There’s an old adage that says that history is always written by the winners. Although this is not always the case, it is true that people's sense of historical events is often influenced by the viewpoints of the historians who write about them. During the Watergate scandal in 1974, many policy pundits wrote columns demanding that President Richard Nixon resign from the presidency because he was, in their view, clearly culpable for the Watergate break-ins. Not all pundits felt this way, however. Click here and here to read articles that offer differing views of President Nixon at the height of the Watergate scandal. Use the attached template to complete the following for this assignment: •Two Approaches to Watergate: Summarize the arguments made in each of the two articles regarding the conduct of President Nixon. How might each of the author’s views impact the reader’s understanding of the Watergate crisis? •Changing Views: Describe how the Watergate events changed American views toward politics and politicians. In your view, how did these events change the press coverage of politicians? •Impact of Technology: Speculate about how the Watergate event coverage might have been different (better or worse) in the age of social media and smartphones. Would it have lasted as long? Why or why not? Are these innovations in technology helpful or harmful to the way that people understand current events? At least 2 credible sources are required for this assignment, in addition to the 2 articles offered for a total of 4 sources. Your sources should be cited using APA format; both in-text citations and references. Please use the CTU Undergraduate Writing Style Guide for assistance on APA formatting. References Burch, D. (1974, May 14). In defense of Richard Nixon. Retrieved from The Harvard Crimson Web site: http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1974/5/14/in-defense-of-richard-nixon-pithe/ The Washington Post. (1973, May 1). Editorial: Watergate: The unfinished business. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/050173-2.htm
...
There’s an old adage that says that history is always written by the.docx
1. There’s an old adage that says that history is always written by
the winners. Although this is not always the case, it is true that
people's sense of historical events is often influenced by the
viewpoints of the historians who write about them. During the
Watergate scandal in 1974, many policy pundits wrote columns
demanding that President Richard Nixon resign from the
presidency because he was, in their view, clearly culpable for
the Watergate break-ins. Not all pundits felt this way, however.
Click here and here to read articles that offer differing views of
President Nixon at the height of the Watergate scandal. Use the
attached template to complete the following for this assignment:
•Two Approaches to Watergate: Summarize the arguments made
in each of the two articles regarding the conduct of President
Nixon. How might each of the author’s views impact the
reader’s understanding of the Watergate crisis? •Changing
Views: Describe how the Watergate events changed American
views toward politics and politicians. In your view, how did
these events change the press coverage of politicians? •Impact
of Technology: Speculate about how the Watergate event
coverage might have been different (better or worse) in the age
of social media and smartphones. Would it have lasted as long?
Why or why not? Are these innovations in technology helpful or
harmful to the way that people understand current events? At
least 2 credible sources are required for this assignment, in
addition to the 2 articles offered for a total of 4 sources. Your
sources should be cited using APA format; both in-text citations
and references. Please use the CTU Undergraduate Writing
Style Guide for assistance on APA formatting. References
Burch, D. (1974, May 14). In defense of Richard Nixon.
Retrieved from The Harvard Crimson Web site:
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1974/5/14/in-defense-of-
richard-nixon-pithe/ The Washington Post. (1973, May 1).
Editorial: Watergate: The unfinished business. Retrieved from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/050173-2.htm
