The Role Of Marxism And Its Role In Inequality In America

The Role Of Marxism And Its Role In Inequality In America
Zainab Naeem
Joel Franks
AAS Sec 6
Oct 21st, 2015
Marxism and its Role in Inequality in America
Marxism, by Karl Marx and associate Friedrich Engles, is a theory written in the second half of the 1800s. The theory highlights the capitalistic impact
it has on society in whole, including how it exploits the different classes and their differing struggles. Withcapitalism making way into the picture of
humanity, Karl Marx views the system as a step closer to a more socialistic society that will one day conquer the inequality between people. Marxism
reflects the American capitalist system by highlighting the divide in experiences between the classes and how a range of hierarchies' influence those
who are categorized in these classes.
Viewed by Marxism as a structure ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
People who were non–white were exploited for their labor, forced out from their nation and then forced into forming a colonial relationship with
white people. Although, it is true people who were white but poor were exploited, and discriminated against, it was not as bad compared to Mexicans,
Native Americans and African Americans. The matter of race also applied to sex; Women who were white had more rights and were paid higher
compared to women who were not white. Although they were still less valued than white males, white women were still held higher and paid more
than those who are of color.
The divide between people of color and those who are not of color is a product due to Institutional Racism; Racism has been bred so deep into the
American economic and political society that it has become a part of everyday life and isn't as easily identifiable, it comes as natural. In order to stop
institutional racism, a revolutionary and extensive event must occur to help reverse the affects of racial
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Analysis Of ' The ' Of ' Ragtime '
Socialism in America
E3 Argumentative essay
Sonia Rani
3/17/2017
Ragtime is an interesting depiction of cultural and political change. It can be argued that the story is not just a reflection of the events in the 20th
Century but the novel reflects the events that continue to happen until today in socialism. For instance, the novel gives a glimpse of the kind of life
experienced by many African Americans. They were victimized by the society and the persons in authority refuse to help them. Even in the 21st
Century, it cannot be denied that African Americans are still subjected to discrimination in socialism. Throughout the stories in this novel character
represent that change and partiality. Because of the massive development, there was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But he proves himself a good example of socialism as socialist. In Ragtime, historical elements like E. Zapata, Emma Goldman, Coalhouse, mother's
younger brother, Tateh and district attorney reveals as a political example.
In socialism, the state also has a character of the class, but its content is opposed to that of the bourgeois state: it becomes, for the first time in history,
a state of the clear majority exploited against the tiny exploitative or privileged minority (Rozman, 2014). Rozman (2014) explains that Conversions to
traditional socialism became more evident after World War II, with the Cold War and later with the disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics. So, as Ragtime, because it was written in about 20th century. Since then, socialist regimes have been adopting more flexible stances. Real
socialism is developed socialism during the twentieth century. Currently, the socialist countries are Cuba, China, North Korea, Laos, and Vietnam.
Ragtime also depicts politics between relationship, at court, as a victim, and attacking people for the sake of justice. On the other hand, ideal socialism
is that developed in the nineteenth century, the main thinker of socialism was Karl Marx, for him this regime arose from capitalism and its means of
production, having its control played by the proletarian, as well as the state, which would later be extinguished, giving rise to communism that
corresponds to a society Without

African Social & Political Thought
PHL 305: AFRICAN SOCIAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT
QUESTION: TAKE ONE AFRICAN SOCIO–POLITICAL PHILOSOPHER AND DISCUSS:
A. HIS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
B. THE PROBLEM HE TRIED TO SOLVE
C. THE EXTENT TO WHICH HE WAS SUCCESSFUL.
African socialism was one of the earliest theories proffered by many African leaders at the outset of independence. Leaders such as Dr. Kwame
Nkrumah, Julius Nyerere, Obafemi Awolowo and Leopold Senghor all supported this concept but had different approaches to it.
In this essay, my focus will be on Julius Nyerere and his approach to the idea of African socialism.
Julius Kambarage Nyerere was born on the 13thof April, 1922 in Butiama in then Tanganyika (Tanzania).As President of the United ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the area of achieving self–reliance by African states particularly Tanzania, Nyerere developed an educational philosophy which could be approached
under two main headings; Education for Self–reliance and Adult education. His interest in Self–reliance shares a great deal with Gandhi's approach to
'Basic Education'. There was a strong concern to counteract the colonialists' assumptions and practices of the dominant, formal means of education,
which he saw as enslaving and oriented towards 'western' interest and norms. It was designed to transmit the values of the colonizing power and to train
individuals for the service of the colonial state. It induced attitudes of subservience, human inequality and individualism, and emphasized white–collar
skills. The context of colonial education was largely alien and the entire system was organized by racial segregation. For Nyerere who was once a
teacher himself, he believed that education had to work for the common good, foster co–operation and promote equality. He asserted that the school
curriculum should go hand in hand with de–emphasizing the import of formal examinations which merely assesses a person's ability to learn facts. He
said it was necessary for African states to abandon examinations that are geared towards

Ideologies In 19th Century Western Europe
Ideologies in 19th Century Western Europe
Most of the new ideas and principles emerged during the 19th century in the Western Europe. These ideologies were introduced and analysed by
multiple individuals. Liberalism, socialism, nationalism and imperialism are the some of the powerful ideologies that impacted the society
development. The 19th century ism's principles were influential during their time and have changed over the years. The ideologies are very influential
till this day and it is the main reason of why our modern society is the way it is. Even though each of of these ideologies have different beliefs,
principles and goals, they have many similarities supporting each other.
Western Europe has been governed by a monarchy system for many years which limited rights of citizens and the representative government. But
during the 19th century the ideology of liberalism which derived from the Enlightenment phase, emphasized the civil rights of citizens, representative
government and protection of private property. Liberals wanted to have a written constitution and a government that leaned towards democracy. They
also wanted to expand franchise, the right to vote, however the liberals still were not sure if women should have the right to vote yet. Also liberals
were more for laissez–faire philosophy which is a minimum government intervention. They believed the less government involvement, the better the
economy will be. Liberalism did not focus on equality in economic

The History Of Communism
Communism is an economic system where the government owns the means of production, and is one where there is no private ownership because it is
under the control of the communities or the state. Since its proposal in 1848 by German Philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, in their book,
"The Communist Manifesto", there are many who have been influenced by the writings of Marx and Engels. This has led to many revolutions and
establishments of governments with the "communist ideals" of peace, solidarity, and labour. The communists of today do not have to live in fear as the
communists during the McCarthy era, where thousands of Americans were monitored and questioned regarding their loyalty to the United States.
During this time, the "Red... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Those who oppose them, from everyday people to the media, will point to the statistics. They will state that communism killed 100 million people in the
20th century, but the counterargument to that is simply to point out the fact thatcapitalism kills, and has killed, more people every 5.5 years. One need
only look at the statistics, such as those mentioned in the article: "Attempting the Impossible – Calculating Capitalisms Death Toll" where the numbers
are crunched together, and by looking throughout the history of capitalism and its influences. Also, one can think of many more deaths ranging from
African slavery, Manifest Destiny, the colonization of Africa, and to the many wars brought on or backed by capitalist countries. The claim of the
opposition is always that capitalist countries were protecting their interests and allies, but it does not warrant the unrestrained use of excessive force,
especially when non–capitalist countries attempt it and are met with massive condemnations and sanctions by capitalist countries. Opposition will
say that communism starves the people. In the dictatorship of countries claiming to be communists, this is true, but to those who use it to point to
the "evils" of communism need to see that capitalism is no better, it is even worse. In capitalist societies, particularly the United States, that boasts
of power and prestige, one has to wonder why millions die in a country that has the means and equipment to feed the hungry, but would rather spend
it on big businesses while an old man struggles to keep his small store from failing, a country that can provide healthcare coverage to all, but would
rather have a family pay out of pocket. They can do all of this, but they do not. Yet they feel that they are in the right to call communism "evil", and
say that it will not work. It will not work for the big

How Did The Socialist Party Influence Social Reform?
During the late 1800s and early 1900s, the socialist movement was destined to hold collective control of the modern economy. Socialism, in popular
definition is the political movement to replace the profit motive and private ownership of productive property (Schneirov 2003). In 1901, the Socialist
Party of America was born in order to meet these goals. The primary purpose of the party was to eradicate capitalism over time and to develop political
reform (ency). Although the Socialist Party of America did not have the impact that the Democratic and Republican parties had, it is still regarded as
having great influence on reform. This paper will focus on the background of the party, political influences, contributions, political achievements,...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The labor movement grew out of the need to protect the common interest of employees. For example, according to Seidler (1961) "They pushed for
social and humanitarian causes such as, old age pensions, natural resource conservation, government aid to the unemployed and disarmament" (210).
These were many issues that were not being targeted by other parties during that timeframe. However, Persuading americans to join the american labor
movement or even vote for it was constantly rejected. Due to the lack of influence in American politics, it was surprising how much of an influence
the Socialist party contributed to the labor movement. For instance Seidler (1961) states "The impact of the Socialist Party on the American labor
movement goes far beyond the fact that some labor leaders of great national prominence have been significantly affected by it" (211). The Socialist
Party of America began a movement that reformed the labor force in the United

The Impact Of Rosa Luxemburg
The impact of Rosa Luxemburg's materialist conception of history in Social Reform or Revolution, arguably became greater after national
independence had been achieved in the nations of the Third World. Luxemburg's assassination afforded her opponents the opportunity to completely
undermine her theory – her work was dismissed by her critics as it was seen to being completely fallacious in its interpretation of the accumulation of
capital. However, as Luxemburg's particular strand of revolutionary Marxism lost its momentum in Europe, it began to pick up traction in the
developing nations of the Third World. The strength of her critique of revisionism, thus, lies in its ability to transcend both international boundaries and
political epoch's. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A large portion of the Black population who voted for the African National Congress (ANC) in the inaugural democratic election, did so because they
believed that a government–approved socialist revolution was on the cards. The ANC and the South African Communist Party (SACP), under the
leadership of Joe Slovo, had been open about their commitment to their two–stage strategy – the struggles against apartheid and capitalism were two
separate battles, that had to be addressed in two separate stages. National liberation would need to be achieved, before the question of a socialist
revolution could be addressed. Luxemburg's critique of revisionism seemed to reign true in this scenario – the struggle against apartheid came to
overshadow the struggle for a socialist transformation. The mass revolutionary struggle of the 1980's came to be replaced by a reluctant acceptance of
reformism. The reformists within the South African government argued that capitalism had reached a stage in which it was no longer necessary to call
for revolution. While it proved possible to remove the political institutions of apartheid within the framework of capitalism, the partnership between
capitalism and racial domination could not be removed without the worker–driven socialist

The Major Classical Theorists Influenced The Economics Of...
Three major classical theorists have attempted to interpret why societies change. They are Adam Smith, Max Weber, and Karl Marx (Franks, 35).
These three have inspired a lot of people down the years. Adam Smith is known as the theoretical father of modern economics. In 1776, Smith argued
that the "invisible hand" of the market would change the economics of a nation and it would make the nation better. In his invisible hand theory, he
states that if one person strived to achieve success, then the person would simultaneously benefit people around him. The prices and quality will be
determined by relationships between consumers and sellers through supply and demand (Franks, 34). In other words, the market will not be regulated
by the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The history of Marxism is controversial, and the ideas have influenced a lot of men and women to address social issues. Karl Marx stated that the
occurrence of capitalism brought humanity a necessary step closer to socialism and the conquest of human inequality (Frank, 30). This is an inevitable
part of the development of human society.
According to scholar Mario Barrera, traditional Marxists thinks that a class is a group of people who have a similar relationship in things that they
use in their daily lives, such as food, houses, and appliances (Franks, 30). Also, Marxists address that each society has its own particular class
structure. In addition, Marxists have defined three primary classes that currently exist in a capitalist social system, and they can be found in the United
States. The first group of classes consists of capitalists, people who own and control an enormous proportion of productive property in the United
States. Having productive property means being able to produce products, such as producing products that people demand. In this case, capitalists are
wealthy because they hold an overwhelming amount of productive property.
The second group of classes consists of workers, people who have cars, computers. cell phones, and homes, but they own little of productive property.
The reason is that most of their income comes from their wages, salaries, and tips. They do not own company themselves. The third group of classes
compose by the bourgeoisie, who

Essay about Choosing Freedom over Equality
This is not an easy motion to debate on. Thus, this piece of writing will mention, discuss and bring forward the irrationality of choosing either
freedom over equality or visa versa, without having a harmonious counterbalance between the two factors, implemented by a regulatory body. It will
also include examples of countries which "total freedom" or "total equality" is in practice, where the search for total freedom led to total anarchy, or
the pursuit for total equality curtailed the freedom in all areas of life. This short writing will be concluded with a personal view.
The idea of choosing either one of these two factors will somehow seems vague. Equality without freedom is suffering and monotony (communism)
whereas freedom without ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All citizens were to be treated equally in regard to Karl Max's ideology, but equality in that sense was incompatible with the situation the country was in.
A struggle for freedom started to take form just after 5 years of scientific socialism, opposing the total equality with which the state imposed upon it is
citizens. And in 1990, after many years of rebellion, the citizens were successful to overthrow the "Scientific–Socialism" based government but
unfortunately could not replace it with a fair government. Instead Somalia's quest for total freedom became worse than total equality.
Equality in freedom can mostly be seen in democratic countries where, citizens are able to politically elect their leaders, express their views and
economically have an equal opportunity, though that extent of freedom and equality is restricted by a state regulation.
As humans naturally, we believe that it is rather better to be free than not to be free, and in some cases we don't consider equality to be of great
worth. One good example that proofs that theory true is, the African slaves in the western world, who fought and campaigned to be freed from slavery
and to see slavery business abolished all together. They were struggling to be free, without having in mind that equality is indeed necessary in their
struggle. As we know they were later freed from being slaves and regarded as freemen and women, but the main obstacle that hindered their progress in
integrating into their

Critical Evaluation of African Socialism, with Regards to...
In 1960s when African states gain independence, many leaders felt that they can not celebrate their victory if they continue using the
economic–political system that has been established by colonizers such as capitalism. They perceived capitalism as the bearer of social inequalities, and
ignorance that exists within societies. They wanted a unique economic and political system with no resemblance of outside influence. AfricanSocialism
was then a unique political ideology and identity of Africa. Julius Nyerere was one of the leading proponents of African socialism "African traditional
way of life" (Hyden, 1980: 200). African socialism as an ideology has its own successes and also its own criticism. Therefore, this essay will critically
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ujamaa is based on Arusha declaration of 1967 the first political effort to fight the accumulation of capital resources in hands of elites which ends in
class divisions and struggles. Nyerere proposed three important assumptions beneath traditional Ujamaa living: the recognition and respect of one
another, common ownership and the elimination of class divisions (Cameron 2007: 130–132).
African socialism failed to deliver its promises and saved people from the aftermaths of colonialism. Many African leaders failed to put in practice
policies that they preached during the African socialism adoption, they also lacked proper planning. Therefore, African socialism seemed as the
mislaid philosophy idealism, worthless development with broken political promises which contained so many contradictions that then hindered its
successfulness. Ujamaa policies shared the same basis and fallacy of development that has propelled and inhibited successive development initiative
in Africa. This is objectification of African peasants and rural settlers as the hopeless sufferers of colonial era who were supposed to be lifted to
higher levels of social and material well being. Thus, Ujamaa's dedication to modernization paradigm ended in a condition where improving well being
of peasants perceived as alienating them from their cultural and social realities to the reinvented colonial practices (Cameron, 2007: 116).
The main problem of African socialism was the

Character Analysis : ' The Eyes Of People With Grand...
Character is defined as "the mental and moral qualities, distinctive to an individual." Character is in fact something that all human beings have the
ability to shape and curve as we grow older. Each day, each opportunity, each encounter, can prove to change our character day in and day out.
Character is essentially a direct source of success for most. The better mental and moral qualities that person wields, the better their chances are at
becoming accomplished in life. Character through the eyes of people with grand eminence such as George C. Marshall and A. Phillip Randolph
seems to take a while to achieve. Their character is so advantageous to most because of the process it took for them to attain it. The constitution of
character for both of these individuals was beyond a lengthy course of action. It took many years for these men to become great leaders in their
respected fields, their character did not transpire overnight. These men are now venerated for infinite generations by those who have the utmost
opportunity to learn about their legacies. So, what allows for a person to attain good character that will help to translate in success in the future? The
answer lies in precious time. Time is key to the development of character, as the longer one can develop their character the more success they will
have throughout their life. George C. Marshall, our 15th US army chief of staff, 50th Secretary of State, and 3rd Secretary of Defense, was the
self–master of character.

Communism In The DSA
The DSA is the largest socialist group in the United States, with 62 chapters across the country, including a chapter in Philadelphia.the DSA has about
7500 to 8000 members but they are growing expeditiously, due to the fact that they are one of the major Socialist organizations working around the
Bernie Sanders campaign, although they are not officially coordinating with the campaign, but are running independently. The rise in popularity of
Democratic presidential hopeful, Bernie Sanders, has given the concept of socialism more attention lately, especially within younger demographics.
The DSA is led by the National Pacific Committee (NPC), Philadelphia's own Joseph Schwartz is a member of the NPC's 16 member body, and a
professor of Political Science at Temple University. I sat down with Professor Schwartz to talk... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rosa Luxemburg, a massive figure in socialist history, said in "the Russian Revolution" on dissent in socialism; "Freedom only for the members of the
government, only for the members of the Party – though they are quite numerous – is no freedom at all. Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters".
Showing that governments while insuring people's social rights, and basic liberties should not be silencing their citizens. Since the freedom of speech
is one of the many pillars holding up socialist societies. The question that Socialists impose on governments is; who is controlling the state? And for
what purpose? If the person who is controlling the state isn't doing it to advance democracy, civil liberties and social rights then that person, to a
socialist, is not fit for control. With the rise of pseudo–fascist ideology, with a xenophobic center, within the

The's Benevolent Association, The Knights Of Labor And The...
The Screwmen's Benevolent Association, The Knights of Labor and the Farmers Alliance are a few of the leading labor organizations in Texas.
Developed as the political and human resource representation for many of Texas' post civil war laborers, these organizations invested considerable
time and funding in advocating for the concerns of the working class. Established socialist communities were natural supporters for unionization based
on their beliefs in cooperation for the greater good. Within a transformative decade for Texas workers, the Knights of Labor reached the pinnacle of its
influence, failed a railroad strike in 1886 and eventually transformed into an agrarian and mechanics' organization. (A&M and Reid 2009) The
growing influence of the Knights of Labor improved the standing of socialists by extension. In reality, the union was not socialist organization by
definition. However, Texas socialists support and political gamesmanship contributed heavily to the growth and development of the Knights of Labor.
(Texas A&M University Press 2010) Advocacy for Texas laborers and support for the civil rights movement became the focus of proponents of socialist
political policies. Labor strikes and litigation against Texas based businesses routinely failed, illustrating the economic entrenchment of corporations
and their accompanying judicial and legislative alliances. As the political clout of the Knights of Labor waned, the weight of political influence
regarding

2002 Ap Euro Dbq: Manchester Essay
The Effects of Industrialization on Manchester, England 1750–1850 England in the 18th and 19th centuries changed dramatically as a result of the
Industrial Revolution, which had many effects on the social structure of England and increased the gap between the rich and the poor. Because of this,
industrialized English towns such as Manchester were both criticized and admired by poets, politicians, journalists, and outsiders, who were
particularly from France. The most powerful points of view were from supporters of industrialization, those who opposed industrialization, journalists,
and outsiders. Supporters of the industrialization of Manchester were typically British politicians or businessmen, impressed by the progress and...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Those who opposed the industrialization of Manchester were more concerned with the well–being of those affected by it. These were poets, women,
socialists, and health reformers who were disturbed by the living and working conditions of the middle class and the peasantry. One protester was
Robert Southey, an English Romantic poet and author of Colloquies on the Progress and Prospects of Society in 1829. Being a Romantic poet,
Southey laments on the industrialization of the city and describes it as a miserable place where the buildings which are "without their antiquity,
without their beauty, without their holiness," and where, "when the bell rings, it is to call the wretches to their work instead of their prayers."
Another protester is Frances Anne Kemble, an actress, poet, and dramatist, who, in her account of a journey of the Liverpool and Manchester
Railway in 1830, depicts a protest by the disgruntled working class over Corn Laws, which were tariffs on imported grain. In her depiction, the
protesters scorn the "triumphs of machinery" and the "gain and glory which wealthy Manchester men were likely to derive from it." This is a very
Romantic depiction, as the protesters are breaking free from their bonds to choose liberty over wealth. A final protester was Edwin Chadwick a public
health reformer, who, in his Report of the Sanitary Conditions of the Laboring Population of Great Britain, argued that the cramped conditions,

Analysis Of George Orwell And Animal Farm Essay
Richard Cortez
Professor Sharon Pittman
HUM 314
13 December 2016
George Orwell and Animal Farm: The Provocative Written Word in Political Protest
INTRODUCTION AND THESIS
Many writers, artists, novelists, journalists, and the sort seek to bring awareness to political and cultural issues through their work. It is not often,
though, that their work attains such critically acclaimed status and subsequently creates a platform by which people are moved to respond to the
writing's purpose.
George Orwell, however, had a knack for this talent. In his essay Why I Write (1946), he concluded that Animal Farm was the first book in which
he tried, with full consciousness of what he was doing, "to fuse political purpose and artistic purpose into one whole." Virtually every detail of the
book has allegorical significance (e.g., the revolt of the animals against Farmer Jones is Orwell's analogy with the October 1917 Bolshevik
Revolution). It is the book's political satire that especially provides its contemptuous nature. Orwell's book provides an excellent example of political
protest in unity with art, so much so that it earned a spot on the USSR's forbidden books list until the end of Communism. His writing was so
contemptuous, so intolerable, so invigorating, and so refreshing to certain classes of people that he created and contributed to movements, new ways of
thinking, and class warfare. Not many artists, whether they be writers or painters, can lay claim to such notoriety.

The Labor Aspect of Human Trafficking Essay
Last semester in my Women Public Health class was revelation for me as a woman, learning about the struggles that other women suffer around the
world. The one subject that caught my attention was the missing girls in China and India. Millions of fetus or baby girls in these countries go missing
yearly by different methods. The subject of the missing girl's lead me to human trafficking (sex trafficking) into and within China's own boarders, due to
the shortage of women. Although there aren't any available history journals for human trafficking and the subject of human trafficking interests me.
Human trafficking has different components such as force labor, sex trafficking, and child trafficking, I will be looking at the labor history. The... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The article the Old Labor History and the New: in search of an American working class by David Brody discusses the recent change that the labor
history had, which up until recently the study of labor wasn't accepted. Brody points out the influx of people of the working class and immigrant's
background after the World War II it started to be accepted. He also points out that the old labor was institution and the new labor is looking at the
people. During the late 1970s, both the LH and ILWC journals were looking at the past labor history and their current one, for example, German
workers of Chicago during 1850–1910, British Syndicalism 1900–1914, and many others. Brody clears why the journals are looking at the past labor
from the 19th & 18th centuries. Smith points out that more and more people were starting to take interested in labor history and the symposium
showed that to their community. Although, during the late 1970s decade there wasn't much talk about human trafficking or evenslavery. Slavery or
what we call today human trafficking during this period, there wasn't, much discourse about it. Slavery has been present since the beginning of time in
our world history, although some parts of it hasn't been silenced, but there may be some other parts that are, but it seem during the 70s there wasn't
much attention for it, they focus on class struggle,

Socialism Vs Social Work
B. To Nielsen Capitalism needs private productive property to work while socialism works to abolish private ownership of production. Socialism is
more free in the sense that is requires public ownership and control of the means of production. Under capitalism there is private property rights.
Under this people who own the property get to choose what is done to the property but in socialism citizens at large get to chose what happens to the
property. (Social Ethics) In socialism there is no domain that is not subject to political determination. Socialism is not a state of ownership though.
(Social Ethics) At the very least its popular sovereignty. The property that is owned by the government is productive property not private personal
property. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To Young oppression has many forms these are exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism and systematic violence. (Social
Ethics)These forms are not all oppressed to the same extent or way but suffer in a way to develop and exercise their capacities and their needs.
Exploitation is the first type of oppression. (Social Ethics)Young says that a capitalist society removes traditional law enforced class distinctions
and promotes the belief in the legal freedom of persons. (Social Ethics)Workers then contract with whatever employer they choose and then receive
a wage from them. Young then raises the question then " why do class distinctions persist between the wealthy ?" (Social Ethics) Every Product's
value is a function of the labor time needed for its production. The labor power is the one product that in the process of being consumed produces
value. (Social Ethics) Profit, the foundation of capitalist power and wealth, comes from the difference between the value of the labor performed and
the value of the capacity to labor which the capitalist purchases. (Social Ethics) Profit is only possible because of the owner of the capital gives it
surplus value showing that the workers are exploited. (Social Ethics)Through private ownership of the means of production and by markets that
designate labor and the ability to buy products, Capitalism transfers powers to one person to others . Then in this process of transferred powers the
capitalist class

The Black And White Americans
The idea that affluence in a capitalist society can be achieved through hard work and dedication regardless of the social and economic circumstances of
the individual has been romanticized throughout history and entrenched in American thought culture. Private ownership is a hallmark of the
"American Dream", representing the opportunity for American citizens to achieve upward social mobility. Though America is famed for providing
equality of opportunity to American citizens, a look at America 's past tells a different story. After spending 245 years in slavery accumulating wealth
on behalf of white Americans, African Americans were denied the 40 acres and a mule promised to them by the United States government. Even in the
absence of de... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I reasoned that a tax credit would make the tax system fairer, support home–ownership among families with lower incomes, and generate substantial
revenues to fund asset–building programs for the poor. The problem with the tax credit policy is that it fails to break the lock–in because black
Americans face discrimination in the housing markets even today, so blacks would not benefit from the tax credit policy as much as poor white
Americans would. Anarcho–syndicalism is a political strategy that opposes exploitation and domination of the working class by replacing capitalism
and government control with a voluntary socialist system, in which the working class is in control of property and the means of production through the
formation of syndicate networks. If implemented correctly, anarcho–syndicalism stands to reduce the wealth gap between black and white Americans
over the next 50 years. Capitalism does not support equality, rather it discriminates against individuals in a society based on class, which is based on
occupation, income, and wealth; this is called social stratification. Black Americans have been racially stratified through many years of discrimination
to the point where much of the black population belong to the poor working class. Whites, being that they were the first to occupy positions of power
and own land, disproportionately make up the affluent ruling class. Capitalism is a profit–driven economic system where a small class of

The Relationship Between Health And The United States And...
The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between health outcomes in the United States and two theories discussed during this Justice
Theory course. With this in mind, it analyzes the significance of the racial formation and Marxist theories as they relate to issues of health quality and
life expectancy in America. Thus, this exploration responds to prompt two of the Justice Theory extra credit opportunity assignment. Accordingly, this
paper presents how the aforementioned theories apply to the California Newsreel film (2008), Unnatural Causes: In Sickness and In Wealth.
Specifically, the organization of this paper first provides a brief summary of the video. Secondly, it clarifies the racial formation theory of Michael
Omi and Howard Winant as well as Karl Marx's theory of a classless society. Finally, it discusses the application of these theories to the issues
highlighted in the film.
Overview – Unnatural Causes: In Sickness and In Wealth
To begin, the film, Unnatural Causes: In Sickness and In Wealth, explores the relationship between levels of income and race with health and longevity
as a result of studies conducted in distinctive counties throughout Louisville, Kentucky. The subjects of the study are within the differing stratum of
classes – the working, middle, and upper classes. The film provides compelling data from within each class and correlates the effects of external
stressors, environment, living situations and education levels to

Radicle Perspectives in International Relations
Radical Theory of International Relations
Radical Theory derives its views from Marxist Theory. It is therefore sometimes referred to as Marxism, Socialism or Socialists internationalism.
Radicals believe that the state is nothing more than a machine for the oppression of one class by another.
Although they consider the state to be an important actor in world affairs, they emphasize the conflicting interests of social classes. Classes (capitalists,
workers, and peasants), clash for control of state policy within countries, and the government pursue not some overall national interest but the interest
of the dominant class. States are not unitary actors. Classes exist within societies but they also span national boundaries. Capitalists ... Show more
From 2005 through 2007, the country was wracked by many thousands of protests from poor communities. One of these gave rise to a mass movement
of shack dwellers 'Abahlali BaseMjondolo' that continues to advocate for popular peoples planning and against the creation of a market economy in
land and housing. Today, many African countries have been accused of being exploited under neo
–liberal economies. (Fredrick Engels: Socialism:
Utopian and Scientific CH. Kerr. Pp 99–110. chapter 111. Historical Materialism).
Asia
The peoples' Republican of China, North Korea, Laos and Vietnam are Asian countries remaining from the wave of Marxism–Leninist Radical theory
implemented socialism in the 21st century. States with socialist economies have largely moved away from centralized economic planning in the 21st
century placing a greater emphasis on markets, in case of the Chinese Socialist Market economy and Vietnamese Socialist–oriented market economy.
Under Deng Xiaoping, the leadership of China embarked upon a programme of market–based reform that maintained state ownership of rights over
land, state or cooperative ownership of much of the heavy industrial and manufacturing sectors and state influence in the banking and financial sectors.
Elsewhere in Asia, Some elected socialist parties and communist parties remain prominent. In Singapore, a majority of the GDP is till generated from
the state sector comprising government–linked companies (Wilkin, Sam

Marxism and the Negro Problem by W.E.B. Du Bois Essay example
Mohammad Abdullah
Africa American History II
PrГ©cis – Chapter 21
Marxism and the Negro Problem by W.E.B. Du Bois
In this essay, W.E.B. Du Bois attempts to analyze Marxism and how it might be interpreted and applied as a solution to the problems facing Black
people in the United States. Marxism, is basically an economic theory and philosophy that was put forward by Karl Marx in the late 19th century that
explains the mechanisms of the system of capitalism as it relates to the different classes of people and the development of history. Because of the high
regard that he had for Marx's work, and because of the influence that Marx's ideas and theories had on the French and Russian revolutions, Du Bois
believed that perhaps there might ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is this conflict of interests that keeps socialism from being a viable force for social and political change in the United States.
In analyzing the problem Du Bois maintains a scientific outlook, free from emotional content and favoritism. To this degree, he demonstrates that
Black people in America play a minor role in their own exploitation by their attempts to join in the game of capitalism. Yet, for the most part, they
are limited in their efforts and consigned even then to a lesser petty bourgeois status. This, again, is due to the racial aspect of class that has been
introduced and become a fixed part the game of capitalism. As such Du Bois concludes that the interests of the Black proletarian class and the Black
petite bourgeoisie are aligned due to the commonality of racist subjugation and oppression at the hands of the White labor aristocracy, whose interests
are aligned with capitalism. In addition, he concludes that since this is the case, there can be no Marxian revolution based upon the principle of a
united class–conscious proletariat, and that in fact, if there is to be one, it will be the Black laborers who will be the vanguard of it. In coming to this
conclusion, Du Bois is making a radical adaptation to accepted Marxist philosophy, yet

Theme Of Socialism In The Industrial Revolution
Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization which represents the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be
owned or regulated by the community as a whole. The origins of the socialism occurred during the industrial revolution. While Carl Marx wrote out the
way of socialism, it was actually developed in France. Socialism was first majorly adopted by the Russians after the Bolshevik party came to
power. Because Russia was such a great influence across Asia and eastern Europe they were able to spread socialism. When the cold war developed
after world war 2 there was a sodden need to spread socialism. The two super nations USSR and the USA batteled an indirect war to spread their
economic system. Americas capitalism and Russia socialism. During the cold war there were several rises in socialism in north African countries and
south American countries. But when the cold war came to an end, socialism spread to asian countries and most importantly china. The cold war had
ended and there was no more ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She represents the general Russian population during the time of the Russian revolution. Following a speech made by a pig named Old Major,
the animals of Manor Farm form their own philosophy of Animalism and lead a successful revolution orchestrated primarily by the pig Snowball.
After a "war" with Mr. Jones he wants to make the manor a more effiecent place for everyone and implementing Old Majors ideas. Snowballs
idealism isn't approved by the other pigs then he is exiled by a more ambitious pig named Napoleon who seizes power over the farm. Also seakeler
another pig advertises Napoleons rule to be spectacular, while on the other hand the animals on the farm or off at a worse situation then when they
had a revolution. Napoleon proceeds to reshape Old Majors ideas to his own liking, and bringing the animals into a darker existence than they had ever

Analyzing Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle'
"How could the text be read and interpreted differently by two different readers?"
The novel, "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair can be interpreted differently by modern impoverished American immigrants/minorities and the modern
American rich class. "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair is a fictional novel and was published in 1906. It was based on the lives of the individuals he
observed in Chicago around that time. He discovered that the lower–working class there was doing horrific work for not enough pay to get themselves,
let alone their families, by. He emphasizes on the flaws of the "American Dream" and writes in the support of the Socialist party of the time. The book
is about Jurgis, a Lithuanian immigrant trying to find work in Chicago, Illinois ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, some may come to the deeper meaning of this text that the author was trying to get across. Some being the flaws of Capitalism and the
"American Dream"; Social Darwinism, only the financially "fit" survive; and how Socialism could be the answer to those who need support
financially. These issues have trailed the United States for many years, one example of a result of these issues is the creation of the Black Panther
Party in the 1960's; due to African American's limited rights, inability to find a good paying job, and cold hatred towards the government. However,
because of the ignorance by the majority of upper–class citizens, they would interpret the book as an attempt to persuade others to look down on
Capitalism due to the struggles portrayed in the book in result of corrupt rich folk.
In conclusion; the novel, "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair can be interpreted differently by different groups of people and social classes. Especially of
those who are impoverished American immigrants/minorities and the modern American rich class. This is largely due to upbringings, financial
stability, workplace environments, and education. This book regardless of who is reading it does however expose the difficulties of the workforce for
immigrants and minorities alike in the early 1900's in cities such as Chicago. It also reveals the

Is Communism Or Utopia?
When a person asks, "What is communism?" many respond negatively often criticizing communism. Communism, a theory co–developed by Friedrich
Engels and Karl Marx, was an ideology where everyone is equal and had this idea of utopia. But why has communism become so dystopian instead of
utopian? First of all, it has to be clarified that there is no pure capitalism nor communism. However, socialism is not exactly the center of the two but
has traits from both. Rather, there is a spectrum where countries are at and might lean towards capitalism or communism. And a democratic country can
be communist. Then what is communism? It most certainly cannot be defined by the definitions given today by average–minded people. Communism
is not a system that has to have a dictator. AlthoughMarxism has made a gateway into modern communism and socialism, Marxism ... Show more
First of all, greed plays a disturbing factor of implementing Marxism. Being greedy often leads to breaking the system, which is cheating. It is
possible to cheat in any system but one person breaking the system often leads to group, which eventually leads to a revolt from the citizens. It also
requires giving something up, regardless of who you are. The citizens have to give up their capital to the government while the government in return
has to increase expenses on their citizens. The second reason is that it only works with medium wealth and no greed. Poor people might benefit as
they would receive more in return than give but then in return, the government would have very little to take from them. It would not work in wealthy
backgrounds as they would not willingly donate all of their capital and power. Only people in the middle with decent living and very little greed are
able to live under Marxism.The third reason is that it results in an overpowering government that collects high taxes, anything from deceased parents,
and limits anything by the

To What Extent Was Wilhelmine Germany an Entrenched...
To what extent was Wilhelmine Germany an entrenched Authoritarian state? Kaiser Wilhelm II came to power in 1888 after Wilhelm I died and a
brief reign from Frederick III, his behaviour could be unpredictable and although he was the grandson of Queen Victoria he was anti–British, however
he admired them at the same time. He believed in the divine right of kings, the theory claimed that, kings were only answerable to God, and it was
sinful for their subjects to resist them. Wilhelm II was determined to exercise much more direct control over government than his grandfather, this was
apparent in 1890 when Wilhelm disagreed with Bismarck's anti–socialist policies, colonial expansion and relations with Russia, consequently Bismarck
retired... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A reason why Bulow may have proposed to lower the tariff rate is because of the power the Social Democrats and Left Liberals held in the Reichstag
as opposed to the Conservatives in 1902. Therefore, this meant that there would be no political backlash towards the Chancellor thus the Kaiser was
less likely to force him to resign. Eventually, the tariff was lowered to pre–1982 levels, and was effectively a compromise between the Social
Democrats, National Liberals and the Free Conservatives. This left the working class content; subsequently meaning they applied less pressure upon
the government. Bulow's decision was backed up the following year by the election result where the Socialists gained 25 seats and the Conservatives
lost 4 seats. This is an example of the declining influence of the Junkers, and more importantly an example of democracy. The Hottentot election was
the name given to the election in 1907 and resulted after the Kaiser dissolved the Reichstag after they failed to support Bulow's government in their
proposal of using more money to suppress the rebels in the Colony of German South West Africa and to compensate the white settlers. The
government's election campaign was anti–socialist, anti–Catholic and Nationalistic. The result was that Social Democrat seats were halved, and right
wing parties gained seats. As a result, 'Bulow bloc' a coalition was formed which comprised of the

Laissez-Faire Capitalism
Founded on democracy and freedom, the United States' very roots are being attacked. Although the transition has been passive and nearly undetectable,
America's fundamental beliefs in the freedom of the individual are gradually being modified. As government intervention continues to burgeon,
American citizens' rights are beginning to diminish. This is noticeable through the implementation of federal health care (known as the Affordable Care
Act) and the overall increase of government involvement in regards to the lives of its people. This results in a reduced ability for laissez–faire capitalism
, which literally translates to "leave alone" in French–an economic theory in which the economy is run without the government's involvement. While no
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This further hinders the spreading of bigotry by allowing minorities to surface and form alliances to protest unfair treatment. The freedom to join with
fellow citizens in peaceful protest and assembly is critical to a functioning democracy and allows for these alliances to fight the discrimination
prevalent in today's culture. This allowance of public speech is vitally important for a country to be successful and strong within its own borders. For
example, if a country governed under a constitutional democratic republic sees its leader as nefarious or scheming, they can impeach him or her with
peaceful protest, instead of forming a violent mob of citizens. A historical example of a lack of freedom to protest peacefully can be seen in the French
Revolution. The king and queen were terribly unqualified and incompetent leaders, which lead the country to famine and financial crisis. However at
this time, France's government was a monarchy, which does not allow for the freedom to protest peacefully. This forced citizens to form mobs and
respond with a violent outbreak against the throne, resulting in the death of both King Louis XVI, and Queen Marie Antoinette ("French
Revolutionaries"). On the other hand, modern–day examples of alliances that have formed due to the freedom of association and freedom to assemble
peacefully include the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF), Parent Advocacy Coalition for Educational Rights (PACER), and the National
Urban League ("Civil Rights"). On their website, the NGLTF explains the history of their formation and

Causes anf Results of Communism in Eastern and Central Europe
Communism was one of the political theories founded by Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx in the end of the 19th century . Both of these philosophers
had the same point of view concerning the economic and political principles. Also, Communism brought up many changes to International Relations ,
and the body of the essay will describe the causes and results of Communism in Eastern and central Europe. In 1844 Engel and Marx started to
discover interesting facts about Communism and no longer in 1848 they decided to write and publish ' Communism Manifesco' , which was thought
to be one of the best and influential political books ever. Under 'Communism Manifesco' all people were thought to be equal. The main idea for
everyone was not to be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A lot of countries were influenced by the Communism. Among them are: Eastern German and Poland, The Communism in Poland lasted for forty
years that brought a new and specific changes in the government at the end of the Second World War. Poland had a really complicated situation
because of Iosef Stalin and his Communist Party. He described his points of view in a very clear way, 'Imposing Communism on Poland was as
absurd as putting a saddle on a cow'. Moreover ,everything was under control of the Polish Government of Stalin, including a lot of spheres as
culture, social aspects of life and economy. As government had all the power in their hands, people were absolutely deprived of power. That kind
of period was strongly disliked by people and brought a lot of strikes, protections and even attacks. As the result, the Communism system had a bad
influence on the development of Poland. Eastern German was also under the Communism regime. The historic German capital of Berlin, although in
the East was a special case. Berlin itself was split into 4 sectors after the war. West Berlin was part of West Germany despite being completely
surrounded by East Germany. The Eastern part of German was absolutely poor in all its aspects. The lack of food, transport and all the necessary
goods lead to the panic. To prevent bad causes of that situation, German government

The Deception Of Communism In Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man
The word "communism" holds endless of emanations from thousands of different people, but under every single aura it gives, it continues to have the
same meaning– holding public ownership of the land and the disappearance of social classes. The communist ideology is to create a better world for
the socially oppressed. In his novel, Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison shows why African Americans were attracted to the ideology and why it failed to
meet their hopes because of the deception and manipulation by groups symbolized by the Brotherhood. Communism can be defined as "the political and
economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit–based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major
means of production ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Pinckney states that the communist party's "involvement was at times more about strengthening the workers' movement than from a
genuine interest in improving the lives of people of color". In reality, the communist party was actually working on making more of a united
infrastructure of all workers', not just people of color. During World War II, the resignation of Philip Randolph, who was the leader of the Negro
National Congress, took a toll on the way the black community viewed the communist party and it's beliefs. It began to turn downhill once Adolf Hitler
attacked the Soviet Union, leading the party to "denounce Randolph's proposed March on Washington against employment discrimination in war
industries, arguing that it might harm production" (Wikipedia), and by doing this, the party contradicted the help they offered earlier to people of
color in labor

Cultural Analysis : Mardi Gras : Made In China
Although the world climate around exploitation has altered in the last few years, mostly moving away from the exploited industrial countries such as
China, it is still important to look at what was happening in China so that it can be understood in connection with today. The documentary by Robert
Redmon, Mardi Gras: Made in China focuses on the exploited Chinese factory workers crafting various beads for the Americans to throw at each
other for sexual gratification. The documentary does a good job jumping back and forth between the factory workers and the celebrators of Mardis
Gras, creating an interesting parallel, implicating the absolute uselessness in the beads for such a large cost. Marx's theories of exploitation through
Capitalism can be tied too well to the Chinese–Mardi Gras beads exploitation, as the Chinese workers were put through an extreme form of Capitalist
exploitation that even Marx may never have expected.
Marx's theory on Capitalist exploitation is an incredibly deep theory, but to explain it in a nutshell, it is that the working–class people are improperly
compensated for their work. The rich, the higher–ups, they continue to expand their wealth by exploiting the working class, the Capitalist system not
only allows but effectively demands that Capitalists increase their wealth, long–term or short–term, whether at the cost of the working–class or not.
There are three "values" to take into consideration, the use–value, the exchange–value and the

An End To The Negro Woman Analysis
Marxism is a method of analyzing socioeconomic status. This idea/method of Marxism started in the mid to late 19th century with the philosophers
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles: they analyzed the class relationships and the societal conflict. The Marxist methodology used economic, social, and
political ideas to understand the development of capitalism and the role of class struggle in relation with the economic change. The analysis showed
that the class conflict came from the problems between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The proletariat were the laborers of the factories and the
mines. The bourgeoisie were the private owners of these factories and mines. As the problem between the two groups of people grew, the proletariat
saw that this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She migrated with her family to the United States where she became a political activist and black nationalist through Communism. She used the name
Jones as a self–protective disinformation. Because of her political activities, she was deported in 1955 and resided in the United Kingdom. She
was the author of "An End to the Neglect of the problem of the Negro Woman", in which she discusses how people were degrading the negro
women. She also talks about the economic hardships of the women and how they were not paid the same as men even though some women
worked the same jobs as men. The history of women in the working class and the importance of women and how they had to fill roles. Women
were the ones that kept families together. In the workforce, the negro women were the last ones to be hired and the first ones to be fired. They
were also forced out of the industrial jobs and forced back into doing domestic work. The negro men and women were the laborers in this case
because neither groups of people owned the modes of production. They were the ones that had to do the work and follow the decisions that were
being made by the factory owners. The people that made all of the decisions and who controlled the modes of production were the white factory,
mine, and plantation owners. In Claudia Jones' reading, the negro women would not be able to fulfill their hopes and expectations because they were
always being told what jobs they had to work. Also at these jobs, the job itself was being controlled by the people that owned the factory or wherever
the women

Why did a Socialist or Labor Party never gain traction in...
Why did a Socialist or Labor Party never gain traction in the United States? According to Marxist revolutionary theory, advanced capitalism is a
necessary precondition to the development of socialism. Capitalists would ruthlessly exploit workers, accumulating capital from the workers' labor but
not sharing it. This would result in the workers developing a collective class consciousness, overthrowing their oppressors, and replacing their bourgeois
government with a dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., socialism. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels expected that, because the United States had the most
advanced form of capitalism in the world, it was the most likely setting for a proletarian revolution, yet, no socialist or labor party has ... Show more
According to Marxist theory, it should have been impossible for Russia to achieve socialism. It was the least industrialized country in Europe, and most
of its population consisted of peasants rather than a class–conscious proletarian working class. The first socialist country should have been a country
like the United States, but proletarian revolution did not occur in the United States first or ever. Over the course of the past 110 years, historians,
political scientists, and economists have all attempted to explain why. The bulk of this historiographical essay will address Werner Sombart's 1906
assessment of the failings of American socialism, Eric Foner's critical reinterpretation of the question from 1984, and these works' conversation with
each other and other studies. German economist and sociologist Werner Sombart agreed with the basic Marxist assertion that the development of
socialism was "a necessary reaction to capitalism," and thus was most likely to occur in the United States first. When no such thing had transpired by
the first years of the twentieth century, Sombart conducted the first book–length study on the question: Warum gibt es in den Vereingten Staaten
keinen Sozialismus? (Why is there no Socialism in the United States?), published in 1906. Sombart does not offer a straightforward answer. Rather, he
examines a litany of issues which hindered the growth of

Capitalism versus Socialism
Capitalism versus socialism
It is much better to live in a country where difference between poor and rich is noticeable, than to know that a person will never differ from others in
his or her own country. My essay will be based on the following the definition, characteristics', types of capitalism and socialism, features, socialism as
alternative to capitalism and social change and economic development. What is capitalism? Capitalism is an economic and political system in
which all means of production and distribution are privately owned and operated within a free market society. What is Socialism? Socialism is an
economic and political system in which all means of production and distribution are collectively owned and operated by all members of society. They
both have pros and cons capitalism promotes free market system, people are free to create almost any product or provide service and it has
self–regulating system. In capitalist system you have choices, incentives and freedom, another thing about capitalism is that it aims to preserve
economic freedom from excessive government control. Most capitalist believe in in the French expression Laissez–Faire, which means "leave it alone".
Capitalism term by Karl Max it is whereby small group of people own large amount of money, land and resources. It is has profit motive. In
capitalism things are made well enough to outdo the competition in order to maximize profits. It's a dog eat dog world, the survival of the fittest.

The Great Depression ( 1929-1939 )
The Great Depression (1929–1939) is the worst economic downturn that the modern world has ever seen before. Beginning with the Wall Street stock
market crash of 1929, the situation grew worse in the United States, in part, due to the tremendous wealth disparity between the higher class and the
lower class. Wages did not grow nearly as quickly as production did during this era, so many people were unable to purchase certain goods. As a
result, there was an excess in supply, which prompted layoffs in several industries. In fact, the national unemployment rate jumped from just four
percent to twenty five percent during the onset of the Depression. However, farmers arguably suffered the most during this time as the value of their
crops... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The royal Czar family was overthrown and replaced by a provisional government, but it was not long before the radical Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir
Lenin, seized power. Under Lenin 's rule, Russia became the world 's first communist country. In 1919, America's two communist parties, the
Communist Party of America and the Communist Labor Party, were established. Despite their disagreements, a couple of years later, the Communist
International organization ordered them to join forces and follow the newly formed Soviet Union's international communist policy. The parties
complied and became the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA), which still exists today. Republicans in America are
conservatives who tend to fight for a small government, meaning one that is not really involved in the economy or other parts of people 's lives.
Republicans were the majority party from 1925 to 1933, which included the sixty–ninth, seventieth, seventy–first, and seventy–second congresses
(United States). In addition, the three presidents of the United States from 1921 to 1933 were all Republicans. Ironically, being the majority party for
twelve consecutive years meant that Republicans significantly influenced people's beliefs and values. Much of what they did made it harder for liberal
ideologies, like communism, to gain public support. In a 1919 animation, a farmer version of Uncle Sam boasts about his bounteous harvests, which
represented American companies, before killing

The Progressive Era In America In The 1920's
The Progressive Era in America lasted from the 1890's to the 1920's. During this time, The United States underwent several changed, or reforms. These
reforms helped to shape our nation into what it is today. There are 10 reforms I'm going to discuss in this essay including the reforms on civil rights,
conservation, government reform, health and medicine, labor reform, radical trade unionism, socialism, temperance, trust busting, and women's rights.
The Civil Rights reform was perhaps one of the most important reforms and had since been expanded upon greatly. During this time slavery had
recently been abolished but racism still plagued our nation. African Americans could not vote, and were completely separate from whites. The Civil
Rights reform ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The temperance reform. The government blamed everything bad that happened on the use of alcohol. So, they banned the manufacture, transportation,
and selling of alcohol. This never really worked though. There were hundreds if not thousands of people who distilled their own alcohol, usually called
moonshine, and sold it themselves. This is where the term "bootlegging" comes in. Bootlegging by definition is the making, selling, or distribution of
illicit products such as liquor illegally. Although this reform has since been changed back, moonshine is still mostly illegal. This reform edited the 18th

Capitalism And Social Darwinism
Throughout history, society has been organized by and for the ruling classes at the expense of those who work and produce. And throughout history,
the ruling class has been usurped and replaced by the next in line to rule society. And every time a new class comes into power they proclaim their
state to be the only state in which humans can function, from the Chinese emperors getting their mandate from heaven, to the captains of industry
utilizing social darwinism. Yet despite what these ruling classes say about their own permanence, history shows a constant trend towards freedom,
towards the emancipation of all people from class society. Currently we live under a bourgeois dictatorship, or a society in which the capitalist class
are the dominant class. This is what creates capitalism, a system in which the means of production, exchange, and distribution are privately owned in a
for–profit market economy. Socialism, however, seeks to replace the bourgeois dictatorship with a dictatorship of the proletariat, a society ruled by
and for the working class as a whole. In this society the means of production, exchange, and distribution would be held in common in a democratically
planned economy. If one has a firm grasp of history it is clear that transitioning to socialism, followed by communism, is the natural progression of
human society. Socialism, therefore, seems to be an inevitability. In light of this it is important to understand socialism economically, politically, and

Review Of Upton Sinclair's The Jungle
The Jungle by Upton Sinclair
Upton Sinclair was an American writer whose works reverts not only the inside but also the socialists view on things. Upton Sinclair was born in
Baltimore, Maryland. He was born into a family which held to its Southern aristocracy in everything that was done. When Sinclair was ten years old,
the family packed up and moved to New York City as there were more opportunities to succeed. The Jungle is both a judgment on and a profit of its
own times. Those times most precise needs to be perspective in relation to what had happened in the last half of the nineteenth century. This ridiculous
time period saw the making of great industries and great fortunes for the ones who were in control of the industries. So far ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
An enlarging number of immigrants confabulate political, cultural and economic intimidation to the predominance of native– born middle and upper–
class Americans. As a result, the nonimmigrant Americans kept pressure on the police to clasp down on the urban crimes, especially crime related to
unsavory aspects of the so called "foreign" community lifestyle like the utilization of alcohol. Many conflict theories during the 1900's were related to
the percent of foreign born and arrested rate of drinkers under numerous controls suggested by criminological researches. Because the urban politics
was a period whirled around battles between city bosses and propagandist, the incorporate political variables were scrutinized. It resulted in supporting
political judgment of the antagonism, with which urban police made arrests for alcoholism. "The 1890s were years of intense labor conflict and
included an economic depression second only to the great depression of the 1930s"(Harring 1981, p. 294; Harring 1983, p.202; Wiebe 1967, p. 124).
There was a boundless failure of banks and businesses that meant the prosecute laceration and unemployment and there were strikes due to this. The
immigrants were judiciously and politically menace. They were interpreted as superficially infinite supply of cheap labor

Why Did Tanzania Achieve True Independence Essay
To a large extent, Tanzania did not achieve real independence. Through evaluating the primary pillars of a country (social, political and economic) and
its growth in a twenty–year period it is evident that, despite, a change in governance Tanzania did not achieve real independence as colonial powers
continued to control the country's economy, colonial ideologies permeated through political structures, socially, the nation's growth and longevity was
inhibited as a result of decades of racial oppression and after independence Tanzania still relied on foreign investment and gifts.
In the context of newly emancipated African countries, true liberation meant being an equal to colonial powers. For Tanzania, this meant self–reliance,
implementing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After WW1 Tanzania was given to Britain and they ruled it until independence in 1961.
Colonialism made a profound impact on the economic development in Tanzania. The general motive behind colonization was the acquisition of raw
materials for economic development in Germany. Tanzania was a supplier of raw materials like minerals and agricultural commodities and a buyer of
processed manufactured goods. These economic structures established by the colonial powers had lasting implications which affected the independent
government's economic performance. Initially, and similar to the USSR after becoming a communist state, Tanzania introduced a five–year economic
plan. However, unlike the Soviet Union, the first five–year plan was made to implement a programme which depended on foreign investment to
support massive, capital–intensive industrialization and agricultural development projects. Consequently, this economic policy upheld colonial ideals.
Later, in attempt to reconstruct Tanzania's national identity and off the benefits of capitalism, theArusha Declaration was avowed. This was a blueprint
that declared the implementation of African socialism under the name Arusha. After the Arusha declaration, the

Film Analysis : Ghandi
The first image, image I, is a depiction of a scene during a short clip from the movie, "Ghandi." This particular scene represents the phenomenon that
Europeans had developed a sense of racism that overtook cultural chauvinism. The colonial people experienced a new European conventional wisdom
which entailed the idea that cultural characteristics were determined by someone's race, or biology, and not by their education, history, or the
environment. They were seen as unequal by their white leaders no matter their abilities. The Europeans looked upon the idea of race as the determining
factor because biological characteristics could not be altered or changed whereas education, history, and the environment had this capability. In this
scene... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This image dates from the late 1800s. The relationship between the two images and their phenomena is that both images depict a time where
European's sought to be in complete control of the colonized people. In some ways, it seems as though the ideas from the "civilizing mission," the
second image, could have influenced the view that European's had and displayed in the scene from "Ghandi" which pertains to the first image. In both
scenarios, Europeans saw the African people as inferior and unequal. They felt the need to obtain full control and civilization over the Africans and
their homeland. 2) The first image, image I, is a depiction of well–known philosopher and socialist, Karl Marx. Socialists believed that it was possible
to create a society free of class divisions and poverty where everyone was happy and fulfilling their potential. This picture of Marx represents the
phenomenon of "scientific socialism" which is a theory that was developed by Marx. He argued that he had proven that there would be a communist
revolution in the future based on his study of human history. Marx backed his theory by stating that he had found historical laws of society that told
there was an inevitable collapse of the capitalist system. He believed

Negative Impacts Of Nationalism
The Nationalist movement began during French Revolution when country men rallied together to go to war against Communism. Nationalism was
invented in Europe by intellectuals who were inspired by Napoleons conquest. This ideology to changed people's perspective about what their country
meant to them. Unified States such as Italy, Germany were created during a great migration that formed unified states. Instead of the smaller societies
people once lived in became a nation of individuals in certain countries that they could call their own. Nationalism has also helped in the improvement
of incomes and education by helping those citizens to come together for a common good. The negative impacts of nationalism is the imposing of views
on other ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These countries sought the right to have their own established entity and through this imperialism spread. Europeans felt a sense of entitlement over
other nations. They chose to impose their views whenever they conquered other societies. The 19th century Europe sent missionaries to use
Christianity as means to conquer African people. Missionaries used a conversion process to build schools, hospitals, and teach english to the native
people. Christianity was used to gain trust of the people in order to impose Europe ideologies on local customs. Even today you can still see the
influences of western culture in many parts of the world. The most significant part of globalization is the ability to introduce new cultural ideas into
others.
Portugal was the first in its efforts to impose imperialism in modern day Brazil. It was used as a port to Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Europe. The
discovery of sugar lands and gold was given to the Portugal King by his nobles. They enslaved not only the indigenous people of the land but
eventually imported Africans because the demand for sugar cane was so great. Once sugar became too competitive of a market, they reverted to gold
that was found in Menius Gerias, Brazil. This created the first gold rush. Portugal and Britain soon found an uneven alliance in which Britain was
entitled to the same right as Portugal. Portugal imposed imperialism on Brazil by gaining useful resources to advance their own society. The
relationship of

The Role Of Marxism And Its Role In Inequality In America

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Carolyn Ostwalt

More from Carolyn Ostwalt (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Role Of Marxism And Its Role In Inequality In America