The Workplace Of The Civil Rights Act

The Workplace Of The Civil Rights Act
2) a. In the workplace everyone should have equal opportunity to advance in their line of work.
Employers should not discriminate anyone who tries for the job. In this case, the veteran wants to
apply for a supervisory position. With the details about him suffering from back pain do to his
Vietnam conflict experiences, employers most likely would not promote him. However, under the
Americans with Disabilities Act, employers are not allowed to discriminate anyone based on a
disability. So in this case, employers have to see past the disability and focus on his credentials and
skills.
b. One law that can benefit this woman against the off–color jokes sprouted by her co–workers is
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. This act forbids the discrimination based on race, age, sex, color, or
national origin. The co–workers who tell the jokes are violating this rule because they are causing
the woman to feel uncomfortable.
c. In businesses, the employers need to hire the best employees for the job. These employees are
found through their credentials and skills, or at least they should be. If companies choose people
based on color, race, sex, national origin, etc.; the company is violating the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Both these prohibit the
discrimination of color, race, sex, national origin, etc. If the company can demonstrate that they
chose their people based on skill, then that is fine. However, if they did discriminate based
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Summary Of Title VII Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1965
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1965 was designed to protect workers from job discrimination.
These employees are known as "protected class." Under the Civil Rights Act, the Equal Opportunity
Act of 1972 and 1991 provide for equal employment opportunity, in which everyone had the right to
employment regardless of sex, race, color, ethnicity, national origin, or religion. The purpose of the
Equal Opportunity Act was to make sure employees gained and kept employment based solely on
their ability to perform their job (Schermerhorn, J. & Bachrach, D. 2015, p. 295). Under this title,
organizations are expected to show affirmative action. Affirmative action gives preference in
employment to traditionally underrepresented women and minority

Title VII Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964: Analysis
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it employment discrimination unlawful. This
provision addresses employment practices such as compensation, training, hiring, termination,
promotions and transfers. This law also protects employees from retaliation by their employers if
they make an accusation of discrimination. Discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, color,
and national origin is not permitted (Ivancevich & Konopaske, 2013). The Civil Rights Act of 1991
is an amendment to Title VII. It clarified disparate discrimination language and addressed the legal
proceedings and award entitlements regarding discriminatory lawsuits. This law also broadened the
scope of EEO to apply to additional situations and people (Ivancevich

The Pros And Cons Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964
There are many controversial decisions that were made in the last 100 years in American history.
One of the most important decisions made in my opinion was the decision to sign the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 into law. In today's world, it would sound crazy to tell someone that they are not equal
to the rest of society. Luckily, people today don't have to deal with laws that take away their
individual rights and cause discrimination against them. African Americans were segregated in all
aspects of society, such as going to segregated school districts and having segregated public places
away from Caucasian people.Without the hundreds of boycotts, marches, protests and federal
government enforcement to end racial inequality among people, we would not have the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 today that allows African Americans the right to vote, citizenship, education equality,
and the ability to share public places. Many people agreed on this becoming law, and others refused.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This fact easily became the reason for the civil rights movement. In my definition, A civil right is a
right or privilege, that cannot be given to one person or group and not given to another person or
group. Examples of civil rights are the freedom of speech, press, assembly, the right to vote, and the
right to equality in public

Civil Rights Act Of 1964: Discrimination In The Workplace
What exactly is the Civil Rights Act? The civil rights act of 1964 is one of the greatest Bills that has
ever been passed. This Bill prohibits discrimination based on race, color, sex, age, religion, or
national origin. The civil rights act was amended from being to protecting only the rights of African
Americans, to protecting the rights of all peoples in the United States. President Lyndon B. Johnson
was the president to pass the Civil Rights act and make it illegal to discriminate based on anything.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 abolished the Jim Crow laws, and made it illegal to discriminate in
public facilities, in the Government, and in employment. There have been in total eight "Civil Rights
Acts" passed by congress and each is added ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Of those claims one thousand one hundred and forty–eight were racial discrimination claims. One
thousand one hundred and two were a person's sex discrimination claims. Two hundred and ninety
nine discrimination claims were discrimination against a person's national origin. Claims of
discrimination against a person's religion totaled one hundred and forty eight claims. Lastly, Seventy
seven claims were made for discrimination against an individual's color. As we can see
discrimination is still affecting people from getting jobs in America even though it was made against
the law in

Civil Rights Act Of 1964: Title Accountability Case Study
This applies to employers with 15 or more employees as well public and private colleges. Section
2000E–4 created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The Civil Rights plays
a big role in the recruiting and hiring stages because it prohibits employers from asking for a
educational background non related to the needs of the job applied for, giving test to applicants non
related to what the job calls for, and only giving applications out to people of the same race or color.
This makes it fair for qualified applicants to get a fair chance in job employment. We need to make
workplaces more multi–cultural unit especially because we live in a multi–cultural nation of
opportunities. I believe that the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There is a guide that helps with these accountability issues called the Human Resource Management
Accountability System Development Guide. The HRM Accountability Guide was created by the
Office of Personnel Management to better manager people effectively in the federal
governmentThese decisions have to follow the Merit System Principles and not adhere to Prohibited
Personnel Practices. The Merit System Principles calls for recruitment of candidates who are
qualified from all walks of life who show knowledge, skills, and ability of said job. Merit System
Principles also includes providing employees with equal pay for equal work as well as giving a fair
chance to applicants of any religion, sex, race, age, or disability. A solution for improving
accountability currently being used is the Measurement Plan Framework. The first step deals with
measuring the goals that were set for the year to see if they were achieved. For example if a
company's goals were to boost social equity they would measure the statistics on the different hiring
of races, the amount of males and female hired, and the amount of racial or sexist conflicts

The Civil Rights Act Of 1964
Introduction Discrimination in the workforce is not only illegal, but it has been the center of
controversy for multiple cases throughout its existence. The purpose of this writing is to reflect on
particular personal circumstances based around actual events. First will be a clearly defined section
of the Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, followed by a brief description of personal experiences
involving discrimination, and concluding with a reflection as to how the American workforce is
protected by law. The writing will cover any ethically related issues, personal thoughts and ideas,
and illustrations of how the law pertains directly to personal events, as well as provide direct links to
any and all reference material covered under the purpose of this writing.
Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 The Civil Rights Act of 1964 states: It shall be an unlawful
employment practice for an employer –
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any
individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because
of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which
would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely
affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national
origin.

The Civil Rights Act Of The United States
As the American political landscape continued its transformation from generation to generation, the
focus of the era was on the best possible implementation of the 14th Amendment to the United
States Constitution, and the interpretation of its language. This focus became a clear codified
interpretation in 1990, following the same strain of thoughts as the Civil Rights Act of the 1960's,
advocates of the disabled community lobbied for the equal protections that had been previously
granted to racial minorities. In subsequent acts, the disabled constituency had gained protections in
1973 with the amendment of the Fair Housing Act and again in 1988 with the Rehabilitation Act.
The final step for equal protections came in 1990 under the 101st ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With the ever–increasing number of disabled among the population, at 1 in 5 according to the
Census Bureau, the responsibility of reasonable accommodations falls to the desks and hands of
administrators and businesses alike. In this case, the steps toward accommodation that West Chester
University makes have a direct beneficial impact on the quality of both education and life of the
students that require them. These steps are crucial to counteracting the latent effects of a society and
infrastructure tailored to able–bodied persons and architectural and economic efficiency.
Additionally, concerning the language of the ADA itself, the main attention for the university falls
under Title Three: Public Accommodations, Subpart C, wherein the language specifically mentions
schools as having to provide access to goods and services, either by way of the removal of "barriers"
of an architectural nature and "accessibility" to the aforementioned. (Harkin, 1990) West Chester
University's ongoing attempts to meet the needs of the student body's various demographics are
commendable, but some areas and services should be granted priority due to their more numerous
natures' and relatively minimal cost. Some of the ones being readily addressed are the constraints of
and accessibility to various academic buildings on West Chester's campus. These include but are not
limited to: However beneficial these facilitations are to the ongoing process, other more

Cultural Impacts of the Civil Rights Act
"Cultural Impacts of the Civil Rights Act"
Abstract
Cultural Impacts of the Civil Rights Act Until the eighteenth century Civil Rights and Liberty's were
taken advantage of as a American. Observation in our judicial system cited within the paper suggest
that our civil rights in America has improved and continue to evolve to this day. Cultural Impacts
of American Civil Rights laws In recent years, a great deal has gone into fair treatment of all. As
history serves, there was a great civil rights activist that fought for fair treatment of all, one man in
particular goes by the name of Martin Luther king jr. The implications of our culturally induced
melting pot of a nation proceeded with immense struggles that carry ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This doesn 't always happen in all cases as it should. In march 2006 a Queens Midtown Tunnel
employee by the name of Gregory fisherman filed a compliant against his boss. He complained
because his boss denied him of promotion and penalized him for taking sick days because he is
Jewish(Lawsuit financial corp,2009). He proved his case by hearing his supervisor use a curse word
before they called him a jew which was his basis for claim. By getting that 51% of the jury to
believe Mr. Fisherman, he was awarded $735,000. In another case, a restaurant called Sorrano's
Mexican Restaurant was sued in 2002 by Terra Neave(manager)for not accommodating to religious
belief. She led a bible study after work and two of her subordinates attended. According to company
policy manager are not suppose to socialize with subordinates,to prevent sexual harassment. The
company offered to transfer her to another location, she refused and continued to lead bible study
with her subordinates. With this type of substantial evidence she lost the case. In these two cases our
rights were upheld and justice was served according to our civil rights laws(Luci Scott, Jan 2009).
Pregnancy discrimination according to U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is
discrimination involves treating a woman unfavorably because she is pregnant,child birth, or
medical condition related to pregnancy or child birth. In 2009 there

The Civil Right Act Of 1964
1. What were the legal issues in this case?
Dunlop sued Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) under the Title VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964,
and both under the Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact. Dunlap feels that he has been
discriminated during the interview process. The district court concluded that TVAs subjective hiring
process permitted racial bias against the plaintiff and other black job applicants. Tennessee Valley
Authorities was found guilty of discrimination against the plaintiff.
The Title Vii of the Civil Right Act of 1964 enforces the constitutional right to vote, to confer
jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injective relief against
discrimination in public accommodations to authorized the attorney general to institute suits to
protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extent he Commission on
Civil Rights to prevent discrimination in federal assisted programs, to established a Commission on
Equal Employment, and for other purposes .Under this law, sec 2000e [Section 701e], the plaintiff is
being protected against discrimination act. A labor organization should deemed to be engages in an
industry affect commerce.it maintains or operates a hiring hall or office which procures employees
opportunities to work for an employee (https://www.eeoc.gov/law/status.titlevii.cfm).
Dunlop feels that the interview has been manipulated to select lower qualified candidates with
favoritism toward family

Impact Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed and passed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson,
whose predecessor, John F. Kennedy had introduced and promoted the act before his death. The act
banned discrimination in relation(s) to and of employment and establishments of communal
accommodation based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It further established a
framework within the federal government in battling discrimination, increasing the directives of the
U.S Commission on Civil Rights, as well as instituting the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (Today in Civil Rights History). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is one of the greatest
realizations of and to the civil rights movement; yet one of its most significant impacts of

Civil Rights Act Of 1964
The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended segregation in public places and banned employment
discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin, is considered one of the
crowning legislative achievements of the civil rights movement. Title I of the act gives equal voting
rights removing registration requirements and procedures against African American. Title II
excludes segregation and discrimination in places of public and transportation. Title VII prohibitions
discrimination by trade unions, schools, or employers involved in interstate commerce or doing
business with the federal government. The latter section also applies to discrimination based on sex
The act also calls for the desegregation of public schools (Title IV),

Compare And Contrast The Equal Rights And The Civil Rights...
hy.com). Civil Rights Act of 1964 and The Voting Rights Act of 1965 The Civil Rights Act of 1964
and The Voting Rights Act of 1965 both have a common factor, discrimination. During the Civil
Rights movement not only blacks, but also many whites were treated unfairly. People began to
protest for what they believed was right at the time. These two rights have made a huge impact on
America's lifestyle. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made many things possible for individuals. It
outlawed all discrimination against color, race, sex, religion. It gave people of all types the equal
access to public places and required that schools be desegregated immediately and gave people the
right to vote. Although it was suppose to end discrimination

1964 Civil Rights Act Case Study
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 pertained to equal opportunity and affirmative action in regards to
occupations within the United States of America. The 1964 Civil Rights Act and its 1972 Title VII
Amendment are federal directives monitor unfair labor employment practices. The Act specifically
prohibits employers from refusing to hire someone because of that persons' race, color, religion, sex,
or national origin. The Act also details that an employer cannot limit, segregate, or classify his or
her employees or applications solely because of factors in regards to race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin (Civil Rights Act of 1964). Meaning that the proper management is in line with
maintaining that every person is given the same opportunities ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
G. (2012). (2) I would make it so that anyone seeking to gain employment in the law enforcement
field would be placed in rotation to learn from seasoned professionals whom have been in law
enforcement for a substantial period of time, which would enable the new personal to experience
real situations that officer handle in the safety of a controlled environment, and (3) every candidate
would have to give their account to what and why they feel they should be a police officer, and
would they plan to improve their community while keeping their hearts and minds free from
corruption. This would allow for recruits to learn what is expected from them and give them
direction into the flow of their career. In doing so, the change that is needed in certain communities
would not only be active but active in front of the community, which is why suggests from their
communities would influence the questionnaire of the

Americans and even immigrants are afforded their basic civil rights based on the Civil Rights Act of
1964. The act, which was signed into law on July 2, 1964, declared all discrimination for any reason
based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin will be deemed illegal in the United States
(National Park Service, n.d.). When the act was enacted, people had to become more open minded;
more accepting to the various cultures and backgrounds of individuals. Understanding that concept
leads to the notion that there is and will be a diverse population within the United States. Diversity,
as defined by the Cambridge dictionary, is the condition or fact of being different or varied
(Cambridge Dictionary, n.d.). Diversity is also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Under the guidance of Title VI of the Civil Rights section, FEMA has established policy guidance to
meet Civil Rights mandates (Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2015). In the event
of a disaster, whether man–made or natural, staff members of FEMA work closely with community
organizations to resolve tension and eliminate potential complaints of discrimination (Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2015). Every individual will be afforded to the
opportunity to receive care and service, even those with disabilities as this community is overlooked
during emergencies. If staff members violate any section of the Civil Rights section, a formal
complaint can be made through the Office of Equal Rights (OER) to obtain assistance (Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2015).
Complaints of discrimination is a serious matter that should to be managed swiftly on the part of any
agency and in the case of FEMA, this matter is addressed formally by a Civil Rights Specialist. A
Civil Rights Specialist is employed to manage cases of discrimination and investigate the validity of
the complaint. The scope of their position is to process complaints, issue acknowledgements and
acceptance/dismissals, conduct compliance reviews and issue a final decision in regards to the
complaint being filed (Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2015). The denial to
programs services, aids, or benefits are prohibited through the program and that is why it is

Analysis Of Title VII Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964
First of all, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal regulation prohibiting employers
from discriminating against employees based on national origin, race, sex, color, and religion
(Follett, Ward, Welch, 1993). This act applies to employers with 15 or more employees and serves
as a mechanism to ensure equality within the workplace (Fraley, 2013). This case is a violation of
Title VII from the aspect of retaliation. Retaliation occurs when an individual is treated differently
after such things as, filing a complaint or engaging in a legally protected activity. It can range from
demotion, terminations, salary reduction, or any negative job action. Second, the plaintiff should
receive judgment for the claims of sex discrimination, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(2005). AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AT SCHOOL AND ON THE JOB. Annual Review Of Sociology,
31357–379. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122155
Fraley, J. M. (2013). INVISIBLE HISTORIES THE FAILURE OF PROTECTED CLASSES.
Harvard Journal On Racial Ethnic Justice, 2995–116.
Perry, S. J. (2001). EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR RETALIATORY HARASSMENT UNDER
TITLE VII. Labor Law Journal, 52(2), 121–127.
BRAKE, D. L. (2014). Retaliation in an EEO World. Indiana Law Journal, 89(1),

An abundant of federal, state, and local regulations prohibit discrimination in employment.
Discrimination towards employees who are members of a protected class is prohibited throughout
the entire employment process, which includes outreach, hiring, job classification, salary, benefits,
promotion, discipline, layoffs, termination, and much more. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a
federal statute created to safeguard individuals from illegal discrimination on the basis of race,
religion, color, sex, and national origin. This Act also established the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commision (EEOC) which is responsible for administering laws outlawing
discrimination in the workplace and has expanded protected classes against discrimination. Such

Civil Rights Acts Of 1964: Article Analysis
The US Hospitals and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 were implemented due to more than one
hundred and fifty years of activism, violence, court fights as well as public demonstrations (Pollitt,
2016). This period saw the death, injuries, and the imprisonment of masses as they marched forth to
force the US government to follow its constitution. This act was aimed at improving as well as
changing the lives of every American, but its implementation had not taken place in any US
hospitals. The article by Friedman holds that there has been a misconception on the Acts' role in the
racial desegregation of American health care by the time the social security amendments of 1965
were passed; many hospitals had already abandoned this practice. Nonetheless,

Title VII Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects classes from jobs discriminating against them
based on their race, color, national origin, sex, and religion. It is unlawful for an employer to refuse
to hire or to fire an individual because of their class. Title VII provided employment equality for
minority people seeking jobs. The EEOC recognized certain classes that could not be discriminated
against. The racial group includes, African American, Asian, Caucasian, Native American, and a
Pacific Islander. Closely connected with racial discrimination is discrimination against someone's
color. Color refers to the color or complexion of a person's skin (651, Cheeseman). Racial and
color discrimination go against Title VII. National Origin

Civil the rights of citizens of a country to political and social freedom and equality. Americans didn't
always have civil rights they had to fight hard just to earn these freedoms. Even after all these
beliefs of freedom Americans mistreated people of different skin colors for man years, even to the
extent of slavery itself.Even after slavery was ended the mistreatment continued to the
workplace,schools,and public areas such as parks and buses. The Civil Rights Act if 1964 was a
major factor in finally eliminating various kinds of discrimination based on things such as
race,sex,and country of origin. In the first place Americans were very unrighteous and had no reason
to deny other humans of their rights. But, as time passed they rightfully

The Civil Rights Act Did Not Happen Over Night
The Civil Rights Act did not happen over night; however, many fought for it and soon prevailed.
During John F Kennedy's presidency the Civil Rights Act was begun. The bill was called for by
President John F. Kennedy address of the nation on June 11, 1963. The President gave a speech
asking for a law giving all Americans the right to be served in all places which are open to the
public–Motels, restaurants, movies, clothing stores, as well as the right to vote. President Kennedy
made this speech after protests from the Black community about how they were being mistreated,
the most current being the Birmingham campaign which ended in May 1963. There were many
factors to the civil rights act of 1964 from presidents to normal civilians. In today's society the
Civil Rights Act is allowing equal opportunities for everyone. The Civil Rights was not just an act it
was a movement fought for almost twenty years. Starting in 1948 with Truman's executive order
9981 that gave equality in the military (infoplease.com, Brunner). Then in 1054 the case of Brown
versus Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, was finalized with the decision that segregation
within public schools was wrong. In august of 1955 the tragedy of Emmett Till occurred, where he
was brutally murdered. There are many more effects of the Civil Rights act, but these were some of
the turning points. Truman's Executive order was filed during world war two when all men were
being drafted

Consequences Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 And 1965
Consequences of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 1965 The passage of the civil rights acts of 1964
and 1965 had immense impacts, especially on the unification of the American society. The passage
of the acts led to the beginning of a reconstruction period in America founded on equality. While
they did not result in the ending of the systemic injustices that had existed in the periods before the
civil rights movement, it created an avenue where future challenges could be dialogued and logical
sacrifices made to make the country a better place for all races. First, the acts resulted in the barring
of the unequal application practices in voter registration. For the first time, the blacks were allowed
to register as voters and choose their leaders.

What Is Title Vii Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964
Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964, is the law that prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing,
training, promotion, discipline, or other work place decisions of a person based on an employee's
race gender, color, religion, national origin. This is a law that protects certain class of people of
being discriminated, because they are protected with the law. It protects the civil rights of people
that did not have it before. Title VII gets many complaints or cases so they have a system. The law
requires the case to go through the EEOC. The EEOC decides if it will take the case. Brokering will
settlement brings more notice to a case. (Bennet– Alexander and Hartman) For a plaintiff to win a
case they need the following. Show that they are

The Civil Rights Acts of 1964: Discrimination Based On Race
In Long Walk to Freedom an autobiography by Nelson Mandela, he writes that,
No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background, or his
religion. People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love
comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite (622).
Growing up as a child, I was taught never to judge a person based on his/her appearance or
prejudice against someone. I was taught never to discriminate based on race or color but to love and
respect everybody. I remember my mom constantly reminded me that I was special, smart and
created equal just like any other person on earth. I guess she was preparing me for the future
because I never knew the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They explained what the Act entails and how it guarantees every citizen as well as Blacks (and other
minority race) protection of the laws under the Fourth Amendment. They also explained how the Act
was passed at the House and in Congress and they showed the role of the Attorney General to
make this Act come to pass. They write,
An act to enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the
United States of America to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public
accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights
in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent
discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment
Opportunity, and for other purposes (29).
Even though the homeless guy lives in the street and has no access to the media, he seems to know
what is going on around him. He said, they passed the Civil Right Act to make it look like er'thin is
fine but e'm still discriminate. He claims he has been looking for jobs for the last couple of years
but no employer wants to hire him. The jobs have Vacancy or Now Hiring or Help Needed
signs on the doors of the workplaces but whenever he applies, they call him for an interview. During
the interview, when they realize he is black, they never call him back. I understood his logic and
reasoning

Should The Civil Right Act?
I have these things called weed moments whereas I think of a concept or an idea that I 'm sure if I
was a marijuana smoker I would think about them. Well, have you ever thought about things how
things might be if something did not happen in the past? For example, where would the world be if
Hitler had won the war? Do you think the United States will still be as powerful as they are today?
Or would they really be an extinction of Jewish people? These types of questions are mind blogging,
right?? Well, let 's think about a question like that when it comes to human resources management.
One particular question that comes across is how significant is that Civil Right Act and how would it
be if that act did not exist.
One of my favorite ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
R.L. Johnson accuses Goodyear of discrimination on him and other r black employees at the
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company plant in Houston, Texas. Johnson sought transfer within the
company and denied that transfer due to certain requirements. Mr. Johnson felt as though some of
the requirement in placed for the transfer was implementing to those of the black race. Reason being
is that Mr. Johnson and other black were hired under the labor department. If any hire that was hired
by the labor department they had to meet certain qualifications to be considered for that transfer. The
qualifications were above the requirement for those hired under the labor department. The courts
concluded that the qualification needs to transfer from 1957 and July 2, 1965, were victims of
proscribed conduct by Goodyear. However, Mr. Johnson was not hired in those years, he was hired
in 1944. The court concluded that Goodyear did not discriminate against him but possible others.
Goodyear since then has made changes to their transfer policies and tries to implement fair
qualifications.
In this case, Goodyear was not found guilty with this particular defended and did not have to pay
any monetary but just imagine if they did. Not only would this bring public notice to this case but
their reputation would start to deteriorate especially among blacks. Therefore, human resource must
very diligent in making policies and procedures. They must make sure they are in compliance with
the

Cons of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Cons of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
When faced with pointing out the cons of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, one may feel there aren't many
if any. Or maybe that it's a justified contradiction to the first amendment, which from the U.S.
Constitution reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right
of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The
1964 Civil Rights act is just one of the many problems that arise from the civil rights act. When the
Civil Rights Act was passed it permitted voting rights, injunctive relief against discrimination in
public places, of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Civil Rights Act voids the Jim Crow laws doing away with segregation. As a citizen who
supports the Jim Crow laws, the Civil Rights act created another way of life that the government
wanted to enforce. This expansion of

Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment on grounds of race, creed,
religion, national origin, or sex. It withholds federal funds from discriminatory state and local
programs. It authorizes the Department of Justice to initiate lawsuits to desegregate public facilities
and schools and it outlawed arbitrary discrimination in voter registration and expedited voting rights
lawsuits. It also barred discrimination in public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce.
2. Title VII, the provision that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the
basis of reasons including race, sex, age, and national origin, has the most impact because it extends
to other suspect classifications besides race and has been used to further the rights of women in the
workplace. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The CRA of 1964 was needed because even a decade after that court case only minuscule
percentage (1%) of Southern school children went to integrated schools. This was because of de
jure and de facto segregation. States were still preventing white and black students from attending
school together and the natural housing patterns and societal norms of the South kept students of
different color from attending the same schools. The CRA of 1964 let the national government take
action against the states' laws and create programs such as busing to integrate schools.
4. The decisions of the Supreme Court in this time period limited Congress' enforcement of the
Fourteenth Amendment to state, rather than individual, action. Therefore, in order to reach the
actions of individuals, Congress, used its power to regulate interstate commerce, to enact the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. Therefore, discrimination based on race, religion, or national origin in public
establishments that had a connection to interstate commerce or were supported by the state was

Civil Rights Act of 1964
Before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, segregation in the United States was commonly practiced in
many of the Southern and Border States. This segregation while supposed to be separate but equal,
was hardly that. Blacks in the South were discriminated against repeatedly while laws did nothing to
protect their individual rights. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ridded the nation of this legal
segregation and cleared a path towards equality and integration. The passage of this Act, while
forever altering the relationship between blacks and whites, remains as one of history's greatest
political battles. Racial unrest by the summer of 1963 was at its height since the Civil War. President
Kennedy picked up the situation at the close of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With public support Kennedy was willing to wage in the political war that would inevitably ensue.
Kennedy and Johnson both were very aware of the walls that Congress would build to stop any
proposals involving civil rights. Immediate and effective action became the new focus. Together
Kennedy, Johnson, and the civil rights leaders combined efforts to achieve speedy and thorough
results. By May 31, 1963, Kennedy announced his plans for the civil rights movements to the
public. First hand attempts to maintain segregation by the outspoken racist Governor George
Wallace of Alabama provided Kennedy with the ideal timing to deliver his message. Before even
outlining the details of his new proposal he told the nation,
100 years of delay have passed since President Lincoln freed the slaves, yet their heirs, their
grandsons, are not fully free... and this nation, for all it hopes and all its boasts, will not be fully free
until all its citizen are free. Next week I shall ask the Congress of the United States to act, to make a
commitment it has not fully made in this century to the proposition that race has no place in
American life or law (Loevy 17).
Immediately thereafter, he and Johnson headed meetings to outline the plans. The Leadership
Conference of Civil Rights consisting of fifty or so civil rights organizations which had previously
been established after Kennedy's initial proposals, called for a meeting on July 2nd inviting its
participating

Advantages Of The African American Civil Rights Act Of 1965
The African– American civil rights movement started in 1954, and although the civil rights act was
signed in 1964, and was meant to prohibit discrimination in both public and private places, equality
still wasn't present in many aspects of American life. African–American's still didn't have equal
voting rights, in order to protest against this, Freedom Summer workers registered people in
Mississippi to vote, after this Martin Luther King launched a march for voting rights in Selma,
Alabama in January, 1965. The voting act that was eventually passed gave the federal government
the power to oversee voting in states where discrimination was practised, which was primarily in the
south. In the mid 1960's America was divided on the issue of civil rights. This was especially
evident through the views in regards to the proposed voting rights act of 1965. The aim of the act
was to overcome the legal barriers, such as unreasonable tests that were given to African American's
when they tried to register for voting. The two approaches seen in the documents are one that is
more legal and evidence based and therefore logical, this refers to document 2A, a statement by
Attorney General Katzenbach. The other, document 2B, is a statement by Attorney General Button,
is an approach that is far more emotional and passionate and thus somewhat biased. It is focused on
the disadvantages for the individual state, as he is the Attorney General for the state of Virginia,
therefore it is only

The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Outlawed Discrimination
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin when hiring, promoting, or firing employees; in public accommodations and in all
programs receiving federal funding(Barnes Bowles, 2015). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 created
equal opportunities for everyone including women by making it illegal to discriminate. Because of
this Act businesses can no longer refuse to employee an individual just because they are black or a
women. Another Supreme Court ruling that was a victory for the equal movements was the
Loving V. Virginia case. Before this supreme court ruling the Racial Integrity Act forbade the
marriage of any white person with someone of another race, defining white

How Did Martin Luther King Impact The Civil Rights Act Of...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 which led to the ban on segregation in southern states such as in
Albany, Georgia, Birmingham and Selma, Alabama has passed and early in 1965 African Americans
were protesting against voting rights registration. Martin Luther King Jr. plans to coordinate a mass
protest against voter registration drive which will secure voting rights for African Americans. Jim
Bevel was a member in SCLC which suggested that the campaign should take place in Selma,
Alabama, where an unsuccessful voter registration drive had been going on for months. In February
1965, Martin Luther King Jr. with other SCLC members visited Selma and led a match to protest in
the Courthouse against voter registration. People protests in Selma which ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After a dinner organizational meeting in the evening, King stepped onto the balcony and talked with
friends below his second floor motel room. After a few moments, a loud sound was heard, and King
slammed against the wall behind him. Martin Luther King Jr. was shot and died within the hour at
St. Joseph's Hospital in Memphis. News of the assassination of King causes riots and violence
nationwide. President Johnson declared April 7 a national day of mourning. Funeral services were
held in Atlanta, where people came across the nation to pay their last respects and King was buried
in the South View Cemetery. King's death did not prevent the realization of his planned protests.
Thousands of supporters came around in Memphis and makes the sanitation workers' protest
successful and the Poor People's Match also took place without him. He was killed because; he
violated racist local laws and federal restrictions

The Civil Rights Act Of Selma And Taylor Branch 's Novel...
The Epic March to Blacks' Voting Rights The Civil Rights Act of 1964 legally banned
discrimination in the United States, but the struggle with racial tension continued to exist. Blacks
were still denied the right to vote, along with other numerous rights that whites had. Obstacles like
the literacy test and the poll tax made it almost impossible for blacks to vote. Martin Luther King Jr.,
an influential figure in the civil rights movement, literally paved the way for equality through
efforts such as protests and marches. The march from Selma to Montgomery was one of the most
memorable marches led by King, and signified the blacks' desire for unhindered suffrage. The
fictional movie Selma and Taylor Branch's novel The King Years: Historic Moments in the Civil
Rights Movement provide historical insight into King's fight for civil rights. Selma, a fictional
movie based on true events, debuted in 2014 and narrates King's efforts to acquire voting rights for
blacks. The movie mainly takes place in Selma, Alabama, hence the movie's title. King rallied
supporters in Selma to organize a march to Montgomery, the capitol of Alabama. The movie
primarily focuses on King and his supporters, and their struggle against the racism of white
oppressors. The fight was certainly not easy, and many supporters in the march faced extreme
discrimination and violence. Annie Lee Cooper, who played a significant role in both the movie and
the actual movement, had her voter registration form

Civil Rights Act of 1964 Essay
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 resulted from one of the most controversial House and Senate debates
in history. It was also the biggest piece of civil rights legislation ever passed. The bill actually
evolved from previous civil rights bills in the late 1950's and early 1960's. The bill passed through
both houses finally on July 2, 1964 and was signed into law at 6:55 P.M. EST by President Lyndon
Johnson. The act was originally drawn up in 1962 under President Kennedy before his assassination.
The bill originated from two others, and one of which was the Equal Opportunity Act of 1962 that
never went into law. This bill made up the core of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Bureau of National
Affairs 18–20).
There were many groups ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The bill then went to the senate where there was much debate and procrastination. Many senators
opposed to the bill tried to use the filibuster technique, which basically is an extended talk for the
purpose of killing a bill or getting drastic modifications. In fact, it was the longest debate in Senate
history lasting 534 hours in total. The final vote in the Senate was 76 to 18 to pass their version of
the bill since they made minor amendments to it (Bureau of National Affairs 18–21). A quote from
Senator John Lesinski, democrat, showed why some were opposed to the bill, There are still many
private rights in America that under our Constitution are beyond the power of government to
regulate and one of these is the right to pick and chose one's associates, one's friends and one's
customers in a private business (Calls Bill Unconstitutional 33). The final vote in the House over
the amendments the senate made was 289 to 126. This set the way for the bill to be signed by the
President to become a law.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 contained eleven titles, or parts, that made the act complete. The first
title, Voting Rights, made sure that there was no discrimination in literacy tests when determining
voting ability. The Public Accommodations title said there would be no discrimination or
segregation in hotels, motels, restaurants, gas stations, places that served food,

Gelato Cheese Company: Are They in Compliance with the...
Introduction The purpose of this assignment is to consider whether or not Gelato Cheese Company
should make any changes in order to be in compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). This paper will discuss the definition of Title VII,
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and its application in employment decisions. In order to
be employed at Gelato Cheese Company for its cleaning crew, it is required that you have a high
school diploma/ or GED equivalent and at the present moment, the company whole cleaning crew is
under the age of 30 and white.
The case Gelato Cheese Company is a company that is a processor of cheese and it is sold
throughout the United States, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The reason why the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies is because it has 100 employees in its cheese
processing plant, which is above the minimum that is required for the Act to apply. The Gelato
Company is involved in discrimination due to the fact that they hired an entire white cleaning crew,
ignoring the fact that 25% of the minority that lives in Heartland Corners has a high school diploma,
therefore showing that Gelato's employment practice is extremely discriminatory and base their
hiring of employees strictly on the race of the individuals.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)
prohibited employers from discriminating against individuals who were 40–65 years old. The Act
pertains to employers who have 20 or more employees for 20 or more calendar weeks(either in the
current or preceding calendar year); unions with 25 or more members; employment agencies; and
federal, state, and local government subunits(Mondy, Wayne 2010 pg.62,63). Gelato Cheese
Company's entire cleaning crew is under the age of 30 and that makes them not in compliance with
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act law. There are some major changes that need to be made
at this company in order for them to not have law suits filed against

In case study 4, we were asked to identify and research three different laws that has help us or our
colleagues. Three different laws stood out to me as being an African American man and a
Uniformed Service Member were Civil Rights Act 1964, Affirmative Action Plan and the
Uniformed Service Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). Each one of these laws
have tried to even the playing fields for African Americans and Service members. As you read
through this case, I will go in to detail of each law and relate these laws to my life experiences
The Civil Right act of 1964 and 1991
The Civil Rights act of 1964 was one the most important pieces of legislation enacted since the
Emancipation Proclamation was issued on January 1, 1863 declaring all black slaves held in ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1866 the House of Representatives and the Senate enacted a Civil Rights bill that was similar to
the 1964 version. The 1866 version made all citizens born in the United States, citizens of the
United States regard less of race and color, without regard of any previous condition of slavery.
There were also fines in this bill that prevented discrimination from blacks. This bill was passed 100
years before the 1964 version but the reason why we still had widespread discrimination because it
was no oversight and that's why the EEOC was created. The United States realized if they were
going to be successful in Civil Rights, oversight was needed. The Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission was created in 1964 immediately after the Civil rights act to end discrimination based
on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in employment programs and make equal opportunity
and reality for all citizens. The Commission job is the receive charges of discrimination, investigate
and attempt to resolve them, however if the complaint is true and the issue isn't resolved, they have
the power to bring a law suit to through the federal

Activists: Environmental racism raises a large concern in todays times because we are all support to
be treated equal no matter what our heritages believe in. In the Title VI of the Civil Rights act of
1964, it clearly states that it prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin
in programs and activist receiving federal assistance. Environmental racism have many things in
common to the civil right activities looking back on time. Like the Warren County example, the way
the protest played out are very similar to the way protests acted out in that 1950's. The actions of
the North Carolina state government in forcing a toxic landfill onto a small African–American
community were an extension of the racism they had encountered for decades in housing, education
and employment. But this time, it was environmental racism.
The Afton protests energized a new faction within the civil rights movement that saw the
environment as another front in the struggle for justice. Many early environmental justice leaders
came out of the civil rights movement. They brought to the environmental movement the same
tactics they had used in civil rights struggles –– marches, petitions, rallies, coalition building,
community empowerment through education, litigation and nonviolent direct action, (The
Environmental Justice.) But many argue the fact that even if civil rights did not happen, the
community members of government intentionally polluted waste lands would still

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most important piece of legislation passed by Congress in the
twentieth century. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the first strong piece of civil rights legislation
introduced to Congress since the American Civil War. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed and
passed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2nd 1964, after one of the longest running
debates in Senate history. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was designed to end segregation and
discrimination and to provide the minority population equal protection under the laws of and the
Constitution of the United States. The question at hand is whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was
necessary in order provide this protection. Prior to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
They passed another in 1960. However, forces within the Congress were able to amend both Acts so
that although they did make moderate gains in the areas of civil rights, they were so watered down,
that they were not effective in alleviating segregation and discrimination for minorities. Failure of
the federal government to pass any effective civil rights legislation led to an environment of racial
unrest that permeated the early 1960's and led to a change of attitude towards civil rights to even the
staunchest opponents in the federal government.
Racial unrest by the summer of 1963 was at its height since the Civil War. President Kennedy
picked up the situation at the close of the Eisenhower years at a time when tensions were rapidly
increasing. By the summer of 1963, however, after a series of violent demonstrations in the South,
particularly in Birmingham, Alabama, President Kennedy pushed for a very strong civil rights bill in
Congress. The first of its kind since the Civil War, this bill drastically called for the end of all
segregation in all public places. In the eyes of the civil rights movement leaders, this bill was long

Why Is It Important To Enforce The Civil Rights Act At Work?
As a Human Resource Manager, the understanding of the Equal Employment Opportunity laws are
initially overwhelming, due to the amount of information dedicated to the subject. However, it is
vitally important to comprehend and apply these laws to any organization, in order to avoid claims
or litigation. Companies need to educate management to take reasonable care to prevent and
promptly correct discrimination and establish anti–discrimination policies (SHRM, 2014). The
EEOC is not out to get employers, but was established to administer and enforce the Civil Rights
Act at work (Dessler, 2015, p. 28). Successful compliance with EEOC law ultimately depends on
authentic and dedicated belief in the capabilities and value of each individual and cultivates a
diverse and sincerely non–discriminating workplace. In my view, the core of this and other civil
rights law finds its origins in the biblical worldview, that all men are created equal in the sight of
God and are bestowed with unique gifts and abilities. Our law points to the gift of God that we live
in a nation dedicated on protecting what God has created.
National Origin In our companies today, we are dealing with a global and diverse environment
making it important for organization's to have a workforce comprised of two or more groups of
employees with various racial, gender, and national origin backgrounds (Dessler, 2013, p. 46). This
first example discusses the hiring process of an Asian woman applying for a

Essay on Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Civil Rights Act of 1964
Danielle Endler
Human Resources 4050, Spring 2013 Semester Professor David Penkrot May 3, 2013
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is considered by some to be one of the most important laws in
American history. (The Most Important Cases, Speeches, Laws Documents in American History)
This Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964 and it is a
comprehensive federal statute aimed at reducing discrimination in public accommodations and
employment situations. (Feuerbach Twomey, 2010) Specifically, it aimed at prohibiting
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy), and religion.
(Civil Rights Act of 1964, 2010) Additionally, it also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It also allowed black men to join the Union Army and Navy, enabling the liberated to become
liberators. (The Emancipation Proclamation) The big change in slavery and the fight for equality
did not come until the Thirteenth Amendment was passed by Congress on January 31, 1865 and
ratified by the states on December 6, 1865. With this event, it was declared that neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly
convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. (13th
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution) Although this Amendment did give slaves their freedom, it did
not guarantee them the same rights nor the same treatment that other citizens of the United States
had and took for granted. This was especially seen in the states that enacted 'black codes' that were
intended to limit the civil rights of the newly free slaves. (Civil Rights) These black codes and
the obvious difference in treatment were a large issue, and they were later addressed in the
Constitution with the introduction of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth
Amendment was ratified on July 9, 1868 and it made large changes for black individuals. This
Amendment granted citizenship to 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States,' which
included former slaves recently freed. (14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) It also forbids
states from denying

The Workplace Of The Civil Rights Act

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Gina Buck

More from Gina Buck (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Workplace Of The Civil Rights Act