2. Week 1/4
Improvement Priority 1: Improvement Priority 2:
Date: 21/01/15 Date: 21/01/15
Time: 14:00-14:30 Time: 14:45-15:30
Venue: Worthing leisure centre Venue: Worthing leisure centre
Equipment: Racket, court, net, shuttles, training kit Equipment: Worthing leisure centre track, stopwatch, correct kit
Weather: Not of concern Weather: Cloudy but dry
Coaches Review: The athlete picked up the tweaked technique well. Her serves
were all getting into the general target area.
Coaches Review: The athlete struggle d with the first session but managed to
complete it. She put in the effort needed.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No
3. Week 2/4
Improvement Priority 1: Improvement Priority 2:
Date: 28/01/15 Date: 28/01/15
Time: 14:00-14:30 Time: 14:45-15:30
Venue: Worthing leisure centre Venue: Worthing leisure centre
Equipment: Racket, court, net, shuttles, training kit Equipment: Worthing leisure treadmill, stop watch, correct kit
Weather: Not of concern Weather: Not of concern
Coaches Review: Athlete is making good progress Coaches Review: Athlete found the session easier than the first. Making good
progress and putting in the effort
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No
4. Week 3/4
Improvement Priority 1: Improvement Priority 2:
Date: 04/02/15 Date: 04/02/15
Time: 14:00-14:30 Time: 14:45-15:30
Venue: Worthing leisure centre Venue: Worthing leisure centre
Equipment: Racket, court, net, shuttles, training kit Equipment: Worthing leisure treadmill, stopwatch, correct kit
Weather: Not of concern Weather: Wet and Windy
Coaches Review: Service is improving as expected Coaches Review: The athlete performed to a high standard today
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
The session was moved from a track session and was
performed exactly the same as planned but on a treadmill in
the Worthing gym instead.
5. Week 4/4
Improvement Priority 1: Improvement Priority 2:
Date: 11/02/15 Date: 11/02/15
Time: 14:00-14:30 Time: 14:45-15:30
Venue: Worthing leisure centre Venue: Worthing leisure centre
Equipment: Racket, court, net, shuttles, training kit Equipment: Worthing leisure centre track, stopwatch, correct kit
Weather: Not of concern Weather: Cloudy, no wind
Coaches Review: Athlete put in a lot of effort this week Coaches Review: Athlete performed well
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
none
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Yes
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No
6. Week 4 Review Testing Excellence Trait – Weakness 1/2
Trait: Position of the Shuttle
Test Name: Service Score
Standardised
Test:
No Normative Data: No
If Not A
Standardised
Test Detail
Method Here:
Test Result 1: 6/10 Test Result 1 Rating: average
Test Result 2: 7/10 Test Result 2 Rating: average
Test Result 3: 6/10 Test Result 3 Rating: average
Best Result: 7/10
Best Result
Rating:
average
7. Week 4 Review Testing Excellence Trait – Weakness 2/2
Trait: Aerobic fitness
Test Name: Astrand Treadmill Test
Standardised
Test:
Yes Normative Data: Yes
If Not A
Standardised
Test Detail
Method Here:
Test Result 1: 35.12 Test Result 1 Rating: Good
Test Result 2: 33.98 Test Result 2 Rating: Fair
Test Result 3: 34.56 Test Result 3 Rating: Fair
Best Result: 35.12
Best Result
Rating:
Good
8. Describe whether the tests show that
progress is being made as planned?
• The test for the position of the shuttle has
shown there is significant progress being
made. Lisa has continuously worked hard and
as a result has gone from poor to average.
• The Astrand test shows that progress is being
made for the vo2 max. Lisa has gone from the
high end of fair to the low end of the good
category.
9. Does the mid point review show that weeks 5-8
need to be adapted?
Describe How you will adapt your sessions?
• I think that because there has been
progressed made from both the placement of
the shuttle and aerobic fitness there is no
need to adapt either plan. They both get
progressively harder and I believe that
changing them would not benefit the athlete.
