SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Download to read offline
DOI: 10.1079/WPS200588 
Sanitary/hygienic processing equipment 
design 
S.F. BILGILI 
Department of Poultry Science, 201 Poultry Science Building, 260 Lem Morrison 
Drive, Auburn University, Alabama 36849-5416, USA 
E-mail: bilgisf@auburn.edu 
Proper cleaning and effective sanitation is an essential component of processing 
poultry, as it contributes significantly to the prevention of product contamination 
with microorganisms that cause food-borne disease and spoilage. Rapid expansion of 
production volume, increased further-processing and introduction of diverse ready-to- 
cook and ready-to-eat products, sophistication of the processing equipment, 
implementation of HACCP and microbial finished-product standards, and, more 
importantly, expensive product recalls have necessitated greater control over the 
cleaning and sanitation process. 
A sanitary process should effectively protect raw and/or cooked products from 
physical (i.e. metal, plastic, bone, packaging materials etc.), chemical (residues of 
cleaning and disinfection chemicals, lubricants, coolants etc.), and biological (food-borne 
pathogens and/or their toxins) hazards. In spite of this, many hazards continue 
to find their way into the processing environment and ultimately into the finished 
products. Microorganisms are naturally introduced into the poultry processing 
environments in high numbers with the live birds and, when the conditions are 
suitable, form growth niches by actively multiplying within the system. 
It is generally accepted that processing equipment should not be a direct or indirect 
source of microbial contamination. Many regulatory and advisory bodies have 
introduced hygienic design and processing guidelines. This presentation will review 
the recently introduced sanitary processing equipment design principles and 
equipment checklist by the American Meat Institute. 
A plant designed, equipped, operated and maintained with internationally accepted 
hygienic and sanitary standards will produce safe and wholesome poultry products 
for the consumer. 
Keywords: poultry; processing; cleaning; sanitation; hygiene 
From a paper presented at the XVIIth European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat, 23-26 May 2005, 
Doorwerth, The Netherlands 
©World’s Poultry Science Association 2006 
World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 
Received for publication June 14, 2005 
Accepted for publication July 15, 2005 115
Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili 
Introduction 
Every stage of production and processing has a role in the safety of poultry products. 
Preventative and proactive food safety programmes, such as HACCP, are globally 
recognized and implemented to prevent, reduce and/or eliminate the physical, chemical 
and biological (i.e. microbiological) hazards in finished products (Mulder, 2000). 
Processing phase of the poultry meat and egg production system has a special role in this 
process, as this is the critical point of transformation of raw materials (live birds or eggs) 
into diverse ready-to-cook or ready-to-eat products. 
Live birds represent the single largest source of biological hazards during processing 
(Barbut, 2002). The role of processing plant is to reduce pathogenic microorganisms while 
preventing chemical and physical hazards in finished products. With the exception of few 
systemic conditions, the muscle tissue (i.e. meat) of healthy animals is free of pathogenic 
organisms until processing. During first-processing (i.e. hanging through chilling) the 
microbial load on the skin and internal surfaces of the carcass are progressively reduced. 
From a microbiological quality stand-point, the second-processing (i.e. sizing through cut-up, 
further processing and packaging) represents a major challenge, as carcasses are 
portioned into various bone-in and boneless products and further processed, exposing 
increasingly more product surface area for contamination from the processing surfaces, 
equipment and environment. 
Cleaning and sanitation 
Poultry processing plants have evolved significantly during the last decade from basic 
slaughter houses to complex food manufacturing plants (Bolder, 1998). Increasingly 
sophisticated processing and portioning equipment are being utilized with high-speed 
processing lines often operating two continuous production shifts. Further-processing of 
poultry have expanded to include minimally processed products and aseptic packaging. 
Effective cleaning and sanitation programmes are essential in these highly mechanized 
and complex processing facilities to minimize risks of contamination with spoilage and 
pathogenic microorganisms. HACCP plans, when properly designed and implemented 
should incorporate specific cleaning and sanitation tasks, be pre-operational or 
operational, on a daily basis. Facility-wide cleaning and sanitation pre-requisite 
programmes and sanitation standard operating procedures (sSOP’s) help customize and 
document these procedures. 
During processing, raw materials, environment (air, water), employees, facility and 
equipment, can serve as sources of biological hazards for poultry (Thomas et al., 1987). It 
is widely recognized that, in a food plant, the manufacturing process itself should not act 
as a source of microbial contamination (Comar, 1988). Microbial contamination of the 
product via the processing equipment could occur either through cross-contamination by 
transfer points (i.e. product contact surfaces) or by microbial growth niches (Butts, 2004). 
Cross-contamination by transfer points is usually controlled by the Good Manufacturing 
Practices (GMP’s) and sSOP’s, as contaminants, for the most part, are eliminated during 
cleaning and sanitation. On the other hand, growth niches harbour microorganisms from 
the cleaning and sanitation steps, creating undesirable and hidden sources of 
contamination. The top priority in a poultry processing plant should be the elimination and 
control of these growth niches for pathogenic microorganisms, such as Salmonella spp., 
Campylobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. This can only 
be accomplished by sanitary/hygienic facility and equipment design and by 
implementation of production and sanitation process controls. 
116 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006
Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili 
Bacterial growth requirements are well characterized to include: time, temperature, 
water, pH and availability of nutrients. However, often many other factors contribute to 
the development of pathogen growth niches during processing, such as product flow and 
pile-ups, debris accumulation, mid-shift cleanups, use of high pressure during cleaning, 
temperature control, unique product characteristics (i.e. stickiness), and more importantly, 
problems with equipment design and/or maintenance (Butts, 2004). 
Equipment design 
Poultry processing equipment has traditionally been designed based on efficiency, safety, 
product quality, and sanitation considerations. In many countries processing equipment is 
evaluated and certified by the regulatory agencies for use in inspected plants. Guidelines 
for the hygienic construction of commercial or custom-built equipment are based on 
various international standards: 
a. Hygiene Requirements for the Design of Meat and Poultry Processing Equipment 
(American National Standard ANSI/NSF/3A 14159-1) 
b. Hygiene Requirements for the Design of Hand Tools used in Meat and Poultry 
Processing (American National Standard ANSI/NSF/3A 14159-2) 
c. Assessment for Cleanability of Belting Materials used in Meat and Poultry Processing 
Equipment (American National Standard ANSI/NSF/3A 14159-3) 
d. 3-A sanitary Standards 
e. National Sanitation Foundation International Standards (NSF International) 
f. European Norms for Food Processing Machinery 
g. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 
The sanitary design criteria and guidelines developed by these regulatory and advisory 
bodies provide benchmarks to reduce hazards from the use of equipment in food 
processing. Since 1997, with the introduction of HACCP, the mandatory evaluation and 
certification of processing equipment prior to its use has been abandoned in the US. 
Absence of standards and oversight by a regulatory agency removed the assurance that the 
processing equipment would not cause microbial contamination problems. Most 
processors purchased equipment based on set of agreed-upon specifications, with little or 
no sanitary design standards to follow. The American Meat Institute (AMI) Equipment 
Design Task Force has created a list of 10 Principles of Sanitary Equipment Design (AMI, 
2003) to guide the equipment manufacturers in modifying their equipment designs. To aid 
in equipment evaluations, a checklist is also added to each of the 10 principles listed 
(Table 1). These checklists allow processors to conduct a sanitary design audit of the 
equipment based on assigned points. To be effective, the equipment must be used in the 
processing line for 90-day period, disassembled to its normal daily level, and evaluated 
Table 1 The American Meat Institute’s 10 Principles of Sanitary Design. 
1. Cleanable to a microbiological level 
2. Made of compatible materials 
3. Accessible for inspection, maintenance, cleaning and sanitation 
4. No product or liquid collection 
5. Hollow areas hermetically sealed 
6. No niches 
7. Sanitary operational performance 
8. Hygienic design of maintenance enclosures 
9. Hygienic compatibility with other plant systems 
10. Validated cleaning and sanitizing protocol 
World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 117
Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili 
both visually and microbiologically. In the audit form, full points are assigned to 
satisfactory, one-half points assigned to marginal, and no points are given to unsatisfactory 
items. A score of 1000 is acceptable, whereas any equipment with a score <1000 needs 
improvement. 
AMI Sanitary Design Principles 
Basically, these principles require all parts of the machinery easily accessible for cleaning 
and sanitation, and elimination of places on the machine that could trap product debris and 
other material that could result in the development of pathogen growth niches: 
CLEANABLE TO A MICROBIOLOGICAL LEVEL 
Food equipment must be constructed to ensure effective and efficient cleaning of the 
equipment over its life span (100 points total). As measured post-installation: 
a. The equipment should be designed as to prevent bacterial ingress, survival, growth and 
reproduction on both product and non- product contact surfaces (20 points). 
b. All surfaces are cleanable as measured by less than one colony-forming unit (CFU) per 
25 square cm, less than one CFU per 10 ml when the item is rinsed, acceptable RLU 
(device specific) when measured by residual adenosine triphosphate, and/or negative 
for residual protein or carbohydrate when using swabs (20 points). 
c. All surfaces are accessible for mechanical cleaning and treatment to prevent biofilms 
(20 points). 
d. When requested, data is available to demonstrate that soiled equipment is cleanable as 
indicated above, by an individual using the cleaning protocol provided by the supplier 
(20 points). 
e. Surfaces are clean visually and to the touch, and pass operational inspections using 
sight, touch, and smell (20 points). 
MADE OF COMPATIBLE MATERIALS 
Construction materials used for equipment must be completely compatible with the 
product, environment, cleaning, and sanitizing chemicals and the methods of cleaning and 
sanitation (100 points total). 
a. Product contact surfaces are made with materials that are corrosion resistant, non-toxic, 
and non-absorbent as approved in NSF/ANBSI/3A 141159-1 (10 points). 
b. In general, stainless steel shall be AISI 300 series or better (10 points). 
c. Composites and plastics remain intact without changes in shape, structure, and function 
through cleaning and sanitation (10 points). 
d. Plated, painted, and coated surfaces are not used for food contact surfaces or for 
surfaces above the product zone areas (10 points). 
e. Coatings and plating must remain intact (10 points). 
f. Cloth back belts are not used (10 points). 
g. Materials such as wood, enamelware, uncoated aluminium, uncoated anodized 
aluminium, and others per NSF/ANSI/3A 14159-1 are not used (10 points). 
h. Metals are compatible with one another (10 points). 
i. Seals and O-rings are designed to minimize product contact (10 points). 
j. Materials used in construction are compatible with the product, the environmental 
conditions which they will be exposed, as well as cleaning methods and chemicals (10 
points). 
118 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006
Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili 
ACCESSIBLE FOR INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, CLEANING AND 
SANITATION 
All parts of the equipment shall be readily accessible for inspection, maintenance, 
cleaning and sanitation without the use of tools (150 points total). 
a. All surfaces in the product zone are readily accessible for cleaning and inspection (15 
World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 119 
points). 
b. Product zone components with inaccessible surfaces can be disassembled without tools 
and easily (15 points). 
c. Where access or disassembly is not possible, the entire unit is cleaned by clean-in-place 
(CIP) or clean-out-of-place (COP) methods (10 points). 
d. Parts remain attached or hung on the equipment for easy cleaning and to prevent 
damage and loss. Separate part carts are supplied as an alternative (5 points). 
e. Machinery and chain guards drain away from product zones and are easily removed (15 
points). 
f. Product catch pans or drip pans are easily removable for cleanup, so they are not lost or 
separated from the equipment (10 points). 
g. Al belting is easily removable or the belt tension is removed easily without tools so the 
surfaces underneath can be cleaned (15 points). 
h. All surfaces in non-product zones shall be readily accessible for cleaning and 
inspection (15 points). 
i. Installation will maintain a 46-cm floor clearance for any product contact areas or 
conveyor travel paths. Equipment design provides 31-cm of clearance to the floor (15 
points). 
j. Equipment is located 77-cm from overhead structures and 92-cm from the nearest 
stationary object (15 points). 
k. All air, vacuum, and product hoses and their assemblies on the equipment are easily 
removable for soaking and sanitizing (10 points). 
l. All air, vacuum, and product hoses are transparent or opaque, and meet product contact 
surface guidelines (10 points). 
NO PRODUCT OR LIQUID COLLECTION 
Equipment should be self-draining to assure that liquid, which can harbour and promote 
the growth of bacteria, does not accumulate, pool or condense on the equipment (total 100 
points). 
a. All surfaces should be designed to eliminate water pooling and to be self-draining (10 
points). 
b. Round framework is used for horizontal members where possible (20 points). 
c. Where square or rectangular bases are used, the flat surface is turned 45 degrees to 
horizontal where possible (10 points). 
d. All open surfaces are made of sufficient strength to prevent warping and subsequent 
pooling of water (10 points) 
e. Moisture does not drip, drain or draw into product zones (15 points). 
f. Belt tension is adequate throughout operations to prevent water from pooling on the 
belts (15 points). 
g. Dead spaces are eliminated (15 points). 
h. Materials used in the construction are non-absorbent (15 points). 
HOLLOWAREAS SHOULD BE HERMETICALLY SEALED 
Hallow areas of equipment, such as frames and rollers must be eliminated whenever 
possible or permanently sealed. Bolts, studs, mounting plates, brackets, junction boxes, 
nameplates, end caps, sleeves, and other such items should be continuously welded to the
Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili 
surface, not attached via drilled and tapped holes (150 points total). 
a. All rotating members, such as drive sprockets or belt pulleys, are to be solid or filled 
with dye and fully sealed with continuous welds (30 points). 
b. All stationary hollow tube construction, such as frame members or blade spacers, are 
fully sealed with continuous welds top prevent interior contamination (30 points). 
c. There are no fastener penetrations into hollow tube construction (30 points). 
d. Threaded leg adjustments are internal and do not penetrate the tube frame members (30 
points). 
e. Name plates and tags are minimized. When attached, plates and tags are continuously 
welded. Rivet- or screw-attached plates (often sealed with caulk) are absent (30 points). 
NO NICHES 
Equipment parts should be free of niches such as pits, cracks, corrosion, recesses, open 
seams, gaps, lap seams, protruding ledges, inside threads, bolt rivets and dead ends (150 
points total). 
a. Surface texture of a product contact surface shall not exceed 32 microns, except as 
described in NSF/ANSI/3A 14159-1 (10 points). 
b. Surface texture on a non-product contact surface shall not exceed 125 microns (10 
points). 
c. Internal corners and angles shall have a smooth and continuous radius of at least 3-mm 
(angles <35 degrees) (10 points). 
d. No lap joints (10 points). 
e. Hermetically sealed spacers are used to allow for space between two adjoining pieces 
to permit mechanical action during cleaning (10 points). 
f. Caulking is not used (10 points). 
g. All joints and welds are flush ad free of pits, cracks, and corrosion (10 points). 
h. All welds are continuous, smooth and polished (10 points). 
i. Sleeved assemblies (bushings, sprockets, and bearings) are no longer than 1.5 inches or 
are disassembled for cleaning (10 points). 
j. Press and shrink fits are not used (10 points). 
k. Fasteners are not used in or above product zone (10 points). 
l. Fasteners that are product contact surface must utilize the ACME 60-degree stub thread 
(10 points). 
m.If fasteners are necessary, they do not have exposed threads and have a positive locking 
method to prevent falling or vibrating off the machine (10 points). 
n. Belt scrapers do not have lap joints and are removed without tools (10 points). 
o. Belt supports are constructed from single pieces of material (10 points). 
SANITARY OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE 
During normal operations, the equipment must perform so it does not contribute to 
unsanitary conditions or the harbourage and growth of bacteria (100 points total). 
a. Buttons on control panels are easily cleaned and sanitized during operations (15 
points). 
b. All compressed air used for blowing on the product or contact surfaces is filtered to a 
minimum of a 0.3 micron level and dried to prevent the formation of moisture in the 
piping system (15 points). 
c. No bearings are present in the product contact zone areas (15 points). 
d. A separation exists between the product contact and non-product contact areas to 
prevent cross-contamination during operation (15 points). 
e. All surfaces near the product contact zone areas are designated as if they were product 
contact zone areas (15 points). 
120 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006
Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili 
f. Product contact surfaces are made to prevent accumulation of product residue during 
World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 121 
operation (15 points). 
g. Shafts passing through a product zone shall have an air gap to prevent product 
contamination (10 points). 
HYGIENIC DESIGN OF MAINTENANCE ENCLOSURES 
Maintenance enclosures and human machine interfaces such as push buttons, valve 
handles, switches, and touch screens, must be designed to ensure food product, water or 
product liquid does not penetrate or accumulate in or on the enclosure or interface. Also, 
physical design of the enclosures should be sloped or pitched to avoid use as storage area 
(50 points total). 
a. Drives, chain guards, electrical control boxes, and bearings are not located over open 
product zones (10 points). 
b. Control and junction boxes are fastened to the frame in a manner consistent with the 
sanitary design principles (10 points). 
c. Utility supply lines and pipes are separated to prevent catch points and allow for 
cleaning (5 points). 
d. Utility lines are 31-cm above the floor and cleanable (5 points). 
e. Conduit and supply lines are not routed above product contact areas (10 points). 
f. Maintenance enclosures in direct wash-down areas must be able to be exposed to water 
and chemicals used in cleaning and sanitation (10 points). 
HYGIENIC COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER PLANT SYSTEMS 
Equipment design should ensure hygienic compatibility with other equipment and 
systems, such as electrical, hydraulics, steam, air and water (50 points total). 
a. Exhaust systems have welded seams with adequate access for cleaning and inspection 
(10 points). 
b. Vertical duct sections have a drain to prevent draining from flowing back into the 
equipment (10 points). 
c. Separate exhausts are supplied for raw and ready-to-eat product zones (10 points). 
d. CIP systems are designed, installed, and validated using a recognized third-party in 
sections of duct work that are not easily cleaned through access openings (10 points). 
e. Equipment is designed to meet criteria of waste water infrastructure capability to assure 
no backups of drainage lines result under normal operation (10 points). 
VALIDATE CLEANING AND SANITATION PROTOCOLS 
Procedures for cleaning and sanitation must be clearly written, designed and proven 
effective and efficient. Chemicals recommended for cleaning and sanitation must be 
compatible with the equipment and the manufacturing environment (50 points total). 
a. Cleaning and sanitizing are considered in the design process (10 points). 
b. Cleaning protocols must be safe, practical, effective, and efficient (10 points). 
c. Cleaning and sanitation protocols are developed by the manufacturer, validated by a 
third-party, and provided in a training manual that is easy to read and understood by 
cleaning and sanitation employees (10 points). 
d. Equipment design and materials are capable of withstanding standard cleanup 
procedures. Equipment materials have been reviewed with Materials Safety Data 
Sheets for the cleaning and sanitizing chemicals to assure compatibility (10 points). 
e. All belts should withstand heating to 71C for up to 30 minutes (10 points). 
Sanitary design plays an important role in controlling the biological, as well as the 
physical and chemical hazards in raw or ready-to-eat poultry products. The current design
Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili 
standards will likely to be frequently modified, as other issues such as economics, 
ergonomics and simplification (training) are considered. Cooperation and collaboration 
between the manufacturers and processors is a must to achieve the desired level of 
hygiene/sanitation. An equipment designed, manufactured, operated, and maintained with 
the recognized sanitary design principles will assure the production of safe and 
wholesome products. 
References 
AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE (2003) 10 Principles of Sanitary Design and Checklist. AMI Equipment 
Design Task Force. http://www.meatami.com/. 
BARBUT, S. (2002) Sanitation in poultry processing plants. In: Poultry Products Processing-An Industry Guide, 
Eds. S. Barbut, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pages 368-377. 
BOLDER, N.M. (1998) The microbiology of the slaughter and processing of poultry. In: The Microbiology of 
Meat and Poultry, Eds. A. Davies and R. Board, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, England, pages 
158-173. 
BUTTS, J. (2004) Seek & Destroy: Identifying and controlling Listeria monocytogenesgrowth niches. 
http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/issues/0304/colmicro0304.htm. 
COMAR, D. (1988) Equipment and the manufacturing environment – microbiological quality assurance. Food 
Technology in Australia, 40(6): 214-218. 
CURIEL, R. (2002) Building the self-cleaning food plant: Hygienic design of equipment in food processing. 
http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/issues/0302/feat0302-3.htm. 
MULDER, R.W.A.W. (2000) Managing the safety and quality of poultry meat. In: Poultry Meat processing and 
Quality, Eds. G. C. Mead, Woodhead Publishing Co., Cambridge, England, pages 332-334. 
THOMAS, C.J., MCMEEKIN, T.A. and PATTERSON, J.T. (1987) Prevention microbial contamination in 
the processing plant. In: Elimination of pathogenic organisms from meat and poultry, F.J.M. Smulders, Ed. 
Elsevier Sci. Pub., pages 163-179 
122 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006

More Related Content

What's hot

The laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitation
The laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitationThe laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitation
The laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitationAyrone Giel Anog
 
EA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSM
EA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSMEA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSM
EA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSMAnanta Prosad Paul
 
Sanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environment
Sanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environmentSanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environment
Sanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environmentusapeec_mexico
 
GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptx
GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptxGENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptx
GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptxHariharan R
 
Hazard analysis and critical control point in aquaculture
Hazard analysis and critical control point in aquacultureHazard analysis and critical control point in aquaculture
Hazard analysis and critical control point in aquacultureharapriya behera
 
Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...
Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...
Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...Agriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
Food & Environmental ProtectionJan Newsletter
Food & Environmental ProtectionJan NewsletterFood & Environmental ProtectionJan Newsletter
Food & Environmental ProtectionJan NewsletterMalilu Galluccio
 
Useful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality Management
Useful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality ManagementUseful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality Management
Useful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality Managementdedmark
 
Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...
Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...
Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...John Blue
 
Microbiological Standards For Meat
Microbiological Standards For MeatMicrobiological Standards For Meat
Microbiological Standards For MeatPANKAJ DHAKA
 
Haccp on walnut oil
Haccp on walnut oilHaccp on walnut oil
Haccp on walnut oilGoutham Matta
 
On Farm Food Safety
On Farm Food SafetyOn Farm Food Safety
On Farm Food Safetyatiqchaudhry
 
Baher cv english
Baher cv englishBaher cv english
Baher cv englishBaher Effat
 
Mr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed Manufacturing
Mr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed ManufacturingMr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed Manufacturing
Mr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed ManufacturingJohn Blue
 

What's hot (20)

The laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitation
The laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitationThe laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitation
The laws and agencies relating food safety and sanitation
 
Aquaculture 4 - Food Safety in Post Harvest and Processing 2013
Aquaculture 4 - Food Safety in Post Harvest and Processing 2013Aquaculture 4 - Food Safety in Post Harvest and Processing 2013
Aquaculture 4 - Food Safety in Post Harvest and Processing 2013
 
EA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSM
EA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSMEA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSM
EA603234 Stdnt-54 Nelson- FSM
 
Aquaculture 5 - Food Safety Management Systems 2013
Aquaculture 5 - Food Safety Management Systems 2013Aquaculture 5 - Food Safety Management Systems 2013
Aquaculture 5 - Food Safety Management Systems 2013
 
Sanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environment
Sanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environmentSanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environment
Sanitary control of listeria monocytogenes in the poultry processing environment
 
GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptx
GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptxGENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptx
GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN PREVENTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESS.pptx
 
Hazard analysis and critical control point in aquaculture
Hazard analysis and critical control point in aquacultureHazard analysis and critical control point in aquaculture
Hazard analysis and critical control point in aquaculture
 
Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...
Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...
Institution of Prosecution against the Act of Transporting In a Vehicle a Bul...
 
Aquaculture 2 - Food Safety Hazards 2013
Aquaculture 2 - Food Safety Hazards 2013Aquaculture 2 - Food Safety Hazards 2013
Aquaculture 2 - Food Safety Hazards 2013
 
Food & Environmental ProtectionJan Newsletter
Food & Environmental ProtectionJan NewsletterFood & Environmental ProtectionJan Newsletter
Food & Environmental ProtectionJan Newsletter
 
Useful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality Management
Useful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality ManagementUseful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality Management
Useful Microbiological Testing in Food Safety and Quality Management
 
Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...
Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...
Dr. David Goldman - Meat/Poultry Antibiotic Residue Testing, Protecting Human...
 
SANITARY AND PHYTO SANITARY MEASURES TO ENSURE FOOD SAFETY
SANITARY  AND PHYTO SANITARY MEASURES TO ENSURE FOOD SAFETYSANITARY  AND PHYTO SANITARY MEASURES TO ENSURE FOOD SAFETY
SANITARY AND PHYTO SANITARY MEASURES TO ENSURE FOOD SAFETY
 
Microbiological Standards For Meat
Microbiological Standards For MeatMicrobiological Standards For Meat
Microbiological Standards For Meat
 
Haccp on walnut oil
Haccp on walnut oilHaccp on walnut oil
Haccp on walnut oil
 
Higiene e Sanitização na Industria de Alimentos
Higiene e Sanitização na Industria de AlimentosHigiene e Sanitização na Industria de Alimentos
Higiene e Sanitização na Industria de Alimentos
 
On Farm Food Safety
On Farm Food SafetyOn Farm Food Safety
On Farm Food Safety
 
HK Food Safety Recall Guidelines_30 July 2014
HK Food Safety Recall Guidelines_30 July 2014HK Food Safety Recall Guidelines_30 July 2014
HK Food Safety Recall Guidelines_30 July 2014
 
Baher cv english
Baher cv englishBaher cv english
Baher cv english
 
Mr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed Manufacturing
Mr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed ManufacturingMr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed Manufacturing
Mr. Gary Huddleston - Biosecurity in Feed Manufacturing
 

Viewers also liked

Tandem mass
Tandem massTandem mass
Tandem massLiz Ram
 
The 4000 english words
The 4000 english words The 4000 english words
The 4000 english words Liz Ram
 
Hazar analisys points
Hazar analisys pointsHazar analisys points
Hazar analisys pointsLiz Ram
 
adsorption and-aggregation-of-surf
adsorption and-aggregation-of-surfadsorption and-aggregation-of-surf
adsorption and-aggregation-of-surfLiz Ram
 
antimicrobial-films-for-food
 antimicrobial-films-for-food antimicrobial-films-for-food
antimicrobial-films-for-foodLiz Ram
 
analisis instrumental
analisis instrumental analisis instrumental
analisis instrumental Liz Ram
 
3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinson
3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinson3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinson
3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinsonLiz Ram
 
handbook of instrumental
handbook of instrumentalhandbook of instrumental
handbook of instrumentalLiz Ram
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Tandem mass
Tandem massTandem mass
Tandem mass
 
The 4000 english words
The 4000 english words The 4000 english words
The 4000 english words
 
Hazar analisys points
Hazar analisys pointsHazar analisys points
Hazar analisys points
 
adsorption and-aggregation-of-surf
adsorption and-aggregation-of-surfadsorption and-aggregation-of-surf
adsorption and-aggregation-of-surf
 
antimicrobial-films-for-food
 antimicrobial-films-for-food antimicrobial-films-for-food
antimicrobial-films-for-food
 
analisis instrumental
analisis instrumental analisis instrumental
analisis instrumental
 
3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinson
3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinson3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinson
3291.analisis instrumental (spanish edition) by judith f. rubinson
 
handbook of instrumental
handbook of instrumentalhandbook of instrumental
handbook of instrumental
 

Similar to Sanitary processing equipment design principles

Sanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptx
Sanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptxSanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptx
Sanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptxchombezuwi
 
Hygienic design of dairy equipment
Hygienic design of dairy equipmentHygienic design of dairy equipment
Hygienic design of dairy equipmentItalia Food Tec A.P.S.
 
plant sanitation.pptx
plant sanitation.pptxplant sanitation.pptx
plant sanitation.pptxPonSutha1
 
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...iosrjce
 
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory PerspectiveViral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory PerspectiveMerck Life Sciences
 
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory PerspectiveViral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory PerspectiveMilliporeSigma
 
Fisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptx
Fisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptxFisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptx
Fisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptxHrishika Barua
 
Breaking new ground with feed machinery standards
Breaking new ground with feed machinery standardsBreaking new ground with feed machinery standards
Breaking new ground with feed machinery standardsMilling and Grain magazine
 
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdfnekhalmanhas
 
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdfSrimathideviJ
 
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptxFOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
L6-Good practices.ppt
L6-Good practices.pptL6-Good practices.ppt
L6-Good practices.pptAnwaar Ahmed
 
260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draft
260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draft260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draft
260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draftMichael Garibaldi
 
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive Advantage
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive AdvantageThe Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive Advantage
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive AdvantageMurray Hunter
 
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Murray Hunter
 
Ehedge controlling air in food industry
Ehedge controlling air in food industryEhedge controlling air in food industry
Ehedge controlling air in food industrylouisaaudrey
 
Biosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptx
Biosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptxBiosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptx
Biosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptxSarmadJamshaid1
 
SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE
SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE
SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE Pranjal Saxena
 

Similar to Sanitary processing equipment design principles (20)

Sanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptx
Sanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptxSanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptx
Sanitation and hygiene in meat processing.pptx
 
Hygienic design of dairy equipment
Hygienic design of dairy equipmentHygienic design of dairy equipment
Hygienic design of dairy equipment
 
plant sanitation.pptx
plant sanitation.pptxplant sanitation.pptx
plant sanitation.pptx
 
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) Application during Olive oil ...
 
victory
victoryvictory
victory
 
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory PerspectiveViral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
 
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory PerspectiveViral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
Viral Risk Mitigation - A Global Regulatory Perspective
 
sup 505.pptx
sup 505.pptxsup 505.pptx
sup 505.pptx
 
Fisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptx
Fisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptxFisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptx
Fisheries Plant Management and Operation.pptx
 
Breaking new ground with feed machinery standards
Breaking new ground with feed machinery standardsBreaking new ground with feed machinery standards
Breaking new ground with feed machinery standards
 
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
 
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
14-th-PPT-of-Foods-and-Industrial-MicrobiologyCourse-No.-DTM-321.pdf
 
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptxFOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
 
L6-Good practices.ppt
L6-Good practices.pptL6-Good practices.ppt
L6-Good practices.ppt
 
260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draft
260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draft260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draft
260353823_Technical Paper 1 final draft
 
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive Advantage
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive AdvantageThe Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive Advantage
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair Competitive Advantage
 
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair
The Concept of HalalGAP as a Means of Gaining Unfair
 
Ehedge controlling air in food industry
Ehedge controlling air in food industryEhedge controlling air in food industry
Ehedge controlling air in food industry
 
Biosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptx
Biosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptxBiosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptx
Biosecurity at Poultry Rendering Plant.pptx
 
SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE
SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE
SCHEDULE T GMP INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE
 

Recently uploaded

Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits
Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of TraitsHeredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits
Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of TraitsCharlene Llagas
 
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...lizamodels9
 
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.aasikanpl
 
BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.
BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.
BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.PraveenaKalaiselvan1
 
zoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistan
zoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistanzoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistan
zoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistanzohaibmir069
 
Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.aasikanpl
 
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Patrick Diehl
 
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptxRESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptxFarihaAbdulRasheed
 
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...Nistarini College, Purulia (W.B) India
 
Cytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptx
Cytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptxCytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptx
Cytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptxVarshiniMK
 
Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2
Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2
Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2John Carlo Rollon
 
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptxAnalytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptxSwapnil Therkar
 
Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫
Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫
Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫qfactory1
 
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptTransposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptArshadWarsi13
 
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms PresentationHarmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentationtahreemzahra82
 
Welcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work Day
Welcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work DayWelcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work Day
Welcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work DayZachary Labe
 
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptxMicrophone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptxpriyankatabhane
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Hot Sexy call girls in Moti Nagar,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
Hot Sexy call girls in  Moti Nagar,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort ServiceHot Sexy call girls in  Moti Nagar,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
Hot Sexy call girls in Moti Nagar,🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
 
Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits
Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of TraitsHeredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits
Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits
 
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
 
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
 
BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.
BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.
BIOETHICS IN RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY.
 
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomyEngler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
Engler and Prantl system of classification in plant taxonomy
 
zoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistan
zoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistanzoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistan
zoogeography of pakistan.pptx fauna of Pakistan
 
Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
Call Girls in Hauz Khas Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝9953322196🔝 💯Escort.
 
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
Is RISC-V ready for HPC workload? Maybe?
 
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptxRESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
RESPIRATORY ADAPTATIONS TO HYPOXIA IN HUMNAS.pptx
 
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
Bentham & Hooker's Classification. along with the merits and demerits of the ...
 
Cytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptx
Cytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptxCytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptx
Cytokinin, mechanism and its application.pptx
 
Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2
Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2
Evidences of Evolution General Biology 2
 
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptxAnalytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
Analytical Profile of Coleus Forskohlii | Forskolin .pptx
 
Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫
Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫
Manassas R - Parkside Middle School 🌎🏫
 
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.pptTransposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
Transposable elements in prokaryotes.ppt
 
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Munirka Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
 
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms PresentationHarmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
Harmful and Useful Microorganisms Presentation
 
Welcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work Day
Welcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work DayWelcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work Day
Welcome to GFDL for Take Your Child To Work Day
 
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptxMicrophone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
Microphone- characteristics,carbon microphone, dynamic microphone.pptx
 

Sanitary processing equipment design principles

  • 1. DOI: 10.1079/WPS200588 Sanitary/hygienic processing equipment design S.F. BILGILI Department of Poultry Science, 201 Poultry Science Building, 260 Lem Morrison Drive, Auburn University, Alabama 36849-5416, USA E-mail: bilgisf@auburn.edu Proper cleaning and effective sanitation is an essential component of processing poultry, as it contributes significantly to the prevention of product contamination with microorganisms that cause food-borne disease and spoilage. Rapid expansion of production volume, increased further-processing and introduction of diverse ready-to- cook and ready-to-eat products, sophistication of the processing equipment, implementation of HACCP and microbial finished-product standards, and, more importantly, expensive product recalls have necessitated greater control over the cleaning and sanitation process. A sanitary process should effectively protect raw and/or cooked products from physical (i.e. metal, plastic, bone, packaging materials etc.), chemical (residues of cleaning and disinfection chemicals, lubricants, coolants etc.), and biological (food-borne pathogens and/or their toxins) hazards. In spite of this, many hazards continue to find their way into the processing environment and ultimately into the finished products. Microorganisms are naturally introduced into the poultry processing environments in high numbers with the live birds and, when the conditions are suitable, form growth niches by actively multiplying within the system. It is generally accepted that processing equipment should not be a direct or indirect source of microbial contamination. Many regulatory and advisory bodies have introduced hygienic design and processing guidelines. This presentation will review the recently introduced sanitary processing equipment design principles and equipment checklist by the American Meat Institute. A plant designed, equipped, operated and maintained with internationally accepted hygienic and sanitary standards will produce safe and wholesome poultry products for the consumer. Keywords: poultry; processing; cleaning; sanitation; hygiene From a paper presented at the XVIIth European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat, 23-26 May 2005, Doorwerth, The Netherlands ©World’s Poultry Science Association 2006 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 Received for publication June 14, 2005 Accepted for publication July 15, 2005 115
  • 2. Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili Introduction Every stage of production and processing has a role in the safety of poultry products. Preventative and proactive food safety programmes, such as HACCP, are globally recognized and implemented to prevent, reduce and/or eliminate the physical, chemical and biological (i.e. microbiological) hazards in finished products (Mulder, 2000). Processing phase of the poultry meat and egg production system has a special role in this process, as this is the critical point of transformation of raw materials (live birds or eggs) into diverse ready-to-cook or ready-to-eat products. Live birds represent the single largest source of biological hazards during processing (Barbut, 2002). The role of processing plant is to reduce pathogenic microorganisms while preventing chemical and physical hazards in finished products. With the exception of few systemic conditions, the muscle tissue (i.e. meat) of healthy animals is free of pathogenic organisms until processing. During first-processing (i.e. hanging through chilling) the microbial load on the skin and internal surfaces of the carcass are progressively reduced. From a microbiological quality stand-point, the second-processing (i.e. sizing through cut-up, further processing and packaging) represents a major challenge, as carcasses are portioned into various bone-in and boneless products and further processed, exposing increasingly more product surface area for contamination from the processing surfaces, equipment and environment. Cleaning and sanitation Poultry processing plants have evolved significantly during the last decade from basic slaughter houses to complex food manufacturing plants (Bolder, 1998). Increasingly sophisticated processing and portioning equipment are being utilized with high-speed processing lines often operating two continuous production shifts. Further-processing of poultry have expanded to include minimally processed products and aseptic packaging. Effective cleaning and sanitation programmes are essential in these highly mechanized and complex processing facilities to minimize risks of contamination with spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms. HACCP plans, when properly designed and implemented should incorporate specific cleaning and sanitation tasks, be pre-operational or operational, on a daily basis. Facility-wide cleaning and sanitation pre-requisite programmes and sanitation standard operating procedures (sSOP’s) help customize and document these procedures. During processing, raw materials, environment (air, water), employees, facility and equipment, can serve as sources of biological hazards for poultry (Thomas et al., 1987). It is widely recognized that, in a food plant, the manufacturing process itself should not act as a source of microbial contamination (Comar, 1988). Microbial contamination of the product via the processing equipment could occur either through cross-contamination by transfer points (i.e. product contact surfaces) or by microbial growth niches (Butts, 2004). Cross-contamination by transfer points is usually controlled by the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP’s) and sSOP’s, as contaminants, for the most part, are eliminated during cleaning and sanitation. On the other hand, growth niches harbour microorganisms from the cleaning and sanitation steps, creating undesirable and hidden sources of contamination. The top priority in a poultry processing plant should be the elimination and control of these growth niches for pathogenic microorganisms, such as Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. This can only be accomplished by sanitary/hygienic facility and equipment design and by implementation of production and sanitation process controls. 116 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006
  • 3. Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili Bacterial growth requirements are well characterized to include: time, temperature, water, pH and availability of nutrients. However, often many other factors contribute to the development of pathogen growth niches during processing, such as product flow and pile-ups, debris accumulation, mid-shift cleanups, use of high pressure during cleaning, temperature control, unique product characteristics (i.e. stickiness), and more importantly, problems with equipment design and/or maintenance (Butts, 2004). Equipment design Poultry processing equipment has traditionally been designed based on efficiency, safety, product quality, and sanitation considerations. In many countries processing equipment is evaluated and certified by the regulatory agencies for use in inspected plants. Guidelines for the hygienic construction of commercial or custom-built equipment are based on various international standards: a. Hygiene Requirements for the Design of Meat and Poultry Processing Equipment (American National Standard ANSI/NSF/3A 14159-1) b. Hygiene Requirements for the Design of Hand Tools used in Meat and Poultry Processing (American National Standard ANSI/NSF/3A 14159-2) c. Assessment for Cleanability of Belting Materials used in Meat and Poultry Processing Equipment (American National Standard ANSI/NSF/3A 14159-3) d. 3-A sanitary Standards e. National Sanitation Foundation International Standards (NSF International) f. European Norms for Food Processing Machinery g. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) The sanitary design criteria and guidelines developed by these regulatory and advisory bodies provide benchmarks to reduce hazards from the use of equipment in food processing. Since 1997, with the introduction of HACCP, the mandatory evaluation and certification of processing equipment prior to its use has been abandoned in the US. Absence of standards and oversight by a regulatory agency removed the assurance that the processing equipment would not cause microbial contamination problems. Most processors purchased equipment based on set of agreed-upon specifications, with little or no sanitary design standards to follow. The American Meat Institute (AMI) Equipment Design Task Force has created a list of 10 Principles of Sanitary Equipment Design (AMI, 2003) to guide the equipment manufacturers in modifying their equipment designs. To aid in equipment evaluations, a checklist is also added to each of the 10 principles listed (Table 1). These checklists allow processors to conduct a sanitary design audit of the equipment based on assigned points. To be effective, the equipment must be used in the processing line for 90-day period, disassembled to its normal daily level, and evaluated Table 1 The American Meat Institute’s 10 Principles of Sanitary Design. 1. Cleanable to a microbiological level 2. Made of compatible materials 3. Accessible for inspection, maintenance, cleaning and sanitation 4. No product or liquid collection 5. Hollow areas hermetically sealed 6. No niches 7. Sanitary operational performance 8. Hygienic design of maintenance enclosures 9. Hygienic compatibility with other plant systems 10. Validated cleaning and sanitizing protocol World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 117
  • 4. Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili both visually and microbiologically. In the audit form, full points are assigned to satisfactory, one-half points assigned to marginal, and no points are given to unsatisfactory items. A score of 1000 is acceptable, whereas any equipment with a score <1000 needs improvement. AMI Sanitary Design Principles Basically, these principles require all parts of the machinery easily accessible for cleaning and sanitation, and elimination of places on the machine that could trap product debris and other material that could result in the development of pathogen growth niches: CLEANABLE TO A MICROBIOLOGICAL LEVEL Food equipment must be constructed to ensure effective and efficient cleaning of the equipment over its life span (100 points total). As measured post-installation: a. The equipment should be designed as to prevent bacterial ingress, survival, growth and reproduction on both product and non- product contact surfaces (20 points). b. All surfaces are cleanable as measured by less than one colony-forming unit (CFU) per 25 square cm, less than one CFU per 10 ml when the item is rinsed, acceptable RLU (device specific) when measured by residual adenosine triphosphate, and/or negative for residual protein or carbohydrate when using swabs (20 points). c. All surfaces are accessible for mechanical cleaning and treatment to prevent biofilms (20 points). d. When requested, data is available to demonstrate that soiled equipment is cleanable as indicated above, by an individual using the cleaning protocol provided by the supplier (20 points). e. Surfaces are clean visually and to the touch, and pass operational inspections using sight, touch, and smell (20 points). MADE OF COMPATIBLE MATERIALS Construction materials used for equipment must be completely compatible with the product, environment, cleaning, and sanitizing chemicals and the methods of cleaning and sanitation (100 points total). a. Product contact surfaces are made with materials that are corrosion resistant, non-toxic, and non-absorbent as approved in NSF/ANBSI/3A 141159-1 (10 points). b. In general, stainless steel shall be AISI 300 series or better (10 points). c. Composites and plastics remain intact without changes in shape, structure, and function through cleaning and sanitation (10 points). d. Plated, painted, and coated surfaces are not used for food contact surfaces or for surfaces above the product zone areas (10 points). e. Coatings and plating must remain intact (10 points). f. Cloth back belts are not used (10 points). g. Materials such as wood, enamelware, uncoated aluminium, uncoated anodized aluminium, and others per NSF/ANSI/3A 14159-1 are not used (10 points). h. Metals are compatible with one another (10 points). i. Seals and O-rings are designed to minimize product contact (10 points). j. Materials used in construction are compatible with the product, the environmental conditions which they will be exposed, as well as cleaning methods and chemicals (10 points). 118 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006
  • 5. Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili ACCESSIBLE FOR INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, CLEANING AND SANITATION All parts of the equipment shall be readily accessible for inspection, maintenance, cleaning and sanitation without the use of tools (150 points total). a. All surfaces in the product zone are readily accessible for cleaning and inspection (15 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 119 points). b. Product zone components with inaccessible surfaces can be disassembled without tools and easily (15 points). c. Where access or disassembly is not possible, the entire unit is cleaned by clean-in-place (CIP) or clean-out-of-place (COP) methods (10 points). d. Parts remain attached or hung on the equipment for easy cleaning and to prevent damage and loss. Separate part carts are supplied as an alternative (5 points). e. Machinery and chain guards drain away from product zones and are easily removed (15 points). f. Product catch pans or drip pans are easily removable for cleanup, so they are not lost or separated from the equipment (10 points). g. Al belting is easily removable or the belt tension is removed easily without tools so the surfaces underneath can be cleaned (15 points). h. All surfaces in non-product zones shall be readily accessible for cleaning and inspection (15 points). i. Installation will maintain a 46-cm floor clearance for any product contact areas or conveyor travel paths. Equipment design provides 31-cm of clearance to the floor (15 points). j. Equipment is located 77-cm from overhead structures and 92-cm from the nearest stationary object (15 points). k. All air, vacuum, and product hoses and their assemblies on the equipment are easily removable for soaking and sanitizing (10 points). l. All air, vacuum, and product hoses are transparent or opaque, and meet product contact surface guidelines (10 points). NO PRODUCT OR LIQUID COLLECTION Equipment should be self-draining to assure that liquid, which can harbour and promote the growth of bacteria, does not accumulate, pool or condense on the equipment (total 100 points). a. All surfaces should be designed to eliminate water pooling and to be self-draining (10 points). b. Round framework is used for horizontal members where possible (20 points). c. Where square or rectangular bases are used, the flat surface is turned 45 degrees to horizontal where possible (10 points). d. All open surfaces are made of sufficient strength to prevent warping and subsequent pooling of water (10 points) e. Moisture does not drip, drain or draw into product zones (15 points). f. Belt tension is adequate throughout operations to prevent water from pooling on the belts (15 points). g. Dead spaces are eliminated (15 points). h. Materials used in the construction are non-absorbent (15 points). HOLLOWAREAS SHOULD BE HERMETICALLY SEALED Hallow areas of equipment, such as frames and rollers must be eliminated whenever possible or permanently sealed. Bolts, studs, mounting plates, brackets, junction boxes, nameplates, end caps, sleeves, and other such items should be continuously welded to the
  • 6. Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili surface, not attached via drilled and tapped holes (150 points total). a. All rotating members, such as drive sprockets or belt pulleys, are to be solid or filled with dye and fully sealed with continuous welds (30 points). b. All stationary hollow tube construction, such as frame members or blade spacers, are fully sealed with continuous welds top prevent interior contamination (30 points). c. There are no fastener penetrations into hollow tube construction (30 points). d. Threaded leg adjustments are internal and do not penetrate the tube frame members (30 points). e. Name plates and tags are minimized. When attached, plates and tags are continuously welded. Rivet- or screw-attached plates (often sealed with caulk) are absent (30 points). NO NICHES Equipment parts should be free of niches such as pits, cracks, corrosion, recesses, open seams, gaps, lap seams, protruding ledges, inside threads, bolt rivets and dead ends (150 points total). a. Surface texture of a product contact surface shall not exceed 32 microns, except as described in NSF/ANSI/3A 14159-1 (10 points). b. Surface texture on a non-product contact surface shall not exceed 125 microns (10 points). c. Internal corners and angles shall have a smooth and continuous radius of at least 3-mm (angles <35 degrees) (10 points). d. No lap joints (10 points). e. Hermetically sealed spacers are used to allow for space between two adjoining pieces to permit mechanical action during cleaning (10 points). f. Caulking is not used (10 points). g. All joints and welds are flush ad free of pits, cracks, and corrosion (10 points). h. All welds are continuous, smooth and polished (10 points). i. Sleeved assemblies (bushings, sprockets, and bearings) are no longer than 1.5 inches or are disassembled for cleaning (10 points). j. Press and shrink fits are not used (10 points). k. Fasteners are not used in or above product zone (10 points). l. Fasteners that are product contact surface must utilize the ACME 60-degree stub thread (10 points). m.If fasteners are necessary, they do not have exposed threads and have a positive locking method to prevent falling or vibrating off the machine (10 points). n. Belt scrapers do not have lap joints and are removed without tools (10 points). o. Belt supports are constructed from single pieces of material (10 points). SANITARY OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE During normal operations, the equipment must perform so it does not contribute to unsanitary conditions or the harbourage and growth of bacteria (100 points total). a. Buttons on control panels are easily cleaned and sanitized during operations (15 points). b. All compressed air used for blowing on the product or contact surfaces is filtered to a minimum of a 0.3 micron level and dried to prevent the formation of moisture in the piping system (15 points). c. No bearings are present in the product contact zone areas (15 points). d. A separation exists between the product contact and non-product contact areas to prevent cross-contamination during operation (15 points). e. All surfaces near the product contact zone areas are designated as if they were product contact zone areas (15 points). 120 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006
  • 7. Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili f. Product contact surfaces are made to prevent accumulation of product residue during World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006 121 operation (15 points). g. Shafts passing through a product zone shall have an air gap to prevent product contamination (10 points). HYGIENIC DESIGN OF MAINTENANCE ENCLOSURES Maintenance enclosures and human machine interfaces such as push buttons, valve handles, switches, and touch screens, must be designed to ensure food product, water or product liquid does not penetrate or accumulate in or on the enclosure or interface. Also, physical design of the enclosures should be sloped or pitched to avoid use as storage area (50 points total). a. Drives, chain guards, electrical control boxes, and bearings are not located over open product zones (10 points). b. Control and junction boxes are fastened to the frame in a manner consistent with the sanitary design principles (10 points). c. Utility supply lines and pipes are separated to prevent catch points and allow for cleaning (5 points). d. Utility lines are 31-cm above the floor and cleanable (5 points). e. Conduit and supply lines are not routed above product contact areas (10 points). f. Maintenance enclosures in direct wash-down areas must be able to be exposed to water and chemicals used in cleaning and sanitation (10 points). HYGIENIC COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER PLANT SYSTEMS Equipment design should ensure hygienic compatibility with other equipment and systems, such as electrical, hydraulics, steam, air and water (50 points total). a. Exhaust systems have welded seams with adequate access for cleaning and inspection (10 points). b. Vertical duct sections have a drain to prevent draining from flowing back into the equipment (10 points). c. Separate exhausts are supplied for raw and ready-to-eat product zones (10 points). d. CIP systems are designed, installed, and validated using a recognized third-party in sections of duct work that are not easily cleaned through access openings (10 points). e. Equipment is designed to meet criteria of waste water infrastructure capability to assure no backups of drainage lines result under normal operation (10 points). VALIDATE CLEANING AND SANITATION PROTOCOLS Procedures for cleaning and sanitation must be clearly written, designed and proven effective and efficient. Chemicals recommended for cleaning and sanitation must be compatible with the equipment and the manufacturing environment (50 points total). a. Cleaning and sanitizing are considered in the design process (10 points). b. Cleaning protocols must be safe, practical, effective, and efficient (10 points). c. Cleaning and sanitation protocols are developed by the manufacturer, validated by a third-party, and provided in a training manual that is easy to read and understood by cleaning and sanitation employees (10 points). d. Equipment design and materials are capable of withstanding standard cleanup procedures. Equipment materials have been reviewed with Materials Safety Data Sheets for the cleaning and sanitizing chemicals to assure compatibility (10 points). e. All belts should withstand heating to 71C for up to 30 minutes (10 points). Sanitary design plays an important role in controlling the biological, as well as the physical and chemical hazards in raw or ready-to-eat poultry products. The current design
  • 8. Sanitary processing equipment design: S.F. Bilgili standards will likely to be frequently modified, as other issues such as economics, ergonomics and simplification (training) are considered. Cooperation and collaboration between the manufacturers and processors is a must to achieve the desired level of hygiene/sanitation. An equipment designed, manufactured, operated, and maintained with the recognized sanitary design principles will assure the production of safe and wholesome products. References AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE (2003) 10 Principles of Sanitary Design and Checklist. AMI Equipment Design Task Force. http://www.meatami.com/. BARBUT, S. (2002) Sanitation in poultry processing plants. In: Poultry Products Processing-An Industry Guide, Eds. S. Barbut, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pages 368-377. BOLDER, N.M. (1998) The microbiology of the slaughter and processing of poultry. In: The Microbiology of Meat and Poultry, Eds. A. Davies and R. Board, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, England, pages 158-173. BUTTS, J. (2004) Seek & Destroy: Identifying and controlling Listeria monocytogenesgrowth niches. http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/issues/0304/colmicro0304.htm. COMAR, D. (1988) Equipment and the manufacturing environment – microbiological quality assurance. Food Technology in Australia, 40(6): 214-218. CURIEL, R. (2002) Building the self-cleaning food plant: Hygienic design of equipment in food processing. http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/issues/0302/feat0302-3.htm. MULDER, R.W.A.W. (2000) Managing the safety and quality of poultry meat. In: Poultry Meat processing and Quality, Eds. G. C. Mead, Woodhead Publishing Co., Cambridge, England, pages 332-334. THOMAS, C.J., MCMEEKIN, T.A. and PATTERSON, J.T. (1987) Prevention microbial contamination in the processing plant. In: Elimination of pathogenic organisms from meat and poultry, F.J.M. Smulders, Ed. Elsevier Sci. Pub., pages 163-179 122 World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 62, March 2006