Advance Nursing Ethics Wgu Essay

Advance Nursing Ethics Wgu Essay
The topics that will be discussed in this paper will be the ethical decisions that have to be made by
Dr. F and the RN in regards to disclosing information to Dr. J. Also, according to the NANDA
nursing diagnosis for ethical consideration, Dr. F and the RN also have to consider if Mrs. Z has
some knowledge deficits in regards to her prognosis and if due to her culture, she feels
powerlessness towards her diagnosis. Ethical theories are important to justifying and relating
situations in nursing. In this paper, there will be discussions relating ethical theories to nursing, as
well as, ethical decision making models that will relate to the delivery of healthcare. Ethical theory
is important to nursing because it provides a filter and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Concepts of reasonable limits refers to limiting one's actions or in reference to nursing, limiting
what one can say or do in terms of a patient's care (Jonstone & Fry, 2002). When discussing
reasonable limits, a nurse has to take into consideration at what point is enough, enough. For
example, in the case study regarding Mrs. Z, reasonable limit would prevent the nurse from pushing
the patient further into pursuing treatment and disclosing her medical prognosis to her family. Mrs.
Z is a lucid individual, so the nurse and doctor caring for her would have to limit their interference
in disclosing information to her husband due to reasonable limits. In nursing, there are times when
breaking a patient's confidentiality becomes an ethical issue. If the nurse was thinking in terms of
Utilitarianism, breaching confidentiality would be the only reasonable thing to do. For example, if a
patient who is HIV positive is knowingly having unprotected sex in order to infect other people, it
would only be right to break the confidentiality of their diagnosis to prevent further harm to other
individuals in the future. Sometimes, in order to protect the greatest amount of people,
confidentiality has to be broken. Another example where a healthcare individual can break
confidentiality is if a minor is being harmed and the minor does not want to disclose to anyone their
situation. For
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Compare And Contrast The Cases Of Karen Ann Quinlan And...
Compare and contrast the cases of Karen Ann Quinlan and Nancy Cruzan. Please note: The
Feinbergs have a factual error on page 163. They say Quinlan was injured in a car accident. This is
incorrect. She overdosed on alcohol and Valium at a party, passed out when she got home, and never
woke up.
Both Karen and Nancy where in situations that caused them to go unconscious. The doctors in
Nancy's case restarted her heart whereas in Karen's case she was still breathing. Both sets of doctors
placed the girls on feeding and antibiotics. Our text does not explain if Karen's family tried to
appeal the courts or try to remove her from life support, but we do know she lived on it for ten years
without recovering in any way before she died. Nancy's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, if a doctor gave an overdose of medication or gave a lethal injection this would be
considered an active euthanasia. Passive Euthanasia is withholding something needed for life.
Examples of this might be taking someone off of a feeding tube or life support and letting them die
on their own.
Flag this Question
Question 5 10 pts
Value in suffering: What Bible passages inform a Christian view of suffering at the end of life? Give
more than just a list –– offer a brief explanation for the verses you list.
HTML Editor Keyboard Shortcuts
Romans 8:18 tells how we don't merely seek an end because it ends our suffering, but rather we
seek the end because of the glory that will come after it. For this reason, we look toward being with
Christ in the midst of suffering and after it.
Philippians 1:21 reminds us that we are not our own because if we are to live on earth even in
suffering we do so to the glory of Christ and being with his spirit and if we die it is only to the glory
of being with him in heaven.
2 Corinthians 1:3–4 shows us how God is our comfort in the midst of suffering so that we can
comfort others.
Romans 5:3–4 points out how suffering only grows us closer to Christ through a transformation of
character and realization of the fact that our hope is in him no matter the circumstance.
Flag this

Essay Pro Euthanasia
When someone is inevitably dying and in inexplicable pain is it really a crime to grant their wishes
and end their suffering? As of right now euthanasia is illegal in many countries and is a very
controversial topic. Is it compassion for the patient helping them in ending their life or murder? The
doctor is not giving death as an option, it is the patients choice and even where it is legal there are
many rules. Euthanasia should not be considered a crime because the patient is not being murdered;
they are having their suffering end in a painless, humane way out of compassion for the patient and
their family.
Euthanasia is defined by the World Book Millennium 2000 encyclopaedia as, "the practise of
painlessly ending the lives of people ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The reason to legalize euthanasia is clear, these people need to have the choice to die with dignity.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian more commonly known as Dr. Death is greatly known for his opinion that
euthanasia should be legalized and his work with patients seeking help. He was very important in
showing euthanasia and voicing his opinion on the subject so the public could not ignore the
importance of the matter. Dr. Kevorkian was said to have been involved with 130 suicides by
patients who wanted to end their own lives (Nicol and Wylie 17). He had two machines he used to
help the patients, one an injection and the other a mask, however both machines were operated by
the patient and although Dr. Kevorkian was taken to court many times for these he was not
convicted because the patient was in control. He was very careful as to not actually commit the act
himself until he was contacted by Thomas Youk, a young with Lou Gheric's disease; Lou Gheric's
disease is when the muscle stop working and eventually the patient chokes to death. Tom's condition
prevented him from actually operating the machines and therefore Dr. Kevorkian decided that he
would operate the machine himself because he cared greatly about all his patients and could not let
Tom live in his constant fear (Nicol and Wylie 11). Dr. Kevorkian taped Tom's wishes and then
himself hooking up the machine and pushing the button to inject the drugs. He then proceed to

Clarice Blake Case
At what age did making your own choices become acceptable? For many people as they turn
anywhere between 10 and up they start to think that every choice made about them, with their life,
that they should be the one making the decision. Most parents would agree with that. So why is it
that when it comes to something medical, people start to believe that they aren't old enough? If a
child understands what they are doing, or the consequences, then they should be able to make their
own decision. Many minors diagnosed with an illness will take the treatment, but some don't want
it. Some minors will tell the doctor that they don't want to be given the treatment, and because of a
few words, they will end up in court going against the hospital, trying ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
People taking care of her said that she was unstable, as she hasn't taken good care of herself her
whole life. But she could take care of herself even though she wouldn't eat much. For example, Mr.
D'Alessandro, her court appointed lawyer, states, "Force–feedings would keep the woman alive but
would do nothing to cure the anorexia, Mr. D'Alessandro said. (Wall Street Journal Online)." Even
after the force feedings that the hospital wanted to give her all it wouldn't cure the anorexia, and
would only keep her alive. She knew that if she didn't go along with the force feedings that she
would die, and she still didn't want them. Her lawyer also says, "She gained weight, at one point
reaching 90 pounds, but the force–feedings damaged her heart and were discontinued. (Wall Street
Journal Online)." She was court order to force feed and as it was helping her with her weight, It
could have also easily killed her. After going against her wish they ended up hurting her. Her lawyer
Mr. D'Alessandro, also states, "There's no path to overcoming her eating disorder," he said.
"She...understands the potential consequence of not having treatment is that she may die." No matter
how hard they tried to eliminate her disorder they couldn't. She knew that she could die, and still
didn't want the treatment, and if force feeding could hurt her then it shouldn't

Euthanasia Is The Painless Killing Of Someone
Would someone want to die miserably or to die without pain? Euthanasia is the painless killing of
someone that is suffering from a disease or something that is incurable. "The concept of dying with
one's personhood intact is often referred to as a "Socratic death." In today's parlance, it is often
called "dying with dignity" ("Dying with Dignity" 1996; Solovy 1999)" (Patel 38). In Greek,
euthanasia literally means a good death. There are also many different versions of euthanasia. The
one that is legal in the United States is physician aid in dying (PAD) or assisted suicide. Active
euthanasia is when one person is brought to death by an act, and passive euthanasia is when
someone leaves the person to die. There are also voluntary ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Euthanasia should be legal in all parts of the United States because adult citizens have the right to
die, the majority of Americans support euthanasia, and due to prohibitive medical costs, it makes
sense financially.
To begin with, in the United States, Americans are meant to believe they have the freedom to do
what they want, so why can the adult citizens not be able to choose the right to die? For many of the
citizens it is hard to see a family member or friend die in a slow, painful way. There are many stories
about patients that slowly die and possibly one of the most famous story is about Karen Ann
Quinlan. Karen was only twenty–two when she was in a coma. On April 15, 1975 she was out at a
party, and after drinking alcohol and possibly taking tranquilizers, she was found without a pulse.
She was taken to a hospital in New Jersey where she was hooked up to a respirator. Her conditions
quickly declined and within a few days, she curled up and was considered to be in a PVS (Persistent
Vegetative State). After a month had passed, there were no signs of recovery and her family asked to
have Karen disconnected from the respirator. The hospital refused this because Karen was not
conscious to make a decision for herself and her parents could not do it on her behalf. Karen's
parents took their case to court. The New Jersey Supreme Court told the hospital that Karen was to
be

Ethical and Professional Implications Essay
Ethical and Professional Implications The autonomy of a competent patient is an issue not often
debated in medical ethics. Refusal of unwanted treatment is a basic right, likened to the common
law of battery, available to all people capable of a competent choice. These fundamental rules of
medical ethics entered a completely new forum as medical technology developed highly effective
life–sustaining care during the 20th century. Several watershed cases elucidated these emerging
issues in the 1960's and 70's, none more effectively than that of Karen Ann Quinlan. Fundamentally,
this case established that a once–competent patient without the possibility of recovery could have
their autonomy exercised by a surrogate in regard to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The case of Karen Ann Quinlan led to four basic approaches to this ethical problem; advance
directives or other clear evidence of the patients wishes while competent, surrogate decision making
(power of attorney), and action in the patients best interest. Each solution has deficiencies both in
theory and practice, but there can be no debate that their application has changed the landscape of
medical ethics. The advance directive, or living will, is one way of circumventing the ethical
dilemma of Quinlan, as it is essentially a set of choices by the competent patient if faced with
different hypothetical circumstances. Patients can thus feel comfortable knowing that their
competent wishes have been documented and can be easily interpreted in case of catastrophe.
However, the authority of advance directives is a topic hotly debated amongst medical ethicists (see
Advance Directive Authority). Arguments against directives state that not all factors are considered
by the person creating the advance order. Also, in some cases of severe dementia, it is argued that
the personal identity of the author is no longer intact and therefore has no authority over the
treatment of the "new" person. The debate on this topic is extremely complex, but many of today's
cases are decided on an individual basis, with the directive often being upheld. A more efficient
method of conveying incompetent patient wishes is by

The Slippery Slope Of Euthanasia
The slippery slope argument has been ongoing in the euthanasia debate. The "slippery slope" refers
to the belief that legalizing voluntary euthanasia and physician assisted suicide will lead to
undesirable outcomes. Many speculate that the legalization of involuntary euthanasia will lead to the
legalization of murder. Since euthanasia is legalized in the Netherlands, some argue that it has
caused a slippery slope. Now, people believe legalizing euthanasia in the United States will also
cause a slippery slope. Although this may be true, there is not sufficient evidence to support this
argument as the rates of euthanasia have dropped in the Netherlands since it has been legalized.
Doctors try to encourage patients to undergo hospice or other types of care before resorting to
euthanasia. Under strict guidelines, euthanasia can be controlled so it can benefit patients without
being abused and causing a slippery slope.
For euthanasia to be effective when legalized, restrictions need to be applied. All of the states that
have legalized physician assisted suicide have strict controls over who is eligible for it. A patient
must be at least 18 years of age, have six or less months to live, have requested for euthanasia two
times at least 15 days apart with the addition of a witness and written request, be a resident of the
state, and be capable of making own decisions (ProCon.org 1). These strict requirements allow
euthanasia to be abused less, while still benefiting those who are

Persuasive Essay On Right To Die
"Whose life is it anyway"? (Clark n.p.). That is a question many people ask when they want to die
and can't because the law is a barrier they cannot break. In general, there are different reasons that
people want to die, terminal illness, trapped in a wheelchair, unable to do everyday tasks, or
conceivably the health of the person limits what they can do. Maybe Logan's Run had it right,
everyone must die at 30. It is important to realize, that whether or not a person wants to participate
in assisted–suicide should be their choice. "Some say right to die, good death, rational suicide, aid in
dying, and merciful release are all euphemisms for the possibility of killing or assisting individuals
to kill themselves" (Salladay n.p.). However you say it, right to die comes down to someone who,
has a terminal illness, with no hope of survival, or trapped in a body, they can't use anymore, the
person with considerable pain, wanting to die and finally be at peace. Nevertheless, on moral
grounds it is wrong and in most states illegal. There are only six states who currently have right to
die laws on the books. More states are thinking about adopting right to life laws every day.
"About once a week, health care providers call the 24–hour palliative–care hotline at the University
of Vermont Medical Center with the same basic question: How should they respond to patients who
seek to take advantage of the state's new law allowing physicians to prescribe lethal drugs to
terminally ill

Essay On Terri Shiavo
They were the subjects of public disputes with family members, court systems, medical
professionals, the media, and society at large. Terri Schiavo, Nancy Cruzan and Karen Ann Quinlan;
their names are synonymous with permanent vegetative state (PVS). The amazing technological
advancements in modern medicine has been credited with keeping persons alive who in times past
would have died, therefore this is remarkable for countless families. In the cases of the Quinlan's,
the Cruzan's and many like them, families members find it unbearable to witness loved ones who
linger indefinitely in PVS with little or no chance for recovery. There are many like Terri Schiavo's
parents, who value the lives of their love ones no matter how limited their ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
374, para. 3). According to John Collins Harvey, a senior research scholar and professor emeritus of
medicine at Georgetown University, feeding tubes should be removed from patients in PVS because
there is no hope for recovery. Harvey explains that the cerebral cortex the area of the brain that
controls conscious thought, language, and sensory perception has been irreparably damaged by a
lack of oxygen (Harvey, 2004). However, recent studies on DOC have revealed the difficulty of
diagnosing PVS, especially because a few PVS patients recovered consciousness and demonstrated
awareness as a result of drug therapies and functional imaging studies (Fisher & Appelbaum, 2010).
Obviously, these patients were not in PVS, an irreversible condition. The awakening of persons after
the administration of specific medications brings attention to the possibility that VS is often over
diagnosed (Sara & Pistoia, 2010). "The differential diagnosis of disorders of consciousness is
challenging. The rate of misdiagnosis is approximately 40%, and new methods are required to
complement bedside testing, particularly if the patient's capacity to show behavioral signs of
awareness is diminished" (Monti, Vanhaudenhuyse, Coleman, & Boly, 2010, para. 1). The Issue of
Death The definition of death is another issue paramount to this discussion. Robert Rakestraw,
professor of theology at Bethel Theological Seminary in his article on this very subject

For Euthanasia Persuasive Essay
"Death is not the enemy doctor. Inhumanity is" (Rebman 5.) This quote was said by 78 year old Eli
Kahn. He placed on a respirator machine in order to keep him alive but against his wishes. Eli Kahn
was among countless people in this world that face an inevitable death who are not given the choice
of preventing the pain and suffering. Euthanasia is a word that most people avoid because it is very
controversial. But why? Euthanasia is a way of ending the prolonging of suffering, while leaving
life in peace. Euthanasia is derived from the Greeks where Eu means good and Thanatos means
death. When these phrases are combined the word euthanasia is created; meaning "good death" (6.)
There are three types of euthanasia although only two ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Hemlock Society was formed by Dereck Humphry in 1980 and now has over 27,000 members.
This Society works to change legislation in favor of euthanasia while offering support for person's
contemplating euthanasia. They also produce publications about euthanasia subjects in order to
better educate the public (18.) The second organization, the Euthanasia Society of America, was
formed in the 1930's and is dedicated to bring euthanasia cases out into the public eye (16.) A man
by the name of Dr. Kevorkian is unrelated to the Euthanasia Society of America but also strived to
bring euthanasia issues into the public. He has assisted in over 100 deaths through euthanasia to
terminally ill patients. One of his patients, Thomas Youk suffered from a very severe and painful
case of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. He found Dr. Kevorkian who helped him peacefully pass away
and end his long time suffering. Kevorkian has also shown a way that euthanasia patients can also
benefit those who are ill but do not want to choose euthanasia. After the death of a

Physician Assisted Suicide : The Heart Of All Medicine
Do no harm. This used to be the heart of all medicine. But now our public is introducing just the
contrary of this. When physician–assisted suicide becomes legal throughout the United States, no
longer will we be stumbling on the fact that someday, somewhere, and somehow we will die
unexpectedly or possibly expectedly, with everything the doctors could do to save us; but now we
can die on our own guidance. Physician–assisted suicide is a debated subject that often divides the
public between those who support it versus those who oppose it. There are some individuals who
believe that patients suffering from chronic and fatal illnesses should be allowed to die on their own
terms and in peace. And there are some individuals who oppose ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
(Interview) The patients have their own decisions and wants on how they want to be treated, allow
them to have a voice and speak for themselves. Everyone would like to be allowed a respectable,
painless death, so we must allow one for everyone else who wants one. We cannot limit or accuse
those who chose physicians–assisted suicide and the ones who don't chose it, we have many medical
advances today, such as nursing home and hospice care, but they are not always enough to cure or
stop any pain that someone may be in; physicians–assisted suicide is the only answer to this
problem. (Interview) Everyone will make plans to ensure that the end of our life remains in our own
personal control. Just as we write wills to dispose of our prized possessions, we can make decisions
about what medical treatment is acceptable and what is not. (Euthanisa) You can even choose
someone to make your health care decisions if you are unable to. This is called the Durable Power
of Attorney for Health Care or Health Care Proxy; and that individual you so choose should be
someone you trust, who knows what you want, and will fight for your rights. (Euthanasia) In a
survey of thirty thousand Americans over the age of fifty–five, sixty–five percent said that people
with a terminal illness should have a

The Right to Die
Analysis The right to die has been brought to the media and public spotlight through the cases of
Karen Ann Quinlan, Cruzan v. Missouri, and Vacco v. Quill. This issue has been the topic of heated
debate for years in the religious, scientific, and political community. This is because this topic ties
into many communities and effects a large amount of people. These cases brought the right to die
debate to the religious community. The reason for this is from the use of life support which many
believe should not be used at all because people should die naturally as they believe god intended.
This belief also ties into the matter of physician assisted suicide brought up in the Vacco v. Quill
case, one should not be given a lethal dose of drugs and should die naturally. The publics opinion on
the right to die has a drastic range, due to the fact this matter spans all groups of people. A popular
opinion from the public is that the government has no right to decide whether someone can or
cannot end their lives, pertaining to the case of Vacco v. Quill and euthanasia. This statement is a
very true one, why should the government be involved in the death of a free person? This may be
the case for euthanasia, but there is another factor in the right to die debate. That other factor is
removing one from life support. This issue is brought up in both the case of Karen Ann Quinlan and
in the case of Cruzan v. Missouri. It is illegal to remove a patient from life support without

Why Is Euthanasia Wrong
According to dictionary .com "Euthanasia is the act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die,
as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person suffering from an incurable disease".
Specialists, researchers, legislators and delegates of various admissions talk about the likelihood of
legitimating Euthanasia. Different nations take inverse sides and either permit Euthanasia or
disallow it. "Killing, nonetheless, happens subtly in all social orders incorporating those in which it
is held to be improper and unlawful. The history of this phenomena dates back for centuries, but it
wasn't until 1906 when the first bill to legalize euthanasia in America was introduced in the Ohio
legislature. For several years, legislatures have been ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Preeminent Court ruled (in Cruzan v. Chief of Missouri Division of Wellbeing) that there is no
commitment to keep up life–maintaining treatment for at death's door patients. There is no lawful
ground, in any case, for a dynamic type of killing that would really abbreviate the life of the patient.
In 1994, the province of Oregon passed a law enabling restorative specialists to endorse, yet not
control themselves, deadly medications to at death's door patients. The Passing with Respect Act (as
a result as of October 27, 1997) orders that patients control the deadly medications themselves.
Different endeavors by the Hedge organization to stop the usage of the demonstration fizzled, and in
2006 the demonstration was maintained by the U.S. Incomparable Court in Gonzales v. Oregon. As
indicated by official Oregon figures, in the period from 1997 to 2008 about four hundred patients
have utilized the Demise with Nobility Act to pass on in an effortless way. In November 2008,
voters in the province of Washington affirmed the presentation of a comparable demonstration in
their state. It can be normal that the 2006 U.S. Preeminent Court choice will prompt level headed
discussion about killing in different states. Killing will remain a combative issue, with sharp
cleavages among the populace, for the most part as indicated by liberal/traditionalist or religious
separating

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Being Pro Euthanasia
Euthanasia is a highly debatable and controversial topic that should ultimately be left up to personal
decision. On the pro side of the euthanasia battle, there are organizations that conduct research on
euthanasia to improve the quality of the information on hastened dying options such as, The
Euthanasia Research Guidance Organization. Exit International is another organization that sets
itself apart by taking a civil rights approach to topic of euthanasia. In accordance, The Death with
Dignity National Center website states that, "the California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont and
Washington, Death with Dignity laws allow mentally competent, terminally ill adult state residents
to voluntarily request and receive a prescription medication so that they can die in a peaceful,
human manner in a place and time of their choosing" (Death with Dignity National Center, n.d.).
This ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I will also state that, I believe that there may be real benefits to being pro euthanasia if that is the
patients choice. I will say, that when put in the real position of having to make that choice, one may
change their point of view. For example, let's look at the case of Karen Ann Quinlan. From the
logical, educated side, I would have denied any life saving measures after being told that she had no
chance of recovery. From the emotional, mother side, I would never want to stop fighting for my
child's life. So, as the medical decision maker, what so you do? I believe that I would take the
logical approach because I do not want to prolong her suffering but, I am unsure of my true reaction
for I have never been in this type of situation. Standing on the outside of the decision, I feel that it is
cruel to keep a loved one alive because the person making the medical decisions cannot handle the
emotional consequences of discontinuing life saving

Karen Ann Quinlan Research Paper
On April 15, 1975, Karen Ann Quinlan, unexpectedly fell to the ground, unconscious, and then
slipped into a coma. The doctors could do nothing about her unhealthy state and after a long year
Karen's family decide that they should remove her feeding tubes, a breathing mechanical device,
and medical help. The doctors refused to do this because they would get arrested without court
permission thus sending the family to court. The family fought over it at court and finally won.
Surprisingly, Karen did not die but 10 years later she passed away naturally. The fact that she
survived led to many acts of controversy. Was it a good idea to let Karen ann go or should they have
kept her on the machines to see what would happen? Through evidence and research,

Bioethics in Medicine, Exemplified by the Karen Ann...
It is accepted that the advances in resuscitation techniques, initiated and influenced the evolution of
bioethics by bringing to the fore the questions of:
(i) just allocation of scarce medical resource, health care
(ii) the nature of "being", and
(iii) the proper purpose of medicine.
The main issues that caused the emergence, or the study and introduction of bioethics was the
introduction of modern technology in medicine in the form of respirators and artificial heart
machines. The media attention to the Karen Ann Quinlan case made the issues public. The Karen
Ann Quinlan case serves as a perfect example of these new issues. She was diagnosed with a
persistent vegetative state, and her life was sustained with a respirator and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This implies a downgrading of the importance of the human body.
The most important lesson learned from this case was the revising of medical treatment. Medicine
should treat patients as autonomous subjects. Thus came about the development of autonomy based
ethics principles. "Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and the respect for
autonomy should be 'first among equals". (Gillon, 2003)
The limitations regarding, "the right to life" was a topical issue at the time of the Karen Quinlan
case. The court ruled that the decision should be in the hands of ethics committees, another
important realisation from the Quinlan case ruling. Many ethics committees were formed to make
the decisions. Hospitals and all extended care facilities got an ethics committee. It was thought that
they should be the decision making body in the future. However, it is now the opinion of experts
that the authority of the ethics committees is limited. Any decision must belong to patients, and/ or
their proxy. Out of this case there has also developed advanced health directives, which led to a
society becoming aware of the need to create living wills as to what family members were to do or
not to do in conditions of "extraordinary" medical care. The power of attorney also came to the
forefront. Many people today would recognise the name of Terry Schiavo. Karen

Euthanasia: A Painless Deaceful Death Essay
Euthanasia is a painless peaceful death. Euthanasia is defined as the deliberate putting to death of a
person suffering from a painful, incurable disease(New Standard Encyclopedia Dictionary). People
use other terms to describe euthanasia: mercy killing, assisted suicide, and physician assisted
suicide. Euthanasia can be unresponsive, (inactive) or active. Unresponsive euthanasia occurs when
an incurably ill person refuses life sustaining medical support. Active euthanasia happens when
another person deliberately causes the death of a terminally ill person, such as when someone gives
a terminally ill person a lethal injection. Euthanasia can also be voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary
euthanasia occurs with the consent of the dying person, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Anyone with strong religious convictions believes that only God or a supreme being has the right to
choose life or death. Advocates also argue that physicians, who are trained to heal, not kill, do not
have any rights to choose who lives or dies. Those who are for euthanasia and the "right to die"
issue believe that it is each person's choice. Before the Karen Ann Quinlan case, the law did not say
whose choice it was to live or die. Now with laws, different than they were in 1976, there are sicker
or even well people have been living wills.
These living wills are to help people make their own decisions, whether they live or die. People
worry about the cost of continuing medical costs. These costs stem from out–of–pocket cost, that
which is not covered by insurance companies. People also forget that the patient's family members
have jobs, but with the patient's needs, the family's job may suffer. They may have fewer hours or
even due to not showing up because of medical responsibilities, they may lose that job. There is also
the emotional cost, tension among the patient and the family members.
A fact also is that men don't live as long as a woman. A woman tries to make her husband's life
easier and last longer; she may be spending more on money than she can afford.
That is exactly what happened to my grandmother. My grandfather had a brain tumor that they
couldn't fully remove. My grandfather was given six months to live, he lasted 1

Karen Quinlan Case
On April 14, 1975, after an evening out at a bar for her friend's birthday, a 21–year–old New Jersey
resident stopped breathing and lapsed into a coma . It was reported that Karen Ann Quinlan had
barely eaten for two days was seen taking pills, and then went out drinking with some of her friends
at Falconer's Tavern . She became unconscious at the bar and never regained consciousness. Thomas
R. French, her roommate, took her back to their house. Karen had "ceased breathing for at least two
15–minute periods " and Thomas attempted mouth–to–mouth resuscitation, paramedics arrived and
put her on a respirator . Precisely how long Karen was unable to breathe on her own is unknown.
However, the interruptions in her breathing apparently deprived her brain of oxygen, which resulted
in her being in a coma . ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When her doctors refused, Karen's parents took the case to court–in what became one of the first
"right to die" cases in the United States . Based on the right to privacy, the court ruled that "no
compelling interest of the state could compel Karen to endure the unendurable" and on March 31,
1976, allowed her to be taken off life support . Her story made headlines and provided the
groundwork for numerous similar cases . However, Quinlan's story didn't end there: weaned from
the respirator, she survived for nearly 10 more years, eventually dying of pulmonary failure on June
11, 1985, in a New Jersey nursing home

Euthanasi The Killing Of A Patient
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide,has continued to be an ongoing debate within today's
news. Euthanasia is known as the killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease
or in an irreversible coma. Some interpret euthanasia as the practice of ending a life in a painless
manner. Many disagree with this interpretation, because it needs to include a reference to intractable
suffering. There are many different classifications of euthanasia that one must understand before
taking a deeper dive into the topic. There is voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.The difference
between the two is that one is when the person decides to go through with it, and the other is when
someone else decides to have that person ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They also found that doctors working in palliative care were more likely to be against assisted
dying. .Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide date from ancient
Greece and Rome. In the 4th Century BC, the Hippocratic Oath was written by Hippocrates, the
father of medicine. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words, Eu (good) and Thanatosis (death) and
it means "Good Death, "Gentle and Easy Death." This word has come to be used for "mercy
killing." In this sense euthanasia means the active death of the patient, or, inactive in the case of
dehydration and starvation.The first recorded use of the word euthanasia was by Suetonius, a
Roman historian, in his De Vita Caesarum––Divus Augustus (The Lives of the Caesars––The
Deified Augustus) to describe the death of Augustus Caesar.
In the United States specifically, a turning point in the euthanasia debate occurred after the Karen
Ann Quinlan (1954–1985) case.When Quinlan was 21 she lost consciousness after returning home
from a party. She had consumed diazepam, dextropropoxyphene, and alcohol. She collapsed and
stopped breathing. Several months later, while being kept alive on a ventilator, her parents asked the
hospital to discontinue active care, so that she could be allowed to die. The hospital refused, there
were subsequent legal battles, and a tribunal eventually ruled in her parent 's favor. Quinlan was
removed from the mechanical ventilation in 1976 – but she

Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia
Euthanasia
Euthanasia is the act of ending a person's life with consent by either injecting a lethal drug or
removing live supporting devices. Assisted suicide, often categorized in with euthanasia, is when a
physician prescribes a lethal drug at the request of the patient for them to then self–administer.
Euthanasia is currently illegal in the United States and almost every other country. In 1976 Karen
Ann Quinlan lost consciousness and stopped breathing after consuming alcohol and prescription
drug. She was rushed to the hospital and declared to be in a persistent vegetative state.
When Quinlan's parents found out about her being in a vegetative state they had to make a decision,
whether to fight the hospital and court to have Quinlan's tube removed, or to let her stay on life
support. They choose to fight for euthanasia. Debates have gone on for years whether euthanasia
should be legal or illegal. The debate centers on the Hippocratic Oath, whether the person choosing
euthanasia is of sound of mind, and moments in history when euthanasia was used.
Illegal
The Hippocratic Oath is one of the main reason why many medical professionals believe that
euthanasia should be illegal. The Hippocratic Oath says, "To please no one will I prescribe a deadly
drug nor give advice which may cause his death", stated by Ann Griswold in the article
"Counterpoint: Euthanasia Should Be Banned" (Griswold). The legalization of euthanasia would
give medical personnel the power to end a person's

Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia
Introduction
There have been many topics of controversy throughout the years, but none have been treated with
the same degree of taboo as that of euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide. Issues of the right to
die, as well as a dignified death, have surfaced as topics of great debate, with many questioning
when and if individuals have the right to end their own lives. There are many demographics that
influence a person's attitude towards voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician–assisted
suicide (PAS), of which 'fear, loss of control, loss of dignity... appear to be among more onerous
factors that have stirred the current euthanasia movement' . This report identifies how these
demographics, as well as age, gender, religion and level of education, influence a person's attitude
towards VAE and PAS using a variety of sources, including university theses/dissertations, (youtube
video) and internet research. Additionally, a survey was completed by Australian citizens, ranging
from sixteen to over seventy years of age.
History of Euthanasia
Whilst the arguments in regards to the legalisation of VAE and PAS are relatively new, records show
that these have been around for a significantly longer time. Originating from the Greek words, 'Eu
(good) and Thanatosis (death) and it means "Good Death, "Gentle and Easy Death."' , euthanasia
was often practised in ancient Greece and Rome in the 5th century B.C.E as both voluntary and
involuntary mercy killings. Even though the

Right To Die With Dignity Essay
Right to Die with Dignity:
Why Can't a Physician Help End a Patient's Suffering?
"I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and
understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or chemist's drug.....But it may also be within my
power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and
awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play God." –Hippocratic Oath: Modern Version
There is no doubt that every sensible person would rather not consider or plan suicide at the end of
their life. Still, imagine that you are a rational and able person, maybe even a physician or lawyer,
for death does not see title or rank. You have been diagnosed, treated and re–diagnosed with
terminal brain cancer, stomach cancer or end stage ALS and you still have your capabilities and
your mental faculties. You have been through numerous chemotherapy treatments, radiation
treatments, trips back and forth to doctors, even some ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
You shake your head and try to give it back to him, "No, you might need it," he tells you. "But
hospice will come when it's time" you tell him; he holds your gaze for a moment and puts the bottle
back into your hand and wraps your fingers around it, "You might need it."
The ethical dilemma of physician–assisted death is not new. In fact, the term "euthanasia" comes
from early Greek meaning "good death." Consequently, while this debate over mercy killing has
older origins, the advancements in medicine today make it harder to have an easier death than ever
before. Most people today die in the hospital, oftentimes from a long, lingering death that usually
involves suffering and pain. Why, with all the technology and advances in today's medicine, can we
still not give a "good death" to those who would want

Essay On Advance Directives
The importance of advanced directives has grown throughout the years with an increasing
recognition of patients' autonomy and the realization that while advanced medical technologies have
contributed to many health care benefits; these same advances have brought on the unacceptable
prolongation of the dying process for many (Evans et al 2011).
Advance directives (AD) are written medical preferences about a patient's wishes and treatment
options and the ability to choose a surrogate as a decision maker on one's behalf in the event that
one is unable to do so due to illness or incapacity. Thus, patients along with their families should be
encouraged to make such medical decisions and make their wishes known while competent (ABA,
2014). When a patient becomes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Missouri Department of Health cases. In both cases, the families of Karen Ann Quinlan and Nancy
Cruzan appealed the US Supreme Court to have life sustaining treatments such as a mechanical
ventilator and artificial feeding respectively to be removed from their daughters. After several
battles and appeals against the lower respective State Courts, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor
of the individual's right to refuse treatment, even life–sustaining treatment such as mechanical
ventilators and artificial feeding (HHS, 2008). The two cases paved the way for the "right to die"
law for the terminally ill or severely disabled individual in regards to withdrawing life–sustaining
treatments from incapacitated persons. It is believed that these two prominent cases led to the
Patient Self–Determination Act enacted in 1990 by Congress mandating that all health care facilities
receiving Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement to create an AD policy that implements the
provision of AD information to all patients. Such information and education should also be
documented in the medical record as part of

Is Euthanasia Wrong
"An assisted dying law would not result in more people dying, but in fewer people suffering"
(Selby). Euthanasia, also known as physician assisted death is the painless killing of a patient
suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma (Nordqvist). There are
many famous cases involving euthanasia. For example, on April 15, 1975, Karen Ann Quinlan lost
consciousness after mixing alcohol and the drug Valium, restricting oxygen to her brain("Karen Ann
Quinlan"). "After several weeks, doctors at St. Clare's Hospital in Denville, New Jersey, say she is
in a persistent vegetative state, with irreversible brain damage"("Karen Ann Quinlan"). In August,
her parents asked doctors to remove their daughter's respirator. This was the first case of physician
assisted death. Another right to die case involved Terri Schiavo. "In February of 1990,at the age of
26, Terri Schiavo collapsed at home and oxygen was cut off to her brain for several minutes"
(Lynne). More recently, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All doctors take an oath known as the Hippocratic Oath at the beginning of their career stating that
they will do whatever they can for a patient in order to help them, but helping is not always keeping
them alive. "Ending a person's life upon request with a purposeful goal is hardly a malicious act,
therefore it is inaccurate to compare euthanasia to murder" (Starks et al.). Another issue that many
people see in physician assisted death is that it gives doctors too much power. However, the only
power that it gives them is to fulfill someone's final wishes. Another valid point is that vital organs
can be saved. There is a long list of people that are in need of a kidney, lung, heart, and liver
transplant. However, with physician assisted death the organs can be preserved and be transplanted
to someone who has been long waiting for a transplant (Messerli). Once again, we have to put the
needs of the living before the

The Death Of Terminally Ill Patients
Mortality requires all of us to eventually face death, although when or in what way we do not know.
Let's say you are given two choices: to choose to die earlier but in a peaceful way, or to prolong
your life for an unknown amount of time but endure a painful and slow death. For terminally ill
patients, this unfortunately is not a hypothetical situation, but a reality of their life, except the
majority of them are denied the first option. Some terminal diseases, such as Amyotrophic Lateral
Sclerosis (ASL, or more popularly known as Lou Gehrig's Disease), brain cancers, or other neural
or muscular degenerative diseases often lead their victims down a unimaginable, unrelenting, brutal,
road to death. Is it morally right to deny the victims of these diseases the option of an early, but
peaceful death upon their request? Should we force a death filled with suffering upon a terminal
patient, or allow them the option of how the last days of their life should play out? Euthanasia, or
the killing of a sick person out of mercy, is a largely debated topic in present day, but this has not
always been so. It gives these sick patients the option of death to avoid imminent suffering in their
later death. Throughout history, the taboo of assisted suicide has changed in different eras, largely
due to the authority of religion in history, and later from religion to morals. The issue at present is
still an issue of morality, but also about rights; not only a right to live, but also a

Essay On Active Euthanasia
Hospice or palliative care is a route many patients and families choose. The difference between the
two is that hospice care is geared towards patients with a life expectancy of six or less months while
palliative care is not limited by a patients' life expectancy or their reference of curative medications
or procedures. Nevertheless, the primary goal is to improve the quality of life and relieve suffering
(emotional, physical, and mental). There have been many studies done, such as one in 2010 by the
New England Journal of Medicine, that show those who have lung cancer, but received palliative
care may live almost two months longer than the patients who don't as a result of improvement in
quality of life and mood. Nevertheless, studies such as these gives evidence that palliative and
hospice care is effective and are great programs that terminally–ill patients and their families should
engage.
What are the cases for Active Euthanasia and Physician–Assisted Suicide?
Feeding tubes, ventilation machines, wires, and drains were originally meant to be temporary
equipment used to help patients regain strength ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All families have their difficulties and go through tough situations where they have to make hard
choices, but in the end, families have to put the needs of the patients before their own. A family who
keeps a loved one alive, who is either in a persistent vegetative state or any other incurable disease
selfishly benefits at the expense of the patient.
Patients who are in a persistent vegetative state of course cannot make their wishes known about
whether or not they would like to use physician–assisted suicide. The families can ask for the right
to remove their loved one's ventilator, feeding tube, or any other life–saving equipment by filing a
court case. That family can use the Fourth Amendment or the Right to Privacy, such as the parents
of Karen Ann Quinlan, to be allowed to let their loved one pass on

Right To Die Research Paper
In recent years, there have been many debates on whether or not it should be legal for physicians to
aid in the death of incurable patients in the United States. The first big case leading to the "Right to
Die" movement was in 1975, when a twenty–one year old girl named Karen Ann Quinlan was
declared to be in a persistent vegetative state after ingesting Valium and alcohol while on a crash
diet. Her parents requested that she be taken off of life support. The doctors refused, the parents
took it to court, and she was ultimately taken off of her ventilator, though she did live for another
nine years breathing on her own but with a feeding tube before passing away in 1985 (Nevdjon,
Mayer 149). There were then more court cases, and Oregon passed ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) defines euthanasia as, "a physician (or other
person) intentionally killing a person by the administration of drugs, at that person's voluntary and
competent request." Therefore, the common term of "voluntary euthanasia" should stop being used
because all euthanasia is voluntary by definition. Furthermore, there is no such thing as "non–
voluntary euthanasia" or "involuntary euthanasia" (killing without consent or against someone's
will); those two things are simply murder. Euthanasia in the U.S. is actually illegal in all fifty states.
The five states that have legalized forms of assisted death have "physician–assisted death" (PAD),
also known as "physician–aid–in–dying" or "physician–assisted suicide," (PAS) which the EAPC
defines as "a physician intentionally helping a person to terminate his or her life by providing drugs
for self–administration, at that person's voluntary and competent request." The key difference here is
that euthanasia is performed in the hospital, where a physician induces a coma using drugs and
while they are under injects a neuromuscular relaxant to stop breathing and kill them, whereas with
PAD the physician simply prescribes the drugs to kill the patient, the patient usually takes the

The Issue Of Assisted Suicide
Active Euthanasia
Science Section
At the basic level, suicide is the act intentionally and voluntarily killing one self. The word suicide
is composed of two Latin words, sui meaning "self" and caedere meaning "to kill." Though the
definition and act of suicide may appear to be quite simple, the circumstances, the causes, and the
aftermath make the subject matter much more complicated than it is (Stewart, 1998). Though
everyone's situation may be different, those who commit suicide tend to have an overwhelming
feeling of hopeless, helplessness, and emotional pain, and therefore see suicide as an escape
(Stewart, 1998).
Assisted suicide occurs when someone allows suicide to occur or provides the necessary means to
end a person's life. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Active euthanasia "is the effort of a person to cause his or her own death... In all three forms of
active euthanasia – suicide, assisted suicide, and mercy killing – the medical cause of death is not
disease or injury but the fatal action taken" (Stewart, 1998). Active euthanasia kills someone while
passive euthanasia allows the individual to die (McMahan, 2002).
Mercy killings can also be broken down into three different categories: voluntary, nonvoluntary, and
involuntary. Non–voluntary euthanasia refers to someone killing a patient without knowing the
patient's wishes. Involuntary euthanasia involves doctors going against the patient's will while
voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient autonomously requests to be killed (Stewart, 1998). The
difference between voluntary active euthanasia and physician–assisted suicide is the means by
which termination occurs. In voluntary active euthanasia, the doctor is the one who terminates the
patient's life. In physician–assisted suicide, the doctor assists the patient in committing suicide by
either supplying a lethal pill or injection (Keown, 2002). Doctors used to have the obligation to
comfort, heal, and revive patients when possible. Medical knowledge in the mid–nineteenth century
began a new concept in the medical field, which lessened the doctor's obligation to heal and allow
for nature to take its own course (Urofsky, 2000). Through the rapid

The Right For Die Act : The Choice Of Committing Suicide...
The Right to Die Act Should a patient that is very ill have the choice of committing suicide with the
help of professionals? This question has long been argued amongst religious leaders, jurists, and
medical ethicists. Some say that it is right to give the patients with diseases or disabilities to get
assist from experts in ending themselves to stop their pain, it also helps bring relief from pain
through death, and it helps save money for healthcare to others that fight. Others disagree on the
right to die act, because it goes against religion, the system could abused and legalized murder, and
the ill person have a chance in recovering in full health. Even though the federal government doesn
't allow this idea, some states actully have this policy.
The opposing side say that it is against religion and it can be risky in letting the act to be passed
amongst the states. The Christianity and Protestantism religions explain that having to end your own
life is going against what is right and satan cause suicides. For Example, in the Genesis "In heeding
God's command, "Thou shall not kill" (Exodus 20:13), we recognize that we cannot end of our lives
or the lives of others as we please. We must respect and protect the dignity of human from the
moment of conception to the moment of natural death". Meaning we can play we our own lives or
others because it offense what god sees with his own eyes. But not only the religions oppose that
idea, the supreme court as well is behind of

The Principle of Substituted Judgment Essay
The Principle of Substituted Judgment
Traditionally, the physician was expected to use all of their talents and training in an effort to save
the life of their patient, no matter the odds. More recently, the physician's role has been redefined to
preserve the autonomy of the patient. Now physicians must give life saving care only in so far and
to the degree desirous of the competent patient.
Until this century, it was rare that brain–dead patients could be kept alive for long periods of time.
However, as technological prowess has increased, it has recently become possible to keep a patient
alive without higher brain functioning for years and even decades. But, as is always the case with
new technology and knowledge, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thus, medical ethics searched for a method and/or principle that would direct them on how to care
for incompetent patients in a manner that respected their autonomy. Surrogates seemed to be the
ethical answer.
Surrogates are those people who, by law or custom, are appointed to make decisions in the place of
the incompetent or doubtfully competent patient regarding medical treatment (Garrett 43). The idea
of the surrogate is that they will defend the patient's autonomy by advocating treatment decisions
based solely on what the patient would want. This means that the surrogate must ignore the interests
of all other parties involved, including that of family, friends, and the surrogate themselves, when
making treatment decisions for the incompetent patient (Garrett 71). In order to ensure that the
surrogate is actually defending the patient's autonomy, the substituted judgment principle is
described as a main responsibility of the surrogate. The substituted judgment principle states that the
surrogate should make decisions for the patient based on what the patient would choose as deduced
from the patient's written statements, oral notifications, or the patient's actions and values (Garrett
70). This usually ensures that, when available, a person who knew the patient well will be their
surrogate. However, there are many problems that arise with the substituted judgment principle in

To the Mercy Killers Analysis
Dudley Randall's poem To the Mercy Killers tackles one of the most controversial issues in America
today: euthanasia. No other issue has divided and caused much division and divergence in thought
and views in this county as mercy killing and has through the years along with abortion become the
defining topic of politics in America. Mercy killing and in fact the very question of what defines life
has becoming a moral dilemma and a divisive factor in our society. Dudley Randall's To the Mercy
Killers is a moving appeal against the practice of mercy killing and the tormenting affect it has on
its victims. The poem was written in 1973 by the African–American poet and librarian Dudley
Randall and has since become one of the most effective ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Subsequently, the arguments put forth by the Pope

Right To Die Act Research Paper
The Right to Die act should be legalized in more states than Oregon, Washington and Vermont,
Because families are tired of seeing their loved ones suffer, terminally ill people don't want to pass
away in pain because of their illness and the end of life act needs to be determined.
The Right to Die Act, also known as the "Death with Dignity Act" is meant to implement the option
of enhanced "End of life care." The Right to Die Act is an optional law that grants a patient with an
incurable illness to quicken one's "Inevitable and unavoidable death."(deathwithdignity.org). The
conception that a patient with an inevitable illness "Should be allowed to commit suicide before
death occurs." What "Right to Die" stated is inaccurate because the official

The Ethics Of Euthanasia
n this paper, I will be addressing why PAS is ethical. PAS allows a person who is declared
terminally ill or mentally unstable the right to die without pain or suffering. This allows them to
make an important decision regarding how they would like to end their life. This describes a human
right because everyone no matter the race or ethnicity should have a choice to determine their life
whether it be Euthanasia or PAS. In the case of a young woman named Karen Ann Quinlan at just
31 years old, she fell into a coma after she took a few tranquilizers and drank a couple of alcoholic
beverages. Quinlan at the time of her death weighed just 65 pounds, but while in the coma she
weighed 115 pounds. A couple of years later she was taken off of a respirator

Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia
Euthanasia is a process designed to help terminally ill patients to die painlessly. It is also known as
physician assisted suicide. "Euthanasia comes from the Greek words, Eu 'good' and Thanatosis
'death' and it means "Good Death, "Gentle and Easy Death." (General). Some people agree with the
procedure, while others still agree with the idea 'Thou shalt not kill', Exodus 20:13.
Euthanasia has existed for centuries. It became more popular in 1938 when the Euthanasia Society
of America was founded. In 1939, they began their argument supporting Euthanasia. In 1968, Walter
S. Sackett tried to create a legislation in Florida supporting the cause, but it was unsuccessful. In
1975, the group changed its name to the Society for the Right to Die. Finally, in 1976 California
made the Natural Death Act a law. Also in 1976, New Jersey was the first court to ever recognize a
right to die act. They allowed Karen Ann Quinlan to end her life suffering with severe brain
damage(General).
Today, Euthanasia is only legal in a few U.S. states. Vermont, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, and
California. The courts decided to make it an optional procedure to individuals in Montana.
Euthanasia would really benefit people in today's society. In a poll taken in 2016, an average of 55%
of patients died in pain. So over half of people who died were in pain. 42% of people supported
Euthanasia, 37% of people opposed it, and 22% of people were unsure of it. Many people are unsure
of it because they don't

Euthanasi An Ethical Way
Is physician assisted suicide an unethical way to end a life? Somebody suffering on their deathbed
should not have to spend the last of their time and money on painful procedures and treatments.
They should have the right to go out a more comforting way. This paper will use the background of
euthanasia, and talk about many of the controversial viewpoints to support the thesis that euthanasia
is an ethical way to end a life.
Euthanasia is defined as the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for
his or her alleged benefit. The most important word in the definition is that the act or omission was
intentional. If the cause of death was unintentional then the act wasn't in fact euthanasia. There are
three types of euthanasia, voluntary, non–voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is when
the person who is euthanized has requested to be. Non–voluntary is when the person didn't ask to be
euthanized. That leaves involuntary which is where the person who was euthanized asked not to be.
Then there are also three ways of committing the euthanasia, assisted suicide, euthanasia by action
and euthanasia by omission. Assisted suicide is when someone provides the individual with the
information, guidance or means need to take his or her own life with the intention that they will be
used for this purpose. When it's a doctor who helps the person it's called physician assisted suicide.
Another way of committing euthanasia is called euthanasia

End Of Life Case Study
Death is an event that we all will experience at some point in our lives. Death is inevitable.
Therefore, while we have our full mental faculty and in physical health at some point, there is the
necessity to plan for the end– of –life. We can make preparations for our end –of– life by instituting
these items: living will, advance directive, and a dual power of attorney. In case, circumstances
mitigate an untimely illness or terminal illness the individual's wishes have already been conveyed,
and now in writing. However, there is sometimes circumstance when a living will, advance
directive, nor a power of attorney is established, and the individual is unable to express their wishes
regarding the way their medical care is facilitated. In this case, another individual makes the
decision. The other individual's decision can be contrary to your ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The family is separated, thus ensuing bitter battle over the removal of a feeding tube, not a
respirator.
As a practitioner of pastoral thanatology my counseling will start with individuals and family
members by assessing their stage of grieving, and then I will provide support, comfort, and spiritual
advice. I shall attempt to broach the subject of living will, advance directive (healthy directive).
The congregation I teach the importance of having your business in order by viewing death as part
of living. I will explain to the congregation that each has the responsibility to prepare for the end–
of– life by having a living will, advance directives which convey their wishes regarding their
medical care at the end–of–life, and power of attorney. Also, the congregation will be encouraged to
invest in life insurance of some type.
The policy maker and insurance companies will be reminded of the cost of sustaining life that
require constant 24hour care, especially in the hospital, vs. hospice care.

Karen Ann Quinlan Case Study
Karen Ann Quinlan was out with her friends on April 14, 1975. Near the end of the night at the
party, she consumed large amounts of alcohol and the sedative Valium. This caused her to go into a
coma. Karen stayed in the coma for 1 year, until her doctor told her family she was in a 'vegetative
state', meaning she was brain dead. Her parents had wanted to end her suffering, so they asked for
Karen to be taken off life support. The doctors refused them so the Quinlan family took the case to
court. At first, the judge had refused to let this happen as the doctors opposed disconnecting the
respirator. Stating that it violated the state's homicide laws. A week later, the Quinlans took this case
to the New Jersey Supreme Court, of whom ruled that it was unusual punishment. But ultimately,
the Supreme Court, based upon the right to privacy, ruled that Karen was permitted to be taken off.
But when she was taken off, she continued breathing. This could be from the cerebellum, which is
the primitive brain and it controls involuntary functions such ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While the doctors and originally the Supreme Court opposed this, the parents said otherwise. While
they wanted her daughter to wake up, since that wasn't going to happen, they wanted to end her
suffering. They felt as though she was uncomfortable and in pain, stating "She tried desperately to
free herself from the respirator, if she could have used her hands she would have" (via Washington
Post). Legally, it was illegal for this to occur, but upon the Supreme Court allowing it, it was
technically legal. Karen did not have a living will, therefore her parents were allowed to make the
decision, but the doctors should also agree for this. So ethically, she should not have been taken off.
But from a family perspective, it's all about what the family members want for them. So regardless
of whether it was a right or wrong decision, all point of views should be

Persuasive Essay On Right To Die
The Right to Die: An Erosion of the Tenth Amendment In the United States of America, citizens
have the right to speak their mind, the right to a public and speedy trial, and now, those in the
LGBTQ community have the right to legally marry the love of their life. But, one right has yet to be
passed in a majority of our 50 states; the right to die and the right of an assisted suicide. Who should
make this decision? Should it be the federal government, or the states and their legislatures? As of
November 30, 2017, only six states have passed the right to an assisted suicide, and one other has
issued the law based on separate court decision ("Death with Dignity"). The federal government has
not been given the authority to intervene in the decision–making process as the tenth amendment in
the Constitution of the United States declares, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the
people." However, the federal government continues to join in on the debate despite what the
Constitution clearly states. Tenth amendment rights are therefore being eroded. The federal
government's actions weaken the tenth amendment in this country. Why have only seven states
made a step forward in allowing the right to die and assisted suicide? Is it because of religious
communities persuading politicians to rethink the concept? Or is it because the federal government
has been subtly giving

7 Habits Of Highly Effective Teens Book Report
When The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens was first assigned, I was unsure whether or not this
book would provide any help in improving my lifestyle. After all, it appeared to be just another open
ended self–help book. However as I continued reading this success guide I began to really see
myself in a whole new way. Sean Covey opened my eyes to see a different way to approach my life.
Each habit provided flexible methods to make a person more productive in both their educational
and personal life. This book's seven habits can be applied to anyone despite age, gender, or
occupation. Julia Quinlan is an excellent example of this. Even with the tragic loss of her daughter
she was able to apply the seven habits in her own way. This inspired me ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Habit two stresses the necessity to plan ahead and "think with the end in mind" (Covey, 5). I always
use materials such as an agenda or the calendar on my cell phone to organize my day. Habit 2 and
Habit 3 work hand in hand. Properly planning events and assignments help to decide which project
is the most urgent and when to work on it. If I continue to think forward it will build a solid
foundation to help me work harder on Habit 3 and get my priorities straight. In a generation as
competitive as the one today, it is important not to see life as a competition. Habit 4 is about
thinking win–win and supporting other people's accomplishments. Being involved in team sports
has contributed in supporting other members of my team. I try to keep up this attitude in and outside
of my team whether it be my friends or family. As I was reading The 7 Habits of Highly Effective
Teens I personally related to Habit 5. This part of the book revolves around the concepts of listening
and understanding others. I always enjoy listening to other people share their stories and express
their feelings. I try my best to be as understanding and caring as possible. After all, "People don't
care how much you know until they know how much you care" (Covey 166). Rather than force my
view upon the person I am with, I listen to what they have to

Advance Nursing Ethics Wgu Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Amy Bakewell

More from Amy Bakewell (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Advance Nursing Ethics Wgu Essay