SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 34
Download to read offline
5.1
Chapter 5
Representation of Synchronous Machines for Stability studies
The equations (3.149) – (3.157) and (3.161) - (3.162) of Chapter 3 representing
the synchronous machine dynamics, equations (4.27) – (4.29), (4.54) - (4.55) and
(4.65) given in Chapter 4 representing the dynamics of generator exciter, steam
turbine and speed governor describes the complete behaviour of a steam generating
system. However, the q -axis of the synchronous generator has to be located with
respect to some reference in order to define the rotor angle. The synchronous
generator terminal conditions like complex voltage, real and reactive power decide the
rotor angle. The synchronous generator terminal conditions in turn depend on the
interaction of the synchronous generator with the network conditions. While
representing a synchronous machine in a system, the representation should include the
dynamic behaviour of the generator as well as its interaction with the network. The
effect of synchronous machine interaction with the rest of the network can be
understood through the steady state conditions.
5.1 Steady State Condition
In the steady state condition the rotor rotates at synchronous speed. Since rotor
rotates at synchronous speed the damper winding currents 1 1 2, ,d q qI I I are zero. Since
the synchronous generator is in steady state, left hand side of equations (3.149) to
(3.157) will become zero. Hence, from equations (3.149) to (3.157) the following
expression can be written
d s d qV R I    (5.1)
q s q dV R I    (5.2)
' '
( )fd q d d dE E X X I   (5.3)
' '
1 ( )d q d ls dE X X I    (5.4)
' '
( )d q q qE X X I  (5.5)
' '
2 ( )q d q ls qE X X I     (5.6)
5.2
Taking the d-axis flux linkage equations in the steady state we get
( )d d d md fdX I X I    (5.7)
( )fd md d fd fdX I X I    (5.8)
Eliminating the filed current fdI from equations (5.7) and (5.8), equation (5.7) can be
written
2
' '
( )md md
d d d fd d d q
fd fd
X X
X I X I E
X X
        (5.9)
Similarly,
' '
q q q dX I E    (5.10)
Substituting equation (5.9) and (5.10) in equations (5.1) and (5.2) lead to
' '
d s d q q dV R I X I E    (5.11)
' '
q s q d d qV R I X I E    (5.12)
Let the three-phase terminal voltage be given in per unit as
cos( )
cos( 120 )
cos( 120 )
ta m s
tb m s
tc m s
v V t
v V t
v V t
 
 
 
 
   
   
(5.13)
by applying Park’s transformation defined in Chapter 3, we get
cos( )
sin( )
d m s s
q m s s
V V t
V V t
  
  
  
  
(5.14)
5.3
Here, s is the angle between the d -axis and the phase-a mmf axis. Let
0s st    where 0 is the initial angle between the d -axis and the phase-a mmf
axis at time 0t  , also noting that in per unit the RMS value of the voltage  tV and
peak value of the voltage  mV are one and the same, equation (5.14) can be written
as
0
0
cos( )
sin( )
d t
q t
V V
V V
 
 
 
 
(5.15)
From (5.15) it can be observed that though ,d qV V are scalar quantities, due the
trigonometric nature of the equation the terminal voltage  tV can be represented as a
ac phasor in dq  axis. Just like an ac phasor in real and imaginary axis rotating at
synchronous speed in electrical radians the dq  axis also rotates at the speed of the
rotor which is synchronous speed in steady state. Hence, the terminal voltage can be
represented as a phasor in dq  axis as
0t d qV V jV     (5.16)
Where, 2 2
t d qV V V  and angle 0   is the angle between the terminal
voltage phasor and d  axis as shown in Fig. 5.1. Instead of taking the angle between
the d  axis and terminal voltage phasor let us take the angle between the terminal
voltage phasor and the q  axis represented as  090      . Then we get
 sin( ) cos( )d q t tV jV V j V     (5.17)
5.4
Fig. 5.1: Phasor diagram of terminal voltage in dq  axis
Here, tV is a complex quantity in dq  axis. Similarly, the stator current tI lagging
the terminal voltage tV by an angle  , can be expressed as a phasor in dq  axis as
 sin( ) cos( )d q t tI jI I j I         (5.18)
Substituting equations (5.11) and (5.12) in equation (5.17), the following expression
can be written
 ' ' ' '
t s d q q d s q d d qV R I X I E j R I X I E        (5.19)
Rearranging terms in (5.19), the following expression can be derived as
 
 
        
    
' ' ' '
' ' ' '
0
' ' ' '
( ) ( ) ( )
fd
t s d q q d s q d d q
s d q q d q q d q q q d d d q
E
s q t d q q q q d d d d d q
s q t q d d fd
V R I X I E j R I X I E
R I jI jX I jI jX I jI X I E j X I E
R jX I E X X I j X X I X X I E
R jX I j X X I E
       
           
 
            
 
 
     
 
…………………………………………………………………………… (5.20)
0 
d-axis
q-axis
tV
5.5
Noting that md
fd fd md fd
fd
X
E V X I
R
  , we can write equation (5.20) as
    md fd d q d t s q tj X I X X I V R jX I     (5.21)
let, the internal voltage of the synchronous generator be represented as
  q md fd d q dE X I X X I   , or   q md fd d q dE j X I X X I   then
 q t s q tE V R jX I   (5.22)
qE is defined as the internal voltage behind the synchronous reactance qX . Equation
(5.22) can be represented as an equivalent electrical circuit as shown in Fig. 5.2.
Fig. 5.2: Electrical equivalent circuit of steady state synchronous generator
From equation (5.22) it can be observed that the internal voltage phasor qE is
aligned along the q  axis as shown in Fig. 5.3. Since qE is aligned along q  axis, it
is at angle  from the terminal voltage tV . This angle  is called as generator rotor
or load angle. The load angle  can be computed if the real power output  tP ,
reactive power output  tQ and terminal voltage  tV of the synchronous generator
are defined. Let us take terminal voltage as the reference and then locate the q  axis
qX sR
tV
qE
tI
5.6
at an angle  with respect to the terminal voltage phasor. The following steps should
be followed
Fig. 5.3: Phasor diagram of the steady state synchronous generator
2 2
1
, cost t t
t
t t t
P Q P
I
V V I
   
   
 
(5.23)
 0q t s q tE V R jX I        (5.24)
1
cos sin
tan
cos sin
q t s t
q
t s t q t
X I R I
E
V R I X I
 

 

 
       
(5.25)
In case of steady state no load condition, the stator currents ,d qI I will become zero
and therefore the following expression holds
'
q q q fd t d md fdV E E E V X I       (5.26)
'
0d d qV E    (5.27)
dV dI
tV

d-axis
q-axis
tI

s tR I
q tjX I
qV
qI
qE
md fdX I
 d q dX X I
5.7
Hence, in the steady state no load case the internal voltage qE and the terminal
voltage tV are one and the same due to which the load angle  becomes zero. As the
load increase the load angle  also increases. It can also be observed that for 1 pu ,
internal voltage or terminal voltage in steady state no-load condition the field current
should be
1
fd
md
I
X
 .
The load angle computed in equation (5.25) is with respect to the dq -axis of a
particular generator. In multi-machine systems there should be a common reference
instead of multiple individual generator references. Usually in a network with
multiple machines a slack bus or a reference bus is defined and all other bus angles in
the network are defined with respect to the common reference bus. Hence there
should be a conversion from dq -axis of individual generator to common reference in
real-imaginary (RI) axis or it is conversion from machine reference frame to common
network reference frame.
Fig. 5.4: Terminal voltage phasor in dq -axis and RI-axis
The load angle previously was defined as the angle by which the q-axis leads the
terminal voltage phasor but now it should be defined as the angle by which the q-axis
lead the common reference R-axis. In steady state both dq -axis and RI-axis rotate at
electrical synchronous speed hence the load angle in the new reference frame is fixed
for a given load condition. Even in case of transients since the effect of rotor speed
R-axis
q-axis

I-axis
tV
d-axis

RV
IV
qV dV
5.8
variation on stator voltage is neglected the load angle can still be considered fixed.
From the phasor diagram shown in Fig. 5.4 the following expression can be derived
cos sin cos
sin cos sin
R t d q
I t d q
V V V V
V V V V
  
  
   

    
(5.28)
   
  2
sin cos sin cos
( ) sin cos ( )
j
t R I d q q d
j
d q d q
V e V jV V V j V V
V jV j V jV e



   
 
 
 
 
     
    
(5.29)
   2
( ) sin cos
j
d q t t tV jV V e V jV

 
   
 
  
 
      (5.30)
Hence, when ever the stator voltage current expressed in dq -axis needs to be
transformed to network reference frame or RI-axis multiply the complex voltage or
current in dq -axis with the factor 2
j
e


 
 
 
where  the load angle is the angle
between the q-axis of the individual generator with respect to the common reference
phasor R-axis.
To understand conversion from dq -axis to common reference let us take the
case of a single machine connected to an infinite bus with a voltage 0j
V e through a
transmission line with impedance T TR jX .
Fig. 5.5: Equivalent electrical circuit of single machine connected to an infinite bus
The generator terminal voltage is j
tV e 
. Let the generator stator current be j
tI e 
and the power factor angle is defined as     . Both the angles  and  are
taken with respect to the infinite bus voltage phasor. Let the generator supply a
complex power P jQ to the infinite bus. From the equivalent circuit shown in Fig.
5.5 the following expressions can be written
0j
V e
qX sR
2
( )
j
j
d q tV jV e V e



 
 
 
 2
j
qE e


 
 
 
2
( )
j
d qI jI e


 
 
 

TX TR
P jQ
5.9
j
t j
t
P jQ
I e
V e



 (5.31)
 
 
2 2 2
( ) ( )
j j j
q d q s q d q
j j
t s q t
E e V jV e R jX I jI e
V e R jX I e
  
  
 
     
       
     
    
  
(5.32)
Substituting   q q md fd d q dE jE j X I X X I    in equation (5.32) we get
 2
j
j j j
q q t s q tjE e E e V e R jX I e


  
 
 
 
    (5.33)
The load angle  can be obtained from (5.33) and this angle is again with
respect to the infinite bus voltage phasor. Equation (5.33) can also be represented as a
phasor diagram as shown in Fig. 5.6. The network equations that is the relation
between the terminal voltage, stator current and the infinite bus voltage can also be
expressed in terms of dq -axis parameters as
 
 
02 2
2
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
j j
j
d q T T d q
j
d q T T d q
V jV e V e R jX I jI e or
V jV V e R jX I jI
 
 


   
    
   

 
  
 

    
     (5.34)
From equation (5.34) separating real and imaginary terms we can get
sin
cos
d dT T
q qT T
V IR X V
V IX R V




      
       
      
(5.35)
The real and reactive power generated by the generator in terms of dq -axis
parameters is given as
 
   
*
*
2 2
( ) ( )
j j
j j
t t d q d q
d d q q q d d q
S P jQ V e I e V jV e I jI e
V I V I j V I V I
 
 
 
   
    
   
 
      
 
 
   
(5.36)
5.10
The electrical torque output is given as, by substituting equation (5.1) and (5.2) for
stator flux linkages,
      
 
  
2 2
*2
( )
e d q q d q s q q d s d d
d d q q s q d
j j
s t q t
T I I V R I I V R I I
V I V I R I I
P R I real E e I e 
       
   
  
(5.37)
It can be understood from equation (5.37) that the per unit electric torque produced is
equal to the real power delivered by the dependent source j
qE e 
.
Fig. 5.6: Phasor diagram of steady state synchronous generator connected to infinite
bus
5.2 Multi-Machine System Representation
In a power system there will be multiple synchronous machines with their
respective exciters, turbines, speed governors and load distributed throughout the
d-axisdV dI
tV

q-axis
tI
s tR I
q tjX I
qV
qI
qE
md fdX I
 d q dX X I
R-axis
I-axis

 
V
5.11
system. The synchronous machines and load are connected through power system
network that is through transformers and transmission lines. For a total system
representation the system network model also should be included along with the
synchronous machine, exciter, turbine, speed governor and static/dynamic load.
Let there be a system with n number of buses. Let m represent number of load
buses and gn number of generator buses and hence gn number of generators. The
dynamics of an th
i generator along with the exciter, steam turbine and speed governor
are given as
 
' ' "
' ' ' '
1' 2
'
( )
( ) ( )
( )
qi di di
doi di di di qi di lsi di di
di lsi
qi fdi
dE X X
T X X I E X X I
dt X X
E E

 
       
 
 
(5.38)
" ' '1
1( )di
doi qi di lsi di di
d
T E X X I
dt

    (5.39)
 
' "'
' ' ' ' '
2' 2
( )
( ) ( )
( )
qi qidi
qoi di qi qi qi di qi lsi qi qi
qi lsi
X XdE
T E X X I E X X I
dt X X

 
       
  
(5.40)
2" ' '
2( )
qi
qoi di qi lsi qi qi
d
T E X X I
dt

     (5.41)
i
i base
d
dt

   (5.42)
 
2 i i
mi ei i i base
base
H d
T T D
dt

 

    (5.43)
 ( )fdi
Ei Ri Ei Ei fdi fdi
dE
T V K S E E
dt
   (5.44)
 , Min MaxRi Ai Fi
Ai Ri Ai Fi fdi Ai refi ti Ri Ri Ri
Fi
dV K K
T V K R E K V V V V V
dt T
        (5.45)
Fi Fi
Fi fdi
Fi
dR K
R E
dt T
   (5.46)
1Mi HPi RHi HPi RHi
RHi Mi CHi SVi
CHi CHi
dT K T K T
T T P P
dt T T
 
     
 
(5.47)
CHi
CHi CHi SVi
dP
T P P
dt
   (5.48)
5.12
1
1 ,0 MaxSVi i
SVi SVi refi SVi SVi
Di base
dP
T P P P P
dt R


 
       
 
(5.49)
Stator algebraic equations are given as
" ' "
" '
1' '
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
di lsi di di
di di qi di qi si qi
di lsi di lsi
X X X X
X I E V R I
X X X X

 
    
 
(5.50)
" ' "
" '
2' '
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
qi lsi qi qi
qi qi di qi di si di
qi lsi qi lsi
X X X X
X I E V R I
X X X X

 
     
 
(5.51)
Here, 1,2......... gi n . These gn generators are connected to the network. In a
power system network with n number of buses, the injected current at all the n buses
can be written in terms of admittance matrix and the bus voltages. The current
injected at th
i bus is given as, where 1,2.........i n ,
1
ij j
n
j j
i ij j
j
I Y e V e
 

  (5.52)
Where, ijj
ijY e

is the ( , )i j element of the admittance matrix. jj
jV e

is the bus voltage
at th
j bus. The complex power injected at th
i bus can be written as
   *
1
i j iji
n
jj
i i i i i j ij
j
P jQ V e I VV Y e
    

    (5.53)
The injected power at any bus is the difference between the power generated at
that bus minus the load power required at that bus. Hence, at th
i bus the injected real
and reactive power can be written as
 
1
cos
n
i Gi Di i j ij i j ij
j
P P P VV Y   

     (5.54)
 
1
sin
n
i Gi Di i j ij i j ij
j
Q Q Q VV Y   

     (5.55)
5.13
Where, ,Gi GiP Q are the real and reactive power generated at th
i bus and ,Di DiP Q
are the real and reactive power loads. The real and reactive power generated at a
generator bus is given as
 
*
2
Real
sin( ) cos( )
i
i
j
j
Gi i di qi
di i i i qi i i i
P V e I jI e
I V I V



   
 
 
 
  
   
    
   
(5.56)
 
*
2
Imaginary
cos( ) sin( )
i
i
j
j
Gi i di qi
di i i i qi i i i
Q V e I jI e
I V I V



   
 
 
 
  
   
    
   
(5.57)
In case static loads they can be represented as a function of the bus voltage as was
explained in Chapter 4. Then equation (5.56) and (5.57) can be written as
 
1
sin( ) cos( ) ( ) cos
n
di i i i qi i i i Di i i j ij i j ij
j
I V I V P V VV Y      

       (5.58)
 
1
cos( ) sin( ) ( ) sin
n
di i i i qi i i i Di i i j ij i j ij
j
I V I V Q V VV Y      

       (5.59)
for, 1,2,......, gi n , generator buses
 
1
( ) cos
n
Di i i j ij i j ij
j
P V VV Y   

    (5.60)
 
1
( ) sin
n
Di i i j ij i j ij
j
Q V VV Y   

    (5.61)
For, 1, 2,......,g gi n n n   , for load buses.
Dynamic equations (5.38) to (5.49), stator algebraic equations (5.50) to (5.51)
and network power balance equations (5.58) to (5.61) together are called as
differential algebraic equations (DAEs) and completely define the behaviour of multi-
5.14
machine power system. In case the loads are dynamic loads then apart from equation
(5.38) to (5.49) and (5.58) to (5.61) the dynamic equations of the loads should also be
considered.
5.2.1 A special case of impedance loads
If loads are represented as constant impedance loads then DAEs given in
equations (5.38) to (5.49) and (5.58) to (5.61) can be simplified to a significant extent.
Suppose load at an th
i bus is represented by an impedance load then, the real and
reactive power drawn by the load is given as
2
i
Li Li
Li
V
P jQ
Z
  (5.62)
* *
Li Li i
Li
i Li
P jQ V
I
V Z

  (5.63)
Where, , ,Li Li LiP Q Z are the real power, reactive power and impedance of a load
at an th
i bus. Substituting equation (5.63) in (5.52), the current injected into th
i bus
can be expressed as
*
1
ij j
n
j ji
i Gi Li Gi ij j
jLi
V
I I I I Y e V e
Z
 

      (5.64)
Let 1
Li LiY Z 
 , then
1
1,2,.......,ij jLi i
n
j jj j
Gi Li i ij j g
j
I Y e V e Y e V e i n
  

   (5.65)
1 2
1
0 , ,.......,ij jLi i
n
j jj j
Li i ij j g g
j
Y e V e Y e V e i n n n
  
 

   (5.66)
5.15
Let a new admittance matrix be formed with the load impedances included as
shunt branches at each bus, represented as BUSY . The equation (5.65) and (5.66) can
be represented as
 
11
11
0
0
gg
gg
G
nGn
BUS
nn
n n
VI
VI
Y
V
V

  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
   


(5.67)
The network voltages and the generator currents can be represented in terms of
the generator internal voltages by making modifications to equations (5.67). This will
eliminate the generator currents and terminal voltages in dynamic equations given in
equations (5.38) to (5.49) reducing the complexity. This also has another advantage
when transient stability analysis is done and this will be explained later.
At an th
i generator bus an additional node is created marked as i with a
voltage  " " 2
ij
i di qiE E jE e


 
 
 
   , representing the generator internal voltage. The
impedance between i i nodes is given as Si diR jX  . Hence, gn numbers of
additional nodes are added to the existing n nodes. The currents injected at these
nodes are given as
 
 
" " 2
" " 2
1
1 1
1,2 ......,
1,2,.......,
i
i
i
i
j
j
i Gi di qi i
Si di
j
j
di qi i g
Si di Si di
g
I I E jE e V e
R jX
E jE e V e i n
R jX R jX
i n






 
 
 

 
 
 
  
        
   
         
     

(5.68)
Note that since i is an additional node connected to an th
i generator node, it is
simply represented with a number same as that of the generator node to which it is
connected but with a prime to differentiate it. Also, now the additional nodes are the
generator nodes injecting a current into the network and at all other network buses the
5.16
current injection is zero. Equation (5.68) can be included in the equation (5.67) which
leads to
1
(1, 1) (1, )1 1 1 1
1 ( , 1) ( , )
11
1 1
0 0
0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0
1
0
0
0
0
g
g g g
g
g
g
n nS d S d
G n n n n
Sng dng Sng dng
Gn
S
n
n
n
R jX R jX
I
R jX R jX
I
R j



   
       
     
     
      
      
          
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

     




1
( 1,1) ( 1, )
( ,1) ( , )
0
(1,1) (1, ) (1, 1) (1, )
1 ( ,1) ( , ) ( , 1) ( , )
0
0 0
0 0
g g g
g
BUS BUS g BUS g BUSd
BUS g BUS g g BUS g g BUS g
Sng dng
n n n
n n n
Y Y n Y n Y nX
Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n
R jX
 
 
        
     
     
             
  
 



 

 
     


 

1
1
1
( 1,1) ( 1, ) ( 1, 1) ( 1, )
( ,1) ( , ) ( , 1) ( , )
g
g
g
n
n
n
BUS g BUS g g BUS g g BUS g
n
BUS BUS g BUS g BUS
E
E
V
V
V
Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n
V
Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n

 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
           
     
                  
 
 
 


  
   


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Let,
1 1
1
0
1
0
g g
S d
II
Sng dng n n
R jX
Y
R jX

 
 
 
 
 
 
  

 

,
(1, 1) (1, )1 1
( , 1) ( , )
1
0
0 0
1 0 0
0
g
g g g
g
n nS d
IN
n n n n
Sng dng
n n
R jX
Y
R jX



  
        
    
    
    
    


   
5.17
(1,1) (1, ) (1, 1) (1, )
( ,1) ( , ) ( , 1) ( , )
( 1,1) ( 1, ) ( 1, 1
( ,1) ( , )
BUS BUS g BUS g BUS
BUS g BUS g g BUS g g BUS g
BUS
BUS g BUS g g BUS g g
BUS BUS g
Y Y n Y n Y n
Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n
Y
Y n Y n n Y n n
Y n Y n n
      
   
   
         
 
      
 
 
   
 
   

 
) ( 1, )
( , 1) ( , )
BUS g
BUS g BUS
Y n n
Y n n Y n n
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
  
     

 
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
, ,
g
g
g g
g g
G
n
G N
n
Gn n
n n
n n
V
I E
V
V
I E
V

 

 
 
                               
 
 
I E V

 

Then,
       
'
1 1
0
g gg g
II ING
T
IN BUSn n n nn n n n
Y Y
Y Y     
    
     
     N
EI
V
(5.69)
From equation (5.69) it can be seen that,
1' T
BUS INY Y

    NV E (5.70)
1' T
G II IN BUS INY Y Y Y

        
I E (5.71)
From equation (5.70) and (5.71) it can be observed that the network voltages
and the generator currents, represented by the vector NV and GI , can be obtained
directly from the internal voltages vector E without the need to solve stator
algebraic and network power balance equations.
5.18
5.2.2 Initial Conditions
Before doing any stability analysis the system along with its generators, loads
and network should be initialized. These are the steps which should be followed for
initializing the system
Step 1
The network real and reactive power balance equations given in equations (5.58) to
(5.61) should be solved. Solving equations (5.58) to (5.61) is nothing but doing load
flow analysis. After load flow analysis all the network bus complex voltages, real and
reactive powers injected at a bus are know.
Step 2
Find the internal load angle of each generator. This can be done as following
  1,2,.....i i Gij j j
i i si qi Gi gE e V e R jX I e i n  
    (5.72)
After load flow analysis the network bus voltages are known. The currents generated
by each generator are also known. With this information an internal voltage can be
defined for all the generators as given in equation (5.72). The internal load angle i of
an th
i generator is the angle of the complex internal voltage ij
iE e 
.
Step 3
Calculate the ,d q axis components of voltages, currents and fluxes
 sindi i i iV V    (5.73)
 cosqi i i iV V    (5.74)
 sindi Gi i GiI I    (5.75)
5.19
 cosqi i i GiI I    (5.76)
' '
di di si di qi qiE V R I X I   (5.77)
' '
qi qi si qi di diE V R I X I   (5.78)
' '
( )fdi qi di di diE E X X I   (5.79)
' '
1 ( )di qi di lsi diE X X I    (5.80)
' '
2 ( )qi di qi lsi qiE X X I     (5.81)
Fi
Fi fdi
Fi
K
R E
T
 (5.82)
 ( )Ri Ei Ei fdi fdiV K S E E  (5.83)
Ri
refi i
Ai
V
V V
K
  (5.84)
i base  (5.85)
SVi refiP P (5.86)
CHi SViP P (5.87)
Mi CHiT P (5.88)
ei MiT T (5.89)
The synchronous machine model along with the exciter, turbine and speed
governor model given in (5.38) to (5.49) can be simplified significantly my making
some assumptions. This simplification can lead to significant reduction in
computational complexity [1]-[2]. The various models that can be derived by
simplifying equations (5.38) to (5.49) is given below
5.3 Sub-transient Model with Stator and Network Transients
Neglected
The rate of changes of the stator flux linkages ,d q   (here dot means rate of
change with respect to time) in equation (3.149) and (3.150) in Chapter 3, can be
neglected. The reason behind this is that the stator, which is connected to the rest of
5.20
the network electrically, has very fast transients as compared to the rotor. Compared
to the slow dynamics of the rotor the stator dynamics can be considered to be very fast
and hence any change or disturbance in the stator or the network can be considered as
an instantaneous change without any dynamics. This leads to reduction in
computational complexity drastically as the network transient also need not be
considered along with stator transients. With these assumptions the synchronous
machine dynamics along with exciter, turbine and governor are given as
q d s dV R I    (5.90)
d q s qV R I   (5.91)
0o s oV R I  (5.92)
 
' ' "
' ' ' ' '
1' 2
( )
( ) ( )
( )
q d d
do q d d d q d ls d d fd
d ls
dE X X
T E X X I E X X I E
dt X X

 
         
 
(5.93)
" ' '1
1( )d
do q d ls d d
d
T E X X I
dt

    (5.94)
 
' "'
' ' ' ' '
2' 2
( )
( ) ( )
( )
q qd
qo d q q q d q ls q q
q ls
X XdE
T E X X I E X X I
dt X X

 
       
  
(5.95)
2" ' '
2( )
q
qo d q ls q q
d
T E X X I
dt

     (5.96)
base
d
dt

   (5.97)
 
2
m e base
base
H d
T T D
dt

 

    (5.98)
 ( )fd
E R E E fd fd
dE
T V K S E E
dt
   (5.99)
 R A F
A R A in R A F fd A ref t
F
dV K K
T V K V V K R E K V V
dt T
         (5.100)
F F
F fd
F
dR K
R E
dt T
   (5.101)
1M HP RH HP RH
RH M CH SV
CH CH
dT K T K T
T T P P
dt T T
 
     
 
(5.102)
5.21
CH
CH CH SV
dP
T P P
dt
   (5.103)
1
1SV
SV SV ref
D s
dP
T P P
dt R


 
     
 
(5.104)
" ' "
" '
1' '
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
d ls d d
d d d q d
d ls d ls
X X X X
X I E
X X X X
 
 
   
 
(5.105)
" ' "
" '
2' '
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
q ls q q
q q q d q
q ls q ls
X X X X
X I E
X X X X
 
 
   
 
(5.106)
Equations (5.90), (5.91) can be substituted in (5.105) and (5.106) which lead to
" ' "
" '
1' '
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
d ls d d
d d q d q s q
d ls d ls
X X X X
X I E V R I
X X X X

 
    
 
(5.107)
" ' "
" '
2' '
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
q ls q q
q q d q d s d
q ls q ls
X X X X
X I E V R I
X X X X

 
     
 
(5.108)
Now by multiplying equation (5.107) by complex number 1j and adding both
equation (5.107) and (5.108) lead to
 
" ' " " ' "
" ' " '
2 1' ' ' '
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
q ls q q d ls d d
q q d q d d q d
q ls q ls d ls d ls
d s d q s q
X X X X X X X X
X I E j X I E
X X X X X X X X
V R I j V R I
 
     
               
   
(5.109)
Rearranging the terms, we can get
    
    
"
" ' " " ' "
" " ' '
2 1' ' ' '
"
" "
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
E
q ls q q d ls d d
q d q d q q d
q ls q ls d ls d ls
d q s d d q
d q s d d q
X X X X X X X X
X X I E j E
X X X X X X X X
V jV R jX I jI
E V jV R jX I jI
 
     
             
    
    

…………………………………………………………………………… (5.110)
5.22
Equation (5.110) can be further simplified by assuming that the effect of
saliency during sub-transient is negligible on the voltage "
E that is it can be assumed
that " "
q dX X . This assumption is very useful in multi-machine system stability
analysis. With this assumption equation (5.110) can be written as
      " " " "
d q d q s d d qE E jE V jV R jX I jI       (5.111)
Where,
" ' " " ' "
" ' " '
2 1' ' ' '
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
,
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
q ls q q d ls d d
d d q q q d
q ls q ls d ls d ls
X X X X X X X X
E E E E
X X X X X X X X
 
   
   
   
Equation (5.111) when expressed in RI-axis can be represented as
      " " "2 2 2
j j j
d q d q s d d qE jE e V jV e R jX I jI e
  
  
     
       
     
      (5.112)
Equation (5.112) can be represented as a dynamical electrical circuit, as shown
in Fig. 5.7. Where,  " " 2
j
d qE jE e


 
 
 
 is a dependent voltage source behind the sub-
transient reactance "
dX producing a current   2
j
d qI jI e


 
 
 
 with a terminal voltage
of   2
j
d qV jV e


 
 
 
 .
Fig. 5.7: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator sub-transient
model
  2
j
d qI jI e


 
 
 

"
dX sR
  2
j
d qV jV e


 
 
 

 " " 2
j
d qE jE e


 
 
 


5.23
The per unit torque is equal to the real power delivered by the dependent source
 " " 2
j
d qE jE e


 
 
 
 , which is
   
 
*
" " 2 2
" "
j j
e d q d q
d d q q
T real E jE e I jI e
E I E I
 
 
   
    
   
  
    
    
 
(5.113)
5.4 Transient or Two-Axis Model
The sub-transient generator model can be further simplified. The sub-transient
time constants " "
,do qoT T corresponding to the damper windings 1 ,2d q are very small as
compare to the transient time constants ' '
,do qoT T . Hence, the sub-transient time constant
" "
,do qoT T can be set zero in equation (5.94) and (5.96). This leads to
" ' '1
1
' '
1
( ) 0
( )
d
do q d ls d d
d q d ls d
d
T E X X I
dt
E X X I



    
   
(5.114)
2" ' '
2
' '
2
( ) 0
( )
q
qo d q ls d q
q d q ls q
d
T E X X I
dt
E X X I

     
     
(5.115)
Substituting equation (5.114) and (5.115) in equation (5.93) to (5.106) the following
expression can be obtained
'
' ' '
( )
q
do q d d d fd
dE
T E X X I E
dt
    (5.116)
'
' ' '
( )d
qo d q q q
dE
T E X X I
dt
   (5.117)
base
d
dt

   (5.118)
5.24
 
2
m e base
base
H d
T T D
dt

 

    (5.119)
 ( )fd
E R E E fd fd
dE
T V K S E E
dt
   (5.120)
 R A F
A R A in R A F fd A ref t
F
dV K K
T V K V V K R E K V V
dt T
         (5.121)
F F
F fd
F
dR K
R E
dt T
   (5.122)
1M HP RH HP RH
RH M CH SV
CH CH
dT K T K T
T T P P
dt T T
 
     
 
(5.123)
CH
CH CH SV
dP
T P P
dt
   (5.124)
1
1SV
SV SV ref
D s
dP
T P P
dt R


 
     
 
(5.125)
' '
d d d qX I E    (5.126)
' '
q q q dX I E    (5.127)
Substituting equation (5.90) and (5.91) in equation (5.126) and (127) lead to
' '
d s d q q dV R I X I E   (5.128)
' '
q s q d d qV R I X I E    (5.129)
Multiplying equation (5.129) with 1j and adding it to equation (5.128) gives
        ' ' ' ' '
d q s d d q q d q d qV jV R jX I jI X X I E jE       
(5.130)
Expressing equation (5.130) in RI-axis lead to, with the additional assumption that
' '
d qX X .
      ' ' '2 2 2
j j j
d q d q s d d qE jE e V jV e R jX I jI e
  
  
     
       
     
      (5.131)
5.25
Fig. 5.8: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator transient
model
The dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of the synchronous generator transient
model is shown in Fig. 5.8. The electrical torque is given as
   
 
*
' ' 2 2
' '
j j
e d q d q
d d q q
T real E jE e I jI e
E I E I
 
 
   
    
   
  
    
    
 
(5.132)
5.5 Flux Decay or One-Axis Model
The transient model can be further simplified by neglecting the damper
windings 1q and considering only the dynamics of field winding alone. This is also
justified as the time constant '
qoT is less compared to the time constant '
doT and hence
can be set to zero in equation (5.117) and with this assumption equation (5.116) to
(5.127) can be written as
'
' ' '
( )
q
do q d d d fd
dE
T E X X I E
dt
    (5.133)
base
d
dt

   (5.134)
 
2
m e base
base
H d
T T D
dt

 

    (5.135)
'
dX sR
  2
j
d qV jV e


 
 
 

 ' ' 2
j
d qE jE e


 
 
 

  2
j
d qI jI e


 
 
 


5.26
 ( )fd
E R E E fd fd
dE
T V K S E E
dt
   (5.136)
 R A F
A R A in R A F fd A ref t
F
dV K K
T V K V V K R E K V V
dt T
         (5.137)
F F
F fd
F
dR K
R E
dt T
   (5.138)
1M HP RH HP RH
RH M CH SV
CH CH
dT K T K T
T T P P
dt T T
 
     
 
(5.139)
CH
CH CH SV
dP
T P P
dt
   (5.140)
1
1SV
SV SV ref
D s
dP
T P P
dt R


 
     
 
(5.141)
' '
d d d qX I E    (5.142)
q q qX I   (5.143)
Substituting equation (5.90) and (5.91) in equation (5.142) and (5.143) lead to
d s d q qV R I X I  (5.144)
' '
q s q d d qV R I X I E    (5.145)
Multiplying equation (5.145) with 1j and adding it to equation (5.144) and
expressing in RI-axis gives
       ' ' '2 2 2
j j j
q d q q d q s d d qX X I jE e V jV e R jX I jI e
  
  
     
       
     
       (5.146)
The dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of flux decay model is given in Fig. 5.9.
5.27
Fig. 5.9: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator flux decay
model
5.6 Classical or Constant Flux Linkage Model
This is the simplest model but not very accurate. This model is useful in case of
very large power systems. In case of dynamic studies with a time period less than that
of '
doT are considered then the field winding dynamics can also be neglected. In the
flux decay model in equation (5.133), if we assume that during the period of study the
voltage behind the transient reactance '
dX ,  ' '
d qE jE , is constant and only the
electro-mechanical equations (5.134) and (5.135) need to be considered. The transient
voltage is computed at steady state,  ' '
_ _d ss q ssE jE , and kept constant throughout the
study. The input mechanical torque mT is assumed to be constant and hence the
turbine and turbine governor dynamics are eliminated. Hence, the dynamic equations
of the model can be written as
base
d
dt

   (5.147)
 
2
m e base
base
H d
T T D
dt

 

    (5.148)
The dynamic equivalent circuit of the classical model is shown in Fig. 5.10
'
dX sR
  2
j
d qV jV e


 
 
 

  ' ' 2
j
q d q qX X I jE e


 
 
 
 
  2
j
d qI jI e


 
 
 


5.28
Fig. 5.10: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator classical
model
'
dX sR
  2
j
d qV jV e


 
 
 

 ' ' 2
_ _
j
d ss q ssE jE e


 
 
 

  2
j
d qI jI e


 
 
 


5.29
Example Problems
E1. A three-phase, 50 Hz, synchronous generator is connected to an infinite bus
through a transformer and two parallel transmission lines. The generator is
transferring a complex power of 1 0.25j to the infinite bus.
The generator parameters are given below:
' '
0.8, 0.7, 0.2, 0.3, 0.55, 0.0025, 20, 1.0,
0.36, 0.125, 1.8
d q ls d q s A E
E F F
X X X X X R K K
T K T
= = = = = = = =
= = =
Initialize the synchronous generator
Sol:
The current drawn by the infinite bus can be computed as following
1 0.25 1.038 14.036
0
t t
P jQ
I j
V
f
¥
-
 = = - = - 
 
(E1.1)
The terminal voltage of the synchronous generator is given as
0.2LX 
0.15TX  1 0V   
t tV 
1 0.25P jQ j   
5.30
( )0.5 1.0915 13.24t t t L t tV V j X X Iq f¥ = + + ´  =   (E1.2)
The internal voltage of the synchronous generator is given as
( ) 2.4536 52.607q t t s q t tE V R jX Id q f =  + +  =   (E1.3)
The rest of the synchronous generator variables can be initialized as following
 sin 0.6923d t tV V     (E1.4)
 cos 0.8438q t tV V     (E1.4)
 sin 0.9463d t tI I     (E1.6)
 cos 0.4086q t tI I     (E1.7)
' '
0.4699d d s d q qE V R I X I    (E1.8)
' '
1.1288q q s q d dE V R I X I    (E1.9)
' '
( ) 2.5482fd q d d dE E X X I    (E1.10)
' '
1 ( ) 1.0341d q d ls dE X X I     (E1.11)
' '
2 ( ) 0.3269q d q ls qE X X I      (E1.12)
0.1769F
F fd
F
K
R E
T
  (E1.13)
 ( ) 2.5482R E E fd fdV K S E E   (E1.14)
1.2189R
ref t
A
V
V V
K
   (E1.15)
314.159 /i base rad s   (E1.16)
1.0SV refP P  (E1.17)
1.0CH SVP P  (E1.18)
1.0M CHT P  (E1.19)
1.0e MT T  (E1.20)
5.31
E2. A 5 bus power system has two synchronous generators and one load as shown in
the figure below. The generators are connected at bus-1 and bus-4. The load is
connected at bus-5. The per unit reactances of the connecting branches are mentioned
in the figure. The load is consuming a complex power of 1.8 0.65j at a voltage
0.98 11.53 . Assuming the load to be constant impedance type, convert the system
admittance matrix to reduced admittance matrix with only internal nodes.
Sol:
The system admittance matrix can be written as
6.67 6.67 0 0 0
6.67 13.16 4 0 2.50
0 4 13.55 5 5.55
0 0 5 5 0
0 2.5 5.55 0 8.05
BUS
j j
j j j j
Y j j j j
j j
j j j
é ù-
ê ú
ê ú-
ê ú
ê ú= -ê ú
ê ú-ê ú
ê ú
ê úë û
(E2.1)
Since the load is considered as impedance type, the load impedance can be included
in the admittance matrix. The load admittance should be added to the 5th
row-5th
column of the admittance matrix. The load admittance can be found as following:
*
5
1.8 0.65
1.932 0.2828
0.98 11.53
L
P jQ j
I j
V
- -
= = = -
- 
(E2.2)
0.2j0.25j0.15j
1.8 0.65j
2 3 4
5
1
0.4j 0.18j
5 0.98 11.53V   
'
0.20dX j
'
0.35dX j
5.32
5 0.4720 0.1704L
L
V
Z j
I
= = + (E2.3)
1
2.0444 0.8295L
L
Y j
Z
= = - (E2.4)
The system admittance matrix can now be changed as
6.67 6.67 0 0 0
6.67 13.16 4 0 2.50
0 4 13.55 5 5.55
0 0 5 5 0
0 2.5 5.55 0 2.0444 7.2205
BUS
j j
j j j j
Y j j j j
j j
j j j
é ù-
ê ú
ê ú-
ê ú
ê ú= -ê ú
ê ú-ê ú
ê ú+ê úë û
(E2.5)
In order to reduce the system to internal nodes first add additional buses representing
generator nodes. The generator internal nodes are connected to the respective
generator terminal buses through the direct axis transient reactance. With the
generator internal nodes added the system admittance matrix changes to
'
GG GN
NG BUS
Y Y
Y
Y Y
é ù
ê ú= ê ú
ê úë û
(E2.6)
Where,
1
0
0.2
1
0
0.35
GG
j
Y
j
é ù
ê ú
ê ú
ê ú=
ê ú
ê ú
ê úë û
,
1
0 0 0 0
0.2
1
0 0 0 0
0.35
T
GN NG
j
Y Y
j
é ù
ê ú-
ê ú
ê ú=
ê ú
ê ú-
ê úë û
'
11.67 6.67 0 0 0
6.67 13.16 4 0 2.50
0 4 13.55 5 5.55
0 0 5 7.8571 0
0 2.5 5.55 0 2.0444 7.2205
BUS
j j
j j j j
Y j j j j
j j
j j j
é ù-
ê ú
ê ú-
ê ú
ê ú= -ê ú
ê ú-ê ú
ê ú+ê úë û
5.33
The reduced admittance matrix can be computed as
( )
1' 0.0343 2.0289 0.0281 0.0788
0.0281 0.0788 0.0230 1.5819RED GG GN BUS NG
j j
Y Y Y Y Y
j j
- é ù- +
ê ú= - =
ê ú+ -ë û
(E2.7)
In the reduced system only two buses are present, which are the internal buses of the
respective generators, hence the size of the admittance matrix is 2 2´ .
5.34
References
1. M. Stubbe, A. Bihain, J. Deuse and J. C. Baader, “STAG-A new unified
software program for the study of the dynamic behavior of electrical power
systems,” IEEE Trans., Vol. PWRS-4, No. 1, pp. 129-138, 1989.
2. P. Kundur and P. L. Dandeno, “Implementation of advanced generator
models into power system stability programs,” IEEE Trans., Vol. PAS-102,
pp. 2047-2052, July 1983.

More Related Content

What's hot

Segmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVT
Segmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVTSegmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVT
Segmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVTByungha Joo
 
The Revolution from Transistor to Digital Electronics
The Revolution from Transistor to Digital ElectronicsThe Revolution from Transistor to Digital Electronics
The Revolution from Transistor to Digital ElectronicsSubhajit Bhattacharjee
 
Lec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOS
Lec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOSLec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOS
Lec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOSHsien-Hsin Sean Lee, Ph.D.
 
4446 4450.output
4446 4450.output4446 4450.output
4446 4450.outputj1075017
 
Topology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source Inverter
Topology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source InverterTopology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source Inverter
Topology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source InverterIJERA Editor
 
Space vector pwm_inverter
Space vector pwm_inverterSpace vector pwm_inverter
Space vector pwm_inverterZunAib Ali
 
Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...
Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...
Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...inventionjournals
 
Resonant circuits
Resonant circuitsResonant circuits
Resonant circuitsarjav patel
 
space vector PWM for 2 leg inverter
space vector PWM for 2 leg inverterspace vector PWM for 2 leg inverter
space vector PWM for 2 leg inverterSudhakar Reddy
 
Implementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTER
Implementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTERImplementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTER
Implementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTERIDES Editor
 
Powerelectronics questionbank
Powerelectronics questionbankPowerelectronics questionbank
Powerelectronics questionbankSudhakar Reddy
 
Power Electronics Chapter 7
Power Electronics  Chapter 7Power Electronics  Chapter 7
Power Electronics Chapter 7guest8ae54cfb
 

What's hot (20)

Segmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVT
Segmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVTSegmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVT
Segmented Timing Arc Gate Delay Modelling Method with Timing Anchor PVT
 
The Revolution from Transistor to Digital Electronics
The Revolution from Transistor to Digital ElectronicsThe Revolution from Transistor to Digital Electronics
The Revolution from Transistor to Digital Electronics
 
Lec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOS
Lec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOSLec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOS
Lec4 Intro to Computer Engineering by Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee Georgia Tech -- CMOS
 
4446 4450.output
4446 4450.output4446 4450.output
4446 4450.output
 
Topology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source Inverter
Topology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source InverterTopology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source Inverter
Topology and Control of Current-Fed Quasi Z-Source Inverter
 
ABCD parameter poster
ABCD parameter posterABCD parameter poster
ABCD parameter poster
 
Space vector pwm_inverter
Space vector pwm_inverterSpace vector pwm_inverter
Space vector pwm_inverter
 
Dtc (1)
Dtc (1)Dtc (1)
Dtc (1)
 
780177
780177780177
780177
 
C05311115
C05311115C05311115
C05311115
 
Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...
Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...
Design Of Sub Synchronous Damping Controller (SSDC) For TCSC To Improve Power...
 
Resonant circuits
Resonant circuitsResonant circuits
Resonant circuits
 
Svpwm
SvpwmSvpwm
Svpwm
 
space vector PWM for 2 leg inverter
space vector PWM for 2 leg inverterspace vector PWM for 2 leg inverter
space vector PWM for 2 leg inverter
 
Implementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTER
Implementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTERImplementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTER
Implementation of SVPWM control on FPGA for three phase MATRIX CONVERTER
 
Powerelectronics questionbank
Powerelectronics questionbankPowerelectronics questionbank
Powerelectronics questionbank
 
Unit 2 resonance circuit
Unit 2 resonance circuitUnit 2 resonance circuit
Unit 2 resonance circuit
 
Some Aspects on 3-Phase Bridge Inverter (180 Degree Mode)
Some Aspects on 3-Phase Bridge Inverter (180 Degree Mode)Some Aspects on 3-Phase Bridge Inverter (180 Degree Mode)
Some Aspects on 3-Phase Bridge Inverter (180 Degree Mode)
 
Analysis
AnalysisAnalysis
Analysis
 
Power Electronics Chapter 7
Power Electronics  Chapter 7Power Electronics  Chapter 7
Power Electronics Chapter 7
 

Similar to Chapter5

Adoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed Drive
Adoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed DriveAdoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed Drive
Adoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed DriveIJPEDS-IAES
 
L021201085091
L021201085091L021201085091
L021201085091theijes
 
Performance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid Conditions
Performance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid ConditionsPerformance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid Conditions
Performance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid ConditionsIJRES Journal
 
Comparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load Compensation
Comparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load CompensationComparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load Compensation
Comparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load Compensationidescitation
 
12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)
12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)
12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)IAESIJEECS
 
09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdf
09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdf09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdf
09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdfgulie
 
BEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.ppt
BEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.pptBEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.ppt
BEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.pptLiewChiaPing
 
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34BinodKumarSahu5
 
Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...
Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...
Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...theijes
 
D0372027037
D0372027037D0372027037
D0372027037theijes
 
A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...
A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...
A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...AM Publications
 
Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...
Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...
Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...ijsrd.com
 
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11BinodKumarSahu5
 
Power system stability 3.pptx
Power system stability 3.pptxPower system stability 3.pptx
Power system stability 3.pptxPoiLkj2
 
Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna
Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna
Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna Piyush Kashyap
 
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems Solutions
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems SolutionsSYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems Solutions
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems SolutionsPower System Operation
 

Similar to Chapter5 (20)

Adoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed Drive
Adoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed DriveAdoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed Drive
Adoption of Park’s Transformation for Inverter Fed Drive
 
L021201085091
L021201085091L021201085091
L021201085091
 
Performance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid Conditions
Performance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid ConditionsPerformance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid Conditions
Performance Analysis of DFIG Wind Turbine During Over Voltage Grid Conditions
 
Comparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load Compensation
Comparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load CompensationComparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load Compensation
Comparison of Control Strategies of DSTATACOM for Non-linear Load Compensation
 
RGPV EX 503 Unit IV
RGPV EX 503 Unit IVRGPV EX 503 Unit IV
RGPV EX 503 Unit IV
 
12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)
12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)
12 11jan17 24 oct16 13127 28779-1-ed(edit-new)
 
09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdf
09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdf09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdf
09_chapter4SPACEVECTORPULSEWIDTHMODULATION.pdf
 
AC to DC convertor.pdf
AC to DC convertor.pdfAC to DC convertor.pdf
AC to DC convertor.pdf
 
BEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.ppt
BEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.pptBEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.ppt
BEF 12403 - Week 6 - Series-Parallel Resistor Circuits.ppt
 
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecture_34
 
Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...
Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...
Application of Variable Inductors in a DC/DC Converter to Increase the Operat...
 
D0372027037
D0372027037D0372027037
D0372027037
 
C0181419International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI)
C0181419International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI)C0181419International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI)
C0181419International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI)
 
A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...
A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...
A Novel of Nonlinear Voltage Regulators analysis by using Synchronizing and D...
 
Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...
Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...
Grid-Connection Control and Simulation of PMSG Wind Power System Based on Mul...
 
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11
Eet3082 binod kumar sahu lecturer_11
 
Power system stability 3.pptx
Power system stability 3.pptxPower system stability 3.pptx
Power system stability 3.pptx
 
Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna
Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna
Method of Moment analysis of a printed Archimedian Spiral antenna
 
A Repetitive Sparce Matrix Converter with Z-Source Network to having less Cur...
A Repetitive Sparce Matrix Converter with Z-Source Network to having less Cur...A Repetitive Sparce Matrix Converter with Z-Source Network to having less Cur...
A Repetitive Sparce Matrix Converter with Z-Source Network to having less Cur...
 
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems Solutions
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems SolutionsSYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems Solutions
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES BY Dr. P. Kundur Power Systems Solutions
 

More from DHEERAJ DHAKAR

Power System Modeling and Simulation lab manual
Power System Modeling and Simulation lab manualPower System Modeling and Simulation lab manual
Power System Modeling and Simulation lab manualDHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
A detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicle
A detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicleA detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicle
A detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicleDHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Facts controllers for power flow control a brief review
Facts controllers for power flow control a brief reviewFacts controllers for power flow control a brief review
Facts controllers for power flow control a brief reviewDHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Power factor correction using bridgeless boost topology
Power factor correction using bridgeless boost topologyPower factor correction using bridgeless boost topology
Power factor correction using bridgeless boost topologyDHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER
A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLERA REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER
A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLERDHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Current affairs-june-2014
Current affairs-june-2014Current affairs-june-2014
Current affairs-june-2014DHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Current affairs-july-2014
Current affairs-july-2014Current affairs-july-2014
Current affairs-july-2014DHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Current affairs-december-2014
Current affairs-december-2014Current affairs-december-2014
Current affairs-december-2014DHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Bank exam-study-material-2014
Bank exam-study-material-2014Bank exam-study-material-2014
Bank exam-study-material-2014DHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Electrical machine lab
Electrical machine labElectrical machine lab
Electrical machine labDHEERAJ DHAKAR
 
Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310
Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310
Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310DHEERAJ DHAKAR
 

More from DHEERAJ DHAKAR (17)

Power System Modeling and Simulation lab manual
Power System Modeling and Simulation lab manualPower System Modeling and Simulation lab manual
Power System Modeling and Simulation lab manual
 
A detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicle
A detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicleA detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicle
A detailed review of technology of hybrid electric vehicle
 
Facts controllers for power flow control a brief review
Facts controllers for power flow control a brief reviewFacts controllers for power flow control a brief review
Facts controllers for power flow control a brief review
 
Power factor correction using bridgeless boost topology
Power factor correction using bridgeless boost topologyPower factor correction using bridgeless boost topology
Power factor correction using bridgeless boost topology
 
Review ijaet
Review ijaetReview ijaet
Review ijaet
 
Psms lab manual
Psms lab manualPsms lab manual
Psms lab manual
 
A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER
A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLERA REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER
A REVIEW PAPER ON A D-FACTS CONTROLLER: ENHANCED POWER FLOW CONTROLLER
 
Control systems
Control systemsControl systems
Control systems
 
Chapter8
Chapter8Chapter8
Chapter8
 
Current affairs-june-2014
Current affairs-june-2014Current affairs-june-2014
Current affairs-june-2014
 
Current affairs-july-2014
Current affairs-july-2014Current affairs-july-2014
Current affairs-july-2014
 
Current affairs-december-2014
Current affairs-december-2014Current affairs-december-2014
Current affairs-december-2014
 
Ca questions
Ca questionsCa questions
Ca questions
 
Bank exam-study-material-2014
Bank exam-study-material-2014Bank exam-study-material-2014
Bank exam-study-material-2014
 
Electrical machine lab
Electrical machine labElectrical machine lab
Electrical machine lab
 
Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310
Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310
Microprocessorlabmanual ee0310
 
Machine lab manual
Machine lab manualMachine lab manual
Machine lab manual
 

Chapter5

  • 1. 5.1 Chapter 5 Representation of Synchronous Machines for Stability studies The equations (3.149) – (3.157) and (3.161) - (3.162) of Chapter 3 representing the synchronous machine dynamics, equations (4.27) – (4.29), (4.54) - (4.55) and (4.65) given in Chapter 4 representing the dynamics of generator exciter, steam turbine and speed governor describes the complete behaviour of a steam generating system. However, the q -axis of the synchronous generator has to be located with respect to some reference in order to define the rotor angle. The synchronous generator terminal conditions like complex voltage, real and reactive power decide the rotor angle. The synchronous generator terminal conditions in turn depend on the interaction of the synchronous generator with the network conditions. While representing a synchronous machine in a system, the representation should include the dynamic behaviour of the generator as well as its interaction with the network. The effect of synchronous machine interaction with the rest of the network can be understood through the steady state conditions. 5.1 Steady State Condition In the steady state condition the rotor rotates at synchronous speed. Since rotor rotates at synchronous speed the damper winding currents 1 1 2, ,d q qI I I are zero. Since the synchronous generator is in steady state, left hand side of equations (3.149) to (3.157) will become zero. Hence, from equations (3.149) to (3.157) the following expression can be written d s d qV R I    (5.1) q s q dV R I    (5.2) ' ' ( )fd q d d dE E X X I   (5.3) ' ' 1 ( )d q d ls dE X X I    (5.4) ' ' ( )d q q qE X X I  (5.5) ' ' 2 ( )q d q ls qE X X I     (5.6)
  • 2. 5.2 Taking the d-axis flux linkage equations in the steady state we get ( )d d d md fdX I X I    (5.7) ( )fd md d fd fdX I X I    (5.8) Eliminating the filed current fdI from equations (5.7) and (5.8), equation (5.7) can be written 2 ' ' ( )md md d d d fd d d q fd fd X X X I X I E X X         (5.9) Similarly, ' ' q q q dX I E    (5.10) Substituting equation (5.9) and (5.10) in equations (5.1) and (5.2) lead to ' ' d s d q q dV R I X I E    (5.11) ' ' q s q d d qV R I X I E    (5.12) Let the three-phase terminal voltage be given in per unit as cos( ) cos( 120 ) cos( 120 ) ta m s tb m s tc m s v V t v V t v V t                 (5.13) by applying Park’s transformation defined in Chapter 3, we get cos( ) sin( ) d m s s q m s s V V t V V t             (5.14)
  • 3. 5.3 Here, s is the angle between the d -axis and the phase-a mmf axis. Let 0s st    where 0 is the initial angle between the d -axis and the phase-a mmf axis at time 0t  , also noting that in per unit the RMS value of the voltage  tV and peak value of the voltage  mV are one and the same, equation (5.14) can be written as 0 0 cos( ) sin( ) d t q t V V V V         (5.15) From (5.15) it can be observed that though ,d qV V are scalar quantities, due the trigonometric nature of the equation the terminal voltage  tV can be represented as a ac phasor in dq  axis. Just like an ac phasor in real and imaginary axis rotating at synchronous speed in electrical radians the dq  axis also rotates at the speed of the rotor which is synchronous speed in steady state. Hence, the terminal voltage can be represented as a phasor in dq  axis as 0t d qV V jV     (5.16) Where, 2 2 t d qV V V  and angle 0   is the angle between the terminal voltage phasor and d  axis as shown in Fig. 5.1. Instead of taking the angle between the d  axis and terminal voltage phasor let us take the angle between the terminal voltage phasor and the q  axis represented as  090      . Then we get  sin( ) cos( )d q t tV jV V j V     (5.17)
  • 4. 5.4 Fig. 5.1: Phasor diagram of terminal voltage in dq  axis Here, tV is a complex quantity in dq  axis. Similarly, the stator current tI lagging the terminal voltage tV by an angle  , can be expressed as a phasor in dq  axis as  sin( ) cos( )d q t tI jI I j I         (5.18) Substituting equations (5.11) and (5.12) in equation (5.17), the following expression can be written  ' ' ' ' t s d q q d s q d d qV R I X I E j R I X I E        (5.19) Rearranging terms in (5.19), the following expression can be derived as                   ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 0 ' ' ' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) fd t s d q q d s q d d q s d q q d q q d q q q d d d q E s q t d q q q q d d d d d q s q t q d d fd V R I X I E j R I X I E R I jI jX I jI jX I jI X I E j X I E R jX I E X X I j X X I X X I E R jX I j X X I E                                                …………………………………………………………………………… (5.20) 0  d-axis q-axis tV
  • 5. 5.5 Noting that md fd fd md fd fd X E V X I R   , we can write equation (5.20) as     md fd d q d t s q tj X I X X I V R jX I     (5.21) let, the internal voltage of the synchronous generator be represented as   q md fd d q dE X I X X I   , or   q md fd d q dE j X I X X I   then  q t s q tE V R jX I   (5.22) qE is defined as the internal voltage behind the synchronous reactance qX . Equation (5.22) can be represented as an equivalent electrical circuit as shown in Fig. 5.2. Fig. 5.2: Electrical equivalent circuit of steady state synchronous generator From equation (5.22) it can be observed that the internal voltage phasor qE is aligned along the q  axis as shown in Fig. 5.3. Since qE is aligned along q  axis, it is at angle  from the terminal voltage tV . This angle  is called as generator rotor or load angle. The load angle  can be computed if the real power output  tP , reactive power output  tQ and terminal voltage  tV of the synchronous generator are defined. Let us take terminal voltage as the reference and then locate the q  axis qX sR tV qE tI
  • 6. 5.6 at an angle  with respect to the terminal voltage phasor. The following steps should be followed Fig. 5.3: Phasor diagram of the steady state synchronous generator 2 2 1 , cost t t t t t t P Q P I V V I           (5.23)  0q t s q tE V R jX I        (5.24) 1 cos sin tan cos sin q t s t q t s t q t X I R I E V R I X I                 (5.25) In case of steady state no load condition, the stator currents ,d qI I will become zero and therefore the following expression holds ' q q q fd t d md fdV E E E V X I       (5.26) ' 0d d qV E    (5.27) dV dI tV  d-axis q-axis tI  s tR I q tjX I qV qI qE md fdX I  d q dX X I
  • 7. 5.7 Hence, in the steady state no load case the internal voltage qE and the terminal voltage tV are one and the same due to which the load angle  becomes zero. As the load increase the load angle  also increases. It can also be observed that for 1 pu , internal voltage or terminal voltage in steady state no-load condition the field current should be 1 fd md I X  . The load angle computed in equation (5.25) is with respect to the dq -axis of a particular generator. In multi-machine systems there should be a common reference instead of multiple individual generator references. Usually in a network with multiple machines a slack bus or a reference bus is defined and all other bus angles in the network are defined with respect to the common reference bus. Hence there should be a conversion from dq -axis of individual generator to common reference in real-imaginary (RI) axis or it is conversion from machine reference frame to common network reference frame. Fig. 5.4: Terminal voltage phasor in dq -axis and RI-axis The load angle previously was defined as the angle by which the q-axis leads the terminal voltage phasor but now it should be defined as the angle by which the q-axis lead the common reference R-axis. In steady state both dq -axis and RI-axis rotate at electrical synchronous speed hence the load angle in the new reference frame is fixed for a given load condition. Even in case of transients since the effect of rotor speed R-axis q-axis  I-axis tV d-axis  RV IV qV dV
  • 8. 5.8 variation on stator voltage is neglected the load angle can still be considered fixed. From the phasor diagram shown in Fig. 5.4 the following expression can be derived cos sin cos sin cos sin R t d q I t d q V V V V V V V V                 (5.28)       2 sin cos sin cos ( ) sin cos ( ) j t R I d q q d j d q d q V e V jV V V j V V V jV j V jV e                           (5.29)    2 ( ) sin cos j d q t t tV jV V e V jV                     (5.30) Hence, when ever the stator voltage current expressed in dq -axis needs to be transformed to network reference frame or RI-axis multiply the complex voltage or current in dq -axis with the factor 2 j e         where  the load angle is the angle between the q-axis of the individual generator with respect to the common reference phasor R-axis. To understand conversion from dq -axis to common reference let us take the case of a single machine connected to an infinite bus with a voltage 0j V e through a transmission line with impedance T TR jX . Fig. 5.5: Equivalent electrical circuit of single machine connected to an infinite bus The generator terminal voltage is j tV e  . Let the generator stator current be j tI e  and the power factor angle is defined as     . Both the angles  and  are taken with respect to the infinite bus voltage phasor. Let the generator supply a complex power P jQ to the infinite bus. From the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 5.5 the following expressions can be written 0j V e qX sR 2 ( ) j j d q tV jV e V e           2 j qE e         2 ( ) j d qI jI e          TX TR P jQ
  • 9. 5.9 j t j t P jQ I e V e     (5.31)     2 2 2 ( ) ( ) j j j q d q s q d q j j t s q t E e V jV e R jX I jI e V e R jX I e                                     (5.32) Substituting   q q md fd d q dE jE j X I X X I    in equation (5.32) we get  2 j j j j q q t s q tjE e E e V e R jX I e                (5.33) The load angle  can be obtained from (5.33) and this angle is again with respect to the infinite bus voltage phasor. Equation (5.33) can also be represented as a phasor diagram as shown in Fig. 5.6. The network equations that is the relation between the terminal voltage, stator current and the infinite bus voltage can also be expressed in terms of dq -axis parameters as     02 2 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) j j j d q T T d q j d q T T d q V jV e V e R jX I jI e or V jV V e R jX I jI                                       (5.34) From equation (5.34) separating real and imaginary terms we can get sin cos d dT T q qT T V IR X V V IX R V                           (5.35) The real and reactive power generated by the generator in terms of dq -axis parameters is given as       * * 2 2 ( ) ( ) j j j j t t d q d q d d q q q d d q S P jQ V e I e V jV e I jI e V I V I j V I V I                                     (5.36)
  • 10. 5.10 The electrical torque output is given as, by substituting equation (5.1) and (5.2) for stator flux linkages,             2 2 *2 ( ) e d q q d q s q q d s d d d d q q s q d j j s t q t T I I V R I I V R I I V I V I R I I P R I real E e I e                 (5.37) It can be understood from equation (5.37) that the per unit electric torque produced is equal to the real power delivered by the dependent source j qE e  . Fig. 5.6: Phasor diagram of steady state synchronous generator connected to infinite bus 5.2 Multi-Machine System Representation In a power system there will be multiple synchronous machines with their respective exciters, turbines, speed governors and load distributed throughout the d-axisdV dI tV  q-axis tI s tR I q tjX I qV qI qE md fdX I  d q dX X I R-axis I-axis    V
  • 11. 5.11 system. The synchronous machines and load are connected through power system network that is through transformers and transmission lines. For a total system representation the system network model also should be included along with the synchronous machine, exciter, turbine, speed governor and static/dynamic load. Let there be a system with n number of buses. Let m represent number of load buses and gn number of generator buses and hence gn number of generators. The dynamics of an th i generator along with the exciter, steam turbine and speed governor are given as   ' ' " ' ' ' ' 1' 2 ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) qi di di doi di di di qi di lsi di di di lsi qi fdi dE X X T X X I E X X I dt X X E E                (5.38) " ' '1 1( )di doi qi di lsi di di d T E X X I dt      (5.39)   ' "' ' ' ' ' ' 2' 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) qi qidi qoi di qi qi qi di qi lsi qi qi qi lsi X XdE T E X X I E X X I dt X X               (5.40) 2" ' ' 2( ) qi qoi di qi lsi qi qi d T E X X I dt       (5.41) i i base d dt     (5.42)   2 i i mi ei i i base base H d T T D dt         (5.43)  ( )fdi Ei Ri Ei Ei fdi fdi dE T V K S E E dt    (5.44)  , Min MaxRi Ai Fi Ai Ri Ai Fi fdi Ai refi ti Ri Ri Ri Fi dV K K T V K R E K V V V V V dt T         (5.45) Fi Fi Fi fdi Fi dR K R E dt T    (5.46) 1Mi HPi RHi HPi RHi RHi Mi CHi SVi CHi CHi dT K T K T T T P P dt T T           (5.47) CHi CHi CHi SVi dP T P P dt    (5.48)
  • 12. 5.12 1 1 ,0 MaxSVi i SVi SVi refi SVi SVi Di base dP T P P P P dt R               (5.49) Stator algebraic equations are given as " ' " " ' 1' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) di lsi di di di di qi di qi si qi di lsi di lsi X X X X X I E V R I X X X X           (5.50) " ' " " ' 2' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) qi lsi qi qi qi qi di qi di si di qi lsi qi lsi X X X X X I E V R I X X X X            (5.51) Here, 1,2......... gi n . These gn generators are connected to the network. In a power system network with n number of buses, the injected current at all the n buses can be written in terms of admittance matrix and the bus voltages. The current injected at th i bus is given as, where 1,2.........i n , 1 ij j n j j i ij j j I Y e V e      (5.52) Where, ijj ijY e  is the ( , )i j element of the admittance matrix. jj jV e  is the bus voltage at th j bus. The complex power injected at th i bus can be written as    * 1 i j iji n jj i i i i i j ij j P jQ V e I VV Y e           (5.53) The injected power at any bus is the difference between the power generated at that bus minus the load power required at that bus. Hence, at th i bus the injected real and reactive power can be written as   1 cos n i Gi Di i j ij i j ij j P P P VV Y          (5.54)   1 sin n i Gi Di i j ij i j ij j Q Q Q VV Y          (5.55)
  • 13. 5.13 Where, ,Gi GiP Q are the real and reactive power generated at th i bus and ,Di DiP Q are the real and reactive power loads. The real and reactive power generated at a generator bus is given as   * 2 Real sin( ) cos( ) i i j j Gi i di qi di i i i qi i i i P V e I jI e I V I V                              (5.56)   * 2 Imaginary cos( ) sin( ) i i j j Gi i di qi di i i i qi i i i Q V e I jI e I V I V                              (5.57) In case static loads they can be represented as a function of the bus voltage as was explained in Chapter 4. Then equation (5.56) and (5.57) can be written as   1 sin( ) cos( ) ( ) cos n di i i i qi i i i Di i i j ij i j ij j I V I V P V VV Y               (5.58)   1 cos( ) sin( ) ( ) sin n di i i i qi i i i Di i i j ij i j ij j I V I V Q V VV Y               (5.59) for, 1,2,......, gi n , generator buses   1 ( ) cos n Di i i j ij i j ij j P V VV Y         (5.60)   1 ( ) sin n Di i i j ij i j ij j Q V VV Y         (5.61) For, 1, 2,......,g gi n n n   , for load buses. Dynamic equations (5.38) to (5.49), stator algebraic equations (5.50) to (5.51) and network power balance equations (5.58) to (5.61) together are called as differential algebraic equations (DAEs) and completely define the behaviour of multi-
  • 14. 5.14 machine power system. In case the loads are dynamic loads then apart from equation (5.38) to (5.49) and (5.58) to (5.61) the dynamic equations of the loads should also be considered. 5.2.1 A special case of impedance loads If loads are represented as constant impedance loads then DAEs given in equations (5.38) to (5.49) and (5.58) to (5.61) can be simplified to a significant extent. Suppose load at an th i bus is represented by an impedance load then, the real and reactive power drawn by the load is given as 2 i Li Li Li V P jQ Z   (5.62) * * Li Li i Li i Li P jQ V I V Z    (5.63) Where, , ,Li Li LiP Q Z are the real power, reactive power and impedance of a load at an th i bus. Substituting equation (5.63) in (5.52), the current injected into th i bus can be expressed as * 1 ij j n j ji i Gi Li Gi ij j jLi V I I I I Y e V e Z          (5.64) Let 1 Li LiY Z   , then 1 1,2,.......,ij jLi i n j jj j Gi Li i ij j g j I Y e V e Y e V e i n        (5.65) 1 2 1 0 , ,.......,ij jLi i n j jj j Li i ij j g g j Y e V e Y e V e i n n n          (5.66)
  • 15. 5.15 Let a new admittance matrix be formed with the load impedances included as shunt branches at each bus, represented as BUSY . The equation (5.65) and (5.66) can be represented as   11 11 0 0 gg gg G nGn BUS nn n n VI VI Y V V                                    (5.67) The network voltages and the generator currents can be represented in terms of the generator internal voltages by making modifications to equations (5.67). This will eliminate the generator currents and terminal voltages in dynamic equations given in equations (5.38) to (5.49) reducing the complexity. This also has another advantage when transient stability analysis is done and this will be explained later. At an th i generator bus an additional node is created marked as i with a voltage  " " 2 ij i di qiE E jE e            , representing the generator internal voltage. The impedance between i i nodes is given as Si diR jX  . Hence, gn numbers of additional nodes are added to the existing n nodes. The currents injected at these nodes are given as     " " 2 " " 2 1 1 1 1,2 ......, 1,2,......., i i i i j j i Gi di qi i Si di j j di qi i g Si di Si di g I I E jE e V e R jX E jE e V e i n R jX R jX i n                                                     (5.68) Note that since i is an additional node connected to an th i generator node, it is simply represented with a number same as that of the generator node to which it is connected but with a prime to differentiate it. Also, now the additional nodes are the generator nodes injecting a current into the network and at all other network buses the
  • 16. 5.16 current injection is zero. Equation (5.68) can be included in the equation (5.67) which leads to 1 (1, 1) (1, )1 1 1 1 1 ( , 1) ( , ) 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 g g g g g g g n nS d S d G n n n n Sng dng Sng dng Gn S n n n R jX R jX I R jX R jX I R j                                                                                            1 ( 1,1) ( 1, ) ( ,1) ( , ) 0 (1,1) (1, ) (1, 1) (1, ) 1 ( ,1) ( , ) ( , 1) ( , ) 0 0 0 0 0 g g g g BUS BUS g BUS g BUSd BUS g BUS g g BUS g g BUS g Sng dng n n n n n n Y Y n Y n Y nX Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n R jX                                                                1 1 1 ( 1,1) ( 1, ) ( 1, 1) ( 1, ) ( ,1) ( , ) ( , 1) ( , ) g g g n n n BUS g BUS g g BUS g g BUS g n BUS BUS g BUS g BUS E E V V V Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n V Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n                                                                                                                    Let, 1 1 1 0 1 0 g g S d II Sng dng n n R jX Y R jX                     , (1, 1) (1, )1 1 ( , 1) ( , ) 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 g g g g g n nS d IN n n n n Sng dng n n R jX Y R jX                                         
  • 17. 5.17 (1,1) (1, ) (1, 1) (1, ) ( ,1) ( , ) ( , 1) ( , ) ( 1,1) ( 1, ) ( 1, 1 ( ,1) ( , ) BUS BUS g BUS g BUS BUS g BUS g g BUS g g BUS g BUS BUS g BUS g g BUS g g BUS BUS g Y Y n Y n Y n Y n Y n n Y n n Y n n Y Y n Y n n Y n n Y n Y n n                                                    ) ( 1, ) ( , 1) ( , ) BUS g BUS g BUS Y n n Y n n Y n n                              1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , g g g g g g G n G N n Gn n n n n n V I E V V I E V                                             I E V     Then,         ' 1 1 0 g gg g II ING T IN BUSn n n nn n n n Y Y Y Y                      N EI V (5.69) From equation (5.69) it can be seen that, 1' T BUS INY Y      NV E (5.70) 1' T G II IN BUS INY Y Y Y           I E (5.71) From equation (5.70) and (5.71) it can be observed that the network voltages and the generator currents, represented by the vector NV and GI , can be obtained directly from the internal voltages vector E without the need to solve stator algebraic and network power balance equations.
  • 18. 5.18 5.2.2 Initial Conditions Before doing any stability analysis the system along with its generators, loads and network should be initialized. These are the steps which should be followed for initializing the system Step 1 The network real and reactive power balance equations given in equations (5.58) to (5.61) should be solved. Solving equations (5.58) to (5.61) is nothing but doing load flow analysis. After load flow analysis all the network bus complex voltages, real and reactive powers injected at a bus are know. Step 2 Find the internal load angle of each generator. This can be done as following   1,2,.....i i Gij j j i i si qi Gi gE e V e R jX I e i n       (5.72) After load flow analysis the network bus voltages are known. The currents generated by each generator are also known. With this information an internal voltage can be defined for all the generators as given in equation (5.72). The internal load angle i of an th i generator is the angle of the complex internal voltage ij iE e  . Step 3 Calculate the ,d q axis components of voltages, currents and fluxes  sindi i i iV V    (5.73)  cosqi i i iV V    (5.74)  sindi Gi i GiI I    (5.75)
  • 19. 5.19  cosqi i i GiI I    (5.76) ' ' di di si di qi qiE V R I X I   (5.77) ' ' qi qi si qi di diE V R I X I   (5.78) ' ' ( )fdi qi di di diE E X X I   (5.79) ' ' 1 ( )di qi di lsi diE X X I    (5.80) ' ' 2 ( )qi di qi lsi qiE X X I     (5.81) Fi Fi fdi Fi K R E T  (5.82)  ( )Ri Ei Ei fdi fdiV K S E E  (5.83) Ri refi i Ai V V V K   (5.84) i base  (5.85) SVi refiP P (5.86) CHi SViP P (5.87) Mi CHiT P (5.88) ei MiT T (5.89) The synchronous machine model along with the exciter, turbine and speed governor model given in (5.38) to (5.49) can be simplified significantly my making some assumptions. This simplification can lead to significant reduction in computational complexity [1]-[2]. The various models that can be derived by simplifying equations (5.38) to (5.49) is given below 5.3 Sub-transient Model with Stator and Network Transients Neglected The rate of changes of the stator flux linkages ,d q   (here dot means rate of change with respect to time) in equation (3.149) and (3.150) in Chapter 3, can be neglected. The reason behind this is that the stator, which is connected to the rest of
  • 20. 5.20 the network electrically, has very fast transients as compared to the rotor. Compared to the slow dynamics of the rotor the stator dynamics can be considered to be very fast and hence any change or disturbance in the stator or the network can be considered as an instantaneous change without any dynamics. This leads to reduction in computational complexity drastically as the network transient also need not be considered along with stator transients. With these assumptions the synchronous machine dynamics along with exciter, turbine and governor are given as q d s dV R I    (5.90) d q s qV R I   (5.91) 0o s oV R I  (5.92)   ' ' " ' ' ' ' ' 1' 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) q d d do q d d d q d ls d d fd d ls dE X X T E X X I E X X I E dt X X                (5.93) " ' '1 1( )d do q d ls d d d T E X X I dt      (5.94)   ' "' ' ' ' ' ' 2' 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) q qd qo d q q q d q ls q q q ls X XdE T E X X I E X X I dt X X               (5.95) 2" ' ' 2( ) q qo d q ls q q d T E X X I dt       (5.96) base d dt     (5.97)   2 m e base base H d T T D dt         (5.98)  ( )fd E R E E fd fd dE T V K S E E dt    (5.99)  R A F A R A in R A F fd A ref t F dV K K T V K V V K R E K V V dt T          (5.100) F F F fd F dR K R E dt T    (5.101) 1M HP RH HP RH RH M CH SV CH CH dT K T K T T T P P dt T T           (5.102)
  • 21. 5.21 CH CH CH SV dP T P P dt    (5.103) 1 1SV SV SV ref D s dP T P P dt R             (5.104) " ' " " ' 1' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) d ls d d d d d q d d ls d ls X X X X X I E X X X X           (5.105) " ' " " ' 2' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) q ls q q q q q d q q ls q ls X X X X X I E X X X X           (5.106) Equations (5.90), (5.91) can be substituted in (5.105) and (5.106) which lead to " ' " " ' 1' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) d ls d d d d q d q s q d ls d ls X X X X X I E V R I X X X X           (5.107) " ' " " ' 2' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) q ls q q q q d q d s d q ls q ls X X X X X I E V R I X X X X            (5.108) Now by multiplying equation (5.107) by complex number 1j and adding both equation (5.107) and (5.108) lead to   " ' " " ' " " ' " ' 2 1' ' ' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) q ls q q d ls d d q q d q d d q d q ls q ls d ls d ls d s d q s q X X X X X X X X X I E j X I E X X X X X X X X V R I j V R I                             (5.109) Rearranging the terms, we can get           " " ' " " ' " " " ' ' 2 1' ' ' ' " " " ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) E q ls q q d ls d d q d q d q q d q ls q ls d ls d ls d q s d d q d q s d d q X X X X X X X X X X I E j E X X X X X X X X V jV R jX I jI E V jV R jX I jI                                  …………………………………………………………………………… (5.110)
  • 22. 5.22 Equation (5.110) can be further simplified by assuming that the effect of saliency during sub-transient is negligible on the voltage " E that is it can be assumed that " " q dX X . This assumption is very useful in multi-machine system stability analysis. With this assumption equation (5.110) can be written as       " " " " d q d q s d d qE E jE V jV R jX I jI       (5.111) Where, " ' " " ' " " ' " ' 2 1' ' ' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) , ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) q ls q q d ls d d d d q q q d q ls q ls d ls d ls X X X X X X X X E E E E X X X X X X X X               Equation (5.111) when expressed in RI-axis can be represented as       " " "2 2 2 j j j d q d q s d d qE jE e V jV e R jX I jI e                                 (5.112) Equation (5.112) can be represented as a dynamical electrical circuit, as shown in Fig. 5.7. Where,  " " 2 j d qE jE e          is a dependent voltage source behind the sub- transient reactance " dX producing a current   2 j d qI jI e          with a terminal voltage of   2 j d qV jV e          . Fig. 5.7: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator sub-transient model   2 j d qI jI e          " dX sR   2 j d qV jV e           " " 2 j d qE jE e          
  • 23. 5.23 The per unit torque is equal to the real power delivered by the dependent source  " " 2 j d qE jE e          , which is       * " " 2 2 " " j j e d q d q d d q q T real E jE e I jI e E I E I                                 (5.113) 5.4 Transient or Two-Axis Model The sub-transient generator model can be further simplified. The sub-transient time constants " " ,do qoT T corresponding to the damper windings 1 ,2d q are very small as compare to the transient time constants ' ' ,do qoT T . Hence, the sub-transient time constant " " ,do qoT T can be set zero in equation (5.94) and (5.96). This leads to " ' '1 1 ' ' 1 ( ) 0 ( ) d do q d ls d d d q d ls d d T E X X I dt E X X I             (5.114) 2" ' ' 2 ' ' 2 ( ) 0 ( ) q qo d q ls d q q d q ls q d T E X X I dt E X X I              (5.115) Substituting equation (5.114) and (5.115) in equation (5.93) to (5.106) the following expression can be obtained ' ' ' ' ( ) q do q d d d fd dE T E X X I E dt     (5.116) ' ' ' ' ( )d qo d q q q dE T E X X I dt    (5.117) base d dt     (5.118)
  • 24. 5.24   2 m e base base H d T T D dt         (5.119)  ( )fd E R E E fd fd dE T V K S E E dt    (5.120)  R A F A R A in R A F fd A ref t F dV K K T V K V V K R E K V V dt T          (5.121) F F F fd F dR K R E dt T    (5.122) 1M HP RH HP RH RH M CH SV CH CH dT K T K T T T P P dt T T           (5.123) CH CH CH SV dP T P P dt    (5.124) 1 1SV SV SV ref D s dP T P P dt R             (5.125) ' ' d d d qX I E    (5.126) ' ' q q q dX I E    (5.127) Substituting equation (5.90) and (5.91) in equation (5.126) and (127) lead to ' ' d s d q q dV R I X I E   (5.128) ' ' q s q d d qV R I X I E    (5.129) Multiplying equation (5.129) with 1j and adding it to equation (5.128) gives         ' ' ' ' ' d q s d d q q d q d qV jV R jX I jI X X I E jE        (5.130) Expressing equation (5.130) in RI-axis lead to, with the additional assumption that ' ' d qX X .       ' ' '2 2 2 j j j d q d q s d d qE jE e V jV e R jX I jI e                                 (5.131)
  • 25. 5.25 Fig. 5.8: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator transient model The dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of the synchronous generator transient model is shown in Fig. 5.8. The electrical torque is given as       * ' ' 2 2 ' ' j j e d q d q d d q q T real E jE e I jI e E I E I                                 (5.132) 5.5 Flux Decay or One-Axis Model The transient model can be further simplified by neglecting the damper windings 1q and considering only the dynamics of field winding alone. This is also justified as the time constant ' qoT is less compared to the time constant ' doT and hence can be set to zero in equation (5.117) and with this assumption equation (5.116) to (5.127) can be written as ' ' ' ' ( ) q do q d d d fd dE T E X X I E dt     (5.133) base d dt     (5.134)   2 m e base base H d T T D dt         (5.135) ' dX sR   2 j d qV jV e           ' ' 2 j d qE jE e            2 j d qI jI e          
  • 26. 5.26  ( )fd E R E E fd fd dE T V K S E E dt    (5.136)  R A F A R A in R A F fd A ref t F dV K K T V K V V K R E K V V dt T          (5.137) F F F fd F dR K R E dt T    (5.138) 1M HP RH HP RH RH M CH SV CH CH dT K T K T T T P P dt T T           (5.139) CH CH CH SV dP T P P dt    (5.140) 1 1SV SV SV ref D s dP T P P dt R             (5.141) ' ' d d d qX I E    (5.142) q q qX I   (5.143) Substituting equation (5.90) and (5.91) in equation (5.142) and (5.143) lead to d s d q qV R I X I  (5.144) ' ' q s q d d qV R I X I E    (5.145) Multiplying equation (5.145) with 1j and adding it to equation (5.144) and expressing in RI-axis gives        ' ' '2 2 2 j j j q d q q d q s d d qX X I jE e V jV e R jX I jI e                                  (5.146) The dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of flux decay model is given in Fig. 5.9.
  • 27. 5.27 Fig. 5.9: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator flux decay model 5.6 Classical or Constant Flux Linkage Model This is the simplest model but not very accurate. This model is useful in case of very large power systems. In case of dynamic studies with a time period less than that of ' doT are considered then the field winding dynamics can also be neglected. In the flux decay model in equation (5.133), if we assume that during the period of study the voltage behind the transient reactance ' dX ,  ' ' d qE jE , is constant and only the electro-mechanical equations (5.134) and (5.135) need to be considered. The transient voltage is computed at steady state,  ' ' _ _d ss q ssE jE , and kept constant throughout the study. The input mechanical torque mT is assumed to be constant and hence the turbine and turbine governor dynamics are eliminated. Hence, the dynamic equations of the model can be written as base d dt     (5.147)   2 m e base base H d T T D dt         (5.148) The dynamic equivalent circuit of the classical model is shown in Fig. 5.10 ' dX sR   2 j d qV jV e            ' ' 2 j q d q qX X I jE e             2 j d qI jI e          
  • 28. 5.28 Fig. 5.10: Dynamic electrical equivalent circuit of synchronous generator classical model ' dX sR   2 j d qV jV e           ' ' 2 _ _ j d ss q ssE jE e            2 j d qI jI e          
  • 29. 5.29 Example Problems E1. A three-phase, 50 Hz, synchronous generator is connected to an infinite bus through a transformer and two parallel transmission lines. The generator is transferring a complex power of 1 0.25j to the infinite bus. The generator parameters are given below: ' ' 0.8, 0.7, 0.2, 0.3, 0.55, 0.0025, 20, 1.0, 0.36, 0.125, 1.8 d q ls d q s A E E F F X X X X X R K K T K T = = = = = = = = = = = Initialize the synchronous generator Sol: The current drawn by the infinite bus can be computed as following 1 0.25 1.038 14.036 0 t t P jQ I j V f ¥ -  = = - = -    (E1.1) The terminal voltage of the synchronous generator is given as 0.2LX  0.15TX  1 0V    t tV  1 0.25P jQ j   
  • 30. 5.30 ( )0.5 1.0915 13.24t t t L t tV V j X X Iq f¥ = + + ´  =   (E1.2) The internal voltage of the synchronous generator is given as ( ) 2.4536 52.607q t t s q t tE V R jX Id q f =  + +  =   (E1.3) The rest of the synchronous generator variables can be initialized as following  sin 0.6923d t tV V     (E1.4)  cos 0.8438q t tV V     (E1.4)  sin 0.9463d t tI I     (E1.6)  cos 0.4086q t tI I     (E1.7) ' ' 0.4699d d s d q qE V R I X I    (E1.8) ' ' 1.1288q q s q d dE V R I X I    (E1.9) ' ' ( ) 2.5482fd q d d dE E X X I    (E1.10) ' ' 1 ( ) 1.0341d q d ls dE X X I     (E1.11) ' ' 2 ( ) 0.3269q d q ls qE X X I      (E1.12) 0.1769F F fd F K R E T   (E1.13)  ( ) 2.5482R E E fd fdV K S E E   (E1.14) 1.2189R ref t A V V V K    (E1.15) 314.159 /i base rad s   (E1.16) 1.0SV refP P  (E1.17) 1.0CH SVP P  (E1.18) 1.0M CHT P  (E1.19) 1.0e MT T  (E1.20)
  • 31. 5.31 E2. A 5 bus power system has two synchronous generators and one load as shown in the figure below. The generators are connected at bus-1 and bus-4. The load is connected at bus-5. The per unit reactances of the connecting branches are mentioned in the figure. The load is consuming a complex power of 1.8 0.65j at a voltage 0.98 11.53 . Assuming the load to be constant impedance type, convert the system admittance matrix to reduced admittance matrix with only internal nodes. Sol: The system admittance matrix can be written as 6.67 6.67 0 0 0 6.67 13.16 4 0 2.50 0 4 13.55 5 5.55 0 0 5 5 0 0 2.5 5.55 0 8.05 BUS j j j j j j Y j j j j j j j j j é ù- ê ú ê ú- ê ú ê ú= -ê ú ê ú-ê ú ê ú ê úë û (E2.1) Since the load is considered as impedance type, the load impedance can be included in the admittance matrix. The load admittance should be added to the 5th row-5th column of the admittance matrix. The load admittance can be found as following: * 5 1.8 0.65 1.932 0.2828 0.98 11.53 L P jQ j I j V - - = = = - -  (E2.2) 0.2j0.25j0.15j 1.8 0.65j 2 3 4 5 1 0.4j 0.18j 5 0.98 11.53V    ' 0.20dX j ' 0.35dX j
  • 32. 5.32 5 0.4720 0.1704L L V Z j I = = + (E2.3) 1 2.0444 0.8295L L Y j Z = = - (E2.4) The system admittance matrix can now be changed as 6.67 6.67 0 0 0 6.67 13.16 4 0 2.50 0 4 13.55 5 5.55 0 0 5 5 0 0 2.5 5.55 0 2.0444 7.2205 BUS j j j j j j Y j j j j j j j j j é ù- ê ú ê ú- ê ú ê ú= -ê ú ê ú-ê ú ê ú+ê úë û (E2.5) In order to reduce the system to internal nodes first add additional buses representing generator nodes. The generator internal nodes are connected to the respective generator terminal buses through the direct axis transient reactance. With the generator internal nodes added the system admittance matrix changes to ' GG GN NG BUS Y Y Y Y Y é ù ê ú= ê ú ê úë û (E2.6) Where, 1 0 0.2 1 0 0.35 GG j Y j é ù ê ú ê ú ê ú= ê ú ê ú ê úë û , 1 0 0 0 0 0.2 1 0 0 0 0 0.35 T GN NG j Y Y j é ù ê ú- ê ú ê ú= ê ú ê ú- ê úë û ' 11.67 6.67 0 0 0 6.67 13.16 4 0 2.50 0 4 13.55 5 5.55 0 0 5 7.8571 0 0 2.5 5.55 0 2.0444 7.2205 BUS j j j j j j Y j j j j j j j j j é ù- ê ú ê ú- ê ú ê ú= -ê ú ê ú-ê ú ê ú+ê úë û
  • 33. 5.33 The reduced admittance matrix can be computed as ( ) 1' 0.0343 2.0289 0.0281 0.0788 0.0281 0.0788 0.0230 1.5819RED GG GN BUS NG j j Y Y Y Y Y j j - é ù- + ê ú= - = ê ú+ -ë û (E2.7) In the reduced system only two buses are present, which are the internal buses of the respective generators, hence the size of the admittance matrix is 2 2´ .
  • 34. 5.34 References 1. M. Stubbe, A. Bihain, J. Deuse and J. C. Baader, “STAG-A new unified software program for the study of the dynamic behavior of electrical power systems,” IEEE Trans., Vol. PWRS-4, No. 1, pp. 129-138, 1989. 2. P. Kundur and P. L. Dandeno, “Implementation of advanced generator models into power system stability programs,” IEEE Trans., Vol. PAS-102, pp. 2047-2052, July 1983.