Essay On The Mexican-American War

Essay on The Mexican-American War
The Mexican–American war determined the destiny of the United States of America, it determined
whether or not it would become a world power and it established the size of the United States of
America. Perhaps the war was inevitable due to the idea of Manifest Destiny – Americans thought
they had the divine right to extend their territory. The Mexican–American War started mainly
because of the annexation of the Republic of Texas (established in 1836 after breaking away from
Mexico). The United States and Mexico still had conflicts on what the borders of Texas was, the
United States claimed that the Texas border with Mexico was the Rio Grande, but the Mexicans said
that it was the Nueces River, so the land in between were disputed and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During the battle of Resaca de la Palma, both sides engaged in vicious hand to hand fighting, the
American Cavalry managed to capture the Mexican Artillery resulting in the Mexicans retreating
and rerouting, but because of the terrain, Arista could not rally his troops. The Mexicans had heavy
casualties and were forced to abandon their artillery and other supplies. Fort Brown caused more
casualties when the Mexicans were crossing the river of Rio Grande. A month later, on June 14th
1846 in California, native English speaking people arrested the Mexican governor and imprisoned
him and declared California the California Republic. Sloat claimed Monterey and took control of the
California Republic. Later he transferred his command to Robert F. Stockton under the orders from
congress. At the same time, Kearny with 1700 US troops marched to Sante Fe, New Mexico and
took control. Kearny later proceeded with 300 dragoons along the Gila River valley. Later on, he
sent back 200 of his 300 dragoons believing the war in California was over. But he clashed with the
Mexican militia the settlement of San Pasqual because he mistakenly believed that it would be a
miss match in the favor of him. He was defeated
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Mexican War of Independence
* * * * * * * * * * * The Mexican Wars for Independence: Failed Ambitions * Pablo A. L. Briger * *
* * * US and Modern World I * Mr. Segiel * February 15, 2013 * * * September 16 is a day of
celebration all through Mexico. Even the president emerges from the royal palace, decorated with a
sash to represent Mexico, rings a bell three times just as Miguel Hidalgo did on that same day in
1810 to commemorate the beginning of the revolution and to unite Mexico behind the ideals of
equality and freedom that Miguel Hidalgo fought for. All Mexico celebrates on that day as one
united country regardless of class or the color of one's skin. Yet, the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The reforms only deepened the social prejudices by kicking out the Jesuits (depriving education to
the creoles), raising taxes only on the Indians then including the creoles, not allowing Mexicans to
dress like Spanish, and finally taking away from the poor entertainment (bullfighting) and cheap
alcohol (pulque). The Bourbon reforms ended up most importantly lowering the creoles to minority
status. Then Charles IV, who became hated by Spain and her colonies, only enforced the Bourbon
reforms; he raised the taxes on the Mexican aristocracy because he would not tax the Spanish. He
then decreed the Law of Consolidation of 1804, which ordered the Mexican church to sell its land
and give its earnings to the crown also call in most loans it had with creoles and Indians. Napoleon
made Charles IV abdicate, and instated Charles' son Ferdinand VII, and then quickly replaced
Ferdinand VII with his brother Joseph. All of Spain and Mexico was in agreement that "Ferdinand
VII was their rightful King and that they would reject any decree or representative from the French
usurper". Which shows the loyalty Spain and its colonies had to their king. With the social injustices
occurring and their constant change in governmental authorities, the people showed they
disapproval. Rallies of rebels (mostly creoles) would cry, "Long live the King! Death to bad
government!" Which represents the support for the king but they were disgusted

Mexican War On Drugs Essay
Summary
The Mexican War on Drugs is a conflict that has been raging since December 11th, 2006 when
newly elected president, President Felipe Calderon, began to heavily crack down on drug trafficking
and organized crime, sending 6500 troops to the Mexican state of Michoacán, with the hopes of
ending drug violence in the region. Since then, the results have been bloody with over 160,000
casualties, including politicians, foreign journalists, and children. Furthermore, the government has
had little success in accomplishing its goal of shutting down the drug cartels within Mexico, yet has
no plans to stop the fighting anytime soon.
Opinion: Just or Unjust
Personally, I would classify The Mexican War on Drugs as an unjust war due to the enormous costs
of the war and lack of results. Not only has it cost 71.6 billion dollars, but it has also cost the lives of
over 160,000 people, mainly civilians. As well, it has created a state of political unrest in ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While not a textbook definition of a civil war, The Mexican War on Drugs can be classified as a civil
war as the two combatants (The Mexican Government and drug cartels) are both from the same
country. Furthermore, much like a normal civil war, the Mexican War on Drugs is a war for territory,
with the cartels trying to gain land; the difference– the cartels are not trying to gain political power
over the land, but rather be allowed to operate within it.
Causes of Conflict
There are two major causes of conflict visible within The Mexican War on Drugs, with the first
being a "Clash of Interest". It can be classified a such, as both combatants have opposing interests;
the government wants to crack down on drugs to shut the drug industry down, while the cartels want
to keep profiting from the sales of drugs. The second cause of conflict evident is "Imperialism &
Economic Competition" as the Mexican government wants to expand their power in order to gain
control over the drug cartels, and in–turn, shut them

Mexican War Justified
The Mexican War: Justified or Unjustified?
The Mexican War, or as it was called in Mexico, the American Invasion, was a very controversial
event. Before the Mexican War, people from the US began moving to Texas. Texas was a disputed
territory, as neither country agreed on who owned it. Mexico said they owned, while the US said
that they did. There are many reasons to argue that the Mexican War should/should not have been
started. The Mexican War should not have been started because US settlers in Texas broke Mexican
law, the US invaded Mexico, and the countries had mixed up borders.
Before the Mexican War started, both the US and Mexico had mixed up borders. Mexico thought
that their border was at the Nueces, making Texas part of Mexico. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"The combination of American troops at the Rio Grande...angered the Mexican government."
(Roden 317). Mexico thought soldiers were deep into Mexico, while the US thought they were in
Texas. "The incident occurred in the disputed territory" (Roden 315). According to this, no country
really "owned" Texas. Mexico had the Nueces River as their border, while the US thought the Rio
Grande to be the border (Roden 315). The borders were mixed up, so no one country was in their
own land, nor could they know if they were invading another land. The Mexican government had to
protect their border, the Nueces (Velasco–Marquez 327). This Information shows: Mexico's border
was at the Nueces. This was technically the real border. This evidence shows the US was not
justified in going to war because the borders were mixed up. The US should not have gone to war
because of mixed up

Mexican War Dbq Essay
{The Mexican War's causes date as far back as 1821, when Mexico declared independence from
Spain. The Mexican government then allowed American immigrants to settle Texas to increase
population. The new Texans however, did not want to be under Mexico's control, and revolted. After
several battles, the most famous being the Alamo, Texas was an independent country in 1836.
However, tension between Mexico and America rose after America annexed Texas in 1844, the year
President Polk, a believer in Manifest Destiny, won the election. By 1845, the border between Texas
and Mexico had still not been decided, as Mexico believed it lied along the Nueces River, and
America thought it was on the Rio Grande. After the troops President Polk ordered to patrol north of
the Rio Grande were shot at by Mexican forces, an event which killed or injured 16 American
troops, Polk convinced Congress to declare ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
*Document C is a secondary source written by Jesus Velasco–Marquez, from the University of
Mexico in 2008. The magazine article "A Mexican Viewpoint on the war with the United States"
from Voices of Mexico explains exactly why the U.S was not justified in going to war with
Mexico.* In paragraph three of Doc C, the author states "In the eyes of the Mexican government,
the mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico...". This is referring to President
Polk's order to have U.S. troops patrol disputed territory in times of peace. The Mexican government
considered this, and the U.S.'s decision to annex Texas, an act of war. Polk knew that sending the
troops to patrol disputed territory would increase the possibility of confrontation with Mexican
forces, which would provoke Mexico. This proves the war was unjustified because Polk wanted a
war, and would do anything to spread America, due to his belief in the Manifest

Mexico and the United States have a rough history, as tension from the U.S. annexing Texas strained
their relationship. The U.S. and Mexico couldn't agree on a border, the U.S. believing it was the Rio
Grande and Mexico believing they had all the land to the Nueces River. The remaining land in
between was called undisputed land, or territory both countries shared. On May 9, 1846, Mexican
soldiers shot a group of Americans patrolling the Rio Grande, inducing one of the more arguable
wars, The Mexican War. In Mexico, this war is referred to as "The U.S. Invasion", but in reality,
both sides were in the wrong. The shots that killed and injured sixteen U.S. soldiers finally gave
President Polk of the United States "reason" to go to war with Mexico. The United States was not
justified in going to war with Mexico because the United States provoked Mexico's "attack" and
only took the land for their development (which they did unlawfully). ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
soldiers, the United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because they provoked it.
Document C, "A Mexican Viewpoint on the War With the United States", by Jesus Velasco–
Marquez, explains why the was was brought on by the U.S., and how it was an attack on Mexico.
The passage states, "...annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and
security reasons. Thus, when the Mexican government learned of the treaty signed between Texas
and the United States in April 1844, it... would consider such an act 'a declaration of war.'" Since
Texas' annexation was unlawful, it made sense it was deemed a "declaration of war" and caused that
stress on the U.S. and Mexico's relationship. The United States caused this when they annexed land
that was taken from Mexico and claimed it as

Mexican American War Dbq
The Mexicans started the Mexican–American War in 1846 because of three main reasons. One
reason was that Santa Anna, a general and president of Mexico during 1836, signed the Treaty of
Velasco, which stated that Texas was a free and independent nation, and is not a part of Mexico.
When Santa Anna returned to the capital of Mexico, he completely disregarded this treaty and
claimed to have never signed it with General Houston, even though the Texans had the papers, and
claimed that Texas was in rebellion, so he got his army ready and went after the Texans. Because of
this, General Zachary Taylor was told by the War Department to be ready to move his men from
Louisiana to a site near or on the Rio Grande river in order to protect and/or repel

A Study On The Mexican Drug War
The Mexican Drug War has cost not only human lives, but also the health of a country's economy. A
study done by Viridiana Rio, a Ph.D. in Government from Harvard University and an expert in
regional economics and rule of law in Mexico, states that "increases in criminal presence and violent
crime reduce economic diversification, increase sector concentration, and diminish economic
complexity" (Ríos V). The direct relationship between violence and economic activity hopes to
sharpen our understanding of the conflict's impact on Mexico (Bannon, I. and Collier, P.). Therefore,
detrimental economic effects brought to the public will be explored. Specifically, the detrimental
effects on workforce, foreign investments, governmental economic activity, and civilian lifestyle
due to the war shall be explored While the military and the government are actively engaged in the
drug war, they are faced with an insurmountable burden to spend a considerable amount of the
government's national budget towards deploying strategic military raids and improving security for
civilians. In efforts to tackle the drug war problem, the Mexican government's expenditure on
military, domestic security, and the justice system has steadily increased from $13 billion in 2003 to
$32 billion in 2015 (Mexico Institute). Although Mexico's priority is to promote peace and ensure
security for its citizens, civilians are frustrated by the fact that the Mexican Drug War, showing no
sign of improvement, has brought

The Mexican-American War Essay
Regardless of the decade or the country a person lives in, there seems to be a reckless disregard for
the toll a war can take on human lives. When the Alamo was fought back in February 1836, it was
about the independence of Texas from Mexico. In retaliation of the death and destruction of human
life, Sam Houston retaliated in April and killed 630 Mexican soldiers and took General Santa Anna
prisoner (Tindall & Shi, 2010). This was the start of the independence of Texas and the quest for
annexation into the United States, which ultimately led to the Mexican–American War of 1846–
1848. This paper will briefly explain the reasons for the Mexican–American War and will describe
the outcome of the war.
The Reasons Numerous reasons can be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The belief was that America had a God–given right, or destiny, to expand the country's border from
the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean (Lee, 2011). Tension arose between the US and Mexico in
1846 after an attempt to purchase the California and New Mexico Territories was rebuffed over a
border dispute. In Texas, the situation worsened when the southern border was disputed. Mexico
claimed the border at the Nueces River, while Texas claimed the border at the Rio Grande. President
Polk wanted to goad the Mexicans into a conflict to obtain Texas while also securing New Mexico
and California, however; it was essential that Mexico commence it (Tindall & Shi, 2010). On May
9, 1846 the Mexicans attacked US soldiers, President Polk's scheme worked. On May 13, 1846
President Polk signed the declaration of war. The Mexican–American War had begun.
The Outcome With no actual war plan, the Mexican war was fought on four fronts – southern Texas,
central Mexico, New Mexico, and California (Tindall & Shi, 2010). The military on both sides were
ill prepared for fighting the war. The US Army consisted of roughly 7,000 soldiers, while the
Mexican forces consisted of 32,000 soldiers. By the time the war was over the number had risen to
104,000 American forces. Some were volunteers for six and 12 month enlistments. General Taylor,
who would eventually become President of the United States in 1849, became popular with the two
victories north of the Rio

Mexican American War Analysis
The start of the Mexican American War started when the United States annexed Texas, we are told
of the results and the clash of opinions between the politicians, but we are not informed about the
military's perspective of the battles they fought. The war how we see it today is different how the
soldiers once saw it. Although we are told of the acquired land received from each battle that was
won, there is no writing informing us of what the soldiers gave up in return for all this land. The
Mexican war provided opportunities to the soldiers such as rapid promotion. Instead of fearing the
idea of war, many reacted the opposite, because of the opportunity it provided. The war gave each
solider the chance to go pass the classic seniority system and get promoted much quicker. When the
time came to actually go to war, many showed almost no sign of excitement through the written
letters they sent. It could be interpreted as fear, or even a sign depressing because they only
expressed their dissatisfaction and only showed concern over family and health. "On 12 April 1844
Texas nearly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Historians only inform the people of the American's success in acquiring such land but they fail to
inform the reader about what brutality that these normal citizens faced. The soldiers were all
volunteers, and were pushed into battle with no knowledge acquired of what they'll face. Due to
their ignorance they wasted valuable time they had in their stay in Texas. When Texas was annexed
they protected the new state from Mexican invaders, and once the state was secured they continue
on to Mexican territory. The Mexican army murdered the more then half, and none of it was
discussed. The Manifest Destiny was view as a great accomplishment to the Mexican government
but instead was a horrific event that took the lives of many American

The Mexican War Essay
The Mexican War
The factors that started the Mexican War lay heavily on American shoulders. Whether if the factors
were created by social, political or economical needs, they have all become the center of attention
for the question of being a national interest or disgrace. However, the Americans felt that they
existed for "...spreading the blessings of peace." according to Andrew Jackson. There will always be
controversy between the two sides of this matter, the Americans who feel that it had to be done, to
the Mexicans who felt that it was an injustice done to their nation.
First of all, socially, the Americans felt that it was their duty to spread their blessings of democracy
and peace. Through manifest destiny, they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
James Polk felt that it was his duty to take it by force and took the matter under his control. Since
John Tyler's decision to hold off the war until Mexico made the initial attack, Polk took it upon
himself to provoke the Mexicans. To accomplish this, he sent troops to the Rio Grande and marched
them along the border until the Mexicans made their attack. After the report of the attack was
delivered, Abraham Lincoln proposed the "Spot Resolutions" to find the exact location of the
American bloodshed on "American soil". However, the Spot Resolutions were built upon false
statements; the Mexicans' attack was premeditated and actually took place on Mexican land. Polk
was successful in starting the desired Mexican War which ultimately led to the defeat of the weaker
adversary Mexico and the attainment of California.
Along with the desire of new land, there were other contributing factors that initiated the war with
Mexico. There were also political and economical factors that were as equally important in the start
of the war. With most of the Mexican land below the 34o30` line, the Democrats and the southern
states were pushing for the war. With the increased amount of representatives for the southern states,
there would finally be a tiebreaker in the free–slave argument. Without saying, the Whigs of the
northern states were opposed to the

Essay On Mexican War
Operation Fast & Furious
The Mexican Drug War is a war that's never going to end mainly because of the corruption that
takes place in Mexico. Drug Trafficking dates back to the 1900s, but nobody knows for sure how
long this has been going on. It's said that it all started with liquor during prohibition (Al Capone
era); after prohibition liquor was then replaced with drugs like Cocaine, Methamphetamine, and
Marihuana. Forward to a century later The US of America made a deal with the Mexican
government a few years ago that allowed Drug cartels not only to push weight into the US but also
receive information about the opposite cartels from Mexico and in return for Mexico to receive fire
arms to supply the deadly cartels. Cartels like the Sinaloa

The Mexican American War Essay
The United States of America has been through many wars, wars concerning many things such as
land oil, pride and respect. However, when the United States went to war with Mexico, it was
planned over greed. The Mexican– American war was a war provoked by the United States, in
efforts to expand the coasts of the country. Mexico was a small under privileged country who had
previously to the war had already lost part of their country (Texas). Needless to say this war was cut
throat and violent, it was however one of the smartest business decisions America has ever made.
The prelude to the war began in the 1830s when Mexico decided to open up their home to America.
Due to the fact that Mexico was under populated, and had too much land they ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Manifest Destiny is a term for the American expansion that the united States not only could, but was
destined to, stretch from coast to coast. Protestants left England and came to America in the 17th
century, and to their understanding arriving to America safely was a sign that god had chosen them
to spread their knowledge, to be a "city upon a hill". Which is a phrase from the bible means to be
looked upon and to set an example for the world to see. "You are the light of the world. A city that is
set on a hill cannot be hidden" Matthew 5:14. This religious example inspired protestants that it was
not just their job but there religious responsibility to expand and show others the right way. The
phrase contributed to manifest destiny was first employed by John L. O'Sullivan in an article on the
annexation of Texas published in the July–August 1845 "it is our manifest destiny to overspread the
continent allotted by providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions ".
According to John L. O'Sullivan going to war with Mexico was god's plan, while others believe that
manifest destiny was an excuse to take land from Mexico. The only reason to attack Mexico was
expansion. According to Whitman (1846) "yes: Mexico must be thoroughly chastised! ... Let our
arms now be carried with a spirit which shall teach the world that, while we are not forward for a
quarrel, America knows how to crush, as well

The Mexican Drug War: The Origin Of The Mexican Cartel
Clare Almond Conflict Assessment Report (December 2015)
13000713
The Mexican Drug War
The origin of the Mexican cartel started with a Mexican police officer called Miguel Gallardo
nicknamed the 'Godfather ' who established the Guadalajara cartel in the 1980 's (Hausmann, Austin
& Mia, 2009). He managed to control all the drug trade and drug trafficking routes throughout
Mexico to the US and was the first Mexican drug chief that was linked to Columbia's cocaine cartel.
Since Gallardo there has been a number of cartels; Knights Templar, Sinaloa Cartel, Los Zetas, Gulf
Cartel, Beltran–Leyva Organisation, Juarez Cartel and the Tijuana Cartel (Mexico 's Major Drug
Cartels, 2015).
In 2006 president Felipe Caldron sent troops to Michaocan ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
CJNG are a group of traffickers that left the Sinaloa Cartel group in 2010 and due to their
experience with the Sinaloa Cartels gained knowledge of the drug market and connections that
provided stability to the group (Bender, 2015)
The drug cartels don 't only smuggle drugs across the US border but smuggle firearms in which
come from the American black markets as it is extremely difficult for Mexicans to purchase firearms
in Mexico City (Astorga & Shirk, 2010). Due to the Mexican Cartels gaining access to firearms and
their groups growing in numbers it has made it difficult for the authorities to try and take down the
organisations. Also the more the authorities get involved the more that the cartels take it upon
themselves to pursue public killings, mass killings, torture, kidnaps, threats, and use the media to in
retaliation to the authorities attempting to take down their businesses (Stewart, 2011).
One of the main factors driving the Mexican Drug war is poverty. The reason being that lower–class
people need an income and people are that desperate that they are joining these criminal
organizations to earn easy money (Monza, Rios & Shirk, 2012). It could be said that this is a fault of
the government for not providing well paid jobs and an ineffective education system. This issue has
been

Arguments Against The Mexican War
Boom! The sound of a cannon in the far off distance goes off, now there is fear that rises up into the
air. When going into this war, many soldiers believed in something called Manifest Destiny.
Manifest Destiny was God's plan that America would extend its territory all the way to the Pacific
Ocean. This bloody war was much like the war that commenced at the Alamo. The Alamo set into
motion actions concluding with the Texans winning their independence from Mexico. The United
States was justified in going to war with Mexico because Mexico attacked American soldiers first,
Texas was not ready to abolish slavery, Texas had their own independence, Mexico crossed
American borders, Americans believed in Manifest Destiny, and the U.S. should follow ... Show
The battle of San Jacinto lead to Texas's independence in 1836.(Roden 271) Texas had just won their
freedom, now they wanted to choose to be part of the US union. According to this information, "The
invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined to annex herself to our union", (Polk
325) Texas had their independence and wanted to join the US. Mexico was unwilling to allow Texas
to leave. As time went on the US finally made a decision to annex Texas the union."Texas is now
ours!" (O'Sullivan 323) Many people were happy and rejoiced that the US now had Texas. This
struggle is displayed in one of Roden's maps, when the Mexicans crossed our borders. In the map
that Roden had, it showed the US going to the Rio Grande and then Mexico coming over to the Rio
Grande too, which was within American borders.(Roden 315) When the Mexicans crossed
America's borders, they didn't think they did, because both America and Mexico had different ideas
of where the border was. Mexico believed it to be on the Nueces River, and America believed it to
be on the Rio Grande. This could have been a reason of to why America and Mexico got into the big
argument. This evidence shows that the US was justified in going to war because Mexico killed U.S.
soldiers on American soil, and Texas itself had chosen to join with the U.S. All this information
gives much

Mexican Drug War
Mexico's War on Drugs differs from many other wars since it isn't a war between two parties but
instead between the government and their own people. It is fueled by the United States' desire for
drugs, which allowed many Mexican cartels to prosper. Long before Felipe Calderon took office, the
drug trade thrived without much opposition for the government. However, in 2006, Calderon
mobilized troops to combat drug traffickers, thus sparking what is now known as the Mexican drug
war("Mexico"). The ongoing war has had devastating consequences for both sides, with a total of
106,000 lives lost("Mexico"). Among these lives, numerous atrocities against independent reporters
and children have been committed, yet the war continues to rage on. Currently, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many, began to see drug trafficking as a financial option and thus, bring the violence of the drug
trade to smaller towns. The great allure of the drug trade managed to take hold in neighboring
countries such as Honduras and brought the violence along with it. Among those affected is 11 years
old Carlos Sanchez, who lives with his mother and hopes he can escape towards a safer life. Within
his life, he personally knows 8 people murdered and saw 3 murdered in front of him. At first, it
scared him; however, he remarks "Now seeing someone is dead is nothing"(Nazario). Milagro
Noemi Martinez shares equally horrific memories of her past. She tells of three girls raped and
murdered within her town, one as young as 8, and due to this, parents are fearful of their children
leaving the house, much less going to school(Nazario). For these children, the foreign drug cartels
dominate their native country of Honduras, despite being thousands of miles away from Mexico.
Many children as young as six are being used for the sellings and transporting these drugs. Children
who have chosen to avoid the cartels are forced to bask in the bloodshed left in the cartels wake. For
the future citizens of Honduras, their existence is and will continue to be marred by continuous war
due to a stagnant economy. The flow of drugs through their country surpasses the annual GDP

Essay On The Mexican American War
What is the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 and how did it affect the US and Mexico
Introduction
Stuck between 1846 and 1848, the US and Mexico (two neighbors) went to battle, which was a
crucial affair for the two countries, thus massive renovation of the region. The way was essential in
the generation of a new identity for the people. Following the end of the war, Mexico lost
approximately half of its territory relating to the present American Southwest from Texas to
California. The war was vital in enabling the United States to become a continental power in the
context of North America.
Background Information The hostilities between Mexico and the United States began in 1846 prior
to its continuation until 1847. According to the historical accounts, Mexico did claim the Nueces
River as its northeastern boarder. On the other hand, the US claimed the Rio Grande River
(McCaffrey, 1994). The troops from Mexico and the US met at the Rio Grande on April 25, 1846
prior to the Mexican army firing at the troops of the USA. This was the onset of the Mexican–
American War. The Mexican–American War associates with various struggles relating to land, legal
rights, and political power within the region. The region of interest has since been one of the most
dynamic economic, as well as politically significant regions of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
From this number, it is essential to note that only 1,700 US deaths related to the battle. Most of these
deaths came from the disease outbreaks in the camps. The entry of the United States troops in the
Mexico City in 1848 ensured that the Mexican–American War was that close to the city. Some of the
battles in relation to the Mexican–American War include (Woods, 2013) the Capture of Monterrey,
the Battle of Palo Alto, Quitman's Attack, Entrance into the City of Mexico, and Occupation of

Essay On Mexican Drug War
The war on drugs is a serious issue in today's society. One of the main places that has to endure this
is Mexico. All around Mexico's states, there are constant drug wars among different powerful cartels
and drug lords. Due to these organizations, there are many instances of violence and needless
deaths. There are many different drug lords, and they have caused many issues throughout Mexico.
The Mexican government has been fighting a war with drug traffickers since December 2006. At the
time, drug cartels have fought each country for control of territory. ("Mexico Drug War") Many
people in Mexico are unwilling to wait so instead, in communities all across the country, groups of
men have donned masks, picked up rifles and machetes, and begun patrolling their neighborhoods
and farmlands. Many Mexican have lost their faith in the government of willing to protect them.
(Foreign Affairs Vol.92) More than 60,000 people have been killed from 2006 to 2012 due to the
drug war violence, but when Enrique Pena Nieto assumed the presidency, intentional homicide
numbers have declined slightly, but the number of kidnappings continues to rise. Ninety percent of
the cocaine that enters to the United States traffics through Mexico. Mexico's main supplier of
marijuana and methamphetamines in the United States. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shortly before Calderon took the office. La Familia Michoacana had decapitated members of a rival
cartel and tossed their heads onto a dance floor at a club. When Calderon assumed the presidency, he
realized that he couldn't rely on federal police. To win this war against the cartels, Calderon needed
real cops he could trust. The Mexican Government has killed or has captured around 40 major cartel
members. One of the biggest captures of cartel members was in December 200, when the Mexican
Marines destroyed the Beltran Leyva Cartel, killing its leader and capturing all of his top duties.
(Foreign Affairs

Was The Mexican War Justified?
How the United States stretched from sea to shining sea by being fair and unfair sometimes. The
Mexican war started on April 25, 1846 when Captain Seth Thornton of the United States Army and
his 70 sailors were attacked by greater Mexican force. This happened in the disputed territory north
of the Rio grande, reports say that 16 Americans were killed and the number of Mexican soldiers
that were killed it unknown. Was the United States justified in going to war with Mexico? The
United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because of manifest destiny, border
distributes, and annexation of Texas. One reason the Mexican War was justified was because of
manifest destiny. Manifest destiny mean in the 19th century United States was destined to, stretch ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Texas and the United States believed that the proper borderline between Texas and Mexico was the
Rio Grande, but for Mexico it believed that the border between them and Texas is the Nueces
River."(Hook) As you can see the United States and Mexico had different beliefs. This evidence
shows the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because the US believed that Mexico had a
smaller amount of land they what they think they have. But Mexico believes that it has more land.
Mexico and the United States were fighting over the disputed territory which was between the
Nueces River and the Rio Grande, which made the tension between Mexico and the US more
negative. " on April 24th of April a party.....of sixty three men and officers, were... dispatched from
the American camp up the Rio del Norte.(Doc B)" This evidence shows that Mexico had went
against its boundary and fought with American men in the striped area where Mexico and the United
states were already fighting for. This Made thing more difficult to handle because the Us and
Mexico were already fighting for land and the probably made things worse between the two

The Mexican War : The Cause Of The Mexican American War
The Mexican American war was started in 1845; the main cause of the war then was whether the
border of Texas would be at Nueces River the claim of Mexico or at the Rio Grande that was being
claimed by United States. U.S. forces emerged victorious and as a result they were able to acquire
more than 500,000 square miles of the Mexican territory and it extended westward all the way from
Rio Grande to Pacific Ocean. However, tension between America and Mexico had been building for
so long since when the Mexican government gave an invitation to the Anglo settlers back in the
1820.
The long standing Anglo grievances that were in most times owned and made by the Mexican
government became another big reason that later resulted to the war("Mexican–American War |
Definition, Timeline, Causes, & Facts") p. 34. The Anglo settlers of Texas were before then invited
by the Spanish government of Mexico to settle in Texas in 1821. The first colony then that had about
300 families and headed led by Stephen F. Austin settled at the coastline to a depth of 150 miles, the
area or the said coastline later became the present day Houston.
Even before the war in 1845, the Mexican and Americans never had a smooth relationship as it is
said back in the year 1831 it is when the major grievance arose between the Texans and Mexican
government. This was ignited during the dictatorial regime of Bustamente who threatened to take
away the holdings of Anglo settlers. Bustamente never bended his dictatorial

Mexican American War Essay
Introduction/Background
The Mexican American War began on April 25, 1846. The war lasted two years losing many men on
both sides. The Mexican war was the third major fought by the United States. In 1810, Miguel
Hidalgo y Costilla triggers the beginning of Mexico's fight for independence from Spain. Mexico
gained its independence in 1821 after a long and bloody revolution against Spain. For Mexico, the
war between them and the United States was a fight to keep their institutions and national integrity
intact, to protect themselves from present and future aggressions by the Americans, but more than
anything else, the war was a struggle for land. In the early days of the republic, most Americans
made their living by farming, so in 1803 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Later in the month, 30 more swam the river. They formed the nucleus of a unit in the Mexican army
which was known as the "San Patricio Brigade." These soldiers would fight alongside Mexico in the
war...they were soon captured by the U.S forces and branded with a "D" pm their faces for deserter
and hanged on the gallows. On April 11 the Mexican troops stationed at Matamoros had welcomed a
new commander and 2,000 more soldiers. On May 8, the Mexicans were all along the enemy line.
When the two armies were only half a mile apart, Mexico fired with their big guns and cannons. The
Americans quickly attacked the Mexican front line. Hardly either side used their bayonets, knives or
bare hands. General Taylor's army fought several battles south of the Rio Grande. He captured the
important city of Monterrey and defeated a major Mexican force at the Battle of Buena Vista in
February 1847. President Polk remarked that he wanted, "a small war, just large enough to require a
treaty of peace and not large enough to make military reputations. Scott and his army entered
Mexico City on September 14, 1847. The fall of the Mexican capital ended the military phase of the
conflict. President Polk's goal was to create a threefold force: an "Army of the West," to conquer
New Mexico and California; an "Army of the Center," to keep Chihuahua and northern Mexico
under control; and an "Army

Mexican War Dbq Analysis
If you looked at a map of North America in the 1820's the countries would look a lot different.
Mexico was as large as the United States, stretching from Guatemala in the south to Oregon in the
north. The US was much smaller, but not for long. The Mexican War, or the "U.S. Invasion"
(according to the Mexicans) started in 1846 and ended in 1848. In that short time the US gained a
large chunk of territory including Texas and California and Mexico lost more than half of their land.
Many Americans and Mexicans died fighting in the war but was this war justified ? I think that the
Mexican war was not justified but provoked by the United States. The reasons why I think this is
that Americans living in Texas violated the rules that Mexico had ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Polk became President as the trouble with Mexico was happening. In 1846 under Polk's orders the
troops of General Zachary Taylor were sent to the Rio Grande. The US considered the Rio Grande to
be the new border between Mexico and the US but the Mexicans believed the border was farther
north at the Nueces River. The Mexican government automatically thought the movement of the
U.S. army was an attack on Mexico. (Doc C). The Mexicans knew they had to defend the border of
the Rio Grande so that's what they did. They set up troops along the Rio Grande to protect its border
(Doc C). In document C it states "The American government acted like a bandit who came upon a
traveler". The Mexicans described us as thieves and a threat to the peace (Doc C). Polk sent a known
spy, William Parrott, back to Mexico on a diplomatic mission after Mexico made it clear that Parrott
was Mexico's enemy trying to give the Congress a reason to go to war (Online book). Polk is trying
to give Congress a reason to go to war with Mexico (Online book).All this time Polk looked like the
"good guy" to the voters back home, defending the land and the people. The people are agreed to go
to war with Mexico (Doc B), So in 1846 Congress votes to go to war (Doc B). The United States
was ready to take action because we thought that we are superior to the Mexicans (Doc

Mexican Drug War Analysis
Imagine waking up every day with the constant fear of being killed and not returning back to a
family. Some people in Mexico wake up every morning and wonder if they're even going to make it
back home and sleep. "Drug–related violence in Mexico continues to rise. An estimated 7,000
people died in Mexico in 2009 as a result of the drug war significantly more than the 1,300 people
who are believed to have died in 2005 before the war began. There were also an estimated 1,200
kidnappings in 2009. Paradoxically, Mexico's strong stance against the cartels seems to be
contributing to increased drug–related violence."(Duff) Duff points out that the violence in Mexico
keeps rising." The Mexican government's war against drugs has also affected the distribution ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Though they think that the drug war only effects those who seek trouble." That incident was just the
latest in a string of attacks against Mexican security forces. On April 7, the cartel ambushed a
convoy of elite state police security officers in route to Guadalajara. Fifteen police officers were
killed in the assault and a further five were wounded."(Bender) Bender argues that cartels will kill
anyone who stands in there for example police officers, and while many believe that the killings of
the police officers didn't effect the citizens. The police officers had families too. Despite of the idea
of the drug war only effecting those who try to stop it or seek trouble mostly every part of Mexico's
society is effected." Since the drug war in Mexico began in 2006, more than 50,000 people have
been killed and organized crime has infiltrated, in one way or another, virtually every part of society.
Many children have lost family members or become victims themselves. Cartels have also begun
recruiting kids to work, often as mule"(Siegel). While on his trip to Mexico, Siegel observes that not
only have certain people been effected like police officers, mayors or any kind of Mexico leaders
but many children and family have been effected somehow. Then again I can see how some may
argue that Mexico's drug war only effects the one who are in the

The Mexican War And The Cause Of The Mexican American War
The Mexican American War, generally called the Mexican War and in Mexico the American
intercession in Mexico, was a prepared conflict between the United States of America and the
United Mexican States from 1846 to 1848. It followed in the wake of the 1845 American expansion
of the free Republic of Texas, which Mexico still considered its northeastern locale and a bit of its
district after its acknowledged severance in the 1836 Texas Revolution 10 years sooner.
After its Treaty of Córdoba with getting opportunity in 1821, from the Kingdom of Spain and its
Spanish Empire as New Spain as far back as 300 years, and a short attempt distinctive things with
government, Mexico transformed into a republic in 1824. It was depicted by broad precariousness,
deserting it inadequately organized worldwide conflict only two decades later, when war diminished
out up 1846. Nearby American assaults in Mexico's pitifully settled north in the decades going
before the war affected the Mexican government to help movement from the U.S. on its upper east
periphery (since 1803 with the Louisiana Purchase from the French Empire (France) of Emperor
Napoleon I) to the Mexican region of Texas to make a support. In any case, the as of late named
"Texians" opposed the Mexican organization of President/dictator Antonio López de Santa Ana, who
had usurped the Mexican Constitution of 1824, in the resulting 1836 Texas Revolution, making a
republic not apparent by Mexico, which still promised it as a segment of its national area. In 1845,
the Texan Republic agreed to an offer of expansion by the U.S. Congress, and transformed into the
28th state in the Union on December 29 that year.
In 1845, as of late picked eleventh U.S. President James K. Polk (1795– 1849, served 1845– 1849),
influenced a proposal to the Mexican government to purchase to the discussed touches base between
the Nueces River and the Rio Grande conduit energize south. Exactly when that offer was rejected,
President Polk moved U.S. troops requested by Major General Zachary Taylor encourage south into
the talked about a zone. Mexican forces attacked an American Army station ("Thornton Affair") in
the had space, killing 12 U.S. troopers and getting 52. These same Mexican troops

Mexican Drug War Essay
The Mexican Drug War
By: Blake Cohen
INR2002 – Spring 2013
Jeff Hernden
Word Count: 3800
Date: 4/22/13
In 2006, Mexico began to crack down on drug trafficking operations in union with the United States.
Why all of the sudden? In regard to that question, my paper will include a history of events leading
up to this sudden crack down on drug trafficking, from its start in the 1960's until today. After the
history of the drug war, I will discuss the main states involved like the United States and Mexico
itself. Along with their main goal of eliminating drug trafficking all together, although it is a very
high expectation. Mexico has sent out 50,000 soldiers that are being paid less than a burrito vendor,
in attempt to lessen the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In February 2011 the United States began sending unarmed drones to collect information on drug
traffickers. Later in August, the United States started in cross border raids, sending CIA operatives
and older military personnel to aid the Mexican military. In addition to assisting Mexico, the United
States increased security on our side and spends approximately $3 billion on securing the border.
Decriminalization is a highly disputed policy option, in November of 2012 two states in the United
States passed laws for the legalization of recreational use of marijuana. However, it is still a United
States federal law that marijuana is illegal. Although decriminalization would lead to less
incarcerations, it would put more drugs in the hands of users and increase drug exporting from
Mexico. A prime strategy that both the United States and Mexico have been using is to take out the
"high value" individuals or "foot soldiers". This takes out the mass exporters but still leaves the
middle and lower class drug traffickers. Which then the middle class moves up and takes over for
whatever "high value" cartel that was just taken out. Almost immediately after, Mexico's new
president, Enrique Peña Nieto took office in December of 2012. Of those who reported missing or
those who just "disappeared" the Peña Nieto government claims they will seek to verify all the
missing ones. After coming into office, the administration of Peña Nieto changes the security
policies. In

The American Army in the Mexican War
During the 19th century, the United States had two armies. Authorized by congress in 1789, the first
was the standing army called as U.S. army. This force consisted of officers commissioned by
Congress and men who joined for a five year period. In 1792. Congress created an auxiliary army
called as militia. The U.S. army was a national force while the militia was the armies of various
states. The militia could be called for federal service: to execute the laws, to suppress insurrections,
and to repel invasions. This two level arrangement formed the basis of military establishment during
the war. The U.S. army was not prepared for the war. The congress authorized 8613 men and
officers for the war but, the actual number was fewer than 5500. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
An 11000 man force was commanded by General President Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna. It was an
amalgamation units of central Mexico, Army of the north and remnants of defeated Veracruz
garrison. Acapulco to Mexico City was guarded by 3000 man army of the south. A 3800man
contingent rounded out the valley campaign's force structures. Lacking established government
depots, the Mexican soldiers got supplies from nearby communities. The soldier's wives and
girlfriends accompanied the campaign. They helped the army by sewing, cooking and ministering to
the sick and wounded of the both the armies.
ROLE OF MEDIA
The war between United States and Mexico witnessed use of technological innovations at the
strategic level. This was more evident in communication. Mounted couriers carried battle reports
and were dispatched safely inside sandbags. In the period from 1821 to 1854, steamboats, railroads,
and telegraphs advanced critical communications at speed beyond imagination. Tactical
communications for armies remained unchanged. Drums and flags marked the progress of units.
Unit at distant places received written or verbal orders delivered by the officers. The volunteer
messenger formed the critical link between the commander and his command.
A typical Mexican newspaper followed a standard format during the war. The local, national and
international news were covered in various sections. Letters written by the public to the editors and
an editorial page were

The Mexican-American War
New Mexico was just a dry desert owned by Mexico. The people in New Mexico were treated badly
and not given the food, water, or money needed to survive. New Mexico was stopped from
expanding and becoming something great. The, what is now a great state, used to just be a poorly
populated desert. The Mexican–American War was hope for the people of New Mexico. The war
could save them, the war could give New Mexico the freedom that it wanted and deserved. The
Mexican American War gave hope to New Mexico and changed New Mexico forever.
The Mexican–American War was a tremendous war that started on April 25, 1846 and ended on
February 2, 1848. The war greatly affected both Mexico and the United States. The war affected
Mexico greatly because, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mexico had a very unstable government at the time. This means that the leaders and laws of Mexico
were changing over and over. In fact at one point, there were over 30 new leaders of Mexico in 25
years. Mexico's economy was also horrible at the time and money was not very easy to come by.
Mexico's Government was short with money as well. Mexico barely had the time and money to care
for itself. It was obviously not in a good enough state to care for New Mexico as well. In result,
New Mexico was isolated from expanding and from the rest of Mexico. Mexico was not
remembered again until the Mexican–American

Mexican War On Drugs
Critics outside and inside of Mexico who are witness to the casualties of the Mexican War on Drugs
are keen to blame Felipe Calderon's administration (the Mexican government) for the escalation of
conflict within the country starting in 2006; arguing that the fast militarization and the lack of the
state's strength augmented such conflict. In the article "Did the Military Interventions in the
Mexican Drug War Increased Violence?" by Valeria Espinosa and Donald B Rubin; the statistics
analysts, studied two articles from a leading Mexican magazine Nexos, both with the same
conclusion, "that military interventions had increased homicide rates in those states where
intervention took place" (Espinosa and Rubin, 17). The results, although it was ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is evidence of correlation between conflict and military intervention. But according to the
studies, military intervention's increase in conflict was only a short–term issue, "initially, military
intervention upset the local balance in power between cartels and local police – which is particularly
relevant if these bodies were infiltrated by organized crime – thereby increasing the violence in the
short term" (Espinosa and Ruin, 26), but that the same interventions decreases the homicide rates in
the long term. Thus military intervention is not the cause of conflict in the form of homicide rates,
but rather in the change in power in local authorities. But can one still blame the Mexican
government for the increase of conflict? According to Michel Coscia and Viridiana Ríos, President
Calderón did not start the Mexican Drug War and violence did not start because of the interactions
of two or more cartels operating in the same territory (Ríos, 22). By implementing a computerized
search algorithm, they both developed Coscia and Ríos went through all of Google's database to
search any information that was ever been published online and indexed by Google News in
national or local press as well as in particular

[Tensions between Mexico and America were present long before the start of the Mexican War in
1846. In 1845, Texas was granted statehood in the U.S. after declaring independence from Mexico.
Mexico viewed the situation as an act of war because they still thought of as Texas as a part of their
territory. American and Mexican relations grew even more strained when a dispute over the border
was raised; the U.S. believed the border should be along the Rio Grande River and Mexico believed
it should be along the Nueces River. Then, a skirmish between American and Mexican soldiers
along the Rio Grande left sixteen American soldiers shot, and America later declared war in 1846.]
The United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because Mexico did not do
anything against America to warrant a war, and America's reasons for going to war were selfish and
unfair. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
was not justified in going to war with Mexico because Mexico did not wrong America and was only
thinking of self–defense. *Document C is a magazine article called "A Mexican Viewpoint on the
War With the United States," from the magazine Voices of Mexico. The document shares details
from the Mexican point of view of the war, written by Jesus Velasco–Marquez.* According to
Document C, "In the eyes of the (Mexican) government, the mobilization of the U.S. army was an
outright attack on Mexico.... As a consequence, the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction
to protect the border..." The Mexican government was only thinking in terms of self–defense. The
American president of the time, James K. Polk, wrongfully claimed that this instance of self–
defense was an example of uninvited aggression by using it in his reasonings for war with

The Mexican American War: The War In Mexico
The Mexican American War was somewhat of a small kept war that was initially started as a
territory claim that turned into a political game. It involved the United States, Mexico, and the
Native Americans (Indians). The Mexican government was a bit unstable at the time in which
allowed for easy maneuvering of any opposition. The United States was run by POTUS James K.
Polk. General Zackary Taylor was the one in charge of looking to the Texas territory to establish an
American presence. The territories in question were also habited by Native American Indians.
General Taylor new of the Mexican opposition but had no idea of the numbers of the Indians that
also occupied the land.
The main objective from the United States in 1846 was to gain the territory north of the Rio Grande.
The Mexican government was not in favor of giving up the land, and was actually in combat with
the Native Americans for the same land as well. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Just as General Taylor was having Congress make a motion for the Unites States to take over the
territory, the Mexican General Santa Anna and his army killed Americans in Texas soil. This was the
turning point and what started the war in the eyes of the Americans. How could Mexico be so
heartless and kill American troops on what was considered American soil to Americans? The war
lasted 2 years, and ended with the ratification of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 ending the
Mexican American War. Mexico was paid 15 million dollars, but was not the only thing that was
costly to America. In real numbers the war cost America 97 million dollars, and 13,000 American
lives. With that America gained the territory, but also the slavery counts that haunted the land. Not
all Americans were in favor, but the deed was done. America now incorporated the land North of the
Rio

The Mexican War : The Causes Of The Mexican American War
When many hear of the Mexican American War, mix feelings and controversies arise.
During the start of the battle in 1846, when James K. Polk declared war against the Mexican's, the
nation was divided. One part of the war and the other half against. While slave owners saw it as " a
place to extend slavery," others such as Frederick Douglas saw it as "robbing Mexico of her
territory." The Mexican American War rose out of the desire of expansion and resulted in new
discoveries. The cause of the war and the reasons American became involved are two vital questions
that must be addressed before examining any other issues. The birthing forth of the conflict came
through the Presidential election of James K. Polk, who promised to bring forth unity by bringing
both Texas and Oregon into the union. After Congress voted to annex Texas into the union Texas
became a state. During this time President Polk began negotiation with Britain about Oregon also
becoming part of the U.S., but the British were unwilling to surrender without a compromise in
which a territorial dividing line was implemented by extending the already existing boundaries
between the U.S. and Canada to the West Coast. However, the negotiation with Texas was overruled
and although Mexico could not prevent Texas from claiming dependency, the Mexicans, with
absolute certainty would not allow Texas borders to reach into the river of Rio Grande and so war
was declared. "A military historian named John S.D. Eisenhower

DBQ Essay: The Mexican War
Anna Fleming
4/27/15
English–5th
History–3rd
Mexican War Sixteen Americans lay dead on the North shore of the Rio del Norte. On April 24th a
party of Americans left from their camp and went up to the North bank of the Rio Del Norte to see if
any Mexican troops had crossed the river. While they were guarding the river Mexican troops came
and surrounded them (Doc.B). Once the fight was over sixteen American were killed or wounded
and the number of Mexicans killed is unknown (Hook Exercise). Many people feel like America
wasn't justified in going to war with Mexico. Some people think that America was justified in going
to war with Mexico. America was justified in going to war with Mexico, because Americans were
losing people to Texas, Mexico ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mexico had just recently won their independence from Spain. Soon Mexico wanted Texas. America
wanted Texas too, because a lot of her citizens had moved there. In document D paragraph 2 it
says," At this period, citizens of the United States had already begun to move into Texas... The idea
was that this extensive province ought to become a part of the United States." In document D it says
that in total, America lost 103,000 white people and 38,000 slaves, because they were all going to
Texas. The reason why all the Americans were going to Texas was that they either were escaping the
government, having slaves there (even though they weren't supposed to), and more.
The second reason why America was justified in going to war with Mexico was that Mexico didn't
have a very good government. In document A paragraph 3 John L. O'Sullivan said,"Mexico never
can exert any real government authority over such a country." America took Texas, because Mexico
can't govern very well. If Mexico was still owning Texas it would probably be chaos. America had a
stronger government than Mexico. Some people thought it was America's duty to make Texas part of
the United States. John L. O'Sullivan said," California will, probably, next fall away from Mexico...
Imbecile and distracted" (Doc A paragraph

Mexican American War Analysis
Aftermath of the U.S. War with Mexico
The chapter is being displayed to show what happened to Mexican–Americans and Mexicans during
and after the civil war, but in a different perspective. In a very detailed perspective from Zaragoza,
he mentions how Anglos would mistreat, abused and even had prejudiced belief about Mexicans
after the U.S. War. This chapter covers what Zaragoza describes about Mexican's discrimination,
prejudice and lynching. "Racist ideas about Mexicans, which served to legitimate the Mexican
American war, only grew more virulent after the war. " (Zaragoza, 112). Anglos wanted power at all
levels they can put their hands on. The idea of this chapter is to really show both perspective on the
history of Mexican American war ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
and Mexico war story has rich information that helps understand the struggles of Mexicans. Many if
not all of the story has yet to be told to the vast majority of the people. There are still many parts that
Mexican–Americans and Americans do not know of and some just really do not want to share the
reality. This chapter really gave me a refresher on something I knew was real and people kept
pushing back saying it never happened. After reading this I feel like these stories need to be out in
the public and need to be taught in our history classes throughout the country. Mexicans did suffer
from all the injustices, prejudices of the Anglos and as we view today, 1850's and the aftermath of
the Mexican American War is similar to these injustices and prejudices still happen at different
levels throughout the U.S. Especially with our current administration that seems like they are
pushing a lot of injustices towards the Mexicans and Mexican–Americans. This chapter itself shows
the different concepts we had in our materials such as the readings, films, and Professor Fraga's

Mexican Cartel War
The Mexican government has gained some control over the war against the cartels, with the
financial aid from the US, and alongside the Mexican Army. Mr. Calderon, previous president, had a
successful plan into crushing these cartels by weakening their positions and taking power away from
them. Mr. Calderon's goal was to destroy the cartels by all and any means. In Mexico's history, Mr.
Calderon during his presidency, he had the most captured, as well as the war against the cartels was
maintained under control. By the time Felipe Calderón left office, 25 of the 37 most wanted men in
Mexico had been either captured or killed (Krauze). Back in December 2006, when Mexican
President Mr.Calderón decided to launch an unprecedented attack against the ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
"Since former president Felipe Calderon launched an all–out war against the cartels in 2006, about
80,000 people have been killed," (Dana). From 2007 to 2014 the crime affairs in Mexico have
claimed more lives all together than the war that has been taking place in the Middle East with Iraq
and Afghanistan. Not only has the number of casualties include cartel members themselves but also
those numbers include young children, men and women of a variety of ages. More than 164,000
Mexicans have disappeared or been killed in the conflict, and the extreme and chronic violence,
coupled with great poverty "Mother Jones". As for the numbers keep growing, and as the years add
up this The continuous war on drugs that has been going on for an extended amount of time may
have some valuable lessons for the Middle East (Dana). In the years since the Calderóns
administration, Mexico has undoubtedly seen a decrease in the number of gangland executions (the
eerie way "progress" is measured in a country immersed in a drug–fueled Civil War). There are a
couple of revealing situations that indicate an increase in the advancement of these cartels not only
getting more violent but as well as gaining more territory. Such incidents include executions in non–
metropolitan areas that have remained

The Mexican War: The Causes Of The Mexican American War
Mexican American War
"...May the boldest fear and the wisest tremble when incurring responsibilities on which may depend
on our countries peace and prosperity..." –James K. Polk. What our 11th president meant by this is
that we need to maintain good relations to bring success as this is the opposite of what Mexico
wanted. In 1845, many Americans believed in manifest destiny which was the belief that the United
States was destined to stretch from coast to coast. As this idea scattered through America, citizens of
the U.S. spread with it. Americans going west ran into Mexican territory, where settlement was
cheap. These settlers moved in and outnumbered the Mexicans six to one, because of this, tensions
arouse. Although the United States war against Mexico may be viewed as controversial, the war was
just due to the Mexican government refusing to hear an offer, the boundary dispute, and the 16
American soldiers killed. The new ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The actions of the Mexicans were a key point in the start of the U.S. war with Mexico. President
Herrera decides to ignore our peace offer which isn't very friendly at all. A Mexican patrol unit
decides to wipe out a squad of American soldiers who held back and tried to avoid conflict to
maintain peaceful relations. On top of that, the Tejanos weren't happy with what they had so they
fought over the boundary. In conclusion, all of these actions the Mexicans committed prove why the
Mexican – American war was just. The United States war against Mexico is still relevant today for
an abundance of reasons. The war was a key part in American history which taught us mistakes that
were made and how we should not repeat them again. The Mexican – American war teaches good
life lessons such as treating neighbors well and not invading other people's

Essay On Mexican American War
Today, the Mexican–American War is still a widely argued topic of controversy with Mexico and
America. But now, this hot topic of controversy can be put to rest. Was the U.S. justified in going to
war with Mexico? The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because Texas had
been free and wanted to be annexed into the U.S., Mexico attacked U.S troops, and Mexico let U.S
citizens in. Before this whole war started, Mexico had won its independence from Spain in 1821.,
Shortly after in 1830, an American named Stephen Austin went to Texas for a huge piece of land. He
then brought 10,000 Anglos, or white people, into Texas because it was his end of the bargain. After
that, the Mexican government put tighter control on Texas, and also enforced laws the Anglos in
Texas did not believe were right. Just like the American Revolution, a rebellion started in 1833. In
1836, a Spanish fort that was turned into a base for the Texan rebellion, called the Alamo, was
attacked. All of the Texan fighters were killed. That devastating loss somehow helped Texas to win
the next war, and gain its independence. (Roden 269) Shortly after, Texas was annexed into the
United States of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The U.S troops were on what they thought was the U.S.'s side. Then, Mexican troops attacked the
camping U.S. troops." When word arrived on May 9, 1846 that Mexican troops had fired upon
Americans on the "Texas side" of the Rio Grande, president Polk had a reason for going to war."
(Roden 317) There were 63 U.S. officers who were camping on the north side of the Rio Grande
watching to see if any Mexican troops were about to cross over to attack. Then, a way bigger army
of Mexican troops attacked them.(Polk 325) Even Jeśus Velasco–Marquez, a modern day journalist
who wrote an article, why the U.S wasn't justified in going to war, admitted that Mexican troops
attacked U.S. troops. (Velasco–Marquez

Consequences Of The Mexican War
The Mexican war was a conflict between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848. This war
had gone by various names such as Mexican War, Spanish Guerra de 1847, or Guerra de Estados
Unidos a Mexico. At this point in history, there were multiple people connected such as James Polk,
Abraham Lincoln, and Frederick Douglass. Additional parties that were involved included the
northeasterners, Santa Anna and the Mexican Government, and the modern–day Mexican people.
This battle brought a numerous amount of casualties and left a cascade of broken tides. There were
over 10,000 people dead and over 3,000 people who had been wounded. The Mexican American
war left behind memories of the redeeming qualities between the United States and Mexico due to a
large number of territories and people that Mexico lost to America.
President James K. Polk who was in power from 1845 to 1849 had been accused of provoking the
War with Mexico. He believed that the war would give him the upper hand in gaining land ... Show
This war had several factors and several people who were involved whether they were on front
lines, and watching as the destruction took place. A few of the parties involved or that had
knowledge about the war was President James Polk who was thought to initiate the war. Abraham
Lincoln who did not agree with the battle deeming it inappropriate for each side involved. Frederick
Douglass who felt that the War only benefitted one person rather than the country as whole. There
were more than just these parties involved Mexico and its general Santa Anna was involved, and the
northeasterners were also involved. Like everything else there were those who agreed with Polk's
decision, and those who did not. I would be one of the ones that did not agree with the decision to
go to war. During that battle lives were lost and that could never be replaced it would only be left in

Mexican Drug War : Mexico
Kelsey McClenning Mrs. Blomme Honors 1 28 September 2014 Mexico Drug War According to the
FBI, there are more than seventy five open cases of Americans that are kidnapped in Mexico. That is
just one of the effects caused by what is called The Mexico Drug War. People are oblivious to what
the outcome of drugs, in general, can do. Many have disappeared or been killed, firearm trade from
the U.S. has gone up, and the supply of drugs in the U.S has increased. The Mexico Drug war
started in December of 2006 and is still lingering about to this day. "From January 2000 through
September 2006, the Mexican government arrested over 79,000 people on charges of drug
trafficking" (Cook 4). As shown, Mexico has a very known past of dealing with drugs. ... Show
In the year of 2011, there was around 27,000 residents that underwent an invasion of Mexico's most
barbarous drug gang, the Zetas. In this invasion they destroyed the town, set fire or bulldozed
through houses, and kidnapped the locals at gunpoint. It was not until almost three years later that
the government took serious action and went under full investigation (Tracing the Missing). "30–40
families from Allende, some with as many as 10 members were 'exterminated'" (Tracing the
Missing). This attack is believed to be the worst of the Mexico Drug War. All because drug
trafficking has been highly restricted, innocent bystanders have to suffer along and be concerned
about running into somebody dangerous who is involved in one of the drug cartels. In Mexico, there
are seven major running drug cartels. Over the years, some cartels became smart and formed
alliances with one another so they can continue their illegal businesses and have each others backs,
so they say (Cook). Because of the restrictions on drugs in Mexico, there is now also a restriction on
firearms. "There are approximated 67,000 licensed firearms dealers in the U.S. along the U.S.–
Mexico border. There is only one legal firearms retailer in Mexico" (Mexico Drug War Fast Facts).
The sales of firearms sales in the U.S. are shooting out of the roof. The sales and number of firearms
being illegally traded have greatly increased since this rebellion began.

The Alamo And The Mexican-American War
When looking on these documents, it is obvious to note the similarities with the writing in the early
textbooks on the topic of the Alamo and the Mexican–American War. When these events happened,
America was still a pretty recent country and was trying it's hardest to make a name for themself
amonst the other well known countries. In 1867, when the first passage about the Alamo was
written, and in 1840, when the first passage about the Mexican–American War was written, it was
quite apparent that the people writing these were not telling the full truth about the two events as it
was shown that in the writing of the Alamo, the author only said that David (Davy) Crockette was
probably killed. From the 1878 edition to the 1905 one, there was a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
From the passage from the 1849 texbook, there was discprencies about the even when comparing to
later excerpts. They said that Mexico was jealous of the American government and that if Texas was
annexe, they would think it be quite a hostile act against them. After that, they talked about how
there was talk negotiations between them and yet the Mexican's went straight ahead and organized
troops to take Texas back. In the passage from the 1880 textbook, it felt more like the writer wanted
to write a fiction book by the way they casted the events with such vague descriptions. There was no
real analyisis of the events that unfolded. In 1911, the idea that the American people were only only
preparing and guessing that the Mexican government was going to launch a strike against them was
the one theory that seemed to stick for years to come. The author said that President Polk was
expecting a fight so he sent his general to the territory in preparation for what was going to happen.
It wasn't until 1966 where there was finally light brought to the issues surrounding the war and how
the President was becoming more and more impatioent about the issue of not gaining the territory
they were fighitng over and knowing the unwillingness of the government to hand it over. There
seemed to be issues in deciding who actually started the war, whether it be with the troops being
sent to the Rio Grande or Polk's

Essay On The Mexican-American War

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Angie Willis

More from Angie Willis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On The Mexican-American War