Rules Of An Essay

The Rules of Evidence Essay
The Rules of Evidence: In today's society there are rules that define evidence pertaining to a
defendant's trial. These rules are defined as the "The Rules of Evidence" or "The Law of Evidence."
These rules create a safe and orderly environment, promote efficiency, and enhance the quality of
evidence that pertain to all criminal trials. These rules restrict what a jury can and cannot hear or see,
details of the law, and the importance of the effective performance of the law enforcement officer.
Americans are well aware of the rules that govern evidence; but what are they, what do they mean,
how do they apply to each case, and how are they broken down. The rules of evidence are prescribed
by Congress and can be found in Title 28 of the...show more content...
There are many tangible circumstances that tend to prove or disprove some facts in all criminal
or civil cases. Under rule 41(b) "A warrant may be issued under this rule to search for and seize
any (1) property that constitutes evidence of the commission of a criminal offenses; or (2)
contraband, the fruits of a crime, or things otherwise criminally possessed; or (3) property
designed or intended for use or which is or has been used as the means of committing a criminal
offense; or (4) person for whose arrest there is probable cause, or who is unlawfully restrained"
(John N. Ferdico, 1999). Evidence is one of the single most important pieces of a criminal trial. It is
used to determine a defendant's guilt or innocence.
Evidence is defined as any matter of fact, the effect, tendency, or design of which is to produce in
the mind a persuasion, affirmative or disaffirmative, of the existence of some other matter of fact
that a crime has been committed.(Paul B. Watson, 1986) In a legal sense, evidence is the
information presented in court during a trial which enables the judge and jury to decide a particular
case (Garland & Stuckey, 2000). There are two main types of evidence, which are testimony and
physical items which can be presented to the judge and jury during a criminal trial. Physical
evidence is any evidence found at the perpetrator's
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Rules Of Behavior Or Standard Of Conduct
Norms are established rules of behavior or standard of conduct. There are various types of norms
we observe every day in our society such as, Folkways: informal rules or everyday practices that
may be violated without serious outcomes within a particular culture. Mores are firmly held
norms with moral and ethical connotation that may not be violated without serious
consequences in a given culture. Laws are formal, regulated norms that have been enacted by
legislatures and are enforced by legal sanctions. My research goal was to seat with random
strangers at their table without an invitation. I wanted a group of three or more persons. I chose a
familiar location to conduct my research for this assignment. The restaurant is large metal
structure formally an airpark FBO and hanger that was later converted into a restaurant; it is
located on an airpark in Benton Kansas. Usually, I would visit the restaurant with a friend,
however for the purpose of the observation I went in by myself. I chose a restaurant I frequent
because it would be easier to identify employee's change in character and mood. My observation
was conducted on Saturday March 21st, 2015 at approximately 6:30PM. Prior to the observation, I
spied on people going in and out of the restaurant. I specifically chose a group of individuals to be
my research subjects. Once the subjects were selected, I proceeded into the restaurant to conduct my
observation. When I first worked in, I greeted the waitress who knows me,

Persuasive Essay On Breaking Rules
Kim Harrison say that " Breaking rules isn't bad when what you're doing is more important than
the rule itself." In discussion of rebellion, one controversial issue has been showing that
everyone's bewilderment. On the one hand, people argued that it is unsuitable to infringe the
rules. On the other hand, people demonstrate that it is justified to contravene the rules. However, I
believe that it is right to break the rules when it support a cause you believe in, unfairly and
understandable. One key reason why we should break the rules when it supports a cause that you
believe in, a cause that is right because you believe, in your opinion, defying authority may help
other people. One clear example of this is from the text, " Hunger games." Katniss breaks several
rules to help her people and her family. To understand why Katniss breaks the rules is because her
people live in a oppressed life in a society by all the specific rules like weapon not allow, hunting
not allow, and you can not go in the wood to pay or sell food. Katniss have to ignore the rules go in
the wood,hunt and trade food so her family can have food to survive. Another strong example is
from "The Montgomery Bus Boycott," when Rosa Parks break the rules on the bus, don't give up
her seat on the bus because white people in texas being racist which mean black people have to
give up their seat for white people. Rosa park shirk the law and justify for her people.To better
understand in that situation is because when other people life in danger you believe that you
should stand up and speak for them as a hero. There are many people life get in danger or dead
because no one believed themself or wanted to stand up and speak for other people. This historical
document illustrates that we should help other people when we think our believe is not wrong.
Another important reason when is it right to break the rules is when it unfairly. One significant
example is that from the text article title "Marriage is a Private Affair." Nnaemeka rebel against the
rules which mean he don't listen to his dad and married someone else in the cosmopolitan
atmosphere of the city not in the Ibo tribe where his dad live. In many countries, all over the world,
there are

Rules Of Third Essay
Rules of Third Rule of Third was an easy task to complete. In this picture I took, I frame the phone
to be on the side but not all the way. I made the phone more interesting by turning on the camera and
letting the landscape fill in. My success with this photo is that it brings more attention to what's
going on in the phone and bring a perfect image in my opinion.
Leading Line
Leading lines was way too easy for me. The skill for leading lines is minimum and it's everywhere.
In this image, the edge of the roof leads to the focal point with is the girl. The image itself is
amazing to me, the lighting, the angle, and the way my eyes follow the line to the subject. This
assignment was easy for me to complete and help me think...show more content...
It was basic but I feel I would not have thought of it if only I wasn't eating any pizza rolls. This
image is significant to me because I thought more outside the box to creative different perspective.
Scavenger Hunt Photo Shoot This image is a leading line photo from September on a scavenger
hunt. This picture was meaningful to me because I like how it focused on the railing and went out
of focus to the subject which again is Marco. I didn't know I was actually good at thinking of
creative ways to pop an image out more. Therefore, this image gain importance in my photography
life because my favorite skill to use is Leading Lines.
Football
This is my friend, Jayden. In the image, I did a rule of thirds that makes the image more
interesting. The way he looks down to the image is too nice and the background is out of focus
which makes him stand out. This picture reminds me of Waconia Friday night game where we did
lost but was my first Varsity football game. This image bring importance in my photography skill
which gives me the confidence to take any picture.
Joy In this picture I took outside, I place my friend Joy next to the fence to create a leading line
portrait. I like this picture a lot because it has a lot of warm tone and is more vibrance. This
picture is useful because I can look back at it to get some ideas on what I should use to take a
amazing picture.
Double Exposure
In this picture, I used three image

Rules Of Engagement Analysis
In the movie "Rules of Engagement" I do not believe that the soldiers were guilty of anything. Even
though these American soldiers may have killed some innocent Iraqi people I do not believe that
they did it intentionally. The American soldiers were fighting for their lives because they just
witnessed their fellow soldiers getting killed and their main goal was to survive and help their
fellow soldiers survive. The soldiers acted accordingly to this situation. For example when they gave
the people in the white car commands and they rejected them by running in the opposite direction.
This made them look very suspect and this gave the American soldiers the right to eliminate the issue
that they were presented with. When talking about collateral

Essay on Rules of Communication
Communication
Communication is a process of imparting or transferring thoughts from one entity to another either
through language or writing or some other signs (Wrench, McCroskey & Richmond, 2008).
Language and other methods of communication, which are appropriate in one semantic environment,
are usually not utilized in another semantic environment. For example in playgrounds and sports,
children use the expressions like "game plan" or "Captain of the ship" which cannot be used in a
different semantic environment for example workplace. Thus language used in one semantic
environment requires first "setting up the modes of discourse and consequently the modes of inquiry
of the second" (Postman, 1984).
Nonverbal Communication
Many of the...show more content...
People usually consider themselves more impressive and authoritative if they are taller than their
subjects or subordinates (Bull, 1987). Another study proved that smiling more frequently decreases
the depression and stress (Freitas–MagalhГЈes & Castro, 2009). Studies have also concluded that
women are more familier with nonverbal communication (Agneta & Anthony, 2000).
Physical Space
Physical Space between the people, who are communicating, plays an important role in nonverbal
communication; however, different cultures perceive and use space in different manners
(Segerstrale & Molnar, 1997). While defining the behavior of people regarding personal space in
nonverbal communication, the term territory is widely used. According to researchers there are four
types of territories:
Primary Territory: it is the space which is very personal to someone like his home
Secondary territory: Although it is not very exclusive and personal, though people feel some
attachment to it like a specific bench in the park etc.
Public territory: it is not at all exclusive and only allotted for a limited time, for example a parking
space
Interaction territory: it is also a temporary territory created by people when they are
communicating. For example when players of a team are talking while walking down the road,
people do not disturb them (Hargie & Dickson, 2004).
Time in Communication
The timing, rhythm

School Rules
School rules and regulations are made not to be broken. Rules are made for the safety and better
welfare of the students in school. Another is to promote good behavior among students and to
maintain the good image of the school. Parents send their children to school in order for them to
learn not only academic values, but also moral values. Implementing school rules will help the
students mold their character and values expected from them by other people.
There are certain factors why nowadays, students tend not to follow rules disseminated by the
school despite of the punishments they will have to face for doing such actions. Some of the
reasons are as follows: peer pressure, drugs, poverty, homelessness, low self esteem, lack of...show
more content...
Since he/she came from a broken family, he/she cannot get support from his/her family and in that
way, to get the attention of his/her parents, he/she tend to do what is wrong just to be noticed by his
/her love ones. Students coming from broken families often times become selfish in a way that he
/she is just thinking of his/her own happiness and satisfaction.
The family is the very source of love, support and guidance for each individual. It is where the good
character of a person is uprooted. Without the support and love coming from every member of the
family, the person, particularly the students becomes delinquent or simply lost in their moral values.
A student without moral values knows no straight path. He always go on the wrong side of the track
just to be noticed.
Media also plays an important role in growing individuals. Most of the students nowadays are
exposed to so much in media particularly on local television. Because at a very young age, they are
easily being influenced by what they see and what they hear, especially from those whom they
idolize and frequently see on screen. Sometimes, through media, they witness negative things that
they initiate because it was presented or shown beautifully regardless of being right, or against the
rules.
We cannot deny the fact that even though the parents raised their children in ways which they
consider as "right," there are still some who lose their direction. It is true that nobody is perfect. So
who

Rules In The Giver
For many people living in a place without the right to love somebody, being released after making
three mistakes would disturbing like many other rules. Rules and laws in The Giver community are
extremely strict because its members don't have rights and are controlled by the Elders. The rules
don't only affect characters, but the relationships between member of The Givers community. All
these actions affect the perspective of the readers to the story.
Setting affects character's actions in the story because members of the community must follow the
rules of his/hers age group. If they don't follow this rules they will be chastise or even get released.
On page 9, Jonas's mother said, "You know that there's no third chance. The rules say that if there's a
third transgression, he simply has to be released."This shows that people in this community need to
follow the rules because if they make three mistakes they will get...show more content...
People while reading this book might be impacted by this community from The Givers because it is
different from most of modern day communities. In The Givers community kids are assigned to a
family and they are assigned a job. In modern day community's kids have the right to get the job of
their choice and families mostly of the time they are born into, not selected. This might impact the
readers because it's something we don't typically see around and it's not just the setting, but how the
setting affects characters and how characters affect us. Readers while reading might feel that this
community is unfair and perfectionist, some people might agree that is the right thing and some
others might that is right but wrong at the same time. It all depends on the person's background and
perfective of the story. It's just like the ending of this novel we really know what happens at the end,
but it all depends on the readers and the way they

The 4 Rules Of Acceptance
Research Assignment Essay on the 4 Rules of Acceptance Acceptance usually occurs when an
offeree becomes fully bound and willing to enter into a contract with the offeror with regards to
the certain specification of a contract. There are four key rules to acceptance. Each rule "must be
clear and undoubted, the correct method must be used, it must be given with knowledge of, and
in reliance upon the offer and it must be communicated" . Through Masters v Cameron , Hyde v
Wrench , Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation , R v Clarke , Felthouse v Bindley and
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co cases the rules will be explained by isolating all aspects
through a different medium. Each case is steadfast towards a particular rule thus each case will
express in detail the importance of acceptance and how some cases failed while others succeeded
due to the modules set up by the offeree or offeror. Conditional acceptance the first rule of
acceptance, cannot result in the agreement existing unless and until the condition is satisfied. The
parties may be merely agreeing to agree at some later date, usually when the particular condition is
satisfied. The Masters v Cameron case has an analysis of various possibilities that arise within the
first rule of acceptance. The Masters v Cameron case in 1954 follows the event based upon the first
rule which takes into concern if an offeree attempts to change the terms of an offer which he or she
does not accepts but then makes a counter

Grammar, Language, And English Language Essay
Grammar is the system of a language that is needed for a better communication. People sometimes
describe grammar as the set of rules of an English language, but in fact no language has rules. If we
think that it is all about rules, there should be someone who created the rules so that other people
can use, learn or practise it. Whereas but languages did not start like that. Languages started by
people making sounds which evolved into words, phrases and sentences. No commonly–spoken
language is fixed. All languages change over time. What we call "grammar" is simply a
reflection of a language at a particular time. When we question ourselves that do we need to learn
grammar to learn or acquire a language, the answer is no. It is not necessary to learn grammar and
acquire a language but we need to learn the grammar in order for a serious learning of a foreign
language or English language. Grammar can help you to learn a language more quickly and more
efficiently. It 's important to think of grammar as something that can help you. When you understand
the grammar or system of a language, you can understand many things about learning the language.
There are many topics in grammar which makes the language better. In this term paper, we are going
to look specifically into prepositions. 2.0 The definition of preposition Prepositions are essential to
sentences because they provide additional and necessary details. Prepositions don 't stand alone.
They show the relationship

Essay Importance of Following Rules
Without rules and regulations all civilization would plunge into chaos, as there would be nothing
protecting us from one another's most basic self serving instincts, and sometimes self–destructive
habits. Often time's simple rules and regulations protect us from ourselves, such as not touching a
hot furnace or driving through an intersection when the light is red. If we look just at laws of the
road one can quickly see how many devastating accidents would occur (and how many lives would
be ruined) if no one followed the rules of the road. Without the utmost care to follow these rules,
things that could easily be prevented may happen, resulting in very negative things.
In societies there has to be a guideline––something that regulates...show more content...
The difference between a law and a rule is that the law describes what the rule is in a negative
way, meaning it does state the terms of the broken rule as on "sex with a minor" and describes a
proscribed penalty the breaker of the rule has to expect.
Rules do establish a society: For example, Hammurabi, who to my knowledge formed the first
society known, established the rule that "the strong shall carry the weak". It was a rule of
significance, because this rule showed the responsibility of those who were strong. Without the rules
we would be living in some sort of anarchy, a society where every one could just do what they
wanted to without having to worry about consequences. Rules do establish a sense of
accountability––to each other, to the neighbors, to the government––without rules we would only be
a bunch of savages....
Being in the United States Army raises the bar of importance for following rules and regulations due
to the extreme situations that a soldier will find himself/herself in. Failing to pick up on small
details or following seemingly small rules and regulations in combat can make the difference
between coming home in a seat on a plane or inside a box in the cargo hold of the that plane. Not
only is that true for yourself, but it is equally true for your Battle Buddies.
The Army has an inordinate amount of rules and regulations that all soldiers, regardless of rank or
duty

Rules for Offer and Acceptance
Introduction: Rules of Offer and Acceptance are applied to enforce an agreement by the law. This
agreement is the first requisite of any contract of the business. In order to a contract come into
being between parties, the offer is made by the offeror and the oferee accept that offer. In 21st
century, there are rapid changes in business trend which create lots of new business model such as
e–business and global business. The more business participates, the more requirements of Offer and
Acceptance Rules to adapt to the change. In this essay, we are going to look at the Rules of Offer
and Acceptance, how do they affect business contract and whether these rules make good business
sense in 21st century or not. Offer And Acceptance, How These...show more content...
In addition, the revocation do not need to be told by the offeror, it can be informed by a reliable
third party. Keenan and Riches also proposed that a second subsequent offer can revoke the first
offer but it must be "sufficiently at odds with the first offer, so that both cannot be accepted"

Why Are Evidence Rules Important
The Rules of Evidence
What are rules of evidence and why are they necessary in our legal system? Rules of evidence range
from physical to tangible items, audio, and video to record logs and receipts that can show prove or
disprove person being accused of a crime is given due process. Even your DNA can make you a
suspect or even the culprit. Evidence is like a double edged sword, it can hurt you if it is available
and shows a person is guilty or it can help exonerate you if lacking enough sufficient credible
evidence cannot prove you are guilty of committing the crime. A few key areas of exploration of
rules of evidence are the following: rules or requirements for evidence that allow them to be
admissible and used in the court system; proof,...show more content...
The way the polygraph was designed to see if the defendant was telling to truth. The examiner
would hook the respondent up to the machine, which would measure their respiration, pulse, and
blood pressure as a series of questions asked and measured how the response was given. The
technique they used would be to initially ask questions that were true, then ask questions that
were false to get a baseline and see the difference between how their body responded to the types
of questions. So when the test taker was to be asked a question, they could tell if the person was
lying by the increase changes of respiration, pulse, or blood pressure. In time, the polygraph became
a controversial issue because some would argue that if people can control their state of mind, they
can falsify or pass the test. "An underlying problem is theoretical: There is no evidence that any
pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception. An honest person may be nervous when
answering truthfully and a dishonest person may be non–anxious" ("Truth About Lie Detectors (aka
Polygraph Tests)," 2004). Most state courts agree that a polygraph does not show a great enough
validity for the information to be used in court as evidence. However, this is a tool in the initial
stages of evidence collection that police use to get a

Rules and Exceptions Essay example
Rules and Exceptions
One of the factors which have led many philosophers to adopt a more or less sceptical attitude in
moral philosophy has been the recognition that most rules have exceptions. This has commonly been
regarded as a threat to the entire moral enterprise. How can a philosopher even attempt to find an
account of the moral relations that obtain among things which will weave them into the unity of a
stable system if every principle, every rule, every judgment has to be qualified by who knows how
many exceptions?
Plato was acutely aware of how devastating the admission of an exception might be. In the Republic
Socrates completely invalidates Cephalus' thesis that justice is simply a matter of returning to others
what is...show more content...
There can hardly be a problem of exceptions if there is no such thing as morality. To most
philosophers this solution to the problem seems too drastic and unnecessarily defeatist.
Another method of disposing of the problem is to dispense with rules and principles in determining
what is moral. We have seen this approach taken by Sartre and to a considerable extent by Fletcher.
Certainly if the problem is reconciling in a consistent fashion the existence of exceptions with the
existence of rules then one solution is to deny the latter (just as one classic solution of the problem
of evil is to deny the existence of God).
The third approach is the converse of the one just mentioned. Instead of denying that there are rules
one simply denies that genuine moral rules and principles ever have exceptions. Perhaps the only
explicit philosophical exposition of this view that moral rules are exceptionless is Kant's discussion
in his essay "On a Supposed Right to Tell Lies from Benevolent Motives". Although this essay may
not provide us with a complete or altogether accurate statement of Kant's position on exceptions it is
none the less the interpretation which is made of Kant's views by most ethical commentators.
Still a fourth approach to the problem is to assert that while all or at least most rules have
exceptions, principles do not. We need only to appeal to them or to some ultimate principle among
them in order to determine which exceptions

The Five Basic Rules Of Narrative Writing
The five basic rules of narrative writing can be applied to any report writing situation and will
allow for the successful completion of any investigative report. Many of these reports were
established to help investigators achieve in their writing and allow them to complete the writing
task as quickly as possible so they can get the information. In addition to the five basic rules of
narrative writing the investigator can do other things as well to develop the report and improve its
professional quality towards the report. The first rule of narrative writing is called first person.
When writing a report or during the time someone gives you information you should always write
in the first person and refer to yourself as "I" or "me". As the writes of an investigative report you
are always correct in using the personal pronouns "I" and "me" when referring to yourself. (Biggs,
Michael, 17) The second rule of narrative writing is called past tense. The past tense is the tense that
is most commonly used to describe events or actions that have already occurred which means by
writing a report using past tense can develop consistency and can make the report easier to read. (
Biggs, Michael, 17) The third rule of narrative writing is called active voice. The active voice is the
way of writing that shows action that someone is doing and with a passive voice that is caused by
someone who is having something done to them.( Biggs, Michael, 18) The fourth rule of narrative
writing is

The Rule of Law Essay
The rule of law is a difficult concept to grasp and proves elusive to substantive definition. However,
the following work considers the attempts of various social and legal theorists to define the concept
and pertinent authorities are considered. Attitudes and emphasis as to the exact shape, form and
content of the rule of law differ quite widely depending on the socio–political perspective and views
of respective commentators (Slapper and Kelly, 2009, p16), although there are common themes that
are almost universally adopted. The conclusions to this work endeavour to consolidate thinking on
the rule of law in order to address the question posed in the title, which is at first sight a deceptively
simple one. The rule of law Modern...show more content...
Slapper and Kelly postulate that: "the 'rule of law' represents a symbolic ideal against which the
proponents of widely divergent political persuasions measures and criticise the shortcomings of
contemporary State practice." (Slapper and Kelly, 2009, p15) These commentators concede that
the concept 'lacks precision' and that its meaning changes over time. Noted legal philosopher
Joseph Raz accepted the necessity for State intervention in society and suggests that the rule of law
is essentially a means of controlling, limiting and shaping the exercise of discretion in this
intervention, rather than seeking to abolish it entirely (Raz, 1977, p195). Raz clearly appreciated
the risks associated with the arbitrary and uncontrolled exercise of discretionary power and
envisaged the principle of the rule of law as the primary safeguard against that threat. Many other
writers appear to share the opinion expressed by Raz that the raison d'ГЄtre of the rule of law is to
control the exercise of discretion, including Dicey, Hayek and Thompson, and to a lesser extent
Unger and Weber. Dicey, for example, in his highly influential magnum opus, An Introduction to the
Study of the Law of the Constitution, suggested that the rule of law is composed of three distinct
and specific, but indivisible elements (Dicey, 1885, p179–201). These are: 1. An absence of arbitrary
power in the hands of the State; 2. The supremacy of ordinary

Growing up Under Certain Family Rules
As children we all have certain rules that we must follow. Each family has different variations of
rules; some may be stricter while others may be more lenient. No matter what type of household
you grew up in, there was most likely some point in time when you got in trouble and told you
parent or parents that you were going to raise your children completely differently. In my case I
told them that I wasn't going to give that rule to my children. Every time I got in trouble and felt
as though my parents were wrong and being unreasonable I would make a mental note in my
mind that I wouldn't give my children that rule. However now that I am older I understand why
my parents gave me certain rules. I can reflect on all of the times I got in trouble and admit that
they were indeed my mistakes. As I've matured I can also start to figure out how I want to live my
life and what I want my own family morals to be. I believe my parents have done a great job of
raising me, they aren't helicopter parents yet they still know where I am and what I'm doing. If I
want to go somewhere they have to know where it is and who I'm going with but most of the time
they let me go. They give each of us kids our own personal space and we can do things on our own.
This was the same as it was when I was younger. I remember we were at the beach once and I was
digging a long stream for the water to run up in and reach a dug out pool. My mom was watching
the whole time and when Mateo and I finally finished

Rules for Offer and Acceptance
Introduction:
Rules of Offer and Acceptance are applied to enforce an agreement by the law. This agreement is
the first requisite of any contract of the business. In order to a contract come into being between
parties, the offer is made by the offeror and the oferee accept that offer. In 21st century, there are
rapid changes in business trend which create lots of new business model such as e–business and
global business. The more business participates, the more requirements of Offer and Acceptance
Rules to adapt to the change. In this essay, we are going to look at the Rules of Offer and
Acceptance, how do they affect business contract and whether these rules make good business sense
in 21st century or not.
Offer And Acceptance, How...show more content...
In the other hand, Treitel (2003, p13) argued that "advertisement of rewards for the return of lost
or stolen property, or for information which can lead to arrest or conviction of the perpetrator of a
crime, are invariably treated as offers". Turning to Timetables and passenger tickets, there a varied
view on whether the contract is made between carrier and passenger (Treitel, 2003). There is a view
that the advertisement stating the times and conditions is the offers made by rail carriers; and the
act of running bus is the offer from road carrier. Another view is the offer is made when the carrier
issue the ticket. In addition, with the advance booking through travel agent, the passenger is the
offeror and the carrier accept the offer when indicates to accept the booking. Therefore, the exact
time of contracting in each case depends on the relevant documents and the issued conditions.
Another issue which need to distinguish between offer and invitation to treat is auctions, according to
Sale of Goods Act 1979 s.57(2) "a sale by auction is complete when the auctioneer announces its
completion by the fall of the hammer or in other customary manner; and until the announcement is
made any bidder may retract his bid". Keenan and Riches (2007) propose that the call for bids is an
invitation to

Rules Of An Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Rules Of An Essay

Similar to Rules Of An Essay (12)

More from Papers Writing Service

More from Papers Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Rules Of An Essay