Julius Ceaser Essay

Julius Ceaser Essay
Julius Ceaser Julius Caesar Julius Caesar was born on July 13th in 100B.C. His full name is Gaius Julius Caesar, which was the same as his
father's name. Julius Caesar was the most famous Roman general and was one of the most influential political and military leaders in history. He
helped establish the vast Roman Empire. Caesar gained all his power in four different areas. Those areas are politics, government, religion, and in the
military. Using these amazing powers he controlled many aspects of Roman life. In 84B.C. Caesar married Cornelia, the daughter of Lucis Cornelius
Cinna, a noble who was Marious' associate in revolution. Lucis Cornelius Sulla demanded they divorce in 83, but Caesar refused, risking his job and
his life....show more content...
They gained control of Rome but soon split up by rivalries.
Crassus died fighting in the East and Caesar went to Gaul and Britain. Pompey feared Caesar's power and allied himself to the Senate. Between
58B.C. and 49B.C. Caesar conquered more territory in Gaul. He also led two expeditions to Britain. Caesar was going to seize power in Rome. He
crushed an army led by Pompey. This left Caesar in charge of the military in Rome. It also signified the end of the Roman Republic. In 44B.C he
was appointed dictator for life and in the same year was assassinated. Before his death he introduced reforms that helped strengthen Rome and protect
his own power. He distributed land and money to the poor and granted Roman citizenship to people in provinces outside Italy. He also reduced
unemployment by creating many building projects and increased the soldiers pay. He introduced a new calendar that was more accurate. It was based
on the Hellenistic astronomy. It was called the Julian Calendar and was used in Europe until 1582A.D. Even though the Senate and Assembly of tribes
continued to exist, he still had total power.
However many people referred to him as a tyrant and that he was destroying the Republic. Other people were jealous of all his popularity. Whatever
the reason, on March 15th 44B.C. a group of conspirators that were led by Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus stabbed Julius Caesar
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Julius Caesar Essay Honor
Madeline Switzer
M. Halfmann
Honors English 9
6 October 2017
Honor
In William Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, many themes are developed. One character, Brutus, displays a significant theme that develops through the
entire play. The theme that is supported most by this character is the idea that honor and respect are gained through performing works for the good of
others instead of for personal gain.
This theme is first seen when Brutus thinks about whether he should kill Caesar. He sits in his orchard and contemplates what his reason for killing
Caesar is. As he thinks this over, he realizes that if he kills Caesar, it is not for his own gain, but for others. He expresses this when he says, "It must
be by his death, and, for my part,...show more content...
The citizens of Rome begin to see Brutus's way of thinking and they understand that he really did think of the good of the people while making his
decision. They also understand that Brutus was not thinking selfishly like they had assumed, but logically. This helps them to trust him more because he
thought about the situation in an unbiased way. The plebeians respond to Brutus's explanation by saying, "Live, Brutus, live, live! / Bring him with
triumph home unto his house... This Caesar was tyrant. / Nay, that's certain. / We are blessed that Rome is rid of him" (III.ii.49–50 and 75–77). The
Plebeians learn that Brutus had honest intentions and they respect and praise him for it. The knowledge that Brutus was selfless enough to kill his
friend in order to save them from tyranny, earns their respect. A final situation where this theme is developed is during the events surrounding the death
of Brutus.
The honor that Brutus gains through performing deeds without thinking of his own gain is solidified at the end of the play around the event of
Brutus's death. At the beginning of act five, scene five, Brutus tells his servants that he believes his time living has come to an end, and he needs their
help to kill him. One after another, Brutus's servants tell him no. They respond to his request saying, "I'd rather kill myself... That's not an office for a
friend, my lord"

Julius Caesar Essay
English II
November 30, 2011.
Julius CaesarВґs Essay Julius Caesar is mostly known for his great leadership in RomeВґs Empire, he accomplished everything he purposed and he did
whatever it took to make it happen. He had all it took to be such a leader; women were in love with him, men wanted to be part of his army and
children wanted to be like him when they grow up. For Caesar all it took was courage and selfishness to get to where he was. A leader is a person who
knows the way; goes the way and shows the way but no one will ever be a leader without courage. Courage was part of CaesarВґs being, he knew that
if he showed this part of him in the moments that seemed lost and accomplished them, people would follow him and they would...show more content...
His craving for power was the secret ingredient for the cake he was baking. "After weeks of fighting Vercingetorix, facing starvation, is forced to
surrender" (Campbell) Weeks and weeks had to pass for someone to surrender and even though CaesarВґs men were suffering the same hunger as their
enemies Julius didnВґt even think about surrender. He just wanted to prove he was stronger than Vercingetorix was and not only some of his army
died because of starvation or simply because their bodies gave up he also left women and children die because he didnВґt let them in his shelter for
protection. But even though he left all those people dying he was still an exceptional leader. Having these two characters made Caesar a standout
in a large crowd. He had all the courage he needed to fight in a lot of battles and a hidden part of him, filled with selfishness, made him want more
the power he always wanted in whatever matters he could get there. He was well aware of everything he was doing, he planned every step of his way
and to make them happen all he needed was lots of courage and lots selfishness.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Caesar, The Early years vol. 1, ed. Horace. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2005. Print

Power In Julius Caesar Essay
Throughout the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare examines themes of power throughout, as well as letting your true colors show. Towards the end of
the play, Brutus is able to show this theme perfectly while in the beginning, Brutus is thought as someone who is unsure and insecure. He is also an
exception to this ongoing theme. But as the play progresses and Brutus becomes true to himself, giving in to the tempting power that appears to be
reachable, he becomes the epitome of this theme. It becomes clear to Brutus that Caesar is not what's best for Rome, in fact, he is the reason that it is
falling apart. However, because it is already embedded into his mind by his good friend Cassius, he believes that the only way to fix this situation is to
kill Caesar. This pivot into a more narcissistic version of himself is gradual, while him agreeing with killing Caesar is sudden. In the beginning ofJulius
Caesar, Brutus is insecure, but as the play progresses and he gives in to Cassius' manipulation and his own hidden thirst for power, Brutus...show more
content...
This is one of the most definitive answers that Brutus has given in this play so far. He is an indecisive person who can't seem to make a decision. He
can also be characterized as insecure within this dialogue as well. Cassius is trying to convince him, even though it is in a very manipulative manner,
that Brutus is more worthy of being in Caesar's position than Caesar himself. Although, Brutus does not believe this. He thinks of himself as no more
than just a commoner in Rome, no matter his political position. Overall, Brutus can be thought of as an indecisive, insecure, person who is having
trouble with being caught in the middle of this feud, but as the play progresses he begins to show what he really thinks, therefore letting his true colors

Essay On Julius Caesar
Introduction– Julius Caesar was a dictator of Rome in 47 BC, and then in 44 BC, he was appointed dictator for life.But really, who was Julius Caesar?
Who is this man that was murdered because of his poor leadership?
Some historians may believe that Julius Caesar did things that was for the benefit of Rome, and that he made Rome more powerful in a strong way. I
understand why some people think that he was a good person, he did do things to benefit Rome. For one thing, he supposedly did give rights to the
foreign citizen tribes outside of Rome, and although he did do other things to benefit Rome, all in all, I believe that Julius Caesar was a horrific dictator
because he didn't have good relationship skills, he couldn't see that he was...show more content...
They were raising taxes, and Julius was hungry for power. As the laws of Rome read that he had to kill the current dictator to become the new dictator,
he killed Sulla, and became the new dictator.– If you were a part of the senate in Rome at that time, and you agreed with the current dictator 's
philosophies, and then a new one came along that did everything differently, would you support him? The senate grew angry with all of Caesars
ideas, and that 's how they 're terrible relationship started... Maybe you still believe that my point of Caesar, having bad relationships is phony, but
think from another point of view, Because in the end, the senate decided to stab him 23 times, one of those people being his best friends... These three
reasons show why I think Julius Caesar had bad relationships, and that goes to show that he was a horrific dictator.
P2– Hurting, not helping Rome
Julius Caesar wanted the biggest and the best of everything, but, the Idea that Caesar was creating a more powerful environment for the people of
Rome was a complete distorted philosophy. Caesar may have been able to make his way to the top of dictatorship, but he ended up hitting rock
bottom for his ways. Wanting the most beautiful empire is not a crime, but, Caesar had no right taking people from their friends and families to use as
slaves to build the beauty that is Rome. As we are tricked

Julius CaesarВґs Death: Analysis Essay
Should Julius Caesar have been killed? This question has plagued history for years without a real answer. Julius Caesar was corrupt and all powerful,
and his death saved Rome. It really is that simple; he declared himself dictator for life and ignored the Senate's power. A man with that much power can
only hurt a nation.
Julius Caesar was a blood thirsty man. He fought everyone he could just to extend Rome. ("Julius Caesar." ) He savagely killed anyone that got in
his way. Many may say that he was a legendary and should be remembered as a great warrior, but should murderers be praised? Genghis Khan was a
great warrior, he created the largest empire in history. Is he remembered well? No, because he was brutal and merciless. Caesar was also...show more
content...
Caesar's assassins had no reason to believe he was different.
Another, of many reasons that Caesar's assassination was a necessary tragedy is he ignored the warnings and signs. In the world today most don't
believe signs exist, but in Caesar's time it was crazy to ignore them. In the Roman Republic it was believed that signs were set by the gods to warn
people and no one would ignore the gods. The priests preformed a ceremony and got bad results, which led them to believe that Julius Caesar was
in danger. Caesar still refused to miss the Senate that day, even as his friends begged that he postpone the meeting. ( "The Assassination of Julius
Caesar, 44 BC." ) These days to many people this is all worthless and fake, but whether signs from gods are real or not is not the question. The
question is what kind of many ignores not only the traditions of his people, but his own gods? A man who would rather be where he is in power, then
heed the warnings of what he believed to be his gods is not a man the Senate believed Rome needed.
All this comes down the last point that will be made in this essay, Julius Caesar's assassins believed that what they were doing was what was best for
the Roman Republic and its citizens. Caesar showed all the signs of becoming a corrupt king–like ruler. With the past experiences of Rome the men
that killed Caesar just wanted to help the people they swore

Essay on Julius Caesar
How Betrayal Led to Downfall in Julius Caesar
In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare shows how friends often betray each other. Julius Caesar is about to be crowned king
of Rome, when some well–known Romans decide that it is not a good idea for this to happen. They form a conspiracy and kill Caesar. Brutus, an
honorable Roman and a very good friend of Caesar's, betrays Caesar by killing him for the good of Rome. Antony, Caesar'sbest friend and another
honorable Roman, betrays Brutus by turning against the conspirators. Cassius, a respected Roman, and Brutus betray each other by arguing and
destroying their friendship. All this betraying lead to many deaths in the play....show more content...
In his soliloquy, Antony praised Caesar's great personality but at the same time, he would keep saying positive things about Brutus. An example is
when he says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me; / But Brutus says he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honorable man." (3.2.85–87). The way
in which he spoke and by telling the citizens the context of Caesar's will, turned the mob against Brutus and the rest of the conspirators. The anger
possessed by the countrymen can be shown when a plebeian says, "Most noble Caesar! We'll revenge his death!" (2.2.244). This betrayal by Antony
caused Brutus to break off their friendship.
Cassius was also driven out of Rome with Brutus and instead of working together to win back their reputation, they began arguing with each other and
destroyed their friendship. Temporarily they argued about how they would attempt to put together an army, they argued about military strategy, and
they argued about other common things that should not interfere between two friends. By not cooperating with each other when they needed to, they
could not succeed in making a comeback and they both committed suicides.
All these instances of betrayal could have been avoided and therefore would not have led to the downfalls of certain characters. Had Caesar lived,
maybe everybody would have gotten along and Rome could

Julius Ceaser Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Julius Ceaser Essay