Essay On David And King Saul

Essay on David and King Saul
During the time of Samuel, why did the people of Israel desire a king? Why was Saul chosen, and,
ultimately, why was he rejected? What attribute did David display that made him a better king than
Saul? What sin did Solomon commit that ultimately led to the division of Israel after his death?
The elders of the tribes come to Samuel and requested a king. They say that Samuel is too old and
his sons are corrupt. They desired a king to "lead them" and to lead them and to go out before them
and to fight their battles. There was certain things that they did not want to do for themselves, so
they desired a king to do them. "The kingdom was established in First Samuel and consolidated in
Second Samuel. First Kings records its division and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
David was truly a man after God's own heart. David was a sinner just like so many but he set his
heart and pointed it to follow God and had absolute faith. Many years had transpired between the
times that David was anointed king and when he actually ascended the throne; and they were not
easy years. David had Saul's life in his hands two different times, and could have killed him and
even was even encouraged to do so by his comrades. David's response was "Behold this day your
eyes have seen that the Lord had given you today into my hand in the cave, and some said to kill
you, but my eye had pity on you; and I said, 'I will not stretch out my hand against my Lord, for he
is the Lord's anointed'" (Got questions). Solomon was a man of many wives; he loved many foreign
women and disobeys God's command not to intermarry them. "Solomon began on the right track as
he followed David's exhortation and purged the nation of those who posed a threat to Solomon's
power and covenant" (Hindson, 2012, p.180). Solomon's wives also turned him away from God
when he got old, and his heart was not loyal to the Lord his God, as was the heart of his father
David. Solomon did evil in the sight of the Lord, and did not fully follow the Lord, and his father
David did. Lust led Solomon to a place he never thought he would see, you can not serve the Lord
and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

How Does David Kill Frank
1 Samuel 26:7–13
Introduction:
David spares Saul a second time.
Observations:
In this passage Saul is king, but because of an unlawful sacrifice to the LORD in a battle with the
Philistines, the LORD prepares the way for a man after His own heart. (1 Samuel 13:13–14) This
man is David, the youngest of his family, and a keeper of the sheep. (1 Samuel 16:11) David is also
anointed by Saul in 1 Samuel 16:13 and serves in Saul's service in 1 Samuel 16:21.
Saul relentless purses to kill David from chapters 19–23, and in chapters 24–26 David has two
opportunities to kill Saul, but doesn't kill him. Because David knows that Saul is the LORD's
anointed, so he shows mercy to him. (1 Samuel 26:8)
David first refuses to kill Saul in 1 Samuel 24:16–21 and again David refuses to kill Saul in chapter
26:9–11 because he knows it is not his responsibility to kill Saul, but knows the LORD will kill Saul
by striking him down or in battle (1 Samuel 26:10) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the Hebrew definition anointed is reserved for specific people such as kings.
Guiltless: This word can also mean blameless or have the idea that responsibility is no longer
necessary. Guiltless is important in this passage because of David's refusal to kill Saul because he
knows God will kill Saul whether he strikes him down or kills him in battle. This shows that David
has mercy on Saul. (26:8) Live: David acknowledges that it is the LORD who gives life and he is to
show mercy. In this passage specifically it's showed in 1 Samuel 26:10 that life is the LORD's and
He will do what is His

Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals
Alinsky's purpose for the Rules for Radicals was to make a guide for prospective community
electives to use in bringing low–income communities, the "Have and Not's", by bring the low–
income communities closer to social, political, legal and economic gain in order to give equality and
justify the present establishment that promoted one's inequality. Within it, Alinsky meth's, that he
had learned throughout life experiences from community organization. Alinsky lessons," is the
oldest and largest community organizing network in the United States" (Harris, Maloney, &
Rother.2004. p269).
Many of society have never heard of Saul Alinsky. Though, his prospective shadows our coming
election. Alinsky approach is still used today, Democrats such

Saul and David Essay examples
God is the creator, sustainer, judge, and redeemer. However, the most important characteristic of
God is love. Love is an admirable quality. Genesis is an account of God's magnificent creations.
God saw that everything he created was good. The book of Genesis focuses on six persons and their
families: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. God blessed man and all of his creations.
For a moment, God's creation was as He intended; paradise. Man sinned and God became unhappy,
but he still provided for his people. God wanted man to repent. He still wanted things to be good
once again. Noah was of the "few" good people on earth. Noah was obedient and honored God. God
wanted to rid the earth of evil and start anew with righteous men and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Isaiah prophesized that people should obey and trust in the Lord. God trusted that Isaiah would
inform people that He was with them and that His love endures forever. In Isaiah Chapter 65–66,
god revealed himself to simmers. He said they would be judged both for good and evil. God just
wanted the people to be obedient. "As a mother comforts her child, so will I comfort you." God is
admirable because He once again was giving people another chance. "As the new heavens and the
new earth that I make will endure before me, declares the Lord, "so will your name and descendents
endure." Isaiah 66:22. God is to be admired in that in Isaiah 7:14 and 9:6. God prophesized though
Isaiah about the birth of a boy who would be great. God through Isaiah offers future hope for the
nation of Israel. Jesus would be the difference between light and darkness, life and death. Anyone
who offers hope of a better future is a person who we would look up to and respect and that is God.
God is always admirable in everything that I have known him to do. He protects us as we are his
children. He is hard on us sometimes, but is always loving towards us. God is to be respected
because he wanted his people to be obedient and live holy. He judged but he has never given up and
always gives us chances to repent. We are his creation, though a work in progress. God has a plan
for us and just tries

Hebraic Monarchy In Israel
The year of approximately 1051 B.C. of the United Kingdom Period of Israel was a significant year
in that it was marked by a shift in the Hebrew view of God and his position over their nation
(Hindson and Yates, 2010). For centuries prior to this date, the Hebrew people not only dwelled
under the theocratic institutes of Yahweh, but for a time, also viewed him as their supreme leader
and judge (Johnson, 2012). By around 1051 B.C., however, the Hebrew mindset had altered, and
desiring to imitate the surrounding nations, the Hebrews demanded that a monarchy be established
over them (Hindson and Yates, 2010). The ultimate result was the founding of the Hebraic monarchy
under the first three kings of Israel: Saul, David, and Solomon. Tragically, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For a brief time, Solomon followed in the footsteps of his father, and exemplified righteousness,
wisdom, and spiritual fervor in every action he undertook. As a result of his actions, the Lord
blessed his endeavors and the kingdom of Israel thrived and prospered under his jurisdiction.
However, Solomon had one great weakness: a love of women. Due to this obsession with women,
Solomon took many wives, most of whom were pagan and had no love for Yahweh or his statues
(Maller, 2011). Sadly, his love for his many pagan wives gradually led Solomon astray, resulting in
his adoption of much of their pagan religious views (1 Kings 11:3–6). Although he is described as
still acknowledging the Lord, his heart was no longer as devoted to the will of God as it had
formerly been, and Jehovah–Jireh had become only one out of the host of other gods to be
worshiped (Hindson and Yates, 2010). The Lord, displeased and grieved by Solomon's infidelity,
warned Solomon that as a result of his ungodliness and unfaithfulness, his kingdom would be torn
from his descendants and given to another. That is, his land would be divided and bestowed upon
another individual not of the house of David and the once united nation of Israel, would now fall
prey to great disunity, incessant war, and bitter rivalries, all as a result of Solomon's failure to
maintain an upright spirit before his God (Maller,

Samuel's Controversy
Samuel's hereditary succession
The Israelites want to set a monarchy like all nations, but Samuel, the judge of Israel, does not want
to establish the monarchy. Why is Samuel unpleasant to the request of the Israelites to set a King?
1 When Samuel became old, he made his sons judges over Israel. 2 The name of his firstborn son
was Joel, and the name of his second, Abijah; they were judges in Beer–sheba. 3 Yet his sons did not
follow in his ways, but turned aside after gain; they took bribes and perverted justice. 4 Then all the
elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah, 5 and said to him, "You are old and
your sons do not follow in your ways; appoint for us, then, a king to govern us, like other nations." 6
But the thing displeased Samuel when they said, "Give us a king to govern us." Samuel prayed to
the Lord,
(1 Samuel 8:1–6, NRSV)
Samuel attempts to pass on his position to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Saul is soon abandoned by God because of his disobediences. Yet, Saul's disobedience is
controversial. Patricia K. Tull, the author of "1 and 2 Samuel" in Theological Bible Commentary,
argues, "Saul's exact offense is unclear, and commentators struggle to reconstruct it, augmenting the
impression that he was given a test with no correct choices." In contrast, Marvin Sweeney, the
professor of the Hebrew Bible in Claremont School of Theology, asserts, "Although the narrative
can hardly be considered anti–monarchic, it takes care to raise concerns about the character of
kingship and its costs to the nation at large and it demands that proper kingship in Israel must be
exercised in accordance with the divine will." In this view, Saul has not been accorded with God's
will. Then, is this God's intentional choice? If it is true, why he does this? If God did not choose
Saul as the king, it would be possible that he is not deserted from God. Bible

Of Means And Ends Saul Alinsky Summary
I was particularly struck by Saul Alinsky when he discoursed about people who demand for change
but do nothing about it. Alinsky had a particular contention on the issue of means and ends, or in the
terminology of informal education, on process and product. He was certainly aggravated by people
who would not take action to uphold their principles. I would like to quote from chapter "Of Means
and Ends" in Rules for Radicals, "He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a
peculiar conception of 'personal salvation'; he doesn't care enough for people to 'be corrupted' for
them". This made me question my own values and principles, and encouraged me to not only
demand for change, but to establish concrete actions. The radical reasons that were employed by
Alinsky in said chapter were the ones that captured me most. Ethical and philosophical discourses
about what is right or wrong often leave open–ended questions in my mind. To say that something is
right or wrong, one may follow some code of ethics, (e.g. law of God, etc.). One argument might
seem ethical for someone, but it is unethical for another one. Meanwhile, I agree with what Alinsky
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This contention of Ainsky contradicts that of Freire, I think. They view things differently. As for me,
I do not completely agree with Alinsky's contentions on ends and means because I find it rather
opposite to my own personal values. Alinsky seems to evaluate actions merely by their ends, and is
so assured of the morality of those ends that he is willing and ready to rationalize almost any means.
This contention of him is somehow troubling because I think that certain means are never justified,
no matter what their ends are. For example, the murder of an innocent person could never be
justified even if it is for the welfare of someone else's

Why Did Israel Want A King
The first three kings of Israel, Saul, David and Solomon were men that had one thing in common.
Even though they had their own sets of strengths, they each shared one weakness, disobedience to
God. In this essay I will explain why Israel wanted a king. I will give you background on each of the
first three kings, their strengths, and their disobedience to God.
During the time of Samuel, why did the people of Israel desire a king?
The Israelites first asked for a king In 1 Samuel chapter 8. Israel had been ruled over by Judges.
Judges were appointed to rule and preside over Israel before the time of Samuel when the people of
Israel fell into disfavor with God. These judges had ruled over Israel and protected the Hebrew
people. Samuel was a judge and a good leader, but was getting older. Samuel appointed his two
sons, Joel and Abijah to become Judges over Israel in Beersheba. Joel and Abijah did not rule as
Samuel did, they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1 Samuel 9:2 It states: "Kish had a son named Saul, as handsome a young man as could be found
anywhere in Israel, and he was a head taller than anyone else." Saul by all accounts was a
charismatic and liked man, and the people of Israel seemed to be smitten by him. Saul was chosen to
be the first king of Israel, being anointed by Samuel (1 Samuel 10:1) and his kingship was
established after the Israelites victory at Jabesh–Gilead. Saul though was a disobedient man, as
Hindson and Yates wrote "The people seemed to focus on Saul's outward appearance rather than
heart." Saul started to make foolish, disobedient, and strange decisions. Saul carried out priesthood
duties and prepared a burnt offering when he meant to prepare a peace offering (1 Samuel 13:9) Saul
was ultimately rejected by the Israelites because of his presumptuous disobedience to God and
disregard of His instructions (1 Samuel 15:23). The Lord had sought a man after His own heart (1
Samuel 13:13) and found that man in

King Saul : The Book Of 1 Samuel
King Saul
In the book of 1 Samuel, we learn about the life of King Saul, who even though he started off very
well, he didn't finish very well. There is a cliche that sums up the life of King Saul, which says, "It's
not how you start, it's how you finish." However, Saul's disobedient actions, unfortunately, derailed
what possibly could have been a God honoring rule over Israel. In order to understand Saul, we need
to take a look into his life and how he lived before he became king.
Saul was the son of Kish from the tribe of Benjamin, and he had come from a family that was very
well off. Scripture tells us that there was no one among the tribe that was as handsome as Saul
(1Sam 9:2b). As being the chosen one of God, he was to lead the scattered nations of Israel that did
not have a central leader other than God. Years before Saul's rule, there was a prophet named
Samuel that was Israel's religious leader, however, Samuel was not a king. The Philistines were
enemies to Israel and because of the threat of war, the Israelites had pressed Samuel to appoint a
king.
With the task at hand, Samuel knew he had to anoint a king from among the people, and Saul was
already anointed secretly but was not publicly anointed to be king. His reign started peacefully
around 1010 BC, however, the peace of king Saul's reign did not last. Saul's downfall began in 1
Sam 13:9–12 which reads, "So Saul said (this is after waiting seven days for Samuel to return to
Gilgal) 'bring a burnt offering and

Introducing The Monarchy By 1 Samuel
Introducing the Monarchy
Introduction
1 Samuel presents Israel transformation from theocracy to monarchy as theological and
sociopolitical. Knut Heim mentions, "Such transformation could not take place without stresses and
conflicts. The book of Samuel in general, and chaps. 8–15 in particular, reflect the tensions and
ambiguities of these transitional time." The Israel's request of a king is seen desperate and insistence
to become like other nations, due to internal and external crises. Of course, it was an evil thing to
ask for because they were the God's chosen people and God was their divine king. They are
supposed to be different than other nations. Nevertheless, God graciously gives them a king, Saul,
who eventually fails but God's eternal plan of kingship unfolds as he choses a king for himself in
David.
Although 1 Samuel narrates the transition from theocracy, the judge, Samuel to a monarchial nation
of Israel, the narrator reminds that Yahweh was already their mighty king and who had also proven
himself trustworthy and also quite capable of calling out charismatic judges to lead the people in
times of emergency after all he is the God. The Israel nation was God's chosen people and under
God's care and divine kingship. In Samuel 7 we see obedience of Israel to God's appointed judge,
Samuel, that favored God's deliverance of Israel from the hands of Philistines. There is no doubt
Israel had not seen and experienced ultimate power of deliverance.

The Friendship Of David And Jonathan
Saul's son Jonathan found great favor in David. Jonathan grew to love David, and helped protect
him from Saul's wrath. The friendship of David and Jonathan was the effect of divine grace, which
produces in true believers one heart and one soul, and causes them to love each other (Henry, 2000).
It is possible to love other people even if a parent has hatred in their hearts towards them. When
Jonathan could not stop Saul's march toward evil, he could warn the intended victim, thus averting a
tragedy (Fackler, 2006). Christians in today's world can learn a valuable lesson of loving others even
if there are issues that are impending on the situation that could cause anger to occur. Jonathan was
loyal to David causing a positive reflection on his covenant and commitment to his friendship with
David. "And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of
Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul" (KJV, 1 Samuel
18:1). Jonathan vowed to help David and stood by his word. Those who love Christ as their own
souls will be willing to join themselves to him in an everlasting covenant (Henry, 2001). I was
unaware that David and Jonathan had such a special bond; and made me think about my own life
and my commitment to my friends. There can be strength found in God's word if you put him first as
David did in his own battles.
How 1 Samuel affects Christians Today
The teachings of 1 Samuel shares valuable

Theme Of Seize The Day By Saul Bellow
Bellow is considered as one of the most celebrated authors of the 20th century and American
literature's most resourceful writer for all times. He has come to his prominence slowly through a
careful building up of a body of work, a composition displaying greater insight, range of power,
with each new novel. Since his appearance on the literary scene in the midforties, Saul Bellow,
recipient of the 1976 Nobel Prize for literature, has left his mark on the international literary world.
He is one the few contemporary authors who has been able to sustain the interest and dominate the
field of academic and scholarly inquiry for over four decades. His fiction typically addresses the
meaning of human existence in an increasingly aloof and world of mechanism. Writing in a
humorous, subjective style, Bellow often depicts introspective individuals sorting out a conflict
between the old world and the new world values while coping with personal anxieties and
objectives. Saul bellow has been a most persistent chronicler of America's restless search for
Alienation or sense of partition is one of the leading themes in Bellow's novel Seize the Day. Saul
Bellow is primarily concerned with the well–worn modern dilemma of the individual: desperately
isolated and profoundly alone in a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The novelist had pictured the theme of alienation throughout the story within the character of this
protagonist. Tommy is fighting a lonely battle against the encroaching selfishness, heartlessness, and
cynicism of the modern materialized world. He rejects the loveless world and the existence of the
voracious in human nature. Hence Saul Bellow exposes one of the major theme: the destruction of
human by his humane ideals. Tommy's character is a typical example for that: though he is alienated
from the society, earns the title of the protagonist but in an untraditional

Why Did Israel Want A King Essay
Why did the people of Israel desire a king? During the time of Samuel the leadership of the judges
was unsuccessful. The people of Israel grew far from God and had to call among the Judges and
Prophets to redeem their people. Hebrews tells us how the people that were called in to redeem the
people of Israel were faulty and flawed. Gideon lacked the courage, Barack was a hesitant leader,
Samson lusted after women, and Ehud was left–handed; these are some of the major flaws the
leaders of this age faced. Ed Hindson and Gary Yates explained, "Because a judge could only
partially and imperfectly administer Torah (legislative function), execute Justice (executive
function), and condemn law–breakers (judicial function), a king was needed who could more
effectively fulfill all three roles. The stories in Judges also, show that not just any king could
effectively govern the nation but rather a king who honored God's covenant" (1). It is obvious why
the Israelites desired a King, they needed someone willing to lead their nation and be successful. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Israelites wanted to chose their own leader and God let them; God knew it would fail and they
would soon have to depend on who He had for them. The Israelites rushed into choosing Saul as
their king. God even told them that none of the leaders they would pick would work out for them. 1
Samuel 16:7 states, "But the Lord said to Samuel, "Do not consider his appearance or his height, for
I have rejected him. The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward
appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart"" (2). Saul was ultimately chosen because he won the
victory over the Ammonites but it was not enough to redeem the people of Israel. Saul looked good
on the outside but just as God said, ..."For I have rejected him..." Saul was chosen as a rushed
decision by the Israelites but he was rejected because of what was truly in his

Saul Vs. David : The Characters Of Saul And David
Saul and David have been the essential two lords of Israel. each of them had been perfect,
chivalrous warriors. Saul laid the standards of Israel's time of power through crushing the
Ammonites and after that breaking the Amalekite burden. David carried on to overcome the
Philistines, the Moabites, the Syrians the Edomites and others, and to advantage oversee of an
enormous realm. every Saul and David had been chosen by God and talented the quality of His
Soul. Neither of them ended up noticeably impeccable, however both committed genuine sins. yet,
with this in typical, one end up noticeably customary and esteemed by method for God, in spite of
the way that he committed infidelity and murder; the other, whose transgressions respected far
littler, was rejected.
As we follow and think about the histories of these folks, we will conceivably observe their
characters reflected in people round us, and additional critically in ourselves.
There are few characters inside the Book of scriptures more noteworthy disastrous than Saul. He
could occasionally have had a superior beginning, or a more prominent discouraging end. He started
with the gift and power of God. He finished searching for help from a witch the day preceding he
and his three children were killed in war towards the Philistines.
David through evaluation proceeded with numerous times of tribulation and battling as Saul chased
and oppressed him, till in distress he fled to the Philistines for asylum. God saved him

Interpersonal Sins And Omissive Sins
God makes it clear that when the Israelites commit iniquity, he will punish them (2 Samuel 7:14).
Their sin warrants God's discipline, but as we see throughout the book of Samuel, God punishes
certain types of sins more harshly than others. Sins that are against another person, such as David
murdering Uriah, have milder consequences than sins that involve lacking to do something, such as
Saul's deficiency of prayer during his reign. I will argue that omissive sins are more offensive to the
Lord than interpersonal sins as determined by the severity of God's punishment. I will prove this
first by defining what comprises interpersonal sins and what constitutes omissive sins. I will then
assess how God punishes each type of sin respectively. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, before God tore the kingdom from Saul, Saul revealed a lack of repentance and
humility. Saul disobeyed God's command to obliterate the Amalekites, then tried to justify his
disobedience in saying that "the people spared the best of the sheep and the cattle, to sacrifice to the
Lord your God" (1 Samuel 15:3; 1 Samuel 15:15) Not only did Saul fail to repent, but he also failed
to honor the Lord in claiming that his sacrifice was for "your", or Samuel's, God. He didn't
acknowledge God as his own, making it appear that all of Israel's successes were by his own
strength. It is only after Samuel tells Saul that the Lord has rejected him that he admits that he was
in sin the entire time and saved the animals because he "feared the people and obeyed their voice" (1
Samuel 15:14).
Yet, even after Saul admitted his sin before Samuel, he still neglected his obligation to remain
humble. Saul said, "honor me now before the elders of my people, [...] so that I may worship the
Lord" (1 Samuel 15:30). This reveals that he worshiped God on a conditional basis and addresses
the Israelites as "my people", claiming ownership and kingship over God's chosen people. This
action reveals that Saul not only is putting his own agenda before the Lord, but he is also failing to
acknowledge the Lord's authority altogether. Even after being warned of the dangers of living
outside of God's will, Saul continues to be self–reliant and disobedient through his impatience in
waiting on

King David Research Paper
In the biblical world, Samuel was the last of the judges, but he was too old to lead the Israelites, and
all his sons were morally wrong to lead a nation. Instead of having another judge to oversee what
happens, the Israelites wanted a king. First came Saul, and then out of Saul came Jonathan, his son
and heir to the throne, but divinely, God intervened and anointed David and the fitting ruler and king
of Israel. What makes Jonathan a hero in the story and life of David is his loyalty to his bestest
friend, his love for David, and his sacrifice in giving up his seat in the throne room. As one of the
most popular stories in the Bible, David is best known for killing Goliath with a sling and the giant's
own sword. Sparked by this battle, Jonathan, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even in knowing that he will never become king, Jonathan wholeheartedly submitted to the will of
the Lord and promoted the kingship of David. Jonathan saw that God had great plans for David and
as a loyal friend, a loving brother, and a sacrificial follower of God, he forfeit his place in kingship
and embraced his place in the sovereign plan that God set out for him. That plan extended into
Jonathan's last battle where he died along with his father. In return of Jonathan's loyalty to David,
David sought out Mephibosheth and cared for him in order to carry out the name and lineage of
Jonathan.
"Jesus said, 'Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one's life for his friends' (John
15:13)." Jonathan was a hero because of the following characteristics: his loyalty to David, his love
for David, and his willingness to forfeit his seat on the throne room. To fit God's will, Jonathan had
to sacrifice many things. He gave up all that he could have had as a king, and exchanged it for an
everlasting gift of eternal life with Christ Jesus in heaven. Jonathan was a true hero of loyalty, love,
and faith in his

Gender Roles In The Old Testament
Though the New Testament is essential to developing one's Christian faith, the Old Testament is full
of godly men and women whose examples Christians should follow, as well as not–so–obedient
individuals who serve as warnings of what not to do. Among the most famous of Old Testament
characters are Joshua, son of Nun, and Saul, the first king of Israel. Both men were chosen by God
to lead His people and succeeded godly leaders, Moses and Samuel, respectively. Yet where one
man fell so far from God that his kingdom was taken away from him, the other provided such
excellent leadership that Israel followed God his entire life and was able to seize the Promised Land.
Even before Joshua is mentioned as one of the twelve spies sent to scope out Canaan, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Saul was commanded to obliterate the Amalekites, yet he spared not only the best livestock, but
even the king, Agag. Adding further insult to injury, upon being confronted by Samuel, Saul placed
the blame on his soldiers rather than owning up to his own disobedience. Even after Samuel
informed Saul that he would lose his kingdom, Saul continued to shift blame: "I was afraid of the
men and so I gave in to them" (15:24). He also sought to redeem himself in the eyes of Israel by
asking that Samuel "honor [him] before the elders of [his] people and before Israel" (15:3). After
this incident, Saul and Samuel parted ways forever.
Though perhaps not completely confirmable by Scripture, another evidence of God leaving Saul and
vice versa is Saul's being tormented by a demon. "...The One who was born of God keeps them safe,
and the evil one cannot harm them" (1 John 5:18) refers, obviously, to Christ protecting the hearts of
believers, though does it not make sense that God would protect those who sought after Him prior to
Jesus' life and death? In light of this verse, it seems, sadly, Saul had fallen so far from God's light
that he was open to demonic torment. His later request of a witch to summon Samuel only further
supports this

A Christian Reading of Hamlet Essay
A Christian Reading of Hamlet
In a famous article, "The Christian Tragic Hero," Poet W. H. Auden defines a Christian tragic hero
according to the Judeo–Christian view that all people are moral agents and own responsibility for
their actions. One of his examples is Macbeth, who listens to the witches and is tempted to commit a
crime that he knows is wrong. Auden says that the audience's response to Macbeth's fall is, "What a
pity it was this way when it might have been otherwise." This contrasts with the pagan tragic hero,
like Oedipus, who is bound by fate. Because Oedipus can do nothing about his ancestry, the
audience's response is, "What a pity it had to happen this way." 1
Just as Macbeth's tragedy begins when he ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Indeed, he is echoing the well–known Bible warning:
For Satan himself is transformed into an Angel of light. Therefore it is not great thing though his
ministers transform themselves, as though they were the ministers of righteousness, whose end shall
be according to their works. (II Corinthians 11:14,15)4
Hamlet expresses a moral awareness here, just as Macbeth did when admitted to himself and his
wife that murder was wrong. Hamlet is admitting that he could be deceived. He goes on in the above
soliloquy, though, to justify himself saying he will use The Murder of Gonzago play to see whether
or not the ghost is lying.
The Geneva Bible on Ghosts
Shakespeare's England was patriotically Protestant. From a Protestant perspective there is even more
than just the possibility of deception. The Bible prohibits any consultation with the dead.
"Let none be found among you that...asketh counsel of the dead...because of these abominations the
Lord thy God doth cast them out before thee." (Deuteronomy 18:10–12)
Just as Hamlet acknowledges in the above quotation, the result of consulting the dead is being cast
out––being damned.
The tragedy of King Saul in the Bible illustrates this. Saul, the first King of Israel, has turned his

back on God, but he is still looking for advice before going to battle against the Philistines. He goes
a medium and

The Bible : The Old And New Testaments
Introduction
When it comes to themes that span the whole Bible, there are none nearly as prominent as covenant.
Apart from anything else, its importance is seen in the designation we give to the two parts of the
Christian Bible – the Old and New testaments, or covenants. The word itself occurs over 300 times
in English translations of the Bible. Beyond the use of words, the biblical story itself can be seen as
a series of covenants that God makes and renews with his people, binding him and them together.
We can see that God administers his kingdom through various covenants, and to trace the covenants
is to trace his unfolding rule over and relationship with, his people.
Covenant with Creation
So significant is the concept that some Christian traditions have held that we must see God in
covenant with creation itself, and Adam and Eve – since, even though the word 'covenant' itself is
not used in the first chapters of Genesis, it is clear that God enters into a special relationship with
men and women, giving them designated authority as those created in his image. Some have even
suggested that we should understand the members of the godhead – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – as
'covenanting' together in saving men and women, working on the assumption that all of God's
actions must be understood from the perspective of covenant.
Even if we decide that's a step beyond the evidence, there's no getting away from the fact that
covenant is a core theme in Scripture. The language of

The Desert Of En Gedi: A Short Story
Saul chased the Philistines away, and he was told that David was in the Desert of En Gedi. Then, he
chose 3,000 men from all Israel and began looking for David and his men. Saul came to the sheep
pens beside the road and he went into a cave and relieved himself there. David and his men were
hiding far back in the same cave, and his men said "The Lord will give you enemy to you and you
can do anything you want to him." David crawled near Saul and cut off a corner of Saul's robe, and
Saul did not notice. David felt guilty, and said "May the Lord keep me from doing such thing to my
master! I should not do anything against him because he is the Lord's appointed king." David did not
let his men attack Saul. Then Saul left the cave and went his way. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
David and Abishai went to Saul's camp that night. Saul's spear was stuck in the ground near his head
and Abner and his men were sleeping around him. Abishai said to David, "Today God has let you
defeat his enemy! Let me pin down Saul to the ground with the spear. I'll only do it once! I won't hit
him twice." David said to Abishai, "Don't kill Saul! The Lord himself will punish Saul." David took
the spear and water jug that were near Saul's head. They left, and no one saw them, or woke up.
David crossed over to the other side of the hill and stood on top of the mountain far from Saul's
camp. David shouted to the army and to Abner to get attention. David said "If you are the greatest
man in Israel, then why didn't you guard your master the king? What you have done is not good. As
surely as the Lord lives, you and your men should die." David asked Saul why he had been chasing
him all around if he had done nothing wrong? Saul admitted that he had made a big mistake and
acted foolishly. Saul concluded that he will try not to harm him anymore. David gave back Saul his
spear and said "The Lord will respect my life, as I have done with yous. God would save me from
all trouble." Then they both

Leaving The Yellow House By Saul Bellow
Saul Bellow wrote many novels; one of his novels "Leaving the Yellow House" is about an elder
woman who lives in a yellow house and is incapable to take care of herself. Her neighbors tell her
that they will help her only in return for her house. The Rolfe's are the only neighbors that really
care about Hattie and do not want her house in return. "Leaving the Yellow House" was one of Saul
Bellow's most known short story. When Bellow was young he was hospitalized for a while. The
time he spent in the hospital was where his interest in literature grew. When he was in school his
friends influenced him to write. He became so interested in writing that he dropped out of college to
pursue his dream of becoming a writer. Bellow served as a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Darly is a sixty–eight–year–old man who works at a dude ranch. He recklessly causes Hattie to
break her arm and never apologizes. As the story goes on he and Hattie are seen as acting differently
towards each other. They have less patients for each other. They do not like the new changes. Pace is
one of Hattie's Neighbors, and runs a dude ranch. When Hattie is in a car accident he offers his help
by giving her a monthly check. He said he will help if she leaves her house for him once she passes
away. Helen Rolfe is one of Hattie's neighbors. She and her husband go on many vacations and have
luxury cars. Hattie feels bitterness towards her because of the calm life that Helen lives. Jerry Rolfe
is one of Hattie's neighbors and is the husband of Helen Rolfe. He is Hattie's only real friend. He is
also the only person who understands Hattie's Pride. Jerry tries his best to help Hattie when she
breaks her arm. Him and his wife have been taking care of Hattie, but is unable to find someone to
care for her like him and his wife have been. Amy Walters is a self–sufficient miner's widow. She
lives twenty miles away from Hattie. Jerry Rolfe tells her that she should move in with Hattie. Amy
is a woman capable of taking care of herself. She will only move in and help Hattie in return for her
house. Conflicts that occur in this short story are Hattie vs. neighbors and Hattie vs. decision. In
Hattie vs. neighbors, her neighbors only offer help

Analysis Of The Book ' The Holy Spirit '
One of the most prominent features of the Holy Spirit is his ability to bring about change. Whenever
the Spirit arrives, the status quo is disturbed. When Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would bring
power to those whom would receive him, the power referred to was 'dunamis' power. Dunamis is the
power to generate the new and change the old. When the Holy Spirit arrives in a person's life, it has
character changing results.
Interestingly, 1Samuel chapter 10 tells the history of how Saul became the king of Israel. The
prophet Samuel had just anointed Saul as leader of Israel and prophesied to Saul: 'Then the LORD 'S
Spirit will come over you. You will be a different person while you prophesy with them.' (Verse 6)
Samuel prophesied the Spirit upon Saul would change his character; he would become a bold,
'different person'.
Why is this change significant? To answer this question one has to take a closer look at the character
of Saul. His character highlights why his change was noteworthy. It is in contrast to one's own
shortcomings that the significance and magnitude of the Holy Spirit's influence become evident.
This is no different for Saul.
Saul, which means, 'asked for' or 'prayed for', was the son of Kish, a Benjamite. Saul was the most
handsome man in Israel–head and shoulders taller than anyone else. God told Samuel he had looked
down on his people in mercy and he heard their cry for their own king. Therefore, Samuel had to
anoint Saul as leader of Israel. This new king

Saul Alinsky & Jane Addams
Brief Paper #1
Harvey Burchett
Northeastern State University
SOWK 4733 Practice III
Dr. Satara Armstrong, MSW
February 8, 2012
Brief Paper #1
Both Jane Addams and Saul Alinsky, worked to enact social change within the poor neighborhoods
of Chicago. Both would also go on to inspire many other social changes due to their methodologies
and accomplishments. However, Addams' and Alinsky's approaches to bring about social change are
often described as being polar opposites. One could argue though, that despite these superficial
differences, Addams and Alinsky shared a commonality that is not often talked about. Jane Addams
started the Hull House. She brought services to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This falls back to Alinsky's "do anything to win" mentality and win he did. The BYNC housed the
infant station and the Chicago Settlement never regained its footing within the community. Alinsky
had again proved the effectiveness of his methods (Hamington, 2010). Addams and Alinsky appear
to have very different organizing philosophies. Alinsky himself often commented how his methods
were so different than those of the settlement houses. These comments however, should have been
more directed at what the settlement houses had become and not at the originating principles of Jane
Addams' Hull House. Jane Addams herself would likely disapprove of the direction that the
settlement houses had moved towards. Addams and Alinsky both recognized the importance of
listening and learning the needs of the community in order to gain perspective. "Addams recognized
that when existing social institutions do not provide a reasonable means for citizen participation,
those citizens will organize to resist... Similarly, Alinsky viewed his organizations as fully
democratic [stating]: This kind of organization can be built only if people are working together for
real, attainable objectives" (Hamington, 2010). The connections between the philosophies of
Addams and Alinsky are inextricably linked. "The resonance between the social philosophies of
Addams and Alinsky is not surprising if the Chicago School connection is taken into account.
Addams and Hull House helped

Mark Twain And Saul Bellow
Humor in the works of Mark Twain and Saul Bellow
The inclusion of humor in writings is one of the essential factors that every author should
incorporate for the success of their works. The writings or rather novels with flashes of humor tend
to do well in the market for the readers as compared to other writings which are purely comic
fictions or without incorporation of humors. Humor facilitate in reader identification, assign positive
traits to characters, convey character relationships, delight readers and get them to read the material
closely (Column & Us, 2017). Mark Twain and Bellow are some of the renowned American authors
that have incorporated the use of senses of humor in their writings and this has made their literature
works successful for a long period of time. The paper discusses how the two authors have used
humor in their works. The American Author, Mark Twain, utilizes humor in his works through
several ways. Twain as an author forms unforgettable and hilarious characters in his works. He uses
Tom Sawyer who is especially prominent as a funny and clever creation in the passages. His train of
crazy ideas, thought, childish logic, acting ability, cruel pranks, wit, and imagination cause a
laughter to readers which make them read the passages several times. The composition of funny
characters which are intelligence in the way of presenting the ideas, enhance in creation of humors
in the Twain's novels. This makes readers to develop more interest in

Essay on Saul's Tragedy
The plot summary is about a man named Saul who was courageous in battle. He was a generous
king. Early in his reign he was admired and respected by the people. However, his life turned into a
tragedy for one reason. Saul did not trust in God. Saul and his servant had just left the Land of
Benjamin because they were in search for Saul's father asses. Saul had figured that they could not
find them and wanted to turn back to tell his father, but his servant suggested otherwise. The servant
had suggested that they go see a well–known prophet in the city of Israel. So instead they venture
off to the city of Israel and encountered the prophet. When Saul and his servant came across Prophet
Samuel's path they caught each other's attention. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When Abinadab realizes this he cries out to his brother and he tries to help Malkishua, but fails. In
his attempt to help Malkishua, Abinadab gets wounded; Jonathan sees this and runs towards
Abinadab. As Jonathan and Abinadab defend themselves from the Philistine they soon are
surrounded and killed horrendously. Their cries were as loud as thunder.
As the tide of battle swiftly turns against the Jews, as Samuel had predicted. King Saul tries to make
it to where his sons are battling, but is too late. He is too occupied defending himself from the
Philistines and can only watch as his two sons suffer defeat. Afterwards, King Saul gets severely
wounded by the Philistine's archers in his legs and becomes unable move. As many fled for their
lives, King Saul's loses hope in winning the war. After having to see the death of his three sons, he
gives up all hope in winning.
King Saul dreaded the thought of falling into the hands of his heathen enemies (King Saul's pride).
So instead of dying by his enemies he calls his armor–bearer to slay him. However, the armor–
bearer is to terrified and will not obey King Saul. Therefore, King Saul kills himself by falling upon
his sword. Since, the armor–bearer saw that King Saul was dead. The armor–bearer also fell upon
his sword and died along with his King.
Thus, King Saul, his three sons, his armor–bearer, and some of the army died together that same day.
Since the chorus is composed of experienced men

The Renaissance Or Modern Era Essay
The fifteenth century was a time when Italian culture embraced the arts and the artist responsible for
transforming medieval artistic style to what is called the Renaissance or modern era. The
Renaissance emerged in Florence during the fourteen and fifteen centuries, where the interest of
expression that had been suppressed, broke free and emerged with a sense of creativity, reproducing
their ancient culture. The sense of creativity gave birth to the Renaissance and the emergence of
humanism, resulting in astounding work by many artist. A city in particular, Florence sparked the
renewed interest by encouraging artist to create art and architecture for religious, political and
personal achievement (Adams 2). Humanism was a departure from the past of flat sharped line
figures, to painting and sculpting the human physique in its actual state. It was no longer seen as a
corrupt and impure (Adams 28). Artist relied heavily on the scriptures of the Old and New
Testaments to provide the history and ideas used to recreate events of the past with resounding
likeness to man. The story of David influenced Donatello, Verrocchio and Michelangelo by how he
is described in the bible as a figure of strength, and beauty as the chosen one to be King of Israel.
The story of David begins years before he was to be King, in the mountains of Ephraim where a
man by the name of Elkanah lived (eBibleStories.com). Elkanah had many wives, one named
Hannah was unable to bear a child, who prayed unto

Comparing Saul And David
Saul and David had a lot in common. Both were kings of Israel while Samuel was its prophet. Both
men were considered attractive. 1 Samuel 9:2 describes Saul as "a choice and handsome man, and
there was not a more handsome than he among the sons of Israel." David is described as "he was
ruddy, with beautiful eyes and a handsome appearance" in 1 Samuel 16:12. While Saul was sent to
find the lost donkeys, David was a shepherd over flocks of sheep. Both men were handpicked by
God. God revealed his choice through the prophet Samuel who also anointed them both.
Both Saul and David were men of war. Each led armies against the enemies of Israel. They were
both politically perceptive and operated prophetically. The difference between these two

Saul Bellow Response essay
In Saul Bellow's essay, Hidden Within Technology's Kingdom, a Republic of Letters, he reveals to
us that by the 1930's the media was beginning to make the written word obsolete.
Most of Americans are losing their since of literature. Bellow tells us of how Oswald Spengler, one
of the most widely read authors of the early '30s, taught that our tired old civilization was very
nearly finished. His advice to the young was to avoid literature and the arts and to embrace
mechanization and become engineers. Shocked by Oswald Spengler conclusion Bellow refused to
me obsolete. He had faced the challenge and defied the evolutionist historians. A few years later, in
an issue of The Wall Street Journal, Bellow came upon an old ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In 2002, only 52 percent of Americans ages 18 to 24, the college years, read a book voluntarily,
down from 59 percent in 1992. Money spent on books dropped 14 percent from 1985 to 2005 and
has fallen dramatically since the mid–1990s. The number of adults with bachelor's degrees and
"proficient
in reading prose" dropped from 40 percent in 1992 to 31 percent in 2003.
I believe that print media will soon become obsolete if it is not already obsolete. There are billions
of cell phone users worldwide. It is much easier for them to get the bulk of their news and
information online. Why would they go to a store to buy a newspaper or magazine, when all they
have to do is turn on a cell phone? I believe with the advent of tablets and e– readers, there will be a
time that print media is obsolete. I already find that anytime I am required to print something, I am
shocked that in 2013 we can't have an e–solution. With newspapers dying by the day, I think that e–
media will be the thing left standing. What motivates us to read? Interest, engagement in the topic,
desire to understand, having the choice and recommendation of those we trust leads us to a book.
How often do we take the path less traveled instead of turning on a computer or the television?
What might our society lose if people read fewer books? We may be slowly evolving to be less

A King Is The Ruler
A king is the ruler, the maker or laws, and is the heart and representation of a country. Dynasties rise
and fall, under the reign of their king. He is sometime called the chosen one, as he has the power to
either bring the country to its glory, or bring ruin and devastation. Thus, throughout the history of
Israel, the three kings – Saul, David, and Solomon – where all chosen by God, and each of them had
contributed to the development of the nation.
Before the time of the three kings, those who reign over Israel were the Judges. However, the
beginning of 1 Samuel unfolded the fading of their era (New International Version). By the time the
leadership lay in the hands of Eli and his ungodly sons, God had stopped speaking to them and gave
His guidance to Samuel (Hinson and Yates 163). Thus, in time, Samuel gained his judgeship and led
the nation to victory and peace. However, as he aged, the people wish to have a king. Since Samuel
son's did not proved to be faithful to the Covenant the way their father did, the people believed it is
necessary to requested for a king (Constable, Notes on 1 Samuel). They claimed: "(w)e want a king
over us. Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and
fight our battles" (1 Samuel 8: 19–20, NIV). Indeed, having a king would give the power against
other enemies. Nonetheless, the people of Israel ultimately failed to understand that their true King,
the one and only that helped them throughout

The Theme of Leadership Portrayed in The Odyssey and the...
Built–in qualities such as intelligence, good looks, height and so on are not necessary to become a
good leader. Anyone can cultivate the proper leadership qualities. In order to excel in their
leadership a good leader must possess qualities such as self awareness, courage, confidence,
innovation, fairness, openness, and dedication among others. Odysseus in The Odyssey, and Samuel,
Saul and David in the Books of Samuel, display these characters. However, at some occasions they
fail to do so. That is to say, leaders, being it great or small, chosen by God or people, are not
completely perfect.
Self–awareness is one of the leadership qualities portrayed in The Odyssey and the Books of
Samuel. Odysseus possesses this quality. Several times ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He shows he is weak and not ready to lead. (1 Samuel 9:21). Saul even hides when he is supposed to
show himself to the Israelites as the chosen King (1 Samuel 11: 22). Although Saul knows that he
cannot lead, he has no choice, he has to follow the Lord's order. At last, God realizes that Saul was
indeed not a leader–type person and chooses another person. God must have known that people are
not forced to be leaders, but they themselves should be aware of the ability to be leaders.
Confidence is another trait a leader should possess. Both Odysseus in The Odyssey and David in the
Books of Samuel demonstrate this quality. They have belief in their abilities to meet most challenges
that come their way. Odysseus never believes a person initially, being it mortal or immortal. He
always likes to be done in his way. Odysseus believes in himself rather than anybody else. He wants
to figure what to do for himself and not someone else do it for him. For instance, he argues with
Calypso and Ino because Odysseus did not believe them initially, but wanted things to be done his
way (Book 5, line 180 & line 370). Moreover, David, another God–chosen King of Israelites, shows
confidence when he tells Saul that though he (David) is young, he can fight the giant Philistine
warrior, Goliath (1Samuel 17:32–37). However, David confidence is from the fact that God is on his
side and will not let him down.
Courage is also needed in a leadership. This quality is portrayed in The

King David Accomplishments
Introduction According to the New Living Translation (1996) King David lived halfway between the
lives of Abraham and Jesus, in addition to becoming one of the most important leaders for Israel and
"a man after God's own heart" ( 1 Samuel 13:14). David's place of birth was Bethlehem, City of
David Jerusalem where he grew up as a shepherd, but he is better known for his youthful triumph
over Goliath, as well as being a poet, musician, soldier, and a king (Holy Bible, NLT, 1996). King
David died at the age of seventy after ruling for forty years. King David wrestled with sin, such as
adultery, family disorder, and rebellion on a national level, however he also experienced great
accomplishments as well. One great achievement was the unification of Israel. "Then all the tribes
of Israel went to David at Hebron and told him, "We are all members of your family. For a long
time, even while Saul was our King, you were the one who really led Israel. And the Lord has told
you, "You will be the shepherd of my people Israel. You will be their leader" (2 Samuel 5:3). It is
here that David makes a covenant with the leaders and becomes anointed as the ... Show more
"David then led his troops to Jerusalem to fight against the Jebusites" (2 Samuel 5:6). Jerusalem
becomes a historical and archaeological site when David captured the city and made it the capital of
Israel. Archaeological evidence was located by a Hebrew University professor Yosef Garfinkel that
authenticated the rule of King David. Objects were located in a "ruin called Khirbet Qeiyafa, a
fortified border city in the Kingdom of Judah adjacent to the Valley of Elah, less than twenty miles
southwest of Jerusalem and five miles west of Gush Etzion" (Gedalyaha, para 2, 2012). It is here
that items such as, "pottery, stone, metal tools, art, and ritual objects" were located (Gedalyaha,
para3,

Graduation Speech : The Lord Of Israel And Judah
May 18, 2016, will be a significant day for me and as it approaches, I am continuously caught in the
emotional tension of trepidation and excitement; on that day, I will be ordained to the Priesthood.
The season of intentional preparation over the past twelve months has been sobering and humbling
as the Lord, in his grace, has combed through my heart, exposing the vileness of my sinfulness
while lovingly disciplining and drawing my heart back to him. This class, throughout the pre–
reading, lectures, the post–reading, and writing proved to be immensely valuable in my priestly
preparatory journey. The most haunting, yet captivating theme was that of seeking the Lord. 1 and 2
Chronicles place a great deal of focus on the necessity of the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
32:22; cf. 32:1). Throughout these books we see as the king sought the Lord, so did the nation,
inversely, as they forsook the Lord, the nation followed (2 Chron. 33:9). Though pastors or priests
are not the equivalent to the King of Israel, they do possess a significant role in the spiritual
leadership of God's covenant people. Consequently, this class has caused me to contemplate,
prayerfully, the necessity and implications of Christian leadership in their passionate pursuit of
seeking the Lord on their congregations and personally, do I, like Hezekiah, seek God with all my
heart?
Saul, David, Solomon & Stephen
Nearly immediately after ending the genealogies, the Chronicler makes a point to address the death
of Saul and connects it directly to Saul's actions. He writes,
So Saul died for his breach of faith. He broke faith with the Lord in that he did not keep the
command of the Lord, and also consulted a medium, seeking guidance. He did not seek guidance
from the Lord. Therefore the Lord put him to death and turned the kingdom over to David the son of
Jesse (1 Chron. 10:13–14).
Saul's disobedience in seeking someone other than Yahweh cost him his kingdom, calling, and life.
The life and kingship of Saul feature only in one chapter (outside of the genealogy) with the purpose
of creating an obvious contrast with David and his life of

Saul of Tarsus
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
THE CALLING OF SAUL OF TARSUS
A RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO DR. BRANDON JONES
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS For
BIBL 364
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY ONLINE
BY
e of Contents
Introduction 3 Saul of Tarsus 3 The Damascus Experience 4 The Call 6 The Conversion Debate 8
Conclusion 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY 11
Introduction The Book of Acts is a literary masterpiece filled with stories of miracles, faith,
chronicles of the growth of Christianity, Holy Spirit encounters, and stories of supernatural
conversions. It is one of the main books of the Bible studied to learn about the power of the Holy
Spirit and God's ability to use anything and anyone for His purpose. The "call" of Saul was ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There has been much discussion surrounding the name change from Saul to Paul beginning in Acts
chapter 13. It is shown throughout the New Testament after Saul's conversion that he called himself
Paul and only used the name Saul when he referred to incidents that occurred prior to his
conversion. Other commentaries attribute the name change to Saul's desire to not share the same
name with wicked King Saul from the Old Testament who persecuted David, Jesus' ancestor. Many
significant people in the Bible were referred to by different names such as Jesus' disciples Matthew
(Levi), Simon (Peter), Abraham (Abram), Sarah (Sarai), Jacob (Israel). The Bible does not offer a
reason why Saul changed his name to Paul or indicate whether it was inspired by God or not. The
timing of the change of name leads us to believe it was because of his conversion and desire to
abandon his old nature and walk in the calling God placed on his life.
The Damascus Experience The account of Saul's conversion is such an important theme that it is

reported in three different areas of the book (Acts 9:1–19, Acts 22:4–16 and Acts 26:9–19). Even
though these 3 verses differ in the amount of detail they contain, they all focus on different aspects
of the miraculous encounter. Charles

King David Research Paper
Introduction
The biblical story of King David and his conflict with King Saul is one of the most notable stories in
the Hebrew Bible. The case can be made that it was the Lord's intention to give Israel a king all
along, but the people of Israel didn't want to wait for what the Lord had for them wanted a King for
the wrong motives and reasons. As it is stated in Samuel 8, the elders of Israel gathered together and
went to Samuel asking for a King. After warnings from Samuel, Samuel obeyed the people of Israel
and the Lord and made Saul the first King of Israel.
Saul Chosen To Be King
Saul was the son of Kish. He came from a very well known family and was characterized as very
tall, and handsome in his appearance. The scripture states that "there was not a man among the sons
of Israel more handsome than he, being taller than any of the people from his shoulder and upward"
(1 Samuel 9:2). He was the one God chose to lead the fearful nation of Israel, which consisted of
tribes that did not have a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Often times they are people we would least expect. From Genesis to Revelation, the Lord used
ordinary people to meet the needs and be used as His instruments to bring deliverance, provision, or
leadership. God chose a young shepherd boy named David to be the King of Israel. God uses people
to meet needs, accomplish worthwhile tasks, and open doors of opportunity that possibly only God
and the person in need know about. In faith and trust, we pray and God answers our prayers,
sometimes in unexpected ways (Hiehle, Mark). This story is a great example of how God can use
anyone and we should never underestimate His power or even the power and faith of a little boy.
David had practiced having faith in God to help protect the sheep. This was also preparing him to
have faith while battling Goliath because he knew God would not leave him or forsake him (Seters,
J.

King Essays : King Saul
King Saul
I like to read stories that have good endings, but some of the finest lessons we can learn come from
stories with unhappy endings.
For a lot of years Gods people were ruled by Judges; however, they looked out there across the
borders and saw people being ruled by kings and they wanted a king, too. God did not favor them
having a king, but they thought they would fair better if they just had a king. So God permitted them
to have one.
God told Samuel to locate the right person to be Israel's first king. Well, he looked at a lot of people;
God guiding him all the time. And finally he selected Saul. Saul was just a boy, but he was a tall,
striking and modest young man.
Now, Saul didn't come to the throne as the results of a hard–fought political campaign. In fact, he
wasn't even running for the office. I don't suppose that he had ever thought of becoming a king. The
day Saul left home looking for his father's live–stock he had no idea that something was going to
happen that would change his whole life.
Saul youth had been spent working in the fields and tending his father's livestock. No doubt, during
those long, hot days, he must have thought: "If I make it until I am old enough to leave home, I'll
find an easier job." I well recall, as a boy growing up on a farm, thinking that if I ever get out of this
cotton field or the cucumber patch and away from those nasty cows, I'd never go back and I didn't.
But, I never expected to be a king and I don't imagine

Saul And David
The relationship between David and Saul, portrayed from 1 Samuel 16 through 2 Samuel 12, is a
dynamic relationship. In the beginning, David submitted himself to Saul, serving him, protecting
him from evil spirits. David grew to love Saul deeply, and in turn, the two had a reciprocated
respect. However, as David grew in popularity after defeating Goliath, Saul became jealous of
David. That jealousy transformed into the fear of David, and that began Saul's pursuit for David's
death. In the end, Saul committed suicide, with feelings of resent over David. But David never lost
his respect for Saul, the man he believed to be "Lord's anointed". The turning point of their
relationship occurred in 1 Samuel 18, after David had defeated Goliath. After

Live Free Or Die By Saul Bellow
"Live Free or Die." These words spoken by General John Stark in 1809 echoed across our country
during the time of America 's early existence and still resonate with our citizens today in the early
twenty–first century. Freedom is a right on which our country was founded and that many
Americans have fought to protect and preserve over the past two centuries. As such, to speak illy of
freedom would be blasphemous; however, that is exactly what Saul Bellow does throughout his
literature. Saul Bellow was a decorated American–Canadian writer who published numerous books
throughout the 20th century winning awards that spanned from the Pulitzer Prize to the Nobel Prize
for Literature. He was born on June 10th, 1915 in Quebec, Canada were he spent ... Show more
Throughout all three of his novels, Bellow fostered a close relationship between his main character
and one of their family members through the implementation of various types of literary devices – in
Dangling Man, he does so with Joseph 's wife. This bond between both characters was demonstrated
when Joseph purposely with held information from his spouse – Iva – to "spare her" rather than "
[sparing himself]" (Dangling Man, 199). Bellow implemented this action to symbolize their
relationship and the love he felt towards her. In this scene, Joseph showed that he cared enough
about his wife to try and protect her from the truth and would sacrifice his own peace of mind rather
than her 's. As such, Bellow forced the reader to recognize the that a Joseph and Iva had a very close
relationship through marriage. In the forefront of Seize the Day, Tommy is addressing his
relationship with his father when he was younger and stated that "[he] could turn to him" in a time
of crisis or need (Seize the Day, 15). Bellow placed this specific line in the beginning of the novel to
symbolize the trust that Tommy and his father once shared and to verify existence of their
relationship. Bellow further bolsters the existence of their relationship later in the novel when
Tommy shares with the reader the fact that they have the same name. This is a special bond held
between a son and a father that is passed down from generation to

Analysis Of King David And King Saul
In the Deuteronomistic tradition, when the people initially asked for a king, God held ambivalence.
Despite the Lord's warnings, the Israelites still wanted a king in order to be like the other nations
around them. As a result of this response, the Lord's anger was kindled, as his people had lost faith
in his protection as well as they threatened the covenant by showing a yearning not to be a special
people distinct from the other nations and ruled by God alone. Nevertheless, God granted the wish
of the Israelites through king Saul; however, this gift from the Lord was soured by Saul's impiety
and disregard for the nation of Israel. Only through the next monarch, King David, would the wish
of security of the nation be fulfilled. These fact can be seen through the ascension stories of king
Saul and king David. While King Saul initially had the support of the Lord and the leaders of Israel,
he did not correctly fulfil the position as monarch. On the other hand, David proved to be the
legitimate king of Israel as he served the Lord and the People of Israel willingly and as he
maintained the laws of the covenant.
While Saul had all the markings of a king, he proved, through his ancestry and his disinterest, to be
unworthy of such an undertaking. For example, in 1 Samuel 9:2, Saul was described in such a way
that, "not a man among the people of Israel (was) more handsome than he; he stood head and
shoulders above everybody." In addition, in 1 Samuel 9, Saul searched for his

Similarities Between Samuel And Elie Wiesel
Ch. 26
" Saul came after David again when he was in Hachilah
" David and Abishai went down to where Saul was sleeping and took his Spear and water instead of
killing Saul
" David and Saul talked again, and Saul ended up going back to his place while David went his way
Ch. 27
" David fled to Gath, and asked Achish for land that he may dwell in and he was given Ziklag
" David invaded the Geshurites, the Gezrites, and the Amalekites and left no man or woman alive,
then returned to Achish
Ch. 28
" The Philistines rose up against Israel
" Saul enquired the Lord about the battle, but He did not respond
" Saul went to a woman to bring Samuel back from the dead and Samuel told Saul that he and his
sons will be delivered to the Philistines the following ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While David was a king of God so to say, Saul was a king of man. Both had different desires in what
they wanted. David was after God's own heart while Saul was after the praise of his people. Saul
was cruel and unforgiving and therefore was separated from God. 1 Samuel 20: 30–32 is a good
example of Saul's harsh behavior. "Saul's anger flared up at Jonathan and he said to him, You son of
a perverse and rebellious woman! Don't I know that you have sided with the son of Jesse to your
own shame and to the shame of the mother who bore you?" (1 Samuel 20: 30) David was the
opposite. He was kind and forgiving and was at peace with the Lord. In 1 Samuel 26, David again
spares Saul's life, showing his

Essay On David And King Saul

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Barb Tillich

More from Barb Tillich (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On David And King Saul