The document summarizes a group assignment where students had to choose 4 people to survive in a bunker for 2 years after a virus killed everyone else. The group selected a female botanist to grow food, a pregnant woman to reproduce, a male army officer to provide security despite having an eating disorder, and a male professor with a medical and law background. While the group's choices were good, the student acknowledges their group could have improved by adding someone with engineering or construction skills.

1. For thisassignmentwe were givenasituationwhere everyone diesfromavirusexceptfor13 people.
Theyonlyhave certainresourcesandproductsto keepthemalive.Theyhave tolive fortwoyearsinthe
bunkerbutit can onlyaccommodate 4 people.Our jobwasto choose the 4 people tokeepoutof a list
of people.Ourgroupendedupchoosingafemale scientistwhoisa botanist,asingle pregnantwoman,a
male army officerwhohasan eatingdisorder,andamale professorwhohasa major inmedical sciences
and a minorincriminal justice inlaw.The reasonwe chose the female scientistwasbecause she can
helpprolongthe seedsgivenaswell asreproduce whenthe twoyearsisup.The onlyreasonwe chose
the pregnantwomanisbecause she can reproduce andhas alreadyprovedtobe fertile.Nextwasthe
male army officerwithaneatingdisorder,we chose himbecausehe canhelpkeeppeace andsince he
has anorexiahe will helpsave foodforthe pregnantwomanandherbaby.Last, we chose the male
universityprofessorbecause we hadhimmajorinmedical sciencesandminorincriminal justice inlaw.I
thinkthat ourgroup had a reallygoodideabutwe couldhave improvedit.Afterdiscussingasa class,I
foundthat some of the othergroupshad good ideasthatour groupwas missing.Ithinkwe shouldhave
addedsomeone wholikestobuildorhasan engineeringdegree.Butotherthanthat I thinkthatour
grouphad a greatidea.Thisassignmentwasverydifficultforme because I'musuallynotcreative butit
helpedme tocome out of my comfortzone.