The document provides background information on Joan of Arc. It discusses that she was born in 1412 during the Hundred Years War between France and England. She claimed to hear voices from saints telling her to help the Dauphin Charles VII regain the French throne. She became a brilliant war leader and led the French to several victories against the English. However, she was eventually captured, tried for heresy, and burned at the stake at the age of 19. The document also provides context about the war and Joan's childhood and upbringing as a peasant in France.
1. What Is Joan Of Arc Essay
Joan of Arc (born Jeanette d'Arc) –was a saint and the national heroine of France in the early
1400's– Joan was born on January 6th 1412, during the Hundred Year War. She became a brilliant
war leader and singlehandedly led a disheartened French nation against British rule. She claimed she
heard voices and that these voices were of St. Michael, St Catherine and St. Margret, Joan believed
that the voices delivered messages from God. This eventually become her downfall which led to her
being burned at the stake and accused of being a witch. Herein then lies the conundrum, was she
killed because the people believed that she was a 'witch' or was the reason more because she was
fast becoming a threat to male rule? Before Joan was born the English wanted a duel monarchy over
both France and England – this led to the Hundred Years War which hugely affected Joan's life –
when Joan was born this was almost a reality. Joan and her parents (Jaques D'Arc and Isabelle De
Vouthon) lived comfortably as peasants in the French village of Domrémy and Joan spent her
childhood learning housekeeping skills, attending her father's cattle and sheep and Catholicism. At
the age of 12 Joan started to hear 'voices' that she believed were messages from God that told her to
reclaim France from English rule and to lead the Dauphin, Charles VII, to his coronation in Rheims.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As she claimed in this letter Joan wanted nothing more than for Charles VII to become King of
France because this is what her voices told her was her mission throughout her life, she never
wanted to rule and thus posed no threat to a male
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
2.
3. The Battle Of Lancaster And The House Of York Ending The...
The battle of Bosworth was the last battle of major significance for the House of Lancaster and the
House of York ending the civil Wars of the Roses. [5] Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond brought in the
house of Tudor closing the Plantagenet dynasty.[5] The ending of the wars put to rest the feudalism
because of the great loss of property and lives of the nobles making it difficult to protest against the
strength of the Tudor monarchy. The problem came about from financial and social trouble that
followed the hundred years of war, along with the weak ruler ship of Henry VI. Richard in his first
and only parliament wanted three main areas of legislation to be covered: the ratification of himself
as king, passing of acts of attainder ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
David's.[3] A struggle between the House of York and the house of Lancaster broke out; which
became a series of wars known as The War of the Roses. The kingship was based on the royal
bloodline and the kings relied upon the support of the powerful Lords to keep their position. [5]
Both Henry Tudor and Richard III believed each had claims to the English throne as they were both
descended from Edward III.[2] Henry Lancastrian's claim to the throne was from Edward III's son,
John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster.[2] In 1339 Henry of Bolingbroke; John's son imprisoned,
Richard II who was the son of Edward, the Black Prince..[2] Henry IV became king, passing his
crown to his son Henry V who passed the crown to Henry VI. Henry VI was becoming unpopular,
due to corruption within his government, his policy of peace with France and the economic situation
in
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
4.
5. Why Does Henry V Continue to Be Such a Famous and Popular...
King Henry V, son of Henry IV, forged his legend in a little over nine years. He made England one
of the strongest kingdoms in Europe and academic KB McFarlane even described him as "the
greatest man who ever ruled England". Even though Henry V was said to be brave, fair, likeable and
a great warrior, he was also arrogant, ruthless, cruel on campaign and organised massacres. So, how
did such a man come to be a national hero? Henry's fame started to build when he was a teenager
after showing his abilities on the battlefield by taking part in the Battle of Shrewsbury, in Wales. In
that battle, he was wounded in the face by an arrow but refused to leave combat, fighting until the
end. The King's army was victorious against the Welsh rebels and Young Henry was recognised
throughout England for his courage. Despite his early entry into public life, Henry was well
educated. Henry V was the first King of England since Norman invasion to use English as his
primary language and who could both read and write in the vernacular language. Henry's accession
to the throne was broadly welcomed by the population of England because they were desperate for a
strong monarch, something England had lacked since the reign of Edward III. And he did not
disappoint them. Henry fulfilled every criteria by which kings were judged: good justice, sound
finance, true religion, political harmony, accepting consel and nobility. Only one remained: success
in war but it was no long before he fulfilled that
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
6.
7. The Five Phases Of The Hundred Years War
A big name for a group of conflicts that were fought in an 116 year time period is the Hundred Years
War (New World Encyclopedia). From 1337–1453, England and France both struggled in battle over
the succession to the French Throne (Wheeler). This war has five phases it can be divided into
(Naval Academy). Many decades consisted of England dominating France and then it went back and
forth. The nation that was winning would always change throughout the series of wars (Wheeler).
The result of the Hundred Years' War remained inconclusive since France and England leaders were
prepared for different phases of the war, were skilled in battle, and were victorious in different
battles against their enemies. Although it may seem that one particular ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The wars were declared by kings and not so much between nations or royal families (New World
Encyclopedia). The Duchy of Gascony was one source of friction while another cause was the
establishment of strong alliance by the Flanders (Calgary). Both practical and constitutional aspects
were there to dispute over Gueyenne/Gascony (Naval Academy). Claims of the French crown by
England was not as much a cause of the war than a founded justification for it. Once King Charles
IV died, the succession of the French throne was left confused to everyone. The thought of an attack
by the French and the Scottish from the north and the south of England concerned Edward III in
1335–1336. After being driven out in 1334 by Edward III, Philip VI gave refuge to King David.
(Naval
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
8.
9. Essay on Henry VI and the Wars of the Roses
From his fifteen year minority to the inept rule of the rest of his reign, Henry VI was a "child", at
least as far as governing ability was concerned. The period of his minority and the time that he was
the titular king laid the groundwork for the Wars of the Roses. Had Henry been an intelligent king,
with at least some political acumen, and the ability to win the respect of his nobles, their may have
never been any Wars of the Roses. But his weakness in allowing government by favorites and
governing foolishly on his own, at the very least directed his country down the road to a bloody civil
war.
Henry VI was born on December 6, 1421, and became king of England on September 1, 1422.
Problems began almost immediately, though these ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Since it was made up of nobles, they tried to protect each others' interests, something not always for
the public good.
Even after he had come of age, Henry suffered from a lack of popular support, something that
invariably helps the "other side" in a civil war. He was considered a fool by the general populace,
which weakened his authority. During his reign, there were many charges of seditious libel to come
before the courts (Storey, 34) and they usually dealt with someone slandering the king. Common
people and yeomen were calling the king a "lunatic", a child, and a fool (Storey, 35). For instance,
one Sussex yeoman called the king a "natural fool" and said that "the king was no person able to
rule the land" (Storey, 35). Evidently, if even the common people were slandering the king, they
must have had some basis for it. The king did nothing to prove the people wrong, rarely going on
progresses to smooth out his image. He stayed in the Home Counties for much of his reign, and even
that did not improve his image with the people.
Among the upper classes, he proved over and over again that he was not a good king. He rarely, if
ever, participated in Parliament, and often did not attend sittings of the king's council. When the
council sat at Westminster, Henry usually managed to be somewhere else (Storey, 35). These actions
give a picture of a king who, though solicited for his opinions, did not want to get involved in the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
10.
11. War Of The Roses
Near the end of the Hundred Years War, dissent in England led to civil strife, and many of the royal
family of Plantagenet were killed in their attempts to seize the throne. Back in 1337, Edward III
declared war on France, after Philip VI's refusal to return territories to England. This struggle would
devastate both nations for 116 years until 1453, ultimately leaving England with even less territory
in France than they had started with. In 1422, near the end of the war, the effective king Henry V
died of dysentery, leaving behind an infant son Henry VI. Young Henry, who was insane, was unable
to control his nation. The House of York challenged Henry VI, and a civil war began that would last
32 years. The War of the Roses was a major turning ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, a division was created when in 1377, Edward III's fourth son, John of Gaunt, became the
first duke of Lancaster, and his fifth son, Edmund of Langley, became the first duke of York. This
separation would prove the be lasting. In 1453, the last English territories in southwestern France
were lost to the Dauphin Charles, which marked the end of the devastating Hundred Years War.
England had lost all of their holdings on mainland Europe, except Calais. This disastrous result
proved that Henry VI was a weak king, and his political enemies, including barons and Richard of
York, rose up against him. Initial conflicts occurred in 1455, and after five years of fighting and
temporary truces, the Battle of Wakefield in 1460 resulted in a Yorkist victory, although Richard of
York was killed. Edward, his son was crowned Edward IV, yet he died 23 years later in 1483. His
brother Richard III claimed the throne, although Edward V, his nephew, was supposedly the rightful
heir. Some Yorkists who opposed Richard III sought help from Henry Tudor, the last Lancastrian
descendent. Henry staged a failed rebellion with Edward Stafford, 3rd Duke of Buckingham, but at
Bosworth Field, (8/22/1485), he defeated Richard III at a final battle, ending the 32–year–old
struggle. Henry was crowned Henry VII, THEN married Elizabeth of York, thus uniting the two
houses. Before the war, England was controlled by the sovereign and a network of nobility.
However, the War of the Roses added to the already high death rate of aristocracy, thus weakening
the feudal state. Seven important royal relatives were deposed or killed in battle, including Henry
VI, Margaret of Anjou, Richard Neville of Salisbury, Richard Neville of Warwick, Edward IV,
Edward V, and Richard III. With less competition for kingship, the Tudors would be able to establish
an empire in relative peace. With many new ideas of the Renaissance being
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
12.
13. Joan Of Arc Book Summary
Book Title
Book Summary
Date
Student Name
God had spoken this was a war accursed of God, that's at least was what the English had said. It was
hard for the French to argue this point or it would have been had they not been too busy arguing
among themselves. This was heavens mandate in action: Only God's will could explain how so few
Englishmen had defeated so many of Frances great knights. Clearly this was another David &
Goliath story. The French had fallen at the hands of the English and this was Gods will? The English
king had given his French subjects every chance to acknowledge his rights to be their ruler, by
decent of a French mother of his royal ancestor king Edward III. Who could have known that it
would be a young peasant girl to save France. Alone in the fields of Dominey a peasant girl hears
heavenly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Joan of Arc was born to Jacque d' Arc and Isabella Rommniee in Dormineey, in the early 15th
century. Her birth year is believed to be 1412. Her parents were humble peasants and owned 50
acres of land. Joan was strongly Intune with the Holy Spirit from a young age. She was
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
14.
15. Wars Of The Roses
The Wars of the Roses, fought in England during the 15th century, was a critical juncture in the
history of England, as it determined the future of England's throne. The Wars of the Roses were not
just one single conflict, but several (hence the name Wars not War) in England during the later half
of the 15th century. The conflict is typically though to stem from the conflicting ambitions of the
York and Lancaster families to control the English throne. The notion that The Wars of the Roses
were a power struggle over the English throne is an obvious one to come to. Given the turbulence
surrounding control of the throne, as well as the violent nature by which Kings were often replaced
during this time it is easy to assume that the conflict was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Such an analysis of the conflict is an easy one to assume based on the nature in which power
shifted hands between the Lancaster and the York families during the time of the Wars of the Roses,
however assuming the conflict was caused simply by two families fighting each other fails to
consider much deeper root causes. If one examines the successful rule of Lancaster King Henry V
compared to the ineffective rule of his son Henry VI it becomes obvious that weak rule, not a thirst
for power was the catalyst behind the York challenge to the throne. Henry V faced no real challenges
to his authority during his successful rule; Henry VI was eventually deposed after his rule saw the
decline of England. Furthermore, given the shifting alliances of nobles, such as the Earl of Warwick,
it is clear that supporting ones' own kinsman was not the central factor in who nobles backed during
the war. If the war was the result of family rivalry one would except family ties to be a crucial
factor. Lastly the notion that the conflict stemmed from the York family wanting to take control of
the throne away from the Lancaster family can be easily attributed to later Tudor propaganda. The
works of William Shakespeare would paint the York claims to power as self serving, which would
go own to be
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
16.
17. Power Struggle In Philippa Gregory's The Lady Of The Rivers
The novel The Lady of the Rivers follows the story of a noblewoman, Jacquetta of Luxembourg,
during the early to mid–1400s. She enters the world of politics at age seventeen when she is married
to the Duke of Bedford. When he dies, she falls in love with and marries a squire, which was not
socially acceptable because he was below her rank. However, she eventually regains her position
and becomes a close friend and advisor of the queen of England, Margaret of Anjou. However, the
country begins to break down as battles between political figures begin. Political and military battles
are prominent in the novel as they are centers of conflict throughout the book. Philippa Gregory's
The Lady of the Rivers accurately portrays the extensive power struggle ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the book, the royal army and the Londoners pushed the Kentish men back across the river and
then raised the drawbridge, which effectively locked them out. After this, the king sent pardons to all
of the rebels involved in the battle. This series of events is reflected by an article discussing the
rebellion. It says, "having failed in this battle to gain control of the bridge, the captain of the Kentish
militia, Jack Cade, negotiated a general pardon for his followers" (Bohna). Both the novel and the
source state that pardons were sent out to all of the people who had gone against the government and
disrupted town life. This was an important part of history because it showed King Henry VI's easy
forgiveness of all wrongful deeds, no matter the size of the impact they made. This mercy was
regarded by most of the political populace as a sign of weakness, and the people who were so easily
pardoned did not seem to feel as if the king had any authority over
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
18.
19. How Does Shakespeare Show At The End Of The Play Henry Vi?
William Shakespeare's Henry V
William Shakespeare is one of the most famous and influential writers of all time. His plays not only
portray the past, but also aspects of love and hate, humour and tragedy.
Henry V, written by Shakespeare, using Raphael Holinshed's historical chronicles, appealed to many
of the citizens of that time, as it presented an insight into their country's past, as well as 'feel–good'
nationalism. It would have been performed on stage at a time when Henry VIII had secluded the
country of all contact with the Church of Rome. Providing the audience with its country's past
glories and triumphs, the play counter–acts this feeling of seclusion and loss of identity with ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Are they correct in their assumption: is Henry a great king, or does William Shakespeare merely
include this as a biased opinion to enforce onto the audience, so as to prosper the basis of patriotism
already built earlier?
The play begins with the chorus' prologue to the play. Naturally, Shakespeare provides the chorus
with words so descriptive and elegant that the apology for lack of realism is forgotten, as is the stage
and theatre, and, instead, the open planes of Agincourt are forcefully seen in one's 'minds eye'. No
more are we an audience, but a witness.
Shakespeare portrays Henry as a very religious king; whether this is to promote Henry or to express
his own opinions as to what principles a King should have, especially whilst Henry VIII was on the
thrown at that time, and the Roman Church had been cut off from England, indicating that religion
wasn't too high on Henry VIII's agenda. There is evidence throughout the play that Henry was a
religious king, "a true lover of the holy church." From Shakespeare's view a good king always
appreciates his creator and knows that it is God who will guide and look after him, so it would have
been important to include as many thanks to God from Henry and his men to prove that they
actually show
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
20.
21. War Of The Roses Essay : The War Of The Roses
The Wars of the Roses The succession line for the English throne has always been a confusing, and
sometimes violent process, but never has this statement been more true than during the Wars of the
Roses. The war of the Roses was a series of battles for control of the English monarchy between two
rival houses. The Wars of the Roses was a major destabilizing and violent event in English history.
Both families had strong claims to the throne, had a strong family history, enough men to engage in
full scale battles, and in the end, both houses got their wish of having a descendant on the throne.
The struggle for the English throne first started in 1455 when Richard, Duke of York, challenged
Henry VI's, the current king, claim to the throne. Henry VI was a direct descendant of Henry IV who
deposed king Richard II. Because of this Richard, Duke of York, saw all of Henry IV's descendents
as having no ancestral rights to the English throne. Richard, Duke of York, was of the same
bloodline as Richard II giving him a strong claim to the throne (Wheeler). The instability in England
at the time allowed for such claims to be taken seriously and not crushed immediately by the current
ruling monarch. This instability was caused by the one–hundred years war that had just recently
ended, and the fact that Henry VI surrounded himself with untrustworthy noble and was known to
have fits of insanity. The House of York was founded by King Edward III's fifth son, Edmund of
Langley, in the late
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
22.
23. Joan Of Arc : The Life Of Joan Of Arc
Joan of Arc was born in Domremy, France in 1412. Her parents were poor tenant farmers named
Jacques d' Arc and his wife, Isabelle who was also known as Romee. Joan learned piety and
domestic skills from her mother. Joan never ventured far from her home, and would take care of the
animals. She also became skilled as a seamstress. In the year 1415, King Henry V of England
invaded northern France. After defeating the French forces, England obtained the support of the
Burgundians in France. The 1420 Treaty of Troyes gave the French throne to Henry V as monarch
for King Charles VI. At the death of Charles's, Henry would become king, but in 1422 Henry and
Charles died within a few months of each other. This left Henry's infant son as king of both
kingdoms. The supporters saw this as an opportunity for Charles's son, the future Charles VII, to
return the kingdom to a French monarch. During the time, Joan of Arc started to have mystical
visions that encouraged her to lead a pious life. Over time these visions became more vivid, with the
presence of St. Michael and St. Catherine assigning her as the savior of France and encouraging her
to search for an audience with Charles and ask permission to expel the English and make him the
rightful king. In May of 1428, Joan's visions gave her the instruction for her to go to Vaucouleurs
and contact the garrison commander and a supporter of Charles, Robert de Baudricourt. At first,
Baudricourt refused her request. However after
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
24.
25. Rhetorical Analysis Of Richard IIi 's ' Black Legend '
There is a clear pattern throughout history of propaganda, myths and contemporary sources clouding
the true reality of events. Richard III is seen to be one of England 's most disputed kings; a monarch
who brings with him a legend of negative connotations. There are seen to be many arguments as to
whether or not the mischievous king was subject to be condemned by his 'black legend ' or fits the
description issued by keen Richard III adversaries. These sceptics see Richard depicted under the
'black ' legend which in turn imply that he was the murderer of his own nephews in the tower,
murderer of his wife, Anne and wrongfully deposed Edward VI among many more brutal
monarchical actions. However, on the flipside the White Rose Richard society base his life around
the ideologies that there is little evidence to suggest the his blackened reputation, that historical facts
have been clouded by Tudor propaganda and superstition and that fundamentally that Richard 's
methods were no more or less brutal than his contemporaries. The justification for both these
opinions on Richard can be argued. Play–write, William Shakespeare is a huge influence among
history in how certain historical figures are presented through his works; Richard III was subject to a
play by him and as a result is further clouded by a cloak of negativity. Shakespeare 's adaptation of
Richard in his plays "Richard III" and "Edward VI: Part III" illustrates him as a deformed
Machiavellian brother, who was summoned
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
26.
27. Politics And Politics In Shakespeare
Shakespeare treats politics and politicians in a derogatory way as we can see that Lear sees them as
being abject tricksters and Hamlet thinks that they are evading God. The first political manual was
Machiavelli`s The Prince believed to written in 1513 and it set the way people viewed politics and
politicians, which was impossible to be a favorably way. His pragmatic book exhibits the
consolidation of power and the gain of it, and also promotes the idea that politicians would do just
about anything in their power to secure a strong state. The Prince describes what men do, and it was
banned by the Tudor politicians because it promoted politics in a vicious way. Richard III is the
vicious he pursues Lady Anne in a brassy way as she was grieving after her husband, Prince
Edward, and her father–in–law, Henry IV. "Was ever woman in this humor woo`d? Was ever woman
in this humor won? What? I that kill`d her husband and his father, To take her in her heart`s
extremest hate, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The credibility stood in their accents and impressive acting background. Richard (Sir Laurence
David) is seen contemplating after his brothers coronation and addresses the audience as he talks
about the jealousy he feels when it comes to Edward (Sir Cedric Hardwicke). He fuels rivalries and
disorders in the court, because his sole purpose is to take the throne. The house of York and
Lancaster engage into battle, as Richard managed to, somehow, remove all obstacles and ended with
a very well seen public image. The famous scene come before the eyes of the audience: knocked
down from his horse, Richard yells the line that everyone knows "A horse! A horse! My kingdom
for a horse" (5.4) The fact that the battle scene was filmed on location, gave the audience a taste of
Richard`s despair as they can see him bloody and surrounded by his enemies in a place that is more
familiar than a theatre
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
28.
29. Similarities Between Game Of Roses And War Of The Roses
A Marriage between Roses and Thrones
A marriage is usually perceived as two people in love and bind themselves together with an
unbreakable bond. However, in the medieval age, political marriages were more often than a love
between couples. Both the Wars of the Roses and HBO's Game of Thrones, political marriages occur
in order to lead to personal gain and conduct strategic planning for one's kingdom. In HBO's Game
of Thrones, a scene from season 3, episode 5 shows Tywin, Tyrion, and Cersei discussing marriages
in a manner which exemplifies the significance of political marriages compared to the Wars of the
Roses, between Margaret of Anjou and Henry VI, especially through close up shots, lighting, and
sound. When watching the fifth episode of season 3 of Game of Thrones, Tyrion, Tywin, and Cersei
discuss how they can use marriages so the Lannisters can secure the North and it can be done if
Tyrion marries Sansa Stark. This is comparable to Margaret of Anjou and Henry VI. Margaret of
Anjou marries Henry VI and thus as stated in The War of the Roses, "Marrying Henry to the French
king's niece seemed to serve two greater purposes: it would bring England a diplomatic and military
truce in the French wars and it would enable Henry and Margaret to rebuild the dwindling stock of
the English royal family. " (Jones 84). As seen, the two of them getting married would give them
exactly what they need to get a truce between the two countries and kings. Similarly, if Tyrion were
to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
30.
31. The Life Of Joan Of Arc
Joan of Arc was born sometime during 1412 in Domremy, France to a poor tenant farmer and a
highly religious mother. At the time that she was born, France and England had been fighting for
seventy–five years, and her region had greatly suffered from the nationalistic war. "From an early
age, Joan displayed a sensitive and religious temperament." Historians comply refer to being
committed to the service of God. Furthermore, from the age of thirteen, she began to have visions.
In these visions, she said she felt a voice telling her to save the French. At her trial six years later,
she said that she felt these visions were as real as seeing a person standing next to her. These visions
were thought to be the voices of Saint Michael, Saint Catherine, and Saint Margaret, all being
important French saints whom Joan had learned about at the church she attended, and through her
mother's teachings. These visions made Joan all the more religiously inclined, and she would
frequent the church confessions. Originally, Joan did not tell others about the visions she had been
experiencing, but in 1428 the voices urged her to seek an audience with the Dauphin Charles de
Ponthieu. This paper will examine the life of Joan of Arc through the Hundred Years War, and
explain how she went from a hero to being executed as a heretic of her time. Before Joan set out for
her mission in 1429, there were many events that led to her taking part in the war. The Hundred
Years War originally started because
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
32.
33. Women's Role Of Women In The Medieval Period
As many would believe, women were thought and viewed to be inferior to men throughout history.
Based on this, they were not seen as ones to take on the same important roles as men would in their
societies like political jobs, warfare, influencer and innovators, and scientists. During the Medieval
period, women rose and began defying the normal stereotypes, even more than usual, and were
recognized by their actions. One woman was Margaret of Anjou, the queen consort of England.
Margaret was the daughter of René of Anjou and the wife of Henry VI. Her home country France
was at war against England and she was offered to King Henry VI as a peace treaty. Being a queen
consort, she did not rule and was an asset to the king. When King Henry suffered from an illness,
Margaret believed she was the one who should temporarily rule in his place. Unfortunately, title was
given to the Duke of York. This occurrence caused a rivalry to emerge between the House of
Lancaster and the House of York; This was called the War of the Roses as Lancaster wore red roses
in battle and York wore white. The second woman is Lady Murasaki, a daughter of Fujiwara family
and a Japanese novelist in the Heian period. She was very intelligent was a young girl and her father
still allowed her to get an education despite it being unsuitable for girls. After the death of her
husband, she went to court and wrote in a diary about the life she has in court and her thoughts. It is
believed that Murasaki sensed that
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
34.
35. How Did Joan Of Arc Changed Society
Joan of Arc was just a girl until she put on the helmet and hoisted the sword that changed the course
of her life. Joan was a soldier for France during the Hundred Years War. Not only was she a woman
on the battlefield, but she led an army at the age of 16. Both her effort in the battles and her trial
majorly changed the outcome of the war. Joan of Arc changed society and continues to influence
history today through her poor upbringing and dedicated early life, her heroics and bravery in battle,
her courage and defiance during her trial, and her role and influence as a Catholic saint.
Joan of Arc showed her caring nature even at a young age and this helped her strong influence over
the culture of her time. Joan was born in Domremy, France in 1412 with the given name of Jeanne
D'Arc. This is where her common nickname Joan of Arc came from. Domremy was located in the
Champagne district of northeastern France and was the last town that remained loyal to Charles VII,
the heir to the throne of France (DISCovering Biographies). Joan, the daughter of Jacques D'Arc and
Ysabeau (Isabelle) Romee, grew up on her father's farm always working in the fields (Bellitto). She
was responsible for herding sheep and cattle and working in the fields during the harvest season.
Joan never attended school and never learned to read or write. She spent most of her time at the
church or praying to the statues that surrounded it. Her religious affiliation came from her mother's
strong Catholic faith
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
36.
37. Similarities And Differences Between King Henry And Julius...
4. Comparing Caesar to King Henry V
4.1 Aristocratic family backgrounds
King Henry V and Caesar share common historical grounds. As the third king in the Lancaster
family line, King Henry was descendent of the old, aristocratic Angevin dynasty which reigned in
England from 1154 to 1485, beginning with King Henry II of Plantagenet. The family dynasty
began in the region of Anjou and the dynasty's expansion into Europe was considered its golden age
(Vauchez, A et al. 2000:65). Similarly, Caesar too came from an old, aristocratic family that had
patrician roots. In his infamous speech made at his Aunt Julia's funeral, Caesar illustrated how the
Julia gens claimed ancestry from Aeneas, son of Aphrodite saying "...while the Julians...descend
from the goddess Venus herself..." Caesars adds that his family "...therefore hold the sanctity of
kings who rule among men and of gods whole rule over kings..." (Freeman 2008:52). By both
having an aristocratic family background, there exists a commonality between the two prominent
historical figures.
4.2 Military conquests ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As Julius Caesar advanced Roman influence and territory into the West through his conquests of
Gaul, Spain, Africa and parts of Asia, Henry V expanded the British empire into France. Henry's
invasion of France began with the attack on the French harbour of Harfleur. The Battle of Agincourt
was the definitive battle that resulted in the Treaty of Troyes being signed on the 21st of May 1420,
the effect being that Henry became the heir to the French throne, further solidified to solidified with
his marriage to Catherine of Valois, amalgamating the French and British empires ("Agincourt
600"). France proved a valuable resource to the British empire as Caesar's conquered territories were
for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
38.
39. Richard King: A Character Analysis Of King Richard III
crowned King Richard III. Deformed in body and twisted in mind, Richard is both the central
character and the villain of the play. He is evil, corrupt, sadistic, and manipulative, and he will stop
at nothing to become king. His intelligence, political brilliance, and dazzling use of language keep
the audience fascinated–and his subjects and rivals under his thumb.
Read an in–depth analysis of Richard.
Buckingham – Richard's right–hand man in his schemes to gain power. The duke of Buckingham is
almost as amoral and ambitious as Richard himself.
King Edward IV – The older brother of Richard and Clarence, and the king of England at the start of
the play. Edward was deeply involved in the Yorkists' brutal overthrow of the Lancaster regime, but
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Tyrrell – A murderer whom Richard hires to kill his young cousins, the princes in the Tower of
London.
Richmond – A member of a branch of the Lancaster royal family. Richmond gathers a force of
rebels to challenge Richard for the throne. He is meant to represent goodness, justice, and fairness–
all the things Richard does not. Richmond is portrayed in such a glowing light in part because he
founded the Tudor dynasty, which still ruled England in Shakespeare's day.
Hastings – A lord who maintains his integrity, remaining loyal to the family of King Edward IV.
Hastings winds up dead for making the mistake of trusting Richard.
Stanley – The stepfather of Richmond. Lord Stanley, earl of Derby, secretly helps Richmond,
although he cannot escape Richard's watchful gaze.
Lord Mayor of London – A gullible and suggestible fellow whom Richard and Buckingham use as a
pawn in their ploy to make Richard king.
Vaughan – A friend of Elizabeth, Dorset, Rivers, and Gray who is executed by Richard along with
Rivers and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
40.
41. Henry V Trojan War Essay
The Treaty of Troyes was signed in Troyes on the 21st of May, 1420. The treaty between Henry V
and Charles VI discussed the agreement that Henry and his heirs would inherit the throne of France
upon the death of Charles VI (of France). The treaty was passed through and approved by a judicial
body. It should be noted that although it was the French parliament that approved the document,
they did not carve up the kingdom (at the very least not on paper). The Treaty of Troyes is often
considered one of the most important treaties of the Hundred Years War. It acts as a sort of backdrop
to the end portion of the war. France and England, around the point of the signing of the treaty, were
in the middle of nearly constant warfare that had lasted ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He fought and won many military battles, and he gained the French throne for his son's inheritance.
An important point is made by Richardson that had the Treaty of Troyes worked, "the United
Kingdom would have been England and France, rather than England and Scotland". Henry was a
great ruler, but he left behind the government in a great debt, most likely due to the expenses of war.
It is notable that not even the revenue from the conquered territories could pay off this debt, because
of the constancy of battle, raids and such. The Treaty of Troyes was one of France's biggest
mistakes. In "War, government and power in late Medieval France" it is mentioned that, "the notion
of state is dependant on binary opposition" Binary opposition is related terms or concepts that are
opposite in meaning . Furthermore, Binary opposition is the system in which languages and thoughts
as opposite are set against one another . This could easily be said of English and French. The two
countries were complete opposites in most aspects of life (culture, language, law, etc.), but put them
together and they form a state. Specifically, a state that had it's ups and down, but was revolutionary
. The treaty of Troyes was never formally revoked . The English Remained Kings of France until the
Treaty of Amiens with Napoleon when it was finally abandoned. It certainly left a mark on
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
42.
43. Joan of Arc Biography
Joan d'Arc was one of the most popular Renaissance warriors and is famously known for her battle
at Orleans, which she won, at only 18 years of age. When she rose to fame, Joan was often called
the "Maid of Lorraine," showing that she was the peasant girl from Lorraine.
Born in 1412, Jeanne d'Arc, more commonly known as Joan of Arc, was raised in the small village
of Domrémy, located in Lorraine, France. Her parents, Jacques d'Arc and Isabelle Romée, were
mere peasants that also helped raise her 4 siblings, Jean d'Arc, Pierre d'Arc, Catherine d'Arc, and
Jacquemin d'Arc. As a child, Joan often had to deal with wars, financial struggles, a corrupt
government, and the slaying of innocent people, often for no reason. This was because of the
simultaneous deaths of the kings of France, King Henry V, and England, King Charles VI. With
them dead, the only heirs to the throne were Charles, who may not have been Charles VI's biological
son, and Henry, who was Catherine (Charles VI's daughter) and Henry V's son. There was a dispute
between the two countries as to who would rule the other, as Henry was only an infant and Charles
might not have really been an heir. As a result, the Hundred Years' War was fought between the two
countries. As Henry grew older, the war raged on. He was eventually crowned king, but didn't use
any of his power to try to win the Hundred Years' War; this gives Henry the title of a Dauphin,
someone who has the power to rule but hasn't taken the initiative; like
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
44.
45. Summary Of King Henry V Speech
In the middle of the siege of Harfleur, when the English were severely and harshly outnumbered,
and the French were against them Henry V gave his second famously motivational speech that
helped the English soldiers to get back in the war and win the battle. King Henry V's speeches that
were used in the war, had been played in day to day speeches, as it has been played on Allied ships
crossing the English Channel to Normandy during WWII. Once more unto the breach, dear friends,
once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. In peace there's nothing so becomes a man
As modest stillness and humility: But when the blast of war blows in our ears, Then imitate the
action of the tiger; Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, Disguise fair nature with hard–
favoured rage; Then lend the eye a terrible aspect; Let pry through the portage of the head Like the
brass cannon; let the brow overwhelm it As fearfully as doth a galled rock O'erhang and jutty his
confounded base, Swill'd with the wild and wasteful ocean Now set the teeth and stretch the nostril
wide, Hold hard the breath and bend up every spirit To his full height. On, on, you noblest English.
Whose blood gets from fathers of war–proof! Fathers that, like so many Alexanders, Have in these
parts from morn till even fought And sheathed their swords for lack of argument: Shakespeare's use
of chorus gives the play a significant atmosphere.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
46.
47. Essay about The Passing of the Crown by Shakespeare's...
The Passing of the Crown by Shakespeare's Henries
In his histories from Richard II through Henry V to Richard III, Shakespeare depicts the English
monarchy as a game between family and friends of vying for a gold ring –– the crown. Shakespeare
gives his reader a central metaphor through which to see this equation in King Henry IV part one.
The prank Prince Hal, later King Henry V, and his friend, Poins, play on their friends, particularly
Falstaff, parallels the plot's focal passing of the crown.
In the first act, Poins outlines his plan to play a prank on Falstaff and their other friends to Prince
Hal, "They [Falstaff and others] will adventure upon the exploit [of stealing money from travelers]
themselves, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The justification Falstaff gives for allowing his appropriated prize to be appropriated from him
without a fight is that he "instinctively" knew that his thief's identity was one with a divine
connection. This is exactly the story all kings, especially new ones like to pawn off on their new
subjects in order to win them over. That is, that God is on their side, otherwise they would not have
achieved the crown. It would be to Falstaff's advantage, having just lost the metaphoric crown (the
money), to give its new possessor a story which overtly flatters and supports him. Furthermore,
though Prince Hal initially re–admits his victim, Falstaff, into his group of friends after tricking him,
ultimately Hal denies him, saying, "I know thee not, old man" (Henry IV part two V.v.50). This is
identical to the behaviors of Bolingbroke toward Richard II in Richard II, and Prince John toward
the rebels (lead by the Archbishop of York and Lord Mowbray) in Henry IV part two. Both pretend
to be friendly to their opposition at first, but really only do so to maintain their own positioning. As
soon as it is maintained, they turn.
Shakespeare's representation of the coming and going of monarchs as a game manifests itself in his
choice of words as well. In all three of the consecutive Henry plays the concept of "winning" is
applied to the acquisition of the throne, a word which equally applies to beating everyone else in a
game. For the last, and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
48.
49. Significance Of Joan Of Arc
1. Introduction– 500
For more than a hundred years, the Kingdom of England and the House of Valois of France found
themselves locked in war for the French throne. The hundred and sixteen year series of battles took
place from 1337 to 1453, with historians often separating it into three phases: the Edwardian Era
(1337– 1360), the Caroline War (1369– 1389), and the Lancastrian War (1415– 1453). Despite
English success that lasted the majority of the conflict, and was revived by Henry V, the war resulted
a French victory but high casualty losses on both sides. Beyond this, the war was not only limited to
the two belligerents, but also involved Scotland, Spain, and the Low Countries, such as Belgium, the
Netherlands, and Luxembourg (Villalon). The French victory and resurgence are mostly accredited
to the arrival of Joan of Arc and, subsequently, the unity of the French after her execution by the
English. Despite this, the question of the significance of Joan of Arc in the context of ending the
Hundred ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, it featured rapid military innovation. Over the course of the war, weapons, the
structure of an army, military tactics, and the very meaning of a war all changed (Curry). In
addition, the war left both England and France with a changed meaning of their setting. France, after
being divided for years, was finally once again united and shared nationalistic sentiment that had
been lacking prior to and during the course of the war (Curry). Meanwhile, the English found
themselves losing almost all of their land outside of their island territory. Thus, this awakened their
need to develop a navy, which would be one of the most notable parts of the British Empire in their
future (Villalon). Therefore, the Hundred Years War has found itself a pivotal place in history and
worthy of study, thus bringing into question the true cause of the end of the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
50.
51. Battle Analysis Essay: The Battle Of Agincourt
Battle Analysis Paper The Battle of Agincourt, waged by Henry V, king of England, against Charles
VI, king of France, was England's way of asserting Henry V's right to the French Throne.
Negotiations for marriage with Charles' IV daughter, which would have made a son of the union heir
to both thrones, had stalled. Furthermore, England was hampered on many fronts by French
interference and incursions. Diplomacy failed. Combat did not. England's resounding victory against
vastly superior numbers decimated the French nobility, and won Henry V the French Princess to
wife and the French crown. The English success resolved the issue of France interfering in English
affairs and confirmed the English as a force to be reckoned with. History The Battle of Agincourt
marks the beginning of the Lancastrian Phase of The Hundred Years' War, was comprised of a series
of battles between England and France to determine who would control France. The Hundred Years'
War is divided into three parts, and the Lancastrian Phase is the middle phase. The Battle of
Agincourt, waged by Henry V, king of England, against Charles VI, king of France, to assert his
right to the French Throne. Henry claimed his right to the French throne through his grandfather,
Edward III. Fig.1 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Franco–Scot alliance had the general effect of further checking English power to the advantage
of both. (13) Additionally, the treaty granted protection by the Scots to French piracy along the
English coast. The French justified their actions by claiming that the English were pirating in the
English Channel. And so, Henry V, having gained battle experience from success in his war with
Wales, as well as the backing of the Grand Council, turned his attention to dealing with the French
and claiming his right to the French
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
52.
53. The Battle of Agincourt Essay
The Battle of Agincourt occurred in the middle Ages, on October 25, 1415. This battle is one of the
most memorable and strategically fought battles between England and France. The Battle of
Agincourt involved England and France near Agincourt. The Battle of Agincourt happened during
the "Hundred Years War". The hundred year War began in 1337 and ended in 1453. The hundred
years war actually lasted 116 years. The Hundred Years war included England, France and later
Burgundy. Sometimes England won the battles and sometimes France won (Keegan 79).
The Battle of Agincourt happened because of The Treaty of Bretigny. The Treaty of Bretigny came
about because of Henry V's great–grandfather King Edward III. King Edward III mother was the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1405, King Henry IV got sick and Prince Hall took over most of his duties until his death in 1413.
Prince Hal became King, took on the name of King Henry V. King Henry V fell into his role as king
quickly, and got involved in other battles prior to the Battle of Agincourt that prepared him for that
battle (Middle–Ages.org).
King Henry V wanted to continue the negotiations with France and made some demands that the
French thought was ridiculous. King Henry V was willing to give up some items in the Treaty but
only if France paid 1.6 million crowns; part of the debt owed his ancestors for the capture of John II.
In addition, he wanted the France to give up Aquitaine, Normandy, Touraine, Anjou, Brittany,
Flanders and other territories. King Henry would marry the Princess of France, King Charles VI
daughter and received pay of 600,000 crowns (Keegan 80).
France refused to negotiate; so King Henry asked the Parliament to tax France for the inheritance
that they owed him. France ignored England's demands. On April 14, 1415, King Henry V asked the
Parliament to sanction war against France. The Parliament agreed and the Battle with France will
soon follow. England was preparing for the Battle of Agincourt (Middle–Ages.org).
King Henry V began to inspire his army with speeches that gave them pride, courage and hope.
Shakespeare's St. Crispen's Day Speech puts in perspective how Henry V led his army to fight the
French.
The title of the speech was in honor of two
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
54.
55. Joan Of The Arc: The Death Of King Joan Of Arc
Joan of the Arc was born on 1412 In Domrémy–la–Pucelle France Her parents were Isabelle romee
and Jacques who were very poor farmers. Although Joan never received a proper education she was
educated well enough to understand loyalty and devoted skills from her mother. 1415 King Henry V
of England breached northern France. subsequently directing a shattering defeat to the French.The
English gained the reiforcements of the Burgandians, 1420 the treaty of Troyes gave the throne to
Henry V as ruler for the deranged king Charles VI. But sadly both of them died in 1422 which left
Henry's son as king of both domains. It was around this time that Joan began to have visons
ensuring her that she was meant to save france and seek an army with Charles. 1428 In may Joan
had a vision that instructed her to attend to Vaucoulers and talk to Robert De Baudricourt about her
army, robert was like the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Joan then cut her hair and dressed in men's apparel, for her 11 day expedition across enemy lines to
Chinon, which was where Charle's court was located. When Joan arrived Charles was not sure on
how to react about this girl asking for an "audince" to save France. Joan although luckily was able to
recognize him in a crowd while he was concealed which impressed Charles enough that, Charles
gave Joan armor and a horse that allowed her to go with her army to Orleans. The French militants
took over the English barracades and by winning this battle the French pretty much gained
invnicibilty. Although Charles accepted Joan's quet it seems that he mightve not trusted her
desicions. After the victory In Orleans Charles was crowned king on july 18, 1429. One year later
King Charles ordered Joan to attack the Burgundians. (Which succeded), but she was later thrown
off her horse and taken captive by the Burganians.After a couple of months in captivity The english
were able to get her exhanged for 10,000
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
56.
57. King Henry's Madness
One of the more underlying causes of the Wars of the Roses was King Henry's madness. King Henry
VI had never been a perfect ruler, often making poor decisions because his wife or favourites
wanted him to, but in August 1453, after the loss of Bordeaux to France at the end of the 100 Years
War, Henry suffered a mental breakdown. He was oblivious to everything going on around him,
could not feed or bathe himself, and did not even respond to the birth of his son. He may have
inherited the same psychiatric condition his grandfather Charles VI of France had, which included
bouts of madness in his later years, and "Some medical historians have diagnosed his condition, on
the evidence available, as catatonic schizophrenia – complete mental withdrawal ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
During medieval times, a knight was expected to be loyal to those above him, and come serve them
when it was time to fight, and "The great peers of the kingdom could call upon minor lords in their
dominions to come fight on their side, under one banner," but they all rallied towards the King, and
disobeying him was extremely frowned upon (Jokinen). Near the end of the middle ages, this loyalty
became a system known as Livery and Maintenance, and contributed greatly to the military aspects
of the Wars of the Roses. Livery and Maintenance was the practice of keeping large numbers of
knights on reserve, essentially a lord's personal standing army. These knights would wear the Lord's
badge and livery, which, in addition to payment for their service, gave them a sort of prestige, as
long as their lord was powerful. Since Lords could raise their own private armies, they had the
choice to refuse support to the king if they did not like him. This was a massive change in the
structure of feudalism, as standing up against the King was generally impossible without an army.
The houses of Lancaster and York would not have gotten anywhere against each other without the
help of powerful landowners like Richard Neville, sometimes called "The Kingmaker." Livery and
Maintenance gave the Noble class the ability to fight for who they wanted on the throne, whether a
York, or a
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
58.
59. Cruel Titles
Titles suck. Almost any high school student would agree that writing an entire 5 paragraph essay can
oftentimes be much easier than typing just one sentence which captures the key ideas developed
throughout the entire essay. This is because students are taught the importance of having a title
which does much more than just capture the reader's attention."...A title creates anticipation and
expectation or, perhaps, disinterest...So I think titles are extremely important"(Reissenweber). Titles
must also hold within themselves subtle hints to the inner workings of the text as a whole. Many
great authors have developed the ability to institute major messages that become evident throughout
the text just through the title. William Shakespeare is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"With an underage boy now king of England, Henry VI, Part 1 depicts the collapse of England's role
in France, as English nobles fight each other instead of the French and as Joan la Pucelle (Joan of
Arc) brings military strength to the French army"(Witmore). This quote exemplifies the title of the
play due to the fact that it portrays equality, which is something that is fought for throughout the
entire text. Due to this, this quote similarly fits and provides some meaning of the title, Measure for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
60.
61. Hundreds Years War Essay
Hundred Years War
The definition of the Golden Rule is that those with the gold make the rules. In other words, those
with the gold have the power as well as those with the power have the gold. History books will
discuss the general reasons for war such as freedom from adversity or freedom from religion. But
the real issue for any war is the thirst for power and control; and the means to finance them are the
economic issues. Nations will endure years of fighting for power and control. France and England
fought each other for more than a hundred years to have control of the Channel trade routes. 1 This
century of warring was known as The Hundred Years' War and is the longest war in record history. It
began in 1337 when King Edward III ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Wine was Gasgony's largest export product and major source of income to the vassal. Wool was
England's largest export product and the source of its wealth. English pastures produced fleeces that
were the envy of Europe which Flanders depended on for its wool and linen market. 8 English sheep
growers sold their long fine wool to weavers in Flanders, across the English Channel. Flemish
weavers as well as English sheep growers depended on this trade for their business. In 1336, Philip
VI arrested all the English merchants in Flanders and took away all the privileges of the Flemish
towns and the craft guilds. Resulting in the Flemings revolting against the French control and
making an alliance with England. 9 Consequently, the flourishing market of the industrial cities of
Ghent, Bruges, Antwerp and Ypres were naturally coveted by the Kings of France and England.
Moreover, the Bordeaux harbor was within the borders of English Gascony and was the center of the
shipping and trading industry. Commodities such as grains, dairy products, dyes and salt would be
shipped into Bordeaux via the Dordogne and Garonne Rivers and the merchants were charged a
customs fee for these products. Also, Bordeaux would receive duties on wine, whether shipped–in or
grown on Gascon soil. Consequently, the profits from the tolls and customs made Bordeaux the
economic capital of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
62.
63. The Hundred Years's War: The Causes Of The Hundred Years War
One of the longest conflicts in the history of warfare, the Hundred Years' War was a time that
defined history for both England and France. The war lasted from 1337 until 1453 passing over one
hundred years and reached a total of one hundred and sixteen years. It began in May 1337 when
King Philip VI of France tried to confiscate English territories located in Southwestern France and it
then ended in July 1453 when the French finally expelled the English from the continent. In the one
hundred and sixteen years' time span, there were about sixty–eight years of peace, and forty–four
years of a series of battles full with raids, sieges, and naval battles. It was a war with unforgettable
results, marking the start of early modern times for England ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In 1420, he forced the French to sign the Treaty of Troyes. This treaty said that Henry would keep
most of northern France, and would marry Charles VI's daughter. Once they had an heir, their
offspring would be crowned the king of England and France. In 1422, Henry V and Charles VI died.
The son of Henry came to throne as Henry VI for both England and France, while Charles VI's son
continued to rule a portion of southern France. Although Henry VI became king, England continued
to attack under the Duke of Bedford, Henry V's brother. With the help of the Burgundians, the
English dominated the northern half of France and were able to attack a major city in central
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
64.
65. Summary Of Wars Of The Roses By Alison Weir
In this book, Alison Weir tells the events and people behind what she describes as "the first Wars of
the Roses", which covers the roots of one of England's bloodiest civil wars and traces its path
through the reign of Edward IV. The war between the houses of Lancaster and York for the throne of
England was characterized by treachery, deceit and at St Albans, Blore Heath and Towton, some of
the bloodiest and most dramatic battles on England's soil. Weir is of the opinion that the conflict
began with the horrible reign of Richard II, historians disagree over this statement. The Wars of the
Roses are one of the most confusing periods in English history. From the origins in the rivalries
between Edward III's children to the final resolution with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Henry was weak and suffered from an illness but Margaret pretty much led them to the war and was
a very strong leader and Joan of Arc raised an army and defeated the English to restore the French
monarchy. The first battle of the Wars of the Roses took place at St Albans on May 22nd 1455. The
Yorkist's led by Richard Duke of York easily defeated the King's army. Henry VI was injured and
taken prisoner. In 1455, Henry suffered another bout of insanity and Richard Duke of York was
made protector of England. In 1456, Henry recovered and retook the throne. There were further
battles and in 1459 Richard was killed at the Battle of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
66.
67. The Wars Of The Roses
et was a decisive engagement in the Wars of the Roses, a dynastic conflict of 15th–century England.
The military action, along with the subsequent Battle of Tewkesbury, secured the throne for Edward
IV. On 14 April 1471 near Barnet, then a small Hertfordshire town north of London, Edward led the
House of York in a fight against the House of Lancaster, which backed Henry VI for the throne.
Leading the Lancastrian army was Richard Neville, 16th Earl of Warwick, who played a crucial role
in the fate of each king. Historians regard the battle as one of the most important clashes in the Wars
of the Roses, since it brought about a decisive turn in the fortunes of the two houses. Edward 's
victory was followed by fourteen years of Yorkist rule ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On their return to the battlefield, Oxford 's men were erroneously shot at by his allies commanded
by John Neville, 1st Marquess of Montagu. The Lancastrians lost the battle as cries of treason
spread through their line, disrupting morale and causing many to abandon the fight. While
retreating, Warwick was killed by Yorkist soldiers.
Warwick had been such an influential figure in 15th–century English politics that, on his death, no
one matched him in terms of power and popularity. Deprived of Warwick 's support, the
Lancastrians suffered their final defeat at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4 May 1471, which marked
the downfall of the House of Lancaster and the ascendancy of the House of York. Three centuries
after the Battle of Barnet, a stone obelisk was raised on the spot where Warwick purportedly died.
Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 Commanders
2.1 Yorkist
2.2 Lancastrian
3 Prelude
4 Fighting in the mist
5 Post–battle
6 Legacy
6.1 Shakespearian dramatisation
6.2 Battlefield
7 Notes
8 References
9 Bibliography
10 External links
Background[edit]
68. Further information: Wars of the Roses
The Wars of the Roses were a series of conflicts between various English lords and nobles in
support of two different royal families. In 1461, the conflict reached a milestone when the House of
York supplanted its rival, the House of Lancaster, as the ruling royal house in England. Edward IV,
leader of the Yorkists, seized the throne from the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
69.
70. Joan Of Arc's 'Hundred Years' War
1337 marks the beginning of what historians have called the Hundred Years' war. There had always
been conflicts and clashes between England and France, as many English kings had property they
resided over in Northern France (278). After the monarchy of the Capetians ended, a struggle ensued
on who would become the rightful heir to the throne in France. England looked to take the title King
and unite the two countries under one king or ruler, but a girl by the name Joan of Arc would halt
the plans of the English. She would in turn help the true king; dauphne Charles take his rightful
throne in the years to come. 1412 Joan of Arc is born 1415 Henry V of England defeated the French
in the battle at Agincourt. This was to be the end of France
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
71.
72. The Role of the Chorus in Henry V by William Shakespeare...
The Role of the Chorus in Henry V by William Shakespeare The role of the Chorus in the
Shakespeare's play, Henry V, is significant. Due to the subject matter that the play deals with, it is
hard to present in the way that it deserves. The Chorus helps the audience follow the play by helping
them to picture things as they were through the use of imagery. It uses descriptive language in
describing events that take place in the play. The Chorus also helps in making the plot of the play
flow together better by filling the time lapses that occur between acts due to the fact that the event
being depicted in only a few hours actually occurred over several years, leaving some gaps between
events. It also explains what happens in an act ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The chorus asks the audience to picture the armed forces and their horses and the battle scenes that
took place when watching the play. And, that the events that happened took place over several years,
and for the sake of brevity, many parts will have to be left out leaving many gaps throughout the
story, jumping from place to place, "turning the accomplishment of many years into an hourglass;
for the which to supply, admit me Chorus to this history" (li 30–32). The Chorus will help to fill in
the gaps and to explain what is going on so the audience will not get lost as the play jumps around.
The Chorus ends by asking the audience to be patient as they view the play. In this instance, the
Chorus' function is setting the stage for the rest of the play. It doesn't reveal the plot or make any
character developments. Instead, it serves as a mediator. Its function is to prepare the audience for
the play that they are about to watch. In Act II, the function of the Chorus is to fill in the lapse of
time that has occurred since the time when Henry made the decision to go to war against France.
The audience is informed that the English have been preparing to go off to battle. All the young men
of England are joining King Henry's forces. The Chorus tells of these brave men, "Now thrive the
armorers, and honor's thought reigns solely
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
73.
74. The Bbc Television Series Called Merlin
The BBC television series called Merlin is based on the story of King Arthur. This is a popular
legend that's popularity was seen throughout the medieval era. The story is thought to have been
based at the fall of the Roman Empire, this was also a time when there was an increase in tribes
from Germany, called Saxons, in England. Arthur was thought to have helped with the removable of
knights from Rome and the Saxons. The legend spans 12 years set in what is thought to have been a
fictional time of peace, when the Saxons and the Celtic Britons were not fighting. King Arthur was
thought have a court that was great and it was seen in the Kingdom of Camelot. When the Saxons
invaded the Celtic Britons relocated to Wales. Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote a book, The History of
the Kings of Britain, in the 1100s that is thought to have been base on a Manuscript by the Celts.
This book included Queen Guinevere, Excalibur; which is Arthur's magical sword, Lancelot, and
Merlin. After this it is thought that the legend of King Arthur was added to by poets and developed
to include situations such as Guinevere's, Arthur's Wife, and Lancelot's, one of the knights of the
round table, relationship. The story continued to develop from the 1100s and the people of the
medieval era were inspired by the legend. The round table, one of the important elements from the
story, was seen created in the 1200s for King Edward I. 15th century The fashion in the 1400s was
more elaborate than those seen in the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
75.
76. Why Does Henry V Continue to Be Such a Famous and Popular...
King Henry V, son of Henry IV, forged his legend in a little over nine years. He made England one
of the strongest kingdoms in Europe and academic KB McFarlane even described him as "the
greatest man who ever ruled England". Even though Henry V was said to be brave, fair, likeable and
a great warrior, he was also arrogant, ruthless, cruel on campaign and organised massacres. So, how
did such a man come to be a national hero? Henry's fame started to build when he was a teenager
after showing his abilities on the battlefield by taking part in the Battle of Shrewsbury, in Wales. In
that battle, he was wounded in the face by an arrow but refused to leave combat, fighting until the
end. The King's army was victorious against the Welsh rebels and Young Henry was recognised
throughout England for his courage. Despite his early entry into public life, Henry was well
educated. Henry V was the first King of England since Norman invasion to use English as his
primary language and who could both read and write in the vernacular language. Henry's accession
to the throne was broadly welcomed by the population of England because they were desperate for a
strong monarch, something England had lacked since the reign of Edward III. And he did not
disappoint them. Henry fulfilled every criteria by which kings were judged: good justice, sound
finance, true religion, political harmony, accepting consel and nobility. Only one remained: success
in war but it was no long before he fulfilled that
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
77.
78. William Shakespeare 's Henry V
In times where kings were references to God, and tariffs were set upon to pardon sins. In which the
Great Chain of being dictated the order
on to which place you ought to be or were born into. William
Shakespeare's Henry V, narrates the story of one of England's greatest monarchs. Shakespeare,
exploits a specific time period in
Medieval History, The battle of Agincourt, France versus England, in
Henry's lead to what we sought and claimed the French Crown, to whom he was denied his but later
culminated on win win in The Battle of Agincourt, and in his marriage with Katherine of France,
King Charles VI daughter.
Shakespeare who's considered to be a liberal Christian for some scholars, decides to incorporate a
dualist personality on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
of the Great Chain of Being's first principle is sought to be that everything is a hierarchy, and the
higher you are in the chain the nearest you are to
God. As for to be expressed in the play, King Henry V is the nearest
to God in England. Furthermore, when talked about the King, one must
relinquish itself in obedience to whatever the King would decide on.
In this excerpt, Shakespeare makes a clear distinction on the closeness of the King to the lord, our
God. However, Renaissance
Humanism, goes past the adulation of the King, on to terms of precisely self–concern and humane
reason, lack of praise for actions sought as to be the Kings qualities. This is why when Shakespeare
presents the Archbishop of
Canterbury talking to the Bishop of Ely, regarding a bill, he doesn 't
want to be passed, because it will affect the church's monetary situation, his mortal reason takes the
first place, in trying to manipulate the King, no praise, no adulation, only raw human control
among another at first when Arch. Of Canterbury states his main real
interest, the church possessions "It must be taught on. If pass it
79. against us, we lose the better have of our possessions" (ACT I,
Scene I, Lines 7–8). In addition to this, there is some adulation in
accordance with the Great Chain of Being, but just partially, because
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...