Ego In Julius Caesar

Ego In Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar In the play Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, Shakespeare is telling his readers that people
like Caesar, Brutus and Cassius only make certain decisions to benefit their ego and will only
directly help themselves. Brutus only cares about himself although he claims he cares for Rome and
the people. Cassius persuades Brutus to turn against Caesar, because he is worried of Caesars rising
power. Caesar thinks he is the biggest, the best and will only listen to who he wants. Caesar is giving
his speech at the senate's house; the conspirators come to kill him. Each of them take their turn and
stab him multiple times. As Caesar is dying he says even you Brutus which shows he was surprised
Brutus had stabbed and betrayed him. During Brutus's funeral speech he says "not that I loved
Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (Act. 3 Sc 2. 23–24). As Brutus is explaining his actions to
the public he explains how he did this for the good of Rome. However that is not the case at all,
Brutus did this because he is jealous of Caesar. He thought by doing this it would work out nicely
for him, meaning he would gain power but instead he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Caesar never listens to what people have to tell him unless it will have a direct affect on how people
see him. Brutus thought he was making Rome a better place when instead he just created a huge
disaster. Cassius manipulates Brutus to get involved in the giant mess when Brutus had potential.
Had these characters listened to advice and done what was right, Rome may have turned out very
differently. Everybody would have still been alive and worked this out in a completely different
way. Who knows how Rome could have turned out, whether good or bad these characters would
have thought beyond themself and things might have turned out for the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Death of Julius Caesar, a Great Leader
Julius Caesar was a great leader of Rome. Not only did he lead a very strong army, but his people
also loved him. The debate is always should he have been killed or should he have lived and lead us
to more victories.
The first document that was used in the debate is a primary source. It's called De Vita Caesarum,
Divus Iulius. The document is a biography of Julius Caesar and his life. Suetonius wrote the
biography. Suetonius was a roman historian who wrote about the Roman Empire. It was written in
110 CE. It was written to show the side of the senators, and how they felt about having emperors. It
is trustworthy because Suetonius used eyewitnesses and other evidence from books to provide a lot
of information about Caesar. The only thing that I think is missing is the side of Caesar because he
wrote it from the perspective of the senators' view. Which puts Caesar in a bad light because the
senators did not like Caesar. Considering that the article was written based off of the senators, it put
Caesar in a bad light. Meaning that this author did not want Caesar to live. Another document that
was used was a secondary source. It was an article written in the Britannica Student Encyclopedia. It
was written for the public to read and understand Julius Caesar. It was used to give a brief overview
of Julius Caesar's life. It talked about him as a person, the civil war that he was involved with, the
march he lead, as well as his reputation. The article is moderately trustworthy

Julius Caesar- Rise to Prominence
Julius Caesar's rise to prominence up until 60BC transpired due to a number of factors. The first of
these being his family background and Marian connections, which at varying stages of his life were
both a help and a hindrance. We can also note that most of his marriages were used to gain political
and financial resources accentuating his connections to powerful families and individuals. This rise
to prominence can also be attributed to Caesar's opportunistic nature and vast ambitions coupled
with his education and specialised tuition in the art of rhetoric, skills essential to gain popularity and
political office. Additionally his acquisition of religious titles added prestige and status to his name
while providing him with an array of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Caesar's ambition, nature and education allowed him to establish himself as a skilled lawyer and
orator to enhance his prominence among the people. Caesar's collection of religious titles
contributed to increasing his influence and provided him with an array of religious powers. As a
young man Caesar was appointed Flamen Dialis with help from his Uncle Gaius Marius a position
that provided little power although establishing Caesar as a Populare supporter. Plutarch tells us that,
"To this candidacy Sulla secretly opposed himself, and took measures to make Caesar fail in it."5
Many years later after acquiring the title of pontifex in 73BC, a highly prestigious and renowned
position Caesar was elected into the office of Pontifex Maximus a short decade later. This surprised
his opponents who had expected the more distinguished Optimate candidates

Julius Ceaser Essay
Julius Ceaser Julius Caesar Julius Caesar was born on July 13th in 100B.C. His full name is Gaius
Julius Caesar, which was the same as his father's name. Julius Caesar was the most famous Roman
general and was one of the most influential political and military leaders in history. He helped
establish the vast Roman Empire. Caesar gained all his power in four different areas. Those areas
are politics, government, religion, and in the military. Using these amazing powers he controlled
many aspects of Roman life. In 84B.C. Caesar married Cornelia, the daughter of Lucis Cornelius
Cinna, a noble who was Marious' associate in revolution. Lucis Cornelius Sulla demanded they
divorce in 83, but Caesar refused, risking his job and his life. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They gained control of Rome but soon split up by rivalries.
Crassus died fighting in the East and Caesar went to Gaul and Britain. Pompey feared Caesar's
power and allied himself to the Senate. Between 58B.C. and 49B.C. Caesar conquered more
territory in Gaul. He also led two expeditions to Britain. Caesar was going to seize power in Rome.
He crushed an army led by Pompey. This left Caesar in charge of the military in Rome. It also
signified the end of the Roman Republic. In 44B.C he was appointed dictator for life and in the
same year was assassinated. Before his death he introduced reforms that helped strengthen Rome
and protect his own power. He distributed land and money to the poor and granted Roman
citizenship to people in provinces outside Italy. He also reduced unemployment by creating many
building projects and increased the soldiers pay. He introduced a new calendar that was more
accurate. It was based on the Hellenistic astronomy. It was called the Julian Calendar and was used
in Europe until 1582A.D. Even though the Senate and Assembly of tribes continued to exist, he still
had total power.
However many people referred to him as a tyrant and that he was destroying the Republic. Other
people were jealous of all his popularity. Whatever the reason, on March 15th 44B.C. a group of
conspirators that were led by Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus stabbed Julius Caesar

Western Civilization Q&A
Western Civ. Test 2 take home
C) First and Second Triumvirates
A Triumvirate is a political alliance involving three rulers, who divide the land and power among
each other. The first Triumvirate involved Pompey; who was a popular general who crushed the
Spanish Revolt. The second was Crassus; he was a wealthy noble with a lot of ambition and was
very ruthless. Crassus owned all the fire stations in Rome, when a person needed his services he
would let the fire burn until he was paid a sum of money to his likings. Crassus was unsuccessful in
his military pursuits. The third was Julius Caesar; he was also a wealthy noble. He was very popular
with the lower class. For a short period Caesar was the Governor of Spain, when he returned he was
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He taught equality, which was very popular among the lower class. The Roman governments
strongly opposed his teachings because he was gaining a strong influence over the lower and middle
class, this was becoming detrimental to the Roman Empire. Pontius Pilot ordered for Jesus to be
crucified to support peace. After his death, followers of Jesus created what is known today as the
"church". Another way that spread Christianity was the practice of Evangelism; created by Paul, one
of Jesus' followers, which is spreading the word of God and Jesus' teachings. Paul was the universal
voice for Christians. Paul also spread his teachings to Gentiles, who are non–Jews. These strategies
helped spread Christianity quickly, and among more groups of people. One of the most significant
events in spreading Christianity was at a Jewish festival in Jerusalem, this event contained many
people from around the world, this was a great opportunity to help spread the word of Christianity.
Christianity struggled for acceptance among the Roman Government. They were essentially ignored,
being barred from offices and politics. By the third century Christianity had settled in Italy and
Judea. Many Roman rulers persecuted Christians, under Diocletian they weren't even considered
human, and outlawed from the Roman Empire. Diocletian claimed Christians as reprehensible for
the fall of the Roman Empire. When Diocletian retired, Constantine took

Roman Empire Pros And Cons
Enirque Harten
Nash Adamson
World History
14/9/15
From a stone into a sculpture
¨I found Rome a city of bricks and left it a city of marble´–Augustus; a former emperor of ancient
Rome and the first one, These words came out of the mouth of one or maybe the most important
character in the ancient Rome's History , he restored order in all of the roman empire an transformed
the little empire of Rome into the gigantic and all fascinating Roman empire that the enemies feared
but now is hugely interesting and leaned a lot of it intellectually and morally. But he did not make
alone, he made Rome into an Empire, an empire basically consists of multiple sates or provinces etc.
,under the rule of one single supreme leader (we can ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He also quickly won the support of the people because of multiple reasons. First of all he gave land
to the legionaries/ soldiers that retired so that they could have a good life after serving the army, he
also restructured the debts of a huge percentage of Rome's debtors and also changed the form of the
calendar. But after a while the senators said that he had way too much control in Rome and killed
him, they stabbed him 21 times to be exact. And this event eventually lend to the fall of Rome, but
that would happen in a long

Rhetoric in Julius Ceaser
Cassius' Persuasion Rhetoric is the usage of words to persuade when writing or speaking. This was
frequently used in William Shakespeare's tragedy "Julius Caesar", specifically in act 1 scene 2 by
Cassius. By using his powers of manipulation with argumentation and persuasion, Cassius then tries
to convince Brutus, a fellow Roman, to join in the conspiracy against Julius Caesar. Doing so,
Cassius uses the rhetorical forms of pathos, logos, and the usage of rhetorical questions. One of the
techniques used by Cassius is the use of pathos, or emotional appeal. Being that Caesar has grown
very popular/powerful around Rome, Cassius explains that if they continue to let him rule, they'll
only succeed in becoming ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Caesar although treated god–like, he is merely a man, no better Brutus or Cassius. He infers on the
idea that Caesar should be treated like everyone else, not overbear the power that should be shared.
When comparing the names of Brutus and Caesar, Cassius rhetorically asks what it is that makes
Caesar so special. Leaving him wonder as to why a man like Brutus isn't as great, "Brutus and
Caesar what should be in that 'Caesar'?" (Act I, scene ii line: 142). Cassius is aware of Brutus's
character, and he knows very well that a titled man such as Brutus deserves the same, if not more
better treatment than Caesar. Questioning the much respectable Brutus against Caesar's strong power
appeals to Brutus's history and ambitions, showing that Caesar is one to be stopped or else the
legacy of Rome will be ruined. In conclusion to the analyzation of Cassius' rhetorical techniques and
their effects, what can be concluded is that Cassius is a very intelligent man in the terms of using
pathos, logos, and rhetorical questions. When using pathos, Cassius is arguing on the issues of
equality among Rome, reflecting on the idea that power shouldn't be hoarded by one person, but
shared. Upon the subject of using logos, he mentions past events to show that Caesar is not the
powerful man he appears to be, following up to the concept that a strong ruler will reflect for a
strong nation. And with rhetorical questions, Cassius makes Brutus question Caesar's great power
and that

What were the Primary Reasons for the Fall of Rome?
What Were the Primary Reasons for the "Fall" of Rome? By 200 BC, Rome was quickly becoming
one of the world's greatest empires with their excellent military conquering territory from modern
day Scotland to Spain. After the Punic Wars and the defeat of Carthage, Rome had full control of the
Mediterranean region, establishing colonies in North Africa, Egypt, the Middle East, and Asia
Minor. Julius Caesar became Rome's first emperor using his military influence. Under his reign,
Rome shifted from a republic to an empire under the rule of an emperor and the military. Rome
steadily increased in stability, power, and wealth, reaching Pax Romana (the time of Roman peace)
under Emperor Augustus Caesar. Rome was forced to discover, as many other ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
These Germanic soldiers were not loyal to Rome and were therefore not as motivated to keep Rome
afloat. Because of the undersized, lethargic Roman military and its aggressive opposition, Rome was
very much open to foreign invasions. By the fifth century, the "powerhouse of the Mediterranean"
was struggling to protect itself with its decreased population, apathetic military, and leaders with
debauched morals. Outside of the Roman Empire, Germanic tribes took notice of the internal chaos
and began invading the empire's borders. Many of the tribes were cruel and combative, such as the
Huns. The Huns "exceed any definition of savagery" and were "fired with an overwhelming desire
for seizing the property of others, these swift–moving and ungovernable people make their
destructive way amid the pillage and slaughter of those who live around them." (Document D,
excerpts about an Asian tribe called the Huns from Roman History by Ammianus Marcellinus).
Roman soldiers would have had a challenge ahead of them if they had to deal with the Huns at the
height of the Roman military, let alone having to fight them when their numbers were depleted and
motivation running low. The Huns played a large part in minimizing what little hope Rome had of
reviving itself into the Mediterranean–dominating empire it once was. Many other tribes followed
the Huns example and invaded Rome at its borders. Document C, a map created from various
sources,

Character Analysis Of Brutus
Cassius states, "Caesar doth bear me hard; but he loves Brutus." Cassius sees that Brutus can be
manipulated both in spite of and because of his nobility. Cassius flatters Brutus and appeals to his
perception of equality. He justifies murdering his closest friend, Ceaser, harming both himself and
the people of Rome. He is proud of his reputation for honor and nobleness, but he sometimes is not
the most practical man, and is often naive. He is the only major character in the play dedicated to
make his behavior fit a strict moral and ethical code. Shakespeare uses the assassination of Caesar to
develop ways to show the complexity of Brutus and his character throughout the play. He cannot
justify, to his own satisfaction, the murder of a man who is a friend and who has not misused the
powers of his office. Consequently, thinking of the assassination in terms of a ritual instead of a
murder makes it more acceptable to him. Unfortunately for Brutus, he misunderstands the citizens of
Rome. In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus is naive, because he exhibits characteristics
flaws such as foolishness, idealism, and self–righteousness, which eventually lead to his killing of
Caesar and himself.
Brutus's naive personality leads him to be easily manipulated by others. Cassius tells the other
conspirators his plan in the killing of Caesar. The other conspirators believe that it would be a smart
idea to do it the following day, due to Caesar receiving his crown. The conspirators decide that it
would only work to involve Brutus in on the plan too. The conspirators agree they will only get
Brutus on their side if they write fake letters to Brutus saying they are from the people of Rome.
Later that night Brutus finds the letters and reads them. After reading the letters, Brutus States, "...
Speak, strike, redness. I am entreated / o speak and strike? O Rome, I make thee promise / If the
redness will follow, thou receivest / Thy full petition at the hand of Brutus" (II.i.55–58). After
reading the letters, he feels he needs to join the conspirators. So Brutus agrees to the plan and tells
the conspirators what he plans to do. Cassius knew that the conspirators could not assassinate Caesar
without Brutus support. Brutus

Julius Caesar Leadership Analysis
Caesar's Leadership
"Leadership is an opportunity to serve. It is not a trumpet call to self–importance"(Donald Walters).
Julius Caesar was a ruler loved by most people. He was their leader longer than Rome's past leaders
and eventually wanted the crown, but never showed the people he wanted it. The people and Senate
were ready to crown Caesar, but some people were jealous or scared of the power he could possess
if he had the crown. As a result, a group of people formed a conspiracy to assassinate Caesar. Along
the story, Caesar was given many warnings about him going to the Senate, which is the place he will
die; but because of his strong headedness, he ignored the signs. William Shakespeare's play of The
Tragedy of Julius Caesar is centered around Julius Caesar, who is so headstrong on his pride and
judgement that he neglects listening to his people who warn him of his future assassination, which
results in a tragic end of him getting assassinated. Caesar likes his place in power and does anything
to stay there. He had to be headstrong to get to his position. He did this by being determined. There
is a downfall by him doing what he wants and claiming himself superior to others. In the play,
Caesar was in the Capitol talking to Metellus Cimber, Cassius, Cinna, Decius and Brutus, who are
all a part of the conspiracy. They try to talk Ceaser into letting Metellus' brother come back because
he was banished. Caesar then responds that his opinion will not change despite all the men begging
him. "But I am constant as the Northern Star,/ Of whose true–fixed and resting quality/There is no
fellow in the firmament/... That unassailable holds on his rank,/ Unshaked of motion; and that I am
he,/"(3. 1. 60–62, 69–70). Caesar is saying like the North Star, which leads voyagers, Caesar leads
the Roman people. The Northern Star does not change its position in the sky and Caesar does not
leave his own position of leading. He is also saying that he is incomparable to other humans; that
there is no one equal to him. He is saying that he is unattackable and keeps his position. In this part
of the play, he shows that he does not change his opinion, even if others persuade him. This quote
reveals that he likes things his own way

Research Paper On Cleopatra
Tiffany Bowland
Kate Jennings
Western civilization
13 July 2016
Cleopatra the queen of the Nile: When I think back to Roman and Egyptian times the first name that
comes to mind is Cleopatra. I envy her for many reasons. She was a great ruler, she had riches, she
had fame and most of all she had an epic love story. There were not many female rulers or females
with power when you look into history. Cleopatra is an example of many things, and is the epitome
of a powerful historical female. Her name is synomious with beauty, power, intrigue and ultimately
tragedy.
In 69 BC Cleopatra was born into an Egyptian dynasty. A dynasty in decline and under the
protection of Rome. At the young age of 18 she assumed the throne along with one ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her dynasty was over, and she proved to be the last pharaoh. With her death Cleopatra has achieved
immortality through the personal story of love and tragedy. When we think of Cleopatra we
automatically think of this story. But upon the research I learned that there were others and she was
actually Cleopatra 7. Many books, plays, movies and stories have been made about the great queen
of the Nile. Some tell us different sides of the story. Each have a little bit of difference in them so
who really knows which one to believe. One thing is certain; Cleopatra was a great female ruler for
her 22 years as the Egyptian queen. Ironically enough she wasn't even Egyptian or roman for that
matter. She and her family were Greek. There are also many works that suggest that she was not a
very pretty woman. Cleopatra's happiness didn't last, which seems that just like in all love stories her
life doesn't have a happy ending. Another side of the story is that Marc killed himself after being
surrounded by Octavia's troops, and then Cleopatra being held prisoner which is why she killed
herself. I was very intrigued by each story that I read of Cleopatra's life and death and her rule, and I
feel like I learned a lot. I think I will go on to watch some of the movies to see them played

The Very Different Ruling Styles of Augustus Caesar and...
Two of the more memorable emperors to the Romans were Augustus Caesar (27 BC to 14 AD), and
Caligula (37 AD to 41 AD). Although only having ruled the empire by a separation of 23 years and
belonging to the same family (through marriage and adoption), their empires couldn't have been
more different. It is possible to determine the impact of an emperor's rule based on their many vices
and virtues, as well as the choices that they make in relation to them. The author Suetonius
expressed in his writings the many vices and virtues that put into perspective the kind of leaders that
these emperors appeared as to their polis. As we explore the concept of vices and virtues, as well as
what kind of ideals these two rulers represented, we will begin to be presented with a clearer picture
of what an ideal emperor would have looked like. A vice can be described as an immoral or wicked
behavior; while a virtue can be described as a behavior showing high moral standards. Suetonius
and the Roman people had a high interpretation of the concept of virtue and vice, as well as their
role in the ruler's life.
When discussing Augustus and Caligula it is simple to bring up the subject of public works and law.
Augustus had the most success with his many projects, including the Temple of Mars the Avenger,
the Palatine Temple of Apollo, and the Temple of Jupiter the Thunderer on the Capitol. Many
colonnade, basilica, and theater were erected and named after relatives. He urged many renowned

Rhetoric and Betrayal in Julius Caeser Play
William Shakespeare's famous play Julius Caesar utilizes the literary element of rhetoric multiple
times throughout to show the true power that words can hold. The rhetoric in Caesar accompanies
the play's themes of betrayal, deception, and exaggeration. Brutus uses rhetoric to persuade the
crowd of plebeians that the murdering of Caesar was positive and beneficial to all of Rome, winning
their support and causing them to join his cause. Soon after, Mark Antony gives a terrifically–
persuasive speech that he claims to be a funeral oration for Caesar, but is truly a cleverly–shrouded
undermining to Brutus's speech. Antony's speech is able to not only gain him the crowd's support,
but causes the crowd to completely disregard what Brutus had ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even the starting line of his oration is a powerful use of rhetoric. By referring to the plebeians as
"friends" and "Romans" he creates a sense of emotional connection with them and shapes a feeling
of citizen–like connection, which is use of pathos. Calling them "countrymen" creates the feeling
that Antony is simply a fellow Roman like the plebeians and he is alike to them. Antony then uses
the rhetoric device of conduplicatio in his speech, repeating that Brutus is an honorable man. This is
also a use of irony. He says in a sarcastic manner that Brutus is honorable after pointing out
contractions to what Brutus had said about Caesar and why he needed to be murdered (Gradesaver).
Antony also mentions that Caesar's declining of the crown three times showed that he was not
ambitious. Antony causes himself to appeal to the crowd even more with another device of rhetoric–
the understatement. He claims his modesty and contrasts his speaking skills with those of Brutus,
when his persuasive skills are actually more powerful than Brutus's in the lines: I come not, friends,
to steal away your hearts. I am no orator, as Brutus is, But, as you know me all, a plain blunt man
That love my friend. And that they know full well That gave me public leave to speak of him.
(3.2.210–14)
Antony's statement is ironic because he states that he is not an orator like Brutus, when is actually a
better orator and persuades the

Julius Ceaser Fate
Some say the death of Julius Ceaser was the outcome of an overly conceited king, desperate to take
the throne. While others argue pride wasn't the issue, the cause of Ceaser's death was merely fate,
caused by the God's determination to set forth Ceaser's destiny, due to dreams and bad omens. As
expressed in the play of Julius Ceaser, Calpurnia's dream had a big impact on this issue. She
believed her dream of Rome's people bathing in the blood of caeser, from Ceaser's statue was a sign,
sign that Bigger and worse events would take place in the near future, that her husband, and future
ruler would be ripped away, and taken so soon. "Nor heaven nor earth have been at peace tonight;
Thrice hath Calhurnia in her sleep cried out, 'Help, ho ! They murder Ceaser!' Who's within?" This
quote is foreshadowing, indicating/ warning of a future event. This would be considered Fate,
Calpurnia had seen it in her dream, before the death Ceaser has happened. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
O Ceaser! These things are beyond all use, and I do fear them." (Meaning there was a lion loose
roaming the City OF Rome, the weather was so horrible it seemed like the gods were fighting at war
and the rain that came down upon the capitol was the blood of the dead ghost. This quote explains
that all these omens are a bad sign that bad things are going to happen. These omens were believed
to be bad omens, Cassius also expressed that all these things are happening because of Ceaser, that
Ceaser was to blame for everything that has been taking place in Rome, and that's why Ceaser must

Of Selfishness In 'Lord Of The FliesAndJulius Ceaser'
Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, "Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of
creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness." In this quote, Martin Luther King, Jr.,
expresses how a person has a decision between selflessness and selfishness, and that their decision
predicts the way they live. The choice of walking in, "the light of creative altruism," allows a person
to live a life with little harm due to their selfless ways. However, a person's choice of walking in,
"the darkness of destructive selfishness," will bring them many struggles and devastations
throughout their lifetime. Therefore, based on the person's actions, they will follow either a path of
hardship or ease. Similarly, in William Golding's, "Lord of the Flies," and Shakespeare's, "Julius
Ceaser," the characters choose between a selfless or selfish lifestyle. This decision is made through
their intentions of killing to help themselves or to benefit the lives of their group. In both the book,
the character, Jack Merridew, and in the play, the characters, Brutus and Cassius, all choose to kill
with the goal of helping their groups. Although the character's notions are right, there are hidden
feelings of jealousy resulting in crimes that are for their own good.
To further illustrate, in William Shakespeare's, "Julius Ceaser," his character, Marcus Brutus,
believes that his choice to kill Ceaser is for the good of Rome. In the play, Cassius convinces Brutus
that Ceaser is not

Compare and Contrast Brutus and Macbeth
Brutus vs. Macbeth through Power, Ambition, and Honor "Absolute power corrupts absolutely,"
unless one knows how to use it, it shall not corrupt. Everyone has ambitions, a strong desire of
achieving great things, and some will do whatever it takes to achieve their goal. Honor is a title one
receives through their noble acts; but some honorable and strongly ambitious people may go as far
as to give up their noble title to accomplish their purpose. William Shakespeare is a well–known
English poet and playwright, a big participant in creating the English language. Among his twelve
tragedies, two has very similar plot and tragic heroes. The play Julius Caesar is about a noble,
honorable, and trusted man named Brutus, who killed his friend and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"It must be by his death; and for my part,/ I know no personal cause to spurn at him,/ but for the
general." (Julius Caesar, II.i.10–12). Brutus has no other reason to kill Caesar than for the greater
good of Rome, whereas Macbeth killed more than three people for his own benefit. Macbeth first
kills Duncan to become king; then Banquo and his son to make sure that they shall not be kings, but
unfortunately for him, Fleance escaped; and finally Macduff's family, though he was mainly aiming
for Macduff himself. The heroes' ambitious deed also led them to lose everything. Aforementioned,
Brutus only killed Caesar for the good of Rome. However, in allowing Mark Anthony to speak at
Caesar's funeral, Brutus made himself and the conspirators the most hated people in Rome. To have
the citizens despise him was not what Brutus had planned, therefore he has lost half of what he had–
admiration from the people, the meaning of his life. To make matters worse, Portia, Brutus's noble
wife, killed herself by swallowing coal. It is not known if Brutus had other family members,
therefore it can safely be concluded that he had lost everything, his fame and wife. Macbeth falls in
a similar matter, first losing his friend and relative Duncan; then his comrade in the field, Banquo;
his wife; and most importantly himself. For killing countless people, Macbeth's guilt slowly builds
in him, and at his end, was exposed in the

The Controversy Of Brutus In Julius Caesar
In the play Julius Caesar, the author Shakespeare depicts a persistent controversy between Caesar
and his conspirators that turned against Caesar. Brutus remained a great friendship with Caesar for a
very long time until he became a disguised rival that was joined by many other conspirators which
involved Cassius. Through many struggles and schemes, they achieved their goal to bring Caesar
down and assassinated him when the chance was given. "E Tu Brute?" were the last words of Caesar
that left a mark even in today's history because Brutus turning against Caesar depicts that not
everyone can be fully trusted for what they portray to be. But, this play highlights also the
importance of real friends such as Antony that tried to bring the best ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He uses the technique of ethos for the citizens to be convinced that what Brutus had done was for
the good of the citizens. In the speech, Brutus quotes " Believe me for mine honor, and have respect
to mine honor that you may believe(III.II. 15–16)", he uses his credibility to provide evidence to the
crowd. He plays a significant role in the Senate, which he is honored. Using this advantage, he
persuades people to believe him that what he does is for their own good and that he would not lie as
he is known to be an honored man. Using ethos, people fell into the trap of believing Brutus and his
reasoning very quickly. However, Antony uses ethos to get the audience's support and it was a very
dangerous moment for Antony as he had to indirectly attack Brutus. Antony uses ethos by
supporting Brutus so that the citizens will believe Antony and his credibility will be able to bring the
audience to understand that what Brutus had done was just part of the conspiracy. In the quote
"Which all the while ran blood, great Caesar fell. O, what a fall was there, my countrymen!(III.II.
201–202)", Antony uses the name of Julius Caesar as a way to bring together the people of Rome.
He uses the authority of Caesar to raise his values and commemorate him and his great leadership he
owned. The word "fall" used in this quote has two meaning; the first being that he fell as he was
assassinated and the second meaning used in this quote by Antony is the falling of Caesar into the
scheme of conspiracy and through this, Antony strikes an enraged emotion from the

The Consequences Of Capital Punishment In Julius Ceaser
In his play, Julius Ceaser, Shakespear wrote, "Cowards die many times before their deaths. The
valiant never taste of death but once." (2.2.34) Crimanals who kill or rape are the most cowardly of
them all. They deserve to suffer; they must face their cowardice actions with suffering. Capital
Punishment or the death penalty is the act of killing someone as punishment for a serious crime.
There is not much justice in the death penelty, no suffering is ever involved. Infact, death can even
be considered an honor. A person commiting a serious crime is always aware that they might be
caught. They know that the death penelty is a possibilty. Life in prison might even be worse. Death
is bliss compared to being caught. Many people commit mass murder and kill themselfs afterwards,
all with the satisfaction of inflicting pain on others because of their own suffering. After all, it would
put them "out of their misery" and give them peace. Where is the victims peace in capital
punishment? Someone who has made another suffer should suffer just as likely if not more, beyond
an "eye for an eye". Depending on whether we seek vengence or we seek justice for those who have
hurt us, there should be more satisfaction; more justice in punishing those who commit these filthy
acts.
Think of your worst fear, something that taunts you. Now, make it a reality and play it on a loop...
"Are you mad?... Are you angry?... Are you... Dead?" (Manson. Manson Trials)Is it the deep dark
waters with sharks

Marc Antony
Independent Study Project
Ancient History
Someone is not born with greatness, they are destined with greatness. Achieving greatness in
leadership may be hard to maintain, keeping it and being known for your greatness is even harder to
accomplish. Greatness can be achieved through military victories, being appointed a high officer,
known as a political figure and considering the lower–class citizens. Many leaders strive to reach
being one of the people's greatest leaders, but many fail. However, there is one in particular who
was capable of achieving the position of being known as 'one of the people's greatest leaders'. Marc
Antony, who served with Julius Caesar, was known as one of the people's greatest leaders for being
a warrior, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Playing a part in many military quests made Marc Antony a great military leader in the eyes of
Rome, and making him known as one of the people's greatest leaders. In the days of Julius Caesar, it
was Marc Antony who was the second most powerful figure in Roman politics. He was a
subordinate to Julius Caesar in the command of his armies and he was an influential figure in
Roman politics. Antonius becomes a tribune of the people, an office with considerable political
power; include veto power over legislation passed by the Senate. With this Marc Antony, being a
high– political figure, he served in a tribune, a group designed to represent the rights of lower–class
Roman citizens. Soon after, Marc Antony is elected one of the two consuls of Rome; chief officer,
this was the highest legal administrative office in the Roman government. Therefore, Marc Antony
was appointed into the government, making him a high–political figure and looked up upon from the
lower–class citizens of Rome, this is how Marc Antony achieved being one of the people's greatest
leaders. Marc Antony formed and was a part of the second Triumvirate. The second Triumvirate was
a three–man ruling group to rule Rome, formed to fill the void in government left by Julius Caesar 's
death. Octavian and Antonius agreed to a sharing of power. They, along with Lepidus, are
designated by the Senate as a Triumvirate with dictatorial powers for five years. Octavian, Antonius
and Lepidus

Essay On Cleopatra
Cleopatra, Greek queen of Egypt, was born at the beginning of 69 B.C and one of the few women
rulers in ancient Egypt. Her father was Ptolemy XII And Cleopatra was the last pharaoh in Egypt.
She is known as clever, covetous, skilled, beguiling and manipulative. Cleopatra's physical features
are not certain and there is not enough information about her profile. "The colour of her eyes and of
her hair is not known; nor can it be said whether her skin was white as alabaster, like that of many of
her Macedonian fellow countrywomen, or whether it had that olive tone so often observed amongst
the Greeks. Even her beauty, or rather the degree of her beauty, is not clearly defined." Cleopatra
was born at the finish of the Ptolemaic dynasty, because, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Despite the fact that Ptolemy was Greek, in order to acknowledged by society, he added numerous
Egyptian customs in his administration. Historians defines Cleopatra as lovely and the prevailing
ruler in each of the three of her co–rulers consist of two brothers and her son. She was higly
educated woman because she studied science, astronomy and also she could speak different
languages. "Cleopatra was a skilled orator. Plutarch wrote that the queen was gripping in her
conversation and persuasive in her discussion, able to speak Ethiopian, Trogodyte, and the
languages of the Hebraioi, Arabes, Syrians, Medes, and Parthians, and many others as well.
Egyptian is not specified but can be presumed because Plutarch referred to the ignorance of that
language on the part of her royal predecessors. In addition to her native Greek, she also knew Latin,
although the Romans with whom she came into contact would insist on speaking Greek." After her
father death, she came to power in 51 B.C. at the age of eigthteen. "Thus when Cleopatra VII came
to the throne in late 51 B.C., she was a remarkably educated

Augustus Caesar and Emperor Nero Comparision
I believe that being a beloved leader has a huge effect on being a better ruler. In 44 B.C. Julius
Caesar was assassinated by his senate chamber. Soon his nephew and adopted son, Gaius Octavian,
would join forces with Mark Anthony and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus into a three–way dictatorship.
This transformed Rome from being a Monarchy into being a dictatorship. Lepidus left Rome soon
after Octavian began reign and went on to lead parts of Africa and Hispania. In 37 B.C. Mary
Anthony met Cleopatra. They fell in love and Mark followed her back to Egypt. Octavian took reign
over Rome and obtained the name Augustus Caesar. Mark Anthony and Augustus became enemies
and war broke out between Rome and Egypt. This is one reason for why I believe that ... Show more
Women gave birth during his shows and some people faked being dead just to be dragged out of it.
Some people even went as far as jumping off the ledge of the theater to their death. These plays
would go on for several days without any breaks. He attempted to set fire to Rome just so he could
rebuild the city. In my opinion, the action that Nero is most known for is for persecuting of Jews.
Nero would crucify Jews for spreading Christianity throughout Rome. Nero was the persecutor of
the apostles Paul and Peter. Nero was a violent leader and a leader who was definitely, not beloved.
In conclusion, being a leader that is beloved has a huge effect on being a better leader. For example,
Augustus Caesar was so favored that his name was passed on through all the emperors all the way
up to 476A.D. The roman citizen would hold festivals just in honor of Augustus. They loved
Augustus which made Rome a happier place all in all. In the other hand Nero made Rome become a
dark and violent empire. I believe that good rulers always work their hardest to please their people
and have positive influences on them. People want a leader who incurages them and is always
striving to help the empire grow

Stonewall Riots Essay
The Stonewall riots were a series of violent, spontaneous demonstrations by members of the LGBT
community against a police raid that took place in the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, at the
Stonewall Inn. Riots, violence and discrimination are not things that the LGBT community are
unfamiliar with. Their history has been painted with opposition and resiliency. As time has
progressed, so has the community and their fight for equality. The community is a medley of very
different people from a wide array of backgrounds; No one person is the same. They do, however,
have one common denominator. The communities fight for equality has been shaped by several
altercations throughout history that inevitably lead to the success, progress and ... Show more
It is not commonly known that the Mafia invested in the Stonewall Inn in 1966, turning it into a gay
bar. Located at 51 and 53 Christopher Street, the Stonewall Inn was owned by the Genovese crime
family. In 1966, three members of the Mafia invested $3,500 to turn the Stonewall Inn into a gay
bar. Previously, it served as a "typical" nightclub and restaurant for heterosexuals. Like many things
the mafia was involved in, much of the legality and dealings were 'under the table.' Once a week, a
police officer would come collect envelopes full of cash as payoffs. The Stonewall Inn also had no
liquor license (due to the SLA refusing to grant gay bars the necessary license), no running water
behind the bar and no fire exits. Used bar glasses were ran through large tubs of water and then
reused. The bar was supposedly not used for any "illegal" transactions. Thigs such as prostitution or
drug deals were prohibited. This was simply a place for gay men in New York City to dance. There
were virtually no places in the city where gay men could do so. This led to be The Stonewalls re–
opening as a gay club. Like all gay bar's in New York, police raids were very common. The raids
were a police 'crackdown' on bars operating without a liquor license. Although the police raids were
legally justified, the gay community had grown weary of the police targeting gay clubs and bars.
Many of these establishments had already been shut down. Like many of the gay bars and

The Assassination Of Brutus And Mark Antony
After the death of Julius ceaser both Brutus and Mark Antony both delivered a speech to the people
of Rome. Brutus admitted to the people of Rome right away that he was involved in the
assassination of Ceaser. Brutus explained to the crowd that Ceaser was a very good friend of his and
he didn't assassinate King Ceaser in attempt to take control of Rome himself or for someone else to
take power: he Explained that he was involved with the assassination because he feared that Caesar
was more focused on his own agenda rather then focused on what was best for the nation and his
people. Brutus explained that he noticed signs of a tyrant in Caesar early on and feared he was only
getting worse and eventually would put all of Rome under his tyranny.

Compare And Contrast Abraham Lincoln And Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caeser were both politicians they are both similar in their own way
although they both come from different walks of life they both share similarities. Abraham Lincoln
served as the 16th president of the United States he was born in Hodgenville, KY in 1809 and he
was assassinated in April of 1865 Abraham Lincoln stood for rights of all people even though these
two men are quite different they stood for leadership and justice and equality. Julius Caeser was
born on July 13 100 B.C.E. he was a politician, and military leader Abraham Lincoln and Julius
Caeser were both rulers of their country they both had made a significant impact people admired
them, they were acknowledged as heroes of their countries. And shortly after they were both
assassinated Abraham Lincoln, and Julius Caeser left a legacy in which would carry on forever.
Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president of the United States of America he was frequently referred
to as the ''The great emancipator'' and yet although he didn't publicly call for the emancipation of the
entire life. Lincoln established his public career by declaring that he was antislavery against
slavery's increasing but not for announcing immediate emancipation. However, the man who began
as ''antislavery'' eventually announced the emancipation proclamation in which freed all slaves in
states that were in rebellion. Abraham Lincoln actively supported the 13th amendment in which
abolished slavery throughout

Julius Caesar Analysis
"Leadership is an opportunity to serve. It is not a trumpet call to self–importance"(Donald Walters).
Julius Caesar was a ruler loved by most people. He was their leader longer than Rome's past leaders
and eventually wanted the crown but never showed the people he wanted it. The people and Senate
were ready to crown Caesar, but some people were jealous or scared of the power he cold possess if
he had the crown. As a result, a group of people formed a conspiracy to assassinate Caesar. Along
the story, Caesar was given many warnings about him going to the Senate, which is the place he will
die. William Shakespeare's play of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is centered around Julius Caesar,
who is so headstrong on his pride and judgement that he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This quote reveals to us that he likes things his own way because he has a great amount of power,
which shows strong headedness. When he was in power, he was allowed to dictate his own beliefs
or lead his people in the ways he wants. One can think that is a reason he liked power and wanted
the crown. His downfall is that he knows he has that power so therefore he feels superior than other
people or feels that no one can ever take his position. This quote shows his arrogance and shows
how he is naive to death. This is a downfall because he does not believe he will die by the will of
another person. Another instance when Caesar shows headstrongness is when Decius comes to
Caesar's home and tries persuading him to come to the Senate. Decius is apart of the conspiracy and
his job is to get Caesar to go to the Senate house where the other conspirators are there waiting to
kill him. Caesar was about to not go because Calpurnia, Caesar's wife, begged him not to go. Decius
heard this and tricked Caesar into going again. "To give this day a crown to mighty Caesar. If you
shall send them word you will not come, their minds may change." (2. 2. 94–96). Decius is saying
that the Senate is preparing to give Caesar the crown. If he does not come, the Senate might change
their mind. "How foolish your fears seem now, Calpurnia! I am ashamed I did yield to them. Give
me my robe, for I will go" (2. 2. 105–107). Caesar then responds saying that the reasons Calpurnia

Caesar Vs. Fate : Ambition And Fate In Julius Caesar
In the tragedy of "Julius Caesar", ambition and fate are everywhere. Caesar forces fate in life versus
the capacity for free will. Brutus, caesar's best friend plays a big role in the importance of fate and
the strong ambition to carry out the deed he did. Finally Cassius the compelling force behind the
murder to commit to something needs an ambition and the plan to guide Brutus to betray his friend.
Never let emotions take over without fear of fate not turning out your way. In the play caesar to a
large degree is about ambition and fate.Caesar was a successful military leader who wants the crown
of rome and is portrayed as imperious, easily flattered, and overly ambitious.Caesar is described
somewhat as a good leader but others fear he will turn the roman republic to a dictatorship leading
to the cause of his death. Ceaser says these lines that show his ambitious "Cowards die many times
before their deaths; brave men die only once. Of all the wonders that i have yet heard, it seems to me
most strange that men should fear death, seeing that it is inescapable. It will come when it will
come." (II.ii.32–37). These lines are used to describe caesar in the play by Brutus "The Gods are
showing disapproval of cowardice. Caesar would be a beast without a heart if he stayed home today
from fear. No, Caesar won't. Danger knows very well that Caesar is more dangerous than he is. We
are like two lions born on the same day I am the eldest of the two, and the most terrible. So Caesar

Power Of Words In Julius Caesar Research Paper
Words holding more power than weapons There's seems to be a lot of examples of words having
more power over weapons in "The tragedy of Julius Caesar" by william shakespeare. The subject
can be agreeable. There's a lot if ways that words can make you feel when comparing two things
together either one can win you over and make you want to know more and be on the other side.
One way words have more power is when Brutus was talking to cassius. Cassius was trying to
persuade Brutus to go against Caesar thou brutus did not give in right away Cassius did make Brutus
think about how rome would be better off without caesar ruling. Brutus seems like a good friend of
caesar and he is but he also fears that caesar will get too much power over his head and end up
crashing with it and making rome fall down with him. But then again if you were a true friend
towards someone you shouldn't just switch up on them. It really doesn't matter what others say you
should be able to stay strong and stick with the person you were always loyal too. ... Show more
"I thrice presented him a kingly crown,Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?Yet Brutus
says he was ambitious,And sure he is an honourable man..." (III.ii.82–96). This part of the play
Antony speaks about how brutus kept saying that Caesar was going over his head and his ambition
was taking over. The crowd was starting to get startled up because they felt caesar was actually a
cruel person but Anothy switches that around and makes them think again. But then Anthony brung
out a will from ceaser and that's when everything goes downhill with people getting mad and getting
to the point that they want to go and kill everyone who sound like a

Julius Ceaser Speeches
Julius Ceaser a roman tragedy based on a true story takes place in B.C. Julius Ceaser a well known
soon to be king was so interested in power and his friends though it would get to his head if he had
decided to be king. Consulters had brought together a plan to take out ceaser so he wont be king.
The dawning of the day appeared and it was time for ceaser to be taken out and stabbed to death.
Julius ceaser's friend Marc Antony was very heart broken and stepped up and gave his heart–
warming speech about his dear friend that got stabbed. There were two speeches that were presented
at Ceasers funeral that day two of which were his very dear friends and they were heart broken and
wanted the people of Rome to catch the idea of the awful tragedy that they had just done. Marc
Antony's speech was very clear that in this point he makes that Ceaser had done great things for
Rome and not just for Rome but also for Antony. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Antony had poured out his heart for ceaser who had just dramatically died a tragic death upon some
selfish people. Antony is heart broken as he says in his speech "My heart is in the coffin with ceaser,
and I must pause until it come back to me" one could tell at that moment Antony was done but also
trying to get thee crowds attention to see what they have done to Ceaser and themselves and Rome.
Both Antony and Marcus Brutus make very clear statements in their speeches about his personality
and what all he had done for Rome and his very close

Justification of Caesar’s Assassination in Shakespeare's...
In 1599 the famous English writer, William Shakespeare, wrote the play The Tragedy of Julius
Caesar. The story takes place toward the end of the Roman Republic in 44 BC in Ancient Rome. The
play follows the words and actions of the Roman senators, plebeians and their emperor Julius
Caesar. As the story begins, readers find out the many of the senators are not pleased with Caesar as
a ruler of the Roman people. Two characters, Brutus and Cassius are especially passionate about
killing Caesar to end his rule. Through discussing plans and creating alliances, the senators get their
way and murder Caesar on the foreshadowed Ides of March. One question that comes up while
reading the play is was Caesar's assassination really justified by the murderers? Although he did
show signs of hubris, or excessive pride, Caesar's assassination by the conspirators was not justified
because their reasons were based on theories and biased opinions, Caesar was a good man, and his
murder was committed for the good of the people killing him and not for the good of Rome. The
killers assassinated Caesar without clear justification and did it based on their own assumptions of
him. Cassius says, "Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed That he is grown so great? Age, thous
art shame! Rome thous hast last the breed of noble bloods!"(Act I, scii, 150–153). Cassius is asking
what is so great about Caesar without saying what isn't great about him. One of Caesar's good
friends, Brutus, claims he

Lord Of The Flies Ralph Character Analysis
To further illustrate, in "Lord of the Flies" the character, Ralph, is a round and dynamic character.
Ralph can be classified as this type of character because of the changes he undergoes as the story
unfolds. To explain, at the beginning of the story, Ralph is confident and optimistic when himself
and multiple boys crash on an island. He takes control and earns the trust if the group. Ralph
conducts assemblies and his words are determined and civilized, "All at once he found he could talk
fluently and explain what he had to say... 'we want to be rescued; and of course, we shall be
rescued...we must make a fire"' (Golding 32–38). Ralph's words and actions show his boldness to
take control and his strong belief in being rescued. However, as the story continues, the system and
trust Ralph establish begins to diminish, resulting in two separate groups. The one group contains
Ralph and very few civilized boys, and the second group is made up Jack and the savages. Although
the groups are at peace at first, multiple fights and Piggy's stolen glasses causes Ralph to partially
change. This change is revealed to the readers when Ralph and Piggy go to the saves to retrieve the
glasses, "Truculently they squared up to each other but kept just out of fighting distance... 'Ralph–
remember what we came for. The fire. My specs"' (Golding 177). During this mission, the once
civilized Ralph begins to fight with the savages and he acted barbaric himself. Ralph's and actions
and Piggy's words show the reader how Ralph transformed the course of the book from being
civilized and confident with his word; however, Ralph is now becoming a savage and loses his
optimistic attitude. Piggy's words to Ralph, shows how Ralph is forgetting the idea of being
civilized because Piggy must constantly remind Ralph of their mission, but Ralph seems to just want
to fight. Ralph's shift in personality shows the reader that he is a dynamic and round character.
Therefore, Ralph's character undergoes development; however, Brutus in "Julius Ceaser" changes in
an equivalent way.
In addition to Ralph's dynamic character, in "Julius Ceaser" the character, Marcus Brutus, is a
dynamic and round character. Throughout the play, Brutus' character experiences a

The Cleverness of Marcus Brutus
Marcus Brutus was the most clever of all, even down to the detail of being a family man. Not many
people know what it takes to be a good politic, family man, and friend. Not many people know how
to pick out who are the good guys. It does not cross their mind that maybe they are just getting the
but of the story. Or maybe they do, but how is Marcus Brutus portrayed to them? How do they see
him? This is such a labeled universe. How hard is it to not put a label on someone or something?
Yeah Brutus, the guy who rolled with the punches and got played, wasn't really the one who got
played. In fact, he was the one who was doing the playing. As clever and intriguing as this sounds
it's going to be hard to tell how it is so. But, the words might come clearer with the fact that this guy
was a genius. Cassius was secretly being a jerk to Brutus. He was being this way to get Brutus to do
things. So in the end Cassius was never really trying to befriend Brutus. Brutus was always a
friendly kind of guy as long as you were not his enemy. Brutus places trust in the people around
him. Brutus would not have put Cassius in his friend category for no reason. Sure, they were "good
friends," but sometimes the call of duty involves creating a close person in order to betray them in
the end. Maybe Brutus knew that Cassius was going to use him. If Cassius didn't use Brutus then the
entire assassination might not have even taken place. And then again it could have been the other
way around to

Octavian Outline
To seek to keep the established constitution unchanged argues a good citizen and a good
man (Augustus)
A. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, was an excellent Emperor and
was considered to be the best ever.
B. He had a rather rough history, after losing his parents at a young age his
uncle, Julius Ceaser, took over as his guardian, and made Octavian a very
good and humble man.
C. Octavian had a fairly good education after being taught by Apollodurus.
He was a very hostile man, and didn't want the fame that an Emperor
should receive.
II. Augustus was the very first and was considered to be the best Emperor of Rome.
His uncle, Julius Ceaser, was his guardian and sent Octavian to learn under
Aplollodurus who was a distinguished ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A. August was a Roman that became Emperor at a young age..
1. He was born on September 23, 63 bc (Nardo 1).
2. He died on August 19, 14 ad (Nardo).
B. His childhood was rough after losing his parents and his uncle became his
guardian.

1. Augustus was short (Nardo 1).
2. He was also prone to sickness (Nardo 1).
3. His uncle, Julius Ceaser was his guardian (Nardo 1).
C. Octavian had a rather rough childhood, after losing his parents, Julius Ceaser
became his guardian and helped him become a great man.
III. August had many great features, with a great education he achieved the highest thing a
Roman could achieve.
A. Octavian was the first and best Emperor of Rome.
1. "He was the first and arguably the best Roman Emperor" (Nardo 1).
2. "He was nothing less than an Emperor with far–reaching powers" (Nardo
1).
B. Augustus achieved many things as an Emperor, but just being an Emperor was an
outstanding achievement in not only his eyes, but everyone elses eyes.
IV. After Julius took over as his Guardian, he sent August to learn under the scholar,
Apollodurus of Pergamum.
A. After Octavian got his education, he achieved the highest gaol any Rome could
dream of, An Emperor of

Pathos, Pathos And Logos In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Throughout the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses a variety of rhetorical strategies to articulate
the points of many characters. More explicitly the use of different rhetorical strategies can be seen
after the death of Caesar. Preceding Caesar's death speeches were given by Mark Antony and
Brutus. In these speeches Brutus tried to justify Ceaser death with vague answers, while Mark
Antony came to the support of Caesar and questioned why he really had to die. Brutus and Mark
Antony's use of logos, pathos and ethos, allowed them both to give effective speeches. Although
Brutus gave a strong speech, Mark Antony exceptional use of pathos and ethos provided him a slight
edge over Brutus. Logos can be seen used by Brutus and Mark Antony, However Brutus was able to
use logos more efficiently to appeal to the citizens. In particular Brutus used this rhetorical strategy
to persuade the people to his side. Brutus's exploit of logos can be examined as he says "Had you
rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?" (45).
From these lines Brutus uses logos as he gives all the citizens a logical reason for why he killed
Caesar. Brutus uses logos to explain to everyone that if Caesar was alive everybody would be living
as slaves rather than freemen. In contrast to Brutus, Mark Antony uses logos to support Caesar.
Mark Antony utilizes logos to disprove the claim made by Brutus about Caesar being ambitious.
Mark Antony use of logos

Julius Ceaser Essay
Carly Bolan
Block 4
Shakespeare
In the play Julius Ceaser a tradgedy written by William shakespeare in 1599, alot goes on such as
drama, tradgedy, action etc. Although the title of the play is " Julius Ceaser" Ceaser is not the only
main and visible character. There is also another character Marcus Brutus who comes in, having alot
of parts and lines in the play as well. Alot of action and drama happend with brutus being the lead
conspirator in the assination of Julius Ceaser as well as Cassius along with it. That being said, he
ended up killing himself after his big defeat at the second battle of Philippi. Cassius ended up
similar to him, in which he commited suicide. Many things happend two years prior to this. His
choices would have been different in this time. Brutus ended up joining with Gaius Cassius in the
plot against julius Ceaser. They both really had hatred and would do anything to go against him. In
other words they really just together, wanted to end his life for good. Brutus was not alone with the
killing of Julius Ceaser. He had his other senators who joined in his plot. Cassius being the number
one canadite. Many things were going on during that time leading up to their deaths. Everything
ends up falling apart ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was upon Ceasers friend Mark Antony, who proposed the amnesty for them. After this all went
down, a majority of the population evoked Brutus and the conspirators to leave Rome. A little after
this situation occuring, in 43 B.C Octavius had gotten his consulship from the Roman Senate. His
first actions were not any of the things Brutus's conspirators would be happy with. He wanted to
have the people who assassinated Julius Ceaser taken down and murdered, as enemies of the state.
Brutus ended up finding it out from a letter, what was going to occur next. In result, Octavion and
his troops fought a numerous of battles and beat

Octavian and Marc Antony- The Duel of Words and Deeds
Octavian and Marc Antony– The Duel of Words and Deeds Following the Julius Caesar's death at
the hands of the Senate, Octavian and Marc Antony propelled themselves to the pinnacle of Roman
power. First joining together during the Second Triumvirate, these men represented the true power
players of Roman politics. As their alliance fractured, both Romans resorted to propaganda to gain
an edge over the other. Through insulting the other and polishing their own image, both Antony and
Octavian looked to capture absolute Roman dominance. Even before their eventual war in 32
B.C.E., the men engaged in a duel of words in deeds. This paper will first overview the formation
and disintegration of Second Triumvirate between Marc Antony, Marcus Lepidus, and Octavian. Its
main portion will divulge the devious propaganda, leading up to the war in 32 B.C.E., used by Marc
Antony and Octavian to destroy the other politically. Plutarch's Antony and Suetonius' The Lives of
the Caesars– The Deified Augustus(De Vita Caesarum – Divus Augustus) will serve as our main
guide to this war of image. After the assassination of Julius Caesar, Marc Antony, Marcus Lepidus,
and Octavian met in October 43 BC to join together, rule the entire government of Rome, and the
control the Roman provinces. In power, they were equal to the consuls and had the right to select
magistrates. The triumvirs' mission, during their first five year term, can be broken down into three
objectives: to "pursue and punish the

The Significance of Calphurnia's Insignificance in Julius...
"Behind every man, there is a woman." As seen throughout history, society has dumped women into
a lower "rank." Women have been seen as much less significant and less important as pertaining to
men. This idea of society's own patriarchal illustration can be seen in William Shakespeare's The
Tragedy of Julius Caesar, in which Julius Caesar's wife, Calphurnia, is left widely unnoticed and
highly insignificant although she holds an image that is really quite important. In The Tragedy of
Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar is seen as what the image history has portrayed him as, a fine general of
Rome's vast military but also a general of an ill mind and ignorance that is upon him. This ill mind
and ignorance is derived from his power and the abuse that came with the power. His abuse of
power is widely seen throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar as he seizes his power from the
Rome senate and everyone and everything. This abuse is also summarized in Brutus's response of
Caesar's power as he describes Caesar as a "serpent egg" and provides a forewarning of the dangers
of Caesar's power as it becomes more and more prevalent throughout the first half of the story
before his death. As it is shown that the assumptions pertaining to Caesar are true; it is also
developed that Caesar begins to overlook his surroundings, of which includes his beloved wife,
Calphurnia. As the story progresses, we find that Calphurnia's nature can be described as shy,
reclusive, and very quiet in her ways.

The Stonewall Rebellion Or Stonewall Riots
The Stonewall Rebellion or Stonewall Riots was a series of violent riots that took place between gay
and trans activists, drag queens, and other patrons of The Stonewall Inn against the police after a
raid had been carried out by the Sixth Precinct police. The days and rebellions that followed are
monumental moments in LGBT and World history.
For New York's gay and trans communities the 1960's marks a turning point in their history;
Sodomy had been reduced to a misdemeanour, with a maximum sentence of six months in prison,
the anti–gay accommodation rules of the New York State Liquor Authority had been overturned,
allowing homosexuals to congregate and be served alcoholic beverages in bars, The American
Psychiatric Association reclassified ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nevertheless, it became a nightly home to homeless youth and runaways, drag queens, people of
colour, and other minorities who were often not accepted in gay spaces. Among its patrons was
African American, Trans, Gay, and AIDS activist, sex worker, and drag queen – Martha P. Johnson.
Who would famously claim that the P. stood for "Pay it No Mind".
The Stonewall Inn had been registered as a private "Bottle Bar" which meant patrons were expected
to bring their own liquor. The Genovese Family would often bribe the Sixth Precinct to turn a blind
eye to the activities occurring in inn. However, in the early hours of June 28th 1969 and readied
with a warrant for storing and selling liquor without a licence; the police prepared to raid The
Stonewall Inn.
The raid began just after 3a.m, and the police found the illegal liquor and began arresting employees
while the crowd booed but remained otherwise calm. Howard Smith, a village voice reporter who
stayed with the police throughout the riot reported "During the "gay power" riots at the Stonewall
last Friday night I found myself on what seemed to me the wrong side of the blue line. Very scary.
Very enlightening." After arresting some of the employees, including the bartender, doorman, and
reportedly brutalising some of the patrons. The police turned their focus on those suspected in
violation of New York's gender appropriate laws; They had checked 5 persons suspected of

Do Consequences Depend on Motives in Julius Caesar by...
An American theologian Reinhold Niebuhr once said, "All human sin seems so much worse in its
consequences than in its intentions." In this statement, Niebuhr exclaims that the consequences of a
situation are undeniably much worse than the motivation of one's instigation of their actions. This
applies to the intentions and, more importantly, the consequences of the characters in both the play
Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare and film Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps directed by Oliver
Stone. Even though some people have honorable intentions and mean no harm, the consequences
can still be disastrous. In much the same way, those with fraudulent intentions also suffer in the end.
Situations like these can be accurately viewed through both the play and the film. The characters
Brutus and Jacob Moore have no other reason but to act in a worthy way. While Cassius and Gordon
Gekko have deceptive intentions, consequences incur similar to Brutus and Jacob Moore. The
intentions may seem like the most important consideration in a decision, but, in reality, the penalties
can be the same no matter what the motives are.
A motive to kill one's best friend requires deep thinking and a reasonable intention. Brutus, Caesar's
best friend, has taken into consideration why he thinks killing Caesar is necessary. Although Brutus
is Caesar's best friend, he has to come to conclusion that murdering him is his final decision when
he asserts, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome

Julius Caesar Quote Analysis
Sanders & Brutus's Thoughts
The play "Julius Caesar" by William Shakespeare is about Brutus who is convinced by Cassius that
the ruler Julius Caesar is becoming too powerful for Rome's own good. Brutus and other
conspirators take this potential dictator down by killing him. Rome breaks into chaos but all in all
the chaos was better than having Julius Caesar as a dictator. Brutus and Bernie Sanders think alike in
the way they want a fair and equal society. They both strongly want to take down the "higher"
people in the world. While Bernie Sanders is looking to take down the 1% and Wall St Brutus is
looking to take down Caeser. Both of them in all want to help the common folk and plebeians of
their country.
Brutus and Senator Bernie Sanders ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A plebeian says ,on act 3 scene 2 line 63 "We are blest that Rome is rid of him" but after Anthony is
done talking a plebeian says "Caesar has had great wrong.". This quote shows how easily the crowd
is swayed and how quickly they can move on. Bernie Sanders gets affected by this except he isn't
against Anthony but he is against Hillary Clinton. "we should level with the American people," said
Hillary Clinton in a 2016 Democratic debate. Hillary is acting as if Bernie Sanders is not telling the
truth and is trying to lie to the citizens of The United States of America. Anthony also does the same
tactic of making the crowd doubt Brutus's words. "Voters are most likely to trust Clinton" states a
poll by a magazine called The Week. This shows how the wicked ways of Hillary are working just
as how they worked against Bernie Sanders. Trust is what everyone wants from a candidate and
Hillary is getting just that.
"Let us wage a moral and political war against the billionaires and corporate leaders, on Wall Street
and elsewhere, whose policies and greed are destroying the middle class of America." – Bernie
Sanders 2016
Page 93 line 23 Brutus "I honour him: but, as he was ambitious I slew

Ego In Julius Caesar

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Crystal Torres

More from Crystal Torres (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Ego In Julius Caesar