Role Of British Imperialism In India

Role Of British Imperialism In India
Title: British Imperialism in India With the governing power of India, the Mughal empire, growing
fragile from overextension, the East India Company, operated and owned by the British, sees this,
battles, and victors over the government of India. This in turn, leads to the EIC configuring taxes
and Indian soldiers (Sepoy) to restrict the Indians. After the EIC jails Sepoy troops, the majority
rebels and frees them from jail, this is when the government finally intervenes and takes direct
control of India. In the end, Although the brittans rule of india had aspects of serenity, surplus
goods, respect and nonviolence, their ruling of India ultimately ended with India having more and
heightened violence, injustice, poverty, and loathing. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I know this because although britain claimed to gift India and her people with an absence of killing,
and mutual respect, the British people have proven otherwise with the Amritsar massacre, and
violent threats. To elaborate, Dr. Lalvani claims that there was a "noticeable absence of killings", but
this contrasts to the fact that in 1919, General R. E. H. ordered 50 Indian soldiers to open fire upon
20,000, killing 400 and injuring 1,200. This is important because it directly contrasts Dr. Lalvani's
previous claim that India had a noticeable absence in killings, with 400 being the dead. Finally, Dr.
Lalvani claimed that there was mutual respect between Indians and britons. But, on the contrary,
"Britain's own cloth manufacturers conspired to cut off the fingers of bengali weavers and break
their looms" (Document 3). This is very important because threats of violence and destruction of
property against Indians is absolutely not
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Compare And Contrast The American Colonies Vs The British...
The American Colonies VS the British Parliament In the Seven Years' War or the French and Indian
War, Britain took over the eastern part of what is now the United States of America. The British
forced out the French from many territories in Canada and received Florida from Spain by giving
the Spanish west of the Mississippi River. With Britain's victory in the war, they had complete
power of the seas and now the American Colonies did not have to fret about attacks coming from the
French, Spanish, and the American Indian allies because the British were there to protect them.
Although the British feel that the colonials should feel the need to thank the British for protecting
them the colonials feel no need to do that. Instead, the colonials do not want their freedom to be
taken over by the British who are across the sea from them. After the French and Indian War the
British and colonials start to have differences in their plans which starts the new laws from the
British and boycotts from the colonials. Although the colonists did not really fight in the French and
Indian War, they should still have the need to help pay for some of the debt from the war because it
was their territory that the British are protecting. However, the British should not have imposed such
strict laws on the colonials because they were treating them like inferiors by starting to declare all
the proclamations and acts. The colonists should feel the need to pay Britain's debt from the French
and Indian

Differences in Slave Laws in Colonial Brazil and Colonial...
Differences in slave laws in British North America and Colonial Brazil Slavery as it existed in
colonial Brazil contained interesting points of comparison and contrast with the slave system
existing in British North America. The slaves in both areas had been left with very little opportunity
in which he could develop as a person. The degree to which the individual rights of the slave were
either protected or suppressed provides a clearer insight to the differences between North American
and Brazilian slavery. The laws also differed greatly between the two areas and have been placed
into three categories: term of servitude, police and disciplinary powers, and property and other civil
rights. Point One: In both systems of slavery, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The law also made a more concerted attempt to protect the slave against mistreatment by his master.
Mistreatment of a slave could lead both to the freedom of the slave and to the imprisoning of the
master. Point Three: The slave in British North America could not own property and had absolutely
no civil rights. The law clearly stated that he could neither own, inherit, nor will property, couldn't
engage in buying or selling anything except at the pleasure of his master. In contrast, the slave in
Brazil could own property, could engage in buying and selling, and was also guaranteed Sundays,
holidays, and other times which to work for his own advancement. In short, the law implied that
while the master could own a man's labor, he could not own the man as a person. In conclusion, it is
not easy to make a comparison between the two slave systems. Brazilian slave masters often evaded
the law and could be exceedingly brutal and British North American masters were often much more
lenient than the law required. Conditions were usually more severe in Brazil and this may have
worsened the actual material situation of the Brazilian slave. In North America the slave was treated
like a thing and in Brazil there was some attempt to treat him as a man. This fact made a profound
difference in the way the two systems affected the slave as an individual and in the way in which
they impinged upon the development of his

Dbq American Independence
Many have different interpretations of how American Independence came to be. Yes, it was difficult
to obtain and took many wars, enlightened thinking and courage to accomplish but the fight for
American Independence had many factors that caused colonies to depart from a monocratic
government. Common knowledge of American Independence teaches that the reason early settlers
fought for freedom from Britain was because of, "taxation without representation". The infamous
Boston Tea Party is thought to have represented the rebellion of the colonists towards Britain by
dumping their tea into the harbor. But that's only partially right. Actually, acting as more of a middle
finger towards the British, the Tea Party was due to the fact that colonists ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Thomas Paine's 79–page pamphlet titled Common Sense had a major effect on colonists and pushed
them to wanting to fight for their Independence. In his publication he talks about having a
government that protects life, liberty, and property rather than a monarchy which gives the crown all
the power. Thinking that they no longer need help from Britain caused colonists to think about war
for independence since rebellions weren't enough. John Dickinson, another enlightened thinker was
influential to colonists as well. Writing Letter from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, that consisted of
twelve letters encouraged colonists to evade British taxes and to cultivate what they needed
themselves. Not purchasing any goods that would give the British revenue, was their peaceful plan
to get rid of the Revenue Act. Also being an influence to colonial thinking, Thomas Hobbs author of
Leviathan, and the Laws of Nature has a perspective of how government should be. He thought that
government should be based on the will of the people and should be under an independent power.
All of these men's ideas went against the British governing and influenced the people and
enlightened them with thinking individually and not wanting to be ruled over by a king that gave
them no

Racial/Ethnic Divide
While the concept of a singular and limited British identity excludes various racial/ethnic, class, and
gendered groups, this essay will focus on the racial/ethnic divide, which began the political
discourse that led to Margaret Thatcher's "new racism" in the 1980's (Goldberg 1714). The
Conservative party's "essentialist" view of the British identity, looks back towards the age of Empire
and concentrates on the importance of the peoples shared history and virtues (Marwick 28). Their
party platform in 1945 emphasized this, claiming a history of British greatness that, for generations,
has resided "in the character, the ability, and the independence of our people" ("Mr. Churchill's
Declaration"). However in forming an identity so strongly connected ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In order to protect their nation from the supposed threat of Immigrants, a need arose to define and
classify the British cultural identity as rooted in the history of the nation. With the loss of the British
Empire throughout the century, in aligning a British identity to the age of Empire reveals nostalgia
for pure, British identity untainted by foreign influences. With an influx of diverse cultures, came "a
racism typified by notions of a common culture and ethnic difference" (Gillborn 347). As
emphasized by sociologist Robert Miles, "the political discourse employed by the British
government since 1945 has been overtly and covertly racist", however rather than the overt
"reference to the inherent biological inferiority" of certain racial and ethnic groups to exclude them
from national belonging, the concept of a national identity based on a shared culture is used as a
covert tool of exclusion (Miles 36–37). Moving away from the scientific racism of the 19th century,
cultural racism in the 60's and beyond makes way for Conservatives "new racism" based on fear of
Immigrants (Gillborn

Factors And Consequences Of The Sons Of Independence
1) Starting with the period of salutary neglect, Parliament set up the colonies to want independence.
By giving them the freedom to do as they pleased without consequences, as long as they were
making money, allowed the colonists to leave how to live as they wanted. Then, when they needed
the colonies to pay the same taxes as everyone else by passing the Stamp Act, the colonists didn't
want to pay it because they were used to making their own laws. Parliament went from imposing
very little regulations on the colonists to trying to control their taxes and that was never going to go
well for them. They had an agreement with the colonists that they would let them be as long as they
were making money and breaking that all at once had a bit ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The Sons of Liberty did not want pay taxes enacted by Britain and did not want to make any
concessions to Britain. They wanted to live in salutary neglect and nothing else would do. When
Britain started to pass laws such as the Stamp Act the Sons of Liberty resisted and made a case for
their beliefs. They opposed the act event thought they were British Citizens and probably should
have been paying the same taxes as everyone else. Next, when Parliament tried to change their
actions to align with their argument by passing the Townshend Duties, the Sons changed their
argument and resisted the new duties. This created more pressure on Parliament and made them feel
they needed to take stronger actions against the colonies. From this resistance, we get the Coercive
Acts and a stronger British presence in the colonies that lead to an escalating of issues. If the
colonies had accepted that to enjoy the benefits of being a British citizen, they also had to pay taxes
like every other citizen, there would not have been so much tension. The Sons were completely
unwilling to make any concessions to the government of Parliament and that played a huge role in
the situations moving out of

Stamp Act Thesis
The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 and was met with much resentment by the American colonists.
The tax forced the colonists to buy a stamp for every official document they obtained. The tax was
meant to fund the British army in America. Violent protests soon became widespread around the
colonies. In 1766 Parliament repealed the Stamp Act.
On December 16, 1773, members of the Sons Of Liberty suck onto a British ship and dumped an
entire shipment of tea. Some of the men were dressed as Native Americans. The British responded
harshly. The Boston Tea Party was one of the major starting points of the Revolutionary War.
The Intolerable Acts were a set of harsh laws set by the British parliament punishing the colonists
for the Boston Tea Party. The

British Imperialism Dbq Analysis
A question often contemplated, but never concluded: Is the effective rule of an alien power bette that
the mismanaged one of your own? This was the case for the people of India during British colonial
rule. India was the largest and most significant colony that was controlled at the height of the British
Empire. Because of its vast quantities of cotton, tea and indigo, the British East India Company
began to take over Indian cities in 1757, essentially establishing a monopoly over trade. When
British sepoys rebelled against the East India Company in 1857, both the East India Company and
the British military took over the entire country of India. Despite many Indians remaining illiterate,
British rule in India was efficient, affluent and contributive. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Literacy barely increased in India during British rule, from %5 at the beginning of colonialism to
just %16 when India got its independence (Doc #5). But while in India, the British banned suttee
(the traditional Indian act that required widows to commit suicide at their husband's funeral) and
established museums to preserve Indian culture (Lalvani). They also established universities in India
and sent rich Indian men to England to study (Lalvani). Though not increase the number of educated
people, the British made people who were educated received a better education. Medical
technologies did improve in India thanks to the British, even if many people did die from famine
(Gandhi). Britain provided advancements in sewage management that drastically improved public
health (Lalvani). If someone did get sick, they also built hospitals and provided improved medicine
(Lalvani). Though many people did die, those who didn't lived longer, healthier lives. Literacy
barely improved and many people did die, but the social actions that Britain had greatly improved
India and their improvements lasted long after they left their

Citizenship, Religion and Society Policy of the United...
Citizenship, Religion and Society Policy of the United Kingdom Introduction Religion affects the
way in which one of the majority of the world's population structures people live. Many mainstream
institutional religions have experienced declining membership, retains power to influence systems of
ethnics and morality. Also, religion has a strong connection with integration and migration.
Therefore, Europe differs considerably in their responses toward integration and migration–related
diversity (Simpson, 235). This is reflected for instance in the time duration with which immigrants
can apply for and receive permanent residence and citizenship status. Currently, Switzerland (12
years), Greece and Austria (10 years) are the most difficult countries to obtain citizenship whereas
Ireland, the Netherlands and France (five years) have relatively fewer barriers (Lebrun, pg. 144). In
England, the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act of 2009 requires a residential status of eight
years before being eligible for naturalization. It also introduced a voluntary community service for
migrants that can reduce the length of the naturalization process by up to two years (Faas, 143). In
this article, it is considered how national identity and citizenship, and understanding of the
geography of religion in the U. K, by Europe and migration–related diversity, are intertwined at
political level and what implications there are for future curriculums development. Regional Setting

Revolutionary War Causes
Causes of the Revolutionary War
"We fight, get beat, rise and fight again!" –General Nathanael Greene 1781. There is always a cause
behind a fight, a war, a movement. The American soldiers had been beaten down but always got
back up for their freedom. For the Revolutionary war, there is many causes, from unjust acts to
massacres, these are the causes of The Revolutionary War.
When the colonists first settled, problems began. The colonists felt like they needed more land. In
1607, there were about 100 people that lived in America. By 1650 there were around 50,000 people.
In 1750 there over a million people that lived in the thirteen colonies. They were running out of land
and decided to move into the Ohio Valley. During this time the French and Indian people occupied
this land. As more and more colonists migrated across the Appalachian Mountains, the tension grew.
This turned into the French and Indian war. During this war, George Washington was trying to earn
his spot as a well looked upon and respected soldier. He was part of the militia with many other
colonists. After their leader, General Braddock died, George worked his way up to become a
successful leader. The turning point of this war happened when British troops took Canada. Because
of this, the British and the French signed a peace treaty or the Treaty of France, declaring that
France would give their land in Canada to the British. Though it seemed as if the colonists had won
the war, they were faced with new

British Dbq
.How did India get taken over? Was it actually the british or a british company's fault? Once the
british officially arrived in India, they caused some from of terror as they went around taking over
they cities. British set up heavy laws just for the Indians. Some were that they couldn't gather in
groups or protest. Not only that but they ruined India's land, made minorities feel unsafe. British
ruined things in India politically, Economically, and Socially while they were there. The British
governed India in such a way that laws were heavily restricted all around them although some
people say it's for the better, it was not. Economically, the British may have protected some old
buildings but they quickly ruined soil for the plants to grow ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The British made a law that didn't allow to Indians to protest in any way or form, or get into a small
gatherings. (#6) After Gandhi started his protests, (Before the law was enforced) The British set up
the law that didn't allow small gatherings from Indians. Due to that law, about 400 people who not
protesting. They were fasting in a calm gathering, from their religion.
Economic Paragraph–DUE at 3:30 on Tuesday, February 27th The British only set up cash crops
and no food, so the soil in the ground started to degrade itself. (#7) Since there was no food, being
grown, and only cash crops. The ground started to degrade terribly. The reason for all that is because
the British cut down a overload of trees, so it grew warmer in India. But so did the high salt content
heavily damaged the soil and so did cash crops.
Social Paragraph–DUE at at 3:30 on Thursday, March 1st The British also set up a postal service
during their time in india, it helped people connect throughout the world (#19) The postal service
lasted a couple years, before being shutting down, leaving many out of a job, and starviving. (Blue
Packet) Not only that but the postal service helped bring english to India, but it eventually failed due
to bad

The Culture Of British Life
Having only studied the culture of British life for the one term that I have been living in London I
have been able to capture a vivid depiction of what it means to be British over a short period of
time. Furthermore, as a junior level ethnographer, I understand that in a universal realm the study of
accounts for general human life can be applied worldwide. Though being able to scope out the
lifestyles, cultural differences, and fundamental basis for living has allowed for me to understand the
multitude of accounts of British life and what it may truly mean to be British. With the blueprint of
what I have learned so far as an ethnographer, and secondly as a temporary British citizen, I believe
that ethnography absolutely produces adequate accounts of British Life.
After exploring the loads of questions that I came across following the prompt. I then had to ask
myself "What does it mean to be an ethnographer?". In order to successfully explain the importance
of the role, one needs to know the duties and the purpose for the position of an ethnographer. An
ethnographer is in many ways an expansion of an Anthropologist, though from a more theoretical
interpretation of studies. The role of an ethnographer has been explained as, "one who uses both a
qualitative research process or method and product, whose aim is cultural interpretation"(Brian A.
Hoey). In understanding the mission of an ethnographer I have been able to focus on the three
mainstages of human life in order to get

British Imperialism In South Africa Essay
The British Empire's ambition to pursue economic prosperity in 19th century Southern Africa is a
key cause of conflict between the British settlers and the Dutch Boers. The imperialist decisions and
aspirations of the British to utilise the country as a trade system, as well as to secure natural
resources, contrasted with the Boer's determination to pursue political independence. This
consequently led to the increasing tensions to arise between the Boers and the British.
An important trigger in the events that led up to the Boer War was the increasing imperialism of
Southern Africa. The first European settlers, the Dutch, established a supply base at the site of Cape
Town, to which over the next 150 years they would occupy. The land they captured surrounding the
Cape and the east of the coast would come to be known as the Cape Colony. Upon the British arrival
at Cape Town in the last quarter of the 19th Century, the primary intention of the British was to
secure vital trade links with India. Achieving this would mean economic security for the British,
who would then use their placement as a foundation for future goals in Southern Africa, in addition
to upholding the British philosophy of "spreading civilisation to the world." This resulted in a heavy
British focus on political ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The gold ore found triggered a strong revolt of the Boers against the rapid imperialist growth of the
British Empire, and the expansion of it's territory in their claimed land. The gold cliff site, known by
the Boer's as the Witwatersrand, contained the world's largest deposit of gold bearing ore, which
prompted worldwide attention. A rush in engineers, miners and merchants from England, America
and other European countries arrived with the intention of capitalizing on the discovery, as gold in
the 1800's was very valuable internationally. The use of their land angered the Boers, whom had
named them "uitlanders"

The Characteristics Of Mercantilism And British Colonies
Mercantilism can be defined as a theory created British authorities that was an economic system that
ensured their control that they had over the colonies. As the statement by a Historian says,
"Mercantilism" was actually more favorable to the colonies than to Great Britain", I would have to
disagree. Although it is true that there was benefits for the colonies, the benefits of the mercantile
system for Great Britain outweighed the little positive effects that it had on the colonies. The British
benefitted greatly from the income that was gained by enforcing this system on the colonies and the
effects that were to come after it was created. This essay will expand on the characteristic of
mercantilism and how Great Britain was affected positively by the system. First and foremost, the
overall reason that the British authorities created such a system was desire for prosperity and
increasing their wealth. This desire was achieved by imposing laws that controlled the economy of
the colonies. For example, "...Navigation Laws of 1650...commerce flowing to and from the
colonies could be transported only in British vessels...laws required that European goods destined
for America first had to be landed in Britain, where tariff duties could be collected and British
middlemen could take a slice of the profits..." (The American Pageant, Page 118) By controlling the
shipments that went through the colonies, the British were able to make a profit for themselves since
they were taking

Why Is Constitutional Law Important To The Development Of...
According to the development of British Constitution, Parliament gained its power over the
monarchy in 1688, meaning that " under UK constitutional law, it is recognised that parliament has
the power to enact, revoke or alter such, and any, law as it sees fit." The Human Rights Act (HRA)
1998 also reaffirms this by saying that "its recognition of the power of parliament to make primary
legislation that is incompatible with the rights provided under the European Convention on Human
Rights (ECHR). Even though judges must abide by the will of Parliament, there are some cases were
statutes have to be amended for a number of reasons and in this essay these will be discussed. In
order to show why same cases need to be amended,the three main rules used which include the
Literal, Golden and Mischief rule will be discussed. A number of different cases will be discussed in
order to better interpret these rules. Next the different interpretations and presumptions used by
judges will be explained. Lastly a conclusion about amending statutes will be discussed and why
this is more beneficial to the courts.
Case law involves using legal precedent in order to solve cases that have come to court, "refers to
the creation and refinement of law in the course of judicial decisions." Since "the doctrine of binding
precedent, or stare decisis, lies at the heart of the English legal system," this means that when judges
have a case, they will always first check to see if there has been a similar

The Colonial Incentives for Independence Essays
The Colonial Incentives for Independence July 4th of 1776 is arguably the most significant day in
American history. On this day, the thirteen British colonies won their independence from Great
Britain, their mother country at the time. The war that allowed the colonies to gain their
independence was, of course, the American Revolution. One reason the colonists' declaration of
independence was understandable was because after an extended period of salutary neglect, the
British started imposing laws on the colonies. Another reason was that the British violated colonists'
rights by implementing the Proclamation of 1763. A third and final reason the colonies were correct
in breaking away from Great Britain was that although the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
These taxes and laws angered the colonies as they had adapted to isolation and started to become
more independent.
A second reason was because the colonists' rights were violated when the British passed the
Proclamation of 1763. This law was passed after the French and Indian War ended in 1763. It
restricted colonists to settle west of the Appalachian Mountains. Great Britain passed this law in
order to avoid quarrels with the Native Americans, but more importantly to control its colonies. The
British wanted to continue its system of mercantilism where the colonies could provide raw
materials to Great Britain, which guaranteed the market for exports. The colonists' western
expansion was being stopped and at the same time laws and taxes were being inflicted on them. The
restrictions that the British set for expanding westward and their sudden involvement made colonists
feel like their rights were being violated.
Finally, the thirteen colonies had the right to secede from Great Britain because of their lack of
representation in British Parliament. After the Molasses Act, the Quartering Act, and the Stamp Act
were passed, the colonists cried out the well–known expression, "No taxation without
representation." The colonists

1763 Dbq Analysis
In 1763, the British and the colonists emerged victorious from the Seven Years' War after the signing
of peace terms at Paris, granting Britain a colonial empire in North America and an end to control of
North American lands by the French and groups of Native Americans. These similarities did not last
long, however. On October 7, 1763, Parliament passed the Proclamation of 1763, prohibiting
colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains, a frontier which the colonists believed they
could explore after defending and securing a New World empire. This angered the colonists, and
their bitterness toward their mother country would become significantly stronger over the following
twelve years leading up to the inception of war with Britain. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The first of these restrictions occurred after Parliament passed the Proclamation of 1763, in which
Parliament prohibited colonial settlement beyond the Appalachian Mountains. In Harold H. Eibling's
map of the lands delegated to the British colonists by the Proclamation of 1763, the British
government reserved the majority of North America not controlled by Spain for the Native
Americans and the colonists could settle in the remaining areas. (doc 2) Eibling's purpose in creating
this map was to indicate the startlingly low percentage of land that the majority of people living in
North America could settle on and the vast quantities of land reserved for a small minority of North
American settlers. This purpose is significant because it demonstrates the spatial restrictions
imposed on the colonists by Parliament. As a result of this legislation, the colonists began to feel
that their freedom to settle in lands which belonged to their government. Furthermore, the colonists
had little to no influence in their own government. According to the Albany Plan of Union, the
President–General and Grand Council had the "power to make laws... as to them shall appear most
equal and just." (doc 4) The colonists and the British government cooperatively established this plan
of union, therefore Britain had an influence in what was being written and what would be

The Constitutional Development Of Canada
CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF CANADA
Human civilization marked the beginning of modern day legal systems. The advancements in
societies resulted in maintaining certain rules and regulations to continue this progress. Every
society has its own set of laws which are in some ways distinct from others. Many of these laws
have common sections and underlying guidelines. This could be because some societies decide to
retain certain aspects of their customs after breaking out of another society. It could also be the case
that over time different societies through trade and other intercultural activities developed together,
which caused them to have agreements in their laws. For many others, it is the case that they share a
common colonial master. The law and legal systems operating today are derivatives of the forms
listed above. Like many other nations today, the laws of ancient civilizations have affected Canadian
law. These include the Code of Hammurabi, the Mosaic law, Greek and Roman laws, the Magna
Carta and a few others. Much recently are the civil and common law derived from the French and
British respectively. Canada did not always have a written constitution. The territory we now refer to
as Canada was once populated by the French and English colonial masters. These colonists extended
the laws of their home countries to their colonies. As the population of this territory grew and the
UK gained control of more colonies including those from the French, making regional

What Problems Did Great Britain Face After The Seven Years...
During the Seven Years War Great Britain received a new king his name was George III, he was an
arrogant man and he began to take charge in the colonies. After the French and Indian war the british
needed a way to keep the Indians and Colonist from fighting each other. King George said that this
was not a problem and that he would just draw a line down the crest of the Appalachian Mountains.
The Indians were to stay to the west of this line and the colonist to the east. This was known as the
proclamation of 1763. The colonist tried to tell the king that the appalachian mountains had been
settled already, but the king ignored there pleas. The British had other problems too. Debt was a
huge problem. Great Britain had to equip soldiers with clothing,

Taxation Essay
Cali–Ann Martin
Professor Dockswell
AMH2010
03 November 2017
The Events That Turned Taxation Into a Nation
The United States of America was not made overnight. There was a culmination of occurrences that
caused the birth of the nation.
There were a number of taxes and regulations imposed by the British to control and tax the young
colonies. The first ones, the Navigation Acts, were passed in 1651. These acts ensured the British
would have a close hold on all colonial imports and exports because it demanded that any goods to
or from the colonies had to be on either English or American ships and were required to pass
through English ports (Keene 2017, ch. 2). The Navigation Acts, however, were only the beginning
of a soon to be tyrannical ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There were protests against the law in print and delegates from nine colonies were called to New
York to attend the Stamp Act Congress. In this gathering, representatives from the colonies wrote a
formal response to the acts that have been passed without their say (Keane 2017 ch.4). It was around
this time that protests had shifted from pamphlets and newspapers to towns and houses. British
officials' homes were attacked and the colonies had become more chaotic.
As a response to the opposition of the Stamp Act, legislation was passed to repeal it. This
legislation, called the Declaratory Act, had a catch however. Also in the act, the British had declared
their power over the american colonies (Keane 2017 ch.4). To the British, this seemed fair: they had
removed what the colonists were opposed to and they had just reasserted their position of power. To
the protesting colonists, on the other hand, the Declaratory Act was even more support to their
argument that the British were violating their rights as citizens by not having the colonies consent to
the changes. A more aggressive group called the Sons of Liberty had been created by some who
were Patriots, the anti–Anglican people who supported the rights of the colonists. Around this time,
British politics began to change to center around what was going to be done about the rebellious
colonies (Keane 2017 ch.4).
In 1767, the Townshend Acts were passed

The Incorporation of the Human Right Act into British Law
The Incorporation of the Human Right Act into British Law
The Human Rights Act came in force in 2000 and has been successful in UK. This is because after a
year Michael Beloff QC pointed out in The Times that 15% of the cases brought in the high court
with Human Rights Act implication had been successful. The Act has the effect of in cooperating the
European convention on Human Rights into British law. The home secretary Jack Straw said "these
are the new rights for the new millennium. The Human Rights Act is the most important peace of
constitutional legislation the UK has ever seen".
A citizen is a member of state who expects the state to protect them but also has duties towards it.
Being a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We must not forget that parliament is sovereign. This means that if it passes a statute which is
against the Human Rights Act, there is nothing the courts can do about it. This is because parliament
is superior to the Human Rights Act. This is a very great weakness for the judiciary.
The process of appealing on a right issue will be cheaper and quicker then the use of the European
Court of Human Rights, that the parliament may enforce the act against the government. But
parliament could also appeal the act in the future so it does not bound forever.
The Human Rights Act is huge step forward in protecting rights, as great as the extension of the
franchise in 1932. Furthermore, cases will be dealt with more quickly than with the European
convention on Human Rights. It is bound to be cheaper because citizens will not have to go aboard
to obtain justice. Most of the rights contained in the convention already exist in UK statutes or in
common law so perhaps the act is not such a big step forward.
But it will make a difference in dealing with the range of rights such as:
· The right to life
· The right to family life
· Freedom of movement, associated and expression
· Freedom from discrimination on race or religions

· The right to privacy
· The right to a fair trail
· The right to be treated

How Laws Affects The Travel Industry In British Columbia
Business Law in Canada
All businesses in Canada are bound by laws reflective of the nature of the business. There are laws
that protect the consumer, laws that protect the business owner, and laws that protect suppliers.
Although many laws are regulatory in nature across the board for all businesses, some are
specifically geared to industries. Below I will outline three ways in which the law affects the travel
industry in British Columbia, specifically. This will be outlined from the perspective of a travel
agency owner.
Firstly I will speak to the provincial law that requires travel agencies in British Columbia to be
registered with the Consumer Protection agency. The Consumer Protection BC is "the regulator of a
variety of sectors ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It has been successful in its intention thus far.
Another facet of this is the annual contributions agencies in British Columbia must make to
Consumer Protection BC. These contributions are what fund the Travel Assurance Fund held and
used by Consumer Protection in the case of an airline or other travel supplier, agencies included,
defaulting on the services contracted by the client. This can, and has happened. After the terrorist
attacks in the United States on September 11th, 2001, Canada3000, which was considered the
largest charter airline company in the world at the time, went bankrupt due to a drastic drop in sales.
Passengers were stranded in multitude of destinations and had to purchase oneway tickets home on
whatever airline they could find seats on. Claims were made through Consumer Protection BC and
most passengers were reimbursed out of the Travel Assurance Fund. I'm not sure many people
realize how protected they are booking with a travel agency in British Columbia. They are afforded
protection that those who book online are not. From the perspective of customers, there is nothing
but positive impacts of this law. The only negative I can see is the annual contributions that travel
agencies must make. It's an added expense to running your business. That being said, provided
you've accounted for that in advance, then you should be able to budget accordingly so that the
business owner isn't surprised. It's a cost of doing business that is a

The Modern Day Legal Systems
Human civilization marked the beginning of modern day legal systems. The advancements in
societies resulted in maintaining certain rules and regulations to continue this progress. Every
society has its own set of laws which are in some ways distinct from others. Many of these laws
have common sections and underlying guidelines. This could be because some societies decide to
retain certain aspects of their customs after breaking out of another society. It could also be the case
that over time different societies through trade and other intercultural activities developed together,
which caused them to have agreements in their laws. For many others, it is the case that they share a
common colonial master. The law and legal systems operating today are derivatives of the forms
listed above. Like many other nations today, the laws of ancient civilizations have affected Canadian
law. These include the Code of Hammurabi, the Mosaic law, Greek and Roman laws, the Magna
Carta and a few others. More recently are the civil and common law derived from the French and
British respectively. Canada did not always have a written constitution. The territory we now refer to
as Canada was once populated by the French and English colonial masters. These colonists extended
the laws of their home countries to their colonies. As the population of this territory grew and the
UK gained control of more colonies including those from the French, regional laws became a
necessity. Between the eighteenth

The Declaration Of The Stamp Act
Under the rule of King George III, many colonists felt robbed of their rights and freedoms.
Consistently abused by the British government, the colonists decided to ask for freedom. The
colonists were considered citizens of Great Britain, therefore forcing them to follow any of Great
Britain's laws. Colonists learned to depend on Britain for supplies and products to help their
economy, which increased Britain's economy as well. The colonists had to listen and obey all ranges
of Britain's government and faced consequences if they rebelled. The passing of these three acts
limited the colonist's privileges and resulted in them yearning for freedom. The Tea Act, Stamp Act
and Intolerable Acts were the most important in leading the colonists to writing the Declaration of
Independence. The ratification of the Stamp Act, Tea Act, and Intolerable Act occurred within 1765–
1774. Each act forced colonists to pay a tax or limit their rights, whether to create revenue for the
British government or keep tighter controls on the country and economy. These three acts pushed
the colonists' further into their dream for independence. They drew up the Declaration of
Independence, which asked King George III for freedom from the British. The Stamp Act was
approved following the French and Indian War. The passing of this act forced colonists to pay a tax
on any printed good. This created revenue for the British Parliament. Following the Townshend Act,
a tax placed on glass, lead and other goods,

Stamp Act Of 1765
Fight for Independence The Colonists rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were
destroyed following these revenue acts that were passed by the British. These different acts which
lead to taxes made life for the colonist so difficult to live because everyday goods and necessities
were so expensive. The British Parliament restricted the colonist and passed a fair amount of
unjustified laws to the colonies. These laws regulated the trade for the colonies so that they would
have to rely on Britain for the goods and supplies that they needed. The Quartering Act, the
Townshend Act, and the Stamp Act of 1765 were just a few of events that lead the American
colonist and Britain to the American Revolution.
The Quartering Act of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Multiple goods were taxed on the colonist. For example, taxes were place on goods like glass, paint,
lead, paper, and tea. "Not only did these duties tax colonists without consent, but they also
eliminated the one lever of power the colonists had over their royal governors: namely, the
appropriation of their salaries and the salaries of their advisers and other officials." (Remini 34)
Following the passing of this act, there were multiple cases of physical violence and verbal
altercations between both the British soldiers and colonist. At this point, the colonist have had
enough and figured that it is time actually send a message to the British parliament so they
boycotted all British goods. They boycotted so that Britain could not take advantage of the colonist
any longer. No British goods equaled no money from taxes for Britain. The Boston Tea Party was a
direct correlation to the Townshend acts. The colonist dressed up like Indians and sneaked onto
British ships in the harbor and through all of the tea, from Britain, in the

Boston Massacre Problems
In the American colonies there were many problems that they faced with the British. The colonists
had very little say in their lives. The American colonies tried to push this issue with the British but it
never worked. The British treated the colonist like they were nothing. The British made many tax
laws that impacted the colonists life. The Stamp Act was a big part of the taxes. All printed materials
were stamped to prove that the tax has been paid examples of printed material would be wills,
playing cards, glass, newspaper, etc. The Boston Massacre was another way of how the British
treated the colonists. On March 2nd a quarrel arose between some soldiers. The word "fire" was
given from the crowd because they thought their was

Relationship Between Britain And The Colonies
Though both are independent nations, the United Kingdom and the United States now share a close
bond, and have even been allies during WWI and WWII in the 20th century. But when the colonies
of the United States were under British rule, the relations between the Colonies and Britain were not
so friendly. The views on government and taxation between the two became radically different and
created a large disagreement between the American Patriots and those loyal to Britain. Cracks began
to form in the relationship between Britain and the Colonies, and the differences between the two
would inevitably result in the American Revolution. Between 1754 and 1763, Britain and French
were involved in the French and Indian War, which was a territorial dispute between Britain and
France. With the help of the British–American colonists, Britain was able to maintain and increase
its borders in America, but the funds needed to support the war caused Britain to go into debt
("French and Indian War/Seven Years' War 1754–1763" 1). Not willing to tax its own citizens any
further, Britain decided to tax the American colonies more in order to generate revenue. Before the
war, American colonists were paying a fraction of the taxes than those living in Britain, and even
after the imposed taxes, the average American would pay less taxes than the average Englishman
("British Acts on Colonial America" 1).
Even though Americans were paying far less taxes than the British, the sudden enforcement of

Mercantilism Advantages
Mercantilism is often seen beneficial to Great Britain because it ensured products went directly to
the mother country allowing them to increase power and limit freedom over the colonies. However,
mercantilism helped the colonies since it gave the British a reason to rule with salutary neglect,
allowed the colonists to benefit from triangular trade, and receive protection from the British navy
for no cost at all. Although Mercantilism benefitted both the colonies and Great Britain in many
different ways, it can be seen favorable to Great Britain because mercantilism justified their control
over the colonies and enabled them to believe that wealth is equivalent to power, and that their
economic, military, and political power could be measured by amount of gold or silver obtain. The
British government looked at the colonies as tenants who were expected to equip products that were
necessary in the mother country, including tobacco, sugar, and ship mast's. Furthermore, they were
unable to export certain products, such as woolen cloths or beaver hats and that they must buy
imported manufactured goods exclusively from Britain. The colonists were also forbidden to indulge
in vexatious dreams of economic self–sufficiency or self government. Parliament also passed laws
to regulate the mercantile system such as the Navigation Law of 1650, which was intended for rival
Dutch shippers who were trying to get into the American carrying trade. Following these acts, all
commerce going to

Economic Impact On India And The Civilization Of India
Introduction
India is the seventh–largest country by area and the most populous democracy in the world. India's
first people were those of the Indus Valley Civilization, who prospered during the 2nd and 3rd
millenia BC. Throughout the next few centuries, India was home to many groups: the Aryans,
Mauryans, and finally the Mughal Dynasty. In the 16th century the British East India Trading
Company started establishing ports in India and by the mid 18th century the British Crown
controlled the country. The British maintained this role for close to 200 years. (CIA World
Factbook). The Human Development Index is a way to measure a countries development using
variables such as life expectency, average income, and years of schooling. India's HDI is 0.624.
India is ranked as the 131st country out of a total of 188 (Human Development Report). Although
ending over 60 years ago, British colonization still impacts India in the way the country
economically, politically, and culturally functions today.
Economy
The British contributed to the loss of the textile industry in India, a once integral part of the Indian
economy. For centuries India was a major exporter of materials such as cotton, linen, and silk. When
the British arrived they were able to sell clothes to Indians at much cheaper prices, enticing Indians
to buy British products, "In the period 1896–1913, imported piece goods supplied about 60 per cent
of Indian cloth consumption, and the proportion was probably higher for most of

Apush Dbq
What if you were in a country where you were forced to overpay on everyday items, but were not
able to change this in any way? If you would feel angry, and frustrated, then you would have
sympathized with the American colonists in the mid 1700s. America had grown tired of being taxed
relentlessly because of the heavy payment of the French and Indian War. One–sided acts and laws
such as the Intolerable Acts and the Stamp Act treated the colonists unfairly. Thoughts drifted
toward rebellion, and the people were empowered by acts of defiance against the British. The
Boston Tea party and the speech by Patrick Henry made the Brits pass more laws and acts, causing
an uproar in the colonies. Many unreasonable laws and acts of defiance led the country ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Though many laws were passed taxing the colonists, America had no say in the British Parliament.
Patrick Henry's speech embodies this argument when he says "We have no representatives in the
British Parliament...... The Stamp Act is against the law. We must not obey it" (Doc. 1). This act of
defiance caught the colonists' attention and made them feel that perhaps they could change the laws
after all. Another act of defiance against the British was the Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party
was a riot against the British that involved colonists dumping tons of tea from British ships into the
sea. Britain then passed a law that said that the Boston Harbor would be closed until the colonists
paid for the tea. This angered the colonists even more, and eventually led to the Revolution. As you
can see, many rebellious deeds inspired the colonists and helped them confront the British.
Through and through, the British had pulled America's last straw. America was frustrated by being
overtaxed. Many laws led to more resentment from the colonists. America was inspired by actions
that defied the British rule. Patrick Henry's speech and the Boston Tea Party emboldened the
colonists. Tons of controversial laws led to war and changed the

British Taxation On The American Revolution
British Taxation on the Colonies were a series of laws passed between 1763–1775 that regulated
trade and taxes. This caused tensions between America and Britain. These laws brought on the
American Revolution faster. The British government ended in the Seven Years' War also known as
the French and Indian War with a lot of heavy debts which led to putting taxes on the colonies.
Britain felt they also had a problem maintaining order in America. The British Taxation of the
Colonies involved Britain increasing revenue in the colonies in order to pay off large debts.
There were many taxes that took place during 1764–1765. The Sugar Act of 1764 was the first
attempt to finance the defense of the colonies by the British government through taxes ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This act was based off of the Currency Act of 1751 in New England. Americans opposed it because
they feared it will upset their economy. The next act is the Quartering act of 1765. In this act,
Parliament orders colonists to house British Troops, even in colonists' homes. It required local
governments in the colonies to provide food for any British soldiers in the area.Many objected to
being obligatory to provide housing and food which looked like an attempt to tax them but not
camouflaged as such. The New York Assembly argued that it could not be forced to comply. these
were one of the first acts created by the British on the colonies.
The Stamp Act was a major taxation law that led to other actions taken place. Parliament required all
legal documents, newspapers and pamphlets required to use water marked, or "stamped" paper on
which a levy was placed. This sought to pay some of the costs of protecting the colonies. The Stamp
Act was the first direct tax on the American colonies.The revenue did not go to colonial legislatures
but to Britain. Many colonists still had complaints and hardships with British colonial policies
because of this act. The Virginian Resolution of 1765 was the Virginian assembly refused to comply
with the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act Congress of 1765 was when representatives for nine of the
thirteen colonies declared the Stamp Act unconstitutional as it was a tax levied without their
consent.

The Revolution : The Cause Of The American Revolution
The American Revolution was the turning point for the colonies that made up the United States
today. It was the war that freed the colonists from British control. But what actually caused the
American Revolution? Well, there's no simple answer to that question. In fact, most of the causes
acted as if they were dominoes. These events can be categorized in four periods of time or setting.
These groups are, Salutary neglect, Mercantilism, Boston, and Unity of protests. Salutary neglect
was the idea for the British to let the colonies prosper without any restricting control on the
colonists. Mercantilism was the idea that the colonies were there to financially help the British who
were in debt from a previous war with the French. The city of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The British had many different motives behind this law. One of the motives was to avoid conflicts
between the Native Americans and Colonists, the British even declared the Proclamation Line of
1763 was "respect for Indian rights"– (Pole 2). However, the British were more concerned with
saving money by avoiding unnecessary conflicts, more than the rights of the Native Americans.
Another motive for the Proclamation Line of 1763 was to prevent Colonists from moving west into
the country because it was easier for the British to control the Colonies if all of the Colonists were
settled on the East Coast. Financially and Geographically, the Proclamation Line of 1763 made
sense for the British, however, the Colonists were very offended by this law. (Kelly 2). This was the
first time the Colonists were outraged by a restrictive law. Unfortunately for the Colonists, it would
be far from the last time. The concept of Mercantilism is when a mother country uses their colonies
for financial or any other type of support. This ideal was hated by the Colonists and before the
enormous debt obtained by the British, it became the "..British idea of how a colony should be
governed"– (Wright 80). The British decided to put more restrictive laws on the colonies, the first
four enacted were the Sugar Act, the Currency Act, the Quartering Act, and the Stamp Act. The
Sugar Act was a raised tax on sugar imported from the West Indies. (Kelly 2). This was the first
attempt by

How Did The British Government To Respond To The...
The American Revolution was preceded in part by a series of British Parliament laws that regulated
trade and taxes. Rumors from England that more taxes might follow encouraged some colonists to
begin thinking about whether they really consented to taxes passed by a Parliament to which they
elected no representatives. (1) This particular legislation of taxation caused tensions between
colonists and local imperial officials, who readdressed the colonists concerns that the British
Parliament would not address American complaints concerning the new laws. The unwillingness to
respond to American demands for change by the British opened the doors to colonial argument that
they were part of a corrupt and tyrannical empire in which their traditional liberties were at stake!
This position eventually served as the foundation for the Declaration of Independence. As the
British government emerged from the Seven Years' War in 1763, they were troubled with
outstanding debts. This led British Prime Minister George Grenville to reduce the tax collected on
items such as sugar and molasses as they were imported into Great Britain, but also to enforce the
law more strictly. Since enforcement of these taxes had previously been lenient, this increased
revenue for the British Government in the the long term, and served to increase the taxes paid by the
colonists. New York and Massachusetts colonial governments issued formal letters of protest to
Parliament. (2) Add to this the Currency Act of

Evaluate the Claim That Migration Creates Global Connections.
Eleanor White – C5206232 TMA – 06 – Option 1
Evaluate the claim that migration creates global connections.
In this assignment, the strengths and weaknesses of the claim that migration creates global
connections, will be discussed. This will be done by discovering what counts as migration and how
it is valued, how global connections can be both positive and negative, about the concepts of
'diaspora' and 'translocalism' and how important they are when considering both migration and
global connections. To enable the discussion of the subject matter, it must first be understood what is
meant by the terms 'migration' and 'global connections', migration is used to describe the circulation
of people from their country of origin into ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If they choose to leave the country, or send money back to family in their country of origin, this
means that the money will leave its original economy and be positioned within another, affecting the
original economy negatively and the new one positively. There are many other types of global
connection, as stated before, someone can leave their country of origin to travel elsewhere, making
new connections with people on the way, this does not mean that all connections from their home
are lost, they are maintained alongside the new connections as they are made. Business connections
are global connections that can be viewed as both positive and negative, an example of this can be
seen in Raghuram and Hardill's study(1998, cited by Raghuram, 2009,p181) on female
entrepreneurs, they interviewed a business woman, who owned a small chain of stores specialising
in modern clothing based on more traditional Asian styles. The stores are predominantly based in the
Western society, with styles influenced by Asian culture, cloth sourced from China and the finished
product being made in India and then shipped to the Western stores, this is a great deal of global
connections for one garment, although by some standards, it is small. Most of the clothing sold by
this particular entrepreneur are aimed at young British Asian women, showing a global
disconnection, as young British Asian men

To What Extent Was The American Revolution Dbq
The end of the French and Indian War brought debt to Great Britain. To pay for the costs of the war,
British Parliament passed a series of laws taxing the American colonists. The colonies became upset
with all of the new taxes and began to rebel. The colonists had no representation in British
Parliament and felt that they should not pay for taxes without the ability to have a say. Their
rebellions only made the British create more laws without them. In 1765, British Parliament passed
the Stamp Act (Document 3) to pay for the French and Indian War. This law taxed the American
colonists on things like newspapers, almanacs, and calendars. The colonists became angry about the
new taxes because they had no representation in the government or say in their taxes. They believed
that it was unfair for Great Britain to tax them without given them the right to a representative in
Parliament. As the colonists rebelled, the British ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Boston Tea Party was when a group of colonists dressed up as Native Americans and marched
onto a ship in the Boston Harbor. The boat contained imported tea from Great Britain. The colonists
were still angry that their was a tax on tea so they threw all of it overboard the ship. The British then
became mad at the colonists and created more laws to punish them. After the Boston Tea Party, the
British Parliament passed a series of laws called the Intolerable Acts (Document 5). The Intolerable
Acts closed the port of Boston until the colonists could pay for all of the tea they had thrown
overboard. They also banned town meetings and had all British officials accused of committing
crimes sent to Britain for their trial. The law that annoyed the colonists the most was the Quartering
Act. This allowed british troops to stay in the colonists homes. These new laws only made the
colonists angrier and more rebellious as they boycotted British

Causes Of The American Revolution
There are many contributing aspects that led towards dissatisfaction and unhappiness in the
colonies. Many of these aspects lead towards the American Revolution, and they are only the
beginning of the rebellious thoughts and spirits instilled in the colonists. Some of the leading
motives for the colonies to reach a certain peak of discontent and rebellion include three major acts
that were passed, two specific laws/policies that were imposed upon the colonies, and the unfairness
of British law. Many acts and taxes were imposed upon the American colonists, and this continued
to anger and ignite a flame of rebellion in their eyes. The laws and acts were viewed as unfair,
unreasonable, and absurd. In particular, there are three primary acts that are passed that made a true
difference in their views of the British government. These three acts include the Sugar Act of 1764,
the Quartering Act of 1765, and the Stamp Act of 1765. The Sugar Act is one of the first major acts
that is passed. The Sugar Act was designed to raise revenue in the colonies, and it set a tax on
imported sugar and molasses, which caused strife with the ongoing manufacturing of rum in New
England (landofthebrave.info). The colonists were mostly against this act because of the fact that
they had never been exposed to actual laws being strictly enforced. Another act, the Quartering Act,
progressed the resentment of the government to an even further extent. This quartering act forced
the colonists to

Seven Year's War Turning Point Essay
The seven year's war was a long and bloody war in Northern America that was fought between 1734
and 1763. It was a war fought between the French and their Indian allies versus British troop and
Colonist over resources, trade routes, territory, and the long time rivalry of the French and British.
The French and Indian war had a significant impact as a turning point in Colonial and British
relations because it lead to the end of an age salutary neglect by the British and changed for the
worse how the Colonials and British viewed each other. For years the Colonies had been neglected
by the British government, who did little to impose British tariffs and laws on the colonies, and so
they became more self–sufficient by creating their own taxes and courts of law. The ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
After the war the Colonist, just like before the war, didn't see why they really needed any support
from the British. The war even started to unify them together at the Albany plan of union. But the
British on the other hand, by fighting a war over the Colonies gained a much higher investment in
the Colonies since they had fought a bloody war and earned a substantial debt for the colonies
Defense. After the war the British could no longer afford to let the Colonies have the level of
independence they had after they had invested so much in them and so they started to enforce
British rule and increase taxation. The Colonist resented the change from the old ways of neglect
and started to see the British as some foreign power imposing its will and taxes on them from 4,000
miles away. The British now had no choice but to be more involved in the Colonies and the Colonies
no longer wanted or needed the British to be more involved. Although, much did change because of
the war some things still stayed the same. The British still had many loyal subjects in the colonies
and many colonist still relied on the

How Is Britishness Represented in East Is East, This Is...
How is Britishness represented in East is East, this is England and Enoch Powell's rivers of blood
speech? In its most simple form; Britishness is simply living within the nation of Britain, with a
British passport and obeying and abiding to the laws and rules of the land. However, many people
have and still do, see Britishness as something much more than just your nationality. People can
view Britishness as a way of life where you have to abide and live up to certain values and fit in
with certain stereotypes. The ideal british citizen would be typically white, with all their ancestors
and relatives coming from nowhere else but Britain. They are all 'hard working', attend the church of
England, have a fry up every morning, drink tea, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even on the cover it shows the impact that racism had with the exclusion of people, even whilst in
such an aggressive and harsh environment (as shown by the expressions of the other gang
members). In the middle of the line of the gang is shaun, this could be considered as symbolic of
him being caught up within a gang culture on his simple quest just to find friends, acceptance and a
little happiness in a world where his had has left him (due to his death in the Falklands war) and he
is left alone. On shauns right hand side is Milky, again possibly symbolic, due to the fact that in the
last seen where Combo attacks milky, it is shaun that stands up for him and tries to stop the violent
outrage. Behind the large metal fence you can see the sky rise of the flats and the bright blue sky.
The flats not only represent the poor and rough surrounding but relate to the scene in the film where
combo rants about immigrants bringing over their families and cramming them into small flats. The
bright blue sky relates in with the title of the film which is painted on the metal fence is red and
white. These three colours being the those of the union jack, the ionic an powerful british symbol.
There are three iconic and powerful scenes from East is East. The first of these is where george
Khan finds 'Ghandi' trying to put back together the broken items used for the wedding ceremony.
Upon this, george asks him "who

How Did The British Rebellion Lead To American Rebellion
The British attempt to tax the colonies lead to the rebellion for a lot of reasons the first thing that
happened was the French and Indian War. The British won the War and got control of land in North
America. The British made a law called the Proclamation 1763 this meant the colonist could not
move west of the Appalachian Mountains. Another thing the new law did for British was how the
Colonist had to stay next to the shore which meant the British would get all the goods. British was in
debt from spending all their money on the War so the made taxes. Smuggling was a big thing in the
colonies so George Grenville wanted to make a law against smuggling. A law was passed called
writs of assistance it allowed the officer go into your home to look ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
March 5, 1770 a fight between the soldier patrolling the town and the Colonist living in Boston.
This fight was called the Boston Massacre the people living in the town got sticks, clubs, and stones
and threw them at. One of the soldier was knocked down so the British soldiers killed 5 of the
colonist. Soon after the Boston Massacre the news got out. Paul Revere and Samuel Adams drew
poster and put them up all around town. Later in the 1773 the Tea Act was an act that made it so they
didn't have to go by the Colonial merchants. The Colonial merchants would distribute the tea. This
made the Colonist mad again so a group of the Colonist hidden as Mohawks whent on the ship and
threw 342 chests of tea of the board. This was known as the Boston Tea Party. British passed a law
called Coercive Acts this law punished the people who did not follow the laws the British made.
This act made the Colonist pay for all the tea they threw overboard. This law also banned meetings
in New England. It also made the people of Boston to have to have a soldier living in there house.
That is the reaction the Colonist had when the British tried to tax

Role Of British Imperialism In India

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Ebony Bates

More from Ebony Bates (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Role Of British Imperialism In India