A Hanging Orwell

A Hanging Orwell
The thought provoking essay "A Hanging" by George Orwell informs the reader about Orwell's own experiences in Imperial Burma in the 1930's. The
essay focuses on the ethical issue of Capital Punishment and through using effective techniques such as creation of setting, convincing characterisation
and highlighting key incidents Orwell's essay provokes the reader to contemplate the morality of taking a healthy human's life.
Pathetic Fallacy and the writer's creation of setting play an important part in encouraging the reader to consider their views on the ethical issue of
Capital Punishment. When describing the setting of the essay Orwell uses word choice to encourage the reader to think about the issue, Orwell uses
the word "sodden" which ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Orwell describes one of the prisoners as " ... a puny wisp of a man, with a shaven head and vague liquid eyes" this suggests that the prisoner was a
small, thin man with distant, far away eyes. His careful word choices seem to indicate a sense of sympathy for the man. "Vague liquid eyes"
suggests that the prisoner has accepted the fact that he is to be hanged; he has lost all hope and has given up on life. By making the reader feel
sympathy towards the prisoners Orwell encourages the reader to think about their opinions on the subject. As the reader feels sorry for the prisoner
they will be forced to consider their own views. The characterisation of the prison guards also plays an important part in allowing the reader to
consider their views on Capital Punishment. When describing the prison guards, Orwell writes, "lashed his arms to his sides" this suggests that the
guards are being very forceful and brutal in their treatment of the prisoner. The writer also uses similes to try and sway the reader to believe Orwell's
own beliefs, that Capital Punishment is wrong. He writes, "It was like men handling a fish which is still alive and could jump back into the water."
This suggests that the prisoner has accepted his fate and isn't putting up a fight for the time being but that he could at any given time. Through
portraying the guards as forceful and brutal Orwell further encourages the reader to think about their own opinions on the main issue the essay focuses
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

1984 By George Orwell
1984 is a novel written by George Orwell. 1984 is set in a dystopian society where the government (The Party) is extremely involved in everything. The
main character is Winston Smith. Winston is a thirty–nine year old an that works for the Ministry of Truth correcting "errors" in the past publications.
The "errors" Winston corrects consist of times where The Party was in the wrong or at fault. Winston struggled to free himself from the power of The
Party because he did not have strength in numbers, he was being watched all the time, and member's of the Thought Police were everywhere. Winston
for most of the novel was alone and the only thing he could confide to was his journal. Then Julia comes waltzing in with a testament of love for

George Orwell Essay
George Orwell
Eric Arthur Blair was born in 1903 at Motihari in British–occupied India. While growing up, he attended private schools in Sussex, Wellington and
Eaton. He worked at the Imperial Indian Police until 1927 when he went to London to study the poverty stricken.
He then moved to Paris where he wrote two lost novels. After he moved back to England he wrote Down and Out in Paris and London, Burmese Days,
A Clergyman's Daughter and Keep the Apidistra Flying. He published all four under the pseudonymGeorge Orwell. He then married Eileen
O'Shaughnessy and wrote The Road to Wigan Pier. Orwell then joined the Army and fought in the Spanish Civil War. He became a socialist
revolutionary and wrote Homage to Catalina, Coming Up for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The book was a record of his experiences, and when released, he was quoted to say, "If it is going to be released, I want it pseudnomly."
Discussing the publication of his first book with his agent, he decided on three possible pseudonyms: Kenneth Miles, George Orwell and H.
Lewis Allways. He favored George Orwell. The Orwell is a river in Suffolk, south of his parents' home. "George Orwell" published his first book in
1933. Down and Out... was followed by the novel, Burmese Days, published first in the United States rather than in England because of his
English publisher's fear of it giving offence in Burma. After Burmese Days came two more novels: A Clergyman's Daughter, published in 1935;
and Keep the Apidistra Flying, published in 1936. In the Spring of 1936 he moved to Hertfordshire and married Eileen O'Shaughnessy, an Oxford
graduate in English, a teacher, a journalist, and later a London graduate in psychology. Orwell's reputation at this time was based mainly on his
accounts of poverty and depression. His next book, The Road to Wigan Pier was written for the Left Book Club and started his career as a political
writer. Much of this book was composed of an essay on class and socialism, which was Orwell's first statement of his political position.
In July, he left for Spain to fight, and later to write, in the Spanish civil war. For the next two or three years, Orwell became a revolutionary socialist.
When he returned from

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' Orwell ' Shooting An...
"Orwell's Shooting an Elephant": Effect of Imperialism in Burma
Imperialism is a state of mind, fueled by the arrogance of superiority that could be adopted by any nation irrespective of its geographical location in
the world. 1. Evidence of the existence of empires dates back to the dawn of written history in Egypt and in Mesopotamia, where local leaders
extended their realms by conquering other states and holding them, when possible, in a state of subjection and semi subjection. Imperialism was reborn
in the west with the emergence of modern nation–state and the age of exploration and discovery. It is to this type of empire building that the term
imperialism is quite often restricted. To Michael Parenti, " By imperialism, I mean the process whereby the dominant politico–economic interests of
one nation expropriate for their own enrichment the land, labor, raw materials and markets of other people. In Orwell's shooting an elephant, the
people of Burma felt the evil of imperialism because it humiliated the occupied people(Burmese). it forced the occupiers into making immoral or
unethical decisions. It reduces the occupied to an inferior status in their own country. Lastly, it forced the occupiers to maintain their superiority status
"2. In the years since world war II, territorial imperialism is no longer the prevailing mode. Rather than, being directly colonized by the imperial
power, weaker countries have been granted the powers of

Loyalty, By George Orwell
Loyalty Questioned, and Humanity Revealed Loyalty is a bond a mutual trust, the most personal and sacred bond in human history. You must have
loyalty before you can have friendship, or love. Loyalty means someone can count on you, someone can trust you to be there when in need. Loyalty is
a major theme of George Orwell's novel 1984. In a totalitarian world where loyalty, love, and any other personal feelings are outlawed by the
vicious "Party," some are still trying to find the strength to rebel. Winston, a silent rebel of the party, lives in constant fear of being captured and
tortured for his suppressed protest. He yearns to live, to feel, and to make love. After he meets a beautiful girl named Julia, who shares his disdain
for the Party, he knows she is the key to his dreams. The love story between these two revolves around loyalty and rebellion. This novel focuses on
the importance of loyalty, and why it must be suppressed if a totalitarian society is to be achieved. It also focuses on how even the strongest of
loyalties can be broken under extreme stress. No loyalty is safe when torture, and constant torment are forced on an individual. This is a heartbreaking
and depressing novel that sheds some harsh reality on loyalty and betrayal. The importance of loyalty, and the breaking point of trust are both major
themes of the novel 1984. Loyalty is incredibly important to any kind of relationship, and it is of particular importance to Winston and Julia in 1984.
The love

George Orwell Dystopia
In the novel 1984 George Orwell takes experiences from his life and what he sees within the government to create the dystopian novel we know
today. "Orwell therefore wishes to create a circle of meaning between himself and his readers by turning his own political and social writing into an
art form"(Roberts 15). Orwell uses his life to bring different elements like the proles in 1984. The Government corruption during his time of life was
something he was very much against. Stalin was a major power at the time. Communism is something that Orwell was very much against. He was
more for Socialism. The purpose of his novel 1984 was to warn people of Communism and the long term effects of it. Orwell was born in India, his
real name being Eric Arthur... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Stalin is much like Macbeth. Macbeth was driven by ambition and greed to rise to power much like Stalin. Stalin wrote a nota bene saying
"Terror is the quickest way to new society" during the Red Terror. The Red Terror was a mass killing of people in 1917 conducted by the
Bolsheviks. Forced labor for the peasants and around 700,000 people were killed during the Red Terror and many others were tortured or put into
slavery. The issues of the past or history is a running theme throughout 1984. It is a complex engagement on materiality of the past. The government
destroy any piece of history that they deem wrong. This is distortion of the truth which is why the proles are so important. They are brainwashed but
they seem to know what has really happened. A difference in Winston is that he looks at the little parts that build up London rather than be like
everyone else who look at London as just the three Ministries. The government's control the people in many different ways. Telescreens are one way
that they control their people. The telescreens allow them to monitor and to scare the residents of London. Although the proles are not monitored by
the telescreens. Surprisingly we are very close to these becoming a reality. Telescreens work on what is like a closed circuit surveillance

Contributions Of George Orwell
Orwell's Life:
On June 25th, 1903 Orwell was born in eastern India under the name Eric Arthur Blair. He went to school in England then moved to Burma, which
at the time was a British colony. He joined the Indian Imperial Police and worked there until his resignation in 1927 when he decided to become a
writer. "He moved to Paris where lack of success as a writer forced him into a series of menial jobs" (BBC). He took on the name George Orwell
shortly before his first book Down and Out in Paris and London was published. Orwell considered himself a socialist and briefly fought in Spain
against Franco's Nationalists before fleeing for his life. He wrote propaganda for the BBC from 1941–1943 and in 1945 he published Animal Farm
which brought his name to fame. In 1949 the now classic 1984 was published and the following year on January 21st 1950 he passed away from
tuberculosis.
Orwell's Work:
Most of Orwell's work was inspired at least in part by life events and his personal political views. He used his experiences in poor areas of London
and the slums of Paris as the base for his written work Down and Out in Paris and London. He altered some of his actual experiences into a work of
fiction that would be more interesting to read than simply telling his story. Orwell's later works often contained his political opinions, which he did
not masterfully incorporate until he wrote Animal Farm. In George Orwell: Why I Write Orwell said "Every line of serious work that I have

George Orwell Symbolism
Benjamin Franklin once said, "Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Franklin, one of the United States' Founding Fathers, talked about a frightened electorate and acknowledged the negative repercussions that are caused
by this group. Furthermore, in 1984, George Orwell explores a world derived on hate, control, and repression of the basic liberties of people. Citizens
are manipulated into absolving themselves of independent thought, forced to pursue loyalties to the Party. Benjamin Franklin's platitude is observed in
the novel through the use of symbolism, irony, and diction, and galvanizes the theme that forced fear leads to a fierce blindness and can eventually ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One such example is the rat, a common motif in the story. When Julia and Winston were together in the room, a rat appeared, which rattled Winston.
He commented, "Rats! In this room" (144). Clearly, Winston dislikes rats, and can go so far as to fear them. The Party uses this fear to their
advantage and tortures Winston in Room 101 to manipulate his thoughts about Julia, who he loved. The Party wanted him to abandon all perceived
loyalties except those towards the Party. Therefore, the rat symbolizes a common fear in everyone. For Winston, it just so happens to be this animal.
Those who deviate or are thought to deviate from the established code of conduct undergo through this process of pain. The usage of extreme methods
to force a certain ideology into someone shows how much control the government of Oceania exerts over its people, and that they do not hesitate to act
on this power. Also, another symbol of control used in the story is the telescreen. The telescreen is a device used in Oceanic society that can both
transmit and receive video and audio simultaneously. As a result, the Party members must live carefully, "in the assumption that every sound you made
was overheard, and, except in

George Orwell Privacy
Privacy at the Cost of National Security Big Brother is watching (Orwell). The truth is that anyone reading this paper from the internet has the right to
know that someone thousands of miles away could very well be watching (Orwell). On top of this shocking fact, a victim would never even know they
were being watched. George Orwell knew what he was talking about when he wrote of a society in which all things are monitored by the government
and an individual's right to privacy is breached for the sake of peace and safety. Some might even say America is such a society today. The citizens in
the USA believe that their government is doing all in its power to protect them, but when do national security measures such as spying and monitoring
become ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In pursuit of a serious threat, it is understandable that some information such as that might be useful. Many people will argue that the current
capabilities of different agencies are constitutional and are for the country's benefit; some have the belief that what they don't know can't hurt them.
Maybe government does have the right to obtain what they want for their discretion, and we should trust that they will not abuse that power. It is
true that the people of America do not know the plans of various government agencies, and perhaps it is best that we accept that and let them do their
work. Besides, just imagine all of the terrorist attacks and other incidents that will be prevented by these national security measures. While all these
points are logical, they're missing the point. Ignorance is not bliss, and a privacy invasion such as one that is occurring now cannot continue. These
national security measures are slowly eating away our basic freedoms and liberties. We cannot just let this pass by and become blasГ© on the matter;
it needs to be understood that there is a limit to what is acceptable and that is, what is necessary? The government does not need to know what
websites people are visiting, and it does not need the phone records of millions of Americans. These current government procedures violate a citizen's
right to

George Orwell A Hanging
"A Hanging" is a story that was written by the author George Orwell. In this story, Orwell narrates the inhuman capital punishment he saw while he
served in Burma as a member of the imperial police officer. It is a real experience in Orwell's life. He witnessed an execution that led him to feel how
brutal a capital punishment was and how powerless he was in which he could not make any change to it. From the narrative, it is apparently true to say
that Orwell was uncomfortable with the prisoner's execution. This is well evident when he points out "It is curious, but till that moment I had never
realized what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man." Though the author was filled with anger over the barbarous execution in Burma, he had to
oppress his anger because he did not have any position and power to make any change. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A sickly light, like yellow tinfoil, was slanting over the high walls into the jail yard." This clearly shows that he had no choice but forced himself to
witness the scene that he did not want to see. At this point in time, Orwell made his position clear that capital punishment was totally brutal and
inhumane. Furthermore, Orwell used a dog to express his sympathy and the deepest thoughts towards the prisoners. The actions of the dog make a big
contrast between the Orwell's sympathetic thoughts and the cruel actions of the

Geroge Orwell Essay
Geroge Orwell
"One of the things Orwell bequeathed us was the adjective 'Orwellian'.... It is a frightening word, generally applied to a society organized to crush and
dehumanize the individual, sometimes signifying the alienation of that individual if he dares to rebel" (Lewis 13). George Orwell, the pseudonym for
Eric Arthur Blair, depicted the importance of the individual in society and the danger of too much community in his literature. Through his personal
experiences, however, he explored the ideas of socialism and was torn between the individual and community ideals. In his literature and his past,
Orwell spoke against movements that remove the individual, but still emphasized the importance of community. Thus, he advocated a ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
He enjoyed the idea that everybody was equal, but he still showed resentment towards it. His inner conflict between these two ideas and his
experiences as a member in the Spanish Civil War caused him to choose a median between the community ideals which he saw and the individual
ideals which he missed: "I have seen wonderful things and at last really believe in socialism, which I never did before" (qtd. in Chen).
With the start of World War II,George Orwell began his fight against Nazism, fascism, and communism. In the eyes of many, communism became
interchangeable with socialism, and he criticized writers of his time that were in support of Stalin and his "socialist" movement: "Why should writers
be attracted by a form of Socialism that makes mental honesty impossible" (qtd. in Lewis 76)? In an attempt to pacify the radical communist
movements and change imperialism, he spoke of a third method to reform the British Empire–a middle ground that would create a socialist community
in Britain. John Newsinger wrote, "[He had a] call for a new socialist movement that would reject both Communist–style revolution and Labour Party
reformism in favour of a third way to socialism, a third way that he continued to call revolutionary but that was adapted to modern conditions" (qtd. in
Chen). Through this, one can see that Orwell wanted to avoid such movements as communism, which attempted to obtain control over the individual,
and yet he had a need to preserve the

A Hanging By George Orwell
"A Hanging" Summary "A Hanging" written by George Orwell is a first person narrative that describes the execution of a prisoner. The story takes
place on a rainy day in Burma, a prison where one of the prisoner is about to get hanged. George Orwell describes the jail cell by saying "We were
waiting outside the condemned cells, a row of sheds fronted with double bars, like small animal cages. Each cell measured about ten feet by ten and
was quite bare within except for a plan bed and pot drinking water." Out of the jail cell the prison guards brought out a prisoner who was a Hindu man
with a thick mustache too big for his body who was about to be hanged. In this story, George Orwell really describes all the events that occur before the
hanging. From the dog in the prison yard jumping up and down with his tail wagging interrupting the event, to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
While this is happening, the prisoner was close to his death. As he reached the platform, all you heard from the criminal, was the he was calling
the name of his god, "RAM!" Orwell describes the scene as "The hangman, still standing on the gallows, produced a small cotton bag like a flour
bag and drew it down over the prisoner's face. But the sound, muffled by the cloth still persisted, over and over again: RAM! RAM! RAM! " The
word choice and tone that he uses in the story is really depressing, and really makes the reader feel sad for the prisoner that is about to be hanged.
The way the criminal dies is described in detail by telling us that there was a "dead silence" and the "clanking noise" that shows that the prisoner is
dead. The use of the dog in the yard and how after one short bark, he retreats back into the corner of the yard shows the upsetting feeling he has for
someone getting hanged. To get away from that, he uses multiple ways in the end to lighten up the mood, such as how one man started to sing after the
prisoner's death, or how all the prison guards were invited by the superintendent to

George Orwell Homosexuality
In Orwell's "shooting an elephant" he gets stuck in a situation where he has to choose between what the people want him to do, or what he believes
is right. An elephant escapes and is loose in the town. Orwell decides that since he is an officer, it's his duty to help return the elephant back to where
he came from. Orwell gets a rifle, and chases after the elephant. When the elephant calms down, he and a crowd of people watch the elephant as it eats.
Orwell is the only one with a rifle, and the Burmese people want him to shoot the elephant for its meat and for their entertainment. Orwell does not
believe shooting the elephant is the right thing to do. He believes that the elephant can be returned safely; however, Orwell shoots the elephant, ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We buy our popcorn, our tickets, and some drinks and head for the theater. The movie begins, and on the opening scene, we see a gay couple. These
days this is very common to spot in different kinds of entertainment such as movies, television shows, and even cartoons. As a Christian, these types
of things are against my religion. Christians are against same sex marriage and homosexuality. Therefore, if I watch a show or movie with
homosexuals, I am violating my Christian beliefs. Same sex marriage is very common these days, and has become legal in every state of the United
States. The United States was founded as a Christian nation, however, same sex marriage has become legal. Yet,homosexuality is all around us, in the
television shows we watch, the celebrities we follow, even the cartoon characters we like, and has become very difficult to avoid. Leviticus 18:22 says,
" Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." Leviticus 20:13 says, "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a
woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Therefore, these scriptures
make homosexuality against my

In the essay "A Hanging" By George Orwell, is about Orwell, a police officer who will come to observe a man being hanged. Right before the man
were hung, the man was crying out to his God, making all the officers who were watching this happen and were apart of this uneasy and then the dog,
which is a guard dog, interrupts the whole process too because it was whining. Finally, after they hang the man, everyone laughs and jokes about it.
The hanging creates an entertainment and suddenly all those people lose their sense of morality. Orwell has 2 thesis' in the essay. Orwell develops one
part of his opinion on capital punishment in the beginning when he notices that the man who is about to get killed is an actual human being when he
stepped

'A Hanging' is an essay written by author George Orwell and is set in a society entirely different from my own. It is set in the 1920s in Burma – a
country in Southeast Asia – which deals with the very influential capital punishment. It mainly focuses on how Orwell – as a Burmese policeman –
deals with the brutal consequences a young Burmese convict faces. The way in which Orwell writes the essay, grants us the opportunity to decide
whether we are in favour or are against capital punishment by using a variety of techniques which include: the tone he uses; his choice of imagery; the
structure of the essay and the word choice he uses to fully describe his feelings on such events.
The essay starts off with Orwell taking in his surroundings and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is now that this man meets his fate for whatever crime he has commited. It is here, that Orwell – like it or not – witnesses how a man's life can be
taken from him in no more than the blink of an eye. The style in which Orwell uses to describe this scene is blunt, impersonal and factual. There is no
reason to try and use different terms or dismiss the blatant fact that this man is going to die in such a brutal manner. He doesn't cut corners or drag on
the story much longer – he gets to the point and addresses the readers exactly what is about to happen. Although bein the main focal point of the story,
the convict hasn't really involved himself with anyone or anything. He hasn't expressed emotion, he hasn't voiced his opinion and he weirdly hasn't
pleaded for his life, – which would be a natural instinct – which suggests he is ready for his time to come and that he has accepted the end. But, as he
was clumsily helped up the ladder and had the noose fixed around his neck, he started cry out a "steady" and "rhythmical" chant which involved the
word 'Ram' being continously chanted. Even the bag that was placed over his head couldn't muffle this convict's cry. The cry was delivered with such
little emotion – it was almost scripted and rehearsed – which suggests the lack of emotion that this man feels and that the cells has drained any real life
from his body. The superintendent seemed so indifferent from what was happening. "His head on his chest, the superintendent was slowly poking the
ground with his stick". The fact that the superintendent was calm and mostly everyone else "had changed colour" and some of the "bayonets were
wavering" proves that the superintendent is literally indifferent from everyone else as he doesn't express any real concern and is quite contained within
his own thoughts. We, as readers, are now seeing the true nature of the convict.

George Vs Orwell
In 1784, exactly two hundred years before George Orwell's 1984., German philosopher Immanuel Kant wrote: "Have courage to use your own
reason!", which would become the motto of the Enlightenment era, marking the turning point in history, freedom from the traditional or divine
authority. In 1932, twelve years before Orwell, English writer Aldous Huxley described a society conditioned by advanced technology. A society too
passive to think at all, let alone think freely. In his futuristic novel, Orwell gave a powerful portrayal of dictatorship. A society in which only Big
Brother, as the leader, is allowed to think, to think for everyone else. Out of fear everyone but the main character complies with that rule. Winston
wants to fight for his... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They work all day long for things they believe they need. Mortgages, loans, material goods and profit; profit above all. Huxley feared there would
be no reason to ban a book, for no one would even want to read. Huxley was right, reading is out of fashion and our world is shallow.
Communication is reduced to mobile phones and social networks, we use forums, chat rooms, dating apps, and spend far more time with machines
than with people. Realdoll, a firm in the U.S., manufactures anatomically correct rubber dolls for sexual pleasure, for 10 000 dollars each, then
satisfied customers give interviews showing off their "perfect girlfriends". Machines run our world, making us alienated and redundant. Both
Orwell and Huxley were spot on in their prophetic novels. Orwell described the dystopian world of dictatorship still existing, where Huxley's
Utopian view described the the first world technocracies. Whereas in the former people are forbidden to think for themselves, in the latter they are
conditioned to think they are free. In Huxley's world there is Soma, a pleasure drug, and in our the opiate comes in the form of religious beliefs and
nationalism wrapped up in patrioism. In Brave New World, people are controlled by inflicting pleasure, and in Walden Two, a 1948 novel written by
behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner, they are made to be happy with what they're given, so much so that they reject even the notion of free

Totalitarianism In Orwell
George Orwell has been a major contributor to anticommunist literature around the World War II period. Orwell lived in England during World War II,
a time when the Totalitarianism State, Nazi Germany, was at war with
England and destroyed the city of London. (DISC) "I know that building' said Winston finally. It's a ruin now. It's in the middle of the street outside the
Palace of Justice. 'That's right. Outside the Law Courts. It was bombed in–oh many years ago.'" (Orwell 83). The main character's being reflects
Orwell's own life experiences as a citizen in war torn England and how he uses this in 1984. George Orwell is famous for two major novels, which
attack totalitarianism. The first is Animal Farm a satire describing the leaders of the Soviet Union as animals on an animal farm. The second novel is
1984 a story of dictators who are in complete control of a large part of the world after the
Allies lost in World War II. The government in this novel gives no!
freedoms to its citizens. They live in fear because they are afraid of having bad thoughts about the government of
Oceania, a crime punishable by death. By employing literary devices such as diction, foreshadowing, and symbolism, Orwell composes a novel
"1984" which proves to be a gem in Orwell's collection of novels against totalitarianism. Orwell wrote 1984 as a political statement against
totalitarianism.
Orwell's word choice drives the plot of the story in that they introduce a new dimension, a world where

Frederick Douglass And George Orwell By George Orwell
George Orwell is the utmost influential figure in the debate concerning thought and power. Orwell does compose his concepts with some
invaluable attributes about politics and excessive government. Although, Orwell does share some unique characteristics and thoughts that
Frederick Douglass had as well, Douglass's and Orwell's thoughts on the importance of language compare to each other quite nicely. Both authors
believe that language is the ultimate way to infringe on an individual's life. By means of using their language to make themselves a considerable
opponent compared to political leaders. The following are a few ideas of how Douglass and Orwell explain the more advanced thoughts of
language, while at the same time be able to use simplistic language for mass audiences. For starters, Frederick Douglass was a former slave. As a
slave, Douglass wondered how life after emancipation would be once he got out of his belittling lifestyle. At the time of his enslavement, Douglas
could not read or write. While a slave and fighting for his freedom, Douglass could not express himself in the ways of every average educated
white male in the country. Although Douglass was determined, he wanted to become a book writer and show how he too could become equal to or
better than the average white male in the country at that time. Douglass knew there would be trouble among some free men as he learned to read
and write under the direction of his master's mistress. Even though he knew the consequences, Douglass still pushed through the perplexing times of
learning how to read and write. After the fact, Douglass had effectively learned to communicate using words and language. Douglass was finally
able to communicate his feelings regarding slavery and the rest of the country's political issues. What he learned from this reading, was that he could
not believe what the black men, women, and children were going through on a daily basis! In his writings of "Learning to Read and Write,"
Douglass states that " I often found myself regretting my own existence, and wishing myself dead; and but for the hope of being free." (page 3) What
Douglass is saying is the power of language brought him a new understanding of hatred and anger

George Orwell : The Political Pen By George Orwell
What sort of life and experiences could lead and inspire a man to write a story of a dystopian future that, over 50 years after its creation, feels like can
become a reality in the not–too–distant future? Keith Ferrell shows the life of that man, Eric Blair (George Orwell), in the biography George
Orwell: The Political Pen. Ferrell presents Blair in the biography as being rebellious and introverted yet considerate. Eric Blair is represented as
being a rebellious person throughout his life because of his earlier youth and the effects it had. For instance, by the end of his time at St.
Cyprian's, he had a realization: Eric Blair had, however, taken from what he could: a hatred for unquestioning obedience to authority, a loathing of
rote learning and memorization for its own sake, and a sense of awareness that class and social position counted for a great deal in the world but
that, for those not born to high class or position, there was not a great deal that could be done. (44) Blair was against many of the things that were
commonplace in society and had a fond hatred for them, which was not common among people; Blair aligned more with socialist ideas than with the
ones in place. Blair was against these standards and the way of things and wanted for there to be a greater sense of freedom in people based on these
ideas. Furthermore, while at Eton, Blair started to become a rebel and "different"; "He took to going out of his way to say shocking, unconventional
things, often

George Orwell Shooting An Elephant
The story "Shooting an Elephant" was written by George Orwell. The story consists of George Orwell wanted to do the right thing, the only problem
was that he didn't what is was. Orwell could of on his own, kill the elephant because the weapon made him powerful or his other option was killing
the elephant under pressure. He clearly was confused on what was best, many have their own way of seeing things but Orwell saw things as under
pressure. George Orwell shot the elephant for many reasons. He decided to kill the elephant because he carved in by seeing all the yellow faces staring
at him. " I looked at the sea of yellow faces above the garish clothes – faces all happy and excited over this bit of fun, all certain that the elephant was
going to be shot." (Orwell 136) Orwell was under threat by all the citizens of the town and what they wanted was for the elephant to be died
therefore they can take the animal's meat. He a gun in his hand, and everyone was eager to see him ready to kill the elephant. Orwell was seemed to
be at the point where he was willing to end an animal's life due to pressure. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
" They did not like me, but with the magical rifle in my hands I was momentarily worth watching. And suddenly I realized that I should have to shoot
the elephant after all." (Orwell 136) The citizens of the town only liked him because he had a weapon in his hands to kill the animal. Orwell didn't
want to end the life of the elephant but in his mind, he had no other choice. He was pressured into ending the elephant's life because he wanted their
respect. Orwell never had the intention of killing the elephant but to him all he wanted was people to appreciate

Benjamin Vs Orwell
Orwell was born as a natural writer in a family where he was the middle child. He was passioned for being a writer when he was at a young age. Until
his late adolescence, he tried to give up his idea of being a writer yet it only happened only for a few years until he realized that being a writer is the
only way that he can express himself towards the society and the political.
Orwell started to write at the age of four, where he wrote poems and stories that were somewhat plagiarism and mostly were unfinished. He wrote
newspapers, magazine, and etc.. for his school. The first completed story that he wrote was the Animal Farm where he discussed his life experiences.
He knew that good stories only comes from the writer's inner self; and that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Orwell expressed his own thoughts in novels like the Animal Farm and 1984. Because he wasn't obsessed with the politician, we can see that he might
have been the animal towards the politician field at the time.
Orwell was similar to Benjamin in the novel because both Orwell and Benjamin is the observances. Both are intelligence but most of the time, they
often seem to discern when injustice occurs and do nothing about it like how Benjamin wouldn't say anything about the injustice until Boxer were
driven off to the slaughter house.
1984 will much likely have an unhappy ending, where throughout the book he will for sure use mere words to describe scenes where he witnessed at
the early age using creative ideas from his own imaginary to describe the events.
Through this website, I learned that not only Orwell is an artist in writing but he's also in loved with arts. He believed that every fact that is published
can be changed, including autobiographies which are not supposed to be changed.
Because Orwell was born to be a writer where he had the abilities to a form an imaginary world of his own, facts that were given in news, articles,
making Salvador Dali autobiography to be untrustworthy at some

George Orwell Beliefs
George Orwell's Personal Beliefs and How They Affected His Writing Eric Arthur Blair may not seem like a familiar name, but it is the birth name
of the English author better known by his pen name George Orwell. This author is best known for his works 1984 and Animal Farm. Both of these
novels exhibit strong symbolism and convey many of Orwell's opinions, especially concerning politics. Orwell's personal background and strong
beliefs about politics, religion, and his exposure to many world cultures is clearly evident within his novels. His opinions made his works controversial
in their time. George Orwell's personal beliefs are strongly rooted in his views on politics. Orwell was a socialist and an anarchist sympathizer. As he
states in his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Orwell was born an Anglican Christian but lived the rest of his adult life as an atheist. He stated in an interview in the late 1930s, while fighting in
the Spanish Revolution, that "[I accepted] mechanically the Christian religion without having any sort of affection for it" He seemed to be forced
to attend church as a child, much to his disliking, but he still seemed to respect it. However, later he said that "As long as supernatural beliefs
persist, men can be exploited by cunning priests and oligarchs, and the technical progress which is the prerequisite of a just society cannot be
achieved." As he aged, he seemed to be less and less tolerant of religion. The absence of religion is prevalent in 1984 specifically during the
interrogation scene near the end of the novel. O'Brien says, "We are the priests of power. God is power. But at the present power is only a word
so far as you are concerned. It is time for you to gather some idea of what power means. The first thing you must realize is that power is collective"
(Orwell 276). O'Brien is comparing the party with God and religion, as the party wants have complete power and control the minds, bodies, and
spirit of its subjects. A few pages later, O'Brien says "the real power, the power we have to fight for night and day, is not the power over things, but
over men" (Orwell 278).O'Brien asks Winston if he believes in God or not and Winston says that

Similarities Between Orwell And George Orwell
Both Aldous Huxley and George Orwell's works were profoundly impacted by their environment and life experiences. They both grew up in similar
areas, and even knew each other, yet their works provide drastically different views of how they believe the future will be. Orwell's life began in
Motihari, India on June 25, 1903 as Eric Arthur Blair. His father was a British colonial civil servant, and he received his education in England. Soon
after he finished his education, Orwell began his life–changing involvement with the Indian Imperial Police in Burma. Soon after this, George Orwell
became involved with the Workers' Party of Marxist Unification, otherwise known as POUM as a shortening of the Spanish name. Through his
involvement with that group, he participated in the Spanish Civil War. Although he did not fight in it, Orwell also experienced the effects of World
War II, which, combined with his experience in the POUM, heavily altered his opinion of government and other high–ranking people. "His experiences
there had given him a distaste for imperialism, and his feeling about his experiences can be seen in Burmese Days (1934" ("Orwell, George.").
Socio–economic factors also played an important role in Orwell's development as a person. "Orwell later placed his family with typical precision as
belonging to "the lower–upper–middle class," and he clearly felt this as a misfortune, though in fact the combination of a sparse upbringing with a
reverence for intellectual values

Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell
In everyone's life there are moments that change us forever. Certain events that give us a new outlook of the world, or that just show us blatantly what
we already knew. For no one else was this truer than George Orwell. Born Eric Arthur Blair he is arguably the most influential novelist of all time. No
other author has had so much influence on popular culture, creating the hit novels 'Animal Farm' and '1984' which have engrained themselves into
popular culture. Orwell's life was a rollercoaster of ups and downs and has had many important moments. However, I believe that the most defining
moment in Orwell's life was the event he would encapsulate in an essay named 'Shooting an Elephant'.
First, what happens in 'shooting an elephant'? ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As he explained in the essay "It was a tiny incident in itself, but it gave me a better glimpse than I had had before of the real nature of imperialism –
the real motives for which despotic governments act." This gave him insight into oppression that he would encapsulate in his later writings. He learned
two things from his experience in Burma. The first, is that people who are oppressed often allow themselves to be oppressed. This indicates why he
hated the Burmans so much; even though he sympathized with their plight. If the Burmans revolted against their oppressors, they could end their
oppression. Instead, they made due with bullying and insulting the people who oppressed them, which changed nothing. This is encapsulated with
Orwell's final message in which he says oppression happens because we allow it, so don't. The second insight into oppression that Orwell gained
from his experience of shooting the elephant, is that the oppressors oppress themselves. He learned this from his experience with the crowd. As he
explained in the essay, he never wanted to shoot the elephant. Everything in his being told him he ought not do it, and he shouldn't have. As an
Englishman he in theory should've been in charge. None of the locals were armed and had no power; Orwell could have just as easily called it a day
and left the elephant. However, he knew that to grab a rifle specifically designed to kill elephants and have the entire village follow him to the
elephant, to turn away would've made him a laughing stock. To keep up his facade of authority, he needed to impress the natives and that meant doing
what they expected of him. Even though he didn't want to do it. At that moment, Orwell knew this was the true nature of oppression. When someone
becomes a tyrant, they destroy their own freedom because they need to do so, in order to oppress others. These two insights, Orwell learns, changes
him for the

Animal Farm And George Orwell By George Orwell
Eric Arthur Blair, under the pseudonym of George Orwell, composed many novels in his lifetime that were considered both politically rebellious and
socially incorrect. Working on the dream since childhood, Orwell would finally gain notoriety as an author with his 1945 novel Animal Farm, which
drew on personal experiences and deeply rooted fear to satirically critique Russian communism during its expansion. Noticing the impact he made, he
next took to writing the novel 1984, which similarly criticized totalitarianism by depicting an overwhelmingly melancholy dystopian society. 1984
achieved similar success and opened the public's eyes to the dangers of the spread of despotic regimes throughout the world. By examining both Animal
Farm and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was indicted for treason and forced to flee the country, and it left him with a hatred and fear towards the communists that he would harbor for the
remainder of his life. Armed with literary ammunition from these experiences, Orwell set out to shed light on the dangers of this type of all–powerful
governance in 1984. This he did mainly by setting up the character Winston Smith to mirror himself and his own views as much as possible. Both
Orwell and Smith were political rebels, propagandists, free–love advocates, and individuals in every sense of the word. He juxtaposed this
individualistic character against the oppressiveness of the Party regime for the purpose of highlighting the unjust tyrannical behavior of the
totalitarian government. When he writes "the two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all
the possibility of independent thought" it is clear that he is issuing a warning about totalitarianism that stems from nothing less than his own personal
beliefs and involvements [1984 193]. The novel altogether follows a similar theme of warning and by taking a closer look into Orwell's personal
biography it makes it clear where these fervent beliefs emanate from. Furthermore, Animal Farm, written in 1945, explores similar topics and themes
as 1984 and acts as a sort of precursor to the novel. Notably, Animal Farm sheds further light on the dangers of

George Orwell Legacy
George Orwell is the pen name of Eric Arthur Blair. He was born in Motihari,India on June 25, 1903 to British parents. He is most known by his
works "Animal Farm" (1945) and "Nineteen Eighty–Four" (1949). He was the son of a British Civil Servant. He was brought to England in the year
1904 and was accompanied by his older sister, Marjorie, and his mother. His father stayed in India and rarely visited, until he was released of his
services in 1912 and even then they didn't grow a strong bond. During 1911 he was sent to St.Cyprian's boarding school to get his education and in this
school he got first hand experience in the class system. He attended the school with a partial scholarship. At this early age he had noticed that the school
treated ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In order to get treatment he had to take various job offers again.With this he was able to build a reputation for himself. In the year 1941 he got a
job in BBC as a producer. When he found himself providing propaganda for his country during World War II (1943) he decided to resign since he
disliked providing the propaganda. Orwell was able to gain success and a legacy through his last two published books, "Animal Farm" (1945) and "
Nineteen Eighty–Four" (1949). His last book "Nineteen Eighty–Four" was inspired by what could happen if the government controlled every detail
about a person's life including their private thoughts."Nineteen Eighty–Four" was a short lived success for Orwell since he died the following year on
January 21, 1950. Due to being in the late stages of Tuberculosis. During his time of life, Orwell was considered an Atheist even though he was an
Anglican in name. He didn't pursue any religious affairs, but did continue in political affairs. The novel Nineteen Eighty–Four especially reflects this.
Since the novel is meant to show near despair for the future of

The Literary Impact Of George Orwell . George Orwell, Born
The Literary Impact of George Orwell
George Orwell, born as Eric Arthur Blair, was a British journalist and author. His works were compelling, especially, when it comes to his strong
political beliefs. He is considered one of the most widely admired English–language essayists of the twentieth century. As Elkins points out, he is best
known for the two novels that were written toward the end of his life: the anti–utopian political allegory Animal Farm and the dystopian novel Nineteen
Eighty–Four (New World Encyclopedia). With the publication of these two novels, Orwell became one of the most important science fiction writers of
modern time (Elkins). George Orwell, due to his early life experiences, inspired millions to challenge and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He went on to tell of the miseries of those years in his posthumously published autobiographical essay Such, Such Were the Joys in 1953
(Encyclopedia Britannica). Orwell wrote in his essay, "Class distinctions obsessed the children and the school authorities as well, and became an
excuse for a variety of injustices and daily humiliations. Those at the top of the hierarchy had the power to dominate, and to impose their will upon
those at the bottom." (Elkins).
In spite of his obvious intelligence and offers of scholarships, Orwell chose not to continue his education at a university. Instead, he joined the
Indian Imperial Police in Burma. He felt that he was being called to follow in the footsteps of many family members. For several years, he was
viewed as an impeccable community servant. He accepted a great deal of responsibility for someone of such a young age. The desire to become a
writer continued to weigh heavily on his heart, and he left his job as a police officer after just five years. He had the support of his fiance Eileen, and
they later married in 1936.
According to Encyclopedia Britannica, it was at this time that Orwell began to search for repentance for the guilt that he felt when he finally realized
just how poorly the Burmese were treated by Britain. He felt that the barriers of race and caste had prevented his mingling with the Burmese, and he
thought that he could expiate some of his guilt by immersing himself in the life of the

George Orwell Research Paper
Davin Rodriguez
Mrs. Cox
English
14 May 2018
George Orwell
George Orwell wrote many essays and books in his career. He grew up with little help. George Orwell became a very successful novelist and writer. He
also wrote six novels. George Orwell's most famous books were Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty–Four. Three of his six novels were non–fiction
books. Three important things about George Orwell is his career, lifetime and his famous book, Animal Farm.
An important thing to know about George Orwell was that he worked really hard. His real name was Eric Blair but everyone knew him by George
Orwell. "Eric Blair, the man who became the writer "George Orwell" was a damn hard worker" (Rodden). He wrote about his deep feelings. George
Orwell wrote ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
George Orwell sold about nine million copies. "When Animal Farm was published in 1945, its British author George Orwell (a pseudonym for
Eric Arthur Blair) had already waited a year and a half to see his manuscript in print" ("Animal Farm"). Orwell made good money just for writing
Animal Farm. "The money Orwell made from Animal Farm allowed, in 1947, to rent a house on Jura, an island off the coast of Scotland, where
he began to work on 1984" ("Animal Farm"). Animal Farm was avery great book. Many people were in loved with it. "Orwell's next book, Animal
Farm, a fable about events during and following the Russian Revolution , was well liked by critics and public" ("Animal Farm"). George Orwell is
known to be a very successful writer, three most important things about him is his career, his lifetime, and his famous book, Animal Farm. Orwell
went through a lot throughout his life. He grew up going through poverty and still created a good career. His wife, family, and readers are very proud.
His famous books will always be remembered by his

Unlike other novels that portray a perfect society, Orwell's 1984 does the exact opposite. Throughout the novel, we see George Orwell's views and
concerns about a controlled society. Orwell is constantly criticizing nationalism, capitalism, political dishonesty, and of course, totalitarianism in his
writing. Many believe that Orwell wrote 1984 to warn and convince leaders to avoid any paths that might lead to an overpowering society. Orwell
was trying to warn us about totalitarian power and how it could affect society in a negative way. Many of Orwells past experiences are reflected in
his books such as 1984. For example, Orwell was a democratic socialist who joined the Independent Labour Party up until World War II came about. At
the time

George Orwell Imperialism
The short story "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell is a memoir dealing with the relationship between two groups of people, the British
Empire and their previous colony, Burma. In the story Orwell executes an Elephant, who on accounts of the local Burmese people had killed a
Burmese man. Throughout the story Orwell represents the two main groups of people in very different ways. The Burmese are seen as spiteful
people that are wrongly oppressed and made to rely on the British for everything. These perspective comes from Orwell's own ethical beliefs as well
as being an enforcer of the Empire. On the other hand the British Empire is represented as cruel and oppressive rulers, but ones that lack reason. This is
because Orwell has "already made up [his] mind that imperialism was an evil thing" – he is "all for the Burmese and against their oppressors, the
British"(1). The contradicting ideals of Orwell's conscience and his job form the perceptions of the British Empire and the Burmese people ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to this he tends to generalize the population inferring that they are spiteful and resentful of him, but at the same time in awe of the power he
holds. Early on the relationship between Orwell and the Burmese is made clear as he "was an obvious target and baited whenever it seemed safe to
do so"(1). The Burmese people express their resentment of the British Empire by trying to embarrass the officers as much as possible. Furthermore,
Orwell mentions that "they did not like [him], but with the magical rifle in [his] hands he was momentarily worth watching"(3). The power Orwell
holds is in his gun, granted to him by the British Empire, and because of it he is resented but also respected. Although the Burmese are resentful and
take whatever chances they can to make his job difficult, they are very aware of a line that they must not cross because of the gun Orwell

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' Orwell ' Essay
Born Erick Arthur Blair, Orwell disregarded his birth name and changed it to George Orwell. After Orwell changed his name, he transitioned from
a supporter of the British imperial to a literary political rebel. Orwell lived in India in his younger years, and later attended a preparatory boarding
school in 1911 on the Sussex Coast. Orwell did not come from a rich family but a hardworking family. His mother was a French extraction in India
and his father was a minor British official in the Indian Civil Service. In preparatory school, Orwell was known to be a brilliant, poor student, and was
treated differently than the middle–class students. Growing up, he was shy and an ill–tempered boy who told his stories through autobiographical
essays and satire stories. In 1922, Orwell won two scholarships to England 's leading schools, Winchester and Eton. He chose to attend Eton, and
once graduated, he decided to follow his family's hardworking tradition. Parallel to his father, Orwell moved to Burma and became an Assistant
District Superintendent in the Indian Imperial Police. From boyhood, he always wanted to become a writer, and with realization of the forced British
Imperial Political System amongst the Burmese people he felt ashamed of his position; therefore, Orwell expressed his memories and reactions of
imperial rule in his novel Burmese Days and autobiographical essays, "A Hanging" and "Shooting an Elephant," all classics of metrical exposer. In
1927, Orwell decided not

George Orwell's essay titled A Hanging is an anecdote that recalls his experience of the hanging of a Hindu man in Burma. This piece was
published in 1931, four years after he completed his time in the British Imperial Police Force. Orwell is able to exploit his anger that he has against
capital punishment through various literary strategies in this essay. To start off the essay he uses fine details like "a sodden morning" and "a sickly
light, like yellow tinfoil" to describe a particular morning of a hanging. Because this is something he actually experienced himself, he was able to be
on point with his imagery and descriptions. The descriptions add to the menacing atmosphere which also creates a mood that is dark and apprehensive
foreshadowing... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Orwell notes that "a dreadful thing happened... a dog appeared and bounded among us with a loud volley of barks." The diction "dreadful" shows
his disturbance and objection to the hanging but they are his own feeling he just shows them through the dog's point of view. The dog leaped onto
the Hindu man and licked his face, the people who aimed to murder the prisoner; the dog conveys kindness towards the condemned man. By
contrast this nice action makes the executioners seem more shocking and uncompassionate. The actual execution of the Hindu man is then outlined
in great detail. The prisoner called out repeatedly to his god "Ram! Ram! Ram!" which built up an intolerable tension. Orwell then went on to use
imagery to describe the executioners as "the Indians had gone grey like bad coffee" just as coffee is discolored when it has gone bad, the shift in
colors shows Orwell's dislike of the hanging. Orwell said "There was a clanking noise then a dead silence." The quick, short structure and the
application of a onomatopoeia in the word "clanking" draws to attention how rapid and effortless it was to kill off the man without a second thought.
Again with using an emotional response to explain it through the dog's actions in the sentence "it stopped short, barked, and then retreated into a corner
of the yard." Using the diction of "retreated" infers the horror and revulsion at what had happened to

George Orwell
George Orwell works in Moulmein, a small town in the British Colony of Burma, as their sub–divisional police officer. The mood of the essay is set
when Orwell illustrates the setting to be a "cloudy, stuffy morning are the beginnings of the rains". This in turn sets the tone of Orwell's story to be
weak and uncomfortable. The Burmese express their hate for Europeans every opportunity they get, without causing a riot. Unfortunately, Orwell's
military supremacy and symbolic authority don't earn him any power to stop the abuse. As Orwell walks down the street, Burmese yell out unpleasant
thoughts and even trip him at the soccer games. Orwell says the Buddhist Priests are the worst of all Burmese people to torment him. Orwell is
opposed to the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Those harmed by the violence are either silenced, like the elephant, or lack the resource, like its owner who had no legal rights because he was an
Indian. Orwell made himself believe that he made the right decision and killing the elephant was legal, by making ideas to justify what he had
done. He stated "legally I did the right thing, a mad elephant has to be killed, like a mad dog, if its owner fails to control it". Orwell even shows a
different light when he admits he is glad the villager was killed in the attack because legally, that too, justifies what he has done. Being tyrant, or
being one who has dominance and power against another, means destroying our own freedom. Excessive power means excessive pressure, and to
allow the pressure to get to you, means all that power controlling the owner. The colonization does not only affect the powerless natives, but also the
colonizer. In conclusion to Orwell's story, we can learn from his mistake and conclude that excessive power ruins one's better judgement and

Authors oftentimes inadvertently express their opinions through their writings and George Orwell's literary work entitled, "A Hanging", is no
exception. Orwells short essay, despite being intended to be a journalistic description of an account of events, reveals his Abolitionist views
predominately through vivid imagery. In his story, Orwell transports readers into 1920sBurma to describe the events preceding, during, and following
the execution of a Hindu man. While serving in the british imperial police Orwell for the first time witnessed the unimaginable horror of watching a
healthy man's life end right before his eyes. As readers, we can feel George Orwell's disapproval for capital punishment in "A Hanging" quite clearly in
the description ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
George Orwell wasn't very religious but sincerely cares about the well beings of others. For example, in the story Orwell says, "I had never
realised what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man... the unspeakable wrongness, of cutting a life short when it is in full tide". In this
quote the readers can clearly see Orwells opposition of the death penalty. He believes that no one should be put to death from commiting a crime.
Orwell puts a high premium on the lives of people and we can see that when he says the man is healthy and conscious. When Orwell says the man's
life is in full tide he means that the prisoner is in the prime of his life and it is wrong to cut it short. Orwell is such a popular writer than many
people have published their own analysis of "A Hanging". One specific interpretation on isomd.wordpress.com stood out to me because it agreed
with my own analysis and explained things very clearly. The article states that in "A Hanging", "the subtle use of words for description is what
carries his narrative, not evidence". We can see this interpretation in Orwells strongest argument when he states, "I saw.. the unspeakable wrongness,
of cutting a life short...". The subtle word used for description in this quote would be unspeakable. Since Orwell does not use actual evidences to
persuade his readers he instead uses pathos in the hopes to make the reader feel as he did during the

1984 by George Orwell
Brittany Beard
Creative Writing
12/14/17
Abstract
In this essay, I will use three sources to develop an answer to the question: "What relevance does Orwell's text, 1984, written in 1948, have on
today's society?". I will discuss today's society's use of words used in, 1984. The sources given are all relatable, but i have chosen these three,
because I can give a better reasoning to how they are relatable. I must include Citations for all information I have provided from each article, and put
all information together in a eloquent essay.
In Orwell's, 1984, Winston Smith is part of the outer party. He works with the Department of the Ministry of truth, which is part of the... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are suspicions that the government use through devices with the ability to to scan our facial features to watch us. It's kind of scary to know that
the government has the ability to do that. In George Orwell's book "1984" they had telescreens, which can be related to the new devices that scan
faces. Wiston feels like the telescreens are watching everyone, and the new face scanners today could be watching us in the same way. There is a
new cell phone that came out that allows you to unlock your phone without touching your screen, it just scans your face. Anything with the ability
to capture a picture of your face has the ability to allow the government to watch you. Are we being tracked by the government through our cell
phones? In an excerpt from "Court case asks if 'Big Brother' is spelled GPS" by Adam Liptak from The New York Times, they explain how the the
Fourth Amendment could be replaced by new surveillance. There have been many court cases that have proven how George Orwell's "1984" is
becoming more pragmatic everyday. The global tracking system is being used as surveillance, in "1984" they are being watched everywhere by
everything. They are being watched from helicopters, telescreens, children, and just about everything. Facebook, Instagram, snapchat, and twitter are
all major social media websites that people are on everyday, they are changing everyday. On each

Brianna White English 1 Mrs. Hickman 29 November 2016 "Good prose is like a windowpane," (Orwell). In George Orwell's novel 1984, he
made sure that his message would be a clear warning to future generations. Orwell was a man who disliked authority and in turn wanted to warn his
readers about how a tyrannical government could arise and be a detriment to our world (Jurma). He uses 1984 to show the types of damage a
tyrannical hierarchy could have and how ordinary people can help to prevent it. Orwell uses different aspects of his novel to show future generations
what can happen to a society when their social, political, and cultural life is taken over by a totalitarian state (Grobman). Orwell first mentions how
people's social aspects of... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Everyone has different backgrounds and different views and customs, except for those that are members of the Party. Orwell shows that the
Proles, who do not live under the rule of a power hungry political party, have 'the power to destroy the Party' (77). They can rise up because they
are not forced into having certain beliefs or views. They are what Orwell wants the future to be, in contrast to the Party. "Until they become
conscious they will never rebel...," (78) is what Orwell is trying to tell the future. He wants people to know that they need to be involved in their
country and be conscious of things that are going on. He does not want people to lose control over themselves, similar to what happened during his
time period (Gerasimov). Winston says "The proles are human beings. We [Party members] are not human." (180) because their life has meaning.
The Proles have families and are allowed to express love to whoever they choose, whenever they want. The people have different cultures and
backgrounds, unlike the Party members who are all practically the same, because they are puppets in the Party's game. Orwell is trying to convince the
future that being different and speaking up is okay. The more that people are quiet and follow along with everyone else, the more out of control they

In George Orwell's "A hanging", George uses his personal experiences as an Assistant superintendent in the British Imperial Police from 1922 to 1927
to convey his argument against capital punishment. Orwell as an officer of the law is sworn to enforce the laws of the state, even if he disagrees with
them morally. Orwell wrote "A Hanging" using an event he acted in to describe his point on why capital punishment is a crime against nature. Although
as a police man he could not oppose the law, his story "A Hanging", Orwell shows his opposition through many symbolic forms. Like Orwell I too am
against capital punishment, by writing "A Hanging" George Orwell shoes the unjustness he sees with the use of the dog, the overall setting and tone of
the story, the words which he uses to describe actions taking place, and the words he uses to describe the characters.
Within George Orwell's "A Hanging" he sets a tone that shows his disgust with capital punishment as well as uses the dog along with the actions
taken by the functionaries to display the wrongness of the event that occurred. Orwell starts the story with a gloomy tone right off the back to
emphasize the gruesomeness of what will occur. When starting with "a sodden morning of the rains. A sickly light, like yellow tinfoil, was slating
over the high walls into the jail yard," (99), Orwell starts his readers with a mood of sadness and a feeling of disgust while simply just describing the
setting. Next one must look at how Orwell

A Hanging Orwell

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Brittany Jones

More from Brittany Jones (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

A Hanging Orwell