Bill Of Rights Essay

The Bill of Rights Essay
Bill of Rights
We live in the 21st century, where most Americans mind their own business but take for granted our
God given rights. Not only God given rights but also those established by our founding forefathers.
This paper will illustrate and depict the importance of the original problems faced when adopting the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It will discuss the importance of the first amendment, the due
process of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and the 8th amendments. Last but not least the importance of what is
known as the "second Bill of Rights" (14th amendment). What problems with the original document
motivated the adoption of the Bill of Rights?
Many felt the Constitution was strongly focused on the power and authority the central...show more
content...
Thus Congress included the Bill of Rights and Federalist and Anti–Federalist came to a compromise
and the Constitution came to be. Give one example of each of the five rights in the First
Amendment. Freedom of religion: A great example of freedom of religion is that fact that central
government or the state that someone might live in, cannot impose a said religion or prosecute
for worshiping the religion of choice of an individual. Freedom of speech: The freedom to speak
freely and without censorship and limitation. A great example of this would be a talk radio,
where people call in to voice opinion on real time political controversy. Right to assembly: The
right to form groups, to organize and to assemble together to address issues of a common goal. The
ability to organize is an important means by which citizens can influence their governments and
leaders ("Freedom of assembly and association", N.D.). Right to petition: The right to present
request to the government without punishment or reprisal. A great example is picketing and
peaceful protest. Keep in mind a violent protest is against the law and you will be arrested and
prosecuted for such actions. Right to press: "Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of
the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it." Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, 1786.
(Coates, 1995–99). Go to the "First Amendment Center" web site and pick a related court case for
one or two
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

What Is The Bill Of Rights Essay
Bill of Rights Essay
Civil Disobedience was a term coined by Henry David Thoreau meaning that a certain person
disobeys certain laws, demands, and commands of a government. Not necessarily all the
government laws, but certain ones that may affiliate with their beliefs or world view. Some people
in the world abuse the right and just make the world a more complicated place. Then there's some
people who use it for the right purpose and get accused for doing wrong. Yet I am not the one to
judge what the world does right and does wrong. But Civil Disobedience is a right that should be
used wisely. For example, Rosa Parks refused to move from her seat on the bus because she
believed that all people should have the same right. We each have the...show more content...
Not everyone understands it. Some people do understand what the meaning and purpose of it is.
And I believe that there should be more people like that today. Because knowledge like that
shouldn't be abused. Yes. Everyone has rights. Everyone has a choice. Everyone has the free will
to make decisions of what's right and what is wrong. Of course peaceful resistance has a positive
and negative impact on society. But people should keep in mind of what they do. Their choices to
act on what they believe is up to them. If you want to prove a point, prove it. It seems like
everyone just adds more fuel to the flame than you need to. Real word problems are big enough.
There is no need to make it bigger. I really wish people knew when to resist and when to speak.
Sometimes people get those two mixed up. There is a lot of false accusations and false
motivation for some peoples actions. For example, when someone feels like they should kill
someone because they feel like they have the right is completely wrong. Unless it is in defense.
Which in some cases, can be mistaken. I feel like the question if peaceful resistance is has a
positive or negative impact is not the best. Of course it does. You just have to know when the right
time to speak is and when the right time to act

Reflection On The Bill Of Rights
Journal entry #45: December 16, 1791 Yesterday the Bill of Rights was ratified and it is the talk
of the country. I know many citizens, like myself, and political figures are satisfied with this
addition to the Constitution. Our president, George Washington, initially expressed in his
inaugural address his desire for a Bill of Rights that would display "a reverence for the
characteristic rights of freemen and a regard for the public harmony..." ("Washington's Inaugural
Address of 1789"). In my opinion, I feel the Bill of Rights successfully expresses the characteristics
George Washington described. This morning I was discussing the Bill of Rights with some fellow
journalists, and we all agreed that we felt a sense of security knowing our rights cannot be stripped
by our government. Even though we agreed on this, I realized that we had extremely different views
on which ones were most important to us. All the amendments affect my life in a way, but some are
more important to me than others. The First Amendment has provided protection for my individual
rights of speech, religion, assembly, press, and petition of government. In my opinion, the First
Amendment is the most important. As a journalist and successful newspaper writer, freedom of
press and petition of government are rights that I cherish. I have many opinions that include my
view on our government and the Bill of Rights has allowed me to speak freely without any concerns.
As a religious family man, the right to

Introduction
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution: an amendment that guarantees three rights,
one of which is the right to freedom of expression. Under this, there resides the freedom of press. It
assures that people are free to communicate through the means of media and dissemination without
governmental restraints. However, if the government desires to interfere in one's expression, the
government can do so, but only with proper justification. In such cases, a court case is necessary
("First Amendment"). One such case is New York Times Co. v.United States. In favor of the
publications made by the Times that had caused concern for the U.S. government, the final verdict
was right in heeding the First Amendment, for the...show more content...
v. United States would ensue.
The main question that probably arose was whether the president's executive order surpassed the
First Amendment. First, the District Court for the Southern District of New York judged the Times
case and decided the government had not "show[ed] justification for the enforcement of such a
[prior] restraint," for it simply deemed the publication of the Pentagon Papers detrimental to the
nation. Likewise, the District Court for the D.C. and the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the
courts that judged the Washington Post case, came to the same verdict (New York Times Co. v.
United States).
The Case: The Result* The Supreme Court case was argued on June 26, 1971 and decided on
June 30, 1971. It affirmed the verdicts of the District Court for the Southern District of New York
& the District Court for D.C. and the Court of Appeals for the D.C. (New York Times Co. v. United
States).
The Supreme Court's decision was supported by three main reasons. In addition to the fact that
President Nixon made the restraint order without proper justification, Justices Black, Douglas,
Brennan, Stewart, White, and Marshall, the ones who concurred with the official judgement,
hesitated to take action without the Congress's tutelage. They thought that the issues were strictly
legislative, so they did not refute the First Amendment (New York Times Co. v. United States; "The
Espionage Statutes and Publication of Defense Information"). Also, per US Code –

Bill Of Rights Essay
A democratic country is the country governed directly or indirectly by people who have their
sovereignty, so it has the laws to protect citizens' rights. Most countries in the world adopt
democracy, and so do the United States and South Korea. However, it doesn't mean that both
countries' laws are same. This essay will cover Bill of Rights and Korean Constitution because they
are the fundamental laws of each country. Also, theUnited States has federal system unlike Korea,
which means each state has their own autonomies under their laws. The Bill of Rights indicates the
first edition of ten amendments for protecting the citizens' rights from the government. There are
some similar and different points between the United States and South Korea...show more content...
Firstly, the Second Amendment is about right for having arms and army. However, there is no
Article in Korean Constitution about it and it is illegal. Secondly, the Third Amendment is about
protection from quartering of armies, but this also doesn't exist in Korean Constitution. Thirdly,
the Seventh Amendment is about civil trial by jury, and laws related to this point don't exist in
Korea. However, there is a noticeable point in Korea, which is called Civil Participation in
Criminal Trials. It has been enforced since 2008 and is same with the United States in terms of
having juries, but there are two crucial differences. In Korea, jury can only participate in severe
criminal cases and their verdicts have no legal binding forces, just advisory effects. Fourthly, the
Ninth Amendment is about protection of rights not specified in the Bill of Rights, and Korea does
not have laws involving this aspect naturally because the Korean Government does not adopt the
Bill of Rights. Lastly, the Tenth Amendment is about the powers of states and people, but this
point is vague. The concept of powers of people can be applied to both United States and Korea,
but the concept of powers of state can't because the Korean Government does not have a federal
system. Therefore, in this essay, it is categorized as difference, but some people can regard it as same

Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights & Amendments Paper
Intro
The United States is a country that was founded on the principle of freedom; it took the Bill of
Rights to be added to the Constitution to guarantee citizens freedom. The Bill of Rights consists of
the first ten amendments in the constitution; a document that outlines how the new American
government would be created and operated. The Constitution was ratified in 1788 which was the
start of protecting the interests of each citizen, two years later the Bill of Rights was proposed by
congress and went into effect in 1791. It was designed to prevent the government from taking total
power over citizens and to provide them with legal defenses. This essay will discuss the
understanding of how...show more content...
However, it was not until "the Voting Rights of 1965 that aimed to overcome legal barriers at the
state and local levels that denied blacks their right to vote under the 15th amendment" (The 15th
Amendment: Ratification, 2012). This had to happen because despite the amendment people were
still using discriminatory practices against the blacks. There is a difference between the earlier
amendments and the later ones because many of the earlier ones like the Bill of Rights were about
civil liberties. The 19th through the 27th amendments dealt with political rights and technical issues.
For example one of these amendments granted women the right to vote and some clarified the
succession to the presidency and vice presidency. The later amendments work to increase political
rights and to conform the details of our system of government. Conclusion
Our individual rights are the most traditional and valued accomplishment of the United States, there
are other states that are not entitled to have such rights. Each of the amendments are very important
to how we live in today's society; the first ten which is the Bill of Rights grants Americans their
freedom. Our founding fathers had a vision on what they wanted America to become they laid the
foundation for the constitution and allowed modification if necessary they knew that America would
grow and the constitution would need adjustments; that is exactly what

Essay On Bill Of Rights
Ever since man walked on this Earth they have had rights and responsibilities. Over thousands of
years the principles of life have not changed. Everyone still has their rights and their responsibilities
for the Earth and their country. While individual beliefs in what a responsibility for the nation is
there are commonly shared thoughts. In America immigrants and lifelong citizens have numerous
rights and responsibilities toward this country. TheUnited States of America has had basic standards
for civilians since the Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791. After the Bill of Rights was adopted
citizens had something to fight for and defend. The Bill of Rights consisted of ten amendments that
listed off guidelines for each citizen to use and follow. With the ratification of the Bill of Rights the
debate of responsibilities of citizens sparked. The main responsibility shared by an American citizen
is to defend the Constitution. Over the years many cases have come up where we have needed to
defend the Constitution. When people are defending the Constitution, they look to one or more of
the twenty–seven amendments and what laws may or may not be violated. The first ten amendments
of the Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights pertain to the personal rights
of how people should be treated in most situations. These amendments...show more content...
In the past there have been numerous cases where the government has required land for different
reasons. In Amendment V this legal matter is discussed, ... "nor shall private property be taken for
public use, without just compensation." This states that as long as the government pays you what
the property value is worth or more than what it is worth and there is a just reason it can be
classified as constitutional. In many cases as well as land there have been debates on the taxes that
are paid by the

English Bill Of Rights
The Bill of Rights is a formal declaration of the legal and civil rights of the citizens. Also known as
the first ten amendments of the constitution, ratified in 1791 and offering freedoms like speech,
assembly, and worship. Originally, the Bill of Rights were proposed by James Madison and they
then became the law of the land. The purpose of the Bill of Rights was a statement of basic
individual freedoms that refrain from the English Bill of Rights passed in 1689. A century later, 7
out of the 13 of the newly independent United States of America adopted a bill of rights as an
addition to their state constitutions, the other 6 states continued using the English bill of rights in
the bodies of their constitutions. Virginia is historically known

Argumentative Essay: The Bill Of Rights
The freedoms outlined in the Bill of Rights are sill significant today, and thanks to them the
American citizens have a right to speak out freely, assemble in a peaceful manner, or to get a
speedy and more importantly fair trial. In my opinion, this document and its heritage has been
incorporated into the United States in a way to ensure the strength of its character. Undeniably, the
ideals represented in the Bill of Rights were introduced to serve as the country's foundation. I
believe that people all over the world, putting aside their abode, race, gender, sexuality, or ethnicity
should be entitled to the exact same rights. Nobody can argue with the fact that we are born equal,
only our living circumstances differ. However, this does not

Bill Of Rights Protect Individual Liberties
Inaleinalbe Life
Countless years of abuse and mistreatment to the citizens of a nation can be traced back to the days
of ancient civilization and can still be found to this very moment. With our newly published
Constitution comes great debate on whether or not our government should incorporate a bill of
rights pertaining to the individual liberties of a person. This argument of whether or not to include
this document is rather ridiculous, as it is evident to see our people are in dire need of a bill of
rights to protect our own freedoms. From all kingdoms and nations that have abused their own
hierarchical power, they persisted their maliciousness and stopped at nothing. What then prevents
our own government from continuing this tradition of oppression of their ancestors before them, if
not balanced by our own individual rights....show more content...
As the bill of rights is certain to state the blatant freedoms of the American people, there is a drastic
need for the bill to be integrated in our constitutions. Contrary to the Federalists who are not
seeking to safeguard the independent rights of our people, these are not simply "political
privileges.". The own oppressing monarchs of our forefathers before us mistreated them and derided
their fight for freedom by using such language to ridicule the liberties as mere privileges. The United
States democracy is a government for the people, yet these Federalists do not want the citizens who
reside in this very country to be granted these simple birthrights to keep our leaders balanced
alongside the powers of an

Essay On English Bill Of Rights
Did you know the U.S constitution and the English Bill of Rights are over 200 years old! The U.S
Constitution is a document that states how the government works and its fundamental laws. The
English Bill of Rights is the British law, that declared the rights and liberties of the people. Both
documents protect the rights of its citizens. In the U.S constitution there are 27 amendments and in
the English Bill of Rights there are 13 articles. Both documents have similar laws but is worded
differently. Article six of the English Bill of Rights states, "That the raising or keeping a standing
army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law."
In other words, keeping or raising an army in the kingdom without the approval of the Parliament is
against the Law. This article can also be found in the U.S Bill of Rights, amendment three. Which
states that...show more content...
Which can also be found in the U.S Bill of rights amendment eight. Which states, "Excessive bail
shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Both Amendment eight and Article 10 have the same meanings, but the words are switched up. The
English Bill of Rights and the US Bill of Rights are very important because both documents protect
the rights of its citizens! Both documents, English Bill of Rights and the U.S Constitution have
similar laws, but is worded differently. The laws of both documents can relate with how they give
legal protection for individual rights and its citizens. Although the U.S Constitution has 27
amendments, the first 10 amendments are known as the U.S Bill of Rights. It's amazing how both
the US Bill of Rights and the English Bill of Rights share similar laws and have similar

Essay on The Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights is a list of limitations on the power of the government. Firstly, the Bill of Rights is
successful in assuring the adoption of the Constitution. Secondly, the Bill of Rights did not address
every foreseeable situation. Thirdly, the Bill of Rights has assured the safety of the people of the
nation. Successes, failures, and consequences are what made the Bill of Rights what they are today.
Firstly, the Bill of Rights has guaranteed the adoption of the Constitution. James Madison proposed
the Bill of Rights to the First Federal Congress on June 8, 1789 (Primary Documents 1). The First
Federal Congress then proposed the twelve amendments to the constitution to the state legislatures
(Constitutional Politics in Ohio 1). The...show more content...
An agreement was finally made to create the Bill of Rights to help secure ratification of the
Constitution itself. Secondly, the Bill of Rights did not address every foreseeable situation. One
failure of the Bill of Rights was the first amendment of the original Bill of Rights. The amendment
concerned the number of constituents for each Representative and was never ratified. It said that
once the House has one hundred members, it should not go below one hundred, and once it reached
two hundred, it should not go below two hundred (Mount 1). Another failure was The Anti–Title
Amendment. This amendment said that any citizen who accepted or received any title of nobility
from a foreign power, or who accepted without the consent of Congress any gift from a foreign
power, by would no longer be a citizen (Mount 1). Basically, this said that if someone received or
accepted something from a foreign power, that person would no longer be a citizen. The Anti–Title
Amendment was submitted to the States in 1810 and was ratified by only twelve states, the last
being in 1812 (Mount 1). Thirty–eight states are required to ratify to add an amendment. The
Slavery Amendment was another failure of the Bill of Rights. This amendment was not ratified
because the House did not want any amendment to be made to the Constitution which would
authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any state, with the domestic
institutions thereof, including that of

Argumentative Essay On The Bill Of Rights
The Bill of Rights is one of the most important things in the American government .The Bill of
Rights has 10 Amendments. The fifth one however is one of the important one. The fifth
Amendment deals with police procedures. Along with basic Constitutional limits, or in other words
guidelines that Congress has to follow. The Fifth Amendment is a one of the most important
Amendments because it gives people the rights to speech and privacy, the fifth doesn't let people be
charged with the same felony twice, and it gives citizens the right to a fair trial.
The first reason the fifth amendment is one of the more important amendments is because it gives
people the rights to speech and privacy. "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or other
infamous crime" (Bill of Rights). This states that a person does not have to talk if they do not deem it
fit. Someone can plead the fifth and they just stated that they do not want to talk. On the other hand
some might say that this is not a strong argument because in other countries crime is limited because
people have to speak. "The government continued to take controversial steps restricting media
freedom, justifying them mostly by the need to counter Russia's anti–Ukraine propaganda" (World
Report 2017). This states that when banning the freedom of social media it protects the government
and country from attacks, mainly Russia. Although this is true banning the rights of social media
may cause arguments to break out. The fifth

Bill Of Rights
The pursuit for liberty marked the birth of an acute conflict that developed and intensified in the 18th
Century. War cries and the blood of brave men were a continuous epidemic that plagued the hopeful
prayers of confined men and women. Nearly a decade has passed since the outbreak of the American
Revolution, terminating this awful chapter of human history and revealing the commencement of a
new nation–America. This time, democracy, not an oppressive dictatorship, will fuel the national
government. The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, granting American citizens the opportunity to
exercise their fundamental rights. Of these, freedom of press, religion, and petition are of the greatest
importance, as they form the basis of a strong...show more content...
Great Britain's refusal to answer the people's continuous petitions gave way to a developing tension
between the colonists and the British monarch. For example, the Declaration of Independence also
states that "our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury..." The public aroused
in rage at the thought, occasionally rioting against the British military while demanding for
unalienable rights. The king of the Great Britain, however, responded by persecuting those who
rebelled against the national government and taking away more rights from the people. The
England's Bill of Rights was an early testimony written in the 1600s that exemplified the importance
of the freedom to petition. The document states that "...it is the right of the subjects to petition the
king, and all... prosecutions for such petitioning is illegal." This statement reflects the public's
opinion on petitioning and opposes Britain's cruel punishments in response to such

The Bill of Rights Essay
In the development process of America, its sound that legislative system has a very solid foundation
for the construction of American society. The Bill of Rights as one of the successful act in America,
its importance position has never been ignored. The Bill of Rights was introduced by James Madison
and came into effect on December 15, 1791. It has given the powerful support for the improvements
of American society. The Bill of Rights has become an essential part in guaranteeing the further
development of culture. The influence of The Bill of Rights can be easily found in its cultural
revolutionizing. It can not only guarantee the harmonious relationship among all the walk of society,
but can also promote the construction of harmonious...show more content...
The Bill of Rights not only enhanced the timely and validity of news communication, but also
played a unique role in the reporting of the important news events and fully satisfying people's
need for information. It has become a common practice for the online media to make live
broadcasts of the Stakeholders Congresses. The role of The Bill of Rights in supervision is giving
full play. The Bill of Rights has actively created conditions for civilian to supervise the
government, and attaches great importance to the role of the poor group in supervision. Civilians
at all levels are required to investigate and resolve in a timely manner all problems reported to the
government by civilian via the The Bill of Rights, and to inform civilian of the results. On the
great majority of government websites, relevant email addresses and telephone numbers are made
public, so that civilians can be informed of problems by the hardworking of The Bill of Rights. In
order to strength civilian's reporting of corrupt and degenerate officials, the central discipline
inspection and supervision authorities and other relevant bodies have set up informant websites.
"Over 60 percent of civilians have a positive opinion to the role of The Bill of Rights in
supervision, and consider it an expression of government's socialist democracy and progress"(The
Constitution and the Bill of Rights, p153). The Bill of

The "Bill of rights" had been proposed as a follow up to Parliament's original Habeas Corpus bill,
which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty. Now just about every colony had a bill of
rights, so James Madison suggested that if the United States was to survived as a a country it
would need to have a set of rules versus thirtheen and every state would have the same rules. In
1789, James Madison proposed a series of legislative articles to the first United States congress,
but the processes took a while; Madison proposed twelve but only ten became known as the "Bill
of Rights" in December 15, 1791. Brant gives a summary of how these amendments proposed by
James Madison, would be added quickly to the Constitution: The first ten...show more content...
Bill of Rights with its earlier analogue, noting that even in the colonial period Americans had
progressed far beyond the English in securing their rights....The English "Bill of Rights," its exalted
name notwithstanding, had a narrow range of protections, including the freedom of petition, free
speech for members of Parliament, and, in language closely followed by the American Eighth
Amendment, bans on excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. As an
antecedent of the American Bill of Rights, the English one was a skimpy affair, though important
as a symbol of the rule of law and of fundamental law. (Levy 5). But it is important to realize the the
English "Bill of Rights" had been proposed as a sort of follow–up to Parliament's original Habeas
Corpus bill, which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty. Although Habeas Corpus still serves as
the legal bedrock of the freedom but left to one's judgment or choice in the lives of individuals by the
state, it falls far short of the extraordinary number of counts of liberties that would comprise the
Constitution's first ten amendments. Madison's proposals would compensate for the "skimpy"
character that Levy attributes to these existing provisions, from which the American authors of the
Constitution derived little more than the name and the

Bill Of Rights Essay
The Bill of Rights is, perhaps, the most important, meaningful, and controversial part of the United
States Constitution. The document is one of most influential of its kind in the history of the country.
A disagreement between the Federalists and Anti–federalists brought the first ten amendments to the
forefront all at once, making the constitution, as a whole, able to be agreed upon. As an American,
each of the ten amendments is of varying importance to the individual citizen. Subjective as it is to
rank the Bill of Rights from most important to least important, ranking can shed some light on the
importance of the document to Americans from then, now and even into the future. For a long time
in the history of the United States of America the Bill of Rights was in the background and provided
little controversy for the young country. Starting in the 20th century, though, the political document
has come under intense scrutiny on how to be interpreted correctly by scholars, politicians, and even
normal citizens (Schwartz 13). The clarity...show more content...
There are five main parts to this amendment that make it the most important. It prohibits the
making of any laws that might confine religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, right to
peaceably assemble, or the right to petition government (Levy 40). There is a lot to take apart in
this bill, granting it much of its gravity. Furthermore, there is much ambiguity here for what exactly
the definition of "religion" might be in the wording or "speech" or "press" (Bodehhamer 23). The
ambiguity has led to many supreme court cases having to define the reach of this amendment and
how it should be interpreted (24). This amendment has all the basics of what the forefathers were
aiming for in a free society, despite the ambiguity. The root of the rest of the Bill of Rights stems
from this one, which makes it the most important of the

Bill Of Rights Impact On Society
The enlightenment had a big impact on today's government and on us as people. For instance the
bill of rights helped create and shape the laws that we have today. People have different views on
things because of what they did when the country was just beginning. We have freedom to enjoy
because of the ideas that were vocalized. The declaration of independence had a big impact
because it make america its own country, and not a part of britain. America became its own
because the people didn't like how the king was treating them. He refused to follow his own laws
that would make everyone else have an easier time. It is stated in the declaration, "He has refused
his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good"(1). Our founding
fathers did not like this, so we made sure that people followed the laws and no one is exempt. This
was part of the natural rights belief because everyone was given the same rules and had to follow
them (equality). He also imposed taxes without asking them and cut off trading. It is stated, "For
cutting off our trade with all parts of the world: For imposing Taxes on us without our consent" (16).
Meaning he didn't let them import or export anything, and...show more content...
The first right written is the foundation to what american freedom is. Stated is, "the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, ot of the press; or the right of the peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government of a reress of grievances" (1). We, as americans, have
the basic rights of saying, thinking, and expressing what we want to, when we want to. This is
what voltaire stood by. We also don't have house soldiers if we don't want to. Its stated, "no
soldier shall, in a time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in
time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by war" (3). This was locke's

English Bill Of Rights Essay
Not to be confused with the American Bill of Rights, the English Bill of Rights was written in
1689. What they really were was an act declaring the rights and liberties of the subject and settling
the succession of the crown. Like the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights is a basic and fundamental
document of the constitution law in England. The reason for the bill of rights was to ensure and
guarantee the safety of the human rights that the citizens were ought to have. The bill of rights
reduced the power the monarch had on the civilians, and gave the civilians more power towards the
monarchs.
The English Bill of Rights came after the defeat of King James II and the crowning of William III
and Mary as the new joint rulers of England. Some of these rights included the rights to bear arms,
the rights to...show more content...
The citizens have full control of who is appointed to any position regarding the government. And if
so it happens that the people don't like the way they are being governed, then by law, they can
petition the people in power off power.
The Bill of Rights hasn't only had a positive effect on England, but they also influenced other
countries to create Bill of Rights of their own. The Kingdom of Scotland also had a similar
document written in 1689, United States of America also has a similar concept of the Bill of Rights.
Its influence can also be seen in the United Nations Declaration of Human rights and the European
Convention on Human rights. All of these countries had a similar problem, too much power
belonging to one person without the system of checks and balances.
The Bill of rights were intended not only to ensure basic human rights to the Englishmen, but to also
limit the power that the monarch had on the people. The Englishmen had already learned a lot from
the previous kings, and they knew a constitutional document was needed to save the people from an
absolute

Do you know what keeps, and has kept America in order since 1789? That would be The Bill of
Rights. The Bill of Rights is simply the first ten amendments. Written by James Madison, The Bill of
Rights lists specific prohibitions on governmental power. The Bill of Rights was officially added into
the constitution in 1791. The amendments are on display in the National Archives Museum. The
First Amendment states that "everybody has freedom of speech, press, and religion." The First
Amendment allows us, as U.S. citizens to speak freely about our feelings throughout the
government. The First Amendment could possibly be the most important in the whole Bill of
Rights. This amendment affects us in our daily life, whether we're teenagers or adults...show more
content...
The law is allowed to search a person if they see things suspicious, which could possibly lead to
crimes. The Fifth Amendment states that " no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except for
cases arising in the land and naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of war
or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy
of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be
deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be
taken for public use, without just compensation." This amendment states in the first line that, no
one can be put on trial for a serious crime unless decided by a Grand Jury that there is enough
proof to need a trial. It also states if there is enough proof then the Grand Jury can decide to indict
them and they can be charged with the crime. The second line states that military personnel can go
to a trial without a Grand Jury first deciding so, this is only applicable in time of war or national
emergency. In the third line of the Fifth Amendment states that if someone is put on trial and the
trial ends then the person cannot

Bill Of Rights Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Writing Services

More from Custom Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Bill Of Rights Essay