Essay about Biography Of Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar
'I came, I saw, I conquered.' These are the words of the man who changed the history of the world.
This paper will show how no other man in the history of the world represented military and political
power better than Julius Caesar. He became a legend for his military exploits and great leadership
ability.
The Early Life of Julius Caesar was spent studying the history of power and wealth in early Rome.
Julius Caesar was born in Rome on July 12 or 13, in the year 100 B.C. His father was a part of a
prestigious Julian clan. He was an official in charge of judicial matters, but never made it to the
post of chief executive. He died when Caesar was only sixteen years...show more content...
Caesar was not on the list but he was ordered by Sulla to divorce Cornelia. Caesar refused to do so
and left Rome for military service in Asia and Cilicia. He returned in 78 B.C. when Sulla died and
began his political career as a prosecuting advocate. At the age of 22 Caesar was unable to gain
office and went to Rhodes where he studied rhetoric. During his journey to Rhodes, pirates
captured Caesar. While in captivity, Caesar convinced his captors to raise his ransom, which
increased his prestige. He then raised a naval force, overcame his captors, and had them crucified.
In 73 B.C. he returned to Rome for Rhodes as very persuasive speaker.
Julius Caesar's Middle Life was full of wars, political plotting. Caesar's first and one of the biggest
political moves was when he helped Pompey take office. In 69 or 68 B.C. Caesar was elected
quaestor. Shortly after this his first wife died. He then married Pompeia, a relative of Pompey. In 65
B.C. he was elected curule aedile, gaining great popularity for his gladiator games. In 62 B.C. he
was elected a praetor. By this time, Caesar was making a name for himself as a political figure. He
divorced Pompeia after a scandal. Caesar was made governor of Farther Spain in 61 B.C. When
Julius returned to Rome in 60 B.C. he joined forces with Crassus and Pompey. In 59 B.C. Caesar
was elected consul, and the year after he was appointed governor of Roman Gaul. During Caesar's
first year as a governor
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
Julius Caesar Essay Honor
Madeline Switzer
M. Halfmann
Honors English 9
6 October 2017
Honor
In William Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, many themes are developed. One character, Brutus,
displays a significant theme that develops through the entire play. The theme that is supported most
by this character is the idea that honor and respect are gained through performing works for the
good of others instead of for personal gain.
This theme is first seen when Brutus thinks about whether he should kill Caesar. He sits in his
orchard and contemplates what his reason for killing Caesar is. As he thinks this over, he realizes
that if he kills Caesar, it is not for his own gain, but for others. He expresses this when he says, "It
must be by his death, and, for my part,...show more content...
The citizens of Rome begin to see Brutus's way of thinking and they understand that he really did
think of the good of the people while making his decision. They also understand that Brutus was not
thinking selfishly like they had assumed, but logically. This helps them to trust him more because he
thought about the situation in an unbiased way. The plebeians respond to Brutus's explanation by
saying, "Live, Brutus, live, live! / Bring him with triumph home unto his house... This Caesar was
tyrant. / Nay, that's certain. / We are blessed that Rome is rid of him" (III.ii.49–50 and 75–77). The
Plebeians learn that Brutus had honest intentions and they respect and praise him for it. The
knowledge that Brutus was selfless enough to kill his friend in order to save them from tyranny,
earns their respect. A final situation where this theme is developed is during the events surrounding
the death of Brutus.
The honor that Brutus gains through performing deeds without thinking of his own gain is
solidified at the end of the play around the event of Brutus's death. At the beginning of act five,
scene five, Brutus tells his servants that he believes his time living has come to an end, and he
needs their help to kill him. One after another, Brutus's servants tell him no. They respond to his
request saying, "I'd rather kill myself... That's not an office for a friend, my lord"
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
Julius Ceaser Essay
Julius Ceaser Julius Caesar Julius Caesar was born on July 13th in 100B.C. His full name is
Gaius Julius Caesar, which was the same as his father's name. Julius Caesar was the most famous
Roman general and was one of the most influential political and military leaders in history. He
helped establish the vast Roman Empire. Caesar gained all his power in four different areas.
Those areas are politics, government, religion, and in the military. Using these amazing powers he
controlled many aspects of Roman life. In 84B.C. Caesar married Cornelia, the daughter of Lucis
Cornelius Cinna, a noble who was Marious' associate in revolution. Lucis Cornelius Sulla
demanded they divorce in 83, but Caesar refused, risking his job and his life....show more content...
They gained control of Rome but soon split up by rivalries.
Crassus died fighting in the East and Caesar went to Gaul and Britain. Pompey feared Caesar's
power and allied himself to the Senate. Between 58B.C. and 49B.C. Caesar conquered more
territory in Gaul. He also led two expeditions to Britain. Caesar was going to seize power in
Rome. He crushed an army led by Pompey. This left Caesar in charge of the military in Rome. It
also signified the end of the Roman Republic. In 44B.C he was appointed dictator for life and in
the same year was assassinated. Before his death he introduced reforms that helped strengthen
Rome and protect his own power. He distributed land and money to the poor and granted Roman
citizenship to people in provinces outside Italy. He also reduced unemployment by creating many
building projects and increased the soldiers pay. He introduced a new calendar that was more
accurate. It was based on the Hellenistic astronomy. It was called the Julian Calendar and was used
in Europe until 1582A.D. Even though the Senate and Assembly of tribes continued to exist, he still
had total power.
However many people referred to him as a tyrant and that he was destroying the Republic. Other
people were jealous of all his popularity. Whatever the reason, on March 15th 44B.C. a group of
conspirators that were led by Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus stabbed Julius Caesar
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
Essay on Julius Caesar
How Betrayal Led to Downfall in Julius Caesar
In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare shows how friends often betray
each other. Julius Caesar is about to be crowned king of Rome, when some well–known Romans
decide that it is not a good idea for this to happen. They form a conspiracy and kill Caesar. Brutus,
an honorable Roman and a very good friend of Caesar's, betrays Caesar by killing him for the good
of Rome. Antony, Caesar'sbest friend and another honorable Roman, betrays Brutus by turning
against the conspirators. Cassius, a respected Roman, and Brutus betray each other by arguing and
destroying their friendship. All this betraying lead to many deaths in the play....show more content...
In his soliloquy, Antony praised Caesar's great personality but at the same time, he would keep
saying positive things about Brutus. An example is when he says, "He was my friend, faithful and
just to me; / But Brutus says he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honorable man." (3.2.85–87). The
way in which he spoke and by telling the citizens the context of Caesar's will, turned the mob
against Brutus and the rest of the conspirators. The anger possessed by the countrymen can be
shown when a plebeian says, "Most noble Caesar! We'll revenge his death!" (2.2.244). This betrayal
by Antony caused Brutus to break off their friendship.
Cassius was also driven out of Rome with Brutus and instead of working together to win back their
reputation, they began arguing with each other and destroyed their friendship. Temporarily they
argued about how they would attempt to put together an army, they argued about military strategy,
and they argued about other common things that should not interfere between two friends. By not
cooperating with each other when they needed to, they could not succeed in making a comeback and
they both committed suicides.
All these instances of betrayal could have been avoided and therefore would not have led to the
downfalls of certain characters. Had Caesar lived, maybe everybody would have gotten along and
Rome could
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
Julius CaesarВґs Death: Analysis Essay
Should Julius Caesar have been killed? This question has plagued history for years without a real
answer. Julius Caesar was corrupt and all powerful, and his death saved Rome. It really is that
simple; he declared himself dictator for life and ignored the Senate's power. A man with that much
power can only hurt a nation.
Julius Caesar was a blood thirsty man. He fought everyone he could just to extend Rome. ("Julius
Caesar." ) He savagely killed anyone that got in his way. Many may say that he was a legendary and
should be remembered as a great warrior, but should murderers be praised? Genghis Khan was a
great warrior, he created the largest empire in history. Is he remembered well? No, because he was
brutal and merciless. Caesar was also...show more content...
Caesar's assassins had no reason to believe he was different.
Another, of many reasons that Caesar's assassination was a necessary tragedy is he ignored the
warnings and signs. In the world today most don't believe signs exist, but in Caesar's time it was
crazy to ignore them. In the Roman Republic it was believed that signs were set by the gods to
warn people and no one would ignore the gods. The priests preformed a ceremony and got bad
results, which led them to believe that Julius Caesar was in danger. Caesar still refused to miss
the Senate that day, even as his friends begged that he postpone the meeting. ( "The Assassination
of Julius Caesar, 44 BC." ) These days to many people this is all worthless and fake, but whether
signs from gods are real or not is not the question. The question is what kind of many ignores not
only the traditions of his people, but his own gods? A man who would rather be where he is in
power, then heed the warnings of what he believed to be his gods is not a man the Senate believed
Rome needed.
All this comes down the last point that will be made in this essay, Julius Caesar's assassins
believed that what they were doing was what was best for the Roman Republic and its citizens.
Caesar showed all the signs of becoming a corrupt king–like ruler. With the past experiences of
Rome the men that killed Caesar just wanted to help the people they swore
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
Power In Julius Caesar Essay
Throughout the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare examines themes of power throughout, as well as
letting your true colors show. Towards the end of the play, Brutus is able to show this theme
perfectly while in the beginning, Brutus is thought as someone who is unsure and insecure. He is
also an exception to this ongoing theme. But as the play progresses and Brutus becomes true to
himself, giving in to the tempting power that appears to be reachable, he becomes the epitome of
this theme. It becomes clear to Brutus that Caesar is not what's best for Rome, in fact, he is the
reason that it is falling apart. However, because it is already embedded into his mind by his good
friend Cassius, he believes that the only way to fix this situation is to kill Caesar. This pivot into a
more narcissistic version of himself is gradual, while him agreeing with killing Caesar is sudden. In
the beginning of Julius Caesar, Brutus is insecure, but as the play progresses and he gives in to
Cassius' manipulation and his own hidden thirst for power, Brutus...show more content...
This is one of the most definitive answers that Brutus has given in this play so far. He is an
indecisive person who can't seem to make a decision. He can also be characterized as insecure
within this dialogue as well. Cassius is trying to convince him, even though it is in a very
manipulative manner, that Brutus is more worthy of being in Caesar's position than Caesar himself.
Although, Brutus does not believe this. He thinks of himself as no more than just a commoner in
Rome, no matter his political position. Overall, Brutus can be thought of as an indecisive, insecure,
person who is having trouble with being caught in the middle of this feud, but as the play progresses
he begins to show what he really thinks, therefore letting his true colors
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
Julius Caesar Essay
English II
November 30, 2011.
Julius CaesarВґs Essay Julius Caesar is mostly known for his great leadership in RomeВґs Empire,
he accomplished everything he purposed and he did whatever it took to make it happen. He had all
it took to be such a leader; women were in love with him, men wanted to be part of his army and
children wanted to be like him when they grow up. For Caesar all it took was courage and
selfishness to get to where he was. A leader is a person who knows the way; goes the way and
shows the way but no one will ever be a leader without courage. Courage was part of CaesarВґs
being, he knew that if he showed this part of him in the moments that seemed lost and accomplished
them, people would follow him and they would...show more content...
His craving for power was the secret ingredient for the cake he was baking. "After weeks of fighting
Vercingetorix, facing starvation, is forced to surrender" (Campbell) Weeks and weeks had to pass
for someone to surrender and even though CaesarВґs men were suffering the same hunger as their
enemies Julius didnВґt even think about surrender. He just wanted to prove he was stronger than
Vercingetorix was and not only some of his army died because of starvation or simply because their
bodies gave up he also left women and children die because he didnВґt let them in his shelter for
protection. But even though he left all those people dying he was still an exceptional leader.
Having these two characters made Caesar a standout in a large crowd. He had all the courage he
needed to fight in a lot of battles and a hidden part of him, filled with selfishness, made him want
more the power he always wanted in whatever matters he could get there. He was well aware of
everything he was doing, he planned every step of his way and to make them happen all he needed
was lots of courage and lots selfishness.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Caesar, The Early years vol. 1, ed. Horace. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2005. Print
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
Essay On Julius Caesar
Introduction– Julius Caesar was a dictator of Rome in 47 BC, and then in 44 BC, he was appointed
dictator for life.But really, who was Julius Caesar? Who is this man that was murdered because of
his poor leadership?
Some historians may believe that Julius Caesar did things that was for the benefit of Rome, and
that he made Rome more powerful in a strong way. I understand why some people think that he
was a good person, he did do things to benefit Rome. For one thing, he supposedly did give rights
to the foreign citizen tribes outside of Rome, and although he did do other things to benefit Rome,
all in all, I believe that Julius Caesar was a horrific dictator because he didn't have good relationship
skills, he couldn't see that he was...show more content...
They were raising taxes, and Julius was hungry for power. As the laws of Rome read that he had to
kill the current dictator to become the new dictator, he killed Sulla, and became the new dictator.– If
you were a part of the senate in Rome at that time, and you agreed with the current dictator 's
philosophies, and then a new one came along that did everything differently, would you support
him? The senate grew angry with all of Caesars ideas, and that 's how they 're terrible relationship
started... Maybe you still believe that my point of Caesar, having bad relationships is phony, but
think from another point of view, Because in the end, the senate decided to stab him 23 times, one
of those people being his best friends... These three reasons show why I think Julius Caesar had bad
relationships, and that goes to show that he was a horrific dictator.
P2– Hurting, not helping Rome
Julius Caesar wanted the biggest and the best of everything, but, the Idea that Caesar was creating
a more powerful environment for the people of Rome was a complete distorted philosophy.
Caesar may have been able to make his way to the top of dictatorship, but he ended up hitting rock
bottom for his ways. Wanting the most beautiful empire is not a crime, but, Caesar had no right
taking people from their friends and families to use as slaves to build the beauty that is Rome. As
we are tricked
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Julius Caesar Essay

  • 1.
    Essay about BiographyOf Julius Caesar Julius Caesar 'I came, I saw, I conquered.' These are the words of the man who changed the history of the world. This paper will show how no other man in the history of the world represented military and political power better than Julius Caesar. He became a legend for his military exploits and great leadership ability. The Early Life of Julius Caesar was spent studying the history of power and wealth in early Rome. Julius Caesar was born in Rome on July 12 or 13, in the year 100 B.C. His father was a part of a prestigious Julian clan. He was an official in charge of judicial matters, but never made it to the post of chief executive. He died when Caesar was only sixteen years...show more content... Caesar was not on the list but he was ordered by Sulla to divorce Cornelia. Caesar refused to do so and left Rome for military service in Asia and Cilicia. He returned in 78 B.C. when Sulla died and began his political career as a prosecuting advocate. At the age of 22 Caesar was unable to gain office and went to Rhodes where he studied rhetoric. During his journey to Rhodes, pirates captured Caesar. While in captivity, Caesar convinced his captors to raise his ransom, which increased his prestige. He then raised a naval force, overcame his captors, and had them crucified. In 73 B.C. he returned to Rome for Rhodes as very persuasive speaker. Julius Caesar's Middle Life was full of wars, political plotting. Caesar's first and one of the biggest political moves was when he helped Pompey take office. In 69 or 68 B.C. Caesar was elected quaestor. Shortly after this his first wife died. He then married Pompeia, a relative of Pompey. In 65 B.C. he was elected curule aedile, gaining great popularity for his gladiator games. In 62 B.C. he was elected a praetor. By this time, Caesar was making a name for himself as a political figure. He divorced Pompeia after a scandal. Caesar was made governor of Farther Spain in 61 B.C. When Julius returned to Rome in 60 B.C. he joined forces with Crassus and Pompey. In 59 B.C. Caesar was elected consul, and the year after he was appointed governor of Roman Gaul. During Caesar's first year as a governor Get more content on HelpWriting.net
  • 2.
    Julius Caesar EssayHonor Madeline Switzer M. Halfmann Honors English 9 6 October 2017 Honor In William Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, many themes are developed. One character, Brutus, displays a significant theme that develops through the entire play. The theme that is supported most by this character is the idea that honor and respect are gained through performing works for the good of others instead of for personal gain. This theme is first seen when Brutus thinks about whether he should kill Caesar. He sits in his orchard and contemplates what his reason for killing Caesar is. As he thinks this over, he realizes that if he kills Caesar, it is not for his own gain, but for others. He expresses this when he says, "It must be by his death, and, for my part,...show more content... The citizens of Rome begin to see Brutus's way of thinking and they understand that he really did think of the good of the people while making his decision. They also understand that Brutus was not thinking selfishly like they had assumed, but logically. This helps them to trust him more because he thought about the situation in an unbiased way. The plebeians respond to Brutus's explanation by saying, "Live, Brutus, live, live! / Bring him with triumph home unto his house... This Caesar was tyrant. / Nay, that's certain. / We are blessed that Rome is rid of him" (III.ii.49–50 and 75–77). The Plebeians learn that Brutus had honest intentions and they respect and praise him for it. The knowledge that Brutus was selfless enough to kill his friend in order to save them from tyranny, earns their respect. A final situation where this theme is developed is during the events surrounding the death of Brutus. The honor that Brutus gains through performing deeds without thinking of his own gain is solidified at the end of the play around the event of Brutus's death. At the beginning of act five, scene five, Brutus tells his servants that he believes his time living has come to an end, and he needs their help to kill him. One after another, Brutus's servants tell him no. They respond to his request saying, "I'd rather kill myself... That's not an office for a friend, my lord" Get more content on HelpWriting.net
  • 3.
    Julius Ceaser Essay JuliusCeaser Julius Caesar Julius Caesar was born on July 13th in 100B.C. His full name is Gaius Julius Caesar, which was the same as his father's name. Julius Caesar was the most famous Roman general and was one of the most influential political and military leaders in history. He helped establish the vast Roman Empire. Caesar gained all his power in four different areas. Those areas are politics, government, religion, and in the military. Using these amazing powers he controlled many aspects of Roman life. In 84B.C. Caesar married Cornelia, the daughter of Lucis Cornelius Cinna, a noble who was Marious' associate in revolution. Lucis Cornelius Sulla demanded they divorce in 83, but Caesar refused, risking his job and his life....show more content... They gained control of Rome but soon split up by rivalries. Crassus died fighting in the East and Caesar went to Gaul and Britain. Pompey feared Caesar's power and allied himself to the Senate. Between 58B.C. and 49B.C. Caesar conquered more territory in Gaul. He also led two expeditions to Britain. Caesar was going to seize power in Rome. He crushed an army led by Pompey. This left Caesar in charge of the military in Rome. It also signified the end of the Roman Republic. In 44B.C he was appointed dictator for life and in the same year was assassinated. Before his death he introduced reforms that helped strengthen Rome and protect his own power. He distributed land and money to the poor and granted Roman citizenship to people in provinces outside Italy. He also reduced unemployment by creating many building projects and increased the soldiers pay. He introduced a new calendar that was more accurate. It was based on the Hellenistic astronomy. It was called the Julian Calendar and was used in Europe until 1582A.D. Even though the Senate and Assembly of tribes continued to exist, he still had total power. However many people referred to him as a tyrant and that he was destroying the Republic. Other people were jealous of all his popularity. Whatever the reason, on March 15th 44B.C. a group of conspirators that were led by Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus stabbed Julius Caesar Get more content on HelpWriting.net
  • 4.
    Essay on JuliusCaesar How Betrayal Led to Downfall in Julius Caesar In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare shows how friends often betray each other. Julius Caesar is about to be crowned king of Rome, when some well–known Romans decide that it is not a good idea for this to happen. They form a conspiracy and kill Caesar. Brutus, an honorable Roman and a very good friend of Caesar's, betrays Caesar by killing him for the good of Rome. Antony, Caesar'sbest friend and another honorable Roman, betrays Brutus by turning against the conspirators. Cassius, a respected Roman, and Brutus betray each other by arguing and destroying their friendship. All this betraying lead to many deaths in the play....show more content... In his soliloquy, Antony praised Caesar's great personality but at the same time, he would keep saying positive things about Brutus. An example is when he says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me; / But Brutus says he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honorable man." (3.2.85–87). The way in which he spoke and by telling the citizens the context of Caesar's will, turned the mob against Brutus and the rest of the conspirators. The anger possessed by the countrymen can be shown when a plebeian says, "Most noble Caesar! We'll revenge his death!" (2.2.244). This betrayal by Antony caused Brutus to break off their friendship. Cassius was also driven out of Rome with Brutus and instead of working together to win back their reputation, they began arguing with each other and destroyed their friendship. Temporarily they argued about how they would attempt to put together an army, they argued about military strategy, and they argued about other common things that should not interfere between two friends. By not cooperating with each other when they needed to, they could not succeed in making a comeback and they both committed suicides. All these instances of betrayal could have been avoided and therefore would not have led to the downfalls of certain characters. Had Caesar lived, maybe everybody would have gotten along and Rome could Get more content on HelpWriting.net
  • 5.
    Julius CaesarВґs Death:Analysis Essay Should Julius Caesar have been killed? This question has plagued history for years without a real answer. Julius Caesar was corrupt and all powerful, and his death saved Rome. It really is that simple; he declared himself dictator for life and ignored the Senate's power. A man with that much power can only hurt a nation. Julius Caesar was a blood thirsty man. He fought everyone he could just to extend Rome. ("Julius Caesar." ) He savagely killed anyone that got in his way. Many may say that he was a legendary and should be remembered as a great warrior, but should murderers be praised? Genghis Khan was a great warrior, he created the largest empire in history. Is he remembered well? No, because he was brutal and merciless. Caesar was also...show more content... Caesar's assassins had no reason to believe he was different. Another, of many reasons that Caesar's assassination was a necessary tragedy is he ignored the warnings and signs. In the world today most don't believe signs exist, but in Caesar's time it was crazy to ignore them. In the Roman Republic it was believed that signs were set by the gods to warn people and no one would ignore the gods. The priests preformed a ceremony and got bad results, which led them to believe that Julius Caesar was in danger. Caesar still refused to miss the Senate that day, even as his friends begged that he postpone the meeting. ( "The Assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC." ) These days to many people this is all worthless and fake, but whether signs from gods are real or not is not the question. The question is what kind of many ignores not only the traditions of his people, but his own gods? A man who would rather be where he is in power, then heed the warnings of what he believed to be his gods is not a man the Senate believed Rome needed. All this comes down the last point that will be made in this essay, Julius Caesar's assassins believed that what they were doing was what was best for the Roman Republic and its citizens. Caesar showed all the signs of becoming a corrupt king–like ruler. With the past experiences of Rome the men that killed Caesar just wanted to help the people they swore Get more content on HelpWriting.net
  • 6.
    Power In JuliusCaesar Essay Throughout the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare examines themes of power throughout, as well as letting your true colors show. Towards the end of the play, Brutus is able to show this theme perfectly while in the beginning, Brutus is thought as someone who is unsure and insecure. He is also an exception to this ongoing theme. But as the play progresses and Brutus becomes true to himself, giving in to the tempting power that appears to be reachable, he becomes the epitome of this theme. It becomes clear to Brutus that Caesar is not what's best for Rome, in fact, he is the reason that it is falling apart. However, because it is already embedded into his mind by his good friend Cassius, he believes that the only way to fix this situation is to kill Caesar. This pivot into a more narcissistic version of himself is gradual, while him agreeing with killing Caesar is sudden. In the beginning of Julius Caesar, Brutus is insecure, but as the play progresses and he gives in to Cassius' manipulation and his own hidden thirst for power, Brutus...show more content... This is one of the most definitive answers that Brutus has given in this play so far. He is an indecisive person who can't seem to make a decision. He can also be characterized as insecure within this dialogue as well. Cassius is trying to convince him, even though it is in a very manipulative manner, that Brutus is more worthy of being in Caesar's position than Caesar himself. Although, Brutus does not believe this. He thinks of himself as no more than just a commoner in Rome, no matter his political position. Overall, Brutus can be thought of as an indecisive, insecure, person who is having trouble with being caught in the middle of this feud, but as the play progresses he begins to show what he really thinks, therefore letting his true colors Get more content on HelpWriting.net
  • 7.
    Julius Caesar Essay EnglishII November 30, 2011. Julius CaesarВґs Essay Julius Caesar is mostly known for his great leadership in RomeВґs Empire, he accomplished everything he purposed and he did whatever it took to make it happen. He had all it took to be such a leader; women were in love with him, men wanted to be part of his army and children wanted to be like him when they grow up. For Caesar all it took was courage and selfishness to get to where he was. A leader is a person who knows the way; goes the way and shows the way but no one will ever be a leader without courage. Courage was part of CaesarВґs being, he knew that if he showed this part of him in the moments that seemed lost and accomplished them, people would follow him and they would...show more content... His craving for power was the secret ingredient for the cake he was baking. "After weeks of fighting Vercingetorix, facing starvation, is forced to surrender" (Campbell) Weeks and weeks had to pass for someone to surrender and even though CaesarВґs men were suffering the same hunger as their enemies Julius didnВґt even think about surrender. He just wanted to prove he was stronger than Vercingetorix was and not only some of his army died because of starvation or simply because their bodies gave up he also left women and children die because he didnВґt let them in his shelter for protection. But even though he left all those people dying he was still an exceptional leader. Having these two characters made Caesar a standout in a large crowd. He had all the courage he needed to fight in a lot of battles and a hidden part of him, filled with selfishness, made him want more the power he always wanted in whatever matters he could get there. He was well aware of everything he was doing, he planned every step of his way and to make them happen all he needed was lots of courage and lots selfishness. BIBLIOGRAPHY Caesar, The Early years vol. 1, ed. Horace. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2005. Print Get more content on HelpWriting.net
  • 8.
    Essay On JuliusCaesar Introduction– Julius Caesar was a dictator of Rome in 47 BC, and then in 44 BC, he was appointed dictator for life.But really, who was Julius Caesar? Who is this man that was murdered because of his poor leadership? Some historians may believe that Julius Caesar did things that was for the benefit of Rome, and that he made Rome more powerful in a strong way. I understand why some people think that he was a good person, he did do things to benefit Rome. For one thing, he supposedly did give rights to the foreign citizen tribes outside of Rome, and although he did do other things to benefit Rome, all in all, I believe that Julius Caesar was a horrific dictator because he didn't have good relationship skills, he couldn't see that he was...show more content... They were raising taxes, and Julius was hungry for power. As the laws of Rome read that he had to kill the current dictator to become the new dictator, he killed Sulla, and became the new dictator.– If you were a part of the senate in Rome at that time, and you agreed with the current dictator 's philosophies, and then a new one came along that did everything differently, would you support him? The senate grew angry with all of Caesars ideas, and that 's how they 're terrible relationship started... Maybe you still believe that my point of Caesar, having bad relationships is phony, but think from another point of view, Because in the end, the senate decided to stab him 23 times, one of those people being his best friends... These three reasons show why I think Julius Caesar had bad relationships, and that goes to show that he was a horrific dictator. P2– Hurting, not helping Rome Julius Caesar wanted the biggest and the best of everything, but, the Idea that Caesar was creating a more powerful environment for the people of Rome was a complete distorted philosophy. Caesar may have been able to make his way to the top of dictatorship, but he ended up hitting rock bottom for his ways. Wanting the most beautiful empire is not a crime, but, Caesar had no right taking people from their friends and families to use as slaves to build the beauty that is Rome. As we are tricked Get more content on HelpWriting.net