Scopes Trial Clash Between Science Faith

John Scopes Trial Analysis
The Scopes Trial, a Dayton, Tennessee legal case involving the teaching of evolution within the public school system, induced a pivotal point in
American history. This world–famous trial represents the ongoing conflict between science and theology, faith and reason, individual freedom of
speech, and overruling opinion of the majority. The preeminent purpose of the case was to decide not only the fate of anevolution theory teacher by the
name of John Scopes, but also to decide if fundamentalists or modernists would rule American culture and education. An object of profound publicity,
the trial was identified as a battle between urban modernism and rural fundamentalism.
On January 20, 1925, a Tennessee state senator, John A. Shelton, proposed... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bryan had disregarded them and explained that he would answer questions only under the circumstance that he could ask questions as well. Bryan had
a lengthy list of inquisitions for Darrow and supporting evolutionists; essential among these questions, he would demand explanation about the missing
evidence in fossil documentation. According to Bryan, genuine science cannot be proven true until it is classified by legitimate knowledge, thus
supporting his claim that the theory of evolution cannot be veritable science since it is merely a string of theories and assumptions. Bryan intended to
express this point in his final argument in the trial. More precariously, he accentuated the missing relations between humans and their supposed
arthropod ancestors, because there are no tangible links between them. Henry Fairfield, President of the American Museum of Natural History, came to
Bryan with so–called evidence of horse and human evolution in 1922. In this confrontation with Bryan, Fairfield explained that evidence for humanistic
development as abundant as that of horse evolution had not yet been discovered, "but the very recent discovery of Tertiary man...constitutes the most
convincing answer to Mr. Bryan's call for more evidence." (Larson). Experienced witnesses requested by Darrow brought this evidence with them to
Dayton.
In the week leading up to the trial, hundreds of people and peddlers lined the streets, selling Bibles, stuffed monkeys, and pins that read " Your Old
Man's a Monkey". There were even circus performers with live chimpanzees to entertain children. Many people thought – incorrectly – that the theory
of evolution claimed that human beings were descended from monkeys; for this reason, the newspapers and reporters dubbed the Scopes Trial "the
Monkey
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Scopes Trial Analysis
The Scopes Trial is part of a series most commonly known as the trial of the century. In this series there are many trials which are looked as
revolutionary and important part of history. But even though some trials may be big, they don't make it into the trial of the century just because
their concept and ideology isn't a very controversial and doesn't make you choose one side or the other. The Scopes Trial, also known as the
"Monkey Trial," didn't have much do with the case itself but what it actually standed for. The Scopes Trial set in motion a debate which still hasn't
been properly dealt with and clashes two polar ideas to compete against each other in order for the future generation's knowledge and to decide which
is the true way of... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In schools today things have been flipped around, for example evolution is okay to teach since it is a scientific fact and can be backed up with proofs
and claims, however a teacher cannot teach about creationism because it is a religious belief and under the law schools have to be religiously neutral.
But most of the time public schools ignore the whole thing, but in Colleges every biology class has evolution in their curriculum and the professors
have to teach it. But even if that's the case, now–a–days I think that the ideology of creationism is being taught less by the churches themselves, though
I am not a Christian and maybe because of that, I have been in several preaching sessions for FCA in middle school and club preaching in high
school and I have also attended church few times; and I have never heard of creationism until this trial and some of these preachings talked about
Genesis but backed away from many aspects of it, so I believe that creationism is being taught less as, in my opinion, as humankind is focusing
more on logic than faith. But even so the debate over the existence of evolution is being argued upon lots of times between: peers, coworkers,
preachers, atheist, agnostics, and sometimes even parents; and I believe that it is common sense to doubt these sorts of things because it is
eventually affects how one may live or how it may affects one's after life and it's human nature to have different views. But it is okay when one
takes away one side of the argument and only is taught one side, and I believe that it should be up to the person which side to be on, but using
evolution to justify one's selfishness is also wrong and is just an excuse which is used by the rich to not help the

The Scopes Trial Was Caused By Political Factors
Can you imagine not learning how to multiply or divide or anything else that you find necessary to help you succeed in school? Then maybe you
can visualize living in the state of Tennessee, where public schools could not teach Darwin's Theory of Evolution. It all started when the teachers
Butler Act was passed, it banned the teaching of the Evolution. Most people were indignant because of how the law favored those who acclaimed
the bible. The conviction of John Scopes in the Scopes Trial was caused by political factors like the laws passed and the trial itself, the geographic
factors such as the location also known as the Bible Belt and lastly the primary factor is social factors, such as religious beliefs.
Politics influenced the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The mistake had not been that Scopes was guilty because of the judges' preference over the prosecution, but it was that Scopes has been over–fined.
While many resented the law, the government did not withdraw the law, "Despite its far–reaching implications, public universities ignored the bill, and
the Governor, whom some expected would veto it, signed it into law...He understood it for what it was, a symbolic protest against the undarmining of
religion by science," (The Scopes). This shows that even though many people did not like the law because of its relation to Christianity the like
remained. The Governor did not sign the law for the purpose to better the state, but because he did not like the idea of religion and science
overlapping. Like the politic factors, geographic location also played a factor in the conviction of John Scopes.
The geographic factors such as the location, history and climate influenced the conviction in many ways. The trial's location had a major effect
because the people who live Tennessee and the extensive area are religious. Tennessee, the location where the trial was held was in the Bible Belt, The
Bible Belt region stretches from Northern Texas to Western North Carolina. In the Bible Belt region, more conservative Christians live there than other
places in the

The John Scopes Trial
Scopes Trial
The John Scopes trial took place during the year of 1925, in the state of Tennessee. John Scopes was a public school teacher who stood accused of
teaching evolution to his students, which would be considered a violation of The Butler Act.. In the movie Scopes was arrested, but in real life he
turned himself in and teamed up with the American Civil Liberties Union to defend his actions. The defense was led byClarence Darrow. William
Jennings Bryan, a three time presidential candidate and representative of the World Christian Fundamentals Association, led the litigation team. An
American journalist named H.L Mencken covered the trial. The preciding judge began each court day with a prayer and did not allow the defense to
call any expert scientific witnesses. John Scopes was found guilty at the conclusion of the trial. His punishment was to pay a fine of $100, calculating
with inflation that would be $1400 today. The verdict was later over turned by the state supreme court. The Butler Act was never again enforced. I
learned that the ACLU offered to defend any teacher charged with violating The Butler Act, and that the trial would bring much needed publicity to the
town. The case was seen as both a theological contest and a trial on whether "modern ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I will continue in the future, as I have in the past, to oppose this law in any way I can. Any other action would be in violation of my ideal of academic
freedom– that is, to teach the truth as guaranteed in our constitution, of personal and religious freedom. I think the fine is unjust". I agree with
Scopes, the fine is unjust. But as the saying goes " you did the crime, do the time". Scopes will forever be remembered in history as an honorable man
who voiced his opinion, even though his feedback fell on deaf ears. I will be lucky if I am remembered half as

William Jennings Bryan's Essay: The Scopes Trial
On the outside, The Scopes Trial was a battle between the glorious State of Tennessee and substitute teacher named John Scopes. Scopes was
accused of violating the state's Butler Act, which was a law that prohibited the teaching of evolution in public schools, favoring religious creation
stories. However, as one digs deeper into the politics of The Scopes Trial one will be able to see the anxiety that was the driving force behind the
spectacle. The trial took place in the 1920s when morals were loose and girls were looser. While William Jennings Bryan sought to push his
fundamentalist views and Clarence Darrow attempted to focus the country's attention on the flaws of the fundamentalists the American people used the
hype of the trial to showcase ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In one corner we had William Jennings Bryan who was an unsuccessful presidential candidate and seasoned leader of the Democratic Party.
Although Bryan was a conservative Christian he was also a complex man. The fundamentalist man was far from a legal or political dummy; he'd
previously served as secretary of state and he was an exceptional public speaker. Bryan was also a strong, verbal critic of the teaching of evolution in
the United States. With experience and his legal and political expertise aiding his legal preparation Bryan attempted to make his personal beliefs,
objectives, and motives a supplementary aspect in favor of creating a more nuanced basis for his argument. As Bryan focused on subtly weaving in his
core Christian, fundamentalist beliefs into his argument he put himself in a position that allowed him to center his argument against teaching evolution
in public schools at the taxpayer's expense. Bryan and many of his followers thought it was unfair that the Bible and Christianity could not be taught in
public schools along with evolution. Many felt that taxpayers were paying for the instruction that they believed was undermining children's faith in
their parents' religion. Bryan was also against teaching evolution as fact instead of just theory. As a result, Larson forces us to see a picture of conflict
between the democracy, represented by Bryan, and individual rights, represented by Clarence Darrow and the

The Scopes Trial : One Of The Best American History
The Scopes Trial is one of the best in American history because it symbolizes the conflict between science and theology, faith and reason, individual
liberty, and majority rule. This trial was to decide not only the fate of an evolution–teacher, but also to decide if traditionalists or modernists would rule
American culture. An object of intense publicity, the trial was seen as a clash between urban sophistication and rural fundamentalism.
On January 20, 1925, a Tennessee state senator named John A. Shelton proposed a bill to make it a felony, or a criminal act, to teachevolution in the
state's public schools. Fundamentalists had been supporting and pushing the passage of laws such as this, because the teaching of evolution and
Darwinism contradicts the religious beliefs of creation in Christianity. Popular evangelist, Billy Sunday, undertook an eighteen–day crusade in
Memphis in support of the prospective bill. Night after night, Sunday's audiences grew until more than two–hundred thousand people heard him preach
against the evils of evolution. The bill, known as the Butler Act, was officially passed on March 21, 1925, just 3 months after its proposal. Just as state
legislators suspected, the ink had hardly dried on the Butler Act before its first challenger emerged.
George Rappleyea, a modernist methodist who was against the new law against the teaching of evolution, urged people to rebel against the law in
order to generate publicity for the city of Dayton. John

Scopes Trial In Inherit The Wind
In their play Inherit the Wind, Lawrence and Lee's fictionalization of the Scopes Trial illustrates how the mid–twentieth century movement against
intellectualism infringed upon the Constitutional rights of Americans. By manipulating details, Lee and Laurence distanced themselves from the
repercussions they may have faced during the McCarthyism era. Furthermore, the addition of new characters and plot differences makes for a more
entertaining play. The playwrights specifically avoid referencing the Scopes Trial by adding a vague setting to their play. The stage directions are set
as "Time: Summer. Not too long ago. Place: A small town." (Lawrence). Additionally, the authors alter character names and add characters. For
example, Rachel, who... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the mid–twentieth century, Joseph McCarthy spearheaded a movement to find and prosecute Communists. Countless Americans were accused of
being affiliated with the Communist party. Thus, politicians, actors, writers, directors; people from all walks of life were very afraid of Joseph
McCarthy. They dared not to question him directly or even express their criticisms in private. Americans' fear of McCarthy became deeply ingrained
within their own minds (Llewellyn 1). Similarly in the Cates trial, Rachel is afraid to criticize fundamentalists such as Brady or Reverend Brown even
in her own thoughts. Near the end of Act 3, Rachel confesses, "You see, I haven't really thought very much. I was always afraid of what I might
think–so it seemed safer not to think at all. But now I know."(Lawrence 77).To criticize McCarthy during the McCarthy era was to criticize America
itself–– criticizing McCarthy was akin to supporting the godless Communists. By comparison, criticizing an authority figure such as Brady, the
so–called messenger of God, was to question God himself and to support the godless

Essay on Inherit the wind (Scopes trial)
The play Inherit the Wind, was written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee to inform its readers about the injustice of a law that limited the
freedom of an ordinary citizen. This play is based upon actual events that happened to an individual, John Scopes, in Dayton, Tennessee during the
1920's. This famous "Monkey Trial" not only allowed people to begin to accept new theories about the origin of man, but also showed that they did not
have to limit themselves in other areas of life.
In the beginning of the play, the authors try to lead us into the topic of Darwinism versus Creationism. One instance was when the character Howard
actually told Melinda "Your old man's a monkey!"(5) The audience also learns that the accused lawbreaker, Bert... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They used it as a tool to decrease the stress of the characters and the trial itself. For instance when Brady sarcastically says to Drummond "is the
defense showing us the latest fashion in the city of Chicago?"(40), and Drummond strikes back with slapping his suspenders down to attract the
attention of the court. They want laughter aroused in the courtroom. Hornbeck himself is in the play to create some cynical humor. Though it is not
exactly a technique, it did capture my attention how the character who did accustom with changes and was open to all new ideas ended better than he
who was "faithful" yet stubborn with old ideas.
What I didn't like about Inherit the Wind does not show to be a historically accurate depiction of the Scopes trial. The main source for Lee and
Lawrence's information was the actual trial record found in Dayton, Tennessee, dating back to 1925. They did not use all of the characters or dialogue
from the records, instead they elaborated on the actual people and events, also using reporters' stories on the case. The authors placed intriguing
characters within the play to make the story's events unfold more readily and become more interesting. The book shows the reader how closed minded
that these characters can be when it comes to a new, different idea.
The authors used primary sources, they depended on the original court recorded documents. In this cause its prevalent to say there documentation of
the trial was an accurate

Essay on Inherit the Wind (Scopes Trial)
The play Inherit the Wind, was written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee to inform its readers about the injustice of a law that limited the
freedom of an ordinary citizen. This play is based upon actual events that happened to an individual, John Scopes, in Dayton, Tennessee during the
1920's. This famous "Monkey Trial" not only allowed people to begin to accept new theories about the origin of man, but also showed that they did
not have to limit themselves in other areas of life. In the beginning of the play, the authors try to lead us into the topic of Darwinism versus Creationism.
One instance was when the character Howard actually told Melinda "Your old man's a monkey!"(5) The audience also learns that the accused
lawbreaker, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This format also allowed the story to be conveyed without any bias to either side. It is in this way that the authors allow each side of the case to speak
their minds freely. In my opinion the theme's purpose was achieved through the expression of becoming open with new ideas and leaving the play as
unbiased form.
The author's key style as well highlighted humour, as a comic relief. They used it as a tool to decrease the stress of the characters and the trial itself.
For instance when Brady sarcastically says to Drummond "is the defense showing us the latest fashion in the city of Chicago?"(40), and Drummond
strikes back with slapping his suspenders down to attract the attention of the court. They want laughter aroused in the courtroom. Hornbeck himself is
in the play to create some cynical humor. Though it is not exactly a technique, it did capture my attention how the character who did accustom with
changes and was open to all new ideas ended better than he who was "faithful" yet stubborn with old ideas.
What I didn't like about Inherit the Wind does not show to be a historically accurate depiction of the Scopes trial. The main source for Lee and
Lawrence's information was the actual trial record found in Dayton, Tennessee, dating back to 1925. They did not use all of the characters or dialogue
from the records, instead they elaborated on the actual people and events, also using reporters' stories on the case. The authors

Scopes Monkey Trial Research Paper
The aftermath of the Great war and the Great Depression brought on a dramatic social change in America in the 1920s. The social change was a
revolution that brought on two fundamentally different beings; modernists and fundamentalists. While fundamentalists valued the bible, and lived by it
in its entirety, modernists were more self–conscious and favored creativity and common sense rather than the bible. The divide had to come head when
the controversial Scopes "Monkey" Trial began and new theories were explored which were then applied in modernist art, literature, and the way of
thinking. The revolution in manners in morals is the direct outcome of new innovations studied in the twentieth century. The Scopes "Monkey" Trial is
a direct reflection... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Albert Einstein, famed psychist, offered scientific research that startled fundamentalists and excited modernists. The huge influence the reject God was
largely responsible of famed psychist, Albert Einstein. His contributions in science left individuals unsure about the past and curious about the future.
Einstein theorized that "space, time, matter, and energy were not distinct" (Shi and Tindall 799). His research left many to embrace the idea that there
"were no absolute standards or fixed points of reference in the world" (Shi and Tindall 799) . What was once said that God created all was questioned
with Einstein's research. Another man's research in psychoanalysis questioned the morals and the way that people carried out their lives in the 1920s.
Sigmund Freud, a psychoanalyst from Europe, heavily influenced Americans because of his teachings about sex and behavior. Freud believed that "the
mind was essentially and mysteriously "conflicted" by often unconscious efforts to control or repress powerful irrational impulses or sexual desires"
(Shi and Tindall 799). His work gave life a deeper meaning and influenced sexual liberation. Writers expressed their art through dreams and
imaginations. The new revelations bought on by Einstein and Freud changed the way of life for both modernists and fundamentalists. Modernists
applied the news ideas by applying them into their life by expressing themselves through art, rejecting the bible, and imagine about the unknown.
Fundamentalists stuck to traditional values and believed in God. The new revelations weren't enough for fundamentalists to question their

Outcome of The Scopes Monkey Trial Essay
The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee vs. Scopes but given the nickname "The Monkey Trial", has been credited as starting
the popular legal dispute between evolution and creationism in the court, and its impact in the 20's was immeasurable. The interpretation of the case
is just as popular, if not more, than the actual result of the case. The worldwide attention and media coverage the case received produced many
opinions. Scholar's opinions range from describing the case as an irrelevancy and a good show to describing it as a "Watershed in American religious
history" (Ronald L. Numbers, 1998, p. 76). A large factor in why the Scopes trial has received so much attention in an insignificant town is because of
the stage... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though many southern states frowned upon teaching evolution because of Creationism being highly influential, Tennessee took the matter up a
notch when they were the first state to make the teaching of Evolution a punishable crime. Evolution was like an evil spirit in Tennessee, no one
wanted to be associated with it, have it taught in public schools, and especially never be compared to a monkey. This strong opposition against
Evolution makes Tennessee an interesting battleground for Creationism and Evolution. The first step of the battle was for theButler Act to find its
opponent. What ended up happening was something that was unknown to the public; Leaders from Dayton, a small town in Tennessee, were
conspiring to violate the Butler Act. "Civil leaders of Dayton saw an opportunity to benefit the town by increasing its visibility through publicity"
(Singham, 2009, p. 23). The idea was first considered in Dayton by George Rappleyea, a businessman who owned multiple mines around Dayton.
Rappleyea, along with a few connections in the county school council and city prosecutors, were looking for someone to charge with violating the
Butler Act (Singham, 2009).
They soon found their candidate, John T. Scopes. Scopes was a substitute biology teacher who was somehow intertwined with Rappleyea's plans.
Scopes agreed to be accused of violating the law mainly because he did not have much to lose career wise, and was not a permanent resident of

The Film, Inherit The Wind, By The Scopes Monkey Trial
This paper discusses how the film, Inherit The Wind, portrays the Scopes Monkey Trial. The film showed both sides of the argument fairly. It was
conveying a message that a person should try to understand and respect each opinion when arguing their own side. Three evidentiary issues of the
trial in the film will also be discussed. The three issues that are objected to in the film are an opinion question, hearsay, and relevance. The judge
sustained all three objections, saying that they were inadmissible. I agree with the judge 's ruling on the opinion question, but I do not agree with the
judge 's ruling on the hearsay and relevance objection. For each of these issues, there will be a discussion of the Federal Rule of Evidence that is
implicated, the judge's ruling on the issue, and whether or not the ruling was appropriate by comparing it to the Federal Rules of Evidence. Each issue
will be explained in detail with the context of the conversation to show how it happened in the film.
INHERIT THE WIND REFLECTION3
Inherit The Wind Reflection The film, Inherit The Wind, conveys a message that a person should try to understand and respect each opinion when
arguing their own side. It did not seem to show much bias, but instead made it seems like they wanted the viewers to see each side. The three issues
that are objected to in the film are an opinion question, hearsay, and relevance. Each issue will be analyzed with the Federal Rules of

Bryan's Trial: The Morality Of The Scopes Trial
The Scopes Trial was an eight day court case brought up around the issue of teaching evolution within schools, and the morality of it, which
ultimately led to the defendant, John Scopes, to be pronounced guilty of teaching evolution within schools. Although it would seem that the Scopes
Trial was an issue of legality, it was chiefly a religious conflict between the old generation's way of thinking, and the new generation's cultural
rebellion. Because of the major focus on William Jennings Bryan's knowledge of the bible, it would be best to observe and evaluate the seventh day
of the trial. As the day starts, Clarence Darrow, the defendant's lawyer, calls Bryan to the stand, and asks of his "interpretation of the Bible," (144).
This question provides further evidence of the religious basis of the Scopes Trial, simply because the defendant's side realized that, in order to protect
the teaching of The Theory of Evolution, flaws within the bible's interpretation and reasoning would have to be pointed out. This would weaken the
argument of the plaintiff, and possible help the jury realize that The Theory of Evolution was plausible.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This immediately tested the old generation's way of thinking, to see if it could stand up to the new generation's way. Although the scientific theory of
evolution would have it that animals evolved into different types, instead of considering the theory, the old generation believed that God made all of
the creatures on Earth as they were for a reason. Bryan, being quite representative of the old generation's way of thinking, confirmed that he believed

Scopes Trial Essay
The twentieth century Scopes trial may have started out as a simple debate between evolutionists and creationists, but quickly escalated to a debate of
historic proportions. The 1920s were times of change in the United States, from women getting the right to vote to prohibition to changes in education,
such as the Butler Act, which created unease and animosity throughout the country. The Butler Act of 1925 prohibited the teaching ofevolution and any
other theories that deny the story of the divine creation of man as taught in the Bible in all Universities and public schools in Tennessee. John Scopes, a
high–school biology teacher in Dayton, Tennessee decided to test this law. He was found guilty of teaching evolution to his high–school ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Giving students freedom in their academic lives encouraged students to form their own opinions. Teachers had biased feelings towards those who
denied students the right to the whole truth because of specific religions, because it raises an uneducated generation. Fundamentalists needed to realize
that as times changed9 modernization of education is necessary, regardless of religious beliefs so students receive the full truth and become liberated
people. If students are restricted from certain topics and are only taught one view on a few subjects then there will be no new or different ways of
thinking, rendering education pointless. "Without freedom in the intellectual life, and without the inspiration of uncensored discovery and discussion,
there could ultimately be no scholarship, no schools at all and no education." The American Federation of Teachers expressed their fear for the future of
education and how it would be constrained due to traditionalism, in contradiction of Sparks and other creationists. Dudley Field Malone, an attorney on
the defense team for the Scopes trial, argued for the importance of teaching science and religion to fully educate the students and allow them to form
their own opinions and ideas. Malone made the point that the old generation owes the new generation all the facts and theories acquired by learning,
studying, and observing so they have the opportunity to enhance and better the generations

The Scopes Trial And Its Impact On The American Education...
The Scopes Trial is a standout amongst the most well–known trials in American history. The trial was a lawful case in 1925 in which a substitute high
school teacher, John Scopes, was charged with violating Tennessee 's Butler Act, which made it illegal to teach Darwinism in any state
–financed
school. This trial was a gathering between various polar opposites, for example, Fundamentalism and Modernism. The clash between fundamentalism
and modernism during the Scopes Trial had a significant impact on the American education system. In America, in the 1920s, two significant cultural
movements arose that eventually clashed. A Christian fundamentalist movement arose in America and the fundamentalist's goal during this time was to
recover and publicly institutionalize old time religious fundamental values. Fundamentalist believed in a literal interpretation of the Bible, and thus
strongly objected to the teachings of Charles Darwin, since his theory of evolution contradicted the origin of man as found in the Bible. In the 1920s,
the Christian fundamentalist began to gain political power across America and started passing legislation banning the teaching of Darwinism in state
funded schools. At the same time cultural modernism was also rising in America. Modernist believes in a secular government and their agenda was
education, democratic reforms, and economic progress. These two conflicting ideologies would inevitably clash, which occurred in the Scopes Trial of

John Scopes Research Paper
During a time when evolution in the classroom was a disgrace, John Scopes illegally taught evolution to a class. The "Butler Act" stopped people
from teaching their beliefs about evolution. John Scopes went to trial and lost, but his motive spoke louder than his actions. Now, people are able to
express their beliefs.The twenties were surely an exciting time for America. Big business grew, people didn't have to work as hard, and people of
different colors and religions gained freedom. Sadly, with every person that embraces change, there is always one who fears change.On March 13,
1925, Tennessee legislature enacted the Butler Act. The Butler Act prevented any school that received government funding from teachingevolution. As
many

John Scopes Controversy
The summer of 1925 was a controversial period of time in the town of Dayton, Tennessee. There had been a law that banned evolution taught in
classrooms; the American Civil Liberties Union challenged said law with the help of John Scopes, who was a teacher that taught the theory of
evolution in his classroom. In the trial, Clarence Darrow represented Scopes and faced off William Jennings Bryan, who was against evolution being
taught and a well–known criminal defense lawyer. In the first section of the book, before the trial, the foundation for the controversy was arranged.
Charles Dawson discovered bones and other fragments of a skull that were known as the Piltdown skull. The Piltdown skull was first thought to have
been from a normal ape, but later evidence collected from Arthur Smith Woodward said otherwise. The skull was said to have been from an... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Scopes fine and conviction were overturned later on a technicality, but the debate between the anti–evolutionists and modernists continued over
evolution and religion in the classroom subject matter long after the trial was over. Many books were written about the Scopes Trials that described
what happened such as Only Yesterday: An Informal History of the Nineteen–Twenties, and Inherit the Wind. The author of Only Yesterday, Fredrick
Lewis Allen, described the trials very simply as a loss for fundamentalism and many others followed in his description. Political and public views
from this case also changed, which led toward the idea of creation to be taught in schools rather than so much emphasis on evolution being banned.
This led to religious practices in schools began to diminish as the years went on as well. As more arguments arose and settled, the law that banned
evolution in school was finally repealed in

John Scopes Background
On March 22, 1925 Tennessee passed the Butler Act. Making it unlawful in public schools to teach any theory that denies the story of divine creation
as taught by the Bible. But to teach instead that man was descended from a lower order of animals. It was in the small town of Dayton, Tennessee
where a 24 year old fresh out of college , high school substitute named John Scopes taught the theory of evolution to a biology class. This was just two
months after the passing of the Butler Act. John Scopes was then charged with teaching evolution in public school. The proceeding trial will not only
become a battle between science and religion but it will bring together two of the most prominent attorneys of the early 20th century. Clarence Darrow
and

Ted Davis's Scopes Trial
On April 7, 2017, a colloquium was given by Dr. Ted Davis from Messiah College. It covered the controversy surrounding religion and science
during the 1920s. At the beginning of his presentation, he presented and handed out some interesting primary sources. These primary sources were
pamphlets commonly used in the 1920s to promote scientific reasoning (mainly evolution) and were written by some influential scholars and
preachers of the time. He briefly discussed the Scopes Trial, which is probably the most famous example of science vs religion here in the US, and
used it as a jumping off point for the history leading up to this trial. From here he began to discuss how World War I had put a negative connotation on
evolution due to the social... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
From class I could see that this was a national issue and very publicized, so having more information regarding the publics mindset has made the trial
even more fascinating for me. One of the things that was mentioned a couple of times was the fact that the scientists calling for a more unified
relationship between religion and science, were also supports of eugenics. As we know, the ideas surrounding eugenics are completely false and was
partly responsible for issues and event such as Racism and Nazism. After taking a couple of days to analyze everything presented, the main course
theme the colloquium seemed to be tied to was propaganda and its uses in American culture. As we have seen in our class propaganda, including
cartoons, has been used to sway public opinion and garner support for things like World War II and the anti
–Communist legislation/ideology.
movement over things like communism and garner support for causes such as World. The various cartoons presented during Dr. Davis' lecture were
very reminiscent to some we have seen in class regarding topics such as the ones stated above. It should be noted that all the cartoons shown besides
one were drawn by the religious side of the conflict. In my opinion, the side arguing for more corporation between science and religion had more
respectable response. Overall, the colloquium by

John Scopes Research Paper
Alex Poppe
Mrs. Lilley
English III
14 April 2016
The Effect of the Scopes Trial on Education
The 1920s was a decade of significant importance in the world of science.
In 1859, Charles Darwin declared his theory of evolution – humans had descended from apes. This ideology was unpopular throughout the minds of
freedom–and–Jesus–loving Americans. Although 1920's technology was on its way to new findings, the traditionally southern public eye didn't seem
to be fascinated with the thought of people descending from humongous and hairy beings. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) supported
Darwin's theory, though. The Union was formed to protect the rights proclaimed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. With that mission in mind, the
ACLU paid for John Scopes' defense team and promoted that he challenge the law (Leinwand 206). John Scopes was a science teacher in Dayton,
Tennessee, specializing in biology. He used a state–approved textbook to teach his students, but because the book included Darwin's theory of evolution
, Scopes was not legally able to teach that portion of the text. He was then arrested for violating the Butler Act, which was just recently passed, and
defended the ACLU (Green 164).
Not only did the majority of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
School boards and textbook publishers made it a point to put an end to the teaching of evolution in schools throughout the United States entirely. The
textbook used by John Scopes in Tennessee was actually renamed as "New Civic Biology" to differentiate it from the previously used book explaining
evolution. George Hunter, the publisher of the biology textbook, feared that the publicity from the Scopes Trial would cause harm to the usage of his
book in classrooms. Because of this frightening thought, Hunter eliminated the section involving evolution, as well as many other of biology textbook
publishers did at the

Scopes Trial Of 1925 Essay
The Scopes Trial of 1925 was one of the quandary case ever witnessed by the American government and public. It was a conflict between science and
theology, faith and reason. Lasting eight days this was one of the first media extensive coverage of that time resulted in thousands of print, interviews,
and commentary sent from Dayton which helped to shape the public perception of what occurred in the nation. In addition, the trial was a maze run
itself where many thought that it was challenging the constitutionality of the bill, to publicly advocate for the legitimacy of Darwin's theory of evolution
, many other thought it was a publicity stunt for the town of Dayton, Tennessee. In simple words, it was a contest between evolution and Christianity....
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They were also strict toward way came through Bible. Judge Raulston who was strong believer of Bible started proceeding each day with prayer of
Lord Almighty. The prosecution thought that their best bet was to focus on the fact that a law had been broken. The soundness of the law, and the
soundness of the religious and scientific aspects of said law, weren't in question. Stating that Butler Act was broken and Scopes should held charge of it.
In comparison defense brought focus on scientific aspect of law. Many experts witnesses that the Darwinism as absolute fact and questioning the
constitutionality of the Butler

Scopes Trial Essay Thesis
The Scopes trial is a standout amongst the most well–known trials in American history. The trial was a lawful case in 1925 in which a substitute high
school teacher, John Scopes, was charged with violating Tennessee 's Butler Act, which made it illegal to teach Darwinism in any state
–financed
school. This trial was a gathering between various polar opposites, for example, Fundamentalism and Modernism. The fundamentalism and modernism
conversion during the Scopes Trial had an extreme impact on the American Education System. The Scopes trial was a trial over a misdemeanor offense
by substitute teacher John Scopes, but it ended up becoming an even huger trial between fundamentalist and modernist. Modernist and fundamentalist
were fighting for control of America's education system and the result of the trial would have a drastic effect on Tennessee's education system. When
the Butler Act was passed in 1925, the ACLU (American Citizens Liberties Union) sent a press discharge to a few Tennessee daily papers, publishing
that they would give legitimate support, and so forth for a teacher in Tennessee who would be eager to stand trial for having taught Darwinism in a
government funded school so an experiment could be mounted to test the established legitimacy of the Act. A gathering of citizens in the residential
area of Dayton acknowledged ACLU 's offer, with the expectation that the exposure encompassing the trial would help to switch the town 's declining
fortunes. The group

The 1920's: The Scopes Monkey Trial
The 1920's were a time of change in America. During previous years religion had been a major part of people's lives, but as America began to
flourish with new advancements, technology, and a flood of immigrants, what was once a religious culture was headed towards a modernist culture.
One example of this shift of ideas is the Scopes Monkey Trial, which was a trial of religion versus science. William Jennings Bryan was the most
significant person who took a stand against the teaching of evolution. Dartmouth College was the only college in the country at the time that required
students to take a full semester of evolution during their freshman year. Bryan went to speak at the college in 1924 (Willey). William Jennings Bryan
had been the democratic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They conducted family devotions and attended church regularly. This is where William Jennings Bryan got his faith. Bryan was a model boy
growing up, he did not drink, smoke, swear, or gamble. Bryan was a prominent Christian in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia, the Baptist
church in his neighborhood even became known as the "Bryan Meeting House." He had a devout religious stance during his professional political
career as well. When asked how he could be a progressive in politics and a fundamentalist in religion, Bryan answered that government is mad
made and therefore imperfect. If Christ is the final word, how may any one be progressive in religion (Willard). Bryan showed that he can be both
involved in politics and in religion. He is a prominent leader in both aspects. Bryan's want for bring international peace and his condemnation of war
came about because of Jesus, the Prince of Peace. His speeches were filled with biblical expressions, metaphors, and quotes. In American history,
Bryan probably quoted more scripture than most politicians. In some cases, people taunted him and said he was a dreamer and visionary, but Bryan
had a touch of humor and would take it as a compliment. He exemplified love and the turning of the other cheek. "Bryan as we have seen had more
attention to political and social reform than did other ultra conservative leaders" (Russell). Bryan felt that preaching the word must cover a vast

Analysis Of John T. Scopes Monkey Trial
Religion and science both face off in ВЁThe Scopes 'Monkey' Trial," the case that America went "bananas" over. Two men duel to prove their points
about evolution and whether it defies state laws or not. The conflict of John T. Scopes defying the Butler Act, an act prohibiting public school
teachers from denying Biblical accounts of man's origin, was temporarily resolved with Scopes being fined, but this compromise was not entirely
settled until the Butler Act was repealed years later. Biblical theology was a very strong belief among many, even when scientists proved them wrong
with evidence. According to "The Scopes Monkey Trial," Charles Darwin first caused scandal to the U.S. when he published his book, On the Origin
of Species By Means

Scopes Trial Case Study
1. An ethical dilemma occurs when two moral imperatives contradict one another. In the case of the Scopes Trial, for example, while the Bible stated
that God created humans on the sixth day of creation, Darwinian evolution argued that humankind evolved through natural selection over a period of
millions of years. This dilemma created a heated debate that impacted the entire country. Describe the circumstances and developments that allowed the
dilemma to become an issue in Tennessee in 1925. (See especially pp. 20–27) [PR1] A legislation act was raised and passed as a bill within Tennessee
in 1925 by the antievolution individual known as John Washington Butler who emphasized on the eradication of initiating teachings that concern
evolution as a learning activity within the learning institution. However, many individuals were against Butler's bill; therefore, Tennessee Senate was
responsible for passing the bill that was voted by the majority. Various issues were raised by the members of the Senate to vote Butler's bill down (21).
This was an indication that... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He obtained the information from the foreman which rendered Mr. Scoop guilty. I do not think Judge Raulston's final decision was just. He should
have considered the importance of the academic freedom before he presented his final decision. Also, the ethical dilemma was not solved since only
one person was prosecuted as a result of presenting information to many people who have already obtained the knowledge concerning the information
presented. I believe that academic freedom is important to all people; therefore, the need of emphasizing on education serves as the essential factor
within the society. People need to understand the importance of academic freedom for them to recognize what is hidden from them and what is needed
to be

The Scopes ' Monkey ' Trial
In the United States, the early 1920s was a time of shifting and conflicting moral values due to people attempting to see which values would dominate
the nation's culture. One conflict was between science and religion; ever since science began to explain what once was unexplainable, it clashed with
religion. Thus, in 1925, the Scopes "Monkey" Trial revealed the struggle of America's culture between the forces of Traditionalism and Modernism.
The mixture of religion and science caused one of the most famous debates in American history to occur because ideas were the main focus instead of
an actual crime. The Scopes Trial opened the doors to the conflict between faith and science that made it the trial of the century.
Dayton is a small beautiful Southern town in Tennessee with only a few thousand inhabitants. However, in 1925, Dayton was on the front pages of
newspapers all over the United States. Thousands of Americans were arriving to watch the spectacle that happened in this town. Mencken, one of the
reporters that came to see the trial unfold, stated that the Scopes Trial was an extraordinary opportunity to put the small town of Dayton on the map
(Scopes Trial, Mencken's Trial Account, July 9, p. 1). Not only that, the trial broughtClarence Darrow, the nation's greatest defense attorney, and
William Jennings Bryan, the nation's greatest political orator and three–time presidential candidate, into the trial. Due to these factors, New York Times
called it "the most

John Scopes Inherit The Wind
Inherit the Wind Rough Draft The Play Inherit the Wind is very similar to many different events in history, such as the Scopes trial, or even the
McCarthy trials. In the famous Scopes trial or "Monkey trial," John Scopes was caught teaching evolution to his biology students. Not long before the
trial, Darwin's Theory of Evolution had been published. Darwin's novel contained a newly formed idea that man was created from gradual evolution.
The idea caused an outrage from several Christian religious groups, because it went against the book of Genesis in the Bible. This discontent grew so
much that the state of Tennessee passed a law on evolution. This law prohibited the teaching of evolution, with a $500 dollar fine per violation. The
Scopes trial led the most famous lawyers of the time to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To break this law was a minor offense, but it would shake America. Scopes lost the trial, but he showcased a point to the world. The play writers used
the Scopes trial to warn of the McCarthy trails, which were happening when it was written. He argued that he had the freedom of speech to teach what
he wanted. This is very similar to Inherit the Wind in which Bertram Cates, also intentionally breaks the laws because he believes that he should be
able to teach what he wants. In the play, the prosecutor, Mathew Harrison Brady, is a very religious man who believes very strongly in the Bible.
He is a priest and basks in popularity and adoration. He is very similar to the prosecutor in the Scopes trial, who is also a religious and popular man.
Through the play Inherit the Wind, Mathew Harrison Brady held onto the old ways too tightly, he built his beliefs and life around love and adoration
from others, and when that was taken

The Scopes Trial: The Monkey Trial
"Everything in the Bible should be taken as it is given" Bryan. "The Scopes Trial" also known as "the Monkey Trial" was a very controversial trial
because of what was at stake and what Scopes was on trial for. John Scopes was on trial for teaching Evolution in his 8th grade class. This trial was
the first trial ever to be broadcast on the radio because of how controversial it was. There was also a book written in 1955 called Inherit The Wind
which we will be comparing to the actual trial. This book was a lot different from the actual trial on many points... I will describe these point and
how they differ. I will be using the literary elements Mood, how he story feels to the reader, Symbolism/Impact, what the story symbolizes and how
it impacted the world, and Setting, the setting is where the story takes place. To begin this comparing I will use mood. The mood in Inherit the
Wind is very tense but there are joyous parts to the story. In the Actual Scopes Trial the mood was very friendly and laid back. These two things
differ greatly as tenseness is the absolute opposite of friendliness. Also in the real trial the jury as actually only in the courtroom for a few hours of the
week long... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Inherit the wind changes the people in the story it makes them change from Church–going Bible Toters to evolutionists. The spectators begins to mill
about... a number of reporters clutter around Drummond. (Lawrence & Lee, 1955). Before Drummond–Darrow in the real trial–Puts Brady–Bryan in
the real trial–On the witness stand to question him on the Bible and Brady admits that the world could have possibly taken more than 6 days as
stated in Genesis. This shows that words can have a real impact on people when they are said by the right person. The exact opposite happened in the
real trial. No matter what was said, the people never budged form their Christianity. This shows that Inherit the Wind is a fictional

The Scopes Trial Induced A Pivotal Point
The Scopes Trial induced a pivotal point in American history because it symbolizes the conflict between science and theology, faith and reason,
individual liberty, and majority rule. This trial was to decide not only the fate of an evolution–teacher, but also to decide if traditionalists or modernists
would rule American culture. An object of intense publicity, the trial was seen as a clash between urban sophistication and rural fundamentalism.
On January 20, 1925, a Tennessee state senator named John A. Shelton proposed a bill to make the teaching ofevolution in the state's public schools a
felony, or a criminal act. Fundamentalists had been supporting and pushing the passage of laws such as this for years, because the teaching of evolution
and Darwinism contradicts the religious beliefs of creation in Christianity. Popular evangelist, Billy Sunday, undertook an eighteen–day crusade in
Memphis in support of the prospective bill. Night after night, Sunday's audiences grew until more than two–hundred thousand people heard him preach
against the evils of evolution. The bill, known as the Butler Act, was officially passed on March 21, 1925, just 3 months after its proposal. Just as state
legislators suspected, the ink had hardly dried on the Butler Act before its first challenger emerged.
George Rappleyea, a modernist methodist who was against the new regulation, urged people to rebel against the law in order to generate publicity for
the city of Dayton. John Thomas

John Scopes: Should Evolution Be Taught In Schools
John Scopes was born on August 3, 1900, in Paducah, Kentucky. In 1924 he started to teach at Rhea County Central High School in Dayton, Tennessee.
At that time there was a national debate about whether evolution should be taught in schools. It was then later decided that evolution would not be
taught in publicly funded schools. The American Civil Liberties Union thought differently and wanted to challenge the Butler Act. John Scopes
volunteered to be tried under this new law. He admitted to using a textbook that contained evolution while serving as a substitute biology teacher. He
wanted to stand up for academic freedom. He once said, "What goes on in the classroom is up to the student and the teacher. Once you introduce the
power of the state telling what you can and cannot do you've become involved in propaganda." John Scopes was found guilty, but his conviction was
later overturned.
John Butler was a state representative from 1923–1927. Representative Butler wrote the Tennessee Anti–Evolution Act, also known as the Tennessee
Monkey Law. Butler lived in Macon County where he became a prosperous middle aged farmer, thresher operator, and community leader by 1925. He
ran for state legislature in 1922 promising to work for the farmers and the economy. He was appointed to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
They say he was in the top of his profession and in the 1920's he was the most famous trial attorney in America regularly earning 250,000 dollars
per trial. Clarence said that a case like this one was a dream come true because he was agnostic and Jennings was a presbyterian. He always wanted
to go head to head against Jennings in a evolution versus religion court case. After the death of Jennings just five days after the trial everyone accused
Darrow of murdering him. He then countered them by saying he died of "a Busted

The Scopes Trial Essay
Dayton, Tennessee only held 6,000 residents however it became a landmark after The Scopes Trials were held there. At the time of the trials, people
flooded in from all around the country to witness what would be one of the most controversial court cases of the century.
On April 24, 1925, John Thomas Scopes was charged with the teaching of evolution, which went against the Butler Act. The Butler Act made it illegal
to teach any theory denying the divine creation of man in all of Tennessee's public schools. Up until then, it was widely accepted that the origin of man
hadn't derived from wild animals. Locals of Dayton pursued publicity from the court case over the actual teaching of evolution. George Rappleyea, the
local coal mine manager, attempted to persuade other town leaders that a controversial court case would attract much media attention and "put Dayton
on the map." School superintendent Walter White was a town leader present and decided 24 year old generalscience teacher John Scopes was a
suitable candidate for the guilty party. Rappleyea said that "nobody could teach biology without teaching evolution." Once Scopes was convinced he
had indeed broken the law by teaching evolution, he agreed to take place in the trial. The main prosecuting attorney was William Jennings Bryan, a
three time presidential candidate and former Secretary of State. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After John Scopes was found guilty, he stated "to oppose this law in any way I can. Any other action would be in violation of my ideal of academic
freedom – that is, to teach the truth as guaranteed in our constitution, of personal and religious freedom." The Butler Act remained in place until May
17, 1967, when teacher Gary L. Scott sought permanent injunction against the act. The Scopes Trial was followed by many similar court cases. After
Epperson vs. Arkansas in 1968 the Supreme Court ruled banning the teaching of evolution

John Scopes Monkey Trial Analysis
The Scopes Trial was one of the most famous court cases ever. The case lasted from the 10–21 of July in 1925. This means that there were eight trial
days. This case all started when John Scopes was accused of teaching evolution in school. In "Monkey Trial begins" by the History channel stated,
"...accused of teaching evolution in violation of a Tennessee state law.
The law, which had been passed in March, made it a misdemeanor punishable by fine to 'teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation
of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals."' "Nearly a thousand people, 300 of whom
were standing, jammed the Rhea County Courthouse on July 10, 1925 for the first day of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This announcement stated that they would offer their service to anyone who would like to go against the newly passed Butler Law. Rappalye saw
this as an opportunity to put Dayton on the map. This plan did put Dayton on the map just like Rappalye hoped it would. He lured John Scopes a
young science teacher to the drugstore. There he convinced Scopes to teach evolution in the classroom. From here the trial eventually began and
became one of history's most famous court cases ever.
When the trial began on the 10th of July spectators and reporters were quick on the scene. The Streets of Dayton, Tennessee had a carnival like
atmosphere. It lasted for seven more historic days. People were selling all sorts of things to flame the fire of the court case.
Each day started out with a prayer by different people. On day one the jury was chosen; it consisted mostly of churchgoers.
According to State v. John Scopes ("The Monkey Trial")by Douglas O. Linder stated, "The defense's goal was not to win acquittal for John Scopes, but
rather to obtain a declaration by a higher court–preferably the U.S. Supreme Court–that laws forbidding the teaching of evolution were
unconstitutional.." The defense team was hoping that no one was realizing what they were

Religion Versus Science in The Scopes Trial
This trial took place in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, and the central figure was a
twenty five–year–old science teacher named John Scopes. Scopes was under the umbrella
of advancing America, and the trial was dubbed The Scopes "Monkey" Trial. In 1925,
John Scopes was encouraged to challenge the Butler Law. This law was passed in the
state of Tennessee to bar teachings contrary to those in the Bible. Teachings from an
evolutionary text, Scopes broke the law and drew the attention of the media. The focus of
the media on the Scopes trial clearly presented the difference in the ideas of a religious
town and an evolving country.
Dayton, Tennessee was a stable and religious town. According to Jeffery P. Moran,
Attorney. General. Tom Stewart was quoted having said that, "The state makes no
contention, as stated by counsel for the defense, that this is a conflict between science and
religion insofar as the merits are concerned" ( Moran 95 ). This conflict was the major
focus of the trial as people in the town were displaying banners with the sign 'Read Your
Bible'. The people living here had taken up the Bible teachings so they could feel a sense

of security within a time of change. "Evolution disputes the Bible record of man's
creation, and the logic of the evolution eliminates as false the miracles of the Bible,
including the virgin birth and the bodily resurrection of Christ" ( Moran 191 ). This made

Scopes Trial Research Paper
The Scopes Trial is part of a series most commonly known as the trial of the century. In this series there are many trials which are looked as
revolutionary and important part of history. But even though some trials may be big, they don't make it into the trial of the century just because
their concept and ideology isn't a very controversial and doesn't make you choose one side or the other. The Scopes Trial, also known as the
"Monkey Trial," didn't have much do with the case itself but what it actually stands for. The Scopes Trial set in motion a debate which still hasn't been
properly dealt with and clashes two polar ideas to compete against each other in order for the future generation's knowledge and to decide the true way
of human existence... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These are two polar ideas but have the same goals and we as human beings want to teach our kids same morals and standards as for us because with
them one has gone on to be successful (hopefully) that is why when we hear the other side of the argument we get protective because one feels like
it may change their child and fail them in life which is also natural to think for someone one loves. But when we go along and think that everyone
would be better their way then this causes mass troubles for the people who opposes that view (like the agnostics in Dayton or Mr Darrow's dad) and
I feel that one should not do that and be open–minded to all ideas and if one disagrees then one should look away but not take that right from someone
else, after all, that is what this nation stands

Scopes Monkey Trial Summary
The Scopes Trial: A Brief History with Documents by Jeffrey P. Moran is a book that details the significant events that transpired in the Scopes
Trial on 1925. The book, in part II, highlights eight days of the proceedings in regards to the Scopes Trial that occurred from July 10, 1925 to July
21, 1925. Furthermore, a couple of newspapers relating to the proceedings were scattered across as well. In part III, a plethora of documents, cartoons,
and newspapers are showcased extensively pertaining to the Scopes Trial. Three documents that have stood out were Who Shall Control Our Schools?
by William Jennings Bryan and Tennessee Can Dictate Curriculum, Not Answers by R.S. Woodworth. The Scopes Trial, also known as the Monkey
Trial, was a court ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, the teacher would be under an employer, the person who is paying the salary or wage to the teacher. Under a business point of view,
contracts are typically signed that waives certain rights from the teacher from performing a considerate amount of actions. Some examples could be
suing the company or even teaching certain topics. Bryan also summed it up well; that "as a representative, [Scopes] has no right to misrepresent;
as an employee, he is compelled to act under the direction of his employers and has no right to defy instructions and still claim his salary (p.191)."
Under business regulations and terms, Scopes would be deemed guilty. However, in this case, it was merely if Scopes violated the Butler Act. While
Scopes did violate the Butler Act, the Butler Act itself would be considered a violation of Scopes' rights of freedom of religion and speech. Hence,
this would be the reason why in 1926, the Tennessee Supreme Court reversed the court guilty ruling and dismissed the

The Scopes Monkey Trial
Ever since science began to explain the previously unexplainable, it has caused conflicts with religion. The Scopes "Monkey" Trial of Dayton,
Tennessee was one of the most talked about trials in history because it was one of the first and most publicized times that this conflict occurred. The
trial showed the schism between the faithful fundamentalists and the newly formed group of evolutionists. Although the jury was reminded that they
only had to decide if Scopes had broken the law, the verdict was seen as much more than that. For one of the first times in history, it seemed as if the
jury had to choose either religion or evolution. For the time being, there could not be both. The Scopes "Monkey" Trial revealed the ongoing conflict
with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That May, the American Civil Liberties Union put an ad in the newspaper looking for a teacher to challenge the law. John Scopes was asked to
volunteer, and he agreed. The trial involved attorneys William Jennings Bryan and Clarence Darrow and lasted over a week, the courtroom constantly
overflowing with people and the witness examinations including many heated debates. (Adams) The case, meant to decide if Scopes broke the law,
diverged from its original intention as the witnesses began to speak about the constitutionality of the law, questioning the legitimacy of the Bible.
One of the most well known of these examinations was the questioning of Bryan by Darrow about the book of Genesis. "After initially contending,
'Everything in the Bible should be accepted as it is given there,' Bryan finally conceded that the words of the Bible should not always be taken
literally" (UMKC School of Law). The final decision stated that Scopes was guilty of breaking the law and was fined $100. While this was seen as a
win for fundamentalists, it was not the end of the battle. "In retrospect... Scopes forged a temporary break, not a full–scale retreat, in the fundamentalist
assault on modernist thought" (Gillon 171).
Starting with the Scopes Trial, many more cases have occurred concerning the teaching of evolution. "By 1928 every southern state except Virginia had
debated or was considering legislation banning the teaching of evolution in the

Scopes Monkey Trial Research Paper
The Scopes Trial, also referred to as the State Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes or the Scopes Monkey Trial, began on July 10, 1925. This event was
a legal case in which a substitute teacher named John Scopes violated the Tennessee Butler Act. The Butler Act administered that evolution was not
allowed to be taught in any public school. While substituting a Biology class, Scopes briefly reviewed the evolution chapter in a textbook. He did not
recall if he had specifically taught evolution in the class, but on accounts of several students it was concluded that he should be charged with breaking
the law. It was later discovered that the trial was planned meticulously beforehand as a national publicity stunt for the tiny town Of Dayton, Tennessee.
This trial was by far one of the most important cases of all time because it brought attention to the neglected conflicts between religion and science. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The roads were filled with commotion and excitement, especially on the roads leading toward the courthouse. The top newspapers in the nation had
press representatives sent out to be present for a certain court proceeding and give daily reports. Street vendors strutted along selling various items like
foods, toys, and books. Peddlers weren't the only ones taking advantage of the throng of people– so were missionaries. Revivalists took this as a sign
from God to preach His Word amongst the crowds and share their beliefs. Religious posters that warned of eternal damnation were hung up. In addition
to all the hubbub, a certain theme was displayed throughout the streets. It was monkeys. Monkey toys, items, gadgets, and souvenirs of all sorts were
everywhere

The Scopes Trial
The Scopes trial happened mainly because the Butler Act was passed, the Butler Act made it illegal to teach human Evolution in a public school. And
even though the main objective of the scopes trial was to attract business to the small town of Dayton, Tennessee it ultimately ended in science gaining
higher value in the American society over religion. The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) gave an ad in the paper saying that it would
financially help defend anyone who would teach evolution in a public school thus breaking the law. And George Rappleyea an oposser of the butler
act went to see the town's school board's head school concerning this matter and they decided not only would this help the small town of Dayton but
also will either

Scopes V. Bryan And Scopes Essay
In 1925, biology teacher John Scopes was arrested for breaking the Butler Law that prohibits the teachings of evolution due to its contradiction of the
teachings of the Bible. William Jennings Bryan, a well–known advocate was invited to prosecute in the famous "Scopes Monkey Trial". In the trial,
William Jennings Bryan, and a Chicago attorney named Clarence Darrow, argued whether Scopes defied the law and taught a doctrine that went
against the beliefs of Bryan and many citizens during this time.
When Scopes was found and arrested, the town leaders of Tennessee wanted him to go along with the trial so that they could become a well–known
and prosperous town. Bryan was asked to prosecute in the case because of his famous rallies that went against the evolution theories that were being
taught in the schools. Bryan believed that science was corrupting the way of thinking for religious people. He wanted the soul to be the important
matter rather than the mind and theories that could not be proven. Clarence Darrow was asked to be Scope's defense attorney because –––. Darrow
viewed religion as something that people try to maintain so hard and narrow their minds to it in which they become ignorant to their surroundings. He
sees science as –––. The strategy of Bryan was to prove that Scopes broke ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I think if science continues to advance, there will never be peace between it, and creationism. I believe so because it will continually defy each other
and never become something that can be taught together and make sense. I also believe that the tax–payers should be the ones to make the decision of
what curriculum should be taught in schools. Their money is being sent to these schools and many of them send their children to them. Therefore, I
feel they should have a say in what their children should be taught outside of their

Scopes Trial Clash Between Science Faith

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cynthia Smith

More from Cynthia Smith (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Scopes Trial Clash Between Science Faith