Pro Gun Control Essays

Gun Control Essay
Gun Control in the USA
The right to the ownership of a firearm is founded on the right to self–defense. Individuals have a
right to defend themselves from anyone who wishes to destroy their lives. The right to self–defense
is related to the right to life. It sounds ridiculous to provide the right to life yet there are no means to
protect the life. The opponents of gun ownership have been against this right to protect life from
danger. The paper will look at the moral right to own a gun and whether the Supreme Court judges
make the law by offering an interpretation on the application of the Constitution.
Moral Right to Own Guns
I hold a belief that individuals have a moral right to the ownership of a gun. However, the rights
are logically before the laws that are enacted by the state. Individuals have the right to take part in
in any activity unless there is a reason as to why they should not be allowed to do it (Huemer,
2017). The person denying the rights has the task of proving that there is the reason for the existence
of the right. Likewise, the person seeking to have the right must proof that they are sufficiently fit to
hold custody of a gun.
Limits on the Type of Weaponry
Despite the right, I find that there should be a limit to the type of weaponry that people should be
allowed to own. Individuals should not be allowed to hold unusual weapons. The Second
Amendment has been made clear by a Supreme Court ruling on the type of weaponry that individuals
should carry. The
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Pro-Gun Rights Essay
"Shall Not Be Infringed"
"When Governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is
tyranny." (Beck 35). This quote is from one of the greatest men in the history of the United States of
America, Thomas Jefferson, the father of the Declaration of Independence, and the third President of
the United States. The validity of his statement is not only historical, but as pertinent today as it was
when spoken anew. It is learned in schools across the nation, although the importance of the words
depends on the teacher, school, and region of the country. During the revolutionary period, King
George learned this same concept the hard way, "...an armed populace is a populace that will not be
pushed around."...show more content...
Investigating all ten of the amendments to the Bill of Rights, only the second specifically ensures
that this be expected. The only true power that the people of a nation can have over their government
is the ability to remove it if it becomes more powerful than the people. This is a belief that is
continuously defended or confronted around the world and throughout history. Unfortunately, when
the people have an army standing between them and the government, the means to fight become very
important, albeit difficult. The federal government of the United States, when they attempt to create
laws on gun control, does not have the law on their side. Thanks to the founding fathers of the
United States, this right is ensured through time. They understood that any form of government can
become corrupt and eventually the people will need a legal way to ensure that they can take back
their personal liberties if it becomes necessary.
In the period of time before the United States became the young country it is today, in order to
secure and protect established borders, the colonists were in need of the assistance of the standing
army of King George, the British Red Coats. As soon as the colonists decided to revolt excessive
taxation and other mandates being imposed on towns and states,

Pro Gun Control
The media talks about it. People start protests over it. The newly elected president already has his
plans on its future in the United States. It's the controversial issue on whether or not guns are safe
for the United States. Pro gun control activists believe putting restrictions on guns would benefit the
country tremendously. However, the anti–gun control people do not want the government taking
over their second amendment right. Many believe that gun legislation should be put into place to
prevent crime, while others believe that putting laws on guns interferes with citizens' constitutional
second amendment rights.
Many consider the second amendment still functional in today's society, however, the opposing side
claims the use of guns today...show more content...
The worry many people have nowadays is that guns will end up in the wrong hands. Hands of those
who commit crimes or the mentally ill who cannot handle certain situations well. Another concern
anti–gun activists have is trying to protect society from gun violence. Recently there have been
mass shootings in schools, public events, and even work places. The concern of safety by citizens
is rising after these horrific events happen. It's the reasoning behind why those who speak about
restricting guns have an opinion like that because anything is unpredictable. Likewise, ProConorg
Headlines continues to discuss the restrictions on guns as a necessity. Conservatives will dispute
that opinion and claim guns are essential for self defense. However, it is claimed, "Of the
84,495,500 property crimes committed between 2007 and 2011, 0.12% of victims (103,000)
protected themselves with a threat of use or use of a firearm" ("Gun Control – ProCon.org."). Most
liberals would argue that it is rarely heard of that a gun was used for self defense. They take these
statistics to prove guns aren't often used as a self defense method to those who claim citizens
need guns for safety and protect themselves. It's a very small percentage of the household crimes
that a gun was used in self defense. The other part of the percentage of crimes are the ones who are
committed by people who are looking to do crime. These stats give them evidence in their argument
that we do not need guns in our society because they cause more harm than they do involving us
protecting ourselves. In addition to those who are against guns, they feel as if the intention of the
second amendment was stretched way beyond its meaning. According to the Progressive Cynic, it is
said, "In order to do this, these gun

Gun Control Essay
Why gun control won't solve any problems Guns have been around since the 1300s, from the
muskets to the very high–tech guns we have today. Today guns are used for sports, like hunting and
competition and also guns are used in self–defense in the protection of ourselves and families and
others. The military uses guns and various other tactics to protect and fight for our country, also guns
are used in law enforcement such as the police. But with these guns comes hostility from people
when shootings and related events that contain guns happen in the U.S. The controversy over gun
control has been around for a very long time. Gun control is always being spoken about. If any
crime is caused by a gun, controlling guns or "Gun control" is the...show more content...
The main part that allows us to keep our guns is the "keep" part of this, this allows us to keep our
firearms. If this right is taken away from us, it would bring chaos throughout America. A lot of
people would be in an uproar about this happening. The number of people who own guns within
the U.S, "in 2016 was between 36% and 49% of the U.S."(Agrestic 10). That's almost half of the
U.S, and that would be almost impossible to do and if the government tried it would take
probably till the end of time to take all of them away from the people. There are "Roughly 371
million firearms that were owned by U.S civilians and domestic law enforcement in
2014"(Agresti 7) taking that many guns away would be basically impossible to do. "Based on
survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, (Agrestic 24)
U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per
year.(Agrestic 25). The National Self defense survey conducted in the spring of 1993" citing
responses from 4,978 households, Dr. Kleck estimated that handguns had been used 2.1 million
times per year for self–defense and that all types of guns had been used approximately 2.5 million
times a year for the purpose during the 1988 to 1993 period."(Congressional digest 5) Gun control
will not decrease mass

Thesis For Gun Control Essay
THESIS STATEMENT: Implementing stricter gun control laws will only effect law abiding citizens,
stricter punishments will affect those that do not abide by the law.
My first resource is comes from a book titled, Evaluating Gun Policy. This book was created by a
complex variety of both supporters, activists, and national statics, all pertaining to current Gun
Control Laws, potential law amendments, and the opinions of men and women who are both for and
against firearms and firearm safety. It's a compilation of Prevalence, Policy, Restrictions, and
potential policy changes (Evaluating Gun Policy, 2003).
Evaluating Gun Policy is not a bias source. Each chapter is filled with facts that pertain to the
research conducted by the many contributors. This is one of the reasons I find this resource so very
valuable. The information is also frequently cited because it is a plethora of outside resources, this
allows me the ability to explore those resources for more information pertaining to my topic.
Retrieved from: http://home.uchicago.edu/~ludwigj/papers/Brookings_Pragmatic_Gun_Chapter1.pdf
While researching my topic, I also ran across this website. Although I realize that this is not
considered a reliable resource, I do find it not only fascinating, but very informative as well.
Debate.org has many topics that are open...show more content...
Not only do they discuss the pro's, con's, and proposed amendments to laws pertaining to gun control
issues, but they also show caparisons between other countries that have enforced stricter gun control
laws. Australia for example, is one country that has implemented a law that forced their citizens to
turn in their weapons, resulting in a thirty–six percent increase in gun related incidents (Jonathan
Masters, 2015). This website is run by the U. S. Government, any research provided was conducted
by the US Government officials, making this website

Pro Gun Control Essay
Persuasive Pro Gun Control Essay
Gun control is a vital necessity to the welfare of our nation. Many people out there are supporting the
"anti– gun control cause" with the excuse of "self–defense". I believe that not everyone will handle a
gun for self–defense. The possession of a gun is a sign of power. One of the bigger ambitions that
one has is to have power and the easier it is to obtain a gun; the faster a criminal will gain power
over an innocent person. When one is in possession of a gun, that person has complete control of
their actions and may act upon the weapon however the person may please even if they know that
their action will cause harm to defense–less people. There are many deaths caused by guns out there
that could...show more content...
Teens are not "strong" enough. I always tell my sister that if she is not strong enough to control
herself, she will never be strong enough to control others and will resort to the easiest ways to
"eliminate" that person. She will do whatever is easier to get that stone out of her way rather than
talking things over and controlling the situation.
Not so long ago my neighbor's daughter was killed by her ex. I am positive that this could have
been stopped. I do not know how the man obtained the gun, but I am sure it was through an illegal
way. He is not a policeman, he worked at a supermarket. He does not live in a violent area. He
lived in Bergenfield with his girlfriend. The man did go buy a gun a day before because he knew
that he wanted to kill his girlfriend. The saddest part is that he killed the girl because she wanted
to break up with him. This is what we want for our country? For people to kill their former
boyfriends/girlfriends because that person ended the relationship. This tragedy could have not been
stopped by the girl having a gun with her. In fact, she might have had to face years of prison for
murder and carrying a gun without a license. Sure, gun control will not eliminate violence or
completely prevent criminals from obtaining guns. Criminals have their ways to go around the law
but by having gun control the murders and assaults with gun will lessen. I know that everyone has
rights but the 2nd amendment is misinterpreted.

Pro Gun Control Debate
As we engulf ourselves in politics for the election year, there has been frequent source of debate
between the candidates; gun control. In the words of Patrick J. Charles of Britannica, gun control is
"...politics, legislation,and enforcement of measures intended to restrict access to, the possession of,
or the use of arms, specifically firearms." Even taking away the political importance, gun control is a
hot topic that is in every Americans mind as fear for personal safety is on the rise. This has been
created by increased media attention and coverage of mass shootings, which seem to occur more
frequently as time goes on. This has lead to the question: can we use laws and enforcement to
reduce the violence? It shows creating laws to control or ban the purchasing and use of firearms is
the most probable to be the solution to reducing gun violence while coinciding with proper firearm
education.
The event that sparked the modern debate of gun control occurred on July 20, 2012 when James
Holmes used weapons with high capacity magazines to open fire on a sold out movie theatre in
Aurora, Colorado, and accumulated 74 casualties, including 12 deaths. Colorado unfortunately is no
stranger...show more content...
Bans of certain classifications of weapons prevent mass carnage from happening easily. Rigorous
background checks ensure no little detail slips through the crack for any individual trying to obtain a
firearm. Along with proper gun education to prevent accidental casualties. There is a way to stop
events such as Sandy Hook from happening, it just requires cooperation from the citizens and the
proper knowledge of how future legislation would work. Although improbable, the United states can
ban together, give up their bigotry and ignorance and create the solution that ensures a safer America
for the

Gun control is a controversial topic that arises frequently in the United States. This old issue
resurfaces whenever a gun related crime such as a school shooting, terrorist attack, or police
shooting happens. The goal with gun control, which is more commonly pressed by Democrats, is to
make the purchasing of a firearm more difficult to attain. This common problem of gun control is
something that is constantly on citizen's minds and has been for years. It's current legal status is
somewhat tricky to understand as it is different state–wide. While there are some rules and
regulations to follow in order to get a gun, some are not seen as solid ways to control anticipated
buyers. Therefore, there is a high demand to make the regulations of purchasing...show more
content...
Some people argue that when it states "a well regulated militia" that it doesn't pertain to citizens.
Others argue that the clarification of a militia is not stated and well enough to define who can
and can not have the right to bear arms. Ever since the second amendment there has always been
a problem with gun control. People use guns for a plethora of reasons. A Gallup poll showed that
36% of gun owners used their firearms for hunting, 21% used theirs for target shooting and 60%
of gun owners had their firearms for protection against crime. With most gun owners using their
guns as protection it poses a question of why do civilians feel the need to constantly have
protection, or why they don't believe that the police are enough. Current Kansas gun laws do not
require a permit to buy or carry a firearm, however these laws vary state to state. Basic gun laws
require the buyer to be 21 years of age in order to buy a handgun and 18 years of age to buy a long
barreled hunting guns, and each buyer has to be processed into an extensive background check.
Proponents of gun control want to make such laws more strict in order to attain a gun by means of
background checks, while some want to ban the usage of guns

Guns can protect people, their freedom, and their nation! Guns should not be taken away from
innocent and law abiding citizens. Guns have been used to protect and fight for our country, they
have been used to provide food and are a great recreational pass time.
We used Guns to win America's freedom and keep it. Guns are not bad, most of the time guns are
used for self defense. The second Amendment give the citizens of the United states the right to bear
arms. This allows the citizens of the U.S. to be able to protect themselves from corrupt
governments, other countries, and bad people."The NRA states that guns are used for self defence
around 2.5 million times a year". Pro gun control groups believe that gun control will end gun...show
more content...
Most of the time when there is a shooting people say that guns killed the people; This is not true,
people kill people, guns are just the tool used to do it. Guns are just tools they are used by people
they can not act on their own. We already have gun laws in place, like having to be a certain age to
buy a gun and you having to have a special license to own pistols and Automatic guns along with
proper background checks.
Guns can and do protect people, their freedom, and their nation! Guns should not be taken away
from innocent and law abiding citizens. More mass murders and killings of innocent people have
occured because of citizens not being armed then all the anti gun arguments. Some examples of
this would be Germany in 1938 the government rounded up all the guns from 1939 through 1945
in result 13 million civilians were rounded up and killed. They were unable to defend themselves
or their families and property against a government turn evil. Guatemala established gun control
and took the guns away from people and from 1964 through 1981 100,000 people unable to
protect themselves were rounded up and killed. You see this again in Uganda in 1970, cambodia
in 1956, and China in 1935. So all through history you can see how taking guns away from the
civilians have turned bad. Guns keep people safe yes they can be used to hurt or kill someone but
the truth Is most of the time guns save

Gun Control Research Paper
A shooting here; a shooting there; a consistent day to day event heard in the daily papers and on the
news stations on TV. New media are announcing a shooting someplace. Regardless of whether the
shootings are intentional or unintentional; they are occurring all over the United States. In today's
society, gun control is essential; stricter federal laws must be enacted to save lives. Individual
states' laws are not sufficient to reduce deaths caused by guns In any case, in today's society,
weapon brutality is a sparking debate and controversy on how to control gun violence. Anyone who
thinks that we have enough gun control laws is either NRA, or severely misguided. All across the
nation, a large number of laws and directions have been...show more content...
All guns must be banned. All guns. Get rid of all weapons in homes, and in the city, and, however
much as possible.Not in light of San Bernardino, or whichever mass shooting may fly up next.
Whenever there's a mass shooting in the U.S., members of Congress refuse to bear in mind
discussing gun control, guaranteeing that gun control advocates politicize the issue at a time of
national grieving. "Now isn't the time," they say. It's been a long time since the mass shooting in
Newtown, Conn.; 18 months since the mass shooting in Orlando, Fl.; and over 2 months since Las
Vegas. Would it be a good idea for us to not ask the Republicans in Congress: "Is now the time?
Furthermore, if not now, when? In one more year? An additional five

Pro Gun Control Essays

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Pro Gun Control Essays