Dbq Essay On Sweatshops

Dbq Essay On Sweatshops
Sweatshops are factories that are used around the world that major brand companies use to make
products. These factories have gained media attention and controversy for the long hours and low
pay given to the workers. Many people say to boycott these factories because of the latter reasons,
but consumers shouldn't boycott companies that make sweatshop products. The first reason
consumers shouldn't boycott these products would be people actually deliberately take these jobs
because in developing countries most jobs don't pay that much. The second reason consumers
shouldn't boycott sweatshop products would be that it allows a lot of people in the developing
worlds to rise out of poverty. To summarize, consumers do not have the ethical responsibility to
boycott products made in sweatshops. As stated in the previous paragraph, people actually take these
jobs willingly because in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One point of their argument is companies exploit poor people in developing countries as said in
document 1. However, this doesn't apply to every sweatshop just a few and most people that work at
sweatshop factories taking these jobs willingly and were confused as to why people wanted to shut
down their workplaces as stated in an interview with some sweatshop workers in China. Another
main point of their argument is that conditions in these factories are abusive and horrible. However,
again many people take these jobs willingly meaning that they really don't care about these
conditions because they need money. Finally they believe that boycotting sweatshops will do
something good for the world. In the video it makes a very good point that at least sweatshops are
doing something to end global poverty while the people who are trying to boycott these sweatshops
may think they are doing something but in reality they aren't doing anything to help end global
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay about Sweatshops
Written over 50 years ago, was a declaration made, promising equality and fair treatment for the
working, which unfortunately turned out to be a false promise for some. The people I speak of, are
our fellow human beings working in slave–like conditions called sweatshops. Sweatshops have
always been prevalent in society, this can be shown by looking at the history of sweatshops.
Presently organizations are failing in there strive to end sweatshops, companies are failing to abide
by the moral code (apparel industry code), there is an ever growing gap between rich and poor, and
consumers are continuing to buy the companies products and remain unaware.
Sweatshop is a term for makeshift factories where ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Feminists against sweatshops focus more on women in sweatshops, than child labor. UNITE is
helping workers form unions to get the fair labor conditions they deserve. Making their own union,
UNITE already has over 500 members who are fighting for better wages, decent conditions and
other rights. They have rallied for things like "The New York City Council passes anti–sweatshop
legislation for City uniforms."(Ref 1). They have training programs and give many good ideas
towards making a statement, and things we as people can do to help. The United Students Against
Sweatshops (or USAS), is an international student movement that involves individual students from
campuses all over America and Canada fighting for sweatshop free labor conditions and workers'
rights. The University of Toronto has it's own version of this, and offers ideas on how you can start
your own group (refer to appendix A). NO Sweat offers the most out of all these organizations. They
have reports on garment enforcement going back to 1995. Although it mainly focuses on sweatshop
conditions for American workers, it's making the most difference, probably because they are so
close to home. Although there have been many successes for these groups, all these efforts and
many more, have still not put a stop to the issue of sweatshops.
In sweatshops, workers work seven days a

Thesis Statement Of Sweatshops
The Benefits Behind Sweatshops
Thesis statement: Sweatshops, when left to operate without government intervention, are the most
efficient way of out poverty.
Introductory rationale: When it comes to social justice issues, most people believe the government
needs to solve the problem. Social justice in sweatshops is no exception. In my research, I have
found that what people see as the cause of injustice in developing countries, sweatshops, are actually
what is responsible for lifting people up out of poverty. As a result, any sort of government
regulation will fail to solve the problem. The audience I am writing for is a diverse group of peers
who are concerned with social justice though they may have different solutions and beliefs about the
topic. My goal in this draft is to expand their knowledge and show them the benefits of not
interfering with the free market.
I. Claim 1: Sweatshops increase the standards of living for the workers and their communities
1. Evidence:
1) Kristof, Nicholas. "Where Sweatshops Are a Dream." The New York Times, 14 Jan. 2009,
www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/opinion/15kristof.html?_r=1. Accessed 7 Sept. 2017.
This article has a personal story from the author about improving conditions. This makes for a good
pathos argument
2) Powell, Benjamin. "Sweatshops: A Way Out of Poverty." Mises Institute, 20 Mar. 2014,
mises.org/library/sweatshops–way–out–poverty.
Comparison of changing living standards due to "sweatshops"
3) Templin, Paul. "The

Benefits of Sweatshops
The Benefit of Sweatshops
Robert Gelber
Integrative Seminar 300
Professor Duclos Alegue
April 28th, 2011
Abstract: Many countries, industries and people are becoming more affected by sweatshops in
different ways because of they're continuous increase in growth. Sweatshops benefit many
developing countries as they provide opportunities of employment to the people living in poverty
and benefit the community at large by creating an economic infrastructure that utilizes the country's
resources and increases their tax base. These institutions first came into existence in the early 1800's
and were referred to as dwelling houses, which were local factories that generally had the same idea
of the sweatshop that we have in today's society. There ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
True womanhood created an ideology that was very beneficial to the textile industry (Hapke, 2001)
as it was based strictly on a profit driven management system, which viewed its workers as factory
hands rather than domestic workers. Lowell Mills was a company that used this ideology to it's full
potential. The making of a product was broken down into specific categories so that each person had
a specific task and repeated that task over and over and over again. Instead of one person making a
product from start to finish, each person was given one task to perform repeatedly. For example one
person would be spinning the yarn while the next worker would be weaving cloths (Hapke, 2001).
This would increase productivity so that products could be manufactured at a more efficient rate that
would generate more profit. Between 1880–1940 tenement houses became the ideal place to
produce garments. The term "Sweatshop" was beginning to come into existence as the sweating
system was commonly used during this time. In the lower east side of New York, tenement houses
reached an outrageous number of 35,000, which resulted in a million and a half people working in
these establishments (Hapke, 2001). The working conditions in these houses were horrendous as
they were terribly overcrowded to the point where it was uncomfortable and unhealthy to work in
the small, poorly ventilated rooms. The facilities were also

Sweatshops In America
In last week's meeting in Canada, the Group of Eight industrial nations grappled with the question of
how to better economic conditions in poor nations. One powerful means would be to improve the
conditions of workers in sweatshops. Two billion people in the world make less than two American
dollars a day. As voters and consumers of sweatshop products, Americans can make a difference in
ending the miserable conditions under which these people work.
Some argue that sweatshops are simply a step up a ladder toward the next generation's success: the
garment worker at her loom is carrying out some objective law of development, or the young girl
making toys for our children is breaking out of male–dominated feudalism. This line of thinking
recalls ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Don't we have the consumer and political power to pressure our corporations to end sweatshop
wages paid to the people who make these goods? These workers are not demanding stock options
and Jazzercise studios. Women in Bangladesh say they could care for their children if their wages
rose to 34 cents an hour, two–tenths of 1 percent of the retail price of the Harvard hat.
Some economists argue that even the most exploited and impoverished workers are better off than
those who are unemployed or trapped in slave labor. But that argument is not about offering anyone
a ladder up, but about which ring of Dante's inferno people in developing nations are consigned to.
We don't want Disney, Mattel, Wal–Mart or other major American companies to leave the
developing world. We simply want to end the race to the bottom in which companies force countries
to compete in offering the lowest wages for their people's labor. There should be a floor beneath
which no one has to

The Benefits Of Sweatshops
There are many views with the problem of utilizing sweatshops in developing economies. Many
insist that utilizing sweatshops in developing economies composes exploitation. In certain
circumstances, this may be true, but not all. It is an ongoing controversy of demolishing sweatshops
and changing the laws of labor. Many anti–sweatshop activist supports the idea of demolishing
sweatshops. Activist commonly focus on work conditions and low wages causing them to be ill –
formed of the economy as a whole. Taking a deeper look into these developing countries, it is with
out of doubt that these countries benefit from sweatshops. Sweatshops should not be demolished
because the employees are benefited with income, their economy receives growth and ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, many U.S jobs offer shift differential for employers who work the "graveyard shifts".
Of course, some may prefer sleeping at night but they take the alternative for the extra income. It is
not out of the ordinary for workers in these developing countries to tolerate poorer working
conditions for higher pay. It is important for activist to include the economy of these developing
countries when considering the demolishment of sweatshops. Not only are the employees benefited
with income, their economies gain and grow. Many of developing countries gain economic growth
due to sweatshops. In the article Beyond Sweatshops: Employment, Labor Market Security and
Global Inequality by James Heitz he states that "access to the markets of affluent countries has
become a key component of growth strategies around the globe" ( Heitz p 224 ). A key component
to developing an economy is trade. Additionally, businesses with increasing services brings forth
growth to the economy. Sweatshops allow manufacturing companies to trade goods, as well as bring
forth new businesses. Through developed countries such as the United States developing countries
gain technical knowledge, fundament and tools. Global poverty is known to be decreased due to
sweatshops. It is said that 83 cases of exploiting sweatshop wages reported in sources and compared
those earnings to the living standards in the countries where they were found. In every country
where the sweatshops were

Essay on sweatshops
Sweatshops
As companies grow larger and more competitive, they are looking for cheaper ways to produce their
wares and increase their profit. That is, after all, how companies are able to succeed, by giving their
customers a comparable product for a cheaper price. This increases sales and the overall bottom line.
Which seems to be a beneficial plan for both the companies and the consumers. That is, as long as
the consumers don't know how the product is being produced. The places that produce these
products for an extremely cheap cost are called "Sweatshops". A sweatshop is a small manufacturing
establishment in which employees work long hours under substandard conditions for low wages.
Sweatshops came about ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The wages and conditions of the work environment are good in relation to other opportunities the
citizens of these countries have. Not only do these people now have a job that feeds their families,
they are learning skills that may benefit them in the future. The companies may also argue that they
are not violating any laws that the country has enacted. Without the use of cheap labor in foreign
markets not only would the company and it's stockholders lose profits, but the products being
produced would be more expensive when entering the United States' market. This in turn would
adversely affect the American consumer.
Fortunately, companies can afford to pay workers higher wages. If this were not true they would not
have been able to become so successful with production in the United States. It is a shame that any
company would see themselves as being morally or ethically correct allowing it's employees to
work in a hazardous environment. Companies should want their employees to enjoy the place they
work in. This would increase satisfaction in the work place, which would in turn increase production
and decrease employee turnover.
We as investors and consumers should not only act in our own self–interest, but also in the interest
of the common good. Companies should invest their clients' money in companies that want to
eradicate sweatshops, to ensure that their products are made in compliance of labor

Sweatshop Sociology
Everyday people get dress without ever glancing at the Tag. A tag that tell a shocking story if
researched. That this exactly what I did; found my Adidas running shoes and researched the story of
how it was made. For years, companies like Adidas have used sweatshop to produce their good at a
low cost while selling the merchandise at higher price. The Real World: Introduction to Sociology
defines sweatshop as "A workplace where workers are subject to extreme exploitation, including
below–standard wages, long hours, and poor working conditions that may pose health or safety
hazards". Through research, it is clear that brands like adidas use sweatshops to produce their over
price products which leave their employees in horrible condition for just pennies. ... Show more
Global Exchange posted and article telling a story about three workers, "And they receive the
equivalent of 15 cents for each shirt they make –– shirts that retail for $40 and more in the United
States." At that rate, it is hard for the people to earn enough money to support their family or make a
living. Sometimes they even go days of unpaid labor and when they do receive payment it is below
the minimum wage. Additionally, if the demands are not met, they do not receive any over time
payments. In addition to low wages, Adidas sweatshop workers have to work in unsafe and
unimaginable conditions. The Institution for Global Labor and Human Rights stated that, "There
around 1,500 workers are watched by cameras as they labor in temperatures of around 37 degrees to
sew football shirts for Puma and Adidas subsidiary Reebok". The working condition lead to health
risk however they do not receive any health plan to cover injuries for sweatshop labor. Furthermore,
the working shifts are usually twelve hours with only two breaks that are

Sweatshops Should Be Outlawed
Sweatshops should be outlawed. Some of the reason that sweatshops should be outlawed are
employment of minors, who required to work long hours, and they are paid low wages. Powell
provides an economic explanation for the presence of sweatshops in the world. The minors work in
deplorable working condition that cause poor health conditions. They perpetuate the violation of
basic human rights as people are exploited for their labor. Today's sweatshops violate our notions of
justice, yet they continue to flourish. This is so because we have not settled on criteria that would
allow us to condemn and do away with them and because the poor working conditions in certain
places are preferable to the alternative of no job at all. Sweatshops also persist ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
At the level of the individual worker, sweatshops can be regarded as a blessing of sort, for they
might be the only way for illiterate people lacking marketable skills to enter the global industrial
marketplace. In many less developed countries with large populations, agriculture is the only
economic activity available to people. Sweatshops provide poor people in developing countries with
better outcomes than the alternative of criminal activity (child and adult prostitution). Employable
for only part of the year, outside of the planting and harvesting seasons, there is little for them to do
and they stream into cities looking for work. Sweatshops exist because of a prevailing mindset that
maintains a clear distinction between business and ethics. My perspective is minors shouldn't have
to work at sweatshops, they should be able to work in a clean and safe environment. During school
days no more than four or five hours a day with a legitimate pay wage. In conclusion, Sweatshops
should be outlawed. U.S. have the rights not to face competition from poor third competition from
poor third world workers, and by outlawing competition from third world we can enhance union
wages at the expense of poorer people who work in sweatshops. (Powell,

Sweatshops In The Sweathing Industry
See
Many large companies, especially in the clothing industry, rely on oversea sweatshops as their
primary source of production. The term sweatshop is used to describe a factory that violates two or
more laws regarding labor. In many developing countries, these workers are subject to terrible
working conditions, low wage, child labour, unreasonable hours and a lack of benefits. Sweatshops
are utilised due to the cheap labor and production by a number of companies like Zara, Kmart,
Cotton On and Target. Despite a number of incidents involving factory fires, collapse and
faulty/malfunctioning equipment killing hundreds at a time, workers continue to face these
horrendous conditions and treatment. This is a social justice issue as wealthy companies take
advantage of the desperation and vulnerability of those living in poverty. This results in unequal
wealth, unfair and immoral treatment of poor people, especially women who make up 85% of the
workforce and children, for which there are over 250 million aged 5–14 in the industry. For many,
their hourly wage is less than a dollar, with many not being payed at.
Judge
The encyclical on human work known as "Laborem Exercens" was released in 1981 by Pope John
Paul II, outlining a human's dignity in work, the importance of the workers as well as the rights of
human person as a factor in all processes (productive, technological and economic). It recognises
that human work has an "ethical value of its own" and that each person is "a

Sweatshops Disadvantages
Sweatshops are work environments that possess three major characteristics–long hours, low pay, and
unsafe or unhealthy working conditions (Sweatshops). Sweatshops do not only employ men and
women but they also employ children, children who get their childhood robbed from to start
working at an early age. Many of the clothing companies that you wear day to day may participate
in these sweatshops .
According to the Average Hourly Apparel Worker Wages photograph, many sweatshops are in third
world countries such as China, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Indonesia
and Vietnam. Those are only a few countries out of the many that participate in sweatshops. While
our minimum wage is $10.50 and still increasing, the hourly ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
That's 260 million children who aren't getting an education or making good childhood memories.
Most of these children are aged from 5 to 14 years old. The children are easy targets for them
because they are obedient and scared which makes them easier and better for the employers to
control them( Moulds). The children also don't have voices to speak up for themselves or speak up
against their employers. Not only are children obedient, scared and voiceless, they are also so much
smaller which makes them perfect for some jobs that big adults can't do.
Many of the clothing brands that are trendy and "cool" are associated with sweatshops. It's not only
clothing companies associated with sweatshops. Many technology stores and sports companies
participate as well. Without knowing so, we support these companies by buying their products and
spending lots of money on them. Some of the clothing companies are American Apparel,
Abercrombie and Fitch, L.L. Bean, Gymboree, Hanes and Burberry. Some of the sports companies
include Nike, Adidas, Pumas, New Balance and FILA(Are your clothes made in sweatshops). Some
of the technology companies linked with sweatshops according to Moore, Malcolm, are Apple, HP,
and Dell. The companies listed above are not even half of the many that are out there.
People's experiences working here are as awful as we thought it would be. A canadian reporter
named Raveena Aulakh went undercover in a Bangladeshi

Zwolinski Sweatshops Analysis
A simple database search will supply a smorgasbord of articles, papers, and personal writings about
the abuse and inhumanity of sweatshop factories. However, there is always two sides to every coin
and Zwolinski's article approaches the topic from the much less popular position of defending
international factories and cheap labor. He formulates a well written academic journal entry
presenting a stout argument for sweatshops while also presenting possible counterarguments.
Zwolinski's strongest premise is the central idea of choice and voluntary action. In fact, he opens his
paper saying: For the most part, individuals who work in sweatshops choose to do so.' They might
not like working in sweatshops, and they might strongly desire that their

Negatives Of Sweatshops
I remember hearing about sweatshops in middle school and just thinking how wrong and useless
they are. After reading the articles I believe that my impression of sweatshops that has stuck with me
has changed. Even though I may find sweatshops to be cruel and useless it is not for others. I agree
that "they are dirty and dangerous" (Kristof & WuDunn, 2000) and most Westerners are opposed to
sweatshops, but for people in less developed countries, such as Asia they like them and want to
work in them. I feel that sweatshops have many bad side effects, such as poor working conditions,
pollution, and child labor, but I can see how they are starting to improve for workers and the rest of
us. I still feel like they can be dangerous regardless, but they are helping so many people stay alive,
have jobs, and make money. I never thought of it from that perspective and really realized just how
much these jobs mean to some people. For example, the 40–year–old woman in Cambodia who
would do anything to work in these sweatshops just to earn enough money to buy a $5 net to save
her family from getting malaria from the area they had to move in order to sell wood to have money
for food. The disease had already killed some of her family and will continue to do so if she does not
make the money she needs to afford one of those tents. To be honest I cannot even imagine being
put into one of these situations. It is so scary and mind blowing. Working in a sweatshop would be
lifesaving to her and be

Sweatshops Case Study
Savior from Sweatshops
A large majority of Americans do not realize where the clothes they purchase are produced.
Unethically made goods are predominantly less expensive than goods made outside of sweatshops.
With the increase in investigations, it is apparent major brands such as Nike, Disney, Reebok, the
Gap and others are involved in the use of sweatshops. Sweatshops are commonly known for having
poor working conditions, unfair wages, unreasonable hours, child labor, and a lack of benefits for
workers. In foreign countries, sweatshops have around 168 million children ages 5 to 14 forced into
child labor ("11 Facts"). Labor conditions are violated, and are often ignored by the US Department
of Labor. Sweatshops are still ongoing due to the ignorance or lack of care for the people involved
in a sweatshop corporation. With the awareness of where the majority of inexpensive clothing is
manufactured, the public and major American companies should reconsider supporting sweatshops.
It is unethical for the American consumer to purchase clothing from companies who use sweatshops
as means to mass produce clothing lines. This is due to the fact that people have to willingly work in
unbearable work conditions, in order to obtain a job which is essential to survival. Workers are
given no leverage for negotiations, and they are forced to accept the sweatshop lifestyle or suffer
through degrading poverty. Acknowledged through multiple witnesses, "work conditions are

Negative Side Of Sweatshops
Colin Buckley
Thibodeau
English 12
May 15th,2017
Although sweatshops get a bad name for their conditions, it has been shown and documented that
sweatshops actually benefit people by occupying them with jobs they wouldn't get anywhere else, as
well as help boost the economy. Sweatshops have been known to boost economies in areas where
poverty is an issue.They offer jobs and shelter from the streets. When someone hears the word
sweatshop they think of child labor, Most people are too focused on the negative side of sweatshops
that they can't see the side that benefits and aids the people of its surroundings. In the grand scheme
of things, The good of sweatshops outweighs the bad. Even though the positive side of sweatshops
outweighs the negative side, their is still an opposing opinion that many people stand by. They stand
on the side regarding sweatshops, the working conditions they provide and that they should be
outlawed. In the article titled "Crammed into squalid factories to produce clothes for the West on
just 20p a day, the children forced to work in horrific unregulated workshops of Bangladesh",
Photographer Claudio Montesano Casillas, documents the horrible yet intriguing conditions of a
"Garment Sweatshop" in Bangladesh. She states that they produce clothes on just 20P a day, and are
forced to work in horribly unsafe conditions. From this article, you can tell that Casillas is not for
sweatshops. Most of the children in the factory, do not have the

Child Labor And Sweatshops
If anyone was asked if they support child labour or sweatshops, they would most likely say no, but
can people say with certainty that the clothes they are wearing have not been made in a sweatshop?
A sweatshop is a manufacturing facility where workers endure poor working conditions, long hours,
low wages and other violations of labor rights. Companies are profiting off developing countries
need to work but customers can reverse this by being mindful of how often and what they are
buying. The sweatshop has come to symbolize the greed of the clothing industry. (Smestad, 2009).
Although some clothes are inexpensive on the price tag, the real expense is the people making the
clothes. Ethical clothing is the answer to prevent sweatshops, while ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Companies try and pass it down the supply chain to until it reaches those who cannot pass it down
any more. The people making these clothes are the most vulnerable, those who have no voice, there
are garment factory workers in Bangladesh, China, Cambodia, cotton farmers in India and the child
slaves working in cotton farms in Uzbekistan. Some sweatshop workers speak out on their
experience. A young woman named Aracerly talks about her experience working in a sweatshop.
She works on her feet for more than 12 hours a day getting payed 80 dollars weekly. Her palms are
calloused and has burn marks that were not treated properly in the sewing shops. She is exposed to
poisonous elements and using unsafe equipment without suitable protection. Most people working
in sweat shops are forced to work in the farms and factories that produce the imputes for our
clothing in the industry. Their wages are so low that they are unable to lift themselves or their
families out of poverty, and the cycle continues.
Apart from lowering wages, firms also try to offset their loss by asking suppliers to cut their whole
sale prices. Suppliers say that because their desperate for business they either cut their prices or
loose out on business (Scharwath, 2015). Suppliers try then to offset their losses by cutting back on
maintaining a safe work environment which can lead to tragedies, such as the Rana Plaza collapse in
2013 where 1137

Exploitation Of Sweatshops
"I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near
certainty that people of equal talent have lived, and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."– Stephen
Jay Gould. Sweatshops exploit people, and children. They take advantage of their poverty, and there
need for a better life. Sweatshops are one of the worst things that ever happened to the business
world, and poor people around the world. Sweatshops should be stopped, and ended.
Sweatshop is a common term used to refer to factories that typically produce apparel; that have very
low wages by modern U.S. standards, long working hours, and unsafe or unhealthy working
conditions; that often don't obey labor laws; and that would generally be considered unpleasant
places to work by most citizens in wealthy countries. Sweatshops first appeared in Great Britain in
the late eighteenth century and persisted there until the early twentieth century. In the United States,
the first textile sweatshops appeared in the early nineteenth century in Rhode Island and
Massachusetts. Virtually every wealthy country in the world had sweatshops at one point in their
past. Sweatshops are an important stage in the process of economic development.
The International Labor Organization (ILO) has estimated that 250 million children between the
ages of five and fourteen work in developing countries. 61% in Asia, 32% in Africa and 7% in Latin
America. Many of these children are forced to work. They are

China's Factories and Sweatshop
China Sweatshop
When you go shopping to Walmart or Apple ask yourself where your product is coming from. China
has numerous sweatshop factories assembling USA's products from stores as Apple and Walmart.
China's Sweatshop tends to violate human labor's rights by forcing overtime and going under the
mandatory minimum wage and other violations as long hour without pay, sexual, and physical
harassment. China's sweatshop factory tends to be quite popular because is cheap labor, free trade
zone, or low fee rates in taxes. The reason store as Apple and Walmart has their product to be
assembled in China's factory is to avoid high export fees. Since Walmart and Apple factory's
locations was identified and it came public in the media it shocked the world of its employee's cruel
working's condition. Factors in China are located in Guangdong Province Songang or in Shenzhen.
For example Foxconn is a factory located in Shenzhen where Apple send their electronic to be
assembled and made. In China the majority workers in factories is occupy by women and children.
The percentage of women in China's Sweatshops is ninety percents. In China, the majority working
in sweatshop are women which are young and not educated; in addition, forcing them to be ignorant
of their own legal rights. Young women in China are attached to numeral discrimination and unfair
pay. China's sweatshop is popular on violating labor rights, especially against women and underage
minor women and men. It is unfortunate

Sweatshops Essay
Sweatshops over the world can be improved through simple and big changes on both the foreign as
well as American fronts. Sweatshops have always been viewed as a negative thing but no one has
really tried to change or improve upon them, it is more of an out of sight out of mind mentality. In
the book Where am I Wearing, the author Kelsey Timmerman said " ... is that we should try to be
engaged consumers..." ( Timmerman 9 ). Society knows it is happening so why not find ways to
improve these sweatshops instead of just ignoring the issues at hand. " We live in a turbulent,
imbalanced world. It can be depressing to think about" ( Timmerman 41) By having Labor Unions
that are there for the people are beginning to be a simple way to start a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Labor Unions could help to enforce labor laws to improve the factories and the conditions within (
Arnold ). These unions could make up for lack of government enforcement within the areas of that
the labor unions ( Arnold ). Also it does not cost a thing to make sure that people are following the
rules to the best of their ability ( Arnold ). Labor unions are beginning to be created to help with
these issues of the factory workers such as their rights and how to educate people of these rights.
As stated before labor unions are a way to improve working conditions but there are others as well.
Sweatshops can make simple improvements by using scraps around the factory to make simple
improvements ( Arnold ). Making improvements can be done in a very simple and low cost ways
especially depending on the size of the company ( Arnold ). In a NIKE sweatshop a worker wanted
to use the rubber waste as a cushion for iron molds so they would not slam against the furnace to
hopefully eliminate noise in the work area, they would not allow the worker to do this (Arnold).
Making conditions better will cause a reduction in the amount of deaths, injuries, and illnesses that
occur from the poor regulation of working conditions in these factories.
Still explaining different ways to improve upon sweatshops as well as the workers lives, improving
wages is a way to achieve this. This is simple as it is a moral obligation for the employer to provide
decent wages for

Sweatshops Research Paper
Sweatshops Violate Human Rights In America, it is rare to see people conscious of where their
clothes come from. Truth is, if these citizens knew what goes through the workers lives that make
their clothes, they could be aware of where they are putting their money. The horrors that go on
inside sweatshops can be so unimaginable to the American mind. People's desire for affordable
clothing and failure to ask why they are so cheap will always lead to these practices. Sweatshops
exist in numerous third world countries and in the opinion of many activists, are a breach of human
rights. Garment makers get minimal to no pay, work in unsafe conditions and are often victims of
child labor. To begin with, workers in sweatshops are completely exploited for the fast production of
clothing. American retailers pay the workers unfair, low wages. Citizens in Pakistan, Bangladesh,
India and China are being paid maybe 60 cents a day or even nothing to make fast fashion for
people in developed countries ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many factories are rat–infested, crowded and hot. As well, the workers are locked inside of factories
with no way to leave. One incident in Pakistan caused 300 workers to die during a fire. Workers in
the Pakistani Factory were alerted that the fire was in the building, but all of the exits were locked,
leaving them to die. This is not the first occasion of deaths from factory fires. According to Matthew
Mosk from ABC News "More than 700 workers have died in factory fires in the past five years." In
addition, in 2009 alone, one million workers in china were injured at their work in sweatshops.
Many of the practices done in the factories can be damaging to the health of the laborers. The lack
of ventilation can cause fatal respiratory diseases such as silicosis. In all, work environments should
be a safe and clean area and no person should have their life at risk due to

The Benefits Of Sweatshops
A large majority of Americans do not realize where the clothes they purchase are produced.
Unethically made goods are predominantly less expensive than goods made outside of sweatshops.
With the increase in investigations, it is apparent major brands such as Nike, Disney, Reebok, the
Gap and others are involved in the use of sweatshops. Sweatshops are commonly known for having
poor working conditions, unfair wages, unreasonable hours, child labor, and a lack of benefits for
workers. In foreign countries, sweatshops have around 168 million children ages 5 to 14 forced into
child labor ("11 Facts"). Labor conditions are violated, and are often ignored by the US Department
of Labor. Sweatshops are still ongoing due to the ignorance or lack of care for the people involved
in a sweatshop corporation. With the awareness of where the majority of inexpensive clothing is
manufactured, the public and major American companies should reconsider supporting sweatshops.
It is unethical for the American consumer to purchase clothing from companies who use sweatshops
as means to mass produce clothing lines. This is due to the fact that people have to willingly work in
unbearable work conditions, in order to obtain a job which is essential to survival. Workers are
given no leverage for negotiations, and they are forced to accept the sweatshop lifestyle or suffer
through degrading poverty. Acknowledged through multiple witnesses, "work conditions are
undeniably poor and human

Sweatshop
Sweatshop is Conflicts With the Moral Standards
PMP 400
Quan Zhang ( Lyla)
Royal Roads University
Elvira Perrella
March 9, 2015
Sweatshop is Conflicts With the Moral Standards
Green, B., & Norton, S. (2011). Reading. In. W, Anne & M. Laura ( Eds.), Essay essentials with
readings (pp. 336– 341). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education Ltd. In the article, before the research, like
many people, the author's attitude was old, but after the research, the author's attitude changed. The
author chose the country of Bangladeshi to illustrate her point that working in a sweatshop can be a
positive experience for women in developing countries by focusing primarily on one country. First,
she argued that sweatshops offer jobs ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I can choose these data and cite them in my paper, and the data will make my evidence more
powerful and believable. Powell, B., & Zwolinski, M. (2011). The Ethical and Economic Case
Against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), pp. 449–472.
doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551–011–1058–8 The idea of sweatshop has grown increasingly has
been hotly contested over the past several years. At first, the author reviews the moral and economic
foundations, then argues that the sweatshops are flawed, which are the violation of labor right. The
author addresses the question of sweatshops are justified in violating local labor laws. Then the
author pointed out that the global market competitions are the fundamental reason for growing
sweatshops. Finally, the author provides some recent literature, which applies to the ban exploitation
of sweatshop labor and offers advice on modifying the behavior of sweatshops. In this article, the
framework is very clear. The author mainly expounds the sweatshops are flawed and against the
sweatshop labor. The author not only used data to support their thesis, but also they used others'
opinions to assess the issue and gave the recommendations. The evidence is believable because the
authors of this article are the professor of economics and philosophy

Sweatshops Research Paper
In today's world, people tend to shop for products in any kind of stores for his or her needs, such as
Wal–Mart, Sears, and Home Depot. These products include clothing, appliances, toys, etc. However,
these were made progressively through sweatshops. Almost every product in stock has a label from
the location was made. A few of the known countries that made these products before manufacturing
to stores overseas are China, Mexico, and Bangladesh. Sweatshops are created during the Industrial
Revolution period of the 19th century, mainly in both the United States and Great Britain. The three
things to learn about sweatshops are the definition, its advantages, and disadvantages.
The term sweatshop has various definitions. In Merriam–Webster dictionary,

Sweatshop Exploitation And Responsibility Of Sweatshops
Gabrielle Chan
Bass
Humanities 3rd Blue
12 November 2014
Sweatshop Exploitation and Responsibility
Sweatshops were first well known to the public eye when several major corporations' exploitation of
workers were revealed during the late twentieth century. Sweatshops generally are factories that
provide workers with socially unacceptable working conditions, especially dealing with clothing
items. With the expanding apparel industries around the world, more and more corporations are
using sweatshop factories to their advantage. Numerous companies claim that they are not
responsible for actions of those factories from which they purchase from because it is not part of
their corporation. However, action needs to be taken by the government and individual corporations
to improve the working conditions in sweatshop factories. Due to the harsh working environment,
insufficient pay, and other factors that cause inhumane treatment of workers in sweatshops, the US
government should improve working conditions for workers, have stricter regulations on
sweatshops, and strive to improve the treatment of sweatshop workers across the globe. Sweatshop
proponents argue that even though sweatshops may not provide the best working conditions for
workers, it at least provides a job for those who are in desperate need of one. In a way, a sweatshop
may even benefit the workers. The money the workers earn from working in the sweatshop factory
may be the deciding factor in whether they have food

Disputes For Sweatshops
Background information
Diane Angeles 10E
Introduction
Sweatshops are exceedingly contentious for numerous reasons interrelated to human rights, greed
and consumerism, feminism and environmental ethics. This segment of the proposal will briefly
outline four immensely combative disputes connected to sweatshops.
Human Rights Breaches
There are various ways to which the operation of sweat shops breach the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (UDHR) advocated by the United Nations (UN). Most sweatshop operators neglect
the health and safety of their workers and often use physical abuse as a source of empowerment to
force the workers to perform unreasonable amounts of labour for extremely long hours at rapid
speeds. This is a direct breach to the UDHR statement which states that 'everyone has the right to
rest leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and precious holidays with pay'
(Article 24). These working conditions are appalling and breach various categories of human rights.
Fuelling Greed
Human misery is experience by sweatshop workers everyday as a result of the extreme greed
substantial companies portray towards sweatshops as a whole. Large companies involved in the
fashion industry are approaching sweatshops demanding cheaper prices to produce products that
will later on be sold for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is known by most that majority of employees in sweatshops are women, in fact a piling 85% of
sweatshops workers are females. Not just women but also children and teenagers are treated no
more than mere objects bound to comply with orders in attempt to avoid inhumane consequences
such as persistent physical abuse. Earning less than three dollars a day, mothers have no choice but
to leave their children in their hometowns to work in endlessly in hopes that their children will not
have a future like their own. Cheap female labour is unacceptable and should not be

Advantages Of Sweatshops Essay
Lageju Krischal 1 Ashley Garcia Casas ESL 400 October 27, 2017 Final draft Sweatshops: worth
the price? A sweatshop is the place that has a poor working condition, where workers are paid very
low wage thought they work for longer hours. A 'sweatshop' is defined by the US department of
Labor as a factory that violates 2 or more labor laws. Sweatshops are common in poor and
developing countries. Basically, they possess three major characteristics – long hours, low pay and
unsafe or unhealthy working conditions. On the other hands it has been one ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Sweatshops also helps in developing the infrastructure of the country. Besides raising the life
standard of the workers, it also helps in raising the economy of the country. One of the good things
is that companies need to pay taxes to the government which directly help to boost the economy of
the country. Furthermore, a successful investment in poor countries will send message to other
potential investors that there is a stable environment for investment, leading in more investment, job
opportunities and prosperity in the country. This have standardized the global economy. Many
technologies are introduced by the sweatshops in the country. Besides it also helps in developing the
infrastructure. As these factories need proper transportation, communication, digital technologies,
etc., it helps in developing it. I also agree that sweatshops are not good all the time. Obviously, there
are some bad sides of sweatshops. The first thing is that people need to work in the horrific
condition putting their life in risk. Sometimes it's like your worst nightmare. They are a curse for
human rights. They do not care about the workers they are working for side workers are allowed to
work for longer hours without any food and break. They have always been criticized for their
violation against child labor and human rights. There are many cases where workers are abused.
They are accused verbally,

Sweatshop Labour
INTRODUCTION
Sweatshop workers make the ultimate sacrifice for profit. Merchandise in the garment industry are
outsourced and produced by slave labourers forced in working conditions that are cruel and
exploitative, often in fear of punishment. "A "sweatshop" is defined by the US Department of Labor
as a factory that violates two or more labor laws" (Do Something, 2016). Human trafficking in the
garment industry is prevalent globally, but astronomical numbers are concentrated in developing
countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam. Multimillion–dollar, globalized companies have no
accountability and turn a blind eye to the exploitation towards trafficked victims occurring behind
the scenes in fear of jeopardizing company reputations. This research ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The countries listed in the table are organized by decreasing wages. At the top of the list, both being
developed countries, the United States and the United Kingdom earning significantly higher hourly
wages. There is a common misconception that sweatshop labourers work in these conditions
voluntarily because it's their only opportunity to employment and allows them to sustain the cost of
living. Because of the lack of transparency in the industry, consumers are unaware of the fair pay
that these labourers are owed. Those who are trafficked into sweatshop labour usually do not have a
choice. Trafficked sweatshop labour victims are all held against their will and forced to work
primarily to give businesses the best chance at earning a profit. Moreover, as they continue to be
underpaid, or often times not paid, they are unable to provide themselves with adequate living
conditions for themselves or their family members. Appropriate and fair compensation for labour is
virtually nonexistent in sweatshop

Why Are Sweatshops Be Banned
Introduction
The word "sweatshop" has always had a negative connotation lingering over it. Many economists
believe that they should be banned and made illegal due to their poor working conditions, safety
hazards and worker exploitations. Although these opinions will indefinitely exist about sweatshops
there are many economists that fight the negative views by bringing statistics and facts about
alternate working conditions into the picture. This forces readers to see alternate views about the
issue and how people in third world countries make a living. The purpose of this review is to
investigate the different aspects and views on how sweatshops are either beneficial or detrimental to
third world countries and the citizens who live there. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many articles were also found through current, credible news sources. The term "sweatshops" was
initially searched and then later changed to "sweatshops and the economy" and "sweatshop
conditions and workers pay." The database was set to show the most current articles from first to
last. Research became a little more difficult after narrowing down the topic from a broad point of
view. Many articles about this issue were also found by researching credible economists that have
discussed the controversy multiple times in journals. These articles helped the most with research
because economists have different views about sweatshops and how it helps shape the economy but
they also do not neglect the aspect of exploitation of workers and unfair pay issues sweatshops
bring. Research on the issue of sweatshops was fairly clear and the documents and professional
journals are

Sweatshops : A Global Discussion On Fair Trade Versus...
"There is no beauty in the finest cloth if it makes hunger and unhappiness"– Gandhi (Harper, 2017)
When reading this quote, it is easy for most of us to agree that sweatshops are a very negative part
of society, when sweatshops are discussed we often think about children, poor working conditions
and exploitation, which makes many of us believe that fair trade is the greater option. But what if I
were to tell you there is more to the sweatshop industry than what the media has portrayed for us. In
today's society there is a global discussion on fair trade versus sweatshops. There are many opinions
on this topic, especially when it comes down to whether or not sweat shops should be ethically and
morally accepted by society. Many argue that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Global Exchange 2001) With more and more sweatshops developing it is allowing economies like
China's to boom. In a recent article by the New York Times "wages have risen from about $50 a
month to $250 a month or more today." (Kristof, Wudunn, 2000) Working in sweatshops may seem
brutal and unfair to many of us who live in western society, but across the globe it can be very
appealing. (Kristof, Wudunn, 2000)
There is a lot of positive effects of sweatshops. It allows for jobs in the developing countries, the
factories in most cases pay a higher wage then other jobs in the surrounding area, it allows for the
country's economy to stabilize by having more people working and less relying on government help.
By stating this I am not trying to say all aspects of sweatshops are good, there are many negatives
that can come from sweatshops too. There are many sweatshops out there, that severely exploit their
workers. Some supervisors are very brutal when it comes to housing their workers, teaching the
workers proper safety precautions, some even employ young children, demand sexual favours from
workers, deny bathroom breaks, over work the employees and do not allow the workers to create
any sort of union. (Kristof, Wudunn, 2000) In any case, wherever in the world, this sort of treatment
is

Sweatshops Collapse Essay
Sweatshops have very poor working conditions, the workers get paid very little, many people are
forced to work there including a huge number of children, workers have to work long hours and do
not get breaks, and the factories are also unsafe for people to work in.
There have been many awful accidents at sweatshops around the world but one of the worst
incidents involving a sweatshop was when the factory in Bangladesh collapsed in April 2013. Over
1000 people were killed in this disaster with another 2500 being injured. There were over 3000
workers in the building at the time that it collapsed. The building collapsed because it was built on
unsafe ground, on top of a pond. Three additional floors were built on top of the original building
and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There could be a law made so that if a company was buying from a factory that was below their
standards they could be fined. That could make businesses consider where they are buying from.
However the consequence of this idea is that the clothes in shops would be more expensive for
shoppers, although the price may not be much more than it would be not some shoppers might not
be happy about having to spend more money on clothes that they may only wear a few times.
Another solution to this problem would be for the company to pay the workers more for their
products but still keep the prices in stores the same. The company would lose some of their profits
doing this but shoppers would not have to pay more for their clothes and they would be helping to
improve the lives of thousands of workers. A study from 2002 by economist Robert Pollin shows
that the price of products being sold in shops would only have to be increased by 1.8% to double the
worker's salary. This shows that the prices in shops would not have to increase by a lot to change the
lives of the workers. This study also shows that the majority of people are willing to spend up to
15% more if the know that the products that they are buying have came from a factory which has
good working

Sweatshops Essay
In a world mired in economic inequality, the questionable morality of sweatshops has become a
highly contested ethical issue. Some argue that sweatshops offer more opportunities for poor
workers, and are thus good. Others view inhumane working conditions and exploitation in these
factories as prohibitive of good moral practice. In this paper, I will show that sweatshops cannot be
immoral using the theory of prices in competitive markets and workers' decisions to work in
sweatshops. By the end of the paper, I will conclude that sweatshops are moral institutions because,
in order to exist, the wage they offer to employees must exceedingly compensate for the costs of
their labor, thus creating more good than bad for the workers and for their ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For this reason, then, sweatshops are immoral because they distribute gains inequitably. My
argument for the morality of sweatshops uses the idea of prices as an assessment of value to
demonstrate that sweatshops must create a net benefit for their workers, and thus cannot be immoral.
The argument revolves around the idea that the benefits of the wage earned by the laborers must
exceed or equal the costs associated with working that job, otherwise the workers would universally
choose other employment. According to Hayek,i prices summarize the value of goods in competitive
markets. Given competition among suppliers and consumers, the market determines prices by
factoring the personal preferences of each actor to assign a value – or price. Given these prices,
individuals decide to buy or sell after an assessment between the monetary value of the exchange
and the value of the good. Only if the monetary value offered equals or exceeds the costs associated
with sacrificing a good will an actor agree to the exchange. Therefore, we can assume that workers
who accept jobs in competitive labor markets believe the value of the wage they receive either
equals or exceeds the costs of their labor and creates a net benefit for them. In the labor market time
often limits workers to one job, so we may also assume that a worker's choice reflects her belief that
she has chosen the best job,

Effects Of Sweatshops
Terrible Sweatshops: The Examination of the Unethicalness
Figure 1 (Lewin)
"FORCED TO WORK EXHAUSTING HOURS" – this is the label which a woman who bought a
summer dress at Primark found (See figure 1). The message was a cry for help from workers and
implies the harsh environment for the people in a sweatshop (Lewin). The word sweatshop was
made in the end of 1800s. The definition of the sweatshop is broad but it describes any workplace
where people are forced poor conditions and long hours of works with low wages (Annabelle). The
US Department of Labor defined a sweatshop as a factory which violates two or more labor laws
(DoSomething.org). People in developed countries tend to enjoy buying cheaper products and do not
care about the reality of the process they have made. In fact, many women and children are forced to
work in sweatshops in developing countries. Some corporations such as NIKE, GAP and Wal Mart
have already revealed those facts but the problem has not been solved yet (Bakan). Actually, those
are just few of the companies involved in sweatshop labor. By using sweatshops, many corporations
reduce their production costs. And millions of people still live with what they get from sweatshops
(Solution). Some people say the sweatshop is ethical because it provides better jobs than the average
jobs in those ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People who believe that sweatshop is ethical argue that it is better to have jobs than to have no jobs
at all. They say that if the countries simply ban the low wage labor, the factories would move to
other countries which permit lower wages and the situation cannot be changed. And even if people
think the conditions of sweatshop labor are unfair and unethical, relative to their other alternatives,
sweatshop labor is a very attractive option for workers in the developing world. Some insist that
workers would only choose a job in a sweatshop when that job is better for them than any of their
other alternatives (Learn

Sweatshops Is Bad
Out of Bad Comes Good
A sweatshop is a factory where workers receive low wages while being forced to work in poor
environments. In general, these workshops produce an abundant amount of the clothing that we
wear everyday. However, few acknowledge the act of sweatshop labor, since it is rarely shown to the
public eye. Ironically, many popular fashion brands that we buy from all recieve clothes that are
made in sweatshops. While sweatshop workers are treated unfairly in the workplace, fast fashion
provides them with jobs and it provides us with the clothing that we constantly demand for. To
understand the topic of sweatshop labor, we must recognize the effects of this controversial working
system.
First, we have to consider the conditions that

Sweatshops In China
It was Martin Luther King, Jr. who said, "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere
ignorance." Many people in the Western world either do not know or choose to ignore the fact that a
massive amount of products that come into North America from faraway lands are produced in
sweatshops, including shoes, clothing, and toys. This ignorance over the inhumane and unjust labour
conditions happening in factories on other sides of the globe is precisely what keeps these horrifying
practices alive. China is home to one of the most enormous and concentrated sweatshop systems in
the world. There are approximately 150 million people in China working in ghastly conditions,
having to live off nearly unsustainable pay, and being refused benefits ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In present China, forced and unpaid prison labor is widespread and common. Characteristics of
Chinese sweatshops include overcrowding, lack of sanitary conditions, no worker breaks, demands
to complete a task within a limited period of time, and a total lack of job security. Government
negligence is what allows such abuses to persist. Some plants force employees into working
extraordinary amounts of hours, for example, a Price Waterhouse audit of Nike factories in China
found that some require seven days of work per week. Many workers who supposedly have the
choice to work overtime must do so in order to survive on their low wage rates. The people working
in Chinese sweatshops only get a small amount of payment for their work and nothing more. The
locals do not benefit at all, but instead suffer from the presence of foreign businesses in their
country. As for the foreigners, one telling statistic is that the United States imports an estimated
$100 million per year in goods produced by Chinese migrant workers. The outside companies gain
millions as the developing countries struggle to survive. Presently, foreigners gain massively from
the resource of migrant workers in China. The locals that can benefit from their presence benefit
very, very little, that is, if a small amount of money for their work is seen as a benefit. The Chinese
employees' work is valuable to the company, for their

Sweatshops Problem
Bangladesh is considered to be among the worst locations of sweatshops with "...more than 4,800
factories and 3.5 million people employed in the... garment industry, producing cheap clothes under
appalling working conditions for major international brands" (War on Want, 2016). This issue
involves women, men and children, however it impacts women the most as "women account for
85% of the textile work force and are particularly vulnerable to discrimination and abuse" (War on
Want, 2016).
Australia contributes to this issue by having retailers which use the sweatshops and order clothes
from them, these can include stores such as Rivers, Coles, Target and Kmart. However, this is not
the only way Australia is contributing, Australian organisations also try to help this situation, for
example, OXFAM Australia have been trying to help the situation for more than 20 years, and they
are keeping an eye on the well–known clothing stores such as Forever New, H&M, Zara to name a
few. They are focussing on women's rights, considering the high number of women working in
sweatshops, mainly how they are suffering sexual harassment and discrimination ... Show more
Large companies care about gaining profit and making money, and if in order for them to achieve
this means using sweatshops, then they will use them and allow the workers to be under legal age, or
physically abused. The companies take advantage of poverty in third world countries, and instead of
helping the situation, they feed it and allow to grow into a larger issue. Sweatshops in Bangladesh
can have negative and positive impacts on the workers and society as a whole. Negative impacts on
the workers can include injuries and sometimes death because of the unsafe work environment.
There are not many positives to this other than the people are working and receiving a wage, yet the
wages aren't enough for them to live off of. So when looked at as a whole, the workers are
negatively impacted from

Sweatshops Thesis Statement
Thesis statement: Sweatshops, when left to operate without government intervention, are the most
efficient way of out poverty.
Introductory rationale: When it comes to social justice issues, most people believe the government
needs to solve the problem. Social justice in sweatshops is no exception. In my research, I have
found that what people see as the cause of injustice in developing countries, sweatshops, are actually
what is responsible for lifting people up out of poverty. As a result, any sort of government
regulation will fail to solve the problem. The audience I am writing for is a diverse group of peers
who are concerned with social justice though they may have different solutions and beliefs about the
topic. My goal in this draft is to expand their knowledge and show them the benefits of not
interfering with the free market.
I. Claim 1: Sweatshops increase the standards of living for the workers and their communities
1. Evidence:
1) "Where Sweatshops Are a Dream" is a short article in favor of sweatshops. The author talks about
how the living standards rose due to sweatshops when he was a kid (Kristof). This article has a
personal story from the author about improving conditions. This makes for a good pathos argument.
2) In the interview with the Mises Institute called, "Sweatshops: A Way Out of Poverty," Powell
talks about how living standards rise in areas with sweatshops as well as how sweatshops actually
pay well in comparison to other jobs (Powell,

Essay on Sweatshops
Sweatshops in the United States
Americans love to shop. With malls everywhere you go, shopping just might be America's favorite
past time! When you are out shopping though, do you ever stop to think where all of those clothes
and shoes come from? When I was younger, well, actually until recently, I always thought they were
all made by machines. Shirt machines, pants machines&#8230;you get the picture. I have
learned, however, that for the most part, clothes are still made on sewing machines, by people, and
often under circumstances that we can only imagine.
Sweatshops have always been a problem in the Unites States, especially during the past century.
Unfair working conditions and pay prompted the formation of the Garment Worker ... Show more
In some cases, I've learned, with brute force. On August 2, 1995, the Department of Labor raided a
factory in El Monte, California. There they found 72 garment workers, mostly Thai and Mexican
immigrants, being forced to work 17 hours a day at wages between $.60 and $1.60 and hour. They
were literally held captive at the factory by barbwire and armed guards. Employees were threatened
with rape and violence if they attempted escape. The El Monte sweatshop was finally discovered
when an employee escaped through a ventilation shaft.
In many sweatshops, however, the workers are there voluntarily. Even the meager wages earned are
more than the undocumented immigrants workers would earn in their home countries. As long as
there is a supply of willing workers, sweatshops will flourish.
So what can be done? How can the sweatshop problem in the United States be resolved? Is there
even a plausible solution? Through my research for this speech I have discovered that everyone
seems to have a solution, yet putting the solutions into action is another thing altogether.
Of the many solutions to the problem, the main, and most obvious solution, is government
regulation. The Department of Labor monitors the garment industry, but with 800 inspectors for
22,000 garment contractors, in addition to 6 million American

Essay on Against Sweatshops
Some companies have acceded to public pressure to reduce or end their use of sweatshops. Such
firms often publicize the fact that their products are not made with Anti–globalization activists and
environmentalists also deplore transfer of heavy industrial manufacturing (such as chemical
production) to the developing world. Although chemical factories have little in common with
sweatshops in the original sense, detractors describe them as such and claim that there are negative
environmental and health impacts (such as pollution and birth defects, respectively) on workers and
the local community.
Various groups support or embody the anti–sweatshop movement today. The National Labor
Committee brought sweatshops into the mainstream media in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Because of the relatively higher value placed on male education, young women are often
encouraged by their families to leave school and migrate to urban areas or Export Processing Zones
(EPZ) to work in the garment industry. As outsiders in a new community, these young women lack
the legal or family support they might receive in their own community and therefore, have to spend
a larger amount of income on supporting themselves. Consequently, these young women who are no
longer receiving an education often find it hard to earn enough money to send back to their family.
[21]
The division of labour in sweatshops is gendered because the vast majority of workers are young
women. The problems faced by many workers are also gendered because gender–based notions of
what is acceptable inform working conditions. Thus medical or maternity leave, employer /
employee relations and the right to organize can all become gender biased. Consequently, the
negative aspects of sweatshops have a disproportionate impact on women. Because of this, some
argue that efforts to combat the poor working conditions in sweatshops should focus more on
empowering women[citation needed]. Although company–led attempts to improve the working
conditions in sweatshops such as the Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) have had some successes,
others criticize the ETI as 'gender–blind'[citation needed]. The modern

Bangladesh Sweatshop
In a third world country, jobs are not easy to come by; especially jobs that pay enough to sustain a
living. However, various individuals living in these desolate places have found a solution that seems
repulsive to people fortunate enough to live in a first world country; sweatshops. On April 24th,
2013, in Dhaka, a district in central Bangladesh, a sweatshop collapsed on the workers inside,
killing a thousand and injuring over two thousand. People were aghast at the working conditions in
sweatshops exposed in this event. Raveena Aulakh, Toronto Star journalist, went undercover at a
sweatshop to see the factory conditions and wrote about her experience in the article, "I Got Hired at
a Bangladesh Sweatshop. Meet my 9–year–old Boss". The article ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Meem did not look unhappy. She was okay with working 12 hours every day, she didn't see
anything wrong with sitting on the floor, she quietly accepted the backache" (Aulakh). However, a
woman reporter from a first world country wrote the article; people in third world countries see
things very differently. While Ms. Aulakh may have seen the pay as minimal, working conditions as
deplorable, and the workers as unfortunate, countless people are desperate to obtain a factory job. In
the New York Times Magazine article, "Where Sweatshops Are a Dream", offers a view into the
garbage dump in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, "This is a Dante–like vision of hell. It's a mountain of
festering refuse, a half–hour hike across, emitting clouds of smoke from subterranean fires" (Kristof
2009). Countless families live on the garbage dump and earn their living by scavenging for valuable
trash. But "talk to these families in the dump, and a job in a sweatshop is a cherished dream, an
escalator out of poverty, the kind of gauzy if probably unrealistic ambition that parents everywhere
often have for their children" (Kristof). While people in first world countries see sweatshops as
abominable institutions, they are a necessary step for individuals in third world countries to escape
poverty, because they provide

Dbq Essay On Sweatshops

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Erin Moore

More from Erin Moore (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Dbq Essay On Sweatshops