Experiencial Apologetics – A Summary, Critque, And Supporters

Experiencial Apologetics вЂ“ a Summary, Critque, and Supporters
LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
EXPERIENCIAL APOLOGETICS– A SUMMARY, CRITQUE, AND SUPPORTERS
SUBMITTED TO DR. GERARDO A. ALFARO
IN PARTIAL COMPLETION OF COURSE REQUIREMENTS FOR
INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS (APOL 500–C09)
JASON DION (Student ID 23494458)
JACKSONVILLE, FL
MARCH 4, 2012
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION1 SUPPORTERS OF EXPERIENTIAL APOLOGETICS2 BLAISE PASCAL 2 SГ
–REN KIERKEGAARD 3 PAUL TILLICH3
CRITIQUE OF EXPERIENTIAL APOLOGETICS4 CONCLUSION4
INTRODUCTION
According to Beilby, "Apologetics is, in its simplest possible terms, the attempt to defend a particular belief or system of beliefs against objections."
Caner considers experiential apologetics one of the five traditional ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The entire concept of sharing one's testimony is subjective. A believer can tell someone about their horrible past, but if they did not know the believer
before they were a believer, the testimony could fall flat. Additionally, it is an non–provable method, since it is a personal feeling or experience the
person is describing, not concrete proof. Finally, there is an issue with duplication by other religions, meaning that other religious believers have a
testimony and experience to share, as well. Relying solely on the experiential apologetics leaves the apologist open to a myriad of problems with proof
and deniability of their testimony.
CONCLUSION

Experiential apologetics proposes that knowledge of God and his grace has to come from a personal experience which then leads to acceptance of
God's truth expressed in the Scriptures. This personal experience may come from a testimony of a believer to an unbeliever, or through direct
experience of a non–believer causing them to become a believer. While several proponents of this method have developed different interpretations of
the form over time, the basic principle still remains valid that a shared experience can help to save a lost soul. Although experiential apologetics are
considered one of the personal and intimate forms of apologetics, it is also considered one of the weakest forms due to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Biblical Foundation For Apologetics : A Strong Sense Of...
Mark 12: 30–31 says, "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength" (New
International Version). The church has done a good job in terms of loving God with all its heart, all its soul, and all its strength but has done a poor job
of loving God with all its mind. Most churches have a strong sense of community through worship, sermons, bible studies, retreats, and Sunday school
but what most churches lack is the desperate need for apologetics. According to a study conducted by the Barna Group, "70–75% of Christian youth in
the United States leave the church after high school" (Barna Group, 2006). The Church needs apologetics because Christians are commanded to defend
the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and
respect" (NIV). The word answer when translated back to Greek is apologia which means "defense" and is where the English word apologetics
comes from. Apo means away, while logos means word or reason, so apologetics could mean "to reason away" (dictionary.reference.com). The
second verse which is often associated with Christian apologetics is Isaiah 1:18 which says, "Come now, let us reason together" (English Standard
Version). One of the earliest Christian apologists was the Apostle Paul. Acts 17:17 says, "So he reasoned in the synagogue with both Jews and
God–fearing Greeks, as well as in the marketplace day by day with those who happened to be there" (NIV). Paul was in Athens debating with Stoic
and Epicurean philosophers. Epicureans believed that happiness or pleasure was the primary goal of life. The Stoics placed thinking above feeling
and tried to live in harmony with nature and reason, suppressing their desire for pleasure. Apologetics can not only help someone defend their own
point of view but it is also extremely important for understanding someone else's beliefs. Paul knew how to deal with other worldviews and was
extremely efficient in articulating his own worldview. Paul encouraged other Christians to also become effective defenders of thefaith in 2 Corinthians

Christian Apologetic Mehods: A Case for Classical...
The aim of the Christian apologist is to appeal to the mind and to the heart of the unbeliever, with the necessary guidance and intervening of the Holy
Spirit, by building a good case for the truth of Christianity. The classical method is a compelling approach because the "two–step" method establishes a
strong case for the truth of theism and also creates a foundation which builds on the truth of the Christian worldview. This approach engages with
natural theology but also recognizes that there are certain truths that can only be known through special revelation from God. Classical apologetics
successfully provides an objective, solidified establishment of the Christian worldview in light of logic and reason through which the Holy Spirit uses
those arguments and evidences to convict and convince the unbeliever. A close cousin of the classical method is the evidential method. The evidential
method uses a "one–step" approach, beginning with implementing a display of facts, both scientific and historical, to defend the central claims of
Christianity . A problem may arise due to different interpretations of fact that some evidentialists may not take into account; for example, a Jew may
become convinced that Jesus rose from the dead but that does not mean that they will become convinced that Christianity is true . The advantage of
using the classical method is that it is beneficial to establish the truth of theism before presenting historical

Christian Apologetics
Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith is a formidable case in favor of Christian theism from the ground–up covering all
major evidences along with responses to common objections. In chapter 17: "The Uniqueness of Humanity," Groothuis develops the challenge that
consciousness and cognition constitute for materialism and proposes arguments in favor of biblical substance dualism. The relationship between mind
and brain remains a mystery explicable in a theistic worldview. Ironically, scientific descriptions of reality in terms of matter require and presuppose
consciousness, given that scientists construct these descriptions! The conundrum for the materialist is that he/she has to be able to explain thoughts
and truth via... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But, if neo–Darwinism is true, we have no warrant for those beliefs as true. Naturalists have not demonstrated that our cognitive abilities are
truth–conducive. The naturalist could argue that true beliefs are needed for survival of the fittest. But this is simply false. All an organism needs is to
interact consistently with the environment. An amoeba has no concept of truth, but still can interact with the environment successfully for survival.
But even if evolution could generate beliefs, (1) there is no reason we should think they are true, and (2) even if they are true, we have no warrant that
they affect behavior in any way. Furthermore, "beliefs could be energy expensive distractions" in the quest for survival since it requires the
development of a higher–brain function. These systems require "increased information–processing" capacities. Interestingly enough,
information–processing systems are at home with the idea of an intelligent mind. If seems then, that all attempts to explain rationality bring us back to
a nonsensical denial of our cognitive abilities or a denial of materialism. Materialists often prefer to leave this as a mystery, but this is by no means
due to an inference from the best available

Studying Apologetics
It has been such a pleasure taking your class and getting to know you this year. Your sense of sarcasm and easy
–going nature always made class so
enjoyable and fun! My faith has never been seriously questioned so studying apologetics this year really changed my point of view concerning
atheists and why they believe there is no god. Thanks to you, I feel like I can more adequately defend my faith in my next step in life. I feel like the
most appropriate way to write this essay is to highlight a few arguments and ideas that have stuck with me the most. Before this however, I would
like to define apologetics and why we study it. Apologetics is the intellectual argument for a belief such as the existence of God. We are studying
apologetics not to make others believe in God, but to be able to defend our own belief in Him so that others arguments against his ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of the arguments that the authors deal with are arguments because of a lack of clear research about the facts. One of these is the claim that
the Jews were very hellenized due to astrological texts which were forbidden by Jewish texts or zodiac symbols found in synagogues. While these
things might have been found, it does not mean that first century Palestinian Jews participated with these things. In my opinion, there is no question
that the Jesus story is historically accurate because all evidence presented against this view is lacking. Living in my Christian bubble, personally, I
have had no one question my faith, but I'm sure that will change once I go to college. I feel like apologetics has helped me become more confident
in why I am a Christian. Before, my Christian faith was purely faith based. Now I can definitively say that I can look at in detail the difficult texts in
the Bible, and not just accept it because it is in the Bible, but because I know the background and the reasons for what is

Christian Apologetics Summary
In Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith–Appendix 1–Dr. Groothuis presents a defense of the fairness of hell. He explains
that, in our pluralistic and relativistic society, hell seems to be a repugnant and offensive doctrine, even when presented biblically and faithfully. Jesus
taught the doctrine in multiple occasions, and given the evidence for the resurrection, his warnings should be taken seriously–if the resurrection is true,
then Jesus was Divine and what he says is authoritative. In spite of this, many Christians avoid the subject of hell altogether and
secularists–ironically–"condemn" it; however Dr. Groothuis raises a solid case for the reality of it with numerous quotes from Jesus. This is a wise
strategy since even... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Groothuis about hell. He correctly states that that our eternal destiny depends on our response to God. However, I believe a point that should have been
strengthened is this: twice in the chapter, Dr. Groothuis affirms that the "unredeemed" go to hell because they "failed to respond rightly" (7088)
and that "eternal punishment" awaits those who reject Christ. While this is technically correct and Biblical, the deepest point and reason for the
existence of hell is the incorrigible depravity of humanity. People don't end up in hell because they confused Christ's purpose and rejected him, or
because of meager sins against a Holy God. Humanity is morally bankrupt and devoid of goodness as thousands of years of death, genocide and rape
attest to that. It is extremely difficult to convince helpless sinners that they need forgiveness if sin is just a liturgical term used in Sunday school. Dr.
Groothuis has already explained that "hell is inseparable" from "sin, God's holiness, and the cross", but the idea that deeply depraved human beings
are already damned and deserving of separation from God–lest they repent trough faith in Christ–is not very clear from the

Christianity, By Clive Staples Lewis
In Mere Christianity, Clive Staples Lewis, known as C.S Lewis known best for his writing, and being a Christian apologist, divides the novel into 4
different section. Each book emphasizes the struggles he has faced and overcome as well as personal life lessons he has learned. The first section,
Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe focus on moral law and the law of nature. Christians Believe, second section, corresponds
with his life because Lewis has had many interviews defending his faith and studied the Bible thoroughly. In the third book, Christian Behaviour. It
talks about all of the different types of morals and behaviors Christians are called to follow because Lewis has studied into Jesus's teaching he has a
deeper understanding of what Jesus has called his followers to be. Lastly, Beyond Personality: or First steps in the Doctrine of the Trinity, is about the
first steps and the process of becoming a Christian. Lewis went from an atheist to a highly Christian figure in the church and believer society resulting
into a lot of personal knowledge of the topics in his novel. C.S. Lewis's life influences his writing in Mere Christianity through his ability to portray the
foundation of Christianity from the growth made from both his believer and non–believer life, using the amount of studies and research done defending
the views of atheists and Christians, his studies in people and Christian behavior, and finally how his intimate growth as a godly person

Outline For Presuppositional Apologetics
The first purpose which the author mentioned was the need for a biblical approach to Apologetics. John Frame's first purposes were stated, "A biblical
apologetic targets unbelief wherever it may be found, strengthening the faith of Christians and calling unbelievers to repentance and faith in Christ."1
Frame began with a brief biblical definition and outline for Presuppositional Apologetics. First he referenced the biblical basis of Apologetics, I Peter
3:15–16, and then outlined, "1. Apologetics as proof:"2 Followed by "2. Apologetics as defense:"3 And then "3. Apologetics as offense:"4 Frame
demonstrated a clear way of understanding as he outlined and in effect taught the basics of Presuppositional Apologetics. Frame touches... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In particular Frame has done a masterful job of laying out the framework (no pun intended) of the Apologetic apparatus, and explaining the many
parts and pieces to this way of looking at Scripture and arguing for the faith. One aspect of this body of study seems to this writer to be unessential
to Apologetics which Frame inserts into his explanation of Apologetics which is predestination. Frame stated, "The doctrine that God foreordains and
directs all events is generally regarded as Calvinistic, and I am not embarrassed to be called a Calvinist."8 Frame goes on to discuss Arminianism.
The question to ask is can the study of Apologetics stand on its own without inserting Calvinism into it? This writer believes so. Good men of course
can disagree, and should be able to remain amicable with one another, especially in higher Christian

Justin's First Apology Analysis
1. Introduction
Second century philosopher, Justin Martyr grew up in Flavia Neapolis, Palestine, a city near the ancient ruins of Shechem. The population of Shechem
is thought to be of Samaritan descent, as was Justin. However, he did not belong to an ethnic group associated with pagan theology. Instead, Justin
devoted his life to the pursuit of Christ by means of philosophy. Thus, Justin contributed to Christian education through his understanding of the logos
and his apologies.
2. Educational Background He mentioned being brought up in a Gentile culture, having a Greek education, and being uncircumcised. Consequently, he
remained unaware of Moses and the prophets until later in life. Furthermore, he associated himself with the Gentiles, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Many scholars have criticized the organization of Justin's First Apology, though, Justin and several others used the apology as an apologetic tool or
teaching material within catechetical schools. Thus, the text could have been modified or rearranged to fit the specific needs of the academic context.
In fact, Minns and Parvis claim the text "contains later glosses, and accidental transpositions of material." However, despite the modifications made to
the text, the Apology contains a logical progression of thought. The Apology followed an ancient format used for speech: the exordium, or introduction;
the narratio, or statement of fact; the confirmatio, or proof of fact; the refutio, or rebuttal against opposing views; and the peroratio, or conclusion.
Many classic authors employ the exordium to gain the favor of the recipient. However, Justin employed it to determine whether they deserved their
advantageous titles, "pious" and "philosopher." Then, Justin employed the narratio to give reasons for his treatise. Next, the confirmatio and refutio
contain most the text. Justin elaborates on the unreasonableness of Christian persecution on the mere basis of identifying with the Christian faith.
Continuing under the premise of Christianity's derelict nature, Justin argued for Christianity's uniqueness in regards to monotheism. Furthermore, Justin
argued for Christians being good members of the community. Finally, after Justin's elaboration, he concluded his first apology by claiming the validity
of Christ's claims are proven by the fulfillment of his prophecies, and that Christian's employed rational reasoning by worshipping Christ

What Is The Purpose Of Christian Apologetics
We are living in a time that seemly scientists, and scholars are negating the authenticity of the Bible; it has stimulated the thoughts of some Christians
to consider the possibility of scientific data because it operates through the theory of rational facts, yet Christianity foundation is centered on faith.
Hebrews 11:6 explains, "But without faith it is impossible to please him; for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of
them that diligently seek him." Unfortunately, Christianity is a religion that attracts sceptics from all walks of life, nevertheless, Christians engages in
apologetics because the world that we live in produces objections regarding biblical theology and philosophical concepts and percepts.

The Apologetics of Christianity Essay
The Apologetics of Christianity
Jesus, a name known by billions throughout the world. To each, this name means something different; savior, friend, philosopher, prophet, teacher,
fraud, fake, liar. Some even believe that He is just an imaginary character from the minds of those who wrote about Him. The Westminster Dictionary
of Theology describes apologetics as, "Defense, by argument, of Christian belief against external criticism or against other worldly views"
(Apologetics 31–32). Though there are still many mysteries that surround the ongoing debate about Christianity, evidence can now prove some of what
Christians took by faith before. Now, more than ever, there is information to prove the existence of this man that walked... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Old Testament books are written in many different literary styles such as historical, prophetic, or biographical. Between the Old and New
Testaments there were four hundred years during which time books were not written. As the New Testament begins, it starts with four books
commonly known as the Gospels. These gospels are a biography of the life and works of Jesus Christ himself. The remainder of the Bible contains
mostly letters to various people and churches throughout Asia Minor, Greece, and Italy. These are letters of encouragement to the early churches of
the world and many Christians who may have been imprisoned or in captivity in several countries. Still one question that plagues the minds of several
modern day Christians is, how did the modern day Bible come to be? The Old Testament had been decided upon long ago. Elders in the Jewish church
met and decided 39 different books in all. These books had been written over the span of several centuries and became what is today known as the Old
Testament. The New Testament was somewhat similar. During the time shortly after Jesus, there was controversy over the books that were truly from
God and those that were not. The early church hierarchy settled this dispute during the second, third and fourth centuries. During this time, councils,
consisting of church elders, met periodically to determine which books had true divine inspiration and which were frauds. In the mid–fourth century,
the New

Christian Apologetics Essay
Apologetics are arguments backed up with evidence to defend Christianity against false accusations and to strengthen the faith of the faithful. (http:/
/www.bethinking.org/apologetics/an–introduction–to–christian–apologetics, 2011). They also remove obstacles by appealing to intellectual reasoning
to non–believers.
The doctrine of Christ's divinity has been challenged, attacked and denied by religious skeptics and various world religions alike. Apologetics have
been used to defend and establish the credibility of the historic Christian faith. Atheists have been relentless in their attack of the Divinity of The Lord
Jesus Christ. Apologetics are used in these instances to confront false ideas with the truth set forth in scripture. To be a Christian... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Theologians have used the biblical evidence to coin the term hypostatic union to accurately capture both the fully divine and fully human nature of
Jesus joined in one Person. Proof of Christ's divinity is shown throughout the Bible many times. Malachi 3:1–3, John 1:1, John 8:58, Colossians 1:19,
Hebrews 1:1–5, and Revelation 1:1 are just a few of the prominent passages that authenticate the deity of Jesus Christ. In the book Fundamentals of
the Faith, Peter Kreeft says another tool for properly utilizing apologetics are creeds. Creeds are a formal statement of Christian beliefs. He also
argues that the creeds specify our destiny as well as the nature of God because God is our destiny. Creeds were created by the church to objectify the
truth as in the Nicene Creed, the Athanasian Creed, and the Apostles Creed. The Apostles Creed speaks about the Trinity. The doctrine of the Trinity
means that there is one God who eternally exists as three distinct Persons – the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Stated differently, God is one in essence
and three in person. These definitions express three

Christian Apologetics Essay
The Importance of Apologetics in an Age of Relativism
At the end of 2016, "post–truth" officially became Oxford Dictionaries' word of the year, demonstrating an increasing rejection of objective truth by
American culture. The spirit of relativism permeates our culture, invading American churches, and tainting the worldview of numerous Christians.
Consequently, many professing Christians find the discipline of apologetics irrelevant to contemporary evangelism, spiritual maturity, and church
edification. Contrary to this popular belief, our cultural landscape renders Christian apologetics increasingly important, as the apologist actively argues
for the existence of objective truth, while presenting a rational case for the truthfulness of the Christian faith. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Blind faith is not a biblical notion, as the prophets of the Old Testament, and the apostles of the New Testament, constantly present evidence to
substantiate belief and validate their message. For example, in the book of Exodus, God empowers Moses to conduct three miracles as a means of
authentication (cf. Exodus 4:1–9), thereby providing a rational basis for faith in Yahweh. Similarly, Paul presents a reasonable case forChristianity to
the philosophers in Athens (cf. Acts 17:16–34) and offers evidence to support the claims of Jesus' resurrection (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:3–7). Peter
instructions Christians to follow Paul's example, calling them to engage in apologetics as well (cf. 1 Peter

APOLOGETICS APPLICATION PAPER
APOLOGETICS APPLICATION PAPER
Glenda Campbell
APOL 500
July 4, 2014
Outline
Introduction
1. Summary of the Islamic worldview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Evaluating the Islamic Worldview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Correcting the Islamic Worldview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. Defending the Christian Worldview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Worldviews are depicted as solutions to clarify the phenomenon we experience. Groothuis gives criteria for assessing worldviews like they were
hypotheses about the world.13
Mystery or a Paradox. The first criteria states that a worldview should not rely on mystery, but it should explain something.14 Every religion has
certain fundamental beliefs, such as the, Creation. The idea of the creation has been a mystery or paradox for religion because of the concept of God
creating the whole universe and every living thing. The scriptures in the Qur'an have been written in Arabic from the inception, unlike the Bible, there
are not different versions of it. The Qur'an has remain in the original Arabic

Impact Of St Augustine Of Hippo
A very influential and great philosopher and theologian of Late Antiquity, Saint Augustine of Hippo is the most important of the Latin Church Fathers.
His works, especially his Confessions (a self–biography), On Christian Doctrine and City of God, helped distinguish the Church in Western Europe
from the Church as it developed elsewhere. In Ancient Rome, the power of speech was appropriated from the Greeks and expanded upon and
innovated. The classical master of rhetoric would be the work of St. Augustine which aid in the expansion and spread of Christianity. W. R. Johnson has
called Augustine "the last of the great ancient rhetoricians." Augustine public speaking was cicero's, while his messages were rooted in Christian
theology. According to James J. Murphy, "Augustine in himself, in no... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
St. Augustine was a major Christian theorist who argued that it would be foolish for truth "to take its stand unarmed against falsehood." Augustine
argued that the human mind apprehends universal, objective, unchanging, and necessary truths that are superior to the human mind itself. Thus, an
eternal God exists to explain these eternal truths, whereas his thoughts profoundly influenced the medieval worldview. He defended the use of rhetoric
and helped to preserve its study and usage. St. Augustine believed that human beings communicate through signs and persuading Christians to lead a
holy life.
St. Augustine believes truth comes from the divine and believes scripture to be divinely inspired, set down by magnificent men through whom the
divine speaks. Augustine's role in the Christianization of rhetoric reveals clearly that Augustine thought the art of eloquence should be put into active
service, and not rejected out of hand because it is tainted with paganism. He wants to offer guidance to those who will be treating the Scriptures, and
who must offer explanations of the sacred writings to others. He looks to advise his clergy on a way of

The Apologetics Application Paper Instructions
Kenneth Davis
APOL 500
May 28, 2017 Instructions for this submission:
Part 1: Make sure you read and understand the Apologetics Application Paper Instructions document before you attempt to complete any part of this
form. Attempted submissions that do not use the submission form provided will not be accepted for credit.
To complete this part of the project, download this form to your computer, save it with a different file name using your last name and the assignment
name, and type your submission directly in the space provided below. Do not change any aspect of the formatting, arrangement, or layout of this form.
In the space below, provide the information indicated.
1.Worldview Selection
Of the 3 choices ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In worldview, the term is used to mean one's view of the world situation– matters of war and peace, immigration, foreign aid and so on.
Postmodernism in a nutshell. When was it created? How did it fail or did it? Is there redemption in postmodernism?
Postmodernism in the life of human beings. Does it answer the questions or does it leave a question mark?
Does postmodernism lead us from God to salvation? This brief and inadequate account of God's doing in the world demonstrates the fact that God is a
God of action who participates in history.
Postmodernism is the source of morality.
History and the afterlife of postmodernism are depicted by Jesus either with God in blessing or outside of God's blessing in a state of regret, loss, and
forfeiture.
Postmodernism the touchstone proposition.
Postmodernism compared to Christians existence. Who is living in the truth?
3.Preliminary Evaluation Ideas
In Chapter 3 of Groothuis's Christian Apologetics, he provides a framework for how a worldview can be evaluated. This presentation focuses on 8
criteria that can be used to evaluate a worldview. In this section, give a preliminary bullet–list of the criteria that you think will be most relevant to your
evaluation of the worldview you have selected. For each bullet in the list, name the criterion and give a concise statement of how you will use that

criterion to

The Relevance Of Christianity : An Apologetic
How is one persuaded to belief in God? Social influences certainly play a role in accepting or rejecting Christianity. Many people raised in a Christian
environment receive positive classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning. However, numerous individuals do not grow up
in a positive Christian environment or have had negative experiences related to Christianity. How are they persuaded to belief in God? Rick Wade
(1998) in his article "The Relevance of Christianity: An Apologetic," offers one dimension to persuading non–Christians to believe. Wade's perspective,
however, had little relevance to my own conversion.
I was not raised in a Christian environment and did not become a Christian until age 20 or so. Therefore, I cannot say that the four sources mentioned
Kenrick, Neuberg, & Cialdini (2015) mention, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, observational learning, and heredity (p. 141) played a
large role in my belief in Christianity. There were not people that I liked who were Christian, nor did I know any Christians (at least that I was
aware of) so classical conditioning did not pay a role. Nor did I receive rewards or punishment for being or not being a Christian so operant
conditioning exerted little influence. Additionally, I did not associate with Christians so I never observed Christians, at least not in a positive way.
What I did see seemed peculiar, at best, to me so observational learning was negative. Perhaps heredity has

Lee Strobel: The Case For Faith
As a matter of fact, author Lee Strobel was a former legal editor of The Chicago Tribune, an award winner in his field as he overtime became a
best–selling author of over twenty books. Yet, remarkably he was an atheist beforehand before eventually becoming Christian–The Case for Christ
detailing his conversion. As such, a majority of his life's work has been sharing evidence that supports Christian claims, aiming to equip believers with
what is necessary to share their faith with those they know and are close to. In any case, Lee Strobel previously acquired his Bachelor of Journalism
and Master of Studies in Law from the University of Missouri and Yale Law School, becoming a journalist and maintaining his career for fourteen
years. Furthermore, he went on to successfully achieve the highest honor from United Press International, specifically for his public service journalism.
Either way, he's had many guest roles on national networks in America, including Fox, Discovery, CNN, PBS and ABC. Moreover, he successfully
managed to host Faith under Fire, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Finishing the book, a reflective sense of enjoyment is around the experience, after already taking the time to delve deeper into the questions of the
Christian faith. Overall, The Case for Faith was an enjoyable read having taken the time to address the major objections that non–believers commonly
hold, arguing the validity of faith in the Christian Religion. Meanwhile, the use of direct investigative style when recounting interviews conducted
thoroughly continued to engage the viewer in its writing, remaining dynamic in its delivery of philosophical questions offered by Lee Strobel and those
he works with. Thus, the addition of thought provoking questions that plague those who may have doubt in their faith are introduced to proofs that
enforce their

Apologetics Definition
Apologetics In definition, Apologetics is to argue, or better said, justify your beliefs. Typically, it follows up with religious topics that people, for
whatever reason, feel the need to scuffle over what they believe to be right or wrong. As we all know, religion has been the main topic in most fights
for eons and has yet to even falter over time. From observations, I've noticed that individuals tend to get rather heated over the subject, and have even
been known to cause harm to one another if so inclined to do so. Personally, I don't believe Apologetics is necessary under most circumstances. If one
feels so powerless in their faith to have to fight about it, they probably shouldn't bother having one at all. This comes to the main question

Presuppositional Apologetics: The Moral Argument for the...
A Christian apologetic method is a verbal defense of the biblical worldview. A proof is giving a reason for why we believe. This paper will address
the philosophical question of God's existence from the moral argument. The presuppositional apologetic method of Reformed thinkers Cornelius Van
Til and John Frame will be the framework. Topics covered here could undoubtedly be developed in more depth, but that would be getting ahead, here is
the big picture.
Apologetics comes from the Greek word, 'apologia' meaning verbal defense. The Greek word is used in the verse, "Always be prepared to give an
answer" (1 Peter 3:15) and in the negative, "men are without excuse" (Romans 1:20). In Reformed terms, stated by Frame, it can be ... Show more
In our modern times, Van Til, a Reformed Dutch philosopher and theologian was a major advocate forpresuppositional apologetics. He said, "To find
out what man is and who God is, one can only go to Scripture. Faith in the self–attesting Christ of the Scriptures is the beginning, not the conclusion, of
wisdom!" That means that Scripture is the source of authority, the basis for all beliefs and the deepest conviction of the heart. If our thoughts are
subject to God and we have repented of independent thinking than we can present the biblical worldview rightly. The purpose of an apologetic
encounter is to bring an unbeliever to repentance and belief. Frame continues to build upon Van Tillian presuppositionalism. "It might seem
strange to look in Scripture for teachings about knowledge, reasoning, proof, evidence, logic, and so on, but God often surprises us by getting involved
in areas of life we would prefer to keep to ourselves. Indeed, every part of life is his domain, and thus he rules all of life, directly or indirectly, by his
Word (1 Cor. 10:31; Col. 3: 17; 2 Tim. 3:16–17)." In the following discussion, Scriptures' preeminence must be kept in the forefront.
A proof is giving a reason for why we believe. The philosophical question of the existence of God has many possible arguments including: personal vs.
impersonal, moral values, epistemology (teleological and ethical), and metaphysics (teleological, cosmological, ontological). And

Tertullian On The Apparel Of Women Analysis
In times of turmoil for the church, intellectuals and scholars who defended Christians against accusations from outsiders were dubbed the Christian
Apologists. They included people like Justin Martyr in the 100s A.D., Augustine of Hippo in 300s– 400s A.D, and Tertullian in 100s– 200s A.D.
Tertullian wrote pieces on philosophy in the church, prayer, and baptism. He was one of several apologists to write about God being three separate
'things', but Tertullian was the first to name the Son, Spirit, and Father as the Trinity. He was one of many to write against women in the church, but he
was the most vulgar and profane. Tertullian's publication, On the Apparel of Women, is characterized by his mimicking of Paul's writings in the
New Testament, paradoxes and hypocrisies throughout, obvious misogyny by a modern standard, and men's harmful view in a time where I, as a
woman, would not be allowed to learn to read and write if my husband or father deemed it so. Not only did he insult a women's place in the church as
others did, he attacked a women's place in anything. In the centuries after he lived, his teachings aren't as influential in the church, but his base ideals
are still part of our society as out dated standards.
Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus's exact ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He is called 'The Father of Latin Christianity', because he was the link between Greek–speaking Christianity and Latin–speaking Christianity. His many
treatises covered his beliefs on Christian practice, human salvation, the Trinity or trinitas, his high regard of martyrs in the church, Greek philosophy,
and the place of women in the church. He coined his most famous quote, "What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?", in a piece about his opinion of
Pagan philosophy (Weaver). Tertullian drew inspiration from earlier Church Apologists like Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and writers like Miltiades and
Melito of Sardis

The End Of Apologetics Summary
The End of Apologetics In The End of Apologetics Myron Bradley Penner addresses the question of how we are to do apologetics in our day in age.
One of the main topics in this book is how the Enlightenment has shaped how apologetics is done in the modern culture. Penner believes that the
Enlightenment "erased our knowledge of past moral discourse (3)." This carried over into the Christian community and shaped how they approached
apologetics. The focus shifted to be more centralized on evidence and reason (7). Christians need to be equipped to deal with these new challenges that
secular society poses against Christians because ultimately the task of apologetics is a Christian's duty. Christian apologetics should be utilize language
well in order to faithfully articulate its message. This includes examining one's own cultural biases.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Penner never truly defines the line between being understanding and loving and compromising on key issues. The relational aspect of
apologetics is one that is missing in the current age, but one may easily compromise his or her orthodoxy by following Penner's example. Penner
stresses this relational approach in the context of the Postmodern context, but it is important in every context. His story of John, the Roman Catholic
Atheist, also brings up the question of the distinction between apologetics and evangelism. He describes the story as being apologetics, but they were
trying to win John to faith in Christ. Penner uses this to describe that the reason he rejects how the modern day from of apologetics is done is because
it focuses on winning an argument rather than reaching the

Basis Of Apologetics
Right from the time of the apostles and throughout the history of the Christian Church, believers have been engaged in the defence of the Christian
faith. This defence is often referred to a an apology (not to be confused with the typical English meaning of a request for forgiveness). This give rise
to a branch of study in the Church called Apologetics. This lesson explores the theological basis for apologetics and its relevance for propagation of
the Christian faith. This will be done through an exploration of the meaning of apologetics and the method of doing apologetics. A.THE MEANING
OF APOLOGETICS This section will begin with a word–study to understand the meaning of the word "apologetics". Further, the biblical usage of this
term in the New Testament will be the basis for understanding the meaning and concept of apologetics. 1.Definition of Apologetics The word
"apologetics" is derived from the Greek word apologian, meaning defense. The standard Greek lexicon, BAG, gives the meanings defense, reply, or
excuse (Bauer 2000:96). Its use in the New Testament is frequent. These biblical uses of apologia and its derivatives show that this word means
"defence" (McGrath 1998:5). Apologetics is generally used to refer to the defence of the faith. Many of these references... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They see the Christian faith as a faith issue, so one either has it or does not have it. This viewpoint has been associated with what has been called
fideism (Fide is the Latin word faith). Hence, fideism is literally faith–ism and implies the demand for faith without the need of intellectual grounds for
believing (Spencer 1987:90–91). Naturally, fideism sees not need for apologetics. Fideism is an untenable position as it amounts to abandoning rational
thought (McGrath1998:5). Every Christian should seek to give a reasoned and thoughtful reply to anyone who has a sincere question concerning the
Christian

Dialogue : My Apologetic Dialogue
For my apologetic dialogue, I used the template provided through the course pages as a foundation for the conversation I would have with my
friend. I met Jessica through a coworker a few years ago and was generally aware of her current lifestyle, but was unsure of her background. I was
prompted to reach out to her as someone with a different worldview than my own. We had our discussion over the phone on November 11, 2017
around 10 AM and went until around 11:15 AM. I also sent her a copy of the questions through email so that she could read along for more detailed
questions.
Summary
I started out the discussion by explaining again the reason for this conversation and the intent behind it, to understand her perspective better and gain ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mary: It feels like they decide whether you're a good or bad person based on their standards of morality. What about you, do you think human beings
are basically good in nature or basically evil? Why?
Jessica: I believe human beings are basically good in nature with a few anomalies that are born with unbalanced chemistries that push them more
towards naturally evil (ie the psychopathic brain).
Mary: So even those people who would be labelled as "evil" like psychopaths, pedophiles, terrorists etc. are basically good, they just have a sort of
"pre–existing mental condition" that keeps them from expressing that good?
Jessica: that's one way to put it.
Mary: I guess one question I have with that is what about those things which aren't part of a chemical imbalance specifically. Like terrorism, racism,
and things like that. Things that aren't medical conditions but most people would say is wrong. Are these people still basically good because they
earnestly believe that what they are doing is good?
Jessica: That's a little tough to figure out. I guess they are still basically good as humans, but have been corrupted by the cultures or families they grew
up in who led them to believe these things were ok.
Mary: If you had to pick the biggest problem of humanity, either something on the list provided or something else, what would you pick and why?
Jessica: I feel like this is never going to be one thing. It's always going to be a

The Christian Apologetics
At the onset of the Christian faith, its followers faced a difficult period in which they had to deal with many internal and external forces of confusion
about their new faith. With Christianity being a rather close subdivision of Judaism, the followers of Christianity are faced with the task of supporting
their beliefs and practices deeming why they are justifiable. In this apologetic period, these Jewish Christians embark on the task of defending their
church and the religion itself in order to establish its credibility and existence. The Christian Apologetics main aim was to give a reasoned defense of
their church's way of life in a Christian community struggling to find its identity. Internally, the Christian community was dealing with... Show more
The bishops and other figures of the church attempted to resolve these conflicts through large gatherings called councils which collaborated to bring
about an agreement over such theological controversies. One council, the Council of Nicea, did just this and brought about a new age of Christianity
that led to a greater agreement across the church and a new method in which these agreements would be

Apologetics Reflection Essay
Although I have always thought of myself as an outspoken and strongly rooted person, this semester changed the way I thought about Christianity, the
Bible, and truth. While this course is called Apologetics, it delves into much deeper issues than just that. I learned in this short semester that I might
not know myself and God as well as I thought I did. On the first day of school, I walked into the classroom after the second bell, already deeply
apprehensive. My own father would be teaching my bible class, something very few students get to experience in high school. As discussion began, I
realized that I was highly mistaken. It was an unusual position, one where there was a professional gap between daughter and father. It was almost as if
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After only a few days into school, we quickly dove into the purpose and use of critical thinking. I quickly jotted down two of my favorite quotes
that could relate to critical thinking, the latter is hanging in my room. The first was by the very popular genius, Albert Einstein. He says, "The
important thing is to never stop questioning." The second quote is by author Mark Twain, " I have never let my schooling interfere with my
education." These two quotes summarize what we learned during this lesson. Critical thinking is more than just thinking. It is questioning at the
most basic level. Since I was little girl, I have always questioned everything and tried to understand. I felt like if I did not ask, then I would never
know. This is part of the reason I am ahead in my class in school today. Teachers would become frustrated when I would ask "why?". Many parents
today try to suppress this in their child so they would not question authority. Yet, sometimes children need to question authority. Parents should simply
teach their children to question politely and in the right circumstance. The popular phrase "Curiosity killed the cat" should be changed to "Curiosity
educated the cat". I believe curiosity is just term people use to describe a good critical

Presuppositional Apologetics
In our last episode, I gave you four purposes for apologetics. In this one, I'd like to flesh things out a little more, so you will have a firm grip on just
what we are doing when we practice apologetics. We've established that what we're trying to do is provide a rational defense for the Christian faith. But
there are different approaches, which we can split into two camps. Now, while some may argue over which approach is best, I am convinced that they
both have merit and so will use whichever seems to be appropriate for the occasion. The two camps are: presuppositional and evidential. The first,
presuppositional apologetics, isn't inclined to wrestle with scientific data like cosmology, biology and the like. Made popular by the Cornelius Van Til,
this approach doesn't see the need for such evidences due to the presupposition that the unregenerate mind cannot comprehend the truth of ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Earlier in his letter, chapter one starting in verse 18, Paul makes an astounding claim about unrighteous men, who he later identifies as all of
mankind. His claim is that men know that God exists, perceived through nature or what theologians dub general revelation, but they reject Him and
pretend that he is not real. This suppression of the truth is the reason that God turns them over to the lusts of their hearts and thus " their thinking
became nonsense, and their senseless minds were darkened." Romans 1:21 This is why, when writing to the church in Corinth he wrote: "For the
message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but it is God's power to us who are being saved. 19 For it is written:I will destroy the
wisdom of the wise,and I will set aside the understanding of the experts." 1 cor 1:18–19 or in 1 corinthians 2:14 when he said "14 But the unbeliever
does not welcome what comes from God's Spirit, because it is foolishness to him; he is not able to understand it since it is evaluated

`` Handbook Of Christian Apologetics `` Essay
Christian teachings have been challenged by unbelievers since the beginning of history. Today, because the new discoveries of science, the existence
of God has been doubted even more, and as a consequence, society has become more selfish, self–centered and self–existent. Questions such as, Does
God actually exist? Is there any evidence of his existence? Is it Christianity the only true religion? have been asked by believers and unbelievers through
the past centuries. Two philosophers from Boston College, Peter Kreeft, and Ronald K. Tacelli, in their book "Handbook of Christian Apologetics"
answer the most common questions about faith and reason, God's existence, Christ and other Christian doctrines.
In Chapter 1, Kreeft and Tacelli talk about the importance and need for Apologetics. It importance comes, first, because with Apologetics we are able
to give reasons for faith as an act of obedience to God. And secondly, because Apologetics is necessary to convince unbelievers and build up believers.
Furthermore, apologetics is extremely needed today because we are living in a civil, cultural, intellectual crisis, and especially a spiritual one. Thus, we
need truth and trough Apologetics, with faith and reason, we can find it.
In Chapter 2, faith and reason are described as allies. They are interrelated. As faith is a subpart of reason, reason is a subclass of faith. Both of them
are necessary for Apologetics, without faith and reason Apologetics is impossible. Faith and reason

Apologetics Reflection
Apologetics is not just about learning to defend yourself. It requires you to know the Truth about the Bible and why you believe in it. Apologetics
also teaches you to set a foundation for your belief and how you could defend yourself from worldly perspectives. As stated in 1 Peter 3:15, "Instead,
you must worship Christ as Lord of your life. And if someone asks about your Christian faith, be ready to explain it." we must be able to know how to
defend ourselves. Throughout the course of the first quarter, we were educated many ideas regarding critical thinking, the Bible, and Truth.
Before we began entering the studies of apologetics, we discussed about the definition of apologetics and its origins. Apologetics comes from the
Greek word "Apologia", ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When I had to answer questions by analyzing information and bringing points together in a test, that's critical thinking. You don't need to be in college
or be asked hard questions to use it. We should use it many times over our life as a student and when out of school.
Near the end of the quarter, we began discussing about Truth. We answered what exactly Truth means as seen in the Bible. When bringing up Truth,
there are certain rules you must abide by, or else it may not actually be true. Aside from all the rules, the concept of Truth is simple. Despite this fact,
people still continue to deny the fact that there is absolute Truth. Truth about reality should always be knowable, as stated in John 8:32 "You shall
know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." There are certain rules to Truth which decerns it from being an absolute Truth or a complete lie.
Truth must correspond to the object it's talking about, correspond to reality, and also accurately express an actual state of affairs. Truth is also always
absolute no matter what. It can't be somewhat be true somehow. Unfortunately, there are many common mistakes people make when trying to find
absolute

Gnosticism And Tertullian's Development Of Christian...
During a time where Gnostic ideology was one of the heresies gaining momentum, Tertullian and Irenaeus were two of the individuals that brilliantly
defended the faith. They saw Gnosticism through the same lens as many other Church Fathers, as nothing else but a heresy. In their time this was a real
threat to the true faith that was laid out for them through the Scriptures and through the oral tradition passed down by the apostles. Like many heresies,
Gnosticism started off within a Christian foundation. However, what makes it more interesting is that Gnosticism as philosophy or the ideology as a
whole may have predated Christianity since we see some epistles arguing against some of the Gnostic principles (Kelly 23). To further refute the heresy,
Irenaeus and Tertullian had a tremendous contribution in the development of Christian apologetics. While similar, many have credited Irenaeus to his
ecclesiological development and Tertullian to his Christological development in the early Church.
Through the writings of Irenaeus, we quickly learn of how he viewed the Scriptures and the apostles. Irenaeus laid his argument by stating a foundation
that every Christian would agree with, which was that Christ himself is the ultimate source of Christian doctrine. While this may seem very intuitive, it
is because of this foundation that Irenaeus lays out that he is able to further develop his argument. Irenaeus continues with this argument by stating that
Christ has revealed his message

Andrew Jackson: Cruelty Or Apologetic?
Should we be apologetic or celebrating Andrew Jackson's death? Lots of people say we should be apologetic because he had pushed american
farther than any other president has before. For example, Jackson had been in the army at the age of 13. The story had been told that one day at
boot camp, a soldier asked Andrew to polish his shoes. But Andrew simply replied no. When he said no to the general, the general got so mad that he
sliced him across the face with a sword they he keeps in his belt. So Andrew Jackson stood up for himself and his decisions. Yet again, Andrew
Jackson became the president. The things that jackson did wrong was how he had cheated on the presidential election of 1828. Andrew jackson
gave a deal to Henry Clay, who was losing the election, to promise to be made the secretary of state. So henry accepted the deal and the plan worked
perfectly. Does Andrew Jackson deserve to be celebrated for his cheating acts towards america, or apologize for him. I believe jackson... Show more
But I have some facts to prove it as well. Some people do not know who Andrew Jackson is one of our president of united states and is took away the
power of slavery. I guess you could say that Andrew Jackson was a hero for the U.S. by ending slavery. But it was what most of the state's wanted.
And taking away their personal opinions on slavery is something that is not constitutional. basically what jackson did was say that the native
americans can either pay double taxes on northern and southern states or move west away for all 13 states and live on their own. But since most of
the native americans didn't have much money, most of them moved away. Moved away from their families, friends, houses, everything they had gone
in a couple of hours. Most of the native americans had also died on the 500 mile trip. Some of the british troops walked them over far enough to
where the land wasn't owned by civilians or

Apologetics
1. What are some ways the Christian gospel is perceived in our culture?
Christian gospel in many ways is perceived in this day and age are a lost word. People have the art of praying and staying faithful to the word of God.
God provided us with all kinds of blessings and opportunities in life so that we can flourish and prosper. Also God took all oursin to the cross and
forgave us for everything we done that was not right in his eyes. We need to also understand that there is only one God and we need to cherish it
every day of our lives. Today's culture perceives the Gospel almost the same was as old days but how man tries to rewrite the word to fits our society
today, people believe that s God except so of things that are going on today ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
4. What are some specific intellectual reasons people may reject the Christian gospel? Some of the reasons intellectually that people reject the gospel is
that they are not understanding or don't want to understand the power that comes behind the word. The world develops minds that think and breathe
social media, television and other thing that separates us from the gospel. Other reasons is that we are not discipline enough in our faith to want to
learn the real truth behind the gospel. The gospel tells us everything that God wants and have instore for us, until we get the discipline to read and
learn we as people will never know its meaning to make our lives better. 5. What can Christians do to address these objections and better communicate
the Christian gospel? We can just be a testament to what beautiful blessings that we have received by being faithful to the word. Christians need to
show the non–believers that there is good that comes out of having faith in the gospel. Once non–believers understand the word and how powerful it is
sky's the limit on the many blessing with one will

Analysis Of The Apologetics Application Of Groothuis 's...
APOLOGETICS APPLICATION PAPER– PART 1 SUBMISSION FORM
Todd Bush
APOL 500
June 5, 2016 Instructions for this submission:
Part 1: Make sure you read and understand the Apologetics Application Paper Instructions document before you attempt to complete any part of this
form. Attempted submissions that do not use the submission form provided will not be accepted for credit.
To complete this part of the project, download this form to your computer, save it with a different file name using your last name and the assignment
name, and type your submission directly in the space provided below. Do not change any aspect of the formatting, arrangement, or layout of this form.
In the space below, provide the information indicated.
1.Worldview Selection
Of the 3 choices listed in the Apologetics Application Paper Instructions, which worldview will you write about in this paper?
Worldview selected:Secular Humanism
2.Summary of Significant Beliefs of the Worldview
In Chapter 4 of Groothuis's Christian Apologetics, he describes the Christian worldview using several major categories of belief. For this section of
your paper, you will describe the worldview you have selected to write about using these same categories of belief. For example, what does the
worldview you have selected believe about ultimate reality? What do they believe about the source of morality?
You do not need to cover all of the categories Groothuis mentions in Chapter 4,

C.S.Lewis
C.S. Lewis: Christian Apologist
Included in the 10 most influential Christians of the 20th century alongside Karl Barth, Pope John XXIII, Martin Luther King Jr, and Billy Graham, the
Christian History magazine named him "the atheist scholar who became an Anglican, an apologist, and a 'patron saint' of Christians everywhere." He
was also dubbed as an "apostle to the skeptics" because he resolutely answered frequent objections individuals had when it came to accepting Christ as
their Savior (christianodyssey.com).
Born into a Protestant family in Ireland on November 29, 1898, C.S. Lewis was the son of A.J. Lewis, a solicitor, and Flora Augusta, a promising
mathematician. He bore a lonely and unhappy childhood. Especially crushed by the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Everybody possesses an internal sense of moral obligation to realize the difference between right and wrong and choose to do what is right. Lewis
ascertains that the existence of this common "moral conscience," can only be the consequential result from the existence of a god who created all
humans. (about.com).
C.S. Lewis disputed for reason–based Christianity as opposed to faith–based Christianity. This is a questionable decision on Lewis' part because
conventional Christianity is indisputably faith–based. Lewis' principal readers were supposed to be skeptics and atheists rather than current believers.
Skeptics doubt for lack of reason and evidence; therefore, only reason and evidence is more likely to draw their reconsideration. In his book, Mere
Christianity, Lewis writes: "I am not asking anyone to accept Christianity if his best reasoning tells him that the weight of the evidence is against it."
(about.com).
One of Lewis' most–often–quoted statements is from Mere Christianity, where he uses reason and logic to introduce three possibilities to us (often
known as the "Lewis trilemma"). According to this trilemma, either Jesus really was God and intentionally lying, or was not God but reckoned himself
to be (which would make him a lunatic). Mere Christianity goes on to say that the latter likelihood is not consistent with Jesus' character and it is,
therefore, most likely that he was being truthful
"A man

Incarnational Apologetics Essay
In reaction to the article on "Incarnational Apologetics," how does this approach impact the way evangelism is taught and acted out in daily life?
How do you balance "incarnational" and "informational" approaches to evangelism? Is there a connection? In addition, based on McRaney Chapter
8, how would the distinction between "Informational" and Incarnational" approaches to evangelism relate to the barriers you have in witnessing? For
instance, do your struggle relating to people on an "incarnational" level; or are you afraid on an "informational" level that people might ask a
question that you cannot answer? What barriers need to be removed in your life in order for you to balance these approaches? Respond in 225 words.
Be VERY thorough,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The approach of this article with today evangelism deals with the counterfeit faith of some people proclaiming Jesus as their savior. However, if this
faith does not show evidence by transforming their lives, then does not deserved to be called saving faith. Such transformation has to show a change
on their behaviors. This does not stop there. A true Christian need to perform daily "self–examination" of its own testimony. Another false gospel is to
separate incarnational from informational apologetic. They go hand in hand as an absolute truth of Jesus Christ in evangelism. Some would have us
believe that incarnational apologetic is not necessary in our society. But, they stand very far from the truth. Both "incarnational and informational"
apologetic are interlaced and important tools for our daily life. The practical application is to be able to balance both terms in our daily life. What I'm
trying to say is that we should view it as a daily self–examination to authentically show the love of Christ in once life. In fact, the will of God has never
been that his children live under a colossal failure day by day due to this counterfeit incarnational apologetic way of leaving. On the contrary, John
said, "for He who is in you is greater than he who is in the world" (1 John 4:4). So, the connection between the two terms is very clear. Therefore,
God's message to us has not changed a bit. It remains

Apologetics New Generation
Review 3: Sean McDowell, Apologetics for a New Generation (Harvest House, 2009)
SUMMARY
Apologetics for a New Generation is a compilation of essays–from some of the greatest Christian minds–geared towards answering the question: How
do we use apologetics effectively to reach the new generations? It is clear that large numbers of youngsters view Christianity negatively. Relativism and
postmodernism have eroded the mindset and values in our culture. Therefore, the immutable truths of Christianity need to be pitched differently to the
current generation. Apologetics is more important than ever, but the manner in which we deliver truth is equally important: Christians must build
relationships in the context of love, civility, wisdom and kindness ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We need to retell the stories of old, the stories of Scripture and of Jesus' Resurrection in ways that captivate the modern mind without compromising
truth. This statement from Brian Godawa summarizes my take away from the book: "The one who can tell the best story, in a very real sense, wins
the epoch" (131). As a left–sided–brain engineer (and not unlike Godawa), I expected my logical syllogisms to be devastating to atheism and that
after seeing the undeniable logic in them, unbelievers would come to Christ in hordes. I am well aware that is unlikely to happen. I am convinced that
the days when masses walk down the aisles in football stadiums to receive Christ are long gone. With the advent of relativism, postmodernism, and
mass media, the modern apologist should adopt a distinct approach. From Apologetics for a New Generation and past experience I believe there are
tree winning strategies for the modern apologist to win the "new generations": (1) Storytelling: both Jesus and the Apostle Paul had the gift of
storytelling. They took fact, encapsulated it in a context–relevant and captivating story, and delivered it to those willing to hear. They were interesting,
engaging, and truthful. They knew their culture and how to engage it. We

Apologetic Artice Review
The following article was written by David Wheeler for publication in an apologetics encyclopedia. However, the subject matter of the article is equally
as important in the realm of evangelism. Considering that most approaches to evangelism, including Share Jesus Without Fear, are basically driven by
supplying proper "information", at what point does one's incarnational lifestyle enter into the equation? Is evangelism only the communication of
proper information, or does it also include the total person in reference to one's outward behavior that validates the information to the world? Is it both
"information" and "incarnation"?
Read and respond on discussion board.
Subject: Incarnational Apologetics
Definition: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The same argument can be applied to other areas of traditional apologetics. Consider for a moment the important issues related to the resurrection of
Christ. While the historical and biblical aspects are imperative in validating the authenticity of the event, one must never ignore how that miraculous
event transforms the individual expressions of a Christian's daily life.
For instance, a Muslim friend who converted to Christianity communicated that it was not the great arguments of traditional "informational"
apologetics that finally drew him to examine the claims of Christ. On the contrary, it was the consistent caring actions of a high school friend who
lived out a "resurrected" life before him.
It was not that his friend ever stopped verbally sharing the "informational" truths about Christ with him. The truth is that he boldly shared the gospel on
many occasions. The bottom line was the simple undeniable fact that his friend's life "incarnationally" validated the biblical truths he graciously
espoused.
In fact, the former Muslim admitted that he regularly abused and embarrassed his schoolmate hoping that he would grow weary and leave him alone.
In the end, the former Muslim became a Christian because he could not argue with the evidences of a transformed life that ultimately became a tool of
the Holy Spirit prompting his heart to further examine the directions of his faith.

It is here that both the "incarnational" and "informational"

Josh Mcdowell Research Paper
Josh McDowell
In 1939, Josh McDowell was born in Union City, Michigan. He grew up with an abusive father and was sexually abused from age six to thirteen.
Josh McDowell thought of himself as an agnostic and thought Christianity is worthless. He always wondered: Who am I? Why am I here? Where am
I going? At community college, he was challenged by his friends to write a paper to disprove the existence of Christianity. It started when he saw his
friends were always happy and joyful. Josh really wanted the inner joy this group contained. He always believed that Christianity was weak and
couldn't be argued, but after research, he discovered the faith of Christianity and trusted Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior. Once accepting Jesus
Christ into his life he changed for the better. He ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One from the Russian Academy of Medicine for his works with Russian kids; and a second from Russian Club of Scientist for becoming a member.
Meanwhile, in the United States, Josh McDowell Ministry created events to help youth in their walk with Christ. These events moved into campaigns
like – Six Hours with Josh, Why Wait?, Counter the Culture, Right From Wrong, and True Foundations. These accomplishments still haven't stopped
Josh. In 1960 he has written 147 books in over one hundred languages. His two most famous books are More Than A Carpenter and New Evidence
That Demands a Verdict. More Than A Carpenter has over 27 million distributed copies and was developed when he discovered the real truths about
the New and Old Testament, in college. New Evidence That Demands a Verdict was named twentieth century's top forty books and one of the thirteen
most influential books on Christianity thought by World Magazine. Josh was also nominated thirty–six times and received the Gold Medallion award
four times. In the midst of spreading God's word, his greatest joy is his family. He has a wife, four kids, and ten

Apologetics Paper
Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition
Sebastian Cornejo
Apologetics paper
Deacon Richard– P5
The scenario takes place between a knowledgeable Catholic man, and a practicing Protestant adult. The Catholic man is Charles, who is a family
friend of Steve, and has a very in–depth knowledge of both the Catholic and Protestant faith. The Protestant adult is Steve, who is curious into learning
the importance of the Catholic faith in Tradition and Scripture. Steve presents to Charles many legitimate questions about his faith and legitimacy of
the Catholic tradition.
Steve: Hello Charles, may I come in?
Charles: Hey Steve, of course you can come in. So, is there anything I may help you with?
Steve: Yes Charles. I came here to ask... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This shows that in unity one another together are what help bring out the Word of God, which is "Solum Verbum Dei.'
Steve: Nonetheless, the New Testament in theBible is the direct tradition from the Apostles because all they learned from Jesus is recorded in their
Gospels and books. As well as their direct sight of the Resurrection of Jesus, this is the center belief of the Catholic Faith that is also stated.
Charles: Even though, much of what you said is true because many men were inspired by God and wrote down some of their thoughts that makes up
Scripture. A good example is in John's Gospel, who is one of the Twelve Apostles stated, "But there are also many other things that Jesus did; if every
one of them were written down, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written."(John 22:25). This shows that not all
Jesus taught is contained in Sacred Scripture, as well as acknowledging that all they wrote came from His inspiration and not His command for the
apostles to write it down. Therefore, showing that would have been impossible to write everything in the Bible.
Steve: I still think that this is not enough proof to show that not all of Scripture contains the Apostolic Traditions?
Charles: Some of the Apostolic Tradition that are not included in Scriptures are prayers, such as the Nicene Creed that was orally handed down by
generation to generation, and the liturgy of the Eucharist that was initially taught down by the action

Experiencial Apologetics – A Summary, Critque, And Supporters

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cristina Franklin

More from Cristina Franklin (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Experiencial Apologetics – A Summary, Critque, And Supporters