with India, the
British, who had come as brokers and had moved toward becoming rulers and
chairmen, had impacted the monetary and political frameworks of the nation.
Their effect on the social and public activity of India was, nonetheless, slow.Till
1813, they pursued an arrangement of non-impedance in the social and social
existence of the Indians. However, changes were occurring in these fields (the
public activity of Indians).
These changes identified with instruction, thestateof ladies,
the position framework and different social practices. But
the Indian Scholars like Dadabhai Nauroji, R. C. Dutta and
numerous others don't acknowledge theperspectivesonthe
British Scholars. They assessed the Legacy of the British
from the nationalistic perspective. They reprimanded the
English as they exasperate the monetary existence of India.
They annihilated the prospering craftsmanship, exchange
and business. They place obstructions in the method for
modernization by misusing the rich monetary assets of the
nation. They likewise spread the sentimentof communalism
among the Hindus and Muslims which at last prompted the
parcel of India.
The British vanquished every one of these states in a steady
progression and built up a domain in India. The British had
presented a uniform arrangement of the organization all
through the nation. Moreover, the presentation of the
railroads broadcasts and bound together postal framework
advanced common contact among the general population.
Without a doubt, the British Liberated India from the
medieval conventions andestablished theframeworksofthe
present-day managerial framework in the country. The
credit of source of authoritative apparatus additionally goes
to the British guideline. The postinsurrection periodsawthe
development and advancement of this regulatory
framework. The Indian Civil Service, the Indian Police
Service, the Indian Audit and Account Service, the Indian
Medical Service, the Indian Education Service, the Revenue
and Judicial Service madean authoritativehardwarethat not
just carried the duty of crafted by Government on an
enormous scale yet additionally managed the starvation,
plague, methods for vehicle and correspondence,ruraltasks
and so forth.
Education System:
At first, the East India Company did not imagine that it was
its obligation to grant training to Indians. It enabled the old
arrangement of instruction to proceed. Pathsalas, which
granted an extraordinary kind of instruction equipped
towards gathering the necessities of a rustic culture, were
available to all. Sanskrit training was granted in told.
Muslims went to Madrasas. Advanced education was
restricted fundamentally to upper ranks. This arrangement
of instruction was in the long run changed by the British.
Around the start of the nineteenth century, the Company
wound up mindful of the requirement for presenting
Western training in India. Notwithstanding, Christian
teachers, who were keen on spreading Christianity through
instruction, had officially settled a few instructive
organizations which were connected to their holy places.
1813 Act:
The Charter Act of 1813 guided the Company to burn
through one lakh rupees on the trainingofIndians.Bethatas
it may, even this pitiful sum couldn't be used as a result of a
seething discussion over the vehicleof guidance. Orientalists
upheld the conventional Indian learning through the vehicle
of the old-style dialects of Sanskrit and Persian.
The Anglicists, then again, contended that Western training
ought to be conferred through thevehicleofEnglish.Thomas
Macaulay, the main law part in the Governor General's
Council, advanced the English language as an instrumentfor
instructing the general population in Western idea and
IJTSRD26563

2. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD26563 | Volume – 3 | Issue – 5 | July - August 2019 Page 1060
beliefs (Macaulay's Minute of 1835). William Bentinck
bolstered Macaulay's perspectives. In 1835, the legislature
passed an Act announcing that instructive assets would be
used for conferringWestern trainingthroughthemechanism
of English.
In 1844, English turned into the official language and it was
announced that individuals knowingaboutEnglish would be
favored for open business. This helped the spread of English
training in India. In 1854, Charles Wood, the Presidentofthe
Company's Board of Control, workedoutan arrangementfor
instructive rearrangement. Through the Wood's Despatch,
the Government proclaimed its expectation of "making an
appropriately enunciated arrangement of training from the
grade school to the college".
The Government's instructive strategies taught a
predetermined number of individuals. English training was
advanced with regards to Macaulay'sMinutehowever,inthe
end, vernacular instruction and mass instruction were both
given significance. The customary Pathsalas shriveled away
as another arrangement of rudimentary training was placed
in its place. In any case, the accentuation was on advanced
education. English instruction, as well, kept on thriving.
It must be recalled that the requirement for low-positioning
English-realizing Indian agents was one of the fundamental
reasons that provoked the administration to find a way to
spread Western instruction. Utilizing instructedIndianswas
essential in view of the need to man an extending
administration.
Culture and Traditional effect:
So as to run India adequately, a comprehension of her past
conventions and culture was required. Sanskrit was
advanced and a few instructive foundations were set up for
that reason. Numerous European researchers and
government representatives turned out to be progressively
inspired by Indian languages. William Jones established the
Asiatic Society. Jones himself was an extraordinary
researcher of Sanskrit.Hedecipheredsomeold Indian works
like the Manu Smriti. Huge numbers of Jones' academic
articles on Sanskrit and Indian past were distributed in the
Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal.
Charles Wilkins made an interpretationof theBhagavad Gita
into English. Max Mueller deciphered the Rig Veda. The
Archeological Survey of India was set up because of the
endeavors of Alexander Cunningham and John Marshall.
James Princep deciphered the Ashokan engravings which
were written in Brahmi. India's rich and magnificenthistory,
as uncovered by Western researchers, helped Indians to
recapture their lost pride and certainty and added to the
improvement of patriotism.
Social Effects:
The interest for social and religious change that showed
itself in the early many years of the nineteenth century
mostly emerged as a reaction to Western training and
culture. India's contact with the West caused instructed
Indians to understand that socio-religious change was
essential for the overall advancement of the nation.
Instructed Indians like Raja Rammohan Roy worked
methodically to annihilate social shades of malice. A time of
social changes started in India during the season of
Governor-General Lord William Bentinck (1828-35) who
was helped by Rammohan Roy.
In 1829, Sati or the act of consuming a widow with her dead
spouse was made illicit or deserving of law. Female child
murder was restricted. Be that as it may, even today, child
murder is drilled in reverse territories in India. Servitude
was announced unlawful. With Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar's
help, the Widow Remarriage Act was passed by Lord
Dalhousie in 1856. Vidyasagar likewise crusaded against
tyke marriage and polygamy. The brutal custom of offering
little kids as penance to satisfy God, polished by specific
clans, was restricted by Governor-General Lord Hardinge. It
is critical to take note of that since the change development
began in Bengal, its effect was firstfelthere.Itrequired some
investment to spread it all over India.
Transport:
The East India Company was fundamentally an exchanging
concern. Business interests guided the British strategy in
India. In spite of the fact that the Company's political
mastery expanded, its exchanging advantages were never
dismissed. As the Industrial Revolution picked up force, the
assembling class turned out to be ground-breaking in
England.
They presently needed the administration to advance the
closeout of machine-made British products, particularly
British materials. Simultaneously crude materials were
imported from India to encourage the developing needs of
British businesses. Rather than sendingoutfabricated items,
India was presently compelled to trade crude materials like
crude cotton and crude silk and estate items like indigo and
tea, or foodgrains which were hard to find in Britain.
The requests of an industrialized England required better
correspondence offices in the settlements. Up to the center
of the nineteenth century, the methods for a vehicle in India
were in reverse. Products were moved by street
predominantly by bullock-trucks, donkeys and camels.
Riverine transport by vessels was likewise predominant.
Because of poor correspondence and moderate vehicle, the
volume of exchange was limited.
The British rulers before long understood that a less
expensive,quicker and progressivelyproficient arrangement
of the vehicle was vital if British fabricated merchandise
were to stream into India on a huge scale and her crude
materials were to be verified for British ventures. They
presented steamships on the streams and set about
improving the streets. Work on the Grand Trunk Road from
Calcutta to Delhi was started in 1839 and finished duringthe
1850s. Significant business focuses and regions wealthy in
crude materials were associated by a system of streets and
trenches. Be that as it may, themostemotionalimprovement
in a vehicle accompanied the presentation of the railroads.
A railroad framework had quickly created in Englandduring
the 1830s and 1840s. Weight before long mounted for its
presentation in India. English producers wouldhave liked to
open up the tremendous and up to this point undiscovered
market in the hinterlands for their completed products and
to encourage the import of Indian crude materials tonourish
their ever ravenous machines.
English brokers and speculators additionally viewed the
advancement of the railroads in India as a channel for the
protected venture of their surplus capital. English steel
makers viewed it as an outlet for their items like rails,
motors, wagons and so on. The principal railroad line from

3. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD26563 | Volume – 3 | Issue – 5 | July - August 2019 Page 1061
Bombay to Thana was opened to traffic in 1853. Ruler
Dalhousie, specifically, focused on the significance of
railroads for exchange and for the upkeep of peace. The
railroads would empower the administration to control the
nation all the more successfully.
The railroads would likewise empower the legislature to
prepare military troops. In 1853, Lord Dalhousie illustrated
a broad program of railroad advancement. The insides were
to be connected with huge ports and the ports were to be
associated. Before the finish of 1869, more than 4000 miles
of railroad track had been laid. Notwithstanding, in their
arranging, development and the executives, there is nothing
to propose that India's own advantage and prosperity were
considered. The essential thought was to serve the
monetary, authoritative and military interests of the British
individuals. The railroad travel of Indians between the
significant downtownareas becameuniquelyas aside-effect.
Network and Communications:
The presentation of the railroads, broadcast and postal
framework connected various pieces of India and advanced
trade of thoughts among the generalpopulation,particularly
among her pioneers. The main broadcast line from Calcutta
to Agra was opened in 1853. The Post and Telegraph
Department was additionally settled around the same time.
A half-anna postage stamp would convey a letter starting
with one piece of the nation then onto the next. The
improvement in correspondences in the long run cultivated
a feeling of solidarity among Indians. The idea of the nation
all in all currently outweighed territorial and common
neutrality. Books, diaries and papers coursed generally and
were presently effectively accessible to taught Indians
everywhere throughout the nation.
The presentation of the railroads specifically stalled
hindrances of religion and position.Individualsfromvarious
religions and social foundations, while going in a railroad
compartment, blended with each other along these lines
testing the deep-rooted conventional ideas of
unapproachability, station based dietary patterns and so
forth. These are the central additionsfortheadvancementof
Indian patriotism. Land kept on being the fundamental
wellspring of income for the British. Since expense ashore
framed the principle wellspring of pay for the Company, the
British attempted to present a proficient arrangement of its
accumulation. In 1765, by the Treaty of Allahabad, the East
India Company got the privilege to gather income from
Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
In 1773, when Warren Hastings turned into the Governor-
General of India, he presented the arrangementof sellingthe
privilege of gathering income for a time of five years. The
privilege was given to the most noteworthy bidders yet they
were regularly unfit to gather the stipulated income. In an
offer to hold their agreements, they attempted to separate
cash from laborers.
Other important effects:
To expel the deformities of the income framework, Lord
Cornwallis presented another arrangement of income
gathering in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, known as the
Permanent Settlement. Under this framework,thezamindar
or the income authority of a home turned into the perpetual
holder of the land.
The zamindar increased genetic rights over the land. Hewas
required to pay a fixed measure of income as a duty to the
Company by a fixed day of the year. On the off chance thathe
neglected to pay by the fixed day, his zamindari would be
seized and sold. The cultivators presently ended up
occupants of the zamindars. They could be expelled by the
zamindars for non-installment of their duty. A considerable
lot of them lost their property. The Permanent Settlement
profited the proprietors more than the administration. The
Company was guaranteed of fixed income at a fixed time no
uncertainty, however, it was denied of a portion of any extra
salary of the proprietors from expanding development
ashore. The cultivators were likewise lefthelplessbeforethe
zamindars who abused them.
The Mahalwari System was presented in Punjab,
portions of Madhya Pradeshand WesternUttarPradesh.
It was a settlement with the town network since normal
responsibility for wonin theseterritories. (Mahalmeans
a gathering of towns.) The talukdar or leader of the
mahal was in charge of gathering income from the
towns.
In the Madras Presidency, Ryotwari System was
presented. In this framework, the direct settlement was
made between the Government and the cultivators or
the ryots. Land income was fixed for a time of 30 years.
Workers needed to pay about a portion of the absolute
produce as assessment.
The best effect of British approaches was the channel of
riches from India. TheIndian economy,presumably, was
essentially a rustic economy, yet Indian craftsman
created products in mass to fulfill the needs of Indian
and European purchasers. A few towns had prospered
as focuses of exchange. Therehadbeenanextraordinary
interest for muslin from BengalandsilkfromBengal and
Benaras.
Conclusion:
In this manner, the British standard in India demonstrated
both useful and destructive in various circles. Truth be told
whatever damage the British had done to India was distinct
to shield their own advantage andwhateverbitofleewaythe
Indians got from the British standard was the result of the
endeavors made by the pioneers of a national movement.
Moreover, the British guideline made the sentiment of
communalism, regionalism among the general population of
India, which prompted the segmentof thenation.Segment of
India is one of the most exceedingly awful consequences of
the approach of the English. There is still back-and-forth
among India and Pakistan for matchless quality.
References:
[1] Arnold, D. (1991). Famine: Social Crisis and Historical
Change (New Perspectives on the Past). Wiley-
Blackwell publication. 21319.
[2] Arvind, N. D. (1982). Agrarian Movements in India:
Studies on 20th Century Bihar. London: Rout ledge.52.
[3] Atal, Y. (1968). The Changing Frontiers of Caste. Delhi:
National Publishing House. 203-04.
[4] Baden-Powell, B. H. (1894). A Short Account of the
Land Revenue and its Administration in British India;
with a Sketch of La. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
97.

4. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD26563 | Volume – 3 | Issue – 5 | July - August 2019 Page 1062
[5] Bagchi, A. K. (2000). Private Investment in India 1900-
1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 285.
[6] Banerjee, A. and L. Iyer (2005). History, Social
Divisions and Public Goods in Rural India.Switzerland:
Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (2-3).
639-47.
[7] Bardhan, P. K. (1984). Land, Labour and RuralPoverty:
Essays in Development Economics. Delhi: Oxford
University Press. 137-40.
[8] Bearce, G. D. (1982). British Attitude towards India-
1784-1858. California: Greenwood Press. 206-11.
[9] Beer, G. L. (1962). The Origins of the British Colonial
System. London: Kessinger Publishing. 194-98.
[10] Bhatia, B. M. (1968). Famines in India,1860-1965.New
York: Asia Publishing House. 93.
[11] Blunt, E. A. H. (1931). The Caste System of North India.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, First Edition. 246-53.
[12] Blyn, G. (1966). Agricultural Trends in India, 1891-
1947: Output, Availability, and Productivity.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 117-
18.
[13] Bose, S. (1993). Peasant Labour and Colonial Capital:
Rural Bengal Since 1770. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. 203- 05.
[14] Boserup, E. (1965). The Conditions of Agricultural
Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under
Population Pressure. New York: Aldine. 161.
[15] Chandra, B. (1966). The Rise and Growth of Economic
Nationalist in India. New Delhi: People’s Publishing
House. 326-32.
[16] Chang, H. J. (2007). Institutional Change and Economic
Development. London: Anthem Press. 109-13.