SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Download to read offline
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 1
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Analysis of reinforced slopes
Input data
Project
Task
Part
Description
Customer
Author
Date
Project ID
Project number
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
Slope Staibily (Internal & Global) and Bearing Capacity Analysis & Design of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh
UOWM
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
14-Feb-20
UOWM-R.E.S.-Edu
Edu200214-7
Name : Project Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
+z+z
1: 5.00
0.1600
0.0800
7.927.92
2.742.74
Fortrac 3D-150
5.46 m
+x
+y
+x
+z
Settings
Standard - safety factors
Materials and standards
Concrete structures :
Coefficients EN 1992-1-1 :
EN 1992-1-1 (EC2)
standard
Wall analysis
Active earth pressure calculation :
Passive earth pressure calculation :
Earthquake analysis :
Shape of earth wedge :
Allowable eccentricity :
Internal stability :
Verification methodology :
Coulomb
Caquot-Kerisel
Mononobe-Okabe
Calculate as skew
0.333
Standard - straight slip surface
Safety factors (ASD)
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor for overturning :
Safety factor for sliding resistance :
SFo =
SFs =
1.50
1.50
[–]
[–]
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 2
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor for bearing capacity :
Safety factor for sliding along geo-reinforcement :
Safety factor for geo-reinforcement strength :
Safety factor for pull out resistance of geo-reinf. :
Safety factor for connection strength :
SFb =
SFsr =
SFst =
SFpo =
SFcon =
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
[–]
[–]
[–]
[–]
[–]
Stability analysis
Verification methodology : Safety factors (ASD)
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor : SFs = 1.50 [–]
Geometry of structure
Embankment height
Embankment length
Cover thickness
hn
ln
tc
=
=
=
7.92
2.74
0.20
m
m
m
Material
Cover material
Unit weight
Shear resistance
g
Rs
=
=
23.00
0.00
kN/m3
kPa
Types of reinforcements
No.
Name
Type of
reinforcement
Line type Reinforcement strength
Tult[kN/m] Rt[kN/m]
Coefficient
Cds[–] Ci[–]
1 Fortrac 3D-150
Fortrac
3D-150
150.00 58.91 0.60 0.70
Reinforcement details
1. Fortrac 3D-150
Short-term char. strength
Long-term design strength
Overall coeff. of model uncertainty
Tult
Rt
FSUNC
=
=
=
150.00
58.91
1.50
kN/m
kN/m
Calculate reduction factors
Life time :
Creep red. factor
Chemistry :
Durability red. factor
Partical size :
Installation damage red. factor
120 years
pH 4.0-9.0
D90 £ 32 mm
RFCR
RFD
RFID
=
=
=
1.60
1.03
1.03
Reinforcement
No.
Number
of
reinforcements
Type of reinforcement
Spacing of
reinforcements
hr[m]
Height of
first
reinforcement
h[m]
Reinforcements geometry
1 6 Fortrac 3D-150 0.91 0.91 identical ending of reinforcements
Reinforcement details
Reinforcement No. 1
Reinforcement type : Fortrac 3D-150
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 3
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Number of reinforcements 6
Reinforcement geometry : identical ending of reinforcements
End point coordinate : 11.00 m
Reinforcement
No.
Origin
l1[m]
End
l2[m]
Height from bottom
h[m]
Length
l[m]
1
2
3
4
5
6
-2.43
-2.11
-1.80
-1.48
-1.17
-0.85
8.26
8.26
8.26
8.26
8.26
8.26
0.91
1.82
2.73
3.64
4.55
5.46
10.68
10.37
10.06
9.74
9.43
9.11
Name : Reinforcement Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
Fortrac 3D-150
5.46 m
+x
+y
Soil parameters
Soil No. 1
Unit weight :
Angle of internal friction :
Cohesion of soil :
Angle of friction struc.-soil :
Saturated unit weight :
g
jef
cef
d
gsat
=
=
=
=
=
19.00
29.00
18.00
15.00
19.00
kN/m3
°
kPa
°
kN/m3
Geological profile and assigned soils
No.
Layer
[m]
Assigned soil Pattern
1 - Soil No. 1
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 4
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Name : Profile and assignment Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
+z+z
Terrain profile
Terrain behind construction has the slope 1: 5.00 (slope angle is 11.31 °).
Water influence
Ground water table is not considered.
Resistance on front face of the structure
Resistance on front face of the structure is not considered.
Earthquake
Factor of horizontal acceleration
Factor of vertical acceleration
Kh
Kv
=
=
0.1600
0.0800
Water below the GWT is restricted.
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 5
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Name : Earthquake Stage - analysis : 1 - 0
0.1600
0.0800
Settings of the stage of construction
Design situation : permanent
Verification No. 1
Active pressure behind the structure - partial results
Layer
No.
Thickness
[m]
a
[°]
jd
[°]
cd
[kPa]
g
[kN/m3]
dd
[°]
Ka Comment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.46
0.11
0.80
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
1.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
Active pressure distribution behind the structure (without surcharge)
Layer
No.
Start [m]
End [m]
sZ
[kPa]
sW
[kPa]
Pressure
[kPa]
Hor. comp.
[kPa]
Vert. comp.
[kPa]
1
2
3
4
0.00
2.46
2.46
2.58
2.58
3.37
3.37
4.28
0.00
46.83
46.83
48.98
48.98
64.12
64.12
81.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.53
5.53
11.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.83
4.83
10.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.68
2.68
5.74
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 6
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Layer
No.
Start [m]
End [m]
sZ
[kPa]
sW
[kPa]
Pressure
[kPa]
Hor. comp.
[kPa]
Vert. comp.
[kPa]
5
6
7
8
9
4.28
5.19
5.19
6.10
6.10
7.01
7.01
7.92
7.92
9.58
81.41
98.70
98.70
115.99
115.99
133.28
133.28
150.57
150.57
181.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.84
18.15
18.15
24.45
24.45
30.76
30.76
37.07
37.07
48.52
10.35
15.87
15.87
21.39
21.39
26.91
26.91
32.42
32.42
42.44
5.74
8.80
8.80
11.86
11.86
14.91
14.91
17.97
17.97
23.52
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) - partial results
Layer
No.
Thickness
[m]
jd
[°]
b
[°]
y
[°]
Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.46
0.11
0.80
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
1.65
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
29.00
11.31
11.31
11.31
11.31
11.31
11.31
11.31
11.31
11.31
9.87
9.87
9.87
9.87
9.87
9.87
9.87
9.87
9.87
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.365
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.603
0.238
0.238
0.238
0.238
0.238
0.238
0.238
0.238
0.238
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure)
Layer
No.
Start [m]
End [m]
sZ
[kPa]
sD
[kPa]
Pressure
[kPa]
Hor. comp.
[kPa]
Vertical comp.
[kPa]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.00
2.46
2.46
2.58
2.58
3.37
3.37
4.28
4.28
5.19
5.19
6.10
6.10
7.01
7.01
7.92
7.92
9.58
0.00
43.08
43.08
45.06
45.06
58.99
58.99
74.90
74.90
90.81
90.81
106.71
106.71
122.62
122.62
138.53
138.53
167.39
167.39
124.31
124.31
122.33
122.33
108.40
108.40
92.49
92.49
76.59
76.59
60.68
60.68
44.77
44.77
28.87
28.87
0.00
39.88
29.62
29.62
29.15
29.15
25.83
25.83
22.04
22.04
18.25
18.25
14.46
14.46
10.67
10.67
6.88
6.88
0.00
34.88
25.91
25.91
25.49
25.49
22.59
22.59
19.28
19.28
15.96
15.96
12.65
12.65
9.33
9.33
6.02
6.02
0.00
19.34
14.36
14.36
14.13
14.13
12.52
12.52
10.68
10.68
8.85
8.85
7.01
7.01
5.17
5.17
3.33
3.33
0.00
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 7
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Forces acting on construction
Name Fhor
[kN/m]
App.Pt.
z [m]
Fvert
[kN/m]
App.Pt.
x [m]
Design
coefficient
Gravity force
Earthquake - soil wedge
Active pressure
Earthq.- act.pressure
0.00
252.69
148.50
167.03
-4.16
-4.16
-2.33
-6.38
1579.29
-126.34
82.32
92.59
6.33
6.33
11.00
11.00
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
Verification of complete wall
Check for overturning stability
Resisting moment
Overturning moment
Mres
Movr
=
=
11113.87
2463.90
kNm/m
kNm/m
Safety factor = 4.51 > 1.50
Wall for overturning is SATISFACTORY
Check for slip
Resisting horizontal force
Active horizontal force
Hres
Hact
=
=
1093.63
568.22
kN/m
kN/m
Safety factor = 1.92 > 1.50
Wall for slip is SATISFACTORY
Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY
Bearing capacity of foundation soil
Design load acting at the center of footing bottom
No.
Moment
[kNm/m]
Norm. force
[kN/m]
Shear Force
[kN/m]
Eccentricity
[–]
Stress
[kPa]
1 303.21 1627.85 568.22 0.017 153.17
Service load acting at the center of footing bottom
No.
Moment
[kNm/m]
Norm. force
[kN/m]
Shear Force
[kN/m]
1 303.21 1627.85 568.22
Verification of foundation soil
Eccentricity verification
Max. eccentricity of normal force
Maximum allowable eccentricity
e
ealw
=
=
0.017
0.333
Eccentricity of the normal force is SATISFACTORY
Verification of bearing capacity
Max. stress at footing bottom
Bearing capacity of foundation soil
s
Rd
=
=
153.17
300.00
kPa
kPa
Safety factor = 1.96 > 1.50
Bearing capacity of foundation soil is SATISFACTORY
Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 8
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Name : Bearing cap. Stage - analysis : 1 - -1
153.17
153.17
Verification of slip on georeinforcement No. 1
Forces acting on construction (verification of most utilized reinforcement)
Name Fhor
[kN/m]
App.Pt.
z [m]
Fvert
[kN/m]
App.Pt.
x [m]
Design
coefficient
Active pressure
Earthq.- act.pressure
Gravity force
Earthquake - soil wedge
112.40
136.79
0.00
222.69
-2.03
-5.78
-3.75
-3.75
62.30
75.82
1391.83
-111.35
10.69
10.69
6.11
6.11
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
Check for slip along geo-reinforcement with the maximal utilization (Reinforc. No.: 1)
Inclination of slip surface
Overall normal force acting on reinforcement
Coefficient of reduction of slip along
geo-textile
Wall resistance
Overall bearing capacity of reinforcements
Resistance along geo-reinforcement
=
=
=
=
=
=
90.00
1418.61
0.60
0.00
0.00
471.81
°
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
Check for slip:
Resisting horizontal force
Active horiz. force
Hres
Hact
=
=
471.81
249.19
kN/m
kN/m
Factor of safety = 1.89 > 1.50
Slip along geotextile is SATISFACTORY
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 9
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Name : Slip on georeinf. Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
+x
+z
128.51
+x
+z
156.40
+x
+z
1391.83
+x
+z
248.98
Calculation of internal stability No. 1
Check for bearing capacity of geo-reinforcement No.: 1
Check for tensile strength
Tensile strength
Geo-reinforcement force
Rt
Fx
=
=
58.91
16.84
kN/m
kN/m
Factor of safety = 3.50 > 1.50
Geo-reinforcement for tensile strength is SATISFACTORY
Check for pull out resistance
Pull out resistance
Geo-reinforcement force
Tp
Fx
=
=
1154.48
16.84
kN/m
kN/m
Factor of safety = 68.54 > 1.50
Geo-reinforcement for pull out resistance is SATISFACTORY
Overall verification - geo-reinforcement is SATISFACTORY
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 10
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Name : Internal stability Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
+x
+z
16.84
Global stability analysis No. 1
Slip surface parameters
(slip surface after optimization)
Center
Radius
Angle
S
r
a1
a2
=
=
=
=
(-2.34;-17.99)
27.16
-17.45
59.51
m
m
°
°
Slope stability check (Bishop)
FS = 1.53 > 1.50
Slope stability is SATISFACTORY
Name : Global stability Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
+x
+z
(-2.34;-17.99)
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 11
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Slope stability analysis
Input data
Project
Settings
Standard - safety factors
Stability analysis
Earthquake analysis :
Verification methodology :
Standard
Safety factors (ASD)
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor : SFs = 1.50 [–]
Interface
No. Interface location
Coordinates of interface points [m]
x z x z x z
1
2
3
-34.32
23.77
0.00
-2.74
38.30
-7.92
4.75
0.00
-7.92
-0.07
-2.74
38.30
0.19
-2.55
-7.92
4.75
-0.07
-7.99
0.00
0.19
0.00
-0.07
Name : Interface Stage : 1
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 12
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Soil parameters - effective stress state
No. Name Pattern
jef
[°]
cef
[kPa]
g
[kN/m3]
1 Soil No. 1 29.00 18.00 19.00
Soil parameters - uplift
No. Name Pattern
gsat
[kN/m3]
gs
[kN/m3]
n
[–]
1 Soil No. 1 19.00
Soil parameters
Soil No. 1
Unit weight :
Stress-state :
Angle of internal friction :
Cohesion of soil :
Saturated unit weight :
g
effective
jef
cef
gsat
=
=
=
=
19.00
29.00
18.00
19.00
kN/m3
°
kPa
kN/m3
Rigid bodies
No. Name Sample
g
[kN/m3]
1
2
Cover
Material of cover
23.00
23.00
Assigning and surfaces
No. Surface position
Coordinates of surface points [m]
x z x z
Assigned
soil
1
2
3
38.30
23.77
0.19
-2.55
0.00
0.19
-2.74
-34.32
38.30
-0.07
4.75
-0.07
-7.99
0.00
-0.07
-7.92
-12.99
-0.07
38.30
0.00
0.19
-2.74
-2.55
-34.32
38.30
4.75
0.00
-0.07
-7.92
-7.99
-7.92
-12.99
Soil No. 1
Cover
Soil No. 1
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 13
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Reinforcements
No.
Point to the left
x [m] z [m]
Point to the right
x [m] z [m]
Length
L [m]
Strength
Rt [kN/m]
Pull out resist.
End of
reinf.
1
2
3
4
5
6
-0.85
-1.17
-1.48
-1.80
-2.11
-2.43
-2.46
-3.37
-4.28
-5.19
-6.10
-7.01
8.26
8.26
8.26
8.26
8.26
8.26
-2.46
-3.37
-4.28
-5.19
-6.10
-7.01
9.11
9.43
9.74
10.06
10.37
10.69
58.91
58.91
58.91
58.91
58.91
58.91
Tp = 51.92 kN/m2
Tp = 71.09 kN/m2
Tp = 90.25 kN/m2
Tp = 109.42 kN/m2
Tp = 128.59 kN/m2
Tp = 147.76 kN/m2
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Water
Water type : No water
Tensile crack
Tensile crack not inputted.
Earthquake
Horizontal seismic coefficient :
Vertical seismic coefficient :
Kh =
Kv =
0.16
0.08
Settings of the stage of construction
Design situation : permanent
Results (Stage of construction 1)
Analysis 1
Circular slip surface
Slip surface parameters
Center :
Radius :
x =
z =
R =
-1.73
19.10
27.96
[m]
[m]
[m]
Angles :
a1 =
a2 =
-14.90
58.30
[°]
[°]
The slip surface after optimization.
Reinforcement forces
Reinforcement
1
2
3
4
5
6
Force [kN/m]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Slope stability verification (Bishop)
Sum of active forces :
Sum of passive forces :
Sliding moment :
Resisting moment :
Fa =
Fp =
Ma =
Mp =
1398.60
2144.86
39104.91
59970.33
kN/m
kN/m
kNm/m
kNm/m
Factor of safety = 1.53 > 1.50
Slope stability ACCEPTABLE
Geodomisi Ltd.
Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
University of Western Macedonia
Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity
Last Cheak
www.uowm.gr
Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 14
[GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com
Name : Analysis Stage - analysis : 1 - 1

More Related Content

What's hot

Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997
Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997
Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design  BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design  BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof exampleSachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof exampleDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...
Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...
Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CEN
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CENSachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CEN
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CENDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazisGeodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazisDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 

What's hot (20)

Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
 
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
 
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
 
Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997
Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997
Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997
 
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
 
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
 
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...
 
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design  BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design  BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
 
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...
 
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005
 
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
 
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
 
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof exampleSachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
 
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
 
Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...
Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...
Sachpazis_CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL Analysis & DESIGN Example According to IB...
 
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
 
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CEN
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CENSachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CEN
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CEN
 
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...
 
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazisGeodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
 

Similar to Sachpazis" Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Earth Slope Stability & Capacity

Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.SachpazisSingle pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.SachpazisDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...IRJET Journal
 
Structural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Structure
Structural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete StructureStructural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Structure
Structural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete StructureIJERA Editor
 
Culvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & Applications
Culvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & ApplicationsCulvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & Applications
Culvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & ApplicationsPath Marketing Inc.
 
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel SystemDesign of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel SystemIRJET Journal
 
ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings. Presented by M...
ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings.  Presented by M...ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings.  Presented by M...
ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings. Presented by M...Engineers Australia
 
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...IRJET Journal
 
IMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDY
IMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDYIMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDY
IMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDYIRJET Journal
 
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureFire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureArshia Mousavi
 
Geosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA Ltd
Geosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA LtdGeosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA Ltd
Geosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA LtdSirmoi Wekesa
 
Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...
Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...
Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...Global CCS Institute
 
Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’
Modeling procedure and Case study of  ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’Modeling procedure and Case study of  ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’
Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’chandrashekhar lakavath
 
post tensioning slabs
post tensioning slabspost tensioning slabs
post tensioning slabsgopichand's
 
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres FinalKrystian Pilarczyk
 
Application of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptx
Application of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptxApplication of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptx
Application of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptxSubhajitPaul88
 

Similar to Sachpazis" Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Earth Slope Stability & Capacity (20)

Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.SachpazisSingle pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
 
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
Final Paper on Study and Design of Footbridge to connect the first floor of C...
 
Structural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Structure
Structural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete StructureStructural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Structure
Structural Design and Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Structure
 
Culvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & Applications
Culvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & ApplicationsCulvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & Applications
Culvert Design 201 Structural Design, Durability & Applications
 
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
 
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel SystemDesign of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
 
ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings. Presented by M...
ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings.  Presented by M...ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings.  Presented by M...
ICWES15 - Challenging Design: Foundations for Tall Buildings. Presented by M...
 
Guidelines
GuidelinesGuidelines
Guidelines
 
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEP EXCAVATION UNDER STATIC AND SEISMIC LOAD CONDI...
 
B012450408
B012450408B012450408
B012450408
 
IMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDY
IMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDYIMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDY
IMPROVING THE STRUCTURAL EFFICIENCY OF STEEL TRUSSES BY COMPARATIVE STUDY
 
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureFire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel Structure
 
Geosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA Ltd
Geosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA LtdGeosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA Ltd
Geosynthetics Applications in Civil Engineering by Sirmoi_Geosynthetics EA Ltd
 
Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...
Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...
Modeling CO2 injection into saline aquifers, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of ...
 
Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’
Modeling procedure and Case study of  ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’Modeling procedure and Case study of  ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’
Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’
 
Ijciet 06 09_014
Ijciet 06 09_014Ijciet 06 09_014
Ijciet 06 09_014
 
post tensioning slabs
post tensioning slabspost tensioning slabs
post tensioning slabs
 
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems  Pilarczyk Pres Final
1 Geosynthetics&Geosystems Pilarczyk Pres Final
 
Application of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptx
Application of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptxApplication of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptx
Application of Advanced Material in Offshore Structure.pptx
 

More from Dr.Costas Sachpazis

Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.pptΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.pptDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκαςSachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκαςDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundationsPile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundationsDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής ΕνέργειαςΣαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής ΕνέργειαςDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About DamsSachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About DamsDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
Sachpazis: Slope Stability AnalysisSachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
Sachpazis: Slope Stability AnalysisDr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...
Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...
Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...
Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...
Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...
C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...
C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2
Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2
Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 

More from Dr.Costas Sachpazis (20)

Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
 
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
 
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
 
Chapter9Lec16Jan03.ppt
Chapter9Lec16Jan03.pptChapter9Lec16Jan03.ppt
Chapter9Lec16Jan03.ppt
 
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.pptΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
 
MBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptx
MBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptxMBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptx
MBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptx
 
Marketing.ppt
Marketing.pptMarketing.ppt
Marketing.ppt
 
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκαςSachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
 
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundationsPile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
 
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής ΕνέργειαςΣαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
 
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
 
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
 
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
 
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
 
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About DamsSachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
 
Sachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
Sachpazis: Slope Stability AnalysisSachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
Sachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
 
Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...
Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...
Slope Stability Evaluation for the New Railway Embankment using Stochastic & ...
 
Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...
Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...
Dr. Costas Sachpazis. 3-D Soil Layer Model from Geotechnical Borehole Data (B...
 
C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...
C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...
C. Sachpazis & Eleyas A - Probabilistic Slope Stability evaluation for the ne...
 
Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2
Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2
Sachpazis_PILE Analysis_Design to EC2
 

Recently uploaded

ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxMaryGraceBautista27
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for ParentsChoosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parentsnavabharathschool99
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxChelloAnnAsuncion2
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4MiaBumagat1
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Celine George
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYKayeClaireEstoconing
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for ParentsChoosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
Choosing the Right CBSE School A Comprehensive Guide for Parents
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
 
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
 

Sachpazis" Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Earth Slope Stability & Capacity

  • 1. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 1 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Analysis of reinforced slopes Input data Project Task Part Description Customer Author Date Project ID Project number : : : : : : : : Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak Slope Staibily (Internal & Global) and Bearing Capacity Analysis & Design of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh UOWM Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis 14-Feb-20 UOWM-R.E.S.-Edu Edu200214-7 Name : Project Stage - analysis : 1 - 0 +z+z 1: 5.00 0.1600 0.0800 7.927.92 2.742.74 Fortrac 3D-150 5.46 m +x +y +x +z Settings Standard - safety factors Materials and standards Concrete structures : Coefficients EN 1992-1-1 : EN 1992-1-1 (EC2) standard Wall analysis Active earth pressure calculation : Passive earth pressure calculation : Earthquake analysis : Shape of earth wedge : Allowable eccentricity : Internal stability : Verification methodology : Coulomb Caquot-Kerisel Mononobe-Okabe Calculate as skew 0.333 Standard - straight slip surface Safety factors (ASD) Safety factors Permanent design situation Safety factor for overturning : Safety factor for sliding resistance : SFo = SFs = 1.50 1.50 [–] [–]
  • 2. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 2 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Safety factors Permanent design situation Safety factor for bearing capacity : Safety factor for sliding along geo-reinforcement : Safety factor for geo-reinforcement strength : Safety factor for pull out resistance of geo-reinf. : Safety factor for connection strength : SFb = SFsr = SFst = SFpo = SFcon = 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 [–] [–] [–] [–] [–] Stability analysis Verification methodology : Safety factors (ASD) Safety factors Permanent design situation Safety factor : SFs = 1.50 [–] Geometry of structure Embankment height Embankment length Cover thickness hn ln tc = = = 7.92 2.74 0.20 m m m Material Cover material Unit weight Shear resistance g Rs = = 23.00 0.00 kN/m3 kPa Types of reinforcements No. Name Type of reinforcement Line type Reinforcement strength Tult[kN/m] Rt[kN/m] Coefficient Cds[–] Ci[–] 1 Fortrac 3D-150 Fortrac 3D-150 150.00 58.91 0.60 0.70 Reinforcement details 1. Fortrac 3D-150 Short-term char. strength Long-term design strength Overall coeff. of model uncertainty Tult Rt FSUNC = = = 150.00 58.91 1.50 kN/m kN/m Calculate reduction factors Life time : Creep red. factor Chemistry : Durability red. factor Partical size : Installation damage red. factor 120 years pH 4.0-9.0 D90 £ 32 mm RFCR RFD RFID = = = 1.60 1.03 1.03 Reinforcement No. Number of reinforcements Type of reinforcement Spacing of reinforcements hr[m] Height of first reinforcement h[m] Reinforcements geometry 1 6 Fortrac 3D-150 0.91 0.91 identical ending of reinforcements Reinforcement details Reinforcement No. 1 Reinforcement type : Fortrac 3D-150
  • 3. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 3 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Number of reinforcements 6 Reinforcement geometry : identical ending of reinforcements End point coordinate : 11.00 m Reinforcement No. Origin l1[m] End l2[m] Height from bottom h[m] Length l[m] 1 2 3 4 5 6 -2.43 -2.11 -1.80 -1.48 -1.17 -0.85 8.26 8.26 8.26 8.26 8.26 8.26 0.91 1.82 2.73 3.64 4.55 5.46 10.68 10.37 10.06 9.74 9.43 9.11 Name : Reinforcement Stage - analysis : 1 - 0 Fortrac 3D-150 5.46 m +x +y Soil parameters Soil No. 1 Unit weight : Angle of internal friction : Cohesion of soil : Angle of friction struc.-soil : Saturated unit weight : g jef cef d gsat = = = = = 19.00 29.00 18.00 15.00 19.00 kN/m3 ° kPa ° kN/m3 Geological profile and assigned soils No. Layer [m] Assigned soil Pattern 1 - Soil No. 1
  • 4. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 4 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Name : Profile and assignment Stage - analysis : 1 - 0 +z+z Terrain profile Terrain behind construction has the slope 1: 5.00 (slope angle is 11.31 °). Water influence Ground water table is not considered. Resistance on front face of the structure Resistance on front face of the structure is not considered. Earthquake Factor of horizontal acceleration Factor of vertical acceleration Kh Kv = = 0.1600 0.0800 Water below the GWT is restricted.
  • 5. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 5 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Name : Earthquake Stage - analysis : 1 - 0 0.1600 0.0800 Settings of the stage of construction Design situation : permanent Verification No. 1 Active pressure behind the structure - partial results Layer No. Thickness [m] a [°] jd [°] cd [kPa] g [kN/m3] dd [°] Ka Comment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2.46 0.11 0.80 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 Active pressure distribution behind the structure (without surcharge) Layer No. Start [m] End [m] sZ [kPa] sW [kPa] Pressure [kPa] Hor. comp. [kPa] Vert. comp. [kPa] 1 2 3 4 0.00 2.46 2.46 2.58 2.58 3.37 3.37 4.28 0.00 46.83 46.83 48.98 48.98 64.12 64.12 81.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.53 5.53 11.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.83 4.83 10.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.68 2.68 5.74
  • 6. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 6 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Layer No. Start [m] End [m] sZ [kPa] sW [kPa] Pressure [kPa] Hor. comp. [kPa] Vert. comp. [kPa] 5 6 7 8 9 4.28 5.19 5.19 6.10 6.10 7.01 7.01 7.92 7.92 9.58 81.41 98.70 98.70 115.99 115.99 133.28 133.28 150.57 150.57 181.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.84 18.15 18.15 24.45 24.45 30.76 30.76 37.07 37.07 48.52 10.35 15.87 15.87 21.39 21.39 26.91 26.91 32.42 32.42 42.44 5.74 8.80 8.80 11.86 11.86 14.91 14.91 17.97 17.97 23.52 Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) - partial results Layer No. Thickness [m] jd [°] b [°] y [°] Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2.46 0.11 0.80 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.65 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 11.31 11.31 11.31 11.31 11.31 11.31 11.31 11.31 11.31 9.87 9.87 9.87 9.87 9.87 9.87 9.87 9.87 9.87 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.365 0.603 0.603 0.603 0.603 0.603 0.603 0.603 0.603 0.603 0.238 0.238 0.238 0.238 0.238 0.238 0.238 0.238 0.238 Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) Layer No. Start [m] End [m] sZ [kPa] sD [kPa] Pressure [kPa] Hor. comp. [kPa] Vertical comp. [kPa] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0.00 2.46 2.46 2.58 2.58 3.37 3.37 4.28 4.28 5.19 5.19 6.10 6.10 7.01 7.01 7.92 7.92 9.58 0.00 43.08 43.08 45.06 45.06 58.99 58.99 74.90 74.90 90.81 90.81 106.71 106.71 122.62 122.62 138.53 138.53 167.39 167.39 124.31 124.31 122.33 122.33 108.40 108.40 92.49 92.49 76.59 76.59 60.68 60.68 44.77 44.77 28.87 28.87 0.00 39.88 29.62 29.62 29.15 29.15 25.83 25.83 22.04 22.04 18.25 18.25 14.46 14.46 10.67 10.67 6.88 6.88 0.00 34.88 25.91 25.91 25.49 25.49 22.59 22.59 19.28 19.28 15.96 15.96 12.65 12.65 9.33 9.33 6.02 6.02 0.00 19.34 14.36 14.36 14.13 14.13 12.52 12.52 10.68 10.68 8.85 8.85 7.01 7.01 5.17 5.17 3.33 3.33 0.00
  • 7. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 7 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Forces acting on construction Name Fhor [kN/m] App.Pt. z [m] Fvert [kN/m] App.Pt. x [m] Design coefficient Gravity force Earthquake - soil wedge Active pressure Earthq.- act.pressure 0.00 252.69 148.50 167.03 -4.16 -4.16 -2.33 -6.38 1579.29 -126.34 82.32 92.59 6.33 6.33 11.00 11.00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Verification of complete wall Check for overturning stability Resisting moment Overturning moment Mres Movr = = 11113.87 2463.90 kNm/m kNm/m Safety factor = 4.51 > 1.50 Wall for overturning is SATISFACTORY Check for slip Resisting horizontal force Active horizontal force Hres Hact = = 1093.63 568.22 kN/m kN/m Safety factor = 1.92 > 1.50 Wall for slip is SATISFACTORY Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY Bearing capacity of foundation soil Design load acting at the center of footing bottom No. Moment [kNm/m] Norm. force [kN/m] Shear Force [kN/m] Eccentricity [–] Stress [kPa] 1 303.21 1627.85 568.22 0.017 153.17 Service load acting at the center of footing bottom No. Moment [kNm/m] Norm. force [kN/m] Shear Force [kN/m] 1 303.21 1627.85 568.22 Verification of foundation soil Eccentricity verification Max. eccentricity of normal force Maximum allowable eccentricity e ealw = = 0.017 0.333 Eccentricity of the normal force is SATISFACTORY Verification of bearing capacity Max. stress at footing bottom Bearing capacity of foundation soil s Rd = = 153.17 300.00 kPa kPa Safety factor = 1.96 > 1.50 Bearing capacity of foundation soil is SATISFACTORY Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY
  • 8. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 8 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Name : Bearing cap. Stage - analysis : 1 - -1 153.17 153.17 Verification of slip on georeinforcement No. 1 Forces acting on construction (verification of most utilized reinforcement) Name Fhor [kN/m] App.Pt. z [m] Fvert [kN/m] App.Pt. x [m] Design coefficient Active pressure Earthq.- act.pressure Gravity force Earthquake - soil wedge 112.40 136.79 0.00 222.69 -2.03 -5.78 -3.75 -3.75 62.30 75.82 1391.83 -111.35 10.69 10.69 6.11 6.11 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Check for slip along geo-reinforcement with the maximal utilization (Reinforc. No.: 1) Inclination of slip surface Overall normal force acting on reinforcement Coefficient of reduction of slip along geo-textile Wall resistance Overall bearing capacity of reinforcements Resistance along geo-reinforcement = = = = = = 90.00 1418.61 0.60 0.00 0.00 471.81 ° kN/m kN/m kN/m kN/m Check for slip: Resisting horizontal force Active horiz. force Hres Hact = = 471.81 249.19 kN/m kN/m Factor of safety = 1.89 > 1.50 Slip along geotextile is SATISFACTORY
  • 9. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 9 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Name : Slip on georeinf. Stage - analysis : 1 - 1 +x +z 128.51 +x +z 156.40 +x +z 1391.83 +x +z 248.98 Calculation of internal stability No. 1 Check for bearing capacity of geo-reinforcement No.: 1 Check for tensile strength Tensile strength Geo-reinforcement force Rt Fx = = 58.91 16.84 kN/m kN/m Factor of safety = 3.50 > 1.50 Geo-reinforcement for tensile strength is SATISFACTORY Check for pull out resistance Pull out resistance Geo-reinforcement force Tp Fx = = 1154.48 16.84 kN/m kN/m Factor of safety = 68.54 > 1.50 Geo-reinforcement for pull out resistance is SATISFACTORY Overall verification - geo-reinforcement is SATISFACTORY
  • 10. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 10 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Name : Internal stability Stage - analysis : 1 - 1 +x +z 16.84 Global stability analysis No. 1 Slip surface parameters (slip surface after optimization) Center Radius Angle S r a1 a2 = = = = (-2.34;-17.99) 27.16 -17.45 59.51 m m ° ° Slope stability check (Bishop) FS = 1.53 > 1.50 Slope stability is SATISFACTORY Name : Global stability Stage - analysis : 1 - 1 +x +z (-2.34;-17.99)
  • 11. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 11 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Slope stability analysis Input data Project Settings Standard - safety factors Stability analysis Earthquake analysis : Verification methodology : Standard Safety factors (ASD) Safety factors Permanent design situation Safety factor : SFs = 1.50 [–] Interface No. Interface location Coordinates of interface points [m] x z x z x z 1 2 3 -34.32 23.77 0.00 -2.74 38.30 -7.92 4.75 0.00 -7.92 -0.07 -2.74 38.30 0.19 -2.55 -7.92 4.75 -0.07 -7.99 0.00 0.19 0.00 -0.07 Name : Interface Stage : 1
  • 12. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 12 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Soil parameters - effective stress state No. Name Pattern jef [°] cef [kPa] g [kN/m3] 1 Soil No. 1 29.00 18.00 19.00 Soil parameters - uplift No. Name Pattern gsat [kN/m3] gs [kN/m3] n [–] 1 Soil No. 1 19.00 Soil parameters Soil No. 1 Unit weight : Stress-state : Angle of internal friction : Cohesion of soil : Saturated unit weight : g effective jef cef gsat = = = = 19.00 29.00 18.00 19.00 kN/m3 ° kPa kN/m3 Rigid bodies No. Name Sample g [kN/m3] 1 2 Cover Material of cover 23.00 23.00 Assigning and surfaces No. Surface position Coordinates of surface points [m] x z x z Assigned soil 1 2 3 38.30 23.77 0.19 -2.55 0.00 0.19 -2.74 -34.32 38.30 -0.07 4.75 -0.07 -7.99 0.00 -0.07 -7.92 -12.99 -0.07 38.30 0.00 0.19 -2.74 -2.55 -34.32 38.30 4.75 0.00 -0.07 -7.92 -7.99 -7.92 -12.99 Soil No. 1 Cover Soil No. 1
  • 13. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 13 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Reinforcements No. Point to the left x [m] z [m] Point to the right x [m] z [m] Length L [m] Strength Rt [kN/m] Pull out resist. End of reinf. 1 2 3 4 5 6 -0.85 -1.17 -1.48 -1.80 -2.11 -2.43 -2.46 -3.37 -4.28 -5.19 -6.10 -7.01 8.26 8.26 8.26 8.26 8.26 8.26 -2.46 -3.37 -4.28 -5.19 -6.10 -7.01 9.11 9.43 9.74 10.06 10.37 10.69 58.91 58.91 58.91 58.91 58.91 58.91 Tp = 51.92 kN/m2 Tp = 71.09 kN/m2 Tp = 90.25 kN/m2 Tp = 109.42 kN/m2 Tp = 128.59 kN/m2 Tp = 147.76 kN/m2 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Water Water type : No water Tensile crack Tensile crack not inputted. Earthquake Horizontal seismic coefficient : Vertical seismic coefficient : Kh = Kv = 0.16 0.08 Settings of the stage of construction Design situation : permanent Results (Stage of construction 1) Analysis 1 Circular slip surface Slip surface parameters Center : Radius : x = z = R = -1.73 19.10 27.96 [m] [m] [m] Angles : a1 = a2 = -14.90 58.30 [°] [°] The slip surface after optimization. Reinforcement forces Reinforcement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Force [kN/m] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Slope stability verification (Bishop) Sum of active forces : Sum of passive forces : Sliding moment : Resisting moment : Fa = Fp = Ma = Mp = 1398.60 2144.86 39104.91 59970.33 kN/m kN/m kNm/m kNm/m Factor of safety = 1.53 > 1.50 Slope stability ACCEPTABLE
  • 14. Geodomisi Ltd. Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis University of Western Macedonia Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Eatrh Slope Stability & Capacity Last Cheak www.uowm.gr Geodomisi Ltd., URL: http://www.geodomisi.com, E-mail: costas@sachpazis.info 14 [GeoStructural Analysis - www.geodomisi.com Name : Analysis Stage - analysis : 1 - 1