Unit 27 Task 3 Week 1-4

Unit 27 Task 3
Week 1-4 and Review 1
Oscar Gamble

Week 1/4
Improvement Priority 1: Power Improvement Priority 2: Speed
Date: 02/02/15 Date: 04/02/15
Time: 11.30a.m Time: 11.30a.m
Venue: Worthing College Gym Venue: Worthing Leisure Centre Track
Equipment: Squat Rack (squats, calf raises, jump squats)
Leg Press Machine
Step Up Bench
Equipment: 400 Metre track
Cones
Stop Watch
Weather: Overcast Weather: Overcast
Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the sets and reps of each
exercise regarding training his legs. Although he found that by
the end of the session he was beginning to fatigue and found
the exercises more difficult.
Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the different sprints distances I
had set out for him with relative ease.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
Scott said he was able to complete all exercises however he
stated that he began fatiguing and found the last few sets
quite a challenge.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
Scott did not ask any questions or give any feedback after
exercise.
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
There is no progression taking place in this week. Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
There is no progression taking place in this week.
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Because Scott began to fatigue during the last sets of exercise
my plan of not progressing or overloading was ideal as he
could struggle and not be able to complete all exercises if
intensity was increased.
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Perhaps my plan of not progressing was not ideal as Scott
found this first week of speed training relatively easy and
therefore could have done with a higher intensity for
upcoming weeks however I wanted to ensure that Scott
sustained a good sturdy level of sprinting before making huge
progression plans.
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No

Week 2/4
Date: 09/02/15 Date: 11/02/15
Leg Press Machine
Step Up Bench
Cones
Stop Watch
exercise regarding training his legs. He found it a little easier
than last weeks training however still felt fatigued by the end
of the session.
Coaches Review: Once again Scott was able to perform all of the different
sprints distances I had set out for him with relative ease.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
exercise.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
Scott asked about whether waiting the first three weeks
before progressing training was a good idea and I explained
that I wanted to ensure he sustained a good level of sprinting
before progression took place so that he did not struggle in
later weeks.
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Expected?
If No Describe:
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Although Scott found the training exercise a little easier he
still stated that he began to fatigue during the end of the
session so my plan of not progressing or overloading training
was ideal as he could potentially struggle and not be able to
complete all exercises if intensity was increased.
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Again perhaps my plan of not progressing was not ideal as
Scott found the second week similar to the first in that he
performed it relatively easily and therefore could have
potentially done with a higher intensity for upcoming weeks
however I wanted to ensure that Scott sustained a good sturdy
level of sprinting before making progression plans.
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No

Week 3/4
Date: 16/02/15 Date: 18/02/15
Leg Press Machine
Step Up Bench
Cones
Stop Watch
exercise regarding training his legs. Again he found it easier
than last weeks training and actually didn’t feel any fatigue.
Coaches Review: Once again Scott was able to perform all of the different
sprints distances I had set out for him with relative ease.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
exercise.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
exercise.
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Expected?
If No Describe:
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
The plans to progress and overload training are appropriate
because for the first time throughout the training programme
Scott completed the training session without feeling fatigued.
This means that Scott has already made some adaption and is
ready for more intense training.
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
The plans to progress and overload training are appropriate
because Scott has found the first three weeks of training
relatively easy and progression is well needed as Scott
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No

Week 4/4
Date: 23/02/15 Date: 25/02/15
Leg Press Machine
Step Up Bench
Cones
Stop Watch
exercise regarding training his legs with the higher weights.
Similarly to week one he struggled and fatigued as
approaching the end of the session however this is what I was
expected as it is the first session with progression and
overload.
Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the different sprint distances I
had set out for him.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
Scott said he was able to complete all exercises however he
stated that he began fatiguing and found the last few sets
quite a challenge.
Athlete Feedback
/ Questions:
Scott had no feedback or questions.
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Progress is as expected because Scott was able to perform and
sustain the whole training session with the higher medium
intensity weights. He may have felt fatigue similarly to what
he felt in week one however this is expected when
progressing to higher weights.
Is Progress As
Expected?
If No Describe:
Progress is as expected.
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
I believe my next weeks overload and progression plans are
appropriate as Scott was able to complete all the exercises this
week and the next session is not an increase in weight but a
decrease in rest time and I would expect Scott to be able to
complete the session, again obviously expecting some fatigue.
Are the Next
Session Overload
and Progression
Plans
Appropriate?
If No Describe:
Yes they are appropriate.
Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No Was Contingency
Needed?
If Yes Describe:
No.

Week 4 Review Testing Excellence Trait – Weakness 1/2
Trait: Power
Test Name: Sargent Jump Test - http://www.brianmac.co.uk/sgtjump.htm
Standardised
Test:
Yes Normative Data: Yes
Test Result 1: 46 Test Result 1 Rating: Average
Best Result: 46
Best Result
Rating:
Average

Week 4 Review Testing Excellence Trait – Weakness 2/2
Trait: Speed
Test Name: 35 Metre Sprint Test - http://www.brianmac.co.uk/speedtest.htm
Standardised
Test:
Yes Normative Data: Yes
Test Result 1: 5.02 Test Result 1 Rating: Good
Best Result: 5.00
Best Result
Rating:
Good

Describe whether the tests show that
progress is being made as planned?
The tests do show that progress is being made as planned as Scott
after the first 4 weeks has made improvements in both of his aimed
areas. Scott's power has increased slightly from 42cm -46cm being his
best result. Although Scott has made improvements I am sceptical
whether he will reach his target we both set out for him at 52cm. As
only a 4cm increase has been made I now expect perhaps him to reach
50cm after the final 4 weeks. Scott's speed has also increased a
considerable amount going from 5.10 seconds – 5 seconds being his
best result. Again however similarly with Scott's power I am sceptical
whether he will be able to reach the target of 4.85 seconds we
originally set out as he has only made a 0.10 second decrease within
the first 4 weeks. I now looking at Scott’s current progress expect him
to reach the target of 4.90 seconds.

Does the mid point review show that weeks 5-8
need to be adapted? Describe How you will
adapt your sessions?
After my mid week testing and reviewing Scott's results I have
decided that the final 4 weeks do not need to be adapted for
either one of the improvement area. Despite the fact as
mentioned in the previous slide I am sceptical that Scott will
reach his set targets I am still very pleased that there is a clear
amount of progression made and rather than change the final 4
weeks of my training programme to try and push Scott to reach
his targets I would rather keep a steady rate of progression
taking place and ensure he adapts in the correct way to benefit
him greater.

Profiling Wheel
Date: 09/12/2014
Student Name Oscar Gamble
Football Performance Level
Enter Your
Score:
Coaches
Score:
Aerobic Fitness 6 7
Flexibility 5 7
Muscular Endurance 5 7
Strength 4 6
Speed 7 7
Body Composition 4 6
Balance 6 8
Co-ordination 6 8
Reaction Time 6 7
Power 6 7
Agility 5 7
Concentration 6 7
Use of Skills 6 8
Control of Anxiety 7 8
Stress 6 8
Vision 7 7
Pass Accuracy 8 8
Use of Both Feet 7 7
Positioning 6 7
Decision Making 7 7
Total out of 200: 120 144
A score of 10 is: Under 18s England Colleges
A score of 8 is: Best player in College First Team
A score of 6 is: College First Team
A score of 4 is: Best player in College Second Team
A score of 2 is: College Second Team
A score of 0 is: Foundation Level Football
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Aerobic Fitness
Flexibility
Muscular Endurance
Strength
Speed
Body Composition
Balance
Co-ordination
Reaction Time
Power
AgilityConcentration
Use of Skills
Control of Anxiety
Stress
Vision
Pass Accuracy
Use of Both Feet
Positioning
Decision Making
Player Score
Coaches Score

API/ASA
Athlete Name: Scott Goodman
Coaches Name: Dave Hall
Date: 09/12/2014
Student Name Oscar Gamble
Football Performance Level API ASA Discrepancy
Aerobic Fitness 8 7 24
Flexibility 6 6 24
Muscular Endurance 7 7 21
Strength 8 6 32
Speed 6 7 18
Body Composition 7 6 28
Balance 8 7 24
Co-ordination 8 7 24
Reaction Time 6 7 18
Power 8 7 24
Agility 7 7 21
Concentration 7 8 14
Use of Skills 8 8 16
Control of Anxiety 7 8 14
Stress 8 7 24
Vision 9 9 9
Pass Accuracy 10 9 10
Use of Both Feet 8 8 16
Positioning 8 8 16
Decision Making 8 8 16
The Six Testing Areas Are Shown Below - These Are Based On The Six Largest Discrepancies Above
Discrepancy 1 Strength
Discrepancy 2 Body Composition
Discrepancy 3 Aerobic Fitness
Discrepancy 4 Flexibility
Discrepancy 5 Power
Discrepancy 6 Balance

Similarities and Differences between
Previous Task and Week 4
Similarities
After the first 4 weeks of training and reviewing Scott at this midway point, there are some
similarities regarding his API/ASA and Profiling wheel. Firstly Scotts coach has clearly not seen any
improvement in his power and he continued to score him the a 7, the same as when training
started. Another thing which is unchanged is Scotts perceived importance score for power as it
has stayed at an 8. I have also kept Scotts speed score and after re-testing and reviewing at a 7.
His coach
Differences
After the first 4 weeks of training and reviewing Scott at this midway point, some changes have
occurred regarding his API/ASA and Profiling wheel. Since the previous task up until this current
midpoint Scotts training has caused adaption to take place in his body. Starting with Power as his
first weakness, I have already noticed changes in Scotts performances and after re-testing and
reviewing Scott I have chosen to raise his score from a 4 to a 6. After 4 weeks of training Scott
must also feel that a slight adaption has taken place and that his power has improved as his ASA
he scored himself a 7, compared to a 6 previously. Scott similarly to power has increased his ASA
score from a 6 to a 7 meaning he feels that his speed has improved slightly after 4 weeks of
training and he has also increased his API score from a 6 to a 7 meaning that because of training
he has been able to see the effects it has on the pitch and how it has helped him. Scotts coach
has also increased his rating of speed from a 6 to a 7.

Unit 27 Task 3 Week 1-4

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (10)

Similar to Unit 27 Task 3 Week 1-4

Similar to Unit 27 Task 3 Week 1-4 (20)

More from oscargamble26

More from oscargamble26 (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Unit 27 Task 3 Week 1-4