2. Learning Objectives
After this session, you will be equipped to :
Define and Discuss Sustainability Issues
Compare construction materials for “green”
compatibility
Identify and select various Green Rating Tools
Compare/contrast Green Building Programs
Evaluate various EWP products based on the
deconstruction/reconstruction principle
Discuss EWP framing systems recognized as
“green” by current Green Build programs.
3. Energy Facts
Energy doesn’t grow on trees
Decisions are now being made based on
energy costs and sustainability
4. A New Vocabulary
Life Cycle
Sustainability Renewability
Costs
Carbon Carbon Embodied
Sequestration Footprint Energy
5. A New Vocabulary
Green
Building
LEED Building
Green
Standard
Green Charrette
Globes
6. Components of Green Building
Resource
Efficiency
Environmental Energy
Impact Efficiency
7. Renewable Resources?
Wood Concrete Steel
Insulating Value? Yes NO NO
Renewable? Yes NO NO
Low Energy Cost to
Yes NO NO
produce?
Purifies the air? Yes NO NO
Potentially
Yes NO NO
Unlimited Supply?
9. Wood is Good for the
environment
US Raw Material Production and Total Energy Used
Source: APA
10. Nature’s Air Purifier!
A growing forest produces 1 ton of oxygen and
absorbs 1.4 tons of carbon for every ton of wood
Mature trees slow in their absorption rate of CO2
Harvesting insures that the carbon is locked in the
wood (Carbon Sequestration) .
Decaying trees release stored carbon back into the
atmosphere
New trees with rapid absorption rates can be
replanted to continue this air purification.
Source: APA
11. Benefits of Wood vs. Steel and
Concrete
high insulating and
acoustic properties
recycling and resource
recovery rates
low pollution rates in
harvesting and milling
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductivity-d_429.html
12. Lifecycle Analysis
Resource
Extraction
Disposal, Reuse
Manufacturing
or Recycling
Building Onsite
Demolition Construction
Source: Building
http://www.athenasmi.org/ Occupancy &
about/lcaModel.html Maintenance
13. Comparison of Materials
5 times 126 times
14 times 24 times
more energy more energy
more energy more energy
to produce 1 to produce 1
to produce 1 to produce 1
ton of ton of
ton of glass. ton of steel.
cement · aluminum.
Source: APA
14. LCA Wood vs. Steel and Concrete
CORRIM Study Results:
Wood vs. Steel: 17% embodied energy
savings with wood
Wood vs. Concrete: 16% embodied
energy savings with wood
www.CORRIM.org
15. Lifecycle Analysis:
the environmental proof of wood*
Sustainability Attribute Wood Steel Concrete
• Total Energy Use • Lowest • + 140% • +70%
• Greenhouse Gases • Lowest • +45% • +81%
• Air Pollution • Lowest • +42% • +67%
• Water Pollution • Lowest • +1900% • +90%
• Solid Waste • Lowest • +36% • +96%
• Ecological Resource Use • Lowest • +16% • +97%
Source: Athena Institute. http://www.athenasmi.org
* Sullivan and Horwitz-Bennett, Using wood for sustainable design&construction
17. Green Building Programs-
Who’s in the “LEED”
National Programs
USGBC/L.E.E.D. Leadership in Energy
and Environmental Design
NAHB/Green Building Standard
Green Building Initiative/Green Globes
18. USGBC/L.E.E.D. for Homes
Mission:
Promote sustainable building
Top 25% of Homes
http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=3638
Best Environmental Features
Promote Green Residential Builders
Promote Green Commercial Building
19. USGBC/L.E.E.D.
Categories
Location & Sustainable
Innovation
Linkages Sites
Water Energy & Material &
Efficiency Atmosphere Resources
Awareness
Indoor Air
and
Quality
Education
20. USGBC/L.E.E.D.
Platinum
Gold
Silver
Certified
Points adjusted for larger/smaller homes
21. USGBC/L.E.E.D.
How to Participate
Join
Identify project team (Charrette)
Build the home
Certify
Sell
Repeat…
22. NAHB Green Building Program
HBA driven
Online scoring tool
Based on GB Guidelines document
Foundation for HBA programs
Residential ISO Standard -2008
23. NAHB Green Building Program
Lot Design,
Resource Energy
Preparation,
Efficiency Efficiency
Development
Operation,
Indoor
Maintenance,
Water Efficiency Environmental
Homeowner
Quality
Education
Global Impact
25. NAHB Green Building Program
Builder Participation
Calculate your score
Forward to Green Verifier
Build and verify Green Status
Certify Home
Test and Inspect
Build again
26. Green Building Initiative
Mission
Accelerate best building practices
Green Globes (commercial construction)
Integrates use of Athena EcoCalculator
ANSI Standard for assessment of Commercial
Buildings
Promotes NAHB program to HBA’s
27. National Program Similarities
Checklist based
3rd party verification required
Similar categories addressed:
Resource efficiency
Energy efficiency
Framing recommendation similar:
Advanced Framing and O.V.E.
Designed to create marketing
opportunities
28. National Program Differences
NAHB program requires environmental
management systems for manufacturer
and builder- ISO 14001
FSC the only forestry certification for
LEED. (USGBC position under review)
NAHB recognizes multiple certifications.
LEED predominantly paper based, NAHB
and Globes are web-based programs.
29. Regional Green Building Programs
Wisconsin Green Built Home
http://wi-ei.org/greenbuilt/
New construction, remodeling,
multifamily, waterfront programs
Wisconsin Energy Star or REScheck +15
levels
Based on points checklist
Minimum 10% 3rd party verified
30. Regional Green Building Programs
Minnesota Green Star
http://www.mngreenstar.org/
New construction and remodeling
Certified, Silver, Gold levels
Based on a points checklist
All 3rd party verified
31. The Big “3” for wood frame:
Summary Categories
Resource
Efficiency
Environmental Energy
Impact Efficiency
32. Resource
Efficiency
Finding a Fit for Fiber:
Determining Optimum Value is
A Manufacturer’s Responsibility
36. Environment
Protect the environment as you conduct
your business
• NAHB Program requirement: “the product
line, plant, or company must be ISO
14001 certified.”
37. EWP Applications meeting Green
Building Guidelines- Resource Efficiency
Life Cycle Assessment Tool
Download EcoCalculator at:
http://www.athenasmi.org/index.html
38. EWP Applications meeting Green
Building Guidelines- Resource Efficiency
Resource Efficiency
Use OVE/Advanced Framing
4’ and 2 Modules
Wider o/c Spacing
More Insulation
Eliminate thermal bridging
Single top plates
2 stud corners with drywall clips
P.E.T.
Construction layouts
39. EWP Applications meeting Green
Building Guidelines-Resource Efficiency
Resource Efficiency Applications- EWP
Wide Flange I Joists
24 oc performance
Framing layouts
Panelize
P.E.T.
40. EWP Applications meeting Green
Building Guidelines- Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency Requirements: Increase R
Value in the building envelope
Applications:
Remove wood, decrease thermal bridging,
increase insulation…..how?
Use wide flange, heavy duty I joists at 24
oc., 1 ¾” wide face studs for walls.
Stack roof framing over wall framing over
floor framing in a 24” oc module.
Use energy efficient materials when possible.
42. EWP Applications meeting
Green Building Guidelines
Environmental Impact
ISO 14001 Environmental Management
System
Defined: An objectively verifiable
declaration of your intended
environmental management system.
43. Summary
WOOD
Clearly superior building material
EWP provides optimum performance
opportunities
Not all Engineered Wood is created
GREEN equal.
44. Learning Objectives
Did we????????
Define and Discuss Sustainability Issues
Compare construction materials for “green”
compatibility
Identify and select various Green Rating Tools
Compare/contrast Green Building Programs
Evaluate various EWP products based on the
deconstruction/reconstruction principle
Discuss EWP framing systems recognized as
“green” by current Green Build programs.
Engineered Wood Products (EWP) have long been recognized as a resource efficient product. For example, when compared to traditional 2 x 12 framing, an 11 7/8 2x3 flanged I joist uses only 55% of the fiber and spans 22% further. This resource efficiency has been part of the EWP story from its inception. As the needs of the marketplace have evolved, the focus has changed and we are not only looking to capitalize on the resource efficiency of EWP, but also looking at how EWP can be utilized in the built environment to create energy efficient structures all the while keeping our commitment to sustaining and renewing the resources we make these products from….
During today’s discussion, I’d like to discuss some of the pertinent issues surrounding EWP, sustainability and green building practices. We’ve set forth 6 key learning objectives that we hope to accomplish by the end or our time together. (Read from slide) Green Building Programs discussion will include programs from NAHB, L.E.E.D for Homes, Minnesota Green Star, and the Wisconsin Green Built Home program.My Notes: (for deconstruction/reconstruction, bring different types of manufactured products: LSL, LVL, GL)
Here’s some other benefits of wood compared to other building materials.Wood ranks high in insulating and acoustic properties.Comparing thermal conductivity (k) between materials yields the following results:Fiberglass: .04Softwoods: .12Glass: 1.05Concrete: 1.7Carbon Steel: 54Aluminum: 250Wood: One inch is R1.25Concrete: 12.5 inches to achieve R1
Compares the overall energy costs embodied in (attached to) the use of product. The life cycle analysis measures a product’s complete lifecycle cost from extraction and manufacture through product utilization to recycling or re-use.The analysis allows designers to make environmentally responsible decisions when specifying products.The EcoCalculator, developed by the Athena Institute, is a Life Cycle Analysis software tool that assesses and allows for side-by-side comparison of the LCA of various building component combinations (wood vs steel studs, insulation, sheathing, etc).LCA looks at every aspect of a product’s useful life.
**Here’s another study found on the Athena Institute site.This study compares multiple aspects of environmental impact of wood, steel and concrete.Again, wood performs better in environmentally sensitive areas.