Essays On Politics

Essay on Power and Politics
Introduction Have you ever wondered what role politics and power play in organizations? When
used effectively they can be compatible in reaching the organizations goals. Power is defined as the
ability to get someone to do something you want done or the ability to make things happen in the
way you want them. (Schermerhorn, Hunt, and Osborn, Chap. 15). Power is important within
organizations because it is the way in which management influences individuals to make things
happen. When power and influence combine, most of the time "politics" become involved in some
manner which may pose some problems. Organizational politics is best described as management
influenced by self–interest through the use of means not necessarily...show more content...
Information can be controlled to a "need to know" basis and/or just limited to the upper
management. This type of power compliments the legitimate power. Finally, there is Representative
power in which an organization uses an individual to be there spokesperson both within the
organization and when dealing with people outside of the organization. The second source of power
that influences individuals and organizations behaviors is known as Personal Power. This power
focuses more on the individual's independent nature within the position that he or she has been
placed. There are three sources under this power that are apparent in most organizations that are well
managed. The first is expert power in which control is based on the knowledge or experience that the
individual possesses in the position that he or she holds. Rational persuasion is the power to control
behavior by being able to show the desirable out comes through reasonable and acceptable means
within an organization. With the diverse personalities within an organization it is essential to have
management that is levelheaded and rational. The final basis of control within personal power is
referent power. It is controlling an individual's behavior within an organization by allowing them to
identify with the source of power that is over them.
Organizational Politics
The official definition of organizational politics
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on American Politics
Every two to four years, politicians aspire to demonstrate their competency for political office.
Political campaigns and organizations concentrate millions of dollars to undercut and outlast the
opposition. They drag names through the mud, as if it were the next step on the political "corporate
ladder." The American people, caught in the middle, are torn between the need for elected officials
and the heartbreak of countless shattered oaths. Consequently, they dissociate themselves from
misused words like Democrat, Republican, and change. They have learned to bite their tongue, drink
their beer and leave well enough alone. That's exactly what the politicians want. In 1933, the
political landscape attained a new twist: "No single...show more content...
Sinclair was the author of over forty fictional books. In those books were quotes, from fictional
characters, that Campaigns, Inc. used as Sinclair's own words in the L.A. Times. Campaigns, Inc.
didn't just omit a couple words to suit their needs. They forged a man's beliefs (Lepore). This
tradition of dishonesty carries through to today. Now, hiring a political consultant is a requirement
and a warning: we will do whatever it takes to win (Cain 377). Ironically, Leone Baxter once voiced
that political consulting "must be in the hands of the most ethical, principle[d] people . . . or else it
will erode into the hands of people who have no regard for the world around them. It could be a
very, very destructive thing" (Lepore 59). In America's political history, there has never existed a
person, who fits Baxter's standards. The first five presidents, who helped instigate America's
freedom, were still trapped in monarchy's glamour: They hated monarchial rule, yet desired the
appearance of a king. Their periods of rule was marked with great ideologies, yet blotted with law
that was quite contrary. With the election of the seventh president, Andrew Jackson, George
Washington's political party–free America was abandoned. Jackson "compared to . . . John Quincy
Adams . . . was poorly educated, with rather limited experience as a public servant. Yet his
popularity among voters had reached

The History of Politics Essay
Many people ponder the nature of politics. Politics is an art, a way of thinking, and a public,
idealistic profession, though it is sometimes succumbs to corruption and a lack of ideals, that often
changes the course of world events. Mortals of reason and influence express their ideas in order to
form or reform a group's policy. In democratic society, the populous is able express and apply their
inherent views into an arena that beholds a battle for the consensus. However, the premise of the
people engaging in free reason and the appointment of representatives of that reason has not always
been the case in the historical spectrum. Throughout the course of history, politics has changed from
being a totalitarian regime to permitting the...show more content...
Many ancient monarchies have been defined for their interest for expansion. For example, the
Neo–Assyrian Empire (1900–605 B.C.) was driven principally by the amount of territory they
conquered. Over a thousand years later, the Hunnic Empire (370–469 A.D.) was formed through a
barbarian people conquering portions of civilization in a relatively short period of time. In addition
to gaining territory, some civilizations wished to spread a culture. Alexander the Great's expansion
into the former Persian Empire was partially for the purpose of spreading Hellenic civilization.
Also, Spain's quest for gold in Central and South America was justified, according to the
conquistadors and the Church, by the spreading of Christianity to the native peoples. Third,
monarchies were driven by control of the people. This can be seen throughout history, most notably
in the Chinese dynasties. What drove this principle of monarchy to near extinction? The idea of
rulers and empires will never change in the terrestrial sense, but the limits of rule did improve in the
middle ages. There are multiple reasons for this, but corrupt entities always fall. Hosea 8:1 states,
"They set up kings without my consent. They chose princes without my approval. With their silver
and gold they make idols for themselves to their own destruction." Absolute rule did not end, but the

Global Politics Essay
Global Politics
The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of politics in the
broadest domain. The domain of international politics in the twenty–first century is characterised by
the increasing number of actors pursuing common and personal interests. It is largely due to the
globalised, interdependent nature of the current international political environment that the concepts
of sovereignty and power deserve further evaluation.
The exercise of authority and power are facts as old as time, throughout the ages men have tried to
explain and understand how and why political authority is organised. Sovereignty is a concept used
to explain political power, to...show more content...
But the appearance of the concept is still delayed until the community and its government, society
and state, remaining necessarily distinct in some respects, have integrated to a certain extent in
others. It is only when the community responds to the state and the state responds to the community
in which it rules that the discussion of political power can take place in terms of sovereignty"
(1986:21).
The importance of what Hinsley said lies in the fact that sovereignty cannot exists without a state
and will not be found in societies in which there is no state structure. Sovereignty is a political idea,
a form of legitimation, a way of thinking about power and rule (Hinsley 1986:25). The question that
then must be asked is what caused people, rulers, philosophers and scholars to begin to think about
power and rule in terms of state and sovereignty?
Since the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, the state has been regarded and accepted as the basic unit of
international politics and the concept of the sovereignty of states was formally recognised. But the
ideas of state and sovereignty had been slowly emerging in Europe in the centuries preceding 1648.
The concept of the state emerged out of the collapse of the feudal system (Nossal

Essay on Politics by Aristotle
The subject which the question focuses on is the view of Aristotle's ideal state. The distinction
between hierarchy and equality is at the heart of the understanding of Aristotle's ideal state. He
claims that an ideal state ought to be arranged to maximise the happiness of its citizens. So
happiness together with political action is the telos of human life. This end can be reached by living
a better ethical life. However, he endorses hierarchy over equality. On one hand we have the equality
which benefits everyone; on the other hand we have the distinction of classes meant in terms of
diversities and differences where the middle one appears to be the means through which the state is
balanced. Furthermore what is clear for Aristotle is that...show more content...
I will now start with the analysis of the relevance in an ideal state of ruling and being ruled.
Aristotle's view on this is clear, he says that citizens should rule and be ruled in turn. He claims that
those who rule and those who obey are the same. At this level, therefore, Aristotle seems to praise
equality. He says:
"... it is obviously necessary on many grounds that all the citizens alike should take their turn of
governing and being governed. Equality consists in the same treatment of similar persons, and no
government can stand which is not founded upon justice. For if the government be unjust everyone
in the country unites with the governed in the desire to have a revolution ..."
I strongly agree with this concept of the cyclical flow of power. I find it as a perfect way to achieve
a well–spread equality in society and for this reason it is needed to have a more equal distribution
of justice. In addition to this he then argues that: "... for he who would learn to command well
must [...] first of all learn to obey." He thinks that those who were firstly ruled, when they have
power they will rule in a better way, because they will understand the meaning of being ruled. I
once again agree with this view, I believe that this mutual change of roles lets citizens think more
carefully on the meaning of ruling and being ruled. As a matter of fact, if we want to live in a state
where justice is its main feature we have to prevent the

Essay about Defining Politics
Defining Politics Politics is the collective name given to many different systems, ideas and real
world issues. It is impossible to define politics as any one thing in particular, but as a label for many
different aspects of life encompassed into one.
Politics is largely about decision making, Politicians dispute on a regular basis about pending
decisions to be made. Decisions to be made, of course vary in size and some are obviously much
more important than others. Nevertheless, politics nearly always sets–out to make decisions in the
best ways irrespective of how big or small they may be. Groups of...show more content...
Politics strives to reduce this conflict and keep it to a minimum. Politics is responsible for taking all
views into consideration and reaching a consensus – something all people involved can agree on to a
certain extent.
Politics also goes hand in hand with the concept of power. Power, in any form of politics is of
utmost importance, without power, politicians wouldn't be able to enforce rulings on a
population. Power concerns being able to get others to do/act as other people would like them to.
Power can be enforced in a number of different ways, power, of course cannot be assumed unless
the people with power have something strong to back up their rulings. Sometimes, force is used to
provoke obedience (coercion), while a legitimate government will often not need to resort to means
of force. People are likely to comply with the law simply because they believe the government to be
making the correct decisions. Coercion and legitimacy work in tandem to maintain obedience.
Politics concerns people, people's involvement in politics is key in running an efficient political
system. Voting is possibly the most important aspect of political activity. Elections are held in which
people vote for their preferred political party, while referendums also play a key part in making
major political decisions. Political involvement doesn't stop with voting. Pressure Groups can be
joined in

Essay about What is Politics?
Politics. It is possibly the most hated word in the English language. Most people hate politics and
government without really knowing what they are. Many different definitions of politics exist. One
definition defines politics as the conflict between groups over something they both want. Another
similar definition calls politics the "who gets what, when, and how." Government is defined as the
institution that has the enforceable right to control people's behavior. But why do people hate politics
and politicians? Is it because politicians cannot be trusted, or maybe because they spend too much
money? Whatever the reasons are for hating politics and government, both are needed as a
mechanism for people to protect themselves. Possibly, if...show more content...
The third and final type of monarchy is an absolute monarchy. In an absolute monarchy, the
monarchy has supreme and absolute authority to do what it wishes. An example of this occurs in the
country of Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, theroyal family can enforce any law it wishes– no matter
how bad it could be for the country. Absolute monarchies are often very oppressive to its people.
For example, Saudi Arabia has very strict laws that have been put in place by the royal family. The
people living in the country have no voice in an absolute monarchy.
The second type of government is a republic. A republic is any government that does not have a
monarch. Republics are also divided into three classes. A republic can be classified as a dictatorship,
an oligarchy, or a democracy.
A dictatorship is a government ruled by one commander. An example of this is Iraq. Saddam
Hussein is the dictator of Iraq. Whatever he decides becomes law. Dictatorships are similar to
absolute monarchies in that they are very oppressive to the people of the country. The major
difference between the two is that absolute monarchies are families inheriting their power while
dictatorships often result from military takeovers or from an elected official who refuses to step
down from his elected office.
The second type of republic is an oligarchy. An oligarchy is a country ruled by the few. An example
of this was in South Africa

Essays On Politics

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Writing Services

More from Custom Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essays On Politics