Gun Control Pros And Cons Essay

Essay about The Pros and Cons of Gun Control
This essay will discuss the pros and cons of gun control. Some U.S. States have already adopted
some of these gun control laws. I will be talking about the 2nd amendment, public safety, home
safety, and do gun control laws really control guns. I hope after you have read this you will be
more educated, and can pick your side of the gun control debate. So keep reading and find out more
about the gun control laws that the federal and some state governments want to enforce on U.S.
Citizens. Firearms are classified into three broad types handguns, rifles, and shotguns. Rifles and
shotguns are both considered "long guns." A semi–automatic weapon fires one bullet each time the
user pules the trigger, it will also eject the empty shell after...show more content...
Background check data gun purchases show that in 2005 nine million checks were done,and for the
first eleven months of 2013 the figure rode to nineteen million. Gun ownership according to
(justfacts.com)"based on gun manufacturers there are over 300 million firearms owned by civilians
and around 100 million of them are handguns. Also 40–45% of households own guns or 47–53
million households. Adults owning guns is 30–34% or 70–80 million adults. Adults owning a
handgun is 17–19% or 40–45 million adults." Why, even after Newtown were a shooting left six
people dead,are gun laws ascending. The starting point for this is violent crime rates. According to
politics/policy "National gun control push began in Ernest in the late 1960's, an era of sharply
rising murder and assault rates,especially in large cities. Violence markedly increased for three
decades, throughout 1993, providing gun skeptics with a plausible basis to argue that limiting
access to firearms might help address the scourge." In December 1993, seventy percent of
Americans supported stricter gun control, according to the pollster at CNN. Then in 1994 for some
reason violent crimes began to decrease falling roughly fifty percent
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
Gun Control
In 2014 of the 42,820 suicides reported that year 21,386 involved a firearm (mel.org). Shootings on
campus raise the question of whether properly trained students carrying firearms. The debate over
gun control has two sides one is that people should have guns for many reasons like it is the second
amendment and to protect themselves. The other side is that people shouldn't have guns because
they can't be trusted with them. The second amendment does not protect having firearms in public
places such as schools and government buildings. Gun control laws are older than the second
amendment. In the June 26, 2008 District of Columbia et al. v. Heller US Supreme Court majority
opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia, LLB, wrote, "Like most rights, the right secured by the Second
Amendment is not unlimited (procon.com). Courts in the 19th century said that people cannot have
firearms whatsoever. The second amendment only allows people in the militia to own firearms. The
second amendment of the constitution reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the
security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
(procon.com). ВЁ270– 310 million americans own firearmsВЁ out of the 326,766,748. Many
Americans believe that it is their right to keep at least one gun in their home or on...show more
content...
Lithuania has one of the world's lowest gun ownership rates (0.7 guns per 100 people) but its suicide
rate (by any method) was 45.06 per 100,000 people in 1999, the highest suicide rate among 71
countries with available information (procon.com). Jim Barrett, author for TheTruthAboutGuns.com,
stated, "the theory that the restriction or elimination of guns would have a positive effect on the
overall suicide rate in the U.S. does not hold up under scrutiny." People can put their mind to
something and do

Gun Control Pros And Cons
Gun Control The gun control debates have been a polarizing issue as people have different stands
concerning the policies that guide the gun control (Spitzer, Robert J, 30). Guns are used for
self–defense. It is illogic to prevent law–abiding citizen from acquiring guns while criminals have
them illegally. Handguns are small and thus can be carried anywhere for self–defense (Lott, John R.
13). Therefore, they are the weapons of choice for the individuals who wish to use it for
self–defense. Unfortunately, they can be the weapon of choice for criminals too (Xia, Yuanqing,
2299). Since the handguns are small, thieves can also secretly use them to instill fear to others and
steal from them. Since criminals are humans who claim to need security, they are also likely to
acquire guns as per the regulations of gun control. Gun control would definitely lead to higher levels
of crimes.
In as much as the gun control aims at ensuring that the security of individuals, some people might
find possessing it quite...show more content...
Disqualifying the law would mean that most that security of people would be compromised. In
Washington D.C it was noted that the average murder rate increased by about 73percent after the
ban of the handgun possessions (Spitzer, Robert J, 30). This is a clear indication that individuals
who were the victims of murder had no way of defending themselves. Life is the most important
asset that every individual has and it is his or her right to protect it. Even criminals may feel
insecure if the individuals they are going to still from using the illegally possessed guns have the
power to fight. Relying on the Chicago facts, the individuals who helped in the robbery were the
ones who possessed guns (Okey, Mary Summersby, and Sarah Cohen. 32). It would be really in
effective when the gun control laws ensure that individuals do not possess guns because no one is
aware the time when the need would

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
Firearm control
Pro VS. Con
One of the main problems that we have as a community is the right to obtain firearms and the use of
these firearms. There are two sides of this argument and this project will try to focus on both sides.
Alongside the idea of anti–gun control, people feel that there God given right to bear arms/2nd
amendment is being manipulated. The argument begins to come when the weapon control activist
begins to question our right to have and carry these firearms.
We face the problem of massive shootings throughout our country. The control side of thefirearm
takes this fact and directly blames firearms for the massive shooting. The shootings such as
Parkland, Fl, are predictably followed by an emotional and heated debate.

Gun Violence : The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
I choose to talk on a topic that most people is clearly not comfortable talking about until something
major happens. I chose to talk on gun control, not that this is an easy subject to focus on but one
that is seeking the attention all around the world. The one thing I do not like when it comes to any
law is that religion and politics is always brought into anything when someone wants to make and
prove a point. "The second amendment protects an individual's right to own guns; that guns are
needed for self–defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders; and that gun
ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime" (Procon.org., 2017). One thing I find
interesting for the argument is that guns are rarely used in self–defense. This is true most of the
crimes that is being committed are most of the victims are not allowed to defend oneself making
the crime seem very senseless. Another pro is guns that are owned legally will likely get stolen and
used by someone with a criminal background. More gun controls lead to fewer suicides. Most adults,
including gun owners, support common sense gun control such as background checks, bans on
assault weapons, and bans on high–capacity magazine. Enacting gun control laws such as mandatory
safety features would reduce the number of accidental gun deaths. Now thinking about the cons
of the gun control, I hear more about gun related offenses then being able to defend why it
happened. There is so much crime that I literally think people shot just to be shooting. Plus there
is no way of stopping a criminal from obtaining a gun think about it a gun can be brought illegally.
" In addition to federal gun laws, each state has its own set of gun laws ranging from California
with the most restrictive gun laws in the country to Arizona with the most lenient, according to
the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence" (Procon.org., 2013). Guns can be stolen and used to
create more crime. Suicides are on the rides but would there be fewer suicides if a gun was not
involved. People use guns to commit suicides because it is probably the quickest way to end a life
but is it always efficient. Being a licensed gun holder I do not advertise that I am certified to own and

Essay about The Pros and Cons of Gun Control
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights). This is the 2nd Amendment of the
United States Constitution. This is a document that grants all Americans certain inalienable rights.
All citizens no matter their age or standing in society have some understanding of the Bill of Rights
and the freedoms that it allows. One freedom that is granted to us, the right to bear arms, has
become the center of a heated issue in today's society and many years before. The majority of
citizens have felt the impacts of guns, either positive or negative, during some point of their life. It
is because of the fact that guns are a part of...show more content...
Granted, this is one meaning and is what a large number of Americans want, but it is not the only
meaning. There are several other varying degrees of gun control that are being taken into
consideration. One is to restrict the ownership of fully automatic rifles (machineguns) to military
personal only or to those with special permits. Another proposal has been to outlaw the ownership of
handguns.
Everyone has a different opinion about the issue and what should be done to solve the problem, no
matter what is done the main question is would restricting the ownership of firearms be a violation
of our 2nd Amendment? Our rights are in place to protect our freedoms, but when is it permissible
to infringe upon those rights for the protection of the common good? The standard which is in place
simply states, that your rights are in place until exercising your rights violates other rights or places
others in danger. Meaning that I have the freedom of speech but that does not allow me to yell fire
in a movie theater because it would endanger the common good. So now that we understand that one
person's freedoms stop where another's starts, the question is does owning a gun infringe upon
other's rights?
The answer to this question is up for discussion; some would say yes that the mere ownership of a
firearm is violating

Essay On Gun Control Pros And Cons
The United States of America has the largest gun culture throughout the entire world. This culture is
so exposed to guns because of its history. Weapons have been a necessity through multiple wars on
the home front. This right to own guns is the second amendment in the constitution. Unfortunately,
there are two ways to look at this amendment. People that support and do not support can interpret
the amendment in a way that goes with their belief. There are also many pros and cons to gun
control. The website procon.org is a nonprofit organization that proves information to people on
controversial issues. They supply readers with the pros and cons of each issue hoping to give people
a chance to understand situations and, ultimately, decide what

One of the most fascinating policy issues that have peaked my interest in the last few years is gun
control. Not because of liking or disliking guns. Not because of liking or disliking control. But
because of the struggle governmental control is having through our means of regulation. When we
think of gun control, we often think about the black and white debate of where one may sit on the
topic. It's very difficult to take an objective approach regarding the topic; lobbyists tend to look at
facts in which will support a specific argument and bias. Looking at it from that perspective, a
valid argument can be made for both sides. For an example, we can compare two different
countries where both have "proof" for both sides of the argument. Then it's easy to say, "in country
X, gun violence is low because of strict gun laws" or "in country X, gun violence is low because of
the protective benefit."...show more content...
But as we can clearly see, it can be a very sensitive subject, especially when dealing with people's
constitutional rights and the perceived threat of infringing on those rights. But perhaps there is a
happy medium in there somewhere; perhaps we are not considering more relevant input data. When
it comes to government control, I think the focus should be more on gun regulation rather than gun
control. By doing so, there would be more buy–in from the gun community to support regulation
efforts. Matter of fact, many gun enthusiasts agree that there needs to be better regulation to keep
firearms out of the wrong hands. Because of the passion involved in this particular debate, I have
always been interested in exploring the feasibility of an objective view by incorporating different
input

With an increase in the number of mass shootings that have occurred in the United States in the last
few years the issue of gun control laws has become a prevalent topic of debate throughout American
society. This debate stems from two opposing arguments over gun control. Some feel gun control
laws are fair and not the contributing factor to these mass shootings, whereas, others feel that there
is an urgent need for strict laws in order to end the problem of mass shootings. There are numerous
pros and cons to the enforcement of stricter gun control laws but we must note a few things: stricter
gun control laws would interfere with the second amendment, it is not the gun that kills it is the
individual, and it is ultimately not laws that are...show more content...
We deserve the right to continue to preserve our protection and banning guns conflicts with that
right. Stricter gun control laws would simply give rise to more societal problems regarding second
amendment rights.
Next, it is important to ask who are the people that really kill? Is it the gun or the person? People
who defend the right to bear arms often state that it is not the gun that kills it is the individual that
kills. Some feel the answer lies in that we need to introduce stricter laws on who is able to apply for
license to carry guns. Gun laws vary from state to state with California being the most restrictive
state to Arizona with the most lenient laws. These laws include background checks, waiting periods,
and registration requirements to who can purchase and sells guns. Even with these laws in place we
have still witnessed an increase in the number of mass shootings over the past few years.
Implementing stricter gun control laws will ultimately not eliminate individuals from acquiring
access to guns if they truly desire. State governments may require licenses to purchase guns but there
remains an underground and online market to purchase guns, which does not monitor whether a
person truly has a license or not. Rather than focusing on implementing stricter laws for control and
ways to make the purchase

Gun control has been a people issue for decades, and the fight for or against it is getting stronger
with each coming year. From the Columbine shooting to the most recent Santa Fe High School
shooting, it seems as though guns are the perpetrator. The greatest defense against gun control is the
Second Amendment, which states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
state, the right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." John Paul Stevens, a 98 year old
former associate justice suggested that America should repeal the Second Amendment, sparking
controversy amongst liberals and conservatives. But should the Second Amendment actually be
repealed? Should America ban guns completely to limit gun crime? Simply

Gun Control: Pros and Cons
Table of Content: No.| Content| Page(s)| 1| Table of Content| 1| 2| Introduction| 2| 3| Gun Control:
Pros (i) Disarm and Control Citizens (ii) Better Management (iii) Reduce Crime Rate and Death
Rate| 3–4| 4| Gun Control: Cons (i) People's Life Unsecured (ii) Women's Safety Unguaranteed (iii)
Spring Up of Black Markets (iv) Conflict with Democracy| 5–7| 5| Conclusion| 8| 6| References| 9|
Introduction: A gun is a normally tubular weapon or other device designed to discharge projectiles
or other material (The Chambers Dictionary). The first devices identified as guns appeared in China
around 1000AD, and by the 12th century the technology was spreading through the rest of Asia, and
into...show more content...
In most case, every nation do this do control the frequency of the guns within the country. 3.
Reduce Crime Rate and Death Rate: One of the advantages of gun control is reduce crime rate
and death rate caused by guns. As we know, a gun is a deadly weapon and one of its functions is
to kill. The fewer people have it, the better it is. If guns were less widespread in the society,
criminals would not obtain a gun easily. Besides, there would be a lower possibility of guns
falling in the hands of teenagers or children, preventing accident like accidental killing by
teenagers or children who do not know how dangerous a gun is. Hence, the death rate is reduced.
Gun control will ensure that there will be a strict check on the ownership of all guns. Before
someone owns a gun, their background will be checked before they obtain the gun. This will be
applied to other firearms too. Therefore a criminal will not easily obtain a gun. Thus, it would
definitely reduce the rate of violent crime. As we know, houses and shops are one of the hot places
for crimes to be happened. So, there will indeed be incidences of shop lifting or house theft. With
gun control, no more guns would be involving in these crimes, therefore death rate would definitely
reduce. Gun Control: Cons Gun control has become a big issue in the United States today. Many
Americans don't agree with the gun control laws that they have today. The Second

Persuasive Essay On Gun Control Pros And Cons
The Gun Control Debate Gun control has a history dating back to 1791, when the Second
Amendment of the Constitution was ratified. The Second Amendment has drawn a great deal of
criticism in recent years. It has evolved into a much more political issue to which many citizens
can relate. After all, many stories involving guns have appeared much more frequently in
newspapers, on the television, and the radio. The debate of gun control started with the passage of
Gun Control Act of 1968, which banned ownership of guns by certain people and regulated the
sale of guns. Since then, two major groups have emerged: people who support strict federal laws
on guns and those who oppose them. This essay will cover the Second Amendment, public safety,
home safety, and hearing from those who are for and those who are against the federal restrictions
on guns. On Friday December 17th, 2012, thousands of people's lives changed forever. Sandy Hook
Elementary was hit by a gunman that...show more content...
On a practical level, gun owners argue that weapons are actually making the society safer. They are
giving the people the power to protect themselves and dissuading criminals from victimizing people
who might be armed. One against gun restrictions would say that they believe, with a gun, they can
stop a mass shooter better than someone with no protection could ever. Opposition to gun control
focuses on attempts to unarm more or less sane, law–abiding adults. No one can say, with certainty,
that guns increase or decrease violence and crime. According to a 1983 National Institute of Justice,
about one percent of privately owned firearms are used in criminal activity. This is suggesting that
eliminating 99 percent of the nation's guns would not benefit crime. Or would it? Philip Cook, an
economist at Duke University calls this speculation about the uselessness of eliminating guns

In the world today, we often hear about the gun control debate. There are two main, obvious sides in
the debate, to enforce more rules for gun control or to leave things the way they are. I believe in the
Second Amendment right to bear arms given to all citizens of the United States by the Constitution.
There are many reasons for the controversy over gun control. There has been an increase in the
amount of gun violence that we see on the news everyday. We hear about shootings and mass
killings. The shooting at Virginia Tech, Columbine, the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, during
the Dark Knight Rises, and one that really got to people, the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary
School in Connecticut which had many young children killed. These...show more content...
The right to bear arms is believed to have been intended to allow citizens to arm themselves and
overthrow the government if it ever were to break the constitution or become a tyranny. While that
still holds true today, guns have become a far more integral part of life and the protection of ones
property. Those in opposition to gun control argue that guns are necessary to defend their homes and
their lives. These people "acknowledge, support, and defend the law–abiding citizen's God–given
right of self–defense" (Republican Party on Gun Control). A level playing field, and armed
civilians offers the opportunity to protect property and stop these mass shootings before they get
out of hand. Take the Dark Knight shooting in Aurora Colorado. Perhaps somebody in that theater
has a CCW (Concealed Weapon Carry Permit), and when the shooting began, he fired back and
wounded the attacker, possibly saving multiple lives. Another belief of gun control opposition is
that disarming civilians gives an advantage to criminals. Criminals by definition break the law, if a
man plans on committing mass murder, he will simply go outside legal means to find a weapon.
Therefore civilians are now disarmed against illegally armed attackers. Perhaps more guns would
make criminals rethink robbing that store or attacking someone. For example, Switzerland has the
most guns

Gun Control is a debatable method to reduce gun violence and many people's perspectives vary.
"Gun control is a broad term that covers many kinds of restrictions. It can include regulations about
what firearms can be bought and sold and who can and can't possess them or sell them and also the
ammunition that you have to buy" (New York Times). However, Gun Control is a horrific method to
resolve Gun Violence this opinion has been proven by numerous professionals. Gun Control didn't
work in other countries, People that shouldn't possess guns will still have access to them, and Guns
break the second amendment and violent people's sense of safety.
To begin, Gun Control has been experimented by numerous countries and many did not succeed.
These countries have tried to put massive restrictions on guns, but they just made gun violence
worse. "Strict gun control laws did not work in Mexico, and will not work in the United States.
Mexico has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world and yet, in 2012, Mexico had
11,309 gun murders (9.97 gun homicides per 100,000 people) compared to the United States that
had 9,146 gun homicides (2.97 per 100,000 people). [88] [89]" (gun–control pro–con ).This quote
proves that the people would be better off now without Gun Control. Why because the same thing
will happen to the USA. And currently, in Mexico, it seems impractical to get a gun ."The country
has only one legal gun store (the Directorate of Arms and Munitions Sales),

Gun control is a very controversial subject to talk about, some people are in favor of it while on
the other hand there are people opposed to it. There are many pros and cons when talking about gun
control. One pro being self–defense, because it gives the individual a sense of support and
protection of their material goods and their life if being attacked. The security that this entails are
the main beliefs that a bearer feels, the mismanagement of security and the criminal heyday has
made the citizens pretend to do justice by their own hand, although it is clear that this is not allowed
by the law, we must always wait for the response of the authorities to take charge of the matter.
Someone who feels insecure in the face of armed robber may feel compelled to arm themselves,
take some shooting lessons and prepare for what they consider their duty: to protect their family. The
habit of having a gun gives the owner the feeling of being safer. Beyond that, the gunman prepares
to risk his own life if necessary, but he hopes not to have to use it: it will suffice to threaten the
offender so that he desists of invading his house. That attitude, which is based on anticipating what
will happen during an assault on a home or workplace.
A con of having a gun at home would be that different accidents could happen for example a pre–trial
homicide to reckless homicide, in the first case it could be raised that outside the need for protection
is made use of the weapon, and could bring legal problems against the bearer. In my particular
opinion, a reckless homicide is most likely, the weapon if it is intended to use it in any case of
danger would have to be in a "visible" and especially accessible range, but if there are children in
the family or in the home they run the risk of a young kid thinking it is a toy and accidentally firing
it at himself or someone else and cause accidents of a regrettable nature.
A value would be that the society itself could be threatened in the case of a misuse of a weapon
either directly or indirectly with respect to its use assuming irresponsible use by the bearer,
otherwise it would not have to be affected or even I would be aware of those who are bearers of
arms, I certainly do not

Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
Gun control is a policy that the government limits the keeping and using of guns by citizens.
According to Firearms and Federal Law: The Gun Control Act Of 1968, the Gun Control Act is
designed to "provide support to Federal, State, and local law enforcement officials in their fight
against crime and violence." (Journal of Legal Studies).
Firearm is an epochal invention. But unfortunately, no matter in the past or now, guns and firearms
are often misused. Therefore, gun control policy exists. In fact, the gun control policy leads both
pros and cons. Policy of gun control is always a hot topic argued by gun control advocates and gun
rights organizations. In this assignment, we will discuss about the pros and the cons that may causes
by the gun control policy.
Gun Control: Pros
Since guns and firearms are invented, a lot of researches shown that the crime rate and death rate are
gradually increasing by time (Just Facts). There are numerous factors caused these to be happened,
such as mental illnesses, interpersonal vendettas, impetuousness of youths, and so on(Gun Control
Debate Clouds Definition of Mentally Ill). Therefore, The Gun Control Act Of 1968 is then arises,
to control the ownerships of the guns and firearms. Though the policy of gun control is strongly
opposed by gun right organizations, gun control actually brings a lot of advantages to peoples.
1. Disarm and Control Citizens:
People are easier to control when they are disarmed, gun control is not about the gun,

Gun Control Pros And Cons Essay
"The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control." The Odyssey Online, 28 Aug. 2017,
www.theodysseyonline.com/pros–and–cons–of–gun–control. This article stood out to me as the
author of this article does not have a strong stance in any of the side regarding gun control.
However, it has convincing content of gun control in both side of the argument. I plan to use this
article's points in relation to the cons of gun control, and express it to my audience. Nonetheless, I
plan to revoke every appeal the other side of argument holds for gun control.
"Guns in the US: The Statistics behind the Violence." BBC News, BBC, 5 Jan. 2016, www.bbc.com
/news/world–us–canada–34996604. This article is great instance why gun control laws needs to be
more strict. The article offers concrete evidence as to how deadly guns are to the nation. I plan to use
this article to inform my audience the dangers of gun violence with the statistics and attempt to reach
out the audience's sentiment with the numbers of death that were caused by gun violence.
Burke, David Edward. "Why The Arguments Against Gun Control Are Wrong." The Huffington
Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 5 Oct. 2017, www.huffingtonpost.com/entry
/why–the–arguments–against–gun–control–are–wrong_us_59d6405ce4b0666ad0c3cb34.
This article offers numerous amount of convincing counter arguments as to why arguments against
gun control are wrong. Moreover, the article offers the advice of experts regarding gun control
specifically why people are the problem and

Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Essay
Gun control has been one of the widely debated topics in the United States and all over the world.
Public safety, economics, and the language of the second amendment are parts of the gun control
argument that might be considered. Considering that the topic is whether or not the right to bear
arms should include assault rifles, the definition of an assault rifle needs to be established. According
to the NRA, an assault rifle is, "By U.S. Army definition, a selective–fire rifle chambered for a
cartridge of intermediate power. If applied to any semi–automatic firearm, regardless of its cosmetic
similarity to a true assault rifle, the term is incorrect." The other key term that plays a major role in
this subject is the second amendment. The second amendment states this: "A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
not be infringed."
Public safety tends to be one of the biggest concerns when assault rifles are included in the
discussion. There are pro–gun control advocates say that countries such as Australia with no guns
have a lower rate of gun–related violence. The people that are against gun control believe quite the
opposite and cite the rate of gun–related violence in Chicago as their proof against it. Another
argument that supports gun control is that the injuries that are treated with our tax money, and that
this is a waste of money that could be put towards other beneficial programs for

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
There are many pros and cons in gun control. One of the pros of gun control is less mass shootings.
Most often killers use legal weapons. According to an article by Mother Jones, more than 70 mass
shootings in the Unites States in the last three decades, about three–quarters of the guns used were
obtained legally by the killer. Gun control would also reduce gang affiliation as it would be harder
for gangs to obtain control of guns. Another pro of gun control is, it would reduce the crime rate.
There would be less suicides and accidental death if there was gun control. According to the New
York Times paper more than 500 people commit suicide with a gun per year. Gun control protects
families and children's. Statistics show that nearly eight

Gun Control Pros And Cons Essay
Gun Control: Worse For Us Than We Know
Almost everyone living in this country should have witnessed such debates. Some people might
not have listened to a formal debate, but an informal gun control debate is being carried on by
many groups and individuals. It is very unlikely that someone has not listened to one. Recall the
occasions when you were traveling or waiting somewhere hearing the neighbors discussing gun
control pros and cons. These conversations are also gun control debates in the wider sense of the
term. After all, a debate does not have to be a formal one. The question where the gun control debate
is heading to come from the fact that there have been innumerable rounds of this debate, but no
conclusion seems to have been...show more content...
The statement "Crime rates will skyrocket if guns are banned because the criminals will do anything
to get guns" (Pros&Cons) is very true in this sense. The gun crime statistics from these countries
reveal that after these laws have come into force, there has been a steep increase not only in the
number of murders but also in the number of suicides. So, how do the pro –gun control groups react
to these reports? Unfortunately, they have not been impressed by these facts. Their attitude to gun
crime statistics has always been lukewarm. Since the facts are not on their side, they employ other
means.
The NRA (National rifles Association), for example, has made no secret of its decision to not
accept any compromise on the issue of gun control. It has been threatening legislators that it will
work for their defeat in the primaries, if they do not toe the line of the NRA. The threat seems to be
working, with some legislators making attempts to change the rules in such a way that organizations
like the CDC will not be able to study gun violence. One remarkable thing about the gun control
debate is that though this debate has been carried on for the past few decades ever since gun
control became a serious issue after President Kennedy was gunned down by an assassin, it has been
able to sustain the interest of the people. People have listened to many gun control pros and cons but
somehow, people engaging in

Gun Control Pros And Cons Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service Reviews

More from Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Gun Control Pros And Cons Essay